Just hope it doesn't end up costing more than a proprietary power supply, especially since you'll most likely only be able to use it with one device at a time.
When you move from one home to the next, as you are packing, if you come across a carton that came from the previous residence but has never been opened, save yourself time, and throw away the carton without even opening it. Use a modified version of that rule. Dont upload any song you have not listened to in the last 3 years. Use the find command with -atime modifier to find the songs that have been accessed in the last 3 years.
Yeah, because if you haven't looked at your grandparents' wedding pictures in the last 3 years, or in the last 3 years you haven't worn those baby booties that your great aunt knitted for you when you were born, you probably don't need them anymore.
Come on, I've got albums that I haven't listened to in 10 years because I played them so much I got tired of them, but that doesn't mean I need to get rid of them.
The government is not required to provide software for you to do your taxes,
Taxes are actually a good analogy... If the gov decides there is a tax problem, they will make you come up with all the receipts to backup your claims on your tax return. Technically, if they suspected there were illegal copies of a song on your computer, they could ask to see the physical disc or a receipt where you ordered the track. However, the problem is that you are allowed one legal backup of anything you've purchased. So if I bought the latest Gaga CD (lol), ripped it to my comp, but my physical disc was destroyed when my car caught fire, I've still got a copy of it on my computer though I have no physical copy (which is exactly the kind of circumstances a backup copy is intended for). But at the same time, I can't produce proof that I own it.
What user information is that, exactly? Apple will only have a list of what songs you have (it's not illegal to have a song)
Yeah, but Apple doesn't have to prove the songs are illegal. The whole point of the program is the assumption that you are replacing illegally obtained songs with good, clean songs. Just by signing up you are admitting guilt. So the user information would be names and contact information, a list of illegal songs you used their service to replace, and admission of guilt in the form of the TOS of the program you signed up for. All of the lawyers' work is done for them.
If you're homeless, you probably qualify for Medicaid.
Being homeless specifically DISQUALIFIES you for Medicaid, food stamps, or any other kind of benefits because you have to have a mailing address where they can reach you to be able to qualify. And to verify that you do, they will send you a letter to that address and if you don't respond, they cut whatever you are getting.
An awful lot of people are throwing around things like "probably", or "I've heard", but it's obvious from the majority of these comments that people are busy talking about something that they have no experience with nor have done any research about beyond things they've "heard".
So there absolutely is a cost to allowing usage to climb with no limit and no increased price.
But the cable companies now are making HUGE profits on the majority of users who are paying anywhere from $29 to $49 per month but are only using 500 megs per month in service. For every Joe Blow who's downloading 200 gigs per month you've got 100 Grandma Jones' using way less than a gig downloading family pictures through e-mail.
The problem isn't that workers don't know the patients are sick. That's why a person is in a nursing home in the first place, because they have something wrong with them that makes it impossible to care for themselves. The problem is that workers in some of these places get complacent, and let the elderly lie in one spot for days at a time until they get bed sores, or let them lay in their own excrement, or make them suffer in other ways just because it's too inconvenient to fulfill their needs. Unfortunately neither this technology nor any other is going to fix that.
Isn't this like a family putting up a reward for a lost dog, THEY find the dog, and then you go in their back yard and say "hey, here's your dog, I want the money"?
I guess iCloud Communications should be introduced to the USPTO. I did a quick search on the trademark iCloud and came up with 12 filed by Apple and one owned by Xcerion AB CORPORATION SWEDEN (registered in 2010). If you want to protect a trademark then register it.
You don't have to trademark it, you just have to prove you used it first. It's the same thing with copyrights.
What they NEED to do in ALL theaters is install RF shielding in the walls and ceiling to make cell phones useless. That way all this is never a problem. Holy shit, you would think there was never a time when parents or employees or whatever actually went somewhere and didn't have access to a cell phone. Worried about your kids? Go out to the lobby and use a cell phone to call home and check on them.
The proof is that if you look around you, there are people dying left and right from brain tumors, which the cell phones cause, since the majority of people (in "civilized" cultures) use cell phones. Right?
What? People AREN'T dropping left and right with brain tumors?
Studies that ask people with brain cancers "How much did you use your phone?" are pretty much all they had, and they seem to be the definition of "Confirmation Bias."
Exactly, and if they had asked 10,000 people with colon cancer how much they used THEIR cell phones, the answer would have probably been "all the time". ANYTHING in the environment could be causing brain tumors: TV use, microwave use, silk pillowcases, dandruff shampoo...
As I walk and drive around town, I see everyone using cell phones. I use one, all my family and friends use them. So why aren't people dropping dead left and right from brain tumors?
There's no big mystery as to why immigrants would turn to hamburgers. They are quick, cheap, and taste damn good. Mystery solved.
Sometimes it's just not necessary to read more into something than is really there.
Slashdot Mirror
Just hope it doesn't end up costing more than a proprietary power supply, especially since you'll most likely only be able to use it with one device at a time.
Yes, but you are forgetting the flip side: piss him off and you will pay. I wouldn't hire him no matter how desperate I was.
Yeah, but that's a chance you take with ANY IT manager. Regardless of technical knowledge, they are all human beings.
When you move from one home to the next, as you are packing, if you come across a carton that came from the previous residence but has never been opened, save yourself time, and throw away the carton without even opening it. Use a modified version of that rule. Dont upload any song you have not listened to in the last 3 years. Use the find command with -atime modifier to find the songs that have been accessed in the last 3 years.
Yeah, because if you haven't looked at your grandparents' wedding pictures in the last 3 years, or in the last 3 years you haven't worn those baby booties that your great aunt knitted for you when you were born, you probably don't need them anymore. Come on, I've got albums that I haven't listened to in 10 years because I played them so much I got tired of them, but that doesn't mean I need to get rid of them.
The government is not required to provide software for you to do your taxes,
Taxes are actually a good analogy... If the gov decides there is a tax problem, they will make you come up with all the receipts to backup your claims on your tax return. Technically, if they suspected there were illegal copies of a song on your computer, they could ask to see the physical disc or a receipt where you ordered the track. However, the problem is that you are allowed one legal backup of anything you've purchased. So if I bought the latest Gaga CD (lol), ripped it to my comp, but my physical disc was destroyed when my car caught fire, I've still got a copy of it on my computer though I have no physical copy (which is exactly the kind of circumstances a backup copy is intended for). But at the same time, I can't produce proof that I own it.
So just like that you want to kill off Wendy's $0.99 menu?
No, but unfortunately the value is about the same.
What user information is that, exactly? Apple will only have a list of what songs you have (it's not illegal to have a song)
Yeah, but Apple doesn't have to prove the songs are illegal. The whole point of the program is the assumption that you are replacing illegally obtained songs with good, clean songs. Just by signing up you are admitting guilt. So the user information would be names and contact information, a list of illegal songs you used their service to replace, and admission of guilt in the form of the TOS of the program you signed up for. All of the lawyers' work is done for them.
If you're homeless, you probably qualify for Medicaid.
Being homeless specifically DISQUALIFIES you for Medicaid, food stamps, or any other kind of benefits because you have to have a mailing address where they can reach you to be able to qualify. And to verify that you do, they will send you a letter to that address and if you don't respond, they cut whatever you are getting.
An awful lot of people are throwing around things like "probably", or "I've heard", but it's obvious from the majority of these comments that people are busy talking about something that they have no experience with nor have done any research about beyond things they've "heard".
So there absolutely is a cost to allowing usage to climb with no limit and no increased price.
But the cable companies now are making HUGE profits on the majority of users who are paying anywhere from $29 to $49 per month but are only using 500 megs per month in service. For every Joe Blow who's downloading 200 gigs per month you've got 100 Grandma Jones' using way less than a gig downloading family pictures through e-mail.
And apparently I didn't read the article close enough to realize they are talking about people in their homes.
The problem isn't that workers don't know the patients are sick. That's why a person is in a nursing home in the first place, because they have something wrong with them that makes it impossible to care for themselves. The problem is that workers in some of these places get complacent, and let the elderly lie in one spot for days at a time until they get bed sores, or let them lay in their own excrement, or make them suffer in other ways just because it's too inconvenient to fulfill their needs. Unfortunately neither this technology nor any other is going to fix that.
Isn't this like a family putting up a reward for a lost dog, THEY find the dog, and then you go in their back yard and say "hey, here's your dog, I want the money"?
Exactly. Plus, what would he get the money for doing? Capturing him? He's already been captured. Killing him? He's already dead.
I guess iCloud Communications should be introduced to the USPTO. I did a quick search on the trademark iCloud and came up with 12 filed by Apple and one owned by Xcerion AB CORPORATION SWEDEN (registered in 2010). If you want to protect a trademark then register it.
You don't have to trademark it, you just have to prove you used it first. It's the same thing with copyrights.
The Beatles company was Apple Records, a subsidiary of Apple Corps. They never had or were affiliated with a company called Apple Music.
What they NEED to do in ALL theaters is install RF shielding in the walls and ceiling to make cell phones useless. That way all this is never a problem. Holy shit, you would think there was never a time when parents or employees or whatever actually went somewhere and didn't have access to a cell phone. Worried about your kids? Go out to the lobby and use a cell phone to call home and check on them.
The problem is that FF will eat up the new RAM you put in, too. I don't personally mind it, though. That's why I still use Windows ME.
I just wonder since when the Lagrange points constitute "deep space". I thought deep space started around the edge of the solar system or something.
What? People AREN'T dropping left and right with brain tumors?
Studies that ask people with brain cancers "How much did you use your phone?" are pretty much all they had, and they seem to be the definition of "Confirmation Bias."
Exactly, and if they had asked 10,000 people with colon cancer how much they used THEIR cell phones, the answer would have probably been "all the time". ANYTHING in the environment could be causing brain tumors: TV use, microwave use, silk pillowcases, dandruff shampoo... As I walk and drive around town, I see everyone using cell phones. I use one, all my family and friends use them. So why aren't people dropping dead left and right from brain tumors?
Sounds more like a bunch of assholes than a group of terrorists.
Destroying a potato field... WHAT'S NEXT??? This is just more evidence of how badly we need the Patriot Act.
There's no big mystery as to why immigrants would turn to hamburgers. They are quick, cheap, and taste damn good. Mystery solved. Sometimes it's just not necessary to read more into something than is really there.
Your abusive attitude negates any valid points you may have made.
Think you'll get a command shell on that shiny new ChromeOS computer?
Yes, I do think that, because I've used ChromeOS, and it had a fully functional terminal.
I think what he's asking is do you think a command shell is ALL you will have, or will it be a GUI just like Windows?