Slashdot Mirror


Your Phone May Send You 'Blue Alerts' To Warn You When Local Police Are In Danger (androidpolice.com)

The FCC recently announced a new alert program called "Blue Alert" that will notify the public of threats to law enforcement in real time. "With the creation of a dedicated Blue Alert event code in the Emergency Alert System, state and local law enforcement will have the capability to push immediate warnings out to the public via broadcast, cable, and satellite providers, as well as to consumer smartphones through the Wireless Emergency Alert system," reports Android Police. From the report: Much like both the SILVER and AMBER alert programs, and utilizing the same notification system, Blue Alerts aim to warn the general public of threats to public safety and/or imminent danger. However, the police force focused alert system provides timely information to the public when police officers may be in danger. Chairman of the FCC and recent deregulator of the internet, Ajit Pai detailed the new FCC order saying, "Similar to the Amber Alerts that many are familiar with, Blue Alerts will enable authorities to warn the public when there is actionable information related to a law enforcement officer who is missing, seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, or when there is an imminent credible threat to an officer."

The December 14 order from the FCC activates the Blue Alerts service for one calendar year to deliver the notifications over the Emergency Alert System, and for 18 months over the Wireless Emergency Alert system.

177 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. Please, no... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, this is a good idea, let's all converge on the scene of a shootout... Or whatever.

    On the one hand, with typical "police behavior", often we are lucky when there are "citizen" observers.

    On ywt another hand, this presents a safety danger with unknown consistences many of which are not good.

    Another aspect that comes to mind is that this is just one more step in the direction of a "Police State" where our Law Enforcement are seen as some holy religious order, our Priests in Blue... We've all seen these 200 car processions when a police officer is killed in the line of duty...

    I don't think this is a well thought-out idea.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re: Please, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you want to kill cops, this is a really good idea for you. Blue alert directs you to the sweet spot where you can kill cops already in distress. Obviously cops who can cope with the situation wouldn't be marked. So, this all sounds like marking the wounded prey. If cops are in danger, it should raise alarm to swat units, military, etc, not civilians, heh.

    2. Re:Please, no... by jdavidb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's well thought out by those who want a police state where we view law enforcement as holy priests in blue. I don't want it, either.

    3. Re: Please, no... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't want to kill cops, but I also don't care about them any more than I care about people in general. This new program is a clear example of "mission creep", and the likely result will be more people opting out of the increasingly stupid and pointless alerts.

    4. Re:Please, no... by mea2214 · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is a well thought-out idea.

      Ajit Pai is behind this. What more can you expect?

    5. Re:Please, no... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I can imagine it now:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      And:

      https://twitchy.com/brettt-313...

      "CNN is reporting is an 18-mile-long funeral procession for Officer Charles “Joe” Gliniewicz"

    6. Re:Please, no... by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      The whole alert system was a poorly planned out. After the first alert jarring me while driving, almost causing collisions, and inciting a state of panic, I turned that feature off and no longer get any level of alerts. A softer, longer, tone which does not blast at me would have been much more welcomed.

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    7. Re:Please, no... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 2

      It's OK, I already think cops are way better than priests.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    8. Re: Please, no... by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, of course it won't provide any information; it'll just tell people, at most that police are being shot at in their neighborhood. They'll just turn it on every so often when they need to rile up the public or when there is an unwanted protest happening. Hell, maybe they'll even use it appropriately a few times, but even then, it might as well just flash "PANIC!" on the screen.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    9. Re: Please, no... by plopez · · Score: 1

      Bureau of Land Management?

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    10. Re:Please, no... by plopez · · Score: 1

      All those good guys with a gun need to find a good way to use them.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    11. Re: Please, no... by plopez · · Score: 1

      run towards the gun fire

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    12. Re:Please, no... by plopez · · Score: 1

      They only rape hookers, "I'll do you a favor if you do me a favor..."

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    13. Re:Please, no... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You're clearly unfamiliar with the Principles Of Pinochetian-Minarchism, explained in meme form here.

      https://epeak.in/2017/11/06/th...

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    14. Re: Please, no... by JohnFen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A million times this.

      It's pretty baffling to me how anyone thinks this is a valuable thing to have. Cops have power and do a job knowing that they may occasionally be put into danger (although being a cop isn't even in the top 10 most dangerous professions, so there's that).

      That's a world of difference from helpless and innocent children being abducted, or being alerted to some imminent public danger.

      Although, I have to admit, I opted out once Amber alerts were brought on board. That was already too much mission creep for me.

    15. Re:Please, no... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Police represent the State.
      Police/State under threat.
      SMS invokes a well regulated militia to come to the State's aid.

      In the event that our Law Enforcement ever needs a "well regulated" militia, they're not going to find it by alerting a bunch of fat red-necks in tactical vest with AR-15's and such. What is meant by "well regulated militia" is called the National Guard .

      For example when Katrina went down and the National Guard was called out.

      Or that big earth quake in California. The National Guard was called out.

      Or the situation with wild fires. The National Guard is helping on that one, too.

      Or massive flooding in the Mississippi River drainage - I believe the National Guard helped out on that one.

      Or back on 9/11, the National Guard was called out to secure airports...

      See the trend in these examples?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    16. Re:Please, no... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, for fuck's sake, the National Guard is not the militia. They are part of the official armed forces of the US government. The militia is all male citizens from 18-45 able to bear arms. You classist bigoted slur is noted right along with your ignorance of the Constitution.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    17. Re: Please, no... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although, I have to admit, I opted out once Amber alerts were brought on board. That was already too much mission creep for me.

      I thought Amber Alerts were a pretty good idea until I got one in the middle of the night for a little girl who had already been found. Then I shut them off.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Please, no... by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 2

      Here's a news flash: The US has been a fully operational police state since end of 2001. But if you want to get technical, I guess Nixson's 1960s would be just as valid a milestone. Read "Rise of the warrior cop" by Radley Balko if you want to know more.

      The state, its branches of government, has lost all meaningful control over the domestic legal monopoly of violence. The federal and local police now operate semi-autonomously, with large incomes through civil forfeiture, sizable contributions from military surplus, and a legal code which is far removed from the law of the land the rest of us follow. Legislators have tried and failed to reverse this trend.

      The question now is, does the US need to go to full totalitarian state or dictatorship before it can be fixed through force, or is there a peaceful way back to a functional state. There are very few cases of historical powers of this magnitude and force which were rectified through peaceful means. The decline of the British Empire and the fall of Soviet Union comes to mind. However, somehow I fail to see the US simply walking away from it all. The motto is "from my cold dead hands", and that's the way I can see it going down.

    19. Re:Please, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, they're not. The National Guard reports to the governor of the state they're from, not the US Federal government. That's why the procedure to federalize the National Guard exists. The National Guard primarily exists to handle state and local problems as well as to operate the same way that an army would on our own soil should the need arise.

      They're also the only body in the US other than the US Military that has access to the heavier firepower that's normally only available to the military. They're the ones that would be potentially taking on the US government if the need were to arise to over throw the government.

      And while yes, any citizen between the ages of 18-45 is in the militia, it's not a well-regulated militia by any stretch of the imagination. Hence why they were able to write laws to ban us from possessing the weapons we would need to wage war. Back in the '30s and earlier people could own fully automatic rifles legally.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act

    20. Re: Please, no... by atrex · · Score: 2

      Yeah, this is dumb. Cops are trained and paid to "Serve and Protect" the citizenry, the citizens aren't supposed to need to come to the aid of the cops. This only makes even remote sense for off-duty police officers.

    21. Re: Please, no... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm assuming it's more cheerleading for law enforcement at taxpayer expense, similar to trading cards except not as useful (since you could use those as a bookmark.

      "ALERT: Police are in danger... Never mind, other police on the SWAT force saved the day! Thanks to the armored vehicle and infrared technology, they caught the fugitive drug dealer who was armed with a knife!"

      (For anyone upset that I'm not virtue signaling about police safety, I'll remind you it's never been safer to be a cop than now and there are many other worse-paid, more dangerous jobs we don't pretend are heroes.)

    22. Re: Please, no... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2

      I am a supporter of BLM and no, I don't want to kill cops. I just want them to go to prison when they kill innocent people.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    23. Re: Please, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For me, it's not the middle of the night that's the problem. It's how your phone absolutely freaks the fuck out out of nowhere, often at inappropriate times. It happened to me once, and now it's permanently suppressed until something more acceptable comes about.

      It should be a regular phone notification like everything else. Or, at least, a setting to make it as such.

    24. Re:Please, no... by HiThere · · Score: 3

      The National Guard is a well-regulated armed body, but it sure isn't what the writers of the constitution meant by a well-regulated militia. They didn't trust the government. They may have meant a militia that was organized by the local government (as in town or village), but even that isn't clear.

      Remember the founders didn't want there to be ANY standing army. 1812 probably changed a lot of minds, but when you say "well regulated militia" you are invoking the US Constitution Bill of Rights, and at that time most of the founders didn't trust the Federal government, and weren't too sure about the state governments. The constitution is almost entirely about what the government is NOT supposed to do. But there's no decent enforcement, so it tends to get ignored except when major fights come up between powerful groups with both (all?) sides haven't lots of governmental support. If it were really enforced there's no way they could have stretched the clause about interstate commerce to cover a farmer growing something for personal use.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    25. Re:Please, no... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And you're assuming that they want to assist the officer. In a lot of areas that's not a safe assumption.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    26. Re: Please, no... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "Well regulated militia" meant a bunch of citizens who have weapons and get together on a semi-regular basis to train in the art of war under a clearly defined chain of command.

      That's precisely what the National Guard is.

      Granted, the guard has full time personnel and maintains its own weapons and ammo stockpiles. That was not part of the original intent. However, it's probably a lot better than having rich landowners bringing their own tanks out for the weekly exercises, to complement the farmers who show up with their personal machine guns and rocket launchers.

    27. Re: Please, no... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The US has been a fully operational police state since end of 2001.

      The best part about idiots who say shit like this is that, generally speaking, 5 minutes later they'll turn around and fawn over how wonderful Cuba is.

      Cognitive dissonance at it's best.

    28. Re: Please, no... by dwillden · · Score: 2

      I turned mine off after getting one for a custody dispute in the middle of the night, for a child three states and at least a 14 hour drive away.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    29. Re: Please, no... by dwillden · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, a "Well Regulated Militia" is in the definition of the term "Well Regulated" in 1790 a functional militia. That means the citizens who make up the militia have their own arms so that they can be called out by their local community leaders and respond with weapons (and ammo) needed to be a force to contend with. A disarmed populous that has to rely on a government stockpile of weapons being available is not a functional militia. The Minutemen didn't have time to head down to the villiage armory, wait for the armorer to be woken up and issue weapons. They heard the call, grabbed their weapons and responded. The founding fathers knew that. The Battles of Lexington and Concord were directly due to British efforts to confiscate gunpowder stockpiled by the communities. But the militia was able to respond with it's own weapons and history was set.

      Further the Militia Act clearly states that the National Guard is NOT the militia, it is part of the formal US Military. While nominally under control of the local state, it is funded and equipped by the Federal Government and can be called up over a Governor's objection. We the people are the Militia, and if we are not armed we are not a functional or "Well Regulated" militia.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    30. Re:Please, no... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Let’s put it in a different way.
      An alert system to alert us about a missing adult who is trained in self defense and in normal strong physical condition.

      Chances are this guy who may seem to be in distress is just out having a beer or getting into their own trouble then actually being kidnap.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    31. Re:Please, no... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      As long as I can turn them off....

    32. Re:Please, no... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Actually, they're both the militia. The National Guard is the "organized militia" and the general body of citizens is the "unorganized militia". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    33. Re:Please, no... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The idea is obviously to support the idea of a "war on cops" by telling the citizenry every time a cop is in trouble because they're enforcing regressive policies enacted by a malicious government, elected by an uncaring populace.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Please, no... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      No, they're not. The National Guard reports to the governor of the state they're from, not the US Federal government.

      You are so far beyond wrong, it's not funny. No, really. It is literally not funny, because it is so chilling. The National Guard is part of the Army, and the Army is under control of the president. That's why Bush was able to force literally thousands of national guard reservists to go fight (and sometimes die, but more commonly commit suicide) for oil in the desert, and then proceed to keep them there past their release date with a "stop-loss" program (also known as slavery.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re: Please, no... by Durrik · · Score: 2

      I opted out to all the messages except the weather alerts. I live in Phoenix, and alerts that there is a dust storm coming in is personally important. It will modify my behavior:
      * Am I going to go out grocery shopping, or to a restaurant now, or wait till it blows through?
      * I need to shut off the fresh air intake in the house, and make sure all the doors and windows are closed.
      * Time to break out the beverage of choice and watch the wall of dust roll over the fields.

      Things like that. Those alerts are important since they are personally important to the people they're being sent to. Amber/Silver alerts aren't so important: 'Look out for this Vehicle' 'but I'm at work/home/etc right now.' And when people get on the road they forget what they're suppose to be looking for. So I agree, most of those alerts are useless alerts for people who don't care. But like most cases of generalizations arguments there are exceptions.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    36. Re: Please, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a good idea. What they need is some sort of communication system that cops can use to call in other cops for backup with situations that are getting out of hand.

    37. Re:Please, no... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1
      All true, but TFA mentions a second purpose which at least seems to have some sort of logic behind it. Probably this was the original purpose and they stuck the 'OMG snowflakes are in danger' on top of it:

      A Blue Alert could quickly warn you if a violent suspect may be in your community, along with providing instructions on what to do if you spot the suspect and how to stay safe.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    38. Re: Please, no... by chihowa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When cops feel threatened, they start randomly shooting at people.

      This alert is very useful for letting you know that you may want to stay inside and away from windows. If the 'threat' is driving a blue pickup truck, you may want to not drive your blue pickup truck (or white pickup truck, or red car), lest it be turned into swiss cheese.

      It's an alert that the police are off of their leash and won't be held accountable for any damage or injury that they cause.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    39. Re:Please, no... by RKThoadan · · Score: 2

      This isn't a case of "so far beyond wrong." It's a case of confusing nomenclature. States can choose to have a state guard (and even state navy) in addition to the national guard. It get's murky because they are partially regulated by the National Guard but are not otherwise part of the National Guard Command Structure.

      Furthermore, to quote wikipedia: As governors often use state defense forces to augment their state's Army National Guard and Air National Guard units, state defense forces have been both officially and informally called National Guard Reserves. When not on assigned duties by the President the National Guard forces are under the authority of the Governor of the State they are stationed in. So if you see an announcement that your Governor has deployed the National Guard it's likely that he has deployed both the National Guard and the State Guard (if your state has one)

      Wikipedia links:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    40. Re:Please, no... by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I don't see what purpose this could serve. LEOs already have CAD and radio communications to support each other, and usually a crime scene is cleared of onlookers, who could wind up getting in the way, or even hurt. They actually want civilians to get involved now? Then there's the very real possibility of BLM or cop haters rushing to the scene to get a pot shot in.
      I could see this being useful if an officer is missing, but for anything else, a real time fistfight or shootout, it seems like a dicey idea.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    41. Re: Please, no... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Not the first time you've posted something extremely unimpressive; well done.

    42. Re: Please, no... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      Middle of the night ... check
      Kid already found by the time of the alert ... check
      also
      Kid was last seen (and found safe) at least 1000 miles from my location... CHECK

      These alerts do indeed seem like a noble idea, but in practice, they're so "chatty" that I just disabled them all.

      I'd disable the "presidential alert" if I could (no, not going to root my phone just to do this) because although I don't think it's ever been used.. I just picture him suddenly becoming aware of its existence and using it at 5am to text "FAKE NEWS!" at the whole country.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    43. Re: Please, no... by Mr3vil · · Score: 1

      I opted out of the EAS weather alerts too. Most good weather apps provide a much less obnoxious notification on your device.

    44. Re: Please, no... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No. The National Guard is normally under the control of the State government, and can be put under the control of the federal government. This is clearly not what is meant by a "well regulated militia". When I said local, I meant city, town, village, or possibly country (or equivalent). And I expect that they didn't want any official government organizing it.

      As I said, I expect a bunch of attitudes changed after 1812, but nobody altered the constitution to update it for those changes.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    45. Re: Please, no... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Cops are paid and trained to maintain the status quo, per the 1981 SCOTUS decision in Warren v. District of Columbia.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    46. Re:Please, no... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      A Blue Alert could quickly warn you if a violent
      suspect may be in your community, along with providing instructions on what to do if you spot
      the suspect and how to stay safe.

      My neighborhood association's facebook page already covers that. Quite well, as a matter of fact.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    47. Re:Please, no... by nasch · · Score: 1

      You would have to be out of your mind to get one of these alerts and go try to assist the officer.

    48. Re: Please, no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you want to ban military like arms, better get on repealing that pesky 2A. Careful, there be dragons.

      If you want to own a gun, be a member of a "well-regulated militia".

      So we're talking no convictions, no mental problems, and documented firearms competency at a minimum. Being "well-regulated" implies above-par behavior, so maybe there should be some additional requirements such as mandatory abstention from drugs and alcohol, training requirements, and a code of conduct for gun owners.

      We can both play that game.

    49. Re: Please, no... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      So we're talking no convictions, no mental problems, and documented firearms competency at a minimum

      Be really careful with the "no mental problems". I'm high-functioning ASD and have dysthymia (sort of chronic depression) myself. Why should my Second Amendment rights be infringed? Do you want people to avoid seeing mental health professionals out of fear that they won't be able to have guns? Is it preferable to have people with untreated mental illnesses owning guns?

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    50. Re:Please, no... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      I suppose it is no different than seeing professional athletes as priests in cleats, as we seem to...

    51. Re:Please, no... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      You might be interested to find out that when not in uniform as an agent of the state, a bunch of the NG are those fat rednecks in tactical vests. Sheesh. Learn something about people. Get out of San Fran or whatever blue enclave you live in and look at the country. Then again, please, stay where you are, you may do less harm there.

    52. Re: Please, no... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Thank you, someone who knows history. The revisionist bozos of today are just amazing.

    53. Re: Please, no... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Exactly. But speaking as a former LEO myself, I'm not sure I like this idea. Specifically, we have a "blue alert" and people show up. Are they good guys who are trying to help -- or more folks who wanna kill cops? No way to know. Just for the record - one of the reasons why I stopped being a LEO was because I thought that the country was moving toward dictatorship extremely fast. I'm rather surprised we didn't get it with Obama - he was way too slick.

    54. Re: Please, no... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      ...we have a "blue alert" and people show up. Are they good guys who are trying to help -- or more folks who wanna kill cops?

      No way to know.

      Agreed, I can see no possible positive outcome from this idea.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    55. Re:Please, no... by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      The police is the legalized enforcer of the legalist mafia ... plain and simple, if it weren't for them, the thieves on top would be overthrown constantly, thats why they always get good pay, decent pension plans, and lots of extralegal (well at least in the police state here they do, its the exact same system as the mob)
      and this gives new incentive to flash-MOB .. "o WOW, COPS IN TROUBLE, lets go give the mob a hand" ... i dont really get this ? they want to warn civilians to come help police when they're being shot at ?
      could you sweep this under the rug before belgium gets hold of this supremely excellent idea (not)

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    56. Re: Please, no... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      You might want to read a bit more in depth on that national firearms act you referenced. Congress passed that as a tax which was thought to make machine guns prohibitively expensive to regular folks of the time, because they knew the Supreme Court of the would have easily shot down a complete ban of machine guns.

      If you want to ban military like arms, better get on repealing that pesky 2A. Careful, there be dragons.

      The NFA was implemented as a tax because they did not know at that time that the interstate commerce clause could be used to do the same thing. It is funny how prohibition of alcohol required a constitutional amendment but prohibition of drugs which do not cross state lines does not.

      Court decisions since then point to how the NFA may be used to ban firearms. Implement a tax and then refuse to collect it. Since the tax is never processed or collected, there is no standing to challenge it in court.

    57. Re:Please, no... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The National Guard is a well-regulated armed body, but it sure isn't what the writers of the constitution meant by a well-regulated militia.

      The National Guard is what they meant by select militia. With the way state authorized law enforcement is armed and behaves today, it is select militia as well.

    58. Re:Please, no... by Agripa · · Score: 1

      All those good guys with a gun need to find a good way to use them.

      And risk being shot by a blue guy with a gun? No thanks.

    59. Re:Please, no... by dacaldar · · Score: 1
      You really shouldn't call it "typical" police behaviour.

      Yes, it happens way more than a one-off, and yes, it's serious and should be addressed in a systemic way, especially to prevent vulnerable or profiled populations, however it's far from representative of the frequent, usual, or normal behaviour of the vast majority of police officers.

      Most sane people want fewer citizens walking around with guns, and the only way you can have that is with the existence of a trusted police force. I sure don't want a "police state", but we do need to entrust a small % of the population with the power and arms to be able to stop someone from wreaking havoc on the rest of us.

      I'm not sure what I think of this Blue Alert announcement, I just don't think it helps the police-to-citizenry relationship by using the word "typical" in such an offhand way, without careful thought.

    60. Re:Please, no... by torkus · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like a business transaction. Granted, an illegal one from both sides but nevertheless...

      All the more reason for prostitution not to be illegal.

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    61. Re: Please, no... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that your definition of innocent is not necessarily the true definition of innocent. If you don't follow lawful orders and act like you're going for a weapon, you're going to get shot.

      No. I'm talking about truly innocent people.

      People like Aiyana Jones, a 7 year old girl who was shot and killed by police officers while she slept.
      I'm talking about people like Kameron Prescott, a 6 year old boy who was killed by police when they opened fire on an unarmed suspect outside of his home.

      I do agree that when it's a clear case of a cop killing somebody for no good reason, that cop should go to prison.

      Bullshit. Your earlier red herring belies the truth.

      There are some bad cops, just not as many as you and your fellow BLM'ers imagine.

      A cop who ignores the misconduct of other officers is a bad cop.

      Walk a mile in their shoes (or at least have some of the training they go through) before you paint them all with such a broad brush.

      No thank you. I chose the life and career I wanted. I didn't want to become a cop.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    62. Re: Please, no... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I could also mention the case of John Crawford III, a man who was shot without warning while holding a toy gun in an open carry state.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    63. Re: Please, no... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      There was also Oscar Grant. (While not truly, completely innocent) He was shot in the back while laying handcuffed on a subway platform and the officer who killed him, though convicted, spent less than two years in prison.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    64. Re: Please, no... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Even when I was still a LEO - I hesitated stopping to act as possible backup for a fellow officer on a traffic stop 'cause he wouldn't know who I was if I didn't have a radio with me at the time. *I* never wanted to see that happen UNLESS I knew his car so well that I knew who it was instantly.

  2. What the fuck are we supposed to do with that? by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Grab our rifles and come help. No future to that.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:What the fuck are we supposed to do with that? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

      No future to that.

      But of course it is the future! It's the police moving to the Über gig independent contractor model.

      An app hails Über cops when the police need backup assistance. The Über cops grab their guns and race to the location to overwhelm the bad guys with shear numbers.

      A Facebook app can take pictures, and tell you from Facebook's faces database who is a good guy, and who is a bad guy, so you don't shoot at the wrong folks.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re: What the fuck are we supposed to do with that? by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Friendly Fire incidents are likely to increase.

    3. Re:What the fuck are we supposed to do with that? by Junta · · Score: 1

      I would have guessed clear or shelter in place as presumably this indicates some imminent risk to the area. However, keying that off of policemen under threat would seem to be a pretty indirect way to say that as opposed to a more general, but more localized emergency broadcast system message..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re: What the fuck are we supposed to do with that? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Or die as "innocent bystander".

      Does it matter? As long as you're having fun, who cares what side you're on.

      No really guys: What kind of actionable would an"officer in danger" possible have to the average citizen?

      And more important question: Why wold this be a better reason for a general alarm than anyone being in danger? Is someone more equal here?

      --
      bickerdyke
    5. Re:What the fuck are we supposed to do with that? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      You're not going to shoot anyone like that. They'll shoot you while you're looking at your facebook app for instructions

      That's the only part of the post you're going to call out as unrealistic?

  3. Re:Who do we call? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    The Marines?

  4. And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What exactly are we supposed to do about it? Gather up the posse and ride off to their rescue? If only we had a paid, professional organization whose job it was to rescue those in great peril...

  5. When *police* are in danger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about an app that warns us when police are nearby and can be set to automatically record and stream to chosen sites if they get within ten feet? Cops nowadays are little more than sociopaths in military gear, and I'd rather not I (or possibly even my husband) get raped, killed, and our car arrested on suspicion of resisting.

    Just passing one by is quickly becoming a coin-toss as to whether or not we end up beaten and arrested on trumped-up charges especially if we're black. Police are not the ones that need protecting from anyone.

    1. Re:When *police* are in danger? by CaptainDork · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... PC education/brainwashing system ...

      And for Mac?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    2. Re:When *police* are in danger? by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... PC education/brainwashing system ...

      And for Mac?

      Apple brains come out of the womb pre-washed and knowing all the lyrics to that new U2 album everyone loves so much.

    3. Re:When *police* are in danger? by cenobyte40k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      LOL. I am going to get you are a white male from an upper middle class or better neighborhood.

    4. Re:When *police* are in danger? by ThanatosMinor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Here's a clue from a responsible adult - if you go into the world and treat the police like an enemy, or teach your kids the same - you are going to be in for a very rough time. Not because of the police - because of your own actions and statements.

      Many people have good reason to believe the police are not there to help them whenever they show up, and that at best they'll be thought of as suspects before victims, and not just suspects but guilty suspects. Trust must be earned. If the police do not have the public's (or any non-empty subset thereof) trust, that is the fault of the police and the criminal justice system as a whole and not that of the public.

      You may be responsible for yourself but you've also been tricked into thinking a police state is a good thing and trying to convince others of the same. But it's a cop's job to protect me, not the other way around. They're public servants and I'm the public so I don't owe the police anywhere near what they owe me. They should smile if I flip them off. Otherwise why am I paying for them?

    5. Re:When *police* are in danger? by Rakhar · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, both extremes are bad and you're a shitty person for wanting anyone, for any reason, to smile if you flip them off. If you treat people like shit, expect them to react in shitty fashion. Public to cop, or cop to public.

      Do you have any idea how moronic people sound when they cry about being lumped together and negatively stereotyped...and then do that exact same fucking thing do another group?

    6. Re:When *police* are in danger? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      (Score:+5 Funny)

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    7. Re:When *police* are in danger? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      But it's a cop's job to protect me

      I thought it actually wasn't?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:When *police* are in danger? by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just passing one by is quickly becoming a coin-toss as to whether or not we end up beaten and arrested on trumped-up charges especially if we're black.

      OK, I'll touch the third rail -- I have plenty of karma.

      Coin-toss, eh? Like, 50-50 odds. Guess you're pretty much hosed if you pass 5-6 every day like I do. How am I still alive?

      Oh, because the real numbers are somewhere around 1.5% of encounters where force is used or threatened . (Pro tip: that means the percentage of encounters where force was actually used is less than 1.5% -- about half that, according to the report.)

      This sort of fanciful swill is what passes for "insightful" on Slashdot these days. The nerds are rapidly becoming outnumbered by the brain-dead activists.

    9. Re:When *police* are in danger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Have you ever wondered about *why* white people from the suburbs are successful? It's not the "white power structure" or racism. It's that we aren't programmed to fail by being told nonsense about how the world actually works.

      Serious question - how would you know you weren't programmed with nonsense about how the world actually works if you've never had to leave the bubble of your white-centric upper-middle class neighborhood?

    10. Re:When *police* are in danger? by atrex · · Score: 2

      There are several kinds of people that police work attracts. Some of them actually do want to make a difference in their communities and protect people. Others want the power that being a police officer gives them to be able to lord it over the commoners. Others want the freedom to enforce their racially biased view points. And some just want to play with guns.

      The fact is that in the U.S. we have a drastically ineffective training system and requirements. IIRC police in the EU get three times as much training as the ones do here in the U.S.

      Additionally, equipping the police with military surplus weaponry and minus the proper training in restraint on when to use that weaponry is an outright recipe for disaster. If you give a kid a cool toy, they're going to want to play with it. And a poorly trained police officer with an assault rifle is far more dangerous than a kid with a BB-gun.

    11. Re:When *police* are in danger? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe you are wrong. I don't believe that protecting the citizenry is the official job of the police. I believe that their major job is to protect the government. That in order to do that they are supposed to enforce the laws, whenever that benefits the protection of the government. And that when it endangers the government they are explicitly supposed to ignore the laws. And that it is intended that the protection of the citizenry be a consequence of the foregoing behavior. It's been awhile since I looked that up, so I've probably fuzzed a few of the details, but that was the essence.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re: When *police* are in danger? by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

      Such an app already exists: Cell411

    13. Re:When *police* are in danger? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      You're describing the current situation. The GP was describing what should be the case. If the police's job were to protect the public, there'd be no problem with a police state. In practice however, as soon as you have a police state, the police no longer have a duty to protect the public.

      I'm seeing extremes here. But I will say that I don't believe the current set up with the police makes any sense. Their first duty should be protecting the public. The numbers of unpunished needless deaths of innocents who offended their killers by doing things such as "Went to reach for license in pocket when officer was screaming at them to simultaneously keep their hands on the wheel and hand them driver's license" shows, to me, the police are far, far, removed from having the values and mandates that are appropriate.

      And without those mandates there's little point in having a police force. A protection racket might offer "protection" from crime but we wouldn't tolerate that, why do we tolerate a police force that believes it has the right to kill people just because the officer was badly trained (I don't mean not trained, I mean deliberately trained terribly) and scared?

      This needs to stop.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:When *police* are in danger? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's that we aren't programmed to fail by being told nonsense about how the world actually works.

      You're programmed to win by shitting on black people, while claiming inherent superiority. You don't get to complain that someone's a bad swimmer while you're pushing on their head.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:When *police* are in danger? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      The police ARE your enemy, in general. At best they are tax farmers, collecting nuisance fines to support their own budget. $50 fine for having a headlight out, for example. In many communities it is even worse, especially in cases where the "criminal" doesn't have $50 lying around to pay the bribe.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    16. Re:When *police* are in danger? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      While I was describing the current situation, it wasn't *only* the current situation. It is clearly the situation back as far as the early 1900's, and I have no reason to believe that things changed at that point. When people lived in smaller groups, they had more direct knowledge of what was going on, and the government was often (not always!) more in line with their desires, so the role of the police was less adversarial, but it's always been to support the government...and those the government supported. (See, e.g., "copper bosses") There have even been times when the army was called out, and the police were operating under the control of the army.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    17. Re:When *police* are in danger? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      On the contrary - the liberal and PC education/brainwashing system is churning out sociopaths like you.

          Here's a clue from a responsible adult - if you go into the world and treat the police like an enemy, or teach your kids the same - you are going to be in for a very rough time. Not because of the police - because of your own actions and statements.

      So Daniel Shaver was just asking for it. Now I understand.

    18. Re:When *police* are in danger? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      You're describing the current situation. The GP was describing what should be the case. If the police's job were to protect the public, there'd be no problem with a police state. In practice however, as soon as you have a police state, the police no longer have a duty to protect the public.

      The courts have repeated ruled that the police have no duty to protect the public. They may even decline to allow the the public to protect themselves while not protecting them.

  6. Great, Now we'll know when to commit robberies. by technosaurus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What a total waste of money, time and infrastructure. Not that any PD would ever use it, but still...

    1. Re:Great, Now we'll know when to commit robberies. by arth1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't underestimate the stupidity of people wearing uniform.

      Yes, your subject is spot on. When there's a blue alert, crooks know that their odds of pulling off a heist went way up, because the fuzz will be busy rushing elsewhere. What a gift!

    2. Re:Great, Now we'll know when to commit robberies. by Rakhar · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I can see the supposed positives (informed public, safety in avoiding) but what I can't see is the gains outweighing the negatives. Also, for those positives to function it would leave open a pretty slippery slope to "Well, he had the alert, he should have stayed inside!"

      I think body cams that are on 100% of the time an officer is on the clock are a better idea. Management on the police side just has to be humane about what they do with it. Right now, in my area they aren't even being humane about tracking locations. Cops get reprimanded for wellness checks (you know, the potentially positive side of police work) because it's seen as slacking and taking a break.

  7. Black Alert? by duckintheface · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perhaps a Black Alert to tell the public when unarmed black men are endangered by the police?

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
  8. A Clear Political Move by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    A policeofficer is in danger to many days for the idea to have any merit.

    Most police would advise against entering a hostile situation, thereby creating another potential victim or hostage.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  9. Morbid sense of hurmor here... by SeaFox · · Score: 2

    All I imagine is a group of gang-bangers laughing as their phones go off while they are the cause of the threat.

    1. Re:Morbid sense of hurmor here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I can imagine them making a sport out of how many alarms they can create in a day. It's the grown up form of kids saying "boo".

  10. Umm, OK, whatever by JohnFen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't have the foggiest notion what this is supposed to accomplish, really. If a situation is such that a cop is seriously endangered, what in the world could I do about it?

    It looks to me like all this does is to further decrease the signal-to-noise ratio in these sorts of things.

    1. Re:Umm, OK, whatever by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If a situation is such that a cop is seriously endangered, what in the world could I do about it?

      If you were a criminal, you could take advantage of the situation by committing a crime somewhere else. Or just steal their squad car.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Umm, OK, whatever by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      It's like Policeman Go, but for criminals.

      The Blue alert keeps track of your score and how many cops are locked into your car trunk.

  11. Because police lives... by K.+S.+Van+Horn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...matter so much more than yours or mine.

    1. Re:Because police lives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I did not see anything. No, I did not hear anything. Sorry, wish I could help you, Officer.

    2. Re:Because police lives... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Blue is the new black.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  12. Why Would Ordinary People Need This? by mentil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see this being useful for off-duty police officers, as there have been cases of them being accosted. However, ordinary people don't need to know every time a police officer gets hurt in a traffic collision (statistically, by far, the leading cause of unnatural serious injury or death to on-duty police.) I could maybe see this as some kind of active shooter alert system... but it's so overbroad it's almost never going to be such a scenario, and people will turn it off/tune it out and never get the message. Furthermore, if I'm hiding from a shooter and my phone starts a siren that can be heard a block away, I'm not gonna be hidden any longer.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Why Would Ordinary People Need This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is clearly so the cities know when is the right time to strike!

    2. Re:Why Would Ordinary People Need This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe they wouldn't get in so many car wrecks if they weren't trying to drive while reading a computer screen in the seat next to them.

    3. Re:Why Would Ordinary People Need This? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Of course no way to know how it will be employee, but I could see some active threat alert, but shouldn't require a policemen to be injured prior to such an alert being issued.

      *Maybe* if an officer is missing, but I can't imagine that's one of the more likely threat scenarios.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    4. Re:Why Would Ordinary People Need This? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "but it's so overbroad it's almost never going to be such a scenario"
      A bit like the old police scanner codes but with a real time map and only the riot, looting information presented.
      Riots that emerge out of the bad areas of a city and town.
      An active riot alert system allows good people to close up their business and get ready for a lot of looters.
      Good people can get their security, friends, family, kin ready for looters and riots.
      A nice GUI that shows more alerts in real time. Project that loss of police control and see if crime is moving out to good areas.
      Was the crime kept very local and well contained in bad areas of a city or is it a city wide problem.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Re:Who do we call? by geekd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the cops ARE the danger?

  14. Re:Black Alert? by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

    Perhaps a Black Alert to tell the public when unarmed black men are endangered by the police?

    Wouldn't it be more efficient to have a Black Non-Alert for when unarmed black men aren't endangered by the police? Then you'd only have to send it out once, maybe twice a year.

  15. Re:Just for police for now by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    Political parties will follow the public safety messages into your phone.
    Reassuring daily messages from a local government that illegal migrants are welcome in the city?
    Pushed gov updates on what a SJW city council wants to do.
    Daily lists of city services that are free for illegal migrants?
    Once one part of gov gets to push out messages, every part of gov will find a need to send out free party political propaganda.
    Protected by a gov/telco partnership so the messages have to be viewed in the GUI.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. DO. NOT. WANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How about an app for when real people are in trouble?

  17. Yawn... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Another set of alerts to disable.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  18. Ajit Pai is a disaster by edi_guy · · Score: 2

    Seriously, this guy is a complete tool and needs to be replaced by someone with a clue. GOP is running the show so they can pick their team, but Ajit is going to hurt them in the long run with his terrible choices.

  19. This strikes me as propaganda by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    e.g. something to rile up people and maybe get some more "tough on crime" legislation. I can't think of any other reason to do this. This is not information the public needs to know on a real time basis.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  20. "...when a police officer is in danger." by Nyckname · · Score: 1

    Great. Just freakin' great. This bloody thing is going to go off every time a Black man is pulled over.

  21. Re:Just for police for now by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    Uh, last i heard the "SJW" crowd tended more toward anti-police sentiments in general while the anti-"SJW"s were all "blue lives matter". So why do you think the "SJW"s are behind a plan to mobilize people to help police?

    Is one of us confused about what "SJW"s want? Or are you just blaming anything you don't agree with on some "SJW cabal" that you've made up in your head?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  22. I just got one of these by jrumney · · Score: 5, Insightful

    BLUE ALERT: Officer has spotted a black man failing to indicate a right turn for at least 3 seconds before starting the maneuver. All residents are advised to remain indoors and definitely do not come out and record the shooting and post to social media.

  23. Re:Amber alerts, lol... by Junta · · Score: 2

    The volume of amber alerts is low, I'm perfectly willing to receive and at least check out a few license plates if that info is provided.

    Sometimes the alert is uselessly vague, a picture could at least help, but describing a fairly common vehicle and/or person in text format doesn't give me anything I could use to help identify. If there is an off chance that it clicks that something looks a bit off and matches the description, ok.

    The silver alerts seem to bit a bit more half-assed. I only know that one exists when one of the electronic signs says "there is a silver alert, *call for more info*, not nearly so aggressive. Generally when you do look into it, it's keep an eye out for person who is liekly to be wandering out of their mind, which when I have seen that I'd call about it regardless.

    I am a bit curious as to the intent of a blue alert. For the other alerts, they want as many people as possible to assisst by looking and calling in. Surely for a blue alert they already know what is up and don't need help. If it is to keep bystanders out, it seems a weird way of phrasing it.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  24. This should be fun by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Blue Alerts' To Warn You When Local Police Are In Danger

    Now we'll all get pestered whenever someone points a camera at the police.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  25. Amazingly stupid by SigmaTao · · Score: 2

    1) I have no idea what they are hoping people do with that information. So the result will be random at best.
    2) It seems like a way to crowd source mobs to attack the police.
    3) It's the kind of feedback criminals can use to infer where the police are focused.
    4) It's also a method by which criminals can cause an event to distract the police or upset the systemic responses of police.
    5) It provides a signal for people to come an watch / video - actually attracting innocent by-standers.
    6) If the system is hijacked, it allows a great way of confusing and disrupting the police.
    7) It creates the avenue to create fake blue signals to produce panic and inappropriate responses in both the population and police.

    1. Re:Amazingly stupid by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Once one part of local gov can send out a message to all phones so can another part of gov.
      Wait for the daily party political messages. Good news about local law changes. Good news on how local government is helping people in the community.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Amazingly stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      It's pretty obvious what the people are supposed to do with this information. People should feel fear. They should also empathize with the police officer(s) in danger and be reminded of the police force's dedication to protecting and serving. There is no "actionable item" for a civilian beyond feeling these emotions.

      At best, the potential abuses you outlined exist out of ignorance. At worst, they are features of the platform meant to put police officers in harm's way to justify the ongoing deterioration of American rights.

    3. Re:Amazingly stupid by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you should come to Chicago, and watch the police beat up random businessmen and bar maids for jollies, or grab an attractive woman and search her thouroughly and slap her around a bit and then claim she was suspected of being a whore, deal some drugs pilfered from the evidence room (grab some cash from there too), maybe empty a gun magazine into an unarmed darkie or two ....yeah serve and protect and living the cop life.

    4. Re:Amazingly stupid by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or just a ticker at the bottom of your screen like every single time cable companies renegotiate with content providers....for every partisan issue.

  26. #2A folks ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... will take this as authorization to shoot on site.

    I am licensed to carry in Texas and I'm always armed (concealed) because I am a wildlife photographer.

    I have trained to use only while peeing down both legs from fear of dying.

    OTOH, I train with Ramboweenies who are looking for any excuse to kill someone.

    Here's their chance.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:#2A folks ... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      I'll bite.

      You're carrying concealed because you are a wildlife photographer? Are you really that worried about the wildlife seeing you're armed and shooting first?

      Where I live, if you want to take photos of wildlife and feel the need to pack heat, you just do open carry. Usually of a rifle....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    2. Re:#2A folks ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I'll see your bite and raise you some common sense.

      The wildlife I photograph lives on a river running through a populated area.

      Homeless people and transits and tourists are part of the landscape.

      I'm loaded (see what I did there) down with equipment already and a rifle doesn't add value like a CM9 does.

      Thanks for playing.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    3. Re:#2A folks ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      #2A folks ...

      Troll detected.

      ... will take this as authorization to shoot on site.

      Troll confirmed.

      I am licensed to carry in Texas and I'm always armed (concealed) because I am a wildlife photographer.

      You don't need a license to carry openly in Texas, and wildlife aren't going to make a MWAG call, so why would you carry concealed? Answer, you're making shit up.

      I have trained to use only while peeing down both legs from fear of dying.

      How long did you train to shit into the comment box here on Slashdot?

      P.S. If you want to write a more credible troll, don't simultaneously claim to carry a firearm and shit on "2A folks", since you are one.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:#2A folks ... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Actually, Texas only recently, as in 2016, allowed open carry of handguns, and then, only for people in possession of a valid concealed carry license.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:#2A folks ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Stepped on your pee pee, didn't you?

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  27. FOIA and create an app from that data by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If a city wants to track crime then put that free data to good use and create a useful app for good people.

    Buy up an entire towns worth of data on every person, home, crime and layer it.
    Not just the open free city data, all the pay to view private sector data that is collected on crime.
    Get all the data on crime, generations of criminals, insurance costs, rent costs, number of people sharing a home. All the hidden statistics that really show what a part of the USA is really like over the decades.
    Layer the numbers, crimes over an interactive real time map.
    Then FOIA the Blue Alert event code and layer that on top.

    Sell a demographics app to warn people from outside the city, the better parts of a town that they are entering a bad part of the town.
    A nice friendly bright normal map GUI in the safe areas.

    The more darker, gloomy colors with voice and GUI when entering an area that should always be avoided. A final apex predator warning for the no-go area parts of a city.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:FOIA and create an app from that data by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Sell a demographics app to warn people from outside the city, the better parts of a town that they are entering a bad part of the town.
      A nice friendly bright normal map GUI in the safe areas.

      You were doing fine until you got here. Yes, let's collect all that data, and then use it to make the bad places work! Fuck your app, let's have the government and the police use that data to determine where to send their officers. Instead of having the cops avoid the most dangerous parts of town, have them spend more time there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Victim blaming? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're saying that all those unarmed black men killed by cops brought it on themselves?

  29. Re:Black Alert? by santiago · · Score: 2

    Perhaps a Black Alert to tell the public when unarmed black men are endangered by the police?

    If that's implemented, it'll just result in everyone's phones loudly buzzing continuously until the batteries run out.

  30. Red and Blue alerts ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ,,, when Republicans or Democrats (respectively) are alleged to have grabbed a pussy.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  31. Re:Amber alerts, lol... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 4, Informative

    Exactly. This one would be switched off immediately.

    I mean, Emergency Alerts? Yeah, definitely. If there's a tornado or wildfire or something bearing down on me, it'd be nice to be notified (and not necessarily have to sit there with a TV/Radio on, just in case). AMBER alerts? Well, okay, I suppose that's helpful in certain situations and, besides, I turn it off anyway for much the same reason. I'd leave it on if it could be made smarter. I don't need this alert at 4:00AM when I'm sleeping, but it might be nice if it would store it so that when I start driving to work, it'll pop-up and say, "Hey, keep an eye out for a blue chevy..."

    I might understand something like this for a very narrow area--for example, if police are looking for a suspect hiding in your area, an alert to the people the, say, 12 block cordoned-off area saying that they should lock their doors and be on the lookout for a guy in a green hoodie might be useful. But I think this already exists.

    Again, this system is supposed to be useful for me. How is this proposed system helpful for me?

  32. Re:This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's called a trigger - " I'm a cop I feel threatened now I can legally murder you"!

  33. Amber, silver and blue by PPH · · Score: 1

    Amber and silver alerts involve people who pose little or no threat to the general population. Blue alerts involve people who have already proven to be a danger to law enforcement. Stare at that creepy guy in the next car who matches the description in the text message and he will think nothing of blowing your head off if he feels threatened.

    Yeah. Great idea.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  34. Re:This is pointless by PPH · · Score: 1

    No one makes a person risk their life, unless there's a cop draft I'm not familiar with.

    National Security Letter.

    We're interested in this guy who is wearing an Allah-u Akbar vest. We want you to spy on him for us. There's nothing you can do about it. Nobody you can complain to. You must comply.

    Oh, by the way. Don't act nervous or anything when he walks in the front door to pay his broadband bill. Or he might push the button.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. What about "Black & Blue" Alerts? by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Will they send "Black & Blue" Alerts whenever the police are beating the shit out of someone who is subdued? Will they send "Black & Red" Alerts whenever the cops unload their magazines into unarmed suspects? Will they send "Yellow & Blue" Alerts when they Tazer grandmothers? Will they send "Spotted Alerts" whenever they shoot someones dog? Will they send "White" Alerts when they shoot babies in their crib during SWAT home invasions? Just wondering.

  36. Gold Alerts by Hallux-F-Sinister · · Score: 1

    They're also planning to start using Gold Alerts, which allow local bankers and business people to push out alerts to cell phone users when they identify a rich person in danger of not having ALL the money he can, due to some grubby peasant somehow managing to come-by some, so that nearby citizens can respond appropriately by taking whatever money anyone nearby might somehow have come into possession of, and handing it directly to the financially endangered rich person, helping him avoid the possibility of his being reduced to being merely well-off. (The HORROR!)

    --
    Our reign has gone on long enough. Indeed. Summon the meteors.
  37. Re:ISP provider to slow down Blue Alerts.. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    What if they have to change the light bulbs for the blue alerts? Surely that takes time.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  38. No scanners? by ai4px · · Score: 1

    This from the same police that wanted apco 25 encrypted audio so we couldnâ(TM)t know what was going on in their world? Really?

  39. Bad idea in many ways by joe_frisch · · Score: 2

    First, sending alerts to people who do not need to take immediate specific action will cause many to turn off alerts entirely. I was woken by one of the large scale Amber alerts - about a child kidnapped 300 MILES from my house. So I've turned off all the alerts that I can.

    Secondly, there is no specific action for people to take when police are in distress. I can't imagine that the police want a bunch of armed citizens with no situational awareness converging on the site of some emergency. Seems like that will make almost any situation worse.

    Finally, while I believe that most police do a good service to the community, I do not seem them as being unusually noble or risk-taking. Firemen, pilots, and roofers and many others are also exposed to danger while serving the community. Why not an "asphalt alert" when a roofer falls and is injured?

  40. Alerts? by tquasar · · Score: 1

    Ow!! My ears. The current test alerts are so loud that I grab the remote to mute the TV. What about alert saturation? Ho-hum, not another one? Who cares?

  41. The Perfect Ring Tone by Tempest451 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps something by NWA?

  42. I feel like I'm being trolled by RonVNX · · Score: 2

    Policeman doesn't even crack the top 10 most dangerous jobs in the USA. What's next, Tree Service worker in danger alerts?

  43. Re:Who do we call? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    And there's something strange in the neighborhood?

  44. For you and me by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    People, this warning system is for you and me.
    What do police do when protecting their own?
    Pretty much anything. Think mama bear and her cubs.
    This is common in the mammalian family.
    Do you want to be anywhere near mama bear?
    No. Be thankful for the warning.

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  45. Why is this my problem? by rossz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Since the police have no legal duty to protect my ass, why should I care if they are in danger? Am I supposed to grab a gun and run to their rescue - probably getting shot by cops in the process since they such scared little girls who like to shoot people?

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  46. If any common sense still exists by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

    people will avoid " blue alert " areas like the plague.

    Because, like the plague, Death awaits you there.

    Police are trigger happy at their best, shoot-first-ask-questions-later types at their worst. Can you guess which personality type you're likely to run into when they're under duress ?

    Sorry you're in trouble, but due to the behavior of some ( as you call it ) " bad apples ", you are on your own.

    You want my help ? Start treating non-LE types as human beings and we'll talk about it.

    Until then, good luck.

  47. Re:Just for police for now by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Or are you just blaming anything you don't agree with on some "SJW cabal" that you've made up in your head?

    Serious question: do you think there is no group of people who self-identify as SJW and who want to force a particular ideology on the majority? Because I'm pretty certain that that qualifies as a "SJW Cabal", and they're most certainly not made-up.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  48. Re:Who do we call? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    When the cops ARE the danger?

    How often does that happen? What's the odds that a citizen will die at the hands of a police officer? According to this source, 937 people were killed by police officers in 2017.

    The odds of the cops being a danger to you are miniscule, and those odds drop further if you aren't engaged in a violent crime.

    You're being hysterical, making a mountain out of a molehill.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  49. Mutual Aid. Use THAT. Not amateurs by RubberDogBone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I used to listen to a police scanner a lot. I mean, a LOT lot. Had radios at home, in my car, and even a handheld to keep me tuned in even on the toilet. No I didn't have a girlfriend at the time, how did you possibly guess? Geez. Mindreaders.

    Anyway, the thing with scanners is you know what the hell is happening, to an extent, as soon as the police do. It can drive spikes in blood pressure listening to a traffic stop turn into a shootout, etc etc. And I had issues with that and the fact the the number one rule, as such, about listening to scanner stuff is never ever never ever never go to the scenes of what you hear. Stay the hell out of it.

    Eventually, the local PD moved to a trunked radio system and none of my radios could hear them. A girlfriend model was acquired and it didn't like listening to police radios either. So I quit. I have no clue what my local PD is doing and I don't care.

    I do not need or want shit alerts showing up to tell me they ran out of dougnuts or some bullshit deemed a police emergency. If they have an emergency, fuck it, they have mutual aid agreements with ALL the adjacent police agencies. They can call up those folks and get trained, real cops to come help. Do that thing. Don't try to get amateurs into the act. The Pros are bad enough,

    --
    Sig for hire.
  50. Re:ISP provider to slow down Blue Alerts.. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    One doesn't expect old Red Dwarf references to show up on Slashdot very much anymore. Well done.

  51. Re:Just for police for now by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    Serious question: Do you think there are people who self-identify as SJW?

    You're a moron
    You may never change your moron status
    (Those are the first two hits on google. If you seriously think there is no *proudly* self-identified SJW you are living in a fantasy.)

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  52. Isn't that what other cops are for? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    So long as I won't be able to fine people who run red lights and drive 30 over the speed limit, I'll let the cops do their own job themselves.
    If they have something that can tell ME they're in trouble, surely there will be enough of THEM on the way to help that they won't even need ME.

    What's the point of this? Really?

    --
    I tend to rant.
  53. Re:Who do we call? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You're being hysterical, making a mountain out of a molehill.

    The cops get safer every year, but the cops kill more of us every year, while simultaneously claiming that there is a "war on cops" going on. It may not be a mountain yet, but it's well past molehill.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  54. Re:Black Alert? by coofercat · · Score: 1

    ...and a brown alert when there's a health-code violation at the local curry house ;-)

  55. Re:Who do we call? by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

    You're being hysterical, making a mountain out of a molehill.

    The cops get safer every year, but the cops kill more of us every year, while simultaneously claiming that there is a "war on cops" going on. It may not be a mountain yet, but it's well past molehill.

    From the link at my previous response, it seems that the cops killed 64 unarmed people for all of 2017 (all ages).

    64 out of 300m is very much a molehill - it's not even a rounding error.

    Look, I'm as wary of armed men standing around with not much to do as the next person. I'm of the opinion that all interactions with the police should be recorded. I believe that the job attracts bullies, and that the cops close ranks to protect their own. I refuse to answer affirmative when asked "May we enter your house" and "Can we search your car"...

    But, 64 killings out of 300m is literally statistical noise, especially considering that these people are in public all day, everyday, armed as well. We can't even plot those numbers on a chart that includes other unlikely causes of death in the US, such as falling down (11,500 last I checked).

    Getting killed by cop is exceptionally unlikely. You are 180 times more likely to die by tripping over your own feet than by death by cop.

    --
    I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
  56. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Too bad the police don't have some sort of radio-based system for alerting each other... they should work on that...

  57. Police in danger? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    WTF am I supposed to do about it? Grab my gun and run in to help, firing every which way like Yosemite Sam? Yes, that would help the situation.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  58. Why?! by martinfb · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I fail to understand the workings and purpose of this Blue Alert thing.

    Police already have a thankless job. It is hard enough for them w/o the general public (potentially) rushing to (and interfering with) a scene.
    I already get a notice in the local papers when a cop is injured or killed.
    I cannot imagine how alerting me real time would actually change that.
    Perhaps we are now all to rush to a scene and start video recording on our smart phone?!
    Every instance where I have been near the presence of a crime, I was told to move on and don't interfere.

    Tell me again how this idiot Ajit Pai came into office? And why he is still there?

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  59. Idiots.... by Miser · · Score: 1

    I do not know what a SILVER alert is, but will add this to the list of alerts I ignore ....

    ( I do pay attention to the weather alerts however )

  60. Re:That just describs fascism 2.0 by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Fascism and Nazism both aimed at a planned economy geared for expansionist war and an all encompassing state - Mussolini defined fascism as "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state". Pinochetian-Minarchism has a small state consisting mostly of a few army employees engaged in murderous anti communist activities with ageing rotary aircraft. Outside the state private enterprise is unaffected, and in fact privatisation means formerly owned state owned companies are sold to the private sector.

    Fascism and Nazism are a form of socialism but Pinochetian-Minarchism is a Minarchist night watchman state where the army has a somewhat suspicious accident record when transporting civilians.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  61. Terrible Idea by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    How many good Samaritans are going to run into a situation where the police themselves are in danger?

    How many cowboys are going to run in with guns drawn and cause problems? Will responding civilians be able to identify plain-clothes officers?

    How long until gangs or other cop-haters start watching for these alerts so they can save their friends or ambush the responders?

    This is the worst idea I have heard in a long, long time. But, hey, this country loves paying lip service to cops. This is a stupid, dangerous gesture.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  62. Re:That just describs fascism 2.0 by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Fascism and Nazism both aimed at a planned economy

    You call those economies planned? The British and (to a lesser extent) the US had much more planning in their wartime economies, even after Todt and Speer rationalized the Nazi economy in 1943-44.

    Fascism and Nazism are a form of socialism

    Not even close. If you're looking for right-wing socialism in the WWII era, look up the proposed Showa Restoration, proposed by right-wing Japanese nationalists, which would have nationalized pretty much everything.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  63. Re:Just for police for now by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I'm for social justice, but I prefer to play magic-using characters.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  64. very good idea by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    Finally Ajit Shitpai did something good.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  65. Oh yes, let's! by thedarb · · Score: 1

    Nothing like telling all the criminals where the cops are so the criminals can go gang up on them.

    --
    This sig intentionally left blank.
  66. Re:Black Alert? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

    Nobody kills more black men then other, non police, black men. Where is the outcry on this? It is absolutely wrong for black men to be wrongly killed by cops - but why doesn't anyone care about the black on black violence in our society?

  67. Re:Just for police for now by wyHunter · · Score: 1

    SJWs are basically nihilists. They want destruction, as near as I can tell.

  68. Not when I'm in the movie theater by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Because Frankly My dear, I don't give a damn!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  69. How about the other way 'round? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

    How about an alert you get when the police are endangering people?

    --
    There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.