Slashdot Mirror


LHC Has First Collisions After Years of Waiting

An anonymous reader writes "Only four days after the first attempt to send a particle beam around the LHC, we have arrived at the point when all four experiments got their first real collisions from the machine. This was met by celebrations and champagne, as people have been waiting years and years for this moment. It is a testament to the engineering of the machine that collisions were reached already, so few days after restarting. The LHC had already demonstrated ca 10h stable beams, and now also stable beams in both directions at the same time. In the coming weeks, we need only wait for increased intensity and the first attempts at acceleration."

324 comments

  1. I for one... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new subatomic overlords.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    1. Re:I for one... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Well, you do that, then.

      I, on the other hand, welcome our new subatomic supplicants.

    2. Re:I for one... by buswolley · · Score: 2, Funny

      I welcome our future past overlords. Anyone wanna bet it will be sabotaged by the future, and not run right?

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    3. Re:I for one... by Herby+Sagues · · Score: 1, Funny

      And I welcome you all to our end. No, seriously, I don't think it's likely something bad will happen, but I find it possible. And given the consequences (the whole world cracking and falling to its core now turned into a black hole) I think that's unacceptable. I find it terrifying the speech that I've seen on this subject. Some high profile scientists said "according to the standard model, you would need more than five dimensions for a black hole to develop, and even if it developed, it wouldn't last for long". Uh... IT IS THE FRACKING STANDARD MODEL YOU ARE TRYING TO REFINE!!! That line of reasoning, analyzing things with your current knowledge at hand applies to every possible situation int he universe BUT THIS ONE. Your "best guess" here is not good enough when it would be feasible that your model is wrong and the whole thing ends up with me being smashed with you in a single point. One scientist said "the chances of that happening are one in fifty million". What? Even if you apply no margin of safety, that's like shooting in the back of the head 120 people (considering that equivalent to one in 50.000.000 of killing six billion, it can be argued that the later is actually much worse even mathematically). And then they claim they have reasonable safety margins, and I can beleive that, but those are safety margins in their NUMBERS, not in their MODELS. A simple, tiny change in the standard model might make black holes not only likely, but inevitable. And you don't know that, as you haven't researched all possible models, and you couldn't. I've also heard scientists saying "similar collisions must happen in other parts of the universe, and we don't see that happening". Huh. How would you be able to "see" a tiny black hole? How do you know the missing mass in the universe is not formed by large amounts of small black holes created when such a high energy event occurred and ate whatever was around it? I'm not a fanatic. You can do that sort of bet when you are playing with models that are extremely well established. But when you are breaking new ground trying to validate your current knowledge, you can't make experiments that might destroy the whole planet if your model was wrong. I would even accept it if we couldn't even figure out what could go wrong, but when the stakes are so high, relying on the probability of the event occurring is plain wrong. It is whe most wrong than anyone has ever been in history. Even if in the end, their models turn out right and nothing happens (until they say "hey, nothing happened the last time, let's build a bigger one, with a chance of one in six!).

    4. Re:I for one... by dougisfunny · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you think, if somehow the sun were turned into a black hole, it would suck in the earth?

      How about if we turned a pound of bricks, or a pound of feathers into a black hole with the LHC?

      What's that? It would still only have the mass of a pound and not have the gravitational pull to suck 'everything' into it, outside of a radius of ~6.71316708 × 10^-28.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    5. Re:I for one... by fractoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the sun turned into a black hole, I believe the Earth would become somewhat colder and less comfortable fairly rapidly. That's besides the point, though - the most reassuring argument I've heard for the LHC not turning the Earth into a black hole is that collisions far more energetic occur all the time, when high-velocity cosmic particles collide with our upper atmosphere. If such collisions had any appreciable chance of creating a microscopic black hole, and that black hole had any appreciable chance of then going all super-happy-meal on the Earth, then it would have already happened.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    6. Re:I for one... by dougisfunny · · Score: 1

      6.71316708 × 10^-28 meters.

      --
      This is not the funny you're looking for.
    7. Re:I for one... by x2A · · Score: 1

      Hells no, once they're actually accellerating particles fast enough, forget black holes, the collision will actually result in a full working copy of DNF, *that's* how amazing this machine really is.

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    8. Re:I for one... by x2A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What have logical arguments got to do with scared idiots?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    9. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I developed the .NET Framework, you insensitive clod!

    10. Re:I for one... by AlecC · · Score: 1

      Then why have significantly more energetic impacts which occur several times a day when cosmic rays hit the atmosphere not destroyed the earth (and Jupiter, Mars, and for that matter a lot of suns)? This energy of collision happens all the timer all over the universe - but unfortunately not in the middle of massive instruments which can see what is going on. The collisions actually do happen, on Earth, frequently.

      Furthermore, people have recently worked out what would happen if a nano-black-hole were created. It would still have a residual energy far, far greater than escape velocity, so it would whizz off into outer space in nanoseconds, capturing a few dozen atoms if any - even if the vector happened to be straight through the core of the earth. These things are so small that their probability of interacting with any atom is negligible.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    11. Re:I for one... by crashumbc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and 10 times that number of respected scientists thought the world would end if we broke the sound barrier too...

    12. Re:I for one... by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

      There's a limit as to how wrong the model can be, add to that, as people say, more energetic collisions happen all the time in the atmosphere - there really is nothing to worry about.

      You have more to worry about H1N1 evolving to have a two-month contagious but asymptomatic initial period, and then causing illness with ebola-like fatality rates.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    13. Re:I for one... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 2, Funny

      whats this in womprats?

    14. Re:I for one... by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      Oh noes! H1N1 will kill us all!

    15. Re:I for one... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It may already have happened. Just not yet to us.

      There are a lot of black holes in the universe.

      What if we're next?

  2. As I learned in driver's education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    As I learned in driver's ed: collisions are bad.
    and because this is the LHC, this must mean the end of the world
    I don't understand because we're still two years away from Dec 21st 2012

    1. Re:As I learned in driver's education by More_Cowbell · · Score: 4, Funny

      we're still two years away from Dec 21st 2012

      I applaud your math skills, good sir!

      --
      Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
    2. Re:As I learned in driver's education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? 2 years and less than 1 month?

    3. Re:As I learned in driver's education by somersault · · Score: 1

      3 years and less than one month..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:As I learned in driver's education by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 1

      But... that's tomorrow!

    5. Re:As I learned in driver's education by depsax · · Score: 2, Funny

      True for large values of "two"

  3. Portal by danbert8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This was a triumph.
    I'm making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS.
    It's hard to overstate my satisfaction.
    Aperture Science
    We do what we must
    because we can.
    For the good of all of us.
    Except the ones who are dead.
    But there's no sense crying over every mistake.
    You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.
    And the Science gets done.
    And you make a neat gun.
    For the people who are still alive.
    I'm not even angry.
    I'm being so sincere right now.
    Even though you broke my heart.
    And killed me.
    And tore me to pieces.
    And threw every piece into a fire.
    As they burned it hurt because I was so happy for you!
    Now these points of data make a beautiful line.
    And we're out of beta.
    We're releasing on time.
    So I'm GLaD. I got burned.
    Think of all the things we learned
    for the people who are still alive.
    Go ahead and leave me.
    I think I prefer to stay inside.
    Maybe you'll find someone else to help you.
    Maybe Black Mesa
    THAT WAS A JOKE.
    HAHA. FAT CHANCE.
    Anyway, this cake is great.
    It's so delicious and moist.
    Look at me still talking
    when there's Science to do.
    When I look out there, it makes me GLaD I'm not you.
    I've experiments to run.
    There is research to be done.
    On the people who are still alive.
    And believe me I am still alive.
    I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    I feel FANTASTIC and I'm still alive.
    While you're dying I'll be still alive.
    And when you're dead I will be still alive.

    --
    Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    1. Re:Portal by Jello+B. · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hurp durp two year old video game reference. i get it. you're so funny.

    2. Re:Portal by Mikail · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hurp durp two year old video game reference. i get it. you're so funny.

      According to xkcd, he's still three years early.

      --
      If life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life, let's all get wasted and have the time of our lives.
    3. Re:Portal by Chees0rz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hurp durp two year old video game reference. i get it. you're so funny.

      Evidently... you don't.

    4. Re:Portal by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually he just copped the lyrics from the Amiga Tribute by Eric Schwartz. Its a cute video, though WTF it has to do with the LHC is beyond me. They ain't running Amigas on that sucker, are they?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Portal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The song "Still Alive" was copied from Portal , the game, as originally stated.... Eric Schwartz just copied it, it's even stated in the summary of the video

    6. Re:Portal by Jello+B. · · Score: 1

      Hurp durp link to xkcd comic. i get it. you're so clever.

  4. The real question is... by gyepi · · Score: 2

    ...when should we throw our end-of-the-world parties?

    --
    Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
    1. Re:The real question is... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...when should we throw our end-of-the-world parties?

      Today. I've already maxed out my credit cards and slept with the neighbors wife. I'd imagine he's gonna be pretty ticked off when he finds out but I'm hoping the LHC destroys the planet before he gets home ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:The real question is... by famebait · · Score: 1, Funny

      There will be a continuous string of technical problems preventing the big kahuna right up until 2012. How long you want to party is up to you.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    3. Re:The real question is... by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      A few small points of information for you:

      Your neighbor actually won't be ticked off when he finds out. Quite the contrary, he's gonna be highly aroused and in the mood for a wet & messy threesome. He's also extremely well endowed and has been eyeing you for some time already.

      So in summary, you're still hoping the LHC destroys the planet before he gets home.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    4. Re:The real question is... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Whenever, if, we find out the universe starts to inflate or something?

      --
      Here be signatures
    5. Re:The real question is... by nhytefall · · Score: 1

      Unless that was what he was hoping for all along, then, probably not hoping the LHC destroys the planet.

      --
      0100010001101001011001 0100100000011010010110 1110001000000110000100 1000000110011001101001 0111001001100101
    6. Re:The real question is... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't that what the Windows 7 release parties were for?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:The real question is... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nothing is special about 2012.. Or are you still working on the really in-accurate assumptions of the Mayan calendar?

      2012 has no relevance to anything.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:The real question is... by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Funny

      This puts another spin on the black hole theories I guess...Now I am recalling images of goatse.cx, damn you, damn you all

    9. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst! You ruin jokes. Stop.

    10. Re:The real question is... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Funny

      Read carefully:

      It's a HADRON collider.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    11. Re:The real question is... by evilwraith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Leave it to dyslexics to have a large hadron colliding with things....

    12. Re:The real question is... by caywen · · Score: 1

      The thought of crossing drumsticks makes me hope for the doomsday scenario.

    13. Re:The real question is... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing is special about 2012

      That's not true. It's one of the years which ended up in movie titles, along with 1984, 2001 and 2010.

      But of course it won't be the end of the world, because that will be 2038, as predicted by the Unix calendar.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:The real question is... by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 1

      Ok... Who let /b in here?

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
    15. Re:The real question is... by atheistmonk · · Score: 1

      This certainly gave me a raging large hadron.

    16. Re:The real question is... by Lord+Lemur · · Score: 1
    17. Re:The real question is... by jamesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      2012 has no relevance to anything.

      It's almost a palindrome. That's gotta mean something.

      It's also nearly 13 years after the year 2000, and we all know how unlucky the number 13 is.

    18. Re:The real question is... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      When I don't know, but I do know where: at Milliways!

    19. Re:The real question is... by altern1ty · · Score: 1

      A palindrome. Yes, we all remember how the seas turned to blood on 02/20/2002 and millions died instantly from the power of the (almost) palindrome! And 12/21/2012 will be almost as bad! I'm certain John Cusack's gearing up RIGHT NOW!

    20. Re:The real question is... by Artuir · · Score: 1

      Reading this thread while drunk is very difficult to do while NOT giggling uncontrollably like a grade schooler.

    21. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst! You're a retard who thinks calling other people unfunny makes you look street. Stop.

    22. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2012 is the year I run for President.

    23. Re:The real question is... by kiehlster · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Black Friday. We can commemorate this year as Black Hole Friday. At least that way we'd have all that tryptophan to put us into a comma so we don't feel the pain of it.

    24. Re:The real question is... by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

      So in summary, you're still hoping the LHC destroys the planet before he gets home.

      Or maybe not ;-)

    25. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In colloquial Russian, "black hole" does not refer to a collapsed star. That may explain the confusion in some circles.

    26. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm your neighbour, and I had a similar idea. Your wife and I took you money and left for some tropical island.
      Oh, and regarding my wife, you can keep that bitch. Sucker.

    27. Re:The real question is... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Right. The real danger here is members of the Catholic church siphoning off vials of antimatter in their plot to do something unintelligible.

  5. They're a chargin' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody stand back! They've been a chargin' their... Um... How does it go again?

    1. Re:They're a chargin' by fractoid · · Score: 1

      IMMA FIRIN MAH HADRON

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:They're a chargin' by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      SHOOP DA WHOOP!!!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  6. Obligatory by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the LHC insured for collisions?

    1. Re:Obligatory by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Obligatory by Yvan256 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      lepton?

    3. Re:Obligatory by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Especially: Does it also cover big bangs?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Obligatory by Cyberax · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Undoing moderation.

    5. Re:Obligatory by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Funny

      woosh!

      Its a particle physics thing.

    6. Re:Obligatory by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      I get a charge out of all this co-motion over the LHC

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    7. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a programmer and I got it. I even managed to sneak through college taking only two semesters of basic physics. Valid woosh.

    8. Re:Obligatory by smash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but surely 99.999% of them know how google works.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    9. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Invalid woosh. Only a tiny fraction of the Slashdot readers work in the particle physics domain.

      Only the *tiniest* fraction? Hahahahahaha! Get it? No... okay, pretend it's 1970 and we don't know about tauons yet! Hahahaahaaaa! No? Dangit.

      On a totally unrelated note, did the LHC scientists learn absolutely NOTHING from Ghostbusters?!?

    10. Re:Obligatory by cmsjr · · Score: 1

      You just had to add your own spin/2, didn't you.

    11. Re:Obligatory by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Funny
      and whoosh to you, too. He was pointing out that this is a hadron collider, so lepton jokes don't make any sense.

      I could say, I suppose, that if he wants to talk about leptons, you need to give him some SLAC... but I won't.

      (typos, on the other hand-- the one where the "r" and the "d" switch order in the word "hadron"-- would be appropriate... but still tasteless.)

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    12. Re:Obligatory by besalope · · Score: 1

      And the most of them sure should this maneuver as well!

      Leptopn

    13. Re:Obligatory by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      Wow, you physics people throw wild ass parties...

      Let me guess, as a practical joke you loosen the covalent bonds in the secretaries dress just before the friday staff meeting.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Obligatory by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      He's strange like that.

    15. Re:Obligatory by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      You're a quarky one, aren't you...

    16. Re:Obligatory by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      ah yes. just be sure to have safe search on when do a google image search in case of that particular transposition.

    17. Re:Obligatory by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When hadrons collide, leptons certainly do come out as debris; I'm sure the LHC will be dealing with plenty of them soon enough.

    18. Re:Obligatory by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we all know how to use google, right?

      (Besides, some of us did real science degrees)

    19. Re:Obligatory by tool462 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess, as a practical joke you loosen the covalent bonds in the secretaries dress just before the friday staff meeting.

      Are you kidding me? That kind of crap is for chemists. We physicists just let our wave functions interact until there is barrier penetration through tunneling. We enforce strict segregation of fermions, but boson-on-boson action is encouraged. As a fermion, I'm usually spin-up when I see their wave functions collapsing.

    20. Re:Obligatory by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      Yeh, but occasionally they are lynched by rampaging mobs of respectable physicists who dont get invited to that sort of party.

    21. Re:Obligatory by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      But doesn't his joke have some charm nevertheless?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    22. Re:Obligatory by siddesu · · Score: 1

      I prefer bosom-on-bosom action, with me in between, but, hey, whatever makes you happy.

    23. Re:Obligatory by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? That kind of crap is for chemists. We physicists just let our wave functions interact until there is barrier penetration through tunneling. We enforce strict segregation of fermions, but boson-on-boson action is encouraged. As a fermion, I'm usually spin-up when I see their wave functions collapsing.

      Well, now that you put it that way, it's easy to see why particle physicists get all the girls. ;)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    24. Re:Obligatory by NotBorg · · Score: 2, Funny

      WRONG!!!

      Leptons go PEW PEW not woosh!

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    25. Re:Obligatory by cnkurzke · · Score: 1

      But doesn't his joke have some charm nevertheless?

      you're all just spouting out some useless quark!

    26. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's right, make a spectacle of me because I use bing.

    27. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      google?

    28. Re:Obligatory by selven · · Score: 1

      Learn to understand physics jokes you WIMP.

    29. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly is the new cool. Woosh for you too, you prolly don't know what bosom is anyway.

    30. Re:Obligatory by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Most of us went to school though. My physics class covered leptons when I was 16, I presume other people had a similar experience.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:Obligatory by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      When your Hadrons Collide.... I will EAT THE PLANET!

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFWdY6wDMrk

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    32. Re:Obligatory by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      You learn about these things in secondary/high school my friend.

    33. Re:Obligatory by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      Just black holes.

    34. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous+Poodle · · Score: 1

      As a non-physicist, I found your comment funny as hell, even if I had no idea of what you were talking about.

    35. Re:Obligatory by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but it's insured for ten trillion dollars against destroying the Earth, by some company called A.I.G.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    36. Re:Obligatory by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      Yeah, but it worked like a charm.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    37. Re:Obligatory by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mutter mutter...

      Look, everyone, he's discovered dark mutter!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    38. Re:Obligatory by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I thought it was a top effort!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    39. Re:Obligatory by Convector · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't forget about the "superposition of eigenstates".

    40. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me? That kind of crap is for chemists. We physicists just let our wave functions interact until there is barrier penetration through tunneling. We enforce strict segregation of fermions, but boson-on-boson action is encouraged. As a fermion, I'm usually spin-up when I see their wave functions collapsing.

      Yeah, yeah, all that macho talk, but when it comes down to it we've seen just how long it takes for a physicist to get his hadron up, and it's a newsworthy event if he manages to keep it up long enough to do some banging...

    41. Re:Obligatory by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Well, aren't you a little old to be believing in Leptons anyway? :p

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    42. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing how to use something is totally different to knowing how it works.

    43. Re:Obligatory by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      So I says, "Supercollider? I just met her!" And then they built the supercollider. Thank you, you've been a great audience.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    44. Re:Obligatory by ajlisows · · Score: 1

      This is why I Love this site. Everyone is always on Top of things.

    45. Re:Obligatory by EEDAm · · Score: 1

      This is particle physics... lots of people enjoyed reading all about the joke but only 12 people in the world actually understand it...

    46. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy mother of higgs! they're going to break everything!

    47. Re:Obligatory by Pwipwi · · Score: 1

      Well, pardon my ignorance, but I thought it was a typo. I wouldn't have looked it up on google. And actually, I don't think many of us would. I propose we make it a half woosh!

    48. Re:Obligatory by Lord+Pillage · · Score: 1

      And 100% of them have posted a lame joke by now.

      --
      try { Signature mysig = new CleverAttempt(); } catch(NonCleverSignatureException e) { postanyway(); }
    49. Re:Obligatory by Stormx2 · · Score: 1

      I'm on a CS degree and know what a lepton is. Even if you don't know much about them, you should at least be aware of their existence.

    50. Re:Obligatory by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Fail. They never even bothered to do more than mention that there were smaller particles in my high school, and there's certainly nothing about it on the equivalency exams. I live in California, though. We dismantled our education system in the mid 1970s, before I even entered it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they don't, and don't call me Shirley.

    52. Re:Obligatory by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I guess you could spin it that way.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    53. Re:Obligatory by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      When your Hadrons Collide.... I will EAT THE PLANET!

      Made me lol, but I can't watch the video to supplement. What is it?

    54. Re:Obligatory by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      But doesn't his joke have some charm nevertheless?

      you're all just spouting out some useless quark!

      Don't worry about him. He's just a little strange.

    55. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was awesome. I got quite a hadron.

    56. Re:Obligatory by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      "The proton absorbs a photon and emits two morons, a lepton, a boson, and a boson's mate." ... Why did I ever take high-energy physics?

    57. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it's not a good time to tell you he lepton a hadron.

    58. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are insured, but they could save money by switching to GEICO.

    59. Re:Obligatory by peater · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for my wave invite. Insensitive clods!

    60. Re:Obligatory by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for a Heisenberg today.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    61. Re:Obligatory by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is google?

    62. Re:Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (typos, on the other hand-- the one where the "r" and the "d" switch order in the word "hadron"-- would be appropriate... but still tasteless.)

      hadrons are hardly tasteless.

  7. Data from first collision through CMS detector by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/performance/FirstBeam/pictures221109/CollisionEvent.png

    The beams aren't squeezed right now, just centered. You have a higher probability of collisions when they're squeezed (which will be coming up shortly). It was very cool to be in the control room when the first collision took place =)

    1. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by baldass_newbie · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was very cool to be in the control room when the first collision took place =)

      I have to say, you kept the coffee fresh, even though you forgot to add sweetener to mine.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    2. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by siddesu · · Score: 5, Funny

      And there is a live video feed available here: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html

    3. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by pwfffff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool picture. My particle physics is a bit rusty, but let's see now... green line distribution seems normal... yellow squiggles there and THERE... hmmm... I see there's more red blocks than blue blocks... ah, yes...

      Congratulations, it's a boy!

    4. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      I believe the yellow is the beam, the red are electron emissions, and the red are muon emissions.

    5. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I love how this got tagged interesting and not funny. Watch the feed for about 30 seconds.

    6. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

      Dear Mod,
      Parent was kidding. Mod it funny.

      --
      -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    7. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And here are the real webcams.

    8. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by jpmorgan · · Score: 1, Redundant

      It's funnier with the interesting mod. Mods have a sense of humor too.

    9. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      So how do you distinguish between electrons and muons if both are red?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    10. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Urp. In my haste trying to get the message typed, I mistyped. Red = electrons. Blue = muons.

    11. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      But what's the red?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    12. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Typo. Red = electrons. Blue = muons.

    13. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      That is informative, I thought for sure uber nerds used KDE.

    14. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by vikstar · · Score: 1
      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    15. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my god you really were there just to make the coffee...

      red is ECAL, this is the first layer of the calorimeter. Electromagnetic particles such as electrons and photons will be absorbed here. Hadronic particles will also deposit some energy. Likely just pi zeros -> di-photon if theres no track. Otherwise possibly charged pi+/-.

      blue is HCAL, where hadronic particles will be absorbed. It has nothing to do with muons. Muons will go straight though. Likely pion+/-s.

      The cross-section for Drell-Yan Mee>1GeV is about 0.28nb, Jpsi is about 28nb. We didnt get that much data to see electrons or muons...

    16. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by stjobe · · Score: 1

      I get a warm, fuzzy feeling knowing that the program they're using to analyze the collisions is called "Fireworks" :)

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    17. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      CMSeye - "No contact with camera"

      oh dear lord!

    18. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by Nathrael · · Score: 1

      Besides, Interesting gives Karma, Funny does not. Some people want to give people Karma for especially good jokes...

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    19. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, yeah I was thinking the same thing and about to reply myself.

    20. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      If they all go black, remember to start running! It'll be too late for us here at the campus, but maybe some of you could make it to Mars and start colonizing it. Hairdressers and middle management first, please!

    21. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that is wrong. I don't work on CMS (one of your friends at point 1), but even I can tell that the yellow appears to be hits in the tracker, the green is reconstructed tracks, and the blue and red are calorimeter deposits. Looking at the side, the red is the em calorimeter and the blue is the hadronic calorimeter. There are definitely no muons in that event.

    22. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by jmtpi · · Score: 1

      Somebody should mod the parent up (red=ECAL, blue=HCAL). The color legend is confusing because some colors are repeated. I think that's what got the guy confused who originally posted the link.

    23. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by gowdy · · Score: 1

      The key is on the left... yellow is tracker hits (charged particles only), red electromagnetic calorimeter deposits (could be anything, but electrons and photons leave larger deposits as they should stop), blue is hadronic calorimeter depoits (anything not stopped in the electromagnetic calorimeter, so probably not electrons of photons). Muons will show up in all these detectors are reach the other muon systems.

      The beam isn't shown, but the estimated primary vertex is (where the two protons collided).

    24. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification!

  8. Since the world is about to end... by dan_sdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    LAST POST!!!!1

    1. Re:Since the world is about to end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The LHC went back in time, from the future, and wrote stories about the collision that never took place... to get us all to believe it happened when it didn't.

    2. Re:Since the world is about to end... by laejoh · · Score: 1
  9. There's a nice formula to show the world won't end by Xeriar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The formula: N(>E) = k(E + 1)^-a

    N is impacts per second
    E is the impact energy in in GeV
    k is ~5,000 particles per steradian per square meter per second
    a is about 1.6.

    So the ground your feet occupy get a dozen or so such collisions per day, and so on.

  10. Crossing the Streams by sexconker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Despite all the hoopla, all they've really done is cross the streams.

    Today the LHC circulated two beams simultaneously for the first time, allowing the operators to test the synchronization of the beams and giving the experiments their first chance to look for proton-proton collisions. With just one bunch of particles circulating in each direction, the beams can be made to cross in up to two places in the ring. From early in the afternoon, the beams were made to cross at points 1 and 5, home to the ATLAS and CMS detectors, both of which were on the look out for collisions. Later, beams crossed at points 2 and 8, ALICE and LHCb.

    An important step, sure. But low-speed collisions and beam tuning are not what the LHC is designed to do. It's akin to a pitcher throwing a few warmup pitches - he won't be bringing the heat til he's out on the mound, he's just trying to make sure he shoulder is fucking healed after he blew it out in his first opening game.

    By the end of the year we should have some real info about the first useful collisions.

    1. Re:Crossing the Streams by macbeth66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's akin to a pitcher throwing a few warmup pitches...

      Huh?

      Could you put that into a car analogy?

    2. Re:Crossing the Streams by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its like a weabo revving the engine of his pimped out ricer at a stoplight. Don't worry, there is a pretty decent chance it will throw a rod when he actually puts it in gear.

    3. Re:Crossing the Streams by Bucc5062 · · Score: 4, Funny

      its like the warm up laps at Talledega (NASCAR) before they throw the green flag. You know there is going to be a big collision after the start, you just don't know when and how big. For the End of the World it would be if all 43 cars got wrecked so bad that not one could continue the race. Game over.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    4. Re:Crossing the Streams by kungfugleek · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's akin to a car throwing a few warmup pitches.

    5. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could I get that in a baseball analogy?

    6. Re:Crossing the Streams by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      There are usually no colliding balls in a baseball game.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than a napanese guy in a caddie.

    8. Re:Crossing the Streams by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 1

      There are usually no colliding balls in a baseball game.

      Depends how good your aim is and how vindictive you're feeling.

      --
      Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
    9. Re:Crossing the Streams by courtjester801 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You hope not if you're at bat, but that's why they wear cups.

    10. Re:Crossing the Streams by TopSpin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could you put that into a car analogy?

      Certainly.

      A particle bunch in the LHC is presently being handled as though it were a young driver that has recently been issued a provisional drivers license. In the same way that smart parents will provide their new commuters with low power, unexciting vehicles to discourage reckless behaviour, the LHC particles are being denied high levels of energy to prevent any additional unintended excursions.

      Just as new drivers suffer a high probability of making mistakes due to inexperience, high energy particles in the LHC are liable to reveal (additional) unknown flaws in the design or construction of the facility. By limiting energy levels the effects of any failures will hopefully be minimal, just as a Volvo 740 wagon that can barely break 60mph due to its 190K miles is less likely to kill you when it slides into a ditch than is a Turbo Carrera disintegrating as it rolls at 210mph.

      Note that this analogy fails when one considers that drivers are trained to avoid collision, whereas LHC particles are intended to experience many collisions.

      BadAnalogyGuy is supposed to be handling these sort of illustrations, but he has been slacking of late.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    11. Re:Crossing the Streams by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      Could you put that into a car analogy?
       

      It's like driving a new car, you try to vary the speeds and transmission loads for the first couple dozen miles before really letting loose with the throttle and taking it into the red.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    12. Re:Crossing the Streams by sjames · · Score: 1

      Considering how badly this pitcher blew out his elbow in the season opener, even seeing him warming up again is good. The kid's got a lot of potential.

      Leaving the analogy, there's plenty left to do, but this is more than it has ever done before.

    13. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's like the pitcher in the batting cage throwing balls at the other pitcher to see if he gets mad. Then in the real game he dose not throw baseballs, but zip lock bags full of backing soda, because the other pitcher is throwing newspapers, and if you hit a flying newspaper with a bag of backing soda fried chicken falls from the sky. But only on days of the month that are prime numbed. Because in real life the pitcher in the batting cage would also have sack of tomatoes to snack on after he strikes out. If the fired chicken hits a tomato then it would create a love quark. And if you get enough love quarks then you can make a small black hole that will suck up the whole of everything in a matter of a bizzillion years. But you see that's why you have the fried chicken. Black holes hate fried chicken, so if you create a black hole just toss some KFC at it and then it will evaporate into a puff of mashed potatoes. That's why you need a pitcher, to hit the black hole with a chicken wing before it has a chance to fall to the centre of the sun.

      --
      We are the Borg...
    14. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh thank you. Thank you!
      I'm having a crap morning and that made me laugh out loud. Thanks again sir.

    15. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its like the warm up laps at Talledega (NASCAR) before they throw the green flag. You know there is going to be a big collision after the start, you just don't know when and how big. For the End of the World it would be if all 43 cars got wrecked so bad that not one could continue the race. Game over.

      Wrong NASCAR race. Talledega is pretty boring and predictable thanks to restrictor plates. I think the race at Bristol is what you had in mind. Bristol is car-nage.

    16. Re:Crossing the Streams by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      all they've really done is cross the streams.

      Judging from past experience, I'm assuming that's bad?

    17. Re:Crossing the Streams by ECCN · · Score: 1
      Obligatory movie quote:

      Dr. Egon Spengler: There's something very important I forgot to tell you.

      Dr. Peter Venkman: What?

      Dr. Egon Spengler: Don't cross the streams.

      Dr. Peter Venkman: Why?

      Dr. Egon Spengler: It would be bad.

      Dr. Peter Venkman: I'm fuzzy on the whole good/bad thing. What do you mean, "bad"?

      Dr. Egon Spengler: Try to imagine all life as you know it stopping instantaneously and every molecule in your body exploding at the speed of light.

      Dr Ray Stantz: Total protonic reversal.

      Dr. Peter Venkman: Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

      from " Ghostbusters"

    18. Re:Crossing the Streams by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      "Ricer"? Are you Australian?

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    19. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite all the hoopla, all they've really done is cross the streams.

      And it took ./ more than 50 comments prior to realize that?

    20. Re:Crossing the Streams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... waiting for a ghostbusters reference here ...

    21. Re:Crossing the Streams by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Despite all the hoopla, all they've really done is cross the streams.

      You said crossing the streams was bad!

    22. Re:Crossing the Streams by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      I hope they don't go 3 wide into turn 4. That'd be a nightmare.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    23. Re:Crossing the Streams by steelfood · · Score: 1

      all they've really done is cross the streams.

      Which was enough to send Gozer and a giant marshmallow man back to where they came from.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  11. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by el3mentary · · Score: 1

    Yes but they aren't high energy collisions.

    Thats not the point the world won't end unless the Pee concentration rises above 90%

    --
    I reject your reality and substitute my own.
  12. Will this be the last.... by quangdog · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Collision for the next 3 years because something else breaks?


    Seems like this thing only ever makes the news because it is broken again in a new and interesting way.

    1. Re:Will this be the last.... by smash · · Score: 1

      Thats what you get when dealing with leading edge multi billion dollar tech... I mean software guys can't even get an OS release out the door without some critical bug, vulnerability or policy oversight - and the LHC is a fair bit more complex than that.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  13. Hmm... by mea37 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently the future has given up its battle against the LHC. Take that, Nature!

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, we just live in the quantum reality in which they failed. Sucks to be (this version of) us.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we just live in the quantum reality in which they failed. Sucks to be (this version of) us.

      You would prefer to live in the quantum reality in which they succeeded and doomed us all by creating a black hole?

    3. Re:Hmm... by AlexWillisson · · Score: 1

      Please tell me those modding parent Informative were all just joking...

    4. Re:Hmm... by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Well, I know I was joking, but I can't figure the mods out today.

    5. Re:Hmm... by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 1

      Wait. Are you suggesting that the forces that tried to cause a failure failed? Damnit. I hate double negatives.

      --
      Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next you'll be claiming there's a parallel universe where Slashdotters get laid. That's crazy talk.

    7. Re:Hmm... by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not for long.

    8. Re:Hmm... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Next you'll be claiming there's a parallel universe where Slashdotters get laid. That's crazy talk.

      No. Even parallel universes don't allow you to break the laws of nature.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:Hmm... by mike260 · · Score: 1

      Orthogonal, not parallel.

    10. Re:Hmm... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      We should use this as a hook to annoy the hell out of creationists and other religious crazy people by using the same delusional methods that they use to tell them that this is irrefutable PROOF that god does not exist! ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:Hmm... by sorak · · Score: 1

      No, we just live in the quantum reality in which they failed. Sucks to be (this version of) us.

      Why couldn't they have just written a note? I'm glad the real world doesn't work like myths, urban legends, and chain mails. Every time someone, in these tales, has a critically important message to deliver, they do it in a way that combines the subtlety of a whisper with a Rube Goldberg design. If the future wants us to turn off the LHC, have the future send us a bad-ass cyborg with a note taped to it's shirt.

  14. You WHAT? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    was met by celebrations and champagne

    Given the dangers involved and the expenses paid already, I think that was a terrible idea.

    1. Re:You WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no, not the bubbles!

    2. Re:You WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahahahah. Jackass.

    3. Re:You WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's okay, they're saving money every step of the way. For instance, some clever modifications to an unused segment of the liquid helium cooling system meant that there was no need for an ice bucket.
      The entertainment expenses of the entire facility is also minuscule, as getting drunk and telling "large hard-on collider" jokes doesn't get old for... well, at least ten years and counting.

    4. Re:You WHAT? by raddan · · Score: 1

      The trick was to pour the champagne into the spot that they found the baguette. Physicists are so smrt.

    5. Re:You WHAT? by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      Quantum foam makes me roam...

  15. That was... quick by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand all this hoopla about why it took so long. When a new machine is brought into our clean room, it usually takes three months before it runs more or less smoothly. The LHC is a bit bigger than our cleanroom and has many more parts. So much more has to be tested, finetuned, etc. before it can even be brought up after a big repair like it had. I think almost two years is a good time in which to do the repair and all that tweaking.

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:That was... quick by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I don't understand all this hoopla about why it took so long.

      They're just the nattering nabobs of negativism who expect you can buy an LHC at BestBuy with a service contract. It's safe to ignore them.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  16. So how much longer... by FunPika · · Score: 1

    Until this happens!? :D

    --
    After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
    1. Re:So how much longer... by MaggieL · · Score: 2, Informative

      Probably more like this. It's a better film, too.

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
  17. I other news... by webdog314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The LHC was shut down again today due to an accident involving a champagne cork."

    1. Re:I other news... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Actually, I heard that two champagne corks collided in mid aid and hit a technician in the eye.

    2. Re:I other news... by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      I heard the corks attained critical mass and are currently devouring the planet.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    3. Re:I other news... by Delkster · · Score: 1

      It must have been some very, very bubbly champagne.

    4. Re:I other news... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      To clarify, it flew off the bottle and hit the big red button at the top of the main control panel. What does the big red button do, you wonder. Self-destruct.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  18. It could take years of analyzing the data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...before the Europeans could agree if the champagne is any good.

  19. Banging rocks together... by White+Shade · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think what I love most about the LHC and whatnot is that, despite all the incredible and amazing science and technology and innovation and potential for learning behind it, what it really comes down to is just us banging rocks together and watching what happens, just like humans have been doing throughout history. It just happens that this time, the rocks are incredibly tiny and incredibly fast.

    Kinda puts it all in perspective, in kind of a cool way, IMO.

    --
    ìì!
    1. Re:Banging rocks together... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      What I love so much about the LHC is that despite all these theories about everything, one may actually get to become proven. Not only that, but we are now kind of like (please do not take this too literaly) reverse enginering our own 'Matrix' so to speak at a level of what, for now at least, seems to be the building blocks, the very foundation, of 'it'*

      *Disclaimer: Yeah, yeah... bla bla... Universe, multiverse, whatever...

      --
      Here be signatures
    2. Re:Banging rocks together... by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, I appreciate the parallel and see the coolness potential, on the other, have people really banged rocks throughout history?

    3. Re:Banging rocks together... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that size they stop being rocks.

    4. Re:Banging rocks together... by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      I dunno about us banging rocks together, but Shakrai is banging his neighbors wife, or so he said in reply to the second post.

    5. Re:Banging rocks together... by pwfffff · · Score: 0

      Same here. Millions upon millions of dollars to answer the most basic of scientific inquiries: What happens when I hit THIS with THAT? Truly warms the heart.

    6. Re:Banging rocks together... by otterpopjunkie · · Score: 0
      VERY SMALL ROCKS! They're just bangin' them together!

      You can't make me unhappy.

    7. Re:Banging rocks together... by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, I appreciate the parallel and see the coolness potential, on the other, have people really banged rocks throughout history?

      My Linear Systems professor had an interesting expression to explain the Impulse Response: "Just kick the system and see what it does".
      Isn't that usually how we start figuring out how stuff works?

    8. Re:Banging rocks together... by beelsebob · · Score: 0, Troll

      one may actually get to become proven
      You sir, don't know how science works. It doesn't prove anything to be right - it only proves things to be wrong. What's left over after you remove all the stuff you know is wrong is an increasingly small amount of stuff that makes a reasonable approximation for right. As we show more and more stuff to be wrong, we get a better and better approximation.

    9. Re:Banging rocks together... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I've heard that the secret is to bang the rocks together so I guess we're on the right track.

    10. Re:Banging rocks together... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      There is an endless amount of axioms, so nothing can ever be realy proven, but finding out that some things do not appear to be wrong, by actually testing a theory, isn't so bad for a change. At least not at this level.

      But then again we can generalize everything into oblivion...

      --
      Here be signatures
    11. Re:Banging rocks together... by Gryle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Scientific research often usually comes down to "what happens when I mix these two things together?" and "poke it with a stick and see what happens." The biggest variation is the type of stick we use.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    12. Re:Banging rocks together... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Just kick the system and see what it does". Isn't that usually how we start figuring out how stuff works?

      In physics, kicking it will tell you what something does.

      In compsci, kicking it will tell you what something did.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    13. Re:Banging rocks together... by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I love so much about the LHC is that despite all these theories about everything, one may actually get to become proven.

      Aside from the point that we falsify not "prove" theories, there's the point that we may end up with many valid theories explaining the same thing. There need not be only one way to explain the universe, but many equivalent ways.

    14. Re:Banging rocks together... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientific research often usually comes down to "what happens when I mix these two things together?" and "poke it with a stick and see what happens." The biggest variation is the type of stick we use.

      Scientific research sounds eerily similar to some parties I attended in college...

    15. Re:Banging rocks together... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid I banged two river rocks together...one of them broke and some shiny sparkly bits came out! 8D

      I was hoping for fossils but that was pretty cool too.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    16. Re:Banging rocks together... by lennier · · Score: 1

      Followed rapidly by "I wonder how fast I can run 200 yards" and "Do tigers climb trees?"

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    17. Re:Banging rocks together... by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Just as long as one side of the equation is 42...

      --
      Here be signatures
  20. I didn't feel a thing? by dUN82 · · Score: 0

    Oh, yes, Mother Erath can take a LHC, alright?

  21. GNOME by Ivan+Stepaniuk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some screenshots at the CERN site show GNOME's 'Clearlooks' window manager theme. At least BSOD will not be a source for further delays.

    --
    My other signature is a car
    1. Re:GNOME by bonch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I haven't seen a BSOD in-person in almost a decade.

      Linux, however, has had problems even booting up on some of my hardware.

    2. Re:GNOME by FST777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    3. Re:GNOME by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.

      If you homebrew, beer is any damn thing you want it to be.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    4. Re:GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because MS made it black, and automatically reboot. So people now assume it's fixed, just because it's not seen.

    5. Re:GNOME by weicco · · Score: 1

      So no need to panic?

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    6. Re:GNOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  22. And Fermilab is on board with it by liquiddark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite the so-called "rivalry" too many science "news" outlets have played up, Fermilab puts it on the front page. Always nice to recall that in the end everyone benefits from this big boy coming online.

    1. Re:And Fermilab is on board with it by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      Fermilab is collaborating on the LHC. Also, if the LHC fails it will pretty much be the end of large scale particle physics. Hard to ask for another $10B machine if the last one didn't work. Still - I'm very glad Fermi is supporting LHC.

    2. Re:And Fermilab is on board with it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Despite the so-called "rivalry" too many science "news" outlets have played up

      News: a story that looks more and more wrong the closer you look at it.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:And Fermilab is on board with it by liquiddark · · Score: 1

      Ain't that the ugly truth.

  23. First Collisions? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like they should have used a switch instead of a hub. Then there wouldn't be collisions.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    1. Re:First Collisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Mighty Casey has struck out.

      Dude, the Phail Whale now has a name and it's MrMista_B.

    2. Re:First Collisions? by MoralHazard · · Score: 0, Troll

      MrMista, do they make "jokes" on your planet?

      http://www.google.com/search?q=+missing+the+joke

      Since the GP is getting modded "funny", you may be the ONLY person on Slashdot who didn't get it. Congratulations, you're an idiot.

    3. Re:First Collisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, they were using a switch and now using a hub to get collision? If only they've switch earlier...

    4. Re:First Collisions? by Zalbik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um... I guess you don't know this, but the whole point of the experiment is to /get/ collisions. It's kinda how basic particle research like this is done.

      The wikipedia article is a good start, but there's more info there, and there's always Google if you want to educate yourself further. :)

      Yeah, um... I guess you don't know this, but there's this whole part of language called humor. It's kinda a basic part of human behavior.

      The wikipedia article is a good start, but there's more info there, and there's always Google if you want to educate yourself further. :)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour

    5. Re:First Collisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and Mighty Casey has struck out.

      Dude, the Phail Whale now has a name and it's MrMista_B.

      Yeah, and boy is MrMista_A pissed.

    6. Re:First Collisions? by MrMista_B · · Score: 1

      How well that help with getting collisions? I guess it won't stop collisions like a switch, but I dunno if it'd be good for the type of research being talked about.

    7. Re:First Collisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The wikipedia article is a good start, but there's more info there, and there's always Google if you want to educate yourself further. :)

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humor

    8. Re:First Collisions? by gsgriffin · · Score: 1

      Not sure which is funnier... your comment which saw me with MCON (milk coming out nose) or the first guy posting in reply to you (on slashdot, of all places) that doesn't see the networking pun. Both are very funny!

      --
      jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
    9. Re:First Collisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Trolls trolling trolls...

      http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/8/81/Trolling101.gif

    10. Re:First Collisions? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      They are just waiting for the token holder to take control of the situation.

    11. Re:First Collisions? by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      My boss is STILL looking for the missing token that brought down the network. Guess I should tell him I was joking....

    12. Re:First Collisions? by tignet · · Score: 1

      No. No. No! You use a switch, but you set your switch to half duplex and your LHC to full duplex. With any load whatsoever, you're almost guaranteed late collisions.

      Better late than never?

    13. Re:First Collisions? by cablepokerface · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they should have used a switch instead of a hub. Then there wouldn't be collisions.

      I think they shot their entire budget on repeaters already.

  24. Good for them by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The black holes or universe-ending paradoxes are still a few months off, at least. They are colliding at a paltry 450 GeV, a level we have been able to produce at other colliders for many years. Wake me when they are passing 1 TeV, on their way to 8...

    1. Re:Good for them by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Shhh... don’t tell them. Rather tell them that now it’s PROVEN that god does not exist, and can by definition not exist. ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  25. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about the Poop concentration?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  26. IT's not at full power yet! and it can fail with a by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IT's not at full power yet! and it can fail with a big boom.

  27. LHC@Home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just want to say, you can also contribute your CPU power for LHC calculations, by joining LHC@Home.

    I'm in awe of this machine, no other monkey species on this planet has been able to make what those scientists made....

    1. Re:LHC@Home! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I just want to say, you can also contribute your CPU power for LHC calculations, by joining LHC@Home.

      But what if it turns my CPU into a black hole?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:LHC@Home! by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just want to say, you can also contribute your CPU power for LHC calculations, by joining LHC@Home.

      LHC@home was used during the construction of the collider to test and validate magnet calibration scenarios - that phase was completed over three years ago. LHC@Home is no longer associated with the LHC *or* CERN (beyond website hosting) and has not provided [BOINC] work units for over two years.

  28. from the "that's not good" department. by pentalive · · Score: 1

    But they crossed the beams and the world did not end.

    1. Re:from the "that's not good" department. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what will happen if they beam the cross?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:from the "that's not good" department. by jimwelch · · Score: 1

      They will be court ordered to attend anger management classes.

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
  29. Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by PaganRitual · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why even bother posting LHC news on /. anymore. It's just top to bottom black hole and collision jokes. The bottom of the barrel has been scraped, and you guys have worked your way through the wood and there is light peeking through on the other side. No funny can escape from this. These are the same jokes that occur every day in the upper atmosphere at much higher humor levels than we can manage. The universe is actively avoiding the discovery of a funny black hole joke, and will mysteriously break any attempts to discover it.

    1. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there... :P

    2. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by caywen · · Score: 1

      That can't be true. Black holes are infinitely funny.

    3. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's just top to bottom black hole and collision jokes.

      I know. You'd have to be a really strange person to think this sort of thing is in any way charming. If it were up to me, I'd moderate all of them down.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by selven · · Score: 1

      You'd have to be a really strange person

      How charming of you.

    5. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by ThreeGigs · · Score: 1

      Hear hear!

      I wholeheartedly suggest an additional "exclude comments rated funny" checkbox in the filter.

    6. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What do you expect, this is the closest they evert got to a beaver: http://www.fnal.gov/pub/today/archive_2009/today09-11-23.html (Scroll to the end of the page.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  30. Re:IT's not at full power yet! and it can fail wit by gsgriffin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I guess we came in with a Big Bang and will go out with a Big Boom. Bummer.

    --
    jsut athnoer menagiensls ltitle psrhae for you to dcoede. Why do we wtsae our tmie dnoig tihs?
  31. when does the gift shop open? by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to buy a snowglobe with a miniature blackhole in it.

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:when does the gift shop open? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what the small plug in the bottom is for.

      Remove it and watch the contents get sucked in!

    2. Re:when does the gift shop open? by Alphathon · · Score: 1

      Not exactly the same, but I'm suddenly reminded on Men In Black

  32. An open letter to Slashdotters. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sorry, I've got some bad news for you all. The world did end, and everyone died. "But," you ask, "if I'm dead, why am I still at work?"

    Uh, yeah, about that. We're kind of swamped up here with all the new souls looking to get in, so we've decided to fast track certain predominantly Godless groups to eternal damnation. You're now stuck at work.

    Forever.

    Respectfully yours,
    The Archon V2.0
    Trainee mortal/immortal liason, New Media Department, Heaven.

    1. Re:An open letter to Slashdotters. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      That can't be right. I'm pretty sure the world hasn't even started yet.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:An open letter to Slashdotters. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I figured it was because God didn't open up the universe to look inside so the quantum wave function hasn't collapsed and we cats inside are both alive and dead.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:An open letter to Slashdotters. by lennier · · Score: 1

      "we've decided to fast track certain predominantly Godless groups to eternal damnation. You're now stuck at work."

      But with Internet access... so how is that Hell again?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    4. Re:An open letter to Slashdotters. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      But with Internet access... so how is that Hell again?

      You'll find out when you hit the bandwidth cap.

  33. Re:IT's not at full power yet! and it can fail wit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that be a 'big bang'? And wouldn't that also be a success?

  34. In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beach front property is now available east of Paris, downtown Paris, ah west of Paris. In other news Al Gore was heard to say "at least we got rid of the CO2".

  35. Re:IT's not at full power yet! and it can fail wit by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    ....are you implying that, if you zoom out from the solar system, out farther and farther, we actually happen to be on the Joker's chin in the 60's Batman TV show?

  36. What my parent just said by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    What he said.

    Except with black holes! And hookers! In fact, forget about the collisions...

  37. inb4ItBreaksAgain by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

    I give it two weeks, tops.

  38. High Speed Collisions by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Informative

    But low-speed collisions and beam tuning are not what the LHC is designed to do.

    You do realize that even at the injection energy the speed of the protons is 99.99978% of the speed of light in vacuum and at full energy the speed of the protons has only increased to 99.9999991%? The collisions are both equally high speed thanks to relativity: what is interesting is the collision energy.

  39. Still record breaking by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    They are colliding at a paltry 450 GeV, a level we have been able to produce at other colliders for many years.

    ...but not with proton on proton.

    1. Re:Still record breaking by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Proton on proton,

      that is sooo hawt.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  40. Cut short.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Celebrations were cut short when one of the scientists spilled champagne on a critical component, causing several magnets so malfunction.

    The LHC will complete repairs next month, after killing all nearby avian wildlife and shutting down local bakeries.

  41. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >So the ground your feet occupy get a dozen or so such collisions per day, and so on.

    Of protons moving at the speed of light in one direction smashing into protons moving at the speed of light in the other direction ?

    Last time I checked, we were moving considerably slower than c.

  42. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by treeves · · Score: 1

    If the Pee concentration is that high, you obviously need to drink more water.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  43. So this is the afterlife. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

    I must say, I am disappointed.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  44. Cross border paperwork by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Funny

    Given that the LHC is under the French/Swiss border, I was wondering what import/export paperwork the CERN operators need to fill in (and tariffs to pay) every time the beam travels from one country to another .... :-)

    1. Re:Cross border paperwork by Joseph+Lam · · Score: 1

      Because of the uncertainty principle, they're still arguing about the exact location and the mass of the goods needed to calculate the duty

    2. Re:Cross border paperwork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the chengen treaty takes care of all that...

  45. The Real Question Is by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it blend?

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  46. Re:IT's not at full power yet! and it can fail wit by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Well, given the current depression, I think a big boom would be more than welcome. I didn't know that the LHC experiments have such a direct effect on our economy, though.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  47. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by ascari · · Score: 1

    Ha! I knew it! Those hadrons aren't so large after all!

  48. congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm just a lowly software developer who works for companies that can't see beyond the next six quarters. I find it completely awe inspiring to see such an immensely complex project come together through the efforts of thousands of dedicated smart people who, in many cases, have devoted literally their entire adult lives, decades, towards this moment. Of course, this is just the beginning...

    All of the evidence for this is out in the open, on the 'Net and on the TV, for all to see. Yet scientists still don't garner a fraction of the respect afforded to people that play "catch" for a living. That makes me sad.

  49. For fuck's sake ... by unity100 · · Score: 1

    this time take care that no bird will drop bread into it, no snail will walk over its pathways, no clown will juggle near it, or no other absurd coincidence will impossibly happen to it to delay it ...

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Here is the full log if anyone is interested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    07h00 Beam rumors :)
    EMCal wants its own partition in a global run ASAP, to be sure they can join PHYSICS_2 without problems.
    08h10 PHYSICS_1 crashed, DAQ tried to restart but has a problem. EMCal test created.
    08h30 restarting PHYSICS_1, DAQ problems apparently solved.
    08h39 FMD shifter at First Physics meeting, another person is on duty.
    08h54 EMCal is not configured to shuttle automatically, so they either have to join PHYSICS_2 or reconfig their shuttle, but their shuttle expert is not reachable now.
    09h15 EMCal wants STU out to revert to old offline code; but current test is valuable, and so if possible run for another 45 minutes.
    09h36 EMCal needs a PHYSICS_2 with PHOS and without STU to test
    09h42 SPD needs 5 minutos to be ready
    09h44 Clock change problem
    09h45 Clock change troubled SSD reconfigration, they cannot standalone if clock is changing.
    09h49 SSD ready, SDD finalizing needs 101458 data to be sent to offline
    09h50 PHYSICS_2 started with PHOS and EMCal
    10h01 PHYSICS_1 try #1
    10h04 run 101467 for EMCal with new configuration
    10h11 Clock in BEAM1
    10h25 Offline confirm it is all fine with SDD
    10h29 Beam turn and dump
    10h54 101467 for EMCal confirmed ok by offline
    11h27 Beam 2 circulating
    11h52 TPC officially out
    TRD only if BEAM STABLE
    12h18 Runs stopped because of beam dump
    12h57 PHYSICS_2 started with V0 added
    13h02 V0 seemed to have a FERO problem for DAQ, but this was explained as normal by DCS, who will release it only when beam is ok
    13h14 The runs currently running should be named "Interaction of circulating Beam 1", according to Federico. PHYSICS_2 running with V0
    13h17 Stopped PHYSICS_1 and _2 to put new CTP code
    13h20 We lost Beam 2
    13h21 PHYSICS_1 started
    13h23 2 beams circulating
    13h27 PHYSICS_2 started, but crashed. V0 ramp and trigger problem.
    13h58 Running
    14h26 Stopped PHYSICS_2, started without V0
    14h32 PHYSICS_2 did not have the DAQ-CTP error either on current or previous runs
    14h52 Stopped PHYSICS, ramped up V0
    14h56 PHYSICS started with V0
    14h59 PHYSICS_2 stopped to remove V0
    15h06 Stopped PHYSICS_1 and _2 for beam dump
    15h10 CTP changes for PHYSICS_1 and _2 do not require DAQ action, according to CTP
    15h24 Dump
    15h27 Permits green
    15h42 LHC Handshake
    15h52 Injection started
    16h00 End of my shift - will continue logging just to be complete.
    16h10 Post Morten
    16h12 Post Morten
    16h15 Post Morten
    16h36 Inject beam 1
    16h37 Inject beam 2
    16h40 First events were displayed one or two minutes ago :) I didn't write down the time because we were cheering at the time :)
    Report:
    Clock change troubles SSD reconfiguration, they cannot standalone while clock is changing.

  52. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, the LHC doesn't accelerate protons to the speed of light. It accelerates them to *near* the speed of light. There's an important difference. Secondly, that's the formula for the number cosmic ray impacts on a given area per day. Cosmic rays are closer to the speed of light then the LHC proton streams. Finally, there's "relativity" which says that if you accelerate one stream to .9c with regards to an observer on the earth, and the other to .9c in regards to an observer on the earth in the opposite direction, they don't hit each other at 1.8c. Relative to each other they are still moving at less then the speed of light.

    And, as it happens, the total energy of those collisions is less then those of cosmic rays.

  53. Re:racist tags! by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

    Actually if this thing makes black holes, they'll evaporate via Hawking radiation anyway, so calling them "white holes" might be okay.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  54. Re:The real question is...Christmas gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey you, haven't you read the news? Americans are BROKEN they can't even afford the shit you sell.

    You can do better if you send them an email in the name of prince Magalubalu IV.

    The funny thing is that maybe a lot of slashtupids are clicking the link and you're actually making sales. PROTIP: don't be deceived! those are mostly niggers and indians and spics, the only people that have money on America from humping white gals, stealing white people job's and being narcs respectively.

    Mod me troll so we all can know that what I say it's true FTW!

  55. The Particle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, did the particle give up, or just buy enough time to re-wire the universe?

  56. foul ball by woolio · · Score: 1

    he won't be bringing the heat til he's out on the mound, he's just trying to make sure he shoulder is fucking healed

    From someone whose handle is "sexconker", I have to wonder on which mound you have injured your shoulder...

  57. Oblig. Red Dwarf by Samah · · Score: 1

    Obligatory Red Dwarf:

    CAT: So, what is it?
    KRYTEN: I've never seen one before -- no one has -- but I'm guessing it's a white hole.
    RIMMER: A _white_ hole?
    KRYTEN: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A black hole sucks time and matter out of the universe: a white hole returns it.
    LISTER: So, that thing's spewing time back into the universe? (He dons his fur-lined hat.)
    KRYTEN: Precisely. That's why we're experiencing these curious time phenomena on board.
    CAT: So, what is it?
    KRYTEN: I've never seen one before -- no one has -- but I'm guessing it's a white hole.
    RIMMER: A _white_ hole?
    KRYTEN: Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A black hole sucks time and matter out of the universe: a white hole returns it.
    LISTER: (Minus the hat.) So, that thing's spewing time back into the universe? (He dons his fur-lined hat, again.)
    KRYTEN: Precisely. That's why we're experiencing these curious time phenomena on board.
    LISTER: What time phenomena?
    KRYTEN: Like just then, when time repeated itself.
    CAT: So, what is it?

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  58. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by lanceran · · Score: 1

    You haven't seen my hadron.

  59. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Resonance cascade then, eh? Let's just hope that they won't cross the beams.

  60. It's begun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flash Forward here we come!

  61. By definition by DrYak · · Score: 1

    it’s PROVEN that god does not exist, and can by definition not exist.

    Saddly, by definition, religious nuts won't let a mere proof stop them.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  62. Typical Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting story, shame about the replies. Far too many discussions are just full of dozens and dozens of pointless rehashed jokes that are not funny.

    My locker combination is 12345678
    - omg only an idiot would have that! (posted only to prove that the person got the joke)
    -- You insensitive clod. (posted only to prove he knows another Slashdot meme)
    --- *Simpons reference*
    ---- *Follow up Simpsons reference from the same episode* (posted only to prove he knows the joke)

  63. Can these guys never get a break? by mcvos · · Score: 1

    After all those accidents and mishaps, now they got a collision? They have some rotten luck.

  64. Uhhh...diamond? by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 1

    So...when does the Pope die and CERN sends for a Harvard Professor?

  65. Traveling wrong way on the proton-autobahn by OMFG+it's+Rici · · Score: 1

    Take a look at THIS: http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/performance/FirstBeam/pictures221109/CollisionEvent.png Collision detection in the CMS.

  66. Where's the kaboom? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!

  67. 10 days uptime maximum by us7892 · · Score: 1

    I'll give it 10 days before another incident shuts it down for a year.

  68. Here you go by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    3.05143958 × 10^-28 womprats.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  69. FTFY by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    No. Even parallel universes don't allow you to break their laws of nature.

    FTFY ;)

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  70. Windows 7 release panties - what does that have by ami.one · · Score: 1

    Windows 7 release panties - what does that have to do with this ? And where do you get them by the way?