Google truly has stopped all innovation and is spending its time chasing competitors, often in saturated markets. They can afford these silly endeavors of course, but it feels like such a waste of talent and resources.
I suddenly wish I was a very popular streamer on twitch or youtube. I would record this 'inaudible acoustic signal' and isolate it using trial and error, and just play it back continuously throughout my stream.
Since learning japanese, I'm looking forward to going back in time a bit and reading all that stuff actually. The west is in rehash and reboot mode and I'm tired of it.
If all he was looking to prevent was people filming the stage with their phones, and his solution is confiscation, I have a better idea. Since taking peoples phones away is kinda a dick move, you can be assured their camera lens will pickup most sources of infra-red light.
All you need to do is wire the stage with very high power(bright as fuck) IR lights. These are invisible to human eyes, so it doesn't disturb the 'mood' of whatever setup was originally though of, but anyone trying to shoot with their phones, in 9:16 no doubt, will be presented with the sun.
People get to keep their emergency contact devices and you get to claim ignorance as a 'technical fault'. Oops!
but welcome to the world of paying for multiple streaming providers (or piracy).
Welcome? I never really left. Streaming services have only one thing over torrents, access speed. They shit on network topology creating peak hours, their pricing model doesn't allow for winners and losers, they have a massive incentive to drive down bitrates to save on bandwidth costs, you cannot take anything with you on trips, you can't edit anything and you can't use your video player of choice. Thats before the difference between free and paid.
If they released a platform like steam, in which I download the game I want, pay the developers directly, play it exactly how I wish, without internet access on the go, in an open codec open container(vp9/mkv) then we can talk. Until then torrents are still the better product.
They don't care about entertainment value, only money. But art and business, especially risk averse suits, do not mix. The masses will smell the stench of stale, watered down pandering sooner or later.
. You don't get it, this is the future. Lines on lines, one pole every 2 meters. The sky will look like spaghetti, I'll have one substation on top of another!
I will rain heavy transformers down on you, and you will drown in them
..we have all the conditions for some terrible bushfires. But where I live in WA we do regular burnoffs during the wet season. In the east they're filled with hippie tree hugging fuckwits that don't like their precious environment getting destroyed by burnoffs, so they let the fuel build up around them, then promptly lose their houses.
I'm guessing theres a similar amount of bleeding hearts for small animals in southern california. Let them burn.
I've been learning japanese for about 2 years, using SRS and reading. I can tell you these systems will be great for instructions on assembling a desk, or how to check your oil. Totally useless for storytelling. Anything containing references, jokes, wordplay, hell even pronouns where english just doesn't have as many will always be compromises.
Your sister could have fed them sugar and just counted calories, they wouldn't be fat. I can't say the same about cavities. There are only 3 types of(eaten) food energy; carbs, fats and protein.
They all 'pay' different amounts of calories. So saying one makes you fat is like saying you only earn money with $20 bills.
>We need to remove inefficiencies from the system and implement basic income with a requirement of 10h/month volunteer work for persons without dependents.
That requirement makes it almost no different than current welfare systems. It just gets paid to everyone, and adds more administration costs in trying to figure out who has dependents, and if they are doing the proper amount of volunteer work, and who is cheating the requirement etc.
The level of money controls what people will do, since right now in countries with welfare, people could just stop working and do nothing, but they continue to work because they want more than the basics.
I see the cost being a factor at first. The lidar system adds something like $7500 on top of the car. Obviously there are already costly alterations done to vehicles right now to make them handicap accessible so a market is there. In fact, the market might be even greater, since current modifications are still reliant on the driver having some capacity.
There must be others that would very much like to be driven around, but are flatly unable to get a license, due to age, vision, motor cortex problems etc. So I see those groups as the pioneers. The increased cost of the lidar will detract the average motorist from making the purchase, but lets say they don't actually need to. I think they have made a robust vehicle 2 vehicle communication system already, something humans do in a very limited capacity using brake lights and indicators.
So these first batch of lidar equipped vehicles become the mobile lighthouses. They feed information to each other, and eventually, to cars without the costly addition. Then when enough vehicles are just talking to each other, the lidar systems are needed less and less, the costs come down to regular vehicles except equipped with a digital chauffeur. Quite appealing.
They don't have to win constantly to turn a profit. Those things you mentioned happened rarely, and all the bots need is a 60 to 70% win rate. Winning more than you lose is the only way forward.
(Fig. 2 from the journal article, supposedly demonstrating an improvement in frailty markers) and just see noise. No dose-response. No consistent benefit across measures for different treatment groups.
The figure shows four different tests for resilience to age-related frailty - each fig. 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d represent how each of the treatment groups performed on these tests at different time points.
There were three treatment groups: patients receiving 100 million cells (100-M), patients receiving 200 million cells (200-M) and a placebo group. The 100 million cell group showed a stat dig improvement in the six minute walk test.
The problem, though, is that the 200 million group did not. So there is no dose response relationship. Generally, if a drug is real, the more drug you apply the stronger treatment effect you observe (lots of caveats to this generality, but none seem too relevant here). Further, the 100 million group on showed a positive outcome in the six minute walk test. It failed to demonstrate efficacy consistently in the other three tests the researchers used to measure resilience against age-related frailty. In some cases it was even worse than placebo.
I would happily bet an amount of money that mattered to me that this result would fail to be replicated in a randomized, placebo-controlled study."
A closed problem has definable limits. For example, I struggle to see how an AI system would accurately render assistance as a psychologist; a field in which I feel we barely understand ourselves.
Then there is the simple bodies we can give them. A nurses work is varied but still well defined and considered closed. But do we have a body for the AI system to do that job and it's many tasks, as quickly and cheaply as a human employee?
Slashdot Mirror
Well I guess that leaves something for the handful of remaining mothers and elderly that still use facebook.
No madVR support? And its the best? I am on slashdot right..
Google truly has stopped all innovation and is spending its time chasing competitors, often in saturated markets. They can afford these silly endeavors of course, but it feels like such a waste of talent and resources.
I suddenly wish I was a very popular streamer on twitch or youtube. I would record this 'inaudible acoustic signal' and isolate it using trial and error, and just play it back continuously throughout my stream.
Since learning japanese, I'm looking forward to going back in time a bit and reading all that stuff actually. The west is in rehash and reboot mode and I'm tired of it.
I can smell the boomer on you.
If all he was looking to prevent was people filming the stage with their phones, and his solution is confiscation, I have a better idea. Since taking peoples phones away is kinda a dick move, you can be assured their camera lens will pickup most sources of infra-red light.
All you need to do is wire the stage with very high power(bright as fuck) IR lights. These are invisible to human eyes, so it doesn't disturb the 'mood' of whatever setup was originally though of, but anyone trying to shoot with their phones, in 9:16 no doubt, will be presented with the sun.
People get to keep their emergency contact devices and you get to claim ignorance as a 'technical fault'. Oops!
I'd watch that movie to be honest.
But holy christ they look silly.
but welcome to the world of paying for multiple streaming providers (or piracy).
Welcome? I never really left. Streaming services have only one thing over torrents, access speed. They shit on network topology creating peak hours, their pricing model doesn't allow for winners and losers, they have a massive incentive to drive down bitrates to save on bandwidth costs, you cannot take anything with you on trips, you can't edit anything and you can't use your video player of choice. Thats before the difference between free and paid.
If they released a platform like steam, in which I download the game I want, pay the developers directly, play it exactly how I wish, without internet access on the go, in an open codec open container(vp9/mkv) then we can talk. Until then torrents are still the better product.
They don't care about entertainment value, only money. But art and business, especially risk averse suits, do not mix. The masses will smell the stench of stale, watered down pandering sooner or later.
. You don't get it, this is the future. Lines on lines, one pole every 2 meters. The sky will look like spaghetti, I'll have one substation on top of another!
I will rain heavy transformers down on you, and you will drown in them
..we have all the conditions for some terrible bushfires. But where I live in WA we do regular burnoffs during the wet season. In the east they're filled with hippie tree hugging fuckwits that don't like their precious environment getting destroyed by burnoffs, so they let the fuel build up around them, then promptly lose their houses.
I'm guessing theres a similar amount of bleeding hearts for small animals in southern california. Let them burn.
I've been learning japanese for about 2 years, using SRS and reading. I can tell you these systems will be great for instructions on assembling a desk, or how to check your oil. Totally useless for storytelling. Anything containing references, jokes, wordplay, hell even pronouns where english just doesn't have as many will always be compromises.
Your sister could have fed them sugar and just counted calories, they wouldn't be fat. I can't say the same about cavities. There are only 3 types of(eaten) food energy; carbs, fats and protein.
They all 'pay' different amounts of calories. So saying one makes you fat is like saying you only earn money with $20 bills.
If that video isn't thunderfoot I'll eat my hat. Hey, look at that, it is him
https://www.reddit.com/r/Futur...
>We need to remove inefficiencies from the system and implement basic income with a requirement of 10h/month volunteer work for persons without dependents.
That requirement makes it almost no different than current welfare systems. It just gets paid to everyone, and adds more administration costs in trying to figure out who has dependents, and if they are doing the proper amount of volunteer work, and who is cheating the requirement etc.
The level of money controls what people will do, since right now in countries with welfare, people could just stop working and do nothing, but they continue to work because they want more than the basics.
I see the cost being a factor at first. The lidar system adds something like $7500 on top of the car. Obviously there are already costly alterations done to vehicles right now to make them handicap accessible so a market is there. In fact, the market might be even greater, since current modifications are still reliant on the driver having some capacity.
There must be others that would very much like to be driven around, but are flatly unable to get a license, due to age, vision, motor cortex problems etc. So I see those groups as the pioneers. The increased cost of the lidar will detract the average motorist from making the purchase, but lets say they don't actually need to. I think they have made a robust vehicle 2 vehicle communication system already, something humans do in a very limited capacity using brake lights and indicators.
So these first batch of lidar equipped vehicles become the mobile lighthouses. They feed information to each other, and eventually, to cars without the costly addition. Then when enough vehicles are just talking to each other, the lidar systems are needed less and less, the costs come down to regular vehicles except equipped with a digital chauffeur. Quite appealing.
Check this out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Somehow it tickles me to think your brother earns more than you to blow hot air.
Sure can. Tip it out the window.
They don't have to win constantly to turn a profit. Those things you mentioned happened rarely, and all the bots need is a 60 to 70% win rate. Winning more than you lose is the only way forward.
Jewish homosexuals.
Reposted from a more reputable interpreter of the results on reddit:
"I look at these results
(Fig. 2 from the journal article, supposedly demonstrating an improvement in frailty markers) and just see noise. No dose-response. No consistent benefit across measures for different treatment groups.
The figure shows four different tests for resilience to age-related frailty - each fig. 2a, 2b, 2c and 2d represent how each of the treatment groups performed on these tests at different time points.
There were three treatment groups: patients receiving 100 million cells (100-M), patients receiving 200 million cells (200-M) and a placebo group.
The 100 million cell group showed a stat dig improvement in the six minute walk test.
The problem, though, is that the 200 million group did not. So there is no dose response relationship. Generally, if a drug is real, the more drug you apply the stronger treatment effect you observe (lots of caveats to this generality, but none seem too relevant here).
Further, the 100 million group on showed a positive outcome in the six minute walk test. It failed to demonstrate efficacy consistently in the other three tests the researchers used to measure resilience against age-related frailty. In some cases it was even worse than placebo.
I would happily bet an amount of money that mattered to me that this result would fail to be replicated in a randomized, placebo-controlled study."
A closed problem has definable limits. For example, I struggle to see how an AI system would accurately render assistance as a psychologist; a field in which I feel we barely understand ourselves.
Then there is the simple bodies we can give them. A nurses work is varied but still well defined and considered closed. But do we have a body for the AI system to do that job and it's many tasks, as quickly and cheaply as a human employee?