I ran into a similar issue in the days before computers existed. We had an awful local recession with a really absurd lack of available jobs with numerous employers shutting down. Everywhere I applied I got the answer that I would not be hired as I had skills and would quit as soon as jobs opened back up again. Oddly those with zero skills were in better shape as there were jobs designed for them all over the local landscape.
After I had had enough suffering with patch work and get by situations I went and started my own company. Although I worked way too hard and way too many hours I actually earned a lot of money. That was right before the IRS tried to end my financial existence.
My advice is to start your own outfit and use a very,very good CPA constantly as you go. Having a good lawyer at hand also tends to help. My lawyers were more than a little bet useful as they managed to turn no pays into paying customers rather quickly.
Perhaps that reflects the personage of a certain republican jerk named Gaimbrige. I assume the Newt name is in reference to his testicals failing to develop or perhaps refer to his obvious castration.
Why would anyone name a kid with a name that sounds like a slimy lizard that lives under rocks in creeks? Maybe even his parents loathed him.
The latest Ubuntu 10.X is so good it is scary. Why anyone wants to run a Windows machine is really beyond my understanding. Do yourself a huge favor and climb off the Microsoft teat.
I can see dumping premium content but I still need cable to get high speed downloads. I like to watch shows in real time and not sit around waiting for them to down load.
Put them on notice that you will no longer bring personal machines to work and that your machines ay home will not ever be used for work purposes or to check your work email accounts. If they wish you to have a laptop or machine for work at home they may feel free to purchase them for you and install whatever software they see fit. Perhaps you should not work at home at all.
Laws that allow the finding and punishment of crooks are good for all of us. Let's hope that the agencies involved get enough manpower to really get the job done.
They should be. SCO has to have the dumbest management of all times. They are just clueless and wasting more and more money in a law suit that never had any hope of success.
Simply ask each potential employee what OS they use at home. If they respond that it is a Windows OS do not hire them. If they use IE at home take them out back and put them out of their stupidity.
In order to be a nation every nation must control its borders. In the case of the US it is more than blatantly obvious that the majority of people in Mexico, Central and South America as well as numerous nations far away all would like to immigrate to the US. If we do not lock down our borders we risk being totally over run with immigrants. Pakistan and India alone would destroy us if we did not keep control of immigration.
I don't think it is a big deal at all for people to carry a wallet with either a driver's license or state ID which enables law enforcement to easily verify their status. And raiding businesses that hire illegal immigrants should result in the seizure of the businesses. If law enforcement does its job we will have no illegal immigrants at all in America.
A missile tracking in on an aircraft carrier will meet defensive systems instantly. The military is constantly on guard for such attacks. The greater hazard would be to commercial aircraft or buildings or even ships such as oil tankers.
It would be sort of nice if your own defense department created a grade B missile that was very cheap to make and use. After all a gifted fellow has hand built this type of missile very cheaply and that is what we really need. Unless a missile is carrying a nuclear device or something far more destructive than conventional explosives the band for the buck when delivered does not justify using the device.
Yes, Open Source and free software do cross more lines than many people suspect. They also cross lines that the wrong people suspect. Oddly the same issue exists with Christianity in some areas. Communism vs. capitalism is a dangerous and non productive battle. Many powerful people do not separate communism from socialism in their thoughts. If Open Source is perceived as socialist then there is actually a certain danger attached. In South America there has been an ongoing slaughter of religious leaders as the powerful perceive Christianity as a danger to their wealth. Perhaps many people who support Open Source consider it more of a social justice action than having anything to do with socialism. But at the end of the day you can bet your last penny that governments take an intense and covert interest in Open Source to continuously assess whether or not it is a threat. And you can bet that big companies such as Microsoft push governments to restrict Open Source.
For my two cents I would like to see computing move further beyond the constraints of businesses and governments. I do not want every aspect of my existence welded to the almighty dollar or the rule of law.
Why give the states more money when they give so little to the public? Make it clear to government at all levels that the people are willing to pay taxes only if they get wonderful benefits in return. Lousy schools, limited health and welfare and streets filled with crime and danger are not signs of money well used by government.
Although I support the wonderful Catholic church and praise the good work that they do it is not unusual for a pope to be off track. Keeping things real does not in any way diminish the Gospel or the joy of Jesus Christ. If anything having the strength to keep faith when we know the truth about others and institutions around us is simply a test for believers. Transparency simply allows light to shine into dark corners. That is something that Christ would be proud of us doing.
Does Mass. suppose that the entire nation or the entire world must comply with such a law? Or does this only apply to those who store data inside Mass.?
Further, do the rights of people within Mass. not equal the rights of people who live outside of Mass.? Or will this devolve into the old dry county types of laws in which a commercial airliner must be wary of whether a county underneath them allows serving of drinks even though they are flying at 600 mph.?
Sometimes there is no difference between the simple truth and what you call psychological violence. When a person faces nothing but grim days, poverty, pain,abuse and disease recommending suicide should not be called a crime. There are some people in such rotten conditions that they really need to die. Pointing that out to them is not always a hostile act. I'm not sure that the law should ever get involved in such an issue.
There were some studies years ago about round rooms and employees going psychotic. Humans seem to need corners and barriers. I would suggest a large square or rectangular table. Also when you use a round table over weight employees tend to be pushed back as the position causes them to be stabbed in the gut. Perhaps a square with an opening in the center for cables to drop down and lines to feed in might be best.
It is a false argument. A law requiring a two thirds vote is entirely different than a law requiring a.66 per cent vote. Solve it as it is written. Multiply the fraction two thirds times 206 and one gets the only correct answer 137.33 votes.Frankly I'm shocked that almost everyone didn't see the real issue.
It really makes me wonder if overzealous nuts in the Bush regime could have caused anthrax to be let lose to justify our military actions. I have no trust at all after things like WaterGate and the arms for drugs crap that went on under republican administrations.
Robots can also accomplish quite complicated tasks as well. I've built robots that could change the tools and fixtures that they depend upon and cross feed conveyors which were also robots of a sort. When these units have computerised saws, lathes and mills as well as doing assembly the only issue is economic viability due to the skilled employees needed to modify and service the systems. But a wide variety of product can be quickly produced. In essence this is the American approach to robotics in industry. Japan placed its bet on using lots and lots of very simple robots to produce a product. In some ways the Japanese method works out better so far. But that will change as the technology improves.
It is sad that workers must live like that but I suspect that in China these folks are probably thrilled with that job.We simply need an economy that reflects reality in every nation. Unions can be a huge help in breaking up sweat shops. Perhaps all profits earned by scab employers should be seized and donated to the poor.
Slashdot Mirror
I ran into a similar issue in the days before computers existed. We had an awful local recession with a really absurd lack of available jobs with numerous employers shutting down. Everywhere I applied I got the answer that I would not be hired as I had skills and would quit as soon as jobs opened back up again. Oddly those with zero skills were in better shape as there were jobs designed for them all over the local landscape.
After I had had enough suffering with patch work and get by situations I went and started my own company. Although I worked way too hard and way too many hours I actually earned a lot of money. That was right before the IRS tried to end my financial existence.
My advice is to start your own outfit and use a very,very good CPA constantly as you go. Having a good lawyer at hand also tends to help. My lawyers were more than a little bet useful as they managed to turn no pays into paying customers rather quickly.
Perhaps that reflects the personage of a certain republican jerk named Gaimbrige. I assume the Newt name is in reference to his testicals failing to develop or perhaps refer to his obvious castration.
Why would anyone name a kid with a name that sounds like a slimy lizard that lives under rocks in creeks? Maybe even his parents loathed him.
The latest Ubuntu 10.X is so good it is scary. Why anyone wants to run a Windows machine is really beyond my understanding. Do yourself a huge favor and climb off the Microsoft teat.
I can see dumping premium content but I still need cable to get high speed downloads. I like to watch shows in real time and not sit around waiting for them to down load.
Put them on notice that you will no longer bring personal machines to work and that your machines ay home will not ever be used for work purposes or to check your work email accounts. If they wish you to have a laptop or machine for work at home they may feel free to purchase them for you and install whatever software they see fit. Perhaps you should not work at home at all.
Laws that allow the finding and punishment of crooks are good for all of us. Let's hope that the agencies involved get enough manpower to really get the job done.
They should be. SCO has to have the dumbest management of all times. They are just clueless and wasting more and more money in a law suit that never had any hope of success.
Simply ask each potential employee what OS they use at home. If they respond that it is a Windows OS do not hire them. If they use IE at home take them out back and put them out of their stupidity.
In order to be a nation every nation must control its borders. In the case of the US it is more than blatantly obvious that the majority of people in Mexico, Central and South America as well as numerous nations far away all would like to immigrate to the US. If we do not lock down our borders we risk being totally over run with immigrants. Pakistan and India alone would destroy us if we did not keep control of immigration.
I don't think it is a big deal at all for people to carry a wallet with either a driver's license or state ID which enables law enforcement to easily verify their status. And raiding businesses that hire illegal immigrants should result in the seizure of the businesses. If law enforcement does its job we will have no illegal immigrants at all in America.
A missile tracking in on an aircraft carrier will meet defensive systems instantly. The military is constantly on guard for such attacks. The greater hazard would be to commercial aircraft or buildings or even ships such as oil tankers.
It would be sort of nice if your own defense department created a grade B missile that was very cheap to make and use. After all a gifted fellow has hand built this type of missile very cheaply and that is what we really need. Unless a missile is carrying a nuclear device or something far more destructive than conventional explosives the band for the buck when delivered does not justify using the device.
Yes, Open Source and free software do cross more lines than many people suspect. They also cross lines that the wrong people suspect. Oddly the same issue exists with Christianity in some areas. Communism vs. capitalism is a dangerous and non productive battle. Many powerful people do not separate communism from socialism in their thoughts. If Open Source is perceived as socialist then there is actually a certain danger attached. In South America there has been an ongoing slaughter of religious leaders as the powerful perceive Christianity as a danger to their wealth. Perhaps many people who support Open Source consider it more of a social justice action than having anything to do with socialism. But at the end of the day you can bet your last penny that governments take an intense and covert interest in Open Source to continuously assess whether or not it is a threat. And you can bet that big companies such as Microsoft push governments to restrict Open Source.
For my two cents I would like to see computing move further beyond the constraints of businesses and governments. I do not want every aspect of my existence welded to the almighty dollar or the rule of law.
Why give the states more money when they give so little to the public? Make it clear to government at all levels that the people are willing to pay taxes only if they get wonderful benefits in return. Lousy schools, limited health and welfare and streets filled with crime and danger are not signs of money well used by government.
Although I support the wonderful Catholic church and praise the good work that they do it is not unusual for a pope to be off track. Keeping things real does not in any way diminish the Gospel or the joy of Jesus Christ. If anything having the strength to keep faith when we know the truth about others and institutions around us is simply a test for believers. Transparency simply allows light to shine into dark corners. That is something that Christ would be proud of us doing.
Does Mass. suppose that the entire nation or the entire world must comply with such a law? Or does this only apply to those who store data inside Mass.?
Further, do the rights of people within Mass. not equal the rights of people who live outside of Mass.? Or will this devolve into the old dry county types of laws in which a commercial airliner must be wary of whether a county underneath them allows serving of drinks even though they are flying at 600 mph.?
Sometimes there is no difference between the simple truth and what you call psychological violence. When a person faces nothing but grim days, poverty, pain,abuse and disease recommending suicide should not be called a crime. There are some people in such rotten conditions that they really need to die. Pointing that out to them is not always a hostile act. I'm not sure that the law should ever get involved in such an issue.
There were some studies years ago about round rooms and employees going psychotic. Humans seem to need corners and barriers. I would suggest a large square or rectangular table. Also when you use a round table over weight employees tend to be pushed back as the position causes them to be stabbed in the gut. Perhaps a square with an opening in the center for cables to drop down and lines to feed in might be best.
There was this big boobed lady in a string bikini and my car just...........
You could not pay me enough money to buy a child!
It is a false argument. A law requiring a two thirds vote is entirely different than a law requiring a .66 per cent vote. Solve it as it is written. Multiply the fraction two thirds times 206 and one gets the only correct answer 137.33 votes.Frankly I'm shocked that almost everyone didn't see the real issue.
It really makes me wonder if overzealous nuts in the Bush regime could have caused anthrax to be let lose to justify our military actions. I have no trust at all after things like WaterGate and the arms for drugs crap that went on under republican administrations.
Why would anyone want to be stuck with FAT? There are several great file systems in use these days.
Robots can also accomplish quite complicated tasks as well. I've built robots that could change the tools and fixtures that they depend upon and cross feed conveyors which were also robots of a sort. When these units have computerised saws, lathes and mills as well as doing assembly the only issue is economic viability due to the skilled employees needed to modify and service the systems. But a wide variety of product can be quickly produced. In essence this is the American approach to robotics in industry. Japan placed its bet on using lots and lots of very simple robots to produce a product. In some ways the Japanese method works out better so far. But that will change as the technology improves.
It is sad that workers must live like that but I suspect that in China these folks are probably thrilled with that job.We simply need an economy that reflects reality in every nation. Unions can be a huge help in breaking up sweat shops. Perhaps all profits earned by scab employers should be seized and donated to the poor.
I see no reason why Mohammed should not be portrayed as a complete ass hole.
Mint might be the distro you seek.