So fast to throw the antisemite card, over nothing. He said nothing that justifies you calling him that. I guess this is the world we live in now, everyone accusing each other of being the worst and most extreme thing you can think of, hoping you'll be seen as the victim and still hold the moral high ground despite the unreasonable aggressive response that's inevitably coming. In short: people enjoy being bullies too much
Is this really the level of discourse that slashdot has fallen to consider insightful? I realize the quality here has dropped considerably over at least the last decade and most knowledgeable "old-timers" have already left, but this is really a new low
It's really scary that she even admitted that this was a learnt belief. We now have full-blown propaganda factories (sorry, sociology majors) that are pumping out hordes of young people who have been taught that racism is not only acceptable, it's desirable
This is your brain on identity politics. You are not a person and your post is irrelevant. You do not subscribe 100% to the current SJW-groups manifesto which means you belong to the Nazi-group. Nazis are evil and hate Muslims thus justifying the comment that was just made
Is this a joke? It's definitely not insightful. You're literally saying all rebelling is equal. Rebelling against the price of coffee in the cafeteria is not the same as rebelling against torture, and pointing that out does not make you a hypocrite - it makes you an intelligent human being capable of holding nuanced views
Every single person who've ever had the thought "I should be, and deserve to be, the next president" and actually went for it, is a mentally unstable megalomaniac
Sure. Reduce half of the population to unknowing idiots. I'm sure that'll get them to agree with your clearly enlightened views.
People like you are why it's not impossible that he'll get a 2nd term. But you'll never understand. You'll keep going with your hard-line rhetoric and push people further and further away. Good luck with that
I'm curious what makes you say that? Most ML devs I know use standard "face packages" that contain men, women, black, white etc. Nobody uses their colleagues faces
I feel like there's a pretty damn big difference between just your name and phone number, and a detailed profile with information about every website you visit, every article you read and all your interests
Stinger missiles are illegal to own now. Why do you think keeping them illegal will suddenly spike the availability of them? Seems like quite the stretch. 10g of cocaine is a lot easier to hide than a truck full of landmines so I don't really get your comparison with drugs either
Calling everyone richer than you a parasite is pathetic. Not considering inheritance, rich people are rich because they contribute more to society either by providing a service few other can (artists, actors) or by taking on more risk and responsibility than others are willing to (CEOs)
You think Google's discriminatory hiring and promotion process is "doing well"? Interesting. And yes, hiring and promoting based on race and gender is discriminatory even if it gets you a pat on the head from the women in your life for supporting it
I understand that you'll probably take some pride and find some validation in being modded up here. But consider who are agreeing with you: nerds. Nerds who have never been successful with women. So they'll agree with you, because it's comforting while still hitting their deepest fear (and reality for most): sex being inaccessible.
For men who are actually successful with women it's obvious that the guy you are replying to is absolutely correct in everything he said
Ah so you agree with univariate statistical analysis. Women do in fact earn 30% less than men. That really is terrible. Go add some more labels to me, see if that makes up for your intellectual inaptitude
Google provides places where you can talk about how you handle wanting to have your wife anally fscked by another man. Literally. Even on company time. In such an environment, are the unspoken rules really that obvious?
Slashdot Mirror
So fast to throw the antisemite card, over nothing. He said nothing that justifies you calling him that. I guess this is the world we live in now, everyone accusing each other of being the worst and most extreme thing you can think of, hoping you'll be seen as the victim and still hold the moral high ground despite the unreasonable aggressive response that's inevitably coming. In short: people enjoy being bullies too much
HR*
Good luck with that strategy when the HD department consists of 95% sjws
Is this really the level of discourse that slashdot has fallen to consider insightful? I realize the quality here has dropped considerably over at least the last decade and most knowledgeable "old-timers" have already left, but this is really a new low
It's really scary that she even admitted that this was a learnt belief. We now have full-blown propaganda factories (sorry, sociology majors) that are pumping out hordes of young people who have been taught that racism is not only acceptable, it's desirable
This is your brain on identity politics. You are not a person and your post is irrelevant. You do not subscribe 100% to the current SJW-groups manifesto which means you belong to the Nazi-group. Nazis are evil and hate Muslims thus justifying the comment that was just made
Is this a joke? It's definitely not insightful. You're literally saying all rebelling is equal. Rebelling against the price of coffee in the cafeteria is not the same as rebelling against torture, and pointing that out does not make you a hypocrite - it makes you an intelligent human being capable of holding nuanced views
Every single person who've ever had the thought "I should be, and deserve to be, the next president" and actually went for it, is a mentally unstable megalomaniac
Sure. Reduce half of the population to unknowing idiots. I'm sure that'll get them to agree with your clearly enlightened views. People like you are why it's not impossible that he'll get a 2nd term. But you'll never understand. You'll keep going with your hard-line rhetoric and push people further and further away. Good luck with that
My experience with gamers in overwatch and dota suggests otherwise :p
I agree. Not worse. Equally as bad
Nerds telling other people how they should behave socially, with absolute certainty... That's rich
I'm curious what makes you say that? Most ML devs I know use standard "face packages" that contain men, women, black, white etc. Nobody uses their colleagues faces
Stop posting these Reddit-level stories that are designed to get people riled up
Doesn't that mean his statement is ultimately completely worthless? Since you're always posting in a subreddit
I feel like there's a pretty damn big difference between just your name and phone number, and a detailed profile with information about every website you visit, every article you read and all your interests
I'm not sure but I do know what you call people who think it's not worth studying and not worth trying to become better at it: awkward nerds :)
Stinger missiles are illegal to own now. Why do you think keeping them illegal will suddenly spike the availability of them? Seems like quite the stretch. 10g of cocaine is a lot easier to hide than a truck full of landmines so I don't really get your comparison with drugs either
We're casually doxxing people now? How are these two idiots comments not removed and their IP permanently banned yet? Wtf.... C'mon /.
Calling everyone richer than you a parasite is pathetic. Not considering inheritance, rich people are rich because they contribute more to society either by providing a service few other can (artists, actors) or by taking on more risk and responsibility than others are willing to (CEOs)
You think Google's discriminatory hiring and promotion process is "doing well"? Interesting. And yes, hiring and promoting based on race and gender is discriminatory even if it gets you a pat on the head from the women in your life for supporting it
I understand that you'll probably take some pride and find some validation in being modded up here. But consider who are agreeing with you: nerds. Nerds who have never been successful with women. So they'll agree with you, because it's comforting while still hitting their deepest fear (and reality for most): sex being inaccessible. For men who are actually successful with women it's obvious that the guy you are replying to is absolutely correct in everything he said
Indeed. Let's just abandon all social etiquette and ask laws. Since there's nothing we can do about human behavior anyway
Ah so you agree with univariate statistical analysis. Women do in fact earn 30% less than men. That really is terrible. Go add some more labels to me, see if that makes up for your intellectual inaptitude
Google provides places where you can talk about how you handle wanting to have your wife anally fscked by another man. Literally. Even on company time. In such an environment, are the unspoken rules really that obvious?