Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Thoughts On Star Wars: The Last Jedi One Week Later? [Spoilers] (independent.co.uk)

AmiMoJo writes: After what feels like an eternity of waiting, Star Wars: The Last Jedi has finally reached cinemas, scoring a whopping $450 million opening weekend worldwide. While reviews have been unanimously positive for Rian Johnson's blockbuster, there's been huge backlash online, many fans expressing disappointment. There's no better place to see the great divide between critics and fans than on Rotten Tomatoes, where the critical consensus scores 93% while audiences score The Last Jedi 56%. The Last Jedi is apparently worse than Phantom Menace, Attack of the Clones, and Revenge of the Sith. Conversely, critics say The Last Jedi equals A New Hope and The Force Awakens, only falling behind The Empire Strikes Back.

One problem with Rotten Tomatoes' audience score, along with IMDB, is there's no vetting process. Instead, we should look to the movie's CinemaScore, an America-based exit poll system that scientifically works out an audience score. The Force Awakens earned an A score, with 90% of all respondents being positive, the average score being 4.5. According to Deadline, non-Disney sources are saying the backlash has been primarily online "trolling." The publication also points to one Facebook page titled "Down With Disney's Treatment of Franchises and Fanboys" who are claiming to use bot accounts to target the film's score.
SPOILERS: With Star Wars: The Last Jedi being released one week ago, we ask you to share your thoughts of the film now that you've had some time to watch and digest it. How did you like Daisy Ridley's performance? Do you think Kylo will try and turn Rey again as Supreme Leader? How will General Leia's future be dealt with now that Carrie Fisher has passed away last year?

152 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. Was Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It had corny pleb joke, a useless side plot, some entertaining space action, and cool CG.
    I didn't like it enough to go out of my way to recommend it to just anyone, but I wouldn't take back watching it.

    1. Re:Was Okay by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I dont think it was a great film. But it was a good film, and I had lots fo fun.

      The dialoge was a bit hammy, and they could have strupped a good 40 minutes out to really tighten the plot up, but I still had fun and so did my friends.

      If the flaming car wreck that was the prequels didnt happen I'd be more critical. But compared to those, this is miles more entertaining and star-wars like, and anyone who claims otherwise is lying themselves

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  2. Re:It sucked! by vux984 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The modern fencing sabre bears little resemblance to the cavalry sabre, having a thin, 88 cm (35 in) long straight blade.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  3. I think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...Johnson and the suits at Disney wanted to recreate the feel of Empire and felt that failure and seeing heroes at their low point was the key. Then they cobbled a pretty poor story together where everybody mostly spun their wheels.

    1. Re:I think... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      It was a great Star Wars. Better than the awful prequel trilogy. It was certainly better than Return of the Jedi.

  4. Hated it! by evanak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I grew up in the 70s/80s and loved the original 4-5-6. Prequels 1 and 3 were okay, 2 can be wiped off the face of the universe for all I care, but I liked 7 and Rogue One. Episode 8 ... crap!!! What ruined it for me was all the stupid jokes. Han Solo made a wisecrack now and then, and those were funny because they were rare and witty. But it felt like Episode 8 had an idiotic joke every 10 minutes. And it's one thing if a new/younger character makes a joke, but Luke???? What will episode 9 bring, fart jokes? Cut the jokes and re-release it as-is, the movie would be 20 minutes shorter and then I can actually evaluate the plot. Extremely disappointed.

    1. Re:Hated it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The fans hate Disney's movie and they blame internet trolls. What a joke!

      **spoilers**

      The movie is getting a love it/hate it response, mostly based on the plot around Luke.

      Luke in he original trilogy was a hero-turned-jedi that rose to the challenge, defeated his enemies, and faced certain death to save his father from the dark side of the force.

      Luke in this movie is a coward and a quitter who contemplated murdering his own nephew in his sleep (because he was falling to the dark side).

      For people who care about character motivation, this plot is a terrible insult to Luke. Luke simply deserved better.

      Similar for Poe; formerly a loyal and masterfully skillful badass hero of the resistance, now a reckless loose cannon who commits mutiny and is ultimately responsible for the resistance being slaughtered.

      If you like watching your heros turn out to be miserable failures as people, then it's a great movie. Well, provided you can overlook the other plot holes and characters acting in ways that contradict their character motivation, as well as the subtle undercurrent of man-shaming. But the special effects were great.

    2. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, this was by far the worst Star Wars to date.

      What's perhaps most frustrating though is the apologists trying to excuse it's abysmal reviews - the summary highlights one example of that "Oh if we write off the raw data as trolling and instead vet aka fix the reviewers so that they're 90% positive then the reviews actually look positive!". No fucking shit. I'll stick to the real numbers though.

      I read the BBC article about the controversy and for some god unknown reason they asked one of those female supremacist types from "Empire" whatever the fuck that is (I had to Google it) who theorised that people were just made uncomfortable by it because there weren't enough white males in it. Yes, that's right you dumb fuck, I'm uncomfortable because a film whose cast has historically been mostly filled with aliens and robots doesn't have enough white males in it.

      Here's a better theory to all those, maybe the film really was just fucking shit? Maybe people found a fucking space ship flying through space for an hour entirely dull? Maybe the dialogues between Luke and Rey just weren't very interesting? Maybe the weird laugh Yoda did as he engaged in a god damn fucking book burning was just all too fucking weird and nonsensical? Maybe writing off a female ace like Tallie Lintra was an astounding waste of an opportunity to introduce a new interesting character to the starfighter side of things to rival Poe? Maybe the subtle jabs at the fanbase with lines from the likes of Kylo Ren as to how it's time to let go and make way for a generation were a little bit too obvious? Maybe Rose was one of the most boring new characters ever introduced into the Star Wars franchise? At least you could laugh at how bad Jar-Jar was, Rose was just a fucking dullard waste of space.

      I'm not even easily disappointed, I'm one of those rare breeds that didn't actually mind Episodes 1 - 3, I loved the OT, and I thought Force Awakens and Rogue One was great. This was literally the first ever Star Wars film that I just didn't like, that I found just outright disappointing and a waste of time.

      Hopefully Rian Johnson will never work on anymore Star Wars stuff, the fact is the film just didn't flow well, the casting and use of certain characters was abysmal, the story was full of random pointless bits and devoid of interesting useful bits that would've driven the story forward. It just wasn't a well directed film, and that's got nothing to do with problems with political correctness, or "online" trolling as the idiots are trying to deflect it as. It was just bad, Rian Johnson did an awful job, there's really no more to it than that.

      FWIW I thought Rogue One was the best of the newest three films, closely followed by The Force Awakens, this new film just didn't come close to either and frankly I think the IMDB reviews are pretty much bang on and are exactly where I'd position this.

      Rather than trying to pretend that the criticism of this film isn't real, Disney would do well to learn from the mistake, prevent Rian working on any future Star Wars work and work damn hard to make sure the next films live up to the same standard as Rogue One - they need to understand Star Wars is a beloved franchise and if they don't get it right people are going to call that out, and accept that the call outs when it's bad are legitimate and learn from them.

    3. Re:Hated it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The OJ type slow moving space battle was the worst. Does the first order only have 3 destroyers? How about jumping a destroyer in front of the fleeing rebels or calling for reinforcements to attack from the opposite side? The whole battle was over 18 hours and no one disturbed either side the whole time.

      Also, if you can destroy multiple enemy ships by going to light speed, why the heck did the rebels let 2 capital ships be shot to pieces and a good 2/3rds of the rebel shuttles shot down before they tried it?

      It's clear that the movie didn't care how ridiculous the decisions the rebels made were as the rebels only purpose was to die slowly.

    4. Re:Hated it! by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Episode 1 literally had fart jokes in it. Pee-yousa!

      --
      -Dave
    5. Re:Hated it! by ravenshrike · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The thing is that this was by far the WORST Star Wars movie both when it comes to the addition to canon as well as storytelling devices. Previously, the Sith took decades to amass significant political power and to advance their plan. Now random Burny McScarface comes out of nowhere and kickstarts an empire with four separate superweapons all of which were designed by a five year old and still gets his ass kicked by acting like he didn't even know what had happened in the 50 years previous. Then there's the fact that all the new force powers are asspulled by the Resistance whenever they need to avoid dying. Along with an evil empire run by people who shouldn't be in charge of a Kwik-E-Mart and you have the WORST entry from a writing standpoint. Yes, worst. As in makes the prequels look like pure fucking genius.

    6. Re:Hated it! by GrpA · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add how no one even has to train to be a Jedi any more... They just learn to meditate and *poof* Instant Jedi.

      At least we now know that Anakin didn't kill the younglings, because according to "The Last Jedi" there's no way a trained sith could defeat an idiot with a lightsaber, let alone a little kid, and especially not a bunch of kids... Obi Wan must have just lied about the video.

      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    7. Re:Hated it! by skegg · · Score: 1

      Spot on. The jokes are also what ruined it for me.
      Specifically, comedy inappropriately placed ... they outright changed certain characters!

      Previous shows had their lighter moments, but they seemed to do a better job of it.

    8. Re:Hated it! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Seems like they toned the jokes down compared to the original trilogy, especially 4 and 6. In 4 they made a bigger deal out of R2 falling over than of the Death Star blowing up an entire planet. In 6 you had the Ewoks... Even Empire had a lot of C3P0 comic relief.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:Hated it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I stopped being a Star Wars fans in the early 80s just after Empire came out. When Jedi reached cinemas in the late 80s I watched it because of cultural inertia and I remember being bored to death watching it but it was the final nail in the coffin and I was just 15 at the time. Haven't cared for Star Wars since that time except for the Ralph McQuarrie art books. Those were gorgeous.
      I find it amazing that 40+ year old guys/gals are still into this franchise, a franchise made 100% for kids. You have to outgrow these films sooner or later. And no George Lucas didn't kill my childhood either.

    10. Re:Hated it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Luke's character turns from hero to anti-hero. Kinda like Paul Atreides, saviour of Freemen cause and later turned religious dictator. It would be silly to have a hero undergo Luke's life and still be a hero at the end. That type of character is called a saint. And saints are nowhere to be found. Not even Yoda. So movie goers need to get the program : people change. You can be heroic in youth and a shitbag in your later years.

    11. Re:Hated it! by Mandrel · · Score: 1

      ...and you have the WORST entry from a writing standpoint.

      Both the dialogue and the story construction did suck. Hardly any memorable lines or character insights. Played out more like a series of TV episodes, rather than a single dramatic arc.

      I blame the recent ego-driven auteur trend of directors writing their own films rather than using dedicated writers.

    12. Re:Hated it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Paul turned into a religious dictator against his will. He resisted that role fiercely but it is what people demanded of him, and furthermore his ability to see the future clearly showed him that any other path would lead to the destruction of the human race.

      And it turned out to be too much for him to bear. He just couldn't become the tyrant that humanity needed to survive, so he passed the mantle to his son Leto, who became the tyrant and instituted the breeding program that produced humans possessed of true free will (as evidenced by his own inability to see their futures, which is what allowed them to overthrow him, which was the final necessity in ensuring that they would not fall into extinction).

        That is a far fucking cry from just giving up and running and hiding and leaving your friends to die after almost murdering your own nephew in fear. This doesn't give Luke depth, it just makes him a colossal failure in every way that matters! That isn't necessary to make the story interesting.

      And contrary to your belief, there are people in the real world who aspire to rise above their weaknesses, be there for those who need them, and make the world a better place. Fanciful heroes embody that spirit and give us inspiration to keep trying. People like you shitting on the heroes that inspire us doesn't make anything better.

      Take your cynicism elsewhere, thank you.

    13. Re:Hated it! by BatesMethod · · Score: 1

      While walking out of the theater, I'd have said it was ok.

      After thinking about it a while, I'd have said it's not among the top 5 or 6 Star Wars movies.

      Now, I'm inclined to agree, it's worse than the prequels.

    14. Re:Hated it! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Young person with natural skills wants to learn from the master, but master resists. Then eventually drops some wisdom, but padwan still needs some experience to really get it, because they are strong willed.

      Like Lightning McQueen and Dusty Crophopper.

      With the added bonus of better plot, dialogue, and character development.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Hated it! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I liked the plot with Luke, nothing wrong with it. Luke is not a 17 year old kid anymore.

    16. Re:Hated it! by cipher1024 · · Score: 2

      The "starting fresh" thing was done so disrespectfully and there was no need. You don't take a giant dump on Luke, our understanding of The Force, and basically everything that came before and then try to make up for it by sucking the marrow out of the previous movies with constant homages and call-backs. You want to start fresh? Go start your own universe. One of the pro-TLJ things I've heard was "I like that it opens the force up to everyone". It's ALWAYS been open to everyone. That's why the Jedi had to search out new candidates. Doesn't it make sense that it could be a little hereditary too?

      "it's time for the Jedi to end" Ya, because they only kept the peace for 10,000 years and in the 60 years since they got Pearl-Harbored, we've had galactic oppression, wars, and serial planetary genocide. Yep, makes sense, time for the Jedi to go.

      "I like that it shows there is no pure good or evil". We've ALWAYS known that. That's why ROTJ worked. I guess now the only truly evil, beyond redemption people are people who have money, because the ONLY way they could make money was by selling arms to both sides. Obviously those people should all die in a fire. No exceptions.

      And I'll just add that immediately after the movie I thought it was OK. I was still gobsmacked by lightspeed ram and a few other great shots. By the time I had walked out to my car I had questions and started reflecting on the story arc. By the time I got home, I hated the movie. That could explain why the data from poll takers right outside the theater tilts more towards positive than the RT audience score. In my experience 50/50 seems pretty accurate.

    17. Re:Hated it! by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Doesn't it make sense that it could be a little hereditary too?

      In the EU it was considered a hereditary talent. New people could learn it, but there were thousands of families that produced the best(light) and worst(darksiders) out of the EU timeline. In some families it was such an over-reaching ability that there were generational gifts bestowed on children who went for training, everything from items to enhance the force, to saber crystal heirlooms, and their own form of non-robe clothing when they became a knight so people could distinguish that they came from a particular family on a particular planet.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    18. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      Well the fact the size of the rebellion had diminished for no apparent reason to that point anyway was a bit fucking odd.

      Where did they all go? did they all retire to casino land for blow and hookers funded off the back of all the scrap metal they sold after destroying star killer base?

      In an entire galaxy there are only a thousand rebels and as you say only a handful of First Order forces? It sounds like the First Order/Rebellion battle is just a pointless side show that no one else in the rest of the galaxy would need give a shit about with those numbers. Let's be clear, we're talking about a few thousand people/aliens, pissing about in a battle in an entire galaxy which would have thousands of planets where a typical planet would likely have billions of inhabitants.

      So rather than it being a battle for control of the galaxy it sounds like it's become a pissy little irrelevant feud on the edges of civilisation that the entire rest of the galaxy could safely ignore.

    19. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth he only directed a mere 3 out of 62 episodes of Breaking Bad so hardly deserves any credit for that show, he was an irrelevance in the grand scheme of it.

    20. Re:Hated it! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      At least we now know that Anakin didn't kill the younglings, because according to "The Last Jedi" there's no way a trained sith could defeat an idiot with a lightsaber

      You mean a trained sith who's been shot in the chest and is bleeding profusely was incapable of taking on a soldier who has been trained from birth?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    21. Re:Hated it! by magzteel · · Score: 1

      I was just pissed at the recycled dialog from multiple other Star Wars movies.

      Do all the evil guys go to some star wars evil guy school where they learn to say the same evil guy lines?

    22. Re:Hated it! by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, Jar Jar was a fucking moronic character. So what? The storyline from Ep 1 was still BETTER than TLJ. Not great, but certainly better.

    23. Re:Hated it! by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      I too, grew up in the 1970's and watched all of the Star Wars movies...Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi

      Timeframe confirmed by AC's use of "Star Wars" and not "A New Hope."

    24. Re:Hated it! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Oh if we write off the raw data as trolling and instead vet aka fix the reviewers so that they're 90% positive then the reviews actually look positive

      I respect people's opinions on the film and if you hate TLJ that's fine by me.

      But you are conveniently ignoring the CinemaScore exit polling (which is actually scientific, as opposed to the easily manipulated/gameable user reviews on places like RT).

      Or are you asserting that CinemaScore is rigged?

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    25. Re: Hated it! by Aboroth · · Score: 1

      The books don't matter. If a movie can't stand on its own then it's crap.

    26. Re:Hated it! by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Wow. Wake up man, it's just amusement, nothing serious.

      First, all SW movies are abysmal in some way. The Force Awakens, where Fin, a non-jedi that barely ever touched a light saber can fight head to head with Kylo Ren for minutes without being touched? Please, that was abysmal. All of them movies have those moments.

      Second, there is no book burning. The books are not in the tree anymore when Yoda burns it. Maybe you weren't paying attention.

      Third, this movie is on par with the others. SW movies are like any movie. You need to be in the right mood to enjoy them. I went with my kids and the entire family loved it. That's how those movies are supposed to be consumed. They are entertainment. Don't take them as seriously as you do, and everything will be fine.

    27. Re:Hated it! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The explanation for where most of the Rebellion went is that the Rebellion (Republic) was blown to bits by the Starkiller base at the end of Episode 7, as most of their fleet was in orbit of the planets that were destroyed. If you look closely in 7 you'll see the ships in orbit around the planets, and that they don't survive.

      Though it's hard to get a good idea as to how large the First Order is. Impression I got at the start of the Episode 7 is that it was some splintered offshoot from the old Empire. Sure, they had a few Star Destroyers, but we also learn they no longer have clone troopers, and also that they are critically low on Tie Fighters. So the Starkiller base really seemed to come out of nowhere (where did they get that???) and in Episode 8 they seem as large as the old Empire and can support at least two of those massive dreadnoughts.

    28. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Or are you asserting that CinemaScore is rigged?"

      Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Organisations that base their entire business model around reviewing always inevitably end up providing favourable figures on demand to those who pay.

      It's the same reason so many political polls fail to represent reality - oftentimes they're paid for by partisan media organisations, or even political parties themselves to sell the story those organisations want sold. They pass this off as "legitimate statistical adjustments" where they adjust for things like age, wealth, income, but all they're actually doing is adjusting for the outcome they've been paid to adjust for.

      But as failed polling over the last decade has shown, this often drives polls further away from reality than the raw data itself showed. In fact, in recent UK votes - the general election and the Brexit vote, the most accurate polls were in fact those driven purely by raw data gathered from the internet.

      It's absurd to claim that IMDB and RT can easily be gamed, but that organisations who work with a far smaller dataset, and who manipulate on demand can't.

      Even without that though there's a question to have to answer if you think IMDB and RT were gamed - why just for this one film? Why when there are so many people vocally declaring their dislike for this film contrasted to their love for the last two do you think the reviews are wrong? Why have they singled out this film? Why haven't they singled out Rogue One? Or Force Awakens? It's hardly an industry secret if you talk to anyone in PR that they exchange favours with critics and professional review organisations to get favourable reviews for their product - companies like CinemaScore, and reviewers themselves are just another arm of the marketing machine, one that pretends to be independent but is as much about selling the product as the flagrant posters you see everywhere for a product.

      IMDB and RT user scores have none of that - they're real people posting real opinions. There's a reason why Episodes 1 - 3 were poorly rated, there's a reason why Rogue One and Force Awakens were well rated, and there's a reason why The Last Jedi was poorly rated - because that's how the majority of people felt about those films, and that's why the sites providing raw un-manipulated data reflect that.

      Having actually read about CinemaScores methdology it's even somewhat astounding you'd declare it as scientific. It's sample size is too small, and collected from far too small a userbase on release night. If you can't understand why an irrelevant handful of the people who turn up on release night in only a few cities that revolve around the film industry might be the type of fan to always favour a film over the general public then there's probably not much point me trying to explain why that's about as scientific as the general population, over say, 150,000 individuals spread across the entire world over a few weeks since the film's release.

      It's the worst Star Wars film to date, and paid reviewers wont change that.

    29. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Wow. Wake up man, it's just amusement, nothing serious."

      Sorry Mr Internet Police, I didn't realise you were banning people from stating negative opinions about a film. I'll make sure I take the internet far more seriously from now on so as not to offend you.

      "Please, that was abysmal. All of them movies have those moments."

      There's a difference between a few bad moments, and a generally bad film with only a few good moments in, which was the case here.

      "Second, there is no book burning. The books are not in the tree anymore when Yoda burns it. Maybe you weren't paying attention."

      Right, but that wasn't known at the time, hence Yoda's comment about them not being real page turners anyway.

      "Third, this movie is on par with the others. SW movies are like any movie. You need to be in the right mood to enjoy them. I went with my kids and the entire family loved it. That's how those movies are supposed to be consumed. They are entertainment. Don't take them as seriously as you do, and everything will be fine."

      Sure, you're welcome to your opinion, I liked every other Star Wars film to date other than this one, that's my opinion.

      None of which changes the fact that this film has been overwhelmingly slated - and that's the point. It's not about your opinion or my opinion, it's a question about whether the film is good or not, and if most people thought it was a poor showing as they did as user ratings show, then it's objectively fair to declare it a poor effort, which it really was.

      They fucked up by making Rian Johnson director, he clearly just wasn't ready for a project of this scale yet, he doesn't have sufficient experience and it showed - for a franchise this big they need to leave it to folks who know what they're doing, even if that means paying someone a little bit more.

      Given that they've got Rian Johnson down as director for 3 more films there's a genuine risk that they could kill off the franchise unless he seriously ups his game. People will only pay for so many bad films before they give up on a franchise altogether - Disney need to take that warning and give us a better product in future, not deny it was bad because a handful of paid reviewers who were paid to say it was good said it was good.

    30. Re:Hated it! by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      If you like watching your heros turn out to be miserable failures as people, then it's a great movie.

      I think if you like that you still wouldn't like this movie. Luke does come around in the end. And the movie isn't about Luke failing; it's about getting him to get over his failure.

    31. Re:Hated it! by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Sorry Mr Internet Police, I didn't realise you were banning people from stating negative opinions about a film

      I was under the impression that answering a Slashdot comment was pretty far from banning anyone from doing anything. I may be wrong.

    32. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      So why get so bitchy at someone for stating their opinion if you don't have a problem with it?

    33. Re: Hated it! by staunch_character · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Cheesy jokes are Star Wars canon, IMO. The Last Jedi would have been too bleak without some moments of levity. I laughed. I cried. I held my breath in parts. Loved it!

    34. Re:Hated it! by Onthax · · Score: 1

      Well it had diminished to 1 small transport, until we needed to defend, then there were trenches full of soldiers. then we needed to escape, so we only have a few people again..

    35. Re:Hated it! by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      I was just expressing my opinion. Point by point. If that's bitching to you then I apologize. But man, the internet must be filled with bitching for you!

    36. Re:Hated it! by Xest · · Score: 1

      "But man, the internet must be filled with bitching for you!"

      Um, you've really not used the internet much have you?

    37. Re:Hated it! by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Let's say that I try to filter out the bitching. It kinda somewhat works.

    38. Re:Hated it! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Yeah that was one of my beefs, but from more of a continuity perspective. I liked it from the "it looked cool" perspective I suppose.

      i.e. they are just figuring out after 8 movies (and how many years of FTL space travel), that you can just light speed into someone to destroy them? Why doesn't everyone do that all the time? Why not do that with the previous death stars/death planet things? Where are all the FTL torpedoes? Shouldn't there be a whole gamete of FTL weapons (and counter measures) if one can so easily use it that way? Anyway while it was certainly cool looking, it made no sense.

      What they should have done is have the general somehow explain with some technical mumbo gumbo and calculations that trying to hit another ship in the same place at FTL speed is a million to one chance (or something really high at least), making the tactic unwise but something perhaps only someone truly desprete would attempt, and she just got really really lucky... Or have Leia somehow force magic nudge it into place or something. I don't know, anything to make it a unique event that can't be replicated (explaining why it isn't used all the time). I mean they lost how many ships on that stupid bombing run, just take one ship and slap a stupid suicide droid in it and call it a fracking day.

  5. I didn't bother to see it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As far as I'm concerned, Star Wars ended after the original three movies.

    If I wanted to see a cow being milked vigorously, I'd tour a local farm.

    1. Re:I didn't bother to see it by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 1

      If I wanted to see a cow being milked vigorously, I'd tour a local farm.

      But now with the all-new Star Wars++ you can see Luke milk a cow vigorously for no additional charge!

    2. Re:I didn't bother to see it by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      It probably tasted like a Kale Smoothie.

  6. Re:We need a better ratings system for movies by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I think nobody really cares about that movie anymore.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. same as it ever was ... by Darth+Technoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never gonna change. Dysfunctional family needs therapy. Lots of explosions. Cute robots and critters (think: merchandising).

    Money maker, cash cow, hard to see how they can change what's pretty much set in stone. Uh, I meant Carbonite.

  8. Not spoiled, but soured by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    For me the first half hour of the movie tried way too hard to be funny, but once the movie got going I thought it was relatively good. The main thing that irrated me was the speech from Holdo, "who is this person and why does Rian Johnson think the audience should to sit through a speech from this random?". I'd have less issues if they dropped Holdo and had Ackbar go out fighting. If they'd made that one change I think I'd be less annoyed with it, but it was no phantom menace.

  9. Thank wikipedia by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As the movie ended and as we were walking out I told my family, "Going to look up in the Wikipedia to know what I just saw", and about six people within ear shot we nodding, "I'm with you buddy!"

    Isn't it interesting the personal body guards serving an evil personified show such great loyalty to him even after he was dead?

    It is three generations after Anakin was burnt completely except his head. And they were able to keep him alive. They can't to that to Snoke?

    What is there that could burn with such nice orange and yellow hydro carbon flames in space ships?

    How come the dreadnought class battle cruiser or whatever it is can be split into two but still there is breathable atmosphere for all?

    Why do I get flash backs of Guns of Navarone like barrels and recoils? and why do spacecraft bank when they turn?

    I was hoping for an ultimate plot twist like, Rey is the daughter of a long living space being being that is the "father" of Anakin with Shmi (and erased her memory after). Thus making Rey a step sister of Anakin and an aunt for Luke. No such luck. I don't believe Kylo. There is a story behind Rey's origins.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Thank wikipedia by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      I don't believe Kylo. There is a story behind Rey's origins.

      Obviously. And Since Snoke was re-writing Kylo and Rey's minds at will from light-years away, there's no reason that the vision Kylo had wasn't a lie planted by Snoke.

      Sometimes, it feels like the time between movies is to let the creators read all the fan theories, then pick the ones they like, use those, then drop hints that the others are true, as red herrings.

      The movie, as a stand-alone movie, is absolutely unwatchable. The Empire, as the second, was very watchable as a standalone movie, even if some things meant more if you had the background. But Last Jedi was a mess. Too long. Inconsistent style and tempo. Suspense through stupidity (the admiral not telling Poe the plan, so he would almost get his friends killed), and the entire dead-end infiltration plotline seemed like, after the script was written, someone demanded a mini-Rogue One inserted into the middle.

      The direction wasn't bad, but the director was. He should have told the Producers to fuck themselves when they came in with those stupid suggestions and additions.

    2. Re:Thank wikipedia by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Suspense through stupidity (the admiral not telling Poe the plan, so he would almost get his friends killed), and the entire dead-end infiltration plotline seemed like, after the script was written, someone demanded a mini-Rogue One inserted into the middle.

      So much this.

      Stylistically, the thing that bugged me was nearly every line was delivered like it was supposed to be the big quote everyone was going to be repeating the next day. Not everything can be, "Search your feelings. You know it to be true."

      --
      Nope, no sig
    3. Re:Thank wikipedia by tempo36 · · Score: 1

      1) Burns are fatal from fluid loss and infection. But I grant you that, according to the books, Darth Maul survived essentially the same injury that Snoke received, and fell down a mine shaft to boot. But the guards aren't medics, how are they supposed to know that he can be saved if they get him to a med bay? Either way, they have to deal with Kylo and Rey first regardless of what the first aid options are.

      2) Oxygen? I think the occupants need that. Also, all the starship engines run on some kind of fuel to produce electricity to power ion drives. Presumably some of that fuel can also combust.

      3) The thing is the size of a few cities...I assume it has some blast doors that seal when there is depressurization. Seems reasonable to build those into a space ship at least.

      4) Meh, because that's what audiences are used to. You can also complain about the sounds of swords in sword fights and when arrows are fired from bows. Foley artists create what audiences expect, now what is reality.

    4. Re:Thank wikipedia by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Buddy, it's Star Wars. It was always full of holes.

      How did a stone age Ewok tribe defeat the Empire? Why did the Empire put its vital shield generator there and not properly defend it anyway? Why can't the Storm Troopers hit anything? Why give droids such silly personalities? Why does the Empire love ground assaults when it can just bombard stuff from orbit?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Thank wikipedia by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Isn't it interesting the personal body guards serving an evil personified show such great loyalty to him even after he was dead?

      People fight to the death on both sides in a war, even in the face of hopeless odds. This is a things that happens. Or maybe it's because of your next point:

      It is three generations after Anakin was burnt completely except his head. And they were able to keep him alive. They can't to that to Snoke?

      Perhaps they didn't consider Snoke as dead enough and were trying to kill Kylo and Rey so they could get him revived.

      What is there that could burn with such nice orange and yellow hydro carbon flames in space ships?

      Clearly they're making ships out of the same stuff they were in Episode IV, V and VII.

      How come the dreadnought class battle cruiser or whatever it is can be split into two but still there is breathable atmosphere for all?

      Bulkheads. I duno, maybe the empire have learned that severe damage in space is a thing and have designed ships with that in mind.

      Why do I get flash backs of Guns of Navarone like barrels and recoils? and why do spacecraft bank when they turn?

      Because it's star wars, not hard sci-fi. The small ships have always been like this and it's bee like this in literally every film AND the Christmas special! And it surprises you now?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Thank wikipedia by bongey · · Score: 1

      Can we say Rome, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq and Afghanistan . Fuke stay the fuck out of Afghanistan

    7. Re:Thank wikipedia by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      They can't to that to Snoke?

      You're assuming Snoke is human. Maybe that's just how his species looks.

    8. Re:Thank wikipedia by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      How did a stone age Ewok tribe defeat the Empire?

      The Ewoks didn't The Ewoks were a distraction that pulled the Storm Troopers away.

      Why can't the Storm Troopers hit anything?

      Storm Troopers do hit things. That's why the Rebels are constantly running from them.

      Why does the Empire love ground assaults when it can just bombard stuff from orbit?

      Because there's a deflector shield strong enough to repel any bombardment.

  10. The movie was fine, but full of problems. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The movie was fine, but full of problems that detract from the story. The best review I've read discussing those problems is 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi': The Full Shapiro Review (spoilers). The review also discusses good parts and things that work toward the bottom, but that list is way shorter than the list of problems.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:The movie was fine, but full of problems. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      While the movie certainly had faults, I wouldn't say the Shapiro's review is good. He makes so many assumptions and seems to forget the original trilogy so often it is hard to take him seriously.
      1. The Force Awakens Apparently Never Happened. Shapiro's premise is that Star Killer Base was the only weapon that the First Order had yet destroying it didn't do any damage to the First Order. Star Killer Base was a major weapon and an important one because of its capacity to obliterate multiple planets at once. Destroying it did hurt the First Order; however, destroying it was never going to decimate the First Order just like destroying the Death Star I didn't prevent the Empire from creating Death Star II or still having an overwhelming fleet of warships. The First Order was going to be a threat before and after Star Killer Base; they just lost their ability to destroy multiple planets instantaneously.
      2. There Is No Gravity In Space. Shapiro's critique is that bombs wouldn't work because there's no gravity. I mean this is a silly critique considering that practically none the fighter scenes in any Star Wars movies would actually work because there is no gravity in space. I think someone said that it was explained that the bombs are self-propelled but have a short range.
      3. Snoke Is A Throwaway. True, he was. This is more a change of direction for me. They could have kept him and make him an formidable presence in Episode IX and then kill him. That would make Snoke the same as Emperor Palpatine and also make the plot in IX very predictable. As for easily dispatched by the Kylo Ren, does anyone remember RoTJ? Emperor Palpatine was thrown to his death by Darth Vader. Quite easily. You'd think a Sith Lord capable of seducing Vader could use force pull to save himself or something. The larger message here is that while formidable a Sith Lord (or Jedi) is not immortal. As for seducing Kylo Ren, Snoke did do that but if he didn't watch or pay attention to TFA or TLJ, Kylo Ren already was dark and Luke sensed it.
      4. Kylo Ren Isn’t Intimidating. I really don't understand this one as TLJ certainly makes Kylo Ren intimidating. He is the new bad guy. This might be a complaint of TFA but not this film. I mean if anything, it shows Kylo Ren was biding his time and waiting for an opportunity to take power like any Sith would. Rey's presence gave it to him. As for Darth Vader not losing until RoTJ, that's not true of ANH or ESB. Vader lost a freaking Death Star in ANH. He also lost the Millennium Falcon several times in ESB as well as Luke. He got a consolation prize in capturing Solo but he didn't care about Solo.
      5. Rey’s Backstory Sucks. Rey is a nobody. So what? We didn't know the backstory of other force users Emperor Palpatine, Yoda, Obi Wan, and most of Darth Vader's backstory by the end of RoTJ. They were fleshed out more in the prequels and maybe novels but the original three movies didn't tell you much about them. I would say this is more of a problem of expectations than anything else. People expected Rey to come from a grand bloodline but from what I know about the Star Wars universe, while force powers can run in families, anyone could have force powers. Now bear in mind, not everyone can have them but a force user can come from anywhere.
      6. Luke’s Weird Farmer Life Is Weird. This is a stupid critique. One of the main questions that people were asking about since TFA is what Luke has been doing all this time. The film shows you exactly what he's been doing. He hasn't been training an army of Jedi or building a collection of Pokemon. This has been his boring life since going into exile.
      7. Luke Is A Bad Teacher. Luke's lessons were terrible was the whole point people missed. Luke wanted to teach Rey just enough to get rid of her. He could sense that she had force powers but didn't know how powerful she was until after the second lesson. It was the same level of power he sensed in Kylo Ren. He wasn't going to actually train her like Yoda trained him. He was done training p
      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  11. peak sci fi navel gazing by Tailhook · · Score: 2

    I'm just going to go ahead and not participate in this. Thanks anyhow.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  12. Ship jumping to hyperspace as a weapon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why didn't they use the Rebel Cruiser as a weapon the moment they abandoned it? (or as they abandoned it and save Adm. Holdo)

    This probably ruins the entire Star Wars universe/canon as far as space combat..

    Where are the hyperspace missiles? If a ship the size of the millenium Falcon can go lightspeed, a similar sized hyperspace missile is unstoppable:
              " Traveling through hyperspace ain't like dusting crops, boy! Without precise calculations we could fly right through a star.." - Han Solo

    See also: https://www.theringer.com/2017/12/20/16800970/vice-admiral-holdo-maneuver-the-last-jedi

    -ahb

    1. Re:Ship jumping to hyperspace as a weapon? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

      That was one of the first things I said after watching it. If you can destroy anything with a hyperspace jump, why the fuck isn't this the standard tactic? Jump an asteroid into the death star and call it a day.

      There were lots of stupid plot decisions in the movie, but this was the biggest one.

    2. Re:Ship jumping to hyperspace as a weapon? by Daemonik · · Score: 2

      It's actually cannon in SW that ships have an artificial gravity well projector that will pull a ship out of hyperspace if they're going to collide. Hodo rammed them at light speed, not hyperspace. Likely the only reason it had an effect was because her ship was big enough that the mass of it cracked through the battle-cruiser's shields, where a lighter missile would bounce off or be disintegrated by the deflectors.

      Or, you can remember that it's a movie and they don't have to explain a damn thing to you so just enjoy it and quit being pedantic.

    3. Re:Ship jumping to hyperspace as a weapon? by Creepy · · Score: 1

      As they said, they were using the cruiser as a decoy to pull the imperial ships away so they wouldn't notice the shuttles and wouldn't have if the hacker didn't clue them in... but how did he know? Its not like those characters were clued in, so you've got me. The plan was for the cruiser to jump as far as they knew. Also Rey teleporting from the imperial ship battle onto the Millennium Falcon somehow... and her going onto that ship in the first place - wtf!? Even if she thought she could turn Kylo Ren, pretty much every dark side baddie was on that ship and it was a suicide mission. Also the bridge explosion force glide back was silly - the second they opened that door they'd be pulled out - its not like that door was an airlock, though they did make an effect that maybe was supposed to be a force field (just briefly and at a bad angle for viewers to see).

      That said, I didn't hate it, but shit like that ruins my escapism. The movie is filled with gaping plot holes we can only hope an extended edition fills in. Rogue One and the last one had much tighter scripts with less gaping plot holes.

    4. Re:Ship jumping to hyperspace as a weapon? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      last one had much tighter scripts with less gaping plot holes.

      Han dropping out of Hyperspace past a gravity well, past a planetary shield, and into atmosphere. And it wasn't even timed, he just did it by hand. If that was possible, why even have space ships, why not just hyper from one plant to another? If it is possible to be in hyperspace close to a gravity well, why even have a Death Star, why not just hyperspace rockets raining down on indefensible targets? The Force Awakens had so many inconsistent plot devices in it, it completely makes every suspenseful thing in every other Star Wars movie nonsensical.

    5. Re:Ship jumping to hyperspace as a weapon? by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      I think that it was the timing...the ship was "jumping" to hyperspace, but not fully transited into it. Thus it retained it's kinetic potency. And likewise, I expect the shields would of stopped a smaller torpedo sized object.

      Though I have wondered why not have a cannon that fires large slugs in a similar fashion.

  13. Mark Hamill is right by jgfenix · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Luke is totally fine out of character. They shouldn't have used the characters of the original trilogy to do this shit.

    have read reviews that say how great it is because how original it's. I disagree: the old Expanded Universe had more originality.

    And those who criticize hardcore fans don't get it. The fans could accept that Luke&Co are no longer the main characters. The problem is that this movie doesn't offer closure. It desecrates the characters. It's what I call "genius complex".

    1. Re:Mark Hamill is right by Daemonik · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And those who criticize hardcore fans don't get it. The fans could accept that Luke&Co are no longer the main characters.

      No.. no they can't. It's hardcore fans who seem to be unable to accept that Rey doesn't come from some deep mysterious Force bloodline, that the script wasn't just "Luke destroys everything, goes home." and are the most butthurt that this movie wasn't just 2 hours of fan service. Casual fans have been pretty positive because they don't *care* if something is cannon or if it adheres to some made up physics model that says ships do bank turns in space but space bombers are wildly out of bounds.

    2. Re:Mark Hamill is right by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      It's hardcore fans who seem to be unable to accept that Rey doesn't come from some deep mysterious Force bloodline

      I'm a hardcore fan and I like that Rey doesn't come from some mysterious Force bloodline. It's just odd to have so much of The Force Awakens be about Rey's parents, just to have it tossed aside in The Last Jedi.

  14. Re:It sucked! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "The modern fencing sabre bears little resemblance to the cavalry sabre, having a thin, 88 cm (35 in) long straight blade."

    Modern fencing sabre? Do you hear yourself? These are sports items, used to deliver electricity to a adversary costume, not slicing weapons.

  15. The Force Awakens was good?!?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    critics say The Last Jedi equals A New Hope and The Force Awakens, only falling behind The Empire Strikes Back.

    Nonsense! Judging from the reviews on Slashdot in 2015, The Force Awakens was not nearly as good as A New Hope. Any claim that A New Hope and The Force Awakens are on par with each other is pure marketing, and it's likely that the 93% critical approval of The Last Jedi is also pure marketing.

    Although I haven't seen the film, I'll trust the audience over the critics on this one.

  16. Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by steveha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This movie did a lot of things right, and I'm going to watch it again, but there are many things that make me question whether it should have been made as a Star Wars movie.

    Visually it's great. It looks like a Star Wars movie, and speaking as a fan I'm glad they used so many practical effects instead of computer generated effects.

    Plot-wise it is a bit of a roller-coaster ride. Ups and downs. Some funny moments.

    But when you think about the overall story and what is going on, it's bleak and depressing, far beyond what is tonally appropriate for Star Wars.

    Spoilers follow. This whole topic is spoilery anyway.

    People didn't like how The Empire Strikes Back ended on a "down" note. Oh my gosh, this movie was at least a thousand times bleaker. Apparently after the big success of blowing up the second Death Star and the death of the Emperor, the Rebellion spent the next 40 years or so losing and losing and losing. The Rebellion starts the movie with one capital ship, a medical ship and some sort of freighter or something; and only a few dozen X-Wing fighters. Then they take horrific losses and end the movie with literally a couple of dozen surviving members on board a battered old freighter. The only senior figure left in the Rebellion is Leia. They have no resources, and no allies (the allies they thought they had did not come when they were needed the most).

    This is so bleak and depressing that it's painful to think about. But at least we get Luke training Rey as a Jedi, right? Oh no; Luke is bitter, and instead of learning from what happened and moving on, he spent decades in self-imposed exile; he said, in so many words, that he went to that planet to die. And in fact he didn't give Rey any useful training. He promised three lessons, and gave two, and they were great lessons if her big problem was that she was stuck-up and had an inflated sense of her own importance; her actual problem was that she was truly gifted in the Force yet had no idea what to do or how to use the Force, in short that she needed good training.

    Then there is the whole Finn and Rose sub-plot where they try to get a codebreaker. Their efforts are worse than useless. The codebreaker somehow figured out that the rebels were sneaking away and tipped off the First Order. (I really don't know how a codebreaker could figure this out; Finn couldn't have told him because Finn didn't know either.) The rebel plan to sneak away was working until the codebreaker tipped off the bad guys, so something like 90% of the surviving rebels died because of that codebreaker guy.

    And why did they take the risk of the whole codebreaker thing? Because the Vice Admiral didn't tell Poe that she actually had a plan, and she went out of her way to let him think she had no plan and everyone was going to die. Was this to "teach him a lesson"? Makes no sense, and that lesson came at a horrific cost.

    I hope that the writers have a plan already for Episode IX. The story is at such a low point that it will take a truly amazing plan to have the Rebellion come roaring back and defeat the bad guys.

    Now, I'll briefly talk about stuff I liked.

    I really enjoyed the bit at the beginning where Poe was all alone in an X-Wing in front of the First Order ships. Some people say all the comedy fell flat, but the bit where he was stalling for time by pretending he wasn't hearing anything was IMHO laugh-out-loud funny.

    I think that one of the stupidest George Lucas ideas from the prequels is being redeemed. (Not midichlorians... that bit of stupidity is irredeemable.) There was this prophecy of "the one who will bring balance to the Force" and that whole thing went nowhere in the prequels. Well, maybe Rey is about to bring balance to the Force. She isn't afraid of the Dark Side and the Dark Side doesn't seem to be pushing her to do evil things... and Yoda seems to think she will do better without the historical teachings of the Jedi. Maybe she will be able to embra

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by s1d3track3D · · Score: 2

      Then there is the whole Finn and Rose sub-plot where they try to get a codebreaker. Their efforts are worse than useless. The codebreaker somehow figured out that the rebels were sneaking away and tipped off the First Order. (I really don't know how a codebreaker could figure this out; Finn couldn't have told him because Finn didn't know either.) The rebel plan to sneak away was working until the codebreaker tipped off the bad guys, so something like 90% of the surviving rebels died because of that codebreaker guy.

      When you see it again, you will notice that as Finn and Rose are flying away on their mission, they get a call from Poe who tells them that the Vice Admiral is evacuating the ship sending off the pods, it's clear that the code breaker hears this as they pan to a shot of him.

      And why did they take the risk of the whole codebreaker thing? Because the Vice Admiral didn't tell Poe that she actually had a plan, and she went out of her way to let him think she had no plan and everyone was going to die. Was this to "teach him a lesson"? Makes no sense, and that lesson came at a horrific cost.

      Her opinion of him was that he was a reckless fly boy who was off the handle and would have probably rejected the plan, I think she was banking on the fact that we would at least fall in line with authority and not do what he did, I feel he thought he had a better plan anyway. I agree with you though, this part was a little "Gilligan's Island-ish".

      But seriously, Star Wars has always been a soap opera in space, the writing/plot has never been really great, it was always the special effects/creativity/imagination that was such magic.

    2. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by Migraineman · · Score: 2

      The story is at such a low point that it will take a truly amazing plan to have the Rebellion come roaring back and defeat the bad guys.

      Perhaps the remaining Rebels could hole-up on a small planet or moon ... yes, a moon ... preferably covered in dense foliage. They could embrace the local population of cute-but-intelligent bipedal mammals (call them The Ursidae ...) Then with primitive local resources they could defeat a vastly superior Imperial force to expose a weakness in the Empire's latest doomsday weapon - the Death MacGuffin. Once exposed, a single small fighter craft, piloted by the charismatic-but-flawed lead character, could fly through a long, narrow aperture and fire a single lethal blow to the Death MacGuffin.

    3. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 2

      Well, maybe Rey is about to bring balance to the Force. She isn't afraid of the Dark Side and the Dark Side doesn't seem to be pushing her to do evil things... and Yoda seems to think she will do better without the historical teachings of the Jedi.

      Or maybe Rey stole the Jedi books and put them on the Falcon before she left and Yoda subsequently set the "Jedi tree" on fire.

    4. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by Tora · · Score: 2

      Spot on I agree.

      Except you missed something critical - Rey did get the historical teachings, and Yoda burned the tree before Luke could get in and see they were missing. At the very end of the show you see somebody pull open a drawer in the millenium falcon and the books are there.

      --
      tora
    5. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by steveha · · Score: 2

      When you see it again, you will notice that as Finn and Rose are flying away on their mission, they get a call from Poe

      Ah, right. Thank you for this.

      Star Wars has always been a soap opera in space, the writing/plot has never been really great

      The first two movies had a satisfying plot and good-enough writing. The prequels showed how special effects and imagination aren't enough to salvage a movie with a really terrible script.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    6. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by Daemonik · · Score: 1

      This is so bleak and depressing that it's painful to think about. But at least we get Luke training Rey as a Jedi, right? Oh no; Luke is bitter, and instead of learning from what happened and moving on, he spent decades in self-imposed exile; he said, in so many words, that he went to that planet to die. And in fact he didn't give Rey any useful training. He promised three lessons, and gave two, and they were great lessons if her big problem was that she was stuck-up and had an inflated sense of her own importance; her actual problem was that she was truly gifted in the Force yet had no idea what to do or how to use the Force, in short that she needed good training.

      Luke never claimed he was going to train Rey to be a Jedi. He specifically said he was going to give her three lessons to show why the Jedi should die. The Jedi order itself was flawed, it's constant push for purity in the light side was it's downfall. Pull the Force towards the light, the dark will only grow stronger to match.

      Because the Vice Admiral didn't tell Poe that she actually had a plan, and she went out of her way to let him think she had no plan and everyone was going to die. Was this to "teach him a lesson"? Makes no sense, and that lesson came at a horrific cost.

      Generals and Admirals don't have to tell the people under them a thing. That's part of the chain of command. Poe got people killed because of his own recklessness, not the Admirals, and started a mutiny because he can't accept that anyone else knows what they're doing. If he were trustworthy enough, and knew how to follow orders, maybe he would have been included in Hodo's plans, like the pilots of all the transports, the captains of the other two vessels, and everyone else who needed to know.

    7. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by steveha · · Score: 1

      Luke never claimed he was going to train Rey to be a Jedi.

      I never said he did. I was saying that it would have pleased the fans if he had. And, now that I think about it, he did kind of give her one single small lesson: he told her to reach out and breathe. (Then he freaked out at how strong she was, and that was the end of that.)

      By the way: the trailer was cut in a way that made me expect to see scenes of Luke training Rey. All the light sabre stuff in the trailer was her training herself without any help from Luke.

      Generals and Admirals don't have to tell the people under them a thing. That's part of the chain of command.

      This is true, but you cannot seriously tell me that the best leaders leave their people totally in the dark, or that convincing your subordinate that he and everyone else are all about to die is a good teaching technique.

      Disclaimer: I've never been in the military so I don't know anything. Total armchair expert. That said, IMHO she should have (a) brought him in on the plan, or else (b) told him "there is a plan, it's need-to-know, and you don't need to know at this time."

      There were so few people left, in such obvious imminent peril, that I really doubt there was any reason to be worried about the First Order having spies among them; so there was no reason not to just come right out and tell the plan. When it was time for everyone to get on board the transports everyone was going to know the plan anyway, so I don't see the need to keep anyone in the dark before then. And it's better to give people some hope rather than have them spend hours convinced they are about to die.

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    8. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I get they were going for an Empire Strikes Back again with ending on a down note, and you're right; what a down note. At least in the ESB the hero's were safe with the fleet. Now the entire Rebellion fits into the Millennium Falcon. Hopefully the writers will pull something off and make it all the more glorious in the next movie.

    9. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      This is true, but you cannot seriously tell me that the best leaders leave their people totally in the dark, or that convincing your subordinate that he and everyone else are all about to die is a good teaching technique.

      There are times in movies when it does work, and that's when they suspect there's a mole on board. They could have easily patched this up with a subplot of ferreting out a spy.

    10. Re:Critical success, but is it Star Wars? by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      "The codebreaker somehow figured out that the rebels were sneaking away and tipped off the First Order. (I really don't know how a codebreaker could figure this out; Finn couldn't have told him because Finn didn't know either.)"

      They covered this... remember, Poe tells Finn to hurry up, because they're fueling the transports. The codebreaker heard that... so he knew. The fact that the First Order didn't see them, tipped the code breaker off to them being cloaked. And he easily could find them.

      I hope Luke does return as a glowing blue plot device, but only to Kylo Ren.

  17. Sabers are swords by Freischutz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just like the rest of these children's movies for stupid kids who don't know shit, especially not physics. Advertisement for action figures for children, it should be forbidden or at least called what it is.

    Hell they didn't even get the name for the stupid light_sabers_ right? Sabers are _curved_, that's what differentiates them from a sword.

    Firstly, sabers are swords just like a Ferrari is a car. Secondly, while the saber started out as a curved bladed adopted by Europeans through contact with the Ottomans, by the 19th and early 20th century sabers became progressively more straight bladed. The US Model 1913 Cavalry saber for example, had a completely straight blade as did many other contemporary sabers. but you are right in that the 'light saber' has nothing in common with any kind of saber. If the lightsaber is anything it's a kind of 'laser shikomizue' or something (one of the few straight bladed Japanese swords I can think of other than a Shinobigatana). Kylo Ren's weapon is more of a 'laser longsword' and he uses it a bit like one too. That was kind of interesting to watch because the 'light sabers' in Star Wars are used in a somewhat 'katana-esque' manner and it is always fun to see Talhoffer and Liechtenauer's ideas clash with the Japanese mindset. Mind you it's way more fun to watch at a HEMA event where the Longswordsman and the Katanna fanboy are both purists and both of them actually know precisely what they are doing.

    1. Re: Sabers are swords by Freischutz · · Score: 1

      +1 for mentioning HEMA. It's a great sport and my brother is very good at it. Is it European only?

      I haven't been doing HEMA long but there is a lively community in the US, Canada and down to S-America judging by the people I ran into at the last newbie course I attended. Japanese fencing does not really come under HEMA since it is European only but many people who go to these events come there from Kendo or from Olympic saber fencing like I did but it is still fun to mix things up and see what happens, like Rapier vs. Katana or Walpurgis sword and buckler vs. Katana (or even arming sword and full sized shield vs Katana or Katana and Wakizashi) which is another thing I'd like to seen in Star Wars, force-field shields and bucklers there is no reason for not having hand held shield generators if you can fit enough energy to contain a plasma stream in a sword hilt.

  18. Re:We need a better ratings system for movies by JohnFen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only reviewers whose opinion matters are those who have similar tastes to yours. That's the whole point -- to give you an idea if you, personally, would enjoy the movie or not.

  19. Watchable but not good by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    (mostly spoiler free)

    That is the best way I can put it. It does okay-ish for watching it. It's pretty, and some cool things happen. There are a few WTF worthy moments (Leia), the humor is out of place, and there's one lenghty disgression from the main action that could have been avoided.

    The main problems come out on further thinking.

    The main problem is: I can see what it tries to do, and it fails badly at it. For instance, a theme running through the entire movie is failure. Everybody screws up. There are two problems with this: first, it's done way, way too consistently, to the point that it feels like a saturday morning cartoon where some writer took on the job of hammering into kids' heads that drugs are bad, rather than something that fits in naturally. Second, it's not even done right. For instance, Poe's screwup kills a lot of people, and yet he suffers no serious repercusions from this. He's not seriously punished in the end, nobody seems to mind his mistake, and he feels zero guilt. Why have a theme of learning from your errors when you're going to paper over the mistakes in such a way? There are multiple such events where grave consequences are bizarrely papered over, which conflicts with this very explicitly stated theme.

    The other problem is that it seems to be obsessively taking down all that came before it, without replacing it with anything better. This is a weird thing to do in a movie that's right in the middle of a trilogy and results in destroying every interesting mystery and not creating anything to look forward to in the next one. To make the problem worse, the overall situation hasn't changed much at the end.

    The movie also spends time on the wrong things. Luke's incident with Ben is big, important and has great consequences, yet the movie refuses to say what actually happened, and what gave Luke the idea to act as he did, while dedicating half an hour on the casino plot instead.

    And then there are the minor details of the execution, like Leia's WTF moment, Luke's bizarre routine on the island, and the ill-fitting humor. Most of it is of no major consequence and could be edited out easily, but it's there and it's at times annoying and bothersome.

  20. Re:Star Wars Sucks by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    The JJ version.

    So, in other words, the version of Star Trek that is essentially Star Wars?

  21. The bombs fell down in space... made me sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Space physics in movies is usually dumb... But I fell like they gave up completely... Dunkirk in Space...

    1. Re: The bombs fell down in space... made me sad... by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      there was some type of artificial gravity on the "bombers" or did you not notice Rose's sister falling down from the catwalk over the bombs. or her trying to kick the ladder to get the remote control to release the bombs to drop down to where she was.

  22. I can't be arsed by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    by all accounts they put so much effort into making their own version of the Star Wars mythos they completely ignored how characters like Luke and Leia should act. The nail in the coffin was that Mark Hamill interview where he's basically said he tried to get them to let him act like Luke and they wouldn't do it.

    I'm not opposed to them doing their own thing, but if you're going to the writing needs to be much better. In the first movie they shoe-horned in a lightsabre battle that was just dumb. An untrained girl should not have held her own against a Dark Jedi. And Finn kept changing from a bumbling fool to a seasoned warrior depending on the writer's needs. I left the theater with a positive impression but the more I thought about it the more I knew it was a bad movie. I'm guessing the second one's going to be like that but more so (especially given the sharp drop off in viewership going on right now).

    I just expect more from a Star Wars movie. Write better scripts guys. This isn't Transformers.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  23. Don't worry, this is /. by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    nobody read the posts much less the Articles around here.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  24. How did Rey get on the Falcon? by david.emery · · Score: 2

    That sure felt like a huge continuity gap, did they cut a scene?

    Overall I thought the production values were first-rate, but the plot and script were mediocre and predictable. (And don't get me started about bad physics or bad tactics - I had to suspend A Lot of belief.)

    1. Re:How did Rey get on the Falcon? by Distan · · Score: 1

      I wondered the same damn thing. They should have removed the entire "Rose & Finn's Excellent Adventure" sequence and added five to ten minutes of Rey fighting her way off the dreadnought. The movie would have been tighter and shorter and benefited from a new scene that advanced the plot.

    2. Re:How did Rey get on the Falcon? by will_die · · Score: 1

      She jumped down a giant air vent, made a force call to Leia who told the Falcon who turned around and rescued her.

      You know that would fit in with the rest of the film.

    3. Re:How did Rey get on the Falcon? by david.emery · · Score: 1

      As long as she didn't have to crawl through the Jeffries Tube, I guess that makes sense.

    4. Re:How did Rey get on the Falcon? by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      She used Snokes personal escape craft. It's a line in the movie.

  25. This isn't the Jedi Master you were looking for by millertym · · Score: 2

    1st viewing I had a fun time. It was a pop corn flick moment. So I'll say that for it. Didn't hate every second of seeing it. I'll still own this movie on blue ray I'm sure.

    That being said - what a sad waste of potential on the story line of the character we all loved so much for those of us growing up in the 70s, 80s. I get that they wanted to kill the character off, ok. I can live with that - but make it glorious. He should have gone down doing something visually stunning. Saving the rebels by pulling a star ship out of orbit with the force. Or thrashing the whole ground attack crew with the force. And certainly shouldn't have been played as a grump old man, without the force, in depressed isolation. He was always a beacon of hope and should have stayed that way. We were robbed of seeing Luke the Jedi Master.

    1. Re:This isn't the Jedi Master you were looking for by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Luke the Jedi Master would have been another CGI Yoda fight. What they did made sense, older Jedi use trickery and cunning instead of fighting.

      And I thought that his ending was pretty dramatic.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:This isn't the Jedi Master you were looking for by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's all part of Hollywood's "fuck you white male" culture. They are allergic to giving white males any more heroes.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  26. Fun film by Chewbacon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Been watching Star Wars for about 30 years. That said, it was a fun film despite the jokes, which I thought was a bit overboard. Anyway, I have come to accept there's nothing truly groundbreaking from them anymore so I just switch the old brain off and sit back and watch the film. Why am I so content with that? Because I have nothing to gain or lose from these films not being a stakeholder. It doesn't fix or ruin my childhood and I don't have a void to fill in my life with it.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  27. Good movie, but Luke == Flynn in Tron Legacy by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    Best part of the movie: You weren't sure who was good or bad throughout. My favorite scene was going to light speed to cut Snoke's ship in half was made that much better because the vice-admiral turned out being good after all. Close 2nd: Snoke getting Darth Mauled. Yeah, Snoke was a wasted character, but wow what a cool way to send him out.

    Good or bad point in the movie (divisive): There was a Rogue One like "graying" of the black and white, good vs. evil Star Wars universe. Having the bomber close her eyes right before her bomber was destroyed and she died, and then the First Order dreadnought's captain accepting death in the same stoic way as the bombs struck his ship and blew it apart, was a very good and subtle way to humanize both sides. It also ended up being the precursor for the tone of the entire movie: There aren't really good guys and bad guys.

    Also, this is a divisive plot point to some, but I loved that Leia FINALLY getting to use the force to save herself. She had Skywalker blood, but her use of the force had never materialized until then. It was NOT corny.

    Worst part of Ep8: Luke. Like Flynn in Tron Legacy, Luke got ruined by sequels.

    In the original Tron movie, Flynn was the fun and light hearted (yet serious) protagonist. He had a heart of slacker hacker gold that you'd love to have as a friend. In Tron Legacy, however, they turned him into a bitter old man who'd been burned one too many times and carried a sack of guilt for his hubris and mistakes. He was miserable, cantankerous, and without spirit for 99% of the parts he was in, and in the end he disappeared from existence without dying.

    That's almost exactly what they did with Luke in Ep. 7 & 8. He was a burned out hermit that was absolutely no fun at all to be around.

    And the anti-war, anti-capitalist, anti-profiteering, anti-animal-abuse all went against the grain of what the Star Wars saga was all about - a fun movie. The entire casino scene especially felt out of place and preachy.

    When the movie ended, nobody clapped, cheered, busted out in loud conversations about the movie, etc. - nothing. People just somberly walked out of the theater. I hadn't seen that quiet and reserved response since the end of Episode 1. I knew immediately that some were definitely disappointed.

    Final feeling on my way out: That was a powerful movie on its own. Great drama, good direction, character development, etc. In that way, it was a great movie - like Rogue One. But it felt like it was the end of Star Wars for me. It was Episode IX (not 8) - the END end. Han is gone. Carrie Fisher is gone. Luke is gone. Han is gone. R2-D2 + C3PO relegated to nothing roles. The Rebel Alliance is gone.

    I'll have to see in a couple of years when Ep. IX comes out, but I'm not sure I care anymore.

    1. Re:Good movie, but Luke == Flynn in Tron Legacy by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I liked some of what they did, but so much of the movie was just a series of straight-up 'take that's' at TFA and the prequels. Rey's parents? Nobodies. Luke's lightsaber? Tossed away, then broken for no good reason. From a certain point of view? Ben and Luke's different perceptions of that fateful night. Poe is a swashbuckling derring-doer and gets his whole squad killed? Fuck you, Star Wars is swashbuckling space opera, it's SUPPOSED to work like that.

      My main problem with the Luke story is that it erased all of his growth from ESB and ROTJ, and turned him right back into a whiney little bitch who wanted to go to Tosche Station and pick up some power converters. They could have had him being an inscrutable old master who went into seclusion to discover where he went wrong, and figure out where to go from there, but instead, he was just running away and hiding. He should have been training Rey like an old kung-fu master, or like Yoda. Yoda's force ghost should have shown up and been like 'That bad, was I? So silly, my training techniques were?'

      Having Luke's final interaction with Leia and Ben be nothing but an illusion robbed it of EVERYTHING. Luke should have shown up on the planet in person, kissed Leia, apologized for Ben, then strode out and called Ben out. The AT-ATs and what not should have been wiped away with a wave of the hand when they tried to interfere. Luke should have absolutely CLOWNED Ben, then simply turned off his lightsaber, said something like 'You see? Even though I'm far more powerful than you, I still failed. Strength alone is never enough' and Obi-Wan'd out. Rey should have been left on the Falcon, at the end, looking across all of the old Jedi texts, and one new one, written by Luke Skywalker. She should have been the inheritor of his new understanding, the one to actually put it into practice.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  28. Re:It sucked! by vux984 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh... because a fictional 'light sabre' is any less disconnected from old cavalry swords??

  29. What was really wrong with The Last Jedi by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

    The biggest problem that I see with the Last Jedi (and The Force Awakens) are the disparagement of Luke, Han and Leia. Most die hard Star Wars fans have read at least some of the Star Wars books, which show Luke, Leia and Han continuing to be involved with the New Republic that's formed after the Empire falls and Luke going on to become the father of a new Jedi order and a master as great as any that came before him. In The Force Awakens we are aghast that Han basically went back to being a no account smuggler and con man (and left Leia or she kicked him out), Leia for some reason is not in any way associated with the New Republic and Luke was a complete failure as a Jedi Master who let his nephew go over to the dark side and apparently in a fit of despair went to live as a hermit on some uncharted world.

    Not that there's anything wrong with characters that have some flaws, but this new series just takes the characters we know and love and tries to tell us that although they had momentary success that in the end they were complete and utter failures. I'm sorry Disney but you've really made a lot of people very angry at the treatment of characters that have become legends in the eyes of the fans.

    1. Re:What was really wrong with The Last Jedi by NormAtHome · · Score: 1

      First just because you haven't read the books doesn't make them obscure, the most successful group of books to continue the story of Luke, Leia and Han were a trilogy of three books by Tim Zahn (Heir to the Empire, Dark Force Rising and The Last Command) all three books were New York Times best sellers. And they were among the first books published that continued the story and didn't just flesh out the back story of the characters.

      The fact that the people continuing the franchise probably haven't read the books is their loss since if they had they would have come up with something better than the trash they did.

      I don't know who you've been talking to but fans of the original trilogy can't stand the new movies for just the reasons I outlined.

    2. Re:What was really wrong with The Last Jedi by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      you ignored most of what I wrote. The books are obscure relative to the film because the vast Vast majority of people watching the films haven't read the books.

      And the fans I know including myself like the new films.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  30. Re:We need a better ratings system for movies by sd4f · · Score: 1

    There is a problem with weighting reviews. In the video game world, a great divide between professionals and gamers have been seen numerous times. In some instances, it was due to suspected payment for favourable reviews, and this doesn't mean an outright payment, but there was an incident with a game called "Kane & Lynch" where banner advertising was bought and a reviewer who scored the game poorly was dismissed, in other cases, which appear to have befallen a company once praised for quality games, Bioware, whose later years have been plagued with games that the public have panned, all the while professional reviewers more broadly have missed and generally reviewed rather favourably. The ending for Mass Effect 3 and overall quality of Dragon Age 2 come to mind.

  31. RT scores don't say HOW good a movie is well.. by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    On the 93% on Rotten Tomatoes vs. the much lower "audience liked it" score, the latter is usually the better indicator of the likability of a movie for the average moviegoer. While it is good at pointing out stinkers and is easy for everyone to understand (the anti-BCS college football formula), the RT percentage/score is not good at telling you exactly HOW good a "fresh" movie is because there's no nuance to it. It's fresh or rotten - that's it; There's no how fresh the movie is: Is it a perfectly fresh tomato, or is it "wilted", "rotting", or "kinda fresh but ready to throw at someone" option.

    Example: Your everyday critic kind of likes a good but flawed, 3-star movie only has the option of giving it a fresh rating (a mathematical 100%) or rotten (0%). When you get 93% of critics doing that, it makes the movie look better than it really was.

    If RT took an average of all the "fresh" critic's separate 1-5 star ratings for it and added that score along with the overall RT score, it would probably much better represent the quality of a movie - and would probably serve much better as their qualifier for their supposed "Certified Fresh" score.

  32. Movie IX ... by will_die · · Score: 1

    Episode 7 was a remake of episode 4, episode 8 was a remake of episode 5 and 6 so that means episode 9 will be a remake of episode 1, 2, and 3.

  33. Chewy should've chewed on the roasted critter by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    He should've taken a huge-ass bite out of the roasted bird/thing, and then barked something at the live ones like, "If you don't get your Jar Jar Bird asses out of this movie, you're next."

    The little animal(s) - especially the one in the Falcon towards the end - were the most annoying part of the movie; They didn't fit the tone of the movie at all, IMO.

  34. I liked it by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm going with the critics.

    When we saw episode VII, we knew that the hopeful situation after Episode VI had fizzled. The Republic was once again threatened by the First Order, much like it was by the Empire. The new Jedi Order was a disaster, producing Kylo Ren and apparently not much else. The characters from the first movie (with the exception of Chewbacca) had been hurt by the intervening events, sometimes hurt badly. There are some new, upbeat characters (Rey, Finn, Poe) who resemble the original trilogy characters. That's the situation going into Episode VIII.

    We see how badly Luke was hurt by what had happened. He's not acting like the Luke of the original trilogy, and there's darn good reasons why. He wants the Jedi Order destroyed. We see that the heroes can screw up, too, rather than having everything work out. Kylo Ren acts decisively when he can, and tries to subvert Rey, despite often looking like he really doesn't know what he's doing. This is Star Wars with more real characters. They have flaws. They often screw up. They keep going. The logic isn't all there, but that's Star Wars as a whole, not just Episodes VII and VIII.

    We've got the visuals we'd expect from Star Wars. The story is bleak, but Leia claims they have everything they need to start a rebellion. We'll see how that goes in Episode IX. Finn and Rose have inspired some discontent and hope on the casino planet.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  35. **more spoilers** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Subtle undercurrent of man-shaming" my ass! It couldn't possibly be more overt!

    Every male character in the movie was a failure, and needed a woman to guide him with her superior wisdom (apart from General Ackbar, I guess, but he didn't last long enough to count).

    Luke is a failure who has decided to run and hide and let the universe die, and he needs Rei to guide him back to the path of caring.

    Poe is so toxically masculine that he just wants to blow everything up, and he needs a purple-haired woman to have a better plan (which she keeps a secret for no reason), to reprimand him, to forgive him and say she likes him as she nobly sacrifices herself to save the day where he failed. And, apparently, Poe is only interested in seeming like a hero whereas she is only interested in being a hero.

    Fin is a coward who wants to flee under pretenses of protecting Rei, only to be stopped by Rose who gives him a better plan and re-ignites his courage. Later on he is so eager to seem like a hero that he is ready to get himself killed, and needs Rose to save him and explain to him that saving what we love is better than fighting what we hate.

    Kylo is, of course, falling to the dark side and needs Rei to pull him back to the light. I guess we will see the rest of that in the next movie (or rather, some of you will, because I sure won't).

    Snoke and general Hux have no women to guide them, so they are just pure evil until the end.

    The take-away is clear: men are violent and selfish and foolish, whereas women are wise and loving and competent.

    1. Re:**more spoilers** by Digital+Avatar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The take-away is clear: men are violent and selfish and foolish, whereas women are wise and loving and competent.

      Yeah, that did annoy me. It would've been great to see Rey buy into Kylo Ren's speech and join him, so the failure of the Jedi would've been complete. Likewise, Poe didn't have to be a gun-happy dumbass, nor did Holdo have to maintain secrecy around what she had intended. Also, Rose didn't need to exist as a character, and that entire sub-plot around her and Fin looking for some cryptologist was so fucking contrived it made it really hard to stay awake when they were on screen.

    2. Re:**more spoilers** by Dayze!Confused · · Score: 1

      And why didn't they spend the last bit of their fuel to do a short jump in hyperspace to the planet that has defenses and launch the transports from there, or land the damn fleet on the planet.

      And the tracking through hyperspace plot. WTF? A rendezvous point is chosen not as the first jump, but as the final location as everyone goes off in different directions. Why do the ships only have enough for 2 jumps? Why was the jump all of them together instead of each going in a different direction to separate locations and only weeks later going to an agreed upon location?

      The entire middle plot with going to get the code breaker did about as much good as Indiana Jones trying to stop the Nazi's from getting the arc of the covenant, which he failed to do and the Nazi's died as soon as opening it, making the whole plot a waste.

      Also, once Luke had died, how could Kylo have gone into the base and found the projected dice on the floor?

      Did every joke need to be queued? What happened to the witty humor that was woven in before? Now each joke has to be a 30 second exchange between two characters?

      --
      "All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent." [Thomas Jefferson]
    3. Re:**more spoilers** by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      That argument only works if you ignore Finn taking on Phasma, ignore that Leia is the mother of the big bad and seems to have done little to turn him back to the light, and that Poe has some totally un-toxic character growth.

      That's how characters work in movies. Luke starts out as a whining teenager who enjoys shooting small animals, and it takes three movies for him to fully resolve his tendency to rush in. Empire is basically about how he is impatient, resulting in the loss of his hand.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:**more spoilers** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought of adding that Han is a loser father that abandons his family, in the prior movie.

      But.....

      I don't think that one really qualifies as man-shaming. Han was introduced as Luke's opposite: a scoundrel that shoots first. We see him discover loyalty that he didn't know he had, as part of his character development in the original trilogy, which tempts us to think that his interaction with Luke and Leah changed him for the better.

      Of course, in the real world, bad boys usually stay bad boys. So I can accept Han's abandonment of his family as more a warning to women that they can't actually change bad-boys into nice guys, and if they think they have they will wind up as a single mom, just like Leah did.

    5. Re:**more spoilers** by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Oh stop joining the troll crowd. Did you complain that other movies in the past treat women merely as background decorations, or that they always seem to need rescuing? Remember that the original Star Wars had a princess that could hold her own and wasn't the stereotypical damsel in distress so popular at the times.

      If these things are what you focus on when watching a movie you need to lighten up.

    6. Re:**more spoilers** by dinfinity · · Score: 1

      Did you complain that other movies in the past treat women merely as background decorations, or that they always seem to need rescuing?

      Two wrongs don't make a right.

    7. Re: **more spoilers** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Indeed, posting this twice did not make you more right.

    8. Re: **more spoilers** by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      two meters is also a little bit larger than a person. 2 meters is roughly 6'6"

    9. Re:**more spoilers** by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      so you're complaining that a Naval Admiral transferred over to ground forces,

    10. Re: **more spoilers** by staunch_character · · Score: 1

      How do we know Han "abandoned his family"? It's clear he & Leia split up, but lots of relationships end. Maybe her successful career kept them apart. Things seemed amicable in TFA.

  36. Terrible waste of time and money by frist · · Score: 2

    I can't believe I'm saying it but the 1st and 3rd prequel may have been better than this. This one was just so tedious. There was no story telling, no character development, no plot to speak of. My son said it was like a bad video game campaign. Go here, blow up this gun, escape from these guys, go there get this thing. No epic story. Oh Chewie flew the MF through some hard to navigate thing that caused the pursuing tie fighters to crash because they're not as maneuverable again. Also the first order is so evil that even the snow foxes know to run from them.

  37. Movey 'Maps' to our society - Good youtube Review. by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

    Great review! .. Worth the time.
    .
    (youtube video "The Truth About Star Wars: The Last Jedi"
    by Stefan Molyneux )
    https://youtu.be/6l9go9X1EbE

  38. Luke is right: It's time for the jedi to end... by DRichardHipp · · Score: 1

    I will continue to go see all the canonical StarWars films on opening night - out of tradition. But the thrill is gone.

  39. Suprised!? by Shogun37 · · Score: 1

    Jar Jar Abrams makes a movie, and people are still suprised it stinks!? The man is juuuust behind Uwe Bolwe, Dark Lord of the Bad Movie!

  40. It's entertainment by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a movie, get the fuck over yourself. I enjoyed it. Any Star Wars movie can be eviscerated by the plot holes. For fucks sake the death star could simply navigated to the correct position to destroy Yavin IV instead of waiting 30 minutes for it to be in range.

    1. Re:It's entertainment by Awkkh · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's that easy. Star Wars isn't just entertainment like any normal movie, but rather is a cultural phenomenon. It's one of the greatest stories ever told, and in terms of fiction, George Lucas' original trilogy is right up there with The Odyssey and Hamlet. He was a big fan of Joseph Campbell and really understood archetypes when creating them.

      On top of that, a whole generation grew up with that first trilogy, and it holds an important place in our hearts, so we're emotionally bought into the story franchise.

      That being the case, when someone creates a new Star Wars movie, they aren't just making another flick, but instead are taking on a big responsibility to live up to the significance of Lucas' original contribution to human civilization along with the warm fuzzy childhood memories of a generation.

      Imagine if someone wrote the sequel to Hamlet. That story would rightly be subjected to an extra level of scrutiny and criticism, and it had better be a work of genius just like the original. It's the same thing here. Episodes 7 and 8 aren't nearly the works of genius they need to be to live up to the gravitas of the original trilogy, and so they're rightfully being criticized, and the creators can't hide behind the argument that it's just entertainment because they accepted a much greater challenge and responsibility when they agreed to make these films.

    2. Re:It's entertainment by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      It's a derivative of a lot of stories before it, with just a different backdrop that was new and unique.

    3. Re:It's entertainment by Awkkh · · Score: 1

      Sure, Star Wars is derivative of previous stories, but so is everything. The themes in Hamlet and The Odyssey weren't completely original either. That's where archetypes come in. Joseph Campbell wrote the book on the study of archetypes and mythology, and Lucas studied his work in depth to create Star Wars.

      One can argue that the original trilogy isn't great in spite of the archetypes it drew upon, but rather that it's great *because* of them. If the creators of E7 and E8 would have had a better understanding of Campbell's work, then maybe the movies would have turned out better.

  41. Good music and ... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Having a Holdo lecture other cast members and the audience did not add to the plot.
    The property destruction at the casino city did not move the plot on.
    The Skywalker plot sold movies and endured the past movies to generations of fans.
    A Rey, Rose and Finn want to replace all that with a very average plot?
    Snoke adds nothing creative or interesting.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  42. Couldn't get past Blaring Plot holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just one question:
    Why in the whole of Lucas's galaxy did the First Order not just Light Speed to head off the Rebels? Double jump it guys, something. It'd only take 1 or 2 destroyers - you've got plenty to spare in your fleet there. Every god-awful storyline choice stems from this stupidity.
    Other plot holes:
    Fin and Rose - call for help from casino planet instead of code-breaker
    Lea - send someone by light-speed directly to allies to get help
    Purple-haired lady - send small groups around in your light-speed craft (you've only got 400 to worry about). You could do much better than the 15 or so that make it by the end of this stupid movie
    Other rebel craft - doc with the capital ship, unload all your people, then light-speed into armada...
    And the list goes on!

  43. It was awful. by bravecanadian · · Score: 1

    The main story arc was stupid and terrible.. and resulted in the slowest chase in movie history because they were low on gas!?

    The secondary plotline was completely irrelevant to everything and everyone. Hating on rich people at a casino and then beating people over the head with heavy handed and incredibly simplistic morality before riding a pack of animals around and trashing the place!?

    Most of the characters are two-dimensional and had no development whatsoever.

    Annnnd they wasted Luke Skywalker's last appearance. After doing a very poor job of the build up throughout the (overly long) bloated mess of a movie, they wasted their last chance to redeem it with Luke going out like the legend he was despite his protestations.. and instead did a stupid gimmick for the final confrontation so it ended up having no emotional resonance at all.

    Like it was bad, man. Just all around terrible storytelling.

    But hey, it's making a ton of money so prepare for more of the same.

  44. Overall plus, but lots of factors.... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Liked it, will see it again and buy it. On track. Not as fresh as 7 or Rogue, but these are the middle innings.

    A few missteps and this could have been a dud. I blame Disney for everything out of band for Star Wars.

    I’ll get this out of the way now: Whoever wrote the “towel” line needs to go stand in a corner until they are very, very sorry for what they did. That line was the skunk at the garden party. That’s a Poe line, not a Rey line.

    OK - stop casting characters qua retail items in movies. In the beginning, there were Wookiees. I like Wookiees. But the Wookiees begat Ewoks. And the Ewoks begat Gungans. And the Gungans begat Porgs. They're going to sell a lot of Porgs. I get it, but *sigh*

    Characters: *Rey is setting up to be a fine parallel to Luke. I was hoping she was going to be another Solo - still could be. She needs her mentor like Luke had Yoda. Hope Luke comes back, but not holding my breath. Her motivation is still a bit uneven, likely a result of wanting to keep some suspense about her background. *Poe is the new Han, he's slotted right in where he needs to be, character is developing well. Needs to do a bit more swashbuckling having had to stand down from Holdo and having all his ships squished and the cave sequence. *Luke is right what he needs to be. I know there is an interview where he says this is “not my Luke” - but it had to happen and he did it with grace and bravery and smarts. *Ben/Kylo is riveting. This is going to be a great character arc if they keep it up. Pity he wasn’t Anakin in 2 and 3, but glad he’s here. *DJ - loved it. So hang me.

    Plot: Say what you want about 1 2 3, but Lucas knows how to tell a story. The four-parallel-story closing act in 1 was so well done you barely noticed it until it was well underway or finished. I need to go back and look at it, but I believe what made it successful is that each had a unique tone and design so that you could follow the shifting shots. Johnson tried it here, and I think it just made it confusing, largely because the tones were not distinct enough. The ships, the caves, etc. in the last half hour kind of muddled together. In general I think they went for visual complexity at the expense of story progress - see “editing” below. The mirror sequence is a good original thing that went nowhere. There is enough meat here for an episode 6.5 with Luke and Ben/Kylo, but I won’t hold my breath. With Snoke gone, Kylo/Ben in 9 needs to be the baddest baddie since his grampy.

    Questions: *I lost count of how many Luke lightsabers there were, working and busted. It was midnight. *Rose can fly stuff? *Did Finn feel the force or did he just wake up?

    Editing: This was my biggest issue. I'd make a director's cut a half hour shorter. There was a bunch of exposition that was just too much. It's hard to show the continuing effect of a slow speed chase, and they did too much of it. The find-the-codebreaker sequence would have been half as long in the original trilogy, and had a lot of fluff - save the animals, etc. Likely an better / shorter / less preachy way to set up the kids at the end. Who cares if it’s salt on the surface? The fishwives and the cow-thing on the exile island? Ennhhhh. Tighten it up. More of this: Holdo’s jump-attack is the most magnificent visual of the movies so far. The rest of the visuals look positively byzantine in comparison. I think Abrams would have made a tighter movie, but hey.

    Flotsam: So let me get this straight - we have two live actors whose characters are dead, and one dead actor whose character is alive?

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  45. Loved it! by siege72 · · Score: 1

    Luke and Yoda literally say what the movie is about. I've only seen the movie once, so I'm paraphrasing.

    Yoda says that failure is the best teacher. What do the Resistance leads do? They fail, often. Poe shows that he's learned from his mistakes, and I'm sure the others will in the next film.

    Luke tells Rey something along the lines of "legends and myths are bullshit." And that's what happens. Snoke is struck down without any backstory. Rey goes from thinking she's the Chosen One to the daughter of smackheads. Canto Bight is full of people cashing in on the legend of good vs. evil. Finn's mission to sneak onto the most powerful ship in the universe is a legend that never sees fruition. Luke doesn't even confront Kylo: it's a fake out.

  46. Poorly written. by Berkyjay · · Score: 1

    It was just a bad movie. Far too much comedy for the serious subject matter, plot holes, illogical motives, deus ex machina (laser battering ram?).

    I get that in this day and age, people aren't used to seeing well made movies. So some can look passed the obvious flaws. But Star Wars has finally been Disney-fied. Blan, safe, and monolithic.

    Star Wars is dead, long live Star Wars.

  47. loved it by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of vocal people who didn't like the movie, that's ok.

    I really liked it. I go for Space Cowboy Wizards, and that's what we got. If you're just now realizing that Star Wars lacks realism and internal consistency in physical, moral, or metaphysical laws, I don't know what to tell you.

    Maybe you're just figuring out that Star Wars is a vehicle for subtle counter culture messaging.

    Maybe it's funny for Yoda to scrounge for cookies in Luke's pack while making odd grunting noises, but you don't want Luke milking a walrus with a goofy look on his face.

    We watch a lot of Star Wars in my house, and all this has been going on the whole time. Maybe you just hated how this iteration was done. That's fine.

    I liked it. My kids liked it, and my kids's grandparents liked it. Rogue 1 didn't end up fitting in with the rest of what "Star Wars" is today, and it's not part of the "Star Wars" conversation with the people I build Star Wars legos with at home. Episodes 4-7, Clone Wars and Rebels are on all time around here. I expect 8 will join the rotation when it's available. It is Star Wars; it fits in.

    My biggest complaint is that Episode 8 was too long. I nearly got peed on by the end. I think that's what Disney is going for. Kids in the theater for Star Wars should rather pee on a parent than miss a minute of the movie.

    1. Re:loved it by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I really liked it. I go for Space Cowboy Wizards, and that's what we got. If you're just now realizing that Star Wars lacks realism and internal consistency in physical, moral, or metaphysical laws, I don't know what to tell you.

      Ha! Me too.

      I enjoyed the film a great deal and I'm goig to go see it again maybe a few times before it's off. then buy it.

      It wasn't perfect. and I also like picking things apart. For example...

      I didn't like the Rose character. Or the Casino plot theme: it didn't fit in in a variety of ways including stylistically. Also I thought it odd that this major new universe game changing piece of tech (the hyperspace tracker) kind of came and went with barely a mention.

      To me that felt like the last minute rewrites were making themselves felt.

      Imagine instead if Rose had been a mole. No need for random piece of tech. No need for the casio scene[*], a bit shorter. Even more good reasonas not to tell Po the tactics. None of the cheesy "save what you love" thing especially as if luke hadn't stopped whinging they'd all have died ayway.

      Anyway, I think the mole plot would have been much cooler anyway, and it would have had a symmetry with Finn.

      Also visually the film wasn't up to Ep 7, that one was more coherent and arresting in its visual style. And this one was a little bitty in places, but that's very hard to avoid in a middle film.

      [*]Though I will concede the retults of that did fit. It's been a bit of a thing that the space-cowboy types doing risky cool shit savig the day and in this one Po made it bad (losing the bombers) then eve worse by leaking the fleet moves. Nice twist.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  48. The universal accusation: "troll" by edgedmurasame · · Score: 1

    non-Disney sources are saying the backlash has been primarily online "trolling."

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  49. Culture Wars! by Evtim · · Score: 1

    The whole saga is the one of the best examples of the cultural war that is plaguing the western civilization since the collapse of the Wall.

    Original trilogy - classic archetypal story; just an exciting, well executed variation of it set in space. Good actors, unseen special effects, groundbreaking musical score, super cool baddies, etc. Great stuff! Bonus - Lucas not directing 5 and 6 (and the one he did he was pressured, uncertain and disbelieved even by the cast, let alone the studio - art born out of crisis and strife - the best). The phantom menace - Ewoks (put something in purely for the merchandise sacrificing logic and plot).

    Prequels - the senility of a (lazy, fat, rich ass) baby boomer who has turned too much PC and prone to injecting contemporary politics into it. The deconstruction, begun it has! Han shot last; commerce is evil, jedi are bunch of senile creatures that can't see beyond their noses, Palpatine resembles GWB (Iraq adventures - playing both sides), etc. Merchandizing is out of control but while this can be understood (though not condoned IMO) it is nothing compared to the mortal wound inflicted on the story.

    Sequels - total destruction of the archetypes, replacing it with the most extreme, silly, anti-science, anti-history, anti-logic, anti-everything "ideology" that is being pushed in the last 10-20 years in the west. Because you know, every archetypal story is a social construct, patriarchy and oppression. All people are identical. Not equal, identical you bastard! Meanwhile, merchandising has reached an entire new level of obnoxiousness.

    Don't people get it, seeing how the critics fall in line out of conformism and fear to be shamed and destroyed within 2 minutes via the mob ruled, bend on lynching hysterical "people's court" of Twitter and FB? Check the opinions of the real fans who truly love good movies and good stories - Red Letter Media for instance - unanimously negative from anyone with a bit of sense and 2 brain cells.

    As a guy who lived under the so-called communism (we had people's courts you know - they killed all the people with skills, brains and education crippling society for a fucking century!) let me say it again - westerners, you have no idea what genie you have let out of the bottle. The cultural division of the west is the worst thing that can happen to the world - this kind of stuff leads to collapse of whole societies, wars and shit..... Stop it! Please! While I wholeheartedly agree that the western system needs continuous improvement and eternal vigilance so that it does not slide into nasty territory at least we can work on it....whereas what is proposed by the reincarnations of the fuckers who ruined my society is totalitarian. You can't control such a system or improve it, you can only wait for it to collapse (as it always does) - meanwhile you and everyone else live in hellish prison for your body and your mind.

    I tell ya folks, one day SW will be studied in history classes as a "manifestation of the deconstruction of civilization values which led to WW3".

  50. Re: We need a better ratings system for movies by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    What we got was social justice before storytelling

    What? Where? Define where you saw this please?

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  51. franchise foresight by epine · · Score: 2

    I basically knew where this was going—at the franchise level—the moment Rey had the telepathic dream sequence after first touching Luke's light saber (the whole point of which was to be profoundly pointless and thereby encourage mass Stockholm-syndrome cud chewing) and I haven't given a shit about the rest of that movie, about this movie, or about the next movie ever since, though I do find it amusing to check in on how others are reacting to the Disney Matrix.

    Almost every big movie these days is a pastiche of three or more genres (sometimes obviously so, other times mildly concealed).

    I was watching the commentary track for Russian Ark last night, and at one point the cameraman panics and tells the guy beside him "I can't do it", because he's got such a bad groin spasm that he worries he'll become crippled permanently. (The entire movie is a single 90-minute take, with a very heavy Steadicam.) But then he sees the 300 actors in period costumes all in perfect position through the next door and he gets a shot of adrenaline and heroically makes it to minute 84. Cut! This breaks a tension so thick that 1000 actors and 1000 assembled extras almost begin to cry.

    Well, that lightsaber dream sequence was the screenwriting team confessing "we can't do it"—noooooo!—about finding a principled way to combine all the necessary genres together in the mandatory Disney stew pot.

    Fuck it, we'll use telepathy.

    A conversation with Martin Amis — 2 December 2016

    Does writing get any easier?

    Yeah, in some ways. It's an artificial distinction but I think quite a useful one. If every novelist comes with some genius and some talent, it's the genius bit that gets weaker. Genius being that sort of God-given quality of perception and articulacy. Talent is technique, and that gets stronger. So a lot of stuff that you used to have to think about when you were younger about pacing and modulation and what goes where, it's very interesting just to look at novelists to see how they get their characters across town. It's very onerous business, getting your characters across town, how you do it reveals technique, and someone like Nabokov, who has a lot of genius and a lot of talent is wonderful—they're suddenly across town and either the journey was very interesting in itself, or they're just across town. It's very unlaborious. That's technique. So your genius, which is the slightly wild, pyrotechnic art of what you do gets weaker, but you get people across town more efficiently than you used to.

    Fuck no, not onerous at all, not after The Great Force Vending Machine in the Sky pukes out, faster than light, lady-in-waiting telepathic midichlorians (of course, this minor capability would have barely figured in the outcome until movie number eight).

  52. Not that great by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

    Luke was completely out of character; even Mark Hamill has said so. Rey is the biggest Mary Sue since the term was invented. Because, *diversity*, or something. Go woke, go broke. At least I pirated it, and didn't pay to see it

  53. The real problem is... by Awkkh · · Score: 1

    I've spent a lot of time thinking about why I loved episodes 4-6 so much, and why it's so hard to make a new Star Wars movie that pleases me, and I think I've figured out the answer. I was born in the 70s and was a kid at exactly the time when the original trilogy was huge. Return of the Jedi was the first movie I ever saw in a theater. I watched the cartoons. I had all the action figures.

    There's a phenomenon which happens on farm yards when baby chicks hatch called 'imprinting' where the chicks imprint on whatever creature they see first as being their mother. If the farmer's dog walks past, then they'll imprint on it (this is slightly hyperbolic, but you get the point). The way I figure it, Star Wars imprinted upon my young mind, and my love for the first trilogy is ingrained deep inside me. This makes in nearly impossible for anyone to ever create a movie that competes. Poor George Lucas didn't realize this when he made Episodes 1-3: You simply can't live up to an entire generation's nostalgia.

    J.J. Abrams saw what happened to Lucas with E1-3 and realized the minefield that he was walking into, so he just played it safe and to avoid the nostalgia trap, he simply made E7 a direct plagiarism of E4 (if you haven't seen the parallels, just go to YouTube and type in "star wars episode 7 episode 4 rip off").

    I thought Rogue One was an excellent movie, nearly perfect, until they dropped the ball literally on the goal line at the end of the movie and placed Princess Leia at the battle of Scariff, creating a huge consistency problem with E4, despite the fact that the whole point of R1 was to set up and explain E4. Sigh.

    E7 and E8 certainly aren't anywhere close to even R1, and I don't need to cite nostalgia to rip them apart. There are dozens of major flaws with them, and many have already been pointed out above, so I'll just focus on my major complaint, which is that Kylo Ren is a wuss. He's not a super villain that commands respect, but instead is the most emotionally vulnerable and insecure bad guy in cinema history. It's like they took Ross from Friends at his whiniest and just draped him in a black cape. What the hell?!? Darth Vader was cool. He would force choke and murder subordinates that displeased him without ever even raising his voice. No whining or self-doubt. Now that's a proper villain worthy of fear and respect! Kylo is the opposite of that, and he's simply not worthy to be the villain in a Star Wars movie. This ruins the whole new trilogy, and there isn't really anything that can be done to offset this massive flaw.

    And then in E8 they took Luke and turned him into a self-doubting whiner as well!!! What happened to the awesome dude who stood on the plank above the Sarlacc pit on Tatooine and told Jabba, "This is your last chance..."? You know what's even worse than not living up to my childhood nostalgia? Going and desecrating it by ruining my hero! What were they thinking?!?

  54. Felt more like a Star Wars movie than 7 by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I liked it. I didn't like how Luke was a prick at the beginning, but if you spend a decade running away from every thing, you're not going to flip to be sociable in a day. It doesn't bother me too much. It was great "seeing" come to save the day - even though he didn't really. I like they were able to get both Kylo Ren striking Luke down, and sending Luke off with a send off that feels proper and fitting.

    The plot device of having an old hero try to convince protagonists that they're not really that great, and are done trying, has been done before. I think it was appropriate here. I didn't like quite how they handled it, but o'well. If Luke is upset about how he failed, Yoda has way more to be upset about and hide from. But Yoda was still willing to train Luke.

    I like how Luke talked about the Force. Way better than anything in the prequals.

    The music was good. The graphics were spot on. I liked how we got to see different worlds and environments. Very space opera; very Star Wars.

    The whole tracking through hyperspace was odd. Previously it could only be done with a homing device of some sort. Not whatever plot device they came up with. The writers even had a great way to make it happen during the first battle with Poe giving the First Order extra time to plant a tracker in the extended battle.

    Overall I really liked it. It didn't have any real universe defying inconsistencies like The Force Awakens did. It tied in some themes from all of the previous movies, without being too overt like the Force Awakens. It certainly had more originality than The Force Awakens.

    I don't like how the whole Resistance now fits onto the Millennium Falcon, but I guess there going for a major low point so they can rise all the higher in the next movie.

  55. A thought... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they thought that if they disposed of the Kylo and Rey, they could rescue their fallen leader and have his wound tended, or his life restored.

  56. WRONG by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    If they suspected a mole was reporting their location, then you keep the info on a need to know basis. Soldiers are trained to follow orders, for this specific reason.

  57. No....you're not thinking... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Push the balls, what happens? Once in motion they will continue down in that direction. Especially without any air resistance. So yes, it looks like they're falling by gravity.

    Oh, but the bottom ones fall first...yes. Um, you do realize that Star Wars universe has artificial gravity. So you're going to pull/push those bombs with a similar technology.

  58. I thought likewise... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    But hear me out...

    The First Order is tracking the Rebel cruisers with new technology, a sophisticated system to allow them to track a ship's hyperspace jump.

    What do you think happens, if a bunch of ships make jumps to lightspeed? It's like following one set of tracks in the snow, and then suddenly a dozen appear. So rather than risk them making a jump to lightspeed and not being able to track them due to their own ships jump trails, they decided to take a conservative approach that (to them) ensured victory - and they were right, none of the Rebel cruisers survived.

  59. Answer by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    It would of interfered with their ability to track the Rebel cruisers in hyperspace. Creating too many trails for their new system to process. That's why they didn't immediately jump after the Rebels in the first encounter.