The flaw in the logic is that "rarely use" is not the same as "would be fine if it didn't exist". The reasons for removing the feature look bogus to me in that they seem to satisfy an aesthetic quality that the developers want rather than provide any benefit to the users of the browser.
But it does mean that owners with the 60kWh version are driving a car with a 25% heavier than necessary battery - not a great thing on a car with a limited range.
Yes but did he say that because he thought Emacs, gcc and gdb were a better developer environment or be3cause he had a thing against Microsoft? I suspect it was the latter because Visual Studio is way better than using this three tools in isolation.
In the UK if you killed somebody who was mugging you, as long as you can demonstrate that the force was proportionate (i.e. you were in fear for your life) you'd get away with it.
You might have trouble explaining why you were carrying a gun, of course, but then you probably wouldn't be because it is pretty much an automatic prison sentence.
If you use Microsoft office, you put a straitjacket on your system. Not compatible with OSX version of Office
That comes as news to me as a Mac OS user in a mainly Windows based office environment. There are no serious compatibility issues between the two versions of Office in my considerable (more than 10 years) experience of use g the Mac versions.
So having a unique MAC address allows people to track you. Why son't we all use the same MAC address, then people won't be able to tell who we are. It's obvious really, what could possibly go wrong?
No it doesn't. Uber's business model simply doesn't work. Uber is a company that drives people from A to B for money. There is no fundamental reason why they should be able to do it cheaper than other taxi companies, at least not if they are doing it legally. There's no disruptive technology here, there's just a taxi hailing app.
Apart from the language mismatch, why do you think that is unfair? Asking people questions so that you understand the problem you are trying to model is a fundamental part of programming. If anything, the question is unfair on people who do know Sudoku because they do not get to demonstrate that part of their skill set to the interviewer.
Why are there so many apps that can do just that in existence then?
Uber's business model just doesn't work. Apart from the app, the only advantages they have over traditional taxi companies is a bunch of gullible investors that give them money to sell rides below costs and no compunction when it comes to flouting taxi regulations. Uber lost £2 billion roughly in 2016 and there is no way they can cut costs to stem the flow. In the taxi business, economies of scale are achieved by having large fleets of identical cars to cut acquisition and maintenance costs. These are economies unavailable to Uber.
Really? Their "self driving" cars apparently need two engineers in them in case anything goes wrong. This whole thing is bullshit so that Uber can scam even more money from their investors to feed their $2billion/ year losses.
You have got a car with Piers Morgan sitting in it. An attacker wants to head butt him in the face (trying to think of a backronym for AnC for this - I have Attacker Nuts... but I can't think of a word beginning with C that describes Piers Morgan) so, for his own protection, you choose where he sits in the car by a random process (Arsehole Seat Location Randomisation), so the chances are the attacker opens the wrong door.
Anyway, it turns out that you can tell by how the car is riding on its springs where Piers Morgan is.
Slashdot Mirror
Android isn't really Linux. Yes, buried in there somewhere is a Linux kernel, but the kernel is not the operating system.
A presidential aide has to visit five separate dead drops...
Mythbusters tried the explosive decompression thing.
It's a myth.
Maybe it's not as easy as it seems.
Unfortunately not, due to a bug, you can still launch a web browser. Fortunately, there is a work around which is to make Google Chrome the default.
The flaw in the logic is that "rarely use" is not the same as "would be fine if it didn't exist". The reasons for removing the feature look bogus to me in that they seem to satisfy an aesthetic quality that the developers want rather than provide any benefit to the users of the browser.
But it does mean that owners with the 60kWh version are driving a car with a 25% heavier than necessary battery - not a great thing on a car with a limited range.
I have got an Atari style joystick which has a TV out and contains an entire Commodore 64 and several games for it.
I think that's pretty negative.
Not only that, but if people can go back and rewrite their words to sound more prefect,
I prefer to go back and rewrite my words to sound more dent.
No human would fall for that...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Oh.
I was using Visual Studio in 1998. I was also using gcc and gdb (but not Emacs). Visual Studio was a vastly better experience.
Yes but did he say that because he thought Emacs, gcc and gdb were a better developer environment or be3cause he had a thing against Microsoft? I suspect it was the latter because Visual Studio is way better than using this three tools in isolation.
In the UK if you killed somebody who was mugging you, as long as you can demonstrate that the force was proportionate (i.e. you were in fear for your life) you'd get away with it.
You might have trouble explaining why you were carrying a gun, of course, but then you probably wouldn't be because it is pretty much an automatic prison sentence.
If you use Microsoft office, you put a straitjacket on your system. Not compatible with OSX version of Office
That comes as news to me as a Mac OS user in a mainly Windows based office environment. There are no serious compatibility issues between the two versions of Office in my considerable (more than 10 years) experience of use g the Mac versions.
So having a unique MAC address allows people to track you. Why son't we all use the same MAC address, then people won't be able to tell who we are. It's obvious really, what could possibly go wrong?
That way if anybody complains about your password for bad language, you'll know that all the rules are completely pointless.
No it doesn't. Uber's business model simply doesn't work. Uber is a company that drives people from A to B for money. There is no fundamental reason why they should be able to do it cheaper than other taxi companies, at least not if they are doing it legally. There's no disruptive technology here, there's just a taxi hailing app.
Apart from the language mismatch, why do you think that is unfair? Asking people questions so that you understand the problem you are trying to model is a fundamental part of programming. If anything, the question is unfair on people who do know Sudoku because they do not get to demonstrate that part of their skill set to the interviewer.
Why are there so many apps that can do just that in existence then?
Uber's business model just doesn't work. Apart from the app, the only advantages they have over traditional taxi companies is a bunch of gullible investors that give them money to sell rides below costs and no compunction when it comes to flouting taxi regulations. Uber lost £2 billion roughly in 2016 and there is no way they can cut costs to stem the flow. In the taxi business, economies of scale are achieved by having large fleets of identical cars to cut acquisition and maintenance costs. These are economies unavailable to Uber.
Uber is going down.
Horses and buggies were driven by humans too.
Really? Their "self driving" cars apparently need two engineers in them in case anything goes wrong. This whole thing is bullshit so that Uber can scam even more money from their investors to feed their $2billion/ year losses.
It's only February, there is still time for Microsoft to overtake iOS in 2017.
And now: unicorns!
You have got a car with Piers Morgan sitting in it. An attacker wants to head butt him in the face (trying to think of a backronym for AnC for this - I have Attacker Nuts... but I can't think of a word beginning with C that describes Piers Morgan) so, for his own protection, you choose where he sits in the car by a random process (Arsehole Seat Location Randomisation), so the chances are the attacker opens the wrong door.
Anyway, it turns out that you can tell by how the car is riding on its springs where Piers Morgan is.
Maybe her foot wouldn't have hit the accelerator if she wasn't drunk.