It can still be devastating in the right hands, as collateral damage. Until more things come EM-shielded. And it wouldn't even have to be on moving vehicles, I'd imagine there are enough unshielded systems.
Imagine what one could do in a hospital. Or an airport...wall street, police station, phone company, power station, a mall.
I do everything in my power to not run into things. That doesn't mean someone driving down the road the opposite direction isn't going to be drunk/falling asleep and run into me. I'd still like to be able to survive that.
Right, and if you're using a protocol for data transmission sending packets of data, there would be no issue. If you treat the 8 wires in the cat 5 cable as separate signals, and don't use any protocol, it would be feasibly like receiving data from 8 out of sync sources. Kinda a stupid thing to do, but the audiophile world is kind of like that. I personally would send packets and reconstruct the data on the receiving end.
While it may not be "smart" coding utilizing "stored procedures" just for the sake of decoupling the database, it is smart when there is a call for complicated set logic which is much more efficient done in a stored procedure.
I would imagine anything that makes it into Debian stable is pretty comparable, given the two years or so between Debian releases. Now if they're using Debian testing as a base, I would concede that its quite feasible that the code could be less stable than a FreeBSD based distro.
Do you think, if somehow the sun were turned into a black hole, it would suck in the earth?
How about if we turned a pound of bricks, or a pound of feathers into a black hole with the LHC?
What's that? It would still only have the mass of a pound and not have the gravitational pull to suck 'everything' into it, outside of a radius of ~6.71316708 × 10^-28.
In this case however, what has MS disclosed that would encourage innovation?
A patent was supposed to be for the case, "I have this neato machine that does X and Y, it uses this method M to do X and Y"
So anyone else could see a machine that does X and Y, and build there own as long as it uses some other method of their own devising O to complete X and Y.
A software patent is a case "I have this neato program that does X and Y on a computer"
And the patent is for doing X and Y, not the implementation M. M is not disclosed. No one else is allowed to do X and Y.
Slashdot Mirror
Because everyone else is using the private networks correctly, and they don't want to step on anyone's toes with their private network.
Just not in Boston, the local authorities will be called and panic will ensue at your terrorist activities. Especially if you have a lite-brite.
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it."
Also, Elvis isn't dead, he just went home.
It can still be devastating in the right hands, as collateral damage. Until more things come EM-shielded. And it wouldn't even have to be on moving vehicles, I'd imagine there are enough unshielded systems.
Imagine what one could do in a hospital. Or an airport...wall street, police station, phone company, power station, a mall.
Or someone with a pacemaker happens to be in the line of fire and hit by accident.
I do everything in my power to not run into things. That doesn't mean someone driving down the road the opposite direction isn't going to be drunk/falling asleep and run into me. I'd still like to be able to survive that.
And what happens when you hit someone else with the same vehicle? Or do you only aim for little cars?
I understand the other measures, but how does checking out in the pharmacy make you less vulnerable to attack?
Mountain Dew, now enhanced with Vitamin Dew
Civil war? When did that happen? I just never stay up with current events....
Right, and if you're using a protocol for data transmission sending packets of data, there would be no issue. If you treat the 8 wires in the cat 5 cable as separate signals, and don't use any protocol, it would be feasibly like receiving data from 8 out of sync sources. Kinda a stupid thing to do, but the audiophile world is kind of like that. I personally would send packets and reconstruct the data on the receiving end.
I think they'd need to tether it to something in a geosynchronous orbit.
a bunch of Verizon blackberrys
It still has pretty bad jaggys even over the component, since it does no AA and its only 720x480.
Why conform, when the conformists are so fucked up?
Because everyone else is doing it. Duh.
Unless you're trying to make sure you won't be liable for talking to a child.
While it may not be "smart" coding utilizing "stored procedures" just for the sake of decoupling the database, it is smart when there is a call for complicated set logic which is much more efficient done in a stored procedure.
I would imagine anything that makes it into Debian stable is pretty comparable, given the two years or so between Debian releases. Now if they're using Debian testing as a base, I would concede that its quite feasible that the code could be less stable than a FreeBSD based distro.
Or they realized that with new releases they can charge customers multiple times for the same software.
6.71316708 × 10^-28 meters.
Do you think, if somehow the sun were turned into a black hole, it would suck in the earth?
How about if we turned a pound of bricks, or a pound of feathers into a black hole with the LHC?
What's that? It would still only have the mass of a pound and not have the gravitational pull to suck 'everything' into it, outside of a radius of ~6.71316708 × 10^-28.
Or maybe they gave it to him so he would feel bad about starting a war after getting the Nobel Peace Prize.
Intent, just like the difference between manslaughter and murder.
Even if the patent is for clicking (once) to buy something?
In this case however, what has MS disclosed that would encourage innovation?
A patent was supposed to be for the case, "I have this neato machine that does X and Y, it uses this method M to do X and Y"
So anyone else could see a machine that does X and Y, and build there own as long as it uses some other method of their own devising O to complete X and Y.
A software patent is a case "I have this neato program that does X and Y on a computer"
And the patent is for doing X and Y, not the implementation M. M is not disclosed. No one else is allowed to do X and Y.