Slashdot Mirror


EU To Move Ahead With Cultural Quotas For Streaming Services (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: The European Union is set to move ahead with a plan to enforce pan-European quotas on streaming services like Amazon Prime Video and Netflix to support production of locally produced film and video content. Roberto Viola, the European Commission's directorate general of communication, networks, content and technology told Variety that the new rules are on track to be approved in December. The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%).

Streaming services will also have to ensure visibility and prominence for local content -- so no burying the 'European third' in a dingy corner of the site where no one will find it, let alone stream it. The EU lawmakers' intention is to stand up for cultural diversity against the might of Hollywood and the flattening power of platforms -- in the latter case by making platforms invest in local content production rather than just doing the easy thing of fencing yet more Marvel superhero movies.

189 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah I'm sure this will work. by xevioso · · Score: 5, Funny

    They will quickly find, much to their chagrin, that people will still end up watching Marvel movies rather than some movie about everyone in a French village being struck with a devastating plague of ennui.

    1. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can't compete? Legislate. It's the European way. Must be sad.

    2. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by lgw · · Score: 1

      They will quickly find, much to their chagrin, that people will still end up watching Marvel movies rather than some movie about everyone in a French village being struck with a devastating plague of ennui.

      What kind of talk is that? We all know a central committee with a five year plan knows better what the consumer needs than th consumer himself. If the plan doesn't work perfectly, it can only be the fault of wreckers, or an unexpectedly cold winter.

      The fact that this measure will divert large sums of money from big companies to friends of the decision makers is a total coincidence, of course, and this is totally not a tariff on digital goods. And even if it were a tariff, the current president of the US would never risk a trade war by retaliating, right? Of course not. But if he does, it's totally his fault and not any predictable consequence of our decisions.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How is this supposed to work anyway? Say Netflix has 3000 films available for streaming today in a particular country. Replacing a third of them would mean needing to find 1000 local films, which would likely require scraping the bottom of the barrel in the case of countries that lack a film scene. That's already problematic enough as it is, but let's ignore it for the moment. More worrying is that in some of these countries, the film scene likely isn't large enough to warrant more than a handful of distributors for theatrically-released, domestic films. This law—at least as it's explained in the summary—would seat those distributors in a disproportionate and unfair position at the negotiating table, since they know that Netflix has no choice but to work with them. They're basically being given the tools to extort Netflix legally.

      In many ways, this bears a striking similarity to another form of intellectual property: standards-essential patents that companies have no choice but to use if they want to build a product in that space. In the case of standards-essential patents, however, the rights holders are required to provide licenses for their patents under FRAND terms in exchange for having their patents included in the standard. It seems to me like something similar should apply here: if the EU is effectively going to compel Netflix to license the rights to specific films, it's only fair that the rights holders to those films should be required to provide licenses under fair terms, lest they seek to take advantage of their propped up position.

    4. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most European countries have a long tradition of subsidising art that is deemed worthwhile, yet isn't attractive enough for the masses to be able to compete in the free market. You could say it's the European way. And with the rise of streaming services and cord-cutting, it makes sense to ensure that this stuff remains available on such services to those who want it.

      Now one could argue that forcing Netflix to host 30% local content isn't the best way to go about it. But another goal of this rule is to ensure that local small productions can find their way into these powerhouse all-you-can-eat subscriptions. It's serving the long tail, something that Netflix has been particularly bad at in my country even when it comes to older content from the US. So yeah, let's legislate. But at the same time that local content should be licensed out at long tail prices as well...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by taustin · · Score: 1

      Indeed. But after Netflix and Amazon meet the 30% quote by reducing everything else down to twice as much as the locally produced stuff, Marvel (and other Disney pap) movies will be about all that's left to watch.

      This will result in zero new production in Europe, and the increase in the streaming of European produced stuff will be lose in the noise.

    6. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      They will quickly find, much to their chagrin, that people will still end up watching Marvel movies rather than some movie about everyone in a French village being struck with a devastating plague of ennui.

      In my limited exposure to French films, it seems that they are usually well made and photographed, but the dialog sucks or is unnecessarily obtuse.

      That said, I liked Luc Bessons' Nikita ("La Femme Nikita") about as much as the American remake Point of No Return, (although I do think the dialog is better written in the American version) as well as his Angel-A. Hm, maybe just like films by Luc Besson ...

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    7. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by taustin · · Score: 2

      How is this supposed to work anyway? Say Netflix has 3000 films available for streaming today in a particular country. Replacing a third of them would mean needing to find 1000 local films, which would likely require scraping the bottom of the barrel in the case of countries that lack a film scene.

      Or, if they already have 100 local films, simply reducing the catalog of everything else to 300 titles, rotated on a regular (perhaps even daily) basis.

      Netflix and Amazon aren't going to be spending a dime more than they do now on European made stuff.

    8. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      The thing is that hosting that said "artwork" is practically free to produce and display on current media platforms. If Netflix doesn't find it worthy then put it on YouTube or FaceBook or WhatsApp or Mega or Reddit or ... - people that want it can see it instead of getting it shoved down your throat at gunpoint.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by denzacar · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If there's significant demand for local content in a given country, the streaming services would fund it on their own. If they don't, then a new comer would identify the market and do so. Legislating means that the market doesn't see the demand.

      Not everyone wants to live in a world of 24/7 "Ow! My Balls!" marathon.
      I.e. 0$ budget productions watched by mental vegetables with voyeuristic disorders and the taste for sensationalism.
      You know... What the "markets" crave. The Trump "base".

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    10. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by MyrddinBach · · Score: 1

      I think it's even worse than that as it says 30% of the content has to be local for *each* country!

      That's insanely ridiculous as if they show their entire catalog in just 3 countries than 90% of their content would have to come from those 3 countries which only leaves 10% from elsewhere.

      They will *have* to reduce their catalogs across all of europe and have separate catalogs for each specific country.

    11. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      I agree that this is probably not the way to go about it. As someone else pointed out: Netflix can meet this quota either by buying more local content or by dropping less popular US content from Euro subscriptions.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    12. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      It's serving the long tail, something that Netflix has been particularly bad at in my country even when it comes to older content from the US.

      That's the part I find odd. Netflix's (and Amazon's) original model was to serve the long tail. The incremental cost to them to serve a new movie or series is quite low. Their competitive edge was having a very large catalog, one stop shopping for video junkies. If European studios want to get in the catalog, I don't see why Netflix/Amazon/Hulu/etc. would have any objection, other than cost.

      If Amazon and Netflix aren't streaming every show ever created, I wonder why? My guess is it's licensing: some studios (Disney and CBS, I'm looking at you) don't want to license their content to Netflix because they want to launch their own streaming services. Or they are willing to license but at too high a cost.

      Does anyone have any actual knowledge (as opposed to my pure speculation)?

    13. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Or, if they already have 100 local films, simply reducing the catalog of everything else to 300 titles, rotated on a regular (perhaps even daily) basis.

      Netflix and Amazon aren't going to be spending a dime more than they do now on European made stuff.

      You're thinking short term. Yes, it's easier for Netflix and others to comply by chopping the US content until the EU content ratio becomes high enough, but that's stage one. EU lawmakers think a bit farther ahead than that, and realise that longer term, Netflix et al will be more likely to add a new European movie/series if that also means they get to add another US movie/series that makes them money. So the long term result is that EU movies and series will have an easier time being accepted, and EU culture will be better served.

    14. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by ffkom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We all know a central committee with a five year plan knows better what the consumer needs than the consumer himself.

      You mean, like the board of a global mega-corporation? After all, the detachment of decision-making from reality and customer demand in large corporations isn't that much different from the detachment of communist governments from the people.

      Also, the content of commercial productions is today totally dominated by the fear to try anything "original" that is too far off the mainstream, simply because return-on-investment isn't guaranteed and the 7th follow-up on a once successful movie is favored over any new story.

    15. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2

      If small, local productions are good, why wouldn't netflix show them?

      these streaming companies already do this. I saw films like Ida, Phoenix, Downfall and Personal Shopper on Netflix or Amazon.

      The reality is that a lot of European movie production just isn't very good. There isn't a generation replacing Fellini, Bergman, Truffaut, Godard and Fassbinder. Or even Luc Besson and Paul Verhoeven. Nicolas Winding Refn is about the only very good European director with a few films to his name.

      Korea and Mexico are producing better directors right now.

    16. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Brujis · · Score: 1

      The market is made up of individuals making trades there is no group to speak of.

    17. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Brujis · · Score: 1

      The point is that the EU has no right to make that a requirement on anyone. The people producing the content aren't their slaves or vassals and as such they get to decide what they do (so long as they do not use force upon another). Try thinking for a change, it will stop you from saying things that monumentally stupid.

    18. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by ffkom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      maybe just like films by Luc Besson ...

      Luc Besson's work is kind of "as hollywoodesque as European films get".

      A much better comparison would be the original 13 Tzameti versus its terribly shallow US-remake 13 (where even the title got overly simplified).

    19. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Brujis · · Score: 1

      If it was worth doing it would already be done. If you still think it isn't then you are more than free to spend your own money doing so and take the profit for yourself.

    20. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Historically there's loads of great French films. La Regle du Jeu, Bande a Part, Subway, Vivement Dimanche, Amelie, Cyrano de Bergerac, Jean de Florette, Belle de Jour, Le Samourai, Les Diaboliques and The Wages of Fear. The problem is they have made very little that's worth watching for years. Since 2000, there's only a couple of French films that really impressed me.

    21. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      You know, there's lots of American movies that aren't like that. Woody Allen, Paul Thomas Anderson, Spike Lee, Sofia Coppola, Wes Anderson, The Coens

    22. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Tuidjy · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no demand, but some people think that there is need.

      You know, my three year old would only eat fruit bars and drink fruit juice if given the choice, but my wife and I insist that she eats actual fruits, yogurt, vegetables, and meat, once in a while.

      Am I saying that European politicians look at their constituents the way adults look at toddlers? Maybe.

      Do I want someone regulating what I watch? No.

      Do I think that making content providers waste resources on something that their customers don't want will make their profit margins lower? Yes.

      Do I think that the content created because of law prescribed quota will be any good? Not really.

      Do I have a plan on how to balance appealing to the lowest human drives and elevating the human spirit? If I did, I would probably run for office.

      But I don't... so I will stick to writing code, tsk-tsking at EU's legislation, and wondering whether I will live to see which of Idiocracy, Elisyum, Terminator or Metro 2033 will end up being prophetic.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    23. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      European governments have a long tradition of making others pay for their state-run media. That's who will benefit. It won't be small studios. It will be government-approved productions that bolster whatever narrative they deem fit.

      This isn't about culture. It's about governments securing their influence in a changing market.

    24. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by naubol · · Score: 2

      I'm prepared to believe that some people will watch the content and that the law makers already understood that the rate of consumption would not be proportional. Chagrin seems unlikely.

      --
      Reality is a slackware box running on a 386 tucked away in god's sock drawer.
    25. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Only in that country though. Germany, 30% German 70% anything else. France, 30% French 70% anything else. Italy, 30% Italian 70% anything else. Spain 30% Spanish 70% anything else.
      You can't have Sweden 30% Swedish + 30% German + 30% French + 30% Italian + 30% Spanish +...+
      Just logically there are more than 4 countries in Europe, so the total would be over 100%.
      Even EU bureaucracy isn't quite that bad,
      yet.

    26. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You do know that movie is going to win three Academy Awards, right?

    27. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by deKernel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that the only reason the trade barriers were put in place was because the other country put their own trade barriers up first...right?

      How the hell the parent was up-voted is beyond me.....*sigh*

    28. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by mbkennel · · Score: 2

      So in Cyprus are there 1000 Cypriot films worth seeing? What about in Malta?

    29. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      > local small productions can find their way

      Screw local small productions

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    30. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Having seen Black Panther I think I'd go for the frogflick - it probably has a better plot & dialog plus a 75% chance of some gratuitous nudity.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Back when broadcast TV frequencies were a limited resource, I would have argued that this was legitimate to ensure that European content could get an airing.

      However, streaming services are on the internet (by definition) and there isn't the same argument for such a quota.

      Basically, they are trying to force consumers who are not interested in their arty-farty movies to pay for them. If I was Netflix, I would fill the 30% with extremely low-budget productions bought very cheaply to meet the auota. And never change them out / rotate.

    32. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Deemed worthwhile by whom?

      European opera houses and art installations used to be packed with people. Commoners who loved what was going on. Now government support is needed for a class of artists only interested in producing art for itself and nobody else. Is this really a good use of scarce government money? Is it in the public interest?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    33. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by xlsior · · Score: 1

      One problem is simply volume: for every single Dutch movie being produced, Hollywood cranks out hundreds. So unless you want them to meet the quota by re-streaming lowest denominator 'reality TV reruns, there's not much alternatives -- especially if Brexit goes through and UK content may no longer count as "european" in their quotas.

      Case in point, according to Wikipedia: "In 2000 the total revenue coming from box office results in the Netherlands was €128.5 million; Dutch films had a share of 5.5%, which is €7.1 million."

      If you force a 30% minimum, you may actually have to reduce the catalog size to meet it since there simply isn't that much native content -- and much of what IS there isn't exactly in high demand.
      At least in the Netherlands, 99% of content on TV will either be in English or Dutch --There has never been any significant demand for other 'European' content (French/German/Italian/Whatever), so it's not like these quotas are going to make any viewers happy.

      They'll just be forcing the streaming company to spend licensing funds on crap no one cares about. After all, if there were demand, then there would be no need for a mandatory minimum %.

    34. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What are you smoking? Who has trade barriers against US steel and aluminum?
      Who wants to drop out of the WTO so they can get away with putting up even more tariffs?

      How the hell you were upvoted doesn't surprise me in the slightest. Ignorance is upvoted around here if it fits the groupthink.

    35. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt there would be, and certainly didn't say this was a good idea.
      Just correcting an error.

      It's not just films but video. So tv series would be included. Do those places make soap operas and local dramas etc? What is their current system of quotas?

      Seems they can 'just pay a small fee' instead, if they can't do enough of the other qualifying things. You knew that obviously because you read the article before jumping in.

      Netflix, Amazon and other streamers will be required to fund TV series and films produced in Europe by commissioning content, acquiring it or paying into national film funds through a small surcharge added to their subscription fee, something which is already happening in Germany.

      Just in case you didn't.

    36. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      My guess is that they are doing bulk licenses and exclusive licenses and not wanting to pay per viewing or likely even to let the other side even know how many times a show has been viewed. The long tail license holders likely also aren't interested in the tiny amount of money that they would be getting from Netflix. I've noticed a lot of movies on Netflix are movies which are part of a series where all parts of the series are not on Netflix. At $8 per subscriber and the average subscriber likely watching 30+ shows per month, the money exchanged per show is likely not what is driving content producers to allow Netflix to show their shows.

    37. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      generally the rules are about new content not existing content.

    38. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      easier, i can make "local" french/german/whatever production company that makes 5 million "french movies" per year and rents the for $10 each to netflix or amazon or facebook or youtube so they have very cheap french content to satisfy this law,

      it is one thing to force companies to include FREE local content like streaming public TV, but its completely opposite asking for them to pay for content almost nobody wants, paying for "local art/culture" is fine but government should do it from their own pockets

    39. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      That's so odd. My copy of the summary says "at least 30%", which is pretty much the exact opposite of "up to 30%". You can find the copy I'm reading right at the top of this page. Any chance you could link to the copy of the summary you're reading where it says "up to 30%"? I'm having trouble finding it.

    40. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      so then pay netflix to host your terrible movies.

    41. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by dargaud · · Score: 2

      Do I want someone regulating what I watch? No.

      Well, everything is still available, so it doesn't really matter.

      Do I think that the content created because of law prescribed quota will be any good? Not really.

      Well, on average, probably, but just look at the amount of Hollywood remakes of small european movies... Even those have a use in Hollywood when they have success and are original.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    42. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No, it will be cheaper for them to just fund a buttload of shitty French nihilist films that cost about $50 to make. So get ready for a whole section of ultra-low-budget pseudo-intellectual Catherine-Breillat-wannabe and neo-Dogme95 movies that no one outside of a handful of suicidal emos will watch.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    43. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by bidule · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well...

      Ok, so I have single 1000 movies catalog shared in all European countries. 30% German means 300 of them, another 300 French, another 300 Spanish. If they are all in the same catalog, that leaves 100 non-German/French/Spanish movies. I can't even add a 4th country.

      What does this mean? Spanish/French movies will not be accessible in Germany, because it's mathematically impossible have 300 of 1000 for each European culture. It's the opposite of spreading culture, nothing but a way to spread money.

      No, the only way to force cultural variety is to limit each country to 30% of the catalog. With 30% Hollywood and 30% British, you have at least 40% left for other European cultures.

      Or if it's really about money, force a certain fraction of collected local income to be spent on local productions.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    44. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      They don't have to offer 30% Dutch content in the Netherlands; they can offer us depressing French movies as well to fill that quota, or insane 70s Italian horror (I wouldn't mind that actually...) In fact Brussels have stated that they want to harmonize content in Europe: what you offer in one country, you'll have to offer in all others. Perhaps going so far as to allow only EC-wide licenses for content as well.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    45. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      YouTube has a huge monetization piece. If people want to see it, then Netflix would pick it up or the market will spring up a dedicated Netflix for this kind of stuff. The majority of foreign/local films aren't worth the bandwidth for the majority of people though. If your government starts requiring 1/3 of the advertising space (which is basically what putting it in Netflix' suggestions is) more people will be pissed about the irrelevant content taking up their screen real estate than the number of people interested in weird films.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    46. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the linked articles did you.

    47. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      As long as they force Disney to pay billions on locally produced movies, they don't care if nobody watches them. It's just a way to funnel more money.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    48. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I get on a ferry, two hours later I'm in france. I point my camera at myself and say, "Bonjour" I point it at my friend, who says, "Bonjour"

      I get back on the Ferry, two hours later I'm back in the UK. I spend another two hours editing the footage, replicating it, adding titles and credits, and end up with a two hour film consisting of two people saying, "Bonjour" to each other.

      It's art. It's in French. It's made in France. Not only can Netflix host it, I can do them a dozen different recuts.

      The worse thing about this plan isn't that it subverts the proposed stupid protectionist European law, it's that people in France would actually watch and like it.

      That's the main thing that puts me off doing this, earning myself 20 quid from Netflix.

    49. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by indytx · · Score: 2

      How is this supposed to work anyway? Say Netflix has 3000 films available for streaming today in a particular country. Replacing a third of them would mean needing to find 1000 local films, which would likely require scraping the bottom of the barrel in the case of countries that lack a film scene.

      This all makes more sense if you assume that this is motivated as a subsidy forced on an American company as a tax. If you are Netflix and want to operate in France, you have to negotiate for French films, and then you are stuck negotiating with some jerk, smoking a Gauloises, demanding more for the streaming rights of a crummy French "art" film than it is worth. Can't get 30%, then you have to cut your catalog. The French filmmaker will know this and act accordingly. This is just a power/money grab.

      --
      Make love, not reality television.
    50. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The way that similar schemes work is to aggregate over the wider EU and consider things like how much the company invests in EU projects. Netflix partners with the BBC and other British television companies, for example.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    51. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Correct, comrade, capitalism is totally just an inferior form of communism! How could anyone doubt such logic?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    52. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by waibati · · Score: 1

      You forgot "The Marching Morons" - derivative works mentioned notwithstanding.

    53. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      No, monopolies are shit, always. Large centralized organizations are shit. These facts are universal and regardless of whether we are talking about government or private business. if you let your capitalist society devolve into privatized communized, then yes, you lose all the benefits of well-working free markets.

    54. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      So in Cyprus are there 1000 Cypriot films worth seeing? What about in Malta?

      Here is a trick:
      Netflix could make a Greek-language version an offer it in greek-speaking countries.

      Or even crazier: They could make their service pan-european, so only 30% would have to be produced in Europe. They are choosing their own buckets.

    55. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      In his example, Mexico is retaliating against the US metal tariffs by putting tariffs on agricultural goods. That is a real world example by the way. The metal tariffs aren't really retaliatory, they are protectionist. Obama placed tariffs on specific types of steel before Trump, Bush did it for a short time in the early 2000's, and Carter put a price floor on imported steel way back in the day. There were other actions of similar types from both Reagan and Johnson. So this is nothing new. In terms of protecting US industry, they don't really work in the long run. I think he was just pointing out the flaw in your question of who has barriers against US steel and aluminum.

    56. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      This isn't subsidizing the art, this is taxing the platforms themselves instead of the populace in an attempt to force consumption of that art. Basically the EU legislature are being a bunch of cowardly cuntweasels and rather than a straight tax that then goes to said art creation which people can complain about, they are instead just having the corporations do it in which case the people won't care cause it doesn't come out of their wallets directly.

    57. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Aquitaine · · Score: 1

      >> You know, my three year old would only eat fruit bars and drink fruit juice if given the choice,

      I think you've hit on it. Government should treat us all like we're three years old!

    58. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 2

      The metal tariffs aren't really retaliatory, they are protectionist.

      Exactly.
      That's why I said this

      Says the Trump voter putting up trade barriers against the whole world...

      In direct response to this

      Can't compete? Legislate. It's the European way. Must be sad.

      Whoever replied after that was clearly not paying attention to the discussion and just trolling away.

    59. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by lgw · · Score: 1

      all the benefits of well-working free markets

      Now you talk like capitalist pigdog, not proud wolf of Mother Russia. Next you say thing like "individual consumer choice is the most efficient economy" and off to the Gulag you go.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    60. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Scroatzilla · · Score: 1

      >>How is this supposed to work anyway?

      Porn. Lots and lots of porn.

    61. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Only in that country though. Germany, 30% German 70% anything else. France, 30% French 70% anything else. Italy, 30% Italian 70% anything else. Spain 30% Spanish 70% anything else.

      You can't have Sweden 30% Swedish + 30% German + 30% French + 30% Italian + 30% Spanish +...+

      Just logically there are more than 4 countries in Europe, so the total would be over 100%.

      Even EU bureaucracy isn't quite that bad,

      yet.

      I think it's locally-produced content, not language.

      So 3000 size cagalog means an additkonal 1000 Germany items and 1000 Spane items and 1000 France items and 1000 Netherlands items and...

      So the 3000 items is just a small fraction of the content they will have to produce to meet this law.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    62. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I should back up farther when changing Spanish to Spain.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    63. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      You're assuming European-produced content WOULD be "arty-farty", and not just another TV series based on a Marvel Comics franchise... but shot in Europe instead (using English-speaking European actors). European studios are as capable of churning out Hollywood-type content as American studios are. Look at the credits for most big-budget TV shows in the US. A *LOT* of their production already takes place in Europe (France is a big center for CGI, just to name one example).

    64. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by bidule · · Score: 1

      You must be new here, since when does anybody RTFA?

      The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%).

      Maybe you understand "each" differently, how it is supposed to be interpreted then? Will 30% German content cover for France/Spain streaming?

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    65. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by Evtim · · Score: 1

      I was in France in 1998. At tgat time the national French TV was obliged to show certain percentage of local programs.

      They did. After 12 pm. Prime time was occupied by mostly American shows.

      Also, because if their language shovinism to always dub a movie rather than subtitling means they could hardly speak English. Most traumatic experience in my life was watching the original SW trilogy dubbed in French!

      Oh, and the radio also had similar restrictions. So I heard Welcome to the jungle in French. Only slightly less traumatic than SW.

      Wonderful country. Only problem is the Frenchman.

    66. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Or you could just say it in English like I already did.
      I like my French car, it never brakes down.
      My car doesn't speak French, it comes from France.

    67. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      Checks id, yes I must be.

      I'm using the English version of 'each', which one are you using?

      For example. Each low id person trolling me is just being silly.
      Collectively they are all being silly. But each one is still silly in his own right.

    68. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by bidule · · Score: 1

      I will note that it is the second time you reply without making any effort to explain what alternate interpretation allows to have a single pan-enropean catalog with 30% "made in each EU country" of Germany/France/Spain where there's more than 10% left to be made in another country.

      Can't you pound the facts or the laws? Because pounding the table ad hominem won't save your victim narrative.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    69. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      I'll just note again that a lot of people are trolling me lately 'for some reason'.
      Anybody the slightest bit serious would have just read the articles by now, instead of asking some random person on the Internet to explain it to them.

      You are the one who is trying to make up some other alternative explanation anyway. Why aren't you explaining it?

    70. Re: Yeah I'm sure this will work. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The majority of foreign/local films aren't worth the bandwidth for the majority of people though.
      That is nonsense.

      If people want to see it, then Netflix would pick it up
      Obviously the streaming business does not work that way. They stream what they have and know what creates revenue. They are not looking at Europe and say: hm, lets see if they have good movies, too.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    71. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by bidule · · Score: 1

      You are the one who is trying to make up some other alternative explanation anyway. Why aren't you explaining it?

      Right... Maybe you remember reading my initial comment?

      Ok, so I have single 1000 movies catalog shared in all European countries. 30% German means 300 of them, another 300 French, another 300 Spanish. If they are all in the same catalog, that leaves 100 non-German/French/Spanish movies. I can't even add a 4th country.

      Still under the belief that 30% German - 70% Others can somehow result is something different?
      Will you somehow manage in your 4th try to come up with a example?
      Did the trolls leave you so sore that you cannot state facts anymore?

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    72. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Why would the EU care that European distributors can put an American tech company over a barrel? After all, Trump has been incredibly belligerent to the rest of the world, threatening trade wars and tariffs, it's only fair that the EU hits back.

    73. Re:Yeah I'm sure this will work. by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      back in the days of enlightened soviet Europe, you had to report your neighbour who didnt know what was good for you ....

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Tariffs by MightyYar · · Score: 2

    These aren't anything like tariffs, so it's perfectly fine to get red in the face at Trump over those.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    1. Re:Tariffs by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Broadcast standards make sense because the airways are a limited resource subject to tragedy of the commons. Regulating the content of internet companies at this stage is just simple protectionism. Like tariffs, which is why I mention the T-man.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    2. Re:Tariffs by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      These aren't anything like tariffs, so it's perfectly fine to get red^h^h^h orange in the face at Trump over those.

      FTFY

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    3. Re:Tariffs by chapstercni · · Score: 1

      Hopefully about 329 weeks til Trump leaves office.

  3. Catalogue reductions by enriquevagu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Such quotas can be enforced in two ways: increasing the amount of local contents (as desired by the EU) or reducing the amount of foreign content.

    I predict massive reductions in the catalogue of Netflix in most European countries.

    1. Re: Catalogue reductions by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      more like the EUs are upset all the content the paid for is available on thepiratebay and not netflix.

    2. Re:Catalogue reductions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can sympathize with the goal - a pure, global free market does tend to mean that a handful of global content producers (i.e. Hollywood) will crush any kind of regional cultural diversity with their economies of scale.

      But the obvious way to comply is to just add a lot of very cheap, low quality, locally produced filler. That's probably not what they're going for..

    3. Re:Catalogue reductions by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Such quotas can be enforced in two ways: increasing the amount of local contents (as desired by the EU) or reducing the amount of foreign content.

      . . . I predict 30% cheap, locally produced . . . porn.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Catalogue reductions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Given the numbers quoted, massive catalog restrictions seem the only possible way. How can 30% of the catalog be made locally when the local film industry is a tiny fraction of the global industry? And if the necessary catalog reduction is too big, neflix will just pull out and not offer service because it isn't profitable. I'm quite for economically socialist things like universal healthcare and a living minimum wage, but this kind of mandate is the kind of thing that reminds me why an actual command economy, with things like direct quotas, just doesn't work. And this whole discussion ignores the actual problem -- which is how current streaming services are moving toward exclusive licensing. The only endgame that I can see is some form of compulsory licensing, but it is going to be a very long and very painful road before we get there. Soon entire media franchises will ONLY be available on their own streaming platform, not even on physical media. I would argue this is the role of government in the market -- creating a fair market that can't be subverted with vertical integration and monopolies. Nominally the whole problem is created by government in the first place by granting ludicrous monopolies on the copying the content. Surely the government should be allowed to modify the terms of that artificial monopoly to maintain a more free market.

    5. Re:Catalogue reductions by taustin · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that at any given time, the Hollywood stuff will be limited to about twice the local stuff that's available, but they'll rotate the catalog on a daily basis.

      Which means TV Guide may be making a comeback.

    6. Re:Catalogue reductions by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      Such quotas can be enforced in two ways: increasing the amount of local contents (as desired by the EU) or reducing the amount of foreign content

      I'm kind of curious how the "make it prominent" bit will work. I'm guessing most people go to the Netflix home page and pick something out of the first page of recommendations. A cup of coffee says 80% of people never scroll off the initial page (people from Netflix (who I am absolutely certain measure this sort of thing) with actual data, please let us know).

      So what does the EU envision? That the initial page must show me 30% local content, even if the recommendation algorithm doesn't think I'm interested in any of it? I mean, I admit, I'm a philistine, I watch a lot of Marvel content. And Dr. Who, which won't count after Brexit. Is Netflix supposed to dilute the value of the very limited home screen real estate?

    7. Re:Catalogue reductions by mattventura · · Score: 1

      Couldn’t they circumvent it by splitting their service into multiple smaller services? Each one would have the same local content, but would have different foreign content.

      Regardless of whether or not they find viable loopholes, I can’t see this law benefitting consumers in any way.

    8. Re: Catalogue reductions by Brujis · · Score: 1

      In the free market companies are not protected from diseconomies of scale. As all of history shows the massive companies and harmful monopolies are exclusively the result of government intervention and regulation of the market.

    9. Re: Catalogue reductions by guruevi · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work that way on the Internet though which is why these new media are so successful. You can put stuff for free on the Internet and let the market speak. Even if it's a tiny market, I can switch my account from Netflix to just about any content provider.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    10. Re:Catalogue reductions by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1, Troll

      In today's episode of watching the grass grow in Germany...quick change to the French grass channel and see who is winning.

    11. Re: Catalogue reductions by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Those things all happened while governments existed. Show me a counterpoint /s

    12. Re:Catalogue reductions by Cederic · · Score: 1

      80s German porn will be very cheap to licence, and there's a lot of it.

      Disclosure: Spent teenage years in Germany in the 80s.

  4. cancon has been around for long time saga channel by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    cancon has been around for long time even saga channel had to have it.

  5. Woo hoo! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Canada had something similar in place 30 years ago - it gave us such gems as SCTV's "Great White North" and the movie "Strange Brew". Thanks to that I learned the difference between back bacon and side bacon, and developed an appreciation for Molson's!

    Take off, you Hollywood Hosers!

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Woo hoo! by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      But it also means that Canadian radio has to play even more Justin Beiber.

      I think you might want to look at the overall outcomes instead of picking out a single (I say single since the movie uses the same characters from Great White North) instance where it worked out well.

    2. Re:Woo hoo! by smoot123 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the Red Green Show, TV at it's finest.

      I'm a man. But I can change. If I have to. I guess. Keep your stick on the ice.

    3. Re:Woo hoo! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      I was actually trying to be funny, but obviously I failed miserably.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Woo hoo! by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Canada had something similar in place 30 years ago - it gave us such gems as SCTV's "Great White North" and the movie "Strange Brew".

      What it gave us was more commercial runtime per show. Commercials made in Canada count as original Canadian content. TV show production companies actually want to have less commercial runtime per episode, but they can't because of the Canadian law. We all have to watch more commercials so that Canadians can enjoy enough Canadian commercial content.

    5. Re:Woo hoo! by baerd · · Score: 1

      We still have this actually: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... And although I think a lot of mediocre content gets promoted because of it, I'm actually ok with it because I can choose not to watch/listen to it. America is a real threat to our culture, and our 'u's, eh.

      --
      I wish I had a lawn.
  6. What does it even mean to "give over 30%" by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand why technically Netflix is supposed to "give over" anything - can't they just ALSO host EU content? Is this rule really mandating that Netflix stop streaming some content even though technically they could steam any amount of content with enough server space?

    I mean, over here in America I'd love to see this content also, let everyone see it!

    I look forward to the new category in the Netflix TV app - right next to "Violent TV shows", or "Feel Good Reality TV" (both actual Netflix categories), they can add a new one "Dreck the EU Made Us Show You".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:What does it even mean to "give over 30%" by cshark · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah. The 30% number insures that you would have to have a finite and probably much smaller catalog in europe than the US. Politicians in the EU are certifiably stupid. Of course, there's not much better in the US.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:What does it even mean to "give over 30%" by losfromla · · Score: 1

      Yup, we pay for that shite. I would like to see more French films myself.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    3. Re:What does it even mean to "give over 30%" by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The content still isn't free. And Netflix is put into a poor bargaining position with this - if the content is limited enough the EU studios are free to extort higher license fees. And to hit their quotas they will likely have to either increase subscription rates or shrink the catalog to stay competitive.

    4. Re:What does it even mean to "give over 30%" by GNious · · Score: 1

      Well, yeah. The 30% number insures that you would have to have a finite and probably much smaller catalog in europe than the US.

      Just a heads-up : that's been the case for as long as Netflix et al existed - their catalogue in the EU is tiny compared to what's available in the US.

  7. Yes but by cshark · · Score: 1

    Question is, if european sourced content is so great, why bother with mandating netflix consume it? If the demand exists, why not create or fund a european service that sources primarily european entertainment?

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

    1. Re:Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Therein lies the problem: people don't really WANT that content.

      The good European movies get lots of play all around the world. Trouble is there aren't all that many and for everyone of those there are a hundred "artsy" snorefests that nobody really wants to watch.

      If your content is good, you don't have to mandate that it be offered. The market already has enough incentive to show it, if it's going to make money.

    2. Re:Yes but by taustin · · Score: 1

      Movie that cost more to make than they bring in are called "failures."

      And people who make them don't get to make any more, unless the government pays for it. That is called "socialism," which is another word for "welfare for people who can't hold down a real job flipping burgers." Which is another word for "failure."

    3. Re:Yes but by losfromla · · Score: 1

      are my fries ready? I'm gonna complain to your boss if you serve them to me soggy again.

      --
      Only I can judge you.
    4. Re:Yes but by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      So EU movie and series makers have funds to make more EU content in the EU.
      Such EU laws force investment in new EU content.
      The paying for past EU movie and series to make up the "European sourced content"
      People want to enjoy very different content but the EU govs will force support to flow back to the EU "arts".

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    5. Re:Yes but by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Because then the customer has to pay two subscriptions: one for netflix *and* one for the new european service.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    6. Re: Yes but by taustin · · Score: 1

      Hollywood accounting is for hiding profits.

      If there aren't any profits be cause nobody will watch your drek, there's no profits to hide.

      Try to pay attention, son.

    7. Re:Yes but by coofercat · · Score: 1

      Well, take my Amazon Prime, for example. The European stuff on there has mostly already been on TV, so I've already had all of that, and don't watch it. There's Comrade Detective, but that got dubbed into American accents (shame, IMHO), and then every last Amazon original is 'American'. Thus, if you looked at my Prime viewing profile, you would conclude I'm keen to 'consume' more American content.

      However, that's not really true - there are loads of good British films which will never compete with Hollywood, mainly because Americans can't stand to watch anything that doesn't have American people in it. That doesn't mean any of these films aren't good though. From Amazon/Netflix/whomever's point of view they're not going to be terribly expensive to buy, and probably don't have overbearing licensing either. They *could* have them in their catalogues, but don't because they don't see the point.

      I'm not sure if quotas are the answer, but France has had this sort of thing for years, and anecdotally it seems to have done them some good (or at least no harm).

    8. Re:Yes but by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      Plenty of Americans want to see good content made in Europe. Unfortunately, quite a bit of it is locked behind the stingy licensing terms of organizations like the BBC, GEMMA, and BREIN, with some popular movies, music, and shows having to be bootlegged even in this day and age because they refuse to license them outright. Oh, sure, BBC will license a few, such as Dr Who or Sherlock, but then bar things such as Cold Lazarus, Doomwatch, or Ultraviolet.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  8. Re:Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 3, Informative

    How long before companies just stand up and say "No" to this kind of buttinsky BS?

    Won't happen. Because money.

    We've already seen how companies are all too willing to bend over for the Chinese govt in order to gain access to that huge market. I'm sure this will be the same. Netflix or Prime won't want to give their competitors an edge in the EU market.

    --
    Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  9. Unintended consequences by tomtomtom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't see how this can possibly work in eg Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus, countries which are very small so will have almost no local content either back catalogue or current production. Just means Netflix etc will never do business there.

    1. Re:Unintended consequences by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Along as something is created on a EU location, has EU staff, used EU rented equipment and was in a EU nation language.
      Such protective EU laws keep an entire "arts" culture in work and working on EU gov enforced content creation.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Unintended consequences by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Just link to cool Malta videos on YouTube.

    3. Re:Unintended consequences by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I can't see how this can possibly work in eg Malta, Luxembourg and Cyprus, countries which are very small so will have almost no local content either back catalogue or current production. Just means Netflix etc will never do business there.

      Luxembourg can choose German, Italian and French content, like they currently do. Cyprus will depend if you're on the Greek or Turkish side, Malta, Spanish or British... Do you think these countries had no local broadcasters before... or are you daft enough to assume that all they played were American movies?

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  10. Wish we had that in the US by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    As long as the foreign content is from the UK. They actually produce the best content.

  11. Calling them "Culture Quotas" seems loaded by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    these are quotas on locally produced content. I'm not surprised the EU would want them. It's not hard to see why smaller local studios can't compete with (let's be honest mostly US based) mega corporations.

    And it's not so much that nobody watches the local content as it's that nobody'll produce it because why spend money making content for 2 markets when you can do it for one and folks will watch by default.

    Hell, I wish we'd do this in America. Lately the dialog and plots in American movies suck balls because they have to be watered down to get past Chinese censors and/or be easy to dub over.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Calling them "Culture Quotas" seems loaded by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Not that loaded. France has had similar quotas in place on broadcast systems for decades, specifically to maintain their culture.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  12. Short-term losers... by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

    So in the short-term, Netflix and Amazon will just disable whatever percentage of their library until they hit the magic number required. This will definitely reduce the amount of content available until original content from each country starts to show up.

    In the long run this could in theory help get production companies going in each member state. Only time will tell how well that will work out. In the short term, the least watched content will get chopped down so that netflix can claim that now offer 30% EU content.

  13. EUphimism by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that, in EU parlance, "locally created" is shorthand for made in Italy or France.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:EUphimism by jarkus4 · · Score: 1

      TFA is wrong. If you follow their source, you will find:
      "Viola said that, starting in December, the EU’s 28 member states would have 20 months to apply these new norms and that countries “could choose to raise the quota from the 30% minimum to 40%.” EU nations can each choose whether the 30% includes sub-quotas on original productions in their countries and whether they want to follow the German model of adding a small surcharge on streamer subscription fees to support the national production fund."

      So its basically 30 - 40 % EU stuff, but some countries may probably require some part of it to be fully local.

  14. As long as its enforced like La Liga by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Face value shows no more than 3 non EU players. With a billion and one loopholes and exceptions...

  15. Re:Next step - Too late... by taustin · · Score: 1

    You can't expect them to create anti-Islamic programming; That would cause people to get killed.

    And worse, cause elected officials to lose re-election.

  16. Sounds like Must Carry Mk II by Fringe · · Score: 1

    "Must Carry" was the FCC approach to local channels in the U.S. It gave the cable carriers a mandate that, if the local channel wanted, they could force the cable carrier to carry their channel... at no cost.

    Or... if the local channel insisted on being paid - keep in mind that the same channel is on the airwaves for "free", sponsored by advertising - then the cable carriers are not under that compulsion.

    Of course the local channels get in battles over the carriage fee, and instead now want a large payment, resulting in regular black-outs during contract negotiations.

    This EU mandate may result in, essentially, the equivalent of the old Public Access programs. Good local content won't be available, because it costs money and really nobody cares. But mediocre podcasts might be, by artists hungry for free exposure. Netflix will just have to add a local YouTube-like content area.

    1. Re:Sounds like Must Carry Mk II by elohssa · · Score: 1

      Netflix will just have to add a local YouTube-like content area.

      This sounds like the best possible outcome.

      The way youtube has been jacking around its creators, I'm sure plenty of good channels would be happy to co-locate on Netflix.

  17. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Chas · · Score: 1

    Europe isn't a backwater, although I doubt you can find it on a map.

    I can find it just fine. It's the plot of land between Norway and Africa, between the Atlantic Ocean and Russia. It's the continent that's slowly being colonized by Islamists...

    So, if it isn't a backwater now? Just wait a generation. It soon will be.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  18. Google "Quota Quickies" by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2

    In the 1920s, UK cinema was suffering from competition from the USA. In response, cinemas were told that 20% of films had to be British. The result of this was simple: companies started producing "quota quickies". Really low budget films that cinemas could buy cheaply and show, just to hit the quota. There's no reason Netflix won't do the same. Go to a company like Gaumont or Pathe and ask what they've got going cheap. Lousy films everyone has forgotten that were made in the 1950s and they'll put them on. Quota ticked.

  19. Re:Next step: by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Alex Jones? Is that you? You don't have to be shy, you can post under your usual handle (transLoverButCloseted).

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  20. Re:Italian Spider-Man and Turkish Star Wars by ffkom · · Score: 1

    There are actually examples of good European "super hero"-movies, like for example Lo chiamavano Jeeg Robot, which has more character depth and plausibility than any of the Marvel "super hero"-movies.

    (Turkey is not part of the EU, and also currently has a terrible movie industry, not least because it serves the exaggerated nationalism of the Erdogan regime.)

  21. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by losfromla · · Score: 1

    That's because their "pussy ass" cops are brave enough to go mano-a-mano with armed suspects/citizens. They are much better trained and those few who are trained to wield guns are much more experienced and know when not to use them (most of the time).
    They don't "fear for their lives" and empty their guns into an 88 year old 70 lb woman (like 'murican cops would) because she was hobbling toward them in an threatening manner, US cops are the pussies, you're just too enamored with seeing them as "heroes" to recognize what cowards they are.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  22. Re:Good. by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's why some US shows are filmed in Canada?

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  23. Unitarity Violation by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Such quotas can be enforced in two ways

    Actually, there is only one way: you HAVE to cut content. The EU currently has 28 member countries and so if each of them has to have 30% local content then the ONLY way you can manage that is to restrict the content available in each country because if all the content you make is available in every country then any one country's share will be a lot less than 30%.

    To make matters worse the EU has very strict rules against restricting services between countries so, if you only allow a show to be seen in country X and not in country Y you may well get into trouble. I suppose one way around this would be to have multiple streaming services each of which plays the same local content to make the 30% requirement and then programming from two plus a third other country's content but I can't help getting the idea that someone did not think these new rules through from a simple mathematical perspective...

    1. Re:Unitarity Violation by ffkom · · Score: 1

      I think the article got it wrong, of course one cannot expect a country like Malta (population ~400k) to produce 30% of a reasonable movie catalog. I am pretty sure this meant "30% content produced anywhere in the EU".

    2. Re:Unitarity Violation by ffkom · · Score: 1

      (Except of course if they were willing to count every movie that got some scenes shot in Malta as a "Maltese movie": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... )

  24. Re:Protectionism by losfromla · · Score: 1

    fuck drumpft! And fuck you too!

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  25. Re:Next step - Too late... by layabout · · Score: 1

    Hollywood has been spreading anti-religous bigotry for many decades. Also, Western Europe has been moving away from Christianity for generations. Neither has made people more egalitarian or happy.

    really?? see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... 17 countries ranked higher than the US. 12 of them were from europe.

  26. Re:Obvious solution by losfromla · · Score: 1

    drumpft?

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  27. Re:Socialist agendas don't work the way you want t by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Why are you assuming that they don't want to watch local content? It isn't as if Hollywood produces the highest quality entertainment on the planet. It is the most expensive, like our health care, expensive and shitty outcomes.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  28. Antigeofencing? by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

    Aren't there EU laws regarding not being allowed to geofence their service?

    How do you give "30% local" to every EU country when you can't restrict the content by country?

  29. Re:So My Solution by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Buy enough 30% decades old EU content. Hours of 1960-70's EU nation movies. Add in a few new low cost EU crime dramas that don't need as much support.
    Then the EU law makers will start demanding that the content has to be "new" productions to ensure more EU wide employment.
    Streaming services will create the lowest cost soap opera, dramas and EU home renovation reality shows. In different EU nations to spread the new gov enforced work around.
    The EU will then demand a quality of EU nation "culture" has to be included in more shows. No more low price content. The EU will demand art and academic experts support production.
    Finally EU gov workers will sit in on all new EU productions to give culture and quality guidance.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  30. Tne simplest solution by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    Netflix gets into the porn business in EU countries.

    There are decades of "local" porn out of current EU members countries, and for all I know, lots of new ones being produced.

  31. True but France is kind of extreme by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in that regard and pretty famous for it. And they make no bones about it, they don't want to lose French culture to the melting pot of globalization (waste of time in the Internet age if you ask me). I don't see that's what the EU is doing here. It just looks like an honest attempt to make sure home grown content doesn't get crushed by slick Hollywood production values.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  32. British TV by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    This is quite funny because there are several British TV shows I'd love to get here in the US but can't because of licensing issues. I'd love me some Red Dwarf but can't get it here in the US.
    I tried to go the UKTV streaming service and could get it here is Western US because their registration process requires a valid GB mail code.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  33. Re: Next step - Too late... by Brujis · · Score: 1

    Ranked on a self selected response to a survey question.... How stupid do you have to be to think that is measure of anything real?

  34. Re:Socialist agendas don't work the way you want t by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

    Why are you assuming that they don't want to watch local content?

    Because if everyone wanted to watch local content, they wouldn't have to force Netflix to carry it at gunpoint.

    If there's enough demand for something, Netflix will carry it, just to make money doing so. You'll only have to force them if what you're requiring is that they show something that will lose money....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  35. Re:Good luck ... by chapstercni · · Score: 1

    But the Red Green show is AWESOME!!!

  36. Mathematical Possibility Is Hazy... by Chrontius · · Score: 1

    Hold up. 30% of their content must come from each EU country.

    28÷3 = 9.3

    So either each country’s originals are banned from viewing in other countries, this law needs amending, or the math says they need ten times more content, without increasing their supply of content. The math simply can’t work as presented in the summary.

    From Variety,

    EU nations can each choose whether the 30% includes sub-quotas on original productions in their countries and whether they want to follow the German model of adding a small surcharge on streamer subscription fees to support the national production fund.

    Okay, so we’ve got the option to make that third entirely handled within the country. Yet even that is ambiguous — is it a third of Netflix’s catalogue has to be made in Europe, or a third in every single of the twenty eight member countries? ‘Cause that’s sure what everyone seems to say, and that’s mathematically impossible.

  37. Re:Socialist agendas don't work the way you want t by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I don't recall Netflix _ever_ sending me a survey asking me what I want to watch. They post stuff, I either watch it or I don't, they really really have never asked me. If they don't put up the content, they won't know if anyone wants to watch it. I think it is very provincial to assume that everyone on the entire planet wants to watch 'murican shows.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  38. Law of unintended consequences by Miamicanes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What the EU intends: TV shows that remain faithful to the vision of each country's own distinct culture.

    What will really happen: Netflix films 20 new TV shows based on... what else... Marvel or DC Comics, but has them produced in the EU instead of the US or Canada. Except they all follow Hollywood norms, have casts fluent in English & are produced IN English(*) so they can be directly monetized as-is in the US and internationally, and end up practically extinguishing what's left of that country's "culturally distinct" film industry (because everyone involved with the country's film/tv industry ends up being too busy chasing after Netflix's money).

    Oh... and lots of low-budget reality-TV and game shows, because they're just about the only kind of show you CAN profitably make if your total market and language community only has a few million potential viewers.

    The thing lots of people overlook is that "Hollywood" isn't a place. It's not even necessarily AMERICAN anymore. It's a business model that has proven over time to be wildly profitable & has spread over the globe.

    Case in point: how would you classify the nationality of a TV show like "Game of Thrones"? Most of its cast members are European. Practically every scene was filmed in Europe. The CGI and production are done in Europe.

    ---

    (*) Or possibly, shoot scenes involving visibly-spoken dialogue twice, back to back... once in English, and once in the country's official language. It would cost more, but not THAT MUCH more since you'd be using the same cast (they're all bilingual, remember), the same CGI, and could do the editing workflow in parallel... and you'd end up with two versions, both of which were a first-quality original shot in their respective languages.

    I can't cite any specific examples, but I'm pretty sure this is ALREADY happening with big-budget Hollywood films co-produced with Chinese studios... two directors & casts [possibly with a few actors shared by both], shooting back to back using the same sets, extras, and CGI.

    1. Re:Law of unintended consequences by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Or possibly, shoot scenes involving visibly-spoken dialogue twice, back to back... once in English, and once in the country's official language. It would cost more, but not THAT MUCH more since you'd be using the same cast (they're all bilingual, remember), the same CGI, and could do the editing workflow in parallel... and you'd end up with two versions, both of which were a first-quality original shot in their respective languages.

      How Pixar movies are changed for international audiences.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  39. Sort of worked for music in France by jurtax · · Score: 1

    Radios in France have a quota of 40% of French "speaking" music, and although you could argue the quality of French "pop" (it's bad), it did keep the industry alive. Of course, the quota of French songs on radio tends to revolve around a small number of tunes in constant rotation but that's the way commercial radio works.

  40. Yeah by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Because quotas worked out so well for the BBC.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  41. Busy man by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Roberto Viola, the European Commissionâ(TM)s directorate general of communication, networks, content and technology

    He can't have much free time if he's an entire department by himself.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  42. Re:Good. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    A lot of US shows are filmed in Canada because certain Canadian cities have made themselves friendly to filming, and certain American cities have made themselves obnoxious.

    Apparently a lot of New York scenes are filmed in Toronto or Montreal because the images of many buildings in New York are copyrighted.

  43. I disagree by rsilvergun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    necessity is the mother of invention. Doctor Who was fantastic and made on a shoe string. The Michael Bay Transformers movies are $100+ million a pop and some of the worst drivel I've ever seen. I'd like to see some small local talent get a shot. They're likely to be constrained in ways that a big production is not, and those constraints will make them more interesting.

    It's like a garden full of Dandelions. They look nice and all but they're still weeds and they'll crowd out the rest of your followers.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  44. Canada tried this too with Netflix by qzzpjs · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this law actually got passed here or not, but I had a simple suggestion for Netflix. Just allow locals to post their own videos in a YouTube like section on the site. It won't take long to get thousands of videos that fill the quotas that the government wants. If you want local culture, then local people should produce it.

  45. Re:30% from each state? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    All Goosio, all the time.

  46. Re:needs to be done but needs parity in funding by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Maybe they rejected your review because they know you only watched 3 minutes of it and that's not very useful.

  47. Meanwhile, in the UK... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

    The BBC produces a plethora of worthwhile content that not only stands and competes on its own merits; but is so sought-after that many people don't even wait for it to be legitimately available.

    Even in the '90s, before moving large video files around on the internet was feasible; things like Red Dwarf and old-school Doctor Who had huge and thriving bootleg PAL to NTSC converted VHS scenes. And when they re-introduced Doctor Who in 2005? Well, more than a few people started using BitTorrent that year, because BBC America was not available in their cable market at the time. Then there's Top Gear, Torchwood, Broadchurch, AbFab, Graham Norton, and Downton Abby, the original versions of The Office, Queer as Folk, and Skins, and of course the various iterations of BBC News.

    But no, EU; don't bother producing good content that can stand on it's own. Abuse the law to force crap content that no one wants on people. I'd bet if you find the money trail and follow it; there'd be some nicely large campaign contributions at the end.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:Meanwhile, in the UK... by johnsie · · Score: 1

      Plethora? I'm calling BS on that right now. There's a reason why the UK has one of the highest rates of Netflix subscriptions. The BBC isn't as good. The Beeb wouldn't last a day on it's own two feet.

  48. Anime by djinn6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guess Crunchyroll's going to get kicked out of the EU. They're over 90% Japanese.

  49. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Chas · · Score: 1

    Also, with shit like this, doesn't it put a lie to globalism?

    If we're all "one world", why does the government need to FORCE a content-oriented business to make localized content in this manner?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  50. Step 2: by Justathot · · Score: 1

    Step 2: due to scarcity of films, local film makers demand premiums from NetFlix so NetFlix can make its quotas.
    Step 3: To break that stranglehold, NetFlix opens (or subsidizes) studios in each country, churning out cheap, abundant schlock that meets the 30% local criteria.
    Step 4: European commission updates standards qualifying what is and is not artistic and local enough.
    Step 5: Local film innovation gets squeezed out by formulaic film makers, OR local film makers have to (discretely) bribe commission members to approve their films by offering 'film debut trips' to exotic locations, 'film opening galas' with lots of free booze and schmoozing with glamorous actors who are told they need to be 'friendly', etc.

  51. Re:cancon has been around for long time saga chann by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Yeah and cancon is pretty much reviled by most people in Canada, because it produces nothing of worthwhile. It's simply a waste of tax dollars to create/promote culture. Something that in and of itself is organic.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  52. article is misleading by jarkus4 · · Score: 1

    Requirement will be for 30% EU content, not for specific country content. Some countries may require part of this to be their local productions, but its optional.

    "Viola said that, starting in December, the EU’s 28 member states would have 20 months to apply these new norms and that countries “could choose to raise the quota from the 30% minimum to 40%.” EU nations can each choose whether the 30% includes sub-quotas on original productions in their countries and whether they want to follow the German model of adding a small surcharge on streamer subscription fees to support the national production fund."

    source:
    https://variety.com/2018/film/...

  53. Actually I read the projected rule differentely. by aepervius · · Score: 1

    " Germany, 30% German 70% anything else" the way I read it is different , it would be " Germany, 30% EU sourced 70% anything else".

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  54. Re:Actually I read the projected rule differentely by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    The proposals will require that streaming services give over at least 30% of their on-demand catalogues to original productions made in each EU country where a service is provided (individual EU Member States could choose to set the content bar even higher, at 40%).

    It could just be sloppy wording, and you may be right. But to me, why use the phrase 'original productions made in each EU country' if they just meant '30% EU original productions to provide services in the EU'. Why mention countries at all?

    Also seems unlikely Germany would be happy with 30% French TV and vice versa. Germany already has a quota for German content, and they probably don't want that changed over to French under the new rules.

  55. NOOOOOO!!!! PLEEASE GOOOD.... NOOOOO!!!!! by Mjlner · · Score: 2

    Please stop this now!

    Coming from a relatively small country that produces only boring dramas and cheap, cheesy wannabe-hollywoodesque crap, this would be the end of all decent programming. Since my country is so small, there isn't enough titles to form the 30%, so Netflix and HBO would have to make up for it by removing existing titles and replacing it with utter shite.

    NOOO!!!!

    --
    Lemon curry???
  56. nuts by countach · · Score: 1

    This is a crazy leftist plan that will result in either hosting complete cultural rubbish to match the quota, or artificially limiting the catalog to match a quota. For god's sake, end this totalitarian EU before its too late.

  57. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Cederic · · Score: 1

    The British grew up with bombings. Except they were being done by people with light coloured skin and Celtic bloodlines.

    The British have been knifing each other for centuries. Even the current issues are related to poverty and have very little to do with skin colour.

    The British have fewer traffic accidents than almost any other nation on the planet. They also deal with them extremely calmly - e.g. https://www.independent.co.uk/...

    Areas of the UK may be turning into total shitholes, but I can at least hope they'll never drop so far that you'll feel at home in them, using such childish slurs as 'mudscums'.

  58. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by guruevi · · Score: 1

    You may want to look at those statistics.

    Mass murders/shootings and gun crime per capita are much higher in the EU (UK, Netherlands and France are in the top 20) than the US (which takes 30th).

    You just hear about the US more because we have a 24h media cycle to feed and a leftist-statist anti-gun platform to promote.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  59. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by turp182 · · Score: 1

    The police only tazed the old woman. But they did have guns drawn.

    I mean, she was stealing dandelions while brandishing a deadly weapon. Her slow manner was obviously a guise, she was probably a ninja.

    As well, the police were afraid, that by moving back to give her space, one of them might trip and accidentally discharge a service weapon. This is a very common problem in the US and only further reinforces the legitimacy of their "taze the old woman" decision.

    Me, I would have turned and run (maybe 10ft/3m or so, and then reassessed the situation).

    You do know, that in Britain, there are gangs of old ladies that attack people? And left turn signs that do the same? At least it was a problem back in the early 1970s:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  60. Re:Good luck ... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Corner Gas
    The Red Green Show

    That's more or less the only two good TV shows ever made in Canada.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  61. Re:Could this help cement a Netflix monopoly? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    I think the EU is thinking in similar lines, but they see it as "it will force Netflix/Amazon/Apple/etc to come finance TV shows and movies here instead of only investing in the U.S.A."

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  62. Re:Just like Canada by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Are you trying to tell me Dan for Mayor isn't funny?

  63. Why? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    Why not just leave it up to the countries to decide the quota?

    I can imagine France and Germany wanting to apply something like this, but as many people here have stated, some nations just don't produce content that's very good to begin with.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  64. Re:cancon has been around for long time saga chann by farrellj · · Score: 1

    Actually, the only people reviling cancon are Conservatives...if you are in the content creation business, be it movies, music or art, you *love* the cancon policy. As for producing nothing worthwhile..what about Rush? What about SCTV? What about Bryan Adams. What about Denis Villeneuve? What about Robert J. Sawyer? What about Shania Twain?

    Canadian great Oscar Peterson was virtually unknown, except in select music circles, and would have been just an obscure pianist....but cancon has made him a household name!

    Just because you can't see it working doesn't mean that it is not doing anything.

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  65. Re:cancon has been around for long time saga chann by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

    If people love it so much why do you need to pass all these laws and take all this tax money to promote it?

  66. Nothing wrong with Marvel Movies by jaq1an · · Score: 1

    but when all the content is American gets a bit boring after awhile. There are some great foreign language shows on Netflix (Okkupert) but not enough of them. Can be hard to break into the scene now that everyone is moving away from TV.

  67. Obvious troll is obvious... by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

    You expect anyone to believe you hadn't commented for weeks, but this topic was so important to you you just had to say something.

    But you didn't bother to read the summary...
    You clearly didn't read the article...
    You didn't understand or read my comment properly...
    You didn't read the comment I was responding to either...

    And now you want me to explain to you why you don't understand anything?

    Do your homework. Come back with a sensible question. And maybe you can have a sensible answer.

    1. Re:Obvious troll is obvious... by bidule · · Score: 1

      Aaaand 5 times.

      You clearly cannot admit you are wrong.

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    2. Re:Obvious troll is obvious... by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      And you still haven't done your homework or read any of the required reading.
      If you even read just 1 of those 4 things you would know the answer already.

  68. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Chas · · Score: 1

    Okay, the rule for XYZland is that you have to cut your balls off to do business in the country. But natives don't.

    We're talking about logic and reason here.

    These institutions want to use GOVERNMENT FORCE to MAKE content providers to make a set portion of their content localized.
    So, if you're a streaming provider in France, they want to FORCE you to make sure X% of your content was produced in France.
    The same for Germany. And Belgium. And Austria. And Finland. And Ireland. And Italy. And...
    Currently there are TWENTY EIGHT member states in the EU.
    And the EU wants to set the bar at 30-40% of total content PER MEMBER STATE...

    The EU is supposed to be about globalism right? We're all "citizens of the world", right?
    If so, what the hell is going on with these protectionist localization requirements?

    Sorry, it's bullshit.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  69. Re:cancon has been around for long time saga chann by farrellj · · Score: 1

    We pass those laws because we are protecting ourselves from the Giant to the south. If we don't protect our cultural identity, we would have American culture overrun us.

    As for why we take all those taxes...so people don't have to go bankrupt if they get sick, to start out with...

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  70. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Chas · · Score: 1

    I'm not "making shit up" dumbass.

    I presented you with an educational example, stripped of partisanship-inducing terms.

    Yet you still don't get it.

    Okay, strike 3. You're out.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  71. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Chas · · Score: 1

    I've explained it to you. Several times.
    If you can't comprehend it at this point, I'm not translating it into sign language for you.

    Howsabout we reverse it.

    Why SHOULD streaming providers be FORCED to produce local/localized content? Why is VOLUNTARY production not good enough? And why must percentages be set?

    And "Because you gotta to follow the rules" isn't an answer. Because I'm questioning the purpose and ideology BEHIND the rule.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  72. Re: Sweet fucking Jesus they're dumb by Chas · · Score: 1

    Translation: You can't justify it with anything other than chauvinism. Fair enough.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!