Explain to me how this is even remotely possible? Let's take something simple. Monitor displaying the number 5 and monitor displaying the number 4. How do the glasses know whether it's a 5 or 4? The computer is relaying the information to the monitor and not to the glasses. The liquid crystal film (LCD) is normally connected to the computer through the monitor. How is it connected now? This is such obvious bullshit that I don't understand how anyone could even consider it.
Actually it's the opposite. It's BECAUSE of the undeveloped countries that the population explodes. It's because the rich and powerful 1%'ers keep the undeveloped world undeveloped that we have these exorbitant population increases. It's FACT that fertility rates (number of children born to an average couple) in undeveloped countries are high and low in developed countries like western countries. If the Big banks like the IMF would stop preventing developed countries from creating industry and wealth for their populations, the fertility rate in those countries would go down. People who have jobs and are happy spend less time fucking than those who have nothing.
You claim that google plus is better than twitter. One must wonder how much google is paying you for that assessment? With twitter, we don't have to give out our name.
Refusing to buy GM foods is IMPOSSIBLE. GM foods aren't labeled as GM foods. You have no way to know that any food item you buy is GM. I also find it funny that you are so uneducated as to be totally ignorant of the fact that companies like Monsanto create these GM foods in order to force farmers to buy their seed (yes potatoes are just like seed and are used to grow new potatoes). Companies like Monsanto contaminate the farms of those who refuse to buy seed from them with their PATENTED GM seeds then they SUE those farmers for using their PATENTED seeds when they were the ones who contaminated the land through cross pollination accomplished by merely driving by a field and throwing a handful of their patented seed in the field. These people are HEROES and should be commended for their service to humanity for destroying these evil crops.
The people don't want their food to be genetically modified. The purpose of genetically modifying food is to patent crops with the result being the control of all food by companies like Monsanto. We don't want them to control our food. We don't want to have to use their seed when we can save our own seed. If the government refuses to listen to the will of the people then the people have every right and even the responsibility to destroy those crops to protect themselves and their future generations.
The Judge mentioned that he noticed a low number of motions to quash in these types of ex parte expedited discovery cases. Ex parte means without notice to the accused. The low number is more than likely the result of the policies of the particular ISP's in regards to giving notice to the subscriber that there is a subpoena for their information.
The judge rightly noticed this discrepancy along with the fact that in some cases the IP holder was not the infringing party. The motion to quash is an essential right of the accused so they can tell the court "hey, I live in an apartment bldg with 20 people who could be leeching off my wireless therefore the subpoena should be quashed because there isn't enough probable cause that I am the infringer".
The ex parte discovery process for that many people is likely to violate someone's rights and this is why the judge denied it.
The reason it's not reasonable to give out a subpoena for 1000 "John Does" is that the judge is not allowed to use the probability ratio that, as you stated, 90 percent of the IP holders are the actual infringers as a basis for probable cause for the subpoena. He must have probable cause for EACH individual person as a separate entity. This is the reason he mentioned that some are assigned to Universities.
For example. Say you are one of those John Does and you live in an apartment building with 3 floors and 7 apt's per floor. You live on the second floor in the center most apartment. You have unsecured WiFi. The probability that you are the infringer is now potentially only 1 in 21. That would not provide probable cause for the subpoena.
No. What this says is that an Airforce Investigator, who was later referred to as Mr. BLACKED-OUT informant, stated the information. More than likely an Airforce investigator would not have the authority to report such things to the FBI so he became an informant.
We can already log into 2 different accounts so long as each login is in a different browser window. I use Firefox to log into one account while I log into another in Internet Explorer.
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, ((((((((((((nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation)))))))))))))."
Why isn't anyone suing for due process violations? No law enacted by congress nor action of the Federal or State Governments can overrule the Constitution.
"UPDATES: Reports of the raid and confiscation of equipment are most likely a hoax or an elaborate social engineering scheme to capitalize on current news events.
Details are still few, and sympathizers should exercise caution before donating funds allegedly for "attorney fees".
The original text requesting donations, as quoted below, and the corresponding link have been deleted from the "suspect" site.
The "suspect" site is no longer available for viewing at the URL provided - but the "suspect" Twitter account is still active.
More Details to follow as soon as they are available. "
"According to the Living Planet Report, human demands on natural resources have doubled in under 50 years and are now outstripping what the Earth can provide by more than half"
Then how are we getting the resources? If I can provide 2 apples and the customer takes three where does the third one come from?
"The report said that wildlife in tropical countries is also under huge pressure, with populations of species falling by 60 per cent in three decades, the'Daily Mail reported."
60 percent? O' RLY? I don't think even the National Enquirer would buy that.
"And the report, from the WWF, the Zoological Society of London and the Global Footprint Network, said that British people are still consuming far more than the Earth can cope with."
Now that I see they meant.999... to infinity the calculation would be.999... * 10 = 9.999...0 emphasis on the zero at the end. While you can never get to the end of an infinite number, if you could you would be required to add a zero after multiplying by 10
Slashdot Mirror
Explain to me how this is even remotely possible? Let's take something simple. Monitor displaying the number 5 and monitor displaying the number 4. How do the glasses know whether it's a 5 or 4? The computer is relaying the information to the monitor and not to the glasses. The liquid crystal film (LCD) is normally connected to the computer through the monitor. How is it connected now? This is such obvious bullshit that I don't understand how anyone could even consider it.
Hate it for you.
If it were me I would drop any provider participating in this scheme.
Actually it's the opposite. It's BECAUSE of the undeveloped countries that the population explodes. It's because the rich and powerful 1%'ers keep the undeveloped world undeveloped that we have these exorbitant population increases. It's FACT that fertility rates (number of children born to an average couple) in undeveloped countries are high and low in developed countries like western countries. If the Big banks like the IMF would stop preventing developed countries from creating industry and wealth for their populations, the fertility rate in those countries would go down. People who have jobs and are happy spend less time fucking than those who have nothing.
When will we be rid of these sick people propagating this absurd lie about carbon emissions?
You claim that google plus is better than twitter. One must wonder how much google is paying you for that assessment? With twitter, we don't have to give out our name.
Can anyone tell me what it's like to live without these? /end sarcasm
Reference: Dark Ages
My first free Bitcoins were received on July, 12th 2010. Sounds like someone needs to learn what patent means.
Refusing to buy GM foods is IMPOSSIBLE. GM foods aren't labeled as GM foods. You have no way to know that any food item you buy is GM. I also find it funny that you are so uneducated as to be totally ignorant of the fact that companies like Monsanto create these GM foods in order to force farmers to buy their seed (yes potatoes are just like seed and are used to grow new potatoes). Companies like Monsanto contaminate the farms of those who refuse to buy seed from them with their PATENTED GM seeds then they SUE those farmers for using their PATENTED seeds when they were the ones who contaminated the land through cross pollination accomplished by merely driving by a field and throwing a handful of their patented seed in the field. These people are HEROES and should be commended for their service to humanity for destroying these evil crops.
Sounds to me like some heroes who need to be awarded commendations for their service to the future human race.
The people don't want their food to be genetically modified. The purpose of genetically modifying food is to patent crops with the result being the control of all food by companies like Monsanto. We don't want them to control our food. We don't want to have to use their seed when we can save our own seed. If the government refuses to listen to the will of the people then the people have every right and even the responsibility to destroy those crops to protect themselves and their future generations.
The Judge mentioned that he noticed a low number of motions to quash in these types of ex parte expedited discovery cases. Ex parte means without notice to the accused. The low number is more than likely the result of the policies of the particular ISP's in regards to giving notice to the subscriber that there is a subpoena for their information.
The judge rightly noticed this discrepancy along with the fact that in some cases the IP holder was not the infringing party. The motion to quash is an essential right of the accused so they can tell the court "hey, I live in an apartment bldg with 20 people who could be leeching off my wireless therefore the subpoena should be quashed because there isn't enough probable cause that I am the infringer".
The ex parte discovery process for that many people is likely to violate someone's rights and this is why the judge denied it.
I think this guy is wrong.
The reason it's not reasonable to give out a subpoena for 1000 "John Does" is that the judge is not allowed to use the probability ratio that, as you stated, 90 percent of the IP holders are the actual infringers as a basis for probable cause for the subpoena. He must have probable cause for EACH individual person as a separate entity. This is the reason he mentioned that some are assigned to Universities.
For example. Say you are one of those John Does and you live in an apartment building with 3 floors and 7 apt's per floor. You live on the second floor in the center most apartment. You have unsecured WiFi. The probability that you are the infringer is now potentially only 1 in 21. That would not provide probable cause for the subpoena.
A fifth (of a gallon) is 24 dollars so a gallon is 120 dollars. How is this ingenuity? It looks more like massive FAIL to me.
No. What this says is that an Airforce Investigator, who was later referred to as Mr. BLACKED-OUT informant, stated the information. More than likely an Airforce investigator would not have the authority to report such things to the FBI so he became an informant.
We can already log into 2 different accounts so long as each login is in a different browser window. I use Firefox to log into one account while I log into another in Internet Explorer.
According to the U.S. Constitution:
"No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, ((((((((((((nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation)))))))))))))."
Why isn't anyone suing for due process violations? No law enacted by congress nor action of the Federal or State Governments can overrule the Constitution.
A simple photo editor would allow you to raise the gamma setting on the photo revealing the guys whole face....
http://current.com/1kuq54c
"UPDATES: Reports of the raid and confiscation of equipment are most likely a hoax or an elaborate social engineering scheme to capitalize on current news events.
Details are still few, and sympathizers should exercise caution before donating funds allegedly for "attorney fees".
The original text requesting donations, as quoted below, and the corresponding link have been deleted from the "suspect" site.
The "suspect" site is no longer available for viewing at the URL provided - but the "suspect" Twitter account is still active.
More Details to follow as soon as they are available. "
*Content copied from website*
"According to the Living Planet Report, human demands on natural resources have doubled in under 50 years and are now outstripping what the Earth can provide by more than half"
Then how are we getting the resources? If I can provide 2 apples and the customer takes three where does the third one come from?
"The report said that wildlife in tropical countries is also under huge pressure, with populations of species falling by 60 per cent in three decades, the'Daily Mail reported."
60 percent? O' RLY? I don't think even the National Enquirer would buy that.
"And the report, from the WWF, the Zoological Society of London and the Global Footprint Network, said that British people are still consuming far more than the Earth can cope with."
Then how is the Earth coping?
Now that I see they meant .999... to infinity the calculation would be .999... * 10 = 9.999...0 emphasis on the zero at the end. While you can never get to the end of an infinite number, if you could you would be required to add a zero after multiplying by 10
Last time I checked, ( a few seconds ago) .999 times 10 = 9.99 NOT 9.999
Maybe that mathematician needs a refresher course. .999 times 9 = 8.991 + .999 = 9.990 or 9.99 for short
Now I know what company not to buy games from!
Yeah, now they will be fucked by their Government instead. Who do you think has the bigger dick?
Mea Culpa.
I misunderstood the initial statement. The numbers were for 1950 - 1959
Excuse me while I wipe the egg from my face. :P