Exclusion from prohibition is the same as permission. Maybe not as much an endorsement as a bill ordering taxpayers to buy the killer robots for police, but the lawmakers made their intent clear so a judge will not prosecute police for killing you from a mile away.
The majority of voters are on welfare, the "get out the vote" message of the socialist party pretends to be neutral, but is really about pushing democracy to failure.
why now? It's because of the elite's organized importation of people from the 3rd world, and the need to suppress the native peoples' defense. Convenient to say that blacks and Jews need to be protected when they are irrelevant
You aren't understanding that governments are pressuring the advertisers because they want certain political speech censored. The governments don't have the legal authority to control people's thoughts, especially people in other countries, but government's regulation of business allows it to control all mass communication. And the demonetization is just one step, they are also threatening to fine Youtube if certain videos aren't removed
someone who denies the obvious sounds like a paid globalist troll, the function key bit is a nice touch since that's probably how you started your career before moving on more sophisticated tools
banks and governments do not accept BitCoin as a way to cover debts and obligations
no different than them not accepting foreign currency, you simply have to exchange it, and of course if it comes down to it they will of course take Bitcoin to settle debts, if they can find them
the government could of course skim off Bitcoin just like from any paycheck, the "tax" Bitcoin avoids is currency devaluation, which is partial enslavement since you are working for less than was agreed
Not that much of a stretch with some schools already over a quarter million. The Fed is pushing inflation towards 3%, and that alone will "stimulate" the bill over $400k
And what is the purpose of this technical solution anyway? Police see an online ad but can't find the location of the "trafficked girl"...when all they'd need to do is call and ask!
Siskel and Ebert each used a thumb, don't know what they did with the other two, but it wasn't a binary verdict. If ratings skew high this change means more of Netflix's content will have the highest rating, which of course is in their interest, though this seems really about eliminating public ratings, in which case 5 or 10 star private rating scales would have provided more precision at least for some users, but apparently the data shows that their customers find it too mentally challenging or that the catalogue has become to thin for detailed ratings to be relevant.
Except all the financial fraud done over the internet which is barely investigated. Organized crime is boring, but if a trivial incident makes the news then a prosecutor hits pause on his porn player and files charges.
more or less risk than self-colonization with thousands of fundamentalists from Islamic State? Apparently your grandparents were misguided, because there are no countries anymore, just a world government ruling over a rabble of slaves, and with no power comes no responsibility
Those who aren't good enough should to be weeded out, the marketing might not amount to fraud, but padding enrollment to get more tax funding should carry a prison term.
Slashdot Mirror
Almost all of the debt is from customer financing, and is therefore basically an asset, though maybe you can question the quality
you'd probably end up paying more than repaying in kind, like $20 for a Netflix disc
Exclusion from prohibition is the same as permission. Maybe not as much an endorsement as a bill ordering taxpayers to buy the killer robots for police, but the lawmakers made their intent clear so a judge will not prosecute police for killing you from a mile away.
You should start by being honest. It's about telling people who don't pay taxes that they can get away with taking from those who do.
The majority of voters are on welfare, the "get out the vote" message of the socialist party pretends to be neutral, but is really about pushing democracy to failure.
What do you think Jesus was doing on the cross?
I'm guessing you get income from taxes, and actually have a negative tax rate.
Advertisers don't care, even Hitler bought stuff. They don't want their business being interfered with by government and activists
why now? It's because of the elite's organized importation of people from the 3rd world, and the need to suppress the native peoples' defense. Convenient to say that blacks and Jews need to be protected when they are irrelevant
You aren't understanding that governments are pressuring the advertisers because they want certain political speech censored. The governments don't have the legal authority to control people's thoughts, especially people in other countries, but government's regulation of business allows it to control all mass communication. And the demonetization is just one step, they are also threatening to fine Youtube if certain videos aren't removed
It's OK because really only dudes working that scam. Pay gap!
someone who denies the obvious sounds like a paid globalist troll, the function key bit is a nice touch since that's probably how you started your career before moving on more sophisticated tools
newspaper is more like a personal blog, twitter pretends to be communications platform open to the general public
banks and governments do not accept BitCoin as a way to cover debts and obligations
no different than them not accepting foreign currency, you simply have to exchange it, and of course if it comes down to it they will of course take Bitcoin to settle debts, if they can find them
the government could of course skim off Bitcoin just like from any paycheck, the "tax" Bitcoin avoids is currency devaluation, which is partial enslavement since you are working for less than was agreed
As a Maoist conservative, if there isn't a candidate conservative enough, you vote liberal socialist. Not very interesting
Not that much of a stretch with some schools already over a quarter million. The Fed is pushing inflation towards 3%, and that alone will "stimulate" the bill over $400k
gravy train for the app creator, cops, "taskforce", "non-profits"...pimpin' ain't that hard
And what is the purpose of this technical solution anyway? Police see an online ad but can't find the location of the "trafficked girl"...when all they'd need to do is call and ask!
Siskel and Ebert each used a thumb, don't know what they did with the other two, but it wasn't a binary verdict. If ratings skew high this change means more of Netflix's content will have the highest rating, which of course is in their interest, though this seems really about eliminating public ratings, in which case 5 or 10 star private rating scales would have provided more precision at least for some users, but apparently the data shows that their customers find it too mentally challenging or that the catalogue has become to thin for detailed ratings to be relevant.
Except all the financial fraud done over the internet which is barely investigated. Organized crime is boring, but if a trivial incident makes the news then a prosecutor hits pause on his porn player and files charges.
more or less risk than self-colonization with thousands of fundamentalists from Islamic State? Apparently your grandparents were misguided, because there are no countries anymore, just a world government ruling over a rabble of slaves, and with no power comes no responsibility
That's like being "center-right" in the USSR, and indeed Merkel was active in the East German Communist Party and is fluent in Soviet Russian.
Zuckerberg only has a problem with censorship if competitors are legally able to host free speech and real news
Those who aren't good enough should to be weeded out, the marketing might not amount to fraud, but padding enrollment to get more tax funding should carry a prison term.