Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Tesla Pickup Truck Drivers Take Over a Supercharger Station -- Again (electrek.co)

An anonymous reader quotes Electrek: In what is quickly becoming a problem for some Tesla drivers, pickup truck drivers have again taken over a Supercharger station and yelled profanities in what appears to be an act of protest against Tesla. Earlier this month, we reported on a strange situation at Tesla's Hickory Supercharger in North Carolina where three large pickup trucks blocked access to the station and reportedly chanted "F*** Tesla"....

Now it looks like it's becoming a trend since another Reddit user spotted pickup truck drivers taking over another Tesla Supercharger. They reportedly were also yelling profanities to Tesla owners coming to charge at the Supercharger station.

Electrek also cites one Tesla owner's reports of being "coal rolled" -- intentionally targetted with extra black exhaust fumes from specially-modified engines.

311 of 719 comments (clear)

  1. Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    No better way to convince people they're wrong/dumb than being an asshole to them. These truckers should run for office

    1. Re: Classic by javaman235 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Truckers drive trucks, including Teslaâ(TM)s. These rednecks are in coal/oil, which pumps money in piss poor towns. They have picked a losing fight.

      --
      -The art of programming is the pursuit of absolute simplicity.
    2. Re: Classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a fake-out. The original reddit post used a cropped photo that deliberately didn't show several vacant recharging stations. That reddit post has since been picked up by various news and blog sites, which has been used as further verification from yet more news sites.

    3. Re: Classic by tempo36 · · Score: 1

      Blocking 3 of 6 stalls and yelling at people is still a dick move and is still harassment. Sometimes, it turns out, there are enough drivers there that they really need all the charging stations. Saying "well they didn't block all of them...FAKE NEWS" makes you look like an idiot.

  2. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Tesla owners are scared of guns. They would cry if they saw one.

  3. Just have them towed. by tempest69 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

    If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

    1. Re:Just have them towed. by haruchai · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

      If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    2. Re:Just have them towed. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      Now that would be embarrassing.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really-- call a tow company in there, block them in, and hook up towing gear, and charge them a stiff fee.

      If it isn't a tow away zone then somebody screwed up.

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      Forget a damn pick-up truck, a Tesla Model X P100D can, and has towed an actual Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner. That's a 130 tonne aircraft being pulled 300 meters.

      See one of these many, many articles. Or this one.

      For a Model X, a pick up truck isn't going to be a problem.

    4. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They'd lose - 1000+ lb-ft of torque for the Duramax engine.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    5. Re: Just have them towed. by gagegage · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep.

      Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 from Supercharger in âDe-ICE-ingâ(TM) feat
      https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-x-tows-chevy-silverado-1500-pickup-truck-de-ice-ing-supercharger/amp/

    6. Re: Just have them towed. by WhiplashII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This should be stated more clearly: Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 with the Chevy's rear wheels locked!

      Pretty cool!

      Although I don't see the point of ICEing. Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    7. Re:Just have them towed. by WhiplashII · · Score: 1

      No, see my other comment. They can tow the truck with the wheels completely locked up.

      It isn't about power, it's about friction on the wheels. If the two vehicles have roughly the same friction coefficient, the Tesla wins because it is heavier. It also has higher starting torque, but that doesn't actually matter because the truck's wheels will be free-spinning while it is dragged forward.

      --
      while (sig==sig) sig=!sig;
    8. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Need traction as well as torque.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    9. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The Tesla loses. The Duramax trucks weigh more, have more contact patch, and more torque.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:Just have them towed. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Need traction as well as torque.

      Teslas are heavy (all those batteries) and many have 4WD.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    11. Re: Just have them towed. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 with the Chevy's rear wheels locked!

      2WD trucks have most of their weight on the undriven (also unlocked) wheels. Teslas have lots of weight and many are 4WD.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    12. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Done in 1972 with a Chevy pickup. Except it wasn't a 787-9, it was a 747 that weighs 170 tons. It's really not that impressive; in fact, here's a man pulling a 142 ton 777. I guess the model X comes up short here...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    13. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Here you go, actual dynometer measurements - at the wheel. Electrics can be strong and powerful, but they do not rule the road. There are stronger, higher power ICE engines on the road - the Duramax being one (with 850+ lb-ft at the wheels).

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    14. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Most big diesel personal trucks are heavier - and usually 4WD (with lots of dually configurations) as well.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    15. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Good point. Guess it depends on how much coal they have in the bed. Of course a good steam motor might be able to out torque a Tesla. The last ones produced had over 1000 ft-lbs at zero rpm. If they had one on each wheel...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re: Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Trepel Challenger 280 is the recommended tug for the 787; it uses a 180 lb-ft 4 cylinder diesel engine. Probably 80% of cars for sale today have more torque than that. Yep, just about anything can tow a 787.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    17. Re: Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gear it down, and anything CAN tow a 787. The GP was correct... If a man can pull a 777, then bragging about how a vehicle can tow a lighter plane really isn't all that smart, is it?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    18. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 2

      I loved my diesel when i owned one, but one thing it severely lacked was bottom end torque. Had to get that motor spinning over a grand before it hit its power curve.
      Now steam, 1000+lbs of torque at zero rpm, 0-75 in 5-10 secs (wiki quotes 10, another site, 5, but that might have been Hughes's souped up one) doing 900 rpm at 75. 1500 miles to a tank of water. Drawbacks included that 30 seconds warm up, high periodic maintenance and a price close to $20,000 when a Ford cost $400. Quieter then a Telsa too.
      https://www.hemmings.com/magaz...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    19. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      The Jay Leno episode with that car was very entertaining! It's a great thing he saves those old cars and lets people learn about them...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    20. Re: Just have them towed. by mixed_signal · · Score: 1

      If the plane's brakes are off, then it's not that hard... It's _meant_ to roll, and it's light weight.

    21. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      A model X getting towed away - actively fighting - against a smallish H2 (basically a mid-size Checy pickup with an SUV body). The Hummer wins unless it basically turns off its traction control.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    22. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    23. Re: Just have them towed. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 2

      Although I don't see the point of ICEing. Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      You've clearly never been to North Carolina.

    24. Re: Just have them towed. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      the tesla is on the same and he's being gentle with pulling it

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    25. Re: Just have them towed. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Cool, but the test is not that clear.

      Conditions are icy in this video, and while you can claim that both the truck and the car are subject to the same conditions, the most important factor in those conditions are the condition and type of tires.

      We have no data on that.

    26. Re: Just have them towed. by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      The parking brake was set (rear wheels only, though)

    27. Re:Just have them towed. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      There were some more recent attempts too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_car.
      I vaguely remember an article about the Saab steam car. IIRC, they had a prototype with decent performance and running quite silent. Fuel consumption was a bit higher than in a conventional ICE though.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    28. Re:Just have them towed. by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      Make it a bet, that's more polite anyway.

      Tesla owner walks up to Bob's big old Ford 4x4 and tells Bob "I bet I can tow your Ford over 50 feet even if you have the brakes applied". Bob might agree, being sure of winning. Now we have a contest where nobody gets shot. We might even get a YouTube video out of it :)

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    29. Re: Just have them towed. by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      Trying to teach us what it is like to be a person who owns a pickup.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    30. Re:Just have them towed. by 605dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your tag line is great. I assume you are trying to say if you want to regulate business and guns, and provide healthcare that you are a Nazi?

      Here let me try.

      The Nazi Party: Militaristic, anti-Immigrant, anti-Gay, anti-Minority, aggressive and resentful of how history has treated our kind. Make Germany Great Again!

      --
      Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a difficult battle. - Plato
    31. Re:Just have them towed. by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      This guy actually did a proof of the concept, though with a relative's truck.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    32. Re: Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      And not even allowed to have a passenger due to the 3500kg weight limit of cars.

      What? What are you on about? Every vehicle has its own gross weight allowance.

      There's a reason pickup trucks are not popular in Europe.

      The lads on Top Gear (at the time) stated that you had vans instead of pickups because if you had a pickup, someone would nick stuff out of the bed every time you stopped at a red light. Here in the USA, we seem to have much less of that kind of crime for some reason. It's not that nobody ever steals anything out of a pickup truck, but for the most part you can drive from place to place picking stuff up without worrying about it unless you are foolish enough to put items in the back which are both small and valuable. Of course, if you park your vehicle and leave it long, someone might break a window just to steal some change in your cup holder, but that holds true around most of the world.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re: Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This should be stated more clearly: Tesla Model X easily tows Chevy Silverado 1500 with the Chevy's rear wheels locked!
      Pretty cool!

      What's cool about that? If the wheels are locked they'll break loose easily, and once you break them loose they have much less traction.

      Although I don't see the point of ICEing. Is this people trying to be stupid for stupid's sake?

      They are not trying. It comes naturally.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Zero wheel RPM? Sure. It's called power-braking. You step on the brakes, rev the engine to make power, then you slowly let of the brakes. Then your wheels start to rotate - with big torque, in a controlled manner. the RPM that matters in these cases is wheel RPM, not engine RPM - which means you can have that torque you want at the start of movement.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    35. Re:Just have them towed. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

      A 747 weighs 170 tons? On which planet?

    36. Re:Just have them towed. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative

      This one. The operating empty weight of a 747-100 is around 172 tons. That was the model pulled in the 1972 commercial.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    37. Re:Just have them towed. by rainer_d · · Score: 2

      AFAIK, the problem is not towing (though that in itself is usually not too good for the gearbox) but braking.

      I saw a video of a VW Touareg (V10) towing such a jet. While the Touareg needed extra sandbags to improve traction, the driver said the techs had told him not to use the brakes, under any circumstances. They certainly weren't designed for such a weight.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    38. Re:Just have them towed. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      This thread is a hilariously silly pissing contest. You can basically make an engine whatever size you want. Both Teslas and pickup trucks are generally towed around (in large numbers) by these, for example:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    39. Re: Just have them towed. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The lads on Top Gear (at the time) stated that you had vans instead of pickups because if you had a pickup, someone would nick stuff out of the bed every time you stopped at a red light.

      the lads in top gear are/were a bunch of idiots.

      We also have plenty of lorries where stuff mysteriously doesn't get nicked all the time.

      We also have rain which makes things wet and having a van keeps it dry.

      Vans are also lower in the back and so rather easier to load large and heavy items and many are sized to hold shipping palettes.

      Also we have pved roads s we don't need 4WD everywhere

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    40. Re:Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I loved my diesel when i owned one, but one thing it severely lacked was bottom end torque. Had to get that motor spinning over a grand before it hit its power curve.

      A grand is great, though. If your standard is steam, sure that seems high, but if it's gasoline then that's incredibly low. Even turbo gassers tend to not come on until at least 1500 or so.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    41. Re:Just have them towed. by azcoyote · · Score: 2

      I think it's funny that the YouTube video of the Austrian man pulling the 777 has this disclaimer: "RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government." Clearly somebody is worried about propaganda or "fake news," but I find it hard to decipher how this video might secretly be a covert disinformation attack against the West. Perhaps it's supposed to trick the U.S. Air Force into hiring a fleet of Austrians to pull their airplanes into position? Am I missing something?

      --
      Incipiamus, fratres, servire Domino Deo, quia hucusque vix vel parum in nullo profecimus.
    42. Re: Just have them towed. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Do they have enough juice to tow the truck if they came to the station to re-charge? Or they just tow it 100m and leave it in the middle of the road?

      Otherwise: this is the most exhilarating news I have seen in a week :-)

      (heart) Tesla

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    43. Re: Just have them towed. by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >Plus the park brake isn’t set

      You daft.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    44. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      I loved my diesel when i owned one, but one thing it severely lacked was bottom end torque. Had to get that motor spinning over a grand before it hit its power curve.

      A grand is great, though. If your standard is steam, sure that seems high, but if it's gasoline then that's incredibly low. Even turbo gassers tend to not come on until at least 1500 or so.

      Truck never had a tach so I'm not sure how much over a grand. What I do know is trying to get moving on a steep hill with a load was a clutch killer. Once moving, that little truck just kept going. It was only a 2.5 litre and really needed a granny gear as well as another overdrive one.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    45. Re:Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It was only a 2.5 litre and really needed a granny gear as well as another overdrive one.

      Most engines that size don't really come on until about 3 grand. Makes for nice mileage when just pootling around town, but it's a clutch killer if you don't have a slush box. Torque converters are magical.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    46. Re:Just have them towed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's an example of how it's done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClDpGqj3PGA

    47. Re: Just have them towed. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      The parking brake usually only applies the brakes on the rear wheels. The truck's rear wheels are not turning.

      Regardless of the torque of the Tesla, I'm really not at all surprised by this. There isn't much weight above the rear wheels of the truck which means the towing vehicle doesn't need need to apply much force to shift it. Don't forget the model X is all wheel drive and is pretty heavy itself.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    48. Re: Just have them towed. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I don't have a van or pick-up truck, but I have a tarp over the crate of my cargo bike and often leave groceries (and occasionally something more expensive) in it, and nobody has ever stolen anything.

      Before I had the tarp, some assholes would occasionally use it as a trash can, though.

    49. Re:Just have them towed. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      They don't need a tow truck. Teslas have a lot of low-end torque and a Model S or X could easily drag those pickups out of the parking spots.

      While this is certainly a funny idea, I'm not sure it's legal, and it's definitely an effective way to get into a fight and a lot of other trouble.

      Better let some authorities tow them.

    50. Re: Just have them towed. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Cool, but the test is not that clear.

      Conditions are icy in this video, and while you can claim that both the truck and the car are subject to the same conditions, the most important factor in those conditions are the condition and type of tires.

      We have no data on that.

      Here are a few tug-o-war matches between a Model X and a Hummer & a Land Cruiser

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    51. Re:Just have them towed. by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1

      The water is part of the transmission though, not the fuel source.

      --
      LRN 2 SWM
    52. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      The water was usually the limiting consumable on steam engines, especially early ones so rather then going from gas station or rather coaling station to station, it was water source to water source when planning a route.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    53. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yea, when I first drove the diesel after little gas engines, the power curve felt so backwards with tons of bottom end quickly fading away as rpms went up. Unluckily when you've only got a few horses (IIRC, 70 in that motor), you want minimal loses. It was cheap to run though, 40 mpg (imperial)

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    54. Re:Just have them towed. by MidSpeck · · Score: 1

      It's just letting people know where the TV station gets their funding so people can make more informed decisions. Do people really think that _everything_ Russia does is an attack or attempt as disseminating propaganda?

    55. Re:Just have them towed. by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Hilarious!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    56. Re: Just have them towed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We also have rain which makes things wet and having a van keeps it dry.

      We have everything here in the states.

      Vans are also lower in the back and so rather easier to load large and heavy items and many are sized to hold shipping palettes.

      Only if they're FWD, which sucks.

      Also we have pved roads s we don't need 4WD everywhere

      We don't need 4WD everywhere, either. Lots of those trucks and even so-called SUVs are 2WD, and lots of the 4WDs will never actually be driven off road.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    57. Re: Just have them towed. by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      Again, the two first videos are on snow/ice. You can't even see the tires in the first one, and the third one specifically indicates at the start that is on "Wet tarmac"

      Viewing them did bring up an equally important factor that I left out. Just as standard ABS help to brake in these conditions, Tesla obviously handle detection of loss of static friction and compensates during acceleration as well.

      I don't want to take anything away from Tesla - this is a good thing, but it is not in line with the original assertion, and I have yet to see one of these 'tug-o-war' on dry tar.

    58. Re:Just have them towed. by boskone · · Score: 1

      depends on the diesel. my 8,400lb truck can do 0-60 in 5.x seconds and has over 1,100 lb-ft of torque. also, with compound turbos, it spools beaucoup fast

    59. Re:Just have them towed. by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Yes, with a big enough engine, just the inertia will help when you pop the clutch. I'd guess modern fuel pumps help a lot too as they can vary their timing better then the old mechanical ones. You've still got limits on the power band though and definitely need a transmission.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  4. Re:Good for them. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We will replace you. And all your coal rolling desperation does is tell us you know it too.

  5. So, just call the police. by bob4u2c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Take our your cell phone, take pictures of the trucks (and license plates if you can). Then call the police and report that trucks are blocking a public entrance. When the cops finally show up, show them the pictures and file a report.

    How hard is that?

    Or I guess you could just pull out your guns and have a showdown. Seriously are people this stupid?

    1. Re:So, just call the police. by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seriously are people this stupid?

      If you don't know, you don't want to.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:So, just call the police. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

      Except it's typically not a public entrance; the charging stations are on private property and the trucks aren't blocking any sort of a driveway. From the reports that I've seen, the gas station attendant tells the truck owners to leave, and they do. The truck owners are still assholes, but reporting them to the police probably won't accomplish anything unless they refuse to leave the property.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:So, just call the police. by magarity · · Score: 1

      Carry an extension cord. Park longwise behind the pickups blocking them in. Plug in with the extension cord.

    4. Re:So, just call the police. by rekoil · · Score: 2

      Great idea, except that the current that gets pulled from a Supercharger would melt a standard extension cord to slag in seconds.

    5. Re:So, just call the police. by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is america we are talking about. Those rednecks are probably the cops themselves.

      --
      -
    6. Re:So, just call the police. by tempest69 · · Score: 1

      Then get something with a bit of girth to it.

    7. Re:So, just call the police. by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      "We didn't see them block the entrance. If it happens again, give us a call."

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    8. Re:So, just call the police. by imidan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, until goddamn the hillbillies beat the shit out of you and destroy your phone. Putting yourself into physical confrontation with that kind of person, and threatening them with the police, is a great way to find out just how stupid they are.

      Getting into a gunfight with them is likely to result in either your death or felony charges.

    9. Re:So, just call the police. by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. It's a dick move, but not a crime.
      The best response is to tweet a pic of the trucks and hope the owners get forever doxxed out of any job that pays above minumum wage.

      That'll learn 'em!

    10. Re:So, just call the police. by Geeky+Don · · Score: 1

      Superchargers deliver 250 amps at 400 volts. Where would you suggest getting an extension cord that could handle that?

    11. Re:So, just call the police. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Call the police and request them to be towed. If I parked my car at a gas pump to block them from filling up, you can be sure the response would be the same.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    12. Re:So, just call the police. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's a dick move, but not a crime.

      Who told you that? It is criminal trespassing, since they're there with willfully malicious intent. The threats are also crimes. If they're in the roadway and not on the property, then it may be reckless driving, which is also a crime.

      Deliberately blocking access to a place of business absolutely can be regarded as a crime, even without the threats.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:So, just call the police. by Hans+Lehmann · · Score: 1

      They're typically parked in a charging station, not a roadway, and they're not (from the reports that I've read) making any outward threats to anyone. They're only trespassing if they refuse to leave after being asked to do so by the property owner. Are they assholes? Yes, but being an asshole in and of itself is not a crime.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    14. Re:So, just call the police. by laird · · Score: 1

      The SuperCharger can hit 250 amps of power. No "extension cord" can survive that. Though perhaps you could plug into a 110 socket somewhere...

    15. Re:So, just call the police. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure making them lose their job is going to make them more rational or less angry.

      Best response would be to get them some therapy to figure out what's wrong with these people.

  6. Gee what a surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Redneck trump supporters being total dickheads. Not surprised by this at all.

  7. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    so i guess itâ(TM)s okay for tesla drivers to block entrances to gas stations and yell obscenities at all the drivers? makes sense.

  8. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You will never own a Tesla, you have never even been in the same room as a gun, and you would never confront anyone over the age of ten years. These facts are immediately obvious to every single person who reads your post.

  9. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They’re wrong.

    FTFY

  10. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those that publicly claim to be a gun owner are seldom capable of effectively using a firearm. Beware of the person with a single firearm ... and keeps it a secret.

  11. Hehe by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First they ignore Tesla
    Then they laugh at Tesla
    Then they fight Tesla <--
    Then Tesla wins

    1. Re:Hehe by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please point to where oil and coal companies aren't getting subsidized but getting by entirely on their own merit.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:Hehe by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Well, their sales figures are solidly beating BMW's in the US right now...

    3. Re:Hehe by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, Teslas are selling as fast as they can build them.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not quite true, apparently, although they are getting close. However, worldwide, Tesla's stales are only a few percent of BMW's. And unlike Tesla, BMW consistently manages to make a profit from those sales.

    5. Re:Hehe by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Except that the paraphrased quote was not a Gandhi quote, contrary to popular belief.

      But I do agree that Tesla is overvalued, and also, that the public subsidy of that company should end. Also, their valuations are ridiculous, when they have constantly been in the red, in sharp contrast to, say, Ford. Also, the truckers are right about one thing. There are about 10 million truckers in the US. One day, all those jobs may well get automated, and we may just use self driving trucks. But to force that now, and driving 10 million people out of work, w/ the domino effects on their families, is something that the truckers are completely justified in protesting. I doubt that it's so much the electric charging vs the gasoline or hybrids, as opposed to the complete automation of their jobs. Musk is the one who deserves to be replaced by a droid.

    6. Re:Hehe by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I'm European, to me that's par for the course.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    7. Re:Hehe by mcvos · · Score: 1

      You mean they pay some of the highest bribes. There's a lot of oil money in politics.

    8. Re:Hehe by mcvos · · Score: 1

      And they're primarily valuated on how fast they're able to ramp up their production to meet that demand.

      That's an unbelievably comfortable place to be in for any company.

    9. Re:Hehe by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      According to a report from what appears to be a very anti-fossil-fuel organization*, the US spends $20 billion per year on fossil fuel subsidies. Sounds like a lot right? But it turns out the US collects $35 billion in fuel taxes.

      Now there's probably some non-monetary benefits that's not being counted, but if the government is making $15 billion a year from it, I don't think it's a subsidy overall.

      * Their mission is apparently "exposing the true costs of fossil fuels and facilitating the coming transition towards clean energy"

    10. Re:Hehe by Calydor · · Score: 1

      If the industry would crash and burn without the money they get from the government (to the tune of 20 billion dollars) then I'd call that a subsidy. It doesn't matter that the government ultimately makes a profit from it.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    11. Re:Hehe by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they would crash and burn?

  12. They'll do it as long as they get attention... by ClarkMills · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suspect that it's a ploy to dissuade buying electric by presenting a "Electric car owners will be bullied" sentiment. I have no doubt it's orchestrated as I am sure the drivers or the utes have better things to do really.

    The inevitable EV revolution is being attacked on many fronts.

    1. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      The inevitable EV revolution is being attacked on many fronts.

      There is no great conspiracy against EVs. It's a combination of:

      Range anxiety.
      They're too damn expensive to build, compared to ICE vehicles.
      Electricity isn't cheap (especially so, if you buy it from a charging station) enough to make a quick ROI.
      In most of the USA, electricity generation isn't particularly "green".
      Used EVs don't become really affordable (compared to an ICE vehicle of the same vintage) until the batteries have become sufficiently degraded.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    2. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Plenty of gas cars cost more than a base model 3.

      Which is a strawman argument. Just because you can spend as much on an ICE vehicle as an EV, it doesn't change the fact that new EVs start at approximately double the cost of the cheapest ICE car. The cheapest new ICE car is the 2019 Nissan Versa S Sedan at a MSRP of $13,255.

      "Range anxiety" is a non issue for the vast majority

      Knowing you can just stop almost anywhere and quickly fill up is like having insurance. It's comforting to know it's there, even if most of the time you don't need it.

      Given that there are early gen Prius

      The Prius is a hybrid, and can still limp along on its ICE if the battery is depleted. The average age of a car in the USA is 11.6 years. Most lithium batteries will be shot to shit at that point.

      So, you can stop with the FUD and bullshit about electric cars

      I'd love nothing more than to see the technology become truly affordable and match ICE vehicles for longevity. We're not even close to that point, yet.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    3. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Nope, guess again redneck

      I was born well north of the Mason–Dixon line, but thanks for playing the "irrelevant personal attack" card.

      the average new car price in the US last was $36,978

      The average is skewed by wealth inequality in the US. The average middle class American can't afford a new car priced at the median average.

      Far cheaper as well, at $0.11 it costs about as much as 2-3 gallons of gas to charge a Tesla from completely flat.

      According to the EPA sticker on the Model 3, the estimated savings is $4,500 over 5 years. If the objective is purely to save money, a cheaper car still wins hands down.

      The Prius was used as an example because the battery packs are showing that they are outlasting the idiot naysayers like yourself by leaps and bounds.

      Being utilized in a hybrid, the Prius batteries aren't subject to the same usage patterns as an EV. We already do know what happens to EV batteries when they're run hard with improper cooling - older Nissan Leafs have extremely poor resale value due to suffering extreme battery degradation. It is also reasonable to assume that since the lithium battery technology used in current generation EVs is similar to battery technology used in portable electronics, that expecting them to last well over a decade (again, the average vehicle age in the USA) might be a bit too optimistic.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    4. Re:They'll do it as long as they get attention... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Wealth inequality is the weakest argument possible you could make for the average price of a car, since the poor buy used cars.

      And how many EVs do you see at Buy-Here-Pay-Here dealers?

      You can drop $5000 on an used all electric today that still has a few years left on it's warranty and charge it at home saving far more in transportation costs.

      This is the cheapest used EV I found near me. $5.5k and 40% battery life remaining. What planet are you living on?

      You still haven't made a single valid or evidence based claim

      Buy an EV if it makes you happy, but it's likely not going to save you any money over simply buying a cheaper, fuel-efficient ICE car. The numbers don't lie.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  13. I really don’t get it by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What exactly do the truck drivers think they’re accomplishing? And what do they think they’re protesting?

    I realize these guys are likely not the brightest bulbs in the box... but seriously, they must have at least a vaguely-defined reason they are choosing to do this.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:I really don’t get it by mysidia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything are self-centered arrogant SOBs who compare p***s links with each other; couldn't care less about being green, and often either don't think the rules apply to them -- or challenge the rules frequently through open defiance, Such as parking as to straddle two parking spaces, ignoring the lines, double parking locking people in, pulling in parallel to perpendicular parking, or pulling in perpendicular to parallel parking, etc.

      Many Supercharger stations are in sectioned off area of a larger parking lot ---
      the pickup drivers' ego is probably irked that someone else is special, other than them. Tesla drivers get dedicated Tesla-only "parking" areas in a crowded space, and that alone drives them batshit insane.

    2. Re: I really don’t get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just carry a few #6 screws with you. I see an asshole do that diagonal parking bullshit, I palm a spike and slip it into the tire treads as I walk past. Most people don't learn the first time, but most learn after the second. Costs me two seconds and five cents, costs them a tire, an afternoon and a tow.

      Sure it isn't eco friendly, but that isn't the point. I'm not trying to save the world. I'm just punishing assholes.

    3. Re: I really don’t get it by usr1987 · · Score: 1

      And Tesla owners are not. Used to be BMW. Now is Tesla.

    4. Re:I really don’t get it by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      They are protesting the size of their brains. They feel short changed, unfairly discriminated against, victims of tiny brain syndrome, being born a dumb loser, being human genetics bitch, fucked in the head, from conception to death, unfairly victimised by everyone in society smarter than them.

      Is it fair and reasonable for those born genetically, well, stupid, to be so victimised by society, at the very bottom of the pay scale, doesn't not matter, colour, creed or religion, born to a shitty minimum wage with no escape, well, unless they have a smarter parent (only needs one to be smart, to support the others) to sponsor well the dummy in a smarter world.

      It's not fair, they might well be annoying arseholes well deserving of being losers but being born that way doesn't mean they should be victimised for it, sure kept at arms distance but those well behaved enough deserve a living wage and to not be ruthlessly exploited. When they are, they play up and become a problem for the normies, stop being prejudiced against them in their chance at a reasonable life.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:I really don’t get it by sjames · · Score: 2

      Not so sure. These are the same people who spend hundreds adding a switch to detune their engine so it will blow clouds of soot. They tend to use it to blow soot at economy cars as well as electric and hybrid.

    6. Re:I really don’t get it by Locutus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most likely it is because they keep hearing EV's are the future, that gasoline and diesel fuel is wrong and you know, the whole 'global warming is fake' thing. Probably listen to guys like Rush and Alex who'll say anything so they've probably heard there'd be people coming to take their truck away from them like the Gun Police they constantly talk about coming to collect their guns. So all of This gets focused on those who are proving EVs are viable.

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    7. Re:I really don’t get it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Treating them as bizarre space aliens instead of fellow Americans who should have their needs cared for just like everyone else is the problem. You're dividing us into US and THEM. Vladimir Putin would be proud. He has to pay people to incite rhetoric like this; you're doing it for free.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:I really don’t get it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time; even when they're not actually hauling anything

      Most people I know only own one car. If it's a pickup truck, that's what they drive.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:I really don’t get it by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's just part of the political divide that completely dominates US culture. Electric cars mean concern for the environment, which means the owners can be assumed to be hippy liberal types who hate freedom and deserve to be covered in good American soot.

    10. Re:I really don’t get it by tfried · · Score: 2

      They're protesting the (anticipated) change in social norms.

      For a long time, in America, you could count on any "green" idea to be laughed at by a solid majority, either for being totally unrealistic, or for being obviously un-American. Thus no sane American would ever be expected to adjust their personal lifestyle towards anything green.

      Now, there is increasing evidence that some green ideas are not so unrealistic at all. (I hesitate a bit to call Tesla "green", but clearly they are riding that wave, and have a green reputation). Those pickup drivers are rightfully afraid that, in a decade or two, their own true American neighbors, too, will expected them to switch to EV vehicles, and possibly even to pick up other green ideas, as well. And they don't want to.

      Of course, class issues do play a role, too, as Teslas are also relatively costly, but I think at the heart of the issue that is a plain and simple fear, that their personal lifestyle is going to have to change, eventually. (The list of fears is long, here, I'll just throw in "vegetarianism" to illustrate the scope of the threat.)

      Bicyclists are even worse "traitors", for obvious reasons, but since those are still so few, and so "obviously" laughable, they are not a real threat, yet.

    11. Re:I really don’t get it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      More to the point, what are they smoking, and what meds are they on?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    12. Re:I really don’t get it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1, Insightful

      by limiting myself to only one vehicle, I'm being a whole lot more green than the twits who keep a stable of them.

      Is this a demonstration of the intellectual capacity of a pickup truck owner? It's how much and what you drive, not how many you own that affects the environment. I'm pretty sure your pickup puts out more smog than a sedan, other things being equal.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    13. Re:I really don’t get it by pz · · Score: 1

      My feeling is many of the people that own and drive personal pickup trucks all the time ...

      I drive my pickup all the time because it is the only car I own. I suspect that is true for the majority of pickup owners, because it is true for the majority of vehicle owners.

      ... even when they're not actually hauling anything

      I also suspect that people driving their cars are similarly not using their vehicles to their fullest capacity and potential the vast majority of the time. Most of the time cars are carrying one or two passengers, a far cry from their full capacity of four or five.

      But why let a few bits of common sense get in the way of a good screed?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    14. Re:I really don’t get it by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      They get treated as what they are based on their behaviour: arseholes.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    15. Re:I really don’t get it by gtall · · Score: 1

      It's fairly simple, the truck drivers hear and see the push for enviro-friendly technologies. Electric vehicles are one of these. They figure that the environmentalists will eventually come for their trucks. So they are doing their bit to dissuade people from buying electric vehicles. Hence the car and truck companies will think twice about the push into electric vehicles, and Goddess-forbid, electric trucks.

      If you are a guy and worried about people thinking you have a small dick, then you buy a big gas-guzzling truck that makes a lot of He-Boy noise. Other enfeebled males now look at you as though you have a big dick and feel they too must have one of these noise-generating male empowerment machines.

    16. Re:I really don’t get it by geekmux · · Score: 1

      What exactly do the truck drivers think they’re accomplishing? And what do they think they’re protesting?

      I realize these guys are likely not the brightest bulbs in the box... but seriously, they must have at least a vaguely-defined reason they are choosing to do this.

      "For the fuck of it."

      "Hold my beer."

      That's probably some of the more popular reasons they have, but I'm sure I could reference any You Might Be a Redneck guide for a few hundred more.

      Even the dullest bulbs in the box, make fun of these kinds of idiots.

    17. Re:I really don’t get it by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Oh fucking please. You're just spouting enclave paranoias. As another commenter said, people usually own one vehicle. If it's a pickup, that's what they drive. A million pickups plus sold each year; the numbers say you're hysterical.

    18. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I drive my pickup all the time because it is the only car I own. I suspect that is true for the majority of pickup owners, because it is true for the majority of vehicle owners.

      Owners of more-expensive vehicles tend to have multiple vehicles, and pickup truck prices have been trending upwards as they have added content. Couldn't rapidly find any stats, though, so I don't have actual numbers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:I really don’t get it by buddyglass · · Score: 2

      What exactly do the truck drivers think they’re accomplishing? And what do they think they’re protesting?

      Just guessing here. Accomplishing: irritating Tesla owners, making it less convenient to own a Tesla. Protesting: subsidies to Tesla, people who don't like fossil fuels, environmentalism in general.

    20. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most likely it is because they keep hearing EV's are the future, [...] so they've probably heard there'd be people coming to take their truck away from them like the Gun Police they constantly talk about coming to collect their guns.

      No, it's because they've heard those things, and they are stupid enough and have little enough historical perspective to believe them. We don't ban vehicles in the USA, we ban sale of vehicles, and let them age out.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:I really don’t get it by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Teslas are also relatively costly...

      Have you looked at the price of pickups lately?

      https://www.ford.com/trucks/f1...

      Cheapest F-150 starts at about $30k, and that's bare-bones. The most expensive one starts at $67k before you add in options.

      If Tesla actually ever comes out with their $35k Model E variant, they then overlap pretty much the entire F-150 price-range, save for the $28k-$34k sliver.

      And in case a delicate little F-150 isn't for you, if you want to go with the Super Duty Fords, top of the line there starts off at $86,500 before you add options. There's a reason Ford is dropping a lot of its automotive lines in favor of just pumping out F-Series. They're cheap to make, and they successfully sell them at ridiculous prices.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    22. Re:I really don’t get it by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Thanks Ivan, but we really don't need your input here. We're talking about our own people here, and fuckshits like you trying to sow discord are exactly who we don't want. Fuck off back to St. Petersburg, troll.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    23. Re:I really don’t get it by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      And, Tesla is coming to take my truck away ha-haaa
      Tesla coming to take my truck away ho ho hee hee ha haaa
      To the funny farm
      Where life is beautiful all the time
      And I'll be happy to see those nice young men
      In their clean white coats
      And Teska is coming to take my truck away ha haaa

    24. Re:I really don’t get it by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You don't need to haul things that often to make it worthwhile. Pickups aren't usually that fuel inefficient, maybe 20 mpg instead of 30. Given the high costs of renting (including extra gas), if you have to haul a time or two a month, it's worth buying.

      Also, cute slight of hand at the end, but you just showed a pair of people having a pair of cars. Which doesn't help as each person needs to drive somewhere different.

      And while I certainly don't want to live in a rural area, telling people that they cannot is likely one of the causes of them being pissed.

      I really don't get the pick-up hate. But then again, I don't get the Tesla hate (except that my tax dollars are subsidizing your car).

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    25. Re:I really don’t get it by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      That all you right-wingers can do? Projection? You're less than pathetic.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    26. Re:I really don’t get it by johnw · · Score: 1

      Pickups aren't usually that fuel inefficient, maybe 20 mpg instead of 30.

      Ouch! I know American gallons are smaller than real ones but that really is terrible fuel consumption. You can drive a decent sized car and get 50 mpg without difficulty.

    27. Re:I really don’t get it by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Just curious, but are you really saying that people who intentionally block others from using a service because of some bizarre prejudice are not assholes?

      Your comment is far more Ivanish than the GP. The vast majority of blue collar workers wouldn't do this. Your attempt to equate a bunch of assholes with generic blue collar workers, and then complain that people who criticize the assholes are "dividing the country", is a dick move, and exactly the kind of thing the trolls promote.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    28. Re:I really don’t get it by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      Well, I had a quick look at ford.com. And their cheapest truck, the Ranger... which you used to be able to buy for $15K-$20K depending on options... now *starts* at $25K, bare-bones, and can push $50K equipped. So, right off, if you choose more wisely you're already in Civic Si and BRZ territory, and really close to an MX-5. Go up on the options list, and you could easily be in a 370Z instead. Fully-loaded, and you could be in a Type-R, a decent 2, 3, or 4-Series, or even a RWD Model 3.

      And their more-popular F-series just gets worse from there. I was able to use Ford's configurator tool to spec an F-series, fully-equipped, at $94,965. That is not a joke. And that would put you into a nicely-specced M-Series, a midrange Model S, or a low-end 911. Hell, you're just *barely* short of GT-R money at those prices.

      So... this whole blue-collar "working class hero" in opposition to those rich and arrogant "liberal technocrat elites" business? I'm not buying it for a second.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    29. Re:I really don’t get it by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

      FWIW, we own both a Chevy volt and an F150. Since I work from home, my wife typically drives the volt and I drive the F150 mostly as a backup vehicle or as you said, if we need to haul something (mulch, tree branches, multiple kids, etc). Just wanted to let you know not all truck owners are raging assholes.

    30. Re:I really don’t get it by exomondo · · Score: 1

      That's the GP's point. They chose a pickup truck to drive around all the time even though they rarely to never haul anything.

      95% of the time they probably don't but every other weekend I do take out the trailer, camper or jetski and/or throw a couple of trail bikes in the tub. I'm certainly not opposed to Tesla and if they can make a reasonably priced vehicle that can do that then I'm all for it (in theory it could be immensely powerful too). I don't know whether they have a solar option or battery booster so you don't have to worry about range when offroading (somebody in the convoy always has, or can get, extra fuel if somebody else runs out) but that would also be important.

      Let's not pretend these few douchebags in the picture are representative of all people who own pickups or that everybody who owns a pickup is irrationally opposed to EVs, the only issue is that there isn't yet an EV that satisfies that market segment. I'm not sure what they're protesting about but certainly depending on your use case there are a lot of reasons to buy an EV and a lot of reasons not to buy one, that doesn't mean the person who does or doesn't buy one is irrational.

    31. Re:I really don’t get it by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Pickups aren't usually that fuel inefficient, maybe 20 mpg instead of 30

      More like 20 mpg City, 23 mpg Highway Instead of: 30 mpg City, 40 mpg Highway.

      Driving only 2/3 the miles is kind of a big deal; it means you need 1.5x as much fuel which also means 1.5x as much
      fuel cost, for city driving, and 2x as much fuel and 2x as much cost for highway driving.

      For an average driver, that's $1600 a year in gas, instead of $800.

      And there's a simple solution for occasional hauling --- fit your car with a towing hitch, and get a small trailer.
      As I was saying.... Pickup Trucks don't make any economic sense at all to purchase, unless its a work truck, and you
      have a special professional justification or good reason to be hauling a lot of stuff with every or nearly every ride.
      Otherwise, it makes
      more sense to own both car and pickup --- one or both vehicles purchased used, and use pickup only when necessary.

      The environmental impact for manufacturing such vehicle is ~5 Tons of CO2; approximately the same as 1 year's worth of driving.

    32. Re:I really don’t get it by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Well, I had a quick look at ford.com. And their cheapest truck, the Ranger... which you used to be able to buy for $15K-$20K depending on options... now *starts* at $25K, bare-bones, and can push $50K equipped. So, right off, if you choose more wisely you're already in Civic Si and BRZ territory, and really close to an MX-5.

      And if you choose more wisely than that you can have a BMW S1000RR and a lot of change, it will be much faster and much more fuel efficient than an MX-5 too. Of course it also has other problems that the MX-5 has like not being able to carry my trail bike, transport my kids or dogs or tow the camper and it certainly can't get very far offroad.

      Everybody is aware that for the price of one thing you can buy many different things. I have a pickup because it suits my needs, if there was an EV that did the same then that'd be great but there isn't (yet).

      So... this whole blue-collar "working class hero" in opposition to those rich and arrogant "liberal technocrat elites" business? I'm not buying it for a second.

      It might serve you well not to paint everybody with the same brush, is every pickup owner - much less every pickup owner who specced up a $94k truck - protesting against Telsa or EVs? No of course not. You've got maybe a couple dozen of the tens of millions of pickup truck owners protesting something here.

    33. Re:I really don’t get it by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Hardly. Vehicles depreciate mainly by miles, not time. You will own the vehicles longer, or someone will.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    34. Re:I really don’t get it by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It's fairly simple, the truck drivers hear and see the push for enviro-friendly technologies. Electric vehicles are one of these. They figure that the environmentalists will eventually come for their trucks.

      And they probably will. And rightly so, if you see some of the dirty smoke these trucks spew. They're not exactly clean machines.

      If they want to keep their trucks, they should encourage cleaner trucks.

    35. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We don't ban vehicles in the USA, we ban sale of vehicles, and let them age out.

      In 1996 the government banned the sale of leaded fuel. If you're looking at it purely historically they certainly could just ban the sale of gasoline.

      My first car was a 1960 Dodge Dart with a 318 ci big block, and a 650 cfm carter carb. It had 12:1 compression and also required leaded fuel, so I had to run both octane booster and lead substitute. Removing leaded fuel from the road did not remove my car from the road; it only forced me to purchase a fuel additive. Your comparison is not only un-apt, it is inept.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:I really don’t get it by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Vehicles depreciate mainly by miles, not time.

      Idling, miles, and years each take their toll in their own special ways, and to varying degrees depending on design, equipment, and storage conditions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  14. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And here, ladies and gentlemen, we have the perfect slashdot comment. It's garbage like this that drags this site ever closer to being another Twitter.

  15. Re:Speak a language they can understand by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a Tesla and own several guns. If this was happening to me, I would construe it as a threat upon my being and I wouldn't hesitate to put the assailant(s) to death.

    This is why a mental health assessment should be required for both gun ownership and a drivers license. You should have neither.

  16. Re:Speak a language they can understand by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Funny

    your airsoft gun will just make them angry, basement dweller. besides, you'll get a sunburn.

  17. LOLZ - mostly not happening by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We have quite a few of those recharging station at the malls and railroad stations around here, 16 within 2 miles of me..... never seen them blocked by anything or anyone, ever.

    1. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Informative

      no one asked for article implying incidents at a whopping total of 3 stations out of 16,000+ were indicative of anything either.

      I live near one of the largest cities in the United States (also one of the "top ten EV friendly cities"), nothing like that has ever been reported here.

      In short, what this article is trying to make a news item out of, mostly is not happening anywhere, to anyone.

    2. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      In short, what this article is trying to make a news item out of, mostly is not happening anywhere, to anyone.

      As is every article. If it was a commonplace, everyday occurrence, it wouldn't be news.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    3. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      Yes, if you personally have not experienced it, it can not possibly happen.

    4. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Tugrik · · Score: 2

      I've not seen any group efforts to block superchargers but this week I did see a single incident. I pulled into a supercharger station in Sandy, OR and plugged in to get a top off. I was the only Tesla there using them at the time. At the end of the row, however, was a huge diesel van; one of those 'earthroamer' types that was jacked up on high suspension with big tires, parked sideways across three of the spots.

      A few minutes later the driver got back to his vehicle. He saw me sitting in my model 3, flipped me off, got in his van and took off with a good bit of tire squealing. No other communication; just a flip of the bird and he was gone.

      Then I see this /. story and have to wonder how often this kinda thing happens. It was mostly just puzzling. :)

    5. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you live in a blue state.

    6. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Geeky+Don · · Score: 1

      The chargers you are referring to aren't Tesla superchargers. Those don't get scattered around like the lower power chargers you frequently see and the appearance is quite distinctive.

    7. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      This happened in Oregon? The place where cyclists catcall pedestrians?

    8. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      So you agree, the article is bullshit spin.

    9. Re:LOLZ - mostly not happening by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Would be BIG NEWS if this were happening coast to coast at dozens of stations. But Instead, it's making mountain out of molehill.

  18. Re: Just a response to smugness by hey! · · Score: 1

    Are you really that fragile.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  19. Nice... by skam240 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nice, have these idiots vehicles legally towed and let them enjoy their ridiculous impound fees that most communities have. Maybe they'll direct their far right rage towards the bullshit government attitude towards the privatization of impound lots. Your car was towed on a Friday? Good luck low income person being able to afford getting your car out of impound on Monday.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re:Nice... by thesupraman · · Score: 1

      That depends very much on where the charging station is - many are on private property, and if asked to leave they must.

      So yes, a representative of the property owner would need to ask them to leave before towing them.
      Of course, if a sign was put up warning them that non-tesla vehicles will immediately be towed at owners expense, then no such warning would be required.

  20. Prius drivers in good company by WaffleMonster · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Prius drivers in good company by jeti · · Score: 1

      As are bicyclists.

  21. Re:Speak a language they can understand by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Tesla owners are scared of guns. They would cry if they saw one.

    They seem pretty fond of flamethrowers though.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  22. I'm just spitballing here by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but they're probably angry at technocrat elites. If they're blue collar types odds are good they listen to right wing media which is often on the warpath against silicon valley and the like. Plus if they're blue collar then odds are good they're not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered.

    Still, I could be totally wrong. Like the author if TFA I'd love to just ask them why.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'm just spitballing here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not blue collar, and even I think saying Fuck You to the technocratic elitists is a great fucking idea.

    2. Re:I'm just spitballing here by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A lot of them just seem to enjoy upsetting "liberals", in the broadest possible sense.

      They feel that "liberals" had to good under Obama, with a lot of changes in their favour like marriage equality and other rights, and a general recognition by society that some behaviour was no longer acceptable. Now they feel things are swinging back the other way and are emboldened to to this kind of stuff.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:I'm just spitballing here by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Drink!

      What? (drinkypoo is long for 'drink', my first Unix login chosen back in 1991. 'drink' was taken by someone who never posted, go figure.

      AmiMojo makes broad generalizations about a group in a way that would totally "upset liberals" if said the other way around!

      What broad generalizations? It's a well-demonstrated and self-avowed tendency of many conservatives that they like to troll liberals.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I'm just spitballing here by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2

      You might try checking out the pricing of pickup trucks.

      I had a quick look over at ford.com today. And unless you're settling for the most bare-bones Ranger (Which is already ridonklously overpriced at $25K.); you're spending quite a pretty penny. With the F-series, which the googles tell me is the best-selling pickup of the lot of them; a middle-of-the-pack setup will put you well into the pricing of a nicely equipped BMW 2, 3, or 4-series, mid-range Infinitis or Lexuses (Lexuii???), or a very nice 370Z. And a fully-equipped F-series? Try $95K. At that point, you're spending as much on your pickup truck as one would on a Model S 100D w/ autopilot, a nicely-equipped M-series, or even a low-end 911.

      Oh, and that $25K Ranger? That is, as I said, only the most basic bare-bones model you can get. Equipped, the Ranger averages $35K and can hit $45K fully-loaded.

      So I'm not, for a second, buying into the "not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered" line. People who aren't doing so hot economically aren't dropping $35K-$60K, and higher, on trucks so they can sit around (not working) at Superchargers to harass and threaten Tesla owners. Hell, I AM doing pretty well financially right now; and I'm still driving my $17.5K Mazda3, and the only way I see myself upgrading to *anything* else in the near-term is if the redesign includes a new Speed3 or if Subaru brings back the hatchback WRX.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    5. Re:I'm just spitballing here by mcvos · · Score: 2

      if they're blue collar then odds are good they're not doing so hot economically since blue collar types got hammered in the last recession and never really recovered.

      It's a wild guess, but they might even be voting for the party that keeps hammering blue collar types.

  23. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then I have good news for you: He has neither.

  24. Re: Speak a language they can understand by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

    I know a guy with two firearm. His name is Johnny Storm.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  25. Extreme dumbassery on both sides. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    Big truck drivers must not have much to do. I wonder how long they waited for somebody to actually wanna use those chargers? Must have been a sale on Copenhagen and Budwieser.

    In TFA, Tesla driver reports “took them 10 minutes or so and one of them did that ‘I’m going to hit you’ maneuver after circling the parking lot.”

    WTF is a ‘I’m going to hit you’ maneuver?

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
    1. Re:Extreme dumbassery on both sides. by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Self-assumed victim preening.

    2. Re:Extreme dumbassery on both sides. by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      That is when you drive aggressively right at you as to actually drive right into your car but then swivel away at the last second.

  26. Re:There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Prices which will very soon look like a bad joke compared to the competition, which is going to come from car companies which have a depth of engineering talent that Tesla cannot hope to match.

    And who do we have to thank for that, other than Elon Musk?

    Because the last time the established car companies made electric cars, it did not end well.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  27. Re:Bullshit by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    WHILE watching Fox 'News'

  28. Re:Headline : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Straight to nazi, huh? It's no wonder we can't have a discourse anymore...civil or otherwise. Yes, I'm saying you're part of the problem

  29. Re:I can imagine the arguments by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Tesla: Why are you blocking the entrance?
    Redneck: Go home, fag!
    Tesla: OK, I'm gay. But why?
    Redneck: Fuck you!
    Tesla: (drops his pants)

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  30. Re:Speak a language they can understand by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    oh boy, John Wick lives, and threatens geeks on slashdot. I'm shaking in my boots, er slippers, right now.

  31. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I fairly clearly said diesel FIRES are harder to start. "Die in a diesel fire, they're harder to start." Jesus man, reading isn't a beartrap, stick a toe in and learn how it works. As if I needed to deign to insult diesel mechanics, lol.

    The poor filthy SOB's have bigger problems than what I think about their choice of fuels. Besides, if you don't make your own bio-d, you're missing the entire point of that platform.

  32. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Er high heels. We know you.

  33. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Taxes are how evil liberal Muslim gay atheists steal the pretty women from us real Muricans. Fucking bastards with their "good higene" and elitist "literacy".

    Trumps gonna build that wall with clean coal and make murica great like back in the fifties!

  34. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shooting someone because they inconvenienced you is pretty much always considered illegal. There is no threat to life, so no reason to shoot. Yes, someone who wants to do what the GP stated he did is either mentally unstable or clearly acting with criminal intent.

  35. Yes, he does know how taxes work. by thesupraman · · Score: 2

    Actually I think you dont have a clue how taxes work.

    What the grantparent said is true. Both teslas and charging stations are subsidized by taxes.
    As of course are a lot of other things, however it does not make it untrue.

    1. Re:Yes, he does know how taxes work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All gasoline in the US is HEAVILY subsidized, but saying charging stations are subsidized and that's "why you don't like them" because you don't have an EV is just ignorant head-in-ass selfish zero-math Republicanism to the T.

    2. Re:Yes, he does know how taxes work. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to include about 75% of the Department of Defense's budget in your subsidy calculation.

  36. Sooner or later by jd · · Score: 2

    Someone is going to die.

    Whether it's a pregnant woman being driven to hospital in a Tesla dying of complications, a kid getting hit by something thrown, raised tempers turning ugly, someone failing to stop in time for the parked cars...

    And the truckers will deny it has anything to do with them. Legally, they'd probably be right. Blood on innocent hands.

    The Tesla drivers will deny any blame, too, if it's a case of raised tempers. Stand your ground is a legal defence.

    It wouldn't matter if they had to stack the bodies in a double 40' trailer. Nobody's guilty here, your honor.

    Who the hell gives a shit what you think of such and such a political ideology that nobody here can define anyway. Who the hell cares what you think of Tesla or truckers?

    Is the absolute certainty of accidental death of someone who has nothimg to do with either side a desired outcome? This isn't whatiffery, this is guaranteed if these incidents keep happening.

    At what point is it more important to find and apply a fix than to whine about the bug?

    My guess is never. The days when getting things done mattered are long over.

    Now get off my lawn!

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Sooner or later by kenh · · Score: 1

      How will blocking a charging station lead to death?

      You'd have to, for example, only own a tesla, not own a home charging station, only have access to the one (now blocked) charging station, and have a medical emergency when you have an inadequate charge to get you to the hospital... AND you live in an area not served by an ambulance service.

      Yeah, that's a certainty.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:Sooner or later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Yeah, that's a certainty.

      If you think the scenario you outlined above amounts to theater of the absurd, remember what year it is and who is president of the United States, and how many people said exactly what I quoted above about the guy in 2015. Shit happens.

    3. Re:Sooner or later by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      How will blocking a charging station lead to death?

      "Irate Tesla owner inserts Supercharger cord into pickup truck's gas tank, details at 11"

      (yes, I know, it wouldn't work in practice due to safety interlocks, etc)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Sooner or later by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      If you have to stop by a charging station on your way to the ER, then you're going to have to ask Cletus to take the patient the rest of the way in his pickup.

    5. Re:Sooner or later by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're harshing the narrative.

  37. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They aren't protesting anything. They are just being jackasses. I think the pickups should be crushed into little cubes. It would not particularly upset me if the owners were inside during the operation.

  38. Re: Speak a language they can understand by usr1987 · · Score: 1

    Interesting. But you don't fit the Tesla owner model. So get rid of one

  39. Hillbillies at their worst by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    Hillbillies and yahoos know no better. This just reveals that they have seen the writing in the wall, and that they are shitting in their pants.

  40. Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by kenh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In what is quickly becoming a problem for some Tesla drivers

    It's happened TWICE - that's the same number of times Hillary lost her bid for President...

    Let's not over-react.

    --
    Ken
    1. Re:Define 'quickly becoming a problem' by tomhath · · Score: 1

      that's the same number of times Hillary lost her bid for President...

      Which tesla drivers still haven't gotten over, two years after the fact.

  41. Re:Headline : by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

    Good Lord go back to /g/ and leave /. in peace.

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
  42. Re: Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Its ironic but the religious the ones that did accept facts" - Learn how to form a coherent thought and get back to us. You're not repeating Hannity verbatim and original thoughts only confuse and anger you.

  43. Anti-Tesla Pickup Drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Do they actually think the Tesla owners are going to say, “Gosh fellas, you’re right. I’m going to sell my Tesla today and buy a Ford pickup.”?

  44. Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side ? by Btrot69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm a suburbanite and I've been driving a hybrid Camry since 2007 and I like it.
    But I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

    I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

    That is especially the case today, when Tesla has been publicizing the success of their SELF-DRIVING electric SEMI-trucks. Tesla says that in a convoy, they are more energy efficient than trains. They even have a standing order for HUNDREDS of these new trucks from Walmart, rural America's love/hate store/employer.

    For years, the only way that a rural American could escape and see the world was to either drive a truck or work on the railroad.
    Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

    There are political and economic solutions that could provide jobs AND save the environment, but its not going to happen by spewing all this filth.

  45. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Hortense+Yaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tesla owners have laser pistols.

  46. It's not hard by Excelcia · · Score: 1

    When you can't find an obvious reason, look for who stands to gain. Traditional auto companies have been fighting a delaying battle against Tesla for years. Tesla is way ahead of them in an area they know they will eventually have to compete in. Plus Tesla is one of the most short-sold companies in history. Doesn't take much to spark a temporary fluctuation in stock prices.

    I would be astonished if there weren't some of these motives behind this. Likely a combination - a lot of those who have short positions on Tesla are funded by traditional auto.

    This is the same kind of FUD Microsoft tried against Linux with SCO. No different.

  47. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Btrot69 · · Score: 1

    No, I think there are plenty of other jobs that rural America can easily adapt to. Obvious ones are solar, wind farming, growing biofuels,

    I requires political leaders who can win people over to a new view of the future.

    I think trolling "Anonymous Cowards" like you, who stick everyone into a "category", and flippantly pose war as the solution don't help very much.

    But we will learn to ignore you.

  48. Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by neiras · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

    Fuck these fragile snowflakes who are so afraid of change that they'll go park their trucks in front of another guy's filling station. That's small ball. You don't see Tesla owners blockading filling stations.

    They don't get to be assholes and expect that anyone will listen to them. The American Yahoo is something to be derided and mocked. I've met them - if you aren't like them, you're their plaything or their enemy. They'll screw you mercilessly if they have an angle, and they'll laugh to their buddies about it later.

    For years, the only way that a rural American could escape and see the world was to either drive a truck or work on the railroad. Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

    Railways will continue to exist. Trucks will continue to exist. The rednecks will still be able to hoot and holler and do doughnuts in walmart parking lots at midnight. Soon they'll be able to stagger out of their shitty bars and have their trucks drive them home without the usual DUI along the way. You don't need to be doing the driving to see the country.

    I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

    The fact is, moving goods around and monkey-wrenching are not going to be fallback jobs for Joe Schmoe anymore. They only ever paid reasonably well because they're shit jobs that no one with half a brain wants. Those jobs will go away, because it's cheaper and more pleasant to deal with a self-driving vehicle than it is to deal with Joe Schmoe. Time for Joe to do something with his life.

    1. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, those pickup truck drivers are the REAL victims here! They should be allowed to molest Tesla drivers in peace! How dare someone harshly criticize them -- on the Internet, no less! -- simply for exercising their right to be assholes? It's a horrible injustice, I say!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do you also shed a tear every day for buggy manufacturers and horse whip makers? Their livelihood ripped right out from underneath them! Progress is so cruel!

      The fact is EVs would have been a thing a long time ago were it not for the intervention of the ruling monopolies of the time. Gas engines are a cancer that we've been forced to tolerate for too long.

    3. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You go! Comfort the comfortable, afflict the afflicted! Speak truth to the powerless!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "The rednecks will still be able to hoot and holler and do doughnuts in walmart parking lots at midnight."

      Ah, no. True independent four wheel drive and traction control is too easy to do with electrics. Sadly, soon not even the driving-a-front-wheel-drive-in-reverse doughnut truck will be viable.

    5. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by neiras · · Score: 1

      Congratulations for providing the least empathetic, ugly bigoted view of your fellow Americans on this thread. You, not them, are the problem.

      Wait... You want me to give the yokels consideration and empathy in a thread about yokels being inconsiderate assholes? Ha!

      No one but rednecks actually likes rednecks or thinks their way of life is worth preserving. They're tolerated because they are a source of cheap labor and easily-controlled, useful-idiot Republican taxpayers too stupid to realize they're being played. They also provide a market for expensive consumer credit and consume huge volumes of trash Chinese goods at insane markups. Smart people mine them for big money.

      They will be forced to adapt to new things, because they don't come up with anything new. They'll get over their egos and delusions of grandeur because they won't have a choice. And if they get the guns out and start acting like Afghani warlords, they'll get run over. No one will tolerate that shit.

    6. Re:Redneck snowflakes are the worst. by neiras · · Score: 1

      you sound completely reasonable. not surprised people probably try to beat your ass every time you open your smug mouth. seriously, you sound like the type of incel that hates women too. good luck in life buddy.

      Nobody tries to "beat my ass" when I open my mouth, because I don't associate with lowlifes like yourself, Mr. Anonymous Coward.

      I understand that it might be a bit of an eye-opener for you to discover that the broskis with their brewskis aren't actually considered kings among men by the rest of civil society. Happy to educate you.

      While we're at it, here are some relevant tips on the correct use of capital letters when writing in the English language.

      Hope that helps!

  49. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I doubt it, at least until the uber-Troll-in-Chief goes off to prison and we stop ALLOWING the Republican faggots to gaslight the rest of America with their anti-science, anti-education, anti-law, anti-professional regime.

    So you're half right, you just don't know how to point out the elephant in the room like it requires to be acknowledged and dealt with.

  50. Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Amiably agree to just split, no civil war necessary. The middle and the South get their "news" from Fox, Breitbart, and AM pundits; and thus have a completely different view of gov't and reality.

    Why keep clashing with them over pollution, healthcare, science, etc.? Just fucking split. Let them have their own reality to themselves.

    1. Re:Time to split the USA by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      So the "middle and South" do what they will to bring down environmental regulations to the point where they can manufacture and pollute as they like. What does the other half do about the environmental fallout created by their laissez faire approach?

    2. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What does the other half do about the environmental fallout created by their laissez faire approach?

      Sanction them.

    3. Re:Time to split the USA by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Your second sentence has it backwards. The "completely different view of gov't" was around before Fox, et al.

    4. Re:Time to split the USA by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't get all that high and mighty about who is the most polluting. Of the ten top polluted cities, CA has 8 and the other two are Phoenix and New York City.

      The only river I've ever seen on fire was in the upper east coast, not the middle or south.

    5. Re:Time to split the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Amiably agree to just split, no civil war necessary. The middle and the South get their "news" from Fox, Breitbart, and AM pundits

      This is how it looks if you ignore reality. But in fact, much of the south has become extremely progressive. Their votes are being miscounted or just made irrelevant (through gerrymandering) to keep the conservatives in charge, but several of those states (notably including Texas) would probably be blue today if not for gerrymandering. We need to pull through this thing together. Giving up on the union is what Putin wants. Don't be his useful idiot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re: Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We'll have more drones.

    7. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      We need to pull through this thing together.

      We'll that's a great ideal, but if it continues to fail, we need to consider splitting.

    8. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      He would get rid of alot of illegals and democrats in the process

      The Wall won't stop illegals. Business has enjoyed their cheap labor and has legally bribed GOP to keep it coming. GOP has only given the issue lip service and punted when they have had a chance to change the flow.

    9. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, "Kick extremists on both sides out" may work if actually performed, but how would you pull that off? Splitting by geographical boundaries is usually much easier than splitting population by personality or beliefs.

    10. Re:Time to split the USA by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

      funny part is nobody know if this would happen in the Middle of the country yet, I live in Wisconsin and we don't have these Tesla charging things yet. or Tesla dealers but i have yet to see anyone "Roaling Coal" at Pedestrians, Cyclists or Prius drivers. to be honest people in the rural Midwest wold be to polite for this.

    11. Re:Time to split the USA by Dusanyu · · Score: 1

      And than they stop selling you food, you are aware that the area of the country you want to separate from is where all the Farms Food Production facilities are?

    12. Re:Time to split the USA by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Why would they automatically want a trade war?

    13. Re:Time to split the USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And than they stop selling you food, you are aware that the area of the country you want to separate from is where all the Farms Food Production facilities are?

      The food is produced in California. We produce far more than we need, and much of the acreage in the midwest is dedicated to export or fuel feedstock crops.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Re: Good for them. by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    You got me. The Russians have been on this account for more than 10 years, slowly building up an excellent karma record, all in pursuit of a fiendish conspiracy that ends with snarking at an Anonymous Coward. ;P

  52. RTFA by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    and look at the pictures they took of the trucks doing it. Those aren't hillbilly trucks. In the first picture they were late models, MSRPs starting at $27k. The second picture it was 2 SUVs and 1 pickup with a pricey looking lift kit. Second pick somebody had the hood popped and was working on something, so it mighta just been somebody who had a breakdown, first picture looked legit though and it's probably just middle class blue collar guys pissed off at the elites they keep hearing about on Fox News or one of Sinclair media's Fox News wannabes.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  53. Re: Just a response to smugness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    pretty much all of those "foreign cars" are made in america dumbass

  54. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Gas? Would you like to rethink your post?

  55. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These North Carolina pickup drivers really took the time and effort to block Tesla drivers from charging their cars?
    Don't these pickup truck drivers have anything better to do, like impregnating their sisters/daughters/mothers? I mean, it is the South, after all.

  56. Re:Good for them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see any reason to be so personal or vengeful on the attacks. Tesla runs on electricity, which can be made with many things, including coal. That is not the choice Tesla owners get to make. Tesla owners get to make the choice of not having to decide what form of energy to use, and at over 100 MPGe, they are using a lot less of whatever it is.

    If you get in a Tesla, and put your foot on the accelerator, you have to like what happens next, it is pretty awesome. And if you are somehow tied to ICE engines financially, you have to worry about what happens next. There are few and declining reasons to cling to a gasoline car for the vast majority of the population.

    Now if it's Tesla in particular they loathe, take the trucks out of the EV charge slots, which is inevitably going to result in a lot of fines and impound fees, and fund an EV car company that makes a cheaper car. I do not think Tesla's place in the automotive universe is certain. They make the best product, but they're up against an industry that knows how to make "just good enough" into a weapon, and they're still at a price point which isn't attainable to the masses.

  57. Re:Bullshit by SirSlud · · Score: 1

    being subsidized should be familiar to lots of people outside of major urban areas

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  58. Republican snowflakes taught us all they know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And now that the rednecsk are being treated as they treat others,suddenly it's mean.... right....

  59. Faith by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

    Seems like conservatives don't actually have faith in the free market. If they really believed electric will fail, why intervene?

    --
    Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    1. Re:Faith by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Seems like conservatives don't actually have faith in the free market. If they really believed electric will fail, why intervene?

      You don't even understand the argument. They believe the free market WOULD do those things, but that it's being interfered with by EV subsidies. Then you tell them about fossil fuel subsidies (both literal and indirect) and they change the subject because they willfully refuse to permit any new information to enter their head and shake things up. Learning makes them uncomfortable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Faith by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      But you just argued my point. If they did believe in free market, they would argue against fossil fuel subsidies. But they support them because they know free markets don't actually work.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    3. Re:Faith by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      But you just argued my point. If they did believe in free market, they would argue against fossil fuel subsidies.

      I think the intent of their comment was to point out that most people don't actually believe there are subsidies supporting the fossil fuel industry.

    4. Re:Faith by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's true. I think they pretend not to believe, but they excuse themselves internally. They're allowed to have subsidies because they naturally deserve it, but everyone else must play by the rules.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
  60. Yeah maybe they keep hearing by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    How we have been killing the planet and how it triggers more and more disasters that will kill us all off
    https://ourworldindata.org/wp-...

  61. If it was me by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    If I needed to use the pumps and it was blocked, I would park in front of the truck so it cannot move. can't help it if the batteries died.

  62. Re:Speak a language they can understand by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Good luck in court with that one you macho douche

  63. Re:Speak a language they can understand by spongman · · Score: 1, Troll

    drunk rednecks vs. faggots. pistols at dawn!

  64. Re:Bullshit by spongman · · Score: 1

    maryland only has one coal-fired power station.

  65. Re:Speak a language they can understand by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, Tesla owners have phased plasma rifles in the 40 watt range. At least the ones in the early-experience program do.

  66. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    > think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to
    > the jobs

    BFD. To use the buzzword... cloud computing posed a "very real threat" to traditional "rack 'em & stack 'em"-style IT & operations jobs. In fact, it basically killed them; unless you want to be a datacenter tech for Amazon or Google. But who cares? We all just learned our ways around AWS, GCP, and Terraform. Problem solved. Hell... I call it an improvement. I'd not realized, before updating my own skill set, how much Id grown to view mucking about with hardware to be the least-fulfilling and most-annoying part of the job.

    It's not, after all, like Teslas never break down or malfunction. The skillset needed when the do is simply different; that's all. It's not like mechanics, and the like, can afford not to keep their skills up already. Working on a modern Mercedes turbo-diesel is a far different deal from keeping a '95 Civic on the road. Moving up to a Tesla is just the next step up or right on the skills tree.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  67. Re:Speak a language they can understand by basecastula+ · · Score: 2

    Hit TV show right there.

  68. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Barsteward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    unfortunately there are far too many irresponsible gun owners out there with shit for brains

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  69. Re:Bullshit by Barsteward · · Score: 2

    they are "smug" because they have an EV? that chip on your shoulder must be getting heavy.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  70. Re:Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    are you mentally old enough to drive?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  71. Re: Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 2

    "f it's their tax money being wasted on some asshole Tesla driver." how does that compare to all the tax money being used to prop up a dying industry from the 2 centuries ago?

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  72. Re: Speak a language they can understand by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Certainly strong enough to cause some serious paint damage on those pickup trucks. That's not a suggestion, by the way, wink wink...

  73. Re:There's no need for them to "fuck" Tesla ... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

    Well, many of the people driving the car would have loved to buy it from General Motors. But GM preferred to have them scrapped at the end of the leasing period.
    So this one seems to be a case of politically wanted (by GM itself) failure.

    Now we go into round two with much more capable cars by multiple manufacturers. The Chevrolet Bolt and the Hyundai Kona Electric come to mind. And of course, the Tesla Model 3. Not exactly the cheapest cars, but much more serious competition this time than the GM EV.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  74. Re:Speak a language they can understand by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    Yep, it's one of the referral benefits. You need about a hundred referrals if I'm not mistaken.

  75. Re: Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    Step 6: work out how to simulate an EV for the data connection handshake with charger

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  76. Re:Good for them. by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    the mistake you are making is that you are expecting these few childish truckers to be logical or thoughtful, its hard for them when they are so racked with jealousy of someone having a more than them.

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  77. Re:Bullshit by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    The tax subsidies are actually hurting Tesla right now. They are being phased out (cut in half from january onwards, and going down further later on) while remaining in full effect for many others.

    (GM's will be cut in half next quarter, too)

  78. Re: Speak a language they can understand by vux984 · · Score: 1

    "the definition of "mental health" is inherently political"

    I guess we can just make stuff up, and declare it is a fact.

    "diagnosis of "mental illness" has been used to suppress political dissent by many different tyrannical regimes."

    Some people are dangerous, unstable, and crazy regardless of who is in charge.

  79. An interesting question: by drolli · · Score: 1

    Is there anything in the terms when buying a Tesla which allows Tesla to run a license-plate scanner in every Tesla car looking for these people (which may owe them compensation for using the charger station without being a customer)? - I am not suggesting they should do it, but could they?

  80. Re: Speak a language they can understand by mukinrestak · · Score: 1

    Much like Islam, redneck is not a race. He's a bigot, and probably a classist, but we've seen no evidence of racism.

  81. Land of the free by k2r · · Score: 2

    home of the stupid bullies.

    Trump as a President fits perfectly.

  82. Re:Bullshit by mukinrestak · · Score: 2

    One of the lesser known functions of the highway system is for national defense. It's not just about civilian shit.

    Also, those non-urban areas have people that pay their taxes just like the urban areas.

    Also, again, those highways to nowhere are what connect your urban areas together so you can move between them, and connect farms to your grocery stores so you have food to eat.

  83. I don't think it's our Slashdot Tesla haters by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    They don't strike me as being a trucking demographic, but more of a mom's basement demographic.

    The pickup protesters in the story probably see a row of EV charger parking spaces as being "stolen" from them. It's the same people who resent seeing handicapped spaces. The boutique mall next to me now has a row of ten Tesla spaces, off to one side so there is less conflict with the ICE population.

  84. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The right-wing in the USA operates under a lot of myths that they tell themselves about the other side. One thing they believe is that if it ever "came down to it" their side would obviously win in any kind of civil war that they like to fantasize about.

    It's because they operate under the belief that they must be an entirely homogenous group so the other side must be as well. Since they perceive the "typical" left-winger as some kind of weak willed pansy they assume they must all be like that.

    Which as an aside, a right-wing myth is in play with the gov't shutdown as well, which is the right-wing pushes the narrative that almost all gov't employees are democrats that are leaching off their tax dollars when the reality is the gov't employees are split much in the same proportions as the rest of the country, about 30% republican, about 30% democrat, and the rest independents.

    You also see it in rhetoric about who receives gov't social welfare benefits. They love to present the myth of them all being inner city and minority when the reality is that there are more rural whites receiving social welfare benefits than city minorities.

    But back to my original point, one myth they love is that republicans surely have all the guns and make up all the military and law enforcement when the reality is that an estimated 45% of guns are in the hands of democrats and that while it's true republicans have a majority in military and law enforcement, it's only a little more than half.

    In spite of what the NRA likes to push there are loads of gun owners and enthusiasts who see no issue with some common sense regulation around guns, and that's not just democrat gun owners but republicans as well.

  85. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Tesla owners have laser pistols.

    No, they have Musk flamethrowers. Just the thing to use on vehicles containing gas tanks.

  86. Re:Speak a language they can understand by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    LOLOL You're a posing liar. Great preening though.

  87. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As a gun owner and concealed carry permit holder in Pennsylvania, you are completely wrong. Anything other than an immediate life-or-death situation is not a justification for brandishing weapons or threatening death. If I had a Tesla and someone was yelling at me while blocking the charging station, I'd leave the area and call the police regardless of if I was carrying or not.

  88. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ever eat any food? Where'd it come from dumb fuck? Your entire urban existence is subsidized.

  89. Re:Speak a language they can understand by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Stop talking, thank you e-tough who we all know is not. We know you.

    We know you too, Anonymous Coward. Run along now, and play with the other cowards.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  90. Re: Speak a language they can understand by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Beware of the person with a single firearm ... and keeps it a secret.

    Maybe. If it's a big secret, how much range time is he getting?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  91. Re: Speak a language they can understand by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    "diagnosis of "mental illness" has been used to suppress political dissent by many different tyrannical regimes."

    Some people are dangerous, unstable, and crazy regardless of who is in charge.

    You're both right. And sometimes, someone dangerous, unstable, and crazy is in charge...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  92. All I can say is this: by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    if the bros driving those trucks were real men they would have backed into the spaces. What sort of truck driving sissy parks a truck nose in?
    They should all be driving Priuses.

  93. Good for the goose, good for the gander by tomhath · · Score: 2

    "...if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” - Maxine Waters

    "at a gasoline station"...hmmm? Maybe it isn't a good idea to incite that kind of activity.

  94. Re:Headline : by spiritplumber · · Score: 1

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Go chuunibyou somewhere else.

    --
    Liberty - Security - Laziness - Pick any two.
  95. Re: Speak a language they can understand by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    It won't confuse anyone. An electric truck would have to be that big in order to have enough battery to do a full day's work for a regular truck.

  96. Re:Bullshit by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Don't bother. I know his type. They think milk comes out of a milk carton, cereal comes out of a cereal box, and that it's possible to live in 70 degree comfort year round at 45 degrees north with solar panels and AA batteries.

  97. Elon Musk can tackle this by conoviator · · Score: 1

    Musk is nothing if not clever and audacious. I'm sure he's designing a whiz-bang death-ray module for the Tesla that will handle these yahoos quite well. Of course, the unintended consequences may get out of hand.

  98. Re: Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nearly all solar panel installations that don't have a battery are directly feeding the grid that everyone is pulling from. Do your research next time.

  99. Everyone wins! by Socguy · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why these folks are upset. Tesla's are made in America... so... jobs... and If EV's ever gain significant market share, the price of gas will plummet. They can fuel their trucks at rock bottom prices!

  100. Re:Just have them towed. - Already been done by mspohr · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  101. Re:Speak a language they can understand by rainer_d · · Score: 1

    They aren't protesting anything. They are just being jackasses. I think the pickups should be crushed into little cubes. It would not particularly upset me if the owners were inside during the operation.

    Ah, the good old "pressing arrangement"...

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  102. Re:Just have them towed. - Tesla wins here by mspohr · · Score: 1
    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
  103. Relevant Laws by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to the states that have laws covering this:

    https://pluginsites.org/plug-i...

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  104. Fighting the future for no damned good reason by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    This is utter stupidity. What are they thinking? Are they thinking that pickup trucks are going to become obsolete or somesuch nonsense? LOL, no, pickup trucks will remain a staple of transportation because of their utility. Let's see how upset these pickup truck owners are when Tesla or some company that comes later starts rolling out full-size plug-in electric pickup trucks that have more horsepower than even the largest V8 ICE pickup truck has right now? That they can then have a high-capacity charging post installed at their house and not ever have to go to a gas station again? If they really want the roaring of a big internal-combustion engine to feel manly they can install a sound system to simulate it, I guess, but really, what's the problem? Nobody is going to take their trucks away from them. They can still have rifle racks in the back window and a Confederate flag flying from it all they want, huge offroad tires and jacked up all they want.

  105. Re:I can imagine the arguments by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Redneck: Not gay if you're pitching.

  106. See what happens when cousins marry? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    I'm disappointed to see some support expressed here for these drooling morons. This is the right wing base in all its hideous glory. These pickup drivers deserve nothing but our disgust and contempt, and maybe a week in jail with nothing to read but math and science text books.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  107. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    I think that electric vehicles pose a very real threat to the jobs and the future of many rural Americans, who feel that their work depends on trucks, cars, vehicle repair, oil, oil equipment, coal, scrap yards, etc, etc.

    That's just junk.

    Cars have little to do with coal,

    That is especially the case today, when Tesla has been publicizing the success of their SELF-DRIVING electric SEMI-trucks.

    So? So has Ford. And a bunch of truck companies. Self driving vehicles are coming this is essentially inevitable and has nothing to do with vehicles being electric. All the major manufacturers are exploring the tech. So why target tesla?

    They even have a standing order for HUNDREDS of these new trucks from Walmart, rural America's love/hate store/employer.

    so why the anger at Tesla not Walmart?

    Tesla says that in a convoy, they are more energy efficient than trains.

    Smells like BS from Tesla to me.

    Its a fundamental part of American culture, and it doesn't escape these people that Tesla's development poses a tangible threat to that way of life.

    Rubbish. The inexorable march of technology, combined wit hcapitalism is the threat here and it's coming for good or ill. It's happening with or without Tesla, and I doubt tesla is affecting the overall timescale.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  108. No information on reactions of owners by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    No information how the situation was resolved.

    Call the police, tow the trucks?

    As for somebody yelling on your on the road: this is pretty much what road is for: for rage.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  109. Re:Speak a language they can understand by iggymanz · · Score: 1

    I'm flattered you have such fantasies about me, twink.

  110. Not in California, that's to be sure. by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    Because it's illegal under California Motor Vehicle Code 22511 and 22511.1.

  111. Re:Headline : by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    Quick, what is a Y chromosome and what effects does it have on a human which possesses one vs a human that doesn't?

    By itself? A Y chromosome has almost no effect on the development of a human fetus. The SRY1 gene which normally resides on it is responsible for penis growth - which occurs even if the SRY1 gene has transposed to the X chromosome. If your trying to argue there are only 2 sexes, you're ignoring that there are at least 6^12 major combinations of sexual genes which result in not 2 sexes, but a multidimensional spectrum with 2 clusters we call 'male' and 'female'.

    A person can have a penis, testicles, and a womb (one father of 3 found that out going in to have his "tumor" biopsied). You also see drug interactions that are often associated with 'male' occurring in 'female' patients. "Male" and "female" are convenient categories, but the reality is NOT as binary as many people think.

  112. Coal Miners Blocking Teslas Counter-Productive by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1

    Teslas need electricity which, in coal country, is generated by coal fired power plants. Gas cars, on the other hand, run on out-of-state oil. In other words, more Teslas mean more coal jobs.

    This is, on the other hand, a mildly counter-intuitive argument for why people in coal country who care about the environment should not currently buy Teslas.

    --
    OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  113. why they protest Tesla by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Had Tesla been a company just focused on making a better car, it would have been one thing. Sure, pack in all the tech you want - built in navigation, connection to CarPlay/Android Auto, rearview cameras, steering controls, et al. (OTOH, Tesla is the only car that commercial towing companies refuse to handle, since impossible to access the engine should the battery die. That's the moronic concept about basing all operations on batteries, rather than allowing for mechanically accessing, say, the hood.) But Tesla coming out w/ self driving cars - a solution looking for a problem, since most people enjoy driving their cars - is one more of those 'disruptive forces' that just threatens the livelihood of truckers - one of the biggest employers in the country, while having little to give for it.

    Yeah, over time, it's fine to assume that ultimately, self driving cars and trucks and planes and ships will be the norm, and that 50-100 years from now, no one will drive. However, to try and force that change now, which is what Musk, as well as companies like Uber and Lyft would love to do, only has major negative societal implications in terms of accelerating the hollowing out of the US, w/o having anything else to show for it.

    1. Re:why they protest Tesla by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      I would submit that there's a huge difference between enjoying a... spirited, shall we say... drive down Skyline's curves & hills on your leisure time; versus a daily trudge down 101 for work. The former, yes, I enjoy it greatly. The latter? If my commute included, in any capacity, the misery that is a peninsula commute on 101; I'd be pinching every penny to get myself into an autopilot-equipped Tesla.

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    2. Re:why they protest Tesla by mcvos · · Score: 1

      But Tesla coming out w/ self driving cars - a solution looking for a problem, since most people enjoy driving their cars

      I would love to have a self-driving car. The main downside to traveling by car compared to train or other public transit, is that I can't read while driving.

  114. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Actually, there aren't substantially more larger white people. That's becoming less and less true each day. Non Hispanic whites account for 61%. So not substantially more people as you suggest.

    Also where did you find that 13% number for whites. I didn't see that on the citation you listed. Only that 41% of the black population in any given month.

  115. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

    I'm a suburbanite and I've been driving a hybrid Camry since 2007 and I like it.
    But I don't think that insulting these truck owners (or vice versa) is going to help anybody.

    Screw that. I'm a suburbanite and I drive an F150. These guys are the same jackasses that terrorized all of the other kids in high school. Our society would be better off if we passed laws that made engaging in this kind of behavior punishable by permanently removing them from the gene pool.

  116. Re: Speak a language they can understand by vux984 · · Score: 1

    "Nah, he's right. Mental illnesses do actually exist, but deciding where to draw boundaries on them depends on the society in which they occur, and is related to the consensus over what's considered acceptable - which is a means to control who is listened to politically."

    The fool claimed it was justifiable to murder people who blocked an entrance to telsa charger, because he felt that amounted to a threat to his life.

    I don't think where we settle in a nuanced discussion on where to draw the line between bona fide mental illness and the politicization of mental illness is the issue.

  117. Why is this news? by adfraggs · · Score: 1

    A small number of asshats behaving like asshats shouldn't be news. We're making far too big a deal out of this and giving the asshats far too much publicity. I'd put this up there with a situation like a handful of errant teenagers loitering around a gas station making it an unpleasant situation for motorists to gas up. People are, and will continue to be, douche bags. Someone will inevitably not like what you're doing with your life, how you spend your money, what your political affiliations are. Most folks will keep quiet and grumble to themselves, others will feel like they have to do something about it and thus express their douchebaggery in a more direct and confronting way. These idiots will eventually be bored with what they're doing and get on with their lives.

  118. Re: Speak a language they can understand by orlanz · · Score: 1

    I thought Mr Musk gave them flamethrowers?

  119. Farmers ruin your therory by Dusanyu · · Score: 2

    I will admit my Father drives a Pickup but, he is a farmer he has his truck for Farm things, Like most farmers he will drive and repair his truck until it needs to be replaced. As such he also can't afford to own a car as well so my parents drive the farm truck into town to get food, banking ext. This may also surprise you but most farmers are very environmentally aware (after all one bad season or storm can make them loose the farm. so they combine trips. It is a forgone conclusion that your average farmer is not parking at a fast charger or "Rolling Coal" they are too busy for that sort of thing. Parking in these lanes is childish, but so is looking down at people who drive a truck out of pure necessity.

    1. Re:Farmers ruin your therory by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I will admit my Father drives a Pickup but, he is a farmer he has his truck for Farm things,

      A Farmer's farm pickup truck is definitely a vehicle used primarily for professional/work reasons,
      e.g. Actually hauling large heavy loads around in a farm, and picking up and dropping off the materials and products related to business conducted by the owner of the vehicle.

      And not used nearly as much for driving when not for the purpose of hauling stuff.

      Which is specifically not the type of pick-up truck owner I'm referring to.

      Look at the pickups in the photo at the charger... these are really shiny with no visible wear, they do not even look like vehicles that have seen much use, let alone hauling for a work purpose.

      You can likely go to a used car lot and purchase 2 to 3 used pick-ups and 1 regular car, all suited for 10 to 15 years or more of additional operation for business use, for the price the owner paid to get one of the new shiny trucks in the photo.

  120. Hickory by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    We visited Hickory a couple years back when we were searching for decent size towns with lakefront homes to retire to. Hickory used to be the furniture capital of the U.S., and pretty much all of that industry is now overseas, so the town has a lot of good stuff from back when it was still doing well. But, it has a lot of skilled workers w/o decent jobs. The first restaurant we had dinner at, we discussed this with our elderly waitress who told us that if we moved there and were cleaning our own house, or mowing our own lawn, we were doing it wrong because the labor is cheaply available.

    So, just my speculation here, but I think what you're seeing is people protesting against what they see as wealthy people with things they can't really afford.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  121. Re: Rethuglicans loved using it. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    Sorry to disappoint but I'm not a Republican, or a Democrat for that matter. Quite frankly I wish all you extremists, left and right, would take your hate and prejudice and fuck off.

  122. Re:Speak a language they can understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    you can be easily killed in moments with simple chinese takeout chopsticks, 1 set, in at least 30 ways off the top of my head.

    Go on then. I'm going to go out on a limb and assume these 30 'ways' are all actually variations on stabbing. So what, through the ear, nose, eyes, maybe throat. I don't think a chopstick will go through a rib cage, well maybe if you do it right but probably not consistently. So come on then 20+ more 'ways'? Don't forget the within moments part.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  123. Re:Speak a language they can understand by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    I see you've played knifey spooney before.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  124. Re: Just a response to smugness by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Given how many charging stations are paid with public tax money - I'm quite all right with tax payers blocking chargers and preventing their tax money from being wasted on some asshole's car.

    Don't forget that Teslas are partially paid for with our tax money, and those chargers are also subsidized with our tax money, for a service almost no one can use.

    Tesla owners deserve everything they get.

    Didn't some car manufacturers get a massive taxpayer bailout not too long ago?

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  125. Re:Why don't you try to UNDERSTAND the other side by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Part of the bizarreness here is listening to people talk "rural" and pretend it's farms and stuff, when actually "rural" in the US means "Non-urban". You're saying you're a suburbanite? Congrats, you probably live in a similar neighborhood to the pick up drivers under discussion. You really think they live on farms?

    Your plumber, your house painter, your AC guy, they're not living on farms, they're living in places like the one you live in. And that goes for the jackasses hogging charger stations too. Yes, those people doing it are jackasses. They don't have economic anxiety, they're doing it to own the libs (which is ironic, I'll get to why in a moment) not to strike a blow for fair wages and more jobs.

    The reason these particular jackasses think of themselves as "rural" and (by-and-large conservative, suburban) Tesla owners as "city" (which is ridiculous) is because of the bizarre identity politics being perpetuated by the culture warriors. They think their "lifestyles" are under threat from "liberals", because that's what Fox News tells them, and they think liberals drive Teslas.

    Which we don't. 60% of Tesla owners are conservative, which is what you'd expect because they're expensive and their chief salesperson lives in a different world from that of most liberals, constantly belittling walkable communities and advocates for that, and treating poverty and poor working conditions as if they don't exist.

    The number of rural Americans is tiny. Most are suburban. A minority is urban. Most suburbs exist because of "White Flight" during the 1950s, 60s, and 70s, which has colored the politics of those areas. Most wouldn't want to admit in a million years that their parents moved to an artificial, poorly thought out, shit hole, because they were frightened of black people, so they cling on to this myth that they live in a "natural", "rural", part of the world that's somehow better than urban living despite being completely unnatural and unusual by historical human standards. And culture warriors like to take advantage of this. And because a handful of every group are assholes, the assholes take it too far, and try to run homeless cyclists off the road (I've seen this), or, less evilly but still obnoxiously, prevent people they think are "bad" by the standards of the culture warriors from being able to do what they want.

    The only funny part of this is that they're more likely to end up blocking the Tucker Carlsons of this world than the Keith Olbermanns, so in some ways it's a tremendous self own. And means you're right in an ironic way, because I think most of the problems in the US right now can be traced to people who promote culture wars and who harness racism and other prejudices to pit people against one another, and that fits the Carlsons of this world.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  126. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's bullshit, alright. Cityfags constantly mock, belittle, and bitch about "rural and suburban sister-fucking retarded backwards racist redneck hicks." Screeching like an autistic idiot when someone points this out is beyond pathetic and hypocritical.

    This is bullshit. _I_ have lived in cities and never said anything of the sort. And most of the people who I have heard call people "racist redneck hicks" actually live... in the suburbs. And they're not saying every non-urban person is a racist redneck hick because that'd mean they're calling themselves that, you stupid twat.

    No, you choose to live in a city, which will always be more expensive due to the basic functions of supply and demand. Take your head out of your ass and get off your high horse.

    No, I don't. I want to live in a city, but YOU STUPID FUCKS have made living in a city in the US completely impossible. The cities have been intentionally run down, with suburban planning rules enforced in the centers, and their transportation systems and infrastructure underfunded.

    Moreover, you're not addressing the point. The cost of living is sky high in the US, and it's because fuckers like you insist that the suburbs need massive subsidies. The result is that taxes are high throughout the US, massive resources are spent providing infrastructure to the suburbs, and most people end up finding the suburbs are the only place they can live thanks to subsidies that make it cheaper than than the cities, and because with infrastructure broken in most cities, they're completely clogged with traffic.

    This is completely fucked up, and pretending that it's A-OK because you once heard someone who you think lives in a city, but probably doesn't, call someone else a racist hick shows how out of touch and part of the problem you are.

    You are the problem. You are why the cost of living is so high. Fuck you.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  127. Re:Bullshit by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

    (Jesus Christ the mods are fucked up today)

    You deduced all that because I observed that we overspend on rural roads and that cities don't get their transportation needs met, huh?

    Want to explain the logic? Oh, you can't? Because you're projecting so far you've disappeared up your asshole? It's kinda weird, I've never seen a city advocate complain about people who live outside of cities, but I'm always coming across suburban idiots, like you, who think they're "rural", despite the fact they've never been within one mile of a cow they weren't passing at 70mph.

    I've lived in two countries, in both rural and non-rural areas. Policies that run down cities and force people to live outside of them are fucking stupid. People who demonize those who live in urban areas, such as the original poster, are part of the problem. You're part of the problem. YOU ARE WHY THE COST OF LIVING IS SKY HIGH IN THE UNITED STATES. Go fuck yourself you stupid scumbag.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  128. What a bunch of losers by euxneks · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what a bunch of losers.

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  129. Re: Speak a language they can understand by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Yes it would. We could all pretend to work, and our masters pretended to pay us.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  130. Re:Good for them. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "I don't see any reason to be so personal or vengeful on the attacks."

    You appear not to understand White Trash. (I'm white and have no problem with that frequently accurate term.) They are primitive vicious human garbage on a good day. The term isn't an accident.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  131. Re:Speak a language they can understand by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    The only way to reduce crime and restore human honor is stop fearing death.

    Stop treating your life as your highest comodity. You will lose. 100% of you

    What matters is _how_ you lived. Never give up a single penny for the fear of your life, the life of your mother or your child. Never give up to a terrorist that tells you "plata o plomo".

    Eat the plomo, die with honor. Let him take the plata at the price of your life. That will mean that much more law enforcement will go after him and overall there will be much fewer apes trying to rob you.

    There are people around the world that live like that.

    You do not have to live like sheep.

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.