wah wah. as you know the shareholders is everywoman and man, not a bunch of billionaires but rather people who deserve for google to do their best.
if you think maximizing profits is wrong, you should tax the companies accordingly.
Ask this:
If it were mandatory for all usable organs to be harvested, would the long run result be that demand for organs would be filled to the extent that there would be no need/incentive for questionable executions/pulling of plugs/etc?
But, if you'd prefer to believe your way, that's your decision. I must quote...
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
George Santayana (1863-1952)
The Life of Reason (1905-1906)
This simply is not true.
It exaggerates an obvious truism in four ways.
Those who go about repeating this catch phrase don't seem to have thought very deeply about what it actually says.
What is true is something like this: those who are UNAWARE of the LESSONS of the past are MORE LIKELY to LIVE SOME SIMILAR VERSION of it.
I used to love NewEgg, but they don't pack sensitive items well... video cards costing $300, hard drives, etc. all arrive with a few sheets of paper and the video card in a box shorter than the video card...it didn't work and I had to argue for a full refund for 15 emails, but I did get it.
Since then I've spent $1500 at ZipZoomFly, TigerDirect, and $50 at NewEgg and that only to get my shipping refund credit for the video card actually.
An illegal search by someone working for the government as a contractor throws out evidence just like an illegal search by a government employee.
If the cops pay me to break into your house it's an illegal search.
not everybody can afford to buy a new computer every two years, or is tech savvy enough to know how to upgrade cheaply.
hell, there are those who have hand me downs of hand me downs, schools, kids, public places like coffee shops, even libraries depending on the city.
to them this info is important, but i doubt the mass media ever broadcasts the information.
That's not how it works.
First of all, why would a good poker player give the house a profit? If they win more than they earn hourly they'd just play for themselves.
The "shills" are there to generate interest in games. They're paid a small hourly sum so tables don't go empty.
On line poker sites don't need shills. They're always people playing and they don't have idle dealers.
Well, there are ways to cheat, and I'd bet a lot of people are cheated.
Friends on the phone playing a table have less incomplete information, and if they find the right sucker, can make a years' salary playing five against one high limit.
Also there was a scandal at Ultimate Bet (Annie Duke and Phil Hellmuth's site) were one person knew the cards other players held.
So cheating is possible, though you are probably safe statistically as so many players are honest.
They didn't seize winnings, they froze money the players requested be returned to them from the site, which often includes money deposited by the played and never gambled.
crack/meth/coke aren't physically addicting anyway, in the sense of painful protracted withdrawal.
A little exercise and some food will cure "cocaine withdrawal".
Opiates are where withdrawal happens.
Don't they make a great deal of money from forcing people who buy prebuilt computers to take a paid for copy of Windows with it?
I can't see Dell, HP, Toshiba et al selling their computers with a beta OS.
Slashdot Mirror
you say downfall, I say lifeblood.
wah wah. as you know the shareholders is everywoman and man, not a bunch of billionaires but rather people who deserve for google to do their best. if you think maximizing profits is wrong, you should tax the companies accordingly.
Ask this: If it were mandatory for all usable organs to be harvested, would the long run result be that demand for organs would be filled to the extent that there would be no need/incentive for questionable executions/pulling of plugs/etc?
Yeah, legalize your pet drug, eh? Legalize it all, and stop using my tax dollars from to keep adults from using drugs they want to use.
because they're public figures. yes, you are actually allowed to watch the government do its work in this country.
But, if you'd prefer to believe your way, that's your decision. I must quote...
"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it." George Santayana (1863-1952) The Life of Reason (1905-1906)
This simply is not true.
It exaggerates an obvious truism in four ways. Those who go about repeating this catch phrase don't seem to have thought very deeply about what it actually says.
What is true is something like this: those who are UNAWARE of the LESSONS of the past are MORE LIKELY to LIVE SOME SIMILAR VERSION of it.
Important distinctions.
Oh, they know I suck at intercourse. They all know.
I used to love NewEgg, but they don't pack sensitive items well ... video cards costing $300, hard drives, etc. all arrive with a few sheets of paper and the video card in a box shorter than the video card...it didn't work and I had to argue for a full refund for 15 emails, but I did get it.
Since then I've spent $1500 at ZipZoomFly, TigerDirect, and $50 at NewEgg and that only to get my shipping refund credit for the video card actually.
Can't they just take names and watch hackers until they break a law and then throw them in the clink? How hard would it be?
Why not just use EULA's instead of copyright to enforce GPL?
followed by doctors, then presidents, finally girlfriends.
An illegal search by someone working for the government as a contractor throws out evidence just like an illegal search by a government employee. If the cops pay me to break into your house it's an illegal search.
it worries me that it worries you so much
Try a studio apartment, makes my life simple enough.
not everybody can afford to buy a new computer every two years, or is tech savvy enough to know how to upgrade cheaply. hell, there are those who have hand me downs of hand me downs, schools, kids, public places like coffee shops, even libraries depending on the city. to them this info is important, but i doubt the mass media ever broadcasts the information.
Really? Tell that to the kid who was abused, photgraphed and knows ten thousand people are using their picture for tissue paper.
Please send $5.69 to Redmond, WA immediately. And please send $0.53 to Mountain View, CA for sending said money. And pay ...
That's not how it works. First of all, why would a good poker player give the house a profit? If they win more than they earn hourly they'd just play for themselves. The "shills" are there to generate interest in games. They're paid a small hourly sum so tables don't go empty. On line poker sites don't need shills. They're always people playing and they don't have idle dealers.
Well, there are ways to cheat, and I'd bet a lot of people are cheated. Friends on the phone playing a table have less incomplete information, and if they find the right sucker, can make a years' salary playing five against one high limit. Also there was a scandal at Ultimate Bet (Annie Duke and Phil Hellmuth's site) were one person knew the cards other players held. So cheating is possible, though you are probably safe statistically as so many players are honest.
They didn't seize winnings, they froze money the players requested be returned to them from the site, which often includes money deposited by the played and never gambled.
And how much more would McD's make if dumpster divers didn't get access to free food at shelters?
The freedom to steal movies faster, cool.
"... a bad part of the Franklin neighborhood in Minneapolis ...."
There's a good part?
crack/meth/coke aren't physically addicting anyway, in the sense of painful protracted withdrawal. A little exercise and some food will cure "cocaine withdrawal". Opiates are where withdrawal happens.
Don't they make a great deal of money from forcing people who buy prebuilt computers to take a paid for copy of Windows with it? I can't see Dell, HP, Toshiba et al selling their computers with a beta OS.