Slashdot Mirror


Ontario Promotes Private Crypto

An anonymous reader writes "Wired News has this story about the government of Ontario, Canada endorsing citizens to use encryption. 'While the US Congress recoils in horror at the prospect of a population armed with cryptographic tools, a government department in Ontario wants to make it clear that encryption is good. ' " After this and my recent trip to Ottawa, I think I may need to stop making Canada jokes...It's interesting to compare and contrast the crypto policies of various nations.

340 comments

  1. It *IS* to install! by deusx · · Score: 1

    Let me differ. Ssh is a pain in the butt to install. I have tried this one and gave up. Laugh however you want about point-and-drool types, I just don't want to spend a week setting up ssh. It just isn't worth the effort presently.

    Whatwhatwhat?

    I'm a complete newbee to SSH, but I managed to install it from an RPM, from source, and rebuilt SRPM on a half dozen machines. Each machine, and each method took me less than 10-30 minutes (depending on compile times).

    And as I remember, it was a mostly trivial task to get up and running. WIthin 2 hours after that, I figured out how to bring up port forwarding and now have various machines piercing firewalls and allowing me to work from home over an encrypted link.

    WHeee!

  2. http://anon.proxy.anonymizer.com/Re:Ontario Politi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a resident of Ontario, if I could just point out a few things:

    The current government in Ontario is incredibly conservative. Whatever label you use, this government has pissed off more people than it has pleased in this province.

    What's that, you say? Didn't they get elected, then get re-elected?

    Let's look more finely at the details -- elections in Canada (and Ontario) are won by the party that wins the most seats. That doesn't mean they are won because more people in the province voted for the winning party. In fact, the Conservative gov't currently in power won with less than 50% of the popular vote in the province, but they still have a majority gov't. That means more people voted against this gov't than for them.

    I could go on for a long time about the many things this gov't is doing that is bad for the province of Ontario. Here's just a few:

    - cutting taxes for the rich (the middle to lower income bracket reaps little from the cuts, the wealthy, quite a bit
    - lowered welfare payouts, and passed laws that require welfare recipients and the elderly to pay for prescription drugs (passing costs on to those who can afford it least)

    Those two small items have the unfortunate effect of making the rich richer, and the poor poorer. Sorry to say it, but it's making Ontario more like the United States. It's a Bad Thing.

    What else? How about:

    - cutting education spending, while simultaneously passing laws allowing universities to raise tuition through the roof, as well as allowing banks to supply loans with longer repayment schedules

    What's bad about that? It passes the cost of education almost entirely on to the students. Students in technical or professional programs (like Computer Science or Medicine) at some universities are footing tuition that has increased by more than 500%. Governments need to realize that education spending is an investment, and that there are a lot of bright kids out there who may just happen not to be rich (like I was) before going to university. A lot of kids in that situation just won't go to university at all, when they consider a $50,000 + debt after graduation. That's just bad economics for the province, who will suffer a lack of skilled workers in the near future.

    I could go on and on. But the original post needed a rebuttal.

    And encryption? The Privacy Commisioner (AFAIK) is entirely independent of the government. So don't be too quick to pass your thanks on to Mike Harris and his cronies!

    Just my admittedly subjective opinion.

  3. Re:Education spending by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. But many US schools offer fairly insane levels of scholarships based on either need or merit. I'm not sure what, say, the *average* net cost is here, or how many people pay full-rate...

    The other thing is, in the US, private schools aren't being subsidized that much by taxes, in constrast to the directly research-related funding that they do tend to get. What happens if you figure the Canadian gov't contribution to it? Is it still more efficient than ours, and if so, are there any obvious reasons why?

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  4. Re:Nuggets of Harris Wisdom by warmi · · Score: 1

    No shit! Why the hell should I support some pregnant woman. She has brains just like everybody else. If she fucks up - her problem ! We are not fricking children anymore.
    I don't mind supporting people who are truly in need of support ( disabled, sick .) That's charity !!!

  5. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same in Calgary. We've had ADSL just about for three years and now offered by two companies. Cable for almost as long.

  6. Re:Peterson's debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets not forget who put Ontario billions in debt in the first place. Bob did a pretty good job for an NDP government at the time. Seems oh so trivial that one of his party members was a Sunshine Boy now doesn't it? Sure glad I got out of Ontario in 92! Now I live in B.C. where geeks are geeks and sheep are very afraid!!!

  7. Re:Ontario Politics by Gryphon · · Score: 1

    Just like to point out, I meant to post that comment logged in.

    Gryphon, in all my humble opinionated glory.

  8. Re:Ontario is looking much better. by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it's a silly point, but it would seem less dangerous (from the shooter's POV) to have a school shooting in a suburban district which is unused to such and has low security measures, than in city schools experienced with gang violence. That, and it's far less likely that any students will be able to fire back...

    Suburban schools haven't taken nearly as many safety measures, in general, and have less experience with doing so. If, say, I went mucker, it'd be a lot safer for me to do so in an upscale New England suburb, than in Chicago, or Dallas.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  9. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Dr.Jay · · Score: 1

    Funny how many Americans (I did not say all as I do not want to offend the handful of learned Americans out there) think that they are right in insulting a country where they know little about, if anything at all. Sorry, can someone remind me the last international standing on academics, including math and science (lets leave geo, his and econ completely out to save humiliation to the southerners...)oh, well I guess I won't be getting those stats any time soon, as few americans can count, spell, type let alone read, so where would they find that info anyway? Unless you know what you are talking about, keep you mouth shut. Canadians may be a quiet bunch, but when we talk, we have something informative to say, and we are usually right. Don't forget tweedledee, that the majority of your space program are ex avroaero boys from up north, that a significant number of your software programmers and computer engineers are Canadian born a raised, and that our minds run the world, we just let you guys spend the money to front our ideas. We may look stupid to you, but who benefits from our ideas for free? Hmmmm, now are our taxes really that high? Nope, we just make it seem so...

  10. So true. by MrEd · · Score: 1
    I'll refrain from comparing the original poster to the H-person, but really...

    The poor are not a burden we can just dump. That's the way to a regime of terror. We, the people who have wealth, must give a small part of what we enjoy to those who are without. And, as the previous poster so insightfully pointed out, if people are starving, they're damn well going to stick you up!

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:So true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a libertarian they are. Remember, THE INDIVIDUAL COMES FIRST. When rich people make up the government, the government will favor rich people. That is the way it has always been and that is the way it will always be in north america. The fascist rednecks here on slashdot want lower taxes so they can make more money. They don't need welfare so they want to get rid of it. They and their immediate families are healthy so they want to eliminate health programs. Short sighted thinking by small minded individuals who think that just because they make good money now in the computer industry, they are set for life. When reality sets in, most of them will probably go back to live with their parents.

    2. Re:So true. by Compuser · · Score: 1

      If some of this is a reference to me then let me enlighten you:
      a. I am extremely poor and I do not foresee making decent money
      any time soon.
      b. I am expressing my worldview, which is not rooted in my financial
      situation. Only a Marxist pig (pardon the flame) would associate one's
      views and their financial interests.

  11. Try debian by NatePuri · · Score: 1

    I am no linux expert. I have set up and use ssh quite a lot on my network. I something like setting up ssh is a problem for you, then you really ought to consider installing debian. A simple 'apt-get install ssh' handles it all for you. It's a 3 min download and a 5 second install. That's it. X11 forwarding, etc, etc....

    I understand your remarks about PGP being difficult. You are right, but what is the alternative? Making some mua do everything automatically creates security holes and other security no no's.

    You want you password cached so that you don't have to remember it? Well is that little cache file secure?

    I'm glad to see other countries taking privacy so seriously, I worry about the U.S. It's not just the government, many many Americans are too reliant on corporations for their daily necessities. Sometimes you just have to hunker down and learn it yourself.

    If you want control over yourself and your love-ones, you really have to take it. Don't ask for it. Don't say, "please Mr. CEO write something easier for me...' Don't be weak. Read. Learn. Work. It's time.

  12. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - me too by tzanger · · Score: 1

    Bleeding Heart. Crybaby. Idealist. Take your pick.

    What did you want them to do? Continue along the previous trend? I for one am glad Harris stayed in power. He's got the balls to do something rather than pander to all the SIGs out there demanding money for this and that and not proposing how to pay for it without raising taxes.

    Why the HELL should welfare recipients get free money without any kind of tests to make sure they aren't pissing it away on drugs and alcohol? I see it all the time. Grab the cheque, cash it and go to the liquor store. Screw that!

    Why the HELL should teachers get a 2 month vacation AND get 4.5hrs a day of non-class time? I realize that prep takes time but 1/2 your day for prep and marking?! Give me a break!

    At the same rate, why should professors be allowed to constantly hike up their salaries and make the government pay for it? I'm not using their services! Friends of mine in university often tell me that the profs hardly do anything; they pass it on to the TAs to take care of so they can get on with research. Why should I subsidize that?

    Hospital cuts were a bad thing. I won't deny that. A very bad thing. There needs to be much work done to figure a way to provide decent health care for all, while at the same time weeding out those who abuse the system and call the doctor for every scrape and every headache.

    PLEASE NOTE I am making many over-generalizations here. I know people on welfare who scrimp and save and just can't get by. I know teachers who put their life blood into teaching children and dump hours of extra personal time into extracarricular activities. I'm sure there are professors who actually teach. What I am saying is that a few bad apples do spoil the bunch. I'm sorry the good has to suffer with the bad, but it's the only way to keep things from turning into total chaos and overspending hell. I really do feel sorry for those people caught in the system where there are now so many checks and balances and rechecks that no actual real work can actually get done. I however would rather proceed cautiously than full steam ahead with abandon.

    Andrew

  13. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in regina, sask. We have had ADSL since 1996, they say the first in North america...We also have Cable and wireless here. Also RADSL. check it out.. http://www.sasktel.com/speed/main_no flash.html

  14. more incentive to leave... by spoon42 · · Score: 1

    God bless America. Where the government has no problem with heavily armed idiots, but is deathly afraid of smart people with cryptography software. Go figure. Yet another reason to move to Canada, eh? ;-)

    --
    --- this comment is presented in WIDE SCREEN STEREO!!!
    1. Re:more incentive to leave... by spoon42 · · Score: 1

      hmm... what happened to my tags? ;-)

      --
      --- this comment is presented in WIDE SCREEN STEREO!!!
  15. Re:Encryption development going on in Ontario by jfunk · · Score: 1

    Yup, I was thinking of trying to join IBM in Ottawa after I finish school but decided against it. It appears that there's nothing in my field there.

    According to IBM, "Ottawa has the largest concentration of database talent outside of Silicon Valley."

    I'm not IT, so screw it. Maybe Cisco will pick up someone like me... Oh well, that's another four years ahead, with three just finished.

    Seven years... If I don't go insane first.

  16. Off Topic - Guns and real power. by Tord · · Score: 1

    "Yeah they do allow it but its heavily restricted and give the people no real power to fight an unjust government." I know this is very off topic, but have you ever heard of Mahatma Gandhi or Nelson Mandela? Both fought and defeated corrupt systems without any weapons.What they had was real power, weapons are just semi-real power. People have also tried to fight unjustice with weapons, but that rarely leads anywhere. Northern Ireland and the Middle East are examples of this. If a large majority (i.e. 90% of U.S. citizens against a possible future corrupt regime) wants to fight for their freedom they'll win with or without weapons. If a minority wants to fight for their freedom they will probably have better luck not using weapons. If they use weapons they will kill people and people will turn against them. Since they're the weaker part they will be defeated. If they don't use weapons, people might listen to their opinions and support their cause. If they are fought with weapons they might gain support from non-involved observers who might be a bigger threat against their oppressors.

    1. Re:Off Topic - Guns and real power. by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      In another country (for instance, Canada!) it may be possible to do this, but in America there is such a large, heavily armed military that chances are 90% of the population could not overthrow the government, with or without petty guns. Of course, the military is going to have a massive loss of morale like that occurs on our soil. At least the Civil war had sides, North vs. South.. a war like that would probably just cause utter chaos.

    2. Re:Off Topic - Guns and real power. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why dont you take a second to think about what you are saying. Ghandi did nothing but get killed (10 years later india was given up for ECONOMIC reasons). And Nelson Mandela had the backing of the majority of the population of the county. And they WERE armed. If it came to fighing Mandela's faction would have won, but it didn't have to come to that because the government realized they would be defeated and so gave up. In that case the realization that the people had power over the goverment brought about a great change without mass bloodshed occuring. And if every irish person in belfast wanted to destroy every british government building, by tommorow the brits would be gone. In the middle east no-one is trying to fight for justice, they fight because they are all religious zealots. Hassan

  17. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmm....last time I checked..When you challenged your government (IE: Your Civil War) it was one of the bloodiest wars in history and still your goverment won.. I cant see how owning a gun allows you to fight your own government..You shoot handguns and assult rifles at your goverment..your government will drop smartbombs on you.. =) Have fun the next time you decide you need a new government and pick up you little gun to try and stop them..After laughing for awhile..they will wipe you off the face of the earth..probably for the better too =) Peace my friend.

  18. Re:You would fit into a fascist state, you know. by Rix · · Score: 1

    Instead of starving people out and scaring the s*&t out of people who can't help themselves already, why don't we go and empower them with skills, knowledge and give them a kickstart?

    But why *should* we? It's not my responsibility to make sure Joe Welfare Bum has food money, it's his! At the very most, we should implement a loan system, like we do for students.
    Cheers,

    Rick Kirkland

  19. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Rix · · Score: 1

    How many Canadians out there have actually read it? Right up front it says that the gov't can exempt a law from it if they like, and judges only have to uphold it if the infraction "brings the system of justice into disrepute."
    Cheers,

    Rick Kirkland

    1. Re:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How many Canadians out there have actually read it? Right up front it says that the gov't can exempt a law from it if they like

      And don't think lots of Canadians, no matter what their politics, hate it. Hard-core right wingnuts hate Quebec using it to keep their unconstitutional language laws in place. Radical left lunatics hate Alberta having considered using it to overturn a court ruling that homosexuals deserve human rights.

      The "notwithstanding clause" is a piece of shit, put in as a sop to Quebec but far too convenient for any government from Quebec to Alberta to Ottawa that doesn't want to acknowledge that we have constitutional law in this country. I don't want any politician deciding that our rights are optional if they have a majority.

  20. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    You've obviously never examined counter-insurgency situations, nor history. Are you aware, for instance, that the Bolsheviks were seriously outnumbered by the White forces at the start of their insurrection? That the Maoists had to deal with a significantly larger and well-funded, but insanely corrupt (True. Chiang Kai-Shek and a certain Tong/Triad) Kuomintang? And so forth.

    Have you studied the ACW? The Confederacy had remarkably poor access to industry, armaments, currency and so forth. They were *seriously* outmatched in just about every regard except generalship (for much of the war) and morale (for the early part). Were the population to rebel against the Gov't en masse here, however, it would be the citizens that have the advantages over population, territory, and production; the US has difficulty with situations where the people oppose them partly because they seemingly have lacked the stomach for such, ever since the conquest of the Philippines post-Spanish-American War (where the US *was* utterly ruthless against the rebels, largely imitating the Spanish pre-war tactics in Cuba).

    And, according to your logic, the Finnish would have been routed by the Soviet Red Army within, oh, days, and the Warsaw Ghetto (one of the *most* overmatched situations in history...) wouldn't have held out an hour. And so forth. Insurgency situations are dramatically different from open-battlefield confrontations from the ACW era, as you'd know if you studied history a whit.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  21. Mr. Harris knows business very well. CDN==LINUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mike Harris, our beloved premier, knows business very very well. This is why we have such policies coming from Canada. We will never see such dumb rules as the US government is trying to release. CANADA will lead the world in security and ofcourse with the help and use of Linux.

  22. Re:MODERATE FREEBSD POST DOWN PLEASE? by nieveh · · Score: 1

    I think it was meant to be posted in the previous article re Oracle. A simple mispost.

    --

    ~~~NO CARRIER~~~

  23. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    Things such as garbage collection which used to be free are now charged for, and our water which used to be a small flat rate is now going to a per gallon fee.

    TANSTAAFL. Those things were never free to begin with. Instead, you used to live in a situation where there was not a relationship between the expenses caused by individuals and the amount that those individuals had to pay. Now things are expensed fairly and there's accountability, and you're complaining?!? *sigh*

    Oh, and lets not forget our education system, ranked as one of the worst funded in North America. Our fscking books are older than I'am, and they're falling apart. That and our teachers have gone on strike twice because of how bad the have been treated by the government.

    If you are unhappy with your "free" public education, why not fire the government from that job? I'm sure you can find someone who will give you a good education for a fair price.



    ---
    Have a Sloppy night!
    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  24. Who gives a shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care if they fly small probes into my ass to see what I ate and what I'll be shitting out in the next 24 hours. This isn't Cloak and Dagger; it's Canada. As long as it doesn't interfere with my day, they can do whatever 'spying' they want. I don't break laws (in any serious way), so as long as they keep what they know about me private from people who know me personally, it doesn't matter. Oooh, look, I'm picking my nose NSA... look at me. I'll spare your little spy droids the pain of watching me pick my arse.

    1. Re:Who gives a shit? by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      What about when the company you work for loses a contract, because a competing company in another country 'mysteriously got some inside information' on your bid? It has happened. Hope it doesn't happen to you.

  25. Re:canada jokes by nieveh · · Score: 1

    uneducated Canadians


    I'd have to high object since the majority of the American population probably couldn't pass their own test for citizenship.


    I really don't have anything against Americans. Just America.

    --

    ~~~NO CARRIER~~~

  26. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  27. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by tzanger · · Score: 2

    What's wrong with user fees?

    Why should you get away with paying $20/mo for the 300 000 gallons of water you use while I pay $20/mo for the 300 I use?

    Why should you get away with free garbage collection when you are wasteful and put out more than a 4-child family?

    And your point about emissions testing... so you WANT your children to grow up in a world where they can't breathe the air? Give me a break! If your car's broken, FIX IT. don't bitch at the government for making you fix it so you don't add to the pollution problems!

    You sound like you've been abusing the system for so long now that when it's time to pay for what you use you'll rant and rave at how unfair it is instead of owning up to it.

    And no, I'm not some wealthy person driving my $60k car, drinking champagne and smoking cigars. I'm a hardworking person who has trouble getting by like the next guy but at least I realize that what is going on is called user fees and evens out the problems. If you were paying a flat fee before, you were subsidizing the guy next to you using more than yourself, or vice versa. If you're a big user, your fees go up. Otherwise they come down.

    Yes harris offloaded on to the municipalities and for the most part I'm not happy with that. However, I am happier that my money is going to somewhere closer to home than it was before. My money now has more 'clout' where I live.

    Personally I'd love to see road work turned over to private companies like it is in the US. introduce fair competition. you want the $5mil contract for resurfacing the roads? bid on it like everyone else and you've at least got a shot at it. THAT would bring about more employment and make things better (I think).

    Andrew

  28. Re:An open letter to the FBI by DGolden · · Score: 1

    >Therefore, this is the US's way of trying to not say OOPS 20 years from now.

    Except that they're trying to shut the
    field gate when the horse has already bolted...

    Strong crypto is easy to get hold of here in Ireland (and the rest of the EU) They may wish it were otherwise, but the cat's out of the bag, and it isn't going back in...

    The chinese and arab nations also, of course, already have strong crypto, and are not stupid enough not to develop it further ( notwithstanding certain idiot fundamentalist muslims (the majority of muslims are very nice, enlightened, reasonable people -more so than most cristians - but I'm an atheist anyway...) breeding out intelligence from their races by encouraging stupid, subservient women, who will of course bear them stupider children - intelligence is partly genetic, but not much sex-linked...


    --
    Choice of masters is not freedom.
  29. Canada strikes back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to remind Americans how cool you are;)

    1. Re:Canada strikes back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who think about nationality are throwbacks.

  30. Mike Harris uses Linux? :) Debian! YEP.. hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Mike Harris use Linux? Ofcourse he does, his home box is running Debian 2.2 -- Using his crypto technology he is the primary test subject for the Ontario government when it comes to encryption. Not Redhat boyz. But Debian, thats right. Mike Harris is a great premier and will always be a great premier. He will change Ontario into a Open Source Business, with all the business' running Linux (Debian ofcourse :) )).

  31. First post!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is the first... Anyway, it's good to see that there is at least one gov't that gives a damn about the privacy and rights of its people. If the US keeps taking away our civiln liberties I may just have to head north.

    1. Re:First post!? by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      One of the cocnerns for governments about cryptography is obviously because of it's ability to be used to do the things the lawmakers talk about, like encrypting kiddy pr0n and other unpleasant things like that. Canada's culture dictates that the rights of the individuals are paramount over those of law enforcement, and they don't have a problem with them encrypting the stuff. For example, un-warrented participant surveillance is illegal in Canada. That's where you get a person to wear a "wire" to record their conversation with someone, who presumable, you the policeman, want to talk to. You can still do it, you just need to show just cause for a wiretap order.

    2. Re:First post!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry you aren't first I am ;'}

    3. Re:First post!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany was actually the first to reccomend this strategy. It was said by the Chancellor the day after the public learned that Air Bus had some of their correspondence snooped.

    4. Re:First post!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I you won't have to work 80 hours like those poor Silicon Valley workholic.

    5. Re:First post!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what makes you guys think we'd take you?

    6. Re:First post!? by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Uh-huh. Yeah sure you will. And if it ever becomes as bad as you think - you won't make it to Canada. So best be on your way right now...

    7. Re:First post!? by poink · · Score: 1

      And how would you (the general population) stop us? With your imaginary guns?

      Scene at border:
      Bang! I hit you! You're dead!

      No, you didn't! You missed!

      I hit you! Not fair! Mommmmm!

  32. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

    AC speaks the truth. I spent some time living in London Ontario. Inside London was great.. Cable TV and internet everywhere.. 5 mins outside London, at a friends place... lets just say there are some areas of Canada where bell still uses party lines. I am not joking. Here we are in 1999 and major Telcos still force people to use partylines. I've also spent a lot of time in rural Australia. My uncle's farm (200kms from the capital city) has four phone lines going into it.. one for the business phone, one for the residential phone, one for the modem to their ISP, in the local calling area, and one for the fax. Even in the middle of the Australian desert, they have public payphones, solar powered with an immarsat uplink, but still ;>

    My point is this.. Canada is a wonderful place. Just as long as you live in a decent sized city. Otherwise.. think yourself lucky if you have electricity.

  33. Runaway fathers by tzanger · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. It should be criminal to shirk your duties as a father. THAT is legislation that should come in.

    How the HELL you'd do it I have no idea. I would imagine if you ran away from your duties the mother woudln't WANT you around, but then you should have your wages garnished to support your children.

    This topic gets me SERIOUSLY seamed. I honestly think that if dad's took a bigger role in their children's upbringing there'd be less violence in the world. Having a poor (or no) father figure is NOT healthy.

  34. Re:http://anon.proxy.anonymizer.com/Re:Ontario Pol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > In fact, the Conservative gov't currently in power won with less than 50% of the popular vote in the province, but they still have a majority gov't Yes, and Bill Gates is in power at MS with only 20% of the shares. Harris got more votes than any of the other candidates. Big deal.

  35. Re:Obviously you haven't heard what the FBI said.. by jilles · · Score: 1

    Well the FBI doesn't own the web, nor does the US (though I have to admit that a large portion is physically located in the US).
    Anyway I don't think that US/FBI can deny non-americans the right to own, use and sell encryption software they can just deny americans the right to sell/give encryption software to non americans.

    --

    Jilles
  36. situation for belgium by Le+Fol · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, in belgium crypto is theorically and pratically not illegal. There is a law against it, _but_ the application texts where never published, so it's perfectly legal up to that time, which will probably never occur. The current trend is to make crypto non only legal, but to make digital signatures having a legal value.

    1. Re:situation for belgium by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Digital signatures use the same basic technology as some crypto systems, but past that, they completely differ. Governments, even the US, and within that, even the NSA, endorse the idea of utilizing strong crypo technologies for use in digital signatures. That's not even close to a "win". That enables much better and reliable tracking. When you sign something, it doesn't in any way hide what you actually signed. It actually makes it much easier to track an individual if everything he sends is signed. It only adds a mathematical hash to the beginning of the file that anyone is able to strip out. They can't substitute it, but if you're not looking for it and it's not there, you won't miss it.

      Fighting for crypto and being enthused for receiving digital signatures is adsurd. I forgot the other word i was gonna use...

  37. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by arafel · · Score: 1

    This may be a silly question, but why is using encrypted mail *all the time* deemed to be a good thing?

    When necessary, sure, but just for casual chats between friends, enquiries to companies, etc. I don't *want* to have to be using encrypted mail.

    Admittedly at least part of this can be traced to the fact that Pegasus doesn't have perfect encryption integration, but I wouldn't change my mind anyway. It's just not required all the time.

  38. Re:�Canada rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ontario government understands business, business understands cryptography. 'nuff said.

  39. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh MY! I guess i better tell my supperiors here at TELUS (BCTEL) in BC that we should no longer be selling ADSL because it doesn't exist here! - I guess that means we have to stop selling ISDN, Wireless & fibre as well so that we can stick with dial-up. I'll be phoning the three cable companies that sell cable internet access here and tell them to stop selling as well.

  40. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
    I use WinNT/Linux.

    Is that a new operating system, like GNU/Linux? Maybe the Wine people will get there one day.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  41. For once Canada does something right! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is because the public found out that the RCMP was intercepting email?

    At least its a step in the right direction.

    Now, if we could just get the Canadian government to stop trying to steal 55% of your income. ;-)

  42. Re:Move west, not south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Saskatchewan? Ha. Saskatchewan is the most socialist place in North America.

    You know, I advise reading more of the Star-Phoenix than one sentence. It's amazing how balanced their coverage is, considering they're owned by not-a-Lord Conrad Black, and part of that balance is a plain and simple realization that the current government is a lot better than any of the alternatives that are on the scene. (You'd also be amazed how few people who actually call themselves socialists think they're living in "the most socialist place in North America".)

    Compared with the backstabbers that are the Liberals, the criminals that are the Tories, and the rednecks who weren't even good enough to qualify as backstabbing criminals that are the (cough) Saskatchewan Party, the NDP are pretty damn good. I voted for them twice so far, and since I like balanced budgets, tax cuts, and social services I will do so again.

  43. This is an insanely good thing to see... by Nugget94M · · Score: 2
    Not only is this an insanely good thing to see, but it provides an excellent opportunity to endorse ssh and pgp.

    You! Reading this article! Do you use ssh and pgp? If not, why not? You're part of the problem!

    If you're not using PGP (yet), drop by http://www.pgpi.com/ and have a look around. http://www.pgpi.com/cgi/download-wizard .cgi will let you easily determine exactly which version of is appropriate for your OS and location. PGP installation is pretty straightforward and there is ample online documentation and tutorials. Not only does PGP become more useful each time a new person starts using it, but the more people we have using PGP routinely the harder it will be to remove our freedom to do so. There's no reason not to use encryption, except for inertia. And I guarantee it's not as hard to install or use as you may be thinking.

    Using a nice pgp-aware mailer like mutt is a nice step, too.

    If you ARE using telnet or rlogin or ftp, then you have problems now and you don't even realize it. Did you realize that every time you telnet or rlogin or ftp to a remote host that you are transmitting your username and password in clear text? Sniffing passwords is a trivial task, mostly due to the widespread use of insecure protocols such as telnet. ssh is a drop-in, secure alternative for telnet, rlogin, rsh, and ftp. Not only is it secure, but it's easier to use and more featureful as well. On top of security it adds such features as compression, encrypted traffic, encrypted tunnels, and completely automatic and secure X11 forwarding. Plus with RSA Authentication you can eliminate passwords entirely. A cracker can't crack a password that doesn't exist.

    Unix users can obtain ssh from ftp://ftp.cs.hut.fi/pub/ssh/ and have it up and running in a matter of minutes. I recommend the 1.2.27 version of ssh (as opposed to the v2 platform) due to licensing difficulties with the v2 platform. Non-unix users have even more options.

    For Win32 there's SecureCRT (http://www.vandyke.com) which is an excellent, albeit commercial solution. There's also a very nice, free implementation of ssh which works with Tera Term. You can grab it from http://hp.vector.co.jp/author s/VA002416/teraterm.html

    There's even an opensource ssh for win32 at http://www.chiark.greenend.o rg.uk/~sgtatham/putty.html although I must admit that I'm not sure I trust an ssh implementation done by a guy who refuses to implement RSA Authentication.

    For Macintosh, I understand that there's a nice plug-in for NiftyTelnet at http://www.lysator.liu.se/~jon asw/freeware/niftyssh/ although I've not used it.

    There's never been a better time to be more secure. Simply by installing a couple of easy-to-use applications you could be on your way to a more secure, more private computing experience. Your data is yours, and here are two ways to ensure that it stays that way.

    Yeah, I ripped this shamelessly from my .plan -- so sue me, it's still useful information...

    1. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by rrogers · · Score: 1

      Going from memory of the docs that came with pgp... Think of it this way: encrypting email is like putting a snail mail letter in an envelope. If it weren't the standard, and then suddenly you started doing it, someone would think you had something to hide. Now if everyone was using encryption(envelopes) all the time, noone would be suspicious of you.

      I know that doesn't even come close to explaining it, but I did the best I could really quickly without going searching for it in the docs (especialy since I just got this computer 2 days ago and haven't gotten pgp on here yet...)

    2. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by Gleef · · Score: 2

      Nugget94M asks:

      You! Reading this article! Do you use ssh and pgp?
      No!

      If not, why not?

      Because ssh is non-free, and pgp is patent encumbered. Why use that when there are excellent Free alternatives, such as:
      SSLrsh
      SSL-MZtelnet
      gpg
      S/WAN

      ----

      --

      ----
      Open mind, insert foot.
    3. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by Fizgig · · Score: 2

      So he meant the client on Windows?! That's even easier. You don't have to type anything!

    4. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by arafel · · Score: 1

      Sure, but if it's encrypted, why do I care if they think I have something to hide? ;-)

    5. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by Sun+Tzu · · Score: 2

      Also, check out the lsh project. I don't know where the home is but the link has the files. The lsh project intends to implement the ssh protocols in open source.

    6. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You! Reading this article! Do you use ssh and pgp? If not, why not? You're part of the problem!

      Thanks for lightening up my day...

      I've never set up PGP because it's pointless. Until we get really good IP-level encryption and logically-impenetrable software (yeah, this *does* require that your assumptions are accurate) at a consumer level, PGP is a strong point...but surrounded by thousands of holes.

      I use WinNT/Linux. I have to use a remote college box via unencrypted telnet. So first off, anyone who wants to can grab my password or whatever. I run a reasonably secure box...I don't have lots of unnecessary things running, I don't run as root, and don't make things that can write to arbitrary files suid. Even so, anyone can sit down and in 10 minutes compromise either of my OSes...either by doing a linux single reboot (which I haven't had the heart to remove, because I need it if I screw up X, which auto-runs because not using xdm is worse security-wise), or by installing another copy of WinNT onto my DOS volume, rebooting, and giving themselves admin privileges. That assumes that they can't find any holes in the OSes.

      And I guarantee it's not as hard to install or use as you may be thinking.

      PGP software should be seamless. I may be greedy, but I want zero effort on my part to use it. I install the rpm, and have encrypted mail. And it just plain doesn't work like that. If PGP was zero- or near-zero-effort, people would use it.

      ssh is a drop-in, secure alternative for telnet, rlogin, rsh, and ftp. Not only is it secure, but it's easier to use and more featureful as well. On top of security it adds such features as compression, encrypted traffic, encrypted tunnels, and completely automatic and secure X11 forwarding. Plus with RSA Authentication you can eliminate passwords entirely. A cracker can't crack a password that doesn't exist.

      Let me differ. Ssh is a pain in the butt to install. I have tried this one and gave up. Laugh however you want about point-and-drool types, I just don't want to spend a week setting up ssh. It just isn't worth the effort presently. And if ssh is so secure, why does it seem to keep having buffer overflow problems left and right?

      I'd really like to see an ssh without authentication. I really doubt that anyone would try an impersonation attack on me, and if they did, it would be noticeable (SYN-flooding sort of sticks out a bit). On the other hand, it *is* a bit too easy for Joe Six Pack to set up a sniffer, and I *would* like to have an encrypted transmission. I shouldn't have to establish and propogate private keys then when installing ssh. That would be nice.

      I haven't tried the commercial Win32 options, because I'm cheap and don't really want to spend a bunch of money on it. I couldn't *find* a free Win32 implementation, so thanks for mentioning that.

      Using the Mac SSH *is* a PAIN. Especially since BetterTelnet is the best Mac telnet, and I don't know whether it supports the same plug-ins that NCSA Telnet and NiftyTelnet does.

      There's never been a better time to be more secure. Simply by installing a couple of easy-to-use applications you could be on your way to a more secure, more private computing experience.

      I just don't see the easy-to-use part. What Red Hat needs to do is rip telnet and put in some type of ssh without authentication (so you can use it as easily as telnet). That way, lots of people use it, and it's already set up for them.

    7. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by Fizgig · · Score: 2
      I use WinNT/Linux. I have to use a remote college box via unencrypted telnet. So first off, anyone who wants to can grab my password or whatever. I run a reasonably secure box...I don't have lots of unnecessary things running, I don't run as root, and don't make things that can write to arbitrary files suid. Even so, anyone can sit down and in 10 minutes compromise either of my OSes...either by doing a linux single reboot (which I haven't had the heart to remove, because I need it if I screw up X, which auto-runs because not using xdm is worse security-wise), or by installing another copy of WinNT onto my DOS volume, rebooting, and giving themselves admin privileges. That assumes that they can't find any holes in the OSes.

      To be fair, you need an armed guard, not IPsec to fix this problem!

      I do have to say that ssh was by far the easiest daemon for me to set up on Red Hat ever.

      rpmfind ssh-server;
      rpm -ivh /tmp/ssh-sever-version-number.i386.rpm;

      That's it. Quite drop-in. Now I suppose if you installed it manually and had to deal with generating a key it might be a bit more difficult, but that was as easy to install as anything I've ever used. Don't know about PGP, though I doubt it's that easy.
    8. Re:This is an insanely good thing to see... by rillian · · Score: 1

      I've never set up PGP because it's pointless. Until we get really good IP-level encryption and logically-impenetrable software (yeah, this *does* require that your assumptions are accurate) at a consumer level, PGP is a strong point...but surrounded by thousands of holes.

      This is true, but misses the point.

      PGP software should be seamless. I may be greedy, but I want zero effort on my part to use it.

      You are being greedy. Public key encryption, like door locks, require a bit of effort to use. That said, I found PGP5's plugin for Eudora on Windows to be pretty close to seamless--point, click, enter passphrase.

      Speaking of, why are we pushing pgp? gpg is a free, GLP'd implementation that doesn't involve patented algoritms. A much better option on Linux, anyway.

      ssh without authentication...I shouldn't have to establish and propogate private keys then when
      installing ssh. That would be nice.


      The default setup just asks you if you want to trust this host when it seens a key it doesn't recognize. You can always say 'yes' if you want that level of security.

      I have to use a remote college box via unencrypted telnet.

      That's too bad. You could always ask them to install something safer...my remote college box turned out to have it installed already. :)

      BTW, there is a version of telnet hacked up to use SSL (if it's available) which makes a nice drop-in replacement. I've only used the version that comes with Debian, and don't see the original off hand. However, you can get the source here, or read about it here. It requires support at both ends, though, so it's only helpful if the server admin is friendly.

      Using the Mac SSH *is* a PAIN. Especially since BetterTelnet is the best Mac telnet, and I don't know whether it supports the same plug-ins that NCSA Telnet and NiftyTelnet does.

      Hmm, what do you like so much about BetterTelnet? I gave up waiting for ssh support and switched to NiftyTelnet some time ago. I haven't had any trouble with it. (here's the encrypting version) BTW, the BetterTelnet faq seems to indicate that there is a working plugin, but doesn't say were to get it. That's an improvement over the last time I checked.

      Just trying to help you feel less down on yourself. :)

  44. Re:Move west, not south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But what's the avaliability of non-modem internet access like (remember, you said this on the geek world of slashdot!)?

    In Alberta, Telus offers a wide range of services that the other poster already described. In Saskatchewan if you're unhappy with telco ADSL (one of the first wide-scale ADSL trials in North America, I think) you can get cable modem connectivity. I've heard bad things about both the phone company and the cable company, but they're both apparently not as evil as the phone companies and cable companies my friends elsewhere complain about.

  45. They do it for the business.. by chris88 · · Score: 1

    Ontario only encourages it because large companies will spend their money in Ontario. They stick their servers in Canada, and now they can have they're strong encryption, while still operating in the US.

    I believe Hushmail does this, they've got their servers running out of Vancouver, but are American owned

    1. Re:They do it for the business.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Germany, a hostile country?

    2. Re:They do it for the business.. by mdvkng · · Score: 1

      A day late perhaps, but please check your facts before you publicly reveal your ignorance. Canada is not a third world country like Mexico or Honduras. it is in fact one of the world's richest. The UN ranks it as the #1 place in the world's "Quality of Life" ranking. Not exactly poor.

      So not only is your tax idea a stupid encouragement of anarchy, your facts are wrong.

      Bye,

      -M

    3. Re:They do it for the business.. by Foxtrot_Xray · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I believe the reason that we are allowing encryption is simply because we (Canada) are not as paranoid as the US. Honestly, to restrict the flow of information these days is almost impossible, so why spend tax dollars trying to prevent it. Also, the computer industry is booming in Canada with places like Vancouver and Ontario taking the lead. Why try to slow down the industry by preventing new and updated technologies to be produced?

    4. Re:They do it for the business.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vancouver is in British Columbia not Ontario. you probably knew this but the way that you stated your point sounded like you thought that Vancouver was in Ontario. Garett

    5. Re:They do it for the business.. by chris88 · · Score: 1

      Well all of canada doesn't give a damn about strong encryption, it's just Ontario seems to have caught on that they can get business from the US by encouraging encryption. And an example is in Vancouver where hushmail has put their servers in
      Vancouver so they can use strong encryption. I'm aware of which province Vancouver resides.

    6. Re:They do it for the business.. by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Plus, Canada's... well, they're Canada. Let's face it, unless the news has completely masked this out, they just don't have as many adversaries as the US. Oh wait - they all talk dirty up there... isn't that why Kenny died and the southpark kids moms went to war with them?

      Anyways.

      We do seem to be in the top notch in the world, so everyone guns at us... Kinda like everyone going after MSFT, but that's another argument.

      Canada can afford to enourage it's citizens to use strong security. The US doesn't deny us this right either. The ONLY thing they're saying is "Don't export it"... Just like you can't send guns to Ireland, or drugs to germany, don't export strong crypto software (or any other extremely "powerful" application (such as enterprise level DBMS') to a hostile country.

      This just doesn't seem to be a big deal. The only reason that it runs the risk of hampering Americans from using strong crypto is because we insist on being able to export it.

    7. Re:They do it for the business.. by Doomsayer · · Score: 1

      The main reason that poorer countries like Canada allow encryption is because they can't afford not to. The US can lose 10 billion in software sales each year and still have a thriving software business, Canada and all other countries don't have that option. If Canada was rich, we would clamp down on encryption too.

      The best way to make the US loosen up its encrytion laws is to stop giving it tax money that is used against you. Dodge taxes for the good of your country, the less cash the bureaucrats have, the less they'll push you around.

  46. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by MassacrE · · Score: 1

    Man, now all they need to do is outlaw BOMBS! Culture is a strange thing. Different things tend to happen in different places. I would love to find a country where you didn't have to worry about shootings, or terrorists, riots, arson, or violence of any kind. Unfortunately, unless I am the only resident of that country, it isn't going to happen.

  47. Re:IMHO - YOUR ABSOLUTLY RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the crypto stuff, they already have. Harris is simply emulating America. When he is done, Ontario will be just another state of uncaring government that favors the rich.

    290 or so million people can't be wrong, but 29 million aren't necessarialy right.

    In case you didn't get it, these are population statistics...

  48. Re:http://anon.proxy.anonymizer.com/Re:Ontario Pol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For chrissakes, you IDIOTS still don't get it, do you? You don't vote AGAINST people, you vote for people. This means xx% people voted party a, xx% people voted party b, and the highest scoring party, with 45% votes, party PC wins. If so many of you voted against Mike, why didn't anyone create a "I hate Mike" party, dedicated to nothing but removing Mike from power? WHY? Because NO ONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND EXCEPT FOR YOU WOULD VOTE FOR THEM! Sorry to shout, but YOU NEED IT!

  49. Re:ertert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mmmmmm... asshole.

  50. Re:Move west, not south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, I live in Ontario, 5 min. from a relatively major metropolitain area (Kitchener-Waterloo) and can't get ADSL! Is telus not goverened by the same rules as bell? :-)

  51. Re:Tax by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    >Well, you get the governement you pay for... :-)

    and I'm willing to admit that our dollar is crap right now so...

  52. Re:Canadian spies at OLS by Carey · · Score: 1

    No, the Navy guy was definitely not from CSE. It was just the six of us in the second row.

    PS. You guys should get a life.

  53. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's gotta be a lie... Unless you live in the 416/905 area code. Or near Ottawa. Bell Sympatico HSE won't offer ADSL elsewhere in Ont. Or are other companies offering it?

  54. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You know, I keep hearing this, and I keep wondering why you believe that a government corrupt enough to need overthrowing will bother to play fair.

    "Mr. President! The rebels have taken Chicago! They have set up another of those anarcho-syndicalist interim councils!"

    I think that it'd be a little more likely that the ruler of a government that evil would say "Fine. Nuke the fucking place. Then tell Montana that they're next," than "Oh darn, the people have spoken. I'll start respecting the Constitution again."

    You point a gun at the government's head? It'll point a rocket at yours. Enjoy your martyrdom.

  55. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well 16.7% doesn't look much better to me! ;-)

  56. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by jilles · · Score: 1

    True,

    The guy was a member of a gun club or something. I think after that the UK imposed even stricter gun control rulings.

    About the festivals, we have at least three big ones (30000+ people) of course some stuff happens but generally thinks go rather quiet (not on the musical side though). I have to say we had our football (soccer in the US) riots whith people ending up dead. God only knows what mess it would have been if guns would have been involved.

    --

    Jilles
  57. typical slashdot crowd by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

    It seems like half are anarchists, the other half are socialists (quibbling over their title)...

    I'm surprised this article is at +2 as I read it... typically views that are against the mainstream /. get knocked down as flamebait.

  58. SLASHDOT POSTER APOLIGIZES PUBLICLY! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoops, I forgot that not all of Canada is under the thumb of Bell Canada. Those of you under telus, etc... obviously have a brighter tech future ahead of you. So, well, sorry. Ok? (Bell is still crap, though!).

    1. Re:SLASHDOT POSTER APOLIGIZES PUBLICLY! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your apology still doesn't cut it. First off, Bell no longer has a monopoly in anything. Long distance competition came in years ago, and local competition has begun in the last two years. Even payphones have been opened up to competition. And, you conveniently ignore London, Windsor, and the rest of SW Ontario also have ADSL available, as do Hamilton, St. Kitts, and Niagara Falls. So, out of the approx. 15 million customers served by Bell in Ontario and Quebec, I'd guess approx. 12 million have access to ADSL, based on standard populations. That's a damn sight more than 10%. I'm not an apologist for Bell - I work in the USA. I just want you to get your facts correct.

  59. Re:Encryption vs. languages by JamesKPolk · · Score: 1

    why is it that the US government wants to deprive its citizens from the benefits of encryption?

    Actually.. for all that the US government does, it doesn't try to deprive its citizens of encryption. For all of DOJ's pleading for key escrow, the NSA seems to have little problem with purely domestic use; they just don't want any non-Americans to get access to cryptography. Hence, they wanted DES to be hardware only, because then Americans would have access to it, but export would be more easily controlled than it can be for a published algorithm.

    My guess is, regardless of what Janet Reno, Bill Clintion, and their thugs want, the long-term NSA strategists (the guys who REALLY control crypto policy) would be perfectly happy if every US citizen and business used 2048-bit RSA and 168-bit tripleDES, as long as the rest of the world used a broken RSA implementation, and 40-bit single DES. In fact, I wouldn't put it above them to use their power of decryption to help a US business or two...

  60. Re:Nope, Canada rules by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    Well DUH!
    Why bother throw away the big money when you can just mooch off someone else! That's what I love about this country, it's moocher's heaven!(except for the taxes)

    -Universal healthcare paid through our taxes.
    -Guaranteed military security from our allies who LIKE to throw the big money into fancy guns.
    -unemployment insurrance + pogy
    -government grants for homegrown music / film production (my brother nabbed I think it was 6 grand towards a film he was doing with his friend because his friend was like 1/16th)

    Yep, I love this place

  61. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was a mistake. See my apology... I guess I didn't check the other telcos (thought for a moment we only had one. I guess some other provinces are more lucky than Ontario!).

  62. Re:An open letter to the FBI by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

    Well, for instance, I also don't agree with the fact that we export arms to countries that aren't our official allies. They can get weapons elsewhere, just not from us.

    Why is this such a hard concept to grasp?

    If the crypto is available overseas, just get it there! If US software developers (ahem - Microsoft!) wrote more intellegently structured products it'd be a cinch to add crypto "plug-ins" (a la photoshop, netscape, etc) that supplement the weak crypto in their products with whatever algorithm you choose.

    I'm not at all against strong crypto - I'm just wondering why everyone is all conspiratory in thinking that the US is out to get US citizens. They're not. They're just trying to make it harder for other countries to get at them.

    The internet is a wonderful mechanism for communciation. But, from the govenrments stand point, it makes protecting ourselves/themselves much more difficult. Prior to this, they could detect the amassing of arms and people and know to look out for an event. Now, all the organization can be done remotely, with all communcation taking place over the internet, will no clue being let on that there's something amiss.

    Sure it hasnt' happened. But do you want that to happen (US citizens?)? No. There's more at stake than boosting our GNP...

  63. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're lucky to get 56k connections. Drive a little west, and you're down to 30k or so... :-( It's funny, I know people living beside the U of Waterloo (for all those not in the know, this is one of THE computer science universities in the world!) who can't even get ISDN! What's up with that?

  64. off topic by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    My brother has what he describes as
    "the little black and white TV with the most cable in the city".
    50+ channels on a B/W set.
    He insists on watching X-Files on it for the atmosphere, even when one of the other sets in the house are available.

  65. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by jilles · · Score: 1

    prisons are more expensive than welfare. The more you'll cut on welfare the higher your crimerate + higher crimerate induces a call for heavier punishment -> even more money goes to prisons.

    If you think thats leftist commy bullshit your probably just another american redneck who deserves to get involved in a shooting at the local school.

    --

    Jilles
  66. Re:Canadian spies at OLS by Chris+L.+Mason · · Score: 1

    No, actually CSIS is the intelligence agency. The CSE is the "Communications Security Establishment" which is similar to the NSA in the States. In fact, it is the Canadian arm of Echelon.

    Visit their web page and say hi.

  67. Re:Obviously you haven't heard what the FBI said.. by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

    That's ALL they're trying to do! They're not even trying to deny americans the right use crypto to protect themselves... They simply do not want it to go past the national borders...

    Granted, then you have people like the NSA trying to artificially weaken domestic products, but that's a completely different argument than allowing the export of commercial products.

  68. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by cdlu · · Score: 1

    I second that.
    I lived four years in the US, and found the US to be full of the most ignorant and self-centred people I have ever met.
    Any wonder Canada's been number one overall on the UN country's list for 6 straight years?

    Sue me. Its the American way.

  69. Re:You would fit into a fascist state, you know. by jilles · · Score: 1

    It's very simple:
    You don't like crime -> you pay
    You want educated children -> you pay
    You want to be taken care of when you get sick -> you pay
    you don't like drugs -> you pay

    So happens when you don't pay?
    You get crime, uneducated children who die because there is no good health care and because they use drugs.

    Eventually they get so sick of you that they shoot their teachers and fellow victims at their local school.

    Sounds fammiliar? That's the US today. Rich people send their kids to expensive schools and live in neighboorhoods with fences around them. They lock out the missery that makes up the rest of the country and still complain about the little pieces of tax they have to pay (living in sweden where 50% of your income ends up being paid in the form of taxes and V.A.T. I can only dream of paying 15%).

    Americans have no right to comlain about crime, drugs or their children shooting each other up in school. They get what they paid for (or rather they don't get what they didn't pay for).

    --

    Jilles
  70. Great ssh client for Windows by alexsh · · Score: 1

    Check out http://www.zip.com.au/~roca/ttssh.html. It's a free implementation of ssh for Windows, with source available. It's built upon the Tera Term telnet client, for which source is available, and is one of the most configurable telnet clients that I've seen in Windows... And ttssh inherits all that. Check it out.

  71. Re:Ontario is looking much better. by jilles · · Score: 1

    even on a per capita basis the murder rate is more than four times as high as in the Netherlands. Plus most of your recent school shootings seem to have taken place in wealthy suburbs.

    --

    Jilles
  72. Re:You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, you are. I've got no reason for saying that, either.

  73. Quantum shades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want quantum security sun/above-moonlight glasses for LOS use. Not the old cold war stuff, but the newer polarized stuff. Then I could have good hat, wrap-glasses, and trench combo with good UV, SPF, and maybe EMF resistance.

  74. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you really think people in Switzerland walk around all day with assault weapons? Don't be absurd. Just because they have conscription doesn't mean they keep the rifles after they leave the military.

  75. Re:Conspiracy Theory (?spelling?) by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    Dunno. Maybe they fear people spying on them, if the agency lacks the relative notoriety or alleged ferocity of others. :-) 'sides, we probably spy on Canada, and you wouldn't want your Government's secrets to leak out through us, eh?

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  76. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by warmi · · Score: 1

    Who the fuck do you think you will work for ??
    Chances are one of those rich motherf* so shut the fuck up and enjoy free ride.
    I can't belive that after 70 years of shit going on in eastern Europe there are still idiots arguing for it ...

  77. Situation in brasil by bogado · · Score: 1
    Here in Brasil crypto is not ilegal, in fact as far as I know there are no laws against using, exporting or importing them.

    But this don't make anything better, because in Brasil we use mainly US made applications witch means that most of our software is restricted to US laws of export. Off course that inteligent people can use GNU tools but most of the population just sticks to windows.

    Other problem is that no one realy cares for crypto or privacy, as I stated before (in other post) we already have a unique ID for all citzens (not that is realy a trheat because the Brasil's goverment is very messy so I don't think they would be able to track everyone), and people here are more or less careless about their rigths. It's common for instance to give up a right so you don't have to create a mess.

    So the situation here is that we can use it, but we don't actualy use it.
    --
    "take the red pill and you stay in wonderland and I'll show you how deep the rabitt hole goes"

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  78. Re:Nuggets of Harris Wisdom by warmi · · Score: 1

    After first questions I was hoping this was going to be funny post , but you spoiled everything with the second sentence.
    It isn't even funny - just another stupid insult.
    Next time come up with something better.

  79. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    >Interesting how Ontario judges a "majority >government". It seems in ontario not all votes >are equal. In an after election tally, 55% of >the population voted against the present
    >government.

    That's total popular vote. The way our provincial elections work is each Riding has an Member of the Legislative Assembly. I don't know how many ridings are in Ontario, but here in Nova Scotia (Fresh off a recent election that put the tories in power, with a majority. It's not the grit win I wanted, but t least the freakin NDP didn't get in!) we've got 52. When a party wins over half of the seats in the Legislative Assembly, it's a clear majority victory. Things get a little tricky when you're under a minority government, less than half the seats are under the control of the governing party, so getting unpopular but neccesary legislation though can take some wheelin' and dealin' and such. McKlellen and the NS liberals found that out the hard way a month or two back with the budget being defeated and the election being forced.

  80. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did you come up with Hull, Ottawa, Quebec City, Toronto ONLY having ASDL? I live in Halifax NS and we have ADSL, Cable, ISDN, and so does the immediate surrounding cities (Dartmouth, Bedford) My ADSL connection gets 2200Mbit Dl and 1100Mbit Ul.

  81. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    St. John's, NF - Cable modem user for over 3 years. ADSL has been available for about a year here. Did you have anything right?

  82. You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an idiot right? Right? I mean, you have to be.

  83. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it looks like someone is noticing the same things i am. In places where everyone has guns noone is forced to use them. If everyone has a gun no criminal will be stupid enough to try and assault someone, quite simply it puts everyday citizens on an equal power level to armed criminals. And as for all you dumb bastards who want to cry Littleton and see all guns taken away, think about the difference one gun in the right hands could have made in that situation. About 20 lives could have been saved.

  84. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canadian immigrations would probably not let you in.

  85. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah it says that when its harder for criminals to find guns it takes a lot longer for a shooting to happen. BUT when they illegaly obtain guns good law abiding citizens become good defenseless victims.

  86. Re:Ontario Politics by Gryphon · · Score: 1

    No, he didn't. Do you know what the term "popular vote" means?

    If there are 10 votes in the entire province, the last election would have broken down rougly along these lines:

    4 votes for Mike Harris & the Conservatives 3 votes for Dalton McGuinty and the Liberals 3 votes for Howard Hampton and the New Democratic Party

    So... Harris wins with just 40% of the popular vote. More people voted against him than for him.

    The problem with our electoral system is that if many votes for a candidate come from an area of the province with more ridings (ie. Toronto and the 905 belt) that party gets more seats. Doesn't mean more people wanted that government in, and the results obviously do not reflect the will of the people.

    Before anybody suggests I'm just anti-Harris, let me point out that the NDP got into power in 1990 with about 32% of the popular vote.

    Our electoral system is flawed in that the results often do not represent the popular vote breakdown in the province. If a better system was used (there are many, I won't go into that here) Mike Harris would have won the last election, but he would have had a minority government, rather than the disproportionate majority he enjoys as the result of our flawed electoral system.

  87. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but tuition fees started going up at most universities long before the Harris government was elected. I know, for example, that 10% tuition fee increases at the University of Waterloo have been happening pretty much every year since about 91-92. And I don't know what else Harris was supposed to do. The NDP nearly bankrupted the province. The government had to make cuts just about everywhere. And raising taxes or keeping them at a ridiculously high level does NOT bring in more money.

    You neglect to mention that the majority of the cuts in health care (and to a large degree education) resulted from cuts in federal transfers. You should be blaming Chretien. The ONTARIO government is actually now spending MORE than they were on health care and education when they were elected. Besides, you can't spend money you don't have.

    You also neglect the fact that the government is actually bringing in MORE money now after the tax cuts. All the new jobs created mean more people paying taxes, and more employers paying payroll taxes, etc. The cuts to taxes on small businesses and even corporations has resulted in more companies doing business in Ontario, which also means more money for the government. The socialists would be quick to suggest that this is because Ontario is riding the boom the US is having. That's nonsense, of course. Ontario would not have achieved that growth with the high taxes, employment equity, and other crap the NDP introduced. Ontario now leads all provinces in economic growth, and in fact, the increase in consumption as a % of Ontario's GDP has been much bigger than the increase in exports.

    The Harris government for the mostpart has been an overwhelming success. That's why they were re-elected. Only a crazy bleeding heart socialist could possibly suggest that the province is worse
    off today than it was in 1995.

  88. Re:Canadian spies at OLS by mwillis · · Score: 1

    The neat thing about CSIS is that no one knows /anything/ about them.

    Actually, stuff comes out in the papers every couple of months. It often makes them look inept, such as them being sued in court by disgruntled former employees. Just because they are usually silent doesn't make them omnipotent. On what grounds do you equate CSIS with the massively-funded, spooky supercomputers-out-the-yazoo NSA?

  89. "accents" by John+Kacur · · Score: 1

    I taught English in Europe for two years and Canadians were actively sought after. We were considered to have neutral accents, highly intelligible by Americans or British people.

    That said, I'm from Ontario, and I do pronounce "milk" as "melk", something which my friends in Nova Scotia teased me endlessly about. Oh, and some of the people in Nova Scotia said "aboot", but mostly as a joke.

  90. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at BC's ADSL - 1.5Mb/s to your door for $39.95/mo - or 2.5Mb/s for $69.95/mo - that's dirt cheap for lightning fast access.. considering a T1 line was almost 1000.00 for installation and then that cost again every month for the service.. how far we have come, it's a great time to be alive and on the net.

  91. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the all I was saying really is that america's greatest skill it seems is killing other americans (thou I was talking the long way and not the most direct route in explaining). Your right, history is not my strongest sucject. However, when I hear people talking about the fact they need weapons to ensure their politicial beliefs. The more I cringe at everything the USA stands for. The USA was created in violence, and will be a violent nation untill it either destroy's its self or people understand that guns are not the tools of rebellian, free mind are. Peace.

  92. Education spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I also forgot to mention that it could be much worse. Look at the US. Many of the top universities there will cost you on the order of $40,000 a year. Even cheaper state universities there are still more expensive than the average university in Canada.

    Also, the public education system here has always been terrible (the Universities are still pretty good though). So for a province that's among the lowest in North America in education spending, Ontario is finally getting good value for it's money. The taxpayers are no longer getting ripped off. If anything, the standardized tests and other metrics the government has implemented will finally SHOW how bad the system is and maybe people will endeavour to FIX it. I think that is already happening. There has already been talk about improving standards. This surely is better than spending a ridiculous amount of money and pretending the system is great because of all the money that goes into it.

  93. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by jilles · · Score: 1

    come outside the states, then find yourself a school where such a incident has occured.

    good luck

    --

    Jilles
  94. Re:canada jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to tell they're ugly and fat. A guy I know went to NewYork. He tough he'd see a freakin amount of cute chicks there but he only saw ugly bitches

  95. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get feeling eh. Wow. You smart. You no need welfare. You big man. Morons.

  96. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read my post above. I give examples of this there. If today the MAJORITY of americans wanted to overthrow the government, we could assuming we were armed. If an ARMED majority resists, the government knows that they will fight for their freedom. So at that point the government cna do 2 things give up, or kill the majority of its citizens. The latter would never happen because it needs manpower, but if we had no way of fighting for our freedom then we would end up providing that manpower from concentration camps. The mere threat of an armed majority is enough to ensure that the goverment remains one that operates according to the peoples will. Hassan

  97. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you think that America could never go facist? If thats the case please do me a favor and go kill yourself. Because you are an idiot and if your breed id be afraid of the result. Gun oweners feel powerful when they have their guns because they are powerful. They have the power to stop any person that tries to take away their rights, or die trying. Its people like you that dont realize freedom isn't just somthing you can take for granted. You have to contantly see that noone tries to take it from you, because whether its the guy on the street corner that wants your wallet or a right wing moral bigot who wants to make sure your kid is raised by the bible, people everywhere want to impose their will on you. If you have no way of stopping them then you may as well forget about the constitution because it means nothing to the people that want to controll your life.

  98. Let's tie some of this together by Zigurd · · Score: 1
    Let's tie some of this stuff together:

    All governments suck, to a pretty large extent. in fact, government, like cola, cars, pizza, music, and blue jeans, is a product. Buy too much of it, with low quality and high price, and it sucks. The difference is that the government can hold a gun to you head and make you buy. IMO, most western governments are about 2X larger and more expensive than they should be. Put them on a PC price curve for a few years are they will suck a lot less.

    Which brings us to guns: Guns are a way for the people to stop buying. In the beginning, the U.S. didn't try to sell too much government, and had no fear of an armed citizenry. In fact, selling less governemnt was the major market differentiator for the U.S. when the U.S. was a startup. Now, however, its buy or die.

    Is crypto like guns? According to U.S. export law it is. In practice, and in relation to the choice to buy less government, is crypto like guns? Yup. In fact, crypto is more dangerous: It enables stored value that cannot be detected like currency. It enables large scale plans to remain secret. It enforces elements of the consitution, like secrity in one's documents, that are now deemed dangerous. It is better than guns at limiting governments' ability to make us buy.

    OK, so who here would buy less government if they could?

  99. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Appearanty you dont realize what compulsory consciption in places like switzerland and Isreal means. It means that for 2 years you carry around an assualt rifle in public. You live your everyday life WITH an assualt rifle. And when you are done you keep the rifle and are no longer forced to carry it around but you are still permitted to. THIS means that in Switzerland people walk the streets with powerful guns.

  100. Re:FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh ! Another FreeBSD waco. I've told you, they are all Soooo CONFUSED. What can you expect from those guys - to select the right OS, dream on...

  101. Re:Cryptography fill follow the same path as guns by RomulusNR · · Score: 1
    Chances are, the wide majority of the population ignores this, even though they know it, because they are paranoid.

    And if you say doing something will stop crime, and that there are evil people in their midsts doing bad things in secret, and couple it with a national fear that computers will someday make us their slaves, and that smart people want to take over the world,

    ...if you're lucky, they'll still allow trojan decoder rings in Froot Loops boces.

    Regards,

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  102. Re: Canada rules by Joe+MacDonald · · Score: 1

    Not quite. Ontario understands politics and this really isn't a whole lot more than a ploy to convince techies that we can be happier here than in the US. The problem is that way too many of us are packing up our maple leafs and our two-fours of beer and heading south for bigger paycheques.

    --
    -Joe
  103. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by WNight · · Score: 1

    It's simple. Provide ways for people to support themselves, or they'll make one. If you don't let people work to survive, they'll *take* what they need.

    And I for one wouldn't blame them one bit.

    There's a difference between not wanting to work and not being able to.

    If you had children you had to take care of and didn't have any way of legally raising money would you sit there and watch them starve or get a baseball bat and go mug some rich fucker as he was getting out of his Jag?

    And if those children barely manage to survive, what choice are they going to have except to do the same thing?

    There are a lot more 'poor' people than rich people, so either treat them with a little respect, like the humans they are, or don't be suprised when they decide to take what the system has taken away from them.

    And honestly, people like you will deserve it.

  104. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the fuck would you want to use a gun. You don't need that. Look guys, the Far West era is over Look at what happen in the US. Each week, a kid kills someone at the local school

  105. moderate irrelevant politic opinions down by John+Kacur · · Score: 1

    I thought this would be a discussion on why cryptography is a good thing, not an political endorsement.

    I think its a little dubious to give credit to Mike Harris for some good policies that Ann Cavoukian - Ontario's privacy commissioner made.

    And the moderators gave you a "informative" rating, I assume because your pro-Harris rant was "tied in" to cryptography at the end by claiming that "if you elect libertarians . . . the free crypto just comes with the rest of the goodies."

    Patented nonsense.

    I'm trying to avoid the temptation to enter a political debate with you, because I passionately hate Mike Harris as much as you like him. I can't think of a politician who has created more strife in society than he.

    In fact, I can't think of a more undemocratic politican in Canada them him, and I believe that allowing citizens the right to use cryptography is extremly democratic.

    Yes, but back to the cryptography. When it comes to governments, regardless of whether it happens to be one that you like or dislike, the price of democracy (to paraphrase someone) is constant vigilance.

    Mike Harris has consistently shown a willingness to bend the rules of democracy (for example when he changed the rules of debate in parliament to limit the time the opposition had on the floor) to ram his policies through, and believe me, if for some reason cryptography was inconsistent with his economic policies (like for example if using it threatened trade with the U.S.), then we would lose it in a day, and any amount of protesting would conveniently be written off as "special interest"

    Finally, to answer your question, "So what the hell does this have to do with crypto?"

    Nothing as far as I'm concerned.

  106. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Toronto and the best thing available for me is 56k dialup. ADSL and Cable have been delayed for over a year straight now and it doesn't look like either will be ready for at least a few more months.. And when they are finally available, it will still be somewhat dissapointing because cable is only available from @Home, and ADSL from Bell (as far as i know). So even some of the 'non tundra parts' of this nation are still left out in the cold, so to say.

  107. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been to Switzerland and they don't do that. Germany has conscription they don't do that either. Ditto for France and the Netherlands. Isreal may ne the exception but they're extremely paranoid.

  108. There's more then paying to decrease unpleasantnes by CBravo · · Score: 1

    All this is very off-topic, and I'll join you in it.

    >>You don't like crime -> you pay
    In the US this usually means that if crime goes up, so do #cops. This helps. Yet it doesn't take away the reason for comitting crimes.

    In the USA there is always a percentage of people who do not do as well as the rest. These 'losers' know this. They may not be skilled in 'living in society' but it is often thrown at their faces that they don't do well. They are often rejected and do not have a lot to lose. This is the key issue.

    Why would you care about anybody if they don't care about you. Here is A MINDGAME: think about different groups (in/outside the USA, different status, education, social group, ...) and decide how much you care about them. Would you give food to a beggar? most people don't. Would you give food to a good friend? Yes. To a neighbour? Yes. Someone you met at a summercamp 10 years ago... THE POINT: caring for each other has a limit, and in the USA the limit is low. Even if something is potentially lifethreatening (like being sick) care is not always given.

    So there is a large group of people who don't care about you and you're wellbeing because you don't care about them. So far, nothing is going wrong. Now here comes the 'loser'-group. They have nothing && don't care about you: they sometimes commit crimes... QED

    --
    nosig today
  109. Re: USA sucks by HighFlyer · · Score: 1

    [flame bait on]
    The USA is the only nation that went from barbarism straight into degeneration.
    [flame bait off]

    - A European.

    PS: As others already pointed out there are actually a few other countries in America, not just the USA.

    --

    -- Truth suffers from too much analysis.
  110. it's about caring by CBravo · · Score: 1

    in essence you don't give a fuck.
    in essence you're not contributing.
    in essence you're e g o i s t i c.
    in essence this is oversimplified, off course :)

    --
    nosig today
    1. Re:it's about caring by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I do not know if you'd count that as contributing, but I do
      pay taxes. I have a right to be all those other things.

  111. Re:Nuggets of Harris Wisdom by toriver · · Score: 1
    No shit! Why the hell should I support some pregnant woman.

    True, there is someone else who should instead: The fucking (pun intended) father.

    That's what all those stupid politicans (including Jesse Ven-DUH-ra) who attack single mothers forget: There is a male prick in the picture, but who has run away from his half of the responsibility, like a little criminal.

    Slightly off-topic, but I sometimes get pissed at certain elements of my half of the population.

  112. Re:Emmissons testing by absolute · · Score: 1

    I'm not so mad at the fact that people have to pay tons of money its the fact that the Government gets a 30% cut of the fees. This is no different than photo radar, except that everyone has to pay.

    And lets not forget all the stories of price gouging by garages...

  113. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The news says different. After watching many of the news stories, quite a few (although far from all) of those bums are there because they find the begging easier than doing what they are qualified for (ie. Bagging groceries, etc...). Bottom line: Crappy education = No good job. Don't tell me they are there because no one will employ them.

  114. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    True. We're a violent people, although it's unclear why -- the statistics just show we are. {shrug}

    'suppose the issue boils down to:

    * Do the people trust the Government, and believe that this will continue?

    * If that trust will be violated, will the people be able to do anything 'bout it -- and will arms hurt or help?

    * Is it feasible to confiscate arms and keep them in the hands of police/military?

    Depending on the answers to those questions, one may argue completely differently. I'd have to say that in the case of the US, #3 is right out (law enforcement would have to sweep the nation, and Customs would have to be *really* tight); #1 is a 'yes' for many today, but a distinct 'no' from the Founding Fathers; and #2 is questionable, in that it'd all end up a mess. Eh.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  115. Re:You would fit into a fascist state, you know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here here! Good point!

  116. Stop eating the BS Harris is programming you with by absolute · · Score: 1

    The teachers aren't the ones who caused the decline in our education, it was the Tory government. Massive funding cuts to programs and rapid changes made with out concern to impact were the cause of the two strikes.

    If you'll notice Harris never once blamed the teachers it was always the evil unions fault. The unions did not start this strike, it was harris provoking teachers who would not stand by idly and let him destroy the education system. I have not met one teacher who didn't support the strikes against their the government changes out of their own free will.

    Harris has done nothing for me but cause aggrivation. I'm glad I finally out of school because there will not be a quality education system in ontario...

  117. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah those rich motherf*ckers who write the laws lowering their own taxes, who write laws making it more difficult for poor people to get education (and thus jobs). Rich people aren't to blame, it's lazy poor people. You fascist moron.

  118. Ontario promotes Private Encryption? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Will Ontario promote Corporal Punishment next?

    (And how about General Education? Then again, Ontario does a good job of that, eh? ;)

    1. Re:Ontario promotes Private Encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? What the hell does private encryption have to do with corporal punishment?

  119. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They still have bans on 'hatefull' political speach. With harsher punishments for using computers. I personaly find this deplorable, " The United States is a incredible country with tens of millions of very intelligent compassionate people. However its braindead constitutional can't-reconsider-or-your-a-traitor attitude towards deplorable or degrading human behaviours as they are related to the consistution and bill of rights is reprehensible. We (Canadians) don't stand around beating on a piece of paper written when people were applauded for beating their wives and slaves were all the rage. Instead we continually re-evaluate the human condition and try to make a system that best fits the current world we live in. (I don't know if anyone else caught it, but a greatly humorous example of US myopia was an episode of Law & Order about 7 months ago where they took it upon themselves to chastize Canada. Made me lose any remaining respect for that piece of entertainment). It is very dangerous to allow nutcase hate mongers to run around spreading hate, as there will always be reams of 14 year old disenfranchised kids looking for a saviour from their social rejection. I have _NO_ problem with that, nor does most of Canada. It's only when some American gay-hater, NAZI and/or racist pig decides to come to Canada to spread their hate and are either blocked at the border or warned in advance that Amercians get their anuses in a tizzy about those darn Canadians. Gosh darnit haven't they read the US Constitution? Everyone has their right to free speech, no matter how much hate they are spreading! Yadda yadda. No they don't. It doesn't serve society for assholes to rally the morons and rejects into a destructive rage. "there taxes are still high" Relatively, no they aren't (although any tax at all can be considered high tax). Everytime an objective comparison is made comparing the social services offered on a par basis Canada comes out very competitively. "people talk funny" Nothing is more offensive than having someone coming HERE and telling US we talk funny. It's the whole center of the universe attitude like "Damn, you don't talk like ME. You talk funny!". Say it from afar, but then stay afar as obviously your travels are limited to your local 7-11. The rest of us realize that it's a world of varied dialects and there is nothing "funny" about other people's speaking habits, it's simply different. "and it's cold" Which means that bugs are kept in check (we have a very limited number of harmful bugs and snakes) and we get to enjoy lots of awesome winter activities. Around this time of year the majority of Canada has had such heat that we are BEGGING for autumn when the beauty of colour changes occur. I love winter. The great thing about cold is that it's very easy to get yourself to the perfect temperature by wearing the proper clothing. With gross heat it's a lot harder pulling your temperature down unless you build a compressor in a backpack and run tubes around your body for outdoor treks. Cheerio!

  120. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agreed with you up until your point about the emissions testing. That is the only GOOD thing Harris has ever done. If people needed to spend $1000 fixing their cars, thats great! That means one less car spewing blue smoke into the air. Cars are a priveledge, not a right.

  121. Re:Nuggets of Harris Wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever considered suicide? It would probably make you a lot happier dealing with other people.

  122. Re:IMHO - YOUR ABSOLUTLY RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the crypto stuff, they already have. Harris is simply emulating America. When he is done, Ontario will be just another state of uncaring government that favors the rich.

  123. Re:moderate BULLSHIT down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May I remind you that this undemocratic Harris let you vote for him? Freely, I might add. He won again. He could have tried to change election laws, but he didn't. Because to do so would be to act as a non-democratic dictator. Why do people lie about Harris so? Tell me an example of his non-democratic stance? He was voted in to bust up unions, and did. He was voted in to bust down taxes, and did. He was voted in to bust up sorry welfare bums, and did. He did his best not to do something he wasn't voted in for. Quite democratic... On the other hand, those commie NDP bastards, like Bob Rae, they didn't do anything like we had expected. Quite undemocratic, wouldn't you say? And the liberals (ie. Chretien), well the FORCE their party members to toe the line in "free" votes. Or no more job. Quite undemocratic. What's the free democratic party now?

  124. Watch your language by John+Kacur · · Score: 1

    He did change election laws. For example, he reduced the minimum numbers of days required for a campaign. So the campaign was only 28 days, but for at least half a year before the election, we saw television commercials telling us all the great things his government did, and these commercials were paid for with your tax dollars. (although after some complaints the PC's did pay for some of the commercials) Did you notice that the commercials whose "purpose" was to inform us have disappeared now that the election was over.

    He also changed the shapes of the ridings. For example, my old region voted against the PC's this round, but we were amalgamated with a conservative region.

    Anwyay, if you like Harris and the PC's, that's fine. You have the right to like whatever political party you want to. But the most important point of my message still stands, and that is, you can't take something like the right to encryption for granted, regardless of whether a government you like or not is in power.

    I have the feeling that you would like Harris even if his government was against encryption. The issue in this particular slashdot forum is encryption, not politics.

    1. Re:Watch your language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common, we're all old enough to swear here... If you're not, then heck, you're not interested in political discussion. As far as what you said goes, none of that changes the vote, and the 45% Harris got was still higher than any other candidate. So there.

  125. Re:"accents" (edging offtopic, but WTF) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is true. Being English I feel I can lay down the law here. Canadians not only have a clearer accent than Yanks, but in my experience their grammer is better and their vocabulary wider.

  126. Hrm... by Nugget94M · · Score: 1
    pgpi.com seems to be having DNS troubles... If you can't resolve pgpi.com, try these urls:

    http://194.234.236.31/ and http://194.234.236.31/cgi/download-wi zard.cgi

  127. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Your statistics are wrong about crime in metropolitn centers. In toronto crime is down 4.36% this year, and 6% for the whole of Canada. In fact, crime hasn't been this low in over 46 years.

    2. The homeless issue has been completely blown out of proportion. You're a victim of the mayors tool to gain approval rating points for his humanitarian acts. Toronto is no different than most other cities in North America.

    3. As for economic equity, this case is the same everywhere. All capitalist countries have gigantic gaps between the rich and the poor. In the us, i think it's (dont quote me i can't remember) 4% of the population with 50% of the wealth. This is just the way the system works and will continue to work. Socialist programs help alleviate these problems, but not entirely (see beaurocratic usage of tax dollars)

    4. I'm an american who has previously lived in canada for 8 years. The countries aren't all that different. The people aren't all that different either. Even within the US, you can travel cross-country and visibly see different cultures and value systems. The same goes for Canada. Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver are very different cities. As for all these Canadians arguing that Americans are rude and full of themselves -- I haven't really experienced that. There have been a couple times where I've been in contact with idiots who's percieved solution to any problem is bomb them to hell because we have a big military -- but that's the exception, not the rule.

    5. Believe it or not, Canada has been completely tied to the American economy since nafta. Any major economic events in the US economy will directly effect Canada. 50% of our exports go to the united states (even more in ontario). This has its positives and negatives. A positive is that we have benifited from the longest bull run in history -- but negatively, we can't exercise fiscal policy well. If canadian unemployment is 5% higher than US, there should be an easy money policy (including some tax breaks and increased gov't spending), but we can't really do that with the US feds raising interest rates can we?

  128. RCMP by jf.lauzon · · Score: 1

    For Those At the Ottawa linux showcase... Remember the mass quantities of rcmp guys in the second row of the ipsec talk???....

    1. Re:RCMP by jf.lauzon · · Score: 1

      Yes. About that Navy guy?... A village People member? Anyway ;)

  129. Re:Cryptography fill follow the same path as guns by j-p.s · · Score: 1

    "Hey! Cryptography doesn't kill people! People kill people!"

    Likening this to gun control is a bit weird, especially given the nature of the original story. People in Canada tend to do just fine without a gun in the bedside drawer, although that may be because of Canada's comparatively better health, welfare and education systems that go some way to lessening crime and so you don't have to fear for your life as much in Canada: there's nothing for the mad NRA people to focus on in Johnny Canuck's mind.

    To some extent, this story doesn't surprise me at all: Canada is a much more laid back and liberal place than the States. Maybe I should move there away from "The Long Arm Of The Straw" here in the UK(copyright NTK.now, I think) -- it would be interesting to see some sort of test case come out, if the Canadian government ever has any problems over encryption. If indeed the USA or UK governments ever have any serious problems over conviction too -- has anyone heard of any such things?

  130. Re:Tax by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    If majority opinion is any guide, you may not have to worry about your dollar for too many years; last Friday's (August 6, 1999) Wall Street Journal has an opinion column (page A-11, column 1) which predicts North American monetary union: a single currency for all.

    If that happened, Ottawa would get rid of the problem of the Loonie falling against the greenback. Instead, Ottawa would have the problem of people and industry fleeing Canada's punitive taxes, and not having to take an exchange-rate hit to do it. Looks like serious reform (scaling back) of Canada's nanny state is going to be essential to survival, no matter what happens.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  131. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's always nice to see Americans acknowledge that there is intelligence beyond their borders.

  132. An open letter to the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear morons, What exactly are you accomplishing by taking cryptography away from law-abiding citizens and businesses? Is it your goal to cripple the competitiveness of US software companies? Are you trying to make criminals more aware of just how useful strong crypto is? Are you trying to hamper the US' ability to compete economically in the information age? Well congratulations, you're doing a fine job. Sincerely, Anonymous by Choice

    1. Re:An open letter to the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you're an NSA shill or just very confused. First, software to which crypto is easily added as a plug-in is also prohibited under the export controls. Second, and more important, the export controls have absolutely no effect on the threat you raise. If an international terrorist organization is planning an attack via the net, they already have access to free (and legal) strong encryption. Ending the U.S. export controls would not help them in any way. The current export controls serve only to reduce the protection that law-abiding citizens have, and to increase the power of the government to monitor those citizens. Finally, since Americans are generally not using strong crypto due to the export laws, they are *more* at risk from criminals.

    2. Re:An open letter to the FBI by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      That's all supposing you believe that public key crypto is secure. Which it's not feasible as being. Everything you need to decrypt PGP is accessible through the public key. When it was first created, RSA provided a sensible way of encrypting information. It is *extremeley* vulnerable to plain-text attack. When you break that, you can decrypt the session key, and hence the message. The only reason you haven't read about this is in the fact that it's much more valuable and useful if people continue relying on PGP/RSA being a "secure" means of communication. As soon as their patent expires (next year?) you'll be sure to read of exploits...

      With that said, and given that PGP is decryptible, what the NSA really wants is to contain all further breakthroughs to the US. With projects such as Echelon, when these further breakthroughs take place, they'll be able to determine who sent the file, and even perform a substitution routine which will insert their public key into the whole process...

      Yes, PGP is available all over. Is it secure? That's what you all'd like to believe. Not really though, to anyone willing to invest the resources, though. The NSA has resources. Therefore, this is an inconvienence... They need to retrieve public keys prior to decryption... So, given that, and given the inconvience of needing to discover how to break further crypto breakthroughs, it's quite sensible to think that the cats out of the bag with PGP...

      Symetric key pose no problem now or in the future... How will you ever exchange them without the risk of inteception?!? Face to face works... but then, that's a trackable occurance. Public key was feasible before, but now??? If you believe it still is 99% secure, you're mistaken.

      --- if you believe that the NSA or another government agency is after you, you've got bigger problems than the security that PGP can provide for you.

      paraphrased from a PGP FAQ that's out there, floating across the net.

    3. Re:An open letter to the FBI by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Microsoft seems to make quite a living selling insecure software products.

      SGI, Sun, HP, IBM, they all make decent bucks selling under current guidelines.

      Yes, if we never ever faced the possibility of a confict again, exporting strong crypto would be fine. We don't have that guarentee. Therefore, this is the US's way of trying to not say OOPS 20 years from now. I'm all for the privacy of my communciations. I just don't understand why it's such a big deal that we *slightly* cripple our software companies by not letting them export ONE type of product (in this argument)

    4. Re:An open letter to the FBI by Rob_D_Clark · · Score: 1

      but I fail to see how crippling our software actually does any good. If you can't get your crypto here, you can get it somewhere else...

      --
      --Rob
  133. The server is being blocked in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to access the Canadian government server and get DNS error messages. In Ensenada, MX you can access the Canadian server - in Berlin, you can access the Canadian server. WTF?

    1. Re:The server is being blocked in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it works from China, of course other dangerous/nasty/breath-of-dog sites are blocked, like CNN for example.

    2. Re:The server is being blocked in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.gc.ca
      or
      198.103.98.131

  134. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Close. It was Scotland. Dunblane Primary School, to be precise. A gunman walked in, randomly shot children and teachers, and then killed himself (iirc). He was a member of a local gun club, and had a license to own firearms. The UK government has since banned the possession of such guns, and there has not been another school shooting since. There's a lesson in there...

  135. Change the defaults? by seanb · · Score: 1

    If you get a login you can choose your OWN default.
    Just a thought...

  136. Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Evangelion · · Score: 1

    When I first read this I thought that, through some miracle, the Harris goverenment actually did something right for once. Looks to be a provincial comittee. Anyone know if this was due to Mikey's little gov't there? I'm looking for a reason, even one, not to hate him :-)

    I'm also getting a DNS look up error on http://www.ipc.on.ca/, which was what the Wired article linked to. Anyone know if that's the right link?

    1. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Was there a long line-up when this happened?

    2. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Scott+Wunsch · · Score: 1
      I'm also getting a DNS look up error on http://www.ipc.on.ca/, which was what the Wired article linked to. Anyone know if that's the right link?
      [whois.cdnnet.ca]
      Subdomain: IPC.ON.CA
      Organization: Information and Privacy Commission
      Type: Independent Provincial Government Agency
      Description: An Ontario Government Commission on Information and Privacy,
      operating at arm's length from the Government.
      ...

      Looks like the right place. Unfortunately, both their DNS's appear to be dead right now.

      --
      \\'
    3. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reason #2: wickedly lower taxes

    4. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously you must be making alot of money because I've yet to see how this tax cut does me any good. All I see is a few, FEW, more dollars in my account and all the social services gone to pot. We need crypto legal here because private businesses are taking over and need a private way of communicating their plans to bleed us dry. (excuse the political comment, i know it's not the place, but Harris really get me mad.)

    5. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Article translated to non-mafia, non-mob, non-union speak (ie. Mike Harris got voted in TWICE because he KICKS ASS. Perhaps you were one of the asses he kicked?). When I first read this I thought that, through some miracle, the Harris goverenment actually did something better than great for once. Looks to be a smart government. Anyone know if this was due to Mikey's biggest provincial gov't there? I'm looking for a reason, even one, not to like him :-) (If you're not from Ontario, here's the story: Mike Harris cut a a million $$$ from the school system here. A few (really, not most like the unions lie) teachers got cut, and nothing changed, except belts tightened on the trustee boards, who do dick all anyways. A bunch of teachers went on strike, saying it was for the kids. They hurt kids more by delaying their education for two weeks than the fact that the cuts boil down to less than the cost of a pack of pencils per student. They keep trying to go on strike again, but after most polls said the average parent thought the teacher's unions were nuts, they reconsider. Note that many teacher's didn't agree to such strikes, but were forced into line by the unions. Mike's been called a union buster, and I'm proud to live in a province run by the government, and not by a mob-mafia-anarchist union (I say this because the TEACHERS, I shit you not, BURNED a Mike Harris dummy, as if to say that they'd like to do this to him...).) BTW: Mike Harris has also been one of the first premiers (sp?) to CUT taxes. At 50% and up, this country needs it (I already have plans to move out of it, as do quite a few people graduating from college/university here. The US doesn't tax like this, and even with medicare added in, you still end up on top!).

    6. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Sorry for the double post, SLASHDOT, PLEASE TURN OFF THE HTML FORMATTED BY DEFAULT!)

      Article translated to non-mafia, non-mob, non-union speak (ie. Mike Harris got voted in TWICE because he KICKS ASS. Perhaps you were one of the asses he kicked?).

      When I first read this I thought that, through some miracle, the Harris goverenment actually did something better than great for once. Looks to be a smart government. Anyone know if this was due to Mikey's biggest provincial gov't there? I'm looking for a reason, even one, not to like him :-)

      (If you're not from Ontario, here's the story: Mike Harris cut a a million $$$ from the school system here. A few (really, not most like the unions lie) teachers got cut, and nothing changed, except belts tightened on the trustee boards, who do dick all anyways. A bunch of teachers went on strike, saying it was for the kids. They hurt kids more by delaying their education for two weeks than the fact that the cuts boil down to less than the cost of a pack of pencils per student. They keep trying to go on strike again, but after most polls said the average parent thought the teacher's unions were nuts, they reconsider. Note that many teacher's didn't agree to such strikes, but were forced into line by the unions. Mike's been called a union buster, and I'm proud to live in a province run by the government, and not by a mob-mafia-anarchist union (I say this because the TEACHERS, I shit you not, BURNED a Mike Harris dummy, as if to say that they'd like to do this to him...).)

      BTW: Mike Harris has also been one of the first premiers (sp?) to CUT taxes. At 50% and up, this country needs it (I already have plans to move out of it, as do quite a few people graduating from college/university here. The US doesn't tax like this, and even with medicare added in, you still end up on top!).

    7. Re:Harris doing something good? Pigs flying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to realize he can't cut the federal tax rate. This is the bulk of the tax you pay. His tax cuts are quite high, probably in the 10-20% of his total budget range. If the federal government would join in, rather than raising taxes (yep, you never noticed because Harris lowered 'em at the same time) you'd have a heap of leftover money. I'm not sure what social services suck worse than they ever did before. I certainly do notice a lot more reporting about bruises, cuts, and scrapes taking a long time to get fixed at hospitals though. (Fear Mongering and FUD).

  137. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Adam+Schumacher · · Score: 1

    Taber, Alberta.

    One kid dead, one wounded.

    Several days after the Littleton shooting.

  138. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to flip the coin for a second, when I lived in Ottawa (5 minutes from Centretown), I couldn't get ADSL service in my area. So even your "10%" isn't completely covered. @Home service, no problem. When I lived in Winnipeg, MTS was all too happy sell me an ADSL line, then informed me that I was outside their supported area...after they'd taken my $100 install fee, of course. I understand that they still don't have their ADSL working properly. Both Videon and Shaw started cable after I left. Now I'm in Calgary. Didn't even bother to see if Telus has ADSL. Cable has been too good to me. BTW, Brandon, MB. Population 40K. @Home service for 1 year now.

  139. I bet 5000 quatloos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that you won't see any mention of this in the mainstream US media (major newspapers, television news). "Free press", indeed. Hmmmph.

  140. Re:MODERATE FREEBSD POST DOWN PLEASE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Someone please moderate this FreeBSD post down, it's not suppose to be here, a simple "Off Topic" would do if a few of you have points to spare.

    Sorry. All pro-BSD, anti-Linux posts are moderated up, not down. Haven't you noticed?

  141. Re:Ontario is looking much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Money is the driving factor in your entire life then, eh? Perhaps that is why I think it is a GOOD thing people like you move out of Canada.

  142. Re:Canadian spies at OLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd really like us to believe that wouldn't you?

  143. Re:Look up your country's encryption policy by HighFlyer · · Score: 1
    He he, I like that one:
    There are a small number of countries where strong domestic controls on the use of cryptography exist. These are mostly countries where human rights command little respect.
    At least Washington has a sense for irony. Death penalty anyone?
    --

    -- Truth suffers from too much analysis.
  144. Re:Move west, not south by Tsu · · Score: 1

    But the fact is, I've met a lot of old-timers and `progressives' for such a small place. (note: I don't even have my driver's licence yet, so please understand that I've lived a very sheltered life ]=) I think part of this might be due to the `community spirit' that a lot of rural places have, which people mistakenly think to be workable in large-scale operations, such as running a province.

    In a province dominated by one party, I must admit that the NDP has done a pretty good job finding middle ground. They've done what's needed to be done (eg. balancing the budget) As it stands right now, I would be very, very afraid if the Liberals or Conerva-- Saskatchewan Party came to power, because they're not even close to being able to make an effective opposition, let alone government.

    Hey, isn't there a newsgroup where we could take this? sk.politics or something? ]=)

    (Other people from SK read /.?! Wow.)

    --
    Wow, I wrote this a long time ago.
  145. Re:Stop eating the communist literature. by absolute · · Score: 1

    Well, you sad sad people obviously can't think for your selves either... I keep hearing the same "Unions are Evil communists" argument over and over again... As an insider on these disputes, I have experienced both sides, and I'am definatly on the teachers side because most of what they want is a good thing... I why should large corporations and rich people get everything the easy way... spread the wealth...

  146. Canadian spies at OLS by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by Justin:

    perhaps you mean CSE (canadian NSA)? i know there were a few of those registered for the conference. there also was a guy in the fifth or sixth row (i sat in the third row and politely declined the poking and prodding for me to take a bow when the slashdot joke came up) who had a white navy-looking uniform...maybe he was a CSE guy?

    1. Re:Canadian spies at OLS by HoserHead · · Score: 2
      CSIS (see-sis) I believe you mean, I've never heard of CSE. The neat thing about CSIS is that no one knows /anything/ about them. I'm fairly certain they are just as powerful, all-knowing, etc as the US' NSA - it's just that they are so far under wraps that they'd have to publicise themselves to become mysterious.

      That being said, I'm not surprised they would be at talks for IPsec and other things. Undoubtedly they're looking for information on possible weaknesses, and, barring that, ways of using it to enhance their own operations.

    2. Re:Canadian spies at OLS by Gordo · · Score: 1
      I was at Ottawa too, the guy in the sailor suit was actually in the US Navy... Hmmm. One of the guys dumb enough to register as a CSE was a friend of a friend (no really) and I felt bad for the chump, everyone was either avoiding him or acting -really- paranoid around him. Come on the CSE only collects the info an gives it to the NSA anyway.

      Interesting cross section of people at Ottawa anyhoo, and anyone else see that cute blond that was that was there? Come one you saw her too, Ouch.

  147. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you not figured it out yet? The party line of resisting the government is just the excuse they use to cover their asses. Gun lovers enjoy them because they feel powerful when they shoot them. That is why people who love guns for their own sake are most often the ones who think the government is out to get them.

  148. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by warmi · · Score: 1

    I came to US with 100 $ and almost no knowledge of English language. 7 years later I am making much more than average American does.
    Don't fucking tell me there are no ways for people to support themselves. If you want - you will make it !!! It is as simple as that.

  149. canada jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Canadian living in America, and I must say that the only Americans who make Canada jokes are the kind of dumbass morons who haven't been outside of their home state, let alone their country, and know nothing of world affairs. Plus, they like to chant "USA USA USA" when watching sporting events. Plus, they have short girlfriends named Debbie, and short, overbearing Moms who send them poptarts in the mail. On the other hand, Mike Harris is a Nazi. HAND

    1. Re:canada jokes by Natty · · Score: 1

      Actually, I crack Canadian jokes because they're sooo easy. I meen what isn't there to make fun of about Canada? In Canada it's cold and polar bears keep on eating residents. They have a stupid sport and they enter their own players into the olympics! How snotty is that? Talking about snotty, they won't even allow themselves to be admitted as the 51st state! They would rather stay a wholly own subsidary of the state of New York! God do I hate those totally out of touch and uneducated Canadians.

    2. Re:canada jokes by Zyber · · Score: 1

      >>
      I'm a Canadian living in America, and I must say that the only Americans who make Canada jokes are the kind of dumbass morons who haven't been outside of their home state, let alone their country, and know nothing of world affairs. Plus, they like to chant "USA USA USA" when watching sporting events. Plus, they have short girlfriends named Debbie, and short, overbearing Moms who send them poptarts in the mail. On the other hand, Mike Harris is a Nazi.

      WHOA! I think you are over the stereotype per line quota. I have trouble believing all of your statements, or that you are Canadian at all.

    3. Re:canada jokes by Griim · · Score: 1
      In Canada it's cold

      The northernmost point in California is several hundred miles further north than the southernmost point in Canada.

      polar bears keep on eating residents

      More people get eaten/mauled by pitbulls in a year in the states than have been attacked/killed by polar bears in the last century.

      They have a stupid sport

      WWF. What more can I say?

      they enter their own players into the olympics! How snotty is that?

      Can we say "Dream Team"?

      they won't even allow themselves to be admitted as the 51st state! They would rather stay a wholly own subsidary of the state of New York!

      You tried to invade us once; we sent ya packin'. Don't make us set the White House on fire again.

    4. Re:canada jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I crack Canadian jokes because they're sooo easy. I meen what isn't there to make fun of about Canada? In Canada it's cold

      What's wrong with cold? Did you know the best ways to keep warm is to share body heat with someone and physical activity. Preferably someone goodlooking of the opposite sex..

      and polar bears keep on eating residents.

      polar bears don't eat our residents, we're armed with inuit art. If it's good enough for the Prime Minister it's good enough for the rest of us.

      They have a stupid sport and they enter their own players into the olympics!

      But if we entered american players we would lose.

      How snotty is that? Talking about snotty, they won't even allow themselves to be admitted as the 51st state!

      Oh come on, Canada isn't the 51st state, the US would have been the 11th provence but got disqualified for being so tiny.

      They would rather stay a wholly own subsidary of the state of New York! God do I hate those totally out of touch and uneducated Canadians.

      All I can say is that we're better educated then those people to the south of us, they can't even spell plough or colour?

  150. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    Sucks to be you!
    Over here in Halifax/Dartmouth we've had competition between cable and ADSL for almost *2* full years now!

  151. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    much of this is a good example of typical anti-american sentiment, coming from a Canadian. Tone down the retoric a bit, and then you have something closer to valid arguments, and people are more willing to listen. Also, just laugh, instead of being offended. You should have learned that when you were 5 years old.

  152. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me too!

  153. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

    >NWT, Yukon, BC, Alberta, Sask., Manitoba, NS, >NB, Nfld., P.E.I.

    Um, not quite. I suppose outside of metro Halifax/Dartmouth in Nova Scotia you're screwed, but ADSL is DEFINITLY available in NS. I know 4 people with their crappy 'mPowered' ADLS connections, while I and 5 others I know have the infinitly better 'Wave' cable connections. Of course, 'Wave' is only available where Accesscable offers services, so people across the harbor in Halifax with ?Eastlink Cablevision? I think... they're stuck with their slower 'Andara' cable systems. Goota love choice ;`)

  154. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by mpe · · Score: 1


    Right. And what precisely do you do with those people who
    just *Can*'t get a job, and do try?

    One big problem is telling the difference between people who
    try but can't find work and people who don't want to work,
    but could easily find a job.

  155. Re:�Canada rules by Scidhuv · · Score: 1

    Although the Ontario government has screwed over it's citizens many many times over int he past four years, they do have one redeeming quality... they know business...

    'Mike knows business'
    .............

  156. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Zigurd · · Score: 1
    In Afghanistan the Soviet Union was defeated with small arms, mortars, and a few man-portable rockets. So, with a bit of outside help, the violent overthrow of government is still possible.

    For every high-tech wonder like radar imaging satellites, you have cases like the Yugoslav war where simple plywood decoys fooled extensive efforts to find stuff.

    There is never a guarantee that a revolution will succeed, or that the most horrifying tactics, as in Cambodia or Rwanda, won't be employed. But the ability of small arms to change the course of history is proven in some cases.

  157. Re:Stop eating the communist literature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How do you propose to spread the wealth? By taxing the "rich" more? Those people who make 80,000 plus?

    Well I'm sorry, but most of my family makes 80,000 plus and they work their ass's off so they can get taxed and have 53 percent of their earnings taken away so that people like you can "spread the wealth". The "rich" don't always have it easy.

  158. ertert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dfgfgf

    1. Re:ertert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm... niggers.

    2. Re:ertert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blech, asshole...

  159. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok heres the last thing im gonna say about Facism and Guns. Look at the only time in history when a facist regimes took power (WWII). What was the first thing that happened in those countrys. The rounded up people they thought were a threat to their power. Belive it or not those people were NOT jews, they were gun owners and people who spoke their minds. In america today most people own guns. That means that in order for America to go facist the government would have to take the guns away from most of its people. Most people wont give away their guns when the government says so. And so as long as a good portion of americans own guns, Facists will never rule america. And btw wanna start talking about reducing violent crime, look at switzerland, it has one of the lowest crime rates anywhere and EVERY CITIZEN is issued an ASSAULT WEAPON at the age of 18 (hint: this is not a coincidence). Hassan

  160. fghfg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sdsdf

  161. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anti-American? You reading the same posting I'm reading? There was NOTHING Anti-American, it's just a different take on rights and freedoms. Maybe you had your "tone down the rhetoric" message all worded out weeks ago and just had to post in in regards to something, but you are grossly out of place in what you replied to. Read it again.

  162. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, no. Most of the larger urban areas in BC (Vancouver, Nanaimo, Victoria, Kelowna, Kamloops, Prince George, etc.) can get ADSL (69/mo), ADSL-Lite (39/mo), or cable Internet (39/mo).

  163. Nope, Canaduh still sucks by delmoi · · Score: 1

    Don't forget They still have bans on 'hatefull' political speach. With harsher punishments for using computers. I personaly find this deplorable,

    there taxes are still high, people talk funny, and it's cold. America may suck in many respects, but it's still better then canada.

    Don't forget here, also all there doing is "recomending" that there citizens use it. Encryption in the US is still legal, its just being held up as a comercial industry by exsport restrictions (that prevent software from being put up for download, among other things) Allthough I'm sure Janet Reno would love to not alow us our encryption, there not really doing anything to take it away. (nor can they, I belive)
    "Subtle mind control? Why do all these HTML buttons say 'Submit' ?"

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though Canuck stereotypes are amusing and everything, where did this 'Canadians talk funny' thing come from? I've made many trips to BC and ontario and have yet to hear anyone speak in a weird accent or mispronounce 'about'...

    2. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (from Ontario, Canada...)
      Yep, taxes are high. Health care system isn't user-pay, though.
      People don't talk funny here. People talk funny in Kentucky. (oh...and Brooklyn)
      How exactly is "America" better than Canada? Do you people not realize "America" is not the name of your country? "America" describes two full continents - not just one self-centered little country.
      I'd rather live in Canada where I'm not likely to get shot at random.
      Gotta love the USA. (*snicker*)

    3. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by fade · · Score: 1

      Well, we may speak unusually to your ears, but that's because the language we speak is called "English". The mongrel tongue you are used to hearing is something rather rustically referred to as "American". As for strange laws, I hear New York will put you up in the felon's Hyatt for possession of Marijuana for longer than those kind folks convicted of rape and arson.. Oops. I better go, I think the thought police heard me typing. I wouldn't want to accrue one of those harsh computer punishments.

    4. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      America may suck in many respects, but it's still better then canada

      Your opinion. Many of us who have lived in both places think the exact opposite.

    5. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      The Canadians talk funny in Southpark, so therefore all Canadians must talk funny.

    6. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by prestige · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that Canada has accepted the Internet as a free market all together. It amazes me how many governments constantly struggle to find new ways to re-inforce their presence and re-assert their power. I believe this instability, stemming from the top of the polical tree, reflects a deeper unrest stirring in the roots of a country's people.

      I fail to see how gun-totting children and a big-brother's watching government puts the civil back in civilization.

      Writting from Toronto, Ontario, I try to assure myself that I am far away from this collection of narcisism and neurocy. Still, I am inevitably effected by the pushy arrogance of those beneath me (no pun intended). Canada, and the rest of the world for that matter, is continually influenced by the USA through it's media dominance. I don't see this a bad thing; we should be open to other cultures and other ideas.

      With Ontario's current stance on cryptography, I just hope our all-powerful neighbor is not so self-promoting as to ignore the influence of those around her.

    7. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by coldguy · · Score: 1

      "Even though Canuck stereotypes are amusing and everything, where did this 'Canadians talk funny' thing
      come from? I've made many trips to BC and ontario and have yet to hear anyone speak in a weird accent
      or mispronounce 'about'..."

      Actually, I've never heard the sterotypical Canadian accent come out of a Canadian's mouth (such as pronouncing 'about' as 'aboot', 'milk' as 'melk', etc), but I have heard this in people from northern Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota. (Minnesota especially. Just say the word yourself and you'll hear it) I'm willing to theorize that the reason this mode of speech was pegged on Canadians is the fact that in general, Americans generalize a lot of things (Myself included, as you have just witnessed), and tend to think of those states as "practically Canada anyway."

    8. Re:Nope, Canaduh still sucks by chris88 · · Score: 1

      I've lived in Arizona back in November till April, and I prefer Canada (Alberta specifically). Though it just might be Arizona that sucks.

  164. Stop eating the communist literature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The changes were needed to get the teachers to wake up and realize that they are not Gods who can float on through their career. Hell, at 80,000 a year and summer off, I wouldn't be complaining. And I definetly don't think they need a union to defend them. And on the topic of unions, I know at least 10 teachers at my high school who are completely against the strikes and believe that what the unions are saying is false. And since the union isn't letting any teachers do extracurriculars, it makes it tough for me to have ANY sympathy for them. And many other teachers think that Harris is in the wrong. But they just can't handle a little more work. Foo on you, Pal.

    1. Re:Stop eating the communist literature. by absolute · · Score: 1

      No teacher makes 80,000 a year... even the most experienced teachers with as masters degree only make about 60,000. Only a person who lives, breaths and eats the shit that Harris feeds them would believe lies like that.

      The fact that teachers get paid through the summer is irrelavent. They could be paid for the 10 months they work and still be paid the same, but I think it would be a much better idea to have the pay spread out throughout the entire year.

      I don't think you could handle being a teacher either, they are some of the hardest working people out there. How many other jobs out there do you bring work home with you even though you don't get paid for over time...???

      Unions basicly exist to organize a group and to solidify efforts. I'm sure Harris would like it much more if teachers were a bunch of small splintered groups, thereby making it easier to bully them so he can make the rich richer and the poor poorer...

      I think that you are reading into Harris' propaganda to much, because he would like every one to believe that unions are evil. I'm sure you noticed the great pains he went to separate the union from teachers. Which is completly BS, because they are the same thing. The overwhelming majority of teachers supported the strike and you know it. You are just affraid to admit it.

      And please drop the communist insults. This isn't the 50's any more, and there is nothing wrong with being a communist if thats what you truly believe in.

    2. Re:Stop eating the communist literature. by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      It sounds to me (and I am an American in Florida here) that it is a union dispute and not a teacher dispute- as in, the majority of the teachers aren't rallying for a strike, the union is pulling them into it. It also sounds like the union is purposely making things worse (not allowing extracurricular participation, etc). I have no pity towards unions. I have pity towards people. Also, maybe I am off here but 60k canadian is still a lot in the US. That is more than I will make when I get out of school. My mother was a teacher for 15 years and the highest she was ever paid was $29k american. And yes, she chose to be paid year-round for easier budgeting of that paltry sum (she still had to get a summer job to make ends meet). She delt with the lack of education funds by taking about $200/month of her own money and spending it on materials for her classroom. In my high school, we had textbooks from the 70's (and I graduated two years ago). The scary thing? We didn't throw those books away when we got new books. We sold them to another school in Mississippi that apparently was a lot worse off then us. It sounds more like there are teachers who actively partake in their union, that have no problem telling their students 'the way things are.' When I see teachers like in the US, where there are garbage collectors who make more, who have to pay out their own pocket to give their students a decent education, I will listen to your cries of poor education. But this sounds more like people scared they will not be able to buy a new car this year due to "That bastard Harris". And in case you haven't figured out from my comments above, I think unions ARE evil. Pure evil. I have yet to be involved in a single union (zero of five) that hasn't been horribly corrupt and caused more pain than it cured. There are people who stand outside of businesses calling for unions here- clue update: they aren't employees of the store. They are employees of COMPETING stores, who can no longer handle the salaries the unions are demanding and stay competitive. So the unions start to picket outside of the businesses, they try everything to 'help the poor, poor non-unionized employees', trying to talk to employees and organize a strike, etc.

    3. Re:Stop eating the communist literature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell did you figure that out as an outsider. Jeez, you gotta be psychic! That's exactly what's going on. If you think unions are powerful in the USA you wanna see 'em here! They've even been able to STOP the government working for a day the other year... As if that made any difference! And yes, you notice much of the convo here is from students. This is because many teachers were filling them with union shit to get them on their side (remember, that 16 year old can vote in 2 years! ;-)

  165. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And btw wanna start talking about reducing violent crime, look at switzerland, it has one of the lowest crime rates anywhere and EVERY CITIZEN is issued an ASSAULT WEAPON at the age of 18 (hint: this is not a coincidence).

    That's because Switzerland has compulsory military conscription.

  166. US should stop going South and look North... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at Ontario - for examples of how to deal with enryption.

    1. Re:US should stop going South and look North... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think US have enough specialists to know :-)

      I also think that what they want to achieve is not a ban on encription (impossible in the long run) but a delay for as long as possible.

      Most Internet backbones go trough US. It is trivial and for a government just pennies to do statistical analysis on emails, usenet and web to determine e.g. trends (particularly the email is of biggest interes as is perceived by most users as private)

      If you want to see such an engine in action see WEBSOM.

  167. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Compuser · · Score: 1

    Prisons do not have to be more expensive if you abolish
    Constitutionally guaranteed rights for prisoners. Already
    the second amendment does not apply in prisons, why should
    any other? I have been a long time proponent of locking people
    in literally four walls and no amenities of any kind. All you'd need
    is to feed these people (you could bring that cost down by
    standardizing rations and cutting down on expensive foods).
    Prisons are not meant to be comfortable, healthy or humane,
    they are meant as an extreme form of punishment.

  168. Encryption development going on in Ontario by Colin+Simmonds · · Score: 1

    Also developing encryption is good for Ontario business. Entrust Technologies is headquartered in Ottawa. I also recall the lead developer from the Ipsec presentation at the Ottawa Linux Symposium saying that he was from Ottawa. There's already a lot of software expertise in Ottawa and Toronto, so support like this makes it possible for Ontario to become a world leader in encryption.

    As a new Ontario resident, I'm rather pleased, and pleasantly surprised to find a reason to like the Harris government.

    1. Re:Encryption development going on in Ontario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story (Wired News, 15.Dec.98) has some related information on Entrust. "An initially modest deal could grow into a project that provides digital IDs for everyone in Canada's most populous province."

  169. Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    I'm gonna indulge myself and get political here. I was a resident of Ontario for many years; the current provincial administration in Ontario is a libertarian's dream. (OK, maybe that's giving 'em too much credit - they've also done some pretty loony things too - but they're the closest thing to libertarians I've ever seen in power.)

    They're politicians - and ideologues - which is a dangerous combination, even (especially!) if you happen to like their ideology, as I do. But at least you know what they stand for and what they're gonna do when elected. Here's a snapshot of their platform:

    • Lower taxes. They were first elected with a promise to cut the provincial portion of income taxes by 30%. Even I thought they were blowing smoke up the voters' arses on that one - and then they did it. I was both pleased and stunned.
    • Lower spending. The five years preceding the current administration saw a socialist administration which hiked welfare benefits by 20%, and taxes to match. Ontario was one of the highest-taxed, highest-spending, highest-deficit provinces when the socialists got the boot for the new crowd. All the spending cuts that were made in Ontario were also campaign promises.
    • Generally libertarian business/social practices. Relaxed labor laws, less red tape, less governmental interference in private and commercial affairs.
    Within a month of their election 4-5 years ago, this administration:
    • Abolished photo radar (brought in by the previous administration - no, not visible cameras on the side of the road as deterrents, but unmarked vans, driving along with traffic, designed to maximize revenue.)
    • Abolished race quotas (the previous administration brought 'em in and said "they're not quotas, they're merely numerical goals for all businesses to meet or get fined")
    • Repealed a rabidly pro-union piece of workplace legislation (umm, also brought in by the previous administration...)
    • Cut welfare payments by 20%.
    • Instituted the first part of a 5-year tax cutting plan.
    Again - all of these things were election promises. This is the first time I'd ever seen a party elected with a platform of repeal laws, not enacting new ones. It was also the first time I'd seen a party actually do the stuff it said it would do during the campaign.

    Five years later, the previous administration's tax hikes had been completely undone, and the budget, which had been running $12B deficits annually, was within epsilon of being balanced. Well, you get the idea about what the current situation in Ontario is about. Ontario lived through five years under socialism, and then brought in the right-wing libertarians in a landslide of disgust with the socialists. That brought about 4-5 years of radical social change, after which Ontario ended up with the lowest provincial taxes in Canada, and a balanced budget to boot.

    The best part? After five years of relative economic freedom (and incessant whining from bitter socialists about how the province was going to hell in a handbasket :), the voters finally got their chance to pass judgement on the new regime...

    drum roll...

    ...and the right-wing libertarian crowd got re-elected with another majority. Based on the fact that they spent five years in power and made good on every tax cut promise they made in the first campaign, folks who live in Ontario can look forward to more income tax cuts, and a 20% cut in a large part of their property taxes.

    So what the hell does this have to do with crypto?

    IMNSHO, if you elect libertarians - regardless of the party banner they happen to be running under - the free crypto just comes with the rest of the goodies.

    1. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The homeless issue has been completely blown out >>of proportion. Homelessness has increased hugely here in Ottawa since the right-wingers took power. It used to be unknown. I pass dozens everyday, mostly unemployable in the wonderful "New Economy". One a few minutes ago, when I was walking back from the store was a young man weeping while he begged for food. There is a human tragedy on the streets of large Ontario cities. I've lived here for 33 years and see it every day. Social spending used to keep it in check. I don't belive pro-business tech policy is incompatible with compassion.

    2. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you die from blood loss kissing Harris' ass any more let's discuss the other side of the coin. Thanks to the new extreme right wing policies, corporations make more money by exploiting our natural resources and reducing employment. Homelessness is at an all time high. The split between the ultra wealthy and the poor is wider than ever. Violence is UP in our major metropolitan centers. Toronto has become a "mega city" thus promoting the already out of hand sprawl and pollution which is slowly killing us all. Yeah, but you got your crypto laws. Freaking fascists.

    3. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without a strong business backing, where would the money come from to pay for the social programs that you seem to want?.. The poor need to get training and education rather than free handouts.

    4. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting how Ontario judges a "majority government". It seems in ontario not all votes are equal. In an after election tally, 55% of the population voted against the present government. Seems that the population is not equaly divided across the seats in Queen's park. Maybe the govenment did all it promesed to do, but you did not show the reprocussions. higher homelessness, Lower school funding causing massive teacher strikes (I went through two) and emergency rooms refusing patients. I personnaly would gladly give that 30% back it it meant having the services that we enjoyed in the past. Also the 30% tax cut was provincial and that is only a small fraction of the total income tax and thus only the rich could apreciate the cut

    5. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was so good, I think I'm going to have to print it out and paste on the wall to point at the next time some asshole at work complains about Mike Harris. He rocks, and that's why he's gotten in twice!

    6. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, with that stunning 45% "majority" of the eligible voters. Who cares if eleven out of every twenty people wanted Harris out on his ass?

    7. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30% tax back from a welfare check? (I've only seen union guys and welfare people complain about Harris much. And you weren't NUTS like the union people.).

      Now, as far as I see, 45% is still more than the Liberals or the NDP got, therefore Mike Harris is still leader (although maybe not with the Iron Grip!).

    8. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You obviuosly can't even count. If what you said was true, a non-existant non-mike-harris party would have won. I don't see that. I see the Ontario government in this order:

      - PC
      - Liberal
      - NDP
      - Other

      This is also the way Federal elections work, and would you say that closer to half didn't want Chretien (sp?) in, or that x people didn't vote for party y, or whatever? No, because this is not only lying, but stupid. People vote for parties, not against stuff. Ie. 45% of Ontarians voted for Mike Harris, xx% voted for party y, and xx% voted for party z. This means Mike Harris got most votes, and won. PERIOD.

      As far as this majority stuff goes, it's actually good. We all know Mike gets his way, and just like the Fillibuster did NOTHING but get annoying, and teacher's strikes got stupid, Mike ends up winning. Whether or not he's in majority. It just makes everyones like EASIER.

      Don't stop the future. You can't for at least another 4 years or so...

    9. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by jmeadows · · Score: 1

      Studies have shown that is is small business that drives job growth, not "corporations."

    10. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let me guess.. you voted NDP maybe? Perhaps your narrow view missed the fact that crime was down in Toronto and in the whole province. And that Toronto has the 2nd lowest crime rate of all of Canada. And let me guess again.. you maybe work for one of those totalitarian unions? Like CUPE or CAW or OSSTF? And I'll bet your a big supporter of "welfare" (read: sit on your ass and get cash while you watch TV) Its a shame that you don't like Mike Harris, but look at the alternatives. Dalton McGuinty? He can barely make his own sentences without reading the teleprompter. Howard Hampton? He's so much a member or former member of the communist party its not even funny. And don't even START me on the teachers...

    11. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view by warmi · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for corporations there would be no jobs available.
      I got feeling you will end up being either goverment employee or welfare recipiant.

  170. Re:Obviously you haven't heard what the FBI said.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Preventing Americans from using crypto is *exactly* the point of the export restrictions. NSA, FBI, and friends know that foreign bad guys already have and use strong encryption, in fact they have publicly said so. The restrictions exist to effectively force software developers to cripple their security and insure that all casual communications can be transparently monitored.

  171. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Tarnar · · Score: 1

    Or maybe the 'need' to revolt against government wouldn't BE there if government didn't suck ass.

    And it seems like Canada is taking steps to not suck.

  172. I fail to see how this takes a week.... by Nugget94M · · Score: 1

    # tar xzvf ssh-1.2.27.tar.gz
    # cd ssh-1.2.27
    # ./configure
    # make
    # make install

  173. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UK government has since banned the possession of such guns, and there has not been another school shooting since. There's a lesson in there...

    A school shooting happened once in what 50 years in the UK. The meer absence of one since then does not prove or even sugest that what the UK goverment did had an effect on this type of behavior.

  174. US/Canada Spy Partners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There a law in Canada that basically says that the Canadian Govt. cannot spy on it's own citizens. The US spys on everyone so basically they just go to the NSA for info on thier own citizens. Canada alows the US to spy on thier citizens in exchange for the info when ever they want it. So much for the privacy they thought they had.

  175. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I live in Kenora, ON and we can get ADSL and we're just a small city of 15K. Of course having a private telco and paying 300 buck a month for ADSL sort of change things too. No 39.99 meal-deal up hear :)

  176. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by bnenning · · Score: 1

    And Israel used to have problems with terrorist attacks on schools, until they started allowing the teachers to carry weapons. No more shootings in years. There's also a lessor in there.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  177. Re:Nope, Canada rules by -=CaP=- · · Score: 1

    I have to agree, USA thinks they can do everything in any countries...

    They think they are so superior that they think they are the rulers of the world...

    tsk, tsk...

  178. Freedom by strider · · Score: 1

    It seems to me a major problem with many American politicians is that they seem to think they can have a free society without a criminal element. This is not possible. I see more and more people wanting to have their cake and eat it to. Sure we want the free exchange of political ideas, a society where new ways of doing things is rewarded, but as long we can't have [inset porn, paranoid delusions of terrorism, racism, or whatever your favorite scape goat is here]. Life does not work like this. Do you want to live in a free society? Their is a price to pay. Encryption is important in giving people the fealing of SECURITY to exchange ideas without fear (even if it be paranoid) of being looked on by some governmental force. The government cannot have the ability to monitor all information sent out over a widespread medium like the telephone service or the internet without becoming a danger to the ideas it was built upon. The freedom of thought is an essential part of a succesfull democracy, and it is the real freedom the bill of rights attempts to protect. If we loose that, then what was the purpose of guarding against [inset your favorite scape goat here] in the first place. Just venting ;).

    --
    The preceding passage has been checked for spelling, you will find no sentence without at least one mis spelled word
  179. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that such an horrific event only occurs rarely in the UK (where we do not have the right for all and sundry to carry guns) says it all.

  180. Re:Ontario Politics by ppanon · · Score: 1

    Of course if you go to a fully proportional system
    of representation, you can wind up with a situation like India or Italy, where you have dozens of political parties dedicated to narrow special interests; nobody gets a majority government; government changes hands once a year; and very little ever gets accomplished. Political lobbying might be lower since no one party has control, but then some political parties might as well be lobbies due to the narrowness of special interests they serve.

    It's similar to the wards/no wards arguments with municipal elections. Why does it have to be all one way? Why not have a mix of of both types of representation in a government with a certain number of seats assigned to each of the two formulas? That way parties with small but widespread popular support might still be able to elect a representative to promote their vues, while still allowing governments to rule effectively and not be held hostage to special interests. Don't special interest lobbies have enough power already that we need to entrench their abilities in the political system?

    On the other hand, I have never taken a political science course, so what do I know?

    --
    Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  181. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They also can provide fiber to the door in most populated non tundra parts of the nation.

  182. Privacy? You've got to be kidding! by symbolic · · Score: 1

    Canada is probably the one nation that is REALLY pushing for a national DNA registry, and the USA is right on its heals. If that's the mark of a government that gives a damn about privacy and the rights of its people, then tell me what isn't.

  183. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by MassacrE · · Score: 1

    "Personally I'd love to see road work turned over to private companies like it is in the US. introduce fair competition. you want the $5mil contract for resurfacing the roads? bid on it like everyone else and you've at least got a shot at it. THAT would bring about more employment and make things better (I think). "

    Not *just* like the US. Local contractors bidding may decrease the cost. But in the US, the money comes from gov. grants, and the conditions are just plain stupid- you must go with the lowest priced contractor (regardless of quality), and everything is against local gov. going after a contractor that is not holding true to their word (as in promised schedule or road quality).

    I would personally prefer a system where local government got to spend the money any way they want to. If the federal government forces them to hire people that build the roads on their side, there isn't much you can do.. complain to your congressman maybe? But if the local government screws up (by hiring without doing their homework, giving someone 'special priviledge' or insider information, etc) they are really going to be up Shite Creek.

    However, I am one for local goverment control rather than big goverment. Let people locally decide how to run things.

  184. Ontario is looking much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally Ontario is starting to turn itself around from the horrible debt that the NDP caused. I am glad that Mike Harris has been re-elected, and if they would only lower the income taxes then I would not even consider moving to the USA. I will be taxed 52% this year on income taxes alone. On top of that, sales tax here is 15%. It is good to see that Ontario is headed in the right direction, and encouraging cryptography is just another bonus of living here.

    1. Re:Ontario is looking much better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are quite right. People always lie about everyone shooting each other in the States. Fact is, it mostly happens in the big cities. If you go live in a quiet town in say, virginia, you will live a happy, lower tax, nearer to the beach, life... Or at least those I have talked to down there are pretty damn proud of what they have! :-) My plans are also set on the USA for after College, but a lower tax is all Canada needs to do to keep me in, and plug up the brain drain. Keep it up Mike!

    2. Re:Ontario is looking much better. by warmi · · Score: 1

      52 % ??? Gee, how the fuck people are putting up with working 6 months basically for nothing.
      And we bitch about having to pay 20 % ...

  185. Restricting "linux single" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even so, anyone can sit down and in 10 minutes compromise either of my OSes...either by doing a linux single reboot (which I haven't had the heart to remove, because I need it if I screw up X, which auto-runs because not using xdm is worse security-wise), or by installing another copy of WinNT onto my DOS volume, rebooting, and giving themselves admin privileges.

    You can stop people from running "linux single" by editing your /etc/lilo.conf file. Find a line like "image = /boot/vmlinuz-..." and add the following lines after it:
    " password = "
    " restricted"
    (then run /sbin/lilo)

    This stops anyone from providing command line arguments (such as "single") to the kernel, though it won't help if people can boot into an insecure OS (if it's practical, set a password required to boot DOS/Windows - don't use the "restricted" keyword for these partitions). You can still enter single user mode if you provide the password.

  186. Nope, Canada Kicks ass!!! by absolute · · Score: 1

    Our taxes may be high, but at least we get free health care, and a crime rate 1/10 of what it is in the states...

    No, people do not talk funny in canada... except for in Newfoundland, but lets not for get all the people in the USA that talk funny, such as southern US states, texas, california vally girls etc etc...

    We don't have bans on "hatefull speech" we have bans on racism, hate crimes etc...

    1. Re:Nope, Canada Kicks ass!!! by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      No you've got it all wrong. Slashdotters want to pay NO taxes and get free healthcare (and ISP's and hardware and blowjobs, etc). Higher taxes just don't work for this crowd.

      (Sorry to any girl (or guy) that may or maynot be offended)

    2. Re:Nope, Canada Kicks ass!!! by warmi · · Score: 1

      Free healtcare ?? Nothing is free dude ! You pay for it ( taxes ) The difference is that your healtcare insurance is run by goverment and not by private industry.

  187. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Answer: Cut out welfare completely, and make those lazy ass people work. I don't care if they have to pick up candy bar wrappers from the gutters for their welfare check, it's way cheaper than prisons.

    Problem solved...

  188. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by MassacrE · · Score: 1

    He is right though.. are you going to rob someone when odds are there are ten people with assault rifles in shouting distance?

  189. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, that's so much the opposite of what I would have said! Why the hell does a 3 yr. old car need to be tested? I mean, if it's a Yugo, ok, maybe, but a 3 yr. old Lexus? Get real!

  190. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by RelliK · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I have to reply to this, for I too live in Ontario. In fact, unlike you, I still live there and don't have any plans to move out. Your post has certainly been very informative but I want to present the other side of the story.

    Yes, Harris lowered taxes. At what cost? Cuts to Health Care, Education, Welfare, etc. I presume you are not aware that Ontario is now one of the worst places in North America when it comes to education spending? I am currently a university student. I make just barely enough money to pay for school, and I don't think I can handle any more of Harris's "tax cuts". (Tuition has already gone up like 30% since I started and I don't even know how much it's gonna be this fall.)
    What about the teachers' strike last year? Harris changed the existing contract and shoved it down their throats.
    What about overcrowded hospitals and shortage of doctors?
    I could go on here but I'm just gonna say one more thing. Our famous libretarian has proposed mandatory drug & alcohol tests for people on welfare, as part of his election campaign.

    So, as far as I'm concerned, this crypto thing is the only thing Harris did right. Well, there is another one actually. Now you can walk around topless anywhere in Ontario. Let's hear it for libretarians :-)

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  191. Re:Nope, Canada rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmmm... Canada vs. U.S. Canada: health care where everyone gets treated anywhere, much lower crime rate per capita, and most of us can find germany on a map of the world. U.S.: Hospitals have you fill out an insurance form before cleaning up the blood you just spilled on the floor from the gunshot wound, crime quite higher, majority of citizens polled couldn't find Canada on a map, and a Big Ass army. I guess the US thinks their big because of their military. too bad they're not as skilled as Canada. Seems we've won the Top Gun competition quite a few times and for most of our pilots it's the first time using live ammunition. So who sucks?

  192. Hey Welfare. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're just upset because you got cut 20%. For some odd reason (dropped on the head too much as a child) you seem to think you can sit on your lazy ass and still collect. Get a haircut, and get a real job loser!

  193. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, get real. I live 5 min (I kid you not. 3 Min. or so from Victoria St.) from Kitchener Waterloo. You can't get: ADSL ISDN Fiber T-Anything Leased Line Cable Internet You can get: Crappy, non-56k phone line. A local calling area you can walk out of. Of course, _inside_ Kitchener Waterloo, things change. You can get: Cable Internet ISDN Leased Line Most T - ? Stuff Moral of the story, if you are one of the 10% most populated places in Canada, you get the stuff. The other 90% have to writhe in higher phone charges. Even many 2nd and 3rd world countries doesn't suck this bad (as far as hi-tech connections go). (Note, we barely get that much snow, never mind tundra.).

  194. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, for G*d's sakes slashdot, put the default back to plain old text...

  195. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Compuser · · Score: 1

    I do not live in Canada (rather US0), but
    What's wrong with cutting welfare? If you ask
    me, all gov'ts should immediately cease to
    support any welfare or related benefits as
    leeching and tell people to work or starve to
    death, whichever they like more. Reducing
    welfare is what Clinton's doing and it's gonna
    be another century before we get all those beggars
    off our backs (if ever).
    I do not however support cuts in medical or
    education fields (regardless of country).

  196. Tax by Betcour · · Score: 1

    Well, you get the governement you pay for... :-)

    1. Re:Tax by Rob_D_Clark · · Score: 1

      Well, you get the governement you pay for... :-)

      Hmm, I think mine's broke... can I take it back and get a refund? :)

      --
      --Rob
  197. Mike Harris: Canada's Next Prime Minister? by Tsu · · Score: 1

    (Let's hope so.)

    --
    Wow, I wrote this a long time ago.
    1. Re:Mike Harris: Canada's Next Prime Minister? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would give me further reason to stay in Canada, and not leave for a lesser tax pressure in the States...

  198. It is seamless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PGP install is seamless. It looks for your Email client and installs plug-ins. When you launch PGPKeys for the first time it tells you what to do step-by-step. The only difficult part is explaining how public key encryption works, and you'll never make that any easier. PGP or any cipher simply is not secure unless you understand how it works.

  199. UN votes Canada #1 country in the world to live by Griim · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  200. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not paying much more, but I think that speaks volumes about the fact that too many people in Ontario go to university and not enough to to college. But hey, doesn't cust to Health Care, Education, Welfare translate to: cuts to union jobs. That's why it looks so bad. Take a look at Maple Leaf, and you'll see what can happen when unions BITCH too much. (A Maple Leaf factory went out of business after many months of striking workers. Fat lot of good their striking did!).

  201. encrypted loopback fs? by Rob_D_Clark · · Score: 1

    I image that it would be possible to set up an encrypted loopback fs... then even if someone rebooted your box, they still wouldn't have access to your data. Anyone ever try this?


    --
    --Rob
    1. Re:encrypted loopback fs? by blkwolf · · Score: 1

      Check out Encrypted Home Directory from either freshmeat or linuxberg, I forgot where I got it.

  202. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I do not live in Canada (rather US0), but What's wrong with cutting welfare? If you ask me, all gov'ts should immediately cease to support any welfare or related benefits as leeching and tell people to work or starve to death, whichever they like more.

    You forgot option number three: put a knife at your neck and tell you to hand over all your money....

    And then kill you anyway after they get it, because they'll get better food and shelter in the prison system than in social programs.

  203. MODERATE FREEBSD POST DOWN PLEASE? by BadlandZ · · Score: 2

    Someone please moderate this FreeBSD post down, it's not suppose to be here, a simple "Off Topic" would do if a few of you have points to spare. I am just going to try to repost the stuff again in the other thread.

  204. Look up your country's encryption policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a survey that covers most nations' cryptography policies. Canada gets a good score. So does my home country, Finland, even though the Finnish government has had to reluctantly give in a bit under strong pressure from the US (probably more or less direct threats of commercial retaliation).

    Marko

  205. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its more like 10% that don't get those services and the other 90% do.

  206. You would fit into a fascist state, you know. by iserlohn · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with having a good, well thought out and working welfare system. A system that can train people and find them jobs.

    Yes we can't have a system that rewards laziness, and we don't have to. There are a lot of progress in reforming the welfare system.

    Instead of starving people out and scaring the s*&t out of people who can't help themselves already, why don't we go and empower them with skills, knowledge and give them a kickstart?

    Real freedom is empowering people; giving opportunities to those who have none. Just because we f*&ked it up before doesn't mean it'll never work. It just means we still have to learn how to make it work.

  207. Re:canada jocks by spitwidth · · Score: 1

    haha, yes, I like it. Stupid americans. Get over yourself

  208. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, Alberta has real good ADSL connections [At least in Calgary, though I'm pretty sure the rest of the province does]. Telus handles that end. I have a friend who runs a server using his ADSL connection, and the ISP I come out of allows static IP addresses [up to 8] if you get their service [2000k/sec roughly]. In summary, add Alberta to your list of Canadian places that get ADSL service. Then again, we don't count.

  209. Encryption vs. "languages" by mutende · · Score: 1

    While I can only congratulate Canada I have always wondered about the encryption policy of the US, or rather: why is it that the US government wants to deprive its citizens from the benefits of encryption?

    Of course I recognize that the answer is Big Brother Wants to Watch You, but really, what is the practical difference between encryption and e.g. using some obscure little-known language?

    Imagine a group of people who for the fun and challenge of it invents and uses a new language in their conversations (written and oral) within the group. Languages have been invented before, this is not an overwhelming task, and I assume that artificial languages (like e.g. Esperanto) fall outside the scope of the US encryption law. Am I right?

    Now, what is the practical difference between encryption and an artificial language in this case, since Big Bad Brother would be unable to decipher the contents in both cases?

    --

    --
    Unselfish actions pay back better
    1. Re:Encryption vs. "languages" by Detritus · · Score: 1

      An artificial language isn't going to help you, unless it is something that is very difficult to learn like Navajo. The list of "dead" languages that can't be translated is fairly short. Cryptographers have been breaking codes (as opposed to ciphers) for many years.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Encryption vs. "languages" by iainh · · Score: 1

      Next Stage US Law: No more than one person may enter an enclosed and possibly unmonitored space at a time. What will be next: FBI Operator: Can I help you. Horny Husband: Yess!! Please I would like to make love to my wife. FBI Operator: The soonest I can reserve a private monitored room is next Thursday. Shall I make a reservation for you.

  210. Move west, not south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both Saskatchewan and Alberta have lower costs of living than Ontario, and if you hate sales tax, well, Saskatchewan has 6% and Alberta has 0%. They're also both right now past their deficits.

    1. Re:Move west, not south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what's the avaliability of non-modem internet access like (remember, you said this on the geek world of slashdot!)?

    2. Re:Move west, not south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Calgary, you can get either cable or 2000k ADSL service. My ISP offers up to 8 static IP addresses if you get ADSL. ISDN is another option.

      Since ADSL is administered by Telus throughout Alberta, I expect you can get high speed service in any major centre.

      In Saskatchewan, you may have to go with cable, which shouldn't be that bad. Remember, we aren't the boonies any more, we're very advanced out here.

    3. Re:Move west, not south by Tsu · · Score: 1

      Saskatchewan? Ha. Saskatchewan is the most socialist place in North America. To quote `Hugh' from the Saskatoon StarPhoenix:

      ``Saskatchewan will be prosperous when all of the old socialists leave and the young entrepreurs stay.''

      Red Roy manages to keep the province afloat only through high taxes, mining profits, and ignoring the poor condition of the roads. (Saskatchewan has to be one of the only places in the world where the quality of roads is a major election issue.]=)

      On the other hand, from what I can tell, Alberta rocks.

      And as for Internet access, I'm sure some of you will be surprised to hear that SaskTel was the first company (in Canada, if not the world) to offer consumer ADSL. They've been doing it for at least two years, I believe, but since I'm too lazy to check my facts, don't quote me. ]=) Unfortunately, I live in the *true* boonies, and it's not available here.

      --
      Wow, I wrote this a long time ago.
  211. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but you can't buy a chastity belt on a prison salary. Why do people think prison is so good? Unless you enjoy gay lovin', shitty tasting food, piss on the floor, and people like me who swear every goddamn friggin' moment they damn well please asshole so go to hell, you won't like prison. And no, a 20% cut is not like that at all. It just means that welfare bums have to quit using cable, colour TV and go back to B/W + rabbit ears. You don't even get TV in some jails, you know.

  212. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by absolute · · Score: 1

    I have lived under the Ontario Tory regime to for the past 5+ years and have experienced all that they have done to my province. Of course he did what he said he would do, but so did Hitler. Point is, it doesn't make you a good person if you do what you say... It is really more important how you do things, and Harris couldn't have done anything more wrong. He cut taxes, but he downloaded a lot of costs to the municiple governments. Things such as garbage collection which used to be free are now charged for, and our water which used to be a small flat rate is now going to a per gallon fee. Basicly, what ever we got as an income tax relief, we lost through additional costs... Oh, and lets not forget our education system, ranked as one of the worst funded in North America. Our fscking books are older than I'am, and they're falling apart. That and our teachers have gone on strike twice because of how bad the have been treated by the government. Not to forget, our environment is being sold out to corporate interests, senior citizens are being killed off by the government because of health care cuts... Oh, and about the photo radar being a cash hog for the government, you obviously forgot the forced emmissions testing by the government, in which the government recieves a 30% cut and EVERYBODY has to take it. If your car has something slightly off, it has to be fixed before you can even take the test, not to mention that I have heard of some people having to have over $1000 worth of repairs done to their vehicles to get them up to spec... You should really consider removing Harris' d*ck from your mouth before you rant and rave about all he's done... Open you fscking eyes for a change...

  213. Re:canada jokes (Previous post was a troll) by Zyber · · Score: 1

    Just ignore those statements, they are looking for a reaction. Although that polar bear thing was funny.

  214. Obviously you haven't heard what the FBI said.... by iserlohn · · Score: 1

    They don't want encryption software on the web. Period.

  215. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by RelliK · · Score: 1

    right. So why don't you *give* these people a job? You can't just cut off their air supply and let them starve. You have to provide a way for them to feed themselves. If a country is unable to provide people with jobs, it deserves to spend millions on welfare.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  216. Go Canuck! Go Crypto! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (gonzocanuck not logged in, forgot pw!)

    Yea! The US may be the only nation in the world with a free speech amendment, but by the time the words have been run thru the litiguous (sp?) lawyer mill, what does it matter?

    Dammit, we are cool! Our lack of national passion prevents us from looking like global idiots and making big mistakes. OK, Brian Mulroney was a big mistake, but I never voted for him. Don't forget, we will triumph one day, just check out Canadian World Domination: http://home.golden.net/~cmkerr/

  217. An American without encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is like a rapist without a penis.

  218. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Athos · · Score: 1
    Apparently, you've never actually LOOKED for it outside of the areas you mention and make some bizarre and wrong assumptions.

    It's ironic that the cities you mention (BCE territory) have the slowest ADSL service I've seen in the country. Only 960kbps down/120 up.

    (Oh, and a side point. PPPoE sucks!)

    --

    --

    --
    The Internet is the Suppository of All Knowledge. You get it in the end.

  219. Oops: I meant to post the above elsewhere. by iainh · · Score: 1

    Bad mouse Bad Bad Bad mouse!!

  220. You said the magic word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This thread is now rendered invalid and has hit the killfile due to the use of the word Hitler as a possible comparison to a real life person. I thought slashdotter's were above this...

  221. Re:Ontario Politics: another insider's view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is 100% BULLSHIT, and you were force fed it by union trash as school. You're just too damn stupid to realize it (stupidity caused by the other government's letting unions run wild).

    Harris has done nothing but improve my life, and I was in OAC during the strikes. I put the blame for the strikes directly on who caused them, and who participated in them, the teachers, and the unions.

  222. FreeBSD by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    I hate to be "One of those FreeBSD nuts" but... I am running both Linux and FreeBSD lately (in addition to using some other commercial UNIX systems that will remain nameless), and I have really found that due to memory management, I much prefer FreeBSD for servers (well, that and the ease of remote administration using ports, giving the advantage of fast downloads without hunting, and compileing software optimized completely to my hardware with the right /etc/make.conf flags).

    Now, on workstations, I am still using Linux, because of the better avaliability of software. But, for something like Oracle, I would prefer a direct port to FreeBSD if I were to ever use it. Because of the fact that Oracle has the potential to use a lot of memory, FreeBSD may have an edge in better memory management (always lower memory usage, IMHO it does a more efficent job freeing up used memory while caching the important stuff).

  223. Re:Nope, Canada rules by Detritus · · Score: 1
    Canada gets a free ride on defense from the USA.

    This lets them get away with a pathetically small defense force and spend the money on other things.

    As a percentage of GDP, Canada spends about 1.2% as compared to 3.4% in the USA.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  224. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Compuser · · Score: 1

    So in essence you pay the bastards their money
    because you are afraid of them. They hold you
    for ransom in your own home. Quite a wimpy
    attitude you got there.

  225. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Spooks · · Score: 1

    Right. And what precisely do you do with those people who just *Can*'t get a job, and do try? Wouldn't you like it if you had some hard times, and the government was there to pick up some of the slack for you?

  226. The mice are revolting! by iainh · · Score: 1

    My mouse caused my offtopic post. Have you checked the loyalty of your mouse recently.

  227. WTF~! by BadlandZ · · Score: 2

    Uh, I submitted this to the previous discussion, I am sure of it. How the heck did it end up here, I am luck I found it. Anyone able to switch the storyID it's attached to and move it over to the previous discussion?

  228. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hull, Ottawa, Quebec City, Toronto. This is where you can get ADSL. This is ONLY where you can get it. This is 10% of Canada's population. If you live in:

    NWT, Yukon, BC, Alberta, Sask., Manitoba, NS, NB, Nfld., P.E.I.

    too bad. I beleive more than 40% of US States (not just per capita here!) have ADSL. Why? because AT & T, sprint, etc... know how to make customers happy. Here, we have a monopoly. No one is happy, because why should bell do that? Why should I have to pay 75 cents if bell can't get me a number on 411? Imagine if you walked into a store, found out they didn't have what you wanted, and on the way out the clerk demanded 75 cents for wasting his time! Bottom line: BELL SUCKS ROCKS, and www.hellcanada.com proved it, while it was up.

  229. Re:�other canada goods stuff by chris88 · · Score: 1

    I'm in Edmonton, and we've got Cable from @home & Videon, ADSL from telus, ISDN from a few people and I believe Videon offers OC-3's to downtown.
    And I know BC also has ADSL and cable.

    Maybe you should do a few minutes of research before thinking only the eastern provinces have high-speed internet.

  230. Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe once Canada stops fearing allowing its citizens any real power (i.e. guns), i'll consider moving there.

    1. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by devin15 · · Score: 1

      Canada does allow private ownership of guns but it doesn't seem that way to americans because we don't have any phyco people that go around killing people (at least not many).

    2. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah they do allow it but its heavily restricted and give the people no real power to fight and unjust government.

    3. Re:Commenton the county that trusts its citizens by iainh · · Score: 1

      If your government has deteriorated to the stage where citizens require guns so that they can have political power then I would suggest that you run for the nearest border. Up here in Canada we can VOTE a government out of office. We can also discuss political issues in private and compose election strategies without the current government having a legal right to the complete transcript of the conversation.

  231. Nuggets of Harris Wisdom by Evangelion · · Score: 1

    "30 or 40 years ago . . . it seemed to be that mom was in the kitchen with the hot breakfast cooking as everybody woke up in the morning."
    -- Mike Harris talking about why we need school breakfast programs. Child hunger is the fault of lazy mothers, apparently (November 1996).

    "Just as hula hoops went out, and those workers had to have a factory and a company that would manufacture something else that's in, it's the same in government."
    -- Premier Mike Harris offering solace to laid-off hospital workers (March 1997).

    "He's there for the full school day, in uniform, fully equipped with a weapon and carrying out a whole range of duties while he's there or she's there. If a problem crops up, I think it certainly raises the comfort levels of the teachers as well, there's no question about that."
    -- Solicitor General Bob Runciman explaining the role of armed cops in the school system (April 1999).

    "My Solicitor-General didn't say that."
    -- Mike Harris in denial (April 1999).

    And of course, the truly classic Harris line :

    "We have to make sure those dollars don't go to beer."
    -- Premier Mike Harris explaining why pregnant women on welfare no longer get $37 per month to buy extra food. Officials in the Ministry of Social Services said they had no evidence of women misusing their allowance (April 1998).

    Mike Harris - Hero of the white, middle class male. Champion of Crypto laws, enemy of hospitals, schools and free political protest.

    Yes, he kept his promises on cutting taxes (the wisdom of which escapes me), but what about his promises not to close any Hospitals? The promises to prevent introduction of user fees (which have just about balanced the difference from the tax cuts anyway.)? What about promises to control tuition increases? What about him just dumping responsibily onto the municipalities, causing an organizational nightmare? What about the incresases in property taxes that we have because responsibilty has been shirked onto the municipalities?

    Oh, but he cut provincial income tax. That makes everything all right. Silly me. I forgot that Cutting Income Tax is a magic phrase which trumps anything else he did wrong.

  232. *cough*Littleton*cough* by chris88 · · Score: 1

    You figure "real power" consists of laws that makes it piss easy for suicidal teens to run around with guns and bombs?

    1. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I believe it was around March of 1996 where an incident took place in England at a school. It's been too long now so I don't remember the specifics but I "believe" an adult shot up a grade school out there. As I said, it's been too long so I don't remember too much of it but there was a major shooting at a school. I remember once talking to some friends of mine in Europe shortly after the Oklahoma bombing. They couldn't believe that Americans were so mesmorized by what looked like a terrorist attack on us. Bombings have been far more likely to occur in Europe than in the states, so they were more "immune" to it happening. We, on the other hand have rarely had to deal with it. Talking to those same people though about the school incident in Europe that year, they were just as "mesmorized" about that incident as we were about a terrorist attack in the states. Americans have been dealing with shootings like that for years so we were more "immune" to that. Basically what I'm saying is different things will happen in different places. A friend of mine was really pissed about the rioting and fires that took place at the end of Woodstock because that will probably prevent it from ever happening again (maybe). He said that EVERY year Europe has festivals just like that (I believe one is in the Netherlands maybe?) and that problems like that never happen. He wanted to know why stupid people here have to make a problem. My response was well we have plenty of sporting events where 80,000+ people attend and you rarely if ever hear of a riot taking place that kills people yet we do hear of that happening in Europe. Oh well, I'll stop my rambling now but remember, different things happen in different places.

    2. Re:*cough*Littleton*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No i figure real power consits of allowing the citizens of a county revolt and destroy an unjust government by any means neccicsary. If you honestly belive that taking away guns will prevent incidents like that at littleton then not only are you ignorant but you are too easily influenced by biased news shows like 20/20. Maybe if parents paid a little attention to their kids and noticed when they were acting out, shit like this wouldent happen. Or maybe if every parents knee-jerk reaction wasen't to give their kid prozac or ritalen, then their kids wouldent be emotionally disturbed and confused. Kids have to get suicidal it doesent just happen. It may seem easy for you to say "if their werent guns then it wouldent happen" but in the end that attitude will give America (or canada) a bloated federal govenment where the PEOPLE have no real power.

  233. Cryptography fill follow the same path as guns by Silex · · Score: 1

    Many years ago a bunch of farmers and merchants sent a letter to England in which they made fun of their tea and said that the Britsh sucked. And so it was, that the United States of America was formed.

    Now, these farmers and merchants were very smart. They understood that power (any form of power) cannot rest dominantly in the hands of a single party. If the Government has power, so must the people. This prevents the system's decline into tyranny. The government has guns, so must the people. The government has strong encryption, so must the people. Obviously this does not apply to military power because that would be insane.

    If power is left unbalanced then corruption comes into play. All parties must be left in check with eachother so that no one can beat the shit out of anyone else.

    Chances are, a good majority of the American people understand this. So if you're lucky, crypto laws will be forced to respect this basic axiom of political science.

  234. Conspiracy Theory (?spelling?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Someone said something about Canada not spying on it's own. Oooh that's Funny! Every gov't spys on it's own. EVERY COUNTRY. Just with the Canada/US, we co-operate on the spying, I'm sure of it.

    NSA? hehehe. Ever heard of the CSE? No? That's because in Canada we know what "Secret Gov't Agency" Really means! 290 Haron Road across from the Canada Post Place in Ottawa. Corner of Haron and Baseline Road. :)

    3 office buildings. One of which has NO WINDOWS. The whole complex has a single enterance and exit. And guess who's accross the road? Entrust. A spawned company of Nortel. So what does Entrust do? Ever heard of CAST-256? Well it's an unbroken candiate for AES. Many crypto's (including myself) feel it's more secure than RC6.

    But strangly, the CSE has approved all out deployment of the algorithim accross the federal gov't. Do you think they know something about CAST/encryption that the rest of the world doesn't?

  235. SSL * by Jordy · · Score: 2

    Personally I prefer SSL telnet. There are a few reasons, most importantly that SSL/TLS are open standards.

    The next thing is that SSL telnet can be implemented directly ontop of your existing telnet daemon and autoswitch between encrypted & non-encrypted clients.

    No special daemons, just your plain old telnet daemon with a few patches to authenticate and encrypt via SSL. Of you can just stick in a copy of sslwrap in front of your telnet daemon and not make any changes at all.

    Not to mention once you get OpenSSL up and running, you can hookup SSL POP3, SSL SMTP, SSL FTP, SSL NFS, etc.

    While most of these don't have Windows clients, SSL SMTP and SSL POP3 do. There is an SSL telnet client for windows, but I don't know how good it is.

    And OpenSSL has a host of useful programs from md5 to sha which come in handy once in a while.

    --

    --
    The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
  236. One question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can we use a server on a country with non-moronic crytpo export restrictions for the main kernel distro and do the things there using SSH? We wouldn't be exporting anything but our keypresses and unless we created a new crypto routine we wouldn't be exporting crypto.

  237. IMHO - YOUR ABSOLUTLY RIGHT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now when is America gonna figure it out.

  238. Re:�other canada goods stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Toronto + Ottawa + QC + Hull = 10% of Canada's population?!? What country do you live in?? The Greater Toronto Area alone has a population of 5 million people. The total population of Canada is 30 million.... 5/30 = 1/6 = 16.7% (not including Ottawa, Quebec City, and Hull) :) Geez man... don't overestimate the size of the rest of the country... the fact remains that nearly half of all Canadians live in Toronto/Montreal/Vancouver

  239. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by Stonehand · · Score: 1

    True. I've seen panhandlers work the same street, for hours and hours, spending time on their rear when literally in LOS of places with "help wanted" signs -- week after week after week.

    'sides, ANY system is going to hose people because of conflicting values.

    * People should get what they EARN.
    * People should get what they NEED.
    * People should do what they CAN.

    It's impossible in practice to balance these. If you reward everybody according to how much they do and what the market feels they're worth, some people aren't going to measure up. Judging from the US, that's a fact.

    If you reward people according to what they need, and go redistribution-of-wealth, a) "need" is incredibly nebulous, b) people are going to work far less efficiently. You'll also have to start arbitrarily denying "wants". That's also borne out by history. Witness, say, the effects of Stalinism and Maoism.

    To force people to do what they can, you have to pay them accordingly -- and not reward them for simply existing.

    Fundamentally, somebody's going to get the shaft.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  240. Re:Ontario Politics: an insider's view - mee too by warmi · · Score: 1

    You are missing the point. There is no law stating that being employed is ones right !
    Country does not provide jobs - people who are smart enough to create wealth do. Yep, those rich motherf... everybody likes to bitch about.

  241. Re:Nope, Canada rules by chris88 · · Score: 1

    The reason the US needs such a big army is cause they piss-off so many nations.