Actually that's Fox Sports Net broadcasters Randy Hahn and Drew Remenda to the uncultured swine of Colorado. And the Avs wouldn't be nearly as close as they are if referees could actually call interference these days.
Too bad I need to root for the sharks now that Phila keeps sucking ass.
By 12 kids should know, or at least be tought that not everyone in the world is a wonderful nice person like in the movies. Sure bad things can happen if they're thrown right into the rawest, most honest form of communication without considering the possibilities of deceit and general evilness.
Why? Why should companies reconsider something that is commonly accepted and promotes working (via morale improvements and efficiency of workers because they don't have to download/find songs)?
Yes. It's illegal. Yes. Artists deserve paid. But nearly everyone sees music at work as a good thing(tm), and more selection of music is a good thing(tm). Eventually people will try their damnedest to make good things(tm) the common thing(tm).
It's not even security as an application poking its head where it does not belong. Is there any good/common reason for flash to do anything with anyone's webcam/microphone? I think not.
Though I also think it's reasonable to at least muse the posibility that this was all just setup by the X10 camera people to setup a world wide voyeur web =]
Seriously. Sure there is a ton of communicative trash on the internet. There's a bunch of lamers on the internet. There's plenty of illegal/immoral/inhuman things on the internet. Most people suck. Get used to it.
One of the things I loved about IRC for example was that this was true. Sure it meant there was tons of human waste I had to deal with, but it also meant the good people where honestly good, since there was nothing beyond themselves to "make" them good.
How about the (soon to be movie) Hulk? He always seemed to be the prototypical super hero for stereotypical pimplyfaced teens. The Hulk was someone that kids could easily relate to as he centered around the base emotion of anger. Everyone knows anger.
I dunno. Reading the reviews on imdb they are all very positive, and all bring up the same/similar points. The user reviews there it seems to me give a good indication of differing people's tastes and are pretty genuine.
It bodes very well as it is quite rare for movies to get unanimously good reviews there.
Come now. Unix suffers from the same problems. Remember when the one compression lib had problems a month or so ago? Tons of stuff was affected. The only benefit *nix has on that point is that those sort of things seem to have *much* better coders working on them than the actual applications.
Immagine if glibc had a buffer overflow in it... How many services/applications would be vulnerable then? If the GNOME libs, or a font renderer had the same problems?
Microsoft uses much more object oriented versions of the shared libraries, and thus it *does* take a bit longer to track down the actual source of the problem, and make sure the fix doesn't break alot more; but that's also what's allowed them to do alot of the things that sells windows (common user interface, good cut/paste)
Look, we have in the past emailed/written/called Boucher to say "yay, good job". Why not now call to say "hey, this sucks. we should be able to sue for privacy violations, and we should have to opt in for this shit."
Actually I think that the majority of slashdot is of the opinion that the current "lack of rights" of minors is already too much, and if anything minors should be given more rights (since we already burdened them with more responsibility) not vice versa.
Furthermore it is patently false that disallowing porn, gore, and obscenity for children prevents the corruption that their immaginations can create anyways (though don't worry, America is working hard on removing immagination too)
Yeah, like the stories of the PKZIP guy, and the maker of MULE. Very interesting people, like probably all of the people who create groundbreaking work.
Perhaps the judge merely meant/intended by law that games should not explicitly get free speech protection just because they are games. The 4 games listed are pretty thin on plot, storyline and certain types of artistry. The artistry that is shown isn't speech so much as trademarkable/copyrightable "feel" and characters.
He also might believe simply that the speech of games is irrelevant to *his case*. After all, people are free to film porn, but are not free to display it on network TV (in america) or even sell it to minors (in america).
IMO I hope this is struck down with great prejudice by higher courts, as IMO the above mentioned limiting vs minors does as much harm as help and it would be foolish to carry that to more genres.
What are your views, as they pertain to *nix in the mainstream, of OS X? Does it hurt or help Linux's chance in the area, or allow Linux to perhaps concentrate on server side areas?
Actually I think that salaries are dropping just because a bunch of people woke up, moved out of the valley where they don't need $75k just to afford a studio apt!
As for MCSE's: I am a windows admin by trade. I've interviewed everyone coming into IT since my hire (except for my boss of course, who was just let go). Ironically enough, every MCSE that we've interviewed, we've not hired (except for my boss, who was just let go). They generally understand how to do things (think procedurally) not how things work (think reason-based).
Simply put: people that can only think procedurally, and do not understand *how things work* do not make good sysadmins. The problem with windows, is it's very hard to find out how things work. Even then it's a pretty vague understanding, and spotty because of Microsoft's kludges and tinkering.
This is why there are few good windows admins, and even then they will never be as good as the best *nix admin. [This is also why I've got 3 BSD machines at home, and also admin 2 solaris boxen at work]
I don't think people question HP's Linux committment, I think people question what sort of management would do something that (from the outside, and being uninformed) appears to be ripe with headaches, inefficiencies, and cost for very little (relative) gain.
I hope that's merely perception and not truth, though there's little history or proof to show otherwise.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually that's Fox Sports Net broadcasters Randy Hahn and Drew Remenda to the uncultured swine of Colorado. And the Avs wouldn't be nearly as close as they are if referees could actually call interference these days.
Too bad I need to root for the sharks now that Phila keeps sucking ass.
By 12 kids should know, or at least be tought that not everyone in the world is a wonderful nice person like in the movies. Sure bad things can happen if they're thrown right into the rawest, most honest form of communication without considering the possibilities of deceit and general evilness.
Why? Why should companies reconsider something that is commonly accepted and promotes working (via morale improvements and efficiency of workers because they don't have to download/find songs)?
Yes. It's illegal. Yes. Artists deserve paid. But nearly everyone sees music at work as a good thing(tm), and more selection of music is a good thing(tm). Eventually people will try their damnedest to make good things(tm) the common thing(tm).
It's not even security as an application poking its head where it does not belong. Is there any good/common reason for flash to do anything with anyone's webcam/microphone? I think not.
Though I also think it's reasonable to at least muse the posibility that this was all just setup by the X10 camera people to setup a world wide voyeur web =]
Note that due to the time distorting effects of the high density, it may be impossible to slow the things down =]
Seriously. Sure there is a ton of communicative trash on the internet. There's a bunch of lamers on the internet. There's plenty of illegal/immoral/inhuman things on the internet. Most people suck. Get used to it.
One of the things I loved about IRC for example was that this was true. Sure it meant there was tons of human waste I had to deal with, but it also meant the good people where honestly good, since there was nothing beyond themselves to "make" them good.
How about the (soon to be movie) Hulk? He always seemed to be the prototypical super hero for stereotypical pimplyfaced teens. The Hulk was someone that kids could easily relate to as he centered around the base emotion of anger. Everyone knows anger.
I dunno. Reading the reviews on imdb they are all very positive, and all bring up the same/similar points. The user reviews there it seems to me give a good indication of differing people's tastes and are pretty genuine.
It bodes very well as it is quite rare for movies to get unanimously good reviews there.
Apparently the story is about a slashdotted webserver...
Come now. Unix suffers from the same problems. Remember when the one compression lib had problems a month or so ago? Tons of stuff was affected. The only benefit *nix has on that point is that those sort of things seem to have *much* better coders working on them than the actual applications.
Immagine if glibc had a buffer overflow in it... How many services/applications would be vulnerable then? If the GNOME libs, or a font renderer had the same problems?
Microsoft uses much more object oriented versions of the shared libraries, and thus it *does* take a bit longer to track down the actual source of the problem, and make sure the fix doesn't break alot more; but that's also what's allowed them to do alot of the things that sells windows (common user interface, good cut/paste)
Look, we have in the past emailed/written/called Boucher to say "yay, good job". Why not now call to say "hey, this sucks. we should be able to sue for privacy violations, and we should have to opt in for this shit."
Actually I think that the majority of slashdot is of the opinion that the current "lack of rights" of minors is already too much, and if anything minors should be given more rights (since we already burdened them with more responsibility) not vice versa.
Furthermore it is patently false that disallowing porn, gore, and obscenity for children prevents the corruption that their immaginations can create anyways (though don't worry, America is working hard on removing immagination too)
Apparently she can take more of it Cap'n!
Yeah, like the stories of the PKZIP guy, and the maker of MULE. Very interesting people, like probably all of the people who create groundbreaking work.
Perhaps the judge merely meant/intended by law that games should not explicitly get free speech protection just because they are games. The 4 games listed are pretty thin on plot, storyline and certain types of artistry. The artistry that is shown isn't speech so much as trademarkable/copyrightable "feel" and characters.
He also might believe simply that the speech of games is irrelevant to *his case*. After all, people are free to film porn, but are not free to display it on network TV (in america) or even sell it to minors (in america).
IMO I hope this is struck down with great prejudice by higher courts, as IMO the above mentioned limiting vs minors does as much harm as help and it would be foolish to carry that to more genres.
Yes. *duh*
A more interesting question I think would be:
What are your views, as they pertain to *nix in the mainstream, of OS X? Does it hurt or help Linux's chance in the area, or allow Linux to perhaps concentrate on server side areas?
Actually I think that salaries are dropping just because a bunch of people woke up, moved out of the valley where they don't need $75k just to afford a studio apt!
As for MCSE's: I am a windows admin by trade. I've interviewed everyone coming into IT since my hire (except for my boss of course, who was just let go). Ironically enough, every MCSE that we've interviewed, we've not hired (except for my boss, who was just let go). They generally understand how to do things (think procedurally) not how things work (think reason-based).
Simply put: people that can only think procedurally, and do not understand *how things work* do not make good sysadmins. The problem with windows, is it's very hard to find out how things work. Even then it's a pretty vague understanding, and spotty because of Microsoft's kludges and tinkering.
This is why there are few good windows admins, and even then they will never be as good as the best *nix admin. [This is also why I've got 3 BSD machines at home, and also admin 2 solaris boxen at work]
My appologies for being the cynic:
I don't think people question HP's Linux committment, I think people question what sort of management would do something that (from the outside, and being uninformed) appears to be ripe with headaches, inefficiencies, and cost for very little (relative) gain.
I hope that's merely perception and not truth, though there's little history or proof to show otherwise.
dropping a bowling ball and a light foam ball to demonstrate how mass is independant of gravity.
There will be a tradesman class, so after work people can go home and exist in a fantasy world where they... work...
I never found stoichiometry problems annoying, let alone difficult.
There's 1 bit in the font that says "please don't allow anyone to copy me?"
Dumb.
Wait? doesn't that happen now? =]
At least then we wouldn't have to pretend we don't.
I dunno, it might not be so bad...
Maybe I can get one for my boss!
Eh? maybe it's just me, but in 7 or so years using windows, I've never once had the MS help actually solve my problem.