Slashdot Mirror


With Financial Aid Declining, Many College Students Don't Have Enough Money To Eat, Studies Show, Even Though About 40 Percent Are Also Working (npr.org)

As students enter college this fall, many will hunger for more than knowledge. Up to half of college students in recent published studies say they either are not getting enough to eat or are worried about it. From a report: This food insecurity is most prevalent at community colleges, but it's common at public and private four-year schools as well. Student activists and advocates in the education community have drawn attention to the problem in recent years, and the food pantries that have sprung up at hundreds of schools are perhaps the most visible sign. Some schools nationally also have instituted the Swipe Out Hunger program, which allows students to donate their unused meal plan vouchers, or "swipes," to other students to use at campus dining halls or food pantries.

That's a start, say analysts studying the problem of campus hunger, but more systemwide solutions are needed. "If I'm sending my kid to college, I want more than a food pantry," says Sara Goldrick-Rab, a professor of higher education policy and sociology at Temple University in Philadelphia, and founder of the Hope Center for College, Community and Justice. [...] According to a survey of UC Berkeley students, 38 percent of undergraduates and 23 percent of graduate students deal with food insecurity at some point during the academic year, Ruben Canedo, a university employee who chairs the campus's basic needs committee, says.

497 comments

  1. this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe it will solve the obesity issue

    1. Re:this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being 10lbs under weight is about as healthy as being 100lbs over. I'd rather be obese than under weight.

    2. Re:this could be a good thing by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Well, sounds like it might be a cure for the old "freshman 15" that everyone used to gain when hitting college.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:this could be a good thing by lgw · · Score: 4, Interesting

      maybe it will solve the obesity issue

      You joke, but maybe it will help pop the tuition bubble. State school tuition is something like 30x what it was when I was young - it's insane. The more money the government threw at the problem, the more universities raised tuition to vacuum up all that financial aid plus all the money they can from their students' families.

      Like all bubbles popping, it's going to suck for a while. But university tuitions need to revert to something affordable when working part time, and that will never happen as long as the government funnels money though (some) students to the universities.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:this could be a good thing by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      We have run-away chronic disease spreading across the world because people are starving themselves. Fat people in America and other countries are starving for the proper nutrition. It defies the visual evidence but it is true. The nutrients you need to replenish brain cells and other metabolic processes is not present in fast food and most of the convenience foods marketed as healthy. Foods that make you fat and miserable are labelled as safe. Ramen noodles for instance, a staple of poor college kids, is nothing but refined flour and egregious amounts of sodium. Full belly and starvation.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re:this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed... in this job market if you don't work you are either with a criminal record (not all jobs are subject to a criminal BC), a drug user (not all jobs require drug testing), a rich kid or an idiot... or simply too lazy...

    6. Re: this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obesity linger far more American than most people realizes while in other Asia based nation there is opposite effect of food comsumption happening likely to be place blame upon by Russia or other players try to harm tge image of western nation.

      -msmash

    7. Re:this could be a good thing by jm007 · · Score: 1

      yessir, you speak truth, all of it

    8. Re:this could be a good thing by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      maybe it will solve the obesity issue

      You joke, but maybe it will help pop the tuition bubble. State school tuition is something like 30x what it was when I was young - it's insane. The more money the government threw at the problem, the more universities raised tuition to vacuum up all that financial aid plus all the money they can from their students' families.

      Like all bubbles popping, it's going to suck for a while. But university tuitions need to revert to something affordable when working part time, and that will never happen as long as the government funnels money though (some) students to the universities.

      Colleges are the worst of excess for the staff. Massive pay, working less than 20 hours a week, full retirements, and sabbaticals every so often. If only we all had it so easy. There's a reason college is never confused with the "real world".

    9. Re:this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obesity has nothing to do with what someone consumed, only how much exercise they do to burn off the calories consumed. Doesn't matter what the calories came from. The continued increase in weight correlates directly with the continued decrease in physical activity.

    10. Re:this could be a good thing by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What you post is partially true. There is a more serious problem. I was absolutely working my ass off at the gym for years and would hit plateaus and really struggled to control my weight. I was "eating healthy" or far healthier than your average American for instance--with restricted calories tracking every morsal. Eating refined sugar triggers your body's metabolic systems to immediately store fat. Not because you are eating too many calories but because of a chemical reaction that is thrown like a switch. One can of coke is too much added sugar for one day. Most people, even those who do not drink soda, are getting way more sugar than their body can handle.
      How many people have you talked to who said they lost weight by eliminating soda? Add up the calories and convert it to the equivalent weight gain/loss and you will see that there is no way the calories alone could have solved for the lost/gained weight.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    11. Re:this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universities in US are being run like corporations. They need to have tons of money to invest in better facilities and faculties. This pumps out better graduates and research that will in turn donate money to increase their endowment even more. Patents that belong to universities are also worth money. Say what we want about the universities, but US still has most of the top universities because of the massive wealth these institutions amassed. Public universities are finding it harder to compete with some of the private universities without increasing tuition. The next thing you know the tuition is out of control, because demand is still > supply.

    12. Re: this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      âoeObesity has nothing to do with what someone consumed, only how much exercise they do to burn off the calories consumed. Doesn't matter what the calories came from. The continued increase in weight correlates directly with the continued decrease in physical activity.â

      From everthing weâ(TM)ve found out in the last 10-20 years, this could not be more wrong. In fact you have it completely reversed. In most cases obesity has 100% to do with what we eat, and exercise has little to nothing to do with it. I donâ(TM)t blame you for this line of thinking, itâ(TM)s what everyone has been telling us for decades. This idea that calories in - calories out = weight loss (of the meaningful, permanent kind) needs to die. Not all calories are the same, your body reacts differently to different kinds of calories and nutrition, and even the way it reacts can differ person to person. Why do many people who migrate to America and adopt an America diet get fat? Did Planet Fitness not honor their memberships from their home countries? (hint: almost all of my uncles and aunts who immigrated to the US from a South American country got obese when they adopted an American Diet, and none of them had gym memberships in their home country)

      https://www.vox.com/2018/1/3/16845438/exercise-weight-loss-myth-burn-calories

      http://www.caloriegate.com/calories-in-calories-out/11-experts-demolish-the-calories-in-calories-out-cico-model-of-obesity

      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/02/books/review/case-against-sugar-gary-taubes.html

    13. Re: this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Underlying all are some basic physics. Simply put, if you exert more energy than consume, you will lose weight. It doesn't matter what contributed to the stored energy (fat), refined sugars, polar bears, baby kittens... whatever. Conservation of energy and all...

      Now with that said, metabolic processes and your biochemistry is pretty complicated stuff and certain foods trigger different reactions in your body that may make you less capable of expending the energy (changing your BMR, sleeping more than normal, etc.) and many foods confuse your stomach's ability to estimate required food intake (empty calories are a big contributor here, dense calories with little volume and easily broken apart processed foods).

      I lost plenty of weight eating a decent amount of refined sugars, however, I personally try to avoid it more to the fact they provide empty calories that don't satisfy my hunger and makes me sleepy. This type of diet makes it far more difficult to maintain a caloric deficit which makes it more likely to fail at weight loss. If you're trying to optimize your weight loss, yes, keep your sugar intake down... it's far easier but it doesn't break the principle of counting calories in, calories out at all.

    14. Re: this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what decade you live in but few positions any more are tenure track offering what you're describing. Due to a huge surplus of postdocs available, most universities (I'm excluding "top" research institutions) want to hire adjunct professors to fill positions which may pay $3-5k per course taught on a yearly contract they can decide not to renew at any time. When you account for time developing curriculum for a course, these adjuncts are often working less than minimum wage after working hard for years. I have a friend that taught adjunct at a local university because of their staff shortage, he felt generous. He'll never do it again because it's simply a money machine for them universities.

      Now the tenured positions you describe do still exist but they typically require years of work, bringing in a lot of hefty research funds, notoriety/prestige, teaching boatloads for pennies, etc. so yes. they often earned lofty fringe benefits by that point because they've pulled in notable profit for the university, it's payment back.

    15. Re: this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah nothing like being obese and diabetic....

    16. Re: this could be a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point with low-carb diets (and more specifically high-protein/high-fiber diets) is primarily that it makes it easier to expend mate calories. Since sugar leads to insulin production, which directly stimulates fat storage, you're quickly left with a so low blood sugar that (1) you're able to exercise less, and (2) you're hungry again quickly. So I agree that while energy of course has to be conserved, going low-carb requires much less mental control to succeed.

    17. Re:this could be a good thing by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      maybe it will solve the obesity issue

      You joke, but maybe it will help pop the tuition bubble. State school tuition is something like 30x what it was when I was young - it's insane. The more money the government threw at the problem, the more universities raised tuition to vacuum up all that financial aid plus all the money they can from their students' families.

      Like all bubbles popping, it's going to suck for a while. But university tuitions need to revert to something affordable when working part time, and that will never happen as long as the government funnels money though (some) students to the universities.

      I am in Canada. WTF is going on in the USA? University education here is provincial government and Federal Government's public/private funding. All top notch.

      Want McGill, University of Toronto, University of whatever dozen or more Canadian university institutions? They mostly match Princeton, Harvard, UCLA and Stanford. Canadians get a university education for 4k/yr plus extra for room and board. Rent a 4 bedroom upper duplex and 4 students can share the affordable rent.
        You can even do evening university (1 to 2 courses per semester).

      Education is at the same level as the quoted American Schools.
      It might be less expensive to earn a bachelor, Master or PHD degree in Canada as a foreign student. I know not what foreign students pay for fees, but I am sure it is less expensive than being in the equivalent school in the USA. Want to get a superb degree in Finance (Hautes Etudes Commercial (HEC), is a University of Montreal (French) school for commerce. Get a PHD from there and your skills will be wanted world-wide. Courses are in both languages (English/French). Want a degree in CS with concentration on AI. See Univ of Toronto, Univ of Ottawa, ETS in Montreal,
      Wow... What is the matter with your American schools. When does a Chancellor need a million dollar salary? Come to Canada for an education, not for a football team.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  2. What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For people to wake the fuck up and realize that short-term profit-driven ideology is not going to work in the long term while sacrificing investment in and opportunities for young people. Future societies will hold the American system in almost all things as a cautionary tail rather than as the triumph it could have been.

    1. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is it going to take for people not to enrol in hamburger flipping degrees like gender-studies or sociology and do something society needs?

      There's a shortage of people in the trades, why not take up a study/work program, become a tradeperson earning good money while you learn.

    2. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is it going to take for people not to enrol in hamburger flipping degrees like gender-studies or sociology and do something society needs?

      There's a shortage of people in the trades, why not take up a study/work program, become a tradeperson earning good money while you learn.

      Can somebody tell me why this got modded down?

      The poster is right. There is a huge lack of people in the trades that don't require college education. Electricians, plumbers, mechanics and the like are in great demand. My brother makes quite a bit as a Mercedes mechanic (he's in the top 1% in the USA) and he wasn't well suited to college so it worked out great for him.

      Even if you don't want to be in the trades all you life, you can work the trades, pay your way though college at night debt free if you are careful.

    3. Re:What is it going to take by jythie · · Score: 1

      They have woken up. They then changed their investment portfolio to depend less on having an educated affluent middle class.

    4. Re: What is it going to take by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Those trades are dying because they don't pay. Be a plumber watch your salary capped at $50-60 k for thirty years. 50k with kids is poverty level.

      Man, I dunno where YOU live, but those low salaries aren't what the plumbers and other associated folks like AC guys make around here!!!

      I calculate what they charge me...and it is well into the 6 figure area...has to be.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re: What is it going to take by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Because we will no longer need plumbers? Welders? Auto Repair, AC repair/Installation, etc?

      What fucking planet are you on? A society needs people from the guys shoveling Shit to the guys talking Shit at universities and everyone in between.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    6. Re: What is it going to take by Train0987 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plumbers make well over $60k and nothing about it is capped. Welders make 6 figures. Crane operators with a few years experience can make over $200k. There is a shortage of all of those and companies are willing to put people in apprenticeship positions immediately to train workers.

      But you have to get your hands dirty, and that's a non-starter for many young people who have been programmed that such work is for the lesser people.

    7. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Future societies will hold the American system in almost all things as a cautionary tail rather than as the triumph it could have been.

      I've got some bad news for you there sport ... current societies already do that.

      America has become a country where if you are rich life is good, and if you're not rich, you have the freedom to die in the streets.

      Since the GOP views poverty as a moral failing, and wealth as a morally good outcome ... they basically view poverty as your own damned fault.

      America, as a society, defaults to behaviour you wouldn't allow a 3 year old to engage in.

      America is already a fucking joke, and electing the Cheeto didn't help.

      America is a country where being a selfish douchebag is considered "the American Dream".

    8. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suspect the ignorance is yours friend. You did't give any reasons, just a pretentious foot-stomp / hissy-fit.

    9. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone can do it, then you are a very replaceable part.

    10. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we will no longer need plumbers? Welders? Auto Repair, AC repair/Installation, etc?

      What fucking planet are you on? A society needs people from the guys shoveling Shit to the guys talking Shit at universities and everyone in between.

      Right? And why is this supposed college hunger issue suddenly an issue? Could it be perhaps we're insisting on sending folks to college for courses that aren't going to pay a return, they can't afford in the first place, and when there are plenty of trades jobs available that NEED workers and pay well?

      I left home at 17(in 1997) and wore a size 31 pants iirc. When I returned home from school a couple of years later I couldn't keep 29's on my ass. My regular meals were Poptarts cooked on my upside down clothes iron and Ramen noodles from the dollar store and I was lucky if I had 2 meals a day. We've raised a generation of "whoa is me" pussies.

    11. Re:What is it going to take by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Now, youngster, you just need to learn to like the Ramen and Peas, just like we used to. You can still get Top Ramen for under $5 for a pack of 10, and canned peas for under $10 for a case of 12. Then all you need is a teakettle and you've got dinner anytime you want it.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    12. Re: What is it going to take by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to add in their travel time, brings it down considerably, but yeah.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is it going to take for people not to enrol in hamburger flipping degrees like gender-studies or sociology and do something society needs?

      There's a shortage of people in the trades, why not take up a study/work program, become a tradeperson earning good money while you learn.

      Can somebody tell me why this got modded down?

      I was wondering the same thing. I think it was set upon by Progressives who want to keep the education bubble from bursting and drying up an entire class of victims. Now, however, it seems that more level-headed moderation has taken hold.

    14. Re:What is it going to take by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Or you can buy fresh veggies, some rice, and your choice of protein source. Sauteing or stir-frying things is relatively healthy, cheap, and easy.

    15. Re:What is it going to take by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What is it going to take for people not to enrol in hamburger flipping degrees like gender-studies or sociology and do something society needs?

      Probably fewer companies that give in to the loudmouths and actually create positions like "Equality Officers" that serve no purpose other than actually working people now not only having to prop up useless middle management but even more useless (and expensive) upper management.

      Middle management was at least only useless, but these goofballs even create more red tape and busywork.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should education just be about learning a trade?

      What happened to on-the-job training. Education is an end in itself not just gearing up for a life of vocation.

    17. Re:What is it going to take by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You'll die from sodium related blood pressure before you're 50, but hey...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re: What is it going to take by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you even talking about? Plumbers these days in most of the US are clearing $70k, lower in poorer areas of course. Mechanics - general mechanics only auto are clearing $65k in non-union shops. Hell 20 years ago when I was finishing out my apprenticeship the hourly rate of pay was around $17/hr(min wage $6.85ish) at a non-union shop. Wages have only gone up. If you want to live in a big city which will suck all your money away and leave you with nothing? Go ahead. Anyone who's smart will commute in, and make a killing.

      Hell welders can clear up to $200k/year right now in the oil patch, pulling $300k+ if you have various certs like boiler. Average wage $110k. What's the median wage in the US these days? 40k? 45k? You know what? Go look at the nearest town with industry, and I'll bet you'll see "apprentices needed - no experience required." Two years ago, nobody was taking apprentices. It wasn't because the jobs weren't there, they were. Companies wanted people to directly fill in the void, no training required. The last time I saw this in the US it was 1999. Canada however? It's absolfuckinglutly dismal for work right now, it's like 2010/11 all over again.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    19. Re: What is it going to take by sycodon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I expect most academics, except for Engineers perhaps, would drown in their own shit if not for plumbers.

      They can't fix cars, they can't raise a crop, they can barely prepare food, they are pretty much helpless.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    20. Re:What is it going to take by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because of the stupidity in the first sentence. It's a very common right-wing talking point that all the people with college degrees, who can't find jobs that use those degrees, were in "dumb" majors.

      It's a lovely-sounding talking point that lays the blame on the recent graduate so that you don't have to do anything to fix it. Problem is it's completely false.

      For example, STEM degrees are something that poster would generally consider "something society needs". The US graduates 1.5 STEM students for every 1 entry-level STEM job opening.

    21. Re: What is it going to take by knoledgesponge · · Score: 1

      Also, many tradesmen are not self employed so much of that money may be absorbed elsewhere.

    22. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would wages be capped? Most trade companies are smaller and would have no ability to do that. If it's an issue, just start your own business. Smile, shake hands do a good job and leave your phone number, you'll have customers busting down your door to pay $100 an hour in a few months unless you live in some kind of shithole area.

    23. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Ironically the modern tools used these days to fix cars, raise crops and cook food are all based on technologies invented by academics of the past. Without us, the world would still be living in the dark ages. And as our society continues to move away from intellectual honesty ("feels > reals") and secular democracy, every day people's lives will continue to get shorter and more brutal while the wealthy elite grab more and more power. I find it amusing that the tide of anti-intellectualism seems to have taken its strongest hold in online tech-oriented communities like Slashdot. You are the direct beneficiaries of thousands of years of intellectual development and you are throwing it away for what?

    24. Re:What is it going to take by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      This false dichotomy is really annoying. Plumbers, welders, truck drivers, etc should all be educated. Will they desire to plug through the nearly useless drudgery of a masters degree or PhD? Hell no. They sure as hell should be exposed to advanced mathematics, literature, theories of supervision, accounting, exponential growth, and a host of other things required to keep them from getting duped by fake news and other fucking liars. People in the trades learn to think, probably more than your average college student, but they should also be equipped with historical context and a background in the hard sciences so their ability to think is bolstered by knowledge humanity has striven for centuries to learn. Deciding that someone else does not need that knowledge is inhumane. Unless all you want is a bunch of robots easily programmable by FOX/CNN.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    25. Re: What is it going to take by peragrin · · Score: 1

      You are stupid. Yes $100 an hour you get charged get broken down and the guy himself end up getting $25 an hour.

      The rest goes to the truck, insurance, taxes, materials, tools etc.

      All of that stuff adds up fast. Very fast.

      Also add in enough to cover slow times when you need to pay your employees to keep them, but don't have incoming business to offset.

      I have worked for contractors and even that $100 an hour was barely covering expenses. Profit overall came from big jobs.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    26. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to take high-scools offering trade programs and guidance counselors advising inteligent and capable students to take those courses instead of "SAT prep".

      Most of the problem is that the cost of College used to mean that everyone there was either rich from family money or exceptionally capable/driven (on scholarship or working and saving like crazy), so the networking opportunities were worth it even if your degree was worthless. That isn't true anymore as college is mostly full of people racking up debt so the only value you get is the degree. However that isn't what high-school students are being told. they're still geting the "go to college. no mater what you study you'll get better opportunities that way".

      The otehr problem is that enough baby boomers defaulted on their student loans that now you can't use them to build credit or discharge them with bankruptcy. So 17 year olds are making financial decisions comparable to a mortgage that they can't get out of based on faulty information. Mostly because the shools get judged on how many of their students go on to attentd college.

      A related problem is that many technology related trades are not being added to the high-school trade lineups like they should. IT, for example should be a trade like auto-mehcnics. A computer science degree is as likely be useless for IT as a physics degree is for an auto-mechnic.

    27. Re: What is it going to take by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Actually they aren't willing to train. They say they are but go doit. They won't pay for the training.

      Neither will they pay for welders. That takes time and skill. Lots of time and they don't want to put that time in to train.

      Lots of companies say they pay training. But you have to work 40-60 hours a week first and then in your free time do the training.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    28. Re:What is it going to take by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Agreed...brown rice, ham, eggs, peas...all cheap and a hell of a lot better than Ramen.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    29. Re:What is it going to take by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or you can buy fresh veggies, some rice, and your choice of protein source. Sauteing or stir-frying things is relatively healthy, cheap, and easy.

      Yep....they can learn to shop and cook, it isn't rocket surgery!!

      Hell, I remember one late night in grad school. I had gone shopping and as usual hit the marked down meat section, etc.

      That might a friend came over late with a pizza, and I was snacking on veal medallions with a champagne cream sauce, and I guarantee I spent MUCH less than he did on the pizza, especially considering I got multiple meals off mine and he got one, maybe 2 best with his.

      It isn't hard to learn to cook, and I'd scour the weekly grocery ads for what's on sale, and check the mark down counters and carts, and basically let THAT drive what I cooked and ate.

      This kind of thing keeps meals from getting boring and keeps costs down.

      I was working part time at the time too.

      I make a healthy living now...but I still largely shop that way, I see what's on sale at the various grocery stores around me, I use that to plan my menus and on the weekend I shop and hit those stores for the best deals, I cook on the weekends, and eat leftovers for most of the week...and they're good and healthy.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    30. Re:What is it going to take by Train0987 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      One doesn't need an undergraduate degree to be "educated". The ability to read and basic critical thinking skills will do. You assume that people who disagree with you politically must be inferior. That's really all the academic Left is teaching people nowadays.

    31. Re:What is it going to take by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      "America has become a country where if you are rich life is good, and if you're not rich, you have the freedom to die in the streets."

      Every country has always been like that for the entirety of human history. There's no such thing as a socialist utopia.

    32. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top Ramen ? Canned Peas ? you are a capitalist pig ...

    33. Re: What is it going to take by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I know contractors, and well...maybe the ones you worked at had money management problems...as that the ones I know, make pretty good money.

      Once you buy your tools, etc...which IS a considerable investment, you then are able to start making some serious money.

      At least the ones I've known are.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    34. Re: What is it going to take by plague911 · · Score: 1

      Yeah become a welder because for one year you can earn 200k while working 100+ hour work weeks, develop a drug habit nearly required by the insane work schedule, then be unemployed for the next 2 years after the oil boom/bust cycle moves on! Great choice!

      I actually do advocate for trades jobs over the burger flipping degrees, but let us not pretend the life of a tradesmen is so rose tinted.

    35. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All modern forms of farming are 100% dependent on your despised academics. Without the work of academics at Ag Colleges, farm yields would be about 10% of what they are today.

    36. Re:What is it going to take by plague911 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes and the rest of us STEM graduates take the business, law, marketing jobs from the poor B.A.'s who cant do jobs in their own studied industry. This is the reason STEM employment peaked at about 1/3 the unemployment rate of BAs.

      Yes there are plenty of dumb degrees and people keep studying them. This is a major problem.

    37. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errrrr ... yes some welders could make 6 figures ... but realistically, in the 90th percentile, you'd be in a decent middle class range of $60-80k a year. Which isn't bad.

    38. Re:What is it going to take by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Where's the correlation between "starving in college" and [degrees you disparage]? Cause most engineers are in school longer than four years, and therefore are more likely to suffer from not enough cash.

      Also, and this needs to be repeated, college is not a trade school. I think people should study whatever blows their socks off. If people study all kinds of things, then society is richer because of it. The fact that we make it unaffordable to study whatever interests people, instead of what pays bills, is a travesty.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    39. Re: What is it going to take by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      This is true. There are a very low number of tradespeople who hit higher specialty wages, or succeed at running their own business.

      Trade wages cap low.

    40. Re:What is it going to take by thunderclees · · Score: 1

      Maybe the US needs to stop financing foreign nationals taking seats at its universities.
      Because administrators know they can fill a seat with a foreign national they have no concern about raising tuition

    41. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that companies want to pay more for employees rather than train someone for less?
      Yeah, I don't think so.

    42. Re: What is it going to take by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      These are boom bust jobs. Many of these jobs are hurting for people at periods, and dumping experienced workers at other periods. It's similar to why nobody wants to pick crops. You have to move often to stay employed and the compensation doesn't match they effort.

      Not to mention the coworkers you end up working with...
      This has little to do with people unwilling to work hard and everything to do with people unwilling to be used up physically and abandoned.

    43. Re:What is it going to take by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      America has become a country where if you are rich life is good, and if you're not rich, you have the freedom to die in the streets.

      If you're dying in the streets you're either homeless and are living on the streets (in which case, you could just as easily be "dying at home" or you're intentionally choosing to do so. An ER has to take you in if you're in a critical condition, regardless of ability to pay, so long as it accepts Federal funding. And "street" implies you're in some sort of vaguely urban area.

      I think what you really mean is "you have the freedom to go off and die in the woods", which is absolutely true and has been so since the Founding.

    44. Re:What is it going to take by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the basic tradeoff between wealth and health that everybody has to choose between? You can always be poor and ignorant instead and not go to college.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    45. Re:What is it going to take by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe where you live. Veggies and protein for under $1/meal? I challenge that. Give me a meal plan that costs under $21 a week.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    46. Re:What is it going to take by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I can't get brown rice, ham, and eggs for a cost of less than $1.50/meal...where do you live that food is that cheap?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    47. Re:What is it going to take by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the champagne ?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    48. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that you had a shit time and survived is not a good reason to advocate that others have a shit time

    49. Re:What is it going to take by theurge14 · · Score: 1

      Well, we could always take a cue from Soviet Russia and restrict college to a select few then send the rest of us out to jobs society needs, as you say.

    50. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Those trades are dying because they don't pay. Be a plumber watch your salary capped at $50-60 k for thirty years. 50k with kids is poverty level.

      Man, I dunno where YOU live, but those low salaries aren't what the plumbers and other associated folks like AC guys make around here!!!

      I calculate what they charge me...and it is well into the 6 figure area...has to be.

      I just had this discussion with someone. Skilled trades paying well is a memory from a generation ago. Due to the destruction of unions the trades don't pay like they used to. Check the Bureau of Labor statistics. The median pay for a plumber in 2017 was around 50k (https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/plumbers-pipefitters-and-steamfitters.htm), Electrician: 54k, Auto mechanic: 40k, Plumber: 53k.... while, at least according to one study, the average STARTING pay for a new college grad (even factoring in those "useless" majors) was around 50k (http://time.com/money/4777074/college-grad-pay-2017-average-salary/). Don't believe the hype, believe the data.

    51. Re:What is it going to take by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Eggs are about 25 cents. Snow peas/green beans, onions, garlic, and tomatoes are also cheap. So are rice and potatoes for carbs. Maybe not $1 per meal, but $2 or $3 is doable. Cheapest isn't always best if it isn't healthy.

    52. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The $200K/year welding jobs require special tickets that are very hard to get. These jobs are similar to software architect vs code monkey in terms of number and skill required. On the surface, this sounds great but welders suffer cumulative damage to their eyes and many suffer vision problems as they get older. Trades pay well but are hard on the body.
       

    53. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plumbers make well over $60k and nothing about it is capped. Welders make 6 figures. Crane operators with a few years experience can make over $200k. There is a shortage of all of those and companies are willing to put people in apprenticeship positions immediately to train workers.

      But you have to get your hands dirty, and that's a non-starter for many young people who have been programmed that such work is for the lesser people.

      While there may be SOME welders that make 6 figures (I'm looking at YOU underwater welders) government data shows that the median salary of a welder in 2017 was about $40k (https://www.bls.gov/ooh/production/welders-cutters-solderers-and-brazers.htm).

    54. Re: What is it going to take by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      $1.50 per meal is still super cheap, but where the hell do you live that you CAN'T get it lower than that? Do you exclusively buy organic free range gluten free hand massaged crap from whole foods?

      Eggs are around $1 per dozen. How many do you need for a meal? 18?

      A pound of bulk dry rice is similarly less than a dollar. How many pounds are you eating per meal?

      Ham is more expensive, but you can get it for $3 per pound or less when it's on sale. Use it sparingly and it can go a long way.

    55. Re:What is it going to take by jeff4747 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes there are plenty of dumb degrees and people keep studying them. This is a major problem.

      No, it really isn't. The vast majority of degrees that are awarded are not "dumb". The majority of people who can't find work have a "smart" degree.

      If you want another example, let's take Law that you mentioned. There's a massive unemployment problem among people with JDs. We're making faaaaaaar too many. Yet no one cites JD as a "dumb" degree.

    56. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They aren't. They are saying that sometimes life is tough and you deal with instead of being a victim and whining about it

    57. Re: What is it going to take by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      And who do you think will keep that 10%?

    58. Re: What is it going to take by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Not bad at all and no loans to pay back

    59. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      State your actual point so it can be directly engaged with.

    60. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iâ(TM)m sure the academics th GP takes issue with are not the ones involved in the hard sciences, but in the liberal arts; lawyers, bankers, etc. I.E. the sort of people who steer policy, skim their living off of the backs of people who are the productive movers of society, not just the shakers who seem to take more than their fair shareâ"and for what value do they add?

      Even flies, worms and mosquitoes have a place in the natural ecosystem, but upon much reflection, I donâ(TM)t see what benefit their analogs are to the human economic ecosystem.

    61. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If you cannot get a job in it afterwards, it doesnt matter how hard the degree was, or how smart you have to be to pass. It was a dumb degree to get, so it is a "dumb" degree.

      If there are no job openings in brain surgeon, well going to school to be one is pretty dumb.

      If there are no job openings for rocket scientist, well going to school to be one is pretty dumb.

      If there are a ton of job openings in plumber, electrician, or mechanic then getting the traing to be one makes your education choices smarter then the other two by a long shot.

    62. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when they do such things as invent the Atomic Bomb, a new weapon against cancer (see use of Avastin to starve tumors) and new software tools.
      Those are academics too.

    63. Re:What is it going to take by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the champagne ?

      Not sure, was a long time ago....but likely was something cheap like J.Roget or the like....which was like about $5-6 back then?

      I did have a job you know....and stretched my money, but you can afford a bottle of booze like that if you save and buy when on sale, etc....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    64. Re:What is it going to take by AlanBDee · · Score: 1

      What is it going to take for people not to enrol in [...] sociology and do something society needs?

      Am I the only one who see's the irony in that statement?

      Yes too many people end up worse off by getting student loans to get a degree that isn't marketable.

    65. Re:What is it going to take by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      America has become a country where if you are rich life is good, and if you're not rich, you have the freedom to die in the streets.

      Since the GOP views poverty as a moral failing, and wealth as a morally good outcome ... they basically view poverty as your own damned fault.

      I make around 60 thousand a year, single dad for two kids, and am able to support myself and my kids. I have no degree but I work smart and I do well. I'm definitely not rich and am not dying in the streets.

      Granted, my 60 thousand wouldn't get me very far if I lived in one of the liberal cities that had a 15 dollar an hour minimum wage.

    66. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you still can't fix shit.
      You can't grow a crop
      You can't butcher an animal
      You can't do much except sit around and snark about how good you are.

      And No, the folks who came up with these technologies were decidedly NOT academics. they were blue collar workers and entrepreneurs. The Wright Brothers were fucking Bicycle mechanics.

    67. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simple fact is we can't always tell what the future will need in terms of degrees. This is besides the point and is used by the real culprits of this issue to distract from the real issue.

      While I agree a one size fits all education system is failing many people in this country, the simple fact of the matter is that this situation is the direct result of a war on education access and equality that the conservative right has raged in support of their plutocratic agenda.

      Having free upper education for all based on their needs and abilities would unarguable pay for itself in higher GDP, but it would create a more meritorious society which is an anathema to the plutocratic society that the conservatives are trying to create, where your birth economic place determines your future, and not your abilities and hard work.

    68. Re:What is it going to take by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      America has become a country where if you are rich life is good, and if you're not rich, you have the freedom to die in the streets.

      Every country has always been like that for the entirety of human history. There's no such thing as a socialist utopia.

      But there's several examples of socialist dystopias.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    69. Re:What is it going to take by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Change it to white rice and you can do that pretty easy. I haven't priced brown rice.

      Heck, there are times I'll cook white rice with a can of wolf chili just to make that chili into a meal for the family. Cost about 3 dollars for the 3 of us and we have food left over for lunch.

    70. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plumbers need people with sinks, tubs, toilets with problems and the money to pay to get them fixed in order to make well over $60k. Make no mistake that the trades will also suffer from the continuing concentration of wealth.

    71. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it would help if the right wasn't molesting and kidnapping children. I mean it really does seem like they are evil cartoon villians out to kidnap children, hide religious child bride marriages, destroy the environment, and just generally be assholes to 99% of the population.

      Like, there really genuinely is something wrong with anyone that supports that stuff, its pure nightmare fuel evil and yes, you must be insane and probably pretty stupid to buy into it. I think liberals have just stopped holding back the punches and trying to be centerist, and why not? The right has gone full monkey shit flinging so the gloves come off. Everyone could calm down and be civil but c'mon, you suckle at the teeth of the drama llama just like everyone else, a Jerry springer shit show of grinning idiots and corruption.

    72. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right? And why is this supposed college hunger issue suddenly an issue?

      Well, if you don't know, then read all the way up to understand what the parent is talking about? You are the one that didn't understand.

      Also, if you look at all of those college students nowadays, where do most of them spend their money? Don't tell me that they really spend their money on necessities. I don't believe that. If you want to brag about your past, then my past is tougher than yours because I put myself through college by going to work as a night laborer. The only route I took from home to school to work and home using public transportation. I didn't do any entertainment but watched and listened to my friends talking about them. I spent exactly the amount of money paying for lunch. The people I worked for paid for my dinner and that was from a street vendor (not a restaurant). I never had breakfast at the time. I finished school and found a job before I graduated. Though, this is a different time.

    73. Re: What is it going to take by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      That's the expected response- call out Universities for their excesses, for their detachment from reality, for their calloussness in taking $100,000 from naive students getting underwater basket weaving degrees.... and get called 'anti-intellectual'

      There's nothing 'intellectual' about anything academics are being challenged for in this thread... 'craven', 'wasteful', 'uncaring', 'fascist thought police' ...these are all much more apt descriptions of the modern academic than 'intelectual.'
      There are a great number of good people at universities doing good work..... but these people ought to be able to see their surroundings for what they are.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    74. Re: What is it going to take by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      Ironically the modern tools used these days to fix cars, raise crops and cook food are all based on technologies invented by academics of the past. Without us, the world would still be living in the dark ages. And as our society continues to move away from intellectual honesty ("feels > reals") and secular democracy, every day people's lives will continue to get shorter and more brutal while the wealthy elite grab more and more power. I find it amusing that the tide of anti-intellectualism seems to have taken its strongest hold in online tech-oriented communities like Slashdot. You are the direct beneficiaries of thousands of years of intellectual development and you are throwing it away for what?

      Don't pat yourself on the back too hard. Colleges are so full of the lazy and entitled today that there's a reason people despise them. Safe spaces are not the products of the intellectually strong and anyone with more than 2 brain cells knows it.

    75. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I sew and repair my own clothes, program my own websites and webserver along with doing hosting. I fix my own car, and I do all the repairs on my apartment myself because my landlord is a friggin slumlord.

      But hey, keep pretending we are some sort of special breed of exotic animal and not your friends neighbors family and the people you went to school with. It is a hell of a lot easier to generalize when you put some kind of a face onto a dummy representing a whole class of people than when you actually take a closer look at them and realize they are people.

    76. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't want to open the youtube =/= can't

    77. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you deliberately ignore the graduate degree required fields like chemistry and physics, and that many STEM graduates are going into fields like banking and healthcare, which aren't "STEM" fields but seem to hire a lot of STEM grads. I've got no problem with tuition assistance for engineering majors, but gender studies? You gotta be shitting me.

      Am I talking out my ass? I wanted to be a math major, but I wanted a paycheck, so I majored in EE got a job, and then the masters in math when I had time and money.

    78. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be nice that you could work and afford college, try that today and watch your little uppity ass get crushed like an elephant stepping on a grape.

      I love you old farts reminiscing about the golden ages and how it was so magical and bootstrappyness and other bullshit, go live in the real world you overly entitled douchebag where people are homeless freezing starving and going to college and figure out that the current situation IS NOT THE FUCKING SAME AT ALL. We have entered into a goddamned economy apocalypse where only older people are still able to squeeze by while the rest of us are FUCKING DYING.

      Stop victimizing us and help us you old bastard fucks

    79. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I looked up the average salaries (and ranges) for those and can't find anything that says a crane operator makes $200k a year.

    80. Re: What is it going to take by jareth-0205 · · Score: 1

      But you have to get your hands dirty, and that's a non-starter for many young people who have been programmed that such work is for the lesser people.

      Yeah. And who did that programming? We did that. We did that.

    81. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of the STEM students graduating are actually citizens? If you're claiming that we've got a job shortage and a talent surplus in STEM then I'm sure you support immigration reform.

    82. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this "Begging the Question" or "The Tail Wagging the Dog"? I can't get my logical fallacies straight.

    83. Re: What is it going to take by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Could you look up the occupations of Einstein, Edison and Tesla for me please? And even these guys weren't living in the Dark Ages. In short, you're quite pompous without warrant.

    84. Re:What is it going to take by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Plumbers, welders, truck drivers, etc should all be educated.

      They already are.

      they should also be equipped with historical context and a background in the hard sciences

      Conservative people (those tradesman you just derided) tend to outperform liberal people at exactly history and hard sciences. So again, they already are.

      host of other things required to keep them from getting duped by fake news and other fucking liars

      Here we start to see your agenda. Fake news and fucking liars occur outside and inside academia. Do you somehow believe academics are all honest people?

      Deciding that someone else does not need that knowledge is inhumane.

      Deciding what they must know and study (and enforcing it) sounds quite totalitarian. Also quite susceptible to abuse once established. I presume you'd like to be on the committee? More of that agenda.

      a bunch of robots easily programmable by FOX/CNN

      Bingo. It is not knowledge you wish upon them but an erasure of their conservative views.

    85. Re:What is it going to take by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Being poor may exclude some from college but certainly not all. There are full scholarships just for that. And being ignorant won't keep you out of college, there are plenty of people who graduated who are both poor and ignorant.

    86. Re: What is it going to take by dj245 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Welders can make 100k a year. The majority do not. The highest paying gigs are usually seasonal or temp gigs.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    87. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that you often times don't know what the market is going to look like years later when you'd have the degree. For just a BA or BS you're looking at a minimum of 4 years down the road and trying to guess what the labor market is going to look like. And that's assuming that you pass all your classes, graduate and start looking at that point. It can be even longer if the path requires an entry level position before having any hope of being hired.

      That's a long time to try and guess what the future will be like. Few people would have predicted the great recession a year before and as a result a number of jobs became very hard to find, so people would have been in school working on a relevant degree for years only to have the rug pulled out from under them at that point.

      What's more, a lot of those "dumb" humanities degrees are actually getting people jobs, they're just not necessarily being used for the purported purpose of the degree.

    88. Re: What is it going to take by Kielistic · · Score: 1

      It's pretty simple really. If push came to shove farmers can feed themselves. Factory farming is not needed to feed small communities. It is needed to feed megacities.

    89. Re:What is it going to take by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Getting a job is really only part of the battle. You actually have to get one that you can stand day in or day out or you're not doing any favors. Become a plumber? Sure, some people don't mind kneeling in muck or working with shit. But 'surprise' some people don't.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    90. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slash dot, where the solution is that gender studies majors should study plumbing.

      Funny how all the geniuses here know so much but are not underemployed UT workers living in their moms basement.

    91. Re:What is it going to take by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      Welcome to capitalism.

      If you choose to privatise tertiary education and make it user pays you also don't get to make moral judgements and dictate what people choose to pay for. If you want to stop people from studying gender or sociology, by all means, socialise the education system and use that to exercise influence on what people study.

    92. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one wants to work in the trades because the trades are blue collar work which is not respected in America, and is constantly under attack by white collar types, who think blue collar work shouldn't pay anything higher than minimum wage.

    93. Re: What is it going to take by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What are you even talking about? The average welder in the patch for example is 47hrs. That's 7hrs of OT at 1.5x/week. I'm having problems finding this drug habit problem you're talking about something else?

      Have you worked a trade or two before? I'm just curious.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    94. Re: What is it going to take by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The $200K/year welding jobs require special tickets that are very hard to get.

      "Hard to get" gee would you look at that? Huh one of the trade magazines is listing most of those tickets and courses starting at around $4k for a 200hr course, optional weekends as well. Very difficult.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    95. Re: What is it going to take by f3rret · · Score: 1

      Get a job doing off-shore work. Go out to sea for a couple of months, make enough money for the whole year.

      Be in imminent mortal danger most of your working hours.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    96. Re: What is it going to take by f3rret · · Score: 1

      That's the expected response- call out Universities for their excesses, for their detachment from reality, for their calloussness in taking $100,000 from naive students getting underwater basket weaving degrees.... and get called 'anti-intellectual'

      There's nothing 'intellectual' about anything academics are being challenged for in this thread... 'craven', 'wasteful', 'uncaring', 'fascist thought police' ...these are all much more apt descriptions of the modern academic than 'intelectual.'
      There are a great number of good people at universities doing good work..... but these people ought to be able to see their surroundings for what they are.

      Can't tell you why. But your words make me think about a book

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    97. Re:What is it going to take by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's not a magic bullet. Where I live higher education is free. Here are the results:

      1. For empty degrees you have 20-30 candidates per seat
      2. For STEM (except Computer Science) you get 0.3 candidate per seat
      3. For SC you get 2 candidates per seat.
      4. Very few people go to trades
      5. Burger flipping and entry level jobs require masters degree (in no particular field, it just serves as a proof that you can concentrate long enough to be useful)
      6. Universities keep coming to the government for more money and usually get them, since "investing in education" brings voters
      7. Students and teachers never see the money from #6, they all get siphoned by bureaucracy
      8. Long gone are the days when people were actually educated in universities. Come in, punch clock, get degree, nobody has time for intellectual discussion.

      The reality is, that it doesn't matter HOW you pay for education. Both models work as long as people make informed decisions, and both fall apart when they get fooled by smoke and mirrors.

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
    98. Re:What is it going to take by f3rret · · Score: 1

      America has become a country where if you are rich life is good, and if you're not rich, you have the freedom to die in the streets.

      Every country has always been like that for the entirety of human history. There's no such thing as a socialist utopia.

      But there's several examples of socialist dystopias.

      There's also lots of examples of socialist...um...averagetopias. Whatever is between a utopia and a dystopia.
      Like most of Scandinavia. Pretty fucking Socialist. Not very utopian nor particularly dystopian.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    99. Re:What is it going to take by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      False premise here.

      No one is saying that people in trades don't need to be educated. What they don't need is to drop $50K on a four year degree at a public or private university when they can get an associate at a community collage for a couple of grand.

      Rich people can afford to spend huge amounts of money studying what are basically hobby subjects. Most people attend higher education to learn what they need to get a job. For a lot of people that should be trade school.

      Once they have a job it's trivially easy now to pick up hobby subjects using one of the online sources for free or way less than a conventional 4 year college.

      If colleges were in the business of preventing people from being duped statistics instead of algebra and calculus would be a required mathematical subject, and history based on facts instead of SJW memes would be taught. But that's not the agenda.

    100. Re:What is it going to take by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      College is a trade school for everyone except the rich. I say that as someone who has three advanced degrees, not one of which I paid for. I can't imagine borrowing a life time of debt to get a degree for any reason other than to make money.

      Society is only richer for subsidizing higher education when people are studying things which benefit society. In Europe competition for "free" education is cutthroat, with only the best performers having slots. And these slots are only in certain areas. Real subjects, not memes, that actually benefit society.

      Education is not dependent on attending specific schools. No one is against education. The problem is we don't need an unending stream of people with degrees in library science or trasngender studies or black history. Be interested in those areas if you want and study them on your own, but be realistic about your ability to get a job in that field before you borrow $50,000 to get that degree. And don't expect everybody else to pay for your hobby if you want to study a field but know you won't be able to work in it.

    101. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If college education really was an end onto itself, they wouldn't ask several hundred thousand dollars apiece for it, nor would students be forced to endure political indoctrination (where disagreement gets you flunked) to graduate.

    102. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're blatantly lying.

      I live in one of the lowest cost of living areas in the country, and I make $95k as an electrician. I could make even more if I needed to, but I want to work a normal schedule.

      The only people pulling under $50k around here are kids or ex-cons.

    103. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we tried to help, we told you not to vote for orange people, you refused to listen, thinking you knew better. reap what ye have sown boy. REAP IT. 0 sympathy.

    104. Re: What is it going to take by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I've seen a Modern Marvels or similar show that IIRC said that the people who load/unload container ships with those overhead cranes do pretty well.

    105. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Average plumber pay right now, just from 10 seconds Googling, is in the mid-$20/hour range.

      The very, very top-end are master plumbers in cities with very strong plumbers' unions, usually ones where a license (and therefore membership in the union) is required to do any kind of work that pays more than a pittance.

      You know why those wages are so high? Because they very tightly control the number of people that are allowed to be licensed plumbers. So they're already at their maximum employment, and only adding on as population grows in the area. There's no room to add more high-paying jobs, because adding more would just drive down wages.

      Plumber wages in other areas are low, and won't go up, because they're in either over-saturated markets with too much competition, or they're in poor areas, or both.

      Same with super-specialized stuff like aerospace welders: just a couple really, really good people do all the super-high-paying work, and nobody else gets trained to do it because it's insanely hard, specialized, and everyone wants to just know that Frank, the guy that's been doing the space shuttle welding for 20 years and has never made a bad weld and knows the thing inside and out, is the one that is going to do it tomorrow, because they don't want some new guy doing it that they don't trust - so they just keep giving Frank raises so he doesn't leave or retire, and only go and find the next-most-amazing person out there when Frank basically dies on them. There's just no room for growth in these areas.

    106. Re: What is it going to take by plague911 · · Score: 1

      No I have not. I am ,however, familiar on an amateur level with the oil industry. There are dozens of articles about the boom bust cycle and its associated impact on massive drug use spikes within the field workers. https://oilprice.com/Energy/Cr...

    107. Re: What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software engineers can make well over $200k without risking their life on a 200 ft tall rickety crane installed by incompetents. This is why STEM jobs have been completely overtaken by the socialist/progressive left; because they are MUCH smarter, provably, then the cult that believes STEM is a liberal conspiracy from Satan.

    108. Re:What is it going to take by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      If there are no job openings in brain surgeon, well going to school to be one is pretty dumb

      If you can reliably predict the economy 12 years ahead of time, you should be making a fortune on Wall Street instead of being a brain surgeon.

    109. Re:What is it going to take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one wants to work in the trades because the trades are blue collar work which is not respected in America, and is constantly under attack by white collar types, who think blue collar work shouldn't pay anything higher than minimum wage.

      Also what the trades do is for the most part actual hard work. Nobody wants that.

    110. Re:What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      When is the left going to wake the fuck up and come to the realization that there is an absolute direct correlation between government student aid and the current cost of education?

      Forever tuition directly matched inflation, and then when the government began the student load program, the VERY NEXT YEAR tuition began to rise much faster than inflation.

      Supply and demand.. If suddenly everyone can afford to go to college, but there are not enough seats to go around, prices RISE. More demand than supply.... ECONOMICS 101

      Meanwhile, Texas alone has a shortage of nearly 50,000 people qualified to work in very high paying ($100,000+/year) equipment operator jobs.

      The left has pushed the "everyone must go to college to succeed" bullshit line. It is the government and the left that is a direct cause of the current financial crisis in education vis-a-vis the societal attitudes toward manual labor and blue collar jobs.

      You can have your lame ass pharmacy technician job, in a field absolutely saturated with techs, and bring home $50K/year while trying to pay off $150,000 in student loans (which will take, on average, 17 years to pay off.

      Meanwhile, there will be those who finish high school, go into the trades, and in 5 years are operating a crane at the Port of Los Angeles and will be making $200/hour and working 4 or 5 hours a day. That person will have vastly more free time and will be a lot richer than the moron who bought the line that you can only be well off if you go to college and load yourself up with tons of debt.

      I am all for college. IF YOU CAN AFFORD IT.

      If you have to load yourself up with crippling debt, to get that education, then I have no sympathy for you. Hopefully, after all that college, you'll at least be smart enough then to realize that 18 years of debt is not worth a $50,000/year job. Of course, by then it's too late.

      Or, you could just realize that nothing the left does is actually for your benefit. The left was always the party of slavery and it still is. Back then it was physical slavery. Today it is economic slavery. The worse off you are economically, the more likely you are to vote Democrat.

      The left cares nothing for you beyond your ability to vote. If they actually cared, then why is Obama currently worth $400 million? I mean, he could live like a King with $100 million. Why hasn't the other $300 million been donated to some charity?

      Make all the excuses you want... We on the right know it's because he is fine with giving you MY money if it will get him YOUR vote. But he sure-as-fuck isn't gonna give up his money to get that same vote.

      The current president of Venezuela just ADMITTED that socialism is the reason his country is BROKE. Socialism is the reason that people in that country are STARVING TO DEATH. Our track record with socialism and starvation remains at 100%.

      The left won't be happy until that occurs here. It will, eventually... Socialism is a system that fails 100% of the time.

      And no, you fucking cunts, the Nordic countries are not socialist. They aren't even close. They're slightly more capitalistic than the US if you really dig into it. The minor bit of socialism they have right now is breaking them, just like it's breaking the US.

      70% of federal spending goes to entitlements and social programs. And now we are $20 T in debt.... How long do you fucking idiots, on the left, think this party can run?

    111. Re:What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      This is precisely the attitude of the left, in general. It does not matter to them that you are correct. In fact, that is probably enraging this person.

      The line of the left is "you must go to college" to succeed. The left hates any evidence that you can succeed by doing, what is traditionally called, blue collar work.

      $100K+/year jobs are out there, waiting to be filled. Tens of thousands of those jobs in Texas alone. Tens of thousands more in CA... Hundreds of thousands across the United States.

      The left will continue to drive the idea that to be successful you must bury yourself in debt to get that education. The left will offer you crap like Vagina Studies which will be absolutely useless in the real world. The left is fine that you'll end up working at Starbucks with $150K in student loans (that the Democrats made sure you can't bankrupt yourself out of) and will end up much poorer than the guy who's fixing your plumbing.

      I went into the military, directly out of High School, and then when my 4 years were done, I went into the trades (telecom) and ended up (in 2 years) making $120K/year. No debt.. ZERO

      You buy what you can afford. Debt should be reserved for the really big purchases.. House, car, etc..

      If you put that Playstation on your credit card, you are an idiot. (unless it's a card rate less than inflation). Why the fuck would you pay more (via interest) for something you don't need, when you could just delay your instant gratification for a bit, and pay for it later with money you have? You'll pay less... It's as simple as that..

      College is wonderful... Provided you can afford it.. Provided you need it... Provided it won't break you financially.

      The parent poster is proof that the left are idiots. Ignorance sucks.. Ignore of economics and reality...

      You can go to college ANY TIME. Do it after you are cash positive.. Take the schooling as you can afford it...

    112. Re: What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      You are a lying (or delusional) fuck.

      Define early. Early like 4 years? i.e. the typical time for college? Early like that person is learning and getting paid, the whole time, to learn? Unlike college where you learn but pay out to learn?

      It may take years to learn your trade, but once you have learned it, you have no debt..(at least not from the education side).

      It's economics.. There is a severe shortage of tradespeople.. Wages have risen to attract new talent. No, it's not all fields.. Today it's heavy equipment operators. Maybe tomorrow it's electricians...

      But keep beating that lefty drum... Keep telling yourself you "care" while driving policies that lead to people with useless Masters Degrees in Women's Studies working at Starbucks and saddled with debt they can't bankrupt... Debt that will last, on average, for 18 FUCKING YEARS. If you can't take a week to research your options and find a job that will pay you $120K/year after a 4 year apprenticeship, then fuck you, you lazy fuck.. Go get that Doctorate..

      Later you can be the asshole that hands me my Burger 'n' Fries. And you better say "Thank you, come again". Yeah, you better say it, because THAT JOB can be filled by anyone... It's suited to both high school dropouts and assholes with useless degrees.

    113. Re: What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Typical lefty, commie, cunt... Give him facts and he cries.

      "Oh, it's so much harder today.. Oh my pussy hurts"

      How about you stop bleeding all over the goddamn place for 5 minutes and learn from history?

      Things aren't tougher now.. The problem is that the generation now wants instant gratification. You don't want to work while you earn your degree. You want it now...

      You'll bury yourself in debt to have it NOW NOW NOW. Back in the day, either your parents PAID for your degree or you earned it while you worked, or you got a scholarship. But, it was PAID FOR NOW. Not later. NOT LATER.

      (also, there were real men who simply worked for a living, raised a family, and did not burden society with their bitching about how hard work is)

      NOBODY WENT INTO DEBT TO GET A DEGREE. What the fuck, about that, is so goddamn hard to acknowledge?

      Nobody came out of University with $150,000 in debt. What the fuck, about that, is so hard to understand?

      $50K/year is not horrible. You can live comfortably on it, even here in CA. Maybe YOU picked a stupidly high priced area to live in, but that's not my fault and I'm not gonna pay for it.

      The left created the problem. The right pays for it. Always..

      You create massive economic problems by refusing to accept that demand/supply are linked. And your solution is always to attack the successful and demand they pay for your fuckups.

      GO FUCK YOURSELF IN YOUR BLEEDING PUSSY.

    114. Re: What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      Everything you said is true. But you are wasting your time. The left looks down on real work. If you work with your hands, you rate the same as a bum to them. I mean, if you don't earn money by sitting on your ass, you must be some sort of mouth-breathing degenerate.. Dirt is so... dirty... You can't expect them to get some on their delicate hands..

      And don't even get them started on calluses.. I mean, if they get calluses, it won't feel like a girl's hand when they sit at home and jerk off. That's all they can do with that worthless degree..Sit at home and jerk off with those soft delicate hands....

    115. Re: What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      And No, the folks who came up with these technologies were decidedly NOT academics. they were blue collar workers and entrepreneurs. The Wright Brothers were fucking Bicycle mechanics.

      Awesome post, man.. I suspect more than one liberal just had a stroke trying to comprehend that one..

    116. Re:What is it going to take by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      The US graduates 1.5 STEM students for every 1 entry-level STEM job opening.

      You don't see the problem right there? You have over saturated the employment pool. Just because a job is useful doesn't mean EVERYONE should try to do it.

      Go do one of the other useful jobs. It is quite useless to get a degree in a field you can't possibly find employment in. Education that can't be put to use is... useless.

  3. All of this was predicted in the 90s by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Informative

    When I was in school. The right wing in America said it would be fine and the kids would just take responsibility and work their way through college like they did (ignoring that they all had higher wages adjusted for inflation and 1/5th the tuition). What drives me nuts is we all knew this was coming and just said fuck it. And all we got for it was some paltry tax cuts that expire.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I went hungry my share of nights back in the late 80s, while working my way through college. My roommates and I would sometimes pitch in together to buy food from the grocery store to make meager meals. So no, its not a new thing, and its not really a problem.

      Tuition price inflation is a problem.

    2. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 3, Informative

      Until LEFT wing America started loaning money to college students in bulk, releasing the constraints on tuition costs and condemning students to a lifetime of debtors prison with nothing more than a "gender studies" degree to work from. What happened? Tuition rates went though the roof at a faster pace than inflation, schools built buildings and new campuses all over the place with the extra money, adding to their costs. All the while students and parents have been left holding the bill as debt.

      This is a multi faceted problem. Stop looking at it in two dimensions.

      By the way... The GI bill still pays out if you enlist. You CAN get though college nearly debt free if you are willing to do what it takes to make it happen. You may have to settle for a less well known college, spend your first two years at an inexpensive community college and work your butt off, but you can make it though college with a minimum of debt if you try. However, a lot of kids are loathed to work, prefer borrowing heaps of easy to obtain cash from the federal student loan program and will spend the next two decades struggling to pay the debt they so stupidly amassed.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I did too. I would have to skip meals at the end of the week until I got my (small) paycheck. So this isn't something that suddenly happened. Some kids come from wealthier backgrounds and didn't have this problem. It wasn't fair. That is life.

    4. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, we all know the right wing dominates the education sector and runs the universities. You can barely find a left wing lecturer or employee at a university...

      Let's face it, if there's something wrong at universities it's entirely the fault of the left. It's the left's fault standards in education at universities are so appallingly low, it's the left's fault that students can't handle criticism or debate, and it's the left fault that they universities they run are charging such absurdly high fees.

    5. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No - the issue is that morons who believe that everyone should "go to college" and can't afford it, took out loans....said loans showed the schools that there's more money to be had, so rates went up, leading to loan amounts going up...

      Then said morons didn't bother graduating and are stuck with loans...or many of those that DO graduate, graduate with degrees that don't help them get a decent paying job.

      Perhaps if we just ban all government backed student loans and let people take out private loans from the banks or, you know, save money/work/go to school online, things will get better.

    6. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful

      GI bill. Yep. Good idea. Sign up to commit murder or be murdered at the whim of a bunch of psychopaths in DC. The military isn't a summer camp -- once you realize what it actually does, the idea becomes less attractive.

    7. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in school. The right wing in America said it would be fine and the kids would just take responsibility and work their way through college like they did (ignoring that they all had higher wages adjusted for inflation and 1/5th the tuition). What drives me nuts is we all knew this was coming and just said fuck it. And all we got for it was some paltry tax cuts that expire.

      Why in the world would a university lower tuition when there is such easy access to loans and aid for students? And you say this is the conservatives' fault.

    8. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Most students don't get a gender studies degree. In fact, the vast majority of students don't get a gender studies degree. That's like a rounding error.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Until LEFT wing America started loaning money to college students in bulk

      What? College loans are bi-partisan, and have been going on for basically forever. Federal student loans started in 1958! Under the freaking Eisenhower administration. I'd agree with you that Republican Ike would likely be viewed as a Socialist today (building those socialist highways), along with that huge Socialist Ronald Reagan, who raised taxes several times! https://lendedu.com/blog/history-of-student-loans. College tuition didn't really become un-affordable until the double digit tuition rises of the 2000s.

      Why did tuition go up? Because more students had to go to University, and states didn't keep up with funding it. Going to College used to be something less than half of students used to do. Now it's practically everyone. That costs money!

    10. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Train0987 · · Score: 5, Informative

      What was predicted is the entry of government-backed student loans would cause tuition prices to skyrocket, which they have (exponentially).

      Allow student loans to be discharged in bankruptcy, remove the gov't from the equation and watch tuition prices plummet back to reality.

      P.S. it hasn't helped that so many public schools have turned into vacation resorts, with lavish housing, recreation facilities and luxurious administration complexes (while ignoring the classrooms and library facilities).

    11. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      Why was I modded Troll? Too many "patriots" afraid of admitting what the military is really used for?

      Fact: the military's primary purpose is to kill. No way around it. And politicians are more likely to be psychopaths than most other professions.

    12. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Even Adam Smith, in Wealth of Nations, included an section explaining in detail why higher education doesn't have competition of the sort that can create a free market, and that as a result it is non-Capitalist and benefits from being supported by the State to support industry broadly.

      But you're a right winger, so you probably can't comprehend Capitalism.

    13. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most students don't get a gender studies degree. In fact, the vast majority of students don't get a gender studies degree. That's like a rounding error.

      Woosh!

      My point here is why are we loaning money for useless degrees? We have more "gender studies" and law degrees than we need right now and not enough STEM graduates, yet we loan money for all of these using the same rules and rates. Which is an illustration of how stupid this idea is. But the real problem is the unrestrained tuition prices. Nobody cares all that much, they can borrow to pay it... Never mind how long it will take to pay it off.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    14. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was I modded Troll? Too many "patriots" afraid of admitting what the military is really used for?

      Fact: the military's primary purpose is to kill. No way around it. And politicians are more likely to be psychopaths than most other professions.

      I'm not the one who modded you down. While your point is a good one regarding the moral concerns that come with signing up for the military, it's your use of the word "murder" in your previous post that makes it a troll post.

    15. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Higher Education sure doesn't have to compete when the government will loan you money to pay education costs without much concern for your ability to pay back the loan. Capitalism has NO chance to work in that case. Price has been literally unconstrained by the federal student loan program.

      I'm therefore saying that government interference, by loaning money, has NOT helped this problem and has obviously made it worse by taking away nearly all constraint on tuition costs.

      Now you want to argue what? That higher education wasn't subject to competition before? Maybe not, but the left's solution obviously wasn't a workable solution and made it worse.

      So, apart from just nationalizing all colleges and making them tuition free and destroying the quality of higher education and driving the country deeper into debt we cannot afford to pay back, do you have a solution to this problem?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    16. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's like a rounding error.

      By far not the only error...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    17. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Murder ... unlawful killing, malice aforethought. War qualifies especially when you're talking about international law.

      War is abhorrent. Advising people to sign up to serve the biggest group of warmongers out there is abhorrent.

    18. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most students don't get a gender studies degree. In fact, the vast majority of students don't get a gender studies degree. That's like a rounding error.

      Woosh!

      My point here is why are we loaning money for useless degrees? We have more "gender studies" and law degrees than we need right now and not enough STEM graduates, yet we loan money for all of these using the same rules and rates. Which is an illustration of how stupid this idea is. But the real problem is the unrestrained tuition prices. Nobody cares all that much, they can borrow to pay it... Never mind how long it will take to pay it off.

      So you should have said that in the first place instead of the provoking and factually incorrect "Until LEFT wing America started loaning money to college students in bulk, releasing the constraints on tuition costs and condemning students to a lifetime of debtors prison with nothing more than a "gender studies" degree to work from."
      The rest of your post was 100% spot on, but you fucked it up with your first sentence.

    19. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Law degrees aren't useless, at least if you pass the bar you can make more than most programmers. In any case, how do you distinguish between a useful degree and a useless degree? Where do you draw the line?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      GI bill. Yep. Good idea. Sign up to commit murder or be murdered at the whim of a bunch of psychopaths in DC. The military isn't a summer camp -- once you realize what it actually does, the idea becomes less attractive.

      Nothing wrong with a military career. Are there risks? Yep. But you can die as a clerk in a convince store too. Here's an idea... PICK carefully which branch of the service you choose. Not all branches are the Army or Marines. The Navy, for instance, would unlikely find you on the sending end of a gun or the receiving end of hostile actions. The Air Force doesn't do much shooting of small arms either, but you might get stuck in a missile launch control room for 48 hours at a time.

      Of course, if war breaks out, you get to go first.. But that's how this game is played. No risk, no gain.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    21. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      When I was in school. The right wing in America said it would be fine and the kids would just take responsibility and work their way through college like they did (ignoring that they all had higher wages adjusted for inflation and 1/5th the tuition). What drives me nuts is we all knew this was coming and just said fuck it. And all we got for it was some paltry tax cuts that expire.

      Well guess what? They were right. What was the problem though? Oh, right. It had nothing to do with lowering the standards so far that even idiots gain entrance, or pushing that everyone can succeed because the system will do it for you. Or that the only thing you need to do to get through university is to engage in rote memorization(gee where'd that idea come from - musta been all those right-wingers in academia). It wasn't all those kids deciding to pick up useless degrees and suddenly being soaked in tens-of-thousands of debt. No no, it was the "right wing" that told the kids not to go into trades, or dirty jobs to make a living. Not the educators(left wing), or in school guidance offices(still left wing) or people in government job centers(again mainly holding left wing), and telling them all that those jobs will all be done by machines in the future and you could simply get a degree and coast your way through life in a cushy office job.

      Gee it's almost like we can plot it out on a graph through the 1980's, 90's and 00's as that line of reasoning(any degree will do), will get you through life so just blow $70k on feminist dance theory and you'll be set, companies will fall all over to hire you!

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    22. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would "involuntary third-party relief of life" be more palatable to your delicate sensibilities?

    23. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      LOL.. That was more of a lawyer joke than anything else. We seriously have PLENTY of lawyers. some say too many...

      Q: What do you call a dozen lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?

      A: A good start..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    24. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interest rates on loans should reflect the risk that the student won't be able to pay the loan back. "Soft" majors would have higher interest rates than engineering degrees. Just like insurance - higher risk, higher rates. Kids should be encouraged to make good decisions, and discouraged from making bad ones.

      College degrees are not mandatory (I know a 20-something for whom college was not a good fit - he's making great coin as a welder).

    25. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      You're still volunteering to support US imperialism and enabling the US government's massive waste of money on wars abroad.

    26. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know peers who, in college, took out loans, and didnt even have the financial discipline to spend the money appropriately. They waste it on alcohol, drugs, etc.

      Then one got AIDS.

      True story.

    27. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did the US increase student loans? As a reward to returning GIs from WWII and to give them the skills to build a middle-class society (which didn't exist before then). Why did it increase them again in the 1960s? Because people were being shut out of education due to lack of affordability. Sure, the loans contributed to tuition inflation but that's not ALL they did. What better solution do you propose to making college more affordable? We could cut tuition at the source. That would require more subsidize, so I assume you're against that?

    28. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Then I guess, getting $$ from the federal government isn't on your list of acceptable ways to pay for college. Your choice. I was just pointing to a specific option to get college paid for by working for it. If you are not willing to do that kind of work, then you will have to make other arrangements.

      At which point, I suggest you learn a trade and be prepared to pay your own way though college the old fashioned way, by earning the money, or doing it the REALLY old fashioned way and get your rich parents to pay for it if you have them.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    29. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Murder ... unlawful killing, malice aforethought. War qualifies especially when you're talking about international law.

      War is abhorrent. Advising people to sign up to serve the biggest group of warmongers out there is abhorrent.

      War is lawful killing.

    30. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The war to end fascism or communism was abhorrent?
      The war to free the slaves was abhorrent?
      The war to establish liberty has the foundation of a nation was abhorrent?

    31. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      WW2 was 75 years ago.

      Civil War was 163 years ago. Also, it was as much about establishing Federal domination as about freeing the slaves. Freeing the slaves was good. Setting a precedent that states were tied to the US for eternity was a bad idea.

      Revolutionary War? Sometimes I think the US would have been better off as a British dominion.

    32. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point here is why are we loaning money for useless degrees? We have more "gender studies" and law degrees than we need right now and not enough STEM graduates

      Duh, because people don't want to work hard while simultaneously feel entitled and empowered to make "change". This ain't no caste based society. You don't get shit just because a magical piece of paper called a "degree" says so. You could get a degree in carpet munching, and it would mean FUCK ALL to 99.9999% of the human population. I agree with you, we need more people educated in meaningful occupations; specifically the STEM field.

    33. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double woosh!

      If you were around after the tech meltdown in 2000, tech jobs were considered just as useless as gender studies and law.

    34. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how, when college attendance rates were lower and mainly the wealthy and/or privileged got to go, college was viewed as a common good and some places was even free (such as the University of California system). Now that over half of the US population tries to go to college, with a large increase in the numbers of poor, working class, and minorities who are trying to better themselves though education, college is being construed as a "personal good". Budgets are being reduced, access is being cut off, and there are even proposals to privatize the entire student loan industry and do things such as charge higher interest rates on student loans if you don't study an "approved" subject. Now all of a sudden education is some kind of giant boondoggle that society can't afford (along with good health care). Talk about shooting yourself in the foot.

    35. Re: All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We would all be better off if you had been aborted, but, well, here we are ....

    36. Re: All of this was predicted in the 90s by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      No way is he learning a trade. His degree in Marxist interpretive dance theory is all he needs.

    37. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      There's the option of going to a foreign school too. Some of those are decent quality and are pretty cheap by comparison.

      Also, the Coast Guard doesn't fight in foreign wars, though getting shot at or murdered at home is still a possibility.

    38. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If each time your argument's basis is questioned you refute it by saying it was a joke, eventually your basis of argument gets too weak to hold water.

    39. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comrade bone spurs gets to choose whether a war breaks out for at least the next two years. How does that risk curve really look to you?

    40. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, lets spit on people who will die to protect your liberty that you never earned or deserve. Soldiers don't start wars, politicians do. The military has no say in who and how they fight. If you had any experience about the US military, you'd know that they actively weed out anyone you might even joke about killing civilians. A liberal cuck like you wouldn't know about things like reality and facts so go ahead with your antifa propaganda.

    41. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds entirely too reasonable.

      The narrative that drives our policies here has been "follow your passion." The expectation is that if we can provide the student loans, then the playing field is made equal and we will get a nice even spread of kids picking the various majors that the world needs, all eager to work because they have followed their passion, all able to find work because they are educated, and everyone wins.

      And its a big fat fucking lie! We see a tiny handful of majors that attract huge numbers of students, with little-to-no work available in the field, and a swath of real-world needs going completely neglected. Worse yet, we get wave after wave of graduates suffering under life-crippling debt, defeated and depressed because their is no work in their field, moving back in with their parents.

      The colleges are fine with this. They don't suffer at all from these negative consequences and they rake in that government-provided student loan money hand over fist....the more they push the "follow your passion" narrative, the more cash rolls in.

      It is a terrible system that harms the students, the taxpayers, and the economy as a whole; all so college administrators can ride the gravy train. And the voters buy into it because they buy the narrative. And now this article presents a new narrative...evil republicans denying the much-needed funding, driving poor defenseless college students to starvation.

      More damn lies. With that funding nixed, colleges simply won't be able to pedal that fairy tale anymore. Enrollment will drop as kids go do something that will actually secure a future for them (like trade schools or whatever), and colleges will again have to offer something of value in order to make money.

      The road to get there will be bumpy and resisted with amazing lies all around, but it is exactly the right way to go.

    42. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said "War is abhorrent". If that were true then it follows that those wars are abhorrent regardless how long ago they were.

    43. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says we don't have enough STEM graduates? The corporations that constantly post unfillable positions and then stuff them full of "qualified" visa workers?

    44. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US invasion of Grenada was in 1983, and it definitely ended communism there.

      We also ended totalitarian rule in Iraq less than 20 years ago, not that anyone really celebrates it thanks to the asshats on the ground that made stability there nearly impossible and the contractors that siphoned money off the operation. In the long term, it'll be good for Iraq even if it cost us a lot of money and still sets people off about the chopper jockies shooting up some journalists "embedded" with our battlefield opponents.

      Bitch about the military all you want. If you're a Code Pink sympathizer, then obviously you wouldn't join the service. For "normal" people with at least a neutral stance towards the four branches of the US Armed Forces, it's a viable option for paying college tuition. Don't put your politics in somebody else's brain. They don't necessarily think the way you do.

    45. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's actually tons of STEM graduates but corporations who would hire them prefer to get HB1 workers in for half the price or advertise the position with outrageous qualifications just so they can say that there's no qualified candidates and then bring in an HB1 worker

    46. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, the Coast Guard was sent to the Middle East during the Iraq war. It also fights drug trafficking far outside of US territorial waters. Domestically, it's turned from a lifesaving agency into a militarized police force.

      Foreign schools are probably the better option. Medical school in France and Eastern Europe is anywhere from free to cheap, even for foreigners.

    47. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      When I was in school. The right wing in America said it would be fine and the kids would just take responsibility and work their way through college like they did (ignoring that they all had higher wages adjusted for inflation and 1/5th the tuition). What drives me nuts is we all knew this was coming and just said fuck it. And all we got for it was some paltry tax cuts that expire.

      I have not seen a serious solution from either the right nor left wing. The problem is that college costs are going up far faster than anything else (double digit inflation most years). That's the problem. This problem is not addressed by having the government pay for it, indeed that will probably make it worse as medical costs show. The problem is not solved by 529 plans either. The problem is solved by figuring out why college costs are escalating so quickly and clamping down on it. I have not heard much talk about that from either the right or the left.

    48. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many people are going to college when they should be going to work in a factory, but oh that's right, the idiot Liberals went and moved all the factories overseas and refused to do anything to bring them back. Hence, Trump got elected. Too bad the Left isn't listening and has already lost the 2020 Presidential election.

    49. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by jmkaza · · Score: 1

      Government deciding which degrees to fund based on 'societal needs' is about as socialist as you can get. In your initial post, though, you're ranting about the LEFT. Seems you might need some internal reflection on your political beliefs.

      If we have too many law degrees, then lawyer's salaries will drop, and people will pursue fewer law degrees. The government doesn't need to pick and choose.

    50. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I understand why you think I was tacking socialist, but I assure you I'm not. My point was that going into debt for a un-marketable degree was stupid, regardless of if it's federally back or not. The free market wouldn't let you borrow for a useless degree, yet the Fed doesn't even look at that, anything goes.

      I think a focus on specific degree programs might have harmed the system less, but the REAL solution is exactly the market solution you suggest. I'm not sure, though, how you fix the liberal mess from where we find ourselves. Simply stopping the program will adversely upset the apple cart and disrupt a lot of things, but letting it continue isn't a good answer either.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    51. Re: All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life does not have to be as hard as it used to be.

    52. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America has the best universities in the world. What school did you go to? What degree? Maybe you're salty because us ivy league grads are making banks.

    53. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You know that the US Military does a ton of humanitarian missions as well, right? Not everyone in the military are in it to be murders or murdered.

      I always find it odd that people view the US military so poorly yet want us to stay in NATO and the UN.

    54. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I do, but that's not its primary purpose.

    55. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GI was gutted at least twice since the 90's with the last one happening sometime in OIF / OEF timeframe. It's not as great as it was by a long shot.

      I would further counter your points by mentioning that most enlisted that get out to cash in on their GI bills are capable of putting in effort. The US is not in peacetime, and things are hard.

      Based on your words, I am unsure if you wished to separate the topics of the GI bill and work ethic or not.

    56. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"When I was in school. The right wing in America said it would be fine and the kids would [...]"

      Sorry, reality check time. The reasons the tuitions went sky high are because the LEFT WING in America making so many grants, more guaranteed loans with much lower standards, requiring additional nonsense additions to the core curriculum, and especially "loaning" to those who could not pay and/or really had no business going to their selected school or perhaps college at all.

      This is almost exactly what happened when the Government started subsidizing EMR (electronic medical records) systems and piling on their regulations- the street prices of the EMR's immediately went up exactly as high as the additional incentives and then went up even higher and higher with each round of regulations.

      Free money isn't free, regulations cost lots of money, and risky loaning has consequences. Having read many of your posts, it is apparent that everything wrong in the world is the so-called "Right Wing's" fault, free market's fault, and/or the lack of Socialism, but I think you are misguided....

    57. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      My point here is why are we loaning money for useless degrees? We have more "gender studies" and law degrees than we need right now and not enough STEM graduates, yet we loan money for all of these using the same rules and rates. ...

      To be fair the "need" for gender studies is exactly zero. They exist only to cause friction and discord, nothing useful could be expected from them. The exact same statement could be said of lawyers but they seem to be more in the necessary evil while gender studies are just evil with no upside.

    58. Re: All of this was predicted in the 90s by cunina · · Score: 1

      And it also has the best healthcare in the world, as long as you're willing to spend $500,000 for an appendectomy.

    59. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      Woosh again!

      GP's point was that very, very few degrees are useless. We're handing out plenty of STEM degrees. My kid's in nursing right now and she had to fight tooth and nail for a spot in her 300 level courses because there's only space for about half of the qualified applicants in any given year.

      Face it, we're underfunding the schools so we could give tax cuts to billionaires (and so those same billionaires can bring in H1-Bs to replace us after claiming there's a shortage of qualifed applicants). As for the loans, those are a symptom of rising tuition brought on by underfunded schools. Not the cause. And you better f'in believe my kid cares about the debt she's accumulating. But what the hell else was she supposed to do? It's all I can do to buy her books, food, healthcare, transportation and everything else needed to keep a young person alive until they can work.

      Tuition prices were and always have been restrained by government subsidies. Anyone who tells you otherwise is lying so they can go back to the trough for more tax cuts and more H1-Bs. You've been had, and when your kids hit college (assuming you have 'em, statistically you probably do) you're gonna find that out the hard way.

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    60. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      My advice, find a copy of the book and read the analysis about the costs and market. You don't seem to even have understood the part I quoted. Maybe you're one of these people whose brains stop functioning when you see the word Capitalism?

      You want to argue, but you didn't read the book, so you're not ready to argue with it yet.

    61. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The problem is solved by figuring out why college costs are escalating so quickly and clamping down on it. I have not heard much talk about that from either the right or the left.

      Cheap loans with 100% repayment requirement. This allows universities to charge more knowing they'll get the money regardless from lenders. More classes unrelated to major. Classes unrelated to minor. Mandatory humanities courses. Mandatory requirement to buy education material directly through school bookstore. University bloat. Too many useless courses, the humanities are full of crap. Literal crap. Universities spending obscene amounts of money on "diversity" handlers(University of Michigan is a great example). Blowing money on projects not related to the university.

      Japan just gut the hell out of all their humanities and social science courses, guess what happened? Course costs dropped, people living "in" the university system but producing nothing of value fell through the floor. That means no more comparative feminist dance theory and it's impact on Harry Potter for example.

      The flipside of course, is where universities have gone so far down the leftwing rabbit hole there's no way out and students refuse to go there. Then this happens all on it's own. University of Missouri for example, or Evergreen college.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    62. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by f3rret · · Score: 1

      I went hungry my share of nights back in the late 80s, while working my way through college. My roommates and I would sometimes pitch in together to buy food from the grocery store to make meager meals. So no, its not a new thing, and its not really a problem.

      Tuition price inflation is a problem.

      Yeah, Young people having to starve to get an education in a first world (barely) country totally isn't 'a problem'. Not even a little.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    63. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      There are too many lawyers.

      This is not a slam against lawyers. This is a fact. There are more people with law degrees that there are jobs requiring law degrees.

      A useful degree is a degree in a field which has a position requiring that degree. In a general sense this can be relatively easily determined by measurement to a degree which is good enough.

      In many fields the use for an advanced degree is primarily to fill an academic position. So for example except for fringe cases all professional historians are either teachers, academics or researchers. Anyone not in one of those fields is probably working out of field. An person with an engineering degree fills a much broader slot, with engineers working in academia a much smaller percentage of the total number of individuals having engineering degrees.

      Too many people have degree in areas for which society has no need or for which the need is very small. In many areas a bachelor degree is relatively useless, for example someone with an archeology degree at the B.A. level will find only a small handful of jobs available in their field. Almost all jobs in that field require at least a master's degree. Many require a PhD. Most English Lit majors either teach or go on to Law school. Many work retail or service jobs, which will never allow them to pay off their student loans. For them this is a useless degree.

    64. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by darth.hunterix · · Score: 1

      The very EXISTENCE of your US Army created long term, stable peace here in Europe for three generations, which is pretty much a record.

      While I do know that your soldiers were engaged in a lot of crappy activities, in general I have great respect for members of American armed forces. They are risking life and limb not just for their country, but for my ass as well and after all is said and done, they make the world a better place. And I thank them for that.

      --
      What is best in life? Hot water, good dentishtry and shoft lavatory paper.
    65. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      I propose that the U.S. follow the practices of other nations.

      College tuition should be free for students who preform at the highest levels in fields which have societal value.

      This means the government should pay for higher education for a a specific number of students in specific fields. The number of such grants should be set based upon the number of people needed in those fields to replace potential losses and reasonably predicted growth.

      As in other nations if you fail to perform you lose your funding. If someone better comes along you lose your funding. If the field becomes obsolete, you lose your funding.

      This is how it works in other places. I know a PhD Physicist from France. He tells me that at every level he had to complete with others to stay funded, right up until he finished his thesis,

      Its not about affordability. Its about getting bang for the buck. Anyone who can afford to pay their own way can take whatever courses they want. If taxpayers are paying for it it needs top be about societal good. The best students get a free ride. Others pay their way or do trades, retail or what ever. Society benefits.

      Keep the GI bill and continue the tax breaks for companies that pay for workers to attend college. That gets other people in without the distorting effect of easy loans for everybody, most of whom will never pay it back, but can't discharge it in bankruptcy.

    66. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once they're mostly replaced with AIs Law will be a dead degree.

    67. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Ding ding ding ding! Took a lot of scrolling but finally found the post that describes the stupidity of the premise of the article. If college students don't have enough money to eat, why are they living in luxury dorms with luxury amenities? Colleges today build 5 star recreation facilities, 5 star dining halls, and every dorm has AC, fast internet, and full cable. Probably a few game rooms too.

      When my parents went to college, they had basic brick dorms with minimal amenities, cheap crappy food, and maybe a running track and an open field for recreation. Didn't cost them an arm and a leg and they got great educations. Now those same universities are reducing classroom space to add more luxury accommodations.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    68. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      If each time your argument's basis is questioned you refute it by saying it was a joke, eventually your basis of argument gets too weak to hold water.

      Right.. Could it be you are nitpicking stuff and yanking it out of context? I think so.

      HOWEVER, don't think it goes unnoticed that you are not adding to the discussion in any way or exchanging any worthwhile ideas.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    69. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 2

      Double woosh!

      If you were around after the tech meltdown in 2000, tech jobs were considered just as useless as gender studies and law.

      Oh I remember that it was my degree and experience that got me that new job in September of 2000. It was hard to get a job, but having a degree was helpful. Woe to the job seeker who didn't have a STEM degree looking for a STEM job. So the degree wasn't a "get a job immediately card" it was what it always was, "get the job before the High School graduate" card.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    70. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >My point here is why are we loaning money for useless degrees?

      Why the fuck am I paying for your healthcare? I want you dead.

    71. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by bobbied · · Score: 1

      THE STATE can fund colleges and universities using local tax dollars if they wish but the issue with the federal student loan guarantees remains. They have allowed tuition rates to sky rocket by taking the incentive to control costs out of the equation. No worries, just BORROW 60K for a degree in business and spend the next 20 years trying to pay it off. Stupid begets Stupid. Tell me you don't see the problem here?

      It's like buying education from those "Rent to Own" outfits. Have you ever sat down and calculated how much you will pay before you "own" that couch? Think of a young couple, newly married making 30K each but having a combined $120K in debt for student loans. They won't be able to pay back that debt for decades...

      How are two business degrees worth $120K + interest when your income only went from $25k/year to $30k/year and it only means $10K/year? That's 12 years without interest, more with interest included. But what usually happens is they cannot pay and end up making the minimum payments until they are in their 40's or more, dragging down their credit ratings and sapping their buying power. For what?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    72. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with lawyers is an unemployed one. An unemployed lawyer's job is to create new work. Generally that means they find a way to cause a problem that need to be fixed... and they are the solution.

      The bigger problem though is LAW FIRMS with no work. When a firm doesn't have enough work they can unleash armies of lawyers to write new laws, lobby politicians and otherwise cause havoc just so they have / maintain work.

    73. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, about 99% of right wingers think capitalism is "give the rich all of your money via taxes and let it trickle back down to you in the form of an unstustainable paycheck". I'm not even joking.

    74. Re:All of this was predicted in the 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By that logic, you can blame all rapes and murders of children on the right, since they make up the vast majority of pedophiles and child rapists. If that's what you were trying to say, then good job, I guess.

  4. Ramen by PeeAitchPee · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How many college kids lived off of ramen noodles -- especially in tech -- and went on to do amazing things?

    1. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Four.

    2. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some went on to have amazing cardiometabolic damage and lower cognitive function:

      "Ramen noodles are particularly unhealthy because they contain a food additive called Tertiary-butyl hydroquinone (TBHQ), a preservative that is a petroleum industry byproduct. They're also incredibly high in sodium, calories and saturated fat."

      "according to a new study by Baylor University researchers. If you eat a lot of ramen noodles, your risk of metabolic changes linked to heart disease, diabetes and stroke rise considerably."

    3. Re:Ramen by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How many college kids lived off of ramen noodles -- especially in tech -- and went on to do amazing things?

      And how many did not or got sick? I remember those days when very often I'd survive with a muffin and a cup of coffee a day. It shits on your health, and then your grades. My college A-streak plummeted when I got my first C in trig - I had a serious bout of bronchitis on that semester (in no small part by not eating well), which seriously screwed me up. It was then that I started taking student loans (yeah, now I can eat some more and buy nyquil.) I shit you not.

      I knew people back then that simply had to drop. I knew college students with broken shoes or health problems because of financial reasons.

      We can all say "yay these kids survived on ramen and went on to invent the new mywhorefacebookgramspace", but many others fall through the cracks (not to mention the many more that crack even earlier in HS.

      I could understand this is if we were in a 3rd world country. However, we are not. Not only are we in a rich country, we are in the richest one ever. This state of affairs, and the glamorization of it, it is atrocious and non-productive. This grind doesn't produce grit, it kills our potential social capital.

    4. Re:Ramen by Dread_ed · · Score: 2

      If only we had some manufacturing jobs for people to work at.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    5. Re:Ramen by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I could understand this is if we were in a 3rd world country. However, we are not.

      At this point you may have to state where you are from. So far I thought this was bout the situation in the US?

      --
      bickerdyke
    6. Re:Ramen by slack_justyb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What kind of statement is that even? Like are you seriously expecting there to be some sort of data collection of what students ate in the past versus what they made in the present? What exactly are you trying to get at here? Are you trying to apply a stereotype to draw some conclusion like "all college kids eat diets of only ramen, some college kids become successful, ergo, an all ramen diet cannot be all that bad"? Do you understand how nonfactual, illogical, and just plain wrong that kind of basis for an argument is? And finally, using your loose argument for college, it would be more than fair to point out that a lot of tech giants dropped out of college as well, so I guess we should conclude that college isn't necessary? Which I do hope you see that, that argument is also equally flawed. We should not take a few successes as evidence of some underlying truth. That's not building a fact based argument.

    7. Re:Ramen by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the memo on robotics. Low wage jobs are here to stay, unless you do something yourself, or allow yourself to become a wage slave.

      I ate ketchup soup in college. Stretched the budget tight. Actually refused to go to the bars, spending my meager wages on yes, actual food. I worked through college. Full load, part time. Scrimped.

      If you have half a brain, you plan how to deal with lots of study and how to feed yourself, sleep at night, and take care of yourself. If you can't do that, college isn't going to help you much, as you'll always be dependent on one branch of the system or another.

      Student loans are far too loose, a bit in the mouth of every future workhorse that takes them. It makes the choices stark. University marketing has seduced so many people into its vortex, when the future careers are hazy. Recruiters don't look at CVs or resumes and say, gosh, this one comes from a podunk college in Iowa, but look, this one comes from Harvard. Were it me, I'd take the candidate from podunk simply because they had to earn their way, and didn't face the massive grade erosion endemic to the Ivy League frauds.

      Life doesn't come to you on a platter unless you're a part of the dynastic wealth in the USA. Let the trust fund babies have their avocado toast. The others will sink or swim. I hope they swim. If they can't feed themselves.... they'll sink later.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    8. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, you admit to not being able to afford school (and all associated living expense costs), and you did it anyways. YOU are the problem.

    9. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The left AND the right are just bat -hit crazy now. The left wants free education and everyone should be able to travel to Europe and play games and not be stressed about school. The right wants to not fund education at all. Can we meet in the middle? You know keep up a B GPA and college is free. No if it is free, you cannot take out loans for your trip to Europe. Yes, you have to take a full load to keep your free school. Yes you have to study something you can get a job in that we need people in. Follow these rules and school is free. But if you do a bender and flunk an exam that causes your GPA to fall below B, sorry, its over. This is life. You are an adult. Time to learn actions have consequences little snowflake. And on the right, yes your taxes ARE going to pay for this. You want the next generation to have a chance don't you! But no, instead we have the hard right offering predatory loans to the hard left who have been convinced education is a trip to europe and parting with friends.

    10. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is flippant, but serious comment above.
      What are those who are below the median, who never excelled at studies, to do with their lives to earn an income?
      The Republicrats moved the manufacturing offshore, push people into useless degrees, straddle the young citizens of this country with debt, debt that can not be paid down with $10 hour jobs, declining wages, rising housing costs, and importation of labor (nursing, unskilled laborers aka illegal immigration, and of course IT)
      If the left and right do not see who the enemy is, the terrorist is, then they deserve what is coming to their children and grandchildren. Look to Brazil, Russia, China, to see the future that is being laid for the next generation...one of a very few at the top, and the rest living in slums.
      Beyond black, beyond white, beyond petty differences. But don't worry, I am sure their are enough teaching, police, military, state jobs to go around.

    11. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe they should not have gone to college if they could not afford it?

    12. Re:Ramen by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      What crack does the 17 cent pack of ramen fall through? Some of what you said was coherent opinions, most of it was whataboutism, but the part about ramen just makes no sense.

    13. Re:Ramen by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you missed the memo on robotics. Low wage jobs are here to stay, unless you do something yourself, or allow yourself to become a wage slave.

      Strange, why are all those companies suddenly repatriating and re-opening factories in the US then?

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    14. Re:Ramen by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you missed the memo on robotics. Low wage jobs are here to stay, unless you do something yourself, or allow yourself to become a wage slave.

      Strange, why are all those companies suddenly repatriating and re-opening factories in the US then?

      Because as other countries rise up, cost of labor is increasing overseas. Then we bring factories... with increased automation. Bringing back factories =/= bringing back jobs. Look it up. After doing it many times, I just got tired of googling references for this anymore.

      If you are aware that factories are coming back, then you are also quite capable of being aware that most of them are relying on automation.

    15. Re:Ramen by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

      so, you admit to not being able to afford school (and all associated living expense costs), and you did it anyways. YOU are the problem.

      Wow, reading comprehension ain't your forte.

    16. Re:Ramen by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 0

      Then maybe they should not have gone to college if they could not afford it?

      And the option is then not go to college and go to work in whatever, see jobs gone to automation and what not and then being blamed for not pulling myself by the bootstraps?

      I did get through, just barely. And I knew many who couldn't. And what happened to them? That's a terrible way to improve social capital, you know, the thing that gives us an advantage in the international arena.

      Again, this type of status quo is OK for a developing nation. It's not OK for a nation who wants to retain its 1st world status.

    17. Re:Ramen by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      zuckerberg came from a privileged background. i'm pretty sure he was eating fine. I think most of the people who captured the early 2k vc funds have similar backgrounds. This isn't intended as a class warfare kind of thing. It just seems like more evidence that living comfortably correlates with success.

    18. Re:Ramen by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      I could understand this is if we were in a 3rd world country. However, we are not.

      At this point you may have to state where you are from. So far I thought this was bout the situation in the US?

      I am originally from Nicaragua. I've been in the US since 1989. I'm describing the situation as I saw it when I went to college in the US.

      And this wasn't just me - I saw plenty of US-born citizens going through that kind of poverty-related issue back in my college years.

      My point again is that the way things are done here, that's a good way to destroy (not cultivate) social capital.

      I do believe 4-year degrees are overtly inflated and that the country should do better in focusing in 2-year and vocational degrees and apprenticeship programs. However, there's nothing of the sort.

      The entire attitude is a) go do something, then b) well, if you can't afford it, you shouldn't, then c) it's not my problem that there are no more options for you.

      As a first world nation, we are unique in our ability to obliterate social capital.

    19. Re:Ramen by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      This even in the most expensive California cities you can still feed yourself for under 50 cents a day.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    20. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Factory open with automation is more jobs than a factory closed due to cheap outsourced labor.

    21. Re:Ramen by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Except no one said anything about muffins or coffee (which by the way are one of the most expensive foods).
      He said Ramen noodles, but he might as well of said rice or any type of cheap noodle. Foods that 90% of the earth eat for every meal and still manage to outlive Americans.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    22. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the same game that's been happening for decades. Those in charge, and the older folks, think younger folks just aren't tough enough, and need to work harder. So they make decisions that amount to selling out their kids and grandkids in order to provide a tiny bit more comfort to themselves. We're fast approaching the time when an entire generation will simply rot out of the system because they can't afford to be a part of it. And then we'll have older people bitching that there aren't enough educated people to take care of their needs as they begin the countdown to doing the dance of death. And it'll be all everybody else's fault.

    23. Re:Ramen by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Oatmeal and hot grain cereal is cheap if you buy bulk. Yes, it may be boring, but technically you can eat cheap and healthy. Throw in an occasional ramen for variety.

    24. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well maybe you should have bought eggs and a head of lettuce and a bag of rice. Much cheaper over time and actually healthy even if boring.

      Muffin and instant ramen is just convenient food.
      It can also be augmented to make it far healthier.

    25. Re: Ramen by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I don't know who you're quoting, but it's definitely not the linked paper. That first phrase sounds like it might have come from the "Food Babe".

      "Omg subway bread has yoga mats in it! Run away!"

    26. Re:Ramen by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... if you're panhandling.

    27. Re:Ramen by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      "So reduced financial aid makes liberals sick and drop out of school? What's the downside?" asks the current administration.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    28. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pointing out that, at least for 30+ years, college students are recorded as scavengers looking for food wherever they can get it. They'll take food service jobs for the discounts on food. They'll go home on weekends for Mom's cooking which isn't something they're nostalgic for yet; they're just really hungry.

    29. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "butane" link for TBHQ was discredited 2 years ago and the food-nut blogger laughed off the Internet.

      High sodium intake is long known as a cause of high blood pressure which is linked to heart disease, stroke, and increased risk of those for people with diabetes.

      Take your trolling back to Facebook, loser.

    30. Re: Ramen by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      For me it was store brand pasta and bananas. I got injected with chemo course once for $2000.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    31. Re:Ramen by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Bringing back factories =/= bringing back jobs.

      That of course doesn't make sense, if it did the unemployment rate would be going up by leaps and bounds. But the opposite is happening in the US.

      If you've been paying attention or worked in a factory the last 20 years, while it's possible to automate many parts of it, people seem to want to buy things that don't break after the first 4 uses too. I'm not talking about electronics here.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    32. Re:Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone from said 3rd world country where some 200+ thousand students go to usa, uk and Australia to study yearly (and mostly dont come back), grind does produce results. We pay 4 to 8 times more whatever you pay to be there. Usually with no family support but skype/whatsapp.
      Knowing the cost, most dont fail n return. Most succeed (or atleast pass) and never return. And these are not rich people sending their kids, its middle class people scarficing their mortgage and stuff to finance this.

      Adversity breeds strength.

    33. Re:Ramen by f3rret · · Score: 1

      How many college kids lived off of ramen noodles -- especially in tech -- and went on to do amazing things?

      So, because college sucked for you. It has to suck for everyone in the future?

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
  5. Thick People by johnsie · · Score: 1

    How are you going to compete on the world stage if your people are poorly educated?

    1. Re:Thick People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to compete on the world stage if your people are poorly educated?

      Tap dancing. Almost nobody does it anymore, so I won't have to be that great at it.

    2. Re:Thick People by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You aren't. We are living in an attempt to sell off everything accomplished in the mid 20th century for short-term gain. The people getting rich from this are not at all concerned about the long-term.

    3. Re: Thick People by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You're confusing attending university with being educated. They're not the same thing.

  6. College Tuition and Fees by Zorro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Blame the Colleges.

    Raising the cost two or three times the rate of inflation for 20 years will do that.

    1. Re:College Tuition and Fees by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      Congress could solve this simply by refusing to guarantee loans for students at universities that increase tuition more than 2% for 10 years, then the rate of inflation after that.

      The can also do a similar thing but mandate the number of sinecure positions be reduced by 1% a year until it reaches no more than, say, 10% or professional positions, rather than >50% at some of the more bloated schools.

      At the end of the day it's driven by easy loans. People wince at adding a $2000 radio to their car, but add $20/month to a car loan, sign me up!

      10% increases per year just adds a little to your loan. There is no magic or mystery here. Colleges are like slick smarmy car salesmen.

      Congress can fix by denying loan guarantees to colleges that increase fees by more than 2% a year.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:College Tuition and Fees by Train0987 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Allow student loans to be dischargable in bankruptcy and most of the problems would be solved. There wouldn't be any more loans given for pursuing worthless degrees.

    3. Re:College Tuition and Fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tuition historically hasn't been that bad, at least when I went to school 18 years ago. It's the administration fees that have been eating the lunch of college students. And where were those fees going? Every school I went to kept raising fees while simultaneously building a shiny new gym and giving raises to the upper rungs of administration. They kept adding new services nobody but a few used.

      Meanwhile the science labs were from the 1950's complete with barely functioning equipment. The library dated back to the founding of the school in the 1800's complete with some of the original books. (Side note: Those were interesting as heck to read.) The computer labs were modern for 5 years in the past, and this was in an era when PCs were obsolete within 2 years. Mismanaged priorities are what are killing colleges.

    4. Re:College Tuition and Fees by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Blame the Colleges.

      Raising the cost two or three times the rate of inflation for 20 years will do that.

      When you throw money at something, prices go up.

      It's Economics 101. And all sort of government aid and government backed student loans that can't be discharged in bankruptcies, guess what, that's throwing money at it.

    5. Re:College Tuition and Fees by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Congress could solve this simply by refusing to guarantee loans for students at universities that increase tuition more than 2% for 10 years, then the rate of inflation after that.

      And/or put an upper limit on loans. If you fund Cadillac educations, you'll get more Cadillacs.

    6. Re:College Tuition and Fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least here in Wisconsin, the raising costs are to offset the decreased aid from state taxes. But our richest now have extra money to get a second degree.

    7. Re:College Tuition and Fees by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      So let me check..

      What you want is for loans to be unavailable, therefore meaning only people from wealthy families can study?

      You also believe that people should not have personal responsibility for large financial commitments they make when young, therefore teaching them that stealing from institutions is a valid life choice..

      I see.

    8. Re:College Tuition and Fees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but who actually bothers to take Econ 101 once in college?

    9. Re:College Tuition and Fees by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Talk about treating the symptoms while screwing the poor rather than solving the underlying problem!

  7. The problem is not enough food produced. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like the great depression. There was so little produced it had to rot in warehouses while the soup lines ran empty.

    Such is the way of artificial scarcity, a natural result of the politics of property over life.

  8. Tax cuts expire because of Democrats. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Informative

    Tax cuts only expire if the Democrats force them to be. All the Republicans wanted to make them permanent but they didn't have enough votes at the time... they should after November though, given what the Democrats are campaigning on these days.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Tax cuts expire because of Democrats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because Tax Cuts are not the answer to a funding problem for Student Aid. Those tax cuts don't help students with massive tuition rates, stagnant to negative job wage growth, and CoL inflation. This is ontop of more requirements for degrees, employers who demand degrees and 10 years experience for entry level positions, and baby boomers who are refusing to retire to keep their health insurance benefits for as long as possible. In a lot of cases those benefits were older school benefits that they got grandfathered in and the benefits that the newer aged workers see are far less...beneficial. But yeah, no, we'll just blame the Dems. That's easier. Less to think about.

    2. Re:Tax cuts expire because of Democrats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax cuts for the rich don't help starving students. All you are doing is kicking the can down the road. Somebody will need to pay the bill at the end of the day. A Democrat President will need to come in and clean up the mess the GOP created.

  9. Not surprising by xystren · · Score: 2

    Given that tuition and textbook costs have dramatically increased, yet the minimum wage has not kept pace, this is not really surprising.

    I remember many of my past professors that went to college in the late 60's and 70's, talked about how they would take the summer off to work and party, that they were able to earn enough to cover their entire tuition and books for the fall and spring semesters. LONG LONG LONG GONE are those days. Today, your lucky if you can find a summer job that will allow you to make rent, let alone, save any sort of money for tuition/books/living expenses. Student loans don't really help in the long term, as the future is mortgaged to pay for the present and that debt will be with you likely for a good 10+ years after one graduates.

    With the current trend of steadily increased costs with minimal wage/salary increases to match, it is unlikely to improve any time soon

    1. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gay for a Klondike bar

    2. Re:Not surprising by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Depends where -- in NY state, public university tuition is maximum about $7500/yr for undergraduate in-state, and places outside of NYC are cheap to live in. This $7500/yr is also reduced by subsidies and grants, so it's not even really that much.

      Nice to live in a state that actually gives a rip about its residents.

    3. Re:Not surprising by GregMmm · · Score: 1

      What is surprising is how simple you made this argument.

      Minimum wage will never keep up with the real problem: Tuition/Housing costs for a college. This needs to be put in check.

      Working a summer and paying for college tuition for the year, ya that's outside of thought at this time, BUT they can take a job and earn what they can to keep their loans down.

      "Student loans don't really help in the long term": Really? How about the extra money those people make for their first 10 years? What about the students who can't afford, or parent can't afford to pay for college? This is a false statement. Not saying getting loans are great, but they meet a need.

      I'm at the start of this adventure with my children. It's very expensive and I hope to work with them to get through these years with minimal to no debt.

    4. Re:Not surprising by Train0987 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's just tuition. Most of the costs are hidden in administration fees. In Louisiana for example, there's a program called TOPS that gives free tuition to state universities for anyone graduating high school with a 2.5 GPA and an 18 on the ACT. That program began about 15-20 years ago. Since then tuition has increased 1000% (since taxpayers are now on the hook for it) and they've added a $5000 administrative fee to students that isn't covered by TOPS. That single-semester administrative fee is double what I paid for an entire year of tuition, dorm and meal plan in 1992. Meanwhile, all of that money has gone to resort-styling housing, ludicrous rec facilities (floating river pools, rock-climbing facilities, etc), administration buildings that resemble Fortune 500 executive suites, etc. The library is still falling down since I was there though. Not a nickel for that or the actual classrooms. Oh, and they've created an entire lobbying department with a staff whose sole job is to extract even more taxdollars from the public each year.

    5. Re:Not surprising by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Admin fees are like $500 a year in NY state. Housing is pretty cheap in many places if you live off campus. No $5000 hidden free like in Loosiana.

    6. Re:Not surprising by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Depends where -- in NY state, public university tuition is maximum about $7500/yr for undergraduate in-state

      $7500/year is 682 hours at NY's minimum wage. There are roughly 480 full-time job hours during the summer.

      So it's only 202 hours under what you can make during the summer.....assuming you do not eat, do not need books or other supplies, and don't pay rent.

    7. Re:Not surprising by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      No one actually pays $7500/yr, though -- it's typically closer to "free" due to grants and the Empire scholarship.

    8. Re:Not surprising by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      " grants and the Empire scholarship"

      Free, huh? Nobody has to pay for that.

    9. Re:Not surprising by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      The solution is for costs to come down, not debt to go up.

    10. Re:Not surprising by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Getting something for your tax money is terrible, right?

    11. Re:Not surprising by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Then why charge $7500/yr and then have an expensive-to-administer program to refund a large portion of that?

      Just charge "free".

    12. Re:Not surprising by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Because dumbfuck politics. Welcome to New York and the US in general.

    13. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one actually pays $7500/yr, though -- it's typically closer to "free" due to grants and the Empire scholarship.

      Average cost is 14,000 and that's before books, equipment, parking, commute, site fees, registration fees, and graduation fees.

      Where's your sources?

    14. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that tuition and textbook costs have dramatically increased, yet the minimum wage has not kept pace, this is not really surprising.

      What's surprising is you haven't figured out that minimum wage will NEVER keep up over the the long term.

      It's impossible.

      Minimum wage adds to costs in the logistics networks that make business possible. It compounds from stage to stage just like compound interest. It feeds back into the logistics network as well - these are not trees, they are graphs. If the cost of food goes up, the plumber - who has to eat - will have to charge more to everybody in the logistics chain that produces food, hence the feedback.

      Increase the minimum wage, then over the long term, everything adjusts so the minimum wage is no longer sufficient - and you've just screwed the poor over, while the effect on the wealthy is a rounding error (i.e. insignificant).

      You can try to 'fix' the inflation by things like monetary policy - but that just ends up 'Robbing Peter to Pay Paul', and creates even more serious problems, most of which end up making life harder for the people most in need. You end up harming the very people you set out to help. Such a fix is not a workable option, which doesn't prevent unscrupulous people from trying it, sometimes the illusion of doing something is more important then the reality in politics - even if you up doing more harm than good.

      In short, minimum wage is a pipe dream, a fantasy, a lie that sleazy politicians sell to buy votes from the ignorant. It's yet example of how successful con men (in this case politicians) can be at scamming people by promising a free lunch, as in "we can fix welfare and you won't have to pay for it!". It doesn't work, and we do end up paying a lot more than we would if a sensible approach had been taken from the beginning.

      You could make an UBI work, if you did it in a sensible way (for example, as a reverse income tax with careful and very strict control for increases over time). But you'll never make minimum wage work over the long term.

      If you want to get the rich, minimum wage is a stupid idea - the only way to do that is to massively reform the tax system, throwing out sales and property taxes entirely, and switching to a sensible progressive tax on income (including trusts and inheritance) and money transfers. A large, complex, complicated tax system creates endless underbrush in which loopholes can hide.

      EU nations compensate to a limited extent for the problems that minimum wage causes for their economies and their people by providing free schooling, free health care, a decent welfare system. It's still a bad idea to have the minimum wage: it causes the EU nations lots of unnecessary problems, slowing economic growth and hindering competition, which costs jobs, limits upwards mobility over the course of a human lifetime, and forces more people onto the welfare system. They, too, have their fair share of con artists in politics.

  10. It costs hardly anything to eat in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it suspect that this is the time in life when most people have not yet learned how to properly budget. It costs hardly anything to eat in the US. A loaf of bread and a jar of peanut butter will set you back like... eight bucks if you're bad at shopping around. Learn to cook rice and you can eat even more cheaply.

    What is most likely happening is growing pains, specifically in the area of budgeting. Now if the story were about students who miss their rent, that makes a lot of sense (though it also often can be traced back to poor decisions).

  11. Finacial aid and loans is what drives up the cost by sinij · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Currently, there is no pressure to keep tuition costs in check. That is, consumers are not price-sensitive. No matter what you are charging in tuition, loans and aid will cover it. Education loans are also not discharged in bankruptcy, so there is no reason to turn borrowers down based on their estimated ability to repay. It is all-around failure to apply market principles that resulted in inefficient and very expensive system. Tuition prices will not come down until there is a market pressure to do so. More aid will only make this problem worse.

    Downstream of "$150,000 loan for gender studies undergraduate degree" is reduced quality of life, reduced lifetime wealth, and overall economical drag from less available income from consumers. If anything, these loans should have a California's mandatory cancer warning label attached.

  12. Tuition prices have to come down by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is an open secret that colleges are abusing the good will of the government and the students.

    College professors are paid no better or worse than they were in the 1950s.

    Tuition adjusted for inflation, the cost of tuition is well over ten times what it was then.

    So, if the professors are not being paid more, the students are not using 10 times as many professors... where is the money going?

    Well, I'm not going to get into that because everyone has short attention spans. It doesn't matter. The point is that the costs can come down dramatically if you squeeze the universities. A lot of administrators and non-essential spending can be cut without impacting the quality of education for the students.

    We can see this in other countries that didn't permit this to happen by writing blank checks to the universities. Education pretty much anywhere but the US is dramatically cheaper without being any worse for quality.

    The solution is not to increase financial aid. In fact, that is a large part of what caused this to get out of control in the first place. The Feds really need to stop throwing around money. It fucked up the housing market, it fucked up US health care which has gone through the same radical inflation in cost, and it has fucked up college education.

    It is a financial feed back loop. Write the colleges a blank check and they'll just get a little bolder every year seeing how far they can push it. You can either put your foot down and do some solid accounting or let it bankrupt you. It is a feed back loop. It doesn't matter how much money you have. Eventually, it will beggar anything as it increases infinitely.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    1. Re: Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where is the money going?

      That's the one question you should have answered. I believe it is obvious. They are using the funds for secret construction of rockets to go to another planet and escape the dying Earth.

      Accordingly, we must seize their stash of rockets and instead save ourselves.

      So it was foretold by the Mayans, Nostradamus and Salzman from accounting. For you see, the dragon has three heads and the prince was promised.

    2. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      By accepting more students a university in the USA can ensure more people get more loans and pay for more food every year.
      "other countries" make people work hard and pass a real exam. Only then are the very best of the best allowed to study.
      The USA also wants its university community to have the demographics of the wider US population.
      So it has to drop the "merit" part and go for "tipping" and "lopping" to ensure admissions look like the wider community.
      The USA wants a pluralistic society at university not the very best students.
      Re "where is the money going?" The value of the loan. The money is in the loan. Larger loan, more money into the university every year.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re: Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, that is a large part of what caused this to get out of control in the first place. The Feds really need to stop throwing around money. It fucked up the housing market, it fucked up US health care which has gone through the same radical inflation in cost, and it has fucked up college education.

      You have it half-right, Karmashock, but you are even more wrong. What the federal government stopped doing is even more important. Remember when the feds had actual food resources to distribute? Now it is SNAP which gets spent at Wal-Mart by its own employees.

      The same happened with healthcare. Resources were cut. Municpal Hospitals were shut down.

      Housing? Gone are the days of government built houses. Now they're sold off as condos. And even worse is the financial fraud that is related.

      Colleges are the same. They've lost government funding over the years. Yet they have such large football stadiums.

    4. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by lgw · · Score: 1

      College professors are paid no better or worse than they were in the 1950s.

      It really is the worst bubble yet. At least in the dot com bubble some tech workers got rich. The tuition bubble is only making a few administrators (and coaches) rich. On the plus side, there's the job creation from all the needless buildings that have been built, and now need to be maintained.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many states reduced tuition subsidies for in-state students, so tuition increased accordingly.

    6. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if the professors are not being paid more, the students are not using 10 times as many professors... where is the money going?

      I'll answer the question while you dance around it.

      A big part of it - common to all public universities of any scope and size - is going to cover the costs that the states used to cover. More states than not opted to reduce state funding for higher education in the past 10-20 years, and the institutions had to cover it somehow. They are pretty limited in options and most had to cover - at least some of it - by raising tuition.

      Second - particularly for large universities - was the cost of just maintaining buildings and keeping the bills paid. Universities can - and do - hit up research faculty directly for the costs of keeping their labs operational, but the non-research space needs to be paid for in some other way. Janitors, plumbers, HVAC people, grounds crew, parking attendants, etc, don't work for free. And what happens when every student expects to be able to charge their laptop and phone at every seat they sit in?

      Third is the cost of staying competitive. This doesn't mean every university needs a first-class lounge for their students, but students will notice which schools have at least bothered to thoroughly clean their dorms since banning smoking. Schools with competitively fast internet speeds will be noticed as such as well. These schools do have a product to sell, they have competition after all.
       
       

      Education pretty much anywhere but the US is dramatically cheaper without being any worse for quality.

      That is because pretty much everywhere else the income tax rate is higher, and the state pays for more - in some cases all or nearly all - of the cost of higher education.

    7. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Solandri · · Score: 1

      So, if the professors are not being paid more, the students are not using 10 times as many professors... where is the money going? [...] A lot of administrators and non-essential spending can be cut without impacting the quality of education for the students.

      The money has gone mostly to non-teaching administrative staff. And it can definitely be cut because those administrators didn't exist 30+ years ago, and nobody has complained about the quality of college education decreasing since then.

      The same problem also afflicts our health care system.

    8. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tuition bubble is only making a few administrators (and coaches) rich

      At many major universities in the USA the top paid employee is a head sports (often football) coach. I've often wanted to be really mad over this, but when you look more closely at it, the anger is at least party unwarranted. At most schools the multimillion dollar coach salaries include zero tuition dollars; they are paid entirely from ticket and sponsorship revenue. It looks terrible to see that coaches - who interact with very few people - are paid tens of times more than faculty (and a hundred or more times as much as a grad student at the same university) who actually make a difference to a large number of people. However they are getting paid from a completely different bucket of revenue so it isn't directly comparable. The only way to bring coach's salaries back to earth is to make the games less profitable.

      The administrators, though, many of them can go straight to hell.

    9. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      I'm interested -- where is the money going?

    10. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by g01d4 · · Score: 1

      I think it's a little more complicated than the graph. The first thing that jumped at me was a 60% increase in faculty with only an 8% increase in students. Then it dawned on me that faculty do research, bring in grant funding and that this funding could be covering some of the staff. I don't think universities were performing anywhere near the same level of research they were 30+ years ago. That's not to say there's no administrative waste, only that items such as health care and pensions are probably major considerations as well.

    11. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      The money has gone mostly to non-teaching administrative staff. And it can definitely be cut because those administrators didn't exist 30+ years ago, and nobody has complained about the quality of college education decreasing since then.

      That is an oversimplification. In many universities, the way that professionals are categorized is the larger factor behind then growth of "administrative staff" than anything. Many researchers - particularly those with advanced degrees who are not looking to themselves become faculty - end up in this administrative staff category even though they are not really involved in administration. Hence schools that are doing a lot of research end up with these strange distributions between faculty and administrative staff as a result.

      Not to say that some of these schools don't have an excess of VPs and executives, but it often isn't nearly as profane as it looks.

      It's also worth noting that a research staff who are classified as "administrative staff" are often paid on grants and if you fired them all this afternoon it would not change tuition one dime as the money that pays their salary does not come from tuition or from the school internally, and cannot be allocated elsewhere.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    12. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Students don't come for the quality of education, they come for the quality of life. Students want food courts, world class gyms, fancy dorms, concerts, and sporting events. This stuff costs money and, in the ongoing competition for students, universities have responded. In a nutshell, this is a nontrivial part of what is driving college costs.

    13. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      staffing at universities has expanded exponentially for non-academic positions.

      there is some graft in evidence

      a lot of money is going into endowment wealth funds... basically the mattress...

      campus beautification is a thing... the cost of that construction is also pretty high if you look at the numbers and what they're building... possibly skimming is occurring there...

      Lots of scholarships... basically moving money around from people that pay including people that are just borrowing from the government to people that are being given the money without having to take out loans etc.

      long list of things...

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    14. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      staffing at universities has expanded exponentially for non-academic positions.

      Exponentially? No. Not even close. There are many things wrong with this as a notion of being responsible for tuition increases.

      First - and most obvious - is that it has not been anything vaguely close to an exponential expansion of non-academic positions.

      Second is that non-academic is not a strict classification at most institutions. Some schools include bus drivers and custodians in this classification, some do not. Some include health care professionals in this classification, some do not. Some include sports team staff in this classification, some do not. Some include research staff in this classification, some do not. Some do fractional classifications for staff members (ie 1/2 in academic 1/2 in something else for one employee), some do not. The granularity in this is important and not consistent.

      Third is that a lot of non-academic staff - for whatever you think that means - are paid off of funding that has nothing to do with tuition. Sports team staff - especially coaches of prestigious college teams - are paid mostly or entirely off of sponsorship and ticket deals that the universities set up. Researchers are often paid mostly or entirely off of grant money that has nothing to do with tuition. Bus drivers are often paid through separate fees that are not tied to tuition.
       
       

      a lot of money is going into endowment wealth funds... basically the mattress...

      I am not aware of a single university anywhere that puts tuition money into an endowment. In fact they usually have laws that prevent that. Endowment money is supposed to be separate, voluntary funds.
       
       

      campus beautification is a thing... the cost of that construction is also pretty high if you look at the numbers and what they're building... possibly skimming is occurring there...

      That's a huge speculation, there. State universities usually ask their respective states for separate funds for beautification and construction projects, they almost never impact tuition.

    15. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Karmashock · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to argue with you. The costs have gone up radically. Where did the money go?

      There have been studies done of the issue that have shown what I said.

      You want to point at the Sun and say it isn't there?

      Cool.

      This is a massive bubble that is going to pop and your willingness to acknowledge that is utterly irrelevant to the matter.

      Good day, sir.

      --
      I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
    16. Re:Tuition prices have to come down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been studies done of the issue that have shown what I said.

      Really? I haven't seen any of them. What I have seen is plenty of publications on how many public universities across the country have had to face substantial budget problems due to having their state financial support cut. One university near me had no choice but to raise tuition by over 10% per year for almost a decade straight as the state legislature continued to hand them smaller and smaller annual budgets.

      More so, the previous comment placed a pretty clear challenge to you. What do you think "non-academic" staff is, exactly? How do you think they get paid? How many do you really think are at universities, and how do you support your claim that they grew "exponentially"? Do you have even the slightest notion of how much of a university's operating budget - specifically the part that comes from tuition - goes to pay these people with "non-academic positions"? It was laid in front of you how many non-tuition sources are used to pay them in many cases.
       
       

      This is a massive bubble that is going to pop and your willingness to acknowledge that is utterly irrelevant to the matter.

      Kindly elaborate. What bubble do you think is going on here?
       
      When we had a real estate bubble, housing prices hit hyperinflation until people couldn't pay and the mechanisms below it were exposed to be built on balsa wood and duct tape. Prices were climbing vastly faster than inflation, and hype was rampant.

      When we had a tech bubble, people were investing blindly in stocks they did not understand and shady companies were getting rich. Stocks for companies with no plans for going forward when stratospheric and then investors lost their shirts when the absence of planning was exposed.

      We don't have those conditions in education. People understand that a high school diploma doesn't cut it anymore if you want a job that pays more than twice minimum wage. They understand there are a variety of options they can pursue. Tuition is rising more than inflation, but the factors driving it are understood and nobody is cheerleading for it to go nuclear.

  13. This is a travesty by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have young people saddled with debt during the most productive years of their life. All so rich people can get a tax break they don't need. This is wrong.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:This is a travesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm correcting your statement for you:

      We have young people who saddle THEMSELVES with debt during their SUPPOSEDLY most productive years of their life. All BECAUSE THEY ARE IDIOTS and think they deserve to go to college, get a useless degree, and take out loans they know they won't be able to repay to pay for it.

      This is wrong.

      abolish government backed loans and a lot of the problems go away.

    2. Re:This is a travesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a useless post: we have a horrible problem - it must be due to rich greedy republicans - I'm at wits end.
      Just more rhetoric from angry Progressives.

    3. Re:This is a travesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I see someone discovered Ayn Rand.

    4. Re:This is a travesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why go to college when all the information is already online? If the problem that college solves is income inequality then why is income inequality getting worse while the % of adults with a college education is growing? It's all so tiresome.

    5. Re:This is a travesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet nothing you said refutes the OP. Try again.

    6. Re:This is a travesty by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      We have young people saddled with debt during the most productive years of their life. All so rich people can get a tax break they don't need. This is wrong.

      What are you talking about? These things are not related. As people have been pointing out elsewhere here, college tuition has been rising at 2-3x the rate of inflation for over 20 years, while professor salaries have stayed constant. Obviously, the issue isn't that we aren't taxing the rich enough.

      Holy shit. Seriously, left wingers. If you don't want to sound like a bunch of morons quit thinking that every single problem in society is caused by the rich not being taxed enough, even though they pay the bulk of all income taxes.

  14. Could someone explain that to me? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

    Europe here so I don't get the situation in the US. But I have always been explained that a part of those tuition fees are due to the fact that they include room anbd board? So food is still an issue?

    --
    bickerdyke
    1. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends. Most colleges have only a certain number of dorm rooms. Pretty much all colleges have meal plans. Both are optional. Some students choose to live off-campus - basically like any other person.

      However, cost of living isn't part of tuition/fees.

      Also remember that in many countries in Europe, the state subsidizes education by large taxes - so in many instances, when you "go to college", for example, in germany, the tuition/fees/room/board are all wrapped into one cost.

      Not so here in the US.

      Also, some students don't properly plan for food and expenses, so at times, have trouble - which is their own fault most of the time.

    2. Re: Could someone explain that to me? by sunji.roaoul · · Score: 1

      no, room and board are not by default included in tuition at most American schools. They are offered, but at a premium.

      --
      with rocket fuel siphoned straight offathe rocket my eyehorn glows
    3. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Many students choose to live off-campus instead of in dorms, because dorms have too many rules, like not using drugs, and not having loud parties all night, and you can't just get drunk and say anything to anybody like you can if you live on your own.

      And partying uses up money fast. They run out of money for food, because at home they had Mom to do it, but they hate rules, so here they are. Every month. For the whole 4^H5 years.

      There are other situations, but this is the most common. The general belief is that it is good for them, because they have to learn responsibility. Or alternatively, that all the blame rests with their parents for not raising them to be better people, so who cares?

    4. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And this is the part I don't get about the US system. Why should your wallet (or that of your parents) decide whether you should go to college? Your brain should. Over here, universities are free (or, IIRC, you pay a token sum like a few 100 bucks a semester). Which leads to entry level courses being flooded with people. Computer Science, in any area, was incredibly overrun in the past with more than 2000 people a year starting at my university.

      Fewer than 100 graduate.

      The rest is weeded out. Brutally. Here's your assignment, do it or don't, nobody gives a fuck but you. Where you find what you need, where you get information and what to do when is for you to find out. Self organization is the first thing you learn. Cooperation with others to make the workload manageable for both of you the second.

      And these are the people I want to hire. I need people who know how to organize, and I need people who know how to work together with others for mutual benefit. And on top of that, I get one of the top 5% in the field I'm actually hiring in, or else he wouldn't have that degree.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Train0987 · · Score: 2

      "The rest is weeded out. Brutally. Here's your assignment, do it or don't, nobody gives a fuck but you. "

      In the US that's racist.

    6. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      STEM programs at most academic-oriented big land-grant colleges in the US weed out students in two phases:

      1) At application time (acceptance rate ranges from 5% - 20% depending on school)
      2) In the first two years of college courses (pass rates are 80% - 95% for most engineering classes and probably 60-70% for core science and math.)

      Over the years the first has changed (sometimes a lot - acceptance rates varied wildly over the last 40 years) but the _number_ of students that make it through the weed-out classes has remained (roughly) unchanged.

      And to some extent employers rely on the reputation of some of these universities to screen out candidates. (3.5+ GPA with a CS major from University of Wisconsin-Madison? Probably pretty good. 4.0 GPA with a CS major from University of Phoenix? Better be applying for that fast food job.)

    7. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Contrary to popular opinion, the ability to self-organize is not a genetic trait. It is learned just like any other skill. By weeding them out without trying to teach them first, you're losing out on a lot of potential talent.

      Likewise, finding a competent partner to work with depends on your charisma and luck. Both are good to have, but plenty of people find success despite not having either.

      And then there's all the private coding "bootcamps" in the US which does exactly what you described. They start with a bunch of assignments designed to weed out everyone except those who are already good at coding, then they put these people through the course without teaching them much, and finally claim all the credit when these people find good employment. As far as their value is concerned though, I put them at the same level as a decent book on the subject.

    8. Re: Could someone explain that to me? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Wow. That makes it even more expensive than what I always thought with already those huge fees.

      --
      bickerdyke
    9. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bullshit. Did you even go to college?

    10. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Another thing we don't have. Our students don't have time to waste on bullshit.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Could someone explain that to me? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You don't learn coding studying CS. At least not here. No time to waste on that, you better know how to write code when you join. What you can learn here is to optimize it, find out how to spot bottlenecks in code, learn about O-notation and what it means. But don't expect anyone to teach you why x=x+y doesn't mean that y has to be zero.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    12. Re: Could someone explain that to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As another poster pointed out, in the United states a meritocracy where college is free but only the best get a degree would be condemned as racist.

      Europeans do not understand this problem, which is unique to the United states. Most European countries have less than 1% black population and effectively 0% Hispanic population. The black immigrants they do have tend to be relatively intelligent and well educated.

      In stark contrast, the United states is around 15% black and 15% hispanic, and unlike any European country, these are not largely vetted immigrants who arrived and were granted citizenship based on merit: these are almost entirely the descendants of slaves and native Americans.

      The white Hispanics - i.e. Europeans - and native Africans in this country are much the same as anywhere else in europe: educated, well spoken, polite, and intelligent. What citizens of European countries often don't understand when critiquing the US is that this is not the case for the vast majority of blacks and Hispanics in this country.

      Consider: The average white IQ in this country is 103. The average black IQ is 85, and the average hispanic IQ is 89. Only around 1 in 10 blacks has an IQ comparable to the AVERAGE white, so if we were to restrict university degrees in this country to only the most intelligent students, it would be optimistic to think more than 1 in 20 of them would be black or hispanic.

      This is the situation that has led to many of our current societal problem, not just in regards to university tuition. The US government has spent decades trying to paper over this problem, pouring in money and passing laws to try to legislate away a biological disparity. With regards to tuition rates, the culprits are primarily those well-meaning individuals who have insisted that college attendance demographics match the general population, without a real understanding of why the demographics didn't match in the first place.

      There is no easy solution here. From afar, and judging our system by European standards, it seems our dysfunctional college system could be fixed by simply offering free tuition and weeding out the unfit. The trouble with that solution is that the unfit are very disproportionally minorities, who collectively make up around 30% of the voting population.

  15. Technical schools and trades... by Hugh+Jorgen · · Score: 1

    Most would be better served by gaining marketable technical skills even if they decide to pursue a degree. That way when they cannot get a job in graphic design they can at least be a plumber or welder.

  16. Food Insecurity Exagerated by Debt Fear by eepok · · Score: 1

    Iâ(TM)ve worked in public higher ed since I was seeking my BA myself. My generation was targeted by credit card companies and we also saw the massive defunding of public higher education and thus the increase of cost to the students themselves.

    But what most people donâ(TM)t know is that, behind the scenes, the bigger public universities we able offset a major portion of that increased tuition/fees with grants funded be increasing out of state and international admissions (who get charged much more than in state students). This means that while the total âoecostâ of higher education has officially increased, the proportional amount paid by students has only gone up a bit.

    But still, there is a newer MAJOR fear of accumulating student debt. I left with $45k in debt, paid my minimums until I could pay more, took a payment hiatus due to unemployment, and then focused again on repayment. It took me 10 years to pay off the debt.

    Today, I see students who are desperately afraid of taking on HALF as much debt as I did and as a result of hungry. Itâ(TM)s stunning how much more the students will self-educate about student debt by reading about the overall numbers of student loan default while not controlling for degree completion or the school from which the education was received (distance learning and for-profit schools are MASSIVELY more likely to pump out students that default on loans).

    So, while there has been an increase in the direct costs of higher education, it has not been so much that students can not afford food. Instead, students have been taught to fear student debt as an extreme (sometimes politically motivated) reaction to poorly reported upon statistics.

    Moral of the story: take the grants and scholarship without worry. Know what youâ(TM)re getting into with a federally subsidized loan, but donâ(TM)t let the big numbers scare you. We ALL go through repayment. Itâ(TM)s not wonderful or fun, but donâ(TM)t go hungry for 4-5 years just because you donâ(TM)t want to make payments.

    1. Re:Food Insecurity Exagerated by Debt Fear by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      My generation was targeted by credit card companies and we also saw the massive defunding of public higher education and thus the increase of cost to the students themselves.

      I remember a friend of mine, on his way to getting a Masters of Psychological Anthropology degree, racked up about $25k of credit card debt. Mostly buying weed. No big deal, that's easy to solve with bankruptcy. The student loans for the useless degree (he wasn't even trying to be a teacher, so wtf?) are still dragging behind him, though.

  17. Guess That's Why They're All So Skinny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, the current crop of kids are fatties. They aren't starving, unless you mean their inability to afford 3 Big Macs per day.

    1. Re:Guess That's Why They're All So Skinny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to live on peanuts for lunch and dinner for a few years in college not many years ago. Peanuts are energy dense with lots of minerals and vitamins.

  18. Re:Suffer, college kids, suffer by sinij · · Score: 1

    Can you afford your resume getting screened by HR regardless of your skill and experience? It was much easier to get into IT without any degree when degrees in IT were rare. Sure, some brilliant people can overcome this even today when CS degree is expected. When you are The Expert in X, people who need X done right won't care about your degree. However, if you are just a replaceable cog in the machine, like 90% of us, not having some kind of degree is highly detrimental.

  19. Re:Correlation, but... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    > This food insecurity is most prevalent at community colleges

    Given that community colleges are dirt cheap, as far as education goes, I suspect the lack of food money has more to do with the kinds of folks whose incomes land them in community college, and that the tuition is not the cause of their woes.

    Both of my kids "landed in community college" because it was inexpensive. Both will graduate with STEM degrees and have zero debt because I am able to pay their tuition and books and they are able to live at home. They will have a great education and zero debt. It's not impossible though it's not easy.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  20. Priorities? by Atmchicago · · Score: 1

    What fraction of these students have a smartphone with a data plan? That's a few hundred dollars per year right there.

    How much have these colleges and universities spent on luxurious campuses and sports facilities which could instead have been "spent" on (saved for) lower tuition?

    --

    You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it dissolve.

    1. Re:Priorities? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Generally, they not only have smart phones, they also pay student fees that include access to campus-wide wifi, so they're double-covered.

  21. Funny how the ones for the 1% by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    never seem to expire. Or how 80% of the cuts go to the 1%.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  22. Merit by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Get into university on merit.
    That would give some sort of full academic scholarship and allow the best in every generation to study and be supported.
    Cant pass the test but have wealth? Buy your way into some study thats fun and use your own wealth to pay for what is needed.

    When poor and not that smart, consider something outside a university education you cant afford.
    Something like HVAC, plumbing and electrical. Vocational training.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  23. Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trick is to walk slowly and keep your energy level use low. Also some colleges have a place where they sell the cooking students products and you can get a good meal for about 4$.

    Educational centers are an ideal within our culture, given a glorified place of hope and future prosperity. Those operating the educational institutes have taken our faith and spun it into gold all while whipping it out and pissing right in our faces. They could develop AMAZING online enhancements to their courses with 3d animations voice overs all sorts of stuff, but instead they spend it on parking so they can handle all the foreign students (at my college outnumbering native countrymen) so they can earn yet more money. They then crank the knob up on EVERYTHING oh you want a pop from a machine? 1.50$ Or would you rather get something at the cafeteria? 15$ Whats that you need to park a car? $694.00 per year. Do you need books? $500. Tuition? jesus I won't even go there because it makes me so increadibly angry and sad.

    Thing is, the education they deliver sucks. I went in for web development, and they taught me DOS (not linux bash) windows (not linux) .net (not javascript) java (and again not javascript) and sql (which is quaint but realistically we can see the future is mongodb) and of course tomcat apache (not node.js). I had to spend almost every night sitting up at the computer actually educating myself after going to school all day and starving because I needed time to learn and college seemed the only way to get my parents to shut the fuck up while I taught myself something by making them think I was into the classes. The classes weren't offering an education, they don't even teach you basic stuff like how to setup a webserver, how to setup financial transactions, how to do login/logout, we NEVER hooked a server side database up to a client side. It was beyond pathetic.

    A big hearty FUCK YOU, to Algonquin College of Ontario Canada. Rip off artists of Canada. The fact that they are greedy scum is just icing on top of a big cake of shit.

    1. Re:Been there, done that by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Most dorms also have kitchens, which few students actually use. If you have an apartment, it definitely has a kitchen. Cooking is cheap as well especially if you rotate between friends and share the meals.

    2. Re: Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relational databases (which you mistakenly called SQL, which is the language used to access the relational database) are STILL and will
      ALWAYS be one of the foundations of CS. Even if you only remembered the course sections on data modeling, ACID, and how to pick a proper id for your data, you will have profited.

    3. Re: Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      Relational databases suck ass, the concept of utilizing the JSON object to properly and logically nest data within data is correct. SQL tried to do something similar but with everything to do with SQL it was a shit show.

      When you need a statment like SELECT AIRPORT.FLIGHT, CUSTOMER.NAME FROM AIRPORT, CUSTOMER, BOOKING WHERE AIRPORT.FLIGHT = CUSTOMER.FLIGHT AND CUSTOMER.NAME = 'bob';
      The database schema for this would look like someone through a bowl of lasagnia at the wall and the noodles just happened to all stick facing upright.

      Compare that to mongodb db.findone({'airport.flight.customer.name':'bob'},function(err,res){ //then you can dig through the airport object for the flights and find bob using dot notation, or restrict the result to just be info about bob
      })
      The database schema for this would be very very very simple probably just having airports and then all the data nested.

      Obviously hands down mongodb wins. Pretending like the two are anywhere near the same level is just delusional. Pretending a 40 year old database system vs one from 2014 which fixed a TON of stupidity in sql is on equal footing is just pure shit eating madness.

    4. Re: Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right, I call it SQL, but why not? You immediately knew what I was talking about, and so does everyone else, when I say 'relational database' you and I know what I am talking about, but immediately about 30% of the people I'd want to talk to about it don't use the term and probably would just give me a blank stare. These 30% are people who use the technology.

      Kind of like Kleenex, the proper term is 'tissue' however everyone says Kleenex not tissue.

    5. Re: Been there, done that by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Found the Kool-aid drinker.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re: Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the Oracle employee

    7. Re:Been there, done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most dorms also have kitchens, which few students actually use. If you have an apartment, it definitely has a kitchen. Cooking is cheap as well especially if you rotate between friends and share the meals.

      Yes, cooking is cheap.

      Shopping isn't cheap.

    8. Re: Been there, done that by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Found the guy on the right, who also doesn't know the difference between "threw" and "through", and who is *not* one of the 0.1% who really does know better than a spellchecker (that's "lasagna", BTW).

      Your example just goes to show that those who fail to understand normalisation are doomed to reinvent it—poorly.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  24. Not true by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    this is a false narrative used to justify cutting funding. It's a straw man.

    The loans were the result of out of control tuition increases. Those increases started when federal funding was slashed. That started with Reagan, continued with Clinton and didn't get any better under Obama.

    We were _heavily_ subsidizing colleges to keep tuition low because mega corporations needed trained American workers. Outsourcing and H1-Bs eliminated that need and when that happened they cut funding. We could have stood up to them and kept taxing them to pay for schools but we didn't.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interest on those loans pay for Obamacare for the poor. Look it up, that's where a lot of money for the ACA comes from.

      Why do you hate having students, who will be making large salaries, paying for healthcare for the poor who didn't get such opportunities? You all begged for Obamacare and are not bitching about having to pay for it. What, did you think only Republican voters would pay for it?

    2. Re:Not True by swillden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I cover this elsewhere on this thread, but it was cuts to federal subsidies that raised tuition, not loans.

      Got any evidence for that claim?

      Here's some on the other side: https://www.mercatus.org/%5Bno.... Emphasis mine.

      In the second stage, with controls for all forms of aid, the authors found that each additional Pell grant dollar to an institution leads to about a 55-cent increase in sticker price tuition. For subsidized loans, they a found a somewhat larger passthrough effect of 70 percent, and for unsubsidized loans, the loading of tuition is about 30 percent. Those results, which are identified through cross-sectional exposures to the changes in student federal aid programs between 2007 and 2010 and contain numerous controls for other effects, support the hypothesis that increases in federal support for higher education lead to increases in tuition and not the other way around. The finding for subsidized loans is quite strong across different regression specifications in both magnitude and statistical significance.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nope...it's a fact.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_tuition_in_the_United_States#/media/File:InflationTuitionMedicalGeneral1978to2008.png

      Supply-Demand-Price is a formula that comes to a natural balance. The demand for a degree was always high while the supply of available admission seats was low. Despite that, without the availability of student loan money that meant that you were either on scholarship, parents paying for it or you were working your way through it.

      Student loan money changed the formula to "how much are you willing to borrow" and removed the price constraint on the supply / demand economics. If people can't afford to pay a particular price, the price CANNOT go up without leaving an excess of supply. By ensuring that anybody willing to borrow money could pay for the education, demand skyrocketed.

      This isn't a false narrative. In 1978 Congress passed MISAA and in 1979 guaranteed banks a favorable return on the loans. The explosion went from there.

      The EXACT same thing happened in the medical industry as employer sponsor insurance programs removed individuals from ever seeing the price for their health care options.

      The moment that you provide an outside money source to separate consumers from the price of what they are consuming, price sensitivity goes away and the service becomes basic supply and demand with no price constraint. Every aspect of the US economy where this has happened has seen costs explode.

      There's no narrative involved in mathematical outcomes.

    4. Re:Not True by sinij · · Score: 1

      All non-profit means in this context is that it doesn't pay out dividends. They are still free to endlessly expand administrative staff, build lavish facilities and dormitories, and voraciously spend on diversity and inclusivity initiatives.

    5. Re:Not True by Train0987 · · Score: 2

      " but it was cuts to federal subsidies that raised tuition, not loans"

      That is absurd! There is a direct relation to subsidy and tuition increases hand has been since federally-backed student loans became a thing. The data is undeniable: tuition began growing exponentially the day after those laws passed and has risen to meet the subsidies every year since. Prior to that tuition was flat for decades, rising at or below the rate of inflation. Once the gov't began backing student loans there was no risk involved with the banks giving them out and tuition began rising with nothing to press them downward. This sin't even debatable.

      Oh, and deans and chancellors at state universities are paid obscene sums. LSU's chancellor, for example makes $600k/year now and is lobbying for another raise. Administrative salaries are up something like 800% in the past 10 years.

    6. Re:Not True by lgw · · Score: 1

      I cover this elsewhere on this thread, but it was cuts to federal subsidies that raised tuition, not loans

      You're asserting that government subsidies lowered prices? Is there any lie too blatant for a socialist?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Not True by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      I cover this elsewhere on this thread, but it was cuts to federal subsidies that raised tuition, not loans. Public colleges do _not_ operate in a supply/demand model. They're non profit. And no, the dean's salaries didn't go up that much (football coaches did, but they bring in enough money to pay for it even though none of that goes to players). Anyone who says loans increase tuition at public non-profit Universities is lying to you to change the narrative and create a straw man to divert attention away from the raiding of the public commons that's been going on for 40+ years.

      Loans go up, students can afford to go to a wider range of schools. Schools now have to compete with a wider range of other schools for students. To attract students they upgrade dorms to apartments, build multiple pools, have food courts instead of cafeterias, add or improve sports to entertain students, and hire staff to maintain and run all these extra amenities. To pay for it all, they raise tuition, which students can simply get a bigger loan to cover.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Not true by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded down? Perfectly sensible analysis that no one else came up with.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    9. Re:Not True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Public colleges do _not_ operate in a supply/demand model. They're non profit.

      This statement is a non-sequitur.

      Students demand an education. Schools supply education. Students have a choice of schools, and want to choose one that has a low cost for the level of quality the school provides. Schools make choices that alter their cost (how much tuition do I charge) and their quality (which professors are hired). This creates a market for education.

      Schools want to bring in as much money as possible. It is true that they are not doing this to please shareholders. They do it because they have to pay professors and teachers, maintain buildings, etc. If a school gets more money, it can win the bidding war for the best researchers, and increase its academic prestige. It can afford to have impressive new buildings. It can afford to advertise. It can pay for more staff to do things for students.

      Anyone who says loans increase tuition at public non-profit Universities is lying to you to change the narrative and create a straw man to divert attention away from the raiding of the public commons that's been going on for 40+ years.

      I am doing no such thing. Anyone who can think through Econ-101 should be able to see that giving most people the ability to spend more money on a service will raise the price people are willing to pay.

    10. Re:Not True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " but it was cuts to federal subsidies that raised tuition, not loans"

      That is absurd! There is a direct relation to subsidy and tuition increases hand has been since federally-backed student loans became a thing. The data is undeniable: tuition began growing exponentially the day after those laws passed and has risen to meet the subsidies every year since. Prior to that tuition was flat for decades, rising at or below the rate of inflation. Once the gov't began backing student loans there was no risk involved with the banks giving them out and tuition began rising with nothing to press them downward. This sin't even debatable.

      Oh, and deans and chancellors at state universities are paid obscene sums. LSU's chancellor, for example makes $600k/year now and is lobbying for another raise. Administrative salaries are up something like 800% in the past 10 years.

      ...and yet, in Louisiana, 9 of the top 10 highest paid state employees were part of the sports programs (https://www.nola.com/education/index.ssf/2017/07/louisiana_college_leaders_pay.html). Don't act like you don't know where LSU's priorities are at. To be fair, Louisiana is not unique in this. The highest paid public employee in the ENTIRE US is Alabama's football coach Nick Saban (https://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2018/04/nick_saban_by_far_the_highest.html?__vfz=rtw_top_pages%3D5103900015156). I wonder what the best teacher in the US is paid? If you look at any given state chances are the highest paid state employee is a coach at the flagship university, not the university president, not the governor, and certainly not a teacher. I guess that's what comes from "running the university like a business"... more tailgates and less education.

    11. Re:Not True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and deans and chancellors at state universities are paid obscene sums. LSU's chancellor, for example makes $600k/year now and is lobbying for another raise. Administrative salaries are up something like 800% in the past 10 years.

      We have a similar situation here, but it really gets fun when you include other compensation. For instance, a local state university chancellor gets nearly $150,000/year for a housing allowance over and above his base $600,000 salary. I'm quite certain there are other bonuses etc. which add even more.

      And as for those who are tooting the "they're non-profit" horn, you're kidding yourselves. Every local college president from the one I was just talking about down to the local community college has, at some point in the last five years, said on the record that their number one priority was raising money.

      They may not have shareholders in the classic sense, but make no mistake, the only thing colleges in the U.S. care about these days is cash. The fiction that they're educating any sizeable portion of the populace is just how they justify their activities.

    12. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but you've been proven wrong, not surprisingly, by history. rsilvergun has the correct historical record; it is extremely easy to verify via any search engine of your choice. Notice you only had one link that actually supports rsilvergun's statement, while you simply tried to flip the cause to a known narrative driven by politics.

      I'm afraid math or history is not on your side. But thank you for posting an obviously wrong example for the rest of us to look out for, and others may use my reply to counter yours in the future a well.

    13. Re:Not True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your source is known to bend the facts to fit a right wing narrative, so I would take it with a grain of salt. As for evidence that the cuts led to raised tuition, I can find over 1,000 reliable scholarly sources that verify the point. The only one I can find to support yours is that exact link, which is highly dubious in methodology.

  25. Not True by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    I cover this elsewhere on this thread, but it was cuts to federal subsidies that raised tuition, not loans. Public colleges do _not_ operate in a supply/demand model. They're non profit. And no, the dean's salaries didn't go up that much (football coaches did, but they bring in enough money to pay for it even though none of that goes to players).

    Anyone who says loans increase tuition at public non-profit Universities is lying to you to change the narrative and create a straw man to divert attention away from the raiding of the public commons that's been going on for 40+ years.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  26. Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

    High-Paying Trade Jobs Sit Empty, While High School Grads Line Up For University https://www.npr.org/sections/e...

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    1. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      High-Paying Trade Jobs Sit Empty, While High School Grads Line Up For University https://www.npr.org/sections/e...

      Where are they going to learn those skills? Even intelligent people have trouble discerning legitimate trade schools from all the for-profit "universities" that prey off predatory loans and fudge graduation and placement rates. The US needs to go the European route with 2 tracks-university and technical/trades. This would reduce demand for college and make it cheaper (colleges won't have to up tuition to pay for all the extra perks and facilities to recruit students) and we will have plenty of skilled workers in trades.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

      The US needs to go the European route with 2 tracks-university and technical/trades.

      That's funny. When my older brother went to high school in the late 1970's, he took vocational courses in automotive and became a auto body specialist after graduating. When I got into high school in the early 1980's, vocational courses were gone. No automotive, no construction, no farming. It was college prep for all the kids, dumb and smart. A one size fits all education. Now we got a shortage of skilled trade workers because everyone wants a high-paying desk job that requires a minimal amount of physical labor.

    3. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Where are they going to learn those skills?

      Apprenticeships and having a good work ethic. You understand that these jobs(trades) while dirty, require you to actually do more then stare blankly at a person while fucking up their order at the local fast food place right? A good work ethic will get you an apprenticeship almost anywhere. A very good work ethic will get you a head of the curve, and selling your services as a independent contractor.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the guy in the story is one injury away from being a greeter at a box store, while his friends who are still in college will have office jobs where any injury would likely be a papercut, but even if serious, would be easily accommodated.

    5. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

      That's funny. When my older brother went to high school in the late 1970's, he took vocational courses in automotive and became a auto body specialist after graduating. When I got into high school in the early 1980's, vocational courses were gone. No automotive, no construction, no farming. It was college prep for all the kids, dumb and smart. A one size fits all education. Now we got a shortage of skilled trade workers because everyone wants a high-paying desk job that requires a minimal amount of physical labor.

      One size fits none education. My high school had a vo-tech in the 90s. I think there are still some vocational high schools still around.

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    6. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      One size fits none education. My high school had a vo-tech in the 90s. I think there are still some vocational high schools still around.

      It's ironic that, for a while, the kids going to the votech classes were considered the "less intelligent" people. These days, with the rise of STEM programs and magnet schools, it's the smart kids that get training in high school on more practical or technical skills such as programming, electronics, etc.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the guy in the story is one injury away from being a greeter at a box store, while his friends who are still in college will have office jobs where any injury would likely be a papercut, but even if serious, would be easily accommodated.

      Sounds like something someone with soft hands living in parents basement would say...

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    8. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      It's called foresight. Even the blue-collar folks have it, which is why disability insurance is a thing.

    9. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

      It's called foresight. Even the blue-collar folks have it, which is why disability insurance is a thing.

      Where's the foresight in taking on 6-figures in debt for a liberal arts degree? Debt is disability by a hundred thousand paper cuts.

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    10. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

      It's ironic that, for a while, the kids going to the votech classes were considered the "less intelligent" people. These days, with the rise of STEM programs and magnet schools, it's the smart kids that get training in high school on more practical or technical skills such as programming, electronics, etc.

      “...I’d rather be antifragile than smart.”—@nntaleb https://medium.com/conversatio...

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    11. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      "liberal arts" means that you had to take English and other things unrelated to your science degree.

      Everybody who got a science degree at a real University has a "liberal arts degree."

      The alternative is to go to a trade school, where you don't have those extra requirements.

    12. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

      "liberal arts" means that you had to take English and other things unrelated to your science degree.

      Everybody who got a science degree at a real University has a "liberal arts degree."

      The alternative is to go to a trade school, where you don't have those extra requirements.

      https://medium.com/conversatio...

      TALEB: Then, the root of that, my feeling, in the Anglo-Saxon world is the desire—this is why they call it liberal arts education—to aristocratic ties to themselves.

      Again, let’s talk about the Greco-Roman world. You had the trivium or quadrivium, absolutely nothing practical about them, the rhetoric, the grammar, some things. The liberal education was what people learned in order to become aristocrat and idle upper class.

      Then you had the real professions of becoming a baker, how to do something with wood. And the English, the upper class—of course they didn’t want to be working class, so they sent their kids to learn that stuff. And this is what came to America.

      Education is split in two. You have technical education like law—not technical, but professional education—law, medicine, what else? Engineering and all these things, and then you have mathematics. If you look at it historically, the engineers didn’t really connect to the other ones because the Roman engineers did not use Greek geometry.

      We only started using Greek geometry late in life after the educational system started including mathematics for these people. Engineers built cathedrals without clear geometry. It was actually more robust.

      Geometry will give you these ugly corners. Before, we didn’t even know what the right angle is. Before, it was more involved, it was rule of thumb, and it was different. They had the separation, segregation.

      So what you want to do? Is this liberal education that’s contaminating the rest? Or is it the technical that’s contaminating the expectation of what education should be like?

      You say, “OK, this is the kind of thing you do like piano lessons on the weekends.” You read Homer and stuff like that. It’s important, and you become civilized. Stuff you do to be civilized and be able to have dinner with the vice president of the World Bank, these are the things you do. And these are the things you do to get you ahead in life.

      Your problem has been a known problem ever since you had Rome and Greece competing.

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    13. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by js290 · · Score: 1

      CAPLAN: Yeah. What I usually tell people who say, “Look, give me a reason why school is great” is that there’s going to be something you learn there that’s going to be invaluable.

      Say, “Look, I agree that it makes sense to expose people to a variety of subjects, but it seems like it makes a lot more sense to expose them to 10 or 20 subjects that they’re actually likely to use than 10 subjects that virtually no one on Earth uses.”

      Rather than saying, “Let’s make sure everyone studies poetry and art history and a foreign language in America, and everyone learns a bunch of sports.” Instead, why not make sure everyone spends a few weeks learning some plumbing, a few weeks learning some electricity, a few weeks going into learning some customer service?

      Yeah, you do want to have a diverse menu. You don’t want to lock a 12-year-old into a career when he’s 12. But it’s still far better to go expose him to a tasty menu of realistic options, rather than the tasty menu of pipe dreams, which is what seems to be education is mostly about.

      --
      "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
    14. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of the big kerfuffle when they decided to require that military officers get a liberal arts education; one of the big complaints was that learning algebra was obviously of no utility to officers because they aren't the ones aiming the artillery. Another was that it was stupid to make them learn history, because why should they need to learn about epaulets on ancient uniforms? As if that is history!

      In fact, the song "I am the Very Model of a Modern Major-General" from the Pirates of Penzance is intending to be ageist, as it might seem without understanding of the politics, but instead was intending to ridicule their image of an educated officer!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    15. Re:Time to learn some real skillz by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I meant to type "isn't intending to be ageist," sorry.

  27. Re:Don't major in art history, then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you have a degree in art-history/gender studies and like to mistake your 'pretension and trivia' for 'talent and ability'.

  28. 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I distinctly remember this happening while I was in college. The only students who would get student loans when I started college were doctors and lawyers, as they would have to attend for a long time, and could most likely pay them back. Then they opened the program up to all students. Two years later tuition started increasing by 5-9% every year. The first two years I was there they had built two new buildings. The last two I was there they built three, including a huge new library and law annex, gutted and renovated two more, and bought an adjacent city block to raze and build a new visitor center.

    In the twenty years since a relative attended school there, they had built, maybe, ten new buildings. In the ten years after the school loan program went through, they had nearly doubled the size of the campus. Guess where that money is coming from?

    1. Re:90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I distinctly remember this happening while I was in college.
      .
      .
      .
      Then they opened the program up to all students.

      Were you in school in perhaps the 1890s? Because federal student loans started in 1958, and student loans have been common since at least the 1980s. My wife's mother back to school in the 80s (she was NOT a doctor/lawyer), and took out loans to pay for it. I heavily assure you that student loans have been VERY common for a VERY long time.

      Stop lying.

    2. Re:90s by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      Only a small subset of students were eligible for the loans introduced in 1958 (engineers, science, etc). The explosion happened when they were opened up to everyone in the late 70's.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. Re:Finacial aid and loans is what drives up the co by crow · · Score: 1

    That's a big part of it. It's also important to look at how schools compete for students based on amenities, not just the quality of education. I haven't studied the numbers, but I would expect to see that the budgets of schools are shifting more and more towards non-academic expenditures.

    Now there is finally enough attention to the cost of schools that schools can compete on cost, so I expect to see the market forces coming into play as a bigger factor in the coming years.

  31. Re:Finacial aid and loans is what drives up the co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Downstream of "$150,000 loan for gender studies undergraduate degree" is reduced quality of life, reduced lifetime wealth, and overall economical drag from less available income from consumers.

    However, the holders of such degrees know that their unemployability is purely the result of The Patriatrchy refusing to recognize their worth.

    Also something about cismorphic monogendered racephobics or whatever the buzzwords are today.

  32. The Most Valuable Lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That means universities are finally teaching something worthwhile: That the socialism doesn't work, free handouts are not something to depend on, and that you aren't going to make a living wage with your degree in Lesbian Dance Theory.

  33. Don't forget the effect of worrying about money by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's been shown that time and energy spent worrying about money massively impacts productivity.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  34. College and goods jobs not a guarantee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its about time college bound kids realize the reality that a degree is not a guarantee for a good paying or rewarding job. You must choose wisely in what you focus your studies on. Some degree's are not worth the paper their printed on and some are in high demand, mostly because they require more effort and difficult classes to achieve the degree. Some just want to roll through their college years and then realize it was all for naught. Who's fault is that? Certainly not anyone else but yourself who obviously choose badly for whatever reason and now are stuck with a huge bill and nothing to show for it.

    1. Re:College and goods jobs not a guarantee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some just want to roll through their college years and then realize it was all for naught. Who's fault is that?

      Whose fault indeed.

  35. Let'm go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumpsterdiving/Skiping
    Plenty of stores around that throw away food that's still good, though the expiration date has passed.

    Just do not make a mess of the dumpsters surroundings!

  36. "Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Luckyo · · Score: 0

    "Food insecurity" is the umbrella term, invented specifically because Western civilization destroyed non-mental illness related hunger in their societies completely, and has now almost eliminated all non-political (i.e. warfare) hunger on world stage. Which is why certain circles, desperate to maintain the narrative of "evil capitalism starving children" when the exact opposite is true, have invented the term "food insecurity". This term encompasses everything from "dying of starvation" to "skipping breakfast because you were late for your first class, because you got drunk off your feet and overslept the previous day".

    That's right. Alcoholic party animal who oversleeps and skips breakfast is just as "food insecure" as hypothetical individual who cannot afford food for months on end and ends up dying. Hypothetical because these individuals no longer exist. Capitalist societies are wealthy enough to ensure that the biggest problem their poor face today is being too damn fat. That's right. Our biggest food related problem for poor people today is that they eat too damn much.

    It's worth noting that hunger still exists. It's usually either mental illness or crime related (relatives starving unwanted child, mentally ill person not taking care of himself), or political (socialism causing mass starvation event in the country's cities in Venezuela).

    1. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm surprised you made it out of cable newsvertainment long enough to type all that. Good work. Keep it coming. Freedom is possible, you'll see!

    2. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hypothetical individual who cannot afford food for months on end and ends up dying. Hypothetical because these individuals no longer exist. Capitalist societies are wealthy enough to ensure that the biggest problem their poor face today is being too damn fat.

      Actually, the term "food insecurity" encompasses this. Poor people are fat because the only food available to them is loaded up with subsidized corn, soy, pesticides, preservatives, and other chemicals. Being fat does not mean being healthy or having enough nutrition. "food insecurity" also includes no *affordable* access to *nutritious food*.

    3. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Desperate name calling is the last refuge of ideologue caught peddling lies.

    4. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      This kind of desperate spin by the activists is exactly what I'm talking about. Now that world hunger has been all but solved, they desperately need some way to keep people thinking that capitalism just isn't helping the poorest.

      That moment when you have to pretend that "people eating too much" is the same thing as "people starving" just to sell your narrative, is the moment you show just how little you actually care about the people.

      There are tens of millions of people alive right now who have mild retardation, not because they lost the genetic lottery, but because they grew poor in countries hit by hunger back then, which crippled the development of their learning ability. To even consider comparing this to people being fat from eating too much sugary food is to be a truly monstrous individual with utter lack of empathy.

      Something that was quite common among the communists in Soviet Union, Maoist China and Pol Pot's Burma, and national socialists of the Third Reich. Can't afford empathy when there's utopia to be built.

    5. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you can't find a lie, then I found it! ;)

      Did you notice that you did the exact thing you complained that I did, except you added a factually untrue statement?

    6. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I noticed that you tried, in your limited ability, to mimic my method and as is common with people who have warped world view because they hold extreme views, you missed the point entirely.

    7. Re:"Food insecurity" has nothing to do with hunger by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You still didn't say anything, even though you managed to use some words. I hope you didn't pay much for them.

  37. Full ride no longer by Revek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My daughter got a full ride scholarship four years ago. The first year cost of very little since all of her food was paid. The next year they changed the food plans that caused her to be short toward the end of the year. Last year I started putting fifty a week in to her bank account so she would be able to eat when she could, due to the collage shutting down several of their little kiosk food nooks. This year they are replacing all of those with food trucks and her vouchers don't add up to three meals a day for the duration of her last year.
    Added into that, she has been audited for three years in a row despite the last two times they found nothing wrong. All the while insisting its 'random'. She is still lucky in that she had the grades to get through collage without a crushing debt at the end.

    This situation is attributed to a new chancellor who immediately spent five million on renovating his house and then doing more renovations the next year. He also wants to get a football team going. Its clear that collages do better without them. The quality of the students who are there to learn is superior to the meat heads they will get with football around.

    1. Re:Full ride no longer by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      This situation is attributed to a new chancellor who immediately spent five million on renovating his house and then doing more renovations the next year. He also wants to get a football team going. Its clear that collages do better without them. The quality of the students who are there to learn is superior to the meat heads they will get with football around.

      And, yet, if you look up about 2 screens you'll find someone claiming the problem is that we're not taxing "the rich" enough.

      Geeze.

    2. Re:Full ride no longer by Revek · · Score: 1

      Sure, sure that is also one of the problems.

  38. Re:Correlation, but... by The+Original+CDR · · Score: 1

    My blue-collar parents didn't believe in college when I decided to quit my construction job ($10 per hour) and go to community college.They allowed me to live at home and provided dinner. Breakfast and lunch was my own responsibility. I worked 30 hours a week ($5 per hour) at the campus bookstore to pay for tution, books, breakfast and lunch. I graduated debt free.

  39. ...no, most are actually obese! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. Re:Finacial aid and loans is what drives up the co by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Downstream of "$150,000 loan for gender studies undergraduate degree" is reduced quality of life, reduced lifetime wealth, and overall economical drag from less available income from consumers. If anything, these loans should have a California's mandatory cancer warning label attached.

    My preference is stick to local state colleges, where you can get a degree at a cost of ~$13k per year in tuition and books. Much lower loans necessary, including the engineering track

  41. More like blame student loans by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    It's simple economics - increasing the supply of money (via student loans) to buy a service while not commensurately increasing the supply of that service will cause the price of that service to go up.

  42. Re:Finacial aid and loans is what drives up the co by Jaegs · · Score: 1

    It's much more complicated than that. Sure, easy access to loans can lead to trouble--e.g., the housing market crash in 2007-2010--but another major contributor is that public higher education is becoming that in name only, as largely Republican-led state government decrease funding to public higher education in favor of tax cuts:

    https://www.insidehighered.com...

    But it goes beyond both of these as well, and is, in part, fueled by this issue. Universities want to attract students, and nowadays, students want their own suites, a climbing wall, a lazy river, WiFi that works in absolutely every nook and cranny on campus, mobile access to every university resource (grades, registration, coursework, events), etc. All of these things a.) cost money, b.) were not even a consideration a few decades ago (e.g., are additional expenses), and are rarely covered by states, so universities jack up student fees and tuition to cover such amenities. Furthermore, when university housing gets more expensive, rentals in the area get slightly less expensive. It all becomes something of an arms race between universities, who now have PR and Marketing groups that oversee admissions and registration.

    Oh, and increased reliance on loans and federal funds leads to an increased need for compliance, which leads to more administration, which leads to higher costs, as one of the single most expensive aspect of a university is managing human capital (personnel, HR, benefits, etc.).

  43. Normal ..? by fish_in_the_c · · Score: 1

    Welcome to the human race. Most humans throughout most of history have had to deal with 'food insecurity' perhaps this experience will help give those in college some perspective.

    Speaking of respective, how insecure is there food in reality. I mean aren't ramien noodles till sold for something like 5 for dollar and tuna sold for cheap, what about those eggs. If you can get to a normal grocery store once a month a single person can live and not starve for less then $30 a month, you just aren't eating food you like. I'm not saying this to be harsh , that is what I lived on my senior year while working to graduate, why because my parents were poor and their available contribution was zero. Maybe we appropriate things more if we have to fight for them, rather then treating college like an extended adolescences and parting till we puke.

      I'd like to see some statistics NOT related to 'feelings'. How about , how many college students are hospitalized per capita for malnutrition? (anybody? was there any?).
    Here the thing, if you are choosing between beer and food, please pick food. A person can also do without new cloths for years ( the good will is nearby if you are hard up.)

    I have my doubt''s if this is actually 'food insecurity' in so much as it is poor planning and wanting what you want.

    Seriously if you have enough money to pay for school you have enough money to eat. Take 1 less class a semester, pick up a few hours and graduate in 5 or 6 years instead of 4. Hmm... food or books.. food or books ... you need to food before you can use the books.

    --
    âoeTolerance applies only to persons, but never to truth. Intolerance applies only to truth, but never to persons.
  44. Supply and demand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We should eliminate all federal student loans and drastically cut aid to force some responsibility and efficiency in the universities. Why has tuition risen so much so fast in the past 3 decades? Why do we belittle and demean non college grads in the trades?

  45. Re:Bullshit by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    I no longer wonder why the average American is way less healthy than the average European. Thanks for solving a mystery.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. very keywords...."or are worried about it" by tacokill · · Score: 0

    How does a country struggling with obesity have a hunger problem? Answer: They don't. Instead, the word "hunger" was redefined to include people who do now know where their next meal is coming from. This is often called food insecurity.

    Well, it's horseshit. All of it. By measuring hunger in this manner, they have drastically changed how hunger is measured and they have artificially increased the number of "hungry" people.

    Remember that whenever you read these "America is going hungry" articles. Then go visit any populated place and see for yourself how hungry Americans are. Hint: Hungry and starving people don't drive scooters.

    1. Re:very keywords...."or are worried about it" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, technically I'm part of the "food insecurity" group since most days until the very minute before lunch I have no idea where to get some. Then literally 30 seconds before I buy some food I take a decision, but of course at this time I'm already totally stressed out by having to choose from about 15 different places within walking distance. I totally need an app for that!

    2. Re:very keywords...."or are worried about it" by tacokill · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is 100% correct. You are included in the definition of "hungry"

  47. What is it going to take-employee benefits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually hamburger-flipping would help the hunger problem. Why? Because most fast-food, and restaurants give meals as part of their employee benefits.

    1. Re: What is it going to take-employee benefits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's changed then. 30ish years ago when I worked for food, you had to pay for your burger just like everyone else.

      I'd be surprised if that changed among the chains. My kids did get meals in the dining centers for working there while in college though.

    2. Re: What is it going to take-employee benefits. by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      That's changed then. 30ish years ago when I worked for food, you had to pay for your burger just like everyone else.

      I'd be surprised if that changed among the chains. My kids did get meals in the dining centers for working there while in college though.

      Grandparent post is tripping. Both QSR (fast food) and full service restaurants only give discounts to regular employees nowadays. The QSR standard is still 50% off, while some full service restaurants have either a fixed low-cost menu, a 20-40% discount, or one which varies depending on the item ("no discounts on market fish or steak", for example).

      Managers at QSRs still typically get free meals, AFAIK. I was working as a manager at the McDonalds adjacent to my college for the first year and a half and probably spent about $40 a month on groceries when I did thanks to all the free meals. (Side note: Nothing bothers me more than Super Size Me. I literally ate nothing but McD for waaaaay longer than he did, but since I wasn't trying to make a propaganda point, I barely gained a pound.)

      Anyway... yes. If you're having problems making food ends meet and you don't have a job in food service, that's one way to help. It's also a great learning opportunity. My later positions in IT/tech support were helped by the customer service skills and management skills I learned at McD.

    3. Re: What is it going to take-employee benefits. by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      When I worked at subway about 20 years ago, I got a free six inch sub a day.

  48. The real problem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem is that people are going to college when they shouldn't. If you can't afford it you can't afford it. Most of the claims of student loan debt is simply money borrowed using a student loan and then spent on housing, food, and entertainment. The idea that schooling must or should continue until the person is old enough to realize that they are an adult has to stop.

    The lack of gifts is not the problem. The lack of intelligence is the problem.

  49. how our gov works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We treat inmate better than how we treat students. Crime pays good dividend.

  50. It's working for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The upcoming cut in capital gains taxes is going to benefit me and mine immensly. If you don't benefit you only have yourself to blame.

  51. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  52. If that was true why didn't tuition skyrocket by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in the 80s? The spikes didn't happen until the late 90s/early 2000s. I know, because I just missed it and read multiple articles about it in my college's newspaper. Articles written with the full backing of the college's economics department doing research to show what was going to happen when the federal funding cuts that were being proposed started hitting. I remember reading how in 20 years tuition would top $12-$16k for a public university. And here we are 20 years later, I've got a kid in college and sure enough her tuition is $16k (3rd year nursing program).


    Again, supply and demand go out the window when government subsidies get involved. There are times when this is a bad thing. Education is not one of those times. We are seeing the effects of what happens when the government pulls back from funding education. It's not that the cost is rising any more than usual. Educating children and young adults was _always_ this expensive. That's why until the government stepped in only the very wealthy went to school. We're going back to those days.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:If that was true why didn't tuition skyrocket by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Educating children and young adults was _always_ this expensive.

      Bullshit. Costs have skyrocketed. You're saying government paying in keeps costs down. That's absurd. It just means a chunk of the cost is paid for by the government. The government doesn't magically erase that cost. The government has stepped back because NOT EVEN THE GOVERNMENT can justify the absurd spending increases.

      More students. Lower standards for admission, graduation, and conferment. Less value to any degrees conferred. Increasing administration salaries. Increasing faculty salaries. Mainly flat staff salaries. Administration growth far outstripping student growth. Faculty and staff growth tracking fairly flat with student growth.

      And they keep expanding and building new buildings in some very expensive real estate areas with tons of red tape for any sort of construction. It's so bad that in California, the University of California has focused almost entirely on out-of-state and foreign students, since they can charge them more tuition. The state said "Fuck you!" to that, finally, and now there's a cap in place with regards to the number of out-of-state and foreign students vs. in-state students. But the campuses with the highest ratio of foreign and out-of-state students are grandfathered in, so they don't ever have to reduce their ratio despite it being above the cap. Guess which campuses those are.

      The UC argues that they need more money for each student. Faculty just got a 3 or 4% raise. Union staff got raises. Non union staff got raises.

      If you give a school a dollar, they'll ask for a dollar fifty.

    2. Re:If that was true why didn't tuition skyrocket by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      It's so bad that in California, the University of California has focused almost entirely on out-of-state and foreign students, since they can charge them more tuition.

      Wouldn't the right way to do this be for the state to pay the subsidy to the university for each in-state student?

      --
      -Dave
    3. Re:If that was true why didn't tuition skyrocket by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The university just demands a larger subsidy per included student if you exclude certain classes of students.
      When the state says the UC gets $X million in funding but only if they don't raise tuition, the UC raises tuition but calls it an administrative fee, not tuition.
      It's all bullshit and it needs to stop.

    4. Re:If that was true why didn't tuition skyrocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's the class war that has made tuition more expensive.

    5. Re:If that was true why didn't tuition skyrocket by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >"Again, supply and demand go out the window when government subsidies get involved. There are times when this is a bad thing. Education is not one of those times"

      Yes it most certainly *is* one of those times. When the government hands out money to just anyone for just any degree, the demand goes up, which increases the price. When they hand out "free" money, the colleges will also simply absorb that money as pure profit and raise their rates. And when consumers don't feel the pain of a price because it has been "subsidized", they often make unsound financial decisions. When Left-run colleges pile on more and more nonsense core curriculum like gender studies, and ethnic studies, PC stuff, etc, than students have to complete more courses, that all costs more money in the total degree. And when we encourage "everyone" to go to college at all costs, for ANY degree, which also lowering standards, that further pushes up the demand, which increases costs, and we end up with a supply of lots of people who have useless or meaningless degrees. And that erodes the value of a degree even further, so many people end up having to pursue EVEN MORE expense to step up to post-graduate degrees.

  53. Let's not forget government requirements too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While everyone is talking basic economics - supply and demand (in this case - supply of money increases demands to use it up...)

    Let's not forget the costs of governmental regulation. Another boogeyman no one wants to deal with.

    Right now I'm in the middle of supporting our IR/IE department (Institutional Research) who is responsible for filing and meeting all of those governmental reports (State, Federal, etc.) - this is at a small college.

    Every year, they "tweak" the reports - which causes additional gyrations in SQL queries to get all the data that is needed in the reports. I spend an inordinate amount of time trying to get the queries tweaked and "right", in addition to the time the IR/IE people spend. We are spending about 2 1/2 MONTHS just producing ONE series of state governmental reporting. And from what we're hearing, unless you spend tons of money getting a specialized data warehouse (just for this reporting) - every college, university, community college, etc. spends about that amount of time. So - either spend the money in personnel, or spend the money for a vendor's solution (which never seems to work correctly anyway, and sucks up about as much time in personnel as not having it...). Gee, we could go out and get a full Oracle license (we have a limited license right now - can't create any tables our software provider didn't create, etc.) but that would balloon our IT costs. And having that would increase demands on additional hardware (why? because it's there!)

    Our IR/IE department doesn't get any time to really deal with internal requests or research - trying to deal with all the governmental demands. They spend about 8-9 months out of the year - just fulfilling those demands. And we haven't even begun on the money/time/people spent for things like FERPA, etc.

    So - that cost isn't ALL "spend it because it's available" (although that's a good part of it) - there's also the governmental regulations that require additional software/hardware/personnel to meet what they demand - to see if the money being spent is paying dividends (to be honest - it's not).

    Books - a friend of mine has a brother who has written a couple of textbooks. He is REQUIRED by contract with his publisher to create a new edition EVERY year - just so they can replace it and students can't buy a used textbook. He does nothing more than move a few things, change a few words, etc. - enough to make it "different" - requiring the purchase of a new textbook.

  54. go & study in Canada - shall be cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    go & study in Canada - shall be cheaper

  55. I should add by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that linking to a chart that shows the cost of education climbing doesn't prove anything. I suspect you did that to add credibility to your arguments and make it seem you were citing mathematical statistics that proved your point. That chart literally proves nothing except that costs have gone up. But they don't show _why_ those costs have gone up. The reason, as I mentioned, is that we were hiding the true costs with government subsidies so that people other than the very rich could benefit from a college education.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  56. Jobs? by whitroth · · Score: 1

    We read, over and over and over, how the workforce needs more and more education.[1] Meanwhile, the GOP keep cutting taxes.[2,3] Where is this "highly educated workforce" going to come from in the US, if this goes on? Asia? Eastern Europe?

    1. I personally know that Philly Community College, in the early eighties, got 90% of its funding from Pell Grants, which have been hacked and slashed.
    2. Check out the results of this in Kansas, where the GOP lege finally told Gov Brownback where to shove it.
    3. When I was a kid, teachers did NOT have to put money out of their pocket for school supplies.

    1. Re:Jobs? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Your "facts" are wrong and so is your opinion.

      For example, adjusted for inflation, the average Pell grant was $2,420 in 1996 and $3,740 in 2016. The max was $3,790 in 1996 and $5,820 in 2016. So Pell grants per student have significantly increased over the last 20 years, hardly "hacked and slashed".

      Also, teachers don't "have" to spend their money for school supplies, although some do anyway. Most teachers send home a list to parents of what they want them to donate, which is also ridiculous, but what do you expect when you have a Democratic Party run government institution? Lots of wasteful spending on non-essentials, like diversity administrators.

      As for Kansas, well, here's total direct revenue for the last 10 years for Kansas. The only portion with a big decline after the Kansas tax cuts in 2011-12 were capital gains-related revenue, a result of the change in the federal capital gains rate, caused by President Obama’s forced expiration of some of the Bush tax cuts. The Kansas tax cuts themselves are estimated to have only affected at most 1.5% of Kansas total revenue, hardly a drop in the bucket and certainly nothing to panic about.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  57. College isn't mandatory! by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    I don't understand. We now live in a world where education is free and never ending. You can learn anything you want. Libraries of books became the internet of infinite websites. You don't need college to learn things. So the right to education has absolutely nothing to do with college anymore.

    College is, what it always was: a certification of advanced skills. When brick-layer was basic, engineer required college. Great. In a world where few had college degrees, college degrees meant better employment. Great.

    That's not today. That hasn't been today for two decades now.

    Today, college means not entering the workforce for 5-to-15 more years.
    Today, there are more can't-find-work surgeons than there are brick-layers. Full stop.

    If you can't afford to go to college to become and out-of-work doctor, brick-layer is something you can do at HALF THE AGE, for what has become an increasing wage (because no one wants to do it). And with the extra 5-to-15 years of income, and the better hours, and the better lifestyle, I don't know why anyone short on money would ever choose college.

    My neighbour's a seasoned municipal plumber of twenty years (think sewers). My housekeeper's a new school janitor for six months. The janitor makes more money than the plumber.

    The janitor works full time, with a pension and paid vacation, in her own community. The plumber takes any hours he can find, and that's it -- unless he chooses a 36 transport to northern nowheresville to start building a new city for three weeks at a time away from his family for triple the money.

    This stupid propaganda that advanced education a) means college; b) means paying for; c) is required; and d) is beneficial at all -- is just foolish.

    Again, if you want to be a doctor and specialize in the back of the knee, and you've got the mind and the money to do it, by all means go pay for college and go work through residency and spend twenty years of your life working with the [ehem] guarantee that you'll earn the big bucks by the time you're 40, and that you'll survive and still want to do it by then.

    But, if you don't have the money, or don't have the intellect, or don't have the desire to invest 25 years all at once into nothing but your career, then there are countless careers that require little education and absolutely zero accreditation.

    We've discussed this before.

  58. I never had enough money to eat while in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent it on more nutritious items like noodles and frozen pizzas.

  59. Re:Correlation, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > This food insecurity is most prevalent at community colleges

    Given that community colleges are dirt cheap, as far as education goes, I suspect the lack of food money has more to do with the kinds of folks whose incomes land them in community college, and that the tuition is not the cause of their woes.

    It took off from IT for a few years to teach math in a community college.
    You are right. It's not the fees at community college that's their problem. Many, if not most of those people have food insecurity because their jobs don't pay much and their lives have other problems. They're trying to get out of the hole they are in.
    Many of the women are single mothers having lost their husband through divorce, death, or jail. Parents helping is not an option because the parents are worse off than the student. The ones that didn't have kids were escaping their parents drug and drunk problems.
    Back when I was teaching, people on the bottom rung had jobs but no option to have medical insurance so they pay for their kids medical bills out of pocket.
    Many people on Slashdot recommend getting trained for a blue-collar job. This is great, but a huge problem for blue-collar men is they get hurt on the job and now cannot climb ladders, or crawl under houses, or bend over a car fender for hours. So they need to get trained for another trade while living on disability and Wal-mart pay.

    These were some the best people I've ever known.

  60. Re:Sociology (psych of societies) = a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FIRING BULLETS at people is a TAD different than DELIVERING an UNPLEASANT but otherwise SURVIVABLE SHOCK!

    BY THE WAY, why are we RANDOMLY capitalizing WORDS?

  61. Then do not go to Berkeley?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to a cheaper, lower cost university....and I don't know, eat dinner?

  62. Let them eat Ramen by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    It would be great if we could get Betsy DeVos to tweet that.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  63. Yet they have the latest expensive smart devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trouble eating, yet many of them sport high end phones and apple computers. Maybe the problem is also with their money management skills? They should first learn to identify necessities and then prioritize before complaining about money issues and then blaming something else for their poor decisions.

    How many of them are willing to sell and trade their expensive devices for cheaper models in order to eat. I'll help out those individuals, assuming they are in a trade program and not some useless "gender studies" degree. Everyone else just wants a handout to fund their expensive hobbies or tastes.

  64. Meritocracy is a Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For people to wake the fuck up and realize that short-term profit-driven ideology is not going to work in the long term while sacrificing investment in and opportunities for young people.

    The System is working as designed - it is opportunity hoarding by the wealthy. They use wealth to exclude the plebs from opportunity by proxy of fake "merit." As the college degree has become a requirement for middle and upper class jobs, the price of a degree has increased so as to exclude the poor. Same thing with unpaid internships which also function to exclude the poor from access to lucrative job opportunities since only the wealthy can afford to work for "free."

    This doesn't just suck for the underclass, its sucks for society as a whole since it means "merit" isn't actually a measure of ability, just of wealth, so we end up with incurious, mediocre rich people in positions of power who are convinced of their own genius.

  65. Food during school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starting my senior year of engineering school soon. My FAFSA has been audited 3 times, and is currently under audit. This has resulted in financial aid delayed by months and sometimes not paying out until November. I've had to pay tuition out of pocket multiple times because of this. During those months when I was going to school before they finished processing my financial aid, I would not only need to work 20+ hours a week, but the only food I could afford was bulk rice.

    The entire financial aid system is completely broken.

  66. you can put your meal plan on a student loans so i by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    you can put your meal plan on a student loans so it's over priced and at some schools it's forced on to you.

  67. Short-term thinking = dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Stock markets = casinos for 1% controlling 90% of the wealth via deregulated banking. Want to know more? See https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    * It'll ENLIGHTEN you & maybe "blow your mind" as to WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON out there...

    (FREE TRADE (easily monetarily OR politically manipulated) IS ANOTHER DANGER TO THE "good of the herd")

    I agree w/ you but there are "catches" in WHY it goes on (human nature really).

    APK

    P.S.=> Why? SELF-PRESERVATION (especially for the rich & powerful whose BIGGEST FEAR is losing that power & control) will ALWAYS take precedence over the desire for the "good of the whole/herd" - it's human nature & think about it - IF YOU CAN'T TAKE CARE OF YOURSELF 1st, you can't TAKE CARE OF OTHERS - problem is, like a drug that's addicting, the POWERFUL tend not to go with "trickledown economics" (a pipe dream UNLESS a fair EVEN HANDED GOV'T REFEREE FORCES IT via taxes & penalties (BIG PROBLEM HERE is the rich buy up politicians OR place their OWN CRONIES into the job))... apk

  68. If they are like in my country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then they should stop wasting all their money on fast food, parties and booze.
    Learning how to cook and be self dependent seems to be better than going for a scam education right before being replaced by the drones you will help build. Knowing how to fix things yourself, manage a monthly salary and self-control are gifts for life while work come and go and subjects change.

  69. Re: Sociology (psych of societies) = a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you recall the Milgram Experiment properly, the shocks started low, but then gradually approached "lethal" levels. Many people still administered "lethal" shocks.

  70. student loans need bankruptcy! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    student loans need bankruptcy!

  71. Either = a matter of character/conscience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Especially when your family's life & dreams are @ stake & you hear "DO YOU LIKE YOUR JOB? KNOW YOUR ROLE!" forcing your hand...

    * ... Since ULTIMATELY in the end? We all answer to our conscience!

    (Provided you actually HAVE one & any empathy @ all for your fellow man as well that is - & thing is, SELF-PRESERVATION will always trump the common-good!)

    APK

    P.S.=> To answer your silly question? Well, then WHY DO YOU?? You trying to BE ME again ala https://news.slashdot.org/comm... ? ... apk

  72. Collage? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Collage? Really?

    Maybe if you had sent your daughter to College instead of Collage (whatever the fuck that is) she and you wouldn't have turned out to be such fucking whiny idiots.

    1. Re:Collage? Really? by Revek · · Score: 1

      No one cares about you grammer ------ nazi

    2. Re:Collage? Really? by Revek · · Score: 1

      Oh and most would know what a collage is.

      collage
      kläZH/Submit
      noun
      a piece of art made by sticking various different materials such as photographs and pieces of paper or fabric onto a backing.
      the art of making collages.
      a combination or collection of various things.

    3. Re:Collage? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelling, you wanker.

    4. Re:Collage? Really? by Revek · · Score: 1

      same same. Like most non anal beings I rely on spellcheck. Since collage is a word it didn't flagged. I got my meaning across and despite your blathering it seems to have been well received. I would like to further add its my daughter who is going to collage not me.

  73. No, _most_ of the cost was paid for by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    By the government. You're massively underestimating just how much of our education system is paid for by the Fed.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  74. you used to be able to work and pay for college by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    you used to be able to work and pay for college.

    You where able to work part time / summer jobs and be able to pay for college in the past.

  75. Also, 3-4% raises are perfectly reasonable by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    given the productivity raises we've continually had in America. Productivity has doubled in 40 years yet real wages are down 14%. It used to be that as productivity went up pay and standards of living did. Americans should be making _more_ not less, but inflation takes 3-4% right off the bat. It's not surprising that educators would know enough to see this and demand a 3-4% raise to keep pace with inflation.

    What _is_ surprising is that labor has gotten so weak that it can no longer demand that as the pie gets bigger they get a share of it. Hell, there was just a new story about how the 1% have finally have as much of the pie as they did right before the Great Depression. That's not a coincidence. We're heading for something nasty if we don't turn back...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  76. I made it out in '94 with no FAFSA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had no ability to access Stafford loans, so I worked, went the community college route, then executed an E.E. degree at a big 10 and paid in cash.

    That would be about twice as difficult now. It was hard then, but I am very happy about the lack of debt.

  77. Possible solution by kenh · · Score: 1

    Perhaps colleges and universities could build cafeterias and offer students meal plans that they can finance along with their student loans?

    --
    Ken
  78. Wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Headline should be "Students forego food in favor of tattoos."

  79. Re:Finacial aid and loans is what drives up the co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The average undergraduate student debt burden is around $30k (https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/personalfinance/2017/04/28/average-student-loan-debt-every-state/100893668/), so there aren't many gender studies majors out there with $150k in debt. Also, as previously pointed out, gender studies majors are a small percentage of college students. The most popular majors are things like business, psychology, and nursing (http://college.usatoday.com/2014/10/26/same-as-it-ever-was-top-10-most-popular-college-majors/). Enrollment in CS programs is booming all over the nation right now. People with $150k+ debt level tend to be physicians, lawyers, and PhDs (maybe some of your professors).

    College affordability has gone down due to a few factors:

    1. Reduced state funding. To compensate, many schools have increased recruitment of out of state students and (in particular) international students. These students have to pay full out-of-state tuition and at many schools these students subsidize the in-state students.

    2. Increased administrative/executive bloat (4 Vice presidents for student life, etc https://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2016-122.pdf). This is in response to #3 (see below).

    3. Competition for students. ie. Many students are attracted by a college's amenities. Schools used to have cafeterias, now they have food courts with commercial eateries akin to your local mall. Schools have sports programs that bleed money (except for at a handful of schools) in order to please students and alumni. Fancy, world class, recreational facilities, etc. You get the idea. None of this increases the quality of education but still all gets lumped into "cost of attendance" and students have to pay for it. However, there has been a cry to run colleges like a business and so they are giving the people what they want. If we had a little more "sit your little a$$ down and learn" instead of "welcome to your 5 year frat party" we might not have quite as many of these issues.

  80. Tuition by thePsychologist · · Score: 1

    When I went to (reasonably good) school, a science degree was about 4K/year. At the same school now (10 years later) it is 8K - twice the cost. As a comparison minimum wage went from about $9 to $14.

    Even back then, it is lucky I got a 50% off scholarship and family helped out. I still would have been able to do it without that help but there is no way I would be at the same level of competitiveness and education that I am at now.

    Getting a STEM degree and doing something useful with it is tough, and it's sad that it's only getting so much tougher.

    --
    "What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us." Ralph Waldo Emerson
  81. Being a student is a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And most degrees do not worth it.

  82. Easily solvable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a tax cut to for wealthy republican donors.

  83. The US has done it: totally screwed up higher ed by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    Y'all have gone and done it now: college is screwed up, and the only hope will be a painful solution. The solution at least has the virtue of being simple: end student loans. After a major period of adjustment, fewer people will be going to college, and tuition will plummet. With luck, this will also eliminate overpaid administrators, and kill off stupid money-wasting programs.

    Unfortunately, it won't make incoming students more qualified. For that, you need to fix the rest of your educational system...

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  84. Poor Nutrition by SSonnentag · · Score: 1

    Perhaps if the students would try eating food instead of money they would have better luck.

    . . . just saying.

  85. You're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it going to take for people not to enrol in hamburger flipping degrees like gender-studies or sociology and do something society needs?

    There's a shortage of people in the trades, why not take up a study/work program, become a tradeperson earning good money while you learn.

    https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes537021.htm
    https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/plumbers-pipefitters-and-steamfitters.htm

  86. 200k crane operators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes537021.htm
    https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/plumbers-pipefitters-and-steamfitters.htm

  87. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference between health is due to European's walking and using public transit vs. Americans driving and sitting at home. Nearly half of all college students in the US own a car (or drive a car owned by a relative.)

  88. FREEDUMB ISNT FREE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no no no. Your conservative ass does't get to use that argument. Welding school ISN'T free. Most will not be able to pay that up front or as they go, so they will need to take out loans to cover it. The details of when, if, and how quickly they can pay them back is irrelevant, just to nip that retort in the bud.

    1. Re:FREEDUMB ISNT FREE by jpaine619 · · Score: 1

      BULLSHIT.

      I know a handful of welders... Not a single one took out a loan to go to welding school. It was expensive, but not beyond their ability to save up and then pay for it.

      You lying sack of shit.... Student loans for welding school....... Are you fucking serious?

      In fact, I don't know of a single trades employer who won't PAY for the schooling if it will result in a better and more skilled employee. Maybe some won't pay 100%, but most have generous yearly allotments you can take.

      My former employer would pay up to $12K/year for industry related schooling. I thought that was quite generous, especially considering that they were already paying me $100K+/year in direct wages..

      See, they had this list of things you could go learn, that would benefit THEM (and you) if you learned them.. Not only would they pay for you to learn these things, but after you did, they would raise your wages accordingly (you were now more valuable to the company)..

      Oddly enough, Gender Studies and Basket Weaving were not on the list...

  89. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the Trump administration is clearly a left-wing nut-job enterprise.

    Also left wing? The George W. Bush administration (2 terms), the George H.W. Bush administration, Reagan administration (2 terms), Ford administration, Nixon administration (2 truncated terms), Eisenhower administration (2 terms), Hoover administration, Coolidge administration, Harding administration, Taft administration, Roosevelt administration (2 terms), McKinley administration (2 terms), Harrison administration, Arthur administration, Garfield administration, Hayes administration, Grant administration (2 terms), and Lincoln administration (2 truncated terms).

    I'll stop there and leave out the Whigs, though there are a bunch of those too.

    Damn those leftist Presidents! They are all under the sway of the... LEFT.

  90. FOX/CONN by tepples · · Score: 1

    Unless all you want is a bunch of robots easily programmable by FOX/CNN.

    Of course I want robots programmable by Foxconn. Automating assembly of electronic devices would at least help alleviate the sweatshop conditions in Chinese factories.

    Oh wait, you said "FOX News Channel and CNN", didn't you?

  91. We'll All Stay Skinny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We'll all stay skinny,
    'cause we just won't eat!"

    c/f Rockstar

  92. Happening at RPI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's happening at RPI because the president makes over $1 million a year.
    She's also turning it into a liberal arts college.

    Yay diversity!

  93. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem is far deeper but driving everywhere is certainly a problem. I work at home and commute on occasion. My job is 3 miles away, completely walkable, but it's not practical for me to do to meet limited time in a daily schedule. Instead I have to force myself to do artificial exercise (running regularly) to make up for it and it's more time efficient.

    If everyone walked and expectations in our society changed about productivity, it would help considerably.

    You'll find that most healthy foods in the US are actually quite expensive relative to unhealthy foods. It seems counter intuitive but my gut feeling is that it's due to basic economics of supply and demand and the fact is, a cheeseburger is cheaper than a simple salad because it's tastier, resulting in significantly higher demand and supply, scaling the cost back. When I try to eat a lot of fresh veggies I find my grocery store bill is significantly higher and I have to make more frequent trips. It also takes more time to prepare (since I can't rely on takeout), costing me more in time. I can afford to pay more because I'm single and earn fairly well but many people cannot and for large families it's even more difficult, especially if they're lower income and likely have even less time working multiple dead end jobs.

  94. Sociology (psych of societies) = a weapon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: THAT's one the "controllers/powers that be" HIGHLY value (such as Milgram's studies on giving electrical shocks to those answering questions wrong - WHY? To see HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL DO AS THEY ARE TOLD despite it hurting others - not what their humanity/inner self TELLS THEM IS WRONG TO DO).

    * He found there are only ~ 35% of folks that will REFUSE to do so (in other words, 65% of "soldiers" would FIRE ON THE U.S. PUBLIC if told to do so & so will officers issuing said orders rather than a 'stand-down' F'YOU politicians back @ 'em... (even though the CIA & Armed Forces are NOT chartered to operate on US SOIL)).

    People REALLY DO "move in herds" & aren't all that different. That "pseudo-science" can show STATISTICAL demonstratable relationships & cull out outliers once they learn to "profile" you for it... it's dangerous. Makes sense too - psychology of the individual FORMS SOCIETIES (& the relationship between individual psychology & sociology (see subject) tends to work (against you)).

    Much as enthusiasm/jingoism/nationalism can work FOR YOU (& say, the stockmarket)? Authority & obeyance of it CAN work AGAINST YOU (as most folks want to just "go along to GET along" often forced to do so for survival ala "DO YOU LIKE YOUR JOB?" might as well be asking "DO YOU LIKE YOUR LIFE & FAMILY?")

    It's a LOT like organized religion: If I control your head, I control YOUR ASS... governments come & go but religious cults were there to control you LONG before governments.

    Mind games...

    APK

    P.S.=> "StRaNgE" Days we live in & be VERY WARY of that one - it's USED AGAINST YOU (& by "you"? I MEAN EVERYONE)... apk

  95. Impersonating me AGAIN? Ok... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1st: You're NOT me (but wish you were) & I'm NOT here to win a "popularity contest": I'm here to WIN so EVERYONE DOES & be faster/safer/more reliably connected online.

    Your CRAP's what I PUT UP W/ when one's "World-Class" (like ME): STALKERS stalking u by UNIDENTIFIABLE ac (everyone sees IT constantly happening & I suspect it's INFERIOR competitors, webmasters & advertisers (mostly) & lastly malware makers (as my hosts engine affects 'em adversely & gives users of it more SPEED/SECURITY/RELIABILITY & more anonymity online)).

    My "portrait" https://365songsblog.files.wor... (lol) so

    * Satan GET THEE BEHIND ME!

    APK

    P.S.=> 3 things show I do it right:

    1st = User praise my hosts engine https://tech.slashdot.org/comm...

    2nd "ATTACKS" I GET (from UNIDENTIFIABLE ac as Elon Musk got https://tech.slashdot.org/stor... )

    3rd BEING IMITATED = "Imitation = sincerest form of flattery" https://linux.slashdot.org/com... ... apk

  96. Oh, one more thing by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I've got a kid in college right now and you can take your lower standards and stuff it. Getting _in_ isn't so hard. Getting into your 300 level courses is damn near impossible. She barely squeaked in with a 4.0, a few summers of volunteering and a specialty program she did to prep her for the classes. Her workload is nuts. She takes summer _and_ winter courses to cover gen-ed requirements because they loader her with 5-6 full time classes for her major during the year proper.

    And this is just a continuation of what she did in high school.

    I don't know how anyone could make it in college and work unless they were one of those freaks that gets by on 4 hours sleep no prob. They work the kids like dogs these days. They have too. Thanks to outsourcing H1-Bs College is a requirement for an entry level job now. There's too many qualified applicants for the 300 level courses. Got to weed them out somehow. You could jack up the price more but colleges don't do that because they non-profit. The goal is to educate, not to make money.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Oh, one more thing by sexconker · · Score: 1

      They let anyone with a pulse go to college now.

      Getting into higher level classes, or certain major-required classes classes is a pain because they let too many students into the fucking school to begin with.
      They don't have enough space to hold classes for all the dumb, stupid GE shit for the incoming freshman, and that cascades to the classes that matter because they have to fight for the same physical space and time.

      Even if you have a dedicated space for a stupid GE and a dedicated space for your engineering / whatever course, they'll pull the engineering course because of the scheduling conflict with the GE course. If your 300 student lecture hall has 50 engineering kids in it trying to pass the kidney stone of a pointless GE at 2 PM to 3 PM MWF, they won't be taking that 2 PM to 3 PM MWF class in the engineering building. And if you can't hold that 2 PM to 3 PM class, then the entire course is cancelled for the quarter/semester despite the other sessions being filled (with waiting lists) because you'd just have to offer it next quarter/semester anyway to handle the people who had to take that GE.

      I had that shit happen to me the quarter I was graduating. A major elective I was taking was a 2 quarter course, and the second quarter's course was cancelled due to bullshit scheduling. Luckily, enough people bitched and the professor fought to get us a space for an early morning class. We had to scrap to find spaces for taking the final and presenting projects, including off campus, but the professor went out of his way to make the course happen.

      Scheduling and space are two of the most difficult real problems colleges face. And it's all because they keep admitting more and more and more students who can't even read, write, or do basic math.

      I, too, had to take classes in summer because I couldn't take the stupid GE classes any other time.
      I, too, had to fight to register for classes I needed for my major.
      I, too, had a job while I was a student.

      If you think colleges are non-profit, or if you think their goal is education and not profit, you're a fool.

  97. Ramen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finished college almost 20 years ago, and Ramen was a staple in my diet for pretty much the whole time. I also had two part time jobs, and three during the summer months while everyone else went on vacation. I entered college with only $400 in my bank account. Rarely ever saw a balance over $100 in my account for the remainder of my time there until my first real job after. Sucks being poor I get it. Please file story under #whyisthisnews.

  98. NEWSFLASH: apk 2b lrn2engrish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    prease 2be lrn2engrish k.

  99. Caplan & Taleb on What’s Missing in Educ by js290 · · Score: 1

    Bryan Caplan and Nassim Nicholas Taleb on What’s Missing in Education (Bonus-Live at Mercatus) https://medium.com/conversatio...

    --
    "Tempers are wearing thin. Let's just hope some robot doesn't kill everybody." --Bender
  100. Just gonna post this here.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Graduated a couple years ago. This graph madr be gag.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-09-05/textbook-case-untenable-trajectory-inflation

  101. Re:Impersonating me AGAIN? Ok then... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you please explain how this engine works?
    Can I use it to block web ads?

  102. Re: Bullshit by orlanz · · Score: 1

    It's not just the luxury of transit, it's also that the US is a land of plenty. We consume a lot of food compared to many nations. I pretty much eat 2x what my European counter parts eat. Although I am almost a foot smaller and 40 pounds less.

    You can also see the changes from wealth in places like India and China. They used to eat a lot of greens, rice, and sugars. But since the increase in wealth, they have bulked up their meals, added enrichments to their foods, and increased their sugar, fat, and protein intakes. You can clearly see the difference in photos across the generations. Both countries now have a growing diabetes epidemic.

  103. how... by sad_ · · Score: 1

    how can you still keep saying, with a straight face, that the US educational system is better then what we have in Europe. This is just lunacy, soon there will only be education for the rich, and by then it will be too late.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  104. It'll block almost anything you like... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll block almost anything you like if served by host-domain name (99% are) e.g. Ads, malicious sites, tracker sites/scripts etc. & it speeds up access to your fav sites you spend most time @ (securing you vs. redirected DNS @ DNS OR router + IP stack setting level).

    * It gets data from 8 reliable reputable security sites (& you can supplement it manually via other security sites daily reports) + you can CHANGE to others easily (flexible .ini file driven).

    APK

    P.S.=> Gives you more speed/security/reliability/anonymity vs. tracking (@ DNS level) vs. ANY single other "so-called 'solution'" LOADED w/ security issues (AV/DNS) & slowdown (browser addons crippled by default to NOT do their job (adblock) 'souled-out' to advertisers, DNS & AV) + exploitation due to their complexity in "moving parts" (local & distributed) for less resource use & complexity via a PROVEN 45++ yr. IP stack in FASTER (more cpu priority given) kernelmode speed vs. SLOWER usermode... apk

  105. Nothing new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't have enough money to eat as a student in the 80s. No car, no spring break holidays, just a hand to mouth existence. It is supposed to be this way, so students are motivated to study, graduate and get their life on track. The only difference today is the constant whining from snowflakes who think that the world owes them something. Toughen up!

  106. LOL! MOMMY HELP ME (golden wine)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hohohohoho see the CLASSIC proof of that here soyboys as you DRINK the golden wine https://news.slashdot.org/comm... straight from MY tap (of GOLDEN piss), all natural ingredients, naturally filtered (of ME pissing right into your shitbag mouths & funniest part is, you help me DO it - you LIKE it, lol!).

    Do you LIKE the taste? Obviously yes - just like folks like my hosts engine, anything I put out, even piss, is GOOD (unlike "your kind").

    Above all else though? Hey - MOMMY LOVES YOU!

    APK

    P.S.=> Hahahahaha (I think this is the BEST overall letting you SHEMALE soyboys destroy yourselves for GOLD (ask SuckerBERG about that - he's the expert as is all his kind are - heading into ZylonB & Furnace time again judging by what's happening - the PRICE of it is that, always, they don't learn)... apk

  107. gender-studies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, ten years ago we laughed and laughed about how useless all these "gender studies" tracks were and how they leave people in debt with no job prospects. Now, all of these people staff each company's diversity management position, HR diversity outreach, sensibility officers, workplace offense detectors, politically correct apps officer, product development positions to make sure all pronouns are available. It was a problem that invented its own solution.

    Who's the fool now.

  108. An Economics Degree... by mchall · · Score: 1
    ...and a few English classes.

    Future societies will hold the American system in almost all things as a cautionary tail rather than as the triumph it could have been.

    The term is "cautionary tale", as in a story that provides a warning. A "cautionary tail" would be more akin to a baboon's ass or a skunk's raised tail. As for the "American system", it has been one of the greatest engines for prosperity that the world has ever seen.

    For people to wake the fuck up and realize that short-term profit-driven ideology is not going to work in the long term while sacrificing investment in and opportunities for young people.

    The problem is not the "people" (i.e. "we the people", or the country as a whole). The problem, in this particular discussion, is students feeling entitled to a free ride. College is not a right. It is not even a necessity. There are plenty of trades that pay exceedingly well and do not require a degree. Taking on the challenge of college also means accepting responsibility for the cost. Ultimately that is on the student. Don't have the funds? Can't get a loan or a grant? Take some time off and get a job the way past generations did. No one owed them a thing, and they still made something of themselves. The entitlement bullshit needs to stop. That's what's killing the "American system". We have a couple of generations that think the world owes them. In truth, it owes them fuck all. If they're not willing to put something into it, then they should get nothing out of it.

  109. UBI FTW by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Govt should provide Free Education and Universal Health Care

  110. Re: Impersonating me AGAIN? Ok then... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you tell me how it works?