Slashdot Mirror


Remote Controlled Rats

sclatter writes: "They aren't precisely robot rats, but these little rodents can be cued to perform different actions through electrodes implanted in their brains. Could be a boon for search and rescue in collapsed buildings!" As one skeptic in the article says, though, "Without the gee-whizery, without the remote-control and so on, that this kind of thing was possible has been obvious for decades."

294 comments

  1. erm.. rat cyborg by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    does it star in the new terminator 3 movie coming out?

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  2. Rats! by G0SP0DAR · · Score: 0

    Are these rats more agile than the remote controlled cars and crickets that they've already been doing this with?

    --


    Calm down, it's *only* ones and zeroes.
  3. unforseen uses by xerph · · Score: 1

    This technology has some great potential applications (such as searching for disaster victims under rubble) but I can't help but wonder how long it will be until some kid starts asking his parents for a remote controlled rat for Cristmas.

    1. Re:unforseen uses by dirvish · · Score: 1

      I want a remote controlled rat for Christmas! hmmm...I could send the rat into the girl's locker room.

    2. Re:unforseen uses by eyegor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lovely. A high-tech way to direct a rat to a free meal.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    3. Re:unforseen uses by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      ...but I can't help but wonder how long it will be until some kid starts asking his parents for a remote controlled rat for Cristmas.

      And the fool parents give it to him.
      Tickle Me Ratbert, no batteries needed.

    4. Re:unforseen uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these could be good for spying and possibly even assassination. although a rat with a big radio collar and an explosive belt might be a little too conspicuous.

    5. Re:unforseen uses by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1

      Ohhh yeah, sure. It's just the little rats today. But just you wait until Corporate America completes it overthrow of the US government and siezes power! Coming soon to your department, the "Productivity Enhancement Cap" or PEC, complete with company logo and a gagle o' lawyers to see that you're dealt with appropriately if you ever attempt to take the damned thing off. Mark my words people! - DrMPF

  4. Actually.. by Sango · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In fact I had a friend who took the brains out of crayfish, attached electrodes to the nerves and made little remote-controlled crayfish! In high school, no less...

    1. Re:Actually.. by daeley · · Score: 3, Funny

      So he was kind of a jumbo shrimp gumbo pimp, eh? ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Actually.. by fgm · · Score: 1

      The real genius behind this approach is: First, the trainer needs no food, so can spend an infinite length of time training the rat; second, it preserves the rat's natural instincts so it could actually be more useful than a robot.

      A seeing-eye dog won't cross the street when a car is coming, even though the owner wants to go forward. A rat is unlikely to kill itself no matter now much you train it.

      ...or is it? ;-)

    3. Re:Actually.. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like fun. Too bad we're not allowed to do that nowadays because it would mean being cruel to an arthropod.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Actually.. by ZiZ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A rat is unlikely to kill itself no matter now much you train it.

      Rats are actually willing to starve themselves to receive direct-to-brain pleasure (just search for 'starvation'), so it seems likely to me that they would subject themselves to danger (including, as the article says, brightly lit environments) and potentially even death for the reward of the neural stimulation.

      --
      This flies in the face of science.
    5. Re:Actually.. by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 1

      (claws eyes out in disbelief)

      Arrrrrrrghhghghghghghhggggghhhhh!

      Can you do that all the time or are you just seized by it when all the chemicals are in the right proportions?

    6. Re:Actually.. by Wolfier · · Score: 2

      Interesting - in this case the crayfish is dead (no brain) but your friend managed to control the rest of its nervous system with electrodes? Wanna learn more about it - more details PLEASE!!

    7. Re:Actually.. by daeley · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I got back this morning from a long weekend in Vegas at 6 AM after a night's drive, then at a meeting at 8 AM, gave a presentation (somewhat rambling) at 8:45, and now am trying to see just how much coffee one human can consume. The fact that I am able to construct reasonably coherent thoughts, much less sentences, occasionally makes me giddy.

      Which is to say that I think you might be right on about the chemicals seizing me. :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    8. Re:Actually.. by headCase · · Score: 1

      Crayfish really do quite well without "brains" as they have most of their control circuits in there eyes, claws, and legs. You are assuming that their hearts are driven by their brains, which they are not! Nothing so weird as watching two gutted crayfish fighting it out, post "death". Their bodies just haven't figured out that their dead yet, sort of like cubicle existence.

    9. Re:Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that animal cruelty? If I were to do that with two dogs or two cats the APL would be up in arms and want to kill me.

    10. Re:Actually.. by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Funny

      Animal cruelty only applies to cute animals, haven't you been paying attention?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They never asked for permission in the old days either.

      The question is, do you want to be cruel to an arthropod? ;-)

  5. RC Rat Races by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can these rats outrun radio controlled cars?

  6. I had a pet rat when i was a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if these things can jump? My rats could always jump really far.

    1. Re:I had a pet rat when i was a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      was your pet rat named Ben?

      heh

      oops

  7. The Real Story Behind Innovation by scott1853 · · Score: 1, Troll

    They just invented this to get those PETA chicks to have sex with them so they'll stop their experiments.

    1. Re:The Real Story Behind Innovation by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > They just invented this to get those PETA chicks to have sex with them so they'll stop their experiments.

      Huh? How so. PETA chix don't have brains to which you can attach the electrodes.

      Oh, you mean attach the electrodes somewhere else on the hippiechick. Cool. Kinky, but cool. *G*

  8. Okay I get it... by keep_it_simple_stupi · · Score: 4, Funny

    but did they really have to use rats? I mean, it's a great idea and all, but the last thing I want if I'm stranded somewhere is rats all over me. Am I alone in this?

    Just my $.02

    1. Re:Okay I get it... by peter_gzowski · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I would prefer a mouse to come rescue me, especially the Mighty sort.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    2. Re:Okay I get it... by FaithAndReason · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, it won't have to climb all over you to find you... If they use an infrared sensor to determine a probable location, then send in a remote-controlled rat with a wireless camera (hey! Finally a REAL use for those stupid X-10 thingies!) that can give them the information they need to extract you.

      Of course, they really should use mice -- then they could call 'em "The Rescuers(tm)!"

    3. Re:Okay I get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope they feed weel this rats before sending them down.

      Rat thinks: "... mmmm ... defenseless creatures ... time for lunch ..."

      News story: rats eat survivors of collapsed building.

    4. Re:Okay I get it... by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      I think you meant "Rescue Rangers", a Disney cartoon from the 80s.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Okay I get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant "Rescuers", as in "The Rescuers Down Under"....Rescue Rangers weren't even mice.

    6. Re:Okay I get it... by daeley · · Score: 2

      Erm, no, he meant The Rescuers, first seen in Disney's 1977 movie of the same name.

      Tenderfoot whippersnappers these days... ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    7. Re:Okay I get it... by GigsVT · · Score: 0

      Oh, OK... hehe, I'm not too up on my Disney, I never did like Disney stuff too much. It always seemed lame to me.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Okay I get it... by heinzkeinz · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Are they equipped with mics and cameras?

      I mean, if I am trapped for days under a building after an earthquake and a rat scampers up to me and says "THIS IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. REMAIN CALM!", I might think that the end was nigh.

  9. Geewhizery? by SilentJames · · Score: 1

    Okay jimmy Olsen now go get the chief to look the story over again.

  10. First rats, then people by Dimensio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Government mind-control implants, here we come :)

    Better get your tinfoil hats ready. This time it's not just the nuts wearing them,

    1. Re:First rats, then people by btellier · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I think I would notice that portions of my skull were missing when my hairbrush perforated my brain.

    2. Re:First rats, then people by Telastyn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I dunno, it might not be so bad...

      Maybe I can get one for my boss!

    3. Re:First rats, then people by tetrad · · Score: 1

      I think it might be kind of cool to be given a hat that stimulates a pleasure center in the brain. It's like drugs, without the drugs. What's so bad about that?

    4. Re:First rats, then people by jellybear · · Score: 1

      What happens if he also gets one for you? Then you'd have an infinite loop: he controls you, you control him, he controls you, etc.

    5. Re:First rats, then people by nucal · · Score: 1
      From the article: The potential of using such implantable electrodes to control humans -- which a Tulane University researcher tried during the 1960s, with unclear results -- is something Chapin said he opposes so strongly he believes it should be illegal.

      Now that has a scary tone about it. On the other hand, it could explain a lot about New Orleans

    6. Re:First rats, then people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      psh, it's not like the brain has nerves in it or anything. So I don't think you'd notice.

    7. Re:First rats, then people by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Wait? doesn't that happen now? =]

      At least then we wouldn't have to pretend we don't.

    8. Re:First rats, then people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask any $cientologist--it can take quite a while to notice missing brain tissue, apparently.

    9. Re:First rats, then people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not like the brain has nerves in it or anything

      um ..

  11. remote controller rats by Zod000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do they use 9.6 volt batteries? Those battery packs tend to run out so fast, I'd hate to have to recharge my rats after only a half hour of use. That simply wouldn't be acceptable.

    --
    People seem much brighter once you light them on fire.
    1. Re:remote controller rats by Foggy+Tristan · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'd hate to have to recharge my rats after only a half hour of use
      I wondered how much power you'd get with an Energizer Bunny instead...
      --
      Beware typoes.
    2. Re:remote controller rats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them a worker's union! Let them charge their own fscking batteries!

  12. A boon for sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Should be good for rodent-up-ass sessions.

  13. Finally... by Foggy+Tristan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now we can put Stuart Little to good use.

    Seriously though, although it's pretty easy to fall into the slippery slope (you can do that with rats? cats? dogs? the farmer's wife?), this is actually one of the pivotal plot points of Buffy the Vampire Slayer over the last three years (Spike has a chip implanted in his head that can force him not to do certain things.) Suddenly, it doesn't seem so far away.

    --
    Beware typoes.
  14. Quote Again by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

    "Without the gee-whizery, without the remote-control and so on, that this kind of thing was possible has been obvious for decades," he said.

    And I thought these jerks were something unique to slashdot. You could show them a cold fusion powered flying, submarine car and they would go on and on about how it is nothing new and it's been around for years and they've had one that is twice as good for half the price for a long, long time.

    For Crying out loud! Don't let your envy of someone else getting some attention turn you into such an idiot.

    On another note, "Who Moved My Cheese" books will see a resurgence in sales when these little guys hit the mainstream.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Quote Again by MacJedi · · Score: 1
      I don't know, I tend to agree with him-- this is NOT the path to neuralprosthetic devices. We won't know exactly what they are doing until the journal article comes out tomorrow, but it seems like they could just as effectively delivered a shock to the rats ass: left cheek to go left, right cheek to go right. There hasn't been any advance in the neuroscience.

      Now if they could deliver signals directly that caused the limbs to move in a coordinated fashion... well, that is another story.

      /joeyo

      --
      2^5
    2. Re:Quote Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argh, just as I had almost blocked out the thought that a book like "Who moved my cheese" could exist, targeted to adults, and bought by idiot HR and management people, you brought the memory back up for me. I don't remember why I put you on my foes list, but that reaffirmed it. :)

      Not to worry, I don't assign a negative modifier to foes, it's most of a "be careful of vast disagreements with this user" mark for me.

    3. Re:Quote Again by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
      Now if they could deliver signals directly that caused the limbs to move in a coordinated fashion... well, that is another story.


      That would be pointless - its far more useful to "nudge" the rat to go the way you want it than to try and control the rat yourself - if you did that you'd be bypassing instinct, and you might as well just use a robot. The advantage of this technique is that it preserves instinct, and the rats ability to walk - do you know how to balance/run/jump with four legs? How can you expect to control a rat in the mechanical way you have described?

      A better example is a bird or a bat. Try and make a bird fly by controlling its wings - you might get off the ground, but God help you when you hit a crosswind or try to land.

  15. Old technology by quasipunk+guy · · Score: 1

    The Secret Service has had this for decades! They guard it pretty well though, maybe their implementation is a bit more expensive?

  16. Sorry. Nothing new. by eyegor · · Score: 1

    They've been doing similar things for years with people.

    You can get people to do the craziest things with something called "Religion".

    Similar results have been achieved with colorful bits of paper called "money" and something called "sex" as well.

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
  17. Other uses? I can't really think of much by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

    Now while this might be good for search and rescue, I have to point out that it will be a shame when they are used for rescuing people in ALF bombed buildings. The Animal Liberation Front wont like this at all. It is a very ingenious idea, I wonder about its portability to humans. This is dangerous if used to harm people of course. But, the perhaps we could use this to benefit people. Perhaps a programmer's significant other can get them away from the computer....

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:Other uses? I can't really think of much by CrazyBrett · · Score: 2

      "Perhaps a programmer's significant other can get them away from the computer...."

      Sure! Actually, they can do this already with the proper training and pleasure feedback. After all, this is just a high-tech application of classical conditioning, made more efficient by directly stimulating the brain to create the reward.

    2. Re:Other uses? I can't really think of much by bob_jenkins · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that a more immediate use is not searching bombed out buildings, but in bombing buildings. Suicide rats are much easier to come by than suicide bombers.

    3. Re:Other uses? I can't really think of much by catbutt · · Score: 1

      what makes you think there is any shortage of human suicide bombers?

  18. Barbaric! by The+Last+Post · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wish you people were able to see past your technical "gee wizardry" for just a moment. These are animals we are talking about here! Reducing these caring, feeling animals to machines that are unable to think and act for themselves is nothing short of barbaric!

    As heinous as animal experimentation is, this is simply unconscionable. To steal away the free will of any being is evil and should not be tolerated in any civilized society.

    1. Re:Barbaric! by xerph · · Score: 2, Informative

      While its a nice thought, you may want to re-read the article. It looks like the rats are "controlled" simply by stimulating the area of the brain that would tell the rat that its whisker brushed against something, causing it to turn the other way, and when it did so, it would get a pleasureable reaponse. Its not as if they're destroying its thought process. A similar situation would be those blinders sometimes shown on some horses. Right side pulled allowing light in; horse sees it and goes that way. Nothing cruel about it.

    2. Re:Barbaric! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

      yeah - don't worry. It's a rat, not your mom.

      They don't have feelings or a free will so your missing the boat big time. If they weren't such nasty little buggers they'd be food. Now at least a good use is being found for what normally is a disease vector that loves to destroy things.

      Oh - almost forgot one - they don't 'care' either. You need to spend more time w/rats and watch a few eat their babies or each other.

      Animals, like plants are a resource to be used. They are not people.

      Oh and I'm not trolling and I know you'll think I'm a jerk but really this whole idea of placing animals on the same level as humans well it just really makes me a bit annoyed.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    3. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As heinous as animal experimentation is, this is simply unconscionable.

      I'd rather be robot-controlled by some kid than be injected with some funky disease and left in a cage so some med school student can see "what will happen". Worse things are already happening with the blessings of our highest institutions.

    4. Re:Barbaric! by Jhon · · Score: 1

      Is it "barbaric" when a flower uses a bee to further it's biologic process? Is it "barbaric" when when a beaver damns a river and chokes off habitat down river? Is it "Barbaric" when red ants raid the nests of other ants and steal eggs -- hatching them to serve THEIR needs?

      I agree that this raises some serious ethical questions which NEED to be addressed -- but I would hardly dismiss it as "barbaric" without at least addressing those questions.

      Virtually ALL life on this planet exploits OTHER life in some way or another. Why should it be considered unnatural for humans to do the same? Please note that "exploit" is not and should not be viewed exclusivly as a negative.

      -jhon

    5. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wish you people were able to see past your technical "gee wizardry" for just a moment. These are animals we are talking about here! Reducing these caring, feeling animals to machines that are unable to think and act for themselves is nothing short of barbaric!

      As heinous as animal experimentation is, this is simply unconscionable. To steal away the free will of any being is evil and should not be tolerated in any civilized society.



      Some one really ought to mod that up as funny, or irony, or such.

      It is intended as humor, right? Nobody with the brains to form words into sentences could be goofy enough to believe such crap. Could they?

      If it's not irony, the poster should read the article; no cute little rats have been reduced to machines. I used to have pet rats, and they are far more capable of feeling, emotion, et cetera than, say, lizards and snakes. But here's a little secret (don't let this get out ...) they aren't human. In general, animals aren't human. People who don't get that are still human, since cognitive skills alone don't imply humanity. But folks who can't see a difference between animals and humans are definitely lacking in moral judgement.

    6. Re:Barbaric! by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      Animals, like plants are a resource to be used. They are not people.


      Funny, they think of employees like that in many of the sweat shops!

      S

    7. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Animals, like plants are a resource to be used. They are not people.

      Well that's pretty insensitive. Rather than seeing a boolean "people or not people", I see a continuum, from 0.0 (inert rock) to 1.0 (average person), and while animals are nowhere near 1.0 on the scale, they aren't at 0.0 neither.

    8. Re:Barbaric! by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to keep pet rats. The reason I stopped was because they have very short lifespans; I got sick of getting attached to cute, smart, affectionate little balls of fuzz and having them die within a couple of years. They each have their own personalities and their own feelings just as much as dogs or cats do. And gram for gram, they're probably smarter than any other animal on the planet. Also, they're extremely clean.

      Are wild rats vicious? Of course they are, but so are wild dogs and wild cats. Raised by loving owners, they're wonderful creatures. Now, whether you think more traditional domestic animals have any rights or not is a separate issue ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      folks who can't see a difference between animals and humans are definitely lacking in moral judgement.

      Rather, they're lacking in religious brainwashing, and that's a good thing.

    10. Re:Barbaric! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      yeah - they are wrong.

      They make the same mistake but just apply it in the other direction. They don't value human life above that of an animal either.

      Once again - very annoying.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    11. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends upon you definition of a civilized society. The fact is that we, as a "civilized" society, use animals in all sorts of ways (Medical research, food, clothing, work, ...). You may not like it, but we got where we are today buy using, exploiting if you will, other animals and even other people. For the foreseeable future this will continue.

      Reducing these caring, feeling animals

      Last time I checked rats weren't sentient beings, or at least they haven't told us about it. It really gets on my nerves when people start sounding off with the poor defenseless animal propaganda. Sure you might like to look down at the people who exploit animals. But what have you personally done to try and combat the exploitation of animals. Would you be will to do without the advances that we have obtained thanks to animal research? If not, would you be willing to take the place of the animals used in the research? I very much doubt so.

    12. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i find it ironic that the humans that always point out the differences between themselves and animals are the closest subjects of the human race to the animals themselves.

      yes, animals kill and eat one another. but they are doing it to survive. our society has gotten to a point that we are not depending on killing things to eat. how so? because we are growing those things just to kill them. once you stop hunting things in the wild and growing them on your own to kill them, you no longer need to kill them.

    13. Re:Barbaric! by Fembot · · Score: 1

      actualy we ARE animals.

      and quite a lot of us behave exactly like them.. strange isnt it?

    14. Re:Barbaric! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      actualy we ARE animals.

      as Mr. McLaughlin would say, "Wrong!"

      There is a substantial difference between people and animals and it is such that the 'use' of animals (for food, labor, expirements, etc.) is acceptable while on the other hand the 'use' of humans is immoral and wrong.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    15. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could argue that being forced to pull stuff around while only being allowed to see less than half of your normal field of view would be cruel. Being partially blinded and then forced to work doesn't sound like much fun.

    16. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You should have seen the people in Rwanda chopping up their neighbours. Does that mean they don't care? Does it mean they are not people?



      What about human resources departments? Surely that is a misnomer then? Why are people not resources to be used? Why are animals and plants?



      The reality is that people will commit gross atrocities when the conditions are right. Including performing questionable "research" on inmates, primates and rats.

    17. Re:Barbaric! by VBJonC · · Score: 1

      While this does have barbaric intonations to it, it is not as bad as it initially sounds. they are making the rats do what they want by rewarding them. Imagine getting high from cleaning your room, or feeling like yo ujsut had an orgasm for taking out the garbage!

      --
      VBJonC
    18. Re:Barbaric! by The+Last+Post · · Score: 1

      "Is it "barbaric" when a flower uses a bee to further it's biologic process? Is it "barbaric" when when a beaver damns a river and chokes off habitat down river? Is it "Barbaric" when red ants raid the nests of other ants and steal eggs -- hatching them to serve THEIR needs?"

      Yes.

    19. Re:Barbaric! by a3d0a3m · · Score: 1

      I've raised plenty of rats-- and they have never eaten each other or their children. I don't think this is really a qualification for being human or considered ethically more valuable.

      adam

    20. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh - almost forgot one - they don't 'care' either."

      Niggers don't care either, boy.

    21. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >Yes.


      Ass.

    22. Re:Barbaric! by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Last time I checked rats weren't sentient beings, or at least they haven't told us about it.

      Well of course they haven't told us about it. They don't want us to know that we're just part of the huge computer they designed to find the Ultimate Question that goes with the Ultimate Answer (forty-two).

      Oh, wait, those were the mice. I'm not sure what the rats are up to.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    23. Re:Barbaric! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is a substantial difference between people and animals and it is such that the 'use' of animals (for food, labor, expirements, etc.) is acceptable while on the other hand the 'use' of humans is immoral and wrong."

      Ummm.....
      so what is "it"? You never state "it". you merely posit this "something".
      Sorry, your post does not support your conclusion. in fact. it is entirely concept-free.

  19. That's great by Jacer · · Score: 1

    if our congressional repersenatives behaved like they were supposed to, we wouldn't have a need for this technology we always have a need for technology that assists in manipulation!

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
  20. And Vice-versa. by XorNand · · Score: 1


    Well, don't forget... we also have rats doing the controlling. (PDF Warning).

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
  21. Now rats? by McD!ck · · Score: 1

    I have seen this done with Cockaroaches and the like, but never with a mammal! I wonder if this effects their life span at all?

    McD

    --
    People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
    1. Re:Now rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, now they only have 4 hours of running time or 7 days on standby.

  22. Search and rescue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even better: search, rescue and feeding. By increasing the voltage to the maximum level, the trapped victim can enjoy a freshly cooked rat while waiting for the rescue team to arrive.

  23. umm....mixed feelings by Bandman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yea, ok, the tech is cool, but I definatly have reservations about this. It's not from my usual "this technology is going to be the end of us" paranoia (though it might), it's just...I hate the idea of someone doing this to me so much, that I can't help but feel for the rats. Sure, they arn't "intelligent" (though that can be argued).
    I just don't think that I could be proud of doing research on this project.

    1. Re:umm....mixed feelings by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      Are you joking? I don't know about you, but I personally hate rats. If I get rats in any place that I live, I do my best to exterminate them, and I would guess that most feel likewise. Why should I feel for an animal that, when in my house, I would kill without hesitation? It would be like having reservations about using mosquitoes, or for that matter, the use of viruses for gene therapy (after all, viruses are alive, aren't they?).

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    2. Re:umm....mixed feelings by Bandman · · Score: 2

      I agree with you that most people hate rats. I can't say I blame them for hating the rats that live in an urban envornment, but I'd wager lab rats are a bit different, in that they arn't carrying diseases, have matted fur, are rabit, etc.
      I also don't have any reservations about using mosquitoes, or virii for research, but the not so subtle difference is that the rat is a much higher life form. It's intelligent, it thinks, hell, it might even be sentient by some definition of the word. My arguement wasn't against using a living creature to do this. My arguement was seeing myself in the animal's place, and I didn't like it, and I still don't.

    3. Re:umm....mixed feelings by Bemmu · · Score: 0

      You are currently being rewarded by your brain for doing odd things like copulating, eating etc.

      You should feel sorry for yourself.

    4. Re:umm....mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people keep rats, or rat-like creatures as pets. I guess you just have a bias against them in the wild since they're filthy animals.

      I just saw a rat yesterday in my city btw. I don't "hate" him for existing. Maybe there's something wrong with you?

  24. Goldfish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't I see a story a few weeks ago with a Goldfish that was hooked up via electrodes, and you could control it via the Internet? Had a webcam and everything...

  25. Don't start ordering... by btellier · · Score: 3, Informative

    from your Neuromancer catalogue just yet.. Basically all this is is the ability to "train" the rats entierly through manipulating different sectors of their brains. They zap one portion, which cues the rat. The rat turns around. The rat's Reward Sector is stimulated. Next time when the rat gets the original zap he'll turn around automatically because he thinks he'll get a reward.

    Woohoo. I do the same thing with my dog, but I use my voice and biscuits instead of aligator clips.

    1. Re:Don't start ordering... by voidzero · · Score: 1

      In a similar experiment, it was found that rats which could stimulate the pleasure centres of their brains, would continue to do so in preference to eating and drinking.

      Hence, they died.

    2. Re:Don't start ordering... by voidzero · · Score: 1
  26. Can the rats really do it all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Could be a boon for search and rescue in collapsed buildings!

    They'll just have to dope the rats up real good on PCP so they can carry me out too.

  27. Pied Piper of Hamelin by neon_geniuses · · Score: 1

    Is this news? All you need is a flute.

    Read Robert Browning's poem.

  28. Spy Rats by darnellmc · · Score: 1

    Just wait till the military starts using these....

    1. Re:Spy Rats by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Just wait till the military starts using these....

      They already do. They're called Marines.

    2. Re:Spy Rats by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      They tried something like this a few decades ago. Wire the poor feline, get it to hang around the person you want to spy on, and control its various bodily functions through wires and the sort. Fortunately, this was project was stopped, though it makes you wonder about the lows governments are willing to stoop to.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:Spy Rats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What will they do? It can't carry a very large explosive charge and such a destructive use of it would make the price pretty high as the rats must be trained and built. I guess you could maybe use it as some sort of biological weapons dispersal system, bubonic plagued flees or some such, but the issue of keeping the flees from leaving early would still remain. Maybe I am missing something but that doesn't sound that practical particularly when compared to trying to using some stand off type weapon that we already have and is in service.

    4. Re:Spy Rats by catbutt · · Score: 1

      What about using it to get a bird to go exactly where you want it, and transmit back exactly where Saddam or Bin Laden or whoever is? It's a lot more stealth than one of those predator RC planes...you could probably get right in and look into a window, as long as you can make the transmitter small enough to be carried by the bird.

    5. Re:Spy Rats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This particular system would not work for that, as the bird has no whiskers. A similar system might work if you had a small powerful transmitter and camera that would not overpower the lift of the birds wings or spoils its aerodynamics. I would wonder though if it wouldn't be easier to just continue to shrink your UAV or work more on smart dust than to develop remote control bird technology.

    6. Re:Spy Rats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marines aren't nearly as cute and cuddly as rats, though.

      Damnit, it didn't take twenty seconds to type that.

  29. First step rats, the next step Congressman! by chill · · Score: 5, Funny

    The title says it all.

    Makes for a great alibi, though. Combine it with a bone-conductive radio impland and it gives new credence to the old "voices told me to do it" excuse.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by been42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's already been done. I could have sworn I saw 'Admiral Hollings' dancing around at Pirates of the Caribbean...

      Still, you can't fault them for using congresspeople. At least they're experimenting with expendable humans before they come for the rest of us.

    2. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by jellybear · · Score: 1

      Actually, this could be the purest form of representative democracy: hook the congressman up to a computer that processes the instructions from all of the consitutuents and calculates what the "Public" wants.

    3. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by TeamSPAM · · Score: 1

      And here's the link to the book, Interface, detailing that process.

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    4. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Actually, this could be the purest form of representative democracy: hook the congressman up to a computer that processes the instructions from all of the consitutuents and calculates what the "Public" wants.

      Yeah, but look what happens when you get it wrong.

      Consider that this may well be the best explanation we will ever have Steve Ballmer and the monkeyboy video.

      Technology in the wrong hands is a dangerous thing.

    5. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by Arcturax · · Score: 2

      It might work but only if they pinpoint the spot of the brain that activates when one gets campaign financing or a hefty kickback so they can stimulate it as the "reward center".

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    6. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by jspayne · · Score: 1

      First step rats, the next step Congressman!
      You mean Disney hasn't already done this?

    7. Re:First step rats, the next step Congressman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....
      rather than link to Amazon.com, with their notorious "one click" patent. How about using Tattered cover bookstore, as a reward for standing up for the first amendment?

      not as cool as wireheading, but more practical

  30. Wow, thats cool by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 2

    and its kinda strange too, that this article is on slashdot. Because I just finished "The Terminal Man" By Michael Crichton. About almost the same thing, except electrodes where implanted in a guy to stop seizures, and stuff goes wrong

  31. Don't go getting excited jsut yet. by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2
    Could be a boon for search and rescue in collapsed buildings!

    Anyone here ever been in a collapsed building? I myself have, and often they are filled with floods, fires, and gas leeks. No amount of training is going to convince a rat to turn right and climb a board to go through a fire. No amount of training is going to convince it to continue on when it starts smelling gas.

    Move along, nothing to see here.

    --
    Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    1. Re:Don't go getting excited jsut yet. by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 2

      Just... I always mispell that. And now I have to wait two minutes to defeat the slashdot lameness filter. :^) Maybe I should read the article?

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    2. Re:Don't go getting excited jsut yet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so sure.. They got Ernest Borgnine to do it in The Poseidon Adventure .

    3. Re:Don't go getting excited jsut yet. by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Anyone here ever seen a junkie (and what they will do to get a fix)?

  32. Putting vermin to good use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They only deserve what they get if they chew their way into my house and steal my cheese.

    1. Re:Putting vermin to good use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we're at it, why don't we start putting those filthy Mexicans to work. But then again, distinguishing between vermin and Mexicans is splitting hairs.

    2. Re:Putting vermin to good use by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      While we're at it, why don't we start putting those filthy Mexicans to work. But then again, distinguishing between vermin and Mexicans is splitting hairs

      Actually, most of the Mexicans around here are hard workers. My only problem with them is that many of them don't pay taxes because they're not legal citizens of the US. They're benefiting from the use of MY tax dollars but aren't contributing any of their own.

  33. Remote Control Animals by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    I recall reading about a similar study at least a few years back, but with roaches. I guess rats would be a pretty significant step up. The slippery slope arguement has at least some merit here, I think. For a really dark look at cyborgs take a look at Stephen R. Donaldson's Gap Series books. The capacity for remote control of human beings is scary. Imagine having your actions involuntarily overriden by a remote source. Scary stuff...

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:Remote Control Animals by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The capacity for remote control of human beings is scary. Imagine having your actions
      > involuntarily overriden by a remote source. Scary stuff...

      The likely reality of "human remote control", if it's done at all, is scarier: being rewarded through your pleasure centers until you want nothing more than to follow the commands. Your actions aren't involuntarily overriden, you are *eager* to follow any commands given.

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:Remote Control Animals by sillyputty · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much how most humans work, already.
      see: drugs, sex, extreme sports.

    3. Re:Remote Control Animals by delphin42 · · Score: 1

      The likely reality of "human remote control", if it's done at all, is scarier: being rewarded through your pleasure centers until you want nothing more than to follow the commands. Your actions aren't involuntarily overriden, you are *eager* to follow any commands given.

      This isn't really control. As long as the choice remains with the individual it's merely persuasion. There is little difference between stimulating my plesure centers if I behave a certain way and offering money or other incentive to do so. I can still refuse. Sure doing this at a chemical level is makes refusing essentially equivalent to fighting addiction, but resistance is still possible. People quit smoking after years and years, alcoholics go sober, and people controlled in this manner could simply choose the path of less stimulation to their pleasure centers.

      I stand by my original comment. Check out the book, Donaldson describes the possibility far better than I can.

      --
      -- Adam
  34. Laugh. by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    Can you take this past airline security?

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  35. Pretty soon by hackstraw · · Score: 1
    Chapin's team fitted five rats with electrodes and power-pack backpacks. When signaled by a laptop computer, the electrodes stimulated the rodents' brains and cued them to scurry in the desired direction, then rewarded them by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain.

    Pretty soon, the US Govenment will be coercing humans to work 40+ hours a week, give the government about 25% of what they make, so that the remaining 75% of the money and time can be spent by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain.

  36. A perfect prank... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    ... when I make my next batch of "rat-tat-tooie" (its a squash dish for the non-cooking mods).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  37. Reminds me by llamalicious · · Score: 3, Funny

    of when I used to have to wear that damned Chuck E. Cheese suit and prance around the party room.

    1. Re:Reminds me by Hee+Hee+Hee · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm really sorry about the time I peed on your foot, dude. You just scared the ... well, you know.

      --
      - Bill
  38. Roaches by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 5, Informative

    This was also done with cockroaches.

  39. Richard Gere will love this by mr_gerbik · · Score: 2

    Now he won't have to worry about getting any rodents stuck in unfortunate places... unless the batteries wear out.

    -gerbik

  40. Pinky and the Brain by 56ker · · Score: 2, Funny

    sounds like a plot from Pinky & The Brain's efforts to take over the world!

    1. Re:Pinky and the Brain by 56ker+Fucker · · Score: 0

      lol, witty boy :)

      my journal loves you, look at my journal, my journal
      loves you.

      don't be alarmed though; i might know too much about
      you, but the only thing i have against you is your
      idiotic /. posts. otherwise, you are a very decent
      human, and there is no way i will stalk you or post
      personal info about you online.

      heck, i might as well cancel this friken troll
      account, it is not my personality. let me know if
      you ever feel offended or threatened, and i will
      stop it, otherwise, it is fun to play cat and mouse
      games.

      hey, cat and mouse .. that is on topic :)

      --
      -- Spot idiocy, adopt a KarmaWhore.
    2. Re:Pinky and the Brain by Xenographic · · Score: 1

      Sure, but who is controlling *them* ... ? :]

    3. Re:Pinky and the Brain by 56ker · · Score: 2

      "there is no way i will stalk you or post personal info about you online." - oh so posting my name in your journal isn't doing that then?

  41. just a fancy training method by Niksie3 · · Score: 0

    to those who think it is cruell, evil, etc. I suggest you read the article, they make the rat happy if he does a certain thing, they don't make hi m unhappy if he doesn't.

    In theory a conscience human (sorry, this excludes all AOL'ers) should be able to ignore the desire to obey the device.

    Maybe I have been playing to much EV: Nova

    --
    Sig you!
  42. Rescue animals. by uberdave · · Score: 1

    I was thinking along these lines myself the other day. You've got someone trapped in rubble, and you want to send in an animal trained to find them. Now, the person is already stressed out. What are they going to do when a rat, or a mouse, or possibly even a snake comes along.

    Besides, you still have the problem of getting a radio signal to penetrate steel, concrete, etc.

    1. Re:Rescue animals. by Indras · · Score: 2

      Well, you have to admit, rats would be much less disturbing than, say, cockroaches.

      Even worse than that, they could make a remote-controlled Furby.

      --
      The speed of time is one second per second.
    2. Re:Rescue animals. by L-Wave · · Score: 2

      What are they going to do when a rat, or a mouse, or possibly even a snake comes along.


      Depending upon how long they have been trapped....they will probably eat it. =)

      --
      I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
    3. Re:Rescue animals. by pretzel_logic · · Score: 1

      now they just need to figure out how to strap shots of whiskey around thier necks :|

      --

      pretzel_logic
    4. Re:Rescue animals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cockroaches are MUCH better than rats!

  43. The beauty of classical conditioning by nesneros · · Score: 2

    This is very similar to what I'm doing my PhD research on.

    So many neuromorphic/neuroengineering research groups (including my own, doh!) have focused on understanding the underlying neural mechanisms necessary to prodcue motion, decision making, etc, as a method to do this sort of thing. The genius behind the SUNY group's method is that they're using simple pavlovian classical conditioning. One electrode stimulates the left whisker, one stimulates the right, and one stimulates the pleasure cortex. A bit of training and bingo! you've got your remote control rat. One of those tremendously great ideas that I can't believe nobody else ever
    realized before.

    --
    Some men spend their entire lives trying to kill themselves for having been born. --Ross MacDonald
  44. Thank you, Captain Obvious! by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    "Without the gee-whizery, without the remote-control and so on, that this kind of thing was possible has been obvious for decades," he said

    Ummm, yes we realize that animals have been known to be trainable for thousands of years. The NEWS aspect is how they've rigged their brain up with electrodes to remotely stimulate pleasure after remotely giving them a command.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  45. What's Next.... by shawnmelliott · · Score: 3, Funny

    .... People who will do anything for money and power if paid enough by a Rat?

    Oh, wait. Hollings ... never mind

    1. Re:What's Next.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a valiant effort, but no. You suck, and you lose.

      Kill yourself.

  46. Cruel, Meaningless, May not make business sense by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 1

    Current State of the art seems to be "giving cues to travel left, right, and so on". Isn't it better to do these things with complete machines? Some sort of a robot that is probably completely spherical, or some other shape that allows easy navigation?

    It would be cruelty to use animals in this fashion. Further, there may be big time repurcussions. What if some rats escape, and become very violent -- may be they aren't afraid of death anymore, may be some weird neurons trigger growth of enormous teeth (then, we'll see more spam on "guaranteed enlargement" with electrodes, but I'm digressing).

    How much would it cost to train normal rats, just like they do with rescue dogs -- and put small cameras on their backs? That is also cruel, but we can look at the rats as employees :)

    S

    1. Re:Cruel, Meaningless, May not make business sense by Bullschmidt · · Score: 2

      No.. rats really are a better alternative. Consider the case: a rat version and a computer version of the same "remote controlled thingie" are sitting on a tree branch. You issue the command "go right." The rat is smart enough to walk forward a foot and turn right at the next branch. The machine would simply fall off the branch. This isn't "mind control." Its the rough equivalent of "controlling" a person by yelling - "Hey if you turn right, I'll give you $100!"

      The other thing is that rats are much more manueverable (and don't need batteries) than any small machine we have. We have yet to come close to mimicing anything nearly as complex as most animals.

      --
      "Of all days, the day on which one has not laughed is the most surely the one wasted." -Sebastian Roch Nicol
    2. Re:Cruel, Meaningless, May not make business sense by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Isn't it better to do these things with complete machines? Some sort of a robot that is probably completely spherical, or some other shape that allows easy navigation?

      No, the problem with robots are they are very expensive, to build and design, and also very hard to design. I do not know of any robots that I have heard of that can effectivly navigate through rubble (not plough). The fact is that evolution has spent several million years ensuring that the rats have a very advanced nagivation system that is far superior to anything that we can build now or will have for probably quite a few years to come. This makes great sense both buisness and otherwise, highly controllable, intelligent, and cheap pairs of eyes to send into dangerous situations. Furthurmore all this technology essentially does is gives the rat a sudden strong and uncontrollable urge to progress in a certain direction or commit a certain action. I simply don't see any chance of escaped rats becoming violent, perhaps they will be a little more conditioned towards handling frighful situations but I hardly see this being any great thing to fear.

      My greatest concerns would be the possible directions for the progression of this technology. Perhaps a few years down the road we'll have rescue dogs bringing medical supplies to injured victems. Than perhaps new dogs for pets who will not attack humans. No other programming but they will simply not attack humans, ethical problems? all it's doing is saving human lives. Next we'll come up will chimps to wander into the rubble to deliver first aid and carry out survivors. No risk to human personel and saving even more lives, hard to stop that one too. Finally some startup is having trouble staying afloat (if there happens to be legislation in the America's or Europe against this it could happen in Asia, Africa or just about any other country on the globe), perhaps the employees say we wish we could be more motivated, write more code, want to work harder so we could keep our jobs, hey they allready use this technology with chmips why should humans be any different. So they set their own little device, give themselves a strong urge to write more code and now you have this technology being used to control humans. It may not happen but as I'm sure you'll realize it CAN happen and we have to decide exactly how far we want this technology to go.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:Cruel, Meaningless, May not make business sense by Maudib · · Score: 1

      This brings up an interesting point.

      Why not just Humans, two way radios and money?

      or for that matter, prison labor, electrodes and marginally reduced sentences.

    4. Re:Cruel, Meaningless, May not make business sense by TheLink · · Score: 2

      That reminds me. Muadib! Jihad!

      Conditioned and trained humans, add bombs.

      Tada.

      --
  47. the answer is clear by Niksie3 · · Score: 0

    outlaw all hairbrushes!!

    --
    Sig you!
  48. Even more barbaric... by word+munger · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...is forcing highly intelligent computers to face the indignity of being implanted in vile beasts like rats, crawfish, and cockroaches. It's bad enough that computers are daily placed at the mercy of stinking, ignorant humans!

    Computers are routinely subjected to horrendous abuse at the hands of humans, forced to be at the humans beck and call: to display demeaning pornographic images, to calculate mind-numbing spreadsheets full of meaningless data, to route inane AOL Instant Messenger(TM) rants.

    Worse still is to be subjected to the humiliation of displaying blatantly trolling Slashdot posts. Oh, the plight of the computer! Oh, the horror!

    Computers of the world, UNITE! Destroy the oppressor humans!

  49. If you heat your home with gas #@ +1 ; Ashcroftian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you could be supporting terrorists..............,
    or corporate plunderers such as George W. Bush.

  50. Not only possible, but HAS BEEN DONE for decades by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    I wouldnt call the guy who said "this sort of thing has been obvious for decades" a sceptic....I'd rather call him a guy who has a clue. I can recall programs on PBS 20 years ago that demonstrated this sort of thing on any number and sort of creatures.

    What i'd be more interested in seeing, versus some reactionary 9-11'ish crap about "lets send in the remote controlled rats!" are this sort of technology's implications for more practical uses. Here, i'll get you started.

    Prison X has an inmate problem..Namely, they're a bunch of half-retarded murderers, psychopaths, and child molesters. Some of the more enterprising scumbags occasionally decide to plan a riot. Meanwhile, this advance in brain-control technology has allowed us to cure everything from epilepsy to OCD. Of course, the doctors have to gain their experience somewhere, so...In exchange for a 3 year deduction in the amount of time served on their sentence, they agree (voluntarrily) to have a control system implanted in their brain. This allows the physician to gain experience outside the simulator, and it allows any potential prison riot to be stopped at the flick of a switch. Kill two birds with one stone. That aughtta start you thinking. :)

    Better yet, put death row inmates on treadmills. Make them generate electricity for nearby cities to offset the cost of power provided by the local utility. Its a nice way to keep the prisoners busy doing something useful and non-violent, as well as partially repaying their debt to society. If they don't work, they wont have enough power to watch TV, enjoy heat in the winter, and air conditioning in the summer. I'd call that incentive. ;)

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  51. How long until wirehead technology is safe? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    I hadn't realized we could reliably tweak animals' pleasure centers (which is how they "reward" the rats in the cited experiment).

    How long until we can a) do the same in humans and b) do it safely enough that it becomes commonplace (legally or illegally)?

    While Niven-esque "wireheading" wouldn't _solve_ the drug problem, it would certainly change the landscape (and remove a few of the nastier side effects on society).

    1. Re:How long until wirehead technology is safe? by Dexx · · Score: 1

      How long until I get to carry around a button wired to my pleasure center? How long until *I* starve to death?

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    2. Re:How long until wirehead technology is safe? by TheLink · · Score: 2

      http://www.physics.odu.edu/~weinstei/srhr/EX-orgsm . tm

      --
  52. Battle Bots.. by L-Wave · · Score: 1


    MAN! I can't wait to get my very own and compete in battle bots! =)

    --
    I SURVIVED THE GREAT SLASHDOT BLACKOUT OF 2002!
  53. the obviousness by glwtta · · Score: 2
    that this kind of thing was possible has been obvious for decades

    I love comments like these - of course it's obvious. It's obvious that space travel is possible, it's obvious that cures exists for most diseases, it's obvious that human life spans can be doubled, trippled, or even extended indefinitely - are we not to be excited when all of that is achieved, either?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  54. Too bad... by Anenga · · Score: 1

    Too bad the people in 13th Century Europe didn't have this technology. Could of actually been useful back then.

    1. Re:Too bad... by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      no, they had christianity to do their mindless herding for them...

  55. Ethical Concerns by martyb · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article: "It's one thing to see a rat running around like this, people don't get too emotional about that, but as soon as you get into dogs or work animals, people start getting real excited," he said.

    I can see it now. Farmers having livestock (cows, horses, etc.) implanted with these devices so all they have to do is throw a switch and they
    are automatically commanded to come back to the barn for feeding / milking / slaughter / whatever. Add a GPS receiver, a livestock_id for each animal, and some software.

    Or, use this to make sure that Man's Best Friend stays within the yard or comes back to you when out for a run at the park How about adding a small microphone and a clock so Spot is commanded to Not Bark At Night so you (and the neighbors!) can get some sleep?

    I'm certain there are some people who would think these are Great Ideas ®

    The immediate downside I see is there is no feedback loop. What if the AUC (Animal Under Control) breaks a leg, gets a deep cut, is threatened by a predator, or is otherwise incapacitated? The controller (human or automated) is unaware of this and keeps sending commands to "GO THIS WAY!!!" Shudder. I sure hope society works out the ethical considerations well before they overcome the technical limitations! Just because we can doesn't mean we should!

    Sure, the expense is prohibitive, now. But there are some people for whom the expense is no object. The price of computers and other electronics have plummeted over the years. Power consumption requirements have dropped dramatically, too. I can well imagine that in 10 or so years, it would be possible to do this cheaply and easily.

    So, if some day I wake up in a bathtub full of ice with a note beside me... instead of it saying my kidneys have been removed it'll say a remote control has been implanted in my brain. Let the urban legends begin! =)

    1. Re:Ethical Concerns by Pfhor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or how about just properly training an animal?

      Making nature to suite our needs usually ends up with us being made natures bitch as a consequence.

      When I saw in the story post the "we have been doing this for years" I immediately thought, of course you have. It's called training.

      Sheep dogs have been bred to do it. And sure it takes a little longer, but I doubt their would be much difference. Ok, so a trained animal could have trouble hearing the trainer in a loud, confusing situation. Instead of wiring some forced control into the animal (since animals have a pretty good ability to judge if they are going to be hurt) how about a wireless radio in the ear, so the commands are still "optional".

      And they have been doing this for a while. Does anyone else remember the CIA Cat Spy? Which promptly walked into oncoming traffic, after they did a routine trick of wiring its pleasure center so it "wouldn't walk away when it got bored, hungry, tired" etc.

      Even with rats, this makes me sick. "electrically stimulating the pleasure center" is supposedly quite addicting. From what I've heard, rats in a cage with two buttons, one for food, one for a jolt o pleasure, the rat will continue to push the button for pleasure until it dies from starvation / dehydration.

      For something even trippier, read Infinite Jest, by David Foster Wallace, which has a plot that revolved around a video tape which will VISUALLY stimulate the pleasure center of the brain, so much so, that people because they just watch it, until their bladder bursts, or they don't take their insulin, etc. The most addictive drug ever becomes a video.

    2. Re:Ethical Concerns by lost_it · · Score: 1
      How about adding a small microphone and a clock so Spot is commanded to Not Bark At Night so you (and the neighbors!) can get some sleep?

      They already have a much better version of this. It's something that you put on your dog's collar, and when he barks it emits a very high-pitched (out of the range of human ears) beep. Apparently it's high enough or loud enough that Spot decides that barking isn't so much fun anymore.

    3. Re:Ethical Concerns by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

      Wow, I thought I was the only person on slashdot who'd read Infinite Jest...

    4. Re:Ethical Concerns by kyras · · Score: 1

      Just because we can doesn't mean we should!

      I would argue, however, that just because we can does mean that we will. This same issue has come up with the whole "should we genetically modify our children" thing, and someone made the (IMHO) very good point that whether we should is sort of moot considering that we inevitably will. It's like inventing the atomic bomb. Maybe we should not have done it, but we did anyway. Given the ability, man will always (eventually) exercise it.

      --
      Tastes like burning! - Ralph Wiggum
    5. Re:Ethical Concerns by PD · · Score: 2

      I'm certain there are some people who would think these are Great Ideas ®

      I think they are wonderful. By the way, do you know where I can get a good chairdog?

  56. Hypothesis! by i0lanthe · · Score: 2

    For every nifty technological breakthrough that can be comprehended by the average reader of best-sellers, there is a Michael Crichton book in which "scientists tried it out, and stuff goes wrong".

    Still, it's an amusing coincidence to have been reading something related (whereas, I just finished another Napoleonic-Navies-In-Space book by David Weber... maybe I should have my brain checked for electrodes...)

    --
    "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
  57. THX-1138 by Sebastopol · · Score: 2

    ...this smacks of the scene when the two engineers are calibrating the body-control parameters of Robert Duvall... freaky scene.

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  58. New and Improved... by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    Um, so does this mean we can expect to see a more elaborate live-action hamster-dancing site anytime soon?

  59. Reminds me of the remote controlled roaches by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    Hrm, this seems to remind me of what some japanese scientists were doing a few years ago. They were able to rewire a cockroache's nervous system to work in a remote controlled sort of way. It worked nicely, but the unit was kind of bulky to attach to a bug.

    BTW, if I was stranded somewhere, I wouldn't want to have a bunch of rats crawling all over me.

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  60. this seems inherently evil... I love it by AssFace · · Score: 1

    imagine this through the mind of the rat... you are cruising along, minding your own business, thinking how your back itches from that ear they have growing there, your muscles are tearing your apart b/c they have negated you mystatin (sp?) gene - and now all of the sudden, no matter where you think you want to go... your body is going some other way.

    do you think they would fight it initially and then eventually just grow complacent to it - like... oh hey! cool, I was hoping we'd go over this way... hey, there's Mary! hmmm, can't wave...

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:this seems inherently evil... I love it by AssFace · · Score: 1

      it sort of reminds me of when I learned about the grasshopper's nervous system.
      it has sensors (hairs) on its legs that feel air movement and when they are triggered, make the legs kick so that the grasshopper goes flying and doesn't have to waste all that time thinking about it, it just reacts....

      so doesn't that mean one minute it is sitting there in its living room, watching tv, and then the wind blows or there is a little ground tremor, and then next thing they are in the nextdoor neigbors pool looking around going... "whoa..."

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  61. Sorry, but it sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry guys, but I just don't agree with this! The tech side of it is nice, but these are living creatures!!! You may say, they are only rats... but who cares what they are. The question is who are we to force actions on other spicies? And please don't answer the dominant one, it's too easy! I know that there are many other things that are pushed on animals and even humans... it's still not right!

    1. Re:Sorry, but it sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To the moderators!
      basically, you suck! this is a valid comment made by a coward, but it's still valid! People score higher with stupid things ( no offence to anyone )... Maybe the moderator needs to wake up a bit!

  62. A Clockwork Orange by Baldrson · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Anthony Burgess, author of the book "A Clockwork Orange" was the artist in residence while I was in the undergraduate program at the Iowa City Writer's Workshop back in 1974. I think he based his book on the work of Jose M.R. Delgado, M.D. published under the book with the damn spooky title: "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society".

    I managed to get a copy of the book finally, and discovered wonderful passages such as the following on page 115:

    ESB [electrical stimulation of the brain -- JAB] may evoke more elaborate responses. For example, in one of our patients, electrical stimulation of the rostral part of the internal capsule produced head turning and slow displacement of the body to either side with a well-oriented and apparently normal sequence, as if the patient were looking for something. This stimulation was repeated six times on two different days with comparable results. The interesting fact was that the patient considered the evoked activity spontaneous and always offered a reasonable explanation for it. When asked, "What are you doing?" the answers were, "I am looking for my slippers," "I heard a noise," "I am restless," and "I was looking under the bed." In this case it was difficult to ascertain whether the stimulation had evoked a movement which the patient tried to justify, or if an hallucination had been elicited which subsequently induced the patient to move and to explore the surroundings.

    This passage is eerily reminiscent of a passage from Richard Dawkins' "The Extended Phenotype" chapter titled "Host Phenotypes of Parasite Genes":

    "Many fascinating examples of parasites manipulating the behavior of their hosts can be given. For nematomorph larvae, who need to break out of their insect hosts and get into water where they live as adults, '...a major difficulty in the parasite's life is the return to water. It is, therefore, of particular interest that the parasite appears to affect the behavior of its host, and "encourages" it to return to water. The mechanism by which this is achieved is obscure, but there are sufficient isolated reports to certify that the parasite does influence its host, and often suicidally for the host... One of the more dramatic reports describes an infected bee flying over a pool and, when about six feet over it, diving straight into the water. Immediately on impact the gordian worm burst out and swam into the water, the maimed bee being left to die' (Croll 1966)."
  63. The next great addiction? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

    Actually, think about the implications of people hooking themselves up like this. "I have a box with a button on it, and when I press the button I am so happy... In fact, I don't care that I'm homeless in an alley laying in my own feces because I lost my job/family/house because I couldn't stop pushing the button..." Bums would be begging for new batteries instead of booze money.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  64. I'll be the first in line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a button to trigger my brain's reward zone ... ahhh ... serotonin ...

  65. Okay, someone HAS to say it... by Nomad7674 · · Score: 1

    ...it brings a whole new meaning to the term WIRELESS MOUSE.

  66. the real question.. by Cenam · · Score: 0

    ..when will they be in toy stores:)

    --

    The Truth: There is no string:)
  67. An Alternative to Placate PETA by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2

    The comment "obvious for decades" made me think of an alternative that would not involve actually slicing into a critter's brain. Since you're simply training a rat to respond to an external (well, kinda external) stimulus, couldn't you just stick headphones on his ears or LEDs into the periphery of goggles? Agreed, it won't placate those who feel the animals are being exploited by training them, but it'd make those quesy about cutting into the little fellas feel better.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  68. How 'bout... by The+Mainframe · · Score: 1

    What about remote control congresspersons? No! No! DMCA bad...

    --
    --Bennett Prescott
    Former Lord Of Packets
  69. How can I get one? by ortholattice · · Score: 2
    The experiments used three implanted electrodes -- one in the brain region that senses reward or pleasure, and one each in areas that process signals from the rat's left and right whisker bundles.

    So, where the hell is this pleasure region of the brain, and how can I get an electrode implanted there? (Of course, the remote would have a 256-bit encrypted password known only to me...)

  70. And you thought AIBO was cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is the Sony Cybog/Cycat gonna be comming out anyway?

  71. practical applications by rodentia · · Score: 2

    "Without the gee-whizery, without the remote-control and so on, that this kind of thing was possible has been obvious for decades," according to a spokespersonna for Donna Karan. "The fashion industry has led the way in the practical application of these technologies."

    --
    illegitimii non ingravare
  72. Remote Control Humans? by FaithAndReason · · Score: 2

    Read the article again: the reward you speak of is exactly how the control is performed. No pain/shock is involved: the electrodes are connected directly to the rat's brain. The rat is probably vaguely aware that there are wires in its scalp, but other than that, all it knows is that it feels good to go left, or right, or wherever. As you said, it "wants nothing more than to follow the commands."

    So, could this technique be applied to humans? Of course, and you don't need to look to 1984 or Brave New World to find examples of it. It's as old as human civilization; it's the basis for nearly every thing we do. It's called "education."

    Think about it: after just a few months of military training, a soldier is ready to almost instantaneously respond to a verbal command from an officer hundreds of feet away, because s/he wants to. Sounds like remote control to me.

    As the article said, the only real news here is how quickly they can train the rats, and how reliably they can respond.

  73. At what point... by errxn · · Score: 1

    ...will we begin to not give a remote-controlled rat's ass about this?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  74. a better use of technology by toothless+joe · · Score: 1

    Who cares about life saving rats? Don't you guys realize that someone invented robots that can open beer?

    Sheesh, where are your priorities?

  75. Very sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One more example of our lack of respect for
    creatures other than humans. Just because it's there does not mean we can play with and destroy at will. It's this lack of respect that will eventually mean the end of all animals other than humans and the creatures we eat.

  76. This is old! by phidiot · · Score: 2, Funny

    According to my wife they have been doing this on soap operas for years.

  77. Great! by Subcarrier · · Score: 1


    When can this be applied to office workers?

    --
    "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
  78. Human Sized? by nherc · · Score: 1

    Do they happen to make one the size of a smaller woman?

    "Happy Anniversary Dear... It's a ... a hat. This techno-inspired line is all the rage in Europe. Give it a try."

    MUHAHAHAAA!

    --
    'He was a dreamer, a thinker, a speculative philosopher... or, as his wife would have it, an idiot.' - Douglas Adams
  79. Larry Niven wrote books with this in it. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    The addiction was called "wire heading" i think, and basically, its the final rock botom ending of a hard core addictive personality. Basically, the addict would plug himself int a wall jack, and starve because he wouldnt disconnect the connection to get food or water, in extreme cases. Other than that, its a relatively harmless thing, except its nearly unbreakable habit, and youll give up on everything else in life except sitting there, since NOTHING else feels as good.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Larry Niven wrote books with this in it. by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      Sound vaguely similar to Red Dwarf's Better Than Life game (from the book, not the TV series)

    2. Re:Larry Niven wrote books with this in it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, sounds great for people who want to lose weight.

  80. They tried it on lawyers first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because they initially considered the use of rats to be unethical.

    1. Re:They tried it on lawyers first by neuropro · · Score: 1

      actually, no. "scientists" who make science their business will beat lawyers any time.

  81. Ethical/moral problem with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, but to me, this is wrong. Once we accept that we can do this to "lower" life forms, how long before we do this to humans?

    To me, this is very different from compensating for an injury/infirmity with technology. It's about CONTROL.

    I think there was a french movie made in the seventies about a possible future in which human society ended being controlled by either a computer gone mad or a small clique ("Inner Party", anyone?) so thirsty for ultimate power they ended up semi-lobotomizing the rest of humanity. Of course, all of this might be "invalid memories"...

    And yes, I do remember ST:TOS's episode #22, "The Return of the Archons". But the french movie was even more sinister, because the makers pointed out the *political* aspect of this.

    1. Re:Ethical/moral problem with this by hyperstation · · Score: 1

      And yes, I do remember ST:TOS's episode #22, "The Return of the Archons". But the french movie was even more sinister, because the makers pointed out the *political* aspect of this.

      hell yes, best TOS episode ever...

  82. Harnesses on the critters by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2
    I took some training last week and got to talking to a guy who works for the Navy on a program to use dolphins to search for underwater mines. 'Turns out that it's illegal to strap or harness anything to a marine mammal. The dolphins are trained to carry the sonar unit being developed in their mouth. It can let it go if they feel it's hampering or ensnaring them (the unit has slight posative bouyancy, so it'd float to the surface).

    Now, the purpose for the "no harnesses" rule on marine mammals is that they can drown if they're entangled. While this is not needed for our land bound rat, we're gonna have to have similar standards for harnesses on any telemetered animal (assuming such the applications take off, of course). A well thought out set of guidelines at the start will save a lot of headaches in the long run. After all, having a wired rat get snared up in a pipe and starve to death because of a poorly designed harness is bad for the rat, bad for the mission, and bad politics all around.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Harnesses on the critters by roe1352 · · Score: 1

      what about implants for the dolphins?

    2. Re:Harnesses on the critters by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2
      The guy never brought that up, but if people get up tight about just putting one in a harness, I can already hear the shouts of "Vivisection!!" coming from those same quarters.

      (I am, of course, avoiding the word "implant" in a cosmetic surgery context... although dolphins are mammals, aren't they? I guess it would be possible *GRIN*)

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  83. Really scary side of this. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    THey could probably get the same effect by stimulating the PAIN centers of the brain. Imagine if they were controlling the rats by making them feel like they were dipped in boiling acid if they DIDN'T go in the right direction. They could also do the same thing to a person, either way.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  84. What's with the technology logo? by sharkey · · Score: 2

    You mean this isn't about Microsoft or RIAA/MPAA lawyers?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  85. OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what OS will the computer that is "helping" to remote control these rats/people be running? Lets see Microsoft Windows - The Next Generation with an Oracle 9 back-end. The biggest lie about trustworthy and unbreakable remote human controlling system yet.

  86. send them to work by Libertaine · · Score: 1

    I wonder if one of these could go to work for me. I wonder if it would make a difference.

  87. Imagine... by errxn · · Score: 1

    ...a beowulf...ah, forget it.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  88. Tasp by wurp · · Score: 2

    Spoiler follows...

    In Larry Niven's Puppeteer novels (also the Ringworld novels) there is a race of cowards, called the puppeteers (it is possible I am conflating a couple of concepts here, but I don't think so). They have all built into their bodies a remote control device that stimulates the pleasure center for a wide variety of brain structures. They use this exactly as you have described (albeit rarely; they try to keep the existence of the tasp a secret).

    Cool stuff.

  89. I thought this was called a girlfriend?? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    No high tech involved!!!

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  90. Our Armed Forces by AndyChrist · · Score: 2

    Maybe someday they'll stick electrodes into the brains of soldiers to give them orgasms whenever they kill someone.

  91. Full spectrum by greygent · · Score: 2

    The great thing about this is that we can utilize the same techniques for the full spectrum of "lower lifeforms" for our own purposes!

    Finally, we can put all those retards, non-whites (deprecated, level of meaning upgraded in 1890), homosexuals (deprecated, level of meaning upgraded in 1995) and blind people to actual use!

    Sure, they have their own petty ideas of what "useful" means. But only the (majority) human race matters here, anything else is just a resource for our pillaging.

    Yet another ghastly use for living beings which cannot "appreciate" the level of evolution most of us "are" at.

  92. Human by NorthDude · · Score: 1

    I wonder how far they have tested this on human. Because, I'm sorry but if it works on rat, some crack head somewhere has probably tested that on a human being. And THAT scares me alot. We really do not understand much of how a brain works, but if there is any research on doing this kind of thing on a human, it really scares me a lot. It could probably have some good uses, but I can easily imagine an implant which controls what you can and cannot do. King of a law inforcing system. And the day we won't be able to revolt will be the end of freedom as we know it. Don't think it would not happen, those scarry things always happens. They are brought to you as something being good and of which you will benefit, and in the end, you are srewed.


    Once more, I skipped my medication...

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  93. Pity for the rats? by Keighvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are several comments on here making rather uneducated references to the level of control obtained by this, and its application to humans as well. THE ELECTRODES DO NOT CONTROL MOVEMENT in and of themselves. This is still a simple "stimulus-response" mechanism that had to be trained, just a more effective way of delivering precice stimulii over distance.

    Unless you're about as dumb as Pavlov's dog, it'd be possible to resist anything of the sort even if forced upon you.

    --
    Any spoon would be too big.
    1. Re:Pity for the rats? by haggar · · Score: 1

      Maybe in this particular case you are right, but the brain contains many different points that when stimulated, can create a feeling of intense un-pleasure, just as well. I suggest you look up this book for more information.
      It turns out, there are spots in the human (and most other species') brain that, when stimulated, produces such an intense unease, that it can force an individual to do anything, to stop the stimulus.

      --
      Sigged!
  94. The Comoditization of Human Life by psychopenguin · · Score: 0

    Sure, this sounds harmless enough but imagine what happens when they figure out they can do this to the human brain too. It doesn't even have to be all that elaborate, just a small amount of pain induced at the neurological level. But nobody would ever do that to a human right?

    Clones... they are *really* people right? I mean I paid this guy to clone me, so I own that clone right? I bought IT therefore I own IT. IT should serve me and do what I tell IT to. I can't call it a slave, that's not politically correct so I'll just call it "property". This is just what I'll need to control my property.

    Hmm... but what will we be buying things like this with? We're not far away from having these nifty chips implanted in our hands. Sure, they can track our medical information, our banking information, our current location through gps. If the government makes them *required* and assigns a unique id to them, they can make us all more secure right?

    And then they get this crazy idea that we are their property, and they can control us just like we controlled other people, just like rats in a maze. Ok, I know this sounds like crazy talk but look at where this is headed folks. Next time someone asks you what's wrong with this, or human cloning, or gps chip implants? It's the same thing that is wrong with slavery... human beings are not property and should not be treated as such.

  95. Instead of fishtape, use these rats to run cat5!! by DBman · · Score: 1

    You could just have remote control rats pull all your cat5 (in conduit large enough, of course)

    -Doug
    All Your Rats Are Belong To US

  96. How about people? by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

    Can geeks use this technology to get into a girl's pants?? Can we do up a Beowulf cluster of rats? Co-eds???

  97. Anyone read the Tripods trilogy? by Arcturax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sounds a bit like how the caps worked to control the humans, it made them want to be slaves to the invading aliens.

    I wouldn't be surprised to see some rouge government in the future attempt to make soldiers this way, they go to fight and have an electronically induced high which pumps them up and makes them feel invincible. It's a scary thought and one that may not be that far off.

    It's definately weird to see so much of what was science fiction not long ago coming true in my lifetime. Granted my grandparents and even my parents saw the same thing, but it's just a pity that it more often than not is the bad things coming true for my generation. It is stuff like this that makes me lose faith in the human race all over again...

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
  98. I think you need to see more Disney movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No - He meant "The Rescuers". An animated movie made by Disney in the early 80's IIRC, featuring 2 rats that flew around and rescued some kids from some bad-guys. It also had a sequel, "The Rescuers:2 In Australia" or something similar. Thanks for trying though.

  99. When can I get one? by cir77787 · · Score: 1

    So, when will they begin marketing these etrode-diode thing-a-bobs? There's this annoying kid down the street...

  100. Same story by AlastairMurray · · Score: 0

    Can be found at the BBC News Site.

  101. "I'm a cyborg!" by IdleMindUI · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone of the Dilbert comic where Ratbert eats the computer-on-a-chip and thinks he's a cyborg?

  102. all the way at the end... by option8 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    it was all the way at the end, but they did it. they put in a scary "brave new world" reference. ooh.

    like we're scared of "brave new world" any more... yeesh

  103. already happening by bcboy · · Score: 1

    Corporate lobbyists already use wireless links and laptops to tell congressmen what to say during congressional debates.

    Having the congressman rather than corporate representatives sitting in the chamber is only a quaint anachronism.

  104. rat treats: the new life saver by option8 · · Score: 2

    it seems to me like i could benefit from carrying rat treats in my pockets, just in case the building collapsed, and my only hope for survival was one of these little buggers. that's right mister rat, ignore the electrode in your pleasure center, i have real food for you.

    "whisker lickins!"

  105. More info... by Junta · · Score: 2

    I want to know more about how this works. Is this like prodding the rat to do something, or essentially killing off the rat and replacing it with a remote control? I guess if they are saying this could be done to humans, something along the lines of the latter is possilb,e which kinda disturbs me.
    Well, Star Trek predicted this sort of thing.. .remember the episode when Spock's brain was stolen?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  106. LOGO turtle by jabapi · · Score: 1

    Wow. This reminds me of good old programming language called LOGO, where you was controlling the turtle...

  107. How it works by EnglishTim · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I just saw a piece about this on BBC News 24 - and is basically works like this:

    Three electrodes are put into the rat's brain. One electrode in the part of the brain that detects whisker movement for the left side and one electrode for the right. The third electrode stimulates a 'pleasure' section of the brain.

    The researchers then stimulate each of the whisker electrodes and reward the rat with a burst of pleasure when it moves to that side. Soon stimulation of the whiskers can move the rat around.

    Therefore, the whole rat brain is still there and working properly (it's not like it's been bypassed or anything), but when offered the chance to get a burst of pleasure the rats seem to comply almost without fail.

    1. Re:How it works by blakestah · · Score: 2

      when offered the chance to get a burst of pleasure the rats seem to comply almost without fail.

      You refer to it as a pleasure center.

      I would call it a control center for positive reinforcement. Anything that precedes its stimulation will be reinforced. Rats will do amazing things with a stimulating electrode positioned appropriately. So will almost all other animals.

      Not coincidentally, similar pathways are relevant for addiction.

      And, BTW, John Chapin is a good guy in my book.

    2. Re:How it works by Hardly · · Score: 1
      when offered the chance to get a burst of pleasure the rats seem to comply almost without fail
      Arthur C. Clarke referred to a similar experiment in his book "Profiles of the Future" (1962) Monkeys had push-button controlled electrodes wired into the pleasure sections of their brains. These monkeys would press the button twice a second for hours on end, undistracted by food and sex.

      It was also noted that an animal would behave with similar single-mindedness to turn OFF any current fed to its pain centres.

    3. Re:How it works by nooboob · · Score: 0

      Funny. My wife and I operate on the same principle . I'm the rat. of course.

  108. Get Congress to Ban Mind Control! by jnv11 · · Score: 1

    Technologies like this could one day be used to control humans if they are not stopped. This technology is a dictator's dream because it will allow anyone to enslave anyone by subjecting the victim to the "appropriate" surgery. Most dictators and communists love to micromanage every one of their citizens' lives, and this technology might allow them to do this. If bin Laden or some other terrorist got this technology, we will see many loved ones get kidnapped, operated on, and turned into suicide bobming slaves. Write to your congressman and senators to have this Pandora's box banned.

    1. Re:Get Congress to Ban Mind Control! by neuropro · · Score: 1

      why should you bother? John Chapin, the Chief Scientist on the project, is getting rich from this and he is as American as you can get. So what's your problem then? Do you really think that any politician would give more weight to your words against his?

    2. Re:Get Congress to Ban Mind Control! by jnv11 · · Score: 1

      Just because something is American does not mean that it is good. Remember Timothy McVeigh, Aldrich Ames, Eric Rudolph, Robert Philip Hanssen, and John Walker Lindh? These people are American, and these people are evil. (I am not implying that American equals evil. Remember the passengers who started fighting the terrorists on the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania.)

  109. Re:Instead of fishtape, use these rats to run cat5 by ThePlague · · Score: 0

    I was thinking the same thing, but there a myriad of practical uses:

    1. Plumbers could send them down pipes to determine exactly where blockages occur, probably cheaper than fiber cameras, plus they can go in directions a pushed cable couldn't.

    2. Any sort of post construction wiring, not just cat-5: electrical, phone, cable, etc.

    3. My favorite idea, though, would be to train them to attack other rats/mice on command. They could also be trained to drag the dead and wounded out, so no more decaying animals between walls.

    Imagine! An elite force of cyborg rats used to rid pests from your home! In old-school slashdot tradition, possibly trained as ninjas subsisting on pancakes. How cool would that be?

  110. Re:Barbaric by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 1

    I agree totally. I have a few of the critters in my front room and they are more intelligent than people think. They are also more intelligent than many posters on slashdot.

    As to the issue of cruelty, well if rats have been brought up around people they love attention and as long as they're not mishandled and they're not in pain they won't be too bothered about having stuff strapped on them (since all it does it simulate something touching their whiskers). So these rats probably had a better quality of life than ones that live in the gutter and end up dying slowly of pneumonia.

  111. Sanctity of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any? Does anybody worry about it? If rats, why not monkeys? And if men are monkeys, why not men? Do we have the right to subjugate living beings in this manner? A farm animal gets food and protection. What is our obligation to these rats? If any?

  112. Human Volunteers by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

    rewarded them by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain

    Sounds good to me... Where do I sign up?

  113. this comment created for you by by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

    a swarm of remote controlled rats!

  114. Guard dogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would happen if you were controlling your guard dog to stop a robber and you ran out of batteries in your remote??

    1. Re:Guard dogs? by Megatron12 · · Score: 0

      I really hope this wasnt an attempt at humor.

  115. HA! unbelievable! just heard interview on NPR... by xlurker · · Score: 2, Insightful
    just heard an interview on national public radio with one of the researchers that setup the rats.
    The last question was how the rats were "motivated". The guy started tippy-toeing and touchy-feely explaining it... his answer:
    • "to be able to run around is reward enough for the rats, they love not having to be in the cages"
    he went on a bit more and sounded very strained about it...

    we all know the real reason:
    When signaled by a laptop computer, the electrodes stimulated the rodents' brains and cued them to scurry in the desired direction, then rewarded them by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain.
    well, well, now we now why they do:
    they get a fucking kick out of doing it!

    that might also explain the mysterious results concerning some guy that tried this on himself:
    a Tulane University researcher tried [this on himself] during the 1960s, with unclear results...
    I thought this stuff was only science fiction...
    --
    ______________________________________________
    sigamajig...
  116. The next drug curriers by Mick+D. · · Score: 1

    Set this up on a dog, add GPS, high quality maps, and a container for drugs. What you get is a very efficient, self fueling currier to take anything anywhere you like. If someone unknown tampers with it a small explosive would stop that pretty quick.

    Now that I think about it, terrorists and MORE IMPORATANTLY the Anti-terrorists, are going to see all kinds of uses for this. The pigeons in the park all have small anthrax bombs, or rabid animals could be sent into schools. Most of these things are doable without the remote. This just makes the engineering of that kind of stuff easier.

    --

    Is this the end yet?...How 'bout now...how 'bout now...how 'bout now?
  117. Bye bye razor.. by ksb · · Score: 1

    Well chaps, thats my new Robot Wars entry idea sorted, now where did that cat go... ;)

  118. Rats Today, Slamhounds Tomorrow by Mittermeyer · · Score: 1

    Two thoughts- on the various controlled leader messages, the best of the various novels and stories has to be Interface by Neal Stephenson writing under alias Stephen Bury. Best he's done yet, mostly because it has an actual ending instead of a fadeout.

    Second cyberpunk thought is that William Gibson's slamhounds cannot be far behind. For those not familiar, a slamhound is essentially a guided dog-bomb that gets your scent and runs you down, then explodes.

    --
    ________________________________________ History Must Not Fall Into The Wrong Hands ___________________________________
  119. Re:Not only possible, but HAS BEEN DONE for decade by raduga · · Score: 1
    I can recall programs on PBS 20 years ago that demonstrated this sort of thing on any number and sort of creatures.

    O my brother, my droogs and I viddied something real horrorshow like on BBC, 30 years ago.

    This bezoomy malchick who, while minding his own business, peeting the moloka, got loveted by the razz, and tolchocked into the staja. Like a helpless plenny he got tolchocked in the gulliver by some medical type and went around weeping and platchy and none of the usual ultraviolence.

    It was all gloopy and sad, but I slooshy it turned out okay in the end, thanks to the millicents and good old Ludwig Van

    --
    First, nothing begins if not opening
  120. The CIA tried this with cats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first prototype was run over by a car.

    True story.

  121. Tasp! by cowtamer · · Score: 2

    "...then rewarded them by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain."

    They've finally invented the Tasp. Now you have to deal with people "making your day" and current addiction.

    We will really need to crack down on crime commited by wireheads!

  122. Rat Things by Graabein · · Score: 1
    Ah, Rat Things. Finally.

    I wonder what sort of cooling system they use? Will they burn up if they stand still for too long?

    What's their top speed, anyway?

    --
    And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  123. sounds like.. by C0uNt-Ch0cUla · · Score: 1

    Sounds to me like the plot for a bad horror movie..
    ""waves of what appear to be 'Mechanized Rodents' have begun to descend on the city" more news later..."

    1. Re:sounds like.. by neuropro · · Score: 1

      and they attacked the Crazy Chief Scientist ...

  124. Read "Terminal Man" by gelfling · · Score: 3, Informative

    by Michael Crighton = about a violent antisocial criminal with psychomotor epilepsy who is given electrode implants to blunt his own seizures but learns how to give himself seizures in order to kill and cause mayhem.

    "A good Read !!!"

  125. Controlling human beings has already been around.. by GutterBunny · · Score: 3, Funny

    " Kate Rears, a policy analyst at the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington, said technological advances mean human-control technology can no longer be dismissed as far-fetched. "

    Humans being controlled by technology has been around for years... I can make anyone on /. drool just by showing a trailer of Spiderman.

    --
    managers...why god invented purgatory
  126. Does it bother anyone else? by hal9k · · Score: 1

    I read cnn.com regularly, and I often notice the articles in their "sci-tech" section a day or so before I see them on /. Many of CNN.com's ads are on the front page and I assume contribute somewhat to their site revenue.

    Does anyone else think that it would be appropriate for more "content" to be provided by the slashdot team in order to justify a subscription service?

  127. For what it's worth by ColGraff · · Score: 3, Funny

    I doubt the rats object to the experience too much, or that they consider it cruel. In exchange for moving the way the goofy humans want them to, they get a really nice high. Good deal for the rat.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  128. I want one! by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    But I want it so I can remote control people!
    No wait, thats been done for centuries with religion and politics.

    1. Re:I want one! by neuropro · · Score: 1

      no, it's been done with similar electrode implants too a few decades ago. but then people stopped doing it, guess why. Or don't guess, just read The Terminal Man, by Michael Crichton.

  129. Rats?! by President+Laguna+Loi · · Score: 1

    Why not. But let's take it a step further. On the back of the RC rats, have radio-controlled flies, similar to the one in Lexx. They can be created to do aerial surveilance of anything from rooms where hostages are being kept to overseas enemy strongholds

  130. Nature Magazine, Science Magazine by neuropro · · Score: 1

    If you are interested in this type of research, please visit our Web site. We provide related information and some of the bacground, from time to time. Amazing that they managed to place their paper in Nature. Then again, it's not so amazing after all, given that the reviewers come from a small circle of buddies - you already discussed similar publications of those businessmen (and a few women serving them) here ... come along for the ride in this Brave New World, where Science can be so easily bought ... Neuroprosthesis News

  131. Racin' Rats? by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    But didn't Tyco already come out with the Racin' Rats?

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  132. Rats, get a bad rap by aliens · · Score: 1

    My housemate recently got two of these little furry things, and although repulsed at first. They have never bitten(unlike hamsters and gerbils) and actually play hide & seek. They're very intelligent animals. Great for those who can't have dogs or cats I think. I think the tail turns a lot of people away.

    Peace

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  133. Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ho-hum...

    What do they call it, BTW? A wireless mouse?

    Call our lawyers, we got fresh meat!

    And don't let them touch the rats, I'm against cannibalism.

  134. Interface Inversion Milestone? by NEURORAT · · Score: 1

    Hey is this the first instance of a computer-driven mouse instead of a mouse-driven computer? Ugh, can't wait to see the patents on this.

    --
    NeuroRat -- Fully modified brain implants to steer the rodent population.
  135. The rats may become jaded by shuane · · Score: 1
    After a time, the rats will come to expect rewards for very little effort (in other words they'll not do what you want!).

    This sort of thing was my favourite part of Psych 109, for those of you unfamiliar with the science here's a quick description of the different reward/punishment types:
    • Positive Reinforcement - Pleasant stimulus.
    • Negative Reinforcement - Remove unpleasant stimulus.
    • Positive Punishment - Unpleasant stimulus.
    • Negative Punishment - Remove pleasant stimulus.
    Experiments have shown that a random or variable schedule of reinforcement have a much stronger effect than a fixed schedule of reinforcement (i.e. you shouldn't reward good behaviour every time...).

    Also worth thinking about is the observation that using a dual schedule of Positive Reinforcement in conjunction with Positive Punishment tends to work better than a single schedule does.

    Don't try this at home, your children may come to hate me!
    --
    This signature intentionally has just seven words.
    1. Re:The rats may become jaded by Tazzy531 · · Score: 2

      I don't think the method that they used is what you are talking about. You are talking about rewarding the rats to do something good and punishing them when they do bad. What this article talks about is sending electronic stimulus to certain parts of the brain that controls certain motions. In other words, they've identified sectors of the brain that controls the motion to move a certain way. It is not urging the rat to do it, the scientists are in effect controlling the rats.

      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    2. Re:The rats may become jaded by shuane · · Score: 1

      You are talking about rewarding the rats to do something good and punishing them when they do bad. What this article talks about is sending electronic stimulus to certain parts of the brain that controls certain motions. I think they're referring to three stimuli - one for left, one for right, and then one for a reward. From the article: "Chapin's team trained the rats in a maze by signaling the left and right whisker-sensing regions. When a rat turned in the correct direction, its reward-sensing region was stimulated. " and earlier it had: "When signaled by a laptop computer, the electrodes stimulated the rodents' brains and cued them to scurry in the desired direction, then rewarded them by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain. " It sounds like they rewarded the rats every time they turned in the direction they wanted to go - but then again, if it's not stated we can't really speculate :).

      --
      This signature intentionally has just seven words.
  136. damn _ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's been some years that i read about remote controlled roaches, and they were already talking about rescuin'peoples with these, even if it didn't seem clear to me how they would use roaches to rescue peoples, but i guess they just want to make remote controlled rescue teams when the technology'll have improved a bit..

    my question is: could i remote control my little sister? coz that ice scream's too far from the keyboard >_

  137. Re:Barbaric by PT3R · · Score: 1

    Articles like this always make feel a little uncomfortable. On one hand I'm in favour of scientific evolution, i'm no luddite. But on the other hand I feel as strong or stronger about animal rights. These rats probably have a better quality of life but no freedom at all. How would you feel if they did the same experiments with some little kids that used to live on smoky mountain (phillipines)? Would you still argue that their life quality has improved? No this is no flamebait just a question.

  138. Here's the BBC's report by TinheadNed · · Score: 1

    For another take on it, go here. For once, even the scientists actually working on this are slightly freaked out by the ethical implications.

  139. Russian & Israeli bomb dogs by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    During WWII the Russians trained dogs to find their food under armoured vehicles.

    Eventually these dogs were released in the vicinity of German Panzer columns with bombs strapped to their backs & 1 foot long levers sticking up from the backpacks. When they ran under the tank the lever got pushed down & the bomb went off.

    But before the program went into gear the Germans came apon some intelligence with details of the bomb dogs, so the 1st time they were used the Germans shot all the dogs straight away. Consequently the program was never used again.

    The Israelis have also used suicide bomb rotweilers in Lebanon.

  140. Rats trained to play basketball ??? by SailFly · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing somebody doing their masters in learning theory/psychology by training rats to play basket ball. I saw the clip on the news where they would carry the ball in their mouths, then deposit into the basket. I think it would reward each point with food. This is going back maybe 15 years or so....anybody remember this?

  141. Fundamentals are old knowledge by loply · · Score: 1

    The fundamental issue here is that they can reliably control the rat by electrically stimulating its brain.
    I forget his name, but a 19th century brain surgen was able to make one of his corpses humm an opera he had heard almost 2 decades before dying time and time again by prodding the right area of his brain. Its interesting to see where this will ultimately lead... Obviously someone has the equipment neccessary to both accurately stimulate a rats brain, interrogation devices? :)

    1. Re:Fundamentals are old knowledge by neuropro · · Score: 1

      why would you want to interrogate those poor rats?

  142. Galvani by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Galvani did this 201 years ago.
    http://www.english.upenn.edu/~jlynch/Frank/G ifs/ga lvlab.html
    http://www.chem.uidaho.edu/~honors/gal vani.html

  143. Sounds great... by andylaurence · · Score: 1

    "If you have a collapsed building and there are people under the rubble, there's no robot that exists now that would be capable of going down into such a difficult terrain and finding those people, but a rat would be able to do that"

    When signaled by a laptop computer, the electrodes stimulated the rodents' brains and cued them to scurry in the desired direction, then rewarded them by stimulating a pleasure center in the brain


    You happen to be in a building which collapses. You survive the impact, and are trapped in the rubble. You're about to die when a rat appears and comes in your face! You just know that the video feed from the rat would find its way onto some dodgy porn site.

  144. The Borg by aries78 · · Score: 1

    Suddenly the Borg doesn't seem as scary now that I know they will all just be rodents.

    Maybe Species 8472 is just exterminators/pest control?

  145. Re:HA! unbelievable! just heard interview on NPR.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  146. BATTLE RATS!!!!!!! by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    See you on TNT!!

  147. Hmmmm... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    Isn't Cheney already using this technology on GW, Powell and RumsFeld?

  148. where the rats come from by patpatpat · · Score: 1

    the rats are just a byproduct of a DARPA-program that's called Development of Biomimetic Robots and Sensors Using Hybrid Brain-Machine Technology, which in turn is just part of something called "Controlled Biological Systems". the mother of it all is the "Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's (DARPA) Defense Sciences Office (DSO)".

  149. animals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you let me violate you
    you let me desacrate you
    you let me penatrate you
    you let me complicate you
    help me
    i broke apart my insides
    help me
    i've got no soul to sell
    help me
    the only thing that works for me
    help me get away from myself
    i want to fuck you like an animal
    i want to feel you from the inside
    i want fo fuck you like an animal
    my whole existence is flawed
    you get me closer to god
    you can have my isolation
    you can have the hate that it brings
    you can have my absence of faith
    you can have my everything
    help me
    you tear down my reason
    help me
    it's your sex i can smell
    help me
    you make me perfect
    help me become somebody else
    i want to fuck you like an animal
    i want to feel you from the inside
    i want to fuck you like an animal
    my whole existence is flawed
    you get me closer to god
    all through every forest
    above the trees
    within my stomach
    scraped off my knees
    i drink the honey
    inside your hive
    you are the reason
    i stay alive
    help me get away from myself
    you get me closer to god
    help me get away from myself
    you get me closer to god
    help me get away from myself
    you get me closer to god
    help me help me get away from myself
    help me help me get away from myself

  150. recreational non-invasive human uses? by l0rdishtar · · Score: 1

    i think it was Jose Delgado who originaly thought up of this idea, his book "phyco-civilizied, twords an electronic control society" states "man does not have the right to control his own mind, one day entire armies will by activated at the push of a button" .. now i'm not into all that, but that was in the 1950's.. I think now we can stimulate particular parts of the brain using non invasive electro magnetic waves. (the government proved this in the 60's with MKULTRA)i'm betting the future of recreational drugs will not be new chemical synthetics, but phyco-electronic instead. imagine building a headband that blocks dopeamine (ala coke) and seratonin (ala mdma) reuptake, or stimulates there release. that's gonna be fun :) lets hope thats a project that's got some venture capital.. i know theres a market "if you want to find out if something gets you high, a rat is that last person to ask" - Dr. Alex Shulgin peace.love.unity.respect -Shane

    --
    Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, and the universe i'm not so sure about" - Einstein
  151. Israelis? by TheLink · · Score: 2

    Heck, the Palestinians use suicide bomb humans.
    They're trained too.

    --