Well, any free solution would be preferable to the cost of chili:P
I have not actually used either solution yet so cant really say which would work better. but based on chili's features, it would be nicer, since running asp2php on the fly could be potentially slower.
ya, good point
thing is, migrating 300 sites and trying to get people to pay is not easy. Some people are just stubborn and think ASP is the best thing ever. Customers also edit their webpages and I could imagine the # of calls because they cant figure out why their edited code isnt working.
heh, in an idea world ppl would only use a nice open source scripting language.
I cant say chili is all that great since it costs alot of $ and as someone pointed out wont work with 3rd party COM components. BUT, for any ASP page that dosnt use them it makes life alot easier
Yes, but its still less of a step.
Alot of asp pages arent using third-party COM components. Though you are right. third-party COM components make life a pain for porting.
Slashdot Mirror
You can't stop your surfing, or god forbid use another browser ?
As much as you consider IE a part of windows..
http://www.mozilla.org it works wonders, apparently.
Yup, I went from linux to BSD. I started with slackware and debian. I found BSD cleaner and I found that the liscense made more sense.
Business would be so much simpler without pesky profits :)
Ya, geeks don't surf. Brilliant as always:)
And the moon men are comming to take you awayyyyyy.
Now, why would they be comparing linux on a mystery x86 box to an old O2.
I'm sure it's faster, but this 5x faster crap is rather annoying when there is no mention of relative configurations.
hell, I should hope linux on a p4 be fast.
This'll be quite the barn burning ..
4444333322221111
4111111111111111
?
;)
http://slashdot.org/palm/ right ?
Perpetual motion eh ?
/. could lower their power bill and get rid of the subscriptions.
Yup, that's what we need..
perhaps then
mmm hmm
Walking off a long flight.
No, honestly, my laptop just leaked...
Thanks, email sent :)
ya, you
Oh, and it has a section showing how it works =)
www.ishit.ca The internet enabled toilet.. runs on linux. Don't know if the feed is up
Just check out the rbua.org forums..
If they could provide descent service then I'd have much less oif a problem paying.
This would only be fair if they actually provided reliable service. Which they certainly do not.
haha retard.
hush up retard, go tweak your X
hahahaha
"better free OSs are available" Want to show me a better RTOS ? With as much reliable support ?
The latest AGP 4X boasts a maximum data-transfer rate of 1,066MBps seems agp is much faster, they probably have their reasons though
Well, any free solution would be preferable to the cost of chili :P
I have not actually used either solution yet so cant really say which would work better. but based on chili's features, it would be nicer, since running asp2php on the fly could be potentially slower.
ya, good point thing is, migrating 300 sites and trying to get people to pay is not easy. Some people are just stubborn and think ASP is the best thing ever. Customers also edit their webpages and I could imagine the # of calls because they cant figure out why their edited code isnt working. heh, in an idea world ppl would only use a nice open source scripting language. I cant say chili is all that great since it costs alot of $ and as someone pointed out wont work with 3rd party COM components. BUT, for any ASP page that dosnt use them it makes life alot easier
Yes, but its still less of a step. Alot of asp pages arent using third-party COM components. Though you are right. third-party COM components make life a pain for porting.
ahaha, and if your an ISP that wants to serve customer pages on FreeBSD? Do I tell the majority to recode their pages to PHP ?