Slashdot Mirror


Samsung's New TVs Are Almost Invisible (qz.com)

Mike Murphy reports via Quartz of Samsung's new top-of-the-line televisions announced at an event in New York today: Samsung's new QLED line of 4K TVs features a technology the company is calling "Ambient Mode." Before you mount the TV, you'll snap a picture of the wall it's going to hang on -- it doesn't matter if it's brick, wood, patterned wallpaper, or just a white wall -- and then after it's up, you can set that picture as the TV's background. The result is something that looks like a floating black rectangle mounted on a wall. Samsung even includes a digital version of the shadow this black rectangle would cast on the wall, as if there really wasn't a large LED panel sitting in the middle of the thin metal strips. There are five QLED models, with minor tweaks between them, ranging in size from 49 inches, up to an absolutely massive 88 inches. The televisions have a built-in timer so that the ambient setting will turn off after a while, in order to spare your electricity bill. Viewing the televisions before Samsung's event, the ambient really did appear to blend them into the walls at first blush. One, against a fake brick wall, was indistinguishable from what was behind it until you really got close up to the screen. The distinction on another, attempting to mimic a painted off-white wall, was a little more obvious. But that's not really the point -- the mode is just intended to give the illusion of invisibility between watching TV, and when you want to show off your new television to a visitor. Pricing isn't available but you can expect them to range from a few thousands dollars all the way up to $20,000 for the largest, sharpest models. Samsung also announced that it's partnering with The Weather Channel, The New York Times, and others to overlay content on the ambient TVs. They will also be able to control any smart device that can control to Samsung's SmartThings system, like Amazon Echoes, Ring doorbells, and Philips Hue Lights. Bixby is baked into the remote to help you search for content and cater to commands.

158 comments

  1. Invisible tvs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    That's stupid.

    1. Re:Invisible tvs! by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you know whats more so stupid? you can do this same thing with any tv you can put a picture on.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Invisible tvs! by Duds · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking that, I've got a bunch of TVs in the office that when we're not using them for meetings show pictures from team-building trips and what have you using a $30 Chromecast.

      I think I just saved the company $19,970, I should ask for a raise.

    3. Re: Invisible tvs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is stupid:

      "and when you want to show off your new television to a visitor."

    4. Re: Invisible tvs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And itâ(TM)s not even an OLED TV. Unfortunately Samsung TVs have been so gimicky lately that itâ(TM)s destroying the brand. Itâ(TM)s almost embarrassing having a Samsung tv these days. LG OLEDs are much better.

    5. Re:Invisible tvs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. The monitor's light intensity has to match the surroundings. Otherwise the effect works only at one ambient light.

    6. Re:Invisible tvs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the main thing would be cabling. Sure you can do this most TVs, but hook a DVR, game system, etc etc etc... and you have a cluttered wall. ;)

      And no, I don't think this is worth the money. Just saying that this TV and your TV are not the same thing.

    7. Re:Invisible tvs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dirty little prols just don't posses the courageous disruptivity required to understand the magnitude of this significance.

      Oh, to live in such heady days. Such great minds using their talents for the betterment of society.

      Thank you great tech geniuses. Thank you!

  2. Energy by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're using energy 24/7 making your TeeVee appear invisible?

    1. Re:Energy by bws111 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have to read all the way to the 5th sentence to see that there is a timer that turns it off.

    2. Re:Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that compare to standby usage? I'm not saying I think it's a great idea, but showing a moving image requires a fair bit of processing power, not to mention tuners and powering whatever is hanging off the usb etc. Showing a static image with everything else in standby mode... screen, very basic not processor intensive refresh routine... I'm thinking not so much?

      (That said, if power consumption didn't worry you I would want actual window emulation: cameras to detect where you're standing, PTZ camera mounted in picturesque location, full streaming video (maybe even audio) from a to b, maybe with optional bi-directional mode if you want the full window experience. That would be both pointless and cool :).

    3. Re:Energy by msauve · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And why make it look like the wall, instead of making it look like a picture in a frame, instead of an expanse of wood, brick, whatever?

      (and if it's not a 3D, curved screen, you're not really buying into the marketing, anyway)

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Energy by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      You're lighting up a several-square-foot screen, which uses power in itself.

    5. Re:Energy by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That problem can be solved easily by hanging the TV in a window with a solar collector in front of it. When it becomes invisible the solar collector will generate electricity.

    6. Re:Energy by rnturn · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the time, ages ago, when flying toasters ruled the screensaver world and a manager asked ``Wouldn't turning the monitor off be an even better way to save the screen? And keep our power usage down?'' as he looked out across the cubicle farm housing dozens and dozens of power-hungry CRT monitors all running screensavers.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    7. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More to the point, if I had $20k to burn on a TV I'd buy a $5k model, then have a contractor install a mounting recess in my wall with a motorized, remote controlled cover on which I'd have a $5k painting mounted.

    8. Re: Energy by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I had $20k to burn on a TV, I'd buy a used one on Craigslist for $500 and take a trip around the world.

    9. Re:Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and the founders of After Dark apparently went on to form moveon dot org. So apparently they didn't care about energy usage back then but woke up after getting millions from Soros lord of the dark arts and thrower of jews under the bus.

    10. Re: Energy by GuB-42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Too bad that many jobs where you earn enough to burn $20k on a TV won't leave you enough time to enjoy a trip around the world.

    11. Re: Energy by baker_tony · · Score: 1

      Some good, high paying jobs pay for you to go round the world (like to other company offices, expo's etc).

    12. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have $20k you have electricity, no?

    13. Re:Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What it really needs is the option to make it look like the wall, but every so often it distorts the image in the shape of a tormented face trying to get through. Do it either really fast for the jump scare, or really slow so people get uneasy until it finally hits them. Gotta keep the house guests on their toes.

    14. Re: Energy by msauve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Some good, high paying jobs pay for you to go round the world (like to other company offices, expo's etc)."

      In my experience, the difference between offices/hotels in different parts of the world isn't worth the travel time.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    15. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in Dumbericuntia, this is true. Most civilized countries actually legally guarantee people 4 weeks or more of vaca time per year. As usual, the Dumbericunts are behind the times.

    16. Re: Energy by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Troll

      If I had $20k to burn on a TV, I'd buy a used one on Craigslist for $500 and take a trip around the world.

      If I had $150k to burn on a TV, I'd buy one of these invisible TVs and use the rest to pay hush money to a porn star for keeping photos of my little dick off of the internet.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    17. Re:Energy by jrumney · · Score: 1

      They already know noone is buying into the 3D and curved screen marketing, that's why they're aiming for the new non-existent market of people who want a framed wall on their wall.

    18. Re:Energy by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      And why make it look like the wall, instead of making it look like a picture in a frame, instead of an expanse of wood, brick, whatever?

      (and if it's not a 3D, curved screen, you're not really buying into the marketing, anyway)

      They make one of those too.

    19. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You run in the wrong circles. The people I know with that money have plenty of time to jet around the world. They are also smart enough to not spend that on a tv and ypud never know they had thar kind of money. A tv at that price is intended for those that you know. They make a lot, and thier lifestyle looks impressive, but still they live paycheck to paycheck and would still spend $20k on a tv.

    20. Re:Energy by msauve · · Score: 1

      "They already know noone"

      What does Peter Noone of Hermit's Hermits, have to do with this?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    21. Re:Energy by msauve · · Score: 1

      "flying toasters"

      Ahh. 30 Seconds Over Winterland.

      Have you seen the saucers?

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    22. Re:Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And why make it look like the wall, instead of making it look like a picture in a frame, instead of an expanse of wood, brick, whatever?

      (and if it's not a 3D, curved screen, you're not really buying into the marketing, anyway)

      Hmm, a good sized window is say 3'x5' or roughly 15 square feet. This is comparable to around a 70" tv. A typical 70" tv uses about 185W which is about 631 btu/hr. Assuming my math is correct, an R4 window of about that size is going to lose or gain about 112.5BTU/hr if the outside temperature is 30 degrees different. (30*15)/4=112.5.

      If we ignore everything else and assume a tv replaces a window, and that somehow the area behind the tv is now almost perfectly insulated, that yields the tv costing about 6 times as much power than the window. This is way over simplified, but it does give a number. (We assume that when the tv is "off" it is in fact displaying a picture from outside from a camera.)

      If you further assume the tv doesn't display a picture when someone isn't in the room, then your probably getting cheaper to just include a tv in place of actual windows. Of course people like windows. It is 2D not 3D, and never will be as clear as the real thing...

      That being said the math is getting close... If we had something like color e-ink, and an acceptable frame rate for real tv, they could work fine. You could even have each window replay the last most significant bit of motion periodically with a voice command or something like that.

      Just think how efficient the average commercial building could be if they got rid of all that metal and glass? Massive amounts of energy leak out in those things... Of course again, do you want to live in a box without windows?

    23. Re:Energy by AndyKron · · Score: 1

      It has a timer. Besides, you'll get sick of it and turn it off after five minutes anyway.

    24. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbericuntia.
      o.O
      Seriously?

    25. Re: Energy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I had $20k to burn on a TV, I'd buy a used one on Craigslist for $500 ...

      Have you checked TV prices lately? For $500 you can get a pretty darn good brand new TV. Costco has a 55" inch 4K UHD TV for $420.

    26. Re:Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it turn off when I turn off the room lights? Or do I need to turn it off twice?

    27. Re:Energy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      They already know noone is buying into the 3D and curved screen marketing

      Not no one. My wife bought a curved TV. She also bought an iPhone X.

      Our economy depends on people like her.

    28. Re: Energy by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Many, er, ... service providers... will give you a trip "around the world" for a lot less than $19,500.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    29. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No you need to have a 'w' and a 'h' after that to have electricity. Right now you just have a really cold temperature which is the opposite of having a lot of energy!

    30. Re: Energy by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Lol.

      You Trumped his response.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    31. Re:Energy by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "And why make it look like the wall,"

      It'd be more fun to make it look like an archway going to an adjacent room or a garden and watch people walk into it.

      ====

      But seriously, I imagine that people with more money than sense -- no shortage of THOSE -- will find uses for these. Put up a famous picture -- The Nightwatch or September Morn. And change it occasionally.

      Heck, there might even be some useful things these things can do.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    32. Re:Energy by pots · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to those dual-mode e-ink / LCD screens? Would be perfect* for this.

      *Not actually perfect, since color e-ink sucks.

    33. Re:Energy by Venerable+Vegetable · · Score: 2

      Not only the guests... it could be an undocumented feature. Or maybe someone could hack Samsung and update the software.

    34. Re:Energy by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You could save even more power if you made your TV look like a scrying mirror

      Actually on an OLED you could take advantage of the excellent contrast ratio and zero power for black pixels to have demonic faces appear very faintly on the TV is scrying mirror mode. Not all the time, perhaps just late at night when people come in and turn off the lights, just before they leave the room. A sort of 'you can see it out of the corner of your eye' thing.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    35. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under which definition of "pretty darn good"?

      I include how long it lasts, which would fall into the following categories:

      Less: Crap.
      5 years: mediocre
      10 years: good.
      15 years: pretty darn good.

      From what I hear, it's pretty hard to get better than mediocre these days.

    36. Re:Energy by ShakaUVM · · Score: 2

      >You're using energy 24/7 making your TeeVee appear invisible?

      Don't forget showing ads.

      Samsung is infamous for patching firmware after release to cause the input bars to display ads on them, despite selling TVs that don't have ads.

      I returned two of them, the second after I disabled firmware updates, and the TV updated the firmware anyway to have ads.

      I won't buy Samsung now, period. I even switched my phones away from Samsung. They can burn in hell.

    37. Re:Energy by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Why not set up a video camera pointing outside and then stream the scene to the television? Instant window!

    38. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it! Gonna be my new term for you dickheads, better than "Seppo" at least.

    39. Re:Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what's the point of that? When you're using it, it will be visible due to displaying video. When you're not using it, the timer will turn it off and it will be visible due to being a big black rectangle.

    40. Re: Energy by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If you had 20k to burn on a TV you'd be buying it and getting someone to install it for you while you're already traveling around the world. Don't apply or people thinking to rich people toys.

    41. Re:Energy by Cederic · · Score: 1

      If it's doing its invisible thing, it's using power.
      If it's not doing its invisible thing, it might as well not have an invisible thing. It's just a gimmick.

      Not to mention being an unwanted lightsource when the room is dark. Unless you switch it off, in which case you've got a big arse tv visible in the dark.

    42. Re: Energy by magzteel · · Score: 1

      If I had $20k to burn on a TV, I'd buy a used one on Craigslist for $500 and take a trip around the world.

      I bought my 50" Pioneer Elite plasma TV on Craigslist for $60. It was probably over $6000 when new.
      It may not be state of the art now but I think the picture is great.

    43. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would want to keep a TV 15+ years?

    44. Re: Energy by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Because you have other things to pay for and don't watch the fuckin thing often enough to care?

    45. Re: Energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 for a craigslist TV? You're getting ripped off...

    46. Re: Energy by sexconker · · Score: 1

      2 chicks at the same time.

    47. Re: Energy by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      The Element sets seem to not be great, but FWIW last year I bought a TCL 43" 4k Roku TV for $350 or so for our new place - existing 60" wouldn't fit above the fireplace. It looks and operates really well, I have no complaints.

      "A few thousand" for a 49" is ludicrous, even if full of useless gimmicks like 3D, 240hz, etc.

  3. Edge TV by crow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Next up will be the Samsung Edge TV. It's just like the current TV, only the screen extends and curves a bit at the edges, so there is no black rectangle frame at the end of the screen. Sure, it's even more pointless than the edge on their phones, but when they're charging a premium for anything that makes them cooler than a TCL or Vizio TV, there's nothing they won't try.

    Now if they had a passive color E-Ink display or the like, that would be really cool. Then you don't have to feel guilty about the power when leaving the screen on to have it blend in with the wall (or appear to be a painting, or whatever). Of course, good luck getting such a display to handle motion and extreme contrast that makes for a quality television. And good luck getting such a display at anything resembling HDTV resolutions, let alone 4K.

  4. I don't get it by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How do you watch an invisible TV?

    1. Re:I don't get it by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      It's only invisible when it's "off". Of course in this case "off" is somewhat dubious because it is presumably still using the full amount of electricity to achieve this "off" effect.

    2. Re:I don't get it by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound like a good feature. What if I knock it over when it is off and invisible?

    3. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the plus side, it's invisible so your parents will never find out!

    4. Re:I don't get it by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      Most TVs hang on the walls these days and if you look at the picture, it's more of blending in with the background than completely invisible. I don't really see much difference from this and pretending to be a painting or fireplace.

    5. Re:I don't get it by 110010001000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you are saying it blends?

    6. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that. Even if everything is still on the processor load decoding compressed video (not required to show a static image) would be substantial.

    7. Re: I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you see invisble TV is just the final evolution of copy protection. it's impossible to pirate what you can't see.

  5. PSA: "QLED" is a con by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The name is meant to imply that it's comparable to OLED technology, but the reality is that it's just regular old LED technology. It IS NOT anywhere nearly as good as real OLED. And only LG makes *real* OLEDs, not Samsung.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      I prefer the color warmth of my plasma projector system. OLED is too harsh.

    2. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need an ISF calibration.
      OLED is awesome once it's dialed in.

    3. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

      I have a fully calibrated plasma projector system. Nothing beats the warmth and the dynamic range.

    4. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Xenx · · Score: 1

      Yes, because everyone is going to always mistake that Q for an O. I'm not saying it can't happen, but it's no better/worse than the confusion between LED screens (LCD with LED backlight) and OLED screens.

    5. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Q isn't the same as O! In fact, it's two better!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    6. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing beats the warmth and the dynamic range.

      Does it play movies from vinyl?

    7. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      What a silly question. Of course it does.

    8. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Inviska · · Score: 4, Informative

      QLED is a con, but for entirely different reasons than you state. Samsung where extremely light on details when they introduced their QLED televisions, but questioning by AV sites revealed that these are not electroluminescent quantum dot displays, but are in fact LCD displays with a quantum dot backlight. It's a lot like Samsung's so called LED displays, that are again just LCD displays with an LED backlight. There's no denying that these quantum dot LCDs are a significant improvement over standard LCD, but they still possess many of the drawbacks of LCD, and to market them as quantum dot displays is misleading.

      Companies are working on true electroluminescent quantum dot displays, with BOE being the first to demonstrate prototypes. There are some pictures here, and another article here. There's a video somewhere but I can't find it right now. Digitimes reported that Samsung have prototype electroluminescent quantum dot displays that they have not yet shown publicly, and other Chinese manufacturers besides BOE are working on the technology.

      It still looks like its a good few years before we'll see commercial electroluminescent quantum dot displays, and micro-LED displays may have taken off by then. I'm still waiting for a decent computer monitor. It is insane that nearly 20 years later you still can't get a monitor that comes close to the Sony GPD-FW900.

    9. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by gspear · · Score: 1

      Even "LED technology" is a con -- it's still an LCD panel (the LED is just the backlight).

    10. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      I have a fully calibrated plasma projector system. Nothing beats the warmth and the dynamic range.

      Warmth? You mean it lowers the colour temperature? How is that good?

      Dynamic range? So it can handle more than 8-bits per channel?

    11. Re: PSA: "QLED" is a con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's , better.

    12. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LED is a con too.

      LED is a Samsung marketing term for regular old LCD displays.

      Actual LED screens exist, but are usually found in stadiums and similar places, because before the invention of OLED, they couldn't be made in home sizes.

    13. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer the color warmth of my plasma projector system. OLED is too harsh.

      Uhm, like every fucking display since the CRT era that isn't a piece of crap allows you to set the color temperature.
      If your plasma system doesn't have a setting for it and only gives you a fixed "warm" setting then you should look into getting a more modern one. Plasma or OLED doesn't really matter.

    14. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      And yet side by side next to LGs OLEDs they look quite comparable. No one cares that the marketing term doesn't match the science behind it. You can't call it a "con" when it in fact shows all the performance and features you expect.

    15. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one cares that the marketing term doesn't match the science behind it.

      The Advertising Standards Agency most certainty do, and you should too.

      Samsung were intentionally misleading the public about the nature of the display, and therefore were conning people. After the launch many people mistakenly believed they were electroluminescent quantum dot displays because they had been successfully conned by Samsung. Some AV sites opted to refer to the televisions as "quantum dot LCDs" to avoid misleading their readers in the way that Samsung intentionally had.

    16. Re:PSA: "QLED" is a con by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      and you should too.

      Not at all. In fact their use of QLED is entirely consistent with the entire industry which described LED TVs to define the technology that sits behind the LED. QLED TVs do use Quantum Dots and LEDs. Just because the technology isn't exactly applied where you want it to doesn't make it a con.

  6. Too much extra shit by DogDude · · Score: 2

    "They will also be able to control any smart device that can control to Samsung's SmartThings system, like Amazon Echoes, Ring doorbells, and Philips Hue Lights. Bixby is baked into the remote to help you search for content and cater to commands."

    Nope. Not gonna use a TV connected to the Internet. That's dumb.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Too much extra shit by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      How are you going to get video to appear on the TV without Internet? You aren't thinking very clearly. Also, this is a smart TV, so it is the opposite of dumb.

    2. Re:Too much extra shit by DogDude · · Score: 1

      You're right. I wasn't making any sense. It's right in the name. I shouldve' known.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Too much extra shit by Required+Snark · · Score: 1

      Now you have a choice at all price price points to have a 24/7 spy in your house.

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    4. Re:Too much extra shit by Cederic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How are you going to get video to appear on the TV without Internet?

      Using one of the myriad of devices that can connect to the internet in a secure, controlled and controllable manner, then provide that content to the TV using one of the industry standard inputs.

      With no fucking adverts, no camera or microphone in the TV monitoring you, no removal of specific applications because the media company stopped paying the TV manufacturer, etc.

    5. Re:Too much extra shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to get video to appear on the TV without Internet? You aren't thinking very clearly. Also, this is a smart TV, so it is the opposite of dumb.

      You're kidding, right?

    6. Re:Too much extra shit by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

      How are you going to get video to appear on the TV without Internet?

      The USB port on the side of mine works great!

      --
      "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  7. What's not invisible by gdonald · · Score: 1

    What's not invisible is how Samsung TVs post all your viewing habits to log-ingestion.samsungacr.com.

    1. Re:What's not invisible by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Oh, it's invisible to most of the sheep out there.

  8. Been doing this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been running MythTV/XBMC/Kodi for 15+ years and I did this on every TV (originally this was a CRT!). Setting the screensaver to display a picture of the wall for a while before going blank. Taking pictures of your "invisible" monitor was all the rage back then.

  9. How would this work in practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just knowing what the wall behind the TV looks like in particular lighting isn't enough to make the TV appear to blend into the wall. You need to know the amount, direction, and color of all visible light sources and how the materials of the wall will respond to that light.

    I'm skeptical that this will do what they advertise outside of a very controlled environment.

  10. Wow! Inoovation! by Xenolith0 · · Score: 1

    No one has ever thought to take a picture of the area behind a monitor and set it as the wallpaper before.... https://www.hongkiat.com/blog/creative-transparent-screen-trick-photos/

    1. Re:Wow! Inoovation! by Known+Nutter · · Score: 2

      In a conference room at my office is an entire cork board wall with a projector screen in the middle. Someone, naturally, took a picture of the cork board, made it the room PC's wallpaper, and I guess set a Group Policy prohibiting the wallpaper from being changed. They INSIST on whimsy. I thought inspirational photos like something from Southeast Alaska would be better... sorry, but no.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    2. Re:Wow! Inoovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered tacking a memo onto it?

  11. After that other article, it begs the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will this thing even turn on if there is no internet?

  12. My existing 2011 LG television does this already by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, I did mount it on a black wall...

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. what would be cool if. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could create the effect by using and E-ink type of tech to reduce the power consumption.

    I bet Apple is pissed they didnt bring this to market, little whinny bitches..
    Wouldn't it be funny if apple tried to Sue samsung for the rights to the tech..
    sounds lame.. But understanding people whom walk into glass walls., etc. I would not be shocked
    Righton Samsung, cool innovation

    1. Re:what would be cool if. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whinny Bitches... Ohhhhh, drool..
      Their's is shinier and more distracting than yours. Now go find out if thats a glass wall or a real opening.

    2. Re:what would be cool if. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it would be funny as fuck to find a video byte of Jobs sucking msmashes fake, black translucent dildo for a can of Coke..
      You all still fucking suck..
      Mod this bitches!!!!!

  14. A Challenge by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Before you mount the TV, you'll snap a picture of the wall it's going to hang on

    So, what happens if I mount this TV on one of the inner glass walls in the new Apple Campus...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  15. I already got one :) by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Heres a picture :P

    --
    [($)]
  16. so.. Samsung have reinvented desktop wallpaper? by dexotaku · · Score: 3, Funny

    Subject says it all.

    1. Re:so.. Samsung have reinvented desktop wallpaper? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No they've invented real wallpaper.

  17. Wow! by MpVpRb · · Score: 1

    Excellent idea!

  18. Whoa Nellie! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm surprised no one commented that after buying a TV with this must have cloaking technology, they are partnering with various outfits to ...

    Wait for it........Serve you stuff that makes the whole thing pointless. So now you can be served those fine advertisements on a beautiful background that looks like your wall. Wowsers, what a brave new world full of wonder and promise.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  19. Screen Saver by freeze128 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure. Set the background as a photo of the wall behind your TV. Then load a screen saver that shows cockroaches running around the screen.

    1. Re:Screen Saver by msauve · · Score: 1

      "load a screen saver that shows cockroaches running around the screen."

      Your house, not mine.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    2. Re:Screen Saver by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Personally I would prefer a series of video streams, recorded or live of pleasant surroundings with pleasant music (here's a favourite https://www.youtube.com/watch?...), probably adjusted to time for my local with a living view adjusted for better night or day light visuals. As for power, well I will replace my windows with their problematic insulation, questionable view (not true I have a fantastic view especially sunsets, I enjoy seeing storms roll in) with solar panels and size does count.

      So Samsung want to sell what people want, include a free scenery channel in your big screen television purchase. Not just country side, but interesting city centres, markets, botanic gardens, zoos and wildlife parks etc.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Screen Saver by ixidor · · Score: 1

      the livestream of the bird hatching from pied piper

    4. Re:Screen Saver by ChoGGi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      something like: http://astronaut.io/ (shows short clips from random youtube videos with low counts and names like DSC 1234 and IMG 4321)

    5. Re:Screen Saver by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer an aquarium with sharks and frickin' lasers :)

  20. Options are Atyme and Silo, AFAIK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adn even there they both run linux under the hood, just without wifi or bluetooth built in to make them remotely hackable.

    Another big concern people need to be aware of: HDMI+Ethernet.

    HDMI cables with ethernet support means your computer or other internet connected device could be relaying messages from your television out onto the network, even if you believe you have a 'dumb' non-wifi connected device.

    The world is becoming a huge security hazard nowdays. How I reminisce for the days when the majority of people were bordering on armed uprising over CPUIDs, Clipper Chips, Palladium, and Glassholes. But now people take all of those features for granted (Save CPUIDs, which iterestingly enough are the ONLY component of your computer without a serial available to the operating system today. You should be very concerned by the information your computer is leaking on a day to day basis. your bios DMI information, your HDD SMART info, including serial #, your GPU guid/serial, your ethernet address, and each and every USB device you plug into your system can be tracked and linked between systems, making it very dangerous for anyone not smart enough to buy the cheap chinese knockoffs with fake/empty serial IDs. Ironically only the hardware equivalent of the warez scene can provide you with anonymity in this day and age.

    1. Re:Options are Atyme and Silo, AFAIK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be very concerned by the information your computer is leaking on a day to day basis. your bios DMI information, your HDD SMART info, including serial #, your GPU guid/serial, your ethernet address, and each and every USB device you plug into your system can be tracked and linked between systems, making it very dangerous for anyone not smart enough to buy the cheap chinese knockoffs with fake/empty serial IDs. Ironically only the hardware equivalent of the warez scene can provide you with anonymity in this day and age.

      That's insufficient, you need to spoof up fake tracking info, to make yourself look like an Average Joe, lest the lack of data about you leads them to single you out for further attention.

  21. The Emperor's New TV by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    "How do you like my new invisible TV? All of the shows on it say what a fantastic job I'm doing."

    "It's tremendous, Mr President. Really spectacular. Now, can we get back to the national security briefing?"

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:The Emperor's New TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a confirmed in-the-wild spotting of Trumpholm Syndrome. Someone takes any topic and defends Trump no matter how much they are abused or how deplorable his stance is. This used to happen all the time with GW Bush, too.

  22. Not a "Best Buy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Samsung also announced that it's partnering with The Weather Channel, The New York Times, and others to overlay content on the ambient TVs. They will also be able to control any smart device that can control to Samsung's SmartThings system, like Amazon Echoes, Ring doorbells, and Philips Hue Lights. "

    'Nuff said.

  23. Goes extra well with the standard spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the modern trend of TVs harvesting data like demonic vacuums, a cynic might suggest that the TV being invisible to people is probably some attempt to get higher quality data or things that people would likely not say in range of the TV normally. If people don't know the spying machine is there, well, what better way to get more candid data?

  24. Samsung smart TVs are stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really need a roku or apple TV to control them, as the built-in operating system and apps are sluggish dogshit at best...bordering on unusable.

  25. Better idea by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Go outside and snap a picture of what you would see if the TV was a window and have that, or a short length animation with the trees gently moving in the breeze. Unless you had a crappy view of an alleyway or something similar on that side.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other side of the wall that my TV is mounted on is a bathroom. A virtual window through that wall would probably make guests uncomfortable.

  26. black is back by AndyKron · · Score: 2

    I'll just paint my wall black and save $1000s!

  27. A Cunning Plan by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here is something for you hackers out there to try.
    The simple version: In a room with no exterior windows, set a large TV/monitor into a wall. Surround it by a window frame. Display the view you'd expect to see from your building, if there actually was a window there.
    Elaboration 0: Use a camera to feed a live view of outside to the 'window'.
    Elaboration 1: Have weird things happen occasionally in the view: UFO, Godzilla attack, albatross flying into the "window", tsunami, pyroclastic flow, spiderman.
    Elaboration 2: Have some cameras inside the room and some AI to identify and track human heads. By whatever method, pick one head as the victim. Feed the location of that head to the display software, so it will display the view with the correct parallax for that viewpoint.

    Once you add the parallax, I think this could be very convincing to any unsuspecting viewer.

    I disclaim any responsibility for the effects this could have on the viewer, or consequences that the viewer or others might visit upon the trickster. Consult your own ethics and lawyers and (if relevant) your institution's ethics review board.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:A Cunning Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynvKWYvyCqw

    2. Re:A Cunning Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baldrick??

  28. glossy by markdavis · · Score: 2

    >"Viewing the televisions before Samsung's event, the ambient really did appear to blend them into the walls at first blush."

    Except that Samsung and apparently most of the other manufacturers are in love with stupid, GLOSSY screens. So no, it will not be invisible, it will reflect every stray light and everything else, even when it is on. (Can you tell I am a fan of now nearly unobtainable MATT displays?)

    I can guess their "sample" setup was engineered VERY carefully to try and hide the actual reality of reflections that would be present in any real-world use.

    1. Re:glossy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw bro its just they didn't want you thinking it was a mirror on the wall. That's next years gimmick 'ultra realism'.

    2. Re:glossy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's "matte". Matt is my brother.

    3. Re:glossy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MATTE

      FTFY.

      Cheers,
      Matt

    4. Re:glossy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying as hard as I can to make more. Come on man.
      - MATT

    5. Re:glossy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First rule of buying a tv in 2018:

      Have a room with no windows.

  29. This seems like a good Roku Channel idea. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Seems like a good Roku Channel idea.

    Also, wonder if the TV will work the same in all light levels (including lights off). Does it?

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  30. I Already Got It Folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right I said I already got it. My Samsung TV is fully invisible and cost $0. Couldn't be more happy with it to be honest.

  31. Mine is totally invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 100" 8K TV that is completely invisible even when turned on!

  32. The article photo is photoshopped by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    No way it's going to blend THAT well with the wall.

    Think about it. Have you ever taken a picture, then held up the camera to the thing you just photographed to compare? The colors are always a little bit off. And think about the way the room's colors change from dim to bright and back with time of day and weather conditions. There's no way the TV is going to be able to compensate for changing lighting conditions.

    You'd be better off just displaying a random picture, like a big digital picture frame.

  33. Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You crackers would be eating this up if it was done by Apple.

  34. "The warmth" ... Snobbery detected! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you’re saying you prefer distorted colors or, when defining "warmth" like people do with vinyl, lack of precision, aka blurriness?

  35. How dumb are consumers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will look like a picture of the wall behind it. Which, I would think, looks really stupid.

    1. Re:How dumb are consumers? by ledow · · Score: 2

      And which you could do on any display device if you could be bothered to.

      Sure it makes a nice meme image from a certain angle if you spent the time to photoshop it just right. Otherwise it looks like someone took a photo of the wall and then showed it on the TV.

      And if it was REALLY convincing, even from an amateur taking the picture themselves, I'd be amazed. Most people have plain walls, surely, nowadays? You may as well just put a flat background of the right colour on it.

  36. In a perfect world... by The123king · · Score: 1

    In a perfectly calibrated lab environment, with perfect lighting, i'm sure it looks seamless. But i don't think it will be seamless in every lighting situation. In some conditions, it's just going to look odd

    --
    If you gave me a choice between a printer and a giraffe with explosive diarrhoea, i'll get my ladder and my raincoat
  37. Not true: it is a Samsung product after all. by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    When it catches fire it becomes very visible, just give it a try!

  38. Our TV already is invisible by The_Noid · · Score: 0

    It's been in its box in the cellar for years, since we didn't use it.

    1. Re:Our TV already is invisible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why in the world did "area man" take so long to show up? Did you move out of the area?

  39. I have the reverse of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of spending energy to turn it invisible, it's invisible unless I spend energy. It's called a projector.

  40. Paid ad much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much did Samsung pay for this ad?

  41. Good old Samsung by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    They can be really relied on to come up with harebrained schemes. But, in truth, they also make the most explosive devices in the market. Anyway, I am already burning with anticipation.

  42. Birds by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    Hope you don't have any pet birds or mount the TV outdoors.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  43. Sharp has better option by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    We have been using Sharp TV's as monitors in our office for years. Quite by accident I learned they have a similar feature called Wallpaper Mode but instead of looking like the wall it has an artistic picture that displays when it is turned off if you enable quick start mode. Looks like a hanging picture and as I learned from the manual is low power so it isn't using nearly as much power as normal. You can also set it to use images loaded to any USB drive connected to the TV. This isn't remotely new Samsung is just marketing it in a new way.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  44. Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ambient Mode" for the network interface.

  45. Pro Tip: by Urinal+Pube · · Score: 1

    Take the wall photo before you install the flush mount hdmi / power outlet.

  46. That's the Beauty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't know it's a TV, so you watch without knowing you are watching.

    You think that's a fireplace over there? Do you think that's a painting? Do you think that's air you are breathing? Stop trying to hit me and hit me!

    Sorry... bit of a Matrix moment there.

  47. Re:How do you watch an invisible TV? by aberglas · · Score: 1

    You close your eyes.

  48. Broken now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put mine where I used to hang the darts board. After a few weeks cracks appeared.

  49. Too bad Samsung TVs Privacy Policy is disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read it and NEVER plug your TV in to the interwebs.