Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard To Require Real First and Last Names For Official Forums

An anonymous reader writes "Recently, Blizzard Entertainment implemented a Real ID feature for some of its current games and all of its future Battle.net-based games. Today, Blizzard announced that it intends to require usage of the real names of Battle.net posters for its StarCraft II forums before release, and for its World of Warcraft forums shortly before the release of World of Warcraft: Cataclysm. From the announcement: 'The first and most significant change is that in the near future, anyone posting or replying to a post on official Blizzard forums will be doing so using their Real ID — that is, their real-life first and last name — with the option to also display the name of their primary in-game character alongside it. These changes will go into effect on all StarCraft II forums with the launch of the new community site prior to the July 27 release of the game, with the World of Warcraft site and forums following suit near the launch of Cataclysm. Certain classic forums, including the classic Battle.net forums, will remain unchanged.'"

833 comments

  1. How does this work for those under 13? by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm assuming it's under the parents name for the account which should be a pleasant conversation at work when your boss asks you why you are trolling the warlock forum?

    --
    open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    1. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just think - now you can find your favorite pornstar wow-players even easier!

    2. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by localman57 · · Score: 1, Funny

      What? I don't know anything about Trolls or Warlocks. Oh, wait. Is this from that movie with DumbleDoor and that pirate guy-not Johhny Depp but the other one-and the big battle scenes?

    3. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Well, Bob, it's like this. Everyone in HR is playing Alliance, and trying to convince Blizzard that Locks are overpowered. You can't expect me to let them get away with that, now can you?"

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    4. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm assuming it's under the parents name for the account which should be a pleasant conversation at work when your boss asks you why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      Already laying the groundwork for the "it was my 13-year-old" excuse, I see. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by UDGags · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the Real ID FAQ Will parents be able to control their child’s access to posting on the forums? Yes. When this change to the forums goes live, parents will be able to decide whether to allow their child to post on official Blizzard forums that use Real ID through Battle.net Parental Controls.

    6. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shit man, i think you just went full retard.

    7. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

      why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      You can't fool me. Trolls can't be warlocks!

    8. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. It posts your childs name.

      And blizz is now blocking name changes on battlenet

    9. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      You can't fool me. Trolls can't be warlocks!

      yet...*grins*

    10. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that means his boss was trolling the warlock forum too. This reminds me of a great episode of the Office:

      Dwight (to Jim): I'm going to write you up for not working.
      Jim (to Dwight): I'm going to write YOU up for not working.
      Dwight (to Jim): Hmmm, well played. Neither of us will write the other up for not working.

    11. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      with the World of Warcraft site and forums following suit near the launch of Cataclysm.

      :D

      (Note the race/class changes that make this possible...)

    12. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are reading too much old news. Trolls can be warlocks in the coming expansion.
      http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?sid=2000&topicId=24702205296&pageNo=1

    13. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      As if I'd work for a company that tolerated the Alliance in the first place.

      I'd worry more about HR monitoring trade chat.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    14. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      WTS: MY {legendary}WANG]{/legendary} PST.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    15. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, more identiity theft.

      There is NO way i would like my full name posted on a forum. sorry blizzard ill fight that 100%

    16. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can come cataclysm...

      http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=24702205296&pageNo=1&sid=2000#8

    17. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming it's under the parents name for the account which should be a pleasant conversation at work when your boss asks you why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      That's a convenient alibi when your boss finds out it was YOU that was ganking his level 49 warrior in Un'goro Crater. "No, sir, it was my kid, really!"

      I see this as a practical application of John Gabriel's Greater Internet Fuckwad Theorem. As he states, normal person plus audience plus anonymity equals total fuckwad. Given that you can't remove the 'normal person' element or the 'audience' element without it no longer being a forum, the remaining option is to remove anonymity.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    18. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      What class is Zalazane, again? The level 10 troll warlock who singlehandedly evicted the Darkspear trolls from their home in the Echo Isles.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    19. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well check out this other submission for the gory details - http://slashdot.org/submission/1276448/Blizzard-employee-shares-real-name-Lesson-learned?art_pos=4

      It seems like a Blizzard employee stepped up and put his name out there - and now the internet is abuzz with pretty much every detail of his life.

    20. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by cappp · · Score: 5, Informative

      A Blizzard employee went ahead and put his name out there as detailed on this site.

      In short, a little digging has found the guy's phone number, home address, the names and home address of his parents, his siblings' names, the valuation of his property, the name of his spouse, his facebook account, pictures of his home, pictures of him, his twitter account, his age, and so on.

    21. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Requiring a "real" First and Last Name is stupid. Not all countries have that convention.

      Requiring a name is not. Most people have at least one name, or they can come up with one.

      I think this recent article is relevant:

      http://developers.slashdot.org/story/10/06/17/2347257/Falsehoods-Programmers-Believe-About-Names?from=rss
      http://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/

      Despite that, that article isn't really that useful in practice (it's useful for perspective). Yes some people don't have names (or names someone can type in repeatably), but they are unlikely to be the sorts posting on web forums (e.g. they are unlikely to be your users in most cases).

      --
    22. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Machtyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That link is classic. It's too bad it's not on the blizzard official forum. However, if it was, it would have been deleted forthwith. I'm sure Blizzard is fully aware of the gameriot thread by now, though.

      EPIC FAIL on Blizzard's part (I wonder how much of a decision this was of Blizzard or Activision). There are some really psycho people on WoW. I'd hate for someone to get hurt because of this issue.

    23. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually can be warlocks in the new Cataclysm expansion.

      http://blue.mmo-champion.com/t/24702205296/race-class-balance-between-horde-alliance/

    24. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      Jews who run your entire media

      Erh. I thought we'd finally moved on to blaming News Corp and patent trolls for all that. Old meme is old, mate. Gotta live in the now.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    25. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      A Blizzard employee went ahead and put his name out there as detailed on this site. In short, a little digging has found the guy's phone number, home address, the names and home address of his parents, his siblings' names, the valuation of his property, the name of his spouse, his facebook account, pictures of his home, pictures of him, his twitter account, his age, and so on.

      Guess that is the last game I will be buying from them. I like my pseudo anonymity.

    26. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      You can't fool me. Trolls can't be warlocks!

      yet..

    27. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      John Davis from Korn plays WoW, as does Mila Kunis (Ditzy brunette from That 70's Show)

      I'm SURE they both love this idea. I look forward to seeing them on Warhammer Online, or some other MMO which isn't made by idiots.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    28. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to the posts on the link you gave, the guy has now deleted his Facebook after getting around 11k "blue posts" (I have no idea what that is) on his page. His entire online presence is pretty much trainted. I actually feel a bit sorry for the guy.

    29. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I would like to take this one step further and start provoking some hate mail or some other bad publicity, to show how stupid this move is on blizzard's part. I never would have guessed that blizzard would be so out of touch with their fan base, but this has shown me they have totally lost it. I was a devoted wow player for a long time, but will never post on any forums if this is the case, and will also read carefully all other EULAs from now on, as I am sure there might be more hidden info such as this saying they might be able to use your personal info which has nothing to do with the game to promote their own xxx (place whatever you feel like here, as I can not think of anything i would want to promote from a gamers perspective) .....

      I also think it is a sad show of what the gaming companies are trying to turn into, almost a google type of data mining center, but I really think blizzard is lost to us, will never be the same again.... : (

    30. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by varcher · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, more identiity theft.

      Think about it. Figuring out the answer to that "security question", like "what is your mother's maiden name" suddendly became much, much easier.

    31. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And that will be the only way to deal with this.

      Find every blizzard employee on the forums, expose all there details. Then they will get it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 2

      It's pretty clear what will happen if Blizzard goes through with this:
      Everyone who doesn't want their real names publicized will stop posting on Blizzard's forums, and third-party forums will take off.
      Then, either Blizzard will revoke the requirement of displaying real names, or save a lot of money in hosting costs.
      I suspect the latter.
      Honestly, it is within Blizzards rights to require whatever they like (just not retro-actively) and this will give them less heavily trafficed forums with a lot lot less trolling and flaming.
      Those who care about their privacy will suffer, having to go to third party forums, but Blizzards forums will become a friendlier more open place that gets overloaded much less often.
      As much as I hate the required privacy breech required to post in future (And I won't be posting there myself) I can't really fault them on it.
      Sure, there'll be a few people who get stalked and such, but that really isn't on Blizzard, that's on the socially retarded few who do such stalking.. It's illegal (well, depending on if they go far enough to be a problem) and a problem for the authorities.
      Although I limit my personal exposure on the internet myself, I find it sad that I feel this is necessary. And I don't blame Blizzard for it.

      In an attempt to anticipate those who disagree (and I am sure there are many) I'll propose this:
      Blizzard adds an option to hide your personal information, and also an option to hide all posts from people who have chosen this option. They're smart enough to figure out a way to integrate this, and could probably take a few cues from the /. forums we're participating in now.
      Now, I know I'm being an insensitive clod, so feel free to correct me.

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    33. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about this for a minute, Just don't use a cc. Buy game cards cash and they will put any name you want on it. James Dean ETC ..

    34. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      classic overbearing corporate policy:

      they mean well, vaguely, but the implementation is *horrible*.

    35. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why you are trolling the warlock forum?

      You can't fool me. Trolls can't be warlocks!

      Actually, in Cataclysm both trolls and dwarves can be locks.

    36. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually this should be rated funny since parental controls basically can only lock (uninspired) parents out anyway

    37. Re:How does this work for those under 13? by cappp · · Score: 1

      Update. Now there's an entire website providing details on the private information of every Blizzard employee they can trace.

      Some pretty personal stuff there including details on children, political contributions, addresses, educational details, and so on. http://asnowstormbyanyothername.blogspot.com/

  2. Hmm.... by Pojut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Real first and last name? Full, no initial? Not sure what I think about that one, Blizzard...

    1. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know what to think of it.

      It is a horrible, horrible idea.

      You know that list of things every responsible parent teaches their children to never do on the internet?

      One of those things is to tell someone your real name.

      Blizzard is forcing them to in a way they are unlikely to notice first or are willing to do anyway because it is for all the new big games.

      Blizzard is going to expose the identities of millions of people, including children and adolescents publicly on the internet. They can then be exploited by anyone, including the "wonderful" guys over at 4chan, and worse.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My thought: Internet Detectives are going to have a field day with this. Got ganked by a Rogue last night? Search the forums for his character name, find his real name, figure out where he lives, and get him right back with harassing phone calls, pizzas, etc...

      Now all we need is for 4Chan to implement the same policy.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Hmm.... by rxan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

    4. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, 4chan, SA etc. They all will have a field day, and Blizzard will feel the pain. I suppose in this all 4chan afterall does serve a purpose.

    5. Re:Hmm.... by Spazztastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My thought: Internet Detectives are going to have a field day with this. Got ganked by a Rogue last night? Search the forums for his character name, find his real name, figure out where he lives, and get him right back with harassing phone calls, pizzas, etc...

      Or they...
        - Track him down and set his house on fire.
        - Find his workplace and tell his boss/coworkers that he's a pedophile/rapist/etc.
        - Find their SO and tell them the same as above.

      It's sickening the amount of things that could follow through from this action and just one remark. The whole RealID thing is a problem in the first place for transgender folks who don't want others to know their legal names, but all of the above listed reasons.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    6. Re:Hmm.... by JSombra · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aye got to agree, real dumb idea. If i still played this would kill me posting on the boards instantly, especially as my real name has a rather unique spelling which afaik only one other person in the world has. Thus making it pretty easy to track me down or for business contacts to see what I am doing in my private time

      Really dumb on Blizzards part too, how long before some nut job trackssome kid down down for ganking them in game and then does them harm. Because this is forced public disclose on the official support channel you can bet your ass that not only will blizzard get sued but they will also probably lose such a case in many countries if it went in front of jury, especially if a child is involved

      Someone has not thought this through

    7. Re:Hmm.... by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      People who read your Facebook page are less likely to be mad than people who you gank and corpse-camp in Stranglethorn Vale.

      Well, for most people anyway... don't know what's on your Facebook page specifically...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    8. Re:Hmm.... by m.ducharme · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh come on, most of those children and adolescents are 4chan.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    9. Re:Hmm.... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      Blizzard is going to expose the identities of millions of people, including children and adolescents publicly on the internet. They can then be exploited by anyone, including the "wonderful" guys over at 4chan, and worse.

      Thankfully it is just a name, though. For most people, first and last name is not enough information to narrow a post down to a single person. For example, there are three people I know of in my city of around 120k with the same name as me, probably more. Even if I told you the name of the city, or the metropolitan area of which my city is a suburb, you still would not be able to identify me absolutely. You might have a short list of candidates and could drive by a few houses, but you could not say who I am.

      The real issue here is often it doesn't matter, because that is one piece of the puzzle. Google my name, dig up usenet posts, domain registrations, etc. and you can figure out who I am.

      As far as children go, I still don't see it as a problem. Criminals who prey on children would be better off molesting the neighbor's kids than going on some crazy Internet hunt for random children who probably are hundreds of miles away anyway. Not only is one method easier, it also fails to leave any kind of audit trail that stupid criminals tend to leave on the Internet.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    10. Re:Hmm.... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      My thought: Internet Detectives are going to have a field day with this. Got ganked by a Rogue last night? Search the forums for his character name, find his real name, figure out where he lives, and get him right back with harassing phone calls, pizzas, etc...

      Step 1: find the person's name.

      Step 2: figure out which "John Doe" it is out of 300,000,000 people in the U.S.

      Step 3: buy plane ticket to fly the 1,000 miles to harass said John Doe.

      Step 4: ???

      Step 5: get "ganked" by a big dude in prison who hasn't seen a woman in years.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    11. Re:Hmm.... by Haffner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      facebook profiles are created with that intention. You are making an account that is you. No one makes their orc warlock thinking it is really who they are. (I'm preparing for contradictory comments below).

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    12. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should read all of the information on this topic before making such bold claims that Blizzard is "forcing" people to expose their personal information.

      In the end it's the player's choice to post on Blizzard forums or not. When it comes down to children playing Blizzard games, they offer parental controls. I don't claim that there's any such control over forum posting, but it seems a likely candidate seeing as how Real ID can be disabled as of now. Additionally, this change will only be active on a new forum system and all legacy posts will not display real names. Blizzard CM's stated there will be ample warning about using your Real ID to post on the new forums.

      That all said, keep your sensationalism to yourself please.

    13. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of this story is that, while you have a choice of whether you use your real name or a fake one on Facebook, you don't get to make that choice on WoW.

    14. Re:Hmm.... by butterflysrage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and for 99% of the time that is fine... but there have been actual MURDERS over starcraft rankings in Korea. OK, so some whacked out arena junkie you knocked out of getting their ________ Gladiator title finds your real name, looks at the post you made about your crappy ISP, figures out your timezone and region based on your posting schedules and camps out a few houses... wouldn't take long to figure out which house had a hardcore wow-head in it... load up the shotgun and get his title back.

      There are precious few pros and a whole wack of cons to this idea.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    15. Re:Hmm.... by kent_eh · · Score: 4, Funny

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      Not everyone.
      not that my "A. Guy" profile is used for much more than looking at other people's public stuff, but still...

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    16. Re:Hmm.... by kage.j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I happen to indulge in world of warcraft from time to time, and let me tell you this...

      I've posted on the forums a total of maybe 3 times...ever.

      If you don't want to show your real name, then just don't use the forums. You can get support in-game or over the phone.

      And parents that want to protect their children: Disable realid (forum) access in the parental controls panel.

      --
      he demonstrated by A plus B minus C divided by Z that the sheep must be red, and die of the rot
    17. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe people should have thought of the repercussions of their actions in relation to their privacy and security BEFORE installing a video game that comes with one of the most aggressive pieces of "legitimate" spyware in recent history and one of the most abusive and openly hostile ToS agreements on the internet.

      Really, this isn't surprising or even the worst that you get when you play WoW. The players have chosen to throw all common sense and reason to the wind for a crack at Azeroth's spoils. Compared to what they've already sacrificed to play a video game, this is nothing.

    18. Re:Hmm.... by a+whoabot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You actually don't have that choice, unless you infringe their terms, which say, "You will not provide any false personal information on Facebook, or create an account for anyone other than yourself without permission".

    19. Re:Hmm.... by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "They can then be exploited by anyone, including the "wonderful" guys over at 4chan, and worse."

      Some people need to be hit over the head with a hammer so they will take security seriously. That situation would make a nice (lulzy) "hammer".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    20. Re:Hmm.... by Pojut · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Really dumb on Blizzards part too, how long before some nut job trackssome kid down down for ganking them in game and then does them harm

      The obvious solution to this, of course, is to not act like a dickhole.

      Obvious disclaimer: I still don't agree with Blizzard doing this...but being polite to your fellow gamers goes a long way to making this not matter all that much.

    21. Re:Hmm.... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Kinda sucks for those of us who didn't spoof their name on their account near 6 years ago because we didn't think Blizzard would do something this stupid.

      It'll take an act of Congress to change the name that's associated with my account.

      And I'm the only one in the US or EU with my name.

    22. Re:Hmm.... by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Step 5: get "ganked" by a big dude in prison who hasn't seen a woman in years.

      Wait a minute, thats not profit.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    23. Re:Hmm.... by LambdaWolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      But Facebook is intended for communicating with people whom you already know in real life.

      Pretty much every forum on the Internet that is (unlike Facebook) meant for communicating with strangers allows anonymity; the WoW forums are about to become the only exception I can think of. And users generally want it this way, gaining anonymity at the cost of occasional trolling and such. So either Blizzard knows something that every other forum and their users don't know, or they're making a massive mistake. I give Blizzard a lot of credit as game designers but something tells me it's the latter.

      --
      "This algorithm runs in constant time. Come on, 2,147,483,648 is a constant..."
    24. Re:Hmm.... by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blizzard is forcing them to...

      At the risk of making the stale old 'they aren't holding a gun to your head' argument, I find the word "force" to be pure rhetoric. It's not even the game itself, just the official forums for the game, which is both optional and has alternatives. It's rather trivial to avoid giving your name if you don't want to.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    25. Re:Hmm.... by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Step 6: profit?

    26. Re:Hmm.... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Real Internet Detectives can usually find an actual name from just the screen name already, so you're already 'in danger' of this happening RIGHT NOW! How often does it happen, though?

      I've usually seen this in response to trolls who attempt to hide behind their anonymity. They tend to disappear when their MySpace pictures get posted in response to their troll posts.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    27. Re:Hmm.... by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      Very bad idea.

      Just now I took the name of a Real ID Friend of mine, 'warcraft' and went for a trip on my attempt to be a stalker (The person knew i was going to attempt to). I only used information I gained from my searches, and started with the assumption the person I found was wrong (I looked for verification/encouragement)

      ..... Removing specifics..... as I don't want to give stalkers ideas....
      within 10 minutes I had City, state, & address (within 5 miles)... Along with more information that could link quickly to a true address
      I Did not spend a dime, I just used a few search engines (starting with google) and 1-2 more that any semi-creative stalker or journalist would use that are not at all related to background searches but can provide more information if you know their name & location.

      The ONLY security hole I found on her part was her current city was exposed (no posts, photos other than profile, etc. were available)... However this is more of a time saver as I some scavenging can provide a narrowing of likely cities based on "friends" information.

      But, this was just a proof of concept I did for my e-mail to blizzard. I stopped here and started posting everywhere for people to secure up their profiles... and I told my RL friend here to remove her city information from her profile.

      Very bad idea this is. Good side of the story though? We're not friends on Facebook! :-D been meaning to add her.

    28. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You like those guys on 4chan, too?

      Best comedians on earth these days, they are.

    29. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? As far back as 1997, we knew that anonymizing identity information was a hard problem. See http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/09/what-information-personally-identifiable. Note that (gender, zip, birthdate) are enough to identify 87% of the population. With a full name, some idea of age, gender, and general geographic location, I expect that you can get much better results. I've got a fairly common first and last name, and there are only 53 people in the US that share it with me. Figure out what state I'm in (easy enough), and you've narrowed that down to less than a half dozen people. Make a guess as to my age, and... well, what do you know. Flip a coin, and figure out which person you're going to visit first. This is a bad idea. Period. It's like your bank deciding to publish a list of the names of everyone who has an account with them. There may be some value, but it's vanishingly small compared to the potential abuses such a list could be used for.

    30. Re:Hmm.... by Cryolithic · · Score: 1

      A scenario: PvP server, some guy is questing, get's owned 15 times by some dickhole, you come around, see a newb and gank him once. Dude snaps, tracks your ass down and smashes your window. Just because you weren't a dickhole doesn't mean someone else is mentally stable.

    31. Re:Hmm.... by mujadaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OH NOOOOO
      I HAVE INFRINGED FACEBOOK'S TERMS

      They're much better about rejecting fake names than they were 2 years ago, but it's not hard to get around that, if you try.

      Sorry, I have to laugh again. Ooooooo, I've infringed Facebook's terms, noooooooo.../giggle

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    32. Re:Hmm.... by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      The kid isn't giving out *their* real name. But parent's last name should be enough - especially - for a phonebook. Creepy indeed.

    33. Re:Hmm.... by TruthSauce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's pretty interesting that a couple of random phone calls "Mr xxx is a pedophile" would pretty much destroy most people's lives.

      Doesn't that underscore a fundamental breakage in our social system?

    34. Re:Hmm.... by genner · · Score: 2, Informative

      Blizzard is forcing them to...

      At the risk of making the stale old 'they aren't holding a gun to your head' argument, I find the word "force" to be pure rhetoric. It's not even the game itself, just the official forums for the game, which is both optional and has alternatives. It's rather trivial to avoid giving your name if you don't want to.

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

    35. Re:Hmm.... by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's pretty interesting that a couple of random phone calls "Mr xxx is a pedophile" would pretty much destroy most people's lives.

      Doesn't that underscore a fundamental breakage in our social system?

      Mob mentality/the overall hassle of it all/just enough to start rumors can be enough damage.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    36. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, this happens regularly as it is.

      In sporting events, where a footballer makes a reckless challenge, it's almost inevitable that the victim of his foul will track him down and set his house on fire.

      And in local bowling leagues, if someone wins and gloats too much about it, his opponents are bound to find his workplace and tell his boss/coworkers that he's a paedophile.

      And in paintball, if someone hits someone else with a well placed shot, you can bet their SO will be hearing all sorts of terrible things about them before you know it.

      That's why in all those things everyone plays anonymously and in masks.

      Or not. But that's all irrelevant isn't it. It's just the internet that's full of psychotic nutters, they don't exist in real life.

    37. Re:Hmm.... by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      facebook and WoW are not equivalent playing fields. right now, female gamers can play anonymously and (with the right privacy settings) simultaneously maintain a facebook page. they can keep their virtual stalkers in WoW, and still interact with their friends/family through facebook. this little snafu needlessly makes that balancing act even harder.

    38. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and like that chick was TOTALLY asking to be raped cause of how she acted and dressed. Her fault completely.

    39. Re:Hmm.... by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 5, Funny

      (I'm preparing for contradictory comments below).

      No you're not!

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    40. Re:Hmm.... by Bakkster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is a predicament, but more because they are trying to phase it in. This wouldn't be an issue if it were the way the game was when released, and those with an objection could simply not sign up to begin with.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    41. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And yet everyone has the option to give out a fake name on Facebook instead of their real one.

    42. Re:Hmm.... by stonewallred · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Really? I have two facebook profiles. One with my real name, with very limited details, and one with a fake name where all my RL friends can find me. A google search brings up nothing about me, even though I was convicted of a felony 23 years ago, there are no pictures of me on the internet that I can find, and I use my real name for nothing, including my WoW account. My phone, cable and power bill are all in fake names, and I rent for cash from a former employer. My vehicles are registered to me, at a 10 year old address and my DL shows the same address. Which the banks also have as my permanent address. I use a PO box in the same county as my "official" address shows. Not everyone is willing to let the government or corporations track their where abouts and doings with ease.

    43. Re:Hmm.... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      I have two Facebook accounts, both use fake names. Said names are based on anime characters I like. I've gotten tons of friend requests on them.... all from other accounts using anime characters names.

      So no, everyone does NOT give their real name out on Facebook. In fact I will never do so. Just because a lot of stupid people do it doesn't mean everyone does it.

    44. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no problem with this...

      My name is Seymour B. Puh.

      My middle name is Butts, btw.

    45. Re:Hmm.... by AndOne · · Score: 1

      I can play the anecdote game too... AFAIK I am the only person in the world with my first and last name. It is quite literally a unique identifier for me. If you just went by just my last name there are probably only 20 or so people who share it. However, as I am of the cell phone generation I don't show up in any real listings, but my family members do and you have to consider someone willing to stalk you is probably willing to stalk your family. Last thing I'd want is my mom being stalked by some nerd with rage issues over a fucking game.

      Additionally... Have you never seen the Terminator? I mean there were like 10 Linda Hamiltons in LA... How did that work out for them :)

      --
      I don't care what you say, all I need is my Wumpabet soup.
    46. Re:Hmm.... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The obvious solution to this, of course, is to not act like a dickhole.

      No, that's not the solution. There are people out there, and I'm sure you've encountered a few, that take any disagreement with them, no matter how polite as an attack on their person and respond like insane psychotics. (Which they probably are.) Being polite is certainly a good idea, but it won't protect you from the lunatics of the world who are either unstable or actively looking for reasons to get offended.

      Anonymity isn't just useful to protect the assholes of the world, it's also useful to protect the normal people from the assholes of the world.

    47. Re:Hmm.... by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      I'm completely in favor of yanking anonymity from that forum.

      I haven't been to the official forums in YEARS. The quantity of utter crap posted there outweighs any value the forums might have, especially since I can retrieve all the important news from mmo-champion or whatnot. I think that putting real names in there might reduce the impact of the Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory by eliminating anonymity from the equation. I wonder how much of Facebook's popularity is the custom and practice of using real names? Probably a lot of it. When people don't have anonymity, they tend to act civilly.

      There's nothing you need to post to a video game forum anonymously. It's not like you're espousing controversial political positions (and if you are, word of advice, GO TO A POLITICS BOARD) or something.

      I think that the current semi-anonymous system works for Slashdot because of the reputation and moderation system. I remember what it was like before moderation, and it was...well, a lot like the WoW forums are now. I don't think a similar system would work on the WoW forums, because the troll:user ratio was nearly infinite when I quit reading the forums.

      If they're trying to make the forums more relevant and have a higher level of participation in the community, getting rid of anonymity is the first step. I think Blizzard really thinks they should be hosting the valuable discussions about their product, and not have the real interesting analysis all done at Elitist Jerks. At the point that their game designers had to go read Elitist Jerks forums so they could see how their own products were working they probably realized they had a problem.

      You can still post anonymously at wow.com. And I can continue to ignore WoW.com and feel 100% informed about the game.

    48. Re:Hmm.... by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 1

      You'd think otherwise if you hadn't seen a woman in years.

      --
      (+1, Disagree)
    49. Re:Hmm.... by hackus · · Score: 0, Troll

      There is no real benefit to the game to post such information.

      Eventually it WILL be required.

      Then it will be time to leave World of Warcraft.

      I already have the government, through treasonous works in the Health Care Bill, able to track my ATM purchases with the new Health Care Bill because the criminal arm of this treasonous government, namely the IRS wants to collect more taxes not owed to said treasonous government for themselves.

      Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve commits treason on a daily basis ripping off little old ladies, pension plans and out to 3 generations not even born yet.

      Usurpers and Destroyers they will be dealt with like all criminals of Liberty and Freedom in history.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    50. Re:Hmm.... by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

      Are you talking about StarCraft? Because this doesn't look to be the case in WoW. You can use either the new RealID system, or the old friends system, or both.

    51. Re:Hmm.... by Joreallean · · Score: 1

      Blizzard isn't forcing anyone to do anything. All you won't be able to do is post on the forums. You didn't buy their game to post on their forums. They didn't say you have to use your full first and last name as your character name. You real name will be visible in the exact same places it is currently unless you *CHOOSE* to post on the forums. No one is forcing you to and you aren't required to post on the forums to use their product. QQ moar

    52. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about ? Real identities are a good thing. Why not ? At leat I'm tired of people hiding behind their nicknames and flooding bullshit on any forum. Everyone should have free speech and take responsibility for the things they say. This encourages that kind of behavior.

      And I mean truly free speech. No censorship, but with moderation of course.

    53. Re:Hmm.... by Joreallean · · Score: 1

      Then maybe you shouldn't piss people off by griefing them... Or even better yet, hopefully a few of these d-bags will go and get themselves arrested, killed, ect and finally eliminate them from the gene pool altogether...we can only hope...

    54. Re:Hmm.... by Joreallean · · Score: 1

      That people are willing to trust complete strangers more than their own friends and colleagues? Yes it is broken....welcome to the real world.

    55. Re:Hmm.... by KarlIsNotMyName · · Score: 1

      Facebook is pretty much designed for giving away your personal information, making yourself available to anyone that wants to look up you and the connected info.

      WoW on the other hand, is a video game.

      --
      We are all God's parents.
    56. Re:Hmm.... by Flamora · · Score: 1

      Precisely. Your name that's on your Battle.net account is used for billing purposes, used to positively identify you in case of account compromise severe enough that you cannot regain access, and a host of other reasons.

      And now they want to use that as the positive identifier for you on the forums - forums which might as well be mandatory for getting technical support or customer service, as their email system takes weeks to reply and their phone lines are more often than not unable to take more callers into queue due to so many irresponsible people allowing their accounts to become compromised.

      This is possibly the most insane thing Blizzard has ever attempted.

    57. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      No... no, we don't.

    58. Re:Hmm.... by Flamora · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incorrect.

      Real ID is "required" to use cross-realm, cross-faction communication, and was designed to be used with people you already know and trust.

      However, there is nothing preventing you from using the pre-Real ID system of "/friends $CHARACTER_NAME".

    59. Re:Hmm.... by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      4chan serves another purpose --as does slashdot-- in that you can post anonymously. In fact I suggest people who don't like this to post on 4chan.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    60. Re:Hmm.... by ZosX · · Score: 1

      I dare to them to prove that I am not the one and only Zos Xavius!

    61. Re:Hmm.... by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Well, i do have a traditional phone and i don't think i'd want some punk from a video game to be crank calling me over it. AFAIK i am the only one in my time zone at least with my name. There ma be a couple in the US and a few on the other side of the world in total. No Thanks.

      I forsee a really boring forum

    62. Re:Hmm.... by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      there's plenty of cases of near unique names, i have 2 quite common names but i'm the only instance of me that comes up in google searches

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    63. Re:Hmm.... by pknoll · · Score: 1

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

      No, RealID is required to use RealID names in the in-game friends list. You can also have the original style of friends on your list, which refer to people only by their avatar's name.

    64. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And have you ever seen what they do to one of their own who accidentally sheds his anonymity?

      Its like dropping a bleeding goat into a school of ravenous piranha.

    65. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the only thing stopping those children and adolescent on 4chan from going all Lord of the Flies on one another is anonymity.

    66. Re:Hmm.... by alexo · · Score: 1

      > In sporting events, where a footballer makes a reckless challenge, it's almost inevitable that the victim of his foul will track him down and set his house on fire.

      The "victim" is not anonymous, he's as visible as the footballer.

      > And in local bowling leagues, if someone wins and gloats too much about it, his opponents are bound to find his workplace and tell his boss/coworkers that he's a paedophile.

      His opponents are not anonymous, they are as visible as the bowler.

      > And in paintball, if someone hits someone else with a well placed shot, you can bet their SO will be hearing all sorts of terrible things about them before you know it.

      The one who go shot is not anonymous, he's as visible as the footballer.

      > That's why in all those things everyone plays anonymously and in masks. Or not.

      That's the thing. On the forums, the posters will be visible, the lurkers will wear masks.

      > But that's all irrelevant isn't it. It's just the internet that's full of psychotic nutters, they don't exist in real life.

      The Internet is just one facet of real life. The "psychotic nutters" exist. There are not many of them, but people do get harassing calls, anonymous death threats and repeated key scratches.

      The most publicized is anti-abortion violence, but there are other incidents.

    67. Re:Hmm.... by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Hiya Jonathon Pater. You won't be able to hide behind Cowboy Neal anymore on WoW forums ;)

    68. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that not apply to anything else in the real world? Got cut off in Traffic? Follow the guy home and (choose from list, above). Someone cut in line in front of you? Call over the manager and tell them the line-jumper a) molested you b) bragged about stealing someone's ticket c) has fake ID (applicable especially at bars/pubs/clubs with lines to get in).

      Paranoia is not a sign of sanity.

    69. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I've seen this happen (and worse) with Evony, not because of real names, but because people hacked/phished to get real names. Then they did all that and more (stalking, vandalism, theft, exploitation of both children and rape victicms, destroyed families, and worse).

      WoW is bad enough as it is. With facebook you have control over who see's you (if you take control).

      With Wow, the only control might be to not to post or play. I like this option.

    70. Re:Hmm.... by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Assuming, you live in the US, I don't think you know the meaning of the word treason. I'd mod you into oblivion as flamebait, but I sorta like my funny comment earlier.

    71. Re:Hmm.... by hackus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh, I am pretty sure I know what the meaning of treason is.

      It means when congress asks what you did with 12 Trillion dollars, you do not respond:

      "No I won't tell you that."

      Or how about passing bail out packages for the wealthy elite because they do not want to lose their wealth or power due to bad bets they made and make tax payers bail them out for trillions?

      Oh I am pretty sure I know what treason is when our cities are rotting, people are living in tent cities and generations not even born yet are essentially debt slaves.

      That is OK because once all of this corruption falls, everyone of them will be shot.

      After we have a trial of course.

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    72. Re:Hmm.... by Kingrames · · Score: 1

      As horrifying as it is now that's just because we know about it. It has gone on far longer and WORSE throughout the entirety of human history.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    73. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they...
        - Track him down and develop a new and lasting friendship over a shared passion for gaming.
        - Find his workplace and tell his boss/coworkers that he's actually a decent guy.
        - Find their SO and tell them the same as above.

      It's wonderful the amount of things that could follow through from this action and just one remark. It's also great that the whole Real ID thing is completely optional so transgender folks can opt out and not have anyone know their legal names, if they're concerned about that. They might miss out on some of the nice things listed above, but ultimately it's up to them.

    74. Re:Hmm.... by rainmouse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blizz admins just want to make sure all those bikini clad elf chicks they have been cyberlicking are actually females.

      An anonymous survey from the Daedalus project a few years ago (http://www.nickyee.com/daedalus/) quoted 40% of warcraft females are actually a female and with Blizards own stoppers preventing players from ever changing the real name the account was created with, I'm guessing theres going to be a lot of surprise transvestites popping up after the patch release.

    75. Re:Hmm.... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, most of those children and adolescents are the cancer.

      Ftfy. :(

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    76. Re:Hmm.... by toleraen · · Score: 1

      People like you and I this is even worse. If my name was Joe Johnson I wouldn't be too worried about it. However running my real name through Google only results in a dozen results, all me. In those results is my FCC call sign registration with my (old) address and a few family photos. Pretty easy to figure out enough personal details from that info.

    77. Re:Hmm.... by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

      Incorrect. Real ID is only required to use the Real ID friends list, which uses your real name and allows your Real ID friends to see and talk to you regardless of what Battle.net game you're playing.

      The old friends list is still there and you can still add characters to your realm- and character-specific friends list.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    78. Re:Hmm.... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You want people to die over a video game, perhaps your post is indicative of why you do not use real names for MMOG (and, the chances you just ended on a federal watch list are also pretty high, I bet you own a bunch o guns don't ya).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    79. Re:Hmm.... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Just do what I do, and misspell your name slightly when you register your Facebook account. That will keep it from being searchable.

    80. Re:Hmm.... by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      To me that's funny as hell as I'd gotten an email to my gmail about responses to my facebook wall. WTF? I didn't sign up with facebook. So I reset the pw, taking tha account from the spammer and changed the account name to spammer foad.

      In response to idiots thinking I've violated the Facebook TOS, they'd be wrong as I wasn't the idiot who signed the aggreement. Instead, all I did was change the PW as my Email addy was used for the sign-up (did facebook spam me?) and changed the damn account name to represent my interest (nadda/zip/f-off and die)

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    81. Re:Hmm.... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      When I had a Facebook account I would have done it to everyone on my friends list. Even my fiancée... especially my fiancée.

    82. Re:Hmm.... by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      No, Facebook is intended to harvest as much information from you and your friends so Mark Zuckerberg can line his coats with Panda fur.

    83. Re:Hmm.... by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      What 12-14 year old do you know that does not know how to not act like an idiot?

    84. Re:Hmm.... by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      hopefully a few of these d-bags will go and get themselves arrested, killed

      I'm caught between the horror of the blatant and gratuitous violence in this remark and my burning desire to silently murder STV campers in their sleep.

      I'm like a car that's... um...

      sick of getting camped.

      Gits.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    85. Re:Hmm.... by Finerva · · Score: 1

      Have you ever even read through the WoW forums or any internet forum?

      Being able to use an online alias removes any accountability or liability that a poster has when using a forum...meaning you can say absolutely horrible things to people and not feel bad.

      Example: Ikillnewbs says in the Warrior forum: "anyone who asks what his armor value should be before tanking 10ICC does not deserve to live or play this game". -->You would never say this to a person's face in real life.

      Blizzard is probably just tired of paying people to moderate a bunch of angry nerds with tourette syndrome.

      If there is any humanity left on the internet, this may return some of it to the forums.

      Also, from an IT perspective having someone's full name from a forum post is not exactly a huge tip off, there would still be some moderately involved hacking to exploit that person further which could be initiated with or without the last name.

      Anyone looking for exploitable WoW players can get all they want from Facebook, they are the real jerks selling your private info to the world!

    86. Re:Hmm.... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      Facebook doesn't force you to use your real name.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    87. Re:Hmm.... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      And yet everyone gives out their real name on Facebook when they have the choice to give a fake one.

      Somehow I didn't use the real me in my facebook ID. It is completely not me and that is fine. Keeps out the folks I dont want to see my crap. Not that they cant see it if someone is really really interested, but it keeps out the idle peekers.

    88. Re:Hmm.... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      part of gaming for a large number of people is assuming a persona you are not and that includes being a rude-boy.

    89. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard is going to expose the identities of millions of people, including children and adolescents publicly on the internet. They can then be exploited by anyone, including the "wonderful" guys over at 4chan, and worse.

      Don't like it ? Don't play ! It's not like the Blizzard guys stand behind you with a gun to your head making you play WOW. As for the "wonderful" 4chan guys, do you really think that you or the rest of those other millions of people are lulzworthy target ? I think it's the case of USI

    90. Re:Hmm.... by mxh83 · · Score: 0

      Really? I have two facebook profiles. One with my real name, with very limited details, and one with a fake name where all my RL friends can find me. A google search brings up nothing about me, even though I was convicted of a felony 23 years ago, there are no pictures of me on the internet that I can find, and I use my real name for nothing, including my WoW account. My phone, cable and power bill are all in fake names, and I rent for cash from a former employer. My vehicles are registered to me, at a 10 year old address and my DL shows the same address. Which the banks also have as my permanent address. I use a PO box in the same county as my "official" address shows. Not everyone is willing to let the government or corporations track their where abouts and doings with ease.

      How did you manage that?

    91. Re:Hmm.... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Really dumb on Blizzards part too, how long before some nut job trackssome kid down down for ganking them in game and then does them harm

      The obvious solution to this, of course, is to not act like a dickhole.

      Obvious disclaimer: I still don't agree with Blizzard doing this...but being polite to your fellow gamers goes a long way to making this not matter all that much.

      Really? When half the game is geared around "being a dickhole" to someone else? (IE, all pvp).

    92. Re:Hmm.... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Real ID is required to use the friends list in game.

      No it isn't, it's still optional there. You can add a character as an in-game friend, the same as you always have. I still have about triple the number of non-Real-ID friends on my WoW main than Real ID friends.

      Real ID is required to use the -cross realm/cross game- friends system.

    93. Re:Hmm.... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      People who read your Facebook page are less likely to be mad than people who you gank and corpse-camp in Stranglethorn Vale.

      Poor innocent.... sometime soon he will have a rude awakening.

    94. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You willingly violate so many laws and boast about it. I guess that really goes to prove, once a criminal always a criminal.

    95. Re:Hmm.... by dugeen · · Score: 1

      I use Facebook for communicating with people I know IRL, but I use a plausible false name to prevent people I used to know IRL, but don't wish to know now, from finding me. I simply tell anyone I wish to communicate with what my Facebook name is, it's not that complex a system.

    96. Re:Hmm.... by giorgist · · Score: 1

      Ok Frank, enough of that

    97. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A blog about Blizzard employees' full names: http://asnowstormbyanyothername.blogspot.com/

    98. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that's how you avoided getting caught again for the last 23 years...

    99. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Bryan.

    100. Re:Hmm.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Atleast they have a choice, and the smart ones do give fake ones, however, no matter how you try, you can not post false info with wow....I tried, there are too many road blocks.

    101. Re:Hmm.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Wait till the first REAL death happens because some kid got so upset of being ganked all the time by the same hordies, that he tracked down another kid using their names, and was able to determine where he lived, and shot him....wow, i mean WoW...that would be so....maybe not.

    102. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true criminal

    103. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your name Sarah Connors?

    104. Re:Hmm.... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The whole "there's no smoke without fire!" mob mentality has destroyed more lives than we can ever keep track. These are the sorts of accusations that even being found innocent is still a form of "guilt", because people will always ASSUME that "there had to be a reason why they investigated such and such"...

    105. Re:Hmm.... by soppsa · · Score: 1

      So you are a nut ball eh?

    106. Re:Hmm.... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      RealID is only required if you want to chat cross-realm, -faction, or -game. You can carry on using the regular friends list if you only want to talk ot friends who are playing your game, on your server, on your faction (in WoW).

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    107. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. The complete absence of critical thinking is a pretty big problem.

    108. Re:Hmm.... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      40% is a lot more than I was expecting.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    109. Re:Hmm.... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Or use Ventrilo, etc, like we used to do before RealID.

      They're barring access to a feature, true, but I'm not seeing any requirement to use it.

    110. Re:Hmm.... by wwphx · · Score: 1

      It will be interesting to see how this pans out. Two of the three women in my guild (it's a very small guild, a dozen players) have bought in to the Real ID stuff. One will not because there's no granularity, she doesn't want people to know when she's signed on to a different server running an alt.

      I think this, and Real ID, is a half-baked idea. In order to post on the official forums, you must have an account. You are identified through that account to Bliz. Your posts are through which ever character toon you like, so you have the same level of anonymity as you do when you're in-game: i.e., you can reveal as much or as little as you want. But Real ID puts your Real Name out there for the world.

      This isn't as bad as the recent Facebook fracas, but that doesn't mean it's good.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    111. Re:Hmm.... by tisepti · · Score: 1

      Those who are seeking help are generally told to post in on the support forums at some time ...

    112. Re:Hmm.... by mujadaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

      When Facebook was just getting off the ground, I registered for an account. As Spispopd J. Spispopd ...

      Got the wife some mule Farmville accounts just recently, too. Last name? O'Confusion.

      Ooooooo, I've infringed Facebook's terms, noooooooo

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    113. Re:Hmm.... by varcher · · Score: 1

      And users generally want it this way, gaining anonymity at the cost of occasional trolling and such.

      The "official" reason given was to curtail the amount of trolling and flaming...

      Thing is, to work, i.e. scare board trolls, the disclosure of your real name - as opposed to a unified pseudonymous ID that's tightly associated with you, but not traçable back to you - must entail real life consequences. If those consequences don't exist, the troll will not care one wit that its name is disclosed. But if those consequences exist... then they also exists for non-trolls for all kind of other specious (or not-so-specious) reasons. You can't threaten the board troll over his real name unless you can also threaten the innocent guy on the next thread in exactly the same manner.

    114. Re:Hmm.... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I am 100% with you on that one, this will be their worst mistake yet, and I think not only will it hurt their future titles, but also this stupid battle.net hook up to your account so you can know that billy bob owns 1 millions games all of which are on his battle.net account, really irks me, i do not need to include others in on the fact i play wow, if i play wow, blizzard knows, and that should be it, no need to tell the whole world if i don't want to...really ticks me off....

    115. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who says that everyone gives their real name on Facebook! I faked my last name, which results in some confusion when I add friends and they don't know which name is real, but it also means that people only really find me if I want them to because they can't find me through conventional searching.

    116. Re:Hmm.... by varcher · · Score: 1

      Find his workplace and tell his boss/coworkers that he's actually a decent guy.

      Actually, what's going on to happen is that, at your next job, the HR guy is going to find that you regularly post 2-pages analysys of the merits of STR vs ArPen in the warrior forum at 2am, label you as "maybe an obssessive-compulsive guy", and hand the job to the other guy who doesn't seem to have such a time-consuming hobby.

      (or worse. Imagine a guy such as the Mitanni in EvE. In his job, figuring out that your lawyer is some "nutjob from that online game" is probably a professional suicide. Whether warranted or not)

    117. Re:Hmm.... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Wow, is it a cabin in Montana you're renting ? That's seriously paranoid. I don't know about the US but I'm pretty sure it's illegal in europe to sign a contract with a fake name.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    118. Re:Hmm.... by Finerva · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Less people trolling those forums is not a bad thing either, knowing that everyone QQing about this wont be on the WoW forums anymore makes my day

    119. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Armed robber or burglar think he's anon on internet.

      Another sign that intelligence is not a prereq to be a criminal.

      13 years for armed robbery is a long time. It must have been nasty.

      Of course I am posting anon. you are a criminal. Now, you might be on thr straight and narrow now, but what about all the other criminals who aren't and troll forums looking for victims?

      Say ho tot he fold out there is Stokes county, will ya?

    120. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've implicity agreed to accept the Facebook TOS by making use of the services of the Facebook website.

      If you wanted

    121. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the children?

      On Slashdot?

      REALLY?

    122. Re:Hmm.... by seebs · · Score: 1

      No, not everyone does. Before I nuked my facebook account, I had several friends under names that I'm quite sure were not their "real" names.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    123. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put my real name on my Facebook account.

      It's just different from my legal name.

    124. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi John

    125. Re:Hmm.... by Camann · · Score: 1
      --
      I can't believe you don't know what a Hasemalphaginnojinglanaporphomism is.
    126. Re:Hmm.... by JarinArenos · · Score: 1

      According to a quick search, I am the only person in the US with my first/last name combo. I don't even have Facebook, but my personal info is there to be found fairly easily. Just because you have a common name doesn't mean everyone does. I enjoyed having discussions on the WoW forums back when I played. Now, I'd be afraid to post, in case someone took offense to a comment meant to be joking and decided to do something about it.

    127. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mens rea can be established more easily for those people, but I don't see any difference for actus reus and initially locating them. It's not like they'd announce their intent right after being defeated (which a nerd rager likely would); they'd stew, plan, execute quietly.

    128. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you elaborate? My latest WoW account has a ridiculous fake first and last name registered to it. If you only pay in game cards (cash) you'll never link a credit/debit card account to the WoW account. Short of an IP lookup which lead to your ISP account (only done for criminal cases) there's no way they could find your real name. Assuming your ISP account was in your real name. See "extremely paranoid guy" above for a good example of how to be mostly invisible. Also, giving a false name for contracts is not illegal in the US if you're not doing it with the intent to defraud - i.e., not pay for the services.

    129. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The players have chosen to throw all common sense and reason to the wind for a crack at Azeroth's spoils. Compared to what they've already sacrificed to play a video game, this is nothing.

      Quoted for truth. Still won't be posting on the RealID forums myself.

    130. Re:Hmm.... by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      The reason people are so free-wheeling with Facebook is because it is PRIVATE, FRIENDS-ONLY. You're not sharing your great bowel movement status update with the whole world, future employers, co-workers, potential girlfriends, and total strangers. You're sharing it only with your family and friends who you've explicitly friended on facebook.

      Every time Facebook has taken (already-entered) personal information and made it public there has been a huge backlash. When "likes" were forced public many people, myself included, removed all of that content from their facebook. The ONLY reason we have that information on facebook is because it is PRIVATE.

      Blizzard is skipping right over the "private, friends-only" concept that made social networking popular on facebook. They're going straight to "no privacy whatsoever" and acting surprised that no one wants it.

      The complete destruction of privacy is something that only corporations with a monetary stake are interested in.

    131. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever modded this informative doesn't play the game any more than parent does. Real ID is *not* required to use the friends list; it's merely required to use Real ID to add Real ID friends.

    132. Re:Hmm.... by Uzuri · · Score: 1

      I always wanted to do this experiment. I know I'm findable (basically gave that up when I started working for a place where my name and photo went online; once that's there, it's not hard to start making connections, though it may take time and brains), but it seems like a fun challenge to see if a "careful" person could be connected with his real name and location and how difficult that would be.

      --
      I'm a she-slashdotter... but I make up for it by living with my folks.
  3. Re:trying to imagine... by qoncept · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you need some help? Everyone will know your real name.

    --
    Whale
  4. Lawsuit Incoming! by Nailer235 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wonder how long it'll be until someone finally tracks down a troll (in real life) and loots their corpse

    1. Re:Lawsuit Incoming! by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Wonder how long it'll be until someone finally tracks down a troll (in real life) and loots their corpse

      I can't find the article, but there was a case of a guy setting someones house on fire over an MMO. If someone can find it and post it that would be great.

      Mod me down to 0 since I'm not providing any actual information, please.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Lawsuit Incoming! by lgw · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mod me down to 0 since I'm not providing any actual information, please.

      If we did that sort of thing, the whole moderation system would collapse. You can, however, check the "No karma bonus" box, the post a 1 instead of 2.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:Lawsuit Incoming! by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Here are some articles of people commiting real crimes over MMOs: 1 2 Now lets help people like these by giving real names...

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    4. Re:Lawsuit Incoming! by IllusionalForce · · Score: 1

      You do know that there's a 3/4 chance of them being reborn, right? (If you don't get it, play more NetHack.)

  5. Jay and Silent Bob by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    Images of the ending of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back come to mind ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjWFZPJZTxU ).

    And those images are happy, indeed. :)

    1. Re:Jay and Silent Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, deserve the Nobel Prize for the prefect "A Propos"

  6. Yeah.. by T-Bucket · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yeah, I can't imagine how forcing minors to put their real first and last names on the internet could POSSIBLY backfire... Brilliant idea.

    1. Re:Yeah.. by Godai · · Score: 1

      Actually, you have to enter your age to post on the forums, so if you're a minor you can only do so if you lie about your age. At that point, it's their own fault.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    2. Re:Yeah.. by T-Bucket · · Score: 1

      Yes, and that will absolve Blizzard of liability just like "But, your honor, she SAID she was 18" would absolve someone of liability after picking up that blonde at the club...

    3. Re:Yeah.. by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Well I just got through the age check while claiming to be 15 years old, which is still classified as a minor in every state and most countries that have access to WoW. The age check is to make sure your not under 12 or younger, but anyone between the ages of 13-17 are minors and having to post their real names is at lightest a privacy issue with what the law see's as someone who isn't mentally capable of understanding the consequence, at worst helping stalkers (and every other 'think of the children' claims possible). Also, the forums are open to the public to read, meaning anyone can sick a data miner of the site and gain a LOT of names real fast and possibly others private information.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    4. Re:Yeah.. by Godai · · Score: 1

      That gateway question screams a lawyer was involved in some way, shape or form, so its probably got some validity there.

      At any rate, if its a concern for a parent, I believe you can actually disabled an accounts ability to post on the forums at all in the Parental Controls.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    5. Re:Yeah.. by Godai · · Score: 1

      It could mine names, but what else? There's nothing else there except the contents of the posts. If you're posting under your real name and giving out crazy amount of personal information, you're clearly not concerned. By default, it won't even display one of the servers you play on; just your name. The only thing you could datamine, really, is someone's opinion. Which is bound to be how much your warlock sucks or how overpowered Death Knights are. I can't imagine that's of much interest to anyone (even Blizzard).

      The age-gate is typical of a lot of websites, so I assume there's some basis in law for it being there. And I think you can disable the ability to post in the forums at all using the Parental Controls.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    6. Re:Yeah.. by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Until everything is implemented there is no complete knowing what could be shown. IP is possible (from Real ID), Real ID has its own friends list that goes beyond a single Blizzard game so that can cause scam issues...

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    7. Re:Yeah.. by Montezumaa · · Score: 1

      I believe Lawrence Taylor will tell you that that argument will not work in certain(New York) courts.

    8. Re:Yeah.. by Godai · · Score: 1

      Well, that's true, but we can only discuss what's announced, right? We can yell when they say "We're going to implement X" if that's going to cause that kind of problems.

      Though I'm curious: what kind of scam issues are you worried about? I'm assuming not in-game from friends, because presumably you'd only accept from people you trust. Are you talking about out-of-game?

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    9. Re:Yeah.. by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Yes, out of game. WoW is well known for account hacks and the more personal information you can get, the easier it is to hack the account. These problems have been seen before with things like AOL and XBox Live accounts.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    10. Re:Yeah.. by Godai · · Score: 1

      Okay, I get you. A friend of mine has that concern because his email address (the one used for his login) actually includes most of his name. Though I'm not sure that particular vector is much use, since there are a lot of variations on the suffix (though I suppose you could just guess @hotmail.com, @gmail.com, etc.). A better one would be to look for that name and get used emails off other sites, though I don't actually know how easy that is myself. Still, all of that gets you the login, not the password, and if you have one of the $6 security thingies it makes it pretty hard to beat.

      Frankly, I half wonder if Cataclysm will ship with a free security thing for everyone. I don't think they're selling those things to make money; in fact, I suspect for everyone one of those they sell for $6, they probably save $60 in support call time.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    11. Re:Yeah.. by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Time will tell just how much information is shared and like everything, people will try to take advantage of the weakest link (which I'm afraid might just be the RealID software).

      As for saving call support time, not many people call support. And I'm not sure if Cataclysm would have those authenticators for free considering not every copy of Cataclysm sold will be a boxed copy (they are available digitally). Granted the digital authenticator is now free on my Android market place and seems to be free for other things so who knows? They may make the authenticator mandatory. Time will tell.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    12. Re:Yeah.. by Godai · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't mean literally 'call support'. I know a large amount of their 'support time' is spent chasing down hacked accounts, restoring items, that kind of thing. I'm guessing that's a significant amount of money that could be saved by making the authenticators (I couldn't remember what the heck they were called!) mandatory, or at least making it super easy for people to get one.

      Yes, there are digital copies, but even if you put one in every boxed copy, that's a lot of accounts you've 'upgraded' security-wise (assuming they get used). I'm sure there's someone at Blizzard who can put a finger on what hacked accounts is costing them every day, and break it down to a per-account cost. Whether that makes it worth doing something like this or not, who knows? As you say, time will tell.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
  7. I actually like this trend... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

    However, I do not personally like the idea of my first and last name being made public everywhere, which is why I have generally shunned Facebook and would not use this feature even if I wanted to.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need to use your real firstname and lastname on facebook?

      Since you can't take away data from facebook after it's been posted, the best approach may be to pollute their database with fake information..

    2. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can just create a facebook account with a false or abriviated name and still enjoy having a facebook account. its usful at timeS!

    3. Re:I actually like this trend... by selven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So you like other people not being anonymous, but you want yourself to still be anonymous? That kind of reminds me of this.

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

    4. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You'll also see a lot more stalking, harassment, and real-world abuse of all kinds. This is a ridiculous decision and one that will probably lead to me finally cancelling my WoW account.

    5. Re:I actually like this trend... by Manip · · Score: 1

      In addition to all that, World of Warcraft players will be completely unemployable so they will have even less reason to leave their parent's basement...

    6. Re:I actually like this trend... by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      However, I do not personally like the idea of my first and last name being made public everywhere, which is why I have generally shunned Facebook and would not use this feature even if I wanted to.

      So in other words, chilling effects on free speech are a good idea, but only if they're placed on other people?

      Rob

    7. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

      New to the internet, eh?

    8. Re:I actually like this trend... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

    9. Re:I actually like this trend... by II+Xion+II · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a horrible idea. Anyone with some basic Google searching skills can uncover a lot about people based on (presumably) their real name. For people such as myself with a name that is not so unique, it is not a huge issue. But for a lot of people who might have more uncommon names, such information can easily be used to find addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, social networking accounts, and other information. This is an identity theft and privacy nightmare. And given the ages and types of people who can play the game, I see it being very successfully exploited.

    10. Re:I actually like this trend... by phyrexianshaw.ca · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about?

      yeah, because all wow players are unemployed bums that sit at home. /sarcasm

      I already publicly have my main on my /. account, and my boss get's a good laugh out of what I do in my spare time. never ONCE has it or should it ever affect your work.

    11. Re:I actually like this trend... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    12. Re:I actually like this trend... by Krahar · · Score: 0

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems,

      That's not been my experience.

    13. Re:I actually like this trend... by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Off to Burma with you...

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    14. Re:I actually like this trend... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1, Funny

      It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems,

      You must be using a different internet than I am. Could you tell me how you get access to the one you're using? It sounds nice.

    15. Re:I actually like this trend... by selven · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, I'm a 3 year veteran of Slashdot, and a 2 year veteran of the World of Warcraft forums. In the WoW forums, where every post is linked to a character, people judge others' posts by the quality of their gear rather than just the quality of the posts. On Slashdot, this doesn't happen.

      I know that the popular opinion of anonymity is that it just invites trolling, but I've had the opposite experience.

    16. Re:I actually like this trend... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      You've never actually been to the internets have you?

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    17. Re:I actually like this trend... by SilverJets · · Score: 1

      ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      Really? Because the John Smith that flamed you is any less anonymous than WolfTrapper?

      A name with no picture of the person and no other personal information is as anonymous as a handle.

    18. Re:I actually like this trend... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I use my real first and last name on Facebook and troll just as much as where I post under a moniker.

    19. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What really makes it a bad idea, is that it is discriminating. What about those pore sods that only have a first name. They can't join in on forums. My thoughts go out to the royalties of Sweden and any other in the unfortunate situation to not have a last name.

    20. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      FYI, you can buy 'Game Time Cards' with cash at every big-box store in the United States.

    21. Re:I actually like this trend... by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      people such as myself with a name that is not so unique

      Y'know, I can't say I've ever heard of anybody else named || Xion ||... maybe it's a regional thing ;)

    22. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The little I remember from newsgroups was that the worst cooks and flamers happily used their real names. And why not, it's not like they had much to lose at that point anymore.

    23. Re:I actually like this trend... by butterflysrage · · Score: 2, Informative

      ok, we know John Smith, we can find out their region by looking at their server, a look at their post times and we can guess what time zone they are in, a reference to a specific ISP and you can get mighty close to knowing who a person is.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    24. Re:I actually like this trend... by breakfastpirate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Only about 12 people in the United States have my last name. If I tell someone my full name, I might as well just tell them my social security number. Names aren't always as anonymous as you'd think...

    25. Re:I actually like this trend... by omnichad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      For pore sod, try a facial cleanser!

    26. Re:I actually like this trend... by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      A CC isn't the only way to buy game time...

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    27. Re:I actually like this trend... by Vayra · · Score: 1

      Yes, because everyone lives in the US and are called John Doe.

      My own name has maybe 3 people sharing it in the country, and I would be surprised if even one occurrence of it exists abroad.

    28. Re:I actually like this trend... by TopSpin · · Score: 1

      forced to use their real names on the Internet

      I must agree. There are plenty of other public mediums that provide anonymity so we need not suffer it and the unpleasant anti-social behavior it fosters on our Internet. Let's expose everyone and leave anonymous coward to his many other venues.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    29. Re:I actually like this trend... by Godai · · Score: 1

      I agree, my experience has been the opposite. In practice I've found that the less anonymity there is, the more cordial the discussion, not the reverse.

      Cue: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2004/03/19/

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    30. Re:I actually like this trend... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      No, I'm a 3 year veteran of Slashdot, and a 2 year veteran of the World of Warcraft forums. In the WoW forums, where every post is linked to a character, people judge others' posts by the quality of their gear rather than just the quality of the posts. On Slashdot, this doesn't happen.

      Post as a level 1. If someone disregards you for your post based on your level, odds are they were going to disregard your post because of your gear/arena team rank/guild/etc.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    31. Re:I actually like this trend... by TheKidWho · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      3 years? I've been on Slashdot 10 years ago and was on the WoW forums ~5 years ago and I'm pretty young(23)...

      Yes, you're new to the internet.

    32. Re:I actually like this trend... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      never ONCE has it or should it ever affect your work.

      Only of these activites in your spare time affect your workplace activities. If you're up until 3AM trying to down the Lich King and you come into your job stacking boxes groggy and tired, then it does become a problem. No different than any other recreational activity, though.

      A lot of the people I know in IT play video games, however a lot of people look down on WOW players because of the negative stereotype. This is why I don't tell people I work with that I play it.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    33. Re:I actually like this trend... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems,

      You must be using a different internet than I am. Could you tell me how you get access to the one you're using? It sounds nice.

      Wait until you see the Internet where everyone uses their real names. Then you're appreciate how little there was of ad hominem attacks, relatively speaking.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    34. Re:I actually like this trend... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      FYI, you can buy 'Game Time Cards' with cash at every big-box store in the United States.

      It also doesn't matter the name on the account doesn't match the name on the credit/debit card. When I was in HS my mom would pay for my account (different last name).

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    35. Re:I actually like this trend... by WiglyWorm · · Score: 1

      But what if my real name IS Captain Jean Luc Picard of the USS Enterprise?

    36. Re:I actually like this trend... by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      There are IIRC only 3 of me on earth. Mostly because my ancestors changed the spelling of their name to sound less German when they immigrated, but they didn't know enough English for it to make any sense.

      And no, my user name is not even remotely related to that name.

    37. Re:I actually like this trend... by jabbathewocket · · Score: 1

      Completely false assumption, that is commonly made re internet behavior..

      Anonymity by itself does *not* make people any more or less likely to post something.. its the person in question complete and utter lack of people skills.. IE yes they would say that sitting in church with mom.

      Better still though is this scenario:

      You refuse to participate in the "realid" forums.. but you have 30~ doppelgangers playing wow who all SHARE your real name..

      So now some random basement dweller goes on a tirade about how much he or she wants to

      Next day at work, your boss lets you know that you services are no longer required, and when you search for a new job, you cannot get past the "reference check" phase due to the extensive use of "googling real names" that is part of the recruitment process these days.

      Now that we have that out of the way.. consider the following..

      You have *never* had to have a REAL name to make a battle.net account , nor use a credit card for the account.. so for the low low price of buying wow retail box version @19.99$ you too can go on a posting spree in persona.

      Now consider that due to the overlap in "real names" there is no real "community" around these realid names in terms of forums anyhow, since there are going to be duplicates for just about everyone..

      What exactly does this system buy us? nothing.. what does it buy blizzard? A huge can of legal issues, and less stress on forum servers (at the start) go team?

    38. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah trolling on the internet will cease meanwhile meat space trolling will uptick significantly. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/7771505/Video-game-fanatic-hunts-down-and-stabs-rival-player-who-killed-character-online.html

    39. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also use other people’s credit cards to pay for accounts. For instance parents, friends, other relatives and victims of identity theft.

    40. Re:I actually like this trend... by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Clearly you've never heard of the Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    41. Re:I actually like this trend... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Oh, so this scheme will also limit discussion to people who have credit cards and feel safe giving the card number to the board operator. What was the problem we were trying to solve again?

    42. Re:I actually like this trend... by jabbathewocket · · Score: 1

      Lets see 19.99 retail wow box Check
      Free email account with one of the myriad providers.. check
      Gamecards at any online or brick and mortar retailer check
      OR
      Disposable prepaid "gift card" from just about anywhere Check

      BTW you also have never been required to have name on account match name on credit card for wow.. and the only way to actually PROVE that you are you would require not credit card matching but rather submitting your government issued ID card #.. which even blizzard is not likely to try to do.

    43. Re:I actually like this trend... by ildon · · Score: 1

      Blizzard doesn't actually check the name on the account vs. the name on the credit card, anyway.

    44. Re:I actually like this trend... by Thansal · · Score: 1

      Right, because the current internet generation doesn't find it cool to be racist, sexist, or offensive in any way they possibly can. We will not see Juan Rodriguez post a long, and insightful analysis of warlock DPS only to have about 50 replies using the term "dirty mexian"?

      I think the Real ID thing is dumb. I think their justification for tying it to the forums is ridiculous.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    45. Re:I actually like this trend... by Godai · · Score: 1

      You can't look at their server unless they choose a character to post with. And even then, you're assuming they rolled on a server in their timezone, which a fair number of people don't.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    46. Re:I actually like this trend... by hldn · · Score: 1

      yeah you can use a fake name to create a wow account, but if you ever have to prove it's your account you're most likely boned.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    47. Re:I actually like this trend... by speedwaystar · · Score: 1

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      You can use the same credit card to create multiple WoW accounts with multiple "real" names... no spoofing is required. No ID check is involved.

      Again, the credit card name *does not* need to match the account name.

    48. Re:I actually like this trend... by Spatial · · Score: 1

      They assume the same thing. Somehow I doubt they bothered to test their ideas.

      Your typical forum suffers from a huge number of systemic problems and anonymity is only a small part of it. Trolls get rewarded with attention, flamewars command more, and good posters don't get a damn thing. Moderators get a shit job that doesn't pay and they're probably assholes and sycophants to boot.

      Now take Slashdot for example. It's a forum with a structure fit for online discussion. Trolls get modded down so hardly anybody reads them. Flamewars get filtered down to the useful or witty posts. Good posters get their posts modded up, and consistently good posters get to moderate for a limited time.

      Result: high quality comments are brought to the forefront, trolls are hidden, and flamewars are curbed. The best posters are encouraged to post more often, creating a positive feedback loop.

      As a result this site has some of the best discussion on the Internet. Despite the frequency of bad topics, there are always a number of great comments. Even contentious subjects like religion and politics produce readable threads here. No small feat.

    49. Re:I actually like this trend... by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Your post presumes that trolling has no value, which is categorically false. Discussion is discussion, and trolls can and do make outstanding, argument winning posts. Not all trolling is meaningful, but enough of it is.

      --
      Good-bye
    50. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you know who it is? Sure. Will 99.9999% of the people reading the post know or be able to know who it is? Not a chance. Ooooh. Its probably an American, probably living on the west coast, using an ISP that millions of other people in the region use. ... and that does fuck all good for reducing douchebaggery. Even if you know all that is correct, you still are fucking incredibly unlikely to be able to snub these people socially. Which is the socially and legally acceptable way to curtail douchebaggery. People with whom you are already friendly in real life are likely to already know who you are in Blizzard-space (and vice versa if you are so inclined). People with whom you are already unfriendly in real life may not know who you are in Blizzard-space. However, their discovery of your identity is highly unlikely to alter the relationship. Oooh, I'll show John Smith! I know I wasn't going to send him an invite to the party, but now I'm really not going to invite him! HA!

      People who live nowhere near you are .. what? Going to show up at your door and say "hey.. you know that fucking trolling you do on the forums? Yeah, fuck you dickface." And won't that person feel like an ass if the guy is like "uh.. I don't play Blizzard games. you must mean one of the other dozens of John Smiths living in the region, playing on MegaCorp's broadband."

    51. Re:I actually like this trend... by Znork · · Score: 1

      you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. ... and instead you'll see a lot more IRL settings-on-fire, beatings and defecating in mailboxes.

      People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more ... ... interested in turning it into a fist fight.

      Most non-anonymous meetings of people of widely differing opinion, such as demonstrations/counter demonstrations, sports events or even your average contested parking space have a much higher chance of ending up vastly more unpleasant than an internet flame war.

      Most of the times I see various people arguing against anonymity I strongly suspect it's because they actually do want to engage in off-line retaliation against people who annoy them in some way, rather than any concern over the level of discourse in various forums.

    52. Re:I actually like this trend... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe if you hurried up and buffed us already it wouldn't take until 3AM.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    53. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your account gets hacked you have to show a copy of your ID, which must match the account holder's name, in order to recover it.

    54. Re:I actually like this trend... by selven · · Score: 1

      We will not see Juan Rodriguez post a long, and insightful analysis of warlock DPS only to have about 50 replies using the term "dirty mexian"?

      Thanks for proving my point regarding anonymity and ad hominems.

    55. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new to internet anonymity, you moron. Stupid noob.

    56. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure.. less trolling. yeah thats nice and all.

      we'll also see a huge spike in identity theft, fraud, and other real serious crimes..

      But we shut those stupid trolls up at least!

    57. Re:I actually like this trend... by kent_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because trolls would never stoop to using fake "real" names.

      Well, they'll find it very difficult to do that unless they figure out a way to spoof the same name on their credit card.

      FYI, you can buy 'Game Time Cards' with cash at every big-box store in the United States.

      At the moment you can.
      And not everyone lives a convenient distance from a "big-box store in the United States"

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    58. Re:I actually like this trend... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

      <sarcasm>Yes, because there's no such thing as ad hominem attacks on slashdot.</sarcasm> With sock puppet accounts and other trickery I'm not sure that it's so even either, on top of those that just want to trash about and destroy any real discussion. But what you don't get on a real name forum, is honesty. And before you all go constitutional on me, it's perfectly rational to not tell everybody everything. Friends, family, employers, the general public, nobody except the government is obliged to treat me the same. You might say that if I do nothing wrong, I should have no problems with sharing it with the world but that is not true. There has been, is and will be unjust laws, individuals and societies that are bigoted and intolerant. That I in principle should not be punished for something does not mean that I won't be in reality.

      It is not an either-or that there should always be anonymity or there should always be identification. I see them both as important but different tools. The anonymity in gathering a community, talking to others who feel the same way, making people comfortable with themselves and letting them know they're not alone. Those that identify themselves first are the spearheads, those that gives names and faces to those people. It does not matter how good the cause is, being a spearhead is hard. If you walked along Gandhi himself you'd still risk arrest, imprisonment or being beaten up by soldiers. You can not expect everyone to be willing to sacrifice everything, some must lead and the rest will support you up to a point. Not everyone wants to be a maryr, they just seek to live their own life as they see morally sound and get away with their way of pursuing happiness.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    59. Re:I actually like this trend... by Naturalis+Philosopho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      never ONCE has it or should it ever affect your work.

      Except, of course, for that time when your boss was considering you for a promotion but chose the other candidate because he doesn't play that "stupid kid's game" in all his spare time.

      True story: I moved to a new town and started a new job working at a management level with a few other degree-level pros and also a large group of high-school and GED level workers. I joined an online dating site and set one of my preferences to be for at least college level education. Some of the ladies at work checked out my profile (you can hide your name, but not having a photo means no views), and it got quickly spread that I was "against" only having high-school level education. Oh, well, right? Well, then I got transferred to work under an older supervisor with "only" a high-school diploma who'd gotten his current position by working for 30+ years in the industry. Yeah, lot of fun working under someone who believed the rumors that you don't think people with only high-school level education are worth anything. Maybe it shouldn't happen, but people judge you both on what you do online and what you're perceived as doing online. That's just the way the world works. Forcing people to use their real names will have many effects, but one big one is that it will cause many thinking people to simply not post anymore, good or bad posts.

    60. Re:I actually like this trend... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      ok, you know his name, his rough location, his ISP and he plays wow.... try facebook, live journal, twitter, my space, hell simple google search.

      enough small things can add up to a total profile...

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    61. Re:I actually like this trend... by cruachan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      3 .. year .. 'veteran'?

      Jeez, is that all it takes to be a veteran these days. What price those of us who remember the dawn of the endless September.

    62. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      And not everyone lives a convenient distance from a "big-box store in the United States"

      Anyone that doesn't live near where they would have access to broadband and/or copies of the game itself isn't necessarily relevant to the conversation.

      Presumably, if you can buy the game, you can buy the game time codes.

      Likewise, you can even get them online directly from sites like 'gametimezone', etc.

    63. Re:I actually like this trend... by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      How did he prove your point? By agreeing with you? Hah!

    64. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are people seriously this out of touch with the modern world?

    65. Re:I actually like this trend... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      And not everyone lives a convenient distance from a "big-box store in the United States"

      Anyone that doesn't live near where they would have access to broadband

      Please note the part about "in the United States"

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    66. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Again, though, this is a non-point. Unless you're attempting to illustrate that rural communities exist, other countries exist, etc.

      I'm ready to stipulate to all of that, because none of which has anything to do with the topic at all.

    67. Re:I actually like this trend... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      You're insane if you think that anonymity prevents people from attacking the person rather than their arguments (sorry, couldn't resist the ad hominem there :)) Now I'll attack your argument:

      Go to any discussion based website out there where people are able to be anonymous. You will see a staggering number of people being incredible assholes to each other because they can do so without repercussion. Many people couldn't care less about developing a reputation for being an asshole because once the burden associated with a particular nickname becomes too much they can just dump it and make a new account. Many people go out of their way to make "alt" accounts just for the purpose of trolling forums and riling people up for no good reason.

      I agree that we *should* pay more attention to the argument than to the identity of a person, but it's been demonstrated that unless the people running a forum are willing to do a LOT of moderation, it's very difficult to have a place that doesn't quickly degenerate into a cesspool when it's anonymous.

      With Slashdot, you have karma and meta moderation etc. which kind of helps (slightly), but there are still a staggering number of trolling comments posted in every thread, people still feel perfectly free to post random bullshit as a way to rile people up, the only difference between here and most is that if you set your moderation threshold at 2 or above you can avoid the majority of them. Unfortunately, that also means newbies (who are posting at 1 by default) tend to not have their comments noticed, and so on.

      There are lots of problems with real names being used, but I think that one of the advantages you'll see is that people will be less willing to be quite so cavalier about their assholery if they're putting their name on it.

      For something like the forums for a video game - and in the specific case of WoW and Blizzard game forums in general those forums are an absolutely worthless cesspool populated by, I assume, angsty children and semi-retarded adults. There's just no other way to account for 99% of the "content" on them.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    68. Re:I actually like this trend... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      3 .. year .. 'veteran'?

      Jeez, is that all it takes to be a veteran these days. What price those of us who remember the dawn of the endless September.

      All it takes to earn veteran status is to win one battle. Or be built in a city with barracks. Time only grants a need for suspenders.

    69. Re:I actually like this trend... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems,

      So you've not been using the Internet very long I take it. Not seeing someone or knowing their name has never slowed anyone down on the Internet. Computer courage actually works just the opposite, it encourages people to call each other names because they can be a complete dick, show their true colors and no one will be able to do shit to them for it.

      Its not new, I realized this on BBSes when I was in my teens.

      Hell, I've read this thread about 3 minutes and already seen 4 posts that aren't modded down that conflict with your statement, imagine if I lowered my comment threshold.

      I think you are using a different Internet than me. Remember, AOL is not the Internet, and they aren't rooms, they are IRC channels.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    70. Re:I actually like this trend... by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      I've got dibs on "Billy Jack."

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    71. Re:I actually like this trend... by gilleain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are IIRC only 3 of me on earth. Mostly because my ancestors changed the spelling of their name to sound less German when they immigrated, but they didn't know enough English for it to make any sense.

      And no, my user name is not even remotely related to that name.

      Well, if we're playing the "who was the rarer name" game, then I probably win. I only know of one other person (on the internet) with my first name.

      ...and yes, that is also my slashdot username :)

    72. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems.

      They pretty much go straight for the ad hominems even when they don't know a thing about the person they're replying to.

      Its the internet, after all.

    73. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so stoopid. How cause you don't use your real name here????? It's becuz in reel life I am a ninja and I could come find you stoopid slashtard troll.
      luv KittyLolzNinja, Shattered Hand

    74. Re:I actually like this trend... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, is that any more "chilling" to free speech than any real-life face-to-face interaction with another person is "chilled" by the risk of being punched in the nose if you act like a total douchebag?

      God forbid people be held accountable for the things they say. If people want to be trolling, feces-flinging, childish douchebags they certainly can do so, but I'm definitely in favor of people who abuse the privilege of anonymity by hurling abuse at people just because they can being limited in their ability to do so.

      People usually don't get up in the middle of a crowded cafe and scream "NIGGERS! NIGGERS! NIGGERS!" just to get a rise out of people in real-life because they're rightly concerned about the consequences of this. Why should online be different?

      As someone who doesn't abuse the privilege of anonymity, I'd be bummed that I won't be able to use those forums anymore unless I give up my anonymity, but at the same time I absolutely understand why it's being done, and it'll probably ultimately be for the better.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    75. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely.

    76. Re:I actually like this trend... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Unless you're attempting to illustrate that rural communities exist, other countries exist, etc.

      I'm ready to stipulate to all of that, because none of which has anything to do with the topic at all.

      That was actually the point I was making. But it was the side point in my original post.
      My original main point was

      FYI, you can buy 'Game Time Cards' with cash
      At the moment you can.


      If they are killing anonymity, I don't expect that over time they will leave an anonymous option to do anything.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    77. Re:I actually like this trend... by alex-tokar · · Score: 1

      I think someone at Blizzard has been reading The Noob Comic too much.

    78. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      They'll have to kill the cards altogether if they want that. There's just not any feasible way to get each and every retailer to do your information collection for you.

    79. Re:I actually like this trend... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      However, I do not personally like the idea of my first and last name being made public everywhere, which is why I have generally shunned Facebook and would not use this feature even if I wanted to.

      So in other words, chilling effects on free speech are a good idea, but only if they're placed on other people?

      Rob

      I'm not chilled by privacy concerns on Facebook, because I don't use it.

      Now, if the government forced everyone to use their real names whenever they said something online, then I'd have a problem.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    80. Re:I actually like this trend... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      How did I post to Slashdot?

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    81. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      We will not see Juan Rodriguez post a long, and insightful analysis of warlock DPS only to have about 50 replies using the term "dirty mexian"?

      Please do note that these offenders would be posting such under their own real names as well.

      Further, people that post such responses to a long insightful analysis need to be ignored, not placated by obfuscating names.

    82. Re:I actually like this trend... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

      How does knowing that some random person's name is Bob Smith help you to know anything about that person? Whether the name on the screen is Bob Smith or CastIron1551, I still don't know who the hell that person is. Or does a person's full name somehow encode a huge amount of information about that person?

      Hell, if your handle is "GoLakers" that tells me more about you than knowing your first name is Alex.

    83. Re:I actually like this trend... by TheTick21 · · Score: 1

      No. My name is somewhat unique. There are zero other people in the US with this name that I can find currently and only one in the past (that I can find through normal methods). So are those of most of my siblings. I know friends whose last name would point them out immediately since they are the last with their surname. A real name is far far less anonymous than a handle. Yes there are some names that are so common as to be anonymous. Not all of us fit into that though.

    84. Re:I actually like this trend... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Meet me at the mission at midnight, we'll divvy up there.

    85. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, that piece of from 'theonion'! Really, theonion? HELLO! Satire? No?

      Secondly, it's a game publishers, presumably, support forum. How many trolls do you want screaming in your ear every time Bob Smith, aka ElfenWhore, kicks your ass in-game?

      Last I checked, you weren't forced to purchase anything from Blizzard, or use their support forums.

    86. Re:I actually like this trend... by alexo · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, is that any more "chilling" to free speech than any real-life face-to-face interaction with another person is "chilled" by the risk of being punched in the nose if you act like a total douchebag?

      The difference lies in the asymmetrical nature of the beast.

      Namely, if the person punches you in the nose not because you "act like a total douchebag" but because he wants to silence your message, you have the option to punch him back. In the case of the signed-with-real-name post, your antagonist knows who you are but you have no idea who he, or they, might be.

    87. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems

      Er, what? What are you smoking? The fact that urmom3945's real name is concealed does nothing whatsoever to prevent HaLoRuLe5 calling him gay.

      Observe Youtube comments some time, and weep that so many humans could fail the Turing test.

    88. Re:I actually like this trend... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      I assumed you used either the darkest magic or some kind of telepathy; it's how I read and post to Slashdot.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    89. Re:I actually like this trend... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Same - doing a google search it shows there's only one other person in this country with the same exact name as me, but luckily he's a semi-famous architect.

      True story too - when I got my gmail account I got first initial, last name - while I get a ton of email for people who think that my address is there address, I also get a lot of his fan-mail.

    90. Re:I actually like this trend... by Windwraith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe not Bob Smith, but Abdul, Jose or Pierre will have a tough time. Racism exists.

    91. Re:I actually like this trend... by egburr · · Score: 1

      Actually, no you can't. The server location has no correlation with where the player lives. I've been playing practically since the original release, and I only recently discovered there is a list of wowwiki of servers by location along with which timezone each server is set to. The average player has no clue what time zone a server is set to until they create their first character there and no idea ever where a server is physically located. I have yet to have a character on a server that is set to my own time zone. I really don't even care what time zone the server is set to as long as people refer to "server time" when making plans. I know the delta between server time and my time and can adjust accordingly.

      All you can determine is what region the physical server is in, not the player.

      Looking at posting times would be a better indicator. However, if I'm posting between 8am and 10pm PST, am I an early riser on the east coast or a 'normal' riser on the west coast?

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    92. Re:I actually like this trend... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      If the account has to be verified by CC or some other form of real-world ID when it is created, then it doesn't matter much how you continue paying for it, I suppose.
      Privacy is lost on day 1.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    93. Re:I actually like this trend... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      ... people judge others' posts by the quality of their gear rather than just the quality of the posts. On Slashdot, this doesn't happen.

      No, on slashdot we judge the quality of a post by how low one's user ID is.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    94. Re:I actually like this trend... by feepness · · Score: 1

      Maybe not Bob Smith, but Abdul, Jose or Pierre will have a tough time. Racism exists.

      And apparently only committed by white people.

    95. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

      And yet you're not posting anonymously.

      Personally I only post anonymously. One out of three of my posts get modded up to 2-3, and one of out 6 get modded up to 5.

    96. Re:I actually like this trend... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      However, I do not personally like the idea of my first and last name being made public everywhere, which is why I have generally shunned Facebook and would not use this feature even if I wanted to."

      I, Alex McQuown, think you to be a complete and utter hypocrite, with this statement as proof.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    97. Re:I actually like this trend... by random_ID · · Score: 0

      ... with more and more people being forced to use their real names on the Internet, you'll see a lot less flaming, trolling, and defacing. People I believe will be less quick to turn a discussion into an argument and more interested in understanding one another.

      People are prone to flaming on the internet because it lacks the emotional impact of face-to-face conversation. It has nothing to do with the name listed on the forum.

    98. Re:I actually like this trend... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      I only know of one other person (on the internet) with my first name.

      That fucker!

      Quick! change your FIRST name to Itchismybuttsbobcat and be truly unique again!

      --

      Liberty.

    99. Re:I actually like this trend... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 1

      doing a google search it shows there's only one other person in this country with the same exact name as me, but luckily he's a semi-famous architect

      You lucky bastard. There are only 3 people that I could find online with my first and last name. One of them kind of looks like me, is my age, lives in my state and also happens to be the largest drug bust in the history of the state.

      Guess what everyone thinks when they google me.

      --

      Liberty.

    100. Re:I actually like this trend... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      That's a good point and one I hadn't considered.

      I'd like to think that if someone called my employer and said something unsavory about me that it'd be greeted with extreme skepticism, but I know for many people it would be a career ender if there was even the hint of an issue. Perhaps make it so that in order to see someone else's RealID info you would have to make your request visible to them. So if I post something it would show up as "thesandtiger" until someone clicked my name, in which case they'd then see my RealID info, but I'd also know I'd been looked at. Of course, one person could see your name and then post it to the site and then you'd never know who was actually doing the harassing, but I would hope that kind of thing would be limited because, of course, such a posting would open up the person doing it to being harassed.

      One thing I would hope could come from this kind of thing would be people taking a more critical eye towards negative things they hear from reasonably anonymous sources about people.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    101. Re:I actually like this trend... by seebs · · Score: 1

      Instead of posting those flames, they'll just look people up online and harass them directly.

      Not sure this is an improvement.

      Basically, you're assuming the people who are currently trolling will have to post, but since the only reason they're posting is to get at people they can't reach any other way, that's not a valid assumption; instead, they'll be able to look the people up and call them at home.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    102. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, the problem is that Encyclopedia Dramatica is used as a recipe book or guiness book of world records for trolling. The assholes just want to outdo other assholes.

      If there was no anonymous activity on the internet, people would think before they speak, but unfortunately, this will just result in people not speaking, rather than engage in conversation.

      Blizzard isn't far off the mark though. They should require the real name during the signup process, and require linking it to something that does require a real name, eg facebook, along with a credit card with that name. Simple 2 factor ID verification here. Keeps the bots off, and makes trolls think twice before getting banned.

    103. Re:I actually like this trend... by sigmabody · · Score: 1

      I'm unsure on what I think of this trend. On the one hand, I wouldn't ever use it, it would strongly incentivise me to quit using any online service which required this, and I would be a strong advocate for staying as far away from something like this as possible (for obvious reasons; I mean, using real names for random internet sites, that's bright, internet safety 101...). On the other hand, it would cut down on a lot of forum spam, and probably push some people away from the games as a result; and since WoW is pretty addictive as it is, anything which helps push people off the WoW-crack can't be that bad.

      I'm a free market advocate generally, though, so Blizzard can do whatever it wants, imho. I'm willing to say I will not buy/play any online game which requires/displays my real name, but I'm just one consumer in the sea, and there are lots of other tasty naive fish out there.

    104. Re:I actually like this trend... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.

      I wish behaving like a child could make me twice as smart. hehehehe.

    105. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you deserved it, bigot.

    106. Re:I actually like this trend... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty young(23)...

      Yes, you're new to the internet.

      I've been on the internet since before you were born.

      Now, get off my lawn.

    107. Re:I actually like this trend... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      No, I'm a 3 year veteran of Slashdot, and a 2 year veteran of the World of Warcraft forums. In the WoW forums, where every post is linked to a character, people judge others' posts by the quality of their gear rather than just the quality of the posts. On Slashdot, this doesn't happen...

      ... instead you are judged by the size of your id number! A seven-digit poster? Tisk, what a noob...

    108. Re:I actually like this trend... by ztransform · · Score: 1

      The truth is most of us hate each other in this world.

      You can pretend racism doesn't exist in the USA or UK but if you talk to a person of the wrong colour in the streets of London your physical safety is at extreme risk.

      Half the people feel compassion for the never-ending barrage of beggars. Half the people would like to jail them.

      A lot of people drive dangerously, probably several of your co-workers, and you'd likely kick them if you found out who they were for endangering lives.

      Everyone is afraid of being exposed because the truth is few of us agree with each other's opinions and thoughts.

    109. Re:I actually like this trend... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      There is no other person with my surname. Anywhere.

      Blizz lost a sale of Cata if they implement this.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    110. Re:I actually like this trend... by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      So you like other people not being anonymous, but you want yourself to still be anonymous? That kind of reminds me of this.

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems, and ensures an even playing field, since newbies' arguments are heard on the same level as those of our celebrities (at least in theory).

      Really? I must say I have found the exact opposite is nearly universially true on the internet, the more anonymous people are the more of a douche bag they feel free to be, ad hominem attacks seem to escalate the more anonymous people feel themselves to be. The few places on the internet where I participate in a non anonymous fashion are the only places I have seen where cordial well thought out discussions and arguments occur.

    111. Re:I actually like this trend... by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Grandpa, you're still alive? Tell me that story again about your pet dinosaur.

    112. Re:I actually like this trend... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I too have a unique name. Well, not so unique as I share it with one other.

      He is an amercian basketball player. Not a very good one if I'd led to beleive his stats.

      Boy, is he in some trouble when my posts get linked to him!

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    113. Re:I actually like this trend... by Calydor · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. There's only one other person in my country with my exact name, so a coin flip is all it'd take.

      Add to that a ~20 year difference and I'm easily recognized as the one likely to be playing WoW.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    114. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally think internet anonymity is a good thing. It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems,

      I disagree with you. Also, you're an insensitive clod, and you suck CowboyNeal's dick!

      But jokes aside, seriously, how does anonymity keep people from resorting to personal attacks? In reality, I usually see the opposite happening: it's much easier to attack someone without feeling bad if there is nothing to remind you that you're dealing with another person, someone with hopes and dreams and aspirations, with feelings, both good and bad, someone who loves, who hurts, someone who's a lover and a child and perhaps a parent? An actual person, in other words, not just words on a screen that you can hate freely because they don't mean anything.

      Of course, I'm far from convinced that requiring people to give up their real names will accomplish much. And there's good reasons to not implement this, much less *force* it on people, but I don't think "people will be politer if they're anonymous" really follows.

    115. Re:I actually like this trend... by randomcole · · Score: 1

      Let me guess . . . is your last name Crunch?

    116. Re:I actually like this trend... by Acaeris · · Score: 1

      You do not need to play WoW to have an account on the new forums. They aren't WoW specific, they are the replacement for the current Battle.Net forum and so all you need is an account (As far as I can tell, you don't even need a Blizzard game to register) so this does nothing to stop trolling at all, it'll just mean a load of fake accounts being used for posting.

      The only thing this does is give information out to the people you may not want to have that information. Teachers in the UK are not allowed to interact with pupils, beyond polite greetings and the like, outside of a school environment with the possibility of being fired if they do. This essentially blocks them from using the forums because of the risk involved.

      Why could they not allow you to set up an alias that shows on the forum and links to a list of characters on that account that are on the armory and allow us to pick a character to post as alongside that alias?

      Bare in mind, if you have any kind of technical problem you will get asked to post it on the forum. You can phone them and then wait in the queue for ages (which is only going to get worse) or just not bother if you are in a position where you need to remain anonymous on WoW.

      I've used and moderated a fair few forums over the years and, though I've never needed to moderate as many posts and users as Blizzard do, any decent forum software makes it as easy as possible for the moderator to do their job. Things like having a page that lists each flagged post with the ability on that screen to delete, ban, temp-ban, edit, visit in context and reply to the message without hunting through the actual thread.

      One feature I'd really suggest Blizzard consider adding for their moderators is a way for the system to flag IPs that have had multiple accounts banned so that if someone really doesn't take a hint they can ban by IP for a period of time.

      Instead they are implementing a change that only alienates good posters and security conscious players and makes all kinds of new trolling possible and worse, could potentially affect someone in real life

    117. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is absolutely the most stupid thing i have heard yet today, at it is 7:09 in the morning, your lucky i'm an asshole and i got a kick out of the fact you worked for such a stupid company! lol

      but seriously, like its already been said, if you get fudged with because of someones judgment of you that they make off of assumptions based on their interpretation of your online activities, you didnt need to work there in the first place!

      peaces!

    118. Re:I actually like this trend... by elBart0 · · Score: 1

      How many of those 50 replies will be there when people have to sign them with their real names?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    119. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Well you can shut up!

    120. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did you meet anyone on the dating site?

    121. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain to me how posting my real name is going to reduce the chance of me trolling or doing any other thing it's supposed to prevent. I mean any real influence that exposure would have would automatically have to apply to anyone not posting troll crap as well. So by admitting that having someone's real name in a post will influence trolls, you are admitting that it will also have negative effects on non-trolls.

    122. Re:I actually like this trend... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

      well, if they are on an EU server, you can eliminate all google hits from the americas when you are doing your stalking planns... not the best metric to remove false positives, but every bit helps.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    123. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It forces people to attack each other's arguments rather than resorting to ad hominems

      You must be on a different series of tubes to the rest of us.

    124. Re:I actually like this trend... by Windwraith · · Score: 1

      You haven't seen much of the real world if you honestly think that.

    125. Re:I actually like this trend... by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      That's a great ideal, and it's awesome that your boss is laid back. Consider yourself lucky.

      I've heard from recruiting companies that they won't hire anyone who plays WOW. All because of one or two bad experiences with WOW players.

      There are also child murderers who played DOOM. But what teenage boy of that generation didn't play DOOM? Yet there is still a generation of adults who assign a stigma to games because of anecdotal evidence.

      WOW is that incredibly-popular game of the current generation. Where DOOM was causing kids to kill each other, WOW is turning them into drooling XP-farming slackers.

      The same employers turning down job applicants because of a google search are clueless that their star employee also plays WOW. The only difference is the star employee was smart enough to keep his video game hobby private.

      Thanks to Blizzard, having a professional career may now mean avoiding Blizzard and Activision PC games. That's the choice they're moving toward - either play our games under your real name, with every piece of loot and boss kill published the internet, or don't play our games at all.

      To many of us with a job and a family, the answer is easy: there are plenty of games out there that I can still play without giving up my privacy.

    126. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -

      How does knowing that some random person's name is Bob Smith help you to know anything about that person? Whether the name on the screen is Bob Smith or CastIron1551, I still don't know who the hell that person is. Or does a person's full name somehow encode a huge amount of information about that person?

      You must not be a sexist, a racist, a Know-Nothing or some other more obscure variety of xenophobe/chauvinist - congratulations on your enlightened upbringing.

    127. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is correct, my fake named WoW account is occasionally linked to my real name debit card. Nary a peep from the Blizzard elves, who presumably don't give two shits as long as the account remains active.

    128. Re:I actually like this trend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to prepaid cell phone vendors.

  8. Triumph of the Marketroids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, we've got a whole generation of Failbookers who believe in attaching everything they do in real life to their real name... and we've got a game. If we can get people to divulge their real names to us, we can trivially cross-reference that with the data that Zuckerberg's already mined for us, and one outer-join later, money falls from the heavens.

    What the consumer actually wanted - the ability to be The Real Them on Failbook, and Someone Completely Different while gaming - doesn't enter into it. *sigh*

    My answer to this is the same as my answer to Failbook: a strange game, and the only way to win is not to play.

    1. Re:Triumph of the Marketroids by Godai · · Score: 1

      They already have the name in this case. They're only changing it so that when you post, that name is displayed instead of a pseudonym. I can't see how this move could possibly be perceived as benefiting Blizzard sales or marketing in any way. If it did, they'd already be able to do it.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    2. Re:Triumph of the Marketroids by flintmecha · · Score: 1

      You're so clever and edgey with the way you consistently replace "Facebook" with "Failbook" and I would love to subscribe to your newsletter. Do you also use other witty and mature subsititions like "micro$$oft" and "Crapple"?

    3. Re:Triumph of the Marketroids by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      Preach it, I have _never_ used my real name on the Internet. I use misnomers, aliases and fake names everywhere, without hesitation or prejudice. I don't give out my race, sex, age or religious beliefs, I relish in the anonymity.

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    4. Re:Triumph of the Marketroids by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Preach it, I have _never_ used my real name on the Internet. I use misnomers, aliases and fake names everywhere, without hesitation or prejudice. I don't give out my race, sex, age or religious beliefs, I relish in the anonymity.

      Have you ever given your real name, or had it discussed, via email? Particularly via an email that is indexed and searched regularly by a third party? In short, if your mom uses gmail, your ID is known to Google, at a minimum.

  9. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now you bastards will know how it feels

    - Johnathan Doe

  10. Reduced server useage by golden_hands · · Score: 1

    This is a nice move(( for Blizzard- not for their customers): 1. Require everyone to use their Real ID 2. Fewer people use forums or post anything they strictly dont need to. 3. Lesser costs on maintenance and infrastructure 4. Profit.

    1. Re:Reduced server useage by ildon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      5. People stop posting legitimate, intelligent useful feedback because they value their personal privacy more than a video game.
      6. Without the constructive feedback, issues without the game go unnoticed or unreported for longer periods of time.
      7. These issues compound and add up making the game less fun, but it becomes more difficult to quantify why the game is less fun without this feedback.
      8. Subscriptions slowly drop off and the game trickles away and dies.
      9. Long term loss of profit for short term, nearsighted gain.

    2. Re:Reduced server useage by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

      Legitimate? Intelligent? USEFUL? Blizzard forums? That's a good one!

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    3. Re:Reduced server useage by Godai · · Score: 1

      That'd be a nice perk, but I suspect this will also be good for customers. It'd be nice to be able to post on the forums without someone telling me to 'go die in a fire'. Hopefully, posting under their real name will discourage that kind of crap. If it helps reduce the asshat incidence level at all, it would be fantastic.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    4. Re:Reduced server useage by ildon · · Score: 1

      It exists, it's just hard to find. Blizzard thinks this will make it easier to find. The reality is it will simply disappear completely.

    5. Re:Reduced server useage by B1oodAnge1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Go die in a fire.

      --
      RUGBYRUGBYRUGBY
    6. Re:Reduced server useage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch the ticket usage go up. Because, when I had some issues with game balance the GM told me to use the suggestion forums. I guess from now on I'll just open 3 more tickets.

  11. The official thread by Xaemyl · · Score: 0

    The official thread that started this is averaging at least 2 pages a minute of negative comments since I learned of it 20 or so minutes ago. 168 pages and counting. And apparently, they're stock is dropping, but I don't know if this has anything to do with it.'

    1. Re:The official thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks for the link

    2. Re:The official thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are stock is dropping? What the hell does that even mean?

    3. Re:The official thread by kuzb · · Score: 1

      If you look at the stock history, this is more of a minor fluctuation rather than a serious drop.

      --
      BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  12. Who's accountable when ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    some can't-stand-loosing person tracks his opponents with this information and starts to harras, or worse : physically attack them ?

    Yes, demanding that everyone is known by his true name to everybody else can only be a good thing ...

  13. Now so bad. by snarfies · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fortunately, my real name actually is KÖRGULL THE EXTERMINATOR, so I won't be needing to change my battlenet ID.

    1. Re:Now so bad. by nege · · Score: 0, Redundant

      KORGULL, Whats up Bro? Its Me, THOG 'TH UNTAMED! How have things been since the lynching?

    2. Re:Now so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that is bad they won't even let me enter my name, stupid validation!

      Signed,

      Julius Andreas Gimli Arn MacGyver Chewbacka Highlander Elessar-Jankov

    3. Re:Now so bad. by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You think that is bad they won't even let me enter my name, stupid validation!

      Signed,

      Julius Andreas Gimli Arn MacGyver Chewbacka Highlander Elessar-Jankov

      You should have it so good!

      Sincerely,
      Johann Gambolputty de von Ausfern-schplenden-schlitter-crasscrenbon-fried-digger-dingle-dangle-dongle-dungle-burstein-von-knacker-thrasher-apple-banger-horowitz-ticolensic-grander-knotty-spelltinkle-grandlich-grumblemeyer-spelterwasser-kurstlich-himbleeisen-bahnwagen-gutenabend-bitte-ein-nürnburger-bratwustle-gerspurten-mitz-weimache-luber-hundsfut-gumberaber-shönedanker-kalbsfleisch-mittler-aucher von Hautkopft of Ulm

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    4. Re:Now so bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why do you go by an assumed name "snarfies" on Slashdot?

  14. In Blizzard's defense by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    If you've ever seen a Blizzard forum, they're some of the worst trolled forums I've ever seen. Blizzard needs to do something. Blizzard looks to be grasping at straws though. What Blizzard really needs is a moderation system like Slashdot.

    1. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, because Slashdot's moderation system works so well. No trolls here.

    2. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No trolls here.

      Hey, if you're browsing at -1, that's your problem, not Slashdot's.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No trolls here.

      Hey, if you're browsing at -1, that's your problem, not Slashdot's.

      It's a shame that GP was modded down, because he proves a good point like many others who are modded down just because someone with mod points is unhappy with their opinion.

      Trolling is a problem here still, and I'll probably be modded as one.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    4. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Godai · · Score: 1

      Actually, its getting a moderation system as well, but everyone is focusing on the 'real name' part of the announcement.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    5. Re:In Blizzard's defense by somaTh · · Score: 2, Funny

      His point is that, unless you're trying to read the trolls/flamebaits, you won't.

      Sadly, though, he had to feed a troll to make it. Now I'm offtopic. :/

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    6. Re:In Blizzard's defense by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      Do not let perfect be the enemy of good.

      Sure, there are trolls on slashdot. However, I keep my filter set to about 4, so the only time I see a troll is when someone has an awesomely crafted response to said troll.

      Moderation may well be the worst method of troll suppression...except for all the other methods that have been tried from time to time.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    7. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who try to use reverse psychology to get mod points by saying "I'll probably be modded down" should be modded down for being douches.

    8. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Maestro4k · · Score: 1

      If you've ever seen a Blizzard forum, they're some of the worst trolled forums I've ever seen. Blizzard needs to do something. Blizzard looks to be grasping at straws though. What Blizzard really needs is a moderation system like Slashdot.

      Then perhaps Blizzard should do something like... hire more forum moderators, or look at using community volunteers as moderators to help keep the trolls in check. But those would cost money, whereas forcing all your innocent customers to give out their real names to every potential psychotic online doesn't cost them anything.

      There are lots of ways to deal with trolling that doesn't involve forcing people to give out their real names. Besides, Blizzard already knows the forum posters real names. Despite that it's not stopping people from being total jerks on their forums, so how they think making those names public will stop it is beyond me. All it's going to do is run off the non-trolls who value their privacy.

    9. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Spazztastic · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'll probably get modded down for this, but... It looks like what you think should be is wrong.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    10. Re:In Blizzard's defense by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      so the only time I see a troll is when someone has an awesomely crafted response to said troll.

      Yes, it is nice having a purpose. Although I would substitute 'just clever enough' in place of 'awesomely crafted'.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  15. No big loss. by jack2000 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I know i'm not going to use that forum if they make this mandatory.

  16. Activision? by II+Xion+II · · Score: 0

    I must ask this to anyone who really knows what is going on with Real ID and the Battle.net system (in addition to Blizzard politics). How much influence does Activision truly have over Blizzard's day-to-day operations and strategic initiatives? Is the eerily 1984-esque move to Real ID and the Battle.net system in more and more areas a product of the fated acquisition or is it something that Blizzard has implemented after getting more out of touch with reality? At first I didn't mind Battle.net or even the Real ID system as using your account name was optional, but now they are expanding it (presumably to combat trolls or dissenters and to better foster "camaraderie") to their forums. How long until they start implementing it in their game world? This is like the Facebook debacle all over again, only without many options. I am hopeful Blizzard will reevaluate this policy as it is not popular and definitively not a good idea from a privacy standpoint. The more coverage it gets, the more of a chance there is to see it scrapped. Especially now that there are other forums where WoW-related stuff can be discussed. Mass exodus from Blizzard forums ahead? Either way, I still wonder if this whole Battle.net and Real ID system is Activision's fault.

  17. Everquest didn't have forums by Selfbain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the old EQ days (I know it's still around but who cares these days), all the forums for the game were run by the fans because there were no official ones. I have a feeling this change will cause similar forums to rise in popularity and Blizzard will accomplish little other than losing control of the conversation and pissing off their users.

    --
    Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    1. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the best way to do it IMO. Wish I had points to mod you up.

    2. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true.

      EQ had official forums, they just sucked... and you could get banned for posting on them.

    3. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      Oh well then today I learned something. They must have sucked something fierce then too because I played for a couple years and had never heard of them.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    4. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Spitfirem1 · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling this change will cause similar forums to rise in popularity and Blizzard will accomplish little other than losing control of the conversation and pissing off their users.

      This is already largely the case with the min/max raiding crowd gravitating to a few non-Blizzard sites/forums for their information and discussion.

      For example:
      http://www.elitistjerks.com/

      Interestingly, one reason the referenced site grew to popularity is the iron-handed approach to moderation - the slightest hint of trolling or asshatery is generally quickly stomped upon and/or mocked relentlessly by both the moderators and user population.

    5. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the not so old EQ2 days, there is an official forum and there are huge forums run by fans. Fan forums exist because official forums - especially in the case of EQ2 - are HEAVILY moderated; to a point where every bit of dissent and criticism get's locked/deleted/banned. Many people don't liek that, so they create their own sites.

    6. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by alfoolio · · Score: 1

      Your youth is hanging out in public view. Check your intertubes young grasshopper, Everquest was a huge market success at the time, with close to a million players in an era where most games had less than 100,000.

    7. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everquest had something much worse than forums, chat rooms.

    8. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Selfbain · · Score: 1

      I said I played the game for two years. It's the forums for the game I'd never heard of.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    9. Re:Everquest didn't have forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually did have forums, and Brad posted quite often on them. However, the noise ratio went through the roof and they eventually closed them and that is when all the server boards went up. Blizzard is kind of at that point where they don't know if they should just close them or do....this.

  18. Its optional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All posts in the future on the new forum systems will be an opt-in choice and ample warning will be given that you're posting with your real first and last name."

    I just want all the QQ to stop already.

  19. oh goodie by KarmaKhameleon · · Score: 1

    Now they can ferret out all those prank phone call names like:

    Coholic, first name Al
    Hyuginkiss, first name Amanda
    Butts, first name Seymour
    or
    I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt

    1. Re:oh goodie by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Hugh Jass and Mike Rotch

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:oh goodie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt

      Hey, don't drag my family's name through the dirt like that! I come from a long line of stupid morons with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt. You should learn to be more sensitive to other people's heritage.

      Yours truly,

      I'm a stupid moron with an ugly face and a big butt and my butt smells and I like to kiss my own butt... the fourth.

    3. Re:oh goodie by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Best NPR corrections segment was when they apologized for a recent interview with someone named "Mike Rotch" and explained that that was not his actual name.

  20. What a sham! by yoshi_mon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While a lot of people have gone on and on about how using real names will promote more civility and better discourse, something I seriously doubt is necessarily true, that is no where near the real reason Blizzard is forcing RealID.

    It's a means to open up their TOS to allow dataminers access to a vast swath of information. Cha ching! Add to that anyone in game using RealID that then links up friends list? Cha ching! Even more information to datamine. And of course anyone who has played WoW knows that they log damn near everything. You can bet that gchat, party chat, officer chat, raid chat, general chat, trade chat, and every other channel that you type a letter in will be up for datamining. Cha ching!

    It's all about the money people. Cloaked in a flag of good intentions.

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    1. Re:What a sham! by seanalltogether · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Data mining players on blizzard isn't nearly as meaningful as you're making it out to be. Blizzard employees have stated on previous occasions that the amount of data they generate is monumental and trying to mine it is so impractical they just throw it all away. This is the reason they can't even catch people cheating by rewinding battlegrounds sessions. Data mining a place like facebook is far more valuable because the connections between people are easily confined and contain stable links. Data mining the complex interactions that take place in a gaming system are impossible on a system wide scale, the best you could do is pick a handful of players and try to make sense of the avalanche of data they generate.

    2. Re:What a sham! by nege · · Score: 1

      I cringe at the kind of advertising potentially created based on trade, general and gchat.

      Probably make good t-shirts though.

    3. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nonsense. First, Blizzard already has the real name associated with an account. If they want, they can already do all that data-mining you're so concerned about. The publishing of the RealID names on the forum are completely unrelated to this.

      Second, the forums only show your name. Not what characters you belong to. Not even what server you play on (disclaimer: you do have the option to associate with a character, but its not on by default).

      So how is any of this not just tinfoil hat ravings?

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    4. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can bet

      Who can bet? You, because you're a Blizzard employee or an industry insider? What is your source for this information?

      I don't see how wild speculation helps anything in this discussion.

    5. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how you draw that conclusion - Blizz already has access to all that datamine info, and they could add the agreement to let them use it in any TOS update (if they haven't already - I never, ever read them).

      Unless you are referring to third parties slurping the forums or something.

    6. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While a lot of people have gone on and on about how using real names will promote more civility and better discourse, something I seriously doubt is necessarily true, that is no where near the real reason Blizzard is forcing RealID.

      It's a means to open up their TOS to allow dataminers access to a vast swath of information. Cha ching! Add to that anyone in game using RealID that then links up friends list? Cha ching! Even more information to datamine. And of course anyone who has played WoW knows that they log damn near everything. You can bet that gchat, party chat, officer chat, raid chat, general chat, trade chat, and every other channel that you type a letter in will be up for datamining. Cha ching!

      It's all about the money people. Cloaked in a flag of good intentions.

      making the assumption that most ppl pay with a credit card to play, they can probably already datamine if they wanted too...

    7. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I sure would use my real name if I could get a Cloaking Flag of Good Intentions.

    8. Re:What a sham! by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      A real name is a powerful little thing. It is my professional opinion as someone who's involved in the background check business, the past 3-4 years have seen a lot of automated tools arise that trawl a lot of publicly accessible content to find out a lot about a name.

      Anything that is accessible by a browser is available, think beyond just Google. Think airline flight scraping sites done properly, querying a few thousand sources that are publicly available but not indexed by Google, only through a POST request. A lot of online games are already added, just to search for nicknames and related information. If things are linked on WoW to real names, it's a fucking goldmine to these services.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    9. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much of the churn on the forums include server specific forums. This change will affect your in-game anonymity. If you post on your server forums looking for a raid, or looking for people to join your raid, you'll need to include your in-game contact info and thus your Real ID will be associated with your in-game toon for anyone who's interested.

      This was not well thought out.

    10. Re:What a sham! by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      When you log into battle.net you are presented with an agreement where you accept that blizzard will read even your whispers/tells.
      So there is no privacy whatsoever on WoW. I dont really care that much but I do feel people should be fully aware of it!

    11. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key issue is the Terms of Service -- if the RealID is a public designator, they can share that out and it's not a TOS violation.

    12. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By forcing real names to be displayed, that makes it public info. They may already have swaths of logs on hand but with this, they could say the info was already out there and users have consented to spreading it around.

    13. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marvelous, now I can find and kill the bastards that keep pounding on me in the game!.

    14. Re:What a sham! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second, the forums only show your name. Not what characters you belong to.

      For the love of all that's unholy, I know people can get very involved in such games, but when your name belongs to your characters I think you may have got a bigger problem.

      Damned soul stealing Warlocks o_O

    15. Re:What a sham! by Ramahan · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. First, Blizzard already has the real name associated with an account. If they want, they can already do all that data-mining you're so concerned about. The publishing of the RealID names on the forum are completely unrelated to this.

      Second, the forums only show your name. Not what characters you belong to. Not even what server you play on (disclaimer: you do have the option to associate with a character, but its not on by default).

      So how is any of this not just tinfoil hat ravings?

      Ooops I guess someone forgot to let you in on the fact that clicking on a posters name will take you to the Armory list of all their characters. Pesky things all little side notes the folks screaming about "Tin Hats" just gloss over.

    16. Re:What a sham! by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. First, Blizzard already has the real name associated with an account. If they want, they can already do all that data-mining you're so concerned about. The publishing of the RealID names on the forum are completely unrelated to this.

      You're right, but one thing you haven't thought of is that up until now, they have never had a way to map a social network of real life friends, or friends that play multiple games together. Just because your character friended a good healer that kept their group alive didn't mean they had a real world connection. But now, with Real ID, in order to map your social network, you have to know your friend's email address. This mapping persists across characters and even realms (servers). In other words, Blizzard wants to be the next Facebook for gamers. They've already announced the next Battle.net will have targeted ads within the loading screens. This is just the first step in Activision destroying the Blizzard franchise by milking it for all it is worth.

      I knew Bobby Kotick would destroy Blizzard, and it looks like it has just begun. I play games to escape reality, not to get griefed in real life because I pissed someone off in a PuG (pick-up group). Being anonymous on the Internet is important, because even if you aren't a troll or an asshole, there are a lot of trolls and assholes out there that might want to make you into a target for abuse. Especially if you are female or different in some way (gay, perhaps).

      The first time a person gets ganked in real life after forum combat, you will know that Activision/Blizzard is a soulless corporation that cares more about profits than the safety of their customers.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    17. Re:What a sham! by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2, Informative

      How? You a Blizzard shill?

      http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?sid=1&topicId=25626349382

      There is one of the better posts on Blizzards own forums as to why publishing someones 1st and last name, in association with other details, is a (TM) very bad thing.

      Yes they can already sell off what data they have but not without their users going wtf!? But when RealID becomes the norm well then it's no wonder Joe Bob Jones is getting targeted ads for snickerdoodles. His forum posts, linked with Facebook and all the rest that I talked about, said that he might like them!

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
    18. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      But we're discussing the forum change, not the Real ID change in-game. That's a separate discussion. I could see how one might think the linking between people could be used that way, but the forum announcement has nothing to do with that. The only connection is that they both use the RealID system, but they are two distinct discussions.

      I'm still inclined to disagree about the 'facebook' argument people keep piping up with, but at least I can see how there's a case there w.r.t. to the in game friending (though I use it and love it). Unfortunately a lot of the concern about that feature spills over into the forum discussion and makes things very confused.

      We can talk about displaying your real name on a forum, but that's really the whole ball of wax. And we can talk about the effect of linking accounts with distinct relationships. But they really don't have much to do with one another other than that they use the same underlying identification system.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    19. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      That'd be hard, since in the new system it doesn't display a character unless you choose to associate one. If you choose to do so, then yes, it would probably link it.

      It's all spelled out in the actual article, which you haven't read closely enough ;) (Though to be fair, there's a LOT of people who miss that point. They really should be bolding that or increasing its font size or something)

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    20. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      By forcing real names to be displayed, that makes it public info. They may already have swaths of logs on hand but with this, they could say the info was already out there and users have consented to spreading it around.

      I'm not sure I agree with that. I'm assuming neither of us is a lawyer, but that's seems like a stretch to me. I posted in a forum that had my name but nothing else, so now the terrabytes of chat logs from the last three are fair game? And that's assuming they aren't already, which I bet they are.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    21. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      There's an interesting sub-thread on guild recruitment in the same vein. Realm forums are another problem area, that's true. It'll be interesting to see if they have any plans for those. Though with LFG and the Raid Browser, they're less critical for what you're talking about (though still useful, particularly when looking for a raid at a future date). Hopefully someone is asking these questions in the official thread on the subject, though it's probably be drowned out by the people screeching.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    22. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      If things are linked on WoW to real names, it's a fucking goldmine to these services.

      But linked to what? By default, its just your name. Granted, that's something of value, but the only thing they can use that to scrape for is what you say on the forums. So they could maybe figure out you play a priest or a warlock or what race you have or something, but how much of that is valuable? There are some threads of a more frivolous, personal nature ("What do you listen to while raiding?" was a recent thread) so those might provide some information to scraping, but they're by far the minority.

      I understand the concern about scraping, but I'm having a hard time seeing what a scraping would come up with on those forums. Maybe I'm just missing something obvious though.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    23. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, though that's not what the GP was talking about. If you read his post, he's raving about linking between your name and chat logs of various channels, all of which they already have.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    24. Re:What a sham! by Ramahan · · Score: 1

      That'd be hard, since in the new system it doesn't display a character unless you choose to associate one. If you choose to do so, then yes, it would probably link it.

      It's all spelled out in the actual article, which you haven't read closely enough ;) (Though to be fair, there's a LOT of people who miss that point. They really should be bolding that or increasing its font size or something)

      You might want to dig a bit deeper into RealID and not just what has been said on that thread. They've said RealID will be used on the Forums, not that 1st and last will be used, which means your RealID will be connected to your list of characters.

    25. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      The first and most significant change is that in the near future, anyone posting or replying to a post on official Blizzard forums will be doing so using their Real ID -- that is, their real-life first and last name -- with the option to also display the name of their primary in-game character alongside it.

      Your 'RealID' is your first & last names. And note the bolded part (emphasis mine). From amending posts later they make it clear that linking it to a character is off by default.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    26. Re:What a sham! by seebs · · Score: 1

      Simple:

      Who cares whether it connects you to your characters (although most customer service threads do, because you have to identify the affected character)? The question is whether some erstwhile forum troll can now harass you in real life without ever posting under his real name, because he doesn't have to use the forums to get at you.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    27. Re:What a sham! by nicolette+sue · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. First, Blizzard already has the real name associated with an account. If they want, they can already do all that data-mining you're so concerned about. The publishing of the RealID names on the forum are completely unrelated to this.

      Second, the forums only show your name. Not what characters you belong to. Not even what server you play on (disclaimer: you do have the option to associate with a character, but its not on by default).

      So how is any of this not just tinfoil hat ravings?

      1. This is only the beginning. Starting In the forums is far more inconspicuous (even given the coverage in the tech blogosphere; I'm willing to bet the average Joe hasn't heard about this yet) and easy to justify. If there isn't a huge exodus of subscribers ($), then it's only a matter of time before it's brought to the game itself.

      2. If the forums see a significant decline in popularity (but people are still playing the game) then Blizzard has lost a lot of its feedback about glitches and bugs. This is a relatively small matter, but should be considered.

      3. Women. Women are still a minority in the gaming world, especially one as unique as WoW. Reveal the first and last name of a woman in the forums and you've likely set them up for several stalkers, any of whom may be likely to take their Internet antics to "real life". Imagine Internet stalking (which most people would be hard-pressed to find truly harmless if it were happening to them) escalating to sexual assault or full-blown rape. If the solution is for women to avoid the forums, that's not fair. Also, see number one. All it takes is a name. Start there and you can find some pretty amazing stuff about people.

      Disclaimer: I don't play WoW. I am a woman. I have an unusual name. If I was playing the game, I'd think seriously about whether it was worth the potential risks to have my full name displayed on the forums and likely deactivate my account. As it stands now, this has solidified my decision to never get an account. This isn't about jobs or perceptions. It's about safety.

      I have also been awake for far too long, so I feel that this is unnecessarily convoluted. I hope it makes sense to SOMEONE.

      If Blizzard can successfully implement this without losing money, look for it to start trickling into the rest of the Internet. I dislike trolls as much as the next person, but anonymity is worth more to me than a halfhearted attempt to get rid of them online. (Trolls will still exist, as they do in real life. This won't significantly change anything about that).

    28. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      That's a different issue than what the GP was talking about. He's raving about how this change someone gives Blizzard information they didn't have before (clearly, this is not the case).

      The connection to a character on the support forums is a valid concern, though the line Blizzard seems to be taking is that there are two more avenues for getting technical support that don't involve posting on the forums, so making an exception for that case isn't necessary. Personally, I think the guild recruitment angle is more interesting.

      As for trolls getting back at you, this has been raised before, and has potential for an interesting discussion. But surely this isn't the first forum to try something like this? Is this new territory, or is there previous case history we could look at to see how likely that kind of behaviour is?

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    29. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure why you posted this in response to my reply to a crackpot, but since its a thoughtful post I figure it deserves some thoughts back. I don't agree with some of what you're saying, but I think its a far more interesting discussion that most of what's being screamed at each other in this story's comments :P

      Anyways, on to your points:

      1. I disagree on this 100%. I don't see any reason why this would be migrated to the game itself -- they already have RealID there, they don't use it the way you're suggesting and the fact that they have made tying a forum post to a character optional suggests to me that they have no plans to make this change anywhere but the forums.

      2. This is a fair point. But the signal to noise ratio on the forums is insanely bad. It'd be ludicrous to assume that if you chased off some of the noise you'd lose none of the signal, but it might actually be possible to have a real discussion about these issues in a way that's not really possible now. That said, you're right, there's going to be -- if not a decrease in eyes -- a decrease in feedback of some kind. How much remains to be seen.

      3. This could be true, but I'm not sure I'm ready to subscribe to the idea that as soon as a name goes up, you're in danger. There are plenty of people posting on their real name in other avenues on the web, and while I'm sure there are cases that turn ugly I suspect if it was a major problem people wouldn't be posting under their real names on blogs, news articles or anything else. Still, I don't want to belittle the possibility, since maybe being male makes just make it seem less a concern.

      Having an unusual name would be a concern to anyone posting on the forums -- male or female -- though there's a lot of thought on the subject that says we're not nearly as anonymous as we think we are already (which isn't to say that this RealID stuff doesn't make it a heck of a lot easier in this case).

      Anonymity can be a powerful thing, and I'm not against it per se. But at the same time, I can also see the point of someone who says "If you're willing to say something, you should stand behind it." Sure, there are times when that's not a smart option (whistleblowing comes to mind) but this is a video game. And ultimately, its not a right to post on their forums, so if someone deems it an unacceptable risk, that's their choice.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    30. Re:What a sham! by nicolette+sue · · Score: 1
      I think I just happened to click the wrong "reply to post" button. I was replying on my iPad within a newsreader and NOT on my computer, which is probably why it went to the wrong place. Apologies! Still, I appreciate your polite and thoughtful reply. What follows are my clarifications from my initial arguments, because I wasn't posting complete thoughts. Shame on me!

      1. I think my inexperience with the game itself is the culprit for my (likely incorrect) ideas about how it could potentially translate from the forums to the real game. I was discussing this with a friend of mine yesterday (and he's slightly more well-versed in how WoW actually works than I am; I've only seen it in passing), and it was a concern for both of us.

      I can certainly see how it would be seen as an unnecessarily paranoid extrapolation of what they're currently doing. In our discussion (and in my ensuing post) we were operating in a worst-case scenario mindset, particularly based on the recent Starcraft beta's implementation of RealID.

      Apparently the Starcraft beta used a variant of RealID to identify its users. "Friends of friends" were able to see each other's RealID, and there was no setting to turn this off in the beta. I have three friends who participated in the beta: two male and one female. Only one male was friends with the female, but both males were friends with each other. The male who was not friends with the female was still able to see her RealID.

      It's this in conjunction with the use of RealID in the forums that leaves me concerned. Sure, for now linking to your game character is optional (as it should be), but I currently don't see anything stopping Blizzard from implementing this into the game itself if it works in the forums. My argument is more of a "worst-case scenario" argument than anything else. Does that decrease its validity? Perhaps. It's simply a function of how I'm processing this, however.

      2. I think you're right in that this is a wait-and-see sort of situation. It wasn't my strongest argument to be sure, but one I hadn't seen in the few hundred comments I had browsed before deciding to post.

      3. I should have clarified that my concern comes from posting using RealID to a particular type of audience, rather than just posting using a real name in general.

      You are absolutely right. There are lots of people who post lots of content online under their real name (or a close variation thereof). LinkedIn, Facebook, Myspace, blogs, news sites--there is a never-ending bevy of content out there linked to real names. And it's all just as vulnerable as this. So why the concern here and not (as much) elsewhere?

      The audience. I know quite a few hardcore female gamers (including one who plays WoW pretty frequently), and they all value their gender anonymity within games. As for the one who plays WoW, she let it slip once that she's a girl, and was immediately subjected to a barrage of come-ons and other interactions that offline would be construed as sexual harassment. The same thing happens to her on XBox pretty frequently, but at least XBox Live includes mechanisms for blocking users who do so.

      Now, give that same gaming community access to a person's first and last name. Let's forget for a moment the potential security risks and instead think about how that person will be perceived as a member of a particular community. In WoW forums where one could be judged by the quality of one's gear (as mentioned by previous posters), how do you believe a woman would be perceived? Would she be more or less capable than a male gamer? Would she potentially be objectified and sexually harassed, just on the basis that she's a female gamer? She would very much be in the minority, and past research into the subject (disclaimer: I hold a communications degree & spent quite a bit of time focusing on interpersonal and gender communication) indicates that she would quickly become part of a muted group, eliminating her opportunity to have a voice even

    31. Re:What a sham! by Godai · · Score: 1

      1. The 'Friend of a Friend' functionality is something I only recently discovered myself, since it’s a little bit buried. At first I was perplexed and a little annoyed, but then I realized it doesn't actually do anything more then let you know someone with that name is playing; e.g. while it does give the person's name, it actually doesn't indicate any of their characters. Once I realized that, I better understood it -- this is a 'Facebook'-like bit of functionality, in that I might look at a friend, see someone we both know and maybe try add them to my own list.

      Now, that said, you're right, they could implement this in-game, but the only reason would be if they wanted to enforce a 'continuity of identity' -- a phrase I've encountered reading on this subject that is rather handy for putting a name to the idea I think I've been grasping for. In fact, I think that more than 'real identity' is what I'd like to see implemented. The main annoyance on the forums it that people can be asshats today, and easily shed that persona and post as someone else tomorrow. I guess I don't actually need to know that person's name, so much as I'd like them to not be able to switch to a different posting character when they want to be an asshole.

      Now there's an argument to be made for making this change in-game as well -- e.g. someone might become well known as a prim donna tank or a ninja looter, etc. -- and want to shed that identity too (they can currently pay US$25 to change their name & race). So I suppose its possible they might someday make it clear which characters belong to a single account, but I suspect there'd be a similar uproar (probably not as vigorous, but still load).

      I still think the chances of seeing your real name under your character's on the character sheet is extremely unlikely though.

      3. Well, it’s harder to argue with you this point now that I know you have a communications degree ;) (usual caveats about how anyone could claim anything, blah blah blah).

      I'm not sure if this came across in my original response, but while I'm not sure I buy the 'danger scenario', I do have a great deal of sympathy for concern a woman might have for remaining gender anonymous. I've been part of a guild for nearly four years now and we've had many women come through (mostly on our raid team) and to a one they all at one point or another remarked that the way they were treated with us was one of the main reasons they opted to stay. Some went so far as to say they only admitted to being women once they saw how well the other women in the guild were treated (or perhaps more accurately, not mistreated).

      Amusing (hopefully) aside anecdote: I myself play a female character, and raided with this guild for a few months before I bought a mic so I could speak up in Ventrillo. I even avoided typing anything that would infer a gender (never actually misleading) -- it was sort of a meta-game I played since when I started raiding, I wasn't sure I'd actually stick with it. I later learned it was generally assumed that I was female, which explains some of the incredibly offensive (well, they would have had I been who they assumed I was; in this case, it amused me) whispers I got from a few players (they were eventually weeded out, even before I said anything). One of the worse was still around when I finally spoke up and I like to imagine him re-enacting the shower scene from the end of Ace Ventura, scrubbing himself madly. Frankly, it would serve him right.

      Back on topic! Of course, you can still avoid this by simply not posting on the forums in a way that ties that back to your character, but it does lend itself to the idea that an obvious woman posting there might be treated more negatively (from her point of view; the offending parties probably don't actually see it that way). Though I still think its a little overstated (this is nitpicky, but meh) because I do think at least some of the mistreatment probably comes as a result that there is a perception o

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
  21. Only idiots post with real name by junglebeast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) Did Blizzard ever stop to think that many (most?) people play their games as an ESCAPE from real life?

    2) Anything on Blizzard forums goes on Google, and comes up in search results. That means anybody who uses their forums is going to be labeling themselves, forever after, as a nerdy computer game player to future employers, dates, etc...which is not something that is looked upon positively by many people. I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

    3) People sometimes have bad days, say things they regret later...on a forum this is all saved forever. Luckily only the people who know their forum name can find it. So you protect your hidden identities more securely than you protect your email passwords. Blizzard aims to make all those mistakes unforgivable.

    There is nothing that is possibly worth saying on the Blizzard forums that is worth sacrificing one's anonymity for.

    1. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Divide+By+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny
      Sir or madam, I respectfully object to the title of your most recent post. I have found using my real name to be an uplifting experience.

      Respectfully,

      Divide B. Zero III, Esq.

      --
      Dare to Hope. Prepare to be Disappointed.
    2. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Manos_Of_Fate · · Score: 1

      1)That means anybody who uses their forums is going to be labeling themselves, forever after, as a nerdy computer game player to future employers, dates, etc...which is not something that is looked upon positively by many people.

      But you are a nerdy computer game player. Are you really that concerned with hiding that from someone you (presumably) somewhat interested in getting to know on an intimate basis? Wouldn't that make finding someone compatible with yourself that much more difficult, if you're holding back parts of your personality? I've never bothered to hide my nerdiness, and it's been a very long time since I felt like anyone was judging me negatively because of it.

      --
      Isn't enough that I ruined a pony, making a gift for you?
    3. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

      Good thing *you* don't post with your real name, else it would be a lot easier to send you a bucket of shit to commemorate your attitude.

    4. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Andorin · · Score: 1

      I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

      What the hell for? All other things being equal, why is Applicant A inferior to Applicant B if Applicant A plays an MMO? Furthermore, why is it any of your business in the first place? Why is anything your applicants do in their spare time your business, insofar as it does not affect their performance on the job?

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    5. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Karunamon · · Score: 1

      I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

      And that makes you a colossal douche. I, for one, don't care what my employees do in their off time.

    6. Re:Only idiots post with real name by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      2) Anything on Blizzard forums goes on Google, and comes up in search results. That means anybody who uses their forums is going to be labeling themselves, forever after, as a nerdy computer game player to future employers, dates, etc...which is not something that is looked upon positively by many people. I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek

      Whereas I might discriminate in favor of such an employee. WoW is a bit like 'new golf'. A person being a player would mean that they would fit in better culturally, would better relate to a portion of the non-work-conversation, etc. It would be a really minor factor, to be sure, but definitely better than a number of other hobbies I can think of... ..but then I work in the IT field. Not sure about your environment and their hostility towards gamer 'nerds'.

    7. Re:Only idiots post with real name by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

      What the hell for? All other things being equal, why is Applicant A inferior to Applicant B if Applicant A plays an MMO? Furthermore, why is it any of your business in the first place? Why is anything your applicants do in their spare time your business, insofar as it does not affect their performance on the job?

      Because they must be addicted to something other than wage slavery. This cannot be tolerated.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    8. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that there are so many people who play WoW, that when these geeks are looking for a job, chances are they might actually find an employer who played as well, and will understand. Better still, get a boss who knows your WoW experience and uses that as an advantage for your hiring process.

    9. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll only discriminate if they don't have Kingslayer. Or if they talk about how awesome subtlety spec is....

    10. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that there are so many people who play WoW, that when these geeks are looking for a job, chances are they might actually find an employer who played as well, and will understand. Better still, get a boss who knows your WoW experience and uses that as an advantage for your hiring process.

      If you're really lucky you'll find an employer whose guild is looking for a new main tank who knows what the hell he is doing.

    11. Re:Only idiots post with real name by mickwd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear Sir,

      There must be some mistake. I know for a fact your line terminated with the first Divide B. Zero. Obviously, some kind of error has happened.

      Regards,

      C. P. Unit

    12. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would discriminate against a WoW geek yet you are posting a comment on Slashdot.
      Priceless.

    13. Re:Only idiots post with real name by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Are you really that concerned with hiding that from someone you (presumably) somewhat interested in getting to know on an intimate basis?

      My boss may be attractive, but I'm sure she doesn't think of me that way.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    14. Re:Only idiots post with real name by swilver · · Score: 1

      I would certainly discriminate against potential employees if I saw that they were a WoW geek.

      I assume then you made that question part of the interview process?

    15. Re:Only idiots post with real name by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Did Blizzard ever stop to think that many (most?) people play their games as an ESCAPE from real life?

      I think ... Blizzard realizes that. But did you ever stop to think of any other group activity where it is entirely acceptable to interact anonymously? Even people in AA know each others names. If you want to be anonymous, go play with yourself, solo, uno, without others so you don't have to agree with standard/established/ACCEPTABLE social contracts.

      Anything on Blizzard forums goes on Google

      Pretty much EVERYTHING you do online ends up on Google. With a minor amount of personal information about you, certainly things your boss would have I promise you I can find you, probably down to your home address and telephone number and certainly most of your user names online. Its not very hard at all.

      People sometimes have bad days, say things they regret later...on a forum this is all saved forever.

      So?

      If someone was a dick last week, they'll have a bad day and be a dick next week, or the week after that. You want to make sure people don't think you're a dick? Don't act like one! No one rules you out over one bad day, those that do are unimportant anyway.

      Basically you want to be a dick and not have to worry about anyone else figuring it out. Tough shit, man up and stand by your actions or don't take those actions.

      There is nothing that is possibly worth saying on the Blizzard forums that is worth sacrificing one's anonymity for.

      What could you possibly say that should be anonymous and requires you to be anonymous?

      Seriously WHAT THE FUCK do you have to say on a PUBLIC MESSAGE BOARD that you don't want people that know you to know? Thats right, nothing.

      If its private/personal/not something for the boss to know ... YOU DON'T FUCKING TELL PEOPLE.

      People who post shit on public websites and like to do it anonymously are one of two types of people ... Trolls, or those with computer courage who don't want to deal with the damage that results from their comments OR voyuers who really want people to know who they are and what they did, but are playing the 'I'm an anonymous tall dark and handsome stranger' game.

      Only idiots post things on the Internet that they don't want people to see/know.

      ITS A FUCKING PUBLIC NETWORK, STOP WITH THIS RETARDED PRIVACY IN PUBLIC IDEA. DON'T DO IT IN PUBLIC IF YOU DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO KNOW YOU ARE DOING IT.

      It really is that simple, repeat it over and over till it gets through the dense rock surrounding your brain.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    16. Re:Only idiots post with real name by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      What the hell for? All other things being equal, why is Applicant A inferior to Applicant B if Applicant A plays an MMO?

      Because to many people it's "unprofessional" and "juvenile" to play video games after about age 14.

      Someone who doesn't hold such beliefs may feel that a 'hardcore' WoW player is more likely to stay up too late playing, or call in sick whenever the next shiny thing appears in-game. Now, you can argue that such problems would become evident in your on-the-job performance, or be caused by a ton of other hobbies. But your hiring manager doesn't have that data yet. So, if A and B are both 'equal' after the interview process, they're gonna pick the one that doesn't play an MMO as the safer choice.

    17. Re:Only idiots post with real name by metrometro · · Score: 1

      I'm a big fan of real names in public discourse where there isn't a lot of heavy persecution going on -- say at US newspaper sites, or other places that discuss issues important to the functioning of a democracy. In these places I think putting some skin in the game is useful to investing people in their comments. The folks at edemocracy.org are good at developing these ideas.

      But what about World of Warcraft requires that level of investment? It's, by design, a place for people to try on fantasy identities. How would more personal investment in the process improve things? Stupid stupid stupid.

      Cant' wait for a new college graduate to rack up forum posts while looking for a job, only to realize his Google results now focus entirely on his gaming. Guess who will stop being helpful in forums: everyone.

    18. Re:Only idiots post with real name by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Sir or madam, I respectfully object to the title of your most recent post. I have found using my real name to be an uplifting experience.

      Respectfully,

      Divide B. Zero III, Esq.

      I'm certain you've been told this before but you'll always be nothing but a zero.

      Good day sir.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    19. Re:Only idiots post with real name by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Anything on Blizzard forums goes on Google, and comes up in search results.

      Anything on Blizzard forums goes on Google and comes up at the top in search results.

      Fixed that for you based on googling my own character's names.

    20. Re:Only idiots post with real name by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I'll only discriminate if they don't have Kingslayer. Or if they talk about how awesome subtlety spec is...

      Don't have a 6k GS? Don't bother applying. And about those gems and enchants you have ...

    21. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only idiots post things on the Internet that they don't want people to see/know.

      I don't have any problem discussing the ins and outs of an obscure quest in Searing Gorge on the WoW forums with my character name. I have a big problem doing it with my real name.

    22. Re:Only idiots post with real name by RichM · · Score: 1

      Sir or madam, I respectfully object to the title of your most recent post. I have found using my real name to be an uplifting experience. Respectfully, Divide B. Zero III, Esq.

      Me too!

      Regards,

      Mr '\x20DROP DATABASE\x20mysql;--

    23. Re:Only idiots post with real name by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      People sometimes have bad days, say things they regret later...on a forum this is all saved forever.

      You've obviously never tried to use the search function on the Blizzard forums. When they're active, you're lucky to find a post 6 hours after it was made.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  22. Celebrity WoW Players by adeft · · Score: 1

    The company may lose business from celebrities wishing to remain anonymous online. Dave Chapelle anyone?

    1. Re:Celebrity WoW Players by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      What, you don't think he'd like to constantly be ganked, always followed up with a tell from a level 1 alt "I'm James Brown, biatch"?

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Celebrity WoW Players by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      The company may lose business from celebrities wishing to remain anonymous online. Dave Chapelle anyone?

      Right, because there's not one single shred of evidence that companies treat celebrities differently than everybody else.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    3. Re:Celebrity WoW Players by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

      Im sure that Mr.T's WOW character is already easy to find... just look at all of them..?

      --
      Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  23. Loss of noise AND loss of signal. by Amnenth · · Score: 1

    Several posts on the WoW general forums and MMO-Champion's article on the subject raise a valid and somewhat chilling point: while forum trolls are likely to be driven away, removing some of the noise from actual discussions, actual contributing posters are going to be shying away from the new forum system as well. People who would otherwise be helpful, share knowledge about class and game mechanics or even info about interface-modding are going to disappear entirely from the forums because they do not want to be compelled to show their real name to all.

    I'm not sure if the loss of signal will be worth the loss of noise here.

    1. Re:Loss of noise AND loss of signal. by II+Xion+II · · Score: 0

      Which basically proves Blizzard only sways between two extremes.

    2. Re:Loss of noise AND loss of signal. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      while forum trolls are likely to be driven away, removing some of the noise from actual discussions, actual contributing posters are going to be shying away from the new forum system as well

      One green poster has already pointed out that many of the trolls are posting openly in favor of the new system as they don't pay by credit card and don't have a true real name attached to their account any way.

      There's a reason why I've never put an armory link to one of my 80s in my /. profile - I want my WoW life completely separate from real life. It's non-negotiable.

  24. I sense a disturbance in the force! by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 0, Troll

    .. as if millions of trolls suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

    1. Re:I sense a disturbance in the force! by cosm · · Score: 1

      .. as if millions of trolls suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

      Youtube's comments were disabled?

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:I sense a disturbance in the force! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the contrary, I sense some epic trolling coming in the near future if the wow forums retain any kind of popularity
      around the sewers of the internet, some of the people make a sport of tracking down people in real life to dig up any dirty/embarrassing information on them in order to out them to their peers
      sometimes it may be the own persons fault for putting their public information out there on the internet for all to see, but in this case I think it's completely different
      I can only imagine there will probably be another cyber-bullying style case where some mentally unstable person decides to commit suicide over it, and I can bet that blizzard will be involved in a few lawsuits because of this

    3. Re:I sense a disturbance in the force! by Boldoran · · Score: 1

      They were in fact (temporarily) disabled just yesterday

  25. While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean I completely agree, that if you remove the anonymity you'll remove a lot of the asshole factor online. People are much bigger pricks when they don't think it can come back to bite them. So it would remove a lot of that.

    However it would also discourage people form sharing thoughts as freely. If I had to use my real name on Slashdot, I wouldn't post nearly as much. I'd make sure to restrict it only to things I was comfortable with all current and future employers seeing. I wouldn't want to screw myself out of a job because I posted something that someone disagreed with.

    As it stands though, a pseudonym allows me to do that. It isn't true anonymity, with a bit of sniffing around you could easily come up with who I really am. However it means that a simple search for my real name will not come up with any of this. That is enough to keep it form being a problem. Just removing the direct connection is all I need.

    Over all, I think it is good to have things that way. I like to be able to freely share my thoughts online, and I'd like to think some people find it valuable (on Slashdot people seem to at least sometimes as I do get modded up). I wouldn't want to have to restrict some of those because of the worry of retribution. I can only do that so long as I can have a small barrier between my real and online identity.

    1. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I had to use my real name on Slashdot, I wouldn't post nearly as much. I'd make sure to restrict it only to things I was comfortable with all current and future employers seeing

      I've said this on here before, but I was once employed by such an employer. They wanted complete editorial control over each and every one of their employees very thoughts. They even went so far as to consider firing employees wouldn't agree to vote the way the upper management thought was 'right'.

      If your comments on Facebook, etc, ever caused such an employer to pass you by, then those comments did you a favor. Trust me. It is better to not get the job than to have to replace it because you're not ideologically compatible.

    2. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by medcalf · · Score: 1

      You would do us all a favor by letting us know which employer, so that we can simply avoid them.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    3. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      If your comments on Facebook, etc, ever caused such an employer to pass you by, then those comments did you a favor. Trust me. It is better to not get the job than to have to replace it because you're not ideologically compatible.

      For the most part I agree with you, but sometimes you need to plan for the worst. You don't always have your pick of jobs, and I'd rather have a shitty job than foreclose on my house.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    4. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      if you remove the anonymity you'll remove a lot of the asshole factor online

      I don't disagree, but just being forced to use your real name isn't going to strip away your anonymity.

      My user name here is my real name - ok, so the C is an initial. My name is Tim Campbell. I'll even tell you that I live in the UK (London to be precise). Good luck finding anything at all out about me though - and if by some chance you manage to do so, you won't know it's me anyway.

      Of course I have an advantage (google my name and you'll see what I mean), but the point holds - so you know the guy you're talking to is called Jo Johnson. Great. So are how many other tens of thousands of people?

    5. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      I mean I completely agree, that if you remove the anonymity you'll remove a lot of the asshole factor online. People are much bigger pricks when they don't think it can come back to bite them. So it would remove a lot of that.

      Yes, the posters would stop being as big of an asshole. But it's not the posters I would be worried about.

      Now, the lurkers...you don't have their name, you don't even know they exist, but they know your name and after a quick google search they probably know where you live, too...

      Protecting the forum at the expense of the posters will result in the forum dying.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    6. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I certainly don't have that luxury. The problem is, what if your employer looks you up online and says hmmmm, he's a member of this non-profit and that one, does skydiving, and likes to knit.

      Well, the non-profit might not coincide with their beliefs, skydiving could be seen as a risky sport (are you going to show up after your next jump???) and knitting sounds pretty boring if you want to be a sales person. This company doesn't want a boring person. Its so easy to jump to conclusions. And this is where its risky. And the HR for any company gets resumes by the hundreds or thousands a year. They just want to filter through as many of them as possible. You see skydiving .... you're out and you'll never know it.

      My real name isn't very common. And there's someone with serious jail time that has a name close to me and lives in Canada. I don't use my real name often and if you Google me, then you only find one hit that is really me. I'm kind of concerned they might associate that person with me. Apples and oranges I suppose. I've never had much of a problem finding a job anyways.

    7. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If I had to use my real name on Slashdot, I wouldn't post nearly as much. I'd make sure to restrict it only to things I was comfortable with all current and future employers seeing. I wouldn't want to screw myself out of a job because I posted something that someone disagreed with.

      You do realize that it takes very little effort with the right software to find out who you are in real life ... right?

      Google has made it incredibly easy for PIs to find out who people are and what they do and never use their real name more than once.

      Your alias and UID are a false sense of security you think obscurity gives you. Unfortunately, thanks to Google, you aren't all that obscure in the grand scheme of things.

      If you aren't proud of something you do maybe its best if you don't do it? If you are proud of it then hiding it won't do you any good, your true colors will shine through eventually anyway, you really can't hide your personality.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      This is simply handled by associating the forum account to the online account/game key. Get banned from the forums could also easily ban you from in-game. There's no need for revealing your personal ID (except to Blizzard) so long as forum membership is tied to a game account (active or inactive), and anonymous posters are simply not al;lowed. Proper moderation based on a system of reporting the assholes, and limiting the number of posts per day/hour of new forum members until they build up sufficient karma/post counts also helps limit the crazies. Balancing the reporting is also important. Reporting someone as a troll should have repercussions if you;re reporting someone simply based on disagreement (ie, their facts are balanced or they make good statements, you just don't like it, so you mark them troll, and that should get you banned quicker than making troll-ish comments).

      Blizzard could very easily handle forum trolls by banning their battlenet/wow account for abuse. Revealing personal information is a nice idea, but not necessary, and imposes much risk.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    9. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      I disagree. There are some employers who just suck, but others who value discretion. If I can do a google search and find weird stuff about you, then so can a client. If you are going to be in a job where you interact with customers, then I don't want the customers concentrating on your personal life instead of the value that the company can offer. Discretion is valued. And it is not a huge leap to think that if you aren't discreet in your personal life, then you also will not be in your professional life.

    10. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by RocketScientist · · Score: 1

      However it would also discourage people form sharing thoughts as freely.

      It's not like it's a forum for political dissidents to post how oppressed they are living in fear of their regime. It's not like it's a forum for victims of child abuse to discuss their thoughts and feelings and get support. Those are places where people need anonymity in order to feel free to share their thoughts and feelings. I can understand all those.

      This forum is, however, not that case.

      IT'S A FREAKING VIDEO GAME.

      I don't understand the need for anonymity there.

    11. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You make an interesting point, but since when is playing WoW not discreet? You're not exactly stripping, pimping, etc... It's just a video game.

    12. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      In my case I have a very unique name. If I Google it the first 20 results or so are all me. So it is the kind of thing that could well be tracked back to me.

      However a common name could be even worse. Someone Googles it, finds some idiot posting idiot things that happens to share your name, and figures it is you. That isn't fair, or smart, but it can happen.

      I like what politicians wold call spin control, that the information publicly available on me is stuff I am ok with because it is pretty neutral.

    13. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Get banned from the forums could also easily ban you from in-game."

      And why the hell would Blizzard want to do that? Sure, it would work, but like moderation, it would cost them money.

      Instead they proposed to do something that probably would not work but would at least not cost them anything.

      Oops.

    14. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I mean I completely agree, that if you remove the anonymity you'll remove a lot of the asshole factor online. People are much bigger pricks when they don't think it can come back to bite them. So it would remove a lot of that.

      But wont the trolls just move to another forum where they could continue to troll and grief anonymously. I mean is it trivial to go from www.blizzard.com/forums/WOW to www.wowtalk.com/forums/wow. All this would accomplish is a reduction of users on Blizzards forum...

      By George, that's genius.

      But trolls, they will troll.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    15. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      I was responding more to posting comments on Slashdot. But, it can apply to WoW. If a "WoW player" does not fit into the image that the company is trying to project and the fact that you are a WoW player is publicly available knowledge, then I can see how an employer could see it as a liability. You don't may not want your clients to think your employees are nerds who live in their mom's basement, whether or not that is actually the case. And you can't really help what your clients' biases are. If they are paying you money, then you have to conform.

    16. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      True, but as I said, if you are comfortable being yourself then you'd be wise to seek an employer who accepts you for who you actually are. Whether you play WoW, are gay, are a Muslim, etc. No point in pretending you're someone else.

    17. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      A few hours of some lawyers debating over the legality of this issue (let alone the legal battle that I can nearly guarantee will occur, combined with a mass exodus from their game servers by the paranoid masses), would be well in excess of the cost of a few months of a few hundred people having their accounts suspended, and even companies that make profits don't miss those from the very lowest scum of their subscribers when they boot them. Plus, booting people can also be a big positive for those who pay and equally want the scum gone. Good morale in a forum by banning those who deserve it can go a long way.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    18. Re:While I do agree I still dislike it in general by street_astrologist · · Score: 1

      Actually, they only ban account holders from posting on the forums, for cases of forum rule infractions. Account bans do carry through to the forums, but it's perfectly possible to be banned from the WoW forums while playing the game.

  26. So what? by LordPhantom · · Score: 1

    This is a non-issue. Blizzard isn't forcing you to use your real First Last name, it's just forcing you to provide *a* first/last name. Put another way, with time codes it's impossible to prove your identity to blizzard, so you can pretend to be anyone you want with little chance they can enforce ULA or other contractual obligations.

    1. Re:So what? by Saishuuheiki · · Score: 1

      I think this part is understated. They don't verify your name with a credit card or drivers license. They post your 'real' name which is really whatever you tell them it is.

    2. Re:So what? by RockClimbingFool · · Score: 1

      I didn't know credit card companies started accepting fake names. Credit card companies (and several government entities) tend to frown upon that sort of thing.

    3. Re:So what? by jabbathewocket · · Score: 1

      Except that if you follow that logic the system makes no sense.. clearly they believe that *most* of the names they have are real valid names, or theres no point in the system existing *at all*

    4. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also incorrect.
      Anonymous Coward I know but ... Hear me out.

      If your account is ever compromised then you are expected to provide a copy of your drivers license and a signed notarized statement proving that you are the account holder. This doesn't work if you don't have your name on the account ...

    5. Re:So what? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      time codes

    6. Re:So what? by coxymla · · Score: 1
      Maybe so, but they collected everyone's first and last names quite a while ago now, before any of this RealID friends list and public forums identity was announced.

      So back then, almost a year ago now, what reason did you have for giving Blizzard fake details? And it's too late to change them, the account-holder real name is read only without providing some serious documentation (passport, etc.)

    7. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a non-issue. Blizzard isn't forcing you to use your real First Last name, it's just forcing you to provide *a* first/last name. Put another way, with time codes it's impossible to prove your identity to blizzard, so you can pretend to be anyone you want with little chance they can enforce ULA or other contractual obligations.

      The problem with using a fake name that is that if you were to get hacked or otherwise lose your account and want it back, you are often asked by Blizzard to provide a copy of some certified identification (drivers licence / passport etc), given that people invest a lot of time and money into an account over years you will want to regain ownership if it were to get lost, the number of hacked accounts is substantial also, so attaching your real name is essential if you want your account to safely remain 'yours'.

      Also when people attached their real names to accounts, it was mandatory, game access was restricted until you did so, it was promised to remain confidential, no one had any idea it would even have a chance to be made public later. You also have no option -at all- to change your name once you have linked it to the account.

      Gamers' problems are not with cutting down forum trolling, we are all very much in favour of that, but that can be done in other ways without a need to give out your real life name and have your wow associations forever pop up in your future career / family life. As a female gamer, whilst I do not realistically expect to get stalked as some of the nightmare scenarios people talk about, I do expect my whole gaming experience to be changed instantly, for the worse. Judgements are made based on a name that can never be made with an avatar or character name and they are not always pleasant. Girl gamers -do- receive attention and it is annoying and unwanted. I could never post on the wow forums again, indeed I will not but there has also been some security implications with the current status of RealID in game now where some addons have bugged and published your real name in local chat. Its a can of worms that they really should not have opened.

      Sorry for being anon, I do not have an account here and don't feel its necessary to create one for this sole reply. Thank you anyway.

    8. Re:So what? by Acaeris · · Score: 1

      So what about those of us who have had set our names on RealID already (when Blizzard stated the information would only be shared with friends) and are now required to provide paperwork to Blizzard for any kind of name change on the account?

    9. Re:So what? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The problem with using a fake name that is that if you were to get hacked

      I generally don't believe "I've been hacked!" stories of any sort.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  27. A very real tipping point by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Seems to me the more restrictions and qualifications for play and participation are imposed, the more likely people will stop playing and participating. After all, it wasn't that long ago that a game company's employee misused his access to do various nasty things... something to do with virtual currency and plans for ships or some such. All of this begs the question of what company employees might do to the customers under certain circumstances were real names and other specific identifiers made available to them. (And I am pretty sure that billing and payments departments have certain rules and requirements placed on them that other company operators do not... its these other operators I am more concerned with... but yes, I know the company "already has this information" in many cases.)

  28. You are not now nor have you ever been anonymous o by r6_jason · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've posted this else where today, might as well post it here. People are up in arms over this one, most people seem to think that they are safe and/or anonymous behind their chosen internet handle. However this is not the case. As a TF2 server Admin I have seen many trolls get blown away when their personal info is posted in response to their trolling posts. Just by Googling the Handle some people use, you can start to gather pieces of personal information, email, phone numbers, real names, places, jobs, etc can be found in a matter of minutes, one piece of information leading to another, which leads to another, and so on until you have a complete picture of someone. You are not now nor have you ever been anonymous on the internet. With this change, adults will be expected to act as adults. If you don’t want the public to know what you are up to, don’t post it on the public internet, it seems rather simple to me.

  29. What about WoW Armory by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this going to tag a character on WoW Armory with the Real ID user name of the account holder?

    It'd be awesome to find the names of an entire guild.

    Worst damned idea ever Blizzard.

    1. Re:What about WoW Armory by Godai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Names on the forum are not connected to a character unless they choose to. So, none of what you're talking about applies unless someone wants to make that possible.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    2. Re:What about WoW Armory by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And when Blizzard started this Real ID was only going to attach a real name you friended for cross-faction/game/realms.

      Then few weeks into that they announce it's going to the forums.

      Sure it's not connected to a character unless they choose too, here is an example of how that's broken.

      Guild X is posting LF guildies and Guild X's recruiting officer puts up the post and uses their real name but no character. So you see Tammy.Jo posted it. You hop on WoW and ask someone in Guild X who their recruitment officer is and now you have Tammy.Jo's real name and character names.

      Now, how long before blizzard shifts this tagging characters and Real Names into Armory?

      It's a dumb idea all the way around.

    3. Re:What about WoW Armory by Godai · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, it doesn't work for the Guild Recruitment forum, though technically the only person it reveals is the recruiting officer belongs to that guild. I suppose if that's a problem they could always rig something up to make that forum a special case if they really want it.

      I don't agree that it's only a matter of time before this gets shifted to an Armory connection. The very fact that you have to opt-in to get a character to show on the forums indicates they're well aware of the concern.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    4. Re:What about WoW Armory by irix · · Score: 1

      Are you being deliberately obtuse while you whiteknight Blizzard in here? It isn't just the guild recruitment forum - typically recruitment officers also post in the realm forums to recruit on-server as well. You need to reveal your character as a contact for recruitment (or it will be obvious who it is - my guild has used the same 2 officers for recruitment for the last 2 years). Then there are posts for support where you need to reveal your character/realm in order for them to assist you with an in-game problem. In other words there are plenty of reasons to divulge your character name on the forums but absolutely no reason to divulge your real name.

      The Blizzard forums are mostly trash, not so much for the trolling as for the lowest-common-denominator for 3M North American players. They have a bunch of options for cleaning them up:
      - Allow people to see your other characters when you post, which will get rid of the "level 1 troll alt" problem
      - Start moderating the forums more severely ... get more people involved, start handing out warnings/bans more quickly
      - Reduce the number of forums

      The answer to their problems with the forums are probably all of the above. Instead this RealID nonsense is going to cause nobody to ever post on their forums again. They will become a wasteland as people migrate to fansite-hosted forums in larger and larger numbers. I play WoW with people who have been playing for 3+ years and the opinion as we discussed it tonight was unanimous - nobody will ever post on Blizzard forums again after this is implemented. This entire idea is so idiotic it is beyond comprehension as to why they decided to do it.
       

      --

      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    5. Re:What about WoW Armory by Godai · · Score: 1

      Are you being deliberately obtuse while you whiteknight Blizzard in here?

      I'm getting pretty tired of being accused of that. I'm mostly posting in here to correct the mis-perceptions of the topic. This is one of the more interesting sub-threads, because it does raise the point about how guild recruiting, but I'll get to that in a second. Half the people in here are looking at the current forums, imagining their real name plastered above their character and getting mad. 99% of my posts in this story are to say "No, it shows nothing by default". If Blizzard would put that in blinking, large red text or something, we could move on to more interesting things like recruitment.

      Now as for recruitment, I was involved in it for three years. As I said in my original post here, I can see the problem for that. Though you should not assume that everyone does it the same way -- the only thing we ever used the recruitment thread for was to announce we were looking, and give our website. We never did any actual back & forth on the forums. This primarily was because it avoided the inevitable asshats who'd pollute such threads -- we can delete posts on our own forums, and you can still post links to the Armoury from there.

      I don't think there will be a mass exodus from the WoW forums over this, but hell, maybe. It'll be interesting to see. Posting on their forums has never been a right though, and if people don't want to post there afterwards, that's certainly their prerogative.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
  30. I don't get it... by f3rret · · Score: 1

    I don't understand, how are they going to enforce the whole 'user must use real name'-policy? Are they going to be requiring users to send in copies of their passport/birth certificate/whatever before they'll allow them to create an account?

    The whole thing seems to be on a purely honor system, sure the moderators there might be able to prune out all the 'Penis McBoobsfaces' that are going to be showing up over time. But there is no way to actually verify that all the John Smiths on there are actually called John Smith, short of them requiring users to send in proof of identity; I can't possibly imagine that asking users to jump through hoops to verify their identities would classify as a 'sensible business decision'.

    --
    Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    1. Re:I don't get it... by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      Can't they just use the name on the credit card you used to pay?

    2. Re:I don't get it... by f3rret · · Score: 1

      What if it is not my name on the card? What if I don't have a credit card and use gametime cards or use a friend/spouse/partent's credit card to pay with.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    3. Re:I don't get it... by Andorin · · Score: 1

      It may be against their ToS to pay for someone else's account. I've never played World of Warcraft or any other Blizzard game, so it's just a speculation, although I know that Jagex (the company behind RuneScape) does this.

      --
      That Anonymous Coward guy is pretty annoying. Can we have the government censor him or something?
    4. Re:I don't get it... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      It may be against their ToS to pay for someone else's account. I've never played World of Warcraft or any other Blizzard game, so it's just a speculation, although I know that Jagex (the company behind RuneScape) does this.

      This is not against their TOS. However, unless at least the last name on the card matches the billing contact (used to derive your RealID name), the charge may fail to go through. I used to pay for my ex wife's account when we were married and never had any problems.

      However, I think the most likely course of action will be people driving to the nearest Best Buy, purchasing game time cards, and using those to pay for their subscriptions. I may go this route once my current subscription charged to my credit card expires.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    5. Re:I don't get it... by goonerw · · Score: 1

      The whole thing seems to be on a purely honor system, sure the moderators there might be able to prune out all the 'Penis McBoobsfaces' that are going to be showing up over time

      Fair point. A more subtle problem with a fake name is if your account gets hacked by a gold seller. Good luck proving who you are if you used a fake name and you can't access the account because the password's changed.

      --
      LOAD ".SIG"
      PRESS PLAY ON TAPE
  31. Blizz forums by space_jake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you've ever been to the Blizzard forums then you'd know nothing of value was lost.

    1. Re:Blizz forums by II+Xion+II · · Score: 0

      I know you're probably just trying to be funny, but this is pretty serious. I can't imagine many will stick around after this change is implemented and given that fact the official community won't be around all that much longer. Of course there are trolls but to attempt to get rid of them by throwing the "baby out with the bathwater" so to speak, is a far worse idea.

    2. Re:Blizz forums by space_jake · · Score: 1

      I used to post quite often on the Warrior forums about ~3 years ago. Helpful stuff and all that jazz. Trolls, whiners, and people that can't be bothered to read a FAQ/guide are tiresome and that is the majority of the posters (anecdotally). If you want to cut through the garbage you're much better off with an unofficial / moderated forum like Elitist Jerks, mmo-champion, or tankspot. I'm sure there are new sites these days but you get the point.

  32. My name is.. by BigJClark · · Score: 2, Funny


    You insensitive clod! My name really is Leroy Jenkins

    --

    Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    1. Re:My name is.. by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That's okay, as the famous guy is Leeroy Jenkins with two "e"s.

  33. Internet Anonymity is good! by rotide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Imagine for a second a 42 year old lonely man (with very little social skills) playing World of Warcraft and he learns that Night Elf Rogue is actually a girl. They chat for a while and become friendly online. He starts to fixate and fantasize that those trips helping her level her alt are "dates" and eventually he falls in love with her. Or at least her character and voice.

    Fixation turns into obsession and after a couple failed attempts to woo her into a real life relationship, she turns him down (hell, he's a creeper).

    He gets upset and from the personal information he has gathered over their time "together" he is able to locate her using her _real_ name that Blizzard forces you to use (not a fictional "eName" you make up to give out on the intertubes to remain anonymous). Fill in the rest with your imagination.

    Or, someone harasses you in game and you look to take revenge. Ninja looters, stealing quest mobs/items, kicking you from group/raid, etc. Maybe they simply want to threaten you (which already happens [NSFW] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUOI7BTmmk0 [NSFW]).

    Of course, this can happen anywhere with any site that shows real names (facebook, etc). But forcing people to drop their anonymity is a bad thing overall. How many children play Blizzard's _games_ of which are going to be forced to link their, or more likely, their parents names to their account and be seen? It's not that hard to track someone down when you know their approximate location and their last name.

    I guess the short is, anonymity can be bad. People act like punks and you have to put up with it from time to time, I know, it sucks. But the good part is, little Johnny potty mouth won't have to potentially pay with his life. Hopefully he learns to grow up on his own without someone like the chick from the link I posted above hunting him down.

    1. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      Or, someone harasses you in game and you look to take revenge. Ninja looters, stealing quest mobs/items, kicking you from group/raid, etc. Maybe they simply want to threaten you (which already happens [NSFW] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUOI7BTmmk0 [NSFW]).

      Mod parent Up!

      This is the funniest video I've seen in forever. Especially when he/she tries to demonstrate their ability to do kung fu kicks...

    2. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      When I played Everquest 1 in its heyday, contested mobs were REALLY stuff people nerd raged about. At the time, there were only a few mobs that gave loot, so you had 3-4 guilds of 100+ people all gunning for Tormax, Hoshkar, Vind, etc.

      During that time, the admins who ran one server's message board got the real life name of a rival guild leader. They started calling the child protective services in the person's city alleging sexual abuse, and it almost got him relieved of his kids. He had to pay thousands of dollars to a lawyer to clear his name, both criminally and civilly to keep his family.

      I'm sure that the 4-channers will be doing that left and right when people's names will be plastered over their posts. Oh, and of course, they will have accounts in fake names with game cards.

    3. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Godai · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a lot of confusion about this feature. It doesn't change anything in-game. The RealID option in-game requires you to opt-in completely.

      Similarly, on the forums, you are not associated with an in-game character unless you choose to. So if you don't use the forums at all, this doesn't affect you. If you do, it doesn't affect you in game unless you choose to display a character.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    4. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ridiculous. We shouldn't post names because someone might kill someone for a minor incident?

      Maybe kids should wear protective gear in public, too, that disguises the fact that they are children. You could expand it to women, too. They could wear veils and shit so potential rapists wouldn't know if they were attractive or not.

    5. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the points in your "scenarios" can be rebutted by simply being smart about your online identity. When you play the game, no one requires you reveal your real name. And when you post online, no one requires you attach screenshots of your character with the avatar name in full view, nor do you have to identify who your character is.

      As for children -- where are the parents? The kids can play the game, but who says the need to be posting on online forums? If the parents are allowing their kids to play these games, then surely they would at least read up on what all that would entail.

      It's because people do not think about their actions that these problems arise

    6. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by rotide · · Score: 1

      So you see no problem with putting thousands upon thousands of hormone enraged teens into a setting, sometimes a highly polarizing setting, where they can easily find out who one another really is?

      You think it's acceptable to force kids to _publicly_ post personally identifiable information about themselves if they want to chat about a game on the official game forums?

      This isn't a "think of the children" stance, it's simple common sense. Kids can be _very_ irrational and vindictive on their own and in their own anonymous way. Force them to see each others real identities as well as adult strangers (who can see them) and you've got a recipe for disaster. Oh, that Rogue SmellyPantsNinja is that home schooled kid down the street? Time for revenge! He ninja'd my new boots from that new boss, time to smash a window! And both my posts don't even mention predators.

      .. and for what?

      To stop some internet trolling. Bravo. Good trade. Lets trade our internet anonymity away to _hope_ trolling, flaming, and general eAssHattery stops.

    7. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by rotide · · Score: 1

      You can't be "smart" about your online identity when you're forced to post it in a games forums. The whole point of "being smart about your online identity" is by _staying_ anonymous. This act by Blizzard goes entirely against that principle.

    8. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Burnhard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes! This is the point. Anonymity is pretty much the foundation stone of identity security. I know it sounds kind-of obvious, but there it is.

    9. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      He gets upset and from the personal information he has gathered over their time "together" he is able to locate her using her _real_ name that Blizzard forces you to use (not a fictional "eName" you make up to give out on the intertubes to remain anonymous). Fill in the rest with your imagination.

      My imagination filled in with him meeting up with Chris Hansen. Hilarity ensued. Good times, good times...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    10. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Stepnsteph · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty much what's going to happen. It's just one more thing for them to be paranoid about.

      The woman who I used to hang out with back in EQ was very popular and had many stalkers. That was partially her fault, of course, but we had to run up walls, break clipping on some objects and do other crazy shenanigans just to get around the creepers. One guy who found us actually threatened me while she was away and then upon her return tried to tell her that *I* was saying threats and being the freak! "Creeper" is a very good term for these types.

      She showed me a few times what happened when she removed /anon by telling me which names to watch out for. It was creepy to watch so I can imagine what it's like to be the focus of that kind of... attention. We both promptly went /anon after that and ported back to our bind spots.

      To say "it's optional!" in this case is nuts. The information on this page: http://us.battle.net/realid/?rhtml=y is particularly disturbing.

    11. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So in short what you're upset about is that you're no longer going to be able to be a complete fucking douche in WoW because someone is going to come kick your ass.

      All in all, I think thats great.

      Also, contrary to popular belief, the Internet hasn't changed the statistics on Rape, abduction or stalking. The stats have remained pretty much unchanged since they've been taken by the FBI for 50 or so years. The only difference now is paranoid idiots like yourself see something on the news and think its common. There are roughly 307 million people in America, LOTS OF THEM ARE DOING BAD, STUPID, DANGEROUS SHIT, and have been since the dawn of mankind. Posting things on the Internet doesn't actually change the odds, real name or alias.

      Finally, as I've said over and over, its REALLY easy to figure out who most people are given very little information about them and Google. I've yet to come across someone who is actually anonymous enough that I can't figure out who they really are.

      Your anonymity on the Internet died with anon.petit.fi (for reference, using anon.petit.fi doesn't really do you much good with things like Google around anyway)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    12. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Stepnsteph · · Score: 1

      I should mention that this is not optional in that you can not participate in the forum community unless you accept your real name being displayed to everyone. The issue of the character name being "optional" is moot since that is what is most important in terms of game play.

      This business with people's real names is optional as much as any other strong-arm, ultimatum-esque tactic is "optional". Thankfully fan sites will provide forums to get around this nonsense.

      I also haven't yet found anything that explains what will happen to past posts. Will they suddenly appear under real names?

    13. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by rotide · · Score: 1

      Answer to your last question, no.

      Originally Posted by Bashiok (Source)
      One important point which I don't believe has been relayed yet is that the switch to showing RealID on the forums will only happen with the new forum systems we're launching for StarCraft II shortly before its release, and a new forum system for World of Warcraft launching shortly before the release of Cataclysm.

      All posts here on the current World of Warcraft forums, or any of our classic Battle.net forums, will remain as-is. They won't (and can't) automatically switch to showing a real first and last name.

      All posts in the future on the new forum systems will be an opt-in choice and ample warning will be given that you're posting with your real first and last name.

      More info @: http://us.battle.net/realid/faq.html

    14. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Joreallean · · Score: 1

      Everything you said in my opinion is a good thing. All the people you mentioned in your post are exactly the people I don't want to play with... People who are afraid of the world and the people in it. Children who have no reason to be unsupervised and unprotected People who use anonymity to be total asshats Bad things happen to good people all the time. The fact of the matter is if a person is so determined to track you down and punish you in real life, then they were probably going to do it by whatever means are necessary.

    15. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by DJ+Wipeout · · Score: 1

      You can't be "smart" about your online identity when you're forced to post it in a games forums. The whole point of "being smart about your online identity" is by _staying_ anonymous. This act by Blizzard goes entirely against that principle.

      Um.

      You're not forced to post in the Blizzard forums. You're not forced to add RealID friends. And face it, you're not forced to play World of Warcraft or Starcraft II. Every single thing you do in life has consequences. If you're not willing to accept the consequences of a particular action, DON'T DO IT. If you don't post on the Blizzard forums and don't add any friends via RealID you have not subverted "being smart about your online identity" at all.

    16. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Snufu · · Score: 1

      Many people would prefer to play an online game in environment with the same enticement for civility as real life, face to face social settings. How did we come to accept that online multiplayer recreation (and other online activity in general) is meant only as opportunity to anonymously vent your "bad day at work?" Why would I want to put up with that in my leisure time?

      I occasionally enjoy a game of pickup basketball at the gym. Some of the participants I know, many I do not. But everyone is recognizable. If someone acts like a jerk, is disruptive to the game, or is generally uncivil, then that individual is subject to repercussions because they are not anonymous. They will not be invited to join future pick up games. If I want to participate, I know I cannot punch another player in the face just because I had a bad day at work. The matches are enjoyable because the participants face consequences for their actions and behave accordingly, just like real life.

      Much of the stigma attached to playing online games arises from their anonymous participation. I doubt your prospective employer would hold it against you if she found out from googling your name that you play pick up basketball at the gym.

      Using real names in a game forum (or any forum) may not solve the problem, but it is a step in the direction I support, and it sends a strong, sensible message. This is a game community I would want to join.

    17. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He starts to fixate and fantasize that those trips helping her level her alt are "dates" and eventually he falls in love with her. Or at least her character and voice.

      So this change might make the LOLIMAGIRLPLAYINGWOW chicks stop taking advantage of guys online? You say this like its a bad thing.

    18. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing everyone has the option to not use Real ID and therefore remain anonymous.

    19. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Burnhard · · Score: 1

      But on the other hand, do you want your 14 year old tantrums to still be available for everyone and anyone to see when you're in your early 30's? Unlike in real-life where relationships change, friends come and go, work-places change and anti-social behaviour may eventually be forgiven or forgotten, or at least may not radiate far and wide in recognition, the internet may cache your ill-advised nonsense for decades and make it available to anyone. We all have moments of idiocy online as we do in real life, but in real-life the effects of that behaviour and memory of it tend to degrade and eventually disappear. You may also change your perspective, attitude or personality (I'm mellowing as I age, for example). Online these things can remain carved into the rock for a very long time indeed.

    20. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed you get better anonymity in real life. Most strangers are not privy to your name unless you tell them, or give them a card. In this case the choice was yours whether to share your name or not. It's akin to being forced to wear a name tag in public.

    21. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because when I signed up for WoW 3 years ago I totally knew they would someday start to mess around with my real name. Not.

      Did you know that, when logging in to WoW, your real name and your e-mail address are transmitted unencrypted over the wire?

      Now I know why it was a good idea to NOT give them my REAL name but some generic one. You just don't trust corporations with your data. You never know how they change in the future.

      For those idiots who use Facebook et al, all hope is lost anyway.

    22. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      He gets upset and from the personal information he has gathered over their time "together" he is able to locate her using her _real_ name that Blizzard forces you to use (not a fictional "eName" you make up to give out on the intertubes to remain anonymous). Fill in the rest with your imagination.

      Something like this has already happened, though the genders were reversed. Two people had their characters get "married" in game and ended up sharing account info. After they broke up, she got her revenge by logging into his account and deleting all his stuff and characters, or something like that.

      I suppose the moral of the story (besides never sharing account info with anyone) is that even virtual divorce is ugly.

      (Edit: That may not have been WoW. I think it may have been a different Japanese-only game)

    23. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by Snufu · · Score: 1

      Online contributions have dates attached, and in that sense they too age and their influence degrades with time. Google searches will generally return the most recent results. Employers look first at the most recent job experience on a resume. "Ill advised nonsensical" behavior carved into internet stone early in one's life will either not be noticed by a potential employer later in life, or be overlooked, deemed the typical indiscretions of youth. Of course, if the unflattering conduct is the rule rather than the exception, than it is the offender's fault, not the internet.
      Also, in this discussion I think it is important to remember that the internet was not created as a platform for anonymous communication. Anonymity is merely a byproduct, an option. There is no inherent "right to anonymity" on the internet.
      Also, when is the correct age to take responsibility for what you write on the internet?

    24. Re:Internet Anonymity is good! by tenaciousj · · Score: 1

      "So you see no problem with putting thousands upon thousands of hormone enraged teens into a setting, sometimes a highly polarizing setting, where they can easily find out who one another really is?"

      Kind of like a Highschool?

  34. Screw the forums... by chill · · Score: 1

    Do I need to do that to play the game?

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Screw the forums... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even visit the offical WoW boards, haven't in a very long time. They are and have always been a cesspool.

    2. Re:Screw the forums... by IKnwThePiecesFt · · Score: 1

      Nope.

  35. RealID Name by UninformedCoward · · Score: 1

    Why are there so many John Doe's on this forum? Most have been a very popular name.

  36. Real names are not unique identifiers by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    What are the chances there will be more than one John Smith on the forum?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Real names are not unique identifiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be able to ALSO associate a character name to uniquely identify you from another on the forum with the same name. The problem is that, some names out there, like mine, ARE unique identifiers - My last name is uncommon and no one else in the entire world has the combination of my First and Last name.

    2. Re:Real names are not unique identifiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Smith? Sure, not unique.

      There are people with unique or near unique names. Penn Jillette and his kid Moxie Crimefighter come to mind. Other celebrities - Vin Diesel plays WoW. Wil Wheaton I think does. Tycho & Gabe from PA do. I have a friend with a unique name that has received death threats [in game] - she's transgendered, and some people are just filled with hate. IRL, she goes out with friends almost everywhere; in game, she feels safe. When they added RealID, she got very upset. If some of the people that know her can get her name, they can get her address.

      Hell, one of the GMs identified himself as Micah Whipple - his address & phone number have been posted in the forums.

    3. Re:Real names are not unique identifiers by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      You will be able to ALSO associate a character name to uniquely identify you from another on the forum with the same name. The problem is that, some names out there, like mine, ARE unique identifiers - My last name is uncommon and no one else in the entire world has the combination of my First and Last name.

      Really? I'm sure I've seen your name pop up, Mr. Coward.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:Real names are not unique identifiers by black3d · · Score: 1

      I have a unique name. :( Every exact google search returns something about myself, wether it be where I work, old pages from school websites, etc. And it's not even an odd-spelling of a name, just an odd arrangement (I have a surname for a first name.. And a surname for a surname.)

      However in most cases, no - Real names are by no means unique identifiers.

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
  37. Pardon my ignorance, but... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    How can Blizzard force you to provide your real first and last name? I mean, I could use any name other than my own so long as it appears to be a legitimate name and not some moniker or nickname.

    1. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Linked to a credit card, I'd imagine.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    2. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by space_jake · · Score: 1

      Not all of their games require monthly payments.

    3. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's against their ToS to sign up under a fake name, I'd assume. Also, they are going to require some serious ID if your account gets compromised, which you obviously can't produce under a fake name. I just won't be posting on the Blizzard forums at all any more. I'll read it without replying, however hard that may be.

    4. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't provide your real first and last name, you're going to have trouble proving your identity if your account gets hacked or you lose your authenticator, or if you have some other problem.

    5. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by black3d · · Score: 1

      It can be difficult to initially associate your credit card with your account if they're in different names (have copped this when I was setting up fake accounts in the past). There are though, other payment options, and if you buy the game in a box instead of online, they'll usually let you pay your subscription fee with whomever's credit card you wish to.

      So no, you're not "forced" to give your real name. What about the 11 million players who already have accounts that they can't change the name on? Initially, the accounts were an individual WoW thing. Then, they forced you to tie them to a Battle.net account with your "real name", making you unable to transfer the characters off that Battle.net account. Of course, you could have picked a fake one at that stage, but why would you plan to in advance, not knowing this was coming? And finally, they then make all forum posting use your real name? At this stage, there's no way out.

      You can't "unassociate" your WoW account from your Battle.net account, so you can't transfer your characters off your account (as you can't transfer them to an account under another name). So, if you want to keep playing the characters you've had for years (ie, keep all your achievements, your pets, the unique world-event items etc - I played WoW for a while, and I'm a hoarder, so I understand the mentality and not wanting to lose all the work you put in), then you're now in a position of either never being able to post to the forums again, or doing so with your real name.

      I like the reasoning behind it. It will shut up a huge number of people. Including myself - I'll never post to their forums again (purely for security reasons, I'm not a troll), although I cancelled my account 6 months ago so wouldn't really have any reason to. :)

      --
      "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
    6. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by LeperPuppet · · Score: 1

      If your account gets hacked or otherwise compromised, you need to send copies of your ID to prove that you are the actual owner of the account to recover it. This will be a problem, unless you have a second set of ID documents for John Smith at 123 Fake Street.

    7. Re:Pardon my ignorance, but... by MoriT · · Score: 1

      They created the real id automatically by scraping your payment details; you can choose not to use it, but unless the credit card wasn't in your name or you have always used game cards, they already have your info and didn't even bother asking.

      There is also a security breech in the wild that allows people to view these real names, whether or not you've ever signed up for anything. Bit of a mess, really.

  38. Stop the QQ by tepples · · Score: 1

    I just want all the QQ to stop already.

    You're going to have to talk to Tencent about that.

  39. The children! by Rydia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like how slashdot commenters love to use "won't somebody think of the children?!" as a device for sarcastic mockery of various Internet policies. Then this happens, and we get a thread full of ...

    "But ... won't somebody think of the children?!"

    1. Re:The children! by Haffner · · Score: 1

      "But ... won't somebody think of the children's privacy?!"

      FTFY

      Sound like slashdot yet?

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    2. Re:The children! by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Well, there is thinking of the children, and well... thinking of the children (and there's the kind of "thinking" that pedophiles do, but let's not get into that).

      In fact, we're always thinking of the children. When the next generation inherits this world, we want it to be a better place, not worse. We want it to be a freer world, not one weighted down with things like excessive copyright and draconian "content protection" measures or other forms of censorship. So though this tired meme gets trot out occasionally in the face of some form of censorship, it's because we're pointing out the irony, that by "thinking of the children," we're merely conveniencing ourselves at their ultimate expense and doing anything but.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:The children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they are the main users, because now they get their parents saying they can or can;t play rather than "it's time for bed". Also, If you took a day off work sick, and your kid posted online during work hours - welcome to being unemployed.

      What if your kid posts random crap about getting high and playing - say hello to child services.

      What about your kid inviting the guild to your place for a chillout?

      The whole reason kids can;t have credit cards and such is because they're not responsible enough to do so.
      Now you're forcing kids to be responsible not only for their own shit, but for their parents. If you had a kid, you know how impulsive they are (after all, they're kids) so imagine if you didn't buy them that candy bar, or didn't let them go to a party. Hmmm I'll get back at my dad for this and post that he molests me.

      Guess what? on a google search of your name, the first thing that comes up is a post about you molesting someone.

    4. Re:The children! by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      There's two different things here - "think of the children" and "think of your children".

      As a responsible, law-abiding, non-pedophile adult like the 99.9999999999999999999999999% of other adults out there, if I've ever come across a kid in genuine distress then I've done my best to get the kid back to the safety of its parents as quickly as possible - and will continue to do that if it happens again. That, to me, is thinking of the children.

      However, simultaneously, I would also be thinking about the type of parents that allow that kid to get into that situation in the first place - for example, the young girl I helped out about 10 years ago when she fell off her bike in slow moving traffic trying to squeeze between the narrow gap between my car and the kerb. She scratched my car but I didn't make an issue of it - I stopped, helped her out, made sure she wasn't injured too badly and let her get on her way after she declined a lift home from me. But I did wonder about her parents who were letting her out on a bike on a busy road when she clearly was lacking in some road sense...

      Why is the Internet any different? If your kid isn't knowledgeable enough to move in a world where there are adults, then SUPERVISE it! Or exercise your parental control over it. And if you can't do that then don't have kids in the first place!

      I really get offended by people who bandy about the "pedophile" word like there's hordes of them out there salivating at the mouth at the thought of getting at your kid - it's utter nonsense, and used as FUD by governments who want to put fear into people so that they can pass laws to control free speech on the Internet easier. Yes, they exist in the same way that drunk drivers exist but the fact is your kid is more likely to be injured or killed by as a result of bullying by a peer (again as a result of lack of parental control) than a pedophile.

      Stop with the utopian society nonsense also. Every single one of us is at risk of death or injury 24-7 and surviving in society comes from being clever enough to understand the risks of that happening and how to avoid it happening - and that's your responsibility to make your kids understand that, my role as a responsible citizen is to not make it any more difficult for you or your kid to live in society.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    5. Re:The children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do the children always have to be the baseline?

      Think about yourself and your privacy protection; adult or kid; it's all the same thing.

  40. I'm changing my name on Battlenet by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 1

    to:

    First: Dick
    Last: McPlenty

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
    1. Re:I'm changing my name on Battlenet by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's worth $40 to be able to post as Cockass McShitfuck.

    2. Re:I'm changing my name on Battlenet by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      $40, hell, you can get a vanilla box for $20! Even tie it into your real account and get a mount out of the deal. Double reason to do it!

  41. Yeaaaahhhh... by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    No. Sorry. Not going to happen even if it means I never play another Blizzard game again.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  42. Somebody at Blizzard reads The Noob by laron · · Score: 1

    This idea is already a few weeks old
    http://www.thenoobcomic.com/index.php?pos=378

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  43. Why Not Use Another Forum? by Quintios · · Score: 1

    So when they implement his, why not just use the Blizz forums for tech support? Leave out your character/toon ID and use another forum for your friendly, and not-so-friendly, discussions? What's so special about the Blizzard forums that you must post everything related to the game there?

    --
    Anonymous Cowards are at -6...
    1. Re:Why Not Use Another Forum? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      What's so special about the Blizzard forums that you must post everything related to the game there?

      The only think I can think of is this: Blizzard only communicates through their own forum.

      If you want to talk about what Blizzard's developers have done, you can go anywhere you want. If you want to talk to Blizzard and even, occasionally have them answer back, well there's only one place for that.

      At present this is the only reason people tolerate the trolls. They don't really seem to want to discuss things amongst themselves. They want to post where they know their ideas are being read by development.

  44. There are no girls on the internet... by Brandee07 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there are no girls on the internet now, there won't be any ever once this goes into effect.

    There's no quicker way to be harassed, stalked, and otherwise massively annoyed by EVERYONE than to reveal that you are in possession of TWO X chromosomes, instead of the internet norm XY configuration.

    And the absolute last thing I want is random assholes that I've pissed off on my server to Google my name, of which the first result is the staff listing on my current employer's website, and then start sending nasty emails to my boss.

    1. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by nege · · Score: 1

      I don't know if this applies to the armory or not (it doesn't say in the link). If it doesn't then probably just don't post on the forums (I won't be becasue my last name is too unique). If it does...well that would just suck.

    2. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, which is why you just told us about your chromosomal configuration.

      in fact, i think i'll start cyberstalking you now.

    4. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by geek · · Score: 1

      Why would girls leave the internet because Blizzard changed their forums?

      Not quite sure what the relation is. Blizzard != The Internet

    5. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Brandee was referring to when this trend continues across all forums on the internet.

    6. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are no girls on the internet now, there won't be any ever once this goes into effect.

      Or maybe it'll become obvious that around 50% (or more?) of the web population is female and that stupid meme will finally die an ignoble death.

    7. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show us yer tits luv!

    8. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! That was the last clue I needed, Brandee Simmons.

      Email is enroute.

    9. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      If they go through with it, it will probably be actionable. The argument can be made that it creates a hostile environment for at least one class of users (due to gender bias), and the real problem is that the forums are provided by the company specifically as an official venue for customer support. Since they require a class to subject themselves to the risks from the hostile environment, and since they forbid using a gender-neutral pseudonym, there's probably a case. I'd be very surprised if it is not pursued this way.

      As a shareholder (small potatoes, I have a few hundred shares of ATVI), I'm concerned that this will drive churn during a quarter when subscriptions are not growing (let alone growing at an increasing rate.) Since new products are being released in the coming quarter, investors are hoping for a period of growth, knowing that another plateau will follow. If they blow this (with churn, or by making competitors a little more attractive), investors can and will park their money elsewhere -- almost anywhere is better than an entertainment company that's not growing.

      I don't know how Blizzard is organized, but I know how things go in a company of this size with a subscription model. Someone in a suit is absolutely livid today, and doing that thing that is worse than screaming, to someone whose bonus depends on reducing churn and avoiding PR disasters. I also know that this is driving voice traffic into a call center that planned its summer budget months ago and there's someone in management there who has a few questions as to why they weren't in the loop. And then there are the poor front-line service reps, whose messages don't make it hard to read between the lines to know that they have their own opinions that aren't exactly being expressed in their canned responses to ... the thousands of complaints raised every hour...

      Some commentators will point to the millions of subscribers to suggest that Blizzard's health is not at risk, but I can assure you that, absent of a period of increasing growth, there are absolutely people who are concerned with churn and its effect of EBITDA. And they have a report due on August 2 that I'm just chomping at the bit to see before I decide to reinvest.

      If there's any doubt that this is a PR disaster, have a look: Somebody's sweating his bonus over this, and it's probably not the guy who decided to go ahead with "RealID".

      BBC News - World of Warcraft maker to end anonymous forum logins
      news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/10543100.stm

      USA Today - 'WoW' studio Blizzard to require real names on forums
      content.usatoday.com/communities/gamehun...al-names-on-forums/1

      ABC News - Bye-Bye Trolls? Blizzard Forums to Use Real Names
      abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=11108240

      CVG - Fans rage over Blizzard forum plans
      www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=254846

      PCGamer (UK) - Why Blizzard's new forum plan is an epic fail
      www.pcgamer.com/2010/07/07/why-blizzard%...lan-is-an-epic-fail/

      The Register - Blizzard exposes real names on WoW forums
      www.reghardware.com/2010/07/07/wow_forums/

      About.com - WoW Real ID: A Really Bad Idea
      antivirus.about.com/b/2010/06/22/wow-rea...-really-bad-idea.htm

      Ars Technica - Blizzard: post about StarCraft 2? Use your real name
      arstechnica.com/gaming/news/2010/07/bliz...e-your-real-name.ars

      Gamespy - Blizzard to Require Real Names on Official Forums
      uk.pc.gamespy.com/articles/110/1104456p1.html

      Kotaku - Blizzard Forums Will Soon Display Your Real Name
      kotaku.com/5580585/blizzard-forums-will-...splay-your-real-name
      Kotaku - Blizzard's Real Name Forum Policy Has Fans In An Uproar
      kotaku.com/5581209/blizzards-real-name-f...as-fans-in-an-uproar

      Joystiq - Your real name to appear on Blizzard's official forums
      www.joystiq.com/2010/07/06/your-real-nam...rds-official-forums/

      Inc Gamers - Blizzard Going Too Far With Real ID?
      www.incgamers.com/Columns/94/blizzard-go...too-far-with-real-id

      MTV

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:There are no girls on the internet... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, my fist thought after reading about the proposed change was that I won't be bumping the guild recruitment posts anymore.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  45. sounds like there will be a bunch of I.P. Freely by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    creating accounts on these blizzard forums.

  46. Not for me by nege · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I think that overall this is a good thing for the Blizzard forums (as well as other changes they are making according to TFA, including rating up and down on posts), it completely removes my desire to post on their forums. I don't troll as a rule (but I can't say it’s never happened), but my last name is so unique that finding me on the Google is already ridiculously easy (my first and last name - all of the first page is me). I don't need prospective employers knowing about my gaming habits, and even less so prospective dates. Not that I go out of my way to hide these things from people, but I don't want it popping up as a matter of course just because someone googles my last name.

    1. Re:Not for me by Platinumrat · · Score: 1
      I'm with you. I'm in a similar situation, where first + last name == me on a google search. A little white pages search and bingo, you have my address, facebook friends == DOB then as a bonus on goodle you get that guestbook I signed 20 years ago. That one, I'd really wish would go away; the original site is gone but the mailing list archives have a life of their own.

      But really, that's not the point as, can Blizzard legally publish names of underage posters? I think there are more than a few laws relating to that.

  47. My name is Yon Yonson by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    I come from Wisconsin.
    I work in a lumber yard there...

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:My name is Yon Yonson by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I come from Wisconsin.
      I work in a lumber yard there...

      Oh, well. You're a lumberjack and your ok.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  48. Forum Rage! by psyque · · Score: 1

    I quietly await news of the first murder related to "Forum Rage"

  49. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what has me worried is that I rarely disclose that I'm female in WoW except to my guild... when other people find out they tend to be less than mature. I would rather not face a barrage of /tells and real_id friend requests from the "plz cyber?" crowd.

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  50. Well I know what it means for me by linzeal · · Score: 1

    I know how it will work for me a 32 year old man who has never used his real name, even on his Facebook profile. I'm not going to keep playing WOW on the weekends to keep in contact with old friends. We have moved on mostly to Star Trek Online, it does not have the massive part down quite yet as the die hards can blow through the game in a few weeks but for anyone with a job it has the community, maturity and game play that makes it a highly enjoyable experience for my long term gaming group of 6 people. We all bought lifetime subs when it came out and we will be there when the last whir of the server fans die in the datacenter.

    1. Re:Well I know what it means for me by Godai · · Score: 1

      If you're keeping in touch with them in-game, this has zero impact on you. If you're using the official forums to do so, well, you're doing it with an audience anyways, but yeah, you might want to avoid that.

      --
      Wood Shavings!
      - Godai
    2. Re:Well I know what it means for me by sirlark · · Score: 1

      We all bought lifetime subs when it came out and we will be there when the last whir of the server fans die in the datacenter.

      Funny, and I always though a lifetime sub meant my lifetime, not some heap 'o junk server's

    3. Re:Well I know what it means for me by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're making excuses for Cryptic?

      Nice.

      STO is terrible, takes a week to blow through and then there's nothing. The community is non-existent, and the maturity levels of people in game are way below that of other games I play. WoW is worse, but you don't go from worst to really bad and say "it's good" do you?

      I'd say you're publicly announcing your justification for handing over too much money to Cryptic.

    4. Re:Well I know what it means for me by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

      We all bought lifetime subs when it came out and we will be there when the last whir of the server fans die in the datacenter.

      Funny, and I always though a lifetime sub meant my lifetime, not some heap 'o junk server's

      You probably thought you were buying that music CD too, didn't you.

      License... revoked.

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  51. Prove it by tpstigers · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering how - exactly - Blizzard intends to verify 'real' names. I'm also wondering how they intend to survive the legal ramifications of publishing the PII of minors on the internet.

    1. Re:Prove it by Yosho · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that they'll use the name set as the credit card holder for your account.

      Also, WoW's terms of service require that you be at least 13 to play; if you're under 13 and playing that means you're breaking the ToS and Blizzard is unaware of it, and they will doubtlessly ban you as soon as they are made aware.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    2. Re:Prove it by Alioth · · Score: 1

      There are games like Starcraft II that don't have a monthly fee, though. They may not have CC details for players of those games.

    3. Re:Prove it by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      minor == 18 in the UK, the whole "13" thing realy, really doesnt apply anywhere but the US.

      HOwever *just* a name is not, in UK DPA terms at least, considered to be PII.

  52. Good use of resources? by Aaron.SD · · Score: 1

    What is the deal with pouring resources into developing the social networking aspects of an MMORPG? Maybe I'm the only one who plays just because it's an awsomely addictive game, while everyone else is there to make new friends and socialize?? RealID would have been way at the bottom of my list of things to improve in WOW... How about taking care of the vulgar character names or the gold sellers ability to generate characters with garbage names for the sake of flooding chat with SPAM?? Blizzard need to collect themselves and get back to basics with WOW, improve and expand the content, period. Otherwise, I feel the game may have peaked and they're just going to milk it for every drop before it fizzles into oblivion.

    1. Re:Good use of resources? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      One possible good outcome would be if they would allow you to IGNORE RealID accounts just as you can friend them. We have some real winners on our server, and I'd just as soon never hear from them nor any of their alts ever again.

  53. Blizzard's dumbest decision ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Simply put, this is Blizzard's dumbest decision ever. Real ID will be used not only for the forums, but for the upcoming cross-faction / cross-server / cross-game chat system. As I understand it, this system will reveal your real name AND the email address tied to your Battle.net account along with it.

    Concerns about minors aside, this is an awful decision for the following reasons:

    1. The vast majority of guild leaders I met during my time in WoW were control freaks who try to make up for their RL shortcomings by lording over their guilds as much as they can get away with. Not the type of person that I'd ever reveal my real name to. One time I quit a guild because I got tired of the leader's d-baggery, and he harassed me and made threats for weeks until the GMs actually had to step in and warn him to stop. Not the type of guy I'd want to have my real identity revealed to.

    Not to mention the millions of other random dbags in WoW and Battle.net that I'd never want to reveal my real identity to. I actually was threatened by one of my opponents during the SC2 beta when I rushed his base.

    Yes, 99.99% of the time these threats are empty even if they got your real information. However, you never know when you're dealing with someone who is completely off the rocker. If seen my fair share of WoW players go off the handle because they lost a roll on loot.

    2. Revealing the email address associated with your Battle.net account will, at the very least be:
    - Giving your login name to attackers, half of what they need to brute force your password if you don't use an authenticator.
    - Giving them your email address so that they can spam you with attempts to phish your password from you.
    I utilize a unique email address for my Battle.net account which is used for NO OTHER PURPOSE. So if I get an email saying it is from Blizzard, I can tell it is a scam if it is not addressed to this account.

    In addition, giving out real names could create greater social engineering opportunities for those that steal accounts. Since I've never needed to call Blizzard tech support / customer service, I'm not sure how diligent they really are when someone calls up to have their WoW password reset.

    I have fortunately stopped playing World of Warcraft, and will likely not play again because I don't like the direction the game has been going for a while. However, I was hoping to play SC2 and D3. From what I can see from the SC2 Beta, Real ID was not going to be required to play, just for cross-game chat. However, if it ever becomes a requirement to play (which I feel it eventually might be), there is no way I would continue playing Blizzard's titles.

  54. Good Bye Blizzard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want anything to do with you now, because you're willing to share my personal information.

    But wait, my personal information is useful to me to secure my account. Why? Because you use it.

    Seriously, I'm dropping out and going to somebody else.

  55. round and round we go by Captain+Lou · · Score: 1

    This will not do anything ot stop trolling or any other sort of abuse. People that do so are adept at creating bogus IDS with which to have their fun. In fact, having real names publically available, you will certainly see cases of trolls chasing real people through the game servers harassing them wherever they play. Character stats are already publically available via their Armoury portal. I'm sure the biggest benenfit to doing this has nothing to do with protecting people from flame baiting

    --
    --My signature is six words long.--
  56. Re:trying to imagine... by Godai · · Score: 2, Informative

    By default it does not associate any post with a particular in-game character. So while they'd know you were female on the forums, there'd be no way to know that any given character belonged to you unless you choose to do so.

    --
    Wood Shavings!
    - Godai
  57. Re:trying to imagine... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

    what has me worried is that I rarely disclose that I'm female in WoW except to my guild... when other people find out they tend to be less than mature. I would rather not face a barrage of /tells and real_id friend requests from the "plz cyber?" crowd.

    There are quite a few women who play WoW, and around a third of the people I know through guilds/real life/friending random people I quested with are female. They don't seem to have this issue. Maybe such aberrant behavior was more common ten years ago, but it seems to be more rare today based on second-hand accounts I receive.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  58. Define Real Name by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    My name on my passport, my name on my birth certificate, and my name on my drivers license are all different.

    That said, this won't stop gold farming or account hacking - that's just going to keep sucking up clueless noobz who think my female characters are female.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:Define Real Name by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      My name on my passport, my name on my birth certificate, and my name on my drivers license are all different.

      The one that Blizzard really has access to and can verify every month is the one on your credit card.

    2. Re:Define Real Name by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      As others have said:

      1) There isn't any requirement that this match the name on the account,

      2) There are alternative forms of payment.

    3. Re:Define Real Name by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      As others have said:

      1) There isn't any requirement that this match the name on the account,

      2) There are alternative forms of payment.

      And the name on my credit card is NOT the one on my passport, my birth certificate, or my drivers license.

      EPIC FAIL, Blizzard.

      P.S.: When you run on my Verizon iPad 3G then you'll truly be a MMORPG ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    4. Re:Define Real Name by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      P.S.: When you run on my Verizon iPad 3G then you'll truly be a MMORPG ...

      So, in your world, there's no such thing as an MMORPG? Because in mine it all got started several years before 'iPad' and '3G' were even on the radar.

    5. Re:Define Real Name by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      "Bzzzt!"

      Oh, sorry, I was too busy using my lightsaber in the MMORPG that does work on my Verizon iPad 3G ...

      Were you saying something?

      (caveat - there is no truth to the rumor that I am the first person to run a role-playing-game by mail with more than 100 players - other than the entries in Who's Who back in the 80s)

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re:Define Real Name by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    7. Re:Define Real Name by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I was on the Internet back when 300 baud was fast, Bobbie.

      And used to hand check my S100 bus computers with an oscilliscope and hand tune my floppy drives.

      You see, we didn't store everything on the Internet back then.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  59. Re:trying to imagine... by jgagnon · · Score: 1

    *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge*

    I'm kidding, but you bring up a very serious point that I've witnessed over and over again. Someone at Blizzard did not think this one through at all.

    I think the only positive thing Blizzard will get from this is less traffic on their official forums.

    --
    Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
  60. Don't bet on it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    While I'm not buying in to the paranoid fantasy of the GP at all (seriously too many Slashdot types are also AFDB types) don't think they couldn't mine the data. While maybe they can't with their current systems, it can be done. Google could do it, they are that good at dealing with that much data. Blizzard could contact them and have a system built for them (or just run something jointly) that would handle mining through the mass amounts of data they generate.

  61. Good Luck With That by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only thing Blizzard is really able to "require" is that the names in the First Name and Last Name boxes on the site. That does not necessarily have any relationship to "real" first or last names. Even paying for the service can be done with someone else's credit card. So... Good Luck With That. Some will comply. Others will not.

  62. What about.... by EntropyXP · · Score: 1

    Mr. T? I mean, now we'll really be able to tell if he is a Night Elf Mohawk or not!

    --
    "No one will really be free until nerd persecution ends."
  63. Phone books by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember a hundred years ago when there was a very real problem with stalkers looking for girl's names in phone books and then stalking them and/or killing them? Phone companies now seem obligated, or at least cooperative, about letting you put whatever the hell you want in phone books. I used to make up the silliest fake names.

    Anyway. I'm excited to see what the damages are like when some girls get murdered and raped over their wow forum posts.

    --
    Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    1. Re:Phone books by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember a hundred years ago when there was a very real problem with stalkers looking for girl's names in phone books and then stalking them and/or killing them? Phone companies now seem obligated, or at least cooperative, about letting you put whatever the hell you want in phone books. I used to make up the silliest fake names.

      Anyway. I'm excited to see what the damages are like when some girls get murdered and raped over their wow forum posts.

      This is sort of a non-starter, isn't it? How does the WoW information lead to their location? Wouldn't they have to use other information that would either exist or not despite the RealID change? And finally, if someone were looking to rape and/or murder, why wouldn't they just abduct someone at random and/or from within their real life? What does WoW have to do with it? ESPECIALLY since the attacker's real name is in play here as well, or at least as much in or out of play as the victim would desire their own name to be...

      None of the dangers are actually being increased here, are they?

  64. Re:trying to imagine... by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't know. Maybe he could point out that in-game grief has resulted in the deaths of real people? Everyone knows kdawson has (serious) editing flaws, but it doesn't require any "spin" to make this look like a terrible decision on Blizzard's part.

    Many people were upset with regards to Real ID on the Starcraft 2 forums during the previous phase of the beta [1] [2]. Of course, most people are not happy with the general direction Blizzard is taking Battle.net -- automatic Facebook integration, Real ID, and now this. I should be able to play an online game without telling everybody who I am and where I live. The best part of this whole thing is that Blizzard has given absolutely no justification for this incredible erosion of privacy and anonymity. All they do is babble buzzwords about "social network integration".

    Sometimes you want to go where everybody knows your name. For most people, the Internet is not one of those places.

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  65. Re:trying to imagine... by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But that's still backwards - my forum persona should be associated with my in-game character, not my real ID. Imagine for a moment this was some sort of role-playing game ... nah, too much of a stretch. For Starcraft, there have already been real life shootings in Korea - this isn't going to help things.

    Why shouldn't I seperate my online persona(s) from my real life identity? What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here? I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  66. Re:trying to imagine... by kg8484 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A female playing WoW?

    I put on my robe and wizard hat

  67. What about people who don't like their real names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some people who do not like using their legal first names in real life, even in formal situations. (For example, a transitioning transsexual who has not yet changed his/her legal name.) Depending on how this Real ID is enforced, one can end up in the unpleasant situation of being referred to by a name that he/she hates. Such people are very likely to leave the forums, and may even end their subscriptions.

  68. What a stupid, irresponsible thing to do. by CodePwned · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In short, this is being done by a ton of really bad people on the forums. This cannot be being proposed by the upper leadership as this has all sorts of legal implications.

    If you have a problem with your forums, on such a large scale... it's EASY to fix.

    Step 1:
    Implement a ranking system. People can give you positive or negative bumps to your posts (think karma here). The longer someone holds an active rank the more "bump" they give to people. You have to be a member of the forum for at least 1 month before you can bump at all, and then give it a progressive growth scale of the strength of their "bump". (1-6 months: 1pt, 7months to 2 years: 5pt, 2+ 10pt).

    Additionally, provide some incentive for activity on the forums by offering discounts of productions/services by maintaining a high activity and in good standing at certain intervals. For example "You've been active on our forums for over 6 months with a great rank! We want to thank you for contributing to our community by offering you 25% off any of our old games... or a $5 credit on your next bill!". The overall cost to blizzard is dirt cheap.

    Step 2:
    Ensure that someone has to been active (logging in) to keep their rank or they start over. You can figure out that time table

    Step 3:
    If a user gets below a certain rank they are auto silenced. They cannot post anymore but can submit for a review of their "silencing" in case of some exploitation. This is highly unlikely since to even bump you have to be a member for quite some time.

    BENEFITS
    - Trolls get silenced pretty damn quick
    - The community monitors itself with minimal administrative intervention
    - You get certain individuals who become leaders in the community from their rank
    - People feel rewarded for contributing

  69. Re:sounds like there will be a bunch of I.P. Freel by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    I was going to start calling myself Biteme Blizz.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  70. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    go on there and try and post anything about high end raiding on a lvl 1 toon, everyone will ask to see your main to prove you actually know what you are talking about. That will not change, if you DONT associate a toon with your name then no one will take you seriously (ESPECIALLY with a female name... sorry but sexisim is alive and well in the gaming world)

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  71. Re:trying to imagine... by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the only positive thing Blizzard will get from this is less traffic on their official forums.

    I can only hope that Blizzard will catch on to the outrage of this. I won't stop playing, but I'll stop using their forums. All of those useful posts I've made in the past will no longer continue to happen, including anything I've said that was inflammatory. The good posts I've made outweigh the ones where I put up bounties on people on my faction, trashed someone, etc.

    I'll be posting on Elitist Jerks or some other forum for anything involving my class or endgame content. For discussing realm matters, I just won't post anymore.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  72. Depends by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In a case like that, sure. Though actually in a case like that I'd make sure to get myself fired over a voting issue and then sue the fuck out of them. The voting booth is a pretty sacred right in the US and termination over it would be bad cause in every jurisdiction I'm aware of.

    However what I'm worried about is a case of people who generally aren't like that, they aren't the "Everyone must agree with us in every way," sort, but that they happen to see something that they decide makes them say no.

    You hear about this all the time, people post Facebook pictures of themselves at a wild party in university and find it hurts jobs later. It usually isn't that the folks doing the hiring are Puritans or anything, they are just dumbasses. They did the same kind of shit themselves when they were young but have conveniently forgotten about it. They think "Well this sort of thing doesn't reflect well for our company," and give the person a miss.

    In my case, what I might be worried about is that I've posted stories about my work environment. Now I've never named my employer, mostly because that comes too close to making it too easy to identify me, but still. I'm not worried now, I work for a public institution and thus I have a right to do it (HR specifically says so) as the tax payers have a right to know. But at some time in the future I go for another job and maybe that company thinks "Well we like the guy, but he talks about his employer online. We really don't want that, have to give him a miss."

    I just find it better that there is a barrier between my real name and what I post online. Not a strong or impenetrable one, but one that if you Google my name, you do not get results of what I've said in forums.

    1. Re:Depends by yuhong · · Score: 1

      You hear about this all the time, people post Facebook pictures of themselves at a wild party in university and find it hurts jobs later. It usually isn't that the folks doing the hiring are Puritans or anything, they are just dumbasses. They did the same kind of shit themselves when they were young but have conveniently forgotten about it. They think "Well this sort of thing doesn't reflect well for our company," and give the person a miss. In my case, what I might be worried about is that I've posted stories about my work environment. Now I've never named my employer, mostly because that comes too close to making it too easy to identify me, but still. I'm not worried now, I work for a public institution and thus I have a right to do it (HR specifically says so) as the tax payers have a right to know. But at some time in the future I go for another job and maybe that company thinks "Well we like the guy, but he talks about his employer online. We really don't want that, have to give him a miss."

      Now of course none of these are a good idea in the PR 2.0 age where candor, honesty, and authenticity are increasingly being valued.

    2. Re:Depends by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's good to know that you have the time, money, and emotional hardiness it would take to sue a large company.

      $50 says you'd go bankrupt before any judgement, and have to withdraw your case.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Depends by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Small claims court is a good start, at least in the UK. Also employment tribunals here are free for the employee, costs the employer regardless of the outcome, and are legally binding.

      Oops, orry, forgot the US is kinda backwards on this topic...

  73. And what about people whose name does not conform? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I know someone who has no last name. Legally. When he encounters online forms that require it, he has traditionally entered his profession when it is inconsequential, although that's not his actual name.

  74. I see you, You see me by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, then be sure to let us, the users know the REAL NAMES of the moderators, business managers, sales staff, marketing gurus of your business and I am sure that openness will be embraced by all!

    1. Re:I see you, You see me by II+Xion+II · · Score: 1

      They are doing that for anyone who posts on the forum. Supposedly community MVPs are not happy about it and even some Blues who have used their names have had their personal details leaked onto pages in minutes thanks to 4chan. This is a debacle for Blizzard and their banhammers will be busy long into the night.

    2. Re:I see you, You see me by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      EVERYONE that posts on the forums will have their RealID exposed, even employees. At least one of the GM/Devs already revealed her name. Also, most of the employees are named in the game manuals (those things we dont read), including the GM mentioned.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:I see you, You see me by Avalain · · Score: 1

      Well, not sure about everyone else, but the moderators and CMs are going to be going by their real names.

    4. Re:I see you, You see me by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Today, yes. Tomorrow? "Due to unacceptable personal threats made against moderators, Blizzard have regrettably decided... blah blah... one rule for you, one for us". In 3.. 2...

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:I see you, You see me by Athanasius · · Score: 1

      You’ll also begin seeing blue posters (i.e. Blizzard employees) posting by their real first and last names on our forums as well.

      From http://eu.battle.net/realid/faq.html

      I've already sent them an angry message via battle.net support pointing out how insane it is to 1) Require real names show when you add a RealID friend, 2) Allow friends of friends to also see your real name, 3) Show the real names on forums.

      You can still play their games and not given the info away, but it means never posting on the forums or making use of RealID friending (you can still do per-game single-character friending).

    6. Re:I see you, You see me by Athanasius · · Score: 1

      Oh and also it's insane that the whole RealID thing revolves around your battle.net account email. Firstly you might not want to give that out to anyone else, secondly it's the ACCOUNT CONNECTED EMAIL, so wonderful to combine with a bit of social engineering to hack an account.

      Blizzard REALLY need to rethink this.

      Firstly allow specifying a global 'screen name' to be shown instead of real name.

      Secondly make the primary (only?) method to add a RealID friend being right-click of the character in-game. If you don't have any game in common then why would you even want to add them as a RealID friend? Failing that have some numeric ID you can use. I used to use that method for Steam adding without the problems it seemed prone to doing it any other way (go to your own profile, copy the URL with numeric ID that can't be anyone but you, paste to friend somehow... now you can have a 'nice' URL form too).

      And even with both of those two I'd like an opt out from the 'friends of friends' listing.

      Requiring revealing your email address (not everyone will have thought to, or be able to, use an address for battle.net that they don't use for anything else) and real name for a game/social thing is insane.

    7. Re:I see you, You see me by ukyoCE · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the RealID thing was strange, and it's only getting stranger. You now have to share your login name with all of your friends. In a game that was already rife with phishing and hacking to obtain logins BEFORE your login was used anywhere aside from logging in.

      Now your username and real name are going to be inseparable from the game, effectively. Who wants that? Anyone?

      Having blue posters "go public" doesn't sell me on the idea. They were *already* public, most of them. And unlike us, they have moderation power to lock or remove threads they don't like, where they're being abused, or where information is being posted that is private.

      When someone posts an unflattering picture of me in my realm forum will they be as quick to lock it as they were when a picture of all the Community Managers was posted and half the responses were asking about "the cute chick in the back"? I doubt it.

      In starcraft 2 (beta) you create an account "identifier" that is different than your login name or real name. Why can't WOW use the same thing, for the same purpose? Your reputation would follow you between forums, between toons, between guilds. There is no need to bring your login or real name into it to achieve that.

    8. Re:I see you, You see me by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      And here's what happened: http://wowriot.gameriot.com/blogs/Americans-are-bad-at-games/Real-Names-on-the-Official-Forums-New-REAL-ID-function?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wowriot+(Latest+Wowriot+Blog+Posts+-+Wowriot.Gameriot.com)

      Rumors are abound that Blues will not be showing their names now.

      BTW, the original thread is over 1200 pages and 24,000 replies now. It is interesting that people are up in a huff over this and not, say, Facebook but the audiences probably differ both in makeup and what they expect.

    9. Re:I see you, You see me by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      Anyone who does inside trading, is awarded nonqualified stock options as a bonus or incentive, or reports directly to the board has personal information disclosed to the public as a matter of compliance.

      If you wanted to direct your comments toward people with the authority to make decisions... just sayin.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    10. Re:I see you, You see me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea. There's a blog that has been set up for that exact purpose.

      http://asnowstormbyanyothername.blogspot.com/

      Probably the most important post there, however, is the information about Activision CEO Robert "Bobby" Kotick: http://asnowstormbyanyothername.blogspot.com/2010/07/robert-bobby-kotick.html

      I assume he doesn't mind, everything on that site is publicly available information found by starting with his first and last name. Imagine what would have been found if someone made a facebook account using the name of one of his real life friends and tricked him (or his 11 year old daughter) into friending it. Or paid a small amount of money for a background check online. But that would be cheating.

  75. Re:trying to imagine... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

    They don't seem to have this issue

    It depends on how public they make this. It sounds like GP tries to be as quiet about it as possible, but if you go around flaunting it you will probably have problems with creepy nerds harassing you.

    You guys should look up on Something Awful's Art of Warcraft section about the guy who pretended to be a girl in game during Pre-TBC and all the gold and gifts he got from these people. It's weird how guys react to women in a game.*

    * I'd link it, but work blocks it.

    --
    Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
  76. I knew it would pay off when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I put a fake name on my account. Share away Blizz!
     
    The good news for the more honest folk is that the response to this has been overwhelmingly negative. I'd be suprised if they go through with it.

  77. Re:trying to imagine... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    "plz cyber?

    I put on my robe and wizard hat.

  78. How Exactly Do They Implement This? by matthiasvegh · · Score: 0

    I mean seriously, how do they *know* I'm not John Doe? The bank account info? Surely paypal would solve this, or if nothing else, buying gamecards from a store.. and if it were bank account info, if my granny bought me a month, would my name change to hers?

  79. two simple solutions by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    Either don't buy any more Blizzard products or don't post on the forums. I played WoW for a few years and can't remember anything of value coming off the public forums.

    I wouldn't want my full name posted but I wouldn't mind if they put Bob S. there.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  80. Joe Generic is still anonymous by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People with very common names will not be impacted in the same way that people with less common names. Real names are non-unique. How does this help? cf. TSA "no-fly" list.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Joe Generic is still anonymous by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, I bet a lot of WoW freaks will legally change their name to their avatar's name. That should be fun.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  81. Re:trying to imagine... by Dragoniz3r · · Score: 1

    I don't know what authentication mechanisms they have in place to make sure you are who you say you are, but if you can get the assistance of a male friend, I can't imagine they'd be too hard to circumvent.

    PS. Hopefully you use a handle a little less obvious there than you do here :P

  82. Using a fake name has downsides, implausibilities by kaputtfurleben · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of replies about how you don't have to provide your "real" name. However, most people that already play have almost certainly used their real names to create their account(s). And once an account is created, the name on the account cannot be changed. Further, should your account ever be compromised, the only surefire way to recover it is to provide some identifying information, such as a driver's license or birth certificate. If you don't use your own name, you risk losing it to some scammer or javascript exploit, and no way to get it back because your name is not legally "I.P. Freely".

  83. Re:Ain't Gonna Happen by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    Nothing will promote civility and mature behaviour on a game forum. Many people are assholes, period. The vast majority of the rest of them are stupid beyond belief. The few who remain can be interesting to have a conversation with, but they are a tiny majority. In any game with PvP involved in it, the ratio of ignorant assholes to intelligent civil players goes through the roof. I have played and still play a lot of MMOs and the smaller the game, the better the level of civility, the bigger it gets, the more the ignorant asshats show up in numbers. What I want is not to see the real names of the other players, what do I care? I think of you as your character names anyways. No, what I want is a game where the minimum allowed subscriber age is about 30. That *might* have a chance of toning down the ignorance a bit, but not much.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  84. Re:trying to imagine... by xaxa · · Score: 1

    I don't play any of these games. Why do you need to give them your real name in the first place?

    i.e. couldn't you give them a real-looking name, Ella Gwite?

  85. It's all true. And Blizzard knows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By allowing anonymous posting, Blizzard creates liability. When people post things that are illegal, Blizzard can be forced to either disclose the names, or accept liability for the posts themselves.

    They don't want to do that.

    So, by forcing everyone to post with their real names, Blizzard can step out of the legal issues created by damaging posts, and further encourage people to avoid posting legally-dangerous material.

    I expect they think conversation on the forums will become a lot more civil because of this.

    So it shifts the dangers of online communication away from blizzard and toward the users doing the communicating. It absolutely causes the problems the OP is suggesting, and that is exactly what Blizzard is counting on.

  86. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    When I got married it was a right pain in the arse to get my wow account name changed. I needed to get them to email me a form, fill it out, mail it with a certified copy of my marriage certificate and two other pieces of ID to prove my name changed... and that was a MARRIAGE. I would hate to see what they would want for a full change of name.

    (thankfully I got it all settled when they went to the battle.net IDs, I just put in my new name and there was no hastle)

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  87. Re:trying to imagine... by Trolan · · Score: 1

    automatic Facebook integration

    Because SC2/WoW have access to your facebook password to pull your friends list? Oh wait, they don't. It will be available, but it's not automatic. Much like giving up your email address book to facebook to scan them.

    As to RealID itself, I don't mind the in-game functionality of it. The people on my RealID list are people who already know me. Everyone else is just via character name. The change to the forum, however, I do expect there to be problems.

  88. Great Idea by tiny69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think posting a person's real name is a great idea. I'd never get embarassed by having my real name associated with some lame username that I picked over 10 years ago.

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
    1. Re:Great Idea by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      so your real name is tiny69?

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  89. Racsim and WoW by doomy · · Score: 1

    I was once in a guild where the vent was so racist that new people would instantly quit it. I've seen this happen in just about every guild I've been in. The more hardcore the guild was the more racist the teenage->20something players were. There view towards women were not that great as well.

    Now that people are forced to disclose their names, I'm pretty sure guilds would start openly discriminating people based on their race, religion and nationality just based on the names alone. In North America, if you have a "strange name", it's pretty easy to pinpoint exactly what you are IRL. This I think would be the basis for a new form of pretty disgusting discrimination among gamers.

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    1. Re:Racsim and WoW by eLore · · Score: 1

      In our guild, you get 1 warning unless it's incredibly offensive, then you're gkicked. This applies to any form of hate speech and applies to vent, guild chat, or any publich chat channel. If you're flying our guild tag, you are expected to behave in public. You're welcome to have whatever belief system you like, but you're not welcome to offend others with it.

    2. Re:Racsim and WoW by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Now that people are forced to disclose their names, I'm pretty sure guilds would start openly discriminating people based on their race, religion and nationality just based on the names alone. In North America, if you have a "strange name", it's pretty easy to pinpoint exactly what you are IRL. This I think would be the basis for a new form of pretty disgusting discrimination among gamers.

      But this is a non-loss scenario. Guilds are volunteer organizations and if they're going to kick you for being brown, it would be FAR better to get it over with earlier rather than later. It isn't as if Blizzard can stop them from doing so. You wouldn't want to be in that guild anyway. Go find one with human beings in it instead, or start one of your own.

    3. Re:Racsim and WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardcore raiding guild:

      Expectations for Members of Dishonor

      1) Personal Conduct

      — We expect members of Dishonor to be upstanding members of the Shattered Halls community

      — Polite, humble, fun, trustworthy, knowledgeable, skilled - these are the words others should use when describing our guild members

      — Member actions that damage this reputation will be dealt with harshly

      — We have a strict "no douchebag policy" - abide, dude

  90. iRacing has done this for 2 years now by Silver+Surfer+1 · · Score: 1

    No issues or problems that I have seen.

  91. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight.

    1) Anonymity currently doesn't exist on the Internet.
    2) Trolling is commonplace on the Internet.
    3) Therefore, removing anonymity will stop trolling.

    Um...

  92. Forums Post by node159 · · Score: 1

    For expressing your opinion:

    US SC2 Thread:
    http://forums.battle.net/thread.html?topicId=25626109041 (337 posts atm)

    US Forums Thread:
    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=25712374700&sid=1 (4517 posts atm)

    EU Forums Thread:
    http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=13816838128 (858 posts atm)

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  93. Re:trying to imagine... by kitanai · · Score: 2, Funny

    You actually get that? I'm female and play WoW, and those episodes have been so few and far between it wasn't worth worrying. Although my guild leader did want nekkid pics.

  94. Re:YOU'D RATHER ATTACK MY ASSHOLE WITH YOUR TONGUE by selven · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Mod parent up. He's making rather good posts if you account for the fact that the subject line only allows for 50 characters, a mere 36% of that allowed by Twitter - his post would even be above average on Twitter despite the 64% character penalty he's incurring.

  95. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by citylivin · · Score: 1

    "Just by Googling the Handle some people use, you can start to gather pieces of personal information, email, phone numbers, real names, places, jobs, etc can be found in a matter of minutes, one piece of information leading to another, which leads to another"

    Unless you have gone to great lengths to conceal your online identity by never reusing the same pseudonyms, not posting your email, real name or number, etc. What can be found within a matter of minutes for some, might be impossible without ip address logs for others. Sure, you are only one compromised system away from having one psuedonym identified, but if you do a good job, you shouldn't be that affected. Of course a concerted effort involving law enforcement, subpoenas and ISP level logs will probbaly make short work of any anonymity, but these options are not available to most people looking to get even with someone on the internet (or whatever).

    Saying that all privacy on the internet is pointless because some people cover their tracks badly is a pretty stupid argument to make. On the other hand, would i even bother posting this if it was tied to my real name? Im sure my employer wouldn't want me wasting company time making this comment, thats for sure. Some people like being anonymous, or at least pseudo anonymous on the internets.

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
  96. Well... by PipeToDevNull · · Score: 1

    Apparently enough people thought this was a bad idea that the thread in which this was announced has crashed the WoW fora. Bets on if it goes through anyway?

    --
    All glory to the hypnotoad!
  97. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don’t want the public to know what you are up to, don’t post it on the public internet, it seems rather simple to me.

    "If you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to hide!" Yes, that IS exactly what you're saying, and yes, saying it DOES make you an idiot.

  98. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why shouldn't I seperate my online persona(s) from my real life identity? What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here?

    The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory. People are less likely to act like an asshole if they don't have anonymity to hide behind. The only people who will be idiots any more are those who are idiots already.

    Another example of a game using real names is iRacing, though real names are used throughout the game, instead of just on the forums. Again, the idea is to discourage anti-social behavior (intentional wrecking, profanity, etc), and this is part of their aggressive policing against griefers. In this case, such a prevention is especially necessary for a racing game of this type. I don't frequent the Blizzard forums, so I'm not sure if there are enough douchebags there to justify such measures.

    I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    In that case, either:
    1) Don't be a jack-ass on the Blizzard forums.
    2) Don't use the Blizzard forums.

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview, so I'm well aware of the issue. However, nothing I said in the past (I've said a lot of stupid stuff) was an issue. If it is a concern to you, don't use the forums (it's an optional part of an optional game you play, you can deal with it), or simply police your behavior before it is recorded for all posterity on the Intertubes.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  99. for a GAME? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    I fully realize that there are places on the internet that it makes sense to require your full, real name.

    But WORLD OF WARCRAFT?

    A game that is entirely based on people pretending to be something they are NOT?

    I could easily see this being done for Match.com, Linked In, or even Facebook. But WOW?????

    How about someone get their head out of their rectum and tell us what makes their game so important that this is neccessary?

    What, someone got upset about a little name calling?

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  100. Re:And what about people whose name does not confo by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

    This is hilariously old school. A lot of very common surnames have origins in occupations (SEE: Smith).

    --
    Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
  101. well by charliemopps11 · · Score: 1

    Lets just get a few things strait: The only reason an MMO has a forum for its own game is so they can control the speech of those in the forum. This is just a further attempt at stifling the speech of those in the forum. If the WOW players were smart they'd flock to some other non-blizzard controlled forum. But its just to easy to use the official forums, and that's why it works.

    1. Re:well by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      If the WOW players were smart they'd flock to some other non-blizzard controlled forum

      They already have. Only a tiny fraction of the player base posts on the forums.

  102. No Problem by twmcneil · · Score: 1

    I have no problem with that.

    Jim Raynor

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
  103. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    My server is "mostly" ok on horde side (dear gods I hated playing ali), but the LFG tool brings in all kinds. They see a female toon and I swear I get at least one a week that goes: "Durrr, are you a GIRL?!" as soon as they zone in.

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  104. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Haffner · · Score: 1

    With this change, adults will be expected to act as adults. If you don’t want the public to know what you are up to, don’t post it on the public internet, it seems rather simple to me.

    And what if the userbase isn't made up of entirely adults? This is wow we are talking about. I bet their are millions of minors who play.

    --
    "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
  105. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because username that has the word "butteryflys" in it definitely makes it impossible to pinpoint your gender...

    This is really a huge privacy issue but making this about gender is like trying to examine all of the ocean with a magnifying glass.

  106. Brilliant! by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

    Oh well played Blizzard.

    If you just turned off your forums because they're a drain on employee time that generates no income and at least as much bad will as good, then you'd cop bad press for the decision. But if you make it so everyone _voluntarily_ abandons the forums, well... thats just letting people do what they want, right?

  107. Well count me out of the Blizzard forums.... by aarongadberry · · Score: 1

    ...where I had previously posted many times with beta feedback.

  108. Re:trying to imagine... by tacarat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    In that case, either: 1) Don't be a jack-ass on the Blizzard forums. 2) Don't use the Blizzard forums.

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview, so I'm well aware of the issue. However, nothing I said in the past (I've said a lot of stupid stuff) was an issue. If it is a concern to you, don't use the forums (it's an optional part of an optional game you play, you can deal with it), or simply police your behavior before it is recorded for all posterity on the Intertubes.

    It'd be safer to do the second option. While your first suggestion is good, times change. What's fine now may not be 20 something years down the road (or even next week). Today's upright, model citizen can be dragged through the mud later on without any misspeaks if future interpretations or values change enough.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  109. Re:trying to imagine... by kitanai · · Score: 1

    I'm just going to put your experience down to horde boys being more immature :-P For the Alliance!

  110. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    oh gods, they are WORLDS better then the aliance I played with when I first started. I maxed my ignore list before I hit lvl 40 (that was before the LFG tool too)

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  111. Re:trying to imagine... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here?

    That's the main question I have about this announcement: "Why?"

    Are they worried about copyright infringement in their forum? Are they protecting the children? Why in the world would Blizzard be requiring real names in an online forum for discussion of their games?

    I think Blizzard may be overestimating just how enthusiastic the market for Starcraft II really is. I mean, a couple of years ago, Starcraft fans were desperate for a new take on their favorite game, but the gaming world has moved on somewhat since Starcraft first came out. That's the problem with going way, way over schedule with a game: out of sight is out of mind.

    From what I can tell from my few experiences with the Starcraft II beta, it's not really going to shake the world. It would be fun to revisit the races and a good RTS game is always worth something, but if Blizzard keeps throwing these unpleasant roadblocks in the way of gamers, they risk turning enough people off to make Starcraft II less than an unqualified success.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  112. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    I agree, anyone who is concerned should just use an alternative forum. Problem solved.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  113. Re:trying to imagine... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    yes, as I use the same name here as I do in game... oh wait, no I don't.

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  114. Re:trying to imagine... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview

    I'm curious, what kind of job are you interviewing for where you feel you should provide your WoW screen name?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  115. Re:trying to imagine... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    There are quite a few women who play WoW, and around a third of the people I know through guilds/real life/friending random people I quested with are female.

    You'd like to believe that, wouldn't you?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  116. Zuckerberg would fit right in at Blizzactivision by Vantharion · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, since when did Mark Zuckerberg work at Blizzard?

    I think this is interesting, perhaps a little far but interesting none the less.
    It makes an possibly powerful move towards potentially controlling goldfarmers and other 'ToS forbidden actions'.

    And for an anecdote:
    I remember a couple years ago when I was at the end of my teenager years and I was starting an account, I had to provide my name and they refused to actually activate the account because my account name did not match that of the credit card name (my parents)... This however did not stop them from taking money from the card, just stopped them from giving me the service it was paying for.
    -Vant

  117. Re:trying to imagine... by tacarat · · Score: 1

    Kind of a pity, though. This can lead to greater community fracturing and security risks for the players. Even with a strong group of volunteers and leaders, getting everybody onto one alternative forum will be harder than getting everybody on to the official one. Throw in the usual exploits and such that go on with keyloggers and hacked ads... /sigh.

    --
    "Common sense will be the death of us all"
  118. Re:And what about people whose name does not confo by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    Prince can just WoW under either his birth name or a pseudonym. Besides, I doubt his Purpleness would want to divulge his real identity anyway.

  119. I PITY da fool.. by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    that tries to make Mr. T give his real name!

  120. All this is... by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    ... is a cost cutting measure. Very few people, in their right minds, would post on the forums when forced to reveal their real first and last names. As a result, less server overhead, maintenance, admin time, etc. As a result, this will make the forums more efficient and give moderators and admins more time to respond to their actively posting customers.... No, really.

    1. Re:All this is... by AdhSeidh · · Score: 1

      ah that may be the only reasonable explanation for this behaviour, I certainly will not be posting anywhere where my real name will be visible.

  121. Will WoW forums be the new Facebook? by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

    When I ask if WoW will be the new Facebook, I don't mean in regards to meaningless drivel (they are both great at that already).

    What I mean is will WoW forums become the new source for posts that provide embarrassment, cause divorces, give ammo to employers to fire someone (or deny employment), and other social and work related blunders?

    Sure, this will be likely be effective in making the game forums less of a cesspool, but I personally wouldn't ever post to the wow forums if my real name was attached. I might if I were named John Smith, but there aren't that many people that share my name. I don't want video game forum posts showing up on Google searches on my real name.

  122. Re:trying to imagine... by stonewallred · · Score: 1

    WTF? Blizz fanboi on /.? STFU, who in the hell wants one more site, especially one they pay to post on, to spread their name across the internet? Fuck Blizz. I will continue to play my current account, but I will not buy Cata nor reactivate any of my other accounts until the RealID shit is terminated. I might change my mind one I get 80s on the alt servers I am currently leveling on, but being it took me 56 days played, over two years, to hit 80 on my main, I don't see it happening any time soon.

  123. Re:trying to imagine... by genner · · Score: 1

    I agree, anyone who is concerned should just use an alternative forum. Problem solved.

    Which is fine until you need tech support. Blizzard employees won't answer your questions on another forum.

  124. Re:trying to imagine... by genner · · Score: 1

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview

    I'm curious, what kind of job are you interviewing for where you feel you should provide your WoW screen name?

    Not unheard of for government work that requires a security clearance.

  125. Can we say legally liable anyone? by NonSenseAgency · · Score: 1

    This will last until Blizzard gets named as a co-defendant in a wrongful death lawsuit because they required a minor to divulge a real name in a public forum, something that any security expert will tell you is about as stupid as it gets.

  126. Re:trying to imagine... by genner · · Score: 1

    *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge*

    I'm kidding, but you bring up a very serious point that I've witnessed over and over again. Someone at Blizzard did not think this one through at all.

    I think the only positive thing Blizzard will get from this is less traffic on their official forums.

    Somewhere a network engineer is claiming a victory. The forums are much more stable and the bandwidth costs have gone down. Hooray!

  127. As someone who suffered... by Lythrdskynrd · · Score: 1
    As someone who suffered abuse at the hands of the 'anonymous mob', I really, really welcome this change.

    I was playing WoWarcraft and made a post on the realm forum that an "elite raider" & 4chan user thought was noobish. It made them angry, they insulted me. I tried to restate my point, but got further and further abused.

    After that it followed me to every forum post I made.

    After that it followed me to in-game abuse (public channels)

    I transfered off server.

    it followed me to the new guild forum I'd set up, anonymous posters setting up new accounts and insulting me in the 'guild general' public forums.

    I am very happy to hear that real first and last are going to be required. Sure, it increases the chance that they can look me up, and harass me "IRL" but then again... I can look them up too.

  128. Re:trying to imagine... by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

    There are quite a few women who play WoW, and around a third of the people I know through guilds/real life/friending random people I quested with are female.

    You'd like to believe that, wouldn't you?

    Yeah, I believe that people I hear on vent with female-sounding voices are women, as are females I know in real life.

    --
    24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
  129. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That depends on the handle they use doesn't it?

    I mean, how much can you tell me about (random made-up handle off the top of my head) BigDog72?

  130. Finally! by ctchristmas · · Score: 1

    Finally! A way to differentiate between the real girls and the guys playing female characters just to stare and half naked night elves and get free shit from unsuspecting, desperate nerds. Now I know when I have my WOW wedding this time it really will be a chick!

    1. Re:Finally! by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Funny

      A way to differentiate between the real girls and the guys playing female characters

            Yes I am sure Leslie, Alex and Sam will turn out to be just what you dreamed of...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  131. Re:trying to imagine... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    But that's still backwards - my forum persona should be associated with my in-game character, not my real ID.

    I think the biggest disconnect here is that your in-game character doesn't have a need to post on the forums. You, the player, do - but not the character in any way. It isn't as if your character needs to find the location of Mankrik's Wife by using the game's forums to complete that quest.

  132. Re:trying to imagine... by Spellvexit · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In answer to your question, the problem they are trying to solve is the fact that most forum threads in the WoW deteriorate into petty insults and gainsaying before the end of the first page of posts. Or at least, that's the published reason for doing this.

    I sympathize with Blizzard's desire to want to make the forums a more constructive and friendly environment, but I can certainly envision scenarios where players carry their RPG rage into real life. I also noted that a few women wrote in response to the new post, and they were disturbed that their gender might become an issue.

    The new system also seems to allow people to rate posts, and I wish Blizzard had first taken this step of moderating before it went whole hog and published the poster's identity.

    --
    The moon may be smaller than the earth, but it's much farther away!
  133. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by goonerw · · Score: 1

    And what if the userbase isn't made up of entirely adults? This is wow we are talking about. I bet their are millions of minors who play.

    Since this is Slashdot, I'm 100% sure you didn't read any comments posted prior to yours. Two words: Parental Controls. https://us.battle.net/account/parental-controls/index.html?rhtml=y

    --
    LOAD ".SIG"
    PRESS PLAY ON TAPE
  134. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is slashdot. not everyone here sucks at the internet as much as these anecdotal 'troll's you mention.

    image: senses

  135. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    Does Blizzard not have another tech support pathway? E-mail or private support requests? I don't play any Blizzard games, so I don't know.

    If that's the case, then it's an issue with Blizzard's implementation. In general, I don't think there's any problem with linking an official forum account to a real name.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  136. quoth Oscar Wilde: by iceaxe · · Score: 1

    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth.

    --
    WALSTIB!
  137. ATTN: People who didnt read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All posts here on the current World of Warcraft forums, or any of our classic Battle.net forums, will remain as-is. They won't (and can't) automatically switch to showing a real first and last name.

    All posts in the future on the new forum systems will be an opt-in choice and ample warning will be given that you're posting with your real first and last name."

  138. They already sucked by uremog · · Score: 1

    Yep, now there's absolutely no reason to use the actual Blizzard forums. Blizzard employees already regularly review every major SC2 forum for comments, so just choose one of those. I, for one, now have no reason to ever post on Blizzard's forums and no growing desire to do so. This is just asking to get your forum's population pwn't. At least my full name is very common.

  139. Re:trying to imagine... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

    Then stop drawing the attention.

    I've known plenty of girls who play MMOs who don't really have that big of a problem with it. The only ones who did had a problem because they tell everyone loudly, attracting attention to themselves.

    I highly doubt you get a significantly higher number of people saying anything to you because of the common assumption that everyone online that says they are female turns out to be a 40 year old fat bald man with a built in sweater.

    I call bullshit on your claim, especially when you can just say 'shut up or I'll call your mommy since I know your real name (or their real name)

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  140. Re:trying to imagine... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview

    Did you do it voluntarily, or were you actually required to do so under the terms of the contract?

  141. Re:trying to imagine... by lgw · · Score: 1

    If I'm posting about my problems with class balance in WoW, the class that I play is of interest. My real world details just aren't. I game as a persona distinct from my own (not that I play WoW these days, but imagine it was really a role-playing game), and I want my reputation, good or bad, to be attached to that persona, and left behind at the office.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  142. Re:trying to imagine... by thirtybelow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem is that the degree to which anyone is deterred will be determined by how concerned they are about their online image. People with careers and families will be even more cautious, and probably less like to contribute to a discussion. 13-y.o. dickheads will go right on being dickheads, because they have nothing to lose and it will be several years before they are in any position to worry about an online reputation. So, people who are most likely to say something worthwhile are the most likely to be silenced by lack of anonymity.

  143. "Real Name" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this does is guarantee that I give Blizzard a fake name.

  144. Hehehehe, stalkers unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOW :)

    So if i were a stalker ... >.> ,i would be able to find out where this girl i used to play wow with lives? .... i know her server char names and state/city, once i have her real name .....

    or not .... lol ....

  145. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Coward is my handle, you insensitive clod.

  146. The solution by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

    Just register your BattleNet account with a fake "real" name. I bet you could even change your name in the profile.

  147. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confirmation bias. Yes, maybe a quarter or even half of the people you encounter can be traced to a facebook page or some other detailed personal profile. But how many trolls has your server seen that are completely untraceable? It's really not hard to have a hard disconnect between nickname and personal information. And what happens when people on that server try and internet detect and run up against a brick wall? They don't post anything. You don't remember it. You only remember the cases where they found the guy's facebook.

    This is why anecdote is not data.

  148. Re:trying to imagine... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    You hit the nail on the head.

    I have a handful of usernames which have a rich history attached to them. I'm pretty identifiable by sizable groups of people in those sorts of circles. My reputation and personality are linked to those usernames.

    What's not (obviously) linked to those usernames is my real name and my life. That's how I want it, and that's how it's going to stay.

    Like you, I don't want something I posted 20 years ago to come back to haunt me. I don't want to be asked about one of those usernames at a job interview. That's my personal stuff. Not private, but personal. Some pseudo-anonymity serves that data well.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  149. Will improve quality of internet noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot being the exception, most blog/forum posts are junk.
    It costs humans millions of man-hours sifting through this trash heap to find useful or interesting tidbits of information.
    Forcing folks to use their real names when publishing information to a public forum is bound to increase the quality of information there.
    Even a small increase in information quality would mean an immense worldwide time savings.

    On a different note, keep in mind that "Common Sense" by Thomas Paine (published anonymously) was not printed in a large, established newspaper - it was independently printed and distributed.
    Folks are still free to publish anonymous opinions today (with paper and on the internet) - you just won't be able to do so on battle.net forums.

  150. Re:trying to imagine... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    If I'm posting about my problems with class balance in WoW, the class that I play is of interest.

    True, but so would your level of experience playing that class, in each type of gameplay offered, as well as any experience you may have playing the class you're QQ'ing about.

    None of this would be reflected in the nomination of a single character.

  151. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  152. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  153. Re:trying to imagine... by nschubach · · Score: 2, Informative

    My guess is that they will link it to a name on a Credit Card account.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  154. Re:trying to imagine... by drzhivago · · Score: 1

    Yep! But the inverse is also true. Other websites will be very happy to have all the traffic that's no longer going into Blizzard's forums.

  155. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  156. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  157. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  158. Re:trying to imagine... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

    That's kinda snarky coming from someone laying in a morgue drawer wearing nothing but a toe tag... Mr. Doe...

    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  159. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I sympathize with Blizzard's desire to want to make the forums a more constructive and friendly environment,

    I haven't been on the Blizzard Fora for years, but my last experience of it was a few years up until they finally killed of the last forum for Diablo I.
    I can tell you exactly what Blizzard could have done to make that forum more constructive and friendly. They could have actually dropped in once in a while to moderate it.

    There was a group of a dozen or so forum regulars who had been there essentially since forever. These people were a very close-knit group, and esentially saw the forum as their own.
    Anyone new who dropped in and said, well, really anything was immediately treated to a spiel about how the regulars expected them to behave (over and above the actual rules of the forum), and woe betide aynone who said anything which the regs disapproved of, or told them what they though of 'extra' rules.
    Anyone who dared to argue with them, or the accepted wisdom of the forum, or tell them that they were wrong would bring the whole wrath of the pack down on themselves. They would then usually be accused of being 'defensive'.
    In short, the forum regulars were self-appointed moderators, who used a general barrage of unpleasantness to drive out anyone who they disapproved of. Most newcomers quickly realised that it wasn't worth hanging around and were never heard from again. Personally I hung around just to prove that I wasn't going to be beaten by them.

    Now, the point of my telling that story is this. That could have been snuffed out YEARS before the forum was finally killed if a few Blizzard people had occassionally dropped in and swiftly dealt with the people who were under the false impression that it was their forum. A user with a blue username saying "This is our forum, not yours. You do not own, run or moderate it; please stop acting like you do" sufficiently early on might have stopped it entirely and prevented these people from getting too big for their boots.

    --
    FGD 135
  160. Penny Arcade wasn't alone..... by malakai · · Score: 1

    Talk about a precog:
    The Noob Comic

  161. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    It was required, though the job was worth it.

    That said, I'm pretty certain that they (or any other investigator) could find any and all screen names I ever used, so it doesn't really matter if I volunteer them or not.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  162. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by KarlIsNotMyName · · Score: 1

    Very true, that's why some of us take great care in using a different name for every single website they post on. Google my nick and see what you end up with.

    --
    We are all God's parents.
  163. If all else fails, then boycott and tell them why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, so we're all making a big stink about how Blizzard is going to release our personal information...

    But think of it from Blizzard's perspective: Only a fraction of WoW players post on the forums, of those only another fraction are against it, and even then only a fraction will quit WoW entirely over this debacle.

    And therein lies the sad truth: If Blizzard makes more money from monetizing your personal information than it loses from people quitting the game in disgust, then it's a win for Blizzard. I'm sure they even did a cost-benefit analysis beforehand and determined that.

    And they know you're hooked, just look at some of the above posts who say "I just won't post." Well, as long as it doesn't hit them in the pocket, they won't care!

    I play the game off and on from time to time, and I'm not going to renew my subscription. I'm not going back for Cataclysm. Even if I don't post on the forums, this is still a travesty. I just hope the rest of you have the dignity to quit.

    I'm not getting my hopes up, though.

  164. stackoverflow by kikito · · Score: 1

    Seriously, Blizzard could copy StackOverflow's reputation model for moderation. All these problems would evaporate without needing a RealID

  165. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily. I've seen many trolls silenced purely through removing that veil of anonymity. Generally, a troll wants to feed their ego, which is hard to do when people are laughing at your MySpace photos.

    That said, I think Blizzard's handling of minor's real names is unfortunate, here. It seems this will be rolled out before there are protections in place, which I think is a big no-no. Either the parental controls should be there first, or all minors should be blocked until that time.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  166. Long Story short... by thatbloke83 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Blizzard just lost my subscription. I WAS going to re-activate my WoW account and purchase Cataclysm when it came out. Unless these changes are reversed, I'm not going to do that. I do NOT want my real name associated and easily searchable by my in-game actions. I might as well name all my in-game characters as my real name and be done with it, because that is what will happen anyway.

    1. Re:Long Story short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I congratulate you on not resubscribing to WoW. But please, make sure you let Blizzard know why you did.

      Many of these posters think that merely not posting will make Blizzard reconsider, but unless Blizzard gets hit seriously in the pocket book, then it will continue as planned.

      You have the dignity to not be a WoW junkie even when Blizzard ignores its customer base and puts it at risk.

      I hope more like you do that.

    2. Re:Long Story short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop talking to yourself cuntwad.

    3. Re:Long Story short... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      ...and, as if by magic, a WoW junkie appears.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  167. Re:trying to imagine... by genner · · Score: 1

    Yep! But the inverse is also true. Other websites will be very happy to have all the traffic that's no longer going into Blizzard's forums.

    That's the webmaster's fault says the network engineer.

  168. Re:trying to imagine... by genner · · Score: 1

    Does Blizzard not have another tech support pathway? E-mail or private support requests? I don't play any Blizzard games, so I don't know.

    If that's the case, then it's an issue with Blizzard's implementation. In general, I don't think there's any problem with linking an official forum account to a real name.

    I always believed that having their tech support run through a forum was brillant. People generally have the same problems and are given the same solutions. If they're all in a forum the semi-compitent people can simply search the forum for an answer once it's been answered once, instead of having a 100 people all email in with the same question.

  169. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you CAN be anonymous if you're not stupid. What's required is to use a completely fake persona that is seperate on *every* site.

    (Therein is the issue - one must never use the same handle twice).

    The issue I have is that a minor mistake by a 12 year old can mean that; years later; the 24 year old will not get employed, ever, due to a post on a forum. See, there are disporportinate repercussions, which is why anonyminity is required.

    Also, for many people it's not 'if' they get they get stalked, or even 'when', but 'how often'.

  170. Re:You are not now nor have you ever been anonymou by Talizorah · · Score: 1

    I've played on Team Interrobang's servers before. =) It is a good community; which, I suppose, means that you are a good Admin!

    I agree that people are more likely to act with greater reservation and self-moderation in the absence of anonymity. However, I disagree that the sudden and immediate sacrifice of anonymity is enough to necessitate such meaningful change in so large and established a population. The reason I find this conclusion so unsatisfying is that it assumes everyone in the community entertains the same definition and value of privacy; which is, in my opinion, unrealistic.

    To get an idea of how the worst users might act under this new Real ID system, we only need to look at how many of them act under the present system, while divulging identifying information such as their "Internet alias" or WoW character name(s). Griefers who are determined enough to cause grief for others typically entertain little concern for the possibility of facing recriminations in the future. Normal users on the other hand might refrain from posting on forums altogether out of fear that that they would become the victim of personally-directed attacks.

    Under this new systems, griefers would possess knowledge of the average user's identity. They have the tools and motivation to make hurtful use of that knowledge. That is what unnerves a lot of people, including myself.

  171. Re:trying to imagine... by yuhong · · Score: 1

    Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    On that matter, see this thread: http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1653880&cid=32227342

  172. Re:trying to imagine... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Yeah till some blizzard gaming brat gets abducted, then the parents will associate it with his real name on a blizzard forum and call every sleazy lawyer from here to Mexico to molest Blizzard.

    Realistically this is a security problem and Blizzard will be humiliated till they quit smoking crack and change the policy. Works for Microsoft, sorta. Bound to work on Blizzard.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  173. Re:trying to imagine... by alienzed · · Score: 1

    Just because you are female, doesn't mean you are attractive.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  174. Re:trying to imagine... by flyneye · · Score: 1

    Well, they say so on line anyway...
          How's that Aerosmith song go?

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  175. Re:trying to imagine... by thewb005 · · Score: 1

    My wife is an outspoken female WoW player. She has never once received a "plz cyber" request and is generally treated much better then anonymous males. I believe you are playing on a bad server (PvP), try a more friendly server and faction if you'd like to be accepted as a female.

  176. eeeh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that this will be a good thing. WoW's only problem that I can see at the moment, apart from poor GMs, is that kids are making accounts to troll and to steal things. Having real names on the forum won't stop this, but it may discourage it. No one doing the dodgy wants anyone to know their real names.

    On the downside, females on the game tend to get trolled, and using real names will show people that I am female. :\

  177. Re:trying to imagine... by RJFerret · · Score: 1

    Which breaks the cardinal rule of the Internet, never give out your surname, which leads to your home address, phone, etc.

    It used to be that was the first thing taught people when they first "went online", then online shopping got people used to giving out real credentials (albeit protected by stringent privacy policies).

    Now?

    I once easily connected someones identity from an online profile quote, to a defunct game's forums (matching quote), which led to another forum with real name email shown, which led to their home address/phone, and another quick search of their employment with likely places nearby, their workplace, opposite gender photo, etc.

  178. I do a little bit of data analysis @ work, and I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really have to agree.

    Small bits of data uniquely identify you w/o a name, address, or region. There's been a story on here about how your FF/ IE/ Chrome / Safari history can uniquely ID you. It's not even difficult.

    It's hard for me to describe, but It's like a jigsaw puzzle. The data elements all line up to form a picture for the data miner. The picture is based on what they are lookingfor.

    Mining for taste in clothes? sure. Music style? in a heartbeat,

    Mining for identity, cake (not the lie cake, the real good sweet tasting kind). That picture will look like either your country, your rough geographic location, your state, county, city, your family, your neighborhood, your imediate family, or your face.

    Someone who would look at lots of data, can, just by scrolling through a spreadsheet, see paterns emerge, see trends, etc... Even if you fit a patern that isn't unique... say 300 people across america, there are ways to break that down to scary levels. Hell, I'm sure my hx at /. could point RIGHT TO ME. It wouldn't be hard, 1/2 of us own our names as domain names. Just lookup Whois: Anonymous Coward. Poof ID found.

    The reason I normally do post info like my name is that with so many people posting their own data, it creates an ocean to sort through. If my boss wants to search all my tweets of when I went to the bathroom to find out that I slept w/ his wife, then so be it! By the time he gets it, I'll have hit it 6, maybe 8 more times! If he wants to sorth through all my inocuous R/C plane / Vacation pictures to find the one of his wife naked... well that wont' be that hard it's labeled "bosses naked wife" but you know what I mean...

    Flood them w/ Data, and they'll develop an algorythm. Flood them w/ more data, and they'll keep developing algorythms, but not really looking at the data. I.E. if you wanted statistics on me, AC, Search for anonymous coward, and you get a 1,960,000 (ish) hits on google, but while my face may be included, you'll not see the individual tree where a forest surrounds it.

  179. Re:Using a fake name has downsides, implausibiliti by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    To be honest i think they're sick of maintaining the forums, so instead of shutting them down they'll make it so noone will want to troll and half the current posters will stop posting

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  180. Say hi to Micah Whipple, Blizzard employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hi, Micah Whipple!

    "To alleviate people's concerns, Blizzard employee Bashiok decided to say his real name on the forums, his real name is Micah Whipple Address: 473 Avenue B Lakeport, CA 95453-6032 Phone Number: (707) 263-0190 Age: 28 Family: Kimberly K Whipple, age: 54 Jason Stephen Whipple, age 34".

    1. Re:Say hi to Micah Whipple, Blizzard employee by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      bwahahahaha.

      hoo boy, is he gonna get a lot of junk mail, crank calls, and general misery from this.

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  181. Is posting on Blizzard forums required to play? by kindbud · · Score: 1

    It's been years since I played WoW (or Diablo, or Starcraft, or any other Battle.net game). So bring me up to date: is participation on the Blizzard forums required in any fashion to play the game? For example, must you use the forum to raise a support request? Is interaction of any kind with the forum required to enjoy all that a Blizzard game has to offer?

    If not, then I don't see what the problem is. Don't want to use your real name, don't post on the forums.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:Is posting on Blizzard forums required to play? by seebs · · Score: 1

      If you call or email support or customer service, you're usually directed to the forums. So, yes, you need to use the forums for technical support.

      The forums have also historically been the best place to ask questions about game mechanics, but most of the people who are expert enough to give useful answers are people who don't want to post under their real names, so the forums just stopped being nearly as important as they used to be.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    2. Re:Is posting on Blizzard forums required to play? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you do not *need* to use the support forum(s) to raise a request. However, by all accounts it is *much* faster than phone/email.

      In terms of non-tech-support forums, no it is not required that one contribute to them to enjoy the game proper. And indeed, I see much (most?) of the forum community adopting the role of read-only until some non-blizzard-orchestrated forums spring up to fill the writer void.

  182. Re:trying to imagine... by pknoll · · Score: 1

    Another example of a game using real names is iRacing, though real names are used throughout the game, instead of just on the forums. Again, the idea is to discourage anti-social behavior (intentional wrecking, profanity, etc), and this is part of their aggressive policing against griefers. In this case, such a prevention is especially necessary for a racing game of this type. I don't frequent the Blizzard forums, so I'm not sure if there are enough douchebags there to justify such measures.

    It's true that iRacing uses real names (I play both iRacing and WoW), but one significant difference here is that you know that going in to iRacing - you never have had a pseudonym for it. For Starcraft 2, the same is true - the game isn't out yet, and you're being made aware that the official forums will not be anonymous. But World of Warcraft is a different story; if they do in fact apply these changes to the official forums, it's changing how they've worked for the past five years.

    I think the reactions here are overblown, however. RealID is 100% opt-in in the game itself, where it replaces an avatar's name on your friends list with their real name. You have to accept an invitation from someone to exchange RealID information.

    As for the forums, I think posting under your real name might just have the effect they're after - people being a little more thoughtful about the words they're using to discuss what happens in a game. It certainly works for iRacing.

  183. Anonymous has nothing to do with a name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see no reason to expect this to improve civility of discourse, and it has many downsides that have been posted. The reason of course is that to many posting on a large forum is anonymous feeling regardless of the name they use. Why do some fans act like A-holes at big sports events? Why do people pick their noses openly while driving down the freeway? It's not because they are truely anonymous, it's because they figure they will never see the witnesses of their actions again and don't give a crap what those witnesses see anyway.

    Posted as AC, of course

  184. Lucky for you your real name is "Mr. 69" by axl917 · · Score: 1

    You dodged a bullet there. :)

    1. Re:Lucky for you your real name is "Mr. 69" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      It's a shame what happened to Tiny68 though.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  185. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh god, you think YOU'RE upset? I'm a hot, constantly naked, supermodel lesbian nymphomaniac and now that's going to be right under my name on the forums too.

  186. The guys at Blizzard don't read thenoobcomic.com by recrudescence · · Score: 1
  187. Re:trying to imagine... by Restil · · Score: 1

    Why shouldn't I seperate my online persona(s) from my real life identity? What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here? I make it a point to avoid any forum identity that could be easliy traced back to my real name, because stuff comes back to haunt you. Do you really want somehting you said 20 years ago in some gaming forum to come up in a job interview?

    It's remarkably easy to not say something that will hurt you in the future. Nobody in the future will ever care that you played the game, or had a vested interest in it, or participated in guild wars, or posted various gameplay techniques, or making any in-character or relevant comments related to the game. They might, however, consider racist, overtly profane, or harassing comments... you know, the ones that say what type of person YOU are, to be relevant to how they might wish to relate to you in the future. If you do find your job prospects to be negatively affected because of a previous inability to act civilized, you have nobody to blame but yourself.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  188. Too bad for me by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    They simply will not believe that Quiet Desperation is my real name. I invited them out to the Desperation compound to meet the rest of my family- Blind, Financial, Final and Raging- but to no avail.

  189. Re:trying to imagine... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    That said, I've given my screen name which I've used for the last decade as part of a background check for an interview, so I'm well aware of the issue.

    Uh, isn't giving out a screen name if you think you've said stupid stuff, kind of uh, well, a bad thing to be doing? :)

  190. robots.txt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems like Blizzard could deflect the main criticism of alot of you if it just didn't allow search engines to crawl its forums. I wonder if they even considered that.

  191. It's probably only a small consoloation but... by Ceseuron · · Score: 1

    ...According to Blizzard's Real ID page:

    "Real ID is a completely voluntary and optional level of identity that keeps players connected across all of Battle.net."

          Unless Blizzard decides to make the Real ID "feature" mandatory for all account holders, one would simply not post on the forums if they didn't want their real names to be used.

            Of course, don't mistake this as my approval of Blizzard's change in policy for their forums. I think the concept of requiring real names to be used on their forums is breathtakingly stupid. While requiring the use of real names may silence the majority of the forum trolls out there, it just gives the more mentally unstable ones access to real names that could be used to "troll" someone in real life.

  192. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not like you're going to be walking around Azeroth with a 'lol i has bewbz' sticker slapped across your forehead.

    Be resonable, a simple dose of common sense should apply:
    - Don't make Real ID friends with 12 year olds. Only friend people you know.
    - If you post on the forums, don't _turn on_ the setting that displays your main character name along with your real name.
    - Don't make Real ID friends with 12 year olds. Only friend people you know.

    Much of the same concerns about these features can be applied to just about any social networking site on the web. If you friend the wrong person on facebook for example you're exposing a lot more of yourself to them than your real name.

    Blizzard have now warned you this is coming, if you want your identity kept secret:
    - then simply ignore the realid system
    - continue only adding 'characters' to your friends list, if you wish
    - and don't post on the WoW or SC2 forums.

  193. Re:trying to imagine... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Hm... lawsuit waiting to happen? Or perhaps it's time to start writing up some complaints to the FTC about Blizzard's reprehensible privacy practices...

    Demanding your customers make their personally identifiable information public to participate, geeze.

  194. How will they know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How will they know that my real name isn't Wernot Questioniort

  195. Re:trying to imagine... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Yes... but I think it will only take one case of the right RP'er taking their beef into real life, for a lawsuit to wind up filed against blizzard for publishing their identity, and not allowing them to participate anonymously, despite the risks to them.

    Surely blizzard has the ability to see the risk, a duty to their customers, to take reasonable measures to protect them from that risk, and a reasonable person can see that most internet forums allow for anonymity and that is a minimal expected protection.

  196. Re:trying to imagine... by mysidia · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they'll come up with a brilliant solution. People under the age of 13 aren't allowed to use the forums.

    People 13-18 must provide proof of parents' consent, standard disclaimer EULA, describing the risks, etc...

    Remember, Blizzard's one of the companies who has actually had their EULA found enforceable in court based on a click through

    I am sure (big company-favoring) binding corporation will be in there somewhere.

  197. It doesn't actually require your name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really doesn't require a real name. I lied on the Battle.net account so that my friend and I would have the same last name so we could transfer characters between accounts. It only shows the 'real' name that you put in, but because I didn't put in my actual last name, I remain anonymous.

  198. OMFG by cloakedpegasus · · Score: 1

    Now I can see if there are any celebrities who are wow nerds. Mila Kunis anyone?

  199. Re:trying to imagine... by cloakedpegasus · · Score: 1

    If you dont have a problem with it, show us. Use your real name here on Slashdot.

  200. Worst idea of all time by scdeimos · · Score: 1
    What could Blizzard big-wigs be thinking by this move? Could you imagine the outcry of "not fair" and "privacy" complaints by Blizzard employees if they were sent the following letter...

    Dear Blizzard Employee,
    In response to Blizzard's policy of publishing all users full names in their Battle.net forums, we here at the IRS are pleased to announce that we are changing our privacy policy. As of now, we will be publishing the full name, date of birth, social security number, residential and postal address, taxable income and phone number of every Blizzard employee and their relatives on our web site's front page.
    We don't consider this will impact your lives in any way, and no amount of complaining about it will change our minds.
    Thank you and kind regards,
    DG IRS

    Sorry, I don't have a car analogy. And no, I'm not a Blizzard user.

  201. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. The front two pages explaining how lying on the forms carries a risk of jail time is quite convincing to disclose the information.

  202. Re:trying to imagine... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    I've known a man doing #1 using a voice modification program passing for female for about 3 years to other players.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  203. Re:trying to imagine... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    That's weird. I'm a guy, all my characters are female, but I think I've had that happen to me once in the past 5 years, and that was on a low-level character in Goldshire.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  204. Just more of the typical sensationalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that has become the norm here at /. . As the story fails to mention, you are free to provide any name you please when you create your account.

    Blizzard does not know, nor do they likely care, that my name is not, in fact, "Dreidel Rosenberg".

  205. It won't affect postings. by Nullifier · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, but it is evidenced by Mashable posts on Facebook that nobody really cares whether they are attached to a comment by full name or not. People cuss, call each other names, and generally act like the trolls I'm sure they are in other places.

  206. NOT Optional. by Enos+Shenk · · Score: 1

    Fun fact, the WoW API has an interesting security hole that's just being toyed around with since this was announced. The new RealID BNSendWhisper() function can be used to send a private message to yourself, whether you use the RealID features or not. This results in your real name being pulled from the server.

      Not too big a deal, until you consider any UI addon (And WoW has hordes of them) can do this. Here's a bit of script you can paste into your chat in-game to demonstrate: /script for i=1,100 do if BNIsSelf(i) then BNSendWhisper(i,"Whisper from myself"); break end end

      Just a simple matter to store the returned name with an event handler and pass it along via whisper to another player.

      Sure, anyone adding something like that to a UI addon would find their addon blacklisted off most of the UI websites, but it's definately possible.

    --
    Just say NO to stinky cheese
  207. Let's pass around the hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is a good solid competition for people willing to change their names.

    The winner gets a lifetime blizzard subscription!

  208. Re:trying to imagine... by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

    yes, as I use the same name here as I do in game... oh wait, no I don't.

    Much like the mighty monarch, your words are razor sharp and laced with venom!

    --
    "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  209. Re:trying to imagine... by AlamedaStone · · Score: 1

    I've known plenty of girls who play MMOs who don't really have that big of a problem with it.

    I've known plenty of guys that get called fags in online games who don't really have a problem with it. But I do.

    I'm with some of the other posts I've read: I'm getting Cata, maybe even collector's edition, but I wouldn't set foot in the forums if they wanted to make me use my real name. This is a real dick move.

    --
    "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  210. Re:trying to imagine... by nacturation · · Score: 1

    But that's still backwards - my forum persona should be associated with my in-game character, not my real ID. Imagine for a moment this was some sort of role-playing game ... nah, too much of a stretch.

    No wait, let's actually imagine that:

    [SkullManger, the level 80 Paladin, just returned from his quest to deliver 20 hearts of the magical glorp beasts to the Wizard for his spell. He ventures into his hut where his wife, FlowerYoga, is crafting a fine meal.]

    SkullManger: "What's for dinner honey?"

    FlowerYoga: "Your favorite, dear... breaded and fried Murloc."

    SkullManger: "Awesome, I can't wait. In the meantime, I've been meaning to look into what other people in the community are doing. Could you hand me my Dell Studio XPS 16 laptop and my Blizzard keyfob?"

    FlowerYoga: "Sure, here you go!"

    SkullManger: "Thanks, doll! Now what was my Battle.NET password again... ah, right."

    [SkullManger uses Firefox 3.6 to deftly navigate the forum, HTTP packets flying into his computer while he types on the beautiful 16 inch glossy display.]

    SkullManger: "I can't believe someone wrote this. I'm going to have to reply."

    [SkullManger composes a beautiful reply using the forum software's fckedit editor, ensuring that he properly quotes the previous post. He often doesn't use the formatting buttons as Paladins are known for their HTML crafting skills. He stares in bewilderment at the fact that the Horde is somehow able to also participate in the forum and that he can read what they have typed. He begins to wonder whether the Horde auction house stocks Dell laptops or if they carry Lenovo, HP, or various other brands. His mind drifts and he starts wondering whether there are mounts that will take him to China or Taiwan.]

    Yeah... or maybe the role-playing should stay within the game.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  211. Re:trying to imagine... by bonch · · Score: 1

    If you're concerned about maturity, the official WoW forums should be the last place on your mind.

  212. I was trying to work out who or what Blizzard were by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    ... then I realised that they're only a game company, and I moved on to something more interesting.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  213. Re:And what about people whose name does not confo by mjwx · · Score: 1

    I know someone who has no last name. Legally. When he encounters online forms that require it, he has traditionally entered his profession when it is inconsequential

    The law is, at least in all nations I've been to is to enter your single name into both boxes, for example if your name is "Yatie" you enter it as:
    First Name(s): Yatie
    Last Name(s): Yatie

    Yes, some cultures have more then one last name, I personally know a Sri Lankan with 5 and the last one is "the great".

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  214. This whole Real ID thing has been botched. by Eskarel · · Score: 1

    The RealID chat feature uses your real name too, which would be fine(after all you're only supposed to be setting that feature up for people you actually know and trust), but in addition to exposing your real name to the person you trust, it also exposes it to everyone they trust, which is a whole different kettle of fish.

    What they've really needed to do all along was to set up posting in the forums/cross game chat via your account name(which is an e-mail address now), as opposed to character names(which is what causes all the stupid trolling), but they've gotten everyone so paranoid about their account details being used for account theft that it's just gotten ludicrous.

  215. Re:And what about people whose name does not confo by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Prince can just WoW under either his birth name or a pseudonym. Besides, I doubt his Purpleness would want to divulge his real identity anyway.

    Problem already solved.
    Last name: Prince
    First Name: Artist Formerly Known As

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  216. Flamewar greater than Slashdot proportions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Number of posts in slashdot ~ 650. Number of posts in Blizzard US forums ~16,650.

  217. Re:trying to imagine... by lgw · · Score: 1

    Before UO, things were different. It was common to assume your RP persona in any interaction in the game - in forums, game lobbies, etc. Never breaking character was part of the fun of online role playing. Heck, the common example you'll still find today is women who adopt a male persona when gaming, to avoid the obvious hassles (that seems to be a particular problem with WoW). Even if you don't go in for that, the forums are part of the game, to me - they certainly have no relation to real life, or anything outside the game.

    And the thing is, lots of people RP in WoW in a very broad sense - their online persona is quite different from their in-person persona. Even though they have no interest in pretending to be living in a medieval fantasy, they really enjoy being a competent hard-ass who doesn't take shit from anyone - and that's half the appeal of MMOs, really.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  218. the irony by kh2ouija · · Score: 1

    ...is that many people create level 1 characters to post on forums in order to not disclose the identity of their level 80, let alone their real life identity.

  219. Re:trying to imagine... by ztransform · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Isn't that the case in society?

    You don't assault people. You don't toss your refuse anywhere you choose. You don't drive dangerously. You don't take public transport with your phone playing mp3s through the tinny speaker.

    Why? You have something to lose. Courts know this. If you get caught for a minor infraction you'll lose money, time, freedom.

    There are three classes of people who don't care and break whatever rules they want:
    - children, who are immune from the law
    - very poor, who have nothing to lose
    - illegal immigrants, who demonstrate their disregard of the law every day they fail to leave and re-enter the country legally

    All anonymity does is give those with something to lose a level playing ground with those who have nothing to lose.

  220. These Decisions Are Only Ever About Money by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    If you have to use your real name on Blizzard's forums then it can only be because it makes your identity more easily trackable for the purposes of targeted advertising - I suspect some Blizzard execs are getting some serious back-handers from ad companies as a result.

    Fortunately, in my particular case, I tried WoW for about a month and it just didn't appeal to me. I do like original Starcraft but I won't compromise the control over my personal identity and information for any company, least of all for one that ultimately *just makes computer games".

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  221. Re:trying to imagine... by Zixia · · Score: 1

    Why shouldn't I seperate my online persona(s) from my real life identity? What problem is Blizzard trying to solve here?

    The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory. People are less likely to act like an asshole if they don't have anonymity to hide behind. The only people who will be idiots any more are those who are idiots already.

    But what is 'anonymity' on the internet anyway? If someone is thousands of miles away in a different country and I am never likely to meet them, see them, or even bump in to them in a different on-line game, how does knowing their real name affect their idea of personal responsibility?

    I fear the Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory will still apply when real names are used, because most people will remain effectively anonymous.

  222. comic created on this topic by jarkus4 · · Score: 1
  223. What can you get from full names? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a blog about the full names of Blizzard employees, which (at least) they will also be required to use when posting in their company forums.

    http://asnowstormbyanyothername.blogspot.com/

  224. Re:trying to imagine... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    You can call or email Tech Support. And also Tech issues are not something that's likely to come back and haunt you:

    "I see here that 5 yeards ago you trolled the Tech forum because of a bug arising after a recent patch. You had the gall to ask someone to investigate it?"

  225. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    I use Bakkster because it practically is my name. My friends use it frequently in IRL conversations.

    If you can't search and find my real name, your Google-fu is very weak indeed.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  226. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    Uh, isn't giving out a screen name if you think you've said stupid stuff, kind of uh, well, a bad thing to be doing? :)

    Stupid yes, but nothing unacceptably so. If saying something obnoxious when I was a teenager is reason to disqualify me from a job, I don't want that job anyway.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  227. The end of the keyboard by Issarlk · · Score: 1

    Step 1: enforce real name on forum posts Step 2: Observe that the forums are not used anymore. Step 3: Remove useless forums. Blizard doesn't like people typing on keyboards. I figure they'll remove chat from Wow soon. And replace it with a few hotkeyed messages: "#PLAYER_CLASS# LFG!" "Heal plz!" "WTF! NOOB!" ...

  228. kiss my.. by Kathars1s · · Score: 1

    As if blizzard has any need or right to know my real first and last name. More importantly my last name. Guess I won't be posting on the forums. Or buying starcraft. Their loss.

  229. It's time to play...login roulette! by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Battle.net! Please enter your REAL name:

    JOHN SMITH

    I'm sorry, that name is already in use. Please enter your REAL name:

    SIGH

  230. Re:trying to imagine... by cnastase · · Score: 1

    The Greater Internet Fuckwad Theory. People are less likely to act like an asshole if they don't have anonymity to hide behind. The only people who will be idiots any more are those who are idiots already.

    I'm not in the business of acting like an idiot on any given forum although I am sometimes inclined to troll. My problem is that I do NOT want a page full of WoW forum links on a Google search for my name.

    In that case, either:

    1) Don't be a jack-ass on the Blizzard forums.

    2) Don't use the Blizzard forums.

    I'll probably do the latter.

    --
    Born to raise hell.
  231. reminds me of this comic strip by He+who+knows · · Score: 1
  232. Re:trying to imagine... by ifrag · · Score: 1

    but the gaming world has moved on somewhat since Starcraft first came out

    In some areas yes, the gaming world has progressed. But as far as RTS is concerned, there has been very little real advancement, and most of that was with their own Warcraft III. There have only been a small handful of good, balanced, and competitive online RTS games since SC / WC3. And even fewer of those have brought anything new to the table. Take a look at some recent games such as DoW 2 and C&C 4. The basic core of RTS, base building, has been completely removed. This is not progress in my opinion. I have not found even one other RTS that I've been able to stay interested with the online play as long as SC & WC3.

    From my experience in the SC2 Beta, there is nothing in there that is so amazing that the whole RTS genre will be reinvented or anything, but there are incremental improvements there, and at least they are not moving backwards like the rest of the industry by scrapping the essential base construction and resource gathering. For Blizzard it looks pretty much like business as usual, take the best ideas and improve them enough that it stands a little taller than everything else. A lot of their recent decisions are questionable at best, but there is very little in the genre to compete with even now.

    --
    Fear is the mind killer.
  233. Re:trying to imagine... by cnastase · · Score: 1

    *wink* *wink* *nudge* *nudge*

    I'm kidding, but you bring up a very serious point that I've witnessed over and over again. Someone at Blizzard did not think this one through at all.

    I think the only positive thing Blizzard will get from this is less traffic on their official forums.

    Somewhere a network engineer is claiming a victory. The forums are much more stable and the bandwidth costs have gone down. Hooray!

    Network engineers don't do servers. They do care about bandwidth, true, but take my word for it, I'm happier when I have a reason to shutdown a customer's cunnection than just not having traffic. No traffic - > no customers -> no paycheck. We like customers that don't have problems and pay their bill ontime.

    --
    Born to raise hell.
  234. words from a mod... by butterflysrage · · Score: 1

    I moderate several forums, many of which have been targets for various semi-organized troll groups... I have seen flames FAR worse than anything bliz has had to deal with... we killed off those sprees of spam, pron, hate, and general jerk-wad-ness by doing a very simple thing...

    we asked the community for new mods. In one case we had to triple the number of active mods to deal with the issue, but shortly after the troublemakers realized that with the raw number of people watching the threads their crap wouldn't stay up long, and they would get the boot in short order.

    problem solved.

    --
    the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
  235. I've got an easy solution for this by Satanboy · · Score: 1

    Stop using blizzard's forums!

  236. Its a MMO"RPG" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    say it slowly blizzard, role .. playing... game. They are so failing it hurts to watch it. Perhaps they have gotten too big to not fail.

  237. Re:trying to imagine... by ShadowDragoonFTW · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's optional. Originally, your forum name would associate with a character of yours. Any one of your choosing. That leads to people creating level 1 characters just to troll and be assholes in general. So, in order to circumvent that, Blizzard did this. HOWEVER, while it's not mandatory, you may still link your forum account to a character... as well as your real ID. So, either just your real name, or your real name AND a character. I kinda like it this way, actually.

  238. Re:trying to imagine... by ShadowDragoonFTW · · Score: 1

    Which is kind of a fix in and of itself. If you have a problem, just do a search for it on the forum. Chances are, someone else will have run into it in the past. Barring that, you can submit a service request in-game, and I believe there are ways you can contact Blizzard through their support page on their main website, which is done via e-mail. There are options out there. Just gotta use your head.

  239. Re:trying to imagine... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I believe that people I hear on vent with female-sounding voices are women, as are females I know in real life.

    You can download dozens of programs that will shift the pitch of your voice without changing the duration of the speech.

    But sure, there are women who play computer games. I was just joshing you, Snowman.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  240. aimost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And people are more likely to be pricks when they know it could come back and bite someone else.

  241. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been running a web forum since 2005 which has a few thousand members; nothing like Blizzard but a good sample study. I implemented the same real first and last name policy in 2007. My problems with trolling immediately and completely disappeared. I have no trolls whatsoever. Meanwhile, the forum has continued to see steady growth and is frequently recommended based on its civility in my field. Even more importantly, many people who I knew to be trolls before the name policy went into effect basically came out into the open and became productive, civil, and interesting participants in the forum. Trolls are usually just bored to start with and then it feeds. Many of them are interesting people, if you can get them to connect. Using real names had that effect; it was the best decision I ever made. Blizzard may lose some traffic over this at first but ultimately this is a very good idea with proven results.

  242. blizzards staff has a knob on the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank god my parents named me Beelzebub deathclaw.. should fit right in with those wow geeks!

  243. Thank You by Idgarad · · Score: 1

    I've posted on this before but when they went live with the RSS log I made some good money mining those activity logs for "File and Fire" goods. That is the crap your employer archives about you and when they need an excuse to fire you; they dig it out and show you to the door.

    It was easy to correlate Killing Boss X to if those telecommuters were playing WoW when they should have been working. We'd get excuses "that wasn't me that was someone using my account.... " and in some cases Blizzard ended up getting involved. Mental Note: When you VPN into work we can see what IP address you are coming from. The connection log Blizzard keeps also indicates which IP address you are on... as well as the MAC address as part of the data link layer. So telling me it was someone else playing doesn't explain the fact it was the same IP and MAC address and pulling your IM log shows periodic and errante WASD typoes in your IM pop ups. Oh and the fact you accidentally responded to a popup from HR with '/random 100' and 'L2P N00b' were kind of dead giveaways. I had 6 months of WoW paid for by a client so I could monitor a list of character names on specific servers to track play times.

    I would not be suprised if this is actually a direct reponse by ActiBliz to expedite those types of situations so they don't want to deal with the hassle of the suits.

    --
    -=[Idgarad]=- I Am A Savage In A Brave New World!
  244. Re:trying to imagine... by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

    Which is kind of a fix in and of itself. If you have a problem, just do a search for it on the forum. Chances are, someone else will have run into it in the past. Barring that, you can submit a service request in-game, and I believe there are ways you can contact Blizzard through their support page on their main website, which is done via e-mail. There are options out there. Just gotta use your head.

    ... except of course, that the chilling effect real names will have may stop a lot of others from posting those useful questions/answers, thus making your suggested technique much less useful.

    --

    The Digital Sorceress
  245. Re:trying to imagine... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    While it's a cute and funny Panny-arcade strip, it's not true.

    Do you think people would behave better when they drive if their real name was on their car? No. However retaliation for precieved slight would certainly increase.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  246. Re:trying to imagine... by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Too things:
    Most '13 year old dickheades" are in the 20's.

    Second, for those that aren't, there will be a record of them being a dickhead when they where 13. This is a problem. While I would like to think that after a while people would no longer concider the behaviour of an applicant when they where 13. As it turns out, people's ability to rationalize conflicting ideas seems to mean they excuse away there own dickish bahaviours while not excusing anyone elses dickish behaviour.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  247. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Much the same for me.

    I've got my Nomme de Net, also I have an "SCA Name" that almost all of my real friends call me, and I've got a legal name which family and co-workers call me.

    I've also got a bunch of toons on WoW, and due to my peculiarities of naming conventions, you if you know one of me, you can figure out any of my alts.

    Regardless of which identity I'm using, I treat them all as equal value in terms of reputation, but they do live in different circles of influence. For one big instance, I don't necessarily mind if folks know I'm a lesbian, but I'd prefer not to be wearing a big scarlet L on my face for everyone in WoW or Slashdot to know.

    I don't even particularly mind if you find out my legal name from one of my other identities, but I like that it's a bit harder to find my other identities if all you have is my legal name... It's a question of maintaining what I feel are healthy boundaries. SCA/goth scene/real life friend: Yeah, I'll tell you from the outset that I'm a dyke (as if you couldn't tell). It makes real, in-person SOCIAL interaction a lot more open. However, I prefer NOT to make a deal out of it in my online or my work life because it's not really relevant. (except in cases like this where I'm specifically mentioning it as part of a bigger point). In WoW, my sexual preference is COMPLETELY irrelevant... I'm there to play a friggn game, not deal with immature F**ktards with puerile fantasies and delusions of adequacy.

    Any way, I totally understand where you're coming from. Like a lot of people, I've invested a lot of time and effort in my different identies, and having a slight bit of insulation between them is more of a convenience factor than a necessity. In the end, I'll stand by what I said as any (even Anonymous Coward), but that doesn't mean I want to have my entire life be an open book.

  248. Re:trying to imagine... by shambalagoon · · Score: 1

    This is a long-needed attempt to control the incessant immature infantile troll-fest that is the WoW forums. One can't ask a simple question on there without a chorus of howling idiots attacking you and each other. I long since saw the futility of looking for help there. It's literally one of the worst corners of the internet. If you want to lose all faith in humanity - spend some time there. Honestly.

    This will help. It's a low-attention way to try to shame people into behaving better. It's not the best solution, but it takes the least effort and expense on Blizzard's part, and I understand why they'd do this rather than hire a hundred people to police the forums and then hire a hundred counselors to prevent those first hundred from plunging forks into their eyes or throwing themselves off of cliffs at the end of each work day.

  249. Re:trying to imagine... by Kelsen · · Score: 1

    Yes, they might - and often do. This altered behavior has been demonstrated and observed with people who have vanity tags. While not necessarily their name, drivers are aware that a unique identifier associated only with them is on display.

    It can and does cause drivers to drive differently.


    RFT!!!
    Dave Kelsen
    --
    Children, your performance was miserable. Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less.

  250. Re:trying to imagine... by lgw · · Score: 1

    I don't want me ral name associated with gaming, regardless of how polite I'm being. It can't possibly help my career, and has a risk of hurting it. Also, your comment assumes the person searching is trying to be fair. Sometimes they're not.

    "Give me six lines written by the most honorable of men, and I will find an excuse in them to hang him." - Cardinal Richelieu

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  251. Re:trying to imagine... by lgw · · Score: 1

    This will do little to reduce flaming and trolling, and will drive many mature and cautious people from the forums entirely. You want to know the secret to controlling flames and trolling? Have a lot of active forum moderators, and a "report" button on every displayed post. I've seen forums where people discussed quite emotional issues stay very flame/troll-free thanks to active mods.

    Once you create a culture of civility, offensive posts will get reported right away by users, and the mods can just react to reports without needing to read every post. It's really, really easy, and cheap on the scale of Blizzard.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  252. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    While it's a cute and funny Panny-arcade strip, it's not true.

    Actually, there is research that suggests that under anonymous circumstances, otherwise normal people begin to behave in anti-social ways.
    Article
    Research paper
    Another paper
    One more

    Do you think people would behave better when they drive if their real name was on their car? No. However retaliation for precieved slight would certainly increase.

    The better question to ask is if people drive with less regard because they feel they are unidentifiable. Would you shout at a driver who cut you off if you knew they could hear you and find you? Would you drive around a line of backed up cars and force your way into line if you believed your reputation could be affected?

    As for retaliation, privacy is already a myth. Anyone who wants to retaliate already can with a little bit of investigation. Physical retaliation is still rare, though. Using real names just removes this facade of privacy, making it obvious to those who speak that they can be held responsible and accountable for their actions (as they already can), and thus reinstating the disincentive to behave badly.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  253. This is good information! by REALMAN · · Score: 1

    Now I know what company not to buy games from!

    --
    - A Frog in a pond utters an azure cry. -
  254. Re:trying to imagine... by AftanGustur · · Score: 1
    I think the poster was making a reference to that t will be much more likely that people will track down and kill those they think treated them badly online.

    It will happen, trust me, you stupid little fat gay smelly ugly newbe Orc !!

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  255. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, the Diablo 1 forum was exactly like every other forum or chatroom on the internet?

  256. Re:trying to imagine... by cloakedpegasus · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming you are A.B. then? If you are then I suppose you really don't have a problem with it. As much as my pseudonym is attached to my real identity, I don't need EVERY corner of the internet announcing me. Just like I don't give everyone whom I meet my first and last.

  257. Sheesh by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    It's just a game! If you want real, then look to the online businesses that supply credit, or banking services. They don't get my real name unless they come under certain type businesses, all the rest get a "blow me!" attitude from me, and a fake name, and nickname.

  258. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

    Oh, I don't deny that there are asshats on fora everywhere, but these were particularly bad asshats because they were:

    1. Convinced that it was their forum to run and
    2. Not challenged by Blizzard

    Most asshats appear, disrupt stuff, and cop a swift thrashing with the banstick. But these guys used their asshattery in a combined effort to take the forum for their own, and didn't get any banstick.

    --
    FGD 135
  259. Re:trying to imagine... by AutumnLeaf · · Score: 1

    Nope. I've already been silenced by the stupidity and spam. I wrote off the forums years ago.

  260. well... by WeeBit · · Score: 1

    It's just like em to get the public hooked on their games, and then pull a "realID" on them. Those are popular games so.... The question is... "Will the gamers see through the cracks?" Or will they sit idle, like the facebook users did, and ignore what the consequences were to their ID being totally public?

  261. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    Yup.

    I'm not saying it needs to be announced everywhere, or for no reason. However, when we're talking about social interaction, I think real name can be a reasonable expectation. Think of real-world equivalents: your car has a unique - but anonymized - identifier, while you give first and/or last for most social interactions.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  262. Re:trying to imagine... by Araxen · · Score: 1

    I think the only positive thing Blizzard will get from this is less traffic on their official forums.

    I can only hope that Blizzard will catch on to the outrage of this. I won't stop playing, but I'll stop using their forums. All of those useful posts I've made in the past will no longer continue to happen, including anything I've said that was inflammatory. The good posts I've made outweigh the ones where I put up bounties on people on my faction, trashed someone, etc.

    I'll be posting on Elitist Jerks or some other forum for anything involving my class or endgame content. For discussing realm matters, I just won't post anymore.

    Spoken like a true addict. The only thing to get Blizz to change their minds if you cancel your subscription otherwise they will do nothing.

  263. More importantly, blatant lies all along... by seebs · · Score: 1

    Monday, Blizzard reps were saying "we understand you may not want to use your real name, but the Real ID system is totally optional, use it only with people you know in real life."

    They've said they have been planning the newer announcement for a long time.

    In other words, they lied. Flat out, direct, lies.

    Everyone I know IRL who played WoW on Monday has cancelled their accounts. This is not a coincidence. It is also the only time most of us have ever cancelled even temporarily.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  264. Re:trying to imagine... by genner · · Score: 1

    Which is kind of a fix in and of itself. If you have a problem, just do a search for it on the forum. Chances are, someone else will have run into it in the past. Barring that, you can submit a service request in-game, and I believe there are ways you can contact Blizzard through their support page on their main website, which is done via e-mail. There are options out there. Just gotta use your head.

    ... except of course, that the chilling effect real names will have may stop a lot of others from posting those useful questions/answers, thus making your suggested technique much less useful.

    Exactly why I'm against it. It breaks a perfectly good system.

  265. Re:trying to imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because that would be lying as opposed to protecting one's privacy.

    Regards,
    Ruemere

  266. Re:trying to imagine... by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    ... except of course, that the chilling effect real names will have may stop a lot of others from posting those useful questions/answers, thus making your suggested technique much less useful.

    Exactly why I'm against it. It breaks a perfectly good system.

    In my day, we used FAQs to fix problems. And 'my day' wasn't all that long ago.

    I would say that the best use for a support forum is assistance from other players, before the support team can help you. Of course, you don't need the official forums for this.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  267. 2 days late but this isn't about the forums at all by Sharpsight · · Score: 1

    I wish I was checking /. on Tuesday instead of posting on the WoW forums. As far as I can tell, Slashdot has completely missed the point here.

    The forums have virtually nothing to do with it. Blizzard could delete the forums tomorrow and it wouldn't affect the community much, aside from having no way of talking with developers / tech support / customer support. We'd all happily migrate over to mmo-champion overnight--it's not that big a deal. Forcing real names on the forums to "prevent trolling" is a total red herring. What this is really about is Activision's recent deal with Facebook. Face-Lizzard-Vision is not something that people want to see.

    Of note: In the past when Blizzard has announced major changes to this game that they felt would make this game better, official posters have been very active on the forums posting to clarify concerns, and outline why they see this change as being beneficial. Aside from a couple posts clarifying major misunderstandings, there have been *NO* posts from official Blizzard posters in the last 40,000 posts in the official threat (plus probably at least 10,000 posts in threads that have been locked and/or deleted).

    What does this tell you? Blizzard is not behind this change. This change has been forced down the pipe by Activision to attempt to monetize the player base with ad revenue from the facebook deal.

    If you're interested, here's a rough timeline of the changes:
    September 2009 interview with Activision's CEO where he says that he will attempt to exploit all Activison's franchises for maximum revenue
    May 5th, Blizzard announces a deal with Facebook for Facebook integration with WoW
    Two weeks ago, RealID is introduced as an optional feature to chat cross server with close friends and family only
    On Sunday, an exploit is discovered which makes anyone with an AddOn installed (virtually everyone) vulnerable to have their name identified in game by anyone.
    On Tuesday, Blizzard announces that RealID is no longer an optional service, and will now be required for forum use.
    A few hours later, a Blizzard poster on the EU forums clarifies this has been in the works for over a year, and that outrage was expected and planned for.

    Can you connect the dots? Here's a hint: the purported purpose (slapping down trolls) could be just as easily be handled by requiring forum goers to select a unique handle, or only one WoW character, with which to do all their posting... you know, like, every single other major forum on the planet? The only reason that first name and last name specifically are required are if you make the connection to Facebook!

    Additionally, in the patch two weeks ago, changes were made to the Terms of Use (unannounced) to include a subsection on gathering user data for use with a third party advertising partner.

    This Real ID changeover has also been planned for over a year, and Blizzard posters have made no attempts to clarify how this proposed system will improve the forums (after all of two minutes it took forum posters to suggest the alternative solution of merely requiring a unique forum moniker.) Blizzard is clearly not behind this change. This is a done deal, by Activision, to sell out WoW players to advertisers, sharing their personal information with the world, through Facebook.

    One WoW fan has co

  268. Blizzard listens to the users concerns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.html?topicId=25968987278&sid=1

    Hello everyone,

    I'd like to take some time to speak with all of you regarding our desire to make the Blizzard forums a better place for players to discuss our games. We've been constantly monitoring the feedback you've given us, as well as internally discussing your concerns about the use of real names on our forums. As a result of those discussions, we've decided at this time that real names will not be required for posting on official Blizzard forums.

    It's important to note that we still remain committed to improving our forums. Our efforts are driven 100% by the desire to find ways to make our community areas more welcoming for players and encourage more constructive conversations about our games. We will still move forward with new forum features such as the ability to rate posts up or down, post highlighting based on rating, improved search functionality, and more. However, when we launch the new StarCraft II forums that include these new features, you will be posting by your StarCraft II Battle.net character name + character code, not your real name. The upgraded World of Warcraft forums with these new features will launch close to the release of Cataclysm, and also will not require your real name.

    I want to make sure it's clear that our plans for the forums are completely separate from our plans for the optional in-game Real ID system now live with World of Warcraft and launching soon with StarCraft II. We believe that the powerful communications functionality enabled by Real ID, such as cross-game and cross-realm chat, make Battle.net a great place for players to stay connected to real-life friends and family while playing Blizzard games. And of course, you'll still be able to keep your relationships at the anonymous, character level if you so choose when you communicate with other players in game. Over time, we will continue to evolve Real ID on Battle.net to add new and exciting functionality within our games for players who decide to use the feature.

    In closing, I want to point out that our connection with our community has always been and will always be extremely important to us. We strongly believe that Every Voice Matters, ( http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/about/mission.html ) and we feel fortunate to have a community that cares so passionately about our games. We will always appreciate the feedback and support of our players, which has been a key to Blizzard's success from the beginning.

    Mike Morhaime
    CEO & Cofounder
    Blizzard Entertainment