Slashdot Mirror


Measles Cases Top Last Year's Total

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Wall Street Journal: So far this year there have been 387 confirmed U.S. measles cases, more than 2018's full-year total and the second-largest number since the disease was declared eliminated in 2000 (Warning: source paywalled; alternative source), according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The disease has spread to 15 states in 2019, with six continuing outbreaks of three or more cases each in Washington, New York, New Jersey and California. The development has sparked new policies aimed at boosting inoculation and curbing misinformation about the measles vaccine.

Measles cases have has risen since 2000 as infected travelers bring the disease to the U.S. Those travelers -- unvaccinated foreign nationals or Americans who become infected abroad -- have spread the highly contagious disease to others in the U.S. who aren't vaccinated or hadn't previously had measles. These cases have fueled outbreaks in communities where large numbers of people haven't been inoculated because of personal or religious exemptions to the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. The largest growth in infections since measles was eliminated totaled 23 outbreaks and 667 cases in 2014. Last year there were 17 outbreaks and 372 confirmed cases. The number of cases in 2019 could increase in the coming months. Measles is a seasonal disease, with cases rising in late winter and early spring in temperate climates, according to the World Health Organization.

211 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is something really wrong with people who don't vaccinate. I don't know what it is exactly, but they are not seeing the world clearly.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its called an IQ, they just don't have any.

      That's not the problem, everyone has an IQ.

      It's most likely that some of these people are actually quite intelligent, they just aren't very good at collecting correct information about the world. Some of them actually spend a lot of time and effort into researching the topic, so you can't even say they are lazy. What is it that they are missing that prevents them from collecting accurate information about the world? A lack of knowledge about statistics?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Something missing in the head by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a lack of critical thinking skills and/or logical reasoning ability.

      These people are like large children, unable to think things through or weigh them with any sense of proportion. They're prone to magical thinking and jumping to conclusions.

      Reasoning with them usually just makes them dig in their heels because a) they don't want to feel dumb, and b) they don't want to lose face.

      At some point eventually even they'll know they're wrong, but they'll go down with the ship rather than admit that they bought into a load of bullshit.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    3. Re:Something missing in the head by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      Necessary bills for unnecessary outbreaks are being paid by all of us.

      https://arstechnica.com/scienc... The true dollar cost of the anti-vaccine movement

    4. Re:Something missing in the head by gravewax · · Score: 1

      negative millions if not billions. The lives and medical costs saved are massive.

    5. Re:Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So why is the anti-vaxxer movement so heavily tied in many countries to the especially affluent, highly educated? They wouldn't get where they are lacking critical thinking skills and/or logical reasoning ability. Hell there's massive swaths of people teaching in universities(i.e. subject expert professors) here in Canada, and they're the core demographic of the anti-vaxxer movement.

      Here's my guess. They've become so specialized in the areas that they teach, that they've become literal retards outside of it. It's why you'll see country kids vaccinated, and city kids not. Kids who grew up in small towns vaccinated, but the kids in major urban areas where government, science, and various specialty sectors live, not. We grew up with various diseases that would threaten animals like turkeys, chickens, pigs, cows, and so on. And know just how much vaccinating can make a difference. The urbanites on the other hand don't, have never seen it, it's especially bad with the "but food comes from the supermarket" lot.

      Your point about losing face is right, but it has far more. Listen to an educated anti-vaxxer go on about how they "know" they're right, because of their education.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Something missing in the head by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not true, stop repeating this. It's not a partisan issue. I have run across strong conservatives who are opposed to vaccination, and will justify it by saying the government has no right to tell them what to do. It's a stupid stance but definitely a common conservative view.

    7. Re:Something missing in the head by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Affluent parents are also much more likely to be home schooled and vaccination optional, poor parents have to send kids to public schools where vaccination is mandatory.

    8. Re:Something missing in the head by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not just anti-vaxx, but there's a strong resurgence in conspiracy theories in general. It's social media spreading this stuff mostly, with a strong theme of "we're smarter than all the experts, so join us and you'll be one of the smartest people on the planet too!" Anti-vaxx, flat-earth, faked moon landing, and just this week there's a conspiracy forming around why the rapper Nipsey Hussel was killed.

      Add to that a strong anti-education movement that seems to be forming, and an anti-science movement, and you can see this here on slashdot even.

    9. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      I've discovered that vaccines saves hundreds of thousands of lives, and billions of dollars in medical costs annually.

    10. Re:Something missing in the head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's because the experts keep discrediting themselves. You might not think they are, but to an increasingly large number of people, science and government institutions are not trustworthy, for what they consider good reasons. The decades of constant spittle-flying extremism from those advocating the positions of these experts, from climate to vax, does absolutely nothing to help instill faith in anyone.

      I consider myself a scientifically-minded person and I no longer have any faith in the scientific institutions reaching the right conclusions, let alone sane policy plans. I have seen too much horribly wrong to continue to hold those beliefs.

    11. Re:Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's why you'll see country kids vaccinated, and city kids not.

      Is that really true? Country kids are much more likely to be vaccinated than city kids?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      For the most part, vaccines also work at the individual level. In most individuals, the vaccine actually does prevent them from getting the disease.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      I'm still not convinced that any of the flat-earthers are actually serious.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    14. Re:Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You can look at the data. This graph is really clear.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:Something missing in the head by bradley13 · · Score: 1

      "some of these people are actually quite intelligent, they just aren't very good at collecting correct information about the world"

      This. Without naming names, there is a blogger I used to read. A very intelligent guy, but...over the last couple of years, he has somehow fallen into the world of conspiracy theorists. Out of curiosity, I looked in on his blog a couple of days ago: he is now busily denying that the Apollo moon landings ever happened. It's really bizarre, watching the convolutions an intelligent mind invents, in order to justify crazy ideas.

      Really, if you go far enough, nothing is provable, everything could be faked. Maybe we're all just brains in jars. But that's no way to live...

      --
      Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    16. Re:Something missing in the head by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      1 death every 3 years on average from 387 reported measles cases per year

      And how would that number change with reduced levels of vaccination ?

      So let's not overreact quite yet

      Suppose your car is parked next to the river, and you notice it ever so slowly rolling towards the edge. What would be a good time to start reacting ?

    17. Re:Something missing in the head by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Or we could pull our heads out now. What if a simple shot could prevent all those deaths from sharks, fireworks and train crashes. And the consequences of measles don't just include "death". It can also make you blind or deaf or leave you with brain damage.

    18. Re:Something missing in the head by TheRealQuestor · · Score: 1

      it's a belief system. People tend to believe what the are told when it is already inline with what their personal beliefs are. The more people who buy into it the more it reinforces that belief. Don't have to look far to see it either. Drive down the road and count the churches. Belief is a tough nut to crack and no amount of empirical evidence or data that proves otherwise will change their minds.

    19. Re:Something missing in the head by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If you threaten my well-being or the well-being of my family, I should be free to shoot you on sight. If not vaccinating only affected the unvaccinated, no one would care.

    20. Re:Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One issue I have heard from people who have concerns is the sheer number of vaccinations. According to the CDC, 19 vaccinations are recommended by the time a baby is 6 months old!

      This creates a tendency to throw the baby out with the bath water. That is, rather than spread out the vaccinations, or just get the really important ones, get none. When everything is top priority, nothing is.

      It doesn't help that there's a ton of mis-information attributing every possible bad thing that may happen to a vaccination. With so many packed into such a short time at a really vulnerable age, there's bound to be a lot of mis-attributions.

      Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical industry seems bound and determined to ruin it's own reputation while giving everyone the finger, making it even harder to convince a parent that at least some of these vaccines are really important and not just yet another scheme to separate people from their money.

    21. Re:Something missing in the head by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Blame social media, and how it's leveraged by (for lack of a better overall term for them) Bad People to affect society in bad ways.

    22. Re:Something missing in the head by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who the fuck cares about preventing a pandemic? Let's just wait for people to start dropping like flies, and then we'll consider action!

    23. Re:Something missing in the head by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      Far less than the damage done by open-heart surgeries.

    24. Re: Something missing in the head by Dog-Cow · · Score: 2

      Waiting for people to be dying is both bad policy and utterly immoral.

    25. Re:Something missing in the head by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I think people are attracted to the idea of feeling special because they "know". Also, the idea that there's an invisible cabal of elite that's shaping the world may be more palatable than the idea that it's nothing but chaotic forces of nature. At least if somebody is in control, there's perpetual hope of a simple fix.

    26. Re:Something missing in the head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or something less completely mental - how about vaccinate on sight? That way you only seem slightly bat-shit-crazy

    27. Re:Something missing in the head by dargaud · · Score: 1

      But how many of those conspiracy theories are pushed on purpose: to sell a book (many), to sell a patent (original antivaxxer doctor), to sell snake oil (sorry, 'essential' oils) or, more importantly nowadays, to destabilize society. If we were to dig I wouldn't be surprised if most of them came from secret services of various countries and 'targeted' at their enemies, including our own. Only they have ways to spectacularly backfire.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    28. Re:Something missing in the head by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, if the car rolls slow enough, the river might dry out before it reaches it? Lets watch and wait!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    29. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      "Deflection"? Are you high?

    30. Re:Something missing in the head by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not true, stop repeating this. It's not a partisan issue.

      Indeed. Anti-vaccination beliefs don't follow the usual political polarization.

      Right-wing kooks see vaccinations as a government conspiracy. Left-wing kooks see vaccinations as a corporate conspiracy. Moderates vaccinate their kids.

    31. Re: Something missing in the head by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What you mean with "post-vax"?
      She got symptoms right after vaccination? That can happen, after all the vaccine consist out of virus fragments of the virus it should vaccinate against.
      She got sick later? Can happen, too. Vaccine is not guaranteed to work!!

      You can even get sick from the vaccine, but that is rare, and it should not be any different than getting sick from the real thing.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    32. Re:Something missing in the head by jblues · · Score: 1

      Yes because one of the interesting things about people is that all of their complex multi-dimensional complex points of view, flaws, beliefs, intelligence, past experience . . . this can all be distilled down to produce a point, upon a one dimensional line. And that line has a clearly defined centre point. People will either fall to the left or the right of that polarising centre point. Once there, that's it. You'd better stick with your own kind, because there will never be reconciliation with the other side. If you would like to find out more, please purchase my new book 'Thinking in Polarities', which is a follow-up to my seminal block-buster 'The Right are from Mars, the Left are from Venus'.

      --
      If it acquires resources on instantiation like a duck, then its a shared_ptr<Duck>
    33. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 5, Informative

      First of all new borns basically have no immune system. Vaccination before about 6 weeks is completely pointless

      Nonsense. Newborns have a poorly developed immune system, but that's a far cry from "no immune system".

      If you'd bothered looking at the list, the only vaccination given prior to 6 weeks is the Hep-B vaccine, and that's due to the high risk of developing chronic Hep-B. And despite your protestations, plenty of European countries also give the Hep-B vaccine at birth:

      https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc....

    34. Re:Something missing in the head by Joce640k · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Not true, stop repeating this. It's not a partisan issue. I have run across strong conservatives who are opposed to vaccination, and will justify it by saying the government has no right to tell them what to do. It's a stupid stance but definitely a common conservative view.

      I'd have thought there's be more conservatives in the anti-vax movement - the religious ones.

      --
      No sig today...
    35. Re:Something missing in the head by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      t's partisan. On the extreme right you have Alex Jones, etc who are not afraid of spreading toxic disinformation. On the extreme right you have Gwynneth Paltrow, etc who are.

      The issue is exactly partisan because asshats like Alex Jones has support of POTUS.

    36. Re:Something missing in the head by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      exreme left regarding Gpaltrow excuse me.

    37. Re: Something missing in the head by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      The "you can even get sick from the vaccine" only relates to a small fraction of vaccines (Attenuation Vaccines) where the virus in the vaccine is not euthanized. The Measles Vaccine happens to be this special type, however AFAIK the patient have to suffer from immunosuppression in order to be susceptible for being infected bu such vaccines.

    38. Re:Something missing in the head by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      One of the main problems here is believing the fraud perpetrated, due to lack of critical thinking skills.

      It's even been measured scientifically to an astounding degree of accuracy. One heartfelt testimonial is given the same weight as a stack of scientific papers 2.74948 miles tall.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    39. Re:Something missing in the head by F.Ultra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While "19 vaccinations" sounds like a lot one have to understand that that very same child will be exposed to more than a million bacteria proteins during and shortly after birth so 19 is a drop in the ocean for an infants immune system.

      When measuring the immune system of an infant Scientists have calculated that they can handle over 10000 vaccines at any one time: https://pediatrics.aappublicat...

    40. Re:Something missing in the head by F.Ultra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      An infant is exposed to over one million bacteria proteins during birth so no, new borns does not "basically have no immune system". If that had been the case then all infants would die at birth. Calculations done point to infants having enough immune system to handle over 10000 vaccinations at a time: https://pediatrics.aappublicat...

    41. Re:Something missing in the head by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      If I wasn't so lazy I would not vaccinate out of anti-collectivist principle, not because of any potential harm a vaccine can cause.

      Then you're free to fuck off and die of smallpox, except you can't because it was eradicated by vaccination. It's not a choice thing like getting a tattoo.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    42. Re:Something missing in the head by F.Ultra · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had the same conviction as you until I saw "Behind the Curve" on Netflix and now I'm unfortunately 100% convinced that there actually do exist people that believe in the flat earth conspiracy.

    43. Re:Something missing in the head by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      If you threaten my well-being or the well-being of my family, I should be free to shoot you on sight. If not vaccinating only affected the unvaccinated, no one would care.

      Hot lead vaccination lol

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    44. Re:Something missing in the head by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

      From the CDC:

      In the decade before 1963 when a vaccine became available, nearly all children got measles by the time they were 15 years of age. It is estimated 3 to 4 million people in the United States were infected each year. Also each year, among reported cases, an estimated 400 to 500 people died, 48,000 were hospitalized, and 1,000 suffered encephalitis (swelling of the brain) from measles.

    45. Re:Something missing in the head by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Speaking of a sense of proportion.... in the United States you're three times as likely to die from a shark attack (1 death per year on average) as you are from from the measles (1 death every 3 years on average from 387 reported measles cases per year).

      To put that into further perspective, the U.S. averages 11 deaths from fireworks and 24 from train crashes per year. Death from a literal lightning strike is 141 times as common than dying from the measles in the United States.

      So let's not overreact quite yet.

      And more people die in the bath than by terrorism but where does all the money go? I don't see many anti-bath teams running around, do you?

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    46. Re:Something missing in the head by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3

      So why is the anti-vaxxer movement so heavily tied in many countries to the especially affluent, highly educated?

      That’s where the partisan tilt comes in. Antivaxers on the right are tied to the Christian fundamentalist movement, with some help from the Nye County desert conspiracy community. As such, they are as far outside the nation’s conversational mainstream as the creationists are.
      On the left, meanwhile, the antivaxers went to the same schools as the No Nukers and food faddists. They dominate in Hollywood and The East Coast intellectual community. In milieux like this, old faiths like Communism find a natural successor in anti-science.

    47. Re:Something missing in the head by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm still not convinced that any of the flat-earthers are actually serious.

      I know one. I have bad news for you. They are really, really serious.

      See here for someone explaining it from a supposed "biblical" standpoint:

      http://www.jaymc.com/FlatEarth...

      and this graphic in particular, with Bible verses:

      http://www.jaymc.com/FlatEarth...

      They conveniently leave out the verses that say the earth is round (meaning, a sphere) and hung in the heavens. Even the ancients understood this stuff to some extent, they use allegories which people now are taking literally.

    48. Re:Something missing in the head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > The true risks are for pregnant women getting a disease like rubella, which cause malformations for the child.

      Why do you undercut your true previous statement

      Perhaps if child doctors don't insist hard enough, young parents (20, 30 years old) who never had those diseases (probably never saw/met one having them) simply underestimate the risks?

      in this way? There are lots of other risks from childhood diseases, including mortality. Many of these risks have low probabilities, and people, in general, are really bad at evaluating such risks.

    49. Re:Something missing in the head by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Speaking of a sense of proportion.... in the United States you're three times as likely to die from a shark attack (1 death per year on average) as you are from from the measles (1 death every 3 years on average from 387 reported measles cases per year).

      To put that into further perspective, the U.S. averages 11 deaths from fireworks and 24 from train crashes per year. Death from a literal lightning strike is 141 times as common than dying from the measles in the United States.

      So let's not overreact quite yet.

      Yes, there are things that kill you other than measles. The difference is that measles is pretty easily preventable - people just have to get vaccinated.

      The other issue with measles - and most of the "childhood diseases" - is that they have other complications besides death.

      https://www.cdc.gov/measles/ab...

      "About one child out of every 1,000 who get measles will develop encephalitis (swelling of the brain) that can lead to convulsions and can leave the child deaf or with intellectual disability."

      "Subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) is a very rare, but fatal disease of the central nervous system that results from a measles virus infection acquired earlier in life. SSPE generally develops 7 to 10 years after a person has measles, even though the person seems to have fully recovered from the illness. Since measles was eliminated in 2000, SSPE is rarely reported in the United States."

      That last line is ironic.

    50. Re: Something missing in the head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Good luck figuring out what is true :P

      That's pretty simple. In (B)

      > where is the high risk of infection if everyone is vaccinated at birth?

      you generalize/exaggerate from a statement "plenty of European countries also give the Hep-B vaccine at birth" to "everyone is vaccinated at birth". Europe is not the entire world, and the original statement did not even imply that the vaccine was mandatory, something which should be obvious from the topic of conversation.

      Which leads me to question whether anything you claim should be taken very seriously, at least without a lot of further checking.

    51. Re:Something missing in the head by froggyjojodaddy · · Score: 1

      I'm vaccinated, as are my kids, but let me tell you, every year, I struggle getting it done. I hate needles, it goes way beyond a dislike and I do everything I can to avoid them. Getting vaccinated is a 60 minute affair while I alternate between hyper ventilating, tensing to the point where I induce a cramp, and trying desperately not to fall unconscious (I have a 70% failure rate). Afterwards, I don't want to do anything involving my arm - driving, eating, lifting things, even typing. The entire day is a write off.

      Of course I realize it's irrational but it's only when I get needles in my forearm/elbow/wrist or hand area that I have a hard time. Poke me in the shoulder or glute to your hearts content, but if I can see it, I'm gonna struggle to make it easier for myself or the nurse.

      I don't know how many people are like me - if they could deliver vaccines in pill form or even by injecting into a shoulder, I'd be there bright eyed and busy tailed the 1st morning. There are folks who don't vaccinate because of their religious or conspiracy theory beliefs but I'm willing to bet there's a LOT more who don't because they can't handle needles.

      Incidentally, why can't they just inject you in the shoulder? I mean, a blood vessel is a blood vessel right?....

    52. Re:Something missing in the head by gtall · · Score: 1

      If all the "research' you do is anti-vax research, then you will get a distorted picture. I think the anti-vaxers go in with mind-set waiting to be validated. So they "research" anti-vax stuff. Lo and behold, their preconceptions are confirmed. Now they are "informed" anti-vaxers.

      They are not unlike the 9/11 conspiracy crowd. They band together for mutual recursive backscratching and no new scientifically vetted information is allowed. Try arguing with one and sooner or later you run into, "you haven't seen the soooper-secret evidence that I have". Oh, yeah, that must be it, I've not yet been gone through the double-secret initiation to receive the Valuable Truth. It's just another cult.

    53. Re:Something missing in the head by bungo · · Score: 3, Funny

      My wife is anti-vax. She is intelligent and educated.

      I had 2 MicroVax IIs, and one VAXStation 3100, all set up in a cluster.

      She made me get rid of them once we were married and were thinking of having children.

      She did let me keep the collection of Sparcstations, but only because they could sit on the desk, rather than being the desk.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    54. Re:Something missing in the head by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Part of the problem is that vaccines were too successful. Most parents nowadays have no first hand knowledge of how bad these diseases were. This is a good thing, of course, but it also means parents can easily assume that a low severity for measles ("you just get a rash for a week and then you're fine") and other diseases (Whooping cough: "you just cough for a bit"). Combine this with Internet misinformation inflating the risk of vaccines ("They've got toxins... TOXINS!!!") and you have a recipe for a bad risk calculation. Sadly, it might take a few more outbreaks before some parents really get the message that the vaccination risk is much lower than the disease risk.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    55. Re:Something missing in the head by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

      Isaac Asimov, Column in Newsweek (21 January 1980)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    56. Re:Something missing in the head by magzteel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the USA vaccine makers have blanket immunity from lawsuit. You can not sue them due to harm, vaccine makers have no accountability. If you were a profit making corporation with no liability for harm, would you maybe give less of a crap sometimes and maybe use the old familiar trick of adding mercury to boost the vaccine production in some batches? Maybe, who cares if you did? No one can sue you for damages!

      This system was created to insure vaccine makers would continue creating vaccines. It is fallout from the incident at Cutter labs where their polio vaccine was produced according to government guidelines but still gave some people polio. The company was sued for negligence even though they hadn't actually been negligent.

    57. Re:Something missing in the head by magzteel · · Score: 1

      Well,
      I'm 52 ... I _had_ all those diseases kids in our days get vaccinated against. Perhaps if child doctors don't insist hard enough, young parents (20, 30 years old) who never had those diseases (probably never saw/met one having them) simply underestimate the risks?

      Exactly right. They grew up in an age where these diseases had been eradicated and they have no idea what life was like before.

    58. Re:Something missing in the head by MaxRockatansky · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many anti-vaxxers are also flat-earthers !?!?

    59. Re:Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Affluent parents are also much more likely to be home schooled and vaccination optional

      Think you meant to say affluent parents kids are more likely to be sent to private schools, where vaccinations can be optional. In Canada, you're more likely to home school especially if you're on the poorer end of the scale as well.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    60. Re:Something missing in the head by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should invent a devaccination drug.

      That's not going to help, since the major problem for everybody is that some people aren't getting vaccinated. Honestly, I wouldn't be nearly so mad at the anti-vaxxers if they were only hurting themselves. Unfortunately, since they are helping to spread contagious diseases, they're not.

    61. Re:Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is that really true? Country kids are much more likely to be vaccinated than city kids?

      I can't speak for the US, but in Canada it's around 93% rural vaccinated vs 61% urban. Got a bit different a few years ago when the laws got changed that if you have a kid in public school they must be vaccinated here in Ontario. There was a huge outbreak of measles and chickenpox in the Ottawa/Hull area a few years ago, basically one year after the other. Only 13% of the kids were vaccinated, all of their parents worked in government, or education, or were in various specialty areas relating to government work(NGO's and such). And all of those kids attended private schools. You can dig up the articles on it from the globe and mail, or ottawa times if you're really interested in it.

      Personally having had chickenpox during the big outbreak back in the 1980's, I sure as hell wished that the vaccine was covered by OHIP at the time instead of being $400/pop(about $850 today). Something my parents couldn't afford. Seeing the reactivation of it in shingles with my grandparents was pretty bad, my one grandmothers reaction was bad enough it put her into the hospital.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    62. Re:Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      The whole "but it's too many vaccinations" bit is pretty stupid. If anything, the whole mass "everything must be sterile, wrapped in a bubble and protected along with air tight homes" has done far more damage to a persons ability to fight off infections. Think of it this way, an urban kids immune system in some countries is so weak that doctors actually recommend sending them to "go play on a farm" for a week or two. Or be repeatedly exposed to barn air before their 1st birth day for a total time of 6 weeks.

      Don't know about you, but that hay-cowshit-freshly tossed oat smell is something special. Kinda like how smelling a campfire triggers that spot in your brain that says "safety."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    63. Re:Something missing in the head by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Not true, stop repeating this. It's not a partisan issue.

      Indeed. Anti-vaccination beliefs don't follow the usual political polarization.

      Right-wing kooks see vaccinations as a government conspiracy. Left-wing kooks see vaccinations as a corporate conspiracy. Moderates vaccinate their kids.

      This,

      This kind of nutty thinking is the fault of extremism, not of any particular left/right view. In Australia, Anti-Vax typically follows the well-off hippie crowds who aren't short of a few bob but are typically far left voters (well far left for Australians) which we call "Champagne Socialists" here in the UK. Australia tends not to have the far-right religious kooks that plague the US, at least not in the numbers the US has and the few that they have are far more concerned in getting the government to ban porn and filter the websites they don't like.

      The opposition to extremists is not an opposing form of extremist, but rather moderates.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    64. Re:Something missing in the head by hai_Priesty · · Score: 2

      So why is the anti-vaxxer movement so heavily tied in many countries to the especially affluent, highly educated?

      One contributor might be their lack of experience - first hand witness or heard - of all the horrors of communicable diseases which killed and ruined so many lives in the poorer countries. Most people from rich countries haven't seen an iron lung before unless they're very old.

      Measles in USA, even at 387 cases this year, is probably perceived as a very remote threat, "things that just doesn't happen often in developed region; not in my neighborhood", compared to other perceived threats like drowning from the swimming pool, gun killings, or even (incorrect assessment) death from shark attack at their Florida beach.

      Perhaps a little related, a tiny minority of highly educated, latte sipping youngsters supporting full fledged Communism while having lived nothing but a life of affluence struck me as having a similar vibe as Anti-vaxxers; people with first hand experience of full fledged Communism abhor it like the plague.

    65. Re:Something missing in the head by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Here's my guess. They've become so specialized in the areas that they teach, that they've become literal retards outside of it

      This isn't unique to the highly educated. Your average plumber is not going to do all that well on an astrophysics test even though they are astonishingly good at plumbing.

      The difference is these people believe that they are smart due to their greater educational attainment. So they assume they are smart in every subject, even when they're woefully uneducated in that subject since it was not part of their degree program.

      If you'd like an example, take a gander at pretty much any Slashdot article regarding, say, Climate Change. There'll be a whole lot of IT folks who are absolutely sure they are smart in climatology, despite knowing very little about it. It's not like you need a doctorate to fall into this "I'm smart at everything" trap.

    66. Re:Something missing in the head by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of a sense of proportion.... in the United States you're three times as likely to die from a shark attack (1 death per year on average) as you are from from the measles (1 death every 3 years on average from 387 reported measles cases per year).

      That rate is because of vaccinations. Anti-vaxxers are working very, very hard to increase that rate. So saying it's currently low doesn't tell you shit about how dangerous anti-vaxxers are.

      Also, death is not the only complication from measles.

    67. Re:Something missing in the head by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      What did you discover?

      That the rate of complications from a vaccine is one in 10 million-ish or higher. The rate of complications from the diseases they prevent is about 1 in 1000-ish (numbers obviously vary by vaccine and disease).

      Also, those complications from vaccines are mostly allergic reactions. Which are 1) pretty easily treatable, and 2) usually detected fairly early in the patient's life, so that they can be avoided in the future.

      Deaths "caused" by the MMR vaccine: 2. Total. One was an advanced leukemia patient who was given the shot because of risk of exposure due to people like you. The other was a baby, and privacy regulations are hiding most of the information.

      Since measles deaths alone exceeded that total in the four months of 2019, you'd have to be an utter and complete moron to think vaccines are higher risk.

    68. Re:Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that a person is smart based on their greater educational attainment, instead of understanding that the person is good at memorization and returning rote answers. Smart is a whole different ballgame. The funny thing with your plumber, is they probably have a better grasp of climate then your average /. does. Because one of the key points is understanding frost and heave information for laying pipelines for example.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    69. Re:Something missing in the head by jeff4747 · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the USA vaccine makers have blanket immunity from lawsuit.

      You misunderstand the law. It's not that they are immune to lawsuits. The government has assumed the liability.

      So you can indeed sue due to vaccine injury. You'll just be suing the government instead of a corporation.

      And you don't actually have to sue. The government set up a vaccine injury program where you can file a claim and get paid without a lawsuit. You are still free to sue if you'd like.

      Also, the FDA stops a whole lot more vaccines than lawsuits ever could. It's not like there's nothing between the corporation coming up with something and the free market, as you imply. And if you want to claim regulatory capture, you'd have to show some vaccines that would not pass trials yet got released.

      use the old familiar trick of adding mercury to boost the vaccine production in some batches?

      :faceplam:

      Thiomersal is a preservative. It has nothing do do with boosting production rates. It was introduced into vaccines in order to let doctors use one vial to treat multiple patients. Pull out a new, empty syringe, fill it with a dose of vaccine from a vial, give the patient the shot, toss the syringe. The alternative is syringes pre-loaded with vaccine, which cost you a lot more money.

      Thiomersal is also ethyl-mercury, which you pee out. Not methyl-mercury that stays in your system. If you want to say something stupid like "it's got mercury so it's all the same!!!" consider ethanol vs methanol. One will get you drunk. One will kill you very quickly. They're almost identical. Ethyl-mercury vs methyl-mercury is similar.

      So, congrats on making vaccines cost more. Also at a higher profit to "big pharma". Also, Thiomersal was removed from childhood vaccines in 2000, with no reduction in autism rates, so you did all this for nothing.

      Before you go off half cocked, don't forget, migrants carry disease

      Only if the vaccination rate in their country is lower than the vaccination rate in the US.

      And since you're making a very obvious dogwhistle, the vaccination rate in Central and South American countries is higher than the US.

      migrants expose themselves and their new host community to new strains of pathogens

      This doesn't matter for the MMR vaccine. The different strains on the planet are still covered by the vaccine. You need a high-mutation-rate disease like influenza for strains to be relevant.

    70. Re:Something missing in the head by Rob+Y. · · Score: 1

      The right has a reflexive reaction to anything coming from the government, and the left has a reflexive reaction to anything coming from business. So both sides of the partisan divide have their own irrational reasons for this stupidity.

      Government isn't always evil, and corporations aren't either. But both sometimes are. What's a citizen to do?

      Trust the scientists, maybe. But of course, conspiracy theorists on the right don't trust scientists because their findings (on climate change, at least) are counter to the interests of the funders of all things right - so distrust of science must be sown on the right. And conspiracy theorists on the left don't trust medical science because its corporate funders are all too willing to hawk incomplete research to sell product. Of course, there's government-funded science, but wait - government!.

      Personally, I cross my fingers an hope the statistics will favor me. I'd rather have herd immunity and avoid an epidemic than avoid the one in a hundred million risk that a vaccination will harm me. But I have no illusions that if thimerosol actually did cause autism, it's makers would be working to suppress that finding. But guess what. I'd trust government scientists to get the word out before I'd trust the makers of thimerosol to do it. And, of course, if we actually made bribery of government illegal in any practical way (with, y'know, actual punishments), I'd trust them even more...

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    71. Re:Something missing in the head by Straumli+Perversion · · Score: 1

      I see the opposite, actually. I'm old enough that I remember when getting the measles, mumps, or chicken pox was a normal occurrence. Kids stayed home so they didn't infect everyone else until the worst of it passed. I don't remember a panic about people dying from the disease or anything. It was unpleasant, but just a part of growing up.

      If I had kids, I would get them vaccinated because those diseases are no fun and why go through it if you don't have to? Why take the chance of getting complications? But I'm not concerned that we'll end up with a scenario like Stephen King's The Stand if we don't.

    72. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yearly fu vaccines are of questionable value. Unless you're high-risk, or interact with high-risk people a lot, you can probably just skip it. It's not the same as measles.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    73. Re:Something missing in the head by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You're making the assumption that a person is smart based on their greater educational attainment

      Nope. Try reading my post again. I make no claim about whether or not a person is actually smart.

    74. Re:Something missing in the head by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, most staunchly religious Christians have no problem with vaccination. There are a few people in sects that are opposed to vaccines they're relatively a small minority, and further they were opposed to vaccines from before Andrew Wakefield and are opposed to a lot of modern medicines in general. I remember from elementary school in the 60s that it typically caused some confusion or humor when some kid wasn't allowed to get vaccinated along with everyone else.

    75. Re:Something missing in the head by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I got a set of Sparcstations from someone whose wife insisted that they had to go. I don't understand the attitude, it's probably better if your spouse's vice is playing with dusty computer rather than hanging out at the bar or getting a giant motorcycle.

    76. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's true, it's like giving a gift to your kid, "now you don't have to go through what I went through!" In terms of suffering, vaccines are way better than the disease, even without the risk. If you don't realize that, and all you see is the child crying when he/she gets injected, then your perception is different.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    77. Re:Something missing in the head by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Poor often means both parents have to work just to make ends meet, and therefore home schooling is not an option. There are exceptions of course. Affluent doesn't necessarily mean rich enough to pay the extremely high costs of private school but they probably have a spouse staying home all day. There are exceptions there too.

      Lots of exceptions, I know poor people who sent kids to private schools (with scholarships, grants, etc) and very rich people who sent the kids to public schools.

    78. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      97% of the measles vaccines (2 doses of MMR) are effective.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    79. Re: Something missing in the head by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      Relax. How is this for a conservative view: If you want vaccinated, cool. If you don't want vaccinated, cool. Leave people the fuck alone! That's my stance. If I'm vaccinated I have nothing to worry about, right?

    80. Re:Something missing in the head by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It's a lack of critical thinking skills and/or logical reasoning ability.

      Critical thinking and logical reasoning is precisely what cements their beliefs when presented with incorrect information. If they can be accused of anything it's suffering from severe observer bias, but there are many well educated anti-vaxxers who are perfectly capable of thinking.

    81. Re: Something missing in the head by illiac_1962 · · Score: 1

      So, they were forced into rationalizing it as safe without expert knowledge? And that's better?

    82. Re:Something missing in the head by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      in the United States you're three times as likely to die from a shark attack (1 death per year on average) as you are from from the measles

      You can thank vaccines for that.

    83. Re:Something missing in the head by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I wouldn't be nearly so mad at the anti-vaxxers if they were only hurting themselves. Unfortunately, since they are helping to spread contagious diseases, they're not.

      But, aren't the anti-vaxxers mostly spreading it to each other, and therefore taking themselves out of the 'pool' so to speak?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    84. Re:Something missing in the head by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Most parents nowadays have no first hand knowledge

      You don't need first hand knowledge. You need to trust the experts whom you charge with helping you make informed decisions.

      How many anti-vaxxers decided to get pregnant and lead their baby to full term with no medical help at all?

    85. Re:Something missing in the head by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      So why is the anti-vaxxer movement so heavily tied in many countries to the especially affluent, highly educated? They wouldn't get where they are lacking critical thinking skills and/or logical reasoning ability. Hell there's massive swaths of people teaching in universities(i.e. subject expert professors) here in Canada, and they're the core demographic of the anti-vaxxer movement.

      Here is my opinion on your question because I'm seeing a similar situation -- bias reasoning. When someone is very bias toward a certain topic, the higher intelligent the person is, the more bias the person goes into the topic. As a result, the person can come up with any reasoning to support the person's point of view. The problem is that the person does not see his/her fallacy of the reasoning and will not accept any counter reasoning at all. It is very difficult for one to see one's own wrong. This similar issue applies to any other thing else including politic.

    86. Re:Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not really misleading. Some doctors are spreading them out, but nevertheless, the recommendation I linked is direct from the CDC. I suspect those some doctors have recognized the excess and don't want the parents to choose none.

    87. Re:Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      There is a wide gulf between everything must be sterile and 19 vaccinations in 6 months.

    88. Re: Something missing in the head by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Waiting for people to die doesn't help either. See gun control.

      OH please....the gun control measure being brough up now do virtually nothing but stop or hinder law abiding US gun owners that are of no threat to anyone.

      If they were serious, they'd go after in full force the main source of gun deaths in the US...gang members using handguns, that are illegally obtained (ie stolen).

      But no, they're going after semi-automatic rifles that are rarely used in gun violence deaths, I think last study was maybe 400/yr?

      Read this interesting article from NY Times....

      The gun control measures they're screaming about now largely are ineffective and the previous "assault weapons ban" did little to curb things (remember Columbine was during the first ban)...and once the ban was lifted, the crime rate due to semi-auto rifles, like the AR-15 never rose.

      And to clarify...the US public does NOT have ready access to "Assault Weapons"...those are fully automatic fire select weapons. The AR-15 and other commonly possessed and used rifles in the US are semi-automatic, one bullet fired per trigger actuation, rather than fully automatic where the gun keeps firing with one trigger pull and doesn't stop till you either release the trigger or run out of ammo.

      If you're going to scream for more gun control, at least do it with an educated insight as to what actually might help.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    89. Re:Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      Look at table 1 in your link from the perspective of a nervous new parent who has seen ample evidence of over-medicalization already, as well as evidence that pharmaceutical companies really are out to gouge us for every penny they can squeeze out. They will be comparing the recommendations to their own childhood immunization in the '80s and their parents' in the '60s.

    90. Re:Something missing in the head by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      How many anti-vaxxers decided to get pregnant and lead their baby to full term with no medical help at all?

      You seem to assume that's going to be a low number. You should read some mommy blogs.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    91. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Not sure what your point is. I see the numbers and they seem reasonable.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    92. Re:Something missing in the head by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That's true. And many parents (myself included) do trust doctors/experts even though they have no first hand information on the diseases that vaccines prevent.

      To expand my previous comment, herd immunity was also a double-edged sword that let the anti-vax movement grow. When the number of anti-vaxxers was low, they could skip the vaccinations and say "see? our children are just fine" because their kids were still protected by herd immunity. It helped to reduce the perceived threat of the diseases while they increased the perceived risk of the vaccines. Now that the movement has grown, though, they're breaking herd immunity which means we're getting outbreaks.

      Also, don't underestimate the stupidity of some people. There are all too many people who think they don't need doctors or professional medical help to have a baby. They just need some crystals, homeopathic remedies, essential oils, or whatever other fad junk science they heard about online. After all, a social media post shared by a non-medical professional is just as good as medical advice from someone with years of training who has personally examined you, right?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    93. Re: Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      Note that in most of that list, it is given only to specific high risk groups. In most of those countries, the ones given at birth are for when the mother is infected.

    94. Re:Something missing in the head by pigwin32 · · Score: 1

      You don't need first hand knowledge. You need to trust the experts whom you charge with helping you make informed decisions.

      I'll see your experts and raise you my experts. Which experts do you trust implicitly? Maybe the experts in the oil companies who knew about climate change and didn't inform us? Maybe the doctors who promoted smoking back in the day? The doctors who prescribe opioids for minor pain despite the epidemic of opioid abuse? What about Bayer which says Roundup doesn't cause cancer, despite two current cases where the jury found that it does? Perhaps the experts that said Sadam had WOMD resulting in a war we are still feeling the effects of today. Your informed decisions are only informed if you have all the information. I try to avoid letting "experts" make my decisions for me unless I'm confident in their expertise.

    95. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If 3% of the population is unvaccinated, and another 3% has vaccines that don't work, I would by probability expect about 50% of the sick cases to be among vaccinated people. It looks like the vaccines are working.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    96. Re:Something missing in the head by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      But, aren't the anti-vaxxers mostly spreading it to each other, and therefore taking themselves out of the 'pool' so to speak?

      Mostly, but not entirely. There are those who have legitimate medical reasons they can't be vaccinated, most of them because they have a compromised immune system. There's also a small percentage of people vaccinated for whom it doesn't "take"; they don't become immune. This happens at random and there's no easy way to test for it. Under universal vaccination, these people are protected by "herd immunity" (which is just a fancy way to say "since almost everybody's immune, there's nobody to catch the disease from"). But every person who could have be vaccinated but wasn't puts these people at risk.

    97. Re:Something missing in the head by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that vaccination holds out the promise of completely wiping out a disease (like we did smallpox). But anti-vaxxers are working to ensure reservoirs of infectious diseases remain in existence.

    98. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I don't see the relevance. His argument was that vaccines given at birth can't work, and that vaccinating infants is somehting only the USA does. Whether it's being given to all infants or just a subset has no bearing on the veracity of those statements.

    99. Re: Something missing in the head by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      No, I think my analysis is correct. I've spent a lot of time working with Bayes' theorem, so I understand the principle. I do make mistakes sometimes so I would appreciate if you double-checked my work.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    100. Re:Something missing in the head by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      Done plenty of research. The death rates from the diseases that you get vaccines from are hundreds of times higher than the risk of death or complications from the vaccines. The reality is anti vaxxers are the ones that obviously don't do the research otherwise they would be terrified of the potential consequences of not have them vaccinated.

    101. Re: Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      It shows that perhaps the schedule and recommendations in the U.S. are a bit much (the broader subject of the sub-thread).

      But in answer to the rest, the risk for a baby born to an already infected mother is sufficient that even a small chance that the vaccine might actually have an effect is worth it. They also give IVIG in those cases.

    102. Re:Something missing in the head by pigwin32 · · Score: 1

      The consequences of not having children vaccinated are only realised if the children catch the diseases. Do you vaccinate your children against all diseases for which vaccines are available? The reality is there is insufficient verifiably independent information available publicly for people to make informed decisions. When we were looking for information to support our intention to vaccinate our children we found lots of hyperbole and graphic images of the effects of disease from our public health system while there was an endless supply of "information", some credible and some not, from those against vaccination. Our children are vaccinated against some diseases but we do not vaccinate just because of "death rates from the diseases".

    103. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      It shows that perhaps the schedule and recommendations in the U.S. are a bit much (the broader subject of the sub-thread).

      It shows no such thing; you can just as easily conclude that the schedule in other places is rather not enough. Unless you've done comparative studies of outcomes you're just operating on your own biases.

      But in answer to the rest, the risk for a baby born to an already infected mother is sufficient that even a small chance that the vaccine might actually have an effect is worth it.

      If there's even a small chance that it'll work, then the claim that infants have no immune system is bunk.

      Of course we know that it's bunk anyway; you certainly won't hear such nonsense from any medical professionals. And we know that the efficacy of infant HepB vaccination is far better than "a small chance".

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m...

    104. Re: Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      First, I have never claimed that babies have no immune system (that was someone else). I do know that many vaccines are delayed because the left over antibodies from the mother would prevent a sufficient reaction to the vaccine to confer immunity.

      I also haven't claimed that HepB vaccine at birth for babies whose mothers have Hep B is a bad idea. Most countries only give Hep B vaccine at birth if the mother has Hep B.

      I see no reason why a baby not in that risk group can't wait on Hep B vaccine unless a family member has it.

    105. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You never claimed much of anything; you just like making insinuations which you can then back away from by saying you never actually said it.

      I'm not sure why you seem to think that "I see no reason" is an argument for anything.

    106. Re: Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      Go back and read the thread, you seem confused as to who said what. As for I see no reason, unless it's a bouncing baby vampire, how likely is it in it's first year to encounter infected blood in the U.S.?

    107. Re: Something missing in the head by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Ah, suddenly "even a little" isn't enough. Funny how that works.

      You are far too disingenuous for me to take this conversation seriously any longer.

    108. Re: Something missing in the head by sjames · · Score: 1

      You seem to be in a bit of a mental tailspin there, PULL UP!

    109. Re:Something missing in the head by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      So why is the anti-vaxxer movement so heavily tied in many countries to the especially affluent, highly educated?

      Wealth has no connection to a person's ability to reason logically, in fact it seems just the opposite.

      The fact is that if you're wealthy, oftentimes you have few, if any, real challenges in life. You never have to figure anything out, struggle with solving everyday problems, and your financial insulation from the real world means you rarely have to make any hard decisions.

      So you're almost never challenged or forced to do the rudimentary learning things that the non-wealthy do. For example, you may never set foot in a grocery store because you have staff to do your grocery shopping. This means you don't ever have to look at prices or try and figure out what's a better deal- 3 for $5 or 4 for $6.

      And what's worse, even if you did have to go grocery shopping, the prices don't mean shit to you. So what if there are two bottles of shampo, one costs $8 and one costs $75. Do you give a shit? No.

      (I mean, do you think Bezos or Musk actually look at the price tag on anything? Maybe for academic purposes, but not because it matters.)

      Your wealth basically means you coast through life without understanding or knowing some of the simplest things.

      For example, look at Trump- he's obviously never set foot in a grocery store, and we know that for a fact because he's said repeatedly that you need to have picture ID to buy groceries. Yes, he said that. Besides Donald Trump, who doesn't know that you don't need picture ID to buy groceries?

      So yeah- your wealth insulates you from much of the world's harsh realities as well as its minor inconveniences. You never have to learn anything because you have people to do it for you. You never have to change a light bulb, do laundry, wash a dish, gas up your car, vacuum the carpet, find car insurance, pay a utility bill, sit on hold waiting for customer service, etc etc etc.

      You live in a fantasy world where practically everything you want just appears with no effort on your part.

      Seriously, most people born into great wealth could barely fill out a library card. They are some of the dumbest people alive because they never had to learn anything.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    110. Re:Something missing in the head by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm still not convinced that any of the flat-earthers are actually serious.

      Sadly, some of them are 100% serious. I kinda doubted too, but there are more than a few 'true believers' out there.

      They're not really any different than the "moon-landing-was-a-hoax" people, and there are tons of those clowns.

      Dunning-Kruger for the win.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    111. Re:Something missing in the head by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I was born before 1960 and I got measles. You can bet your ass I got my son vaccinated when it was time.

      We had a neighbor who had polio. It didn't look like fun. As far as I'm concerned, anyone who refuses to shield a kid from that shouldn't be allowed to have children.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    112. Re:Something missing in the head by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of a sense of proportion.... in the United States you're three times as likely to die from a shark attack (1 death per year on average) as you are from from the measles

      1) Maybe that's because there's no anti-shark vaccine.

      2) The reason so few people die from measles is because most people get vaccinated.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    113. Re:Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The difference is these people believe that they are smart due to their greater educational attainment.

      You're free to clarify it, if you think I'm failing to actually understand your PoV on it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    114. Re: Something missing in the head by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I'm not doing this again, but either get rid of all the guns or don't bother. You're right that handguns are the biggest problem and going after just rifles is pointless. All or nothing.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    115. Re:Something missing in the head by bungo · · Score: 1

      Being honest, later on I did also have to get rid of my Sparcstations (4 SS20s, plus a couple of Tadpole Sparc laptops). I can't remember where the SS20s went, but the Tadpoles went to someone working on the OpenBSD project.

      I also got rid of a HP 9000 (J282, I think), a 8-CPU RS/6000, a Dec Alphaserver, and a Sunblade 150.

      On the bright side, I do have a dual socket Xeon E5-2690, 192 GB ram with a stack of SSDs. Less room heating and way more processing power of anything I had before. With Redhat and VMWare Workstation, I still get to play with many different 'computers'.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    116. Re:Something missing in the head by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      They're afraid to end up with an autistic kid. And autistic kids are more work than dead kids.

      Maybe someone should tell them that measles aren't necessarily just eliminating the problem but that there are quite a few complications that make them end up with a crippled child for life?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    117. Re:Something missing in the head by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And if your kid doesn't have measles, just draw some dots on their face and let them join the fun.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    118. Re: Something missing in the head by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I always thought that's the libertarian view? I mean, like, do as you please as long as you let me do as I please, that's conservative now?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    119. Re:Something missing in the head by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It's not. The group of anti-vaxxers is neither conservative no liberal, neither poor nor rich. The only common denominator I have detected is a distrust of science and/or government. Sadly, this distrust of "scientific facts" doesn't lead to own research (personally I would base this on a lack of ability, i.e. missing prerequisite information and knowledge to actually DO own research) but instead to believing someone else. It's what we find abundant in various conspiracy circles: "I do not want A to be true, so I'll believe B without reason".

      They "feel" that whatever they're told by science and/or government is wrong, so they search on the internet for "alternative views". And of course they'll find some and accept it, sadly without questioning or even reviewing the veracity, plausibility of at least possibility of that "alternative claim" because they match what they "feel". And now they have someone else saying what they "feel", so they feel vindicated and right.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    120. Re: Something missing in the head by strikethree · · Score: 1

      First of all new borns basically have no immune system. Vaccination before about 6 weeks is completely pointless

      Nonsense. Newborns have a poorly developed immune system, but that's a far cry from "no immune system".

      While technically correct (the best kind of correct!), your view was too narrow.

      Here, let me clarify (in a non-hostile manner):

      First of all new borns basically have no immune system.

      I have bolded the relevant word. Be honest. Isn't it reasonable to equate "basically no immune system (functionality is a word that should have been added here for clarity, but the meaning is generally the same regardless)" to "Newborns have a poorly developed immune system"?

      There are numerous different ways to word it. "basically none" and "poorly developed" really mean the same thing in this context.

      It was not useful.

      Your information was useful as was your ultimate point. On this one portion though, it seems rather nit-picky to bring it up because we can be certain that both statements are functionally the same.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    121. Re:Something missing in the head by strikethree · · Score: 1

      What is insane about all of this is that some basic scientific knowledge and a 4 meter straight edge and a large body of water are all that is needed to *see* that Earth is round(ish) and you can even get pretty close to measuring the actual size. I did it myself when I was in the Navy and in the middle of the ocean, but it can be done from the shore:

      Hold the straight edge over the horizon. Try to align the straight edge with the edge of the horizon. You can't. Why? Because the Earth is curved. Measure the difference between the straight edge and the horizon and with some simple math, you can get a rough measure of the size of the planet.

      Without anything but some observations and some logic, you can also arrive at the Earth being round. This one is too long to describe for short attention span people but the essence is that round is the only acceptable shape for a planet of this size to be.

      Ultimately, there is no way to decide that the planet is anything but round unless you believe that the Universe does not have universal principles that apply everywhere under all circumstances. Of course, once you hit "God did it", no amount of logic or reason will ever a/effect their "knowledge".

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    122. Re:Something missing in the head by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are things that kill you other than measles. The difference is that measles is pretty easily preventable - people just have to get vaccinated.

      Another aspect of this that you should address to these fuckers: The more hosts that a virus can live in, the more mutations that will occur. This speeds up the evolution of the virus and can lead to a strain that is much more terrible than *mere* measles.

      Even further than that, a virus is a "living" "creature" that can reproduce exponentially, and once it gets to a certain level of "presence" the risk increase exponentially because there are people who can not be vaccinated or that the vaccination just didn't work for them.

      On the one hand, I get a creepy feeling when I am told that everyone needs to get something injected to them. On the other hand, I have learned what this is all about and agree that everyone should be vaccinated, even if it is done at gun point with them kicking and screaming like any other wild animal would.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    123. Re:Something missing in the head by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You skipped over a very crucial word.

      The difference is these people believe that they are smart

      Here, lemme italicize it

      The difference is these people believe that they are smart

      They believe that they are smart. They actually fall on the typical distribution of intelligence. Perhaps with the very extreme "dumb" end cut off.

      One of the ways you can tell they are not actually smart is they believe they are smart in every subject. Which is exactly the point I made above.

    124. Re: Something missing in the head by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      No, I can't, perhaps they don't exist, but the reports say that opportunity costs are the primary reason for partial vaccination. That is, parents are too busy working.

      So I guess that sure explains why parents can sign a waiver to grant a public health nurse the ability to give a vaccination right? I mean that's only been an option for oh 15 years or so across most of Canada.

      Perhaps you just misread something.

      Don't worry AC. If I actually misread something, you'd be crowing about it in any form except as a AC. Perhaps it's your inability to read that's stunting your ability to reason things out.

      You do that a lot. Remember when you were confused about who did what in Alberta?

      You mean that thing where I said the NDP were closing down coal power plants then, an AC kept screaming that it was really the PC party? Yes. I do indeed remember that.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    125. Re:Something missing in the head by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      [quote]So why is the anti-vaxxer movement so heavily tied in many countries to the especially affluent, highly educated? [/quote]

      Russia. Search for 'russia antivax'. Like messing with US politics, Russia is pushing dozens of unhealthy narratives at western democracies, seeking to weaken and destabilize them.

      https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567

    126. Re:Something missing in the head by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      "there's a strong resurgence in conspiracy theories in general. It's social media spreading...."

      Social media is the tool. But a lot of the rise in conspiracies, "everything is fake news", anti-vax, anti-science, etc, can be directly laid at the feet of Russia. They are very effectively hijacking social media and pushing about every harmful narrative they can to try to weaken and destabilize western democracies.

      https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567

      I don't know how to make this happen, but we've got to find a way to counter misinformation faster in social media. And/or prevent hostile governments from being able to use it altogether. But that would likely be a game of whack'a'mole, so I'm not sure how to counter it.

    127. Re: Something missing in the head by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you have not realized yet, but it was obvious from the discussion: new born infants don't get a vaccine. They get anti bodies. Unfortunately the laymen english does not distinguish that.

      So: no, a new born has no working immune system, that can work with 'standard vaccinations' no idea what you guys learn in school or in life. Before age of 6 weeks, it makes absolute zero sense to give a 'standard vaccine' (not antibodies, immunoglobin) to infants.

      And we know that the efficacy of infant HepB vaccination is far better than "a small chance". Yes: because it is the HepB antibody, and not a vaccination!!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  2. Re: Interestingly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not fake news
    The outbreaks in clark county Washington only a couple were vaccinated. It was reported in the local and national news.
     

  3. Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This latest outbreak is going to jump start more laws to stop this stupid crap. If you go to a public school I want no exceptions to MMR and DPT except medical ones. Don't like it? Pay for a private school that doesn't care. If that doesn't work, we need to stop the un-vaccinated from going into public places like grocery stores.

    Lets clamp down on these jackasses until they can't live in the society without getting the vaccine, or all go live on their own private island.

    1. Re:Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Then it sounds like you would choose option number two: go live on your own private island. That's fair.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    2. Re:Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by gravewax · · Score: 4, Interesting

      forced exposure to unnecessarily sick people is a basic human rights violation. End of Story.

    3. Re: Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by astrofurter · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna sue the MTA. No way they should be allowing people with the common cold to ride the Subway. What are they, deranged murderers??

    4. Re: Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      at the reported rate of 387/year w/measles

      The rate is that low because of vaccinations. It's almost like you don't actually understand the subject.

    5. Re:Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This latest outbreak is going to jump start more laws to stop this stupid crap.

      Nope. Because this is America and someone's believe in some sky daddy anti gubbmint rubbish trumps laws and for some arse stupid reason this is frequently upheld in courts.

    6. Re:Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      This latest outbreak is going to jump start more laws to stop this stupid crap.

      Nope. Because this is America and someone's believe in some sky daddy anti gubbmint rubbish trumps laws and for some arse stupid reason this is frequently upheld in courts.

      It's not that so much (there are some with actual religious objections to any medical care, but they're super rare). The ones opposed to it for stupid reasons (autism! big pharma! kills people! conspiracy!) are just using the religious angle a wedge to get their way. And in any case, there's plenty of left wing zealots who got duped by FaceBook into thinking they know better than their doctor, many of whom have no strong religious inclinations.

    7. Re: Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      He said unnecessarily sick people. As in, there's no reason you should have gotten sick because you should have been vaccinated against measles or whatever. We have no reasonable way to prevent the common cold, but if you are experiencing symptoms your sick ass should be holed up at home as a courtesy to others.

    8. Re:Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by adfraggs · · Score: 1

      Of course they are. There is no such thing as absolute and un-compromised human rights. Welcome to reality, where people don't exist in their own private bubble.

    9. Re: Say goodbye to the anti-vaxers. by gravewax · · Score: 1

      The sad fact is we now have generations of parents that weren't alive in the 80's when millions were dieing every year from measles, let alone when Polio was killing or crippling people for life. They think of these as historical things like it can't happen to them and all the vaccinations are just a big scam. It would take any serious anti vaxxer about 5 mins of googling stats to realise how fucking wrong they are yet they won't do that as facts are an inconvenience to their conspiracy thoeries.

  4. Blame the parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When an child doesn't have their proper vaccinations and gets a disease that they should be vaccinated against, we need have children's aid take custody of all their kids and send the parents to prison for a very harsh sentence. The charge can be failing to provide the necessities of life. In Canada (where I am), that carries a 5 year sentence. That's a good starting point but I think the US can do better. Life would be good.

  5. Stupidity Is Winning by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This shit just makes me shake my head....all the work and effort and time and money that went into developing vaccines, and these ninnies won't use them.

    And it's all because discredited former British doctor (Andrew Wakefield) published a bullshit medical paper claiming that vaccines were unsafe. That's all it took- the morons and dumbshits ate it up and stopped vaccinating their children.

    Now we have measles epidemics again, yay.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:Stupidity Is Winning by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between someone who doesn't get vaccinated for measles and someone who doesn't get a yearly flu vaccine.

      You're also ignoring the fact that some vaccines are harmful, albeit to a small number of people. Guillain-Barre syndrome is real and people who received the flu shot in the 2008-2009 season possibly at greater risk of H1N1.

      It's just as misleading to claim all vaccines are totally safe as it is to claim they cause things like autism.

    2. Re:Stupidity Is Winning by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      And it's all because discredited former British doctor (Andrew Wakefield) published a bullshit medical paper claiming that vaccines were unsafe.

      No, it's worse than that. The bullshit medical paper claimed that a specific vaccine from a specific manufacturer was unsafe. Wakefield was paid by a competing manufacturer to write the paper.

    3. Re:Stupidity Is Winning by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Gets better. Once the US absorbs a good portion of South America

      Pssst....the vaccination rate in every country in South America is higher than the US. "Absorbing" South America would actually reduce the rate of preventable deaths from diseases like measles.

    4. Re:Stupidity Is Winning by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      You're also ignoring the fact that some vaccines are harmful, albeit to a small number of people.

      So is traveling in an automobile, so what?

      And I never said that "all vaccines are totally safe". Please stop putting words in my mouth. It's rare, but yes vaccines can cause side effects. Again, so what?

      Your chances of dying in a car accident are far, far greater than the chance of side-effects from any vaccine but you still drive all the time, right?

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:Stupidity Is Winning by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      The anti-vax movement didn't pick up steam on its own. Like a lot of the misinformation about all sorts of things lately, it is being systematically perpetuated by hostile foreign governments.

      See https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567

      Google 'russian anti-vax'. Racial divides, climate change 'debates', 'fake news'. Anything that is unhealthy and disruptive to western democracies is being actively pushed and inflamed by Russia.

  6. Re: Shill siren ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I would, but it's not right to make fun of somebody so mentally disabled.

  7. Re:South of the Border by Falconhell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most cases are spread by returning unvaccinated travellers, sorry to ruin your dog whistle.

  8. It's a self-solving problem by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    In the context of Darwinism, those who refuse to vaccinate their children (and those who associate with such people) are unfit when it comes to genetic survival. I'm not saying it will be fast or clean but ultimately, this problem will solve itself.

    If people don't wise up, I'm pretty sure there will be revenge killing where parents who refused to vaccinate their child are killed by the relatives of a child who died as a result. This could also result in possible sociological solution where doctors enable others to vaccinate children of anti-vaxxers on their own accord. Rights and laws are only honored when they make sense to the general public.

    You humans are really silly. You solve a problem and then somehow make it a problem again.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:It's a self-solving problem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      child are killed by the relatives of a child who died as a result.
      Then the other child was not vaccinated either ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    2. Re:It's a self-solving problem by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Then the other child was not vaccinated either ...

      Measles vaccine, as an example, is only about 97% effective. It's good enough to stop the spread of measles, but not good enough to absolutely guarantee that you won't get measles....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:It's a self-solving problem by gotan · · Score: 1

      When someone vaccinated gets measles it's more likely (compared to unvaccinated cases) to be less severe.

      So there are 3 good reasons for vaccination:
      - most vaccinated people are immune,
      - even for those who aren't a measles infection will likely be less severe,
      - "herd immunity" also protects those who aren't vaccinated.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  9. Swindle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who is getting swindled? Are people paying big fees to increase their IQ? Are they joining expensive clubs like Mensa, and then hit with annual dues that they must pay because you can't quit the club?

    Also, it is a bit like saying "Height is a swindle." We like to measure things. Yes, IQ is measured by a battery of questions that are limited to a person's ability to recognize patterns or otherwise "see" things that fall into patterns... what makes this "pseudoscientific"? The results of a population of people fall along a bell-shaped curve, with most people in the middle. Most people consistently fall in a certain area of the curve. Where is the swindle? Is it a swindle to point out that different people perform differently on the test? Is it a swindle to find correlations between economic or social factors and how people do on the test? Shhhh! Don't talk about people being different!

  10. Re:Hallelujah, praise the vax! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Chemicals, eh? Wait until you realize your body is full of poisonous chemicals that your own body created. Hormones, too.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  11. Not just social media by Uberbah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Russia Madcow has been pushing a stupid conspiracy theory for almost three years on MSNBC. Whereas people who call BS on crap like false flags in Syria or a DNC worker being shot twice in a robbery where nothing is taken are smeared as "conspiracy theorists".

    1. Re:Not just social media by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      'smeared as "conspiracy theorists"'

      Some of these theories have some supporting evidence, though not to the "beyond a reasonable doubt" level of proof. Others have no evidence at all. The latter are conspiracy theories, not the former.

      Take for example the Seth Rich case. No evidence at all has turned up to back the claim that he was assassinated. On the other hand, Seth Rich himself said it was a mugging gone bad and the perps ran away... You did remember that Seth Rich lived long enough to get to the hospital and talk to the police, right?

    2. Re:Not just social media by fafalone · · Score: 1

      I've not seen enough evidence to form a conclusion on Seth Rich, but a "mugging gone bad" is precisely how you would assassinate someone. You'd make it look like a common crime, not an assassination. If anything it shifts the weight towards the latter, not away. Maybe his life was too clean for him to OD, and suicide too suspicious.

    3. Re:Not just social media by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Most of her stuff checks out, though.

      When she misses the mark she owns up to it, but an awful lot of the stuff she's reported on has been found to be true. Sometimes right away, sometimes later, but most of the time what she reports is accurate.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    4. Re:Not just social media by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      I've not seen enough evidence to form a conclusion on Seth Rich, but a "mugging gone bad" is precisely how you would assassinate someone. You'd make it look like a common crime, not an assassination. If anything it shifts the weight towards the latter, not away. Maybe his life was too clean for him to OD, and suicide too suspicious.

      Bullshit. What you're doing is shooting the arrow and then drawing a bullseye around it.

      You could claim anything and it would be impossible to prove it wasn't true.

      Hell, maybe he got mixed up with some crazy two-timing bitch and her other boyfriend hunted Seth Rich down and shot him. You don't know it's not true and it's every bit as valid as your 'theory'.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    5. Re:Not just social media by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Not so much. Ten million a year from NBC has turned Maddow from an insightful commentator into an unholy amalgamation of Glenn Beck and Alex Jones.

    6. Re:Not just social media by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You did remember that Seth Rich lived long enough to get to the hospital and talk to the police, right?

      And you do know he was shot, right? That people that are in shock and bleeding out aren't likely to whip out their deer stalkers and solve their own case, right? That an assassin wouldn't say "hey dude I'm here to kill youz" instead of "gimme your wallet".

      Right?

    7. Re:Not just social media by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. What you're doing is shooting the arrow and then drawing a bullseye around it.

      Speaking of bullshit, you're ignoring that nothing was taken in this "robbery", and that Wikileaks has all but identified Rich as being the source of the leaks.

    8. Re:Not just social media by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of bullshit, you're ignoring that nothing was taken in this "robbery", and that Wikileaks has all but identified Rich as being the source of the leaks.

      Those facts just bolster my case.

      It's so obvious- the other boyfriend wasn't out to rob him, he was out to kill him- that's why nothing was taken in the "robbery".

      See, I can 'connect' imaginary dots just like you can. But thanks for helping make my point.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  12. Re:Hallelujah, praise the vax! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Water is toxic. Please stop ingesting it.

  13. Re:Eliminated? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    Your reading comprehension is non-existent, so there's no hope for a resurgence. Elimination is defined by region, not world-wide. The cases in the US spread from people who came from outside the US.

  14. Wny Vaccinate. by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Just put it into our water lol...

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:Wny Vaccinate. by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Just put it into our water lol...

      As if these lunatics aren't paranoid enough. They already think fluoride treatment of water is some huge conspiracy too.

      Assholes should meet my mother, who has more crowns and bridges in her mouth than real teeth, for lack of fluoridated water when she was a child.

  15. Conspiratorial thinking, in largest part. by Truth_Quark · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some Aussies looked into the reasons last year.

    In order of magnitude, antivaccination attitudes were highest among those who

    (a) were high in conspiratorial thinking
    (b) were high in reactance
    (c) reported high levels of disgust toward blood and needles
    (d) had strong individualistic/hierarchical worldviews.

    In contrast, demographic variables (including education) accounted for nonsignificant or trivial levels of variance.


    The Psychological Roots of Anti-Vaccination Attitudes: A 24-Nation Investigation, Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. Health Psychology (2018)

    I don't know what you can do with that, but that's what's wrong with them: Conspriacy theorists who are bolshie, but not from any particular education level or demographic group.

    1. Re:Conspiratorial thinking, in largest part. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Are they people who are already prone to conspiratorial thinking and being bolshie, or were they made that way when they fell down the anti-vax rabbit hole and got "radicalized"?

      A journalist in the UK did test that was only semi-serious, but which had interesting results. He cut out all sources of news except for the Daily Mail. He reported feeling more paranoid and being more angry after a month of exposure, having come to view all sorts of groups with suspicion and hostility.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re: Conspiratorial thinking, in largest part. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Nice find, thanks!

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  16. Re: Liability by ruddk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But why, pray tell, do you think the death count from measles are so low?

  17. Re:Interesting question is by gaiageek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Measles was eliminated in the United States in 2000. Unless you're going to quarantine the US completely (close all borders, no one gets in or out) you're going to have people getting exposed. Vaccines are the only practical way to prevent it from spreading.

  18. No. Sometimes you can't reach stupid. by Uberbah · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's because the experts keep discrediting themselves. You might not think they are, but to an increasingly large number of people, science and government institutions are not trustworthy, for what they consider good reasons.

    Can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into. You can deluge anti-vaxxers with an exceptionally polite list of facts and research and it just makes them dig in even more. So what do you do with people that can't be reasoned with?

    1) Mocking. The Daily Show had on the lunar conspiracy theorist who got decked by Buzz Aldrin, after he hounded the retired astronaut, accusing him of being a liar and a cheat. After playing the clip of the theorist getting punched, the "reporter" "pointed out" that it looked fake.

    2) Give them so much shit in public, all the time every time, that they voluntarily stfu.

    1. Re:No. Sometimes you can't reach stupid. by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 2

      Funny that you should bring up the Daily Show since they had anti vaxxer and profession Katherine Hepburn impersonator RFK jr on and from what I remember they didn't mock him. I think this is the video of that episode but it's been a long time since I've last seen it. http://www.cc.com/video-clips/...

      --
      Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    2. Re:No. Sometimes you can't reach stupid. by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      That's a shame. With RFK I would have used tactic #3, using their own dumbass logic but on another subject. Like, when are we going to reign in the seat belt conspiracy? They don't always save lives, companies make money manufacturing them, and the government mandates that they be installed in all cars and trucks....ermagerd!

  19. Re:Interesting question is by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

    Even that won't work, if there's an animal reservoir and/or vector for the disease. That's why it's impossible to completely eradicate bubonic plague, for example.

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  20. Re:Interesting question is by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

    It kind of does if the animals are also vaccinated.
    That's how Belgium and Germany eliminated rabies, by spreading vaccinated bait for the foxes.
    It is far more difficult to achieve for the plague, though.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  21. Media put that in your head by aepervius · · Score: 4, Informative

    Factually what you reflect is the media stupid vault face on everything or jumping on any press release not understanding what is written. The reality is that science in general, no matter what a few tells you about reproducibility or significance criticism, is very very reliable. But the media don't like what they don't understand so you are very likely to read article spreading distrust on expert, or media taking a random idiot and pretending that person is an expert. The end game is people like you distrusting the expert, when in reality without expert you have NOTHING. Same shitty situation as with brexit really, where expert are distrusted "project fear".

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  22. Measles is eradicable by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The only infectious human disease we have ever eradicated is smallpox, which was eradicated way back in the 1970s. From an eradication point of view, measles and smallpox are very similar: they are viruses, they are highly infectious, they do not mutate super-fast, they infect only humans, it is obvious when someone has the disease, there is a very effective vaccine. From a technical point of view, eradicating measles is a very similar task to eradicating smallpox.

    However, there is one significant difference: measles is a fairly worrying disease, whereas smallpox is absolutely terrifying. This means there hasn't been the social and political will to push an eradication program. If the will did exist, we could wrap it up in about 10 years (wild guess on my part), and then nobody would ever need a measles vaccination ever again. Don't like vaccinations? Push for eradication. Your kids will get the jab, but your grandkids, great-grandkids, etc. forever, will not.

    The list of diseases considered eradicable (as of 2008) is quite short. For example, influenza is not - it readily jumps species (so eradication from humans would require vaccinating wild ducks, for example) and it mutates rapidly, so new vaccines are constantly needed.

    The list:
    Smallpox (eradicated)
    Polio (on the verge of eradication, probably 5 to 10 years off)
    Dracunculiasis/Guinea worm (on the verge of eradication)
    Yaws (on the verge of eradication)
    Malaria (eradication still decades away)
    Hookworm
    Lymphatic filariasis
    Measles
    Mumps
    Rubella
    Lymphatic filariasis
    Cysticercosis

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Measles is eradicable by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Well then, perhaps you should answer your own question: How did smallpox get eradicated?

      'Cause we know it did after a massive vaccination campaign, and people only stopped getting the vaccine after it was eradicated.....so the vaccine sure looks like it got the job done.

    2. Re:Measles is eradicable by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Is Malaria on that list because of vaccination or taking out the mosquitos? Because I know some people have talked about intentionally wiping out that species.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:Measles is eradicable by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You still failed to explain how smallpox was eradicated.

      Also, no, the vaccine did not give people smallpox. But hey, when you're doing one massive lie, might as well do two.

  23. Re:"infected travelers bring the disease" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is that a polite way of saying illegal immigrants are bringing diseases into the US?

    No. It refers mainly to unvaccinated US residents who temporarily leave the country to visit another and then return, or unvaccinated foreigners who enter the country for a visit and come into contact with unvaccinated locals before returning home - either way, almost entirely through airports and legally. Of course, unvaccinated immigrants pose the exact same risk as unvaccinated travellers, but you were asking specifically about whether the term is a euphemism. It is not.

    Measles are just one disease that we had nearly eliminated that are coming back now. Coincidence?

    No, for it to be a coincidence the two things must coincide. Immigrants, including infected ones, were entering back when measles was managing to stay "eliminated" too - it's not a recent phenomenon. That isn't a coincidence - that's a red herring.

    However, the resurgence of outbreaks does coincide with rise of the anti-vax movement. Make of that what you will.

  24. Re:"infected travelers bring the disease" by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    Except of course that Mexico and Nicaragua have higher vaccination rates against measles than the US: https://theweek.com/articles/5...

  25. Re:Hallelujah, praise the vax! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    We're gonna FORCE everyone to shoot up with CRAZY CHEMICALS!!!??1!!!1!!!! Hallelujah, praise the vax!

    Totally full of DHMO. The most deadly chemical known to man, fatal in all forms and its everywhere, completely unregulated. Mobilise the masses, something must be done!

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  26. Re:Shill siren ! by F.Ultra · · Score: 1

    Pro-vaccine shills, is that another word for "we who hate disease"? Does that make you a pro-disease shill then?!

  27. Re:Interestingly... by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, EVERYONE who got the measles had been vaccinated.

    This fact has been suppressed by the mainstream news outlets.

    Vaccination isn't the same as immunisation. Hence two completely different words.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  28. Latin America has better MMR use than USA by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 3, Informative

        Latin Americans are generally vaccinated (MMR) at a higher rate than people in the USA.

    I can tell you that when I looked it up online (google search) I found that Latin American countries had higher reported rates of MMR vaccination of their people than the USA does, by and large.

        I don't know who brought measles to the USA (illegals or unvaccinated travellers, or vaccinated travellers who got sick anyway), but looking at the stats, it's more justified for Latin America to bar immigration from the USA to them than vice versa.

        Kind of took the wind out of any ideas I may have had about illegal immigrants from Latin America bringing disease to USA. Either exaggerated or not true, more likely driven by racist bigotry than fact, at least when it comes to measles/mumps/rubella.

        In fact, given that I have heaps of evidence of racist bigotry, (black people get criminal convictions and far harsher punishments in USA for the *exact same crime* and with the *exact same criminal record* (look it up!)) and no real information about immigrants bringing disease, I'm just going to assume claims of immigrants bringing disease in at larger rates than native spread are more likely racist bigotry than fact. Occam's razor--not guaranteed to be correct, but a good heuristic.

    --PeterM

    1. Re:Latin America has better MMR use than USA by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Yeah the illegals swarming the border are causing HUGE tuberculosis problems for the US. A bit worse than fucking measles bro. Ask John Keats how bad dying of tuberculosis sucks.

      Or we could, I don't know, treat them for tuberculosis since that's a thing now that wasn't available in John Keats' day.

      And also, it was three cases of tuberculosis and 4 of HIV from a group of thousands of migrants. Hardly a huge problem as you claim.

      Both of these were top results in a 2 second Google search. Maybe just the tiniest bit of fact checking next time?

  29. MMR is 97% effective. Or 3% ineffective (2 doses) by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 2

    I didn't get the context about the claim that EVERYONE who got the measles had been vaccinated. I know that in some of the outbreaks in the USA right now, they're mostly raging amongst the unvaccinated.

    That said, vaccines aren't always perfectly effective. People's immune systems differ. MMR is 97% effective against measles after 2 doses. That means that 3% of people are susceptible despite vaccination.

    When you have an insanely contagious disease like measles, which can infect 20 new people for every case in a population that is not immune, you can expect a good amount of cases in VACCINATED people even when they've been vaccinated.

    That 3% of the vaccinated, and those who are immunocompromised by, say, antirejection drugs so that they can keep an organ that they've had donated to them, or who are on cancer chemotherapy, must depend on "herd immunity" to protect them from measles.

    Herd immunity is the effect that if enough of a population is immune to a disease, it can't spread in the population, and no member of the population is likely to be exposed, ever. For highly contagious measles and with a 97% vaccine effectiveness, herd immunity requires more than 90% of people be vaccinated.

    Anti-vaxxers thus put EVERYONE at risk, not just their poor helpless kids who are the primary victims of their parent's negligence of their civic duty to protect both their kids and the nation from disease. This is a big part of the reason that there is such disgust for anti-vaxxer behavior from the rest of us.

    --PeterM

  30. Re:"infected travelers bring the disease" by link-error · · Score: 1

    May illegal immigrants are coming from Guatemala, El Salvador, and Honduras. Not sure of their vaccination rates, but I'm sure it's not good.

    https://www.reuters.com/articl...

      and these are just the ones they catch. Others are disappearing into society, going to schools and using emergency facilities when they get really sick.

    --
    -Unresolved symbol? Byte me!
  31. Re:Interestingly... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, EVERYONE who got the measles had been vaccinated.

    Citation?

    I've seen several articles discussing the current outbreak as happening to people who were not vaccinated in areas where lack of vaccination was more common than normal for the USA as a whole....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  32. Re:Interestingly... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Informative

    Replying to myself.

    A quick check of Clark County, WA, indicates that of 73 cases reported at the time of the article, 63 were NOT vaccinated, three had had only one vaccination (as opposed to the two that are standard), and the remaining seven were "vaccination status unknown".

    So, I repeat, where is the evidence that "EVERYONE who got the measles had been vaccinated"? Evidence seems to support at least 90% NOT vaccinated....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  33. Re:Illegals by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The vaccination rate in Central and South American countries exceed the vaccination rate of the US.

    So no, it's not "illegal aliens". They get their shots. We don't.

  34. Re:Hallelujah, praise the vax! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, never mind the actual risk of that happening.

    It's 1 in 10,000.

    The rate of an adverse reaction to the MMR vaccine is about 1 in 6,000,000. And most of those are allergic reactions that are very treatable and do not cause life-long harm.

    There have been two deaths caused by the MMR vaccine. Ever. One was an advanced leukemia patient, who decided to risk the vaccine because of their risk of catching the disease due to morons like you. One was a baby, and the parents didn't authorize sharing their information.

    If you are unable to understand the difference between 1 in 10,000, 1 in 6,000,000 and 2 in 2,500,000,000, you should not be making the medical decisions for anyone.

    You do know that basically every person over the age of 60 has had the measles, right? Where exactly are their horror stories?

    In your local graveyard.

  35. Re: Hallelujah, praise the vax! by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    More than that. Everyone over 40 has had the measles

    Nope. I'm 45, never had measles. 'Cause I got vaccinated.

    It's almost like you don't actually know the history of the thing you're talking about...

  36. Re:Liability by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    The problem is it's difficult to prove a particular infection came from one person unless the disease is very rare.

  37. Re:Measles Paranoia and Propaganda by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Measles has an adverse reaction rate of 1 in 10,000. Yes, you survived. Hundreds of millions did not.

    We'd like those hundreds of millions to not die. You don't give a shit, since it won't kill you personally.

  38. Re:"infected travelers bring the disease" by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Almost none of them have ever been vaccinated

    Actually, the vaccination rate of every Central and South American country is higher than the US. So no, they were vaccinated. Also, these outbreaks were caused by US people getting infected abroad and bringing the disease back.

  39. Re:Illegals by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...so odd you didn't provide a cite for your bullshit, but require one from everyone else.

    So, you know where to find Google, right? There's this entity called the "World Health Organization" that tracks vaccination rates.

  40. Re: Hallelujah, praise the vax! by lactose99 · · Score: 1

    Facts and logic were never an antivax strength.

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  41. Re:Hallelujah, praise the vax! by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

    You do know that basically every person over the age of 60 has had the measles, right? Where exactly are their horror stories?

    In your local graveyard.

    This is the best mic drop end of comment I've seen in months. If I only had mod points good sir!

  42. Re:Liability by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    Let me put it this way, about 17 people died from a confirmed negative reaction to the MMR vaccine in 2017 (most recent year I could find good data for).

    Got a cite for that? It sounds odd ... "about 17".

    --
    Nope, no sig
  43. Not just that by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's large power structures encouraging a general distrust of science. Mega corporations fight climate change science. You've got Young Earth creationists railing against evolution and claiming the ark flood happened. And to this day people believe in trickle down economics crap like the Laffer curve and the "Job Creator" narrative.

    A lot of very wealthy people are spending a ton of money to convince people that science doesn't work so we won't listen to those pesky scientists because if we did we'd cost those wealthy people an awful lot of money...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not just that by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      There's the age old problem arising that old jobs go away and new jobs show up. This has almost always caused problems when it has happened in the past, with protests, strikes, politics, violence, etc. There's no difference now and politics is showing up to demand that obsolete jobs remain (coal mining) and that new jobs aren't wanted (green tech). It gets ugly when this is all framed as a conspiracy of the left to oppress those on the right, which is absurd but also it's nothing new historically.

      Compare the Thatcher era in the UKt where those losing mining jobs were blaming the conservative government directly for this while labour on the left were the ones insisting that they could keep these economically infeasible jobs. In the US it's flipped so that the "workers" are not on the left because of religious and cultural reasons (another reason why left vs right is becoming a meaningless measurement in the us as both major parties are a mix of both left and right).

  44. Re:Show the no nukes is antiscientific by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    The "dangers of wind turbines" narrative is fake too, being noting but a Denigrate Not My Solution argument. The real problem with wind and solar is the low energy density for each generating unit. Except for photovoltaic installations on existing structures, this causes energy sprawl, the need to pave over square kilometers of that sacred Environment to get utility-scale amounts of power. Dense, concentrated, small-footprint sources of energy that are available 24/7 are the best. The one renewable that fits this description is hydro (and in a few lucky places, geothermal).

    I don't know whether you're European, but several years ago I went over there to hike the Wainwright. Every small village across Cumbria and Yorkshire was fighting the NIMBY battle to install a three-turbine wind facility. Had they just installed one big nuke at Windscale, the start of the hike and a place where the nuclear bullet has already been bitten, they could have powered the region while avoiding the whole mess, and left all those villages pristine.

  45. almost feels like by sad_ · · Score: 1

    somebody is playing Plague Inc IRL

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  46. Re:Illegals by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Literally 5 seconds of googling "vaccination rates"...

    https://data.oecd.org/healthca...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  47. Re:Illegals by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Measles cases have has risen since 2000 as infected third world trash Illegal aliens bring the disease to the U.S.

    Fixed.

    Actually you'll find it's the trash locals that aren't vaccinated and travel to places where such diseases are active, then bring them back to developed nations to spread which are to blame.

    Asylum seekers get checked for vaccinations at the border, if not present, are then vaccinated... Even if the program has to be run by volunteers like MSF (Doctors Without Borders).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  48. Re:You first. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Not only that but Mexico has a higher vaccination rate against MMR than the US...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  49. Re:Interesting question is by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

    Measles was eliminated in the United States in 2000.

    I hear this meme a lot. The CDC reported 216 cases of measles in the U.S. from 2001-2003. Roughly 1 in 5 of those were of "unknown" origin (i.e., they couldn't find evidence to pin the case on an external source).

    That's certainly a puzzling definition of "eliminated" -- it seems more along the lines of "Mission Accomplished" in Iraq than any sort of statistical reality.