Slashdot Mirror


Who's Pirating Game of Thrones, and Why?

TheGift73 writes "In a few hours a new episode of Game of Thrones will appear on BitTorrent, and a few days later between 3 and 4 million people will download this unofficial release. Statistics gathered by TorrentFreak reveal that more people are downloading the show compared to last year, when it came in as the second most downloaded TV-show of 2011. The number of weekly downloads worldwide is about equal to the estimated viewers on HBO in the U.S., but why? One of the prime reasons for the popularity among pirates is the international delay in airing. In Australia, for example, fans of the show have to wait a week before they can see the latest episode. So it's hardly a surprise that some people are turning to BitTorrent instead. And indeed, if we look at the top countries where Game of Thrones is downloaded, Australia comes out on top with 10.1% of all downloads (based on one episode). But delays are just part of the problem. The fact that the show is only available to those who pay for an HBO subscription doesn't help either."

1,004 comments

  1. A week? by solanum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage?

    Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

    --
    Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis habes.
    1. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well you have to wait a week AND have cable television which isn't anywhere near as ubiqutous as it is elsewhere in the world...

    2. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That week is critical to not seeing spoilers online, we live in an international community, forums inhabited by users all around the world, if half of them can't see the episode for a week+ that doesn't work.

    3. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey relax, its not like they're rioting about it, they're just quietly downloading it when they want.

    4. Re:A week? by macemoneta · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage? Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      The week delay wouldn't matter if everyone weren't connected via instant communication. Fans discuss shows online, so those that get it first start spilling spoilers all over the place. It's easier for many to go offline for a few hours and get the download, than it is to stay offline for a week (or months in the case of some shows). The regional delay in distribution is killing TV/Cable networks, yet they insist on holding on to the antiquated distribution methodology.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    5. Re:A week? by negRo_slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cable television AND a subscription to HBO.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    6. Re:A week? by balzi · · Score: 5, Funny

      "fans of the show have to wait a week before they can see the latest episode. So it's hardly a surprise that some people are turning to BitTorrent instead"

      I live in Australia as well, and it's intolerable that we have to wait for our entertainment. I mean, those lazy American's are always a few days more entertained than we are!
      Some fool tried to tell me that entertainment wasn't measured by the latency between a show airing and my viewing of it - how ridiculous!?!!? What a notion?

      And don't get me started on the olympics - I'm considering suing the IOC everytime the Olympics are held abroad. I, and countless others Aussies, will have to wait til the evening to get any live action, whilst the English can watch it in the morning and afternoon as it happens. Outrageous!

      sincerely, Balzi

      --
      "I split coffee all over my wife's nightie .... serves me right for wearing it" -Speelberg, no 'Spar
    7. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's worth pointing out that the show is only available on Cable in Australia - and only a small proportion of our population has cable. There's a variety of reasons for this, partly it's because cable is not available in many areas, partly there's a cultural issue we have with paying for TV.

      So when a show is only shown on cable - if it's a good show, and people want to watch it - you buy the DVD, borrow the DVD, or download it.

      And of course - when it comes to the DVD, because of region encoding, often DVDs of popular shows aren't actually released in Australia until well after it's shown on cable, which can often be months or years after it's shown in the USA.

      So even people who want to fairly pay for their content find it very hard to.

    8. Re:A week? by Severus+Snape · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Give you Lost for an example, I was hooked to it from the first season. I watched the first mabey 3 or 4 episodes on TV then started downloading them because through the show there was a delay of less than a week. What's the incentive to wait though? Nothing. I can also watch whenever I want instead of when they want to show it.

    9. Re:A week? by yamum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Obviously you don't realise how many ads Australia puts in their shows. There is absolutely no chance I'm watching TV in Australia. I really don't understand how Australians can put up with it.

    10. Re:A week? by Nyder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can download the show before it airs here in Seattle, and often I do. I don't watch it till later that night though.

      Why don't I watch on on Comcast Cable? I can, I have HBO, but the quality of Comcast HDTV is lackluster at best, and artifacty at worse. If I paid for it, I would be bummed out. The copies I download are almost always of better quality.

      Here's why I think people download it:

      It's a good show, but has a limited view range. Meaning, you have to have HBO to see it. So, people don't want to wait to see what everyone else is talking about. Honestly, I can't blame them, who wants spoilers? We live in an instant world now. While I can wait to see stuff, the mentallity seems to be everything now. Which is probably why people watch cams of movies.

      In this day and age, making something that can be digitalize, scarce to make more money, is going to back fire on you.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    11. Re:A week? by balzi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A serious problem that cannot be sorted by the "antiquated methodology" is that the US primetime slot is far removed from the Australian and European primetime slot. A network is not to going to the air the episode when HBO do, just to get it "live". It would be on at 10:30am over here if they did.

      --
      "I split coffee all over my wife's nightie .... serves me right for wearing it" -Speelberg, no 'Spar
    12. Re:A week? by Jstlook · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Cable Television, a subscription to HBO, AND care about a particular TV show.

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    13. Re:A week? by haruchai · · Score: 0

      I can't believe I live in a world where so many people who can read, can't actually READ.

      Try again.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    14. Re:A week? by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

      And don't get me started on the olympics - I'm considering suing the IOC everytime the Olympics are held abroad. I, and countless others Aussies, will have to wait til the evening to get any live action, whilst the English can watch it in the morning and afternoon as it happens. Outrageous!

      sincerely, Balzi

      Please do, you're welcome to the £11 Billion boondoggle of corporate sponsorship that is the Olympic games. The chances are that they will benefit you just as much as me anyway, despite my living in the UK. (I'm in the North so the best we have to hope for is the torch passing through.)

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    15. Re:A week? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage?

      And why are you in such anticipation of this show? Because its creators and distributors promote it so that you will crave your next viewing, as they should.

      Then they release it early in the town down the road, and expect you not drive over there and watch it on a friends TV.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    16. Re:A week? by macemoneta · · Score: 2

      A serious problem that cannot be sorted by the "antiquated methodology" is that the US primetime slot is far removed from the Australian and European primetime slot. A network is not to going to the air the episode when HBO do, just to get it "live". It would be on at 10:30am over here if they did.

      Which is when the see it if they pirate it, so it appears to work for some folks. Also, they have these things called DVRs now.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    17. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you use bit torrent. See problem fixed when people are self-reliant rather than just whining. ;)

    18. Re:A week? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Believe it or not, it's reality. If you don't want people to do this, try making it extremely simple to get it legitimately (at the time it airs somewhere). It may or may not be difficult to do that, but people likely don't care about your difficulties.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    19. Re:A week? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't recognise just how awesome a show it is.

    20. Re:A week? by Golden_Rider · · Score: 3, Informative

      That week is critical to not seeing spoilers online, we live in an international community, forums inhabited by users all around the world, if half of them can't see the episode for a week+ that doesn't work.

      Pretty sure that TV series is based on books which have been available for years already. So I don't know how one week more would make a difference.

    21. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fans discuss shows online, so those that get it first start spilling spoilers all over the place"

      God forbid people ever read the books ... then you'll get spoilers from Season 5.

    22. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is true. What also happens is when popular shows are aired in Australia they are often cut to make more room for ads. David Attenborough's Frozen Planet was a perfect example of this - each episode is 49 minutes and yet the 60 minute time slots somehow managed to have 14 minutes' worth of ads.

    23. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is this even worth discussing? It's just a stupid TV show anyway. Go get a life.

    24. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      It's a goddamn medieval soap opera. It was a shitty, long-winded, repetitive series of books and it's a shitty TV show.

    25. Re:A week? by EllisDees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would someone download a show they have no interest in?

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    26. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wanna wait and get cable TV [which is Australia is rather unpopular and overpriced, foxtel especially] be my guest sucker. Frankly this is what happens in the modern age when a company uses bad distribution channels.

    27. Re:A week? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a difference between having an interest in a free show and feeling the need to buy $100 worth of cable to see it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:A week? by bug1 · · Score: 1

      It is the basic human condition to seek and share what you you love.

      Even in Australia, or would you have us give that up ?

    29. Re:A week? by dwillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not about not knowing or not reading the books. It's enjoying how it's portrayed on the screen. Fanatsy Books seldom transfer well onto the screen, large or small. So when such a great series is translated so well, we like being able to watch it. I'd say a very large portion of those who want to watch it without waiting or on their time schedule, or without paying for HBO on top of Cable, have already read the books.

      It's about experiencing the stories in another medium. I've read the books, I've listened to them all on Audible and now I'm enjoying seeing it play out in a visual medium.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    30. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually that one week of having to watch the spoilers, and commentary kinda does make the difference, people who want to know already know the story, there is nothing new actually coming out as far as that goes it seems, so its only an interest in seeing the treatment of the show, most of which is given away in the spoilers etc, so instead of simply then watching a story you already know the ending of, you are also watching one that you know how they are going to do it and probably have already seen the most insteresting parts of the episode.

    31. Re:A week? by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm Australian, I have Sattelite TV (foxtel) for $70 a month (because my wife and kids like it), and don't have access to watch Game of Thrones and Fringe, the two shows I actually give a fuck about. If I want to watch Game of Thrones, I need to upgrade to the $100/month package, and then watch it at the time they specify.

      Fuck that. I pirate Game of Thrones, and Fringe and buy the box sets when they come out.

      --
      ... wait, what?
    32. Re:A week? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Well you could live in Canada. I mean there's been oh 3 or 5 dozen cases where TV shows have been delayed for 9-18 months before being shown. And to think, of that as a neighbor right next door. That was one of the reasons why I said cut the cord on my TV, and just download something I feel like watching. Though that hasn't really happened in the last 3 years or so.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    33. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which also means you're going to have to watch it on the TV connected to the STB and unless you happen to be offered the privilege of paying more to avoid this scenario, you can only watch it when it airs. So basically, a quick recap:-

      Ridiculously bundling to raise prices.
      Unnecessary delay in a global market.
      Lack of flexibility in avenues to consume.

      Whether you agree with the pirates or not the reason they download is because media buisness models are stuck in the last century. Even when you have a legal subscription to the show, many will download regardless due to the many benifits included in the last point alone. Others will argue that the bundling of products to squeeze more money from consumers is unreasonable, and thus will never be willing to pay a subscription fee in order to watch a single series.

      In the UK here, and whilst you can watch the episodes about 24 hours after they air in the US, you can only do it if you happen the relevant SkyTV packages. If I'm honest, the price of the Entertainment package at £20 a month doesn't seem to terrible*, but the idea of mounting a satellite dish to the side of my house doesn't please me. Give me SkyTV as a streaming service (preferably meeting the above criteria) and I'd be more than happy to drop cable**, and any theoretical downloading*** of shows that I do.

      * You'll get locked into year long contracts and additional bundles should you want HD content or a fuller set of channels. May face some hidden fees, but it still seems better than the cable bundling.

      ** I pay for cable because other family members consume it. I could go without, but I'm fairly sure they'd need STB type access to actually use the thing.

      *** I would imagine most people download shows because there simply isn't resonable access to them (not everything is availble everywhere), which isn't something a streaming service would completely fix.

    34. Re:A week? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      At least you eventually get to watch it. When are you Aussies going to send your MasterChef over? The one we got in the US was just one day a week and had Gordon Ramesy.

      Don't worry, I've torrented every episode, Jr., too. We're still picking favorites for this year. Kevin going so early was a shame, but Jules really stepped up for not having made pasta before.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    35. Re:A week? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Or what they did to the MasterChef finals last year. That was a bomb!

      (Not that it personally bothered me since I live in the US and torrent it.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    36. Re:A week? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Insightful

      $100?

      I live in Canada. I bought Dance with Dragons the day it came out from my local bookstore. (It helped that I was taking several cross-Canada trips for work a week after it came out.) I bought every book and I've told dozens of people about the series, probably making Martin enough to buy lunch, maybe dessert afterwards.

      If I would like to upgrade my service to watch Game of Thrones, I would have to do the following:
      1. Buy an HD-DVR system from my oligarchy cable / ISP / phone provider ($600)
      2. Upgrade to cable. ($100 a month)
      3. Upgrade to HD service ($50 a month)
      4. Upgrade to some package that includes HBO ($50 a month)

      And then I'd have to make certain that I was home during that time. Although I would have spent $600 on the HD PVR in step 1, they are so buggy and flakey that they tend to lose settings and recorded shows. So all told, I would have to spend close to one thousand dollars to watch Game of Thrones in the off chance that I'm home, my wife is home, the kids are in bed, the DVR doesn't pixelate out, they don't have decryption problems (happened all the time during the Olympics), AND they don't lose all my settings so I could actually watch the HBO that I've spent a grand on.

      Option 2 is not watch the show. I'd really rather watch it. My wife likes the show as well.

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release. Riiiight.

      Option 4 is direct electronic import from Sweden. Like Colt 45, it works every time.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    37. Re:A week? by yodleboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yeah you might have a general sense of where things are supposed to be headed, but TrueBlood and Dexter are good examples of shows that don't always stay on track with the books. I get to hear my wife complain every season about how "that shit's not in the BOOK!!" Some minor characters become major, others are written out, the entire dynamic between some is changed.

    38. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part? Religion, slavery, war, I mean really you can't believe the world we live in because people are not willing to wait for some show, well dude I have a bunch of real estate to sell you over here in the States.

      I for one believe and understand completely how the old model of doing things does not work any more.

    39. Re:A week? by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, it isn't just a TV show. It is one you are engaged in enough to want to see what happens. I know what I did with the one season of Doctor Who that got delayed a week because in the states BBC America didn't want to air a new episode on Memorial Day.

      I had two options:
      1) Stay a week perpetually behind for the rest of the season. Avoiding sites I enjoy like a lepper because of where I lived. After all, the net isn't local, it was filled with people who didn't get delayed due to a holiday. Avoid talking with other friends who enjoyed the show that weren't bound by this limitation about this mutual interest.

      2) Pirate the bloody episode and watch it so I was in sync with the rest of the fandom.

      You might not care about this television show, true. But television of largely digital these days. A week made more sense back in the day when things had to be shipped. A week for a book, a movie, a cd (cassette, 8-track, record, whatever)? Yes, acceptable. A week for a eBook to come out just to fit out dated norms? A week for a digital downloaded song because of where you live? Or any other such good?

      The exact topic, a television show, is a bit laughable I suppose. The important thing this is a symptom, and one that helps triangulate the real disease. Sometimes a sneeze is just a lil' pepper, and sometimes a sneeze is something worse. The specific is relevant to /, and what is going on in the world. What is going on with piracy when anti-piracy measures are driving so much law creation lately.

      People don't want to be pirates. They just see a stupid road block and know a way around it. Gabe of Valve called this a service problem. If this were a government act, not a corporate one, we'd be calling it a stupid regulation, a hindrance that should be stricken from the books. This is one more piece of evidence that a chunk of piracy could be fought by offering what services and goods the people want.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    40. Re:A week? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 3, Funny

      People love their soap operas. that's all LOST was, that's all BSG was, that's all SGU was, that's all Heroes was, that's all True Blood was, that's.. that's all they are. Nothing interesting. Heavy on the over-hyped and ridiculously dramatic interpersonal relationships. "My goodness, this person said something rude to me, so I shall brood menacingly and later whine about it to some other fuck who will pat me on the back as we sob together about how terrible that rude person is like a bunch of teenage girls".

      Nobody fucking acts like that in real life, and if they do, if you do find someone like that -- nobody fucking likes them. But hey, great TV, aint?

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    41. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *woosh*

      And now for something completely different.

      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.

      It's been 14 seconds since you hit 'reply'.

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

    42. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Totally! When I want things but they're more than I consider reasonable to pay, I prefer to steal.

    43. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why wait if you don't need to?

    44. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to ask this, those that are making the argument that they have to wait a week probably already have HBO anyways, so they have paid to watch it. Who is it hurting if they download it a week early, it's not like there are advertisements being cut out /FairUseArgument.

    45. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my response as well. I've heard some outlandish excuses for justifying piracy but the alternative of waiting a week pretty much takes the cake. The spoilers excuse is amusing as well; I often wait until a suitable night to relax and catch up on PVR'd TV and during that time, I forget that I haven't seen the latest episode and I've never been reminded by spoilers. Heck, I often PVR sporting events and they're typically not ruined.

    46. Re:A week? by errandum · · Score: 1

      Instead of mocking, lets just assume this happens (in my country it is more or less the same).

      What solution do you propose? There are lots of reasons to why people do this:

      One to three weeks delay is a lot when you're part of on-line communities. If you are part of any MMORPG your guild chat / world chat will be ripe with spoilers after the episode.
      For the same reason people will spend a whole night reading a good book, people will try to watch the next chapter of a good story as soon as possible (that's human nature)
      The current distribution model makes it extremely hard to get your hands on an episode even if you're willing to pay. And when I say hard, I mean darn near impossible if you did not see it live.

      If HBO does not want people to pirate their shows, distribute them legally. I know people that would gladly pay for the episode on iTunes but aren't able to. I'm sure they have their reasons, but with the ease of distribution pirating channels have, there is no way to fight this torrent without joining the battle. Ignoring the problem will make it worse.

    47. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG!!! The horrors of first-world problems. I might see a spoiler about a TV show!!! THE WORLD IS ENDING!!!!

    48. Re:A week? by poity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really. I've waited longer than that for a game to come down to the price I care to pay. I also don't have to spend $400 every so often for the latest graphics cards.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    49. Re:A week? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which explains what you're doing here, right?

    50. Re:A week? by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

      That week is critical to not seeing spoilers online, we live in an international community, forums inhabited by users all around the world, if half of them can't see the episode for a week+ that doesn't work.

      Really? I do subscribe to HBO which is also available On-Demand. It's usually around Wed/Thu before I get around to watching the previous Sunday's 'new' episode, and somehow manage to avoid all the spoilers. It worked for Boardwalk Empire too.

    51. Re:A week? by balzi · · Score: 1

      "Which is when the see it if they pirate it, so it appears to work for some folks. Also, they have these things called DVRs now."

      Firstly, all I was saying is that no network can be held responsible for the show not being simulcast to all regions at once. It's just a logistical nightmare. Maybe it would be possible to do for 1 show with a less-than-24-hour delay, but not the 100s of shows on all around the world.

      Secondly, are you seriously suggesting that a TV station would willingly put a series on TV at a time when they could expect to get a large proportion of viewers via DVR? I'm sure the advertisers (those paying to let you watch the show) would think that was a great idea!

      --
      "I split coffee all over my wife's nightie .... serves me right for wearing it" -Speelberg, no 'Spar
    52. Re:A week? by hughJ · · Score: 1

      There's obviously a big difference in profile for spoilers of a niche/fantasy book that's 13 years old compared to spoilers of a popular mainstream TV show episode that's aired only 2 days ago.

    53. Re:A week? by Stewie241 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not saying that Cable/Satellite providers in Canada don't rip you off, but what you say just isn't true:
      You don't need an HD-DVR. You just need any old cable/satellite box. Bell's site completely sucks and I wasn't able to price anything out, but with Rogers you can get basic digital cable ($34.49/month), rent a receiver box ($4.56/month) and get the TMN and MPIX package ($20.95/month which includes HBO) for a total of $60/month plus fees (which admittedly always makes me cringe, but I don't know what they actually come to).

      I do believe that Cable/Satellite is over priced and only get it because other household members want it, you greatly exaggerate the situation and only make yourself look silly.

    54. Re:A week? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      In Australia here, and most of our free-to-air stations (publicly funded and commercial) have online catch-up services that let you steam episodes for a few weeks after they aired. It's a perfect solution to that sort of consumer demand.

      Would be interesting to see the Pay-TV channels do the same thing.

    55. Re:A week? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters?

      I wait till 5 episodes are broadcast, download them and burn to a DVD. So I get my own DVD one or two days after the finale.

    56. Re:A week? by bloodhawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I live in Australia and download it instead of watching on foxtel. I have a subscription but why wait for it to air in inferior SD quality when I can download a HD copy and have it a week earlier, be allowed to watch it in any room rather than be restricted by the foxtel box to one TV and also watch it in my own time. Convenience and quality make it worth the 10 seconds of effort required to download it.

    57. Re:A week? by arose · · Score: 1

      TV shows are frivolous. TV show copyright is Serious Business. Duh.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    58. Re:A week? by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1, Funny

      Plus, although I haven't a gay bone in my body, damn thats one sexy dwarf.

    59. Re:A week? by KingMotley · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Odd because here in the USA it's more like:
      1) DVR - $10/mo rental (Free with the larger cable packages)
      2) Cable - $50/mo
      3) HD Service - Usually free with the bigger cable packages, $10/mo if not
      4) HBO - Usually free in the larger cable packages, or you can usually get it free if you threaten to switch to dish/at&t u-verse etc, if all else fails, it's $15/mo

      Worst case, it's $85/month.

    60. Re:A week? by Stewie241 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't the model the cable company wants you to follow, but I could see how it would be tempting. Presumably the extra $30/month isn't just for those two shows. The problem is the package system which forces you to buy $30/month of stuff when you really just want a small portion of what that buys.

      Given this, it would be easier for somebody to justify 'piracy'. He is getting the content and the author/creator is being compensated (note that he claimed that he purchases the box sets when they come out). In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the producer of the content actually receives more compensation from a DVD box set purchase than from cable subscription payments because the cable subscription payments would be distributed across all the content which presumably isn't the case when buying specific box sets.

    61. Re:A week? by arose · · Score: 1

      People who want to watch it on prime-time TV (with dub/sub where appropriate, that does take extra time) would not be affected by making the show available for digital distribution when it first airs. Oh, I forgot, copyright should be used to enforce the broadcast TV specific "prime-time" concept, not to encourage creation of creative works for the benefit of the general public.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    62. Re:A week? by mestar · · Score: 1

      Cable Television, a subscription to HBO, care about a particular TV show, and at least one working eye.

    63. Re:A week? by guises · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the time difference were only twelve hours it wouldn't be an issue. It takes a few hours for the pirates to upload it anyway, and some amount of time to download it, so if it were broadcast with only a twelve hour delay (to hit Australian primetime) we wouldn't be having this conversation.

    64. Re:A week? by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let me do the math for my own little facet of the gem here.

      I generally like a few shows at once. I am currently interested in Big Bang Theory, Game of Thrones, Fringe, Walking Dead and Falling Skies.

      As these are shows that are aired at different season times, I will calculate the costs for a year of viewing.

      To get access to both BBT and GOT, it costs me around $90 per month. Fringe WAS aired on Free to Air, although it was at a 10:30pm timeslot. Walking Dead was finally aired around a year and a half after the US release. Fox8 is airing Falling Skies season 2 "fast tracking" it to Australia just three days after an episode airs in the US.

      So, for a mere $1080 per year, I do get access to these shows, if I watch them in their timeslots and most with commercials. Now, lets say that I don't want to time my life to these shows, I can get a Foxtel IQ and record these shows, it costs me $10 per month. That's now $1,200. Now, I do understand that for my money I get a LOT of other channels and shows. But where my frustration comes in is that I am simply not interested in them. Would I watch some of them if I had them? Sure. But that's no different to saying "Would I watch a DVD if I had it?" Yeah, probably, but would I buy it if I saw it at the store? Probably not.

      I simply can't justify spending that sort of money for the few shows that I am interested in, furthermore, I am offended that the majority of the money I spend would go to subsidizing all the shit programming that is aired on all these other channels. I don't mind voting for shows with my wallet, but I feel violated knowing that a portion of my monthly fee is going to Jersey Shore, American Pickers or any other horrific mind throttling series.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    65. Re:A week? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Game of Thrones has dialogue that's almost exactly the same as the books; most scenes are directly from the books, and just changed a bit because of the change of medium.

    66. Re:A week? by DragonTHC · · Score: 2

      It's not that really.

      It's probably because you can't actually get HBO unless you pop for a very expensive cable subscription.

      If HBO GO were a standalone subscription, I'd pay for it. Even if it cost the same as the cable version.

      Since it's not offered except as part of an expensive cable subscription, I can't get it.

      My primary TV source is Netflix, supplemented with hulu and other sources like crackle.

      THE market is speaking. Is the owner of HBO listening?

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    67. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Plus, although I haven't a gay bone in my body

      Would you like one?

    68. Re:A week? by curunir · · Score: 1

      Some of us downloaded them because we didn't want to wait the years it would take before HBO aired them. Mind you, I downloaded them from Amazon on my Kindle and actually paid for them.

      It's one thing to have to wait a week for a crack-on-tv show like Lost and an entirely different thing to have to wait a week for a show based on a book that's been available for years. Besides...the show has become a bad parody of the book...they're making lame changes for no good reason and generally rushing through everything while simultaneously adding bizarrely-long bits of dialog that weren't in the book.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    69. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for a cable company and after pricing it out for OUR service, for the same convenience and quality it came to $57.95/month before taxes. That's Limited Basic cable ($24.95/mo) plus 1 HD-DVR (for "anytime access", $16.00/mo) and HBO itself (separate package, $17.00/mo) for the time that you want to watch it. Granted, you could go out and build a DVR (I myself have been looking at the Ceton card.) and reduce the DVR cost to $5.95/mo (cable card) but that still comes to quite a bit with the DVR investment. If you don't care what else is on, this is unjustifiable. But if you watch more TV than just GoT, you might be able to do it.

    70. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I torrent a lot of things lately because they aren't available here. I could buy them from counterfeiters, but I'm not really sure that's any more reasonable than just pirating them honestly, at least this way nobody makes money on the deal.

      If they want my money, they should consider dropping the stupid region restrictions, or at least offer a worldwide option.

    71. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, if that's the fees you really need to pay then you need to find another company. Even Comcast doesn't ream you that hard. Heck Dish would provide all that (that's including the hopper whole home hd DVD that can record up to 6 channels at once) for around $80 a month

    72. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I like Game of Thrones. At any given time there are about two shows that I'll be interested in. And HBO is usually in one of the higher cable tiers. I am not going to spend $100+/mo just to watch one or two television shows. That's stupidly expensive. Especially when you throw in the cost of the cable provider's DVR/HD boxes (which are $20/mo at Comcast). That would end up being around $1,600/mo --- easily --- for about 100 episodes worth of shows (MAYBE 8 total shows a year at 13 episodes each). That's fucking $16/episode!

    73. Re:A week? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      The world also wouldn't end if I punched you in the face. Doesn't mean getting punched in the face isn't an unpleasant experience, though.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    74. Re:A week? by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      "My goodness, this person said something rude to me, so I shall brood menacingly and later whine about it to some other fuck who will pat me on the back as we sob together about how terrible that rude person is like a bunch of teenage girls".

      Nobody fucking acts like that in real life, and if they do, if you do find someone like that -- nobody fucking likes them. But hey, great TV, aint?

      What are you talking about? You've just described every second water cooler discussion that goes on in our office. We have employees that I think are kept around for that backstabbing entertainment value alone.

    75. Re:A week? by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      MythTV with commercial detection goes a long way. I find myself getting angry if I have to watch ads now, having become used to not being emotionally manipulated into buying crap. Ironically there are laws limiting the amount of advertising.

    76. Re:A week? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      In an isolated environment the delay does not matter. So what if you have to wait a week to see the first episode, then the next episodes will come out once a week, just like they do in the USA. You can even be one year behind and have no problems. Until you want to discuss the TC show with other people. If you go to an international forum, there will be people who saw the show when it aired in the US (Americans and those who downloaded the torrents), they will be discussing an episode you have not seen yet. If you wait the week to see, say, episode 3 the guys on the forum will be discussing episode 4 and so on. The only way for you to discuss that show in that forum is to wait until the show takes a break and you can catch up.

    77. Re:A week? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Not disagreeing with you as I didn't discover the books until I'd heard the series was coming to the small screen but that wasn't what my comment was about.

      Rather it was that slashdotter solanum, who's likely been coming here for over 10 years, posted a dumb comment without actually bothering to check the link.

      That said, I have finished the books and am enjoying the series immensely. Overall, the casting is terrific. Lena Headey - best work to date; Peter Dinklage - role of a lifetime; Maisie Williams - delightful, hard to believe this is her 1st screen role; Jack Gleeson & Sophie Turner - really bring the characters to life.

      But I have several fears for the series - expense, departure from the books and GRR Martin's writing speed ( and ruthlessness).
      He's shown in the books that no one is safe and I'm not sure how the audience will react to the death of some of the popular characters.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    78. Re:A week? by murdocj · · Score: 0

      Have you considered that if you don't want to pay for something, you do without?

    79. Re:A week? by murdocj · · Score: 2

      I'm in the USA and I'm paying $70/month for cable.no DVR, no HBO. So your "worst case" isn't.

    80. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't, we download them :)

    81. Re:A week? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      Yup... this is probably how they broke guys at Guantanamo. None of that water boarding stuff, just make them wait a week for a TV show, AND put a spoiler up on a forum they read.

    82. Re:A week? by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      That was mostly (but not entirely) true in season 1. Season 2 has had a somewhat looser take on the adaptation.

    83. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You raise a very valid point that I believe is severely overlooked by the people criticising revenue loss due to piracy; those who want to watch their favourite show ASAICO (As Soon As It Comes Out) will torrent it, but I notice that most of my friends (including myself so I guess thats just 1 in total) who do this also buy the box sets when they come out. For me thats a high ratio of pirate to purchaser.

    84. Re:A week? by 3dr · · Score: 1

      It's been interesting to compare the two. I've been reading the books and am halfway through book 5, and watching the series. They've fabricated things for more skin-time (such as the prostitute Roz in the HBO story, not in the book), and switched things around. Another embellishment in the HBO story, purely for shock value, was when Joffrey forced the whore in his bed to beat the other whore viciously. Most of the "simpler" changes are to make it simply more interesting to watch, and on HBO that means more tits, usually. These are not substantive changes to the storyline, however.

      More questionable changes DO change the storyline. I don't think we'll know if it was for TV adaptation, or if the edits simplify the storyline, or what until much later. For example, one was last week's (?) episode where Lord Tywin tells his cupbearer (Arya) of the difference between saying m'lord and my lord. There are two things different in that scene: (1) in the book, Arya is never Tywin's cupbearer at Harrenhal, and (2), the m'lord/my lord conversation takes place much later, in book 5, between Lord Bolton and Reek. So this first change could bring huge implications; for instance, while Arya was serving, Littlefinger recognizes her but it's not yet known if he reveals or uses this information elsewhere, which would be very different from the book.

    85. Re:A week? by Grayhand · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Option 1 Ratings fall due to piracy so HBO cancels Game of Thrones. Fans actually have the potential to kill a show in this case. HBO is hypersensitive to ratings. My favorite show was Carnivale and inspite of it making money the ratings fell and they were facing larger budgets so they canceled it after the second season with I believe four more years left in the run. If the ratings fall off on Game of Thrones HBO will kill it in a heartbeat in favor more cheap to produce comedies. Notice how few shows like Game of Thrones are on the air and how many dumb comedies? You can produce a comedy for a quarter of the money so if it gets half the ratings they figure they come out ahead. Sure I'd love to have another option than having HBO for seeing the show but my subscription is helping fund it and they aren't likely change their distribution method.

    86. Re:A week? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I live in Canada and most of our TV channels are actually American channels. Which shows were unavailable up here for 18 months..?

    87. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have ads in our TV shows? No one told me. I guess that's what I get for not owning a TV.

    88. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      a year - by which time you've already heard the spoilers...

      if you want to watch pop culture, you want to watch it at the time it is actually popular and people are discussing it

    89. Re:A week? by Jens+Egon · · Score: 2

      Oh my goodness, because I'm black I have to sit in the back of the bus?

      Yes, all the other crap surrounding that is far less severe for Australians, but at heart it's the same issue.

      Should we or should we not treat a bunch of bloody transportees with the same diginity as real people?

    90. Re:A week? by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      Hardly the only reason.

      If you live in Australia, you would already pirate everything else anyway - the commercial TV networks are terrible - poor HD content, editing programs to fit more ads in, US content shown when convenient for them etc.

      And subscription television was a flop here well before BitTorrent existed.

    91. Re:A week? by demonlapin · · Score: 2

      My cable - the full package that includes all the movie channels - is $120/mo. That doesn't include my internet or telephone. I could get the main HBO channel only for around $85/mo, but it would be with a much smaller set of overall channels.

    92. Re:A week? by pthisis · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Game of Thrones has dialogue that's almost exactly the same as the books; most scenes are directly from the books, and just changed a bit because of the change of medium.

      That was kind of true in season 1 but is very much not the case in season 2.

      For instance, last week's episode had 7 major storylines; of those, 5 are pretty much created entirely for the show with little resemblance to exact scenes from the books. 1 of them (Sansa/Cersei/Hound period scenes in King's Landing) is very close to the book, and 1 of them (Theon chasing Bran and Rickon) is parallel to book scenes but rewritten because some of the major characters don't exist on the show. The show's doing a remarkable job of staying relatively true to the overarching story without really following exact scenes all that closely in season 2.

      Breakdown:
      Theon chasing Bran and Rickon: These scenes are altered greatly from the books because major characters are omitted. The escape is led by Meera and Jojen Reed in the books and they drive all the conversation about Bran's dreams. They don't exist at all in the TV show.

      Jon Snow/Ygritte: The whole "wandering alone with Ygritte in the cold" storyline is the show's fabrication, it never happens in the books (there, Jon frees Ygritte and remains with the rangers until they're captured by Rattleshirt).

      Arya/Tywin: These scenes are fabricated entirely for the show, as Arya never serves Tywin in the books. They're awesome but brand new dialog.

      Sansa/Cersei: These scenes are pretty close to the book.

      Daenerys in Qarth: These scenes are completely fabricated for the show; the whole dragons-getting-stolen plot doesn't exist in the book.

      Rob Stark: These scenes are completely fabricated for the show; the books never show the western campaign at all and never have Rob-POV chapters. The character of Talisa seems maybe based on Jayne Westerling, but it's tough to know for sure because we never see Jeyne until after a major SPOILER event happens in the books. Catelyn is certainly not out west in the books, and her book version would never let things develop between Robb and Talisa.

      Jaime Lannister: Again fabricated completely for the show, he never has any escape sequence like this in the books (he does have an escape sequence but it's nothing like this and certainly doesn't have nearly identical dialog).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    93. Re:A week? by kqs · · Score: 1

      And why are you in such anticipation of this show? Because its creators and distributors promote it so that you will crave your next viewing, as they should.

      Exactly! It's not our fault, it's the creators and distributors fault that we download it! There is no action so bad that we cannot blame someone else for it.

    94. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except lots of DVD titles simply do not make it here (Especially series) at all due to Region preferences by the content providers.

    95. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point, actually. In the digital world, I should be able to make sure my money is going to reward the people who make the content I like, and not to the people who's content I don't like or am indifferent to. The sports packages are the same; why would I sign up to an expensive package that effectively subsidises sports I'm not interested in, when I already have a fast pipe right to my house that could deliver precisely what I want to watch, when I want to watch it?

    96. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No television show is worth $30 per season, either (the price of it on DVD, Blu-Ray, or iTunes).

      I'll pay $20 or even $30 per month for a Netflix service that includes awesome shows like that (I think the $8/mo Netflix charges even just for their current offering is almost absurdly cheap). I will not pay $30 for eight or twelve episodes of a show, however. Also, I don't want to stack up physical media. I'm tired of having shelves full of crap.

    97. Re:A week? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do this.

      I'm going to nominate you as a Gold Star Consumer. There's a $50 fee for entering your name for this wonderful honor, but if you win, you receive a $2-off coupon for an iPad 3 and the right to stand in line for 16 hours just for the chance to pay full price for an iPad 4, which will be so awesome it will change peoples' lives. Credit card only, please, and a $50/mo unlimited 2gig data subscription is required.

      Plus, your picture goes on the Wall of Gold Star Consumers for posterity. You will be a role model for hundreds of millions.

      I know it may seem like a small thing to some people that you're willing to "wait a year" to pay $159.99 for the boxed Blu-Ray set of a movie that everybody else has seen and is halfway through the next season, but it takes a certain kind of person to show your kind of willingness to serve.

      But you know what? The Blu-Ray boxed set you waited so obediently for will still have DRM and an FBI warning that you will not be able to fast foward through and if you try to rip a copy to put on your iPad3 you are classified as a terrorist, because despite the fact that you have yielded to every single one of their demands, and bragged about it on Slashdot for all the world to see, making you a paragon of consumer values, the corporations behind Game of Thrones still hate you.

      Life just ain't fair sometimes.

      And you know what? They don't love you because they don't have to. You are the consumer equivalent of the jilted boyfriend who writes poems in floral-scented ink and saves each returned envelope in a special shoebox decorated with hearts even though your beloved is heels-up on the basement of a biker bar. Wouldn't it be great if desperation made you more attractive? Yes, that's why those corporations treat you like a love-struck trick. Because they know you'll take it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    98. Re:A week? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Some of us are impatient and want to see them soon/right away! :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    99. Re:A week? by Artifakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's a difference between waiting a year or longer for a released DVD (game in your example) to come down in price, and waiting a year (or more) for it to be released at full price, and start that year or more discounting process.
      When you're waiting on, for just one example, someone who bought the game at full price to put it up for sale used, any time involved will depend on what are genuinely free market factors (such as how many other people evaluate that product as worth more than you do and snap up used copies before the average price gets down to your amount "X"). But waiting on the initial release itself seems to have little or no correlation with such market factors.
      I'm a bit of a fan of Fringe. I'm waiting on the DVD sets for season 4 and eventually 5, and have bought all the others. I'm rather glad that Fringe is getting that 5th season, a thing which was far from certain. However, I have no way of knowing if my choosing to buy seasons 1, 2, and 3 at full price when they came out had any effect at all on whether Fox decided to go with the 5th season. That's literally an anti free-market situation. Good old Adam Smith's very definition of what a free market is says that parity of information for all parties is what improves market efficiency and results in the greatest good for the greatest number. Fox chose to deliberately not give out information that would help fans know if they were encouraging the show to continue if they bought the DVD sets new rather than buying used or downloading them. So, add to the physical price, and to various other prices imposed such as region encoding, that I don't know if buying at full price and before a certain date will actually encourage the creators to keep the show on the air, or have no affect at all.
              Now Fox treated the fans of Fringe with considerable respect in the end - much better than in several past cases such as Babylon 5. For that matter, in the end, the situation for Fringe has involved more mutual respect for various parties than we've seen for literally hundreds of other shows with mediocre to poor ratings. But that means for the more typical show, any problems the fans have in being able to plan for DVD releases and similar are going to be much greater. That's an additional price for waiting on legitimate channels to play catchup. That says the cost of doing things by the book isn't just a year (or whatever), but a year and uncertainty penalties about whether the wait will eventually terminate, and when.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    100. Re:A week? by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      Impossible? no. more difficult than torrenting? Yes.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    101. Re:A week? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      And given how crazy Nick Stahl has been of late, I don't forsee us finding out what happened between him and Sophie.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    102. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about Option 5, known as the "Completely Legal and Not Full of Bullshit Rationalization" option? It goes a little something like this:

      Game of Thrones, Season 1:
      1. Open iTunes. or Amazon VOD service.
      2. Pay $38.99 US ($43.99 on the Canadian version; 28.99 for the std def version on the Australian itunes store) for the entire Season 1 Game of Thrones in "HD".
      3. Download series.
      4. Watch whenever the fuck I want, as many fucking times as I want.
      5. Know that I'm not breaking the law;
      6. Know that I'm supporting a show I enjoy and appreciate;
      7. Know that by providing a financial reward, the likelihood of other shows like this that I enjoy and appreciate will also be made in the future;

      Game of Thrones Season 2:
      1. Open iTunes. or Amazon VOD service.
      2. Pay $28.99 for std def season pass;
      3. Episodes 1-6; (Episode 8 was broadcast tonight in the US);
      4. Watch whenever the fuck I want, as many fucking times as I want;
      5. Know that I'm not breaking the law;
      6. Know that I'm support a show I enjoy and appreciate;
      7. Know that by providing a financial reward, the likelihood of other shows like this that I enjoy and appreciate will also be made in the future;
      8. OPTIONALLY: skip this, wait for HD version to come out;

      No HBO subscription, no cable subscription, just a computer, a credit card, and an iTunes or Amazon account. You're, at worst, 2 weeks "behind" the most recent broadcast. Not a big deal, because you've likely already read the fucking books and know what's gonna happen, so it's not like your coworkers are going to ruin some amazing magnificent surprise by telling you "Jaime fucked Cersei. Oh, and Theon was a complete dick."

      Your excuses, they ring hollow.

    103. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm an Australian, and I can't. Anything that is on commercial TV that I want to watch I have to time-shift somehow. Or, you know, download the whole damn thing in high definition from Bittorrent. I think the government would actually be doing the networks a favour by mandating a maximum number of minutes per hour of commercials. If it was the same rule for everyone, there would be less of a race to the bottom, and the networks might stop shooting themselves in the foot. More likely, however, they would just make everything an infomercial or something.

    104. Re:A week? by xQx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is this a problem?

      If I am going to watch it in a week anyway on Free-to-Air TV and time-shift the commercials out, why is it wrong to download it a and watch it a week earlier?

      We are Australian - our economy is doing just fine thanks to us exporting dirt to china, unlike America's economy which relies on exporting crap (ie. Movies, TV and reality drama) to the rest of the western world.

      Sorry if I don't believe that bittorrenting supports terrorism or is un-patriotic.

    105. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using US itunes store prices:

      Walking Dead: $19.99 per season, HD;
      Fringe: $39.99 per season;
      Big Bang Theory: $29.99 per season;
      Game of Thrones: $38.99 per season, HD;
      Falling Skies: Don't see it on the iTunes store, but Season 1 Blu Ray is available from their website for $49.99 ($39.99 for DVD)

      So, assuming there's 1 season per year, that's... $178.95.

      (In other words, your "1200/yr" figure is almost off by an order of magnitude. You could easily watch these shows without violating copyright, for a very reasonable price - and the money you spend on THOSE SHOWS would be a way of voting very specifically with your wallet: "i'm willing to buy X, Y, and Z, but I won't pay 1200 a year for a cable subscription for all that other bullshit."

    106. Re:A week? by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

      People love their soap operas...that's all SGU was...

      Somebody liked SGU???

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    107. Re:A week? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      $140 month in my town in USA.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    108. Re:A week? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      In most parts of the country HD+DVR+a package that includes HBO is going to easily top $100/mo. You may be able to get it below that by bundling it with phone and internet service, but by that time you're sending $150 or more to the cable company each month.

    109. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that would constitute torture, as it's a clear violation of their human rights under the Geneva Conventions.

      Sure, you can waterboard them. But you best not make them wait a week for the latest episode of Game of Thrones.

      (Unrelated: I'm not usually into blondes, but goddamn, I love that HBO spends time finding ways to expose Daenerys' tits.)

    110. Re:A week? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Considering he said he bought the newest book on the day of release, I would assume he already knows any potential spoilers. Or does the TV series change things?

      As for the issue...I might be interested in seeing the series if I had HBO. The cost of DVDs isn't worth it, but they are available on Netflix, so maybe I'll give it a shot. If it weren't available there, I would simply not watch it. Just because I'm not willing to pay for something doesn't mean I am justified in pirating it. (If I lived in an area where I simply couldn't get it, then I may have a different attitude.)

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    111. Re:A week? by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Dude, you guys have Danger 5 and that isn't even available through approved channels in the states.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    112. Re:A week? by Fluffeh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, that's taking the argument I made right out of context. Lets say you want to get sandwich for lunch from a shop. However, the only cafe around won't sell you a sandwich unless it is part of a "lunchtime fixed menu". However, that menu includes breakfast, dinner, a three course dessert, alcoholic bevages and a courtesy waiter who spoons it into your mouth. That Fixed Menu also costs four hundred dollars. You would go somewhere else to get lunch.

      If my $1,200 per year covers 262,800 hours of programming (30 channels, by twenty four hours, by three hundred and sixty five days - and there are in fact many more channels that I would have to buy to get access to these few shows I like) and I am only really interested in watching a hundred hours, then I am paying 99.9996% of my money to shows that I think the world would be better off without. Using that math, Foxtel also thinks that my 100 hours of shows that I am actually interested in are worth $0.45 (100 hours divided by 262,800 hours multiplied by my $1,200 cost).

      I really wonder how many shows would be produced if people could pay for individual series on the equivalent of Pay Per View, but at a more reasonable price.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    113. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been watching lately, have you? Remember that part in the book where Dany's dragons are stolen or the part where Jon is captured and doesn't have to kill Qorin? Yeah, me neither.

    114. Re:A week? by Compaqt · · Score: 2

      Dirt to China -- you mean uranium?

      Just wondering.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    115. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the funny thing in Australia after a while they decided to pull all the new American TV series (lots of HBO) from the regular packages and bundle it with the $30+ extra movies package (pushing most people over $100 a month, ohh and you can't just buy the movies package), so even if you didn't want movies the only way to get Game Of Thrones etc was to buy that package along with the base package.. With Sci-Fi you can pay $5 or $6 extra a month to get just the one channel on top of the base package, they chose a different model for new TV series and it seems to have backfired...

      Also in Australia we only have one cable provider (well one owner under a few different names) so there isn't exactly any competition and the government has done their best to encourage and support this situation..

    116. Re:A week? by Jimbob+The+Mighty · · Score: 1

      I live in Melbourne, Australia. I was able to watch the Seaon 1 finale of Game of Thrones 2 days before I saw the first advertisment for the series. The ad campaign was launched weeks before the series was aired here.

    117. Re:A week? by yamum · · Score: 1

      The govt used to mandate this. It was maybe 10-15 years ago they "unmandated" it. I think it was a maximum 2 minutes of continuous ads.

    118. Re:A week? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      To watch a weekly show, that's about US$20 per episode.

      You have to be a really great fan of the show to pay that much (notwithstanding the trouble to go through to get it all arranged and installed, and cancelled later).

      And after a free download you can watch it when YOU think it's a good time, not when the broadcaster thinks it's a good time.

    119. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to watch it at the time they specify. If you include the iQ DVR in your package you can automatically set it up to record each episode of Game of Thrones and watch it when ever you want to. Cost: $102 per month (Movie package: $92 + iQHD $10).

    120. Re:A week? by Compaqt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >I really wonder how many shows would be produced if people could pay for individual series on the equivalent of Pay Per View, but at a more reasonable price.

      Good question. A lot of people also wonder why they always cancel the good shows.

      Some observations:
      1. The "good shows" are the ones that are truly interesting and different. They're not the dime-a-dozen reality shows or sitcom set in an apartment building.
      2. Because of #1, they gain a passionate following.
      3. But the networks play around with the shows, moving them from slot to slot. People don't know when they're on, they miss them, ratings go down.
      4. They're canceled.

      By contrast, if people were paying $1 directly for a show, that'd be, say $2 mil or so per episode, enough to produce most shows. Maybe $2 for a show with EFX.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    121. Re:A week? by schnell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really wonder how many shows would be produced if people could pay for individual series on the equivalent of Pay Per View, but at a more reasonable price.

      Extremely few. Most US broadcast or cable TV networks create 5-20 new programs a year. Some will be hits (maybe), most will be flops. The whole reason they can afford to produce all these shows is that they already know (roughly) how much money they're going to make from advertisers and/or cable subscriptions. Therefore, they have a budget for creating new shows and can take some risks on shows that may or may not pan out, knowing that overall the network will still make money. Every single program will still earn some revenue, even if nobody watches it, because they are guaranteed revenues from the cable/satellite TV providers.

      If every single show was pay-to-watch, some shows might now generate absolutely no revenue. The hits would still be hits, but the network couldn't predict whether it was going to have any money to pay employees or produce new shows, since their revenue could fluctuate every week with the quality of each individual show and episode. Networks would be financially disincentivized to take any chances whatsoever, knowing that every show would need to be as close to a "sure thing" as possible - so get ready for reality TV, all the time.

      The reason that PPV shows are produced today is precisely due to the above - the creators know from past experience that people will pay $70 for a boxing match, or $50 for a wrestling match or whatever they cost. If shows were all PPV, expect nothing but "sure things" to be produced.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    122. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't equate this adaption, as every other tv-from-book adaption, because the series has diverted from the books, and is it's own path now. At this point, they're using the story from the books very mildly, with some story arcs completely new, which end up subtracting a lot from the books down the line.

      Granted I haven't read the books, and only watch the series, but it appears if you have read the books, and then watch the series, you pull your hair out because it ISN'T just like the books down to the T.

      I'll read the books, or at least the first 2, before season 3 of G.O.T. starts.

    123. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This how I do it: Set the DVR to record the show. Start watching show 15 to 30 minutes into the show. Jump all commercial breaks.

    124. Re:A week? by wanzeo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I call BS. I devote a large part of my free to movies, tv, and internet media. Even so, I was able to go through the entire first year of Game of Thrones without watching it or getting spoilers. Most people will go out of their way to avoid giving away spoilers with a degree of fanaticism rarely seen anywhere else.

      No, people torrent Game of Thrones because they can. Maybe this particular example is a little easier to justify because of the absurd notion of actually buying cable + HBO, but everything else is available to torrent as well. Even over-the-air shows, which are essentially free, are torrented because it only takes 1 person in a billion who is willing to capture it and edit out the advertising for the rest of us.

      The only business model that can survive into the future is one that clearly connects money raised with future content (think kickstarter, but with mainstream professionals instead of super-niche pipe dreams). If Game of Thrones announced tomorrow they were not making another season until it was paid for, my $20 would be in their paypal account within the hour. They could charge as the market will bear, but only the stuff that people actually want could get made.

    125. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, mostly coal and iron ore.

    126. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was trained to download my television when it used to take 12 months+

      Sure the world has moved on, but we found a better way. To little to late.

    127. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Uh, the major spoilers for the entire season (and for the three seasons to follow if it gets reviewed) are already widely known, because the series is based on a popular series of novels.

    128. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      They've changed some minor things, generally to move the story along faster. But so far, the major plot developments--the sort of things that people think of as "spoilers"-- have matched the books.

    129. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage?

      Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      lol. Well you obviously haven't seen the show :)

    130. Re:A week? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Why can't they just put it online, on demand, you know like the "pirates" do? There are several issues with the antiquated methods:
      a) You can't record HBO shows in my neck of the woods (even though it's the US) - the DRM prevents the Cable DVR from recording and my personal DVR can't decode encrypted channels (legally). So you're stuck watching at particular times or ... pirating it.
      b) HBO shows don't seem to appear on Hulu or Netflix or any other on demand online distribution channels
      c) I cancelled cable and now pay only for cable internet + hulu + netflix + amazon and I can get pretty much anything I damn well please, if I can't, I get TED (The Episode Downloader) to download it for me. I would gladly pay for HBO on-demand if they offered it for say $5/month (which what HBO is at most worth for the 4h/month of entertainment they offer).

      Give us unrestricted IPTV and the world will be way better off, pirating will drop at least 90%, air the damn thing every 4 hours if you really want to stick to a certain hour.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    131. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 2

      Actually, it is possible to rent and watch the entire season for considerably less than $159.99. Just rent it from your local Redbox or video store. If you are a Netflix subscriber in the US, it costs you nothing extra.

      And is it really such a horrible hardship to go to the bathroom during the FBI warning?

    132. Re:A week? by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      Regional licensing. Don't know about the parent but I live in a country that only recently (last six months) got movies in the iTunes store. TV shows? Hah! We've been begging for that for ages. Foreign TV networks won't let us watch shows via their websites ("This content is not available in your region at this time") and local TV channels clearly don't have the right licensing agreements to stream foreign shows (even more infuriating when they list all shows they air on their website but only a handful have the little "stream this show now" icon next to it).

      At this point I've just given up. I don't even own a TV anymore, just a 1080p projector and my computer. I use a couple of RSS feeds from private torrent trackers to download the few shows I want to watch whenever they become available (normally within hours of airing in their country of origin). My only problem these days is that I catch myself talking about stuff that happens on the shows weeks or sometimes months before my friends (since they watch the "imported" broadcast on TV).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    133. Re:A week? by KhabaLox · · Score: 4, Funny

      We are Australian - our economy is doing just fine thanks to us exporting dirt to china, unlike America's economy which relies on exporting crap (ie. Movies, TV and reality drama) to the rest of the western world.

      Because fuckers like you won't pay for our culture. ;)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    134. Re:A week? by chilvence · · Score: 1

      I know somebody that acts like that in real life. I have to be honest I don't much like them.

      Can't blame tv folks though, after all they do go to 'drama' school, so drama is what you will get. The first thing actors and writers are going to forget is how actual real people behave, because they are watching and mimicking them instead of actually being one. There is always some sense mixed in every show, maybe a bit of humour, a bit of imagination, but the melodrama poison is just a hazard of the job.

      Not to take the edge of your rant, but I reckon you might find it more productive to not let it bother you. Unless you would rather watch normal space men go about their normal space lives with a complete absence of mortal peril :)

    135. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm aware, only Big Bang Theory is available via Australian iTunes, and getting the US versions without setting up a proxy server and obtaining a US credit card isn't exactly easy.

    136. Re:A week? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The problem with the timing tends not to be the network that produced the show but rather with the ones paying to get exclusive rights in another country. Here in Sweden it's not uncommon for shows to be artificially held back several weeks just to "buffer" for breaks in the US TV seasons which don't traditionally exist in the Swedish ones.

      Of course, the whole exclusive geographic licensing thing means I can't just stream the show legally from the US (or download it from iTunes), my choices are basically brought down to:

      1. Wait patiently like a good consumer until the show airs here.
      2. Wait even longer until the show comes out on DVD/Bluray (after the end of the season, if they're feeling particularly shrewd they'll hold back the Bluray release until after the DVD release).
      3. Pirate it.

      Guess which option most tech-savvy users go with.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    137. Re:A week? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Funny all I have to do to watch every season of Game of Thrones past, present and future is be patient. I found I enjoy TV series the most when I own all the seasons on DVD and watch one episode after another without missing any, living a normal life in between of course. If I die before achieving this, meh, seriously think I give a crap. Game of Thrones sounds good, likely I'll buy it in several years time, once the complete series box is discounted of course, waited that, no sweat waiting longer.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    138. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The content you have requested is not available in your region".

      You were saying..?

    139. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters?

      Part of most peoples enjoyment from current TV/Movies/Games comes from social interaction (discussion).

      Therefore, yes, it is impossible for most Slashdotters to wait a year, at least if they want the most out of their experience.

    140. Re:A week? by ThePeices · · Score: 1

      A week is not a problem, but there are other countries than Oz.

      Where I am, we havent even been shown the first season yet. For that reason alone I pirate it. Im not waiting more than a year.

      I own and have read all of the Song of Fire and Ice series, so I see nothing wrong with pirating the series. Mr Martin has made his profit off me.

    141. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND a monitor/TV, AND electricity, AND eyeballs, AND ...

    142. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regional licensing. Don't know about the parent

      you mean, the guy whose opening statement was, "I live in Canada," and then proceeded to explain that it would cost him 1200 per year to get the show legally?

      The numbers I just provided are absolutely relevant to him. If your country has different terms, then by all means, bitch about the unavailability of the show, but when it's cheap & legally available, it's pretty hard to argue that you have to pay 1200 a year, when 40 bucks will get you what you want.

    143. Re:A week? by Fluffeh · · Score: 2

      Indeed, it's often hard to be able to purchase what you want out here in a timely manner.

      A perfect example is Dollhouse. I simply can't buy it here. EzyDVD has had this up for a few years now: http://www.ezydvd.com.au/DVD/dollhouse-joss-whedons-season-1/dp/807893. JBHifi (one of our main DVD/Music retailers) hasn't got a release date. Sanity ( http://www.sanity.com.au/Search.aspx?sanquery=dollhouse ) doesn't have it. I can buy it via Fishbowl ( http://www.fishpond.com.au/Movies/Dollhouse-Season-2-Eliza-Dushku/5039036044707 ) but guess what, it is simply the US - Region 2 - version that I need a multi-region DVD to play. That's a show that aired in 2009 for goodness sake! I enjoyed it, I want to give the studios money for it, yet I can't find a decent way to do it - businesses that generally make it hard for their customers to get their goods generally don't stay in business.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    144. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because you feel like maybe you paid for george martin's lunch one time does that mean everyone else involved owes you free content? really, you just sound like someone that wants an excuse to complain.

      also, your calculations are suspect. you're going to buy the pvr hardware then plan to not use it. also you're claiming that it would cost $200/mo for cable + hd + hbo. rogers is offering the same right now for ~$110/mo. and that buys a lot more than just the one hour per week in question, and they offer a non-pvr box.

      Honestly, i think this is the best show on tv, probably of this decade. I am glad to pay for it. Person centuries worth of labor went into producing it. I don't like working for free and neither should they.

      You bought a book. Good for you. Go fuck yourself with it.

    145. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that plenty of people would be glad to pay for HBO, as they put out a lot of other good content as well, but that requires spending a lot of money for a cable package that they probably don't care about. HBO could obviously fix this and just sell everyone who wants one a subscription to HBO Go, even at the same rate that it would cost to pick it up through a cable or dish provider and they'd get hundreds of thousands of new subscribers. But that's not enough to offset any loses from deals with cable companies who'd be pissed so they won't do it, even though millions of people pirate their show.

    146. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I obviously don't know which bit of Canada you are in - but Rogers (which covers Ontario) ergo a very large number of Canadians sells The Movie Network (which includes HBO Canada) for $16.95 per month plus tax. No where near the $50 you say it costs. They also don't require you to buy and HDPVR - you can rent them or if you take one of their deals you can get it rental free. Indeed you don't even need a PVR - an HD Terminal will also do the trick. Even if you *did* want to buy an HDPVR, you don't have to buy it from Rogers - you can get one from Future Shop or Best Buy. Just double check with the shop assistants that it's compatible with Rogers before you buy.

      The upgrade to HD packages won't cost you $50 per month either.

      Suffice to say, if you're a Rogers customer it won't cost you nearly as much as you're speculating. I'd be surprised if Bell's prices are much different.

      Yours,

      AC who works in Rogers Customer Service

    147. Re:A week? by GNious · · Score: 1

      Thank you - I thought I was going mad, while watching that episode...

    148. Re:A week? by rockout · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hardship has nothing to do with it. The reality is that HBO (and most other media creators) are clinging to an outdated business model, and the longer they cling to it, the more people will pirate their shows. I'm not saying it's legal, or even morally right, but it's reality. And really, since when has what's morally right ever influenced the corporations more than the all-mighty dollar? There is a certain irony in watching as all these people download Game of Thrones instead of paying for it simply because they CAN'T pay for it yet, and even if they did, they'd still have to deal with the annoying things like DRM and FBI warnings, etc. It's not one single thing that drives people to download, it's the sum total.

      Eventually the business model will change, as the dinosaurs in charge retire or die off, and the next generation takes control of the process. I can't predict what that will be with any accuracy; if I could, I'd be a millionaire, I suppose. But one thing is certain; the current way they're going about it is completely useless. And folks like yourself that focus on the "right" way to do things ("right" as defined by those corps, of course) are missing the forest for the trees.

      Remember..... perception of reality, IS reality.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    149. Re:A week? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      True Blood and the books they are based on are wildly divergent (I hear the same about Dexter, but I hear the shows are better than the books so no loss). GoT is faithful enough, there are differences, but I'm never surprised and I don't see how spoilers are that relevant.

      Anyway being held hostage for a week for the show is asinine, can't really blame people for it, especially when there is no good technical reason and it's just about business bullshit.

    150. Re:A week? by fearofcarpet · · Score: 2

      I live in Europe, where we get a grab-bag of American TV shows at various offsets from their original air dates. For example, Dexter just started here a year or two ago, but The Big Bang Theory seems to be almost real time. HBO just started being offered in our market this year, and it seems to run basically the same stuff as in the US, but on a delay. I follow a few TV shows--Game of Thrones Included--but I can't be bothered to figure out when the next episode that I haven't seen is airing in my living room, so I just download everything. Typically shows sit around for days or weeks--less often months or years--before I get around to watching them because I have to travel for work, my schedule fluctuates, and I have an ever-expanding family to entertain me.

      So I am technically paying for the right to watch these shows on my TV through the coax cable that comes into my house, just not via the cable modem, and not on-demand (and not without hard-coded subs and commercials for products I will never use). But I am a relentless pirate because TV is a PITA and DVRs are a kludge for something that works incredibly well with a low-power Linux box and some python scripts. With my current setup, I can also stream to my laptop/tablet from just about any hotel WiFi (region blocking prevents me from streaming "legally.") But I don't subscribe to cable because I like handing money over for a service that I don't use; they bundle it with my Internet access which to me feels a bit like an admission that downloading is more facile than watching TV.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
    151. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This person is a prototypical downloader. Completely uninformed. Needs to read more newspapers/news websites for approx. 2 years before they will understand what is going on around them.

      Note to OP: The reason other people wait a week is because they _want to be legal_. They want to do the right thing, even though nobody is really watching. In your case, I hope you get caught, because you are the ones who bring the group down. I know it sounds bizarre, but most other people do the right thing even without supervision. Please don't whine when you get picked up; you don't/won't have a right.

    152. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      $159.99 for the boxed Blu-Ray

      I bought season 1 from amazon for my kindle fire for like $25. you must be doing it wrong.

      it takes a certain kind of person to show your kind of willingness to serve

      it takes a certain kind of distorted world view to think that when one party voluntarily produces a valuable good or service that a second party is "serving" the first party by compensating them for it.

      You have ZERO claim over these people's time or motivations. They owe you NOTHING. If you don't want to pay them, go fuck off, you owe them nothing either.

    153. Re:A week? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the advertisers (those paying to let you watch the show) would think that was a great idea!

      Too bad. They need to figure out how to deal with that kind of thing, or they are only going to continue bleeding. I don't even HAVE a TV because of their bullshit.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    154. Re:A week? by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      So basically, it doesn't bother you that you're paying twice as much for streaming/downloads as you would for the season DVD?

    155. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They stopped airing the show after season2 in my country and the stores didn't even sell the DVD box after season3.
      I tried to get season4 from Amazon but they said they didn't ship to my country...
      Only 1 option left was ......

    156. Re:A week? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I know, right? I mean I was totally going to solve hunger in Haiti, but instead I decided to watch Game of Thrones and was pissed off that some monkey shit already ruined every ounce of suspense I could have obtained from the show. My emotional state has greater dynamic range than the decibel scale. And those TV execs, I know they were going to give the proceeds for Game of Thrones to starving African children and were shortchanged by some Australians who got the show from illicit sources, so they decided to just pocket that fat wad of cash instead.

      These decisions we make certainly aren't based on our own motivations, but rather a detailed and reasoned understanding of the state of the world around us. I would hate to think that our capricious nature and hedonistic tendencies were being put above the fate of the world and those less fortunate, nor that we were unable to put in perspective our own vantage point in life with respect to every unfortunately horror story that exists on planet earth right now. That would be truly outrageous.

    157. Re:A week? by EdIII · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ease of Use.

      Arguing about it being on at a different local time live is just pedantic. You're right the 12 hours makes no difference.

      If they are already paying for a cable subscription and have DVR, the path of least resistance dictates that they would just hit the record button instead of going online and messing around, and then trying to get it on their big screen.

      That's what the studios just don't get. Make the path of least resistance be in their favor, even if it theoretically results in slightly less revenue (which I don't believe).

      Additionally, what is beyond stupid, is having a one week delay and then claiming that paying customers who pirate the show a week early are actually causing any declines in revenue. They paid for the product, just went out and got a copy a week early.

      When that logic does not apply because the customer is not paying them for anything like a cable subscription, and they are not providing a method of purchase in that demographic, it is ludicrous to complain about any piracy from that demographic and that it affects revenue that logically cannot exist.

    158. Re:A week? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      (I'm in the North so the best we have to hope for is the torch passing through

      Uhhhhh.....

      Do you mean the flash light passing through? I seem to remember that is what you guys mean by torch. Kind of like how french fries are chips, and chips are crisps and all that.....

      Or is a torch both things at the same time?

      I'm confused.

    159. Re:A week? by Malc · · Score: 1

      I pay £145 / year (~CAD$233) for a TV license. My TV has a FreeView tuner built-in, but I also have a cheap-o Freesat box too. That's about a half what you need for basic cable in Canada. I actually refused to pay Rogers when I lived in Toronto due to being too expensive, and not offering much more than the handful of free channels from the CN tower (and way better video compression quality OTA).

      To get the Game of Thrones, I'd have to pay for the Atlantic HD channel from Sky. That would double or probably triple the cost of TV, and support that scum Rupert Murdoch. Hmmmm, I wonder why people are downloading GoTs in the UK?

    160. Re:A week? by Eraesr · · Score: 1

      Look sunshine, I live in the Netherlands in a town where my cable supplier hasn't even bothered making HBO available to me. So the only way for me to get the series is by pirating it.

    161. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would also need digital if he wanted HD version that would be another 20 a month.

      Who needs to PVR, do not forget OnDemand comes with those services. And HBO OnDemand has the latest show available and all previous shows available with the latest show being available on Tuesday night after the live release on Sunday.

      By the way I live in Canada I have Rogers and I have read every book, hell I remember waiting for Storm of Swords to come out. Oddly enough I do not like the show it is nowhere close to as good as the books.

      Despite all of that, idiots like me pay for that show to be made, so your welcome. Remember this, if everyone did what you do there would be no series to be pirating.

    162. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop being such a prideful douche who thinks your way is the right way. WE WANT TO GIVE HBO ONEY AND WATCH NOW! They are so terrible at business they think getting 100 bucks from the 10 people a month that are stupid enough to still have premium cable is better than getting 10 a month from the five hundred thousand willing to pay for streaming only content.

      Does this hinestly seem like the right business ecision to you? Is your desire to wait until every spoiler is leaked to the public to the point that everyone knows everything and discusses it in the supermarket line really the one you think everyone should have to put up with? DVDs are meant to OWN a show after it has aired and you've seen ot and know you like it. You don't just buy the set of any TV show you think you might like and hope for the best, At least SMART people don't.

    163. Re:A week? by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage?

      Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      How can this be moderated "Insightful"?! - It's arrogant bullshit, that's what it is!

      A week, a month, a year... Different countries, different delays... and that's the problem! - Not how much but that there is a delay at all.

      I pirate (meaning: download each new episode a few hours after airing when they turn up online) a dozen shows, and these shows are by far not all available in my country (yet). some turn up a few months late on subscription channels, but most turn up about a year late on 'free' advertising-based channels. On average per season 2-3 shows never make it here. Some don't even get released on DVD.

      It should at least be possible for everyone to watch the shows as they air online through subscription... but all offers on this seem to be limited to the US residents only. Why can't someone from Europe sign up and actually be allowed to pay for the pleasure? - I guess they don't want our money so we have to pirate the shows instead. How mind-boggling stupid. We want to pay and they won't sell.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    164. Re:A week? by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      Nailed it bro!

    165. Re:A week? by chromeronin · · Score: 1

      Here in NZ season on is only now being shown on sky. I could buy the DVD, but then I'd have to spend a few hours ripping it for my plex server. Overall, I'd pay for a legit DRM free service.

    166. Re:A week? by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      You can't watch Game of Thrones on free-to-air TV, because the outdated-but-still-better-than-the-US ratings system won't let you show R-rated content there.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    167. Re:A week? by Moofie · · Score: 2

      OK. Tried step 1 for Season 2. It's not available in the United States.

      What now?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    168. Re:A week? by jhdsl · · Score: 1

      Just in this little place you call Europe.

    169. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. They refuse to sell them to me, because "The content you have requested is not available in your region".

    170. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      holy damn if the stupid studios started doing that... Stargate SG-1 might have been be hitting season 15... do we get to provide input on where we wanna see some story ideahttp://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/05/20/2250211/whos-pirating-game-of-thrones-and-why#s going too?

    171. Re:A week? by geogob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't create a hype about something and expect those hung by it to wait a year or more. It's simply against the nature of what you are trying to do with your marketing campaign.

    172. Re:A week? by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      Yep. Fully 25% of commercial free-to-air TV is ads. If there's a show on free-to-air that I want to watch (and just happen to have the TV on) I'll pause it for 15 minutes for each hour of programming, just so that I can skip the ads.

      If they didn't turn the volume up (yes, I know, they don't turn up the volume, they use a compressor so the average loudness is more. whatever, it still sounds louder) then they'd be less annoying than they are...

    173. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best post!

    174. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they add another 5db to the volume. completely kills the mood. you go from suspense to "HEY! DON'T TRADE IN YOUR CAR WITHOUT CALLING US FIRST!"

    175. Re:A week? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      In the UK if you wanted to watch it you'd be need Sky TV or cable. That's £20 per month for a minimum contract of 12 months or £240 just to watch a show which only runs for 10 weeks. It's not hard to understand why many people would wish to download it instead. I suspect even people with Sky / cable download it anyway just so they have a copy which they can watch without a using bunch of iffy Sky software with all the DRM and time restrictions that it imposes on viewing.

    176. Re:A week? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Option 4: Download it now then buy the DVD in a year's time to make things 'legal'.

      --
      No sig today...
    177. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really. I've waited longer than that for a game to come down to the price I care to pay. I also don't have to spend $400 every so often for the latest graphics cards.

      I try to but I tend to forget what movies/series I wanted to watch. When things are available/affordable I have usually lost interest or forgotten about them.
      Instead I end up watching funny youtube clips and browse 9gag.

    178. Re:A week? by the_enigma_1983 · · Score: 1

      Part of me thinks they're getting dangerously close to messing this up too much. A search for "automatic downloading of tv shows" actually leads to some reasonable articles showing how to set up automated downloads. I also know that software exists which can tie in to these and automatically sort tv shows and add them to libraries in XBMC or similar.

      It's not going to be long before average Joe can install one piece of software, and from then on have "free" TV shows popping up on his home system whenever they air. As the generations get older too, you'll have less and less people who are used to the idea of "channels" on a TV even, and soon this will be the norm. People are switching because it's easier, cheaper or more convenient to pirate. What motivation (beyond legal repercussions) will be left when a majority of people are using free 1-click software packages to acquire TV shows?

    179. Re:A week? by Pseudonym · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where I live, it's legal to borrow your friend's car if they think it's okay. They also have cars that you can hire on a pay-only-for-what-you-use basis. They even have ones where someone will drive it for you.

      I can only imagine what it's like to live in a place where cars are sold by the manufacturer on the condition that they're not resold, hired out or lent. I feel bad for you, dude.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    180. Re:A week? by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      I'm in Denmark and I've got both seasons of Dollhouse on Blu-ray. Don't know which reason they are as all my players are region free. Wouldn't buy one if it wasn't. No, it isn't common for players to be region free but everything can be modified and they will be. Nobody serious about movies or tv-shows would want it any other way as it takes forever for even a fraction to be released locally.

      The region system is stupid and just another way of geo-discriminating people. So our money isn't as good as the money of people who happen to live in the US and Canada? No matter how hard we try we cannot get to pay for watching tv-shows in a timely fashion. We have no choice but to pirate them. I want to pay. I want to support the shows. But no, they don't want our money. Sure, we can buy the boxed releases but buying the locally released box-sets released years later would be supporting the delayed release and I don't want that. Basically I want everything to be available globally on all formats at the same time. I want the choice of going to a cinema or watching it at home. I want the choice of watching it once for less or to have to watch whenever I feel like it for more. I want this choice from day one.

      Why don't they offer this?

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    181. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no commercials on HBO.

    182. Re:A week? by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally I think HBO is actually the most forward-thinking of the cable-related services. HBOGo has their entire library available for streaming. Sure it's a bummer that you have to have a cable subscription with one of a few providers to use it, but I'm sure if they could sell cable-less HBO subscriptions they would. As it is I'm sure the actual cable companies are kicking and screaming about HBOGo. I don't even pay for the subscription, I'm using a friend's cable account (with permission) to log into it. I don't have cable TV myself because there's virtually nothing I ever want to watch on TV that's not on HBO (or another premium service).

      Keep it up HBO!

    183. Re:A week? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      The software already exists.

      uTorrent and RSS feeds. Any decent private torrent tracker will have RSS feeds. Some regex rules (not simple I know), an updated RSS feed 4 times an hour, and you have an automated download to whatever box you want to run.

      I can't remember since I don't use it anymore, but there was a one-click front end for this kind of set up. It was based off public trackers which is why I stopped early on. Public torrents have way to much infected crap and are monitored by dickheads willing to sue you if they decide to make an example (of their stupidity).

      It had TV shows divided into categories, and IIRC it had its own RSS feed too. For the time I had it running I had over a dozen shows on automatic download schedules.

      Sorry, I can't remember the name anymore, but what you are talking about already exists. Why more average people are not using it, I dunno.

    184. Re:A week? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Well? Clearly some people would rather pirate than wait. However amoral and impatient you see it, they're not going to stop. They don't have a problem here. HBO has the problem. If HBO wants people to stop they'll need a better tactic than telling people off for not wanting to wait.

    185. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try living in france. We have to wait sometimes years to get an awful french-dubbed version. So yeah, most of us just pirate the original version.

    186. Re:A week? by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      i never said it was a problem, i personally torrent the shit out of tv and movies because it's slightly easier than getting them legally. i couldn't give a shit whether it's right or wrong, however i have been known to pay for reasonably priced quality content rather than torrent it.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    187. Re:A week? by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      I do this. Since I'm also watching Walking Dead and Mad Men (and thinking of Boardwalk Empire), it works.

      Also,I can lend the DVD/BDs to friends and relatives 10 years from now. AFAIK my brother is watching B5 atm.

    188. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the other hand.... it got boobies in it! (and dragons)

    189. Re:A week? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Kickstarter?

      "David Benioff here. I did the Game of Thrones TV adaptation, which you liked. HBO saw the ratings were falling and pulled out of the third series. If you want to see it, the first three episodes will cost $1.5m. HBO say they'll air it if it's free to them, and the rest of the episodes in the series will be funded by them under the regular arrangement.

      You put $10m into a watch which connects to your phone, so I know you donate to projects you are interested in. Get donating."

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    190. Re:A week? by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

      There are shows on VODO that follow a model like this, where by you donate so they can make the next episode.

    191. Re:A week? by Monolith1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because fuckers like you won't pay for our culture. ;)

      What's the difference between Americans and yoghurt? If you leave yoghurt alone for 200 years it will grow a culture.

    192. Re:A week? by Mark+Hood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Game of Thrones, Season 1 (UK experience):
      1. Open iTunes. (no Amazon VOD service over here)
      2. Search for 'Game of Thrones'.
      3. Filter out podcasts.
      4. Discover it's not available.
      5. Buy the Blu-Ray or DVD instead (which only recently came out, but OK).
      6. Realise that it's technically illegal to copy them onto a mobile device.
      7. Know that I'm being screwed over 'because they can', and start making justifications for an impending download.

      Season 2:
      1. Not available online, or in any stores.
      2. Ah, it's on Sky Atlantic (their rebranded HBO channel) only one week behind the US.
      3. But that channel is not available on cable, only on satellite.
      4. Decide I don't want to move my phone, internet just to get one channel.
      5. See step 7 above.

      Hat tip to the Oatmeal.

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
    193. Re:A week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People like to discuss show on the internet and with friends. The media companies actively encourage it, for them viral marketing is extremely valuable. Yes, it's the same lame peer pressure that makes school kids do stupid things just to be part of the group.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    194. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot afford it, I'm on unenmplyment insurance. I wish I coukd.

      Hopefully when I can in 5 years, they"ll let me give them money without licensing anything.

    195. Re:A week? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. It's a stupid warning, when I download something like that I don't get it anyway
      2. The FBI doesn't have jurisdiction in the Netherlands
      3. If I bought it, then I don't need any more warning that copying it is frowned upon
      So the least they could do is make it skippable.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    196. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage?"

      Well, by not reading Entertainment Weekly,Hollywood Reporter and tons of other news outlets who spill the beans and spoil the stuff for you.
      I live in Europe and I would have to wait and watch it with a crappy German or French dubbing which I can do without.
      I want to see it in the original language, no matter what it is, they won't give it to me, so I torrent it.

    197. Re:A week? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really."

      For Fantasy shows perhaps. Lots of other shows have tons of puns about things in the news that you won't understand a year or 2 later.
      Also for popular shows you will have read in the past year in several news sites all the solutions, who murdered Laura Palmer, that John Locke is really dead and who's the Man in Black.

    198. Re:A week? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many lost sales they would have if you didn't pirate it and consequently didn't buy the box sets?

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    199. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I paid like $44 (shipped) on Amazon to buy the GoT boxes set? Where is this $159 coming from? $4/episode in a new fold out box with 5 (or is it 6?) Blu-rays shipped to my door is hardly outrageous.

    200. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $100?

      I live in Canada. I bought Dance with Dragons the day it came out from my local bookstore. (It helped that I was taking several cross-Canada trips for work a week after it came out.) I bought every book and I've told dozens of people about the series, probably making Martin enough to buy lunch, maybe dessert afterwards.

      If I would like to upgrade my service to watch Game of Thrones, I would have to do the following: 1. Buy an HD-DVR system from my oligarchy cable / ISP / phone provider ($600) 2. Upgrade to cable. ($100 a month) 3. Upgrade to HD service ($50 a month) 4. Upgrade to some package that includes HBO ($50 a month)

      And then I'd have to make certain that I was home during that time. Although I would have spent $600 on the HD PVR in step 1, they are so buggy and flakey that they tend to lose settings and recorded shows. So all told, I would have to spend close to one thousand dollars to watch Game of Thrones in the off chance that I'm home, my wife is home, the kids are in bed, the DVR doesn't pixelate out, they don't have decryption problems (happened all the time during the Olympics), AND they don't lose all my settings so I could actually watch the HBO that I've spent a grand on.

      Option 2 is not watch the show. I'd really rather watch it. My wife likes the show as well.

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release. Riiiight.

      Option 4 is direct electronic import from Sweden. Like Colt 45, it works every time.

      I guess some kind of legitimate online provider (Netflix) at $10/month is somehow out of the question?

      Regardless, I'm not exactly sure what you were trying to prove here. How bad you want to watch a cable TV show, or why stealing a Ferrari is SO much better than stealing a Chevy due to the price tag.

    201. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These do not exist in Canada.
      Hell Video rental stores do not exist in Canada. I'm serious. Blockbuster went bankrupt, and Rogers Video closed all their locations. Unless you want to rent asian counterfeits with chinese subtitles from the hole in the wall places, there is no way to rent anything.

    202. Re:A week? by HnT · · Score: 1

      Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      You mean a world where people are very, very passionate about a fantastic and thrilling story put into breath-taking pictures with beautiful sceneries and excellent actors portraying deep, actually interesting characters and people just cannot wait to see how it continues? And a world where a majority of internet users are from the States and you are pretty much bound to run into spoilers or as a fan won't be able to really participate in the fan communities because you are still waiting to see the latest episode? If you are not a TV show junkie, you probably cannot relate and that's OK but who are you to judge?

      You may sneeze at this all you want - let's say you are a sports fan, are you satisfied with reading the results of a big game in tomorrow's newspaper? I doubt you are, thus a multi-billion-dollar industry does nothing but show live events. Is it really so strange that fans of a great TV shows are just as passionate and desperate about seeing the next episode? Welcome to the Western world of entertainment and consuming...

      --
      "Only one thing is impossible for God: To find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." - Mark Twain
    203. Re:A week? by MattSausage · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, which cable companies give HBO away free? I've never seen this before.

    204. Re:A week? by rb12345 · · Score: 1

      If this post is to be believed, it's Sky-only. If you currently have cable, you're even worse off (£240/year for Sky + internet costs (cable or installing a new phone line) on top).

    205. Re:A week? by kikito · · Score: 1

      > Your excuses, they ring hollow.

      All rings are hollow. Otherwise you would not be able to put your fingers in them.

    206. Re:A week? by Inda · · Score: 1

      "The Big Bang Theory seems to be almost real time"

      It's not in the UK.

      The wife and I were watching it a few weeks ago. I swore to her that we must have must have missed some episodes as the plot wasn't making any sense.

      TBP, Season 5, all of them in one go was easier than finding the missing episodes. That is part of the story of my piracy.

      The other part is that I used to pay for Usenet access. A large sum of money with stupidly high bandwidth. I wonder who else would like that money?

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    207. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming iTunes sells it. Most often they don't.

      My boss is a KISS fan, but can't buy "Gene Simmons Family Jewels" from iTunes in the UK. The series may never make DVD, but he could download it. This is an example of being forced to choose between piracy or nothing.

    208. Re:A week? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 5, Informative

      And is it really such a horrible hardship to go to the bathroom during the FBI warning?

      Is it really so unbelievable to you that people don't feel they should have to sit through that bullshit if they actually paid for the fucking product like they're supposed to? Unskippable commercials and previews, ridiculously long animated menus...I click my pirated file and the episode starts, immediately.

      My pirated copies of the first season of Game of Thrones don't have any of that bullshit on them, they're in a file format and in a codec that is recognized on every device I have, and will play on literally any device I have without a bunch of stupid bullshit DRM standing in the way. They are literally a superior product in every single way.

    209. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoilers?!? It's based on a freaking book series!!!

      Though that could apply to other properties...

    210. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're way out. Try this from Verizon, Brighthouse is similar too:

      Odd because here in the USA it's more like:
      1) DVR - $10/mo rental (Free with the larger cable packages)

      $16 for the oldest DVR, $18.90 for the current model. No "free" STB of any kind.

      2) Cable - $50/mo

      $80 + $79 for Internet, or $129 bundled.

      3) HD Service - Usually free with the bigger cable packages, $10/mo if not

      No free HD, one of two options for above if you want more than 5 channels.

      4) HBO - Usually free in the larger cable packages, or you can usually get it free if you threaten to switch to dish/at&t u-verse etc, if all else fails, it's $15/mo

      Worst case, it's $85/month.

      Never free, $24/month. So you see, you obviously have no idea what you are talking about, you lied, pretending you wrong numbers were facts.

    211. Re:A week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Better idea: Buy the season pass but then pirate an .mkv version of each episode. Much better format that works with my TV's DLNA and on XMBC, no shitty DRM in sight. HD episodes available within an hour or two of broadcast, and I can set up my server to automatically download them via RSS torrent/NZB feeds.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    212. Re:A week? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Also,I can lend the DVD/BDs to friends and relatives 10 years from now.

      I can just give my friends a relatives my digital copies, and I've got MP3s that are older than that on my hard drive, downloaded in the glorious Napster days.

      My digital copies aren't trapped on a piece of plastic that depends on 3rd party manufacturers to still be making players for the proprietary formats involved. My digital copies can be transcoded when newer, better codecs come around. How does that work with your DVD/BDs? I can copy my digital files by pressing CTRL-C. How do you copy your DVD/BDs?

      The pirated copy is a superior product in almost every way.

    213. Re:A week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Stargate Universe was an "expensive" show, costing $2M an episode. Tons of special effects and CGI.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    214. Re:A week? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Someone should make a web site that allows people to donate directly to shows, with target amounts for producing new episodes/seasons. Kind of like Kickstarter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    215. Re:A week? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      If you are a Netflix subscriber in the US, it costs you nothing extra.

      Or a sorcerer with the capability to convince Netflix you are in the US. I oppose piracy, but fuck territorial restrictions. Thankfully our laws refuse to recognise them as a valid use of technological protection measures and still permit breaking them if that's all they're for.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    216. Re:A week? by vlm · · Score: 2

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really. I've waited longer than that for a game to come down to the price I care to pay. I also don't have to spend $400 every so often for the latest graphics cards.

      99.99999% of TV is only watched because its trendy, because everyone else is doing it, because they can talk to everyone else about the show at the water cooler / while smoking / while on break / while trying to pick up a date

      Yes, yes, last thursday I did watch "city on the edge of forever" from 40 years ago, because its good. And today I'm making a data verifier and importer system out of bear skins and stove knives at work. Actually I'm using Perl. Same difference. Anyway that doesn't mean that a week from now anyone will remember "Game of Thrones" or want to discuss it at the water cooler / smoke area / singles bar, much less a year later or 40 years later.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    217. Re:A week? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      That's season two. Season one was bloody ages ago. In fact, we're only a week behind the US (for a bloody change).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    218. Re:A week? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Wait... there's a Falling Skies series 2?!?

      Fuck you New Zealand. Fuck you. Can't get anything in a decent timeframe. (Is it on Hulu? Hmm...)

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    219. Re:A week? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      My sister-in-law has read all the True Blood books, but she honestly says she prefers the show to the books, which is not something I hear very often regardless of the show in question. The show is taken much more seriously, whereas the books are pretty campy...so she tells me, anyway.

      The few things she's told me about the books have made me glad they've taken liberties. For instance, a retarded Elvis as a vampire that goes by the name of Bubba? Yeah, kinda glad they left him off the show...

    220. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that the show is only available to those who pay doesn't help either."

      Let me fix that for them.

      Oh my gosh, you mean pirates steal stuff to which they have no rights. Shocking I say. Shocking! Why didn't they say so before? This is new to me. That would have never occurred to me until I read this post that pirates steal content to which they have no rights. Shocking!

    221. Re:A week? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      This is the pure truth.

      It would cost me a fortune to pay for cable TV, especially HDTV, and on top of that, add HBO.
      I'd be happy to pay-per-view online for the show, or even pay for HBO for the six months GoT is broadcast, but cable TV is way out of budget.

      HBO needs to change it's business model, and stop depending on cabletv companies.

    222. Re:A week? by dave420 · · Score: 1

      A torch is simply a portable means of illumination, so both definitions are covered.

    223. Re:A week? by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      That's funny, because the show is screen the same day as USA in Argentina, are you sure it takes a week to get to australia? We're already well-known for receiving things late in general.

    224. Re:A week? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      In most non-US countries, yes. I have to convince Netflix I am in the United States for them to even take my money - and that includes getting a credit card that they believe was issued by a US bank. Ditto for Hulu, and pretty much every other provider. We've only recently even got streaming radio services, and that's despite the fact that Spotify still hasn't even gotten off their collective asses and launched here. iTunes still won't even sell TV shows.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    225. Re:A week? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      In NZ with Sky (a Foxtel sister company) it's an extra $10/month for ONE channel that contains Game of Thrones. They still don't even carry any other remotely decent Sci-Fi content.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    226. Re:A week? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Netflix will not be getting Game of Thrones or any other HBO series. In the future you will be lucky to see anything on Netflix that is not already being shown on TBS three times a night. The MPAA and studios essentially consider streaming video to be piracy lite.

    227. Re:A week? by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      You'd best hope they don't. Sky TV in NZ (owned by the same people as Foxtel - another fucking News Corp vampire) did this, and 90% of the content on the site requires yet more payment - and they used it as justification to increase the base package price again.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    228. Re:A week? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really. I've waited longer than that for a game to come down to the price I care to pay. I also don't have to spend $400 every so often for the latest graphics cards.

      Depends on your home life.

      When I was a student I had to watch episodes of Star Trek the day after they came out, unless I wanted to be spoiled on t'internet.

      Now I don't have such time with a family taking up most of my time. We're currently working our way through a 90s TV series box-set. Over the last few years we've worked our way through B5/DS9/Buffy/Angel/Fraiser and Farscape in this manner.

      It's much better this way, we don't get into a series to have it cancelled from underneath us (in the last year alone that's Terra Nova and Pan Am). We watched Fringe as it was broadcast, relying on the PVR to stack up a few episodes. All it takes is a single corrupt recording (usually weather related) and it's off to piratebay to get the missing episode. A right hassle. We've stopped now, and will buy the last couple of seasons when they come out

      If the networks released the episodes
      * At the time of broadcast
      * As the broadcasted HD transport stream
      * With no DRM

      Then I'd happily pay $50 per [26 episode] season for a decent series.

      If not, I'll buy the whole box-set for $50 in 10 years time and they get less money from me.

      Some series work as TV. You can watch simpsons, family guy, etc, episode out of order with no problems.

    229. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      HBO should be completely ratings insensitive. It makes no sense for them to give a crap about ratings. Ratings determine advertising rates. HBO doesn't have advertising, they have subscribers. Ratings are a very very very stupid measure for HBO. This is ESPECIALLY true because they are only looking at the ratings of the initial airing of any given episode, even though they re-air that episode a dozen or so times later that week. Dumb. So dumb. I bet if they looked, they'd find that subscriptions dropped quite a bit when they cancelled Carnivale. Bet it happened with Deadwood as well.

    230. Re:A week? by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, do you have any moral qualms with somebody who buys the season pass on iTunes or Amazon, but gets the episodes from bit torrent to avoid the one week delay? TV shows like GoT have a big social component to them and talking about it with friends or coworkers is part of the experience. I totally understand why some people don't want to wait.

    231. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Prick!!!! I was waiting for this episode to air in Australia and you just spoiled it for me!!!!!

    232. Re:A week? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      doesn't take a year. they could have it in shops the day it screens if they were really on their shit. we do this with "Offspring". it just takes some co-operation.

      - get the master from the makers, hopefully they're not so pov that they can send one to you and one to the network for broadcast. the master will be ready well before screening date, hopefully. if it isn't it can be a problem.
      - send a disc to the OFLC/COB/Classification Board/whatever they're called this week for express classification. this is costly, but not a problem considering the potential sales.
      - author a DVD and have it ready to send to the replicator at a moment's notice - once classification comes back and you can print the little coloured "MA" square on the disc.
      - when classification comes through (express is guaranteed within a week), tell the replicators "GO!" and send through the disc artwork.
      - the finished discs might take a week to be replicated and packed, but it can be sent to shops all over within a couple of days, even in Australia which is a very large country with hardly any people.
      - stores hold the discs ready for screening day, and when it screens the discs hit the shelves in time for the would-be-downloaders.

      i'm not going to judge people for getting for free something which cannot be offered for a fair price in as timely a manner. like the Steam guy says, it's a distribution problem, not a legal problem. suing people only hurts the market.

    233. Re:A week? by thomasw_lrd · · Score: 1

      If you're getting all that for ~$85 a month, you're getting a hell of a deal. Just basic cable where I live would run me ~$60+. Of course I live in rural Arkansas and my only choice is Suddenlink for Cable TV. Or satelite, but last time I had satellite, it was ~$60+ without any movie channels or DVR.

    234. Re:A week? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      your buying habits don't necessarily reflect those of the core market for Game Of Thrones.

      i appreciate your taking the high road, but where there's a will, there's a way, and when there's a way, there's a swarm of arseholes getting something for free. it can't be stopped, it just needs to have the business model tweaked to extract some profit. it's not like your average downloader is poor - certainly my friends aren't. the ones that can't afford the DVD/BD aren't exactly lost sales anyway. no problems there.

    235. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, uranium is exported to China but not much. Australia exports about 12 times as much to the US, 11 times as much to the EU and 8 times as much to Japan.

    236. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused.

      More retarded than confused.

    237. Re:A week? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I didn't check if Sky Atlantic was on cable. Wikipedia suggests cable companies are being held over a barrel on pricing and aren't showing it. That would mean a lot of people couldn't watch it even if they wanted to. And many more would simply refuse to sign up to Sky on principle. I'm sure there is a similar story around the world and so it's not surprising if its widely pirated.

      This probably isn't all a bad thing for HBO who doubtless will sell a lot more boxed sets. It might be bad news for Sky and other providers though, depending on how much they paid for the rights.

    238. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're willing to "wait a year" to pay $159.99 for the boxed Blu-Ray set of a movie that everybody else has seen and is halfway through the next season,

      $159.99? WTF are you looking at? I see the bluray boxed set for $43.96 at amazon now. If you had preordered it, it was more like $30 or $35 back then

    239. Re:A week? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      2. The FBI doesn't have jurisdiction in the Netherlands

      The US didn't have jurisdiction in Pakistan, but that didn't help bin Laden.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    240. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is possible to rent from netflix. That said, I've had GoT disk 1 in my #1 spot of my queue for 2 months and it is STILL listed as "very long wait".

    241. Re:A week? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      $159.99 for the boxed Blu-Ray

      I bought season 1 from amazon for my kindle fire for like $25. you must be doing it wrong.

      You didn't get the collectible edition where the disks come in a little plastic box with an embossed dragon on it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    242. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly coal and iron ore

    243. Re:A week? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      You must not have Comcast in your area...

    244. Re:A week? by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Same here, neither Amazon nor iTunes seem to have anything from season 2 available.

    245. Re:A week? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Amazon on-demand video also has a season (SD or HD) for $30.

    246. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just wait way longer, until the spoilers have died down! I'm currently watching "The Sopranos" series 1 - 5 and enjoying it (though errm I didn't exactly buy the box set)

    247. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, I have no way of knowing if my choosing to buy seasons 1, 2, and 3 at full price when they came out had any effect at all on whether Fox decided to go with the 5th season.

      That's easy: the answer is no, it had no effect. DVDs are released by the production companies not the networks. Fringe is produced by Warner Bros. and then Fox buys the rights to air the shows. Warner Bros. has total control over the DVDs and the revenue they generate. Fox could care less how many DVDs you buy.

    248. Re:A week? by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      TV producers *must* take account of DVD sales for fans who want to own or wish to give away as gifts or for people who are willing to wait. Similarly, for people with a large family and has a cinema room or for those who have difficulty getting to the cinema, it makes sense to wait a few months and purchase the DVD. Arguing that people who wait for the DVD are jeopardising future planned seasons is only half the story.

    249. Re:A week? by dead_user · · Score: 1

      Just like movies, right? Big media never takes a chance on those. Oh wait....

    250. Re:A week? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I do the same - ebay for DVDs a year (or a few months, depending how good the movie is) after it was released and you get it for next to nothing.

      The only trouble is trying to remember which 'hot' movies actually looked like they were any good.

    251. Re:A week? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2

      That's about $75 pcm more than I'm prepared to pay for single viewings of a show. If I can buy the series on iTunes for $30, I should be able to watch it on TV for less than $30. No, all of the other "added services" do not make up for that price; I am not interested in them. Really, the only option for release-day viewing of the show, outside of the US or stupid bundled packages of 99% dogshit, is piracy.

      Not that I'd "buy" it from iTunes; I want it accessible if Apple folds or closes the service (same reason I don't buy Steam games anymore).

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    252. Re:A week? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      well, they cancel enough decent shows anyway, and it looks like the piracy in this case is not harming sales, so I don't see the problem. The studios will whinge about piracy, but bottom line is whether they make enough money from subscribers. They also *need* at least 1 decent show on cable to persuade people to keep paying for it. Once they scrap all the good shows (that will be pirated no matter what) and stuff the channel with cheap crap sitcoms, then people will stop with the subscriptions. Half the ratings often means half the people will not watch it, the other half just happen to have it on as background noise.

      So, net result is that HBO needs Game of Thrones and cannot scrap it unless they have something equally good (they are probably happy with the publicity they get - this game is sooo good, everyone in the damn world is pirating it, all you law-abiding or non-technical people out there need to buy cable to watch it)

    253. Re:A week? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really.

      The studios hire the best writers that they can afford to use every trick that has been learned in 50 years of television to play on people's emotions so that they can get them to crave the show enough to tune in each week. It should not surprise anyone that people click on a link and download a show for free rather than wait a year to pay. The incentives are all messed up.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    254. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is kind of BS. I just bought the Game of Thrones S1 Blu-Rays ($39 here in the US). The show originally aired a year ago. I've had exactly jack shit spoiled for me. I watched The Wire, likewise, years after it came out. I had nothing spoiled. I watched Mad Men seasons 1-3 after they aired. I had nothing spoiled.

      The only time I had significant stories spoiled was The Sopranos, but that show was part of the cultural zeitgeist like none I have ever seen, including the above mentioned very popular shows. I don't know where people go to get all their stuff spoiled, but I would suggest they stop going to those places.

      I don't need to pirate. I canceled HBO because I was tired of paying the fee - HBO airs old movies 90% of the time and I had no desire to watch any of that. But that doesn't give me carte blanche to download their products without paying them.

    255. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you are active on the internet and have to wait a week for a show to air in your country you have a problem. We'd all like to believe that the world is good and nice and people post SPOILERS before giving everything away but that isn't the case. This is part of a larger problem we are getting into where the world constantly gets smaller because technology constantly makes communication better, but archaic business models and copyright laws are getting in the way of international release schedules. The show is done at the same time, so why should anyone have to wait at all? I mean they speak English in Australia so the thing doesn't even require translation.

    256. Re:A week? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      While the post is about Game of Thrones, which airs with no commercials, most shows/networks have commercials. You seem to be assuming that a pay-to-watch system would have zero commercials and the only revenue would be from viewers. I don't think that would be the case. There's also product placement which is another advertising-related revenue stream.

      Additionally networks would undoubtedly have things like a 'season pass' for a show (and probably also a 'network pass' which is basically buying the channel a la carte), which would smooth out the revenue fluctuations.

    257. Re:A week? by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      Spoilers? I already read them, years ago, in the books the HBO series is based on...

    258. Re:A week? by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      If shows were all PPV, expect nothing but "sure things" to be produced.

      Movies are all PPV... and there are higher budgets there than on TV. And TV series are produced based on speculation that they'll get ratings and sell advertizing and/or future DVD copies. There's always a risk involved in producing something, whatever the distribution method.

    259. Re:A week? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      a year - by which time you've already heard the spoilers...

      if you want to watch pop culture, you want to watch it at the time it is actually popular and people are discussing it

      I don't have to wait a year. I could subscribe to the local cannel that has licensed GOT but, unfortunately, the only way to do that is by buying a 'package' including around a dozen other (mostly football, basketball, golf and motor racing dominated) sports channels I have no interest in and the channel that airs GOT has little else I am interested in either. I'm not about to pay USD 70 just for a cable subscription so I can watch GOT, I'm definitely not shelling out for a satellite dish and GOT not available on iTunes or some similar online service right now so the only other option is to pirate it. If GOT was released on iTunes, say a month after airing on HBO, I'd actually be prepared to wait that long and pay. As things stand right now I'll download a crappy illegal copy of GOT with spanish or russian subtexts just to get my fix it and then buy the DVD set in a years time when it arrives.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    260. Re:A week? by Twylite · · Score: 1

      So $85 for 3 months and you get a ton of crap you don't want, or download precisely what you want for $36. Oh wait, you can't do that because the on demand download will only be available after the season airs on cable.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    261. Re:A week? by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      Great idea, except it doesn't work that way. Season 2 won't be available on those services here until HBO releases the DVDs, just as Season 1 wasn't. It's exactly like the Oatmeal comic on the topic: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/game_of_thrones

    262. Re:A week? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... It's not your culture. I'm well aware that it's fiction, but it's based on feudal Europe. America's native culture is Mayan.

      So, technically, we're not paying you for a fantasy spin on Europe's culture. ;)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    263. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh - A Clash of Kings came out in 1999.. what *possible* spoilers could be talking about?

    264. Re:A week? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Fuck my history education (what little of it I got); America != N+S America.

      Go read here if you care. My point still stands, though.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    265. Re:A week? by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Besides, there's usually tits.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    266. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only works in U.S though.
      The rest of us have to wait for local deals and/or DVD release.

    267. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your point, and I raise with a "but a physical copy doesn't take up valuable pr0n storage space".

      What really bugs me isn't the distribution method however, but digital restrictions management..

    268. Re:A week? by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      If you live in the US, you can't get Season 2 through either iTunes or Amazon.

      An iTunes season pass is how I watch Mad Men, and it's totally worth it. I'd love to be able to buy a Game of Thrones season pass on iTunes. (I'd be a little ticked that it's a two-week delay and SD, since the standard for most shows is a one-day delay and HD. But, that can be suffered through.)

      I hope HBO is only making such poor decisions in the American market because of terrible contracts with cable companies. I hope they're profiting a lot off of those terrible contracts, because they are screwing themselves out of a large market by not having the show individually buyable for streaming.

    269. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      They are literally a superior product in every single way.

      You mean, aside from the ripping off the people who created them thing?

    270. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Game of Thrones is available from Netflix as a physical DVD or blu-ray disk.

    271. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Disk 1 of the first season? That's odd. My friend put it on his list and it came immediately?

    272. Re:A week? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      1. That was not the FBI
      2. I won't get shot in the eye over downloading a dvd (which is legal here in the Netherlands) because there is a world of difference between downloading a dvd and planning a terrorist attack.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    273. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Hardship has nothing to do with it. The reality is that HBO (and most other media creators) are clinging to an outdated business model, and the longer they cling to it, the more people will pirate their shows. I'm not saying it's legal, or even morally right, but it's reality. And really, since when has what's morally right ever influenced the corporations more than the all-mighty dollar? There is a certain irony in watching as all these people download Game of Thrones instead of paying for it simply because they CAN'T pay for it yet, and even if they did, they'd still have to deal with the annoying things like DRM and FBI warnings, etc. It's not one single thing that drives people to download, it's the sum total.

      While this is entirely true, the outdated business model of the distributors is still a pretty lame rationalization for ripping off the creators of a work. I like the series and I'd like to see the adaptations if "Game of Thrones" continue, and that is dependent upon the distributor being able to sell the product, however outdated their distribution model might be. So I refuse to personally contribute, in however small a way, to the failure of the series by ripping them off. One can make a moral choice whether or not to participate in the tragedy of the commons.

    274. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all shows went PPV the model used for new shows would change. It's even a model you've seen used to some extent already....new shows would have pilots released for free with perhaps voting on the show....if they want a voting with dollars method they see how many people are willing to pay for an ep 1 after watching the pilot. This method was used to weed out several new shows last year. (The early pilot method)

    275. Re:A week? by godefroi · · Score: 1

      I'm currently halfway through season 3 of Lost. My local library has the DVDs for free. I also caught up on The Big Bang Theory the same way. Cost to me: $0

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    276. Re:A week? by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      But what is the point? Why do we try so hard to apply scarcity to virtual goods which scarcity doesn't apply to? Are we so used to the physical world we cannot consider anything else?

      Consider this: If you would not buy it now, if you say "i'll buy it in a year", then you are not a lost sale. You've said you won't buy it now (can't afford it, it isn't available for purchase, whatever) so if you then pirate it, it isn't costing anyone anything except for your internet bandwidth and that of the peers you transfer from. If you weren't going to buy it, there's no opportunity cost, so there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. Unless, because you watch it now, you suddenly change your mind and don't buy it in a year. I don't think that is likely at all. I think its very, very likely you can say to yourself "I can't afford HBO, this is dumb, I'm not paying monthly fees to watch just one show, I don't care about the rest of HBO. I'll buy this show on DVD as soon as its available, and I'll go ahead and download it now."

      Hell, it was ruled that using VCRs to timeshift shows was legal. TiVo's legal, right? So this is just timeshifting in the other direction. Instead of taking a show that's aired and watching it later, I"m taking a show I will buy in the future and watching it now.

      *sigh* in b4 "but piracy is theft!" argument. (No, it isn't, its copyright infringement, and its about equally bad as recording a song off the radio onto a cassette, listening to it a few times, and then deciding to buy that CD or not in the store).

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    277. Re:A week? by godefroi · · Score: 1

      My experience is (first season only), the series changed pretty much exactly nothing (that I noticed). Seemed to me like it followed the books very closely.

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    278. Re:A week? by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. What the hell happened that businesses suddenly think they get to dictate terms to the market? Control how your customers use your product? Goodness they've gotten entitled. And now we have people defending these companies! "If the corporation makes a product, you should be happy, sir! IF it works, you just be thankful you got the privilege to buy it!" Uh, no, that's not how it works at all.

      I remember hearing this phrase once upon a time that went "the customer is always right". Yeah, its not true when they're being unreasonable, but within reason, the customer is right. The customer makes the deal. If you try to control the customer, your product loses value.

      This is only working because there is no alternative. (Oh wait, there is... Netflix. Which, of course, providing a legal alternative, is HUGELY popular with just about everybody I've ever met. Sadly, the tv and movie industry is too scared of losing what they have to embrace the future. As soon as somebody puts all their new media on Netflix, that somebody is going to dominate the market). You can push your customers around as long as you have a monopoly, and all content creators have an inherent monopoly on their media, they have a copyright on that art, a state-sponsored monopoly.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    279. Re:A week? by operagost · · Score: 1

      I didn't expect the Australian Inquisition!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    280. Re:A week? by trdrstv · · Score: 1
      Do you have Amazon VOD available where you're at ? Every TV in the house has a Bluray player that streams Amazon VOD, and this is how we catch our non-Netflix shows.

      We get Big Bang Theory, Castle and Criminal Minds by buying them as they come out (~$2 each and less when you buy the season) so assuming every show has a new episode each week we're only out $24 for the month + Netflix ($8) and with VOD we own it and can watch it unlimited times and from wherever we are (in the country is the 1 limitation).

      Any HBO shows (which tend to be very serial in nature), I simply wait till they're on DVD / Bluray and spend a few weeks going through it at once.

    281. Re:A week? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why more average people are not using it, I dunno.

      Might it have something to do with not knowing how to get into invite-only trackers? Or having to maintain a ratio (which can be royally screwed if you're one of the last to download a given work)?

    282. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between having an interest in a free show and feeling the need to buy $100 worth of cable to see it.

      Since when was this show free?
      It is aired & produced by a premium network that is only available with a subscription.

      I fully understand why people (such as myself) pirate shows like this, but theft is still theft.

      note: i have HBO and yet i still download the show :)

    283. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now Bin Laden probably deserved what he got but i have several issues with what we did.

      1) what we did was essentially an act of war on Pakistan.

      2) Aren't we the land of "innocent until proven guilty?" seems public opinion was that Bin Laden was guilty, but we never gave him a trial. we simply shot him and then dumped his body at sea.

    284. Re:A week? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Like I said, it was based off public trackers.

    285. Re:A week? by thirdpoliceman · · Score: 1

      I do this as well. I am following so many shows from a year behind that it really isn't a big deal anymore. I have a lot of TV to watch on disc, so much that I have trouble watching it all before the next season is done. The only problem is avoiding spoilers, and since I've read A Song of Ice and FIre that really isn't a problem for me.

    286. Re:A week? by confuscan · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. There is a large population that does not want to wait AND would pay (per my other comment) for the convenience of immediate gratification. Internet/downloading has conditioned them. A smart business would take advantage of that desire, get the series online and milk the hell out of it. A year later, the high quality DVDs, interviews with actors, directors and author would follow and the population that waited a year would buy them. Know your market and understand your competition, in this case bittorrents and respond accordingly.

    287. Re:A week? by confuscan · · Score: 1

      Business 101: Never put impediments in front of a customer who wants to buy. This sounds like an HBR case study in the making :-)

    288. Re:A week? by quenda · · Score: 1

      1. Open iTunes.


      $ itunes
      itunes: command not found
      $ sudo apt-get install itunes
      Reading package lists... Done
      Building dependency tree
      Reading state information... Done
      E: Unable to locate package itunes

    289. Re:A week? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Sorry, must have missed that. Let me try again: Perhaps some of the problem is ISP-imposed download caps (especially for satellite users, who are often limited to single digit GB/mo) or the fear of becoming the next Jammie Thomas.

    290. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "for a total of $60/month plus fees"

      Something is off, because I already pay more than that ($74/month) for basic (non-HD) cable plus whatever "extended cable" package gives you the Space Channel. To get HBO on top of that would be significantly more, I presume.

      We've been on the verge of canceling cable for years. It's crazy expensive and most of it is a reality TV wasteland. With the money saved we could buy a box set of whatever few series we wanted to watch every couple of months. More than that if they are on special. If we didn't have to buy so many channels we have zero interest in watching (i.e "bundling"), then maybe we could get it down to a reasonable price, but they don't offer that option.

      The bottom line is: 1) if you want it *now*, legally, you'll pay through the nose for it and a whole lot of other stuff that you don't want (i.e. HBO on cable/satellite), and in that instance I suppose pirating it might seem like a bargain compared to the available options; 2) if you're patient and still want to support the show, you can wait a while and pay a reasonable price for it through a variety of options (iTunes, netflix, DVD box sets, etc.). Increasingly, I and my family are exercising option #2, because option #1 is being priced out of our market and we don't like paying for things we don't want.

    291. Re:A week? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I have Sattelite TV (foxtel) for $70 a month (because my wife and kids like it), and don't have access to watch...Fringe

      I wish I had that "problem."

    292. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. It's on private trackers within 30 minutes, couple hours worst case. It's been that way for most shows, especially popular shows, for years. There's huge competition to be the first to release, for "props" I guess.

    293. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Buy an HD-DVR system from my oligarchy cable / ISP / phone provider ($600)
      2. Upgrade to cable. ($100 a month)
      3. Upgrade to HD service ($50 a month)
      4. Upgrade to some package that includes HBO ($50 a month)

      And then I'd have to make certain that I was home during that time. Although I would have spent $600 on the HD PVR in step 1, they are so buggy and flakey that they tend to lose settings and recorded shows. So all told, I would have to spend close to one thousand dollars to watch Game of Thrones in the off chance that I'm home, my wife is home, the kids are in bed, the DVR doesn't pixelate out, they don't have decryption problems (happened all the time during the Olympics), AND they don't lose all my settings so I could actually watch the HBO that I've spent a grand on.

      This is so full of hyperbole and bad math it's actually embarrassing. I too live in Canada. On behalf of my country I apologize for this guy.

    294. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, do you have any moral qualms with somebody who buys the season pass on iTunes or Amazon, but gets the episodes from bit torrent to avoid the one week delay?

      Actually no, I think that's perfectly reasonable - I'm not suggesting that you should "buy the DVD, buy the Blu-Ray, buy the book, buy the VOD, buy the iPhone version, etc". - I think it's perfectly reasonable to buy a single copy, and "watch it anywhere" - I'm not arguing in favor of restrictive DRM. I'm arguing against the notion that "anything I want is mine to take if I can find it for free somewhere," and I'm also trying to demonstrate that this, "OH woe is me, I have to spend $1200 to watch Game of Thrones, or pirate it, they're my only options to see the most important piece of programming I've ever seen in my life," is greedy rationalization, and patently false. I'd *even* say "pirating it initially, and then buying a copy of the DVD when it's available in my country," is mostly reasonable, too.

      But if you are pirating content, and not supporting the creators monetarily, then you are part of the reason why so much bullshit advertising and useless fucking "reality tv" is all that's available on tv. If you want to watch Game of Thrones, support the fucking series with your money so they keep making it, and keep making other shows LIKE IT. Loan your copy to friends and family, and urge THEM to buy the DVD too if they like it.

      Besdies, Khal Drogo would never let a pirate be his bloodrider, you bitches.

    295. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im also in the north and our reward for the 'London' olympics. The torch relay is passing through my town. On a coach.

    296. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Gonna watch the video on the command line, too, sport?

      Good thing I wrote "Open iTunes or Amazon VOD."

      Your platform not modern, and not supported? Tough shit, wait for the DVD.

    297. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasons I pirate:

      #1: Pop over ads. Due to a virtual monopoly by Bhell Media in Canada every show gets a full 1/3rd of the show covered by ads for a good chunk of it
      #2: Annoying animated/ad laden watermarks
      #3: Time delays
      #4: Cost. Again, due to the virtual monopoly you won't see a show airing on many stations, they'll be spread across Bhell's specialty channels so you have to pay more per month to get all the channels you need to watch the shows you want
      #5: Lack of availability on alternative services like Netflix. Where the US gets just about everything on Netflix Canada's is pathetically sparse
      #6: I can get what I want when I want without any hastle
      #8: Delay coming to DVD and cost due to shortened seasons

    298. Re:A week? by Metabolife · · Score: 1

      So you think Australia is healthier for exporting a finite resource while America exports a renewable? You're literally selling your country to China.

    299. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was, he admitted he was. And how does this help the conversation?

    300. Re:A week? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm not really addressing any moral issues involved.

      As a pragmatic matter, the show is available in the following ways:
      1. At a regularly scheduled time on HBO (or some other premium networks worldwide).
      2. About an hour after it airs on HBO, it becomes trivial to download from the internet.
      3. After the season is over, it becomes available on DVD and some download services to rent or buy.

      The first option would cost me about $100/month.

      The second option is free (minimum entry would be about $30/month for an internet connection).

      The third option is cheap but requires me to wait.

      Now take a dispassionate look at the incentive system that has been created above and it is easy to see why "2" is so popular. You'd have to like other shows on HBO to pick option 1, or you'd have to be wealthy enough that the money was no issue. Three is certainly reasonable, until you factor in that the network deliberately creates the show in such a way as to make you desire the show enough to tune in every week and pay for HBO. TV has been around for 50 years or so, and they've gotten quite good at pressing the right human emotion buttons. Thus, option 2 is quite popular and always will be until the incentives change.

      I'm not sure what the effect would be, but the engineer in me says that they should create an easy-to-use download of the show immediately after it airs on HBO, and perhaps poison the P2P networks just enough to make people want to pay a dollar or two to download the show in a known high-quality format. Of course, this would make it harder to monetize all of their crappy shows that they air the rest of the week... so perhaps their business model is ultimately doomed.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    301. Re:A week? by tokul · · Score: 1

      3) get up at 8 AM and watch DrWho on BBC Britain.
      Just make sure your roommate does not invite some hot blonde to sleep on your couch corner.

    302. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, all this carping about outdated business models.

        I pay $14 a month for all the HBO channels & HBO HD on-demand. Suffice it to say, I feel I watch enough programming each month to justify the cost. Compare this to 198x when $9.99 a month got you 1 channel of HBO standard definition.

    303. Re:A week? by quenda · · Score: 1

      Really? Gonna watch the video on the command line, too, sport?

      $ mplayer -vo aa gsmeofthrones.avi

      (aa = ascii art )

    304. Re:A week? by HArchH · · Score: 1

      But we're talking about Game of Thrones here man!

    305. Re:A week? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Comcast

    306. Re:A week? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      That is comcast

    307. Re:A week? by HArchH · · Score: 1

      It's so wonderful to live in a first world country where watching a freaking TV show isn't a major life decision.

    308. Re:A week? by bostongraf · · Score: 1

      But is it possible that the desire to pirate an early version is driving up the monthly costs for those of us that are playing by the rules and paying for HBO?

    309. Re:A week? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      While this show will probably show up on DVD, there are plenty of others that haven't and probably never will. Special Unit 2, anyone?

    310. Re:A week? by ICLKennyG · · Score: 1

      This is even more shocking than at first glance - and I would say a rather strong indictment of the current business model. The USA has roughly 310M people and accounts for 9.7% of the pirated downloads cited in the article. On the other hand, Australia has ~22M, accounts for 10.1%. If you take the top 5 countries that are not the USA, (Australia, Canada, the UK, The Netherlands and Norway you account for 1/3 of the pirate copies. However as a population, those countries only represent 140m potential pirates. You are talking a roughly 6 times higher density in pirates per capita in these other 5 countries. Australia is over 15 times more dense!

    311. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Game of Thrones announced tomorrow they were not making another season until it was paid for, my $20 would be in their paypal account within the hour..

      So would mine, and it's not even broadcast on my cable subscription (I live in the UK, it's only shown on Sky, which is satellite.) So I would argue that without pirating it, I wouldn't even know about it, to give it my £20.

      Piracy would be helping them out in this case, and really, by not making it available everywhere for a £2 per episode download, they are only hurting themselves.

    312. Re:A week? by DerangedAlchemist · · Score: 1

      $100?

      I live in Canada. I bought Dance with Dragons the day it came out from my local bookstore. (It helped that I was taking several cross-Canada trips for work a week after it came out.) I bought every book and I've told dozens of people about the series, probably making Martin enough to buy lunch, maybe dessert afterwards.

      If I would like to upgrade my service to watch Game of Thrones, I would have to do the following: 1. Buy an HD-DVR system from my oligarchy cable / ISP / phone provider ($600) 2. Upgrade to cable. ($100 a month) 3. Upgrade to HD service ($50 a month) 4. Upgrade to some package that includes HBO ($50 a month)

      And then I'd have to make certain that I was home during that time. Although I would have spent $600 on the HD PVR in step 1, they are so buggy and flakey that they tend to lose settings and recorded shows. So all told, I would have to spend close to one thousand dollars to watch Game of Thrones in the off chance that I'm home, my wife is home, the kids are in bed, the DVR doesn't pixelate out, they don't have decryption problems (happened all the time during the Olympics), AND they don't lose all my settings so I could actually watch the HBO that I've spent a grand on.

      Option 2 is not watch the show. I'd really rather watch it. My wife likes the show as well.

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release. Riiiight.

      Option 4 is direct electronic import from Sweden. Like Colt 45, it works every time.

      I guess some kind of legitimate online provider (Netflix) at $10/month is somehow out of the question?

      Regardless, I'm not exactly sure what you were trying to prove here. How bad you want to watch a cable TV show, or why stealing a Ferrari is SO much better than stealing a Chevy due to the price tag.

      That's right - no legitimate online provider will sell it in Canada and the customer would have paid for it if it was remotely reasonable. So its more like whining Ferrari get stolen more when they can only be bought as a bundle with an entire car dealership. Then claiming car thieves, not idiotic business practices against all rules of microeconomics, are the problem to push for harsher laws.

    313. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Japan and Season 1 isn't even out - a week is nothing...

    314. Re:A week? by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so there we go.

      As a Stargate fan, would you pay $2/ep ?

      Networks sharks definitely start circling the waters when the audience gets to about only 1 million.

      We definitely need a new entertainment model, but the networks don't want it.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    315. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the US. I see season 1 but not season 2 available in either iTunes or Amazon VOD.

    316. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being up-to-date on a current TV show is a social thing. I am aware that most Slashdotters can't be expected to understand that, but it's why people like to download the show and watch it before they go to work on Monday, so they don't have to be all upset when they hear, "OH SHIT DID YOU SEE THEY KILLED NED STARK."

    317. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason people pay $70 for a boxing match is because they dont have the $1200 to go to Vegas and watch it there, not to mention the coast of getting there. PPV has you by the balls if you dont live within driving distance of the venue, let alone the cash to get a ticket. The Pay for TV method does not fit with what the consumer wants.

    318. Re:A week? by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Its not 100% about the spoilers though. Some people like to discuss what is happening and that discussion usually happens in the first couple of days following the airing (since some people DVR it, or watch it on demand, or torrent it).

      I tend to participate in some discussions on a forum I am a member of, but I wait to watch with friends--we probably won't be able to get together until tuesday to watch it. I can still go back and read the discussion that is occurring now, but as comments get stale, I can't really respond to them. I could read them now without spoilers since I have read the book, but a lot of the discussion tends to be about differences from the book and without seeing the episode, I can't really talk about those points.

      It would be even worse if I was a week late. If it airs on sunday night and I don't go hit the forum until lunchtime on monday, there are probably already 10 posts about the new episode on top of a pile of posts about the episode I just watched...I really can't engage in the conversation at this point. If I just went online and downloaded it last week when it aired (since these days you can usually have the torrent downloaded and be watching 60 minutes after airing), I would be able to engage in the discussion.

      --
      Bottles.
    319. Re:A week? by stubob · · Score: 1

      By streaming, I assume you mean "Not their streaming."

      --
      Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    320. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Buy an HD-DVR system from my oligarchy cable / ISP / phone provider ($600)

      HBO GO is supposed to be out in Canada in the second half of 2012. You'd still have to pay for items 2 and 4 though.

    321. Re:A week? by Linuxmagic · · Score: 1

      Oh, you can still rent DVD's? Not in this neighbourhood since Rogers and Blockbuster all closed their doors. :)

    322. Re:A week? by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      When Netflix starts carrying HBO-owned content, let us all know.

      When HBO Go content does not require a subscription to HBO on your cable/sat provider, let us all know.

      In the meantime, having players ignore requests because they "must" show a fucking FBI warning is just plain stupid. Those who are going to make a copy do so, regardless of the warning.

    323. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would pay for it, even if it cost the same as the cable version...why don't you just pay for the cable version that includes it?

    324. Re:A week? by lee13se · · Score: 1

      But that is how the music industry has operated (at least before the internet has lead to the expansion of self-published music) for decades. Music labels would risk lots of money to sign a band, record an album, make and distribute CDs/tapes/8-tracks/records on the hope that people would buy it. Some albums would become crazy popular and make millions for the albums, others would flop and the label would lose money. The profit from the hits more than of-set the losses of the flops and the label would make money (at least the ones that had a good ear for selecting bands and/or were lucky). Sure the radio helped, not only to promote music and encourage album sales, but the radio pays a fee to the label every time the song is played. But some songs suck, DJs don't want to play them and no one calls in and requests them. The label may is unable to recover the costs of producing the album.

    325. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      When Netflix starts carrying HBO-owned content, let us all know.

      A friend of mine just began watching the series on his Netflix subscription. The disks arrived promptly in the mail.

    326. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's only 1 day (in practice about 18 hours) behind the US.

    327. Re:A week? by thatbloke83 · · Score: 1

      Actually GoT is only about 16 hours behind the US in the UK. It's broadcast on sunday night in the US, then that same episode is on Sky Atlantic the following Monday in the UK.

      But I agree entirely with the rest of your post :D

      The problem is the intentional limiting of the availability of the content and the hobbling of said content by loading it with DRM and other restrictions that prevent you from watching it where and when you would like.

    328. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great example - except piracy advocates saying "f this place clinging to their outdated model" and sneaking into the kitchen and just taking the sandwich.

    329. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True Blood was also in the First Person so it had to be altered IIRC

    330. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if every single show was *OPTIONALLY* pay-to-watch, while keeping the current system in place (for a while, at least.)

      Keep the current Cable/HBO/DVR/etc model exactly as it exists, but also make episodes available via NetFlix or Amazon Streaming or some other service at a $5 a pop, see if people bite. And most importantly, release them at the same time.

      Not a year later, or a month later, or even a day later. Make it a viable alternative and see what happens.

      I'd be very interested to see the reaction to this concept. HBO (or whoever) would keep their profit revenue from the advertisers and cable subscriptions, but would ADD money from people who are not willing to spend money on the whole cable package, and don't want to torrent it.

    331. Re:A week? by hotdoghead · · Score: 1

      I really wonder how many shows would be produced if people could pay for individual series on the equivalent of Pay Per View, but at a more reasonable price.

      Well, HBO hasn't gotten any money from me, but AMC has. I willingly forked over $2/episode for Breaking Bad and Walking Dead, which I can watch again and I don't have to sit through the FBI warning. So call it $40 for the 2nd season of Walking Dead, and they had an average audience of ~5 million. If all those people were like me and didn't have cable, that's potentially ~$200 million in revenue. Let's be conservative and halve it. The total budget for that season was something like $60 million. So that's a $40 million profit, which I wouldn't scoff at. In fact, that's all of AMC's quarterly profit. Seems like a viable model in a world where people aren't shelling out $100/month for a bunch of crap they don't want to watch.

    332. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that. I download Game of Thrones, and Fringe, and make my own box sets with downloaded ISOs.

    333. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone download a show they have no interest in?

      Just to make the number of downloads go one higher. If is also free publicly for the show. Look how many people are downloading it. It gets more people thinking what is this show that so many are downloading? It also gives the anti piracy lawyers more ammo to use. A multi-sided sword.

    334. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage?

      Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      Let's see, because going to sites like Reddit, Facebook, or using Twitter, where everyone is talking and posting about the latest episode and you're left out makes segregated markets asinine.

      Everyone has already moved on to talk about the latest episode and you first get to watch it because you don't live in the right market?

      Sometimes I can't believe the comments some people make.

    335. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have cable/satellite at all is my question. I cut the cord a little over 2 years ago and don't miss it. Netflix, torrenting and Amazon Prime have filled in nicely.

    336. Re:A week? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Just remember to cancel or you could be paying the normal price. Cable + extended cable (to get sifi or is it syfy now?) initial cost me $50 a month. Now it is $95 a month. No DVR. No HBO. To get HBO now I have to get digital cable which adds another $40 a month. If I had an option that was not worse I would switch. I made a DVR. I can record 4 channels at the same time. I can record more if I add another tuner card. If I switch to digital cable, fios, or satellite I can only record 1 maybe 2 channels at the same time. For some reason the shows I like get moved all to the same night at the same time. The price has gone up and will continue to go up until the analog cable cost equals the digital cable cost. Then we will get a 'free' upgrade to digital cable. Which will allow me to do less then I can do now. For me it would be a downgrade to digital cable.

    337. Re:A week? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I won't get shot in the eye over downloading a dvd

      No, you'll get shot in the back while running away from the SwatFIAA, because downloading a ripped copy of a DVD is terrorism.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    338. Re:A week? by TheLandyman · · Score: 1

      But really.. what is pakistan going to do to us? America! Fuck YEAH!

    339. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, the economy might have imploded and you're fighting off rioters.

    340. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is, to NOT be treated like a pirate (being forces to watch how many 10-second FBI warnings), you have to pirate the show.

    341. Re:A week? by BatGnat · · Score: 1

      Australia does not have an HBO Channel. It airs on Showtime. I have a subscription, but still download.

    342. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My pirated copies of the first season of Game of Thrones don't have any of that bullshit on them, they're in a file format and in a codec that is recognized on every device I have, and will play on literally any device I have without a bunch of stupid bullshit DRM standing in the way. They are literally a superior product in every single way.

      This is the REAL issue that needs to be discussed, not some endless corner case discussion of "well, if you don't like 'x' just do 'y' and stop whining". We can list 100 reasons why pirating the show is superior to the legitimate methods of obtaining it, and other than "it's the right thing to do" there's NOTHING in the plus side of paying for it.

      I would GLADLY pay HBO for the right to download the episode from THEM...but for some reason they don't consider that an option and are apparently happy for people to pirate the show...but they're not happy for people to pirate the show. They're basically the psycho crazy ex-girlfriend of media.

    343. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hum,. I live in Canada and the pvr is rented 10$ a month and my total cable package with tmn/hbo and the pvr is about 70$ a month.

    344. Re:A week? by gpronger · · Score: 1

      How do you poor blokes survive. By the way, what is "Game of Thrones". And my answer is to your last line (I can't quite believe the world we live in) is to do my damnedest to ignore it. Greg

    345. Re:A week? by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      That was just speculation. Better reasons are given in the comments. Basically, it mostly seems to be about convenience: HBO doesn't make it very convenient for most people to get to watch the show.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    346. Re:A week? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      I almost bought the DVD set.. but first I wanted to be sure I'd really like the series, so I did the next best thing.
      I went through my BluRay player to the amazon store and ordered the first episode for $2.99 (man I love that thing). The next Saturday night, I bought and streamed ep2... and last weekend, ep3.
      If I keep doing this, yah, it'll be more expensive maybe than buying the set, but still it's been a great, cheap, and legal way to watch the show, until I'm sure what I want to do. In any case, it's cheaper than buying a special cable package to get HBO.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    347. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea what a soap opera is. The definition posted on this page is not only wildly inaccurate and general but EVERY show is covered by that definition - and it's bullshit. BSG was certainly an opera, but the others, no not really.

    348. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really is the truth. I have pirated everything ever for over a decade, for some easy to understand reasons:
      1) Demo purposes. 2) Don't have the money yet but fully intend to buy it 3) Not purchasable in my region or not available for sale yet 4) Before it was easy to buy anything you wanted on the internet back in the 1999/2000.

      I have also gone and purchased as much of it as possible. As a materialistic American, I want a lot of things - most of them movies/tv/music/games. I try to buy two blu rays a week, or video games, etc. Many of them are things i pirated and decided were good enough to own. The gubmint and especially corporations themselves fail utterly to understand the psychology behind this "epidemic" of piracy and that, as Newell said (not that he's one to talk, Steam sales are so cheap you don't need to pirate and none of Valve's games are worth pirating unless you really aren't someone who plays multiplayer) is a service problem.

    349. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need a "-3 Sarcasm really isn't as clever as you think it is" moderation option...

    350. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on your side but, to point out a flaw in your argument - most blu ray releases now include about 4 copies of the movie. Blu-ray, DVD, downloadable digital copy specifically meant for your comp or tablet or mobile, and a streaming copy.

    351. Re:A week? by Elldallan · · Score: 1

      Why bother? I will also get the DVD when it's released here in Sweden but in the meantime I will pirate the episode when it's released in the US because I rarely ever watch TV so I don't have a DVR and I can't be arsed to sync my private life with the airing schedule and as far as I know there is no legal streaming service that releases the episodes in a timely manner.

    352. Re:A week? by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      Totally! When I want things but they're more than I consider reasonable to pay, I prefer to steal.

      Spoken like a true Ironborn.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    353. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paying for a channel is retarded, and proves you're retarded...

    354. Re:A week? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure the 6 cents the people that actually CREATED the show receive will be sorely missed. You know, as opposed to the 97% that will get sucked up by middle men that don't contribute a fucking thing to the medium?

      When Hollywood stops fucking over the artists with their Hollywood accounting bullshit, I'll be more inclined to feel guilty. Until then, fuck 'em.

    355. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pirate Game of Thrones? Of course I pirate Game of Thrones! That's because I live in Iran, you insensitive clods!

    356. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is to do with the speed of light limit and the distance to your location...

    357. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had no idea that when he pirates that show nobody else gets to see it. Is this a new exploit for bittorrent I've not heard one, one that deletes the show on all the seeds after you've downloaded it? Incredible slashdot has never heard of it!

    358. Re:A week? by BobSutan · · Score: 1

      I'd get the season pass IF and only IF it was HD.

      --
      "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
    359. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in Australia and don't have cable TV, I don't watch enough to justify the expense.

      http://www.jbhifionline.com.au/dvd/dvd-genres/action-adventure/game-of-thrones-the-complete-first-season-blu-ray/663748
      As you can see, anyone who can afford to pay retail in Australia doesnt give a shit about cost.

      I also pirate GOT season 2 because it has no ads and is high quality.
      If I could get it through a TV download service that actually works in Australia and doesnt require retarded subscription fees (Steam for TV is what I'm after really.) then I would pay for each ep.

      Why would I want to deal with a shitty cable service full of ads or a shitty download service that requires more effort than piracy (and ads im sure) when I can download it for free in high quality?
      I will buy GOT S2 and Boardwalk Empire S2 box sets once they are available, I discovered them both because I bought the S1 box sets.

      Until paying for TV results in a better and easier user experience than piracy I can't understand why anyone would pay.

    360. Re:A week? by jxander · · Score: 1

      Bingo. +5 doesn't do it justice. People will gravitate towards what is easiest and most convenient for them. Money is secondary if the convenience is there.

      If it's substantially easier to just torrent the thing so you can watch it how you want, where you want, when you want... that's what going to happen. I spent a LOT more money than the price of a cable bill setting up a nice little NAS system for my house. Was a fun little project I worked on over a few weeks, and now I have 6 TB worth of RAID-5 storage, accessible from any TV in the house. You can watch movies, view pictures, listen to music etc. It's great. Most of the content on their can be transferred to the iPad, Zune, etc or any other external media player.

      And lets talk about that content, because it's mainly 2 flavors: Music, either ripped from my own CDs or downloaded legally through Amazon because that shit is TOO easy. I just think "man I haven't heard that song in a while," and boom $1 gone and the song is in my library .... and Movies, either ripped from my own DVDs or downloaded via torrents because there does not exist a legal method to do so. And yes, Game of Thrones is on there. If I had the option to download a legal copy, I certainly would. It's a great show, and I'd gladly pay for it... "Shut up and take my money!!" But that option does not exist, so you don't get my money.

      --
      This signature is false.
    361. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha I know you're taking the piss but we can't pay for it even if we want to.
      I don't know why but with the Aus dollar consistently above parity with the US everyone still insists on a) Delaying releases on TV and again on DVD of everything and b) charging like a wounded bull.

      Also we can't get services like Netflix, im not sure if they just think 20million~ people are just not worth their time or if bandwidth limitations here make it impossible.

      I'm going to import the box set from UK or US for minimum 25% less than Australian retail (postage included) and if I can't buy it I'll just pirate it.

    362. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure the 6 cents the people that actually CREATED the show receive will be sorely missed. You know, as opposed to the 97% that will get sucked up by middle men that don't contribute a fucking thing to the medium?

      If the show gets cancelled because it doesn't make enough money to justify its budget (as has happened to a number of top quality HBO series, including Deadwood and Rome), it very likely will be sorely missed. Probably especially by Peter Dinklage, who doing a fantastic job acting the role of a lifetime—a rare opportunity to play the hero of a dramatic series. Perhaps while he (and the many other actors, set designers, costume artists, special effects artists, scriptwriters, etc., etc. whose efforts combine to create a major production like this) is pounding the pavement looking for his next gig, he will have time to ruminate about your principled concern for his level of compensation. Somehow, I doubt if he will be grateful to you.

      But who cares about how they feel when you have the opportunity to save a few bucks and enjoy the show they created a few months earlier? Fuck 'em!

    363. Re:A week? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Fuck 'em!

      Yeah! There's the spirit!

    364. Re:A week? by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Hahaha!! Your bum buddies modded you up to Insightful?!?

      Well done!

      You should be lucky to do as well with reading comprehension

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    365. Re:A week? by crafty.munchkin · · Score: 1

      Netflix and Amazon Prime aren't available in Australia - which leaves Torrenting. I'm all for it, but my wife and kids like being able to switch on tv, flick till they find a channel showing something they like, and watch it. I prefer to know exactly what I'm going to watch when I sit down at the TV, and would be happy to disconnect the Foxtel... but a happy wife and kids is important to me. :)

      --
      ... wait, what?
    366. Re:A week? by danomac · · Score: 1

      MythBusters is one. Some episodes can air a year or more in Canada after the US:

      One of the most common questions we hear from you at Discovery Interactive is about Mythbusters. Specifically, you wonder why we don't air the show at the same time as they do on Discovery Channel USA.

      However, we don't organize these episodes into seasons. Because of issues such as rights clearances, budgets, and Canadian content rules, we don't always air new episodes right away.

      So if you want to keep current with MythBusters, you can't with Discovery Channel Canada. All they do is drive people to download.

    367. Re:A week? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Why is this a problem? If I am going to watch it in a week anyway on Free-to-Air TV and time-shift the commercials out, why is it wrong to download it a and watch it a week earlier?

      Because the show isn't on Free-to-Air TV. You have to subscribe to HBO to get this show. It is wrong to download it a week earlier and watch it, because you didn't pay for it.

    368. Re:A week? by chrismcb · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is "It is too pricey for me, so I'll just take it without paying for it?"

    369. Re:A week? by chrismcb · · Score: 0

      You would go somewhere else to get lunch.

      But what you are saying is, if there is no where else to eat lunch, you'll sneak in the back and take the sandwich stuff from the kitchen for free.
      If the only game in town is overcharging you... it doesn't mean you can just take it instead.

    370. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $60 a month + fees on a lock in package that is how long?
      Do they show ads on pay tv in Canada? they do here no matter what you pay for.

      No thanks, I'll stick with free.

    371. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly if there were a legit marketplace for TV content online and shows lived or died based on their sucess there things would be a lot better.
      Dog the bounty hunter would be dead and burried forever and we could all rejoice.
      Swamp people would go die in a fire along with ice road truckers and 100 other inane redneck reality tv carcrashes.

      Things like Dr. Horribles singalong blog would make a bundle of money through word of mouth and prosper.

      This will never happen because the big companies that pump out the majority of content absolutely do not want this to happen.

      You think anyone would stump up the money to make a show about bridezillas if they didnt have an ultra low budget off peak network slot in mind?

    372. Re:A week? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      most blu ray releases now include about 4 copies of the movie. Blu-ray, DVD, downloadable digital copy specifically meant for your comp or tablet or mobile, and a streaming copy.

      Why would they make you download a digital copy when you're buying a Blu-Ray? The digital copy for a mobile device is not that big.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    373. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrast the loneliness of the pay tv stands in the shopping malls to the crowds in Apple stores. People* actually line up and wait to buy/learn from Apple employees, people sneer and smirk as they walk past the pay tv stand. Well I do.

      Being made to sign up to an expensive "package" of crud that I have no interest in just to get access to an (ok, admittedly a very good) series such as Game of Thrones or Sopranos is not an extortion I am going to be a part of. Might be worth *something* to me if the advertising - even network and future program adverting - wasn't so pervasive. I hear that torrents do not come with advertising. Not that I would know.

      Pirate stuff do I? Log IPs here do they?

      *I have recently bought my first Apple device, a MBA 13". Love the experience mostly, hate Windows, usually use Linux on other computers. Got the Mac as an experiment. It works very nicely to watch certain TV series from the US while at work. (*cough* legally obtained of course). Nasty cold I've got.

    374. Re:A week? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      XFINITY Bundled Services
      HD Preferred Xf 05/15 - 06/14 159.95
      Includes: Digital Preferred, STARZ, Included
      Video Equipment, High-speed Internet and
      Digital Voice Unlimited
      Ret HD Pref Xf 12mo -39.96
      Total XFINITY Bundled Services $119.99
      Additional XFINITY TV Services
      High Def DVR 05/15 - 06/14 8.00
      Includes: HD DVR Digital Box, Remote, DVR
      Service.
      HBO 05/15 - 06/14 17.99
      Service Discount -7.99
      Total Additional XFINITY TV Services $18.00

      Copy and pasted from my comcast bill.
      $119.99 for cable + internet + voice.
      $8 for my DVR.
      $10 for HBO (It was free for first 6 months, $10/month for the 6 months after that)

      So unless you know where I can get VoIP services (or phone line) and 20Mbit+/sec internet for less than $45/mo, I was pretty close to what I said.

    375. Re:A week? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Oh, and that was the preferred package, not the baseline one. I wanted the preferred package because it included BBC America. It would have been about $20 cheaper per month if I wanted the next lower package.

    376. Re:A week? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Except, we can get the American Discovery Channel just as easily and watch it right away. Just because ONE channel doesn't air right away, doesn't mean the entire show doesn't.

    377. Re:A week? by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      If you have comcast, pay the extra $8 for the DVR, and complain about the price, and they will give you HBO free for 6 months to a year. They did 6 months free, 6 months @ $10/month for me. And you'll be at $78 for the first 6 months, and $88 for the second six months. Seems pretty close to what I said.

    378. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about iTunes, but I just tried the Amazon approach that you suggest and it doesn't work in Australia due to licensing constraints. Amazon VOD is US only.

    379. Re:A week? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I've never had cable. I pay for garbage to be hauled away from my house, not piped in. 500 channels of soul-robbing drivel doesn't excite me. I'm logging off now, and going to the garden.

    380. Re:A week? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Planned seasons catch 22, wait and they cancel mid way through because no one bought but you don't care because you didn't buy into a partially completed story, don't wait and they cancel the series and you now have bought a partially completed story. I am sorry but way to many cancelled series to buy into the buy now marketing lies. Now if they want to sell micro percentages of gross (forget net I know that game) with penalties for failure to complete (directors and producers loose their share back to be divided up), then they have a deal.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    381. Re:A week? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sometimes in the same frame...

    382. Re:A week? by Macka · · Score: 1

      What a boring show that was. I gave up on it after the first episode, and I was previously a huge SG fan.

    383. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your excuses, they ring hollow.

      Excuses? Your legal options are not available for people living in smaller markets (even in Europe). How About this:

      1. Season 1 still hasn't aired in my country, never mind about season 2. So we're 1 year and counting behind orignal airing date.
      2. HBO isn't available here, no matter what provider I use
      3. Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, iTunes are all regionally restricted and unavailable here. I'd subscribe, if they would please take my money. Similar services that are available (typically from local providers) have the same release restrictions, so they don't offer newer US shows.
      4. Imported DVDs / BlueRay are typically region coded and won't play here. Circumventing this restriction is again illegal in many places. Moreover, these discs are not adapted for my region, so no subtitles. Season one of GoT has recently been released in my country (I have bought it), but less popular shows are often not officially released until they have aired here, if at all.This is my only legal option: wait a year and hope they don't skip my country when releasing the DVDs

      When they finally stop with these idiotic region based release schedules, I will be happy to give them my money. Right now, they won't even take it.

    384. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I often wait until a full season of something is completely finished before watching any of said season, however some shows are so addictive that it becomes difficult. Game of Thrones is just such a thing, as was Lost for the first 2 or 3 seasons.

      This "difficulty waiting" effect is not limited to slashdotters; I've observed it with regular humans too. I think one of the key drivers is being able to talk about a show with your friends while you're both in the same state of suspense.

    385. Re:A week? by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      I don't. I watch it on catch-up and zap the ads. Or I buy the DVD/BluRay. Or I just read /. or play $SOME_GAME instead. I'm afraid that I'm not that good a product for the advertisers.

      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
    386. Re:A week? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Yes it is. So I download them violently, depriving HBO of money needed to feed the executives children. And then at the peak of their despair, I buy the special edition BluRay box set to further turn that screw.

      I would subscribe to HBO GO if I could. but I refuse to give a obscene amount of money to Comcast for their overpriced crap just to get HBO.

      So I violently download the episodes and watch them dripping in evil..... and when I can buy an even better version on BluRay...

      But... I add more evil to it... I then RIP the bluray and put the files on my NAS in the house so I can watch it on multiple TV's at the same time....

      Muahahaha! I am so episodically evil!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    387. Re:A week? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      " "wait a year" to pay $159.99 for the boxed Blu-Ray set"

      The limited edition was $40.00 if you got off your ass and knew where to pre-order it.

      This show is not owned by whores that overcharge for things badly, like the Babalyon 5 Franchise owners.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    388. Re:A week? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      IF HBO was to tell all the cable companies to go screw themselves and went to a netflix/AppleTV model, they would utterly crush the market.
      release apps for Roku, and other devices to watch the HBO channel of shows, have the initial release as the $3.99/$6.99HD purchase to download it the second it is released and a week later offer it streaming for the subscribers in a lesser format.

      Things like their Boxing and other PPV sports, you switch to the live channel they broadcast over IP. IF Leo Laporte can do this, HBO can easily do this.

      I would pay the $15.00 a month to HBO for access to their stuff without Cable TV.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    389. Re:A week? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I can't comment on the rest, but Heroes was like that only when it started to slide. The first couple of seasons, it was all about the mystery - who's Sylar? Who's the man with the horn-rimmed glasses? What are all these powers? What does it all mean? When it had answered half of those, showed no sign of answering the rest, and substituted them for melodrama, the show tanked.

      I get the feeling Lost was similar, although I never watched it myself.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    390. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you got this info, but in the US season 2 is NOT available on amazon or iTunes. There is no legal way to watch season 2 except having cable and HBO.

    391. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The delay is merely only one part of the problem. The other big issue with these TV shows is that they are not following the vast shift to viewing TV and content on demand. PVR's becoming more and more common are a great example of this trend as is Netflix. Let's not forget the issue of spoilers plastered all over the net as well, that is an equal issue if not a greater one.

      I will give an example. My wife and I are huge fans of Top Chef (Masters included). Top Chef Masters Season 3 Aired in the USA in April of last year. I was searching for some info on top Chef Canada and came across a Wikipedia article for Top Chef Masters Season three. It breaks down ALL of the results. The series airs in Canada next week. Now I know what you're thinking, it is your own damn fault for clicking a link like that and I agree. But when one goes to Bravo and can easily MISS the Canadian version and the American results are shown front and center.

      I have been mentioning for years to my wife that Youtube needs to start competing against Live TV with well produced TV-style shows. They could even facilitate the means to self promote through Facebook sharing or G+ sharing if friends watched an episode and liked it. By releasing a single International English release I think it would dramatically improve many of these shows ratings, revenue and with a free ad-based web release likely be more profitable as well. Advertisers would likely be more inclined to want their ads to be displayed to the targeted audience their product appeals to, The web can facilitate that. Traditional TV not so much.

    392. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just keep in mind that these payments do not in any way resemble payments for a traditional purchase. The DRM-damaged media will be yours to use as long as both the provider (Apple/Amazon) and the rights holder agree that you can use them. The moment either party is done letting you use their property, they have the ability (and have demonstrated the will) to flip the switch and shut off your access.

      There's nothing wrong with renting, but just keep in mind that your transaction resembles a rent with a totally indefinite rental period far more than it resembles a purchase.

    393. Re:A week? by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Don't try to talk to us after you've watched it, we're all talking about series 3.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    394. Re:A week? by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really. I've waited longer than that for a game to come down to the price I care to pay. I also don't have to spend $400 every so often for the latest graphics cards.

      What kind of computer requires you to upgrade a graphics card to watch TV?? Damn, I use a 4 year old corporate POS Dell to watch 720p video with zero issues.

    395. Re:A week? by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      Especially now that a lot of member only torrent sites are offering 1080p versions...

    396. Re:A week? by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that no monetary support from you factored in to their decision. They moved it to Friday deliberately. Just like Star Trek.

    397. Re:A week? by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      My coworkers pay close to $150/mo with their DVR boxes, full 3 tiers and bundled phone/internet from Shaw. I think I'll stick with my $40 a month internet bill.

    398. Re:A week? by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      I would love to have a micropayment option for GoT or Fringe. I would never pay for the shitty Simpsons episode that was on Sunday Night. Maybe the system would regulate out shit? Naw, the powers that be will never let that happen.

    399. Re:A week? by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      But then I need to buy a computer! Nope, too expensive for me.

    400. Re:A week? by morcego · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between having an interest in a free show and feeling the need to buy $100 worth of cable to see it.

      I have cable and HBO subscription, and I still download Game of Thrones. I just don't own a video recorder (of any kind). By downloading, I can watch it on my computer, and at whatever time I choose to.

      Avoiding paying for a subscription is hardly the only reason people download it.

      --
      morcego
    401. Re:A week? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      That's true - I sometimes download a game (or at least the crack) so that I don't have to worry with the DRM.

      This is a natural reaction when the paid-for product is not as good as the free one.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    402. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That week is critical to not seeing spoilers online, we live in an international community, forums inhabited by users all around the world, if half of them can't see the episode for a week+ that doesn't work.

      Pretty sure that TV series is based on books which have been available for years already. So I don't know how one week more would make a difference.

      Because EVERY PERSON who watches the show has read and devoured the books to know exactly what's going on, right?

      How do you get by day to day with such flaws in your thinking process?

    403. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You yog-hurt my feelings.

    404. Re:A week? by morcego · · Score: 1

      That's true - I sometimes download a game (or at least the crack) so that I don't have to worry with the DRM.

      This is a natural reaction when the paid-for product is not as good as the free one.

      THERE!!!! That is why the war on piracy is being lost. Because instead of trying to win people back, they are making their product worse. People are willing and do pay for their products, then use the pirated version.

      One would expect they would get the message.

      --
      morcego
    405. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya baby, that fortified beer 'get's ur dun' every time.

    406. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, a lot of good shows got canceled before they had a chance to become bad shows, thus remaining "good shows" in peoples minds.

      I'd much rather a show get canceled while I have a good memory of it (e.g. firefly) before the producers take a massive dump all over it (SGU anyone?).

    407. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. I wonder what is in the Netflix envelope on my console then? It says 'Game of Thrones'. Have I been hoodwinked?

    408. Re:A week? by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      Um, why exactly can't HBO sell cable-less subscriptions to their own service?

    409. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Option 3 is wait a year for the DVD release.

      I do this. Is this really impossible for most Slashdotters? A year is nothing, really. I've waited longer than that for a game to come down to the price I care to pay. I also don't have to spend $400 every so often for the latest graphics cards.

      I've waited longer than a year for an article to even show up on Slashdot.

      OH HO HO HO HO HO HO

    410. Re:A week? by Lord_Jeremy · · Score: 1

      I would imagine that they've received significant pressure from the cable companies precisely to not do that. There might even be some terms in their contracts with the cable companies that somehow prohibit them offering subscriptions themselves.

    411. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We stop watching TV. And download good stuff from overseas. :)

    412. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Game of Thrones Season 2:
      1. Open iTunes. or Amazon VOD service.
      2. Pay $28.99 for std def season pass;
      3. Episodes 1-6; (Episode 8 was broadcast tonight in the US);
      4. Watch whenever the fuck I want, as many fucking times as I want;
      5. Know that I'm not breaking the law;
      6. Know that I'm support a show I enjoy and appreciate;
      7. Know that by providing a financial reward, the likelihood of other shows like this that I enjoy and appreciate will also be made in the future;
      8. OPTIONALLY: skip this, wait for HD version to come out;"

      #1 Check iTunes as I am mac centric.
      #2 Not available in US on iTunes. Do not use Amazon.
      See also Torchwood Miracle Day.

    413. Re:A week? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      And they censor it.

    414. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spoilers?

      You do know that this is based on a book, right?

      Like, one you can read?

    415. Re:A week? by letherial · · Score: 1

      Just say it...

      Everyone should pirate everything to make a point, shit needs to change because what was acceptable is no longer acceptable.

    416. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another part of his post is true, though. The crappy PVR tech. I tend to download about one show a week because my PVR "lost" the schedule for that show, or Rogers or the network re-scheduled it but didn't tell my PVR or ... etc. etc. And I noticed too late to catch it on a time-shifted channel, and Rogers has decided that this week, they're not making that particular series available on "On-Demand". The On-Demand service is pure crap, btw.

      Is it still piracy if I paid for it but didn't get it so then I torrented it? Is there an assumption in my cable contract that I have to wait for the re-run to come around?

      Note - HBO re-runs GoT episodes fairly often, so its one of the least likely for me to have to "pirate"...

    417. Re:A week? by internerdj · · Score: 1

      But how can we know unless we pirate copies or read the spoilers???

    418. Re:A week? by internerdj · · Score: 1

      So here is the thing. I want you the well known actor/actress/producer etc. to bump my ratings. Are you going to come work for me for some tiny trial salary to see if the show takes off? Or you are a writer, what kind of story will you write if you don't have a season commitment? Well that means for a series, the best thing is probably a season purchase by the consumers. Now you are running the studio, you need to finance the production of a whole season of the series before the viewers start paying. How many regular series do you need running to pay for all the lackies to run down financing and manage your business? Well you need a bunch. For argument's sake, lets call it a "channel". Now you are starting to grow, you have a bunch of these "channels" under your belt. Most everyone wants to pay for your sports "channels" but maybe only a couple hundred thousand want your science "channels." Well you can drop the science channels but you lose all those customers who aren't really interested in your sports "channels." So the best business decision is to sell a bundle of channels to the customer through their provider. And then finally you have the provider who won't have customers if they charge for every bundle, so they pick and choose their bundles to be affordable. Let's call this a "subscription." I'd probably pay $2 an episode but you are pushing a lot of risk on the networks that they won't take (and may not be able to afford to take at $2 an episode.) Is the risk half the season price? The season price? A season and a half because of the adminstration costs?

    419. Re:A week? by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

      On the flip side, check out amazon studios. I'm not sure if I've seen anything come out of this, but I am hopeful that it is a successful venture.

      In terms of buying a subscription, I wouldn't be opposed to buying a subscription to HBO (or Comedy Central, or Cartoon Network). I buy a subscription (membership) to my local art museum, without knowing what particular exhibits they intend on putting out this year. But I know I like their programming, and will attend there events. If that subscription comes with the content from every show that studio has produced (like HBOgo), even better.

    420. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i bet you are a very exciting person :)

    421. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The *only* reason that Australian TV networks are showing these episodes with only a week's delay is because of the people downloading them. They have a long and storied history of jerking the viewer around, and used to wait a year or more after a show debuted in the US to show it here. It's only after people got fed up with their crap and started going straight to the source that they pulled their finger out and started 'fast-tracking' shows.

      They screwed me over one time too many; my TV/PVR hasn't been switched on in two years. And I've never looked back.

    422. Re:A week? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Cable Television, a subscription to HBO, cares about a particular TV show, and is fanatically devoted to the pope.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    423. Re:A week? by acidrous · · Score: 1

      You got a good point there.

    424. Re:A week? by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      When the production quality of Internet based entertainment reaches a certain threshold then, and only then, will the entrenched corporations react. Real competition causes change. The film/tv business relies on it's monopoly of distribution and content to enforce it's will. The Internet is the place that this can change. New shows and media on the net are actually starting to show promise but it is nowhere near what it needs to be.

      --
      Balderdash!
    425. Re:A week? by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage? Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      The week delay wouldn't matter if everyone weren't connected via instant communication. Fans discuss shows online, so those that get it first start spilling spoilers all over the place. It's easier for many to go offline for a few hours and get the download, than it is to stay offline for a week (or months in the case of some shows). The regional delay in distribution is killing TV/Cable networks, yet they insist on holding on to the antiquated distribution methodology.

      I think the GP wanted to say that this is a silly display of Internet entitlement mentality. Your response is yes it is serious because of spoilers on the Internet. Thanks for the good laugh buddy.

      Somehow people do manage to enjoy TV shows and movies that are not steaming fresh out of the oven, and I hear people even manage to read books at their own leisure without being poked in the eye by spoilers at every turn. It's a great mystery how this is all possible I guess.

    426. Re:A week? by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      Oh my goodness, because I live in Australia I have to wait a week before seeing a TV show? How do I manage? Sometimes I can't quite believe the world we live in.

      The week delay wouldn't matter if everyone weren't connected via instant communication. Fans discuss shows online, so those that get it first start spilling spoilers all over the place. It's easier for many to go offline for a few hours and get the download, than it is to stay offline for a week (or months in the case of some shows). The regional delay in distribution is killing TV/Cable networks, yet they insist on holding on to the antiquated distribution methodology.

      I think the GP wanted to say that this is a silly display of Internet entitlement mentality. Your response is yes it is serious because of spoilers on the Internet. Thanks for the good laugh buddy.

      Somehow people do manage to enjoy TV shows and movies that are not steaming fresh out of the oven, and I hear people even manage to read books at their own leisure without being poked in the eye by spoilers at every turn. It's a great mystery how this is all possible I guess.

      Your argument condenses down to entertainment content has no value. I agree. Piracy is, as a result, a non-issue.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    427. Re:A week? by psiclops · · Score: 1

      yes one could find the spoilers already if he went looking for them, but once they happen in the show, it becomes increasingly difficult to avoid hearing them as many people around talk about the show.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    428. Re:A week? by psiclops · · Score: 1

      just because you have already read the series and know what is going to happen does not mean that there are other people that exist who have not. who would like to watch the series now, before everyone else sees it and talks about the plot around them making it incredibly difficult for them to not know future plot events.

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    429. Re:A week? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Option 6:

      1) Download them and watch them as they come out.
      2) ALSO purchase them on iTunes when they eventually come out ~8-10 months later (in the leadup to the next season IIRC), because I genuinely want to support the show financially.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    430. Re:A week? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > Option 3 is wait a year for DVD

      What, you have no self control and are that much a slave to a TV series? I feel sad for you.

      One of the nice things about getting the DVD/BluRay is that you can just watch episodes back to back. "Batch" watching is more optimal use of time; plus you can burn thru the story, finish the series off and watch the next series.

    431. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're forced to pay $50 for a boxing match, they should know that guys will pool money together and watch it in a big group, so essentially they end up making only $5.00 revenue per pair of eyeballs anyway. Why not charge $5.00 anyway so they are more likely to purchase more sports events for themselves alone. The wife already has enough issue with $50 charges every time their man wants to see a 3 minute fight.

    432. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of how popular or unpopular a show it, the bean counters and focus groups eventually make the ultimate decision on whether a show survives. Nothing truly survives on just merit in the entertainment industry. Some of the finest shows ever made died after the first pilot. I once took part in a review of a sitcom and had 2 plungers to push when I thought the show was funny or became boring. Horrible horrible show, jesus christ the only funny person in the entire thing was Betty White (She never is NOT funny). Despite my panning of the steaming pile of comedy, it actually went to air and lasted a season I think before being cancelled. It should never have hit the little screen, but some statistical analyst and a blue suit gave it the green light. It has nothing to do with fans.

    433. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm the books?!

    434. Re:A week? by zlives · · Score: 1

      +1

    435. Re:A week? by zlives · · Score: 1

      their shows are actually worth watching compared to the free crap on the rest of the TV and no commercials...

    436. Re:A week? by zlives · · Score: 1

      but are perfectly willing to steal it...

    437. Re:A week? by zlives · · Score: 1

      145 for internet/phone and all channels including hbo/sho/max from comcast

    438. Re:A week? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I wish I had your affiliate.

    439. Re:A week? by craigminah · · Score: 1

      The HBO business model is similar to the way CDs were sold...buy a CD and get one or two good songs and a lot of crap songs as filler. HBO has the best original content but other than a few stellar shows the rest is mediocre at best. I'd love an ala cart-style HBO where I could subscribe to a show and pay for the season. Game of Thrones is on iTunes but it's posted once the season ends so it's not a great option.

    440. Re:A week? by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

      Skip all of the attempts to get the show (legally or otherwise) - just get pthisis (27352) to post their rather splendid summary after each episode !

      --
      while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
    441. Re:A week? by Artifex · · Score: 1

      If you are a Netflix subscriber in the US, it costs you nothing extra.

      Doesn't come up when I search Netflix. I just get "Game of Death," "The Game of Death," "Assassination Games," and so on.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    442. Re:A week? by Artifex · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if they could sell cable-less HBO subscriptions they would.

      There is no technical reason why they can't. And I'm not buying the idea that cable companies have any real power over HBO; it's not like they can threaten not to carry the channel any more, when it's probably their most popular premium channel.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    443. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few hours? More like a few minutes, generally speaking. Especially for a major show like Game of Thrones.

    444. Re:A week? by galatian · · Score: 1

      This is probably true. The MPAA is far more superior at ripping off the people who created them thing than any lowly pirate could ever hope to be.

    445. Re:A week? by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      So since the MPAA rips off creators, I shouldn't feel guilty about ripping them off myself? That doesn't really work for me. I learned that two wrongs don't make a right by the time I was eight years old.

    446. Re:A week? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently halfway through season 3 of Lost. My local library has the DVDs for free. I also caught up on The Big Bang Theory the same way. Cost to me: $0

      I'll save you some wasted time: Abandon Lost now.

      Worst. Series. Ever.

  2. I have HBO... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... but I get busy doing something most Sunday nights or forget to watch it, so I usually start the download Monday morning and watch it after work.

    It's not pirating if you're time shifting.

    1. Re:I have HBO... by Brucelet · · Score: 1

      Doesn't HBO give you access to an on-demand service for this very reason? Or do you have to pay extra for that?

    2. Re:I have HBO... by toganet · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of DVRs? How about HBO Go? There are legal ways to do what you need to do here.

      Now, if only you could get HBO without having to pay for a full cable subscription...

    3. Re:I have HBO... by _defiant_ · · Score: 1

      If you have an HBO subscription then I why aren't you using hbogo.com to watch the episode you missed?

    4. Re:I have HBO... by marnues · · Score: 3, Funny

      As the GP pointed, he's time-shifting. Nothing illegal here.

    5. Re:I have HBO... by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... but I get busy doing something most Sunday nights or forget to watch it, so I usually start the download Monday morning and watch it after work.

      It's not pirating if you're time shifting.

      I have no interest in Game of Thrones, but I download a lot of other TV shows from a variety of sources.

      -- Don't have to remember to program the DVR
      -- Commercials are already cut out
      -- .mkv format with gives good quality with a fairly small file size
      -- I can save them all to my hard drive and have hundreds of episodes available any time I want
      -- Easily transfer to a thumb drive or other computer for maximum portability

      Once again the entertainment industry is failing to provide people what they want and so people are taking matters into their own hands.

    6. Re:I have HBO... by artor3 · · Score: 2

      Only with certain cable/satellite companies. If, like me, you get your cable from a small, cheaper, regional supplier, then you're SOL.

    7. Re:I have HBO... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      sure it takes 4 days for game of thrones to show up in on demand.

      Some shows like Legend of Korra on Nickelodeon, take 10 days before they show up. you are basically two weeks behind the current.

      I can understand on demand showing up a couple of days later, that way you see it live first. however not all of us can afford to sit around and watch tv when it airs. I wish everything would go on demand and they dry up the dumb channels. or at least let me choose which channels to pay for.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    8. Re:I have HBO... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      It's quite likely that torrents are available with significantly better playback quality than what HBO GO streams, or that his preferred playback device does not support HBO GO.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:I have HBO... by amorsen · · Score: 0

      As the GP pointed, he's time-shifting. Nothing illegal here.

      That isn't how copyright law works. You don't get to download from someone else even if you own the exact same bits from a legal source. See What Colour are your bits?.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    10. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That isn't how copyright law works.

      You're probably right, but that is how it should work.

    11. Re:I have HBO... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      You get it 3 hours earlier. The torrent clears in under 5 minutes.

      I have HBO too but only watch a few old shows on HBOGo through the iPad. I don't even know which channel HBO is on out of possible 700 channels. Been a subscriber for over 5 years, must have accidentally tuned in maybe once or twice on a TV.

      Torrents are convenient. It's not even about piracy for some people.

    12. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it isn't /legal/. However it is moral, and you're never going to get caught.

    13. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you do get caught downloading only and not uploading what are they going to tell the judge? Hey this guy downloaded something he already paid for? What kind of damages would they actually get.

      -wmbetts

    14. Re:I have HBO... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > -- Don't have to remember to program the DVR

      That's pretty lame. I have some recording rules that are as old as my DVR. You only have to "program the DVR" once. That's the whole value proposition of a DVR.

      Set it. Forget it. Let the whole "automation" thing do it's work.

      It's a DVR, not a VCR.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    15. Re:I have HBO... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Except downloading from an unauthorized source for personal use is barley illegal (if at all).

      It's the distribution that that is a crime.

      Thus my subscription to Usenet.

      If providers follow take-down notices, it's legal for them too (and there is a lot of legit content on Usenet).

      It's the original uploader that's made the illegal copy (with the provider getting safe-harbor).

      IANAL

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    16. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Our legal system is supposed to approximate as closely as possible "all ethical things are legal and some subset of unethical things are illegal". Ethics are more fundamental than law. When we fail at constructing that approximation, and the failure is apparent, just ignore the law if you're not going to get caught.

    17. Re:I have HBO... by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      Made me think of a new justification: if you're buying your internet access from your cable provider, any video you download is just using an alternative method of delivery for the content you've already paid to view.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    18. Re:I have HBO... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Call up HBO and ask them if it's pirating. I'm pretty sure they'll disagree with you.

      You are expected to watch the show when they air it. If you do not, they want you to buy the DVD. Then they expect you to buy the extended DVD with directors commentary when they come out with it a year later. It's all about manipulating the consumer and the content providers have gotten very fat and happy off of it. The idea that you now have choices is what's making them angry...

    19. Re:I have HBO... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      No HBO Go in Canada, and it's legal to download content in Canada.

    20. Re:I have HBO... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      No HBO Go in Canada.

    21. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the show. I'm downloading the low res version to keep up with the show. I will purchase the blueray of it when it comes out.

      It's a great show, and I will purchase it.

      it's not the way the media conglomerates want me to participate, but it's the best I can do.

      I COULD just not watch it, nor buy it, period.

      I'm happy to do that as well. It's always an option.

    22. Re:I have HBO... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      ... but I get busy doing something most Sunday nights or forget to watch it, so I usually start the download Monday morning and watch it after work.

      It's not pirating if you're time shifting.

      Once again the entertainment industry is failing to provide people what they want and so people are taking matters into their own hands.

      I'm one of the millions of people pirating Game of Thrones...

      It's not even on TV here in Australia. It wont be for six months at the very least. As the GP post said, the entertainment industry is failing to provide.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    23. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of my same thoughts. I have not watched Game of Thrones really yet but I watch tons of other shows.

      RSS + BitTorrent > DVR + Cable

      Even when the stations have the shows for free on their site I still prefer torrents. At one point I lived in an area where high speed internet was not an option so I had satellite TV and a DVR. It worked somewhat well. I had to skip commercials by hand, couldn't keep the episodes for years like I do on my PC but the most annoying thing was with the service I had I could not record more than 2 shows at once so there were a few times during prime time I had to pick and choose.. Then I could not watch what I missed till it was on a repeat.. Then some times it recorded the wrong show or missed the first few minutes or last minutes of a show.. all sorts of bs.

      I ended up having uTorrent installed on a friends PC a few miles away where high speed internet was an option and just swapped out hard drives about once a week when I was in town to get my shows....

    24. Re:I have HBO... by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      though, it would be nice if HBO Go was a standalone package like Netflix and Hulu. With HBO Go, Netflix, Hulu etc, the only things keeping me from cutting the cable is live sports and maybe news (though I get most of my news online).

      --
      Balderdash!
    25. Re:I have HBO... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      That breaks as soon as your network changes the schedules. Which, in my personal experience, is quite often. The only show that I know is broadcast at the same time for ages is the evening news. Everything else is regularly moved around. And even the evening news (especially the late night broadcast) is occasionally delayed due to some sports event or so.

    26. Re:I have HBO... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I'm in a similar boat...

      I have paid a subscription, and can watch game of thrones (and all sorts of other stuff) legally, however i still regularly choose to download the torrents:

      The supplied DVR keeps the content encrypted so you can't take it off the DVR...
      You can't use your own DVR with the service, you are stuck with the one they provide.
      The online services provided don't work on linux, and are streaming-only so don't work when you're on a slow connection or don't have a connection available when you want to watch.
      My connection is capped during the day, but unlimited late at night.

      I regularly travel for work, so i'm often not at home to watch the shows i like, and the tv offering in hotels is usually crap plus the internet connection is often slow. I might download shows before i go, or leave them downloading overnight at the hotel, and then watch them in the evening in the hotel.. I will frequently watch a show on the train to work using a tablet, which goes in and out of tunnels so would have a slow/unreliable connection at best.

      I pay for the service, i should be able to watch the shows i have paid for whenever, however and on whatever i want.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    27. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it isn't /legal/. However it is moral, and you're never going to get caught.

      No, it's not moral. If you want to use something which belongs to someone else, part of their conditions dictate where you get it from. If you're not willing to abide by their conditions, you have no moral standing to be using their product or service.

      And you're not correct about getting caught either- new releases like that get a lot more attention by the MPAA/RIAA hit squads.

      Just for the record, I do download it myself. Why? Because the pause/rewind on my DVR sucks and doesn't have a slow advance or frame-by-frame, which makes it kind of difficult to masturbate to during some scenes. Downloading allows me a much finer grained control over such things. But I'm also not claiming to be on the moral high road, either.

    28. Re:I have HBO... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Even if you do get caught downloading only and not uploading what are they going to tell the judge? Hey this guy downloaded something he already paid for? What kind of damages would they actually get.

      Statutory damages. That is, damages that are specified in the statute - the law - and don't care one bit about the circumstances. So a $750 minimum (or $200 if you had no reason to believe you were breaking the law which doesn't apply here).

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    29. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -- .mkv format with gives good quality with a fairly small file size

      Ugh. Matroska (MKV) is a container format, not a video or audio format. Internally, it's MPEG4 video and probably MP3 or AAC audio.

      MKV has nothing to do with the quality of the video or audio streams. It's just packaging them into a single file. You could extract (aka demux) the streams from the MKV and put them unaltered into an AVI or MP4 and it'd be exactly the same when you played it back. The process of transferring the streams would take seconds, since no decode & encode is involved. (Quirks in some formats can wreak havok on muxers, leading to audio/video sync problems, but most multiplexers are intelligent enough to handle it or allow adjustments)

      The world has too many people that don't understand this. I've seen people re-encode a perfectly good AVI into an MP4, to make it more Mac-esk or simply work on their iThings. They should've extracted the streams, and muxed them together into an MP4 so the quality wouldn't degrade.

    30. Re:I have HBO... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 2

      I have HBO and the last time I tried to sign up for it the process was totally fucking ridiculous, requiring me to do a bunch of bullshit to confirm that I actually have Charter despite the fact that I got to the signup through Charter's fucking site. It was all pop-ups and bullshit, too, that required me to sit here and play games with adblock and Noscript to figure out what the fuck was being blocked that they needed to confirm my goddamn account.

      Granted, this was about a year or so ago, but my first experience was piss poor, and I wasted more time than it would have taken me to download the goddamned episode I was trying to watch just trying to sign up for the service to legally stream the shit. So guess what I did? I gave HBOGo the finger, torrented my desired content, and enjoyed it without jumping through all their stupid hoops to prove I'm a legitimate customer.

      Maybe the process was simpler for you, but that's immaterial to me. They only got one chance, and it was a dismal failure for me, so fuck 'em. That's what happens when there are alternatives. I know that's a concept that the MAFIAA is still trying to wrap it's mind around, the whole "we don't have to come to you for our entertainment anymore" thing, but that doesn't much matter to me, either. The pirated copy is still the superior product. Until that changes, they will always be watching people download the shit out of their content. That's reality.

    31. Re:I have HBO... by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      To record something on a modern DVR you just select the programme and then press the button for "record this every time it is on". From then on the DVR records that programme every time is is shown. You don't have to worry about the time, day or remembering to record the next episode it just does it. The whole point of the DVR is that you can just tell it what shows you like watching and it records them all for you. Then when you want to watch some TV you can pick and choose from the shows it has downloaded recorded already.

    32. Re:I have HBO... by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      I prefer the philosophy of "Wget it. Forget it." myself.

    33. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a DVR. It's still pirating, just dumb pirating since you could have had it legally.

    34. Re:I have HBO... by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Once again the entertainment industry is failing to provide people what they want and so people are taking matters into their own hands.

      Apparently what people want is free entertainment. The entertainment industry will NEVER provide free entertainment. It can't as it isn't sustainable.

    35. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not moral.

      Yes, it is. I've already paid for it.

    36. Re:I have HBO... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      That's pretty lame. I have some recording rules that are as old as my DVR. You only have to "program the DVR" once. That's the whole value proposition of a DVR.

      Set it. Forget it. Let the whole "automation" thing do it's work.

      It's a DVR, not a VCR.

      That only works if you have a Good DVR(tm). Most people own digital VCRs courtesy of their cable or satellite provider.

      My experience has it that the provided digital VCRs are literally crap at scheduling. Something like TiVo though IS literally "set it and forget it". Tracked many series through timeslot changes (Fringe being the latest one it automatically did for me)

      When my cable company went all digital (and being in Canada, it means no CableCARD), my TiVos still had uses for me to tell me when the bloody TV show is on because the cablebox was utterly useless at recording shows.

      TiVo's been around 14 years now. The patents are definitely licensed. Surely one of those is how to schedule a TV program properly. Hell, if it isn't patented, TiVo might as well do it because doing it is obviously a very difficult thing to do and non-obvious.

    37. Re:I have HBO... by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      Every show I torrent except for HBO stuff has a Canadian Network logo in the corner. True north strong and free, for now.

    38. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why should it not be moral if you're not an HBO subscriber? It's illegal either way. Do you get a reward in heaven for having a subscription while "pirating" their content? Does it relieve your capitalist conscience?

    39. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but I get busy doing something most Sunday nights or forget to watch it, so I usually start the download Monday morning and watch it after work.

      It's not pirating if you're time shifting.

      You have HBO. Game of Thrones is available online through HBO immediately after airing on TV.

      Some pirates just love to pirate.

    40. Re:I have HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on where you live does it not?? Here it would be considered fair usage and thus would be completely legal according to law even if the content owners believe otherwise.

    41. Re:I have HBO... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Legality is established if you have access to those channels, those shows, that have already aired. You are essentially time-shifting. Mr. Rogers (RIP) would argue it.

      What can't be done due to agreements between other parties not involved in the recording, transcoding and distribution of the files themselves is... distribute them (even after they air in this case mind you).

      Movies, TV shows, music - they are restricted by who can distribute them, and that's the problem. It's like being able to have drugs (TV recordings for shows you [paid for and] missed) but no one can sell them but other parties who have agreements in place to be the sole distributor. And that's a civil matter except now we have laws against not agreeing to an exclusivity contract that you were never presented with. I don't even understand how some of these cases actually proceed when I think of how ignorant the argument is - however, I do understand very much so everyone wants to get paid.

      There is your golden ticket, content delivery over the internet that is as fast and reliable as pirates that is freely shared and money changes hands to pay the original owners of the works.

  3. I would love to pay for GoT. by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 1

    But at the moment we have cable data only ($53/month or some-such) and upgrading to cable with HBO would be the better part of another $100 per month.

    I seriously look forward to a time when the last-mile people can GTFO and allow me to pay for the specific content that I want to buy.

    G.

    1. Re:I would love to pay for GoT. by marnues · · Score: 1

      What do you think the last mile people have to do with this? Cable companies have no love of bundling. They have to do it or they lose large swathes of content. If you're like me and won't pay for a cable subscription just to watch Game of Thrones blame Time-Warner, owners of HBO, and the people that ensure you are paying a cable company for all their other channels before you get HBO.

    2. Re:I would love to pay for GoT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy episodes on iTunes

    3. Re:I would love to pay for GoT. by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      No, you can buy episodes from last year's season on iTunes. Not this year's season.

    4. Re:I would love to pay for GoT. by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      They love to bundle TV with the internet (cable + Internet is $100, either alone is $65).

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    5. Re:I would love to pay for GoT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People say that, but they never ever actually have an URL. Google doesn't have that URL either.

  4. No win win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder why companies like HBO haven't followed suit with other broadcasting companies that air the show a few days later on the internet with commercials. I'd see this as a win-win. The subscribers get it first hand, and everyone else gets it the next day + commercials. The whole week-delay, however, is archaic, and un-excusable.

    1. Re:No win win? by Lehk228 · · Score: 2

      HBO is owned by Time Warner, HBO won't be available completely stand alone until Time Warner finishes dying and HBO is sold off or spun off.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:No win win? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Game of Thrones is kind of a loss leader-- it gets people to buy a subscription

    3. Re:No win win? by poity · · Score: 2

      That makes a lot of sense. The current explanation is that HBO's contract with national cable providers prohibits them from doing anything like that unilaterally. I think HBO has enough clout to alter the agreement, or just sever the deal and go at it alone. Ad-supported 320p episodes, with 720p for purchase, then 1080p for the physical disc archive. They'd likely make a ton of money just with the free 320p & links to merchandise.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    4. Re:No win win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's supposed to happen here is that someone buys out the stocks of the loss-leader, and starts reselling it in a more convenient form. Why don't we let this happen with TV shows?

    5. Re:No win win? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      But if people don't subscribe because they are downloading it HBO WILL cancel the series. This is pay TV people, if you don't pay for it the pay TV station has no incentive to keep producing the show. A series like Game of Thrones is VERY expensive to produce and I guarantee if HBO isn't seeing the subscription revenue on it they will kill the series before they finish the books.

      So if you love the show and will be pissed if it's canceled but don't subscribe remember to blame yourself when it's canceled.

      Oh and one other thing, Time Warner and HBO are the most likely content players to go the RIAA route and start suing downloaders. I wouldn't be surprised if they are collecting evidence right now.

    6. Re:No win win? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I doubt the show makes much of the revenue from the actual airing of the footage, they make money from the box sets, the merchandise and everything surrounding the franchise. Do you really think that HBO will cancel the show? The producers will just shop around some other channels who will most definitely be jumping to buy it and air it on non-premium channels.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    7. Re:No win win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I'd consider that a "loss leader". A "loss leader" is when you sell something at a loss to entice people to visit in the hopes that they will buy something else that is profitable to you.

    8. Re:No win win? by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that HBO will cancel the show? The producers will just shop around some other channels who will most definitely be jumping to buy it and air it on non-premium channels.

      Yes and those non-premium channels won't be able to pay anywhere near enough to cover the cost of making the show. Making TV shows is very expensive, making TV shows with top rate actors in fantasy settings that require extensive location shooting, costumes, sets and props is fantastically expensive. This can't be paid for with DVD sales and merch.

      Shows like Game of Thrones can be made because they serve as loss leaders for the cable networks. If cable subscriptions fall significantly because people are downloading the shows online then HBO will cancel it in a heartbeat, they would be crazy not to. This happens to shows all the time. If ratings drop below a certain level then the advertising revenue isn't high enough to make the show worthwhile and it is cancelled. This is especially true of shows that are by their very subject matter very expensive to make. One of the reasons Firefly was cancelled was that it was an expensive show to make and Fox didn't think the ratings were high enough to make it pay.

  5. Only viable Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd be happy to pay to download or stream new episodes, but I live outside the US so that is not an option. Considering the pirated version is in 1080p if I want, with no ads and the ability to pause and watch whenever I want just makes it easier.

    1. Re:Only viable Option by Dunge · · Score: 0

      There's no 1080p tv show.. it's 720p only.

    2. Re:Only viable Option by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's in 1080 i , actually.

  6. Offer people what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop using scarcity with something that is an unlimited resource.

    Stop forcing people to pay for packages. Stop forcing people to pay for networks. Stop using the limited countries mindset, those are artificial political boundaries.

    Start making your shows available to everyone world-wide at the same second. Start asking for reasonable prices per episode, not a higher price than buying the DVD box set which you sell after a season is over.

    Stop being dumbasses and start being smart. People want to see your shows, they just won't jump through your stupid, mindless 1950's hoops anymore.

    1. Re:Offer people what they want by marnues · · Score: 2

      Artificial scarcity makes Time-Warner more money right now. Plus they might be able to pull off some huge win copyright lawsuits. They'll wait for someone else to create a successful business model before they change.

    2. Re:Offer people what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      PLEASE DO THIS.

      I would happily pay to help support more brilliant work.
      BUT NO. I have to go through some real awful companies like BSkyB in order to consume said content. Am I HELL paying another penny to them. HORRIBLE company.
      So would a considerable number of these other people who do it as well.

      Same goes for anime, there is a huge market there for foreign releases, but a tiny amount ever get released in other countries.
      And they wonder why the market is in such a mess? Release globally and be done with it.
      Let fansubbers sub, let fandubbers dub, let them remix and twist, if you release globally, people will like you.
      I know many people who regularly order things internationally through other parties because they don't have any such official service.
      Whether it is figures, manga, food or clothes.

      The internet is a goldmine waiting for you. Please, for the love of your industries, figure out how to USE IT!

      Hell, even throw up a donation page using the most plainest text you can find and let some international payment service deal with the rest.
      Translators gonna translate, donators gonna donate. Extra income without having to go through the legal hurdles with global licensing.
      I donate money every so often to various efforts. Including some promising Kickstarters and fan projects where the people involved show a true love for their work, that passion you can just see in people.

    3. Re:Offer people what they want by russotto · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Artificial scarcity makes Time-Warner more money right now. Plus they might be able to pull off some huge win copyright lawsuits. They'll wait for someone else to create a successful business model before they change.

      So basically they make a lot of money by being dicks. Some people respond to them being dicks by getting their show without paying them any money. But they're still better off for being dicks. So what's the problem? Everybody wins.

      Time-Warner can whine about stealing and piracy and all that, but since they abandoned the moral high ground by being total dicks, no one should listen to them. What they really mean by all their pissing and moaning is they want the state to back up their right to be total dicks. That's a bad move; that just makes gives them more incentive to be total dicks.

      Summary: Want to promote unbundling and shows seen sooner in foreign markets: pirate away. Want more bundling and longer delays for shows in foreign markets, DVD releases, etc -- respect copyright.

    4. Re:Offer people what they want by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      What people want is to get the show for free and have it be really conveniently available all around the world. There is no possible business model of "release an elaborate fantasy television series for free."

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    5. Re:Offer people what they want by arcsimm · · Score: 1

      re: anime, the market there is not as deep as it might seem. Anime releases in the US market went though a huge boom-bust cycle a few years back. The BitTorrent download numbers made it look like a lucrative market, since a fair portion of the fanbase watched ~80% of the shows airing each season via fansubs. US licensees were buying up every mediocre property they could get their hands on, but it soon became apparent that US anime fans would, generally, only buy DVDs of shows that they loved madly. As a result, most of the US licensees went belly-up around 2007 or 08. These days, I get most of my anime through Crunchyroll, but when I count the number of shows I watch I think the amount spent per episode viewed is under $1 -- and I'm not sure I'd pay much more if it came to it. HBO would balk at handing out Game of Thrones for a buck a hit, and I'm not sure that they're wrong, but that may be what it takes to win the BitTorrent crowd over. Is it so surprising that they'd want to protect their current business strategy, in that context?

    6. Re:Offer people what they want by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I pay for HBO and I have a Tivo. It's still easier for me to just grab the torrent and watch it some time during the week. I've found torrents easier than Netflix (paying account unused several months), Hulu+ (paying account unused several months), cable TV (paying account partially used daily) or renting from Redbox/video store. Plus it's stored on my 3TB USB drive that I can access at any time.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Offer people what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was never any indication that fans would buy horribly overpriced, dubbed DVDs for something they'd watch once. The market was for cheap, rapid release, subbed downloads, i.e. the legal equivalent of the torrents. That's the whole point, companies keep complaining that people aren't buying what they didn't ask for and demand harsher punishment. And no, I wouldn't want to stick on a sinking ship just to feel that I'm making more money, because I recognize that giving people what they want now that tech lets you where it's at and that it's the profit that matters, not the unit price. Everyone wants to see my shit? Great, if selling it for a quarter a pop makes me more money than selling to 50% of the audience then that's what I'll do!

    8. Re:Offer people what they want by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Do they really?

      Letting people pay less to access something popular can give you a much larger income stream. How many times has this happened recently with computer games? For example, making Team Fortress 2 "free to play" gave valve a 12x increase in revenue.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    9. Re:Offer people what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Artificial scarcity makes Time-Warner more money right now."

      Do we know this though?

      How many of those folks would pirate and how many would pay if they were available as a DRM-free download for a few bucks per-episode?

      I currently pirate GoT. I would love to know how much they would make per viewer from my subscription if I subscribed to cable, and how much from advertising. I bet it doesn't come close to the $5-$10 per episode I'd pay to have it timely, legal and unencumbered by DRM.

    10. Re:Offer people what they want by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      I go farther than that and say that artificial scarcity is immoral. Imagine if food was infinitely reproducible but a company put restrictions on it so that poor people in many parts of the world would have to pay for it and couldn't have access to that resource. That's immoral.

      Information is free to reproduce, when you put artificial restrictions on it you are committing a similar act.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    11. Re:Offer people what they want by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I and many others have both paid for a subscription on which we can watch game of thrones (among other things) and yet still choose to download torrents in addition. If the service i had paid for offered me the same convenience as the torrents, i would not bother with the torrents.

      If i, as a paying customer, could log in to a site provided by the tv operator and download a high quality drm-free mkv file made available as soon as the show airs then that's exactly what i would do. Instead, all they offer is a streaming-only service that doesn't work on linux.. I want to watch on my linux box, i want to download now and watch later when i will have limited or no connectivity.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Offer people what they want by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Handing it out for $1 an episode would still be highly profitable, the distribution costs are absolutely trivial, that $1/viewer adds up quickly over millions of viewers, viewer numbers will increase with lower prices and they can still sell commercials because although a drm-free file would make it easy to remove them few people would bother.

      Depending how many shows you watch, you could be paying effectively a lot less than $1/episode if you have a cable subscription...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:Offer people what they want by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      What people want is to get the show for free and have it be really conveniently available all around the world. There is no possible business model of "release an elaborate fantasy television series for free."

      Which is why you get torrents... people are willing to pay, just not the value the studios set on it. I suppose the argument could be "tough it's their show, they can charge what they want" to which I suppose people's reactions would be, it's available to me online for free... why pay that much when the internet reveals it's true "value"

    14. Re:Offer people what they want by brit74 · · Score: 2

      > "Stop using scarcity [wikipedia.org] with something that is an unlimited resource."

      Scarcity is used as a method to get you (the consumer) to pay for the entertainment, and creating entertainment costs money. If companies could create entertainment and give it away, and you'd generously donate to them so that they could get well-paid (preferably as well as they'd get paid under an "artificial scarcity" system), then they probably wouldn't have a problem doing that. (Assuming they aren't consumed by the fear that they're getting underpaid). The problem comes in when people don't/won't donate. It's easy to get into a comfortable situation where you simply aren't thinking about production costs of your entertainment. In that sense, "artificial scarcity" is the second-best solution in that it maintains enough income for the creators to continue to create. The best possible system is one where they give it away and you donate. But, if enough people aren't donating (and I don't personally believe they will) then the artificial scarcity model is the best result (while maintaining the economic viability of the businesses creating the "resource").

      If you're going to complain about "artificial scarcity", I also think you should start complaining about a whole bunch of other stuff in society where "resources" are not fully utilized because they have a price tag attached to them. For example: more theaters aren't sold out for every show - force movie theaters to offer reduced price or free tickets to movies. Force greyhound buses to carry you around for free or reduced prices until all the seats are full. Force concerts to let in extra people if the show isn't sold out. Force rental property owners to offer their apartments for free or reduced prices if they aren't being occupied. Force amusement parks to let people in for free or reduced price until the park reaches capacity.

      Personally, I think this system would fail because people would get good at showing up whenever these events aren't at full capacity. The end result is that you drive them out of business, which would make you guilty of mismanaging the economy in an attempt to "fully utilize our underutilized resources". I feel the same way about this "artificial scarcity of digital media" complaint - it would likely lead to bankruptcy, which results in nobody having access to those resources.

    15. Re:Offer people what they want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "For example: more theaters aren't sold out for every show - force movie theaters to offer reduced price or free tickets to movies."

      Seats are a scarce good. And you get last-minute tickets cheaper in many cases, if there are free seats.

      "Force greyhound buses to carry you around for free or reduced prices until all the seats are full."

      Seats are a scarce good. And you can get last-minute tickets cheaper in many cases, if there are free seats.

      "Force concerts to let in extra people if the show isn't sold out."

      Seats are a scarce good. And you can get last-minute tickets cheaper in many cases, if there are free seats.

      "Force rental property owners to offer their apartments for free or reduced prices if they aren't being occupied."

      Homes are a scarce good occupying land (another scarce good) and you can lose your property if you fail to pay upkeep, taxes and other costs of maintenance of ownership.

      "Force amusement parks to let people in for free or reduced price until the park reaches capacity."

      Seats are a scarce good. And you can get last-minute tickets cheaper in many cases, if there are free seats.

    16. Re:Offer people what they want by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Except Game of Thrones isn't a requirement for life so your comparison with food is ludicrous.

      HBO create Game of Thrones and choose to share it with people who subscribe to their TV channel, or buy DVDs from them. While it is in their interests to sell access to as many people as possible no-one has a 'right' to watch it. They could choose to not let anyone see it, just make the show and then put it in a cupboard somewhere. At the end of the day it is their property and they can do what they want with it. Morality doesn't enter into the equation at all.

    17. Re:Offer people what they want by tepples · · Score: 1

      And you can get last-minute tickets cheaper in many cases, if there are free seats.

      And in many cases you can't, due to minimum advertised price policies.

    18. Re:Offer people what they want by shemyazaz · · Score: 1

      I for one would be willing to pay for physical copies of most anime assuming that two conditions were met: 1. The price must be reasonable. I WILL NOT pay $30 for a DVD with 5 episodes of a 350+ episode series. Just not happening. 2. The translation quality needs to increase. Its sad when a group of people on the internet translating these things for free can provide better quality than a large company with paid translators. I pay for Crunchyroll because its cheap and convenient. The translations are pretty crappy, but simulcasts are nice.

    19. Re:Offer people what they want by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      Ideas and data (which amount to the same thing) are not covered under the normal rules or laws of property. Not even natural law supports such a notion. You can't own an idea. You can't own a string of numbers.

      I'll let Thomas Jefferson speak for me since he figured this out over 200 years ago:

      "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me."

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    20. Re:Offer people what they want by fluffythedestroyer · · Score: 1

      I'm with Videotron in canada and their prices are insane. First you gotta have the basic package which is around 20$, then you can have the hbo package which includes 3-6 channels or networks which i won't even look or watch because all i would want is hbo. You can't get that channel alone so that's really idiot on their part. That price is around 16.99$ for the whole hbo package. So if you have the basic + another specific package which almost everyone have here your montly price should be around 50$ minimum per month. Add that 20$ for the hbo package and you got an insane price per month for 1 silly channel you want. I stream it until Videotron will make HBO available...alone and not in a package. That is illegal if you ask me only because they will ripe me off to get more money out of my pockets. Like most people say, that business model is very very old and it's not working anymore. Fortunately I don't have a lot with my account at videotron cause i don't watch TV anymore. Good thing I got Internet lol

  7. The Oatmeal by juventasone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Oatmeal has already demonstrated the problem perfectly.

    1. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That some space age video codec he's stumbled upon there!

    2. Re:The Oatmeal by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The Oatmeal also demonstrates why most people have no problem stealing things: it's easy when you can rationalize away the problem.

      HBO is only interested in selling the show to you if you subscribe to their service. They don't want to just sell you the episodes at a fraction of the price of a monthly subscription. This is HBO's show, it is HBO's right to make that decision.

      The right thing to do is to not watch it. Not pirate it and then try to justify it. HBO did not want to sell it to you on your terms, therefore you have no right to watch the show. And it's not committing piracy that tells HBO that you're unhappy, it's not watching the show that tells HBO you're unhappy. If you steal the show that just tells HBO you're too cheap to pay and that they should do more to stop pirates.

      The measurement of a moral person is that they can do the right thing even in difficult situations. The Oatmeal only demonstrates that people can't do the right thing unless it's convenient to do so.

    3. Re:The Oatmeal by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo. I'd pay more for HBO Go than I do for all of Netflix, but I don't have the option unless I *also* pay for cable, and I want exactly nothing from cable except HBO. I don't want to pay $100+ for the DVDs because I doubt I'll re-watch the show.

      I'd have to pay something like $60 a month (a guess--it might be higher) for one channel, which is ridiculous. $20/month for all of HBO Go? Hell yeah.

    4. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "right"

    5. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I feel The Oatmeal normally nails things, he missed horribly on that one.

    6. Re:The Oatmeal by bug1 · · Score: 2

      Define "stealing"

      Legally, copyright infringment isnt stealing as its non-transitive.
      If copying was stealing they wouldnt have needed seperate laws against copyright infringment would they...

    7. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "stealing"

    8. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reframed problem below:

      Givens:
      1 - Going to watch show that is enjoyed.
      2 - Will pay for entertainment covered in entertainment services.
      3 - Will not buy a stack of unmarked programming, with payments continuing indefinitely into the future.
      4 - Will violate morals if keeping them is frustrating, angering, and difficult.

    9. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Oatmeal only demonstrates that people can't do the right thing unless it's convenient to do so.

      The Oatmeal also demonstrates that companies can't do the right thing (i.e. sharing their DIGITAL, EASILY REPRODUCIBLE content with the public) unless it's profitable to do so. Seriously, how much effort does it take to put up a video on Netflix, so that paying customers (admittedly, Netflix's paying customers, not HBO's, but HBO will get a cut of the money anyway) can get access to it? There's licenses to work out, yes, but evidently HBO decided that having a large number who are watching GoT be paying nothing for it is better than getting some sort of recompensation for it, via Netflix, Hulu, or whatever else. Pirates are going to pirate. There's also a large number of "normal people" who will pay reasonable prices for good content instead of just downloading it, since we feel like we should support the producers if we can. But ignoring that section by making the good content ridiculously overpriced is only cutting into your own margins.

    10. Re:The Oatmeal by Ocker3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How does HBO know Why I'm not watching the show? If I don't watch the show because I don't like fantasy tv shows, how is that different to not watching because I don't like one of the actors, or the adult nature of the plots, or the nudity, or something else? Telling people not to watch the show only helps HBO change its behaviour if you also tell them to contact HBO and tell them Why they're not watching the show. There needs to be a feedback mechanism.

      If people download the show it tells HBO that people like their Content, but not their delivery method. Even if Time Warner isn't willing to change their delivery method, perhaps those Huge traffic numbers are telling other more responsive companies that there's a huge demand for content and they can make a bucketload of money if they can just figure out the sweet spot between on-demand viewing, price and availability.

      Here in Australia, we have the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, which is Gov owned and paid for out of our taxes, something like 13c a day or something silly and small per person. They produce/license Huge amounts of content, and make the vast majority of it available online on iView, which lets me stream shows to any net-connected device (with probably some region-locking). So we collectively (as Australian citizens) pay for the content, it gets delivered to anyone with an Australian internet connection (with certain week/month availability after the airing date limits), and it's sweet as all get out. I know the BBC does something similar (which the ABC may well have copied, go them, and I wish I could buy access to the Beeb's content). It's technically possible to do all of this, NetFlix, whatever, just some managers/execs/whatever can't get with the low-cost/high-volume model.

    11. Re:The Oatmeal by Kjella · · Score: 1

      You'd think that if it went "Games? Steam. Music? Spotify. Tv series? TPB." that they would take a hint, but maybe that's too much to ask. But they sure wouldn't know that you'd like to see the show if you didn't see it at all.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:The Oatmeal by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Is HBO acting morally by denying people access to a what is effectively a published, creative work, unless they pay for it? It might be necessary for their business model, it might even be a reasonable and generally unobjectionable practice, but restricting the availability of culture for mere money doesn't strike me as being affirmatively moral.

      Generally I regard copyright as an amoral field, governed mainly by utility. But if I had to look for a moral dimension, surely it would be on the side of the subset of pirates who, whatever their other failings, at least disseminate published creative works to anyone who wants them, for free, and often in a more useful form than the legitimate publisher. (This would exclude commercial pirates, ad-supported or ratio-supported pirates, etc., but it still leaves plenty)

      Remember, just because HBO has the right, i.e. the legal authority, to control the distribution of the work, that doesn't make them right, i.e. morally justified, to do so.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    13. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just checked here in Ontario, Canada with Rogers. After tax, the cheapest it would be is $73.45 (basic digital+HBO). Ridiculous when the only show I watch is GoT as well (maybe Dexter this fall). What is that, $18 an episode if there's 4 per month?! Thanks, but no thanks.

    14. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The Oatmeal also demonstrates why most people have no problem stealing things: it's easy when you can rationalize away the problem.
      Stealing? We're talking about piracy, what's theft got to do with anything?

      > HBO is only interested in selling the show to you if you subscribe to their service. They don't want to just sell you the episodes at a fraction of the price of a monthly subscription. This is HBO's show, it is HBO's right to make that decision.
      Sure, they're free to make that decision. And the rest of us are free to ignore their decision.

      > The right thing to do is to not watch it.
      Why? Why is it morally wrong to act against the wishes of a corporation?

      > HBO did not want to sell it to you on your terms, therefore you have no right to watch the show.
      Again, why? If HBO refuses to make content available on reasonable terms, what incentive is there to respect their copyrights? By the time GoT enters the public domain (if ever, it looks like the duration of copyright may well be increased indefinitely) everyone who has downloaded it today will long be dead, so waiting for that to happen is not an alternative.

      > And it's not committing piracy that tells HBO that you're unhappy, it's not watching the show that tells HBO you're unhappy.
      What HBO thinks is irrelevant, so if they wish to draw the wrong conclusions, let them.

      > If you steal the show that just tells HBO you're too cheap to pay and that they should do more to stop pirates.
      Again with the stealing. HBO was deprived of naught but artificial scarcity. Piracy is not theft. And again nobody cares about what HBO thinks.

    15. Re:The Oatmeal by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I already have cable and don't bother with HBO. I don't bother with HBO because beyond their original content, they have an incomplete selection of things like movies. If you want full access to all new movie content, you pretty much have to pay for ALL of the premium channels rather than one.

      That's not happening in my house.

      For the originals, the marginal cost of an HBO subscription is still more than I would pay for any boxed DVDs.

      So I just buy the DVDs and am patient enough to wait for them.

      I expect I am rather weird when it comes to the whole "patience" thing. So I don't knock others for not (being patient).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    16. Re:The Oatmeal by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      do you really think $25 an episode is cheap? assuming thats what it will cost you to watch this particular tv series. (with the subscription fees that have to be paid to get a chance to receive it at $100 a month).

      Even then your assuming the people who downloading haven't subscribed there is almost certain to be some that have subscribed and choose to watch on a different device and or time.

      your definition of moral is rather flawed because we all do immoral things most days of our lives to some degree or other. Chances are that somebody got exploited just to produce the device your reading this comment on. Do you protest every unjust thing that goes on in the world or do you sit idle and ignore well, most of them.

      I don't pirate this tv show from hbo, i honestly don't believe by your definition that makes me a moral person because of all the other immoral things I do and don't do. realistically you can't seriously suggest that you are a moral person either because it's impossible to be in the moral right all the time.

      As moral offences go pirating a tv show is a minor immoral act, a rather stupid one as Tv has little to no intrinsic value. Arguably paying for hbo whilst your children eat crappy food because you decided the cable bill was more important is more immoral than pirating it and ensuring your children eat regularly and healthily.

    17. Re:The Oatmeal by arose · · Score: 1

      What heavy handed protection of outdated business models? That does seem to be the actual question you are answering anyway. Copyright is an ethical issue as long as it is used to encourage creation, once it steps outside of its bounds (e.g. protecting business models or providing for grandchildren) it is not worth trying to get every single stubborn ox to create. If we trade 5% of created works for having access to the rest of them and being able to build on the rest of them in a reasonable time frame, than that is what we should do. Piracy is part of this, for better or worse (not saying that I pirate or you should, just that in the grand scheme it's existence is part of the solution).

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    18. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is HBO acting morally by denying people access to a what is effectively a published, creative work, unless they pay for it?

      Yes, they are. It is recognized as an artist/creators right to restrict access to what they have created. However, but taking advantage of a quasi-legal monopoly, and requiring you to buy access to tons of channels you don't want to just get access to the one you do, that may change the morallity.

      I stopped pirating shows that I can get on Netflix. I had quicker access to streaming content, and I had it already on my TV instead of at my desk. What's cause me to start again was shows I liked that were on Netflix and other streaming systems, got removed. It was as if content producers saw that people were willing to pay to watch their shows, figured out what price people were willing to pay, and they said "screw it, make them buy cable instead". No thanks, I'm doing quite fine without cable. I'd even watch the shows on their webpages (I'm looking at you, broadcast stations) if their webpage design didn't look like an early 2000's "oh look what I can do in Flash" demonstration. Or didn't require me to run unsigned scripts from countless numbers of third party tracking sites just to watch an episode.

    19. Re:The Oatmeal by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      How does HBO know Why I'm not watching the show?

      When no one subscribes to the network but the DVD sets are flying off of the shelves, they'll know.

    20. Re:The Oatmeal by Ylleks · · Score: 1

      If people download the show it tells HBO that people like their Content, but not their delivery method.

      No - that just tells HBO that you don't want to pay for it.

    21. Re:The Oatmeal by TranquilVoid · · Score: 0

      It really pisses me off that you got downmodded, not because you trolled or had clearly wrong facts, but because people didn't agree with you. I try to use my mod points only to mod up posts I don't agree with (provided they are well-argued).

      The Oatmeal only demonstrates that people can't do the right thing unless it's convenient to do so.

      Now, this is harsh but there's some truth to it. Look at riots and looting. As soon as people perceive the social order has disappeared they commit all sorts of anti-social acts (e.g. Katrina). Pirating is an example where it appears to people that the established authority has disappeared. After all, they're alone sitting at their computer in the comfort of their own house, not a store detective or security camera in sight.

      Paraphrasing Bertrand Russell, if your philosophy always justifies behaviour that is convenient for you, then you probably didn't arrive at it through logic.

    22. Re:The Oatmeal by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Even this is stupid. I don't want DVDs any more - I'm past that.

      Sell it to me on a flash drive so I can up it to my media centre. Save me the trouble of ripping the disc.

    23. Re:The Oatmeal by WillyWanker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since when does morality have anything to do with it? It's simply business. Stop believing that we the people are supposed to follow some high and lofty moral compass while corporations are free to rape and pillage at will. Bullshit. When THEY treat us with dignity, respect, honestly, and consideration THEN and ONLY THEN can they demand to be treated the same.

      All they care about is money. Whatever system earns them the most money is the system they will continue to use. They don't care if you can't afford cable and HBO. They don't care if you have to wait a week, a month, or a year to see their content. Cause they don't give a shit about you. They only care about THE MONEY. There is no right. There is no wrong. There is only PROFIT.

      So why the FUCK should I care about them when they've made it abundantly clear they don't give a shit about me?

      While you can continue to insist that it's wrong to consume content without paying for it the rest of us will continue to tell you we don't give a fuck. Just like HBO doesn't give a fuck if I want to watch their show but refuse to pay over $100 a month for it. Whatever I need to do to save the most money possible is what I'm going to do. Just like how HBO is going to do whatever earns them the most profits. So in the end both HBO and I are essentially doing the same thing -- looking out for #1 and not giving a rat's ass about the other. I learned it all from our corporate overlords. God Bless uh'Murica!!!

    24. Re:The Oatmeal by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      It is recognized as an artist/creators right to restrict access to what they have created.

      In this context, you are describing a legal right, not a moral right. Don't confuse legality with morality; there are plenty of immoral things which are legal, moral things which are illegal, and laws -- such as copyright -- which are meant to follow other principles, and are merely expected to be amoral.

      The reason, at least the alleged reason, why copyrights are granted (at least in the US, though it's the only sensible reason, anyway) is that it promotes the public interest. Not because authors are entitled to it, or because it's the right thing to do. Copyright is supposed to promote the progress of science by encouraging the creation and publication of certain creative works while minimizing the harm it necessarily causes the public, so as to produce a net public benefit. Nothing to do with morals; just utility.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    25. Re:The Oatmeal by schnell · · Score: 1

      "Games? Steam. Music? Spotify. Tv series? TPB."

      I like your argument but I think it would be much more convincing to the content providers if so many games weren't being torrented even though Steam exists. That's the kind of behavior that makes content companies say, "why should I distribute with Steam-like weak DRM when people will still pirate it?"

      I hope the content providers learn not from Spotify but rather from the iTunes and Amazon music stores since they offer exactly what most of the posters here claim they want: offline playback, simultaneous digital release, choose only the content you want to buy. But as long as these things are still being torrented by users who don't ultimately pay - even though digital distribution outlets exist that provide them in the form people claim they would be willing to pay for - content providers (game, music or video) will continue to point to that as justification for being afraid of properly embracing digital distribution.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    26. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's more like ...this oatmeal remix... down our end of the planet... :(

       

    27. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah... tried putting in a link to this- http://theoatmeal.com/pl/game_of_thrones/nz -and left out a tag (fail). It reflects the problems we have down under more succinctly :)

    28. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bingo. I'd pay more for HBO Go than I do for all of Netflix, but I don't have the option unless I *also* pay for cable, and I want exactly nothing from cable except HBO. I don't want to pay $100+ for the DVDs because I doubt I'll re-watch the show.

      I'd have to pay something like $60 a month (a guess--it might be higher) for one channel, which is ridiculous. $20/month for all of HBO Go? Hell yeah.

      Too bad. Wait until it releases on DVD/Bluray and rent it if you don't want to pay the Premium price to watch it when it's "fresh".

      As for the price of getting the TV, you're not looking at the issue properly. There is a minimum overhead for giving you the cable TV services, a minimum amount of profit to make it feasible for the business to offer it, and those are the bulk of your base cable TV prices. Put simply, it costs the cable TV operator very little to offer you the full basic cable package on top of the base operational costs. Were they to offer you HBO only, you'd find the bill was almost exactly the same as a result of the overhead costs, and also because of the legal requirements which mandate delivery of certain channels with any cable TV service.

    29. Re:The Oatmeal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people download the show it tells HBO that people like their Content, but not their delivery method.

      No, that's the message you hope they receive. The message they actually receive is that you're a cheapskate and a thief and they need to do more to stop you.

      Note for the mods/Trolls- I'm not calling it theft, I'm simply pointing out how they will view it.

      There needs to be a feedback mechanism.

      There already is- their subscription percentages and whether they're increasing or decreasing their penetration into a given market. HBO already conducts their own market research, and you are capable of giving them feedback directly. Don't bother calling your cable operator, they do not have any ability to report complaints to HBO... the only thing HBO cares about from your cable provider is their subscriber numbers.

    30. Re:The Oatmeal by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      What content providers can learn from Steam and Spotify, is that there are plenty of people willing to pay for content even if they can get it for free from some pirate site. And the lesson from iTunes is: reducing the amount of DRM on your content will increase your revenue from legal downloads, not reduce it. Your content will be pirated no matter what measures you take, and the more DRM you add on, the more you will piss off your actual paying customers, and the illegal (and DRM-free) versions of your content will become all the more appealing to them.

      I would gladly pay for video content if it comes in convenient formats with the option of format-shifting as well; who in their right mind wants to hunt around on pirate sites with annoying pop up ads, wait for some poorly seeded torrent to finally download, and then finding that what you've downloaded only has the German dubbed audio track? Instead, if I could pay to download from Warner's or HBO's full library of content, I'd be all over it.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    31. Re:The Oatmeal by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      2 - Will pay for entertainment covered in entertainment services. 3 - Will not buy a stack of unmarked programming, with payments continuing indefinitely into the future.

      #3 implies that you will not do #2 if #2's service agreement requires it.

    32. Re:The Oatmeal by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      Remember, just because HBO has the right, i.e. the legal authority, to control the distribution of the work, that doesn't make them right, i.e. morally justified, to do so.

      The implication here is that HBO owes everyone something (the content). That's a lot of nonsense. Being that it is a lot of nonsense, any "moral" discussion already went out the window.

      They've produced a show for their subscribers, nothing more. If you have to no desire to be their subscriber, you are not entitled to anything. Just because something is produced does not mean it automatically grants everyone the right to said thing.

    33. Re:The Oatmeal by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I'd pay more for HBO Go than I do for all of Netflix, but I don't have the option unless I *also* pay for cable, and I want exactly nothing from cable except HBO. I don't want to pay $100+ for the DVDs because I doubt I'll re-watch the show.

      Making epic fantasy tv shows is very expensive. The only reason HBO can afford to make something as lavish as Game of Thrones is that the cable companies will pay them a lot of money for the show. The cable companies are willing to pay that money because then they can use access to HBO as a drive for people to subscribe to cable. It isn't as simple as being able to say "I only want to watch Game of Thrones so I should only have to pay for that". If Game of Thrones wasn't able to drive sales of cable subscriptions, and generate advertising revenue on the channels it is shown on, then it would either never have been made or it would be much lower budget and nothing like the show as it is now.

    34. Re:The Oatmeal by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      What advertising revenue? Does HBO have ads now?

      I just want to pay more than the cost of adding HBO to cable service but less than it costs for a cable subscription + HBO to watch HBO's original shows online. Seems like a reasonable proposition to me.

    35. Re:The Oatmeal by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      It is recognized as an artist/creators right to restrict access to what they have created.

      Not yet it isn't. It is recognized as an an artist/creators right to only disseminate what they have created to people of their choosing, but what happens afterwards is out of the creator's control in many ethical frameworks. Those who stand to benefit would like you to use the term "intellectual property" so as to conflate the utilitarian copyright/patent legal engine with the private property of libertarian idolatry.

    36. Re:The Oatmeal by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      All they care about is money.

      It's funny. You seem to only care about money as well. You want your Game of Thrones for free, and you want to keep your money.

    37. Re:The Oatmeal by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      Yes. Finally, we're all on the same page. Like I said, I learned from corporations that value money above all else. No morality, no right and wrong, no compassion, understanding, empathy, or goodwill. Just money, pure and simple. If it's good enough for them, it's good enough for me.

    38. Re:The Oatmeal by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      The implication here is that HBO owes everyone something (the content). ⦠Just because something is produced does not mean it automatically grants everyone the right to said thing.

      Well, I don't think that they owe anyone anything. It would be immoral to compel an author to create a work, or distribute or perform a work. If HBO decided to cancel the series, we should not force them to resume it. (We can ask, we can put forth arguments that might convince them to reconsider, but we can't force them)

      But that's not the situation here. Here, HBO has created and performed the work of their own volition. No one could rightly force them to put it on the Internet as a freely downloadable file. But if some third party did that without HBO's involvement, then it would be wrong for HBO to take action to prevent this. At least, insofar as we care about morality here, as opposed to utility, which is a lot better suited to this issue, I think.

      And yes, if a creative work is created, everyone does have rights to it. This is an inherent part of free speech: the right to repeat verbatim what someone else has already said. Now, again, there is no right to force someone to create a work or to share it with you in some fashion. So if the work is kept secret, your right is moot; you don't have knowledge of the work or access to it. But once the author willingly grants you a look, you have the right to share it with anyone else, and you can see how it snowballs from there.

      We put legal constraints on this for utilitarian -- not moral -- reasons. But they're artificial and ultimately optional. There is no right of an author to force none else to grant and respect copyrights. If we do so, it's because it suits us, and only to the extent that it suits us. (At least assuming the laws are not corrupt) In the absence of these laws, one may do as he pleases.

      That's why there is a law that summons copyrights into being, and a law that dismisses them back again, but no law that grants rights in uncopyrighted works to the public, because there is no need for such a law; that is what happens automatically.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    39. Re:The Oatmeal by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      What advertising revenue? Does HBO have ads now?

      HBOs shows are syndicated to other channels which do show ads. Also all of the other cable channels that HBO works as a loss leader for show adverts.

    40. Re:The Oatmeal by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      That is a very interesting argument.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    41. Re:The Oatmeal by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      I don't want cable with one channel--I want HBO streaming.

      Netflix can do it. I'd pay *more* for HBO, despite its smaller amount of content. They could make it work, they just choose not to.

    42. Re:The Oatmeal by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      While at a gut level, I think I agree with you, your logic is flawed.

      Morality has something to do with it when YOU have morality. Saying "I'm throwing my moral code out the window because others don't abide by it" doesn't fly.

      If you're really saying "I see that those who don't have a moral code have the life I want, so I'm going to abandon my moral code too and become like them" then your argument is perfectly correct.

      Some people value their morals more than their privilege to entertainment though, and for them, your argument doesn't work. Instead of shelling out $100/month to be entertained by TV shows, they choose to shell out $30/month to gain access to Project Gutenberg and Youtube (and other free offeringx) and add to this entertainment by going for walks, hanging out with friends, spending even MORE money to make and eat tasty food, etc.

      Oh, and you're wrong about HBO: they care about you. You're an untapped revenue stream. You care about them too: they're a tapped luxury entertainment stream.

  8. Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I don't download Game of Thrones. I watched the first few episodes, saw that it was a soap opera trying to gain legitimacy with a few sword and sorcery components, and gave it up. But one reason to download is that you get to see the film on your terms, at a date and time of your choosing, instead of being locked into a broadcasting schedule. And, no commercials, but the first part is the biggest I think. If these shows were available on demand, instead of trying to force a TV paradigm that's largely dead these days, there may be fewer downloads.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize: 1) HBO has no commercials 2) HBO shows its programs multiple times a week 3) Most HBO customers have access to the program On-Demand 4) Have you heard of a DVR?

    2. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HBO has an on-demand streaming service, doesn't it? HBO GO?

    3. Re:Watch it when you want to by marnues · · Score: 1

      Soap operas have public executions? I might have to give the genre another go!

    4. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      1) I'm talking in general, not necessarily this show in particular. 2) "Multiple times a week" is still != "when I want to watch it" 3) see 1), 4) Yes, I have, thanks. They're a lot of trouble, compared to typing in a show name and clicking on a link.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Soap Op--er-a

      Noun: A television or radio drama series dealing typically with daily events in the lives of the same group of characters. The plot in "Soap Operas" tend towards the melodramatic. The writing is often open-ended, with plot threads rarely being resolved. The story centers on the feelings and emotions of the various characters to the exclusion of almost all else.

      Yep. To which I would add, most of the characters are an absolute waste of skin, and the only reason they're still breathing is that nobody has yet bothered to put them out of their misery.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:Watch it when you want to by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      Genres, there are differences, but I'm too bored to define them for you.

    7. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Nod. You appear to be easily bored.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe Dark Shadows did. Well maybe not official executions but plenty of murders.

    9. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 & 3. You were talking about this show in particular. You spend two of five sentences specifically on it, then transitioned to reasons to download for two seconds, then went back to "if these shows were available on demand [...] there may be fewer downloads" when this one is available on demand and has the most downloads.

      4. What DVR did you use? They aren't trouble. They are really, really easy. A good measure of that is after trying many times, I cannot teach my mom or sibling how to download things off of bittorrent and have it stick, but they understand DVRs well enough to get by (another testament is the old joke about being unable to program your VCR didn't survive the jump to DVRs).

      I agree in theory typing in a show name and clicking a link would be easiest, which is why things like Netflix are a great idea. In practice there are roadblocks today. Oh shit, I don't have this codec installed for this one. VLC didn't work either. That file's a honeypot. Don't click that one, all those thumbs down mean it's probably gay porn labelled as GoT. Oh fuck, my favourite torrent site has been taken down. This one is stuck at 98% and all the seeders have left. I downloaded this one and it's dubbed in German. This file glitches out at the 40 minute mark. This one has all the sound out of sync with the video by almost one second. I thought I downloaded all the episodes from season 5 thus far but half of what I downloaded was season 4 because the seasons are counted differently in European and US distribution.

      Which isn't to say the roadblocks are good, or right, or the fault of the medium; nor is it to say that DVRs never have technical issues. Just to say -- DVRs are not really a lot of trouble by comparison to bittorrent.

    10. Re:Watch it when you want to by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      You appear to believe that Game of Thrones is melodrama (it's drama; if you don't understand this difference, you need to go study up on what each means), it depicts their daily lives (rather than the epic war between factions, with a month or more between some episodes), the characters have no depth or development (although not all are diving depth, that's expected of a character that dies within two episodes of being introduced; John Snow, Tyrion, and many others, have taken a fucking journey already, and have plenty of time to go barring their death), and that there's open ended writing to the books (as yet unwritten, but the author of the books did give the HBO producers the main plot points in case he dies,, indicating there's a fairly well formed ending point; the HBO series' dialogue is lifted DIRECTLY from the books).

    11. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was at least one public execution on Dark Shadows in the the 60s. Victoria Winters was hung as a witch after being sent 200 years back in time during a present-day seance.

    12. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life

      Noun: A reality dealing typically with daily events in the lives of the same group of characters. The plot in "Lives" tend towards the melodramatic. The sequence of events is often open-ended, with plot threads rarely being resolved. The story centers on the feelings and emotions of the various characters (e.g. what they value) to the exclusion of almost all else.

    13. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > 4. What DVR did you use? They aren't trouble. They are really, really easy. A good measure of that is after trying many times, I cannot teach my mom or sibling how to download things off of bittorrent and have it stick, but they understand DVRs well enough to get by (another testament is the old joke about being unable to program your VCR didn't survive the jump to DVRs).

      I've used a lot of different kinds over the years, from old tape machines, to DVR built into the cable box, to Windows Media Center. It's always easier to download than it is to dvr. I'm sorry, but until usability improves, it just is.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched the first few episodes, saw that it was a soap opera trying to gain legitimacy with a few sword and sorcery components

      Then you saw wrong. It's not about the personal relationships between the people, it's about the politics and intrigue. As for your claim that it's trying to gain legitimacy, you've got your head squarely up your ass. The novels are hugely popular, and it's one of the most viewed (and pirated) original series in history.

      And, no commercials,

      It's HBO. Other than a couple trailers for other HBO series at the beginning there are no commercials.

    15. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really want to get into an argument about the definition of a genre. After the first few episodes of Game of Thrones I wasn't very convinced of the shows quality. You should really finish the first season before you judge the show if you don't like it after that then by all means stop watching it.

    16. Re:Watch it when you want to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should give it more time than a few episodes to let the plot threads resolve. Jeez, it's a ten episode first season of what's intended to be at least seven and you expect plot threads to resolve in the first few episodes? By your interpretation there are only soap operas.

    17. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're really into it. That's fine, if there weren't different kinds of people, there wouldn't be different kinds of entertainment.

      It is most definitely melodrama. Test by: Go over the dialog and situations in your head and try to imagine real people acting that way. No, right? To have a collection of people that mean and that thoughtless and that self-absorbed, and (the important part) that transparent about it, is not realistic. The characters are painfully exaggerated, and this is where drama => melodrama.

      You know, it's fine. I saw this tendency in the BG reboot -- to make a soap opera with sci-fi elements, or a sci-fi in a soap opera framework (whether you believe that the chicken or egg came first) in an obvious attempt to combine the audience for long winded melodrama (typically non-geek women) with the audience for sci-fi or fantasy (typically geek men) which provides something both can enjoy. It's not for me. I liked the crew interaction in Firefly, for example, but every scene had a purpose -- it led somewhere, it wasn't just people continuously barking at each other for little reason. If I wanted that, I'd just stay at work.

      Parenthetically, I think it was melodrama that killed SGU. By the time the writers had grown tired of the painfully long-winded "who was commanding the ship" thread and finally got to the real story arc, most of the viewers had bailed. Too bad, there was an interesting story in there somewhere, but it never got told.

      But Game of Thrones still seems to be doing well, I suspect in part because it has inherited part of its audience from housewives still in withdrawal from the cancellation of "All My Children". And if there are fantasy enthusiasts who don't mind the soap opera elements or have gone through the mental gymnastics to redefine what their eyes and ears are telling them, who am I to say that's wrong? It's not like the show offends me by existing. I'm not required to watch it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:Watch it when you want to by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      It is most definitely melodrama. Test by: Go over the dialog and situations in your head and try to imagine real people acting that way. No, right? To have a collection of people that mean and that thoughtless and that self-absorbed, and (the important part) that transparent about it, is not realistic. The characters are painfully exaggerated, and this is where drama => melodrama.

      This is NOT the modern definition of melodrama in film. Melodrama is, in basic terms, where the story is posed like a drama, but you know the outcome. It's more complicated, of course, and is better defined by the total lack of character development and emphasis on action, but the basic test above fails for any melodrama. Titanic is a melodrama. Both are a melodrama by the Victorian-era standard, but not by the current definition. Sidney Lumet (Before the Devil Knows You're Dead):

      ""In a well-written drama, the story comes out of the characters. The characters in a well-written melodrama come out of the story."

      If you watch GoT, it's clearly within that definition of drama. Ayn Rand:

      "a drama involves primarily a conflict of values within a man (as expressed in action); a melodrama involves only a conflict of man with other men."

      Again, GoT has more internal conflict than external conflict. One last one, from Dictionary.com:

      1. a dramatic form that does not observe the laws of cause and effect and that exaggerates emotion and emphasizes plot or action at the expense of characterization.

      Again, GoT is clearly within the definition of drama here. I don't know about BG, or SG, or Firefly, but it's the trend in film (both TV series and movies) that nearly everything is melodrama - the top tier (each channel has a few big "anchor" shows they refer to that way as a group, like GoT, Boardwalk Empire and True Blood for HBO) subscription channel series are the most consistent exception to that rule, and their base material is picked specifically for depth for these series. I had a professor that worked at HBO for 25 years, from long before the Sopranos to about 3 years ago, and he had a whole lecture devoted to melodrama vs drama because most of the class couldn't tell him the difference the week before.

    19. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > This is NOT the modern definition of melodrama in film. Melodrama is, in basic terms, where the story is posed like a drama, but you know the outcome.

      Can you tell me with a straight face that you do not know the outcome?

      Compare the character interaction between Game of Thrones and, say... Dallas (1978). Besides the environment, (texas oil tycoons vs power struggle in environment with fantasy elements) what's the difference?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    20. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Clearly you missed the Dynasty 1985 season finale. Well, so did I, but my wife watches that stuff so I hear all about it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    21. Re:Watch it when you want to by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen Dallas, but I can tell you that I don't know the outcome (just as a sidenote, there is no definite ending yet - it's two books away from the supposed end, so there literally is no ending). Plenty of the good guys have died - there's no clear winner at the end of this whole thing. I pegged Ned Stark as the "good guy winner" of the series (I imagine this is who you thought was going to come out on top based on the first few episodes) - he died near the end of the first season. Then I thought Robb Stark (son of Ned), but some spoilering asshole mentioned in the comments of an article on it that he dies too. Then I pegged it on Bran (running Winterfell after the war over Ned's death starts), who just died last episode. It's throwing you for a loop, even if you don't believe so based on the first couple of episodes.

      John Snow has already been conflicted multiple times internally. Theon has changed from being the adopted Stark son to taking Winterfell and burning Bran alive. The same kind of total changes and development go for every major character other than Joffrey, who's been a douche the whole way.

      Contrast that to Harry Potter, who was the same kid the entire way through, and was going to be the clear victor from the very beginning. There's no depth to that plot - the "good guy always wins" is a mantra attributable to melodrama, not drama, and GoT is proving along the whole way that it's not a melodrama. In fact, the plot may even play off of people expecting a melodrama out of it, if my reaction is common.

    22. Re:Watch it when you want to by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      .....and I just finished this week's episode. Bran's alive. Didn't see that coming either.

    23. Re:Watch it when you want to by Eythian · · Score: 1

      We can tell you didn't watch it much at all then. A lot of them have been put out of their misery.

    24. Re:Watch it when you want to by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      So somebody did bother. Bravo. Let me know when they're all gone.

      when I'd heard that (spoiler alert!) Sean Bean's character was axed (get it? Axed? Never mind.) I actually felt some relief. He's a fine actor, and free of this tawdry mess makes him available to appear in something I'd actually watch.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  9. The Internet Sucks outside the US by RPGillespie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...But I didn't realize it until I left. Half of all the youtube videos I try to watch are blocked for one reason or another, Hulu, Netflix, and my Amazon Instant accounts were all out of commission, and iTunes was pretty much my last resort to stream content. I hate iTunes. I also hate trying to stream videos I own on Amazon through a proxy. Suddenly BitTorrent looks mighty friendly to a boredom-induced insanity.

    1. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by Cimexus · · Score: 2

      Yay - someone gets it :D There's a reason Australia pirates so much and it's not because we're evil, dirty people who refuse to pay for stuff. It's just that American (well, mostly American) companies refuse to offer their 'legal' options outside the US. Don't they want our money?

      Mind you, our companies do the same thing. Australian TV channels all have free online streaming and catch-up services (some of which are damn good, ABC iView is brilliant), but they too are blocked outside Australia. Incredibly annoying when you're travelling (until I left a SOCKS proxy running at home ... that works nicely). Stupid copyright law!

    2. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      *cough*Danger5*cough*

    3. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'd have to wait a week? That is a really poor rationalization for stealing, even by Slashdot standards.

    4. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by LS · · Score: 2

      The Internet doesn't suck outside of the US... Hulu, Netflix, Youtube, and Amazon suck outside of the US. They are all implementing bullshit regional policies that don't take into account the global nature of the Internet. The Internet works just fine.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    5. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

      Please mod the parent up - s/he's absolutely right. GP is confusing walled garden services with The Internet.

    6. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because publishers stick to the archaic model of regional licensing. Sucks for me as I live in Germany, which means we at best get movies/series a year later with horrible/emotionless/plain-wrong translations and censorship (especially video games).

      Industries won't adapt, so I resort to piracy. Considering the rampant corruption media associations propagate and their absurd fees on blank media and "reproduction equipment", I have zero qualms about pirating stuff. With the exception of indie game developers for some reason. At least they don't discriminate against me or have the budget to create special, censored versions.

    7. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      How I miss that show now :(

    8. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      Which I would not have been able to enjoy if it weren't for piracy.

    9. Re:The Internet Sucks outside the US by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      You do know there is more to the internet than YouTube, Hulu, Netflix, Amazon and iTunes?

  10. Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I'm against draconian DRM's, I find blaming the widespread piracy on countries with delay somewhat naive. I'm certain that a large number of people in the US pirate the show - not because they couldn't get it if they wanted to, but because they don't have HBO, and because they just don't wait to wait until it comes out on DVD.

  11. Oh please by sunking2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because we live in a society where everyone deserves everything. And no puppies are killed if you do download it. Solving piracy is pretty simple to do. Instead of threatening to sue, you send them a package with a dead puppy in it.

    1. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Please don't...

      I prefer to kill my own puppies, thanks.

    2. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I am, laughing without mod points...

    3. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you intend to discourage people by rewarding them with free food?

    4. Re:Oh please by elgo · · Score: 1

      I meant to moderate this +1 insightful, and I modded it -1 redundant! I am posting to undo the incorrect moderation.

      --
      - elgo
    5. Re:Oh please by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Instead of threatening to sue, you send them a package with a dead puppy in it."

      Sweet! I can counter-sue for "stuff", and I don't like puppies that much.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meanwhile in China...
      "I just downloaded this american movie off the Internet and they rewarded me with a free box of dog meat!"

    7. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of threatening to sue, you send them a package with a dead puppy in it.

      Unless that person has a pet carnivorous animal, or belongs to an ethnic group that uses dogs for food. For them, puppy snacks would encourage pirating.

      To stop Chinese piracy, you'd need to send a box full of live Indians, Tibetans, Koreans, teenage Americans, and/or the Japanese.

    8. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all that's going to do is flood pinterest with recipes for puppy burgers, puppy soup, hot puppy gumbo and so on...

      It'll be like the AOL floppies all over again...

    9. Re:Oh please by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      Well, the way food prices are going, this might actually encourage piracy.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  12. purchasing content by musikit · · Score: 1

    live in japan so cant get hbo. would buy the dvds but they dont sell them here. would be even more inclined to buy them if they had japanese language and subtitles. but because the show is so interesting to me and i feel its moving too slow for my tastes i have purchased the offical "hbo licensed" books which are just reprints of the normal books. so i guess in a way i'm format shifting which is perfectly legal.

    1. Re:purchasing content by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      live in japan so cant get hbo. would buy the dvds but they dont sell them here. would be even more inclined to buy them if they had japanese language and subtitles. but because the show is so interesting to me and i feel its moving too slow for my tastes i have purchased the offical "hbo licensed" books which are just reprints of the normal books. so i guess in a way i'm format shifting which is perfectly legal.

      I would probably not use bittorrent to get TV shows if the wait was a couple of days-weeks, but since most of them take at least a year before being available at all, torrents are a no brainer.

  13. There really needs to be an article for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The fact that the show is only available to those who pay for an HBO subscription doesn't help either"

    Can all of the pirating apologists admit that, in this case, this is why most people are bootlegging the show?

    1. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The fact that the show is only available to those who pay for an HBO subscription doesn't help either"

      Can all of the pirating apologists admit that, in this case, this is why most people are bootlegging the show?

      No. The problem is that you cannot obtain this show without also paying for every other HBO show, and also paying for a cable subscription and DVR. If you need a car analogy, it's like having to buy a stocked dealership when all you want is a Toyota Prius.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    2. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what better way is there to show your disdain for the system by not buying a cable/HBO subscription? Sometimes fighting for change means you have to make a sacrifice; I'd say watching "Game of Thrones" is an easy one.

    3. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      it's like having to buy a stocked dealership when all you want is a Toyota Prius.

      A little, it's also like having to pay extra for a Prius because it factors in their failed Echo model. Cable is bundled to spread the risk of producing shows. Even selling it in whole months is a form of bundling. If individual shows were available this would introduce volatility to the point where you'd start seeing more shows cancelled halfway through a season and so on. Nevertheless, it's the consumer-preferred model and hopefully it prevails.

    4. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my case. I don't have a TV. I don't want a TV, I'm not from that generation, that option doesn't event enter my mind. I cannot buy game of thrones from itunes or any other retailer the day it comes out. What realistic choice do I have ?

    5. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      In this case, it is possible to achieve exactly the same effect without sacrificing (well, no more than a few GB a month anyhow). Nice, eh?

    6. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not watching it seems pretty realistic to me.

    7. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All pirates are just making excuses for being cheap. If you attempted to purchase this show by the episode from the internet I gaurantee it will cost you more than $15/month ($15 for 4 episodes). Each episode has the budget of a full length movie so you are basically getting to see 4 movies for $15. Also, the model for HBO is to encourage subscribers. This means their budget comes from the 8 months the show isn't even airing. If they sold each show on its own and didn't promote other shows they wouldn't have even been able to make Game of Thrones. They need the steady income to take the risks they can by creating tons of quality shows and spending a fortune on them.

      You honestly don't have 1 friend that already has cable or can purchase HBO? Hell you could even split the $15 per month with him/her and just agree you can go to their house to watch it without pirating and BAM you get all the episodes for the price of $7.50/month for the 3 months the show is on. Even if you split a whole yearly fee with your friend you would only pay $90 to watch a season of game of thrones (although everyone saying they wouldn't watch any other HBO show or movie is a lie).

    8. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      This is my case. I don't have a TV. I don't want a TV, I'm not from that generation, that option doesn't event enter my mind. I cannot buy game of thrones from itunes or any other retailer the day it comes out. What realistic choice do I have ?

      Huh? You certainly do have a "TV." It just happens to be a computer monitor driven by a computer. But claiming you don't have a TV, and then watching television programs on your computer is just a copout, and a way to say you don't own a television. The fact that you don't own a separate monitor soley for the use of watching television program is irrelevant. Personally I happen to like watch my tv programs on my tv. It is a larger screen, and frees up my computer monitor for doing computery stuff like surfing the internet and programming... It is kind of like have 3 monitors instead of 2.
      What other realistic choices do you have? Wait for it on DVD, or don't watch it. I want to watch game of thrones. I watched several hours of it once when I was in a hotel that had HBO. It looked good. But I don't pay for HBO so I don't watch it. Maybe one day I'll buy or rent the DVDs. In the meantime I do something else.

    9. Re:There really needs to be an article for this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for this. You've helped to curb my misanthropy a bit; at least until a similar article pops up.

  14. Not only that but... by multiben · · Score: 4, Informative

    In Australia, our TV networks show an incredible amount of greed and disdain in regard to popular TV series from the US. They constantly shift the time and day on which the show airs. They frequently leave gaps of several weeks between episodes (see Big Bang Theory) in order not to compete with other networks which may be launching a new show expected to dominate in the ratings. The more popular the show the more advertisements they pack in - sometimes up to 6 ad breaks in a single 21 minute show! The ad breaks are now so aggressive that they sometimes cut off punch lines (see the Simpsons). And sometimes they even play the damn episodes out of order (Firefly and American Gothic)! And they wonder why we go and download them where we can actually enjoy the show. F you Australian TV networks. You have no-one to blame but yourselves.

    1. Re:Not only that but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they showed Firefly out of order, you might have gotten to see it in the correct order.

    2. Re:Not only that but... by Smiddi · · Score: 0

      So true! The TV and movie delivery system is so broken in Australia. Delayed compared to other countries (as mentioned above), pay to watch (using paid TV services, high prices for these pay TV services, then when it does come out on DVD, the DVD is seriously over-priced. Its a broken product delivery system. I cant see it changing soon either with the limited media ownership options we have. I saw a movie ont he weekend "The Dictator". What rubbish. I paid $15 each for me and my GF ($30), popcorn and a coke $10, totalling $40 for utter rubbish that Hollywood can put out. Why would I? I can download it quicken than it takes to get the movies, watch it on my big TV in the comfort of my own home, Microwave popcorn at $2, bottle of coke $2. Thats $4 versus $40!!! Sorry TV and movie industry; you gota get better products and a better delivery system to compete. .

    3. Re:Not only that but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more. It is horrendous here.
      It's as if they don’t want the shows to succeed.

    4. Re:Not only that but... by bug1 · · Score: 2

      And thats after we have paid 30% more for the TV, DVD player and whatever other hardware we buy.

    5. Re:Not only that but... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Sometimes they cut movies so drasticly to fit in more advertisments that it can entirelt change the story. Many crime dramas that rely on revealing the meaning of clues cannot afford to lose twenty minutes. There was one set in the Louisiana swamps which was cut so much that the scene where the real killer is revealed was not shown, leaving the viewer with the impression that over half of the movie was a pointless red herring (and the idea that the killer was somebody else).

    6. Re:Not only that but... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      In Australia, our TV networks show an incredible amount of greed and disdain in regard to popular TV series.

      Your Australia sounds an awful lot like our United States. We may be getting earlier releases, but we're probably getting as much if not more commercials than you guys are.

    7. Re:Not only that but... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I basically gave up trying to follow shows like E.R. and CSI and now will watch them if they are on and there is nothing better but wont go out of my way to watch them. I DID buy all the seasons of E.R. on DVD and I have the first 4 seasons of CSI:NY on DVD. (I want to buy Season 5 but I just haven't gotten around to it yet plus I am waiting for a sale or discount on it as I refuse to pay the rip-off prices most DVDs are sold at in this country)

      Some other shows I try to follow but have just about given up trying to specifically follow:
      Pawn Stars
      Hardcore Pawn
      American Pickers
      Family Guy
      American Dad
      Mythbusters
      Top Gear
      And others

      And the networks wonder why the first thing people like me do when they find that they missed a show of their favorite series (because the network moved it around or aired a new episode instead of a repeat or whatever) is to go on Google to find a video-streaming site that will let them watch the episode they missed.

      As for playing episodes out of order, just go ask anyone who tried to watch "My Name Is Earl" about the butchery done to it by Channel 7.

    8. Re:Not only that but... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      sometimes up to 6 ad breaks in a single 21 minute show!

      This truly makes me wonder why anyone is still watching it. I've been put off watching TV by the regular breaks (4-5 an hour), cutting up a movie in dozens of parts and sometimes nearly doubling the playing time. Yet the fact that they do this, means that there are still lots of people put up with it and are watching the show on TV. The advertisers also accept it, and think people are watching their ads, otherwise they wouldn't buy those slots.

      With bittorrent and so becoming easier and easier these days, and forums aplenty where people will be happy to help those who don't know how it works and where to find the good torrents, it makes me wonder why not more people download the show instead - if only as form of revolt against too much advertising.

    9. Re:Not only that but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as an American, I can't begin to understand how horrible it would be if our local networks aired Firefly episodes out of order.

    10. Re:Not only that but... by BatGnat · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, that the free to air channels (non cable) have 3 channels each (give or take) 1 HD and 2 SD.

      Channel 10 dedicates it HD to: sports... crappy sports
      Channel 9 dedicates it HD to: A woman focused channel, which is in reallity A re-runs channels that 90% of show are not in HD to begin with.
      Channel 7 dedicates it HD to: A re-runs channels that 90% of show are not in HD to begin with.
      Channel 2 dedicates it HD to: 24 hour News

      So you see none of the big shows in HD in Australia (excepting cable)

      And they they try to tell us they are 'fast tracking' shows from the U.S., which can mean a delay between, anything from 1 day to 6 weeks (usually towards the latter).

    11. Re:Not only that but... by multiben · · Score: 1

      Ah yes! I totall forgot about My Name Is Earl as an example. I love that show and 7 really screwed it - I thought I must have woken from a coma or something. I gave up and bought the entire series on DVD.

    12. Re:Not only that but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep I can no longer stand to watch any shows on commercial Aust TV. If i hear a great show is coming on I just download it, cos I know for a fact that it will be butchered beyond reason by the channel packing in adverts at stupid moments (hello channel 10, i'm talking to YOU), and if its any good they will put the new episodes on about once every 4 weeks and out of order older seasons episodes in between. What a fabulous viewing experience that is. Its like they assume we are all lobotomized already.

  15. Broke now, but not later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because all I can afford is an internet connection now, but I have every intent of buying the boxed editions with all the goodies.

  16. It's not about having to wait; social network by QuasiSteve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not about having to wait. If the issue were just having to wait then people who now keep saying they would buy DVDs if they only cost $3 would wait the 18 months that it takes for big titles to end up in the clearance bins.

    It's about the social network. In our increasingly socially connected world - one which even Microsoft is going to push further by making Windows 8 not about Windows, or the apps, but about sharing everything with your friends - if you don't watch Game of Thrones within, say, 2 weeks, you're already going to be bombarded with spoilers from people you follow on twitter, your friends on facebook, the people in your Google+ circle, etc.
    The more people end up on these centralized social networks rather than their own fragmented pieces (Orkut, Hyves, whatever), the more people get exposed to that phenomenon.

    You can liken this to some people who watch sports just because that's what their colleagues are likely to talk about at the watercooler, and they don't want to feel left out by not knowing a single thing about what's being referred to.

    So if people on your social networks are discussing the latest episode of Game of Thrones, it's not so much the issue that you may only be able to see it (legally) a week later. It's that by the time that week is done, if you were to try talking about it it'd be like saying "The cake is a lie!" and "Bruce Willis is dead people!". Your entire discussion is old news and hardly anybody will want to engage you.

    That may not matter to you, particularly. I certainly don't give a flying brick. But to many, many people - it matters.

    The media companies would do well to recognize this, but they would rather negotiate large sums with foreign distributors, networks, etc. According to their accountants, any lost sales as a result are insignificant compared to the lost sales, contracts, etc. if they were to try and offer their content directly to any and all who are interested for a low price.

    1. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by hldn · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Bruce Willis is dead people!"

      DUDE. fucking spoiler warning please.

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said but Media companies are old turds who need to die off and let a whole new generation of people come in and run it like its suppose to in todays world. Time to end this segregation of information from country to country. Reason I do the same with Dr. Who why should I have to wait a year to get it in the states F that.

    3. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Greatest spoiler of all time:

      It was Kevin Spacey all along!

      The real question is, what movie am I spoiling?

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    4. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      The real question is, what movie am I spoiling?

      Spartacus? It's not much of a spoiler, as it turned out that they were all Spartacus.

      My turn: Rob Schneider.

      There, what movie did that spoil? Click here for the answer.

    5. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Two actually:

      Seven

      The Usual Suspects.

    6. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bruce Willis is dead people!"

      DUDE. fucking spoiler warning please.

      Seriously I know it's been 10+ plus years but I still haven't seen that movie..

    7. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know about the Soylent Green though, right?

    8. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if people on your social networks are discussing the latest episode of Game of Thrones, it's not so much the issue that you may only be able to see it (legally) a week later. It's that by the time that week is done, if you were to try talking about it it'd be like saying "The cake is a lie!" and "Bruce Willis is dead people!".

      You son of a bitch! Hudson Hawk was next on my Netflix queue.

    9. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by CriminalNerd · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Penny Arcade comic: http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2005/12/05

    10. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Face it, if you haven't seen Armageddon yet, you're not going to.

    11. Re:It's not about having to wait; social network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't watched any of Game of Thrones yet. I'm waiting until I read the books (and I have no idea when that will happen). I have friends on Facebook who have read the books and watch the show (or are just watching the show, not having read the books). I still have no idea what the general plot line of Game of Thrones is about.

      I don't use Twitter, so I can't comment on that.

      I watch a number of FOX shows on Hulu, which don't become available until 8 days after they air. I also "like" the shows on Facebook and occasionally see postings about the shows ("Fringe" being the biggest one). Yet I have still not had anything spoiled for me. For my friends who watch the shows as they air, they don't spoil things for me, and it's really no issue that I have to wait 8 days before things can be discussed.

      I go on Reddit a lot. Haven't subscribed to any subreddits specific to any of the shows I watch, so if they exist they may not all operate the same. I did check out "The Walking Dead" subreddit at one point, and they were very conscientious about noting which posts contained spoilers (either about the TV show or the comics). I successfully browsed through there without getting anything spoiled (and have since read and caught up with the comics so I don't need to worry about comic spoilers).

      I don't think having things spoiled is as likely as you think, and it requires very minimal effort and just a tiny bit of self-control to not visit something you think will contain a spoiler.

  17. The oatmeal was right on the money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As seen here:

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/game_of_thrones

    The oatmeal is as usual correct.

    As for me, I live in New Zealand, and the only way to see this is to subscribe to sky tv, but the basic subscription doesn't allow it so then you have to pay more on top to get it. After that you have to be at home at the right time. And then this is some weeks after it initially broadcasts in the states.

    I can't buy it or rent it to watch when I want, and by this I mean at a point in time when i'm not out and about doing the chores that daily life requires of me. I also don't want to pay about NZ$100 or so a month just for a subscription so I can watch one tv show a week.

    So to quote Gabe Newell... "Piracy is almost always a service problem and not a pricing problem". So HBO, provide me with a convenient way to watch your show, and all you need to do is sit back and watch my wallet open. Either that or sit back and watch me open my U***** client

    ****** (first rule and all)

    1. Re:The oatmeal was right on the money... by karnal · · Score: 1

      What's a Uhunter2 client?

      --
      Karnal
  18. They should look at s2e2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When it aired internationally before it aired in the US.

    HBO needs to open up HBO Go to subscribers. Make it $10 a month or whatever an HBO subscription costs, and they'll be able to pocket more than they get by distributing it via cable companies. I remember HBO used to be distributed by antenna, so it's similar to that.

  19. Your business model is dead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't watched scheduled television in 4 years. Because the nice pirates have cut them out, I haven't seen any advertising as well. Their business model is as dead as making buggy whips after the automobile revolution.

  20. Uh hi Australian here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There's a very good reason Australia is so high on the list.

    In Australia we have 1 viable option for traditional pay tv (ie. not streamed content). The way the company's plans are structured though is to gouge as much money as possible out of the consumer. They've taken "packaging" and charging to an unreasonable level. For example if I want just the basic rubbish channels and some sport, I'm up for $92 per month. If I want the channel with game of thrones (Showtime), add $16 per month. If I want the sci fi channel ontop of that, add another $16 a month. So that's before you even get into debates about how long it takes for shows to even be released over here.

    Australians aren't idiots, and we've had (and still have today) a considerable history of being charged alot more money for media than most major developed nations. Even for our own media, for example at the moment there's an outcry about an Australian artist "Gotye - Somebody That I Used to Know" and that fact that Australians are charged twice as much on Itunes for the single than Americans are.

    I'd honestly subscribe to pay tv if itwas offered under reasonable terms, but my family simply can't afford $100+ a month when we have reasonable free-to-air TV available to us. I'm not saying I advocate pirating it either - I'm just saying I understand why many Australians are so disillusioned with the media companies.

    1. Re:Uh hi Australian here by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      If I want the sci fi channel ontop of that, add another $16 a month.

      you havw scifi channel in Aussie? You lucky bastards!

      The rest of the world has to make do with the miserable syfy channel :(

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  21. Naughty bits. by outsider007 · · Score: 1

    In some parts of the world HBO edits out the naughty bits. Sad but true.

    --
    If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  22. Several reasons by cockroach2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    In my country the delay would probably be around a year plus there's a good chance that we'd have to watch a poorly dubbed German version instead of the original English thus there's really no other option except piracy.

    1. Re:Several reasons by datorum · · Score: 1

      In my country the delay would probably be around a year plus there's a good chance that we'd have to watch a poorly dubbed German version instead of the original

      exactly! German translations usually are bad, not funny and sometimes it becomes just total bullshit, here a normal example:
      "they are the best and they specialize in the ridiculous" (English Trailer about 1:30)
      "sie sind die besten und ihre Methoden sind außergewöhnlich" (Germain Trailer 1:30)
      now let's translate that German line back into English:
      my translation: "they are the best and their methods are extraordinary"
      google translate: "they are the best and their methods are exceptionally"

    2. Re:Several reasons by cockroach2 · · Score: 1

      lol, that sounds about right.

    3. Re:Several reasons by he-sk · · Score: 1

      Never mind the bad translations. What about the sterile sound quality of the dub and how it totally obliterates the emotional content of the actor's performance? Why does it have to sound like it is spoken by some bored dude sitting in a studio?! Oh, wait. Right. And then there's the disconnect between the visual and auditory sensory perception, i.e. the words are not synced to lip movements.

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    4. Re:Several reasons by datorum · · Score: 1

      Never mind the bad translations. What about the sterile sound quality of the dub and how it totally obliterates the emotional content of the actor's performance? Why does it have to sound like it is spoken by some bored dude sitting in a studio?! Oh, wait. Right. And then there's the disconnect between the visual and auditory sensory perception, i.e. the words are not synced to lip movements.

      different tastes/different perception I guess, I am more on the content side, you are probably more on the auditory/visual perception side. I never realized the out of lip sync back in the days, when I only had German translations. Nowadays, I avoid German versions like the plague, we even drove about 120 km in one direction "just" to see Iron Sky in English and not in German. I probably have to pay close attention to get the out-of-sync lip movement, but I know for a lot of people it's just awful.

    5. Re:Several reasons by arose · · Score: 1

      It should be: "They are the best and their methods are unconventional", extraordinary doesn't capture it at all (exceptionally is worse). It's somewhat closer, particularly with the right tone of voice (think bit of a pause before it and a somewhat amused, unsure expresion) on außergewöhnlich. Now try to come up with a good translation (and this is a tagline, it has to be exceptionally smooth), translating well is an art and while, yes, they did a crappy job here... what would you do?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    6. Re:Several reasons by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      "Ich liebe es wan ein Plan functiert!"

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    7. Re:Several reasons by datorum · · Score: 1

      It should be: "They are the best and their methods are unconventional", extraordinary doesn't capture it at all (exceptionally is worse). It's somewhat closer, particularly with the right tone of voice (think bit of a pause before it and a somewhat amused, unsure expresion) on außergewöhnlich.

      ahem? you are picking on the wrong thing... you are arguing about the back translation from the wrong German translation. "they specialize in the ridiculous" (the Original!) does not in anyway mean "their methods are ...". also my problem is less with the translation itself, but on the fact that if you want to watch the original English version it is way more problems and troubles. Basically, the translation is forced upon you. The only way - besides piracy - you buy it on DVD (delay time unit: years), sometimes even iTunes has only the German version. Usually quite a few people write about that in feedback commentary in the iTunes shop.

    8. Re:Several reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I really cannot understand how they can screw up localisation as bad as they do with TV series in Germany. The last time I watched German TV was Futurama. I vowed there and then never to watch any series or movie in German ever again.

      I occasionally overhear series on TV in German when I visit my parents. I never realised before how outright bad these voice actors are. Compared to the original voices they sound completely devoid of any emotion. They also tend to eliminated most of the background sound effects, so it sounds bland and monotonous. Plus, there is only like a subjective total of 5 voice actors for all characters in all series combined. You cannot even tell what's on based on the characters' voices.

      Not to mention that most interesting TV series never even get here in the first place.

    9. Re:Several reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You love it when a plan radioes?

    10. Re:Several reasons by arose · · Score: 1

      Whether or not specialize would map onto methods would depend entirely upon context (I was just trying to improve the back-translation there, not necessarily claim that the original was justified) but, more importantly, it's a trailer, it needn't be accurately translated, just accurately (as much as usual anyway) describe the movie or whatever they are advertising. Fully agreed on the second part though, I prefer to watch/read/listen to the original whenever possible and think that everything that TV shows and other 'perishable' media should have a world-wide digital release along with whatever traditional method is used in the core market (in this case, the initial broadcast), localized versions can still be provided when they are done for those who prefer them.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    11. Re:Several reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-german-native-speaker here.
      Off the top of my hat: "sie sind die besten und spezializieren sich in das ..."
      I'd google for a translation for ridiculous, but if pressed without internet, I'd say "Bizarren" (well when I say it, it's closer to grammatical correctness).
      I dunno, but to me that feels closer to the original. And that top of my hat, from a guy with no day-to-day exposure to German.
      Man that sucks.

  23. You say that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as if you wouldn't do the exact same thing in their shoes. You would. You are ill with the capitalist virus as well. Quit being a hypocrite.

    --

    1. Re:You say that... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      as if you wouldn't do the exact same thing in their shoes.

      The fact that you'd act differently if you were in another situation (in this case, theirs) is irrelevant to whether or not you're correct.

      You would.

      You don't know him, and you don't know that.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:You say that... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If I were running HBO then I would be seriously preparing for the post-cable apocalypse.

      I would be preparing to do everything the OP said not because "I am a nice guy" but out of concern for my company's continued survival in a changing technology landscape.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  24. Got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The fact that the show is only available to those who pay for an HBO subscription doesn't help either."

    Ummm, doesn't the person who wrote the synopsis understand that HBO pays to produce the show with the expectation that having the show would increase subscriptions? This statement is nothing more than a contrived excuse to pirate. I could care less if you pirate tv shows/movies, but at least be honest about why. Stop making up excuses and at least have some sort of comprehension of the idea of business models and content creators needing a revenue stream of some sort. You can easily argue that many media companies are grasping on to out of date models and should find new ways to reach modern audiences. I would agree with that.

    1. Re:Got to be kidding... by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

      I pirate it cause I'm not going to spend $25 per episode to watch it. It's a good show. But it ain't THAT good.

      Is that honest enough?

  25. Meanwhile back in the real world by Chucky_M · · Score: 1

    It is a massive hit because it is a great show with an even better story and the options to watch it while paying for it are poor at best! This is a ridiculously large market that is being totally ignored by the army in suits who cling to what they believe to be the reality of their current income. STEAM - start selling this and the rest of you wake up! I will buy and millions like me will also, do not make a company with minimal rights to distribute a partial list of shows nobody wants that or cares. Take multiple large established download clients and use them ALL with no exclusivity and you win, remember "When you play the game of thrones, either you win or you die". Just saying.

  26. Downloading is how I like to consume by brucek2 · · Score: 2

    I have been a continuously active subscriber of HBO for at least several years, including all the times during which Game of Thrones aired. I bought the BluRay of season 1 the day it was released and anticipate doing the same for all future seasons. I have access to HBO Go (and like it, especially for the bonus content.)

    Yet even with all that, downloading is still the way I like to watch. I watch most TV on computer, for starters. Sometimes the timing works out better for me to watch the captured east coast feed rather than wait a little longer for my west coast airing. And while HBO Go has some nice features, it typically has streaming issues and/or decreased quality during peak demand as top shows are airing, while conversely BitTorrent works great at peak demand (for me at least.) I also enjoy the random access to scenes and replayability, both of which I'll probably make good use of during the next several days since its such a great show.

    Anyway, just more examples of why "pirating" is not always primarily or even at all about avoiding paying for content.

    1. Re:Downloading is how I like to consume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fuck the word "consume". You're a person, not a consumer, and you have a whole range of more empowering verbs add your disposal like "buy," "acquire," or even just "watch."

      Also "content." Similar reasons.

      These marketing terms help separate people from the power structures of the day. Don't adopt them.

  27. Our a la carte Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that the show is only available to those who pay for an HBO subscription doesn't help either.

    Well, pardon HBO for attempting to produce a show to entice you into buying an HBO subscription. Boohoo, I can't buy just Game of Thrones and screw all the other HBO content. Why should I have to pay for the stuff that HBO needs money to produce, when all I want is Game of Thrones.

    People who support pirating Game of Thrones on the basis of "I have to buy an HBO subscription to get just the one show I want" are the same short-sighted people believing they should only pay for the Fire Department when their house is on fire.

    1. Re: Our a la carte Society by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to see you left the crack pipe long enough to post this really insightful observation, asshole.

  28. Dear television content providers. by brainproxy · · Score: 1

    We know that the cable and satellite companies have a monopolistic ball grab on you. I love some of what you do and would like to give you monies. But the means by which that I am forced to use to get your hard work, (like said assclown franchise locking "service" providers), want me to subscribe to their "packages" so very bad.

    I schluffed off their subscriptions, only using their "high speed internet". But they know we'll use it to watch your programs that we download for free like little commie criminals, so they want to "cap" us so we don't download too much! "Cap" has a jaunty ring to it, doesn't it. Like a night cap! But its not for lack of trying!

    Creators of television programs, I want to give you monies, shinies, ducats, for your hard work. Let me download it, as soon as its aired. Even if you're soulless overlords like NBC, Syfy, etc., get a cut. Here, I'll address them directly:

    Soulless overlords, please let me buy reasonably priced shows I want to watch, a la cart. Take a moment whilst you sit upon throne of blood and bone. Raise your hand, not to cause the death shrieks of cancelled shows we like, or spew forth more reality show afterbirth from your gaping, fetid maw; allow me to download and keep, episodes of Game of Thrones, Parks and Recreation. I would make offering. No animal burning, though.

    Who knows? You might, even then, squint and raise a claw? Hoof? Mandible? to your countless dead eyes and gaze in wonder at the brilliant light of realization: Where there was once a cancelled Firefly or Farscape, they might yet be reborn in a righteous blaze of countless micro transactions the likes of which even Kickstarter.com hasn't seen.

    1. Re:Dear television content providers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steve Jobs heard your prayer, and wants you to know that you can download and keep episodes of Game of Thrones & Parks and Recreation from the iTunes store.

      Also, Amazon VOD.

      You're welcome.

  29. Re:What's a television and an HBO? by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Informative

    Serious question. No flames, please. I just want to know.

    It's an ancient technology, still used by the elderly and the feeble-minded to obtain single-media entertainment and unsourced information in a serial, time-oriented fashion. It's the precursor to the on-demand random access entertainment and information sources we have today.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  30. Me. Because I'm a lazy idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My TiVo missed the episode last week, so I grabbed it the next AM and watched it. Was more convenient than waiting for the next airing, and the HBO Go verification process is a PITA for me (I can't think of the last time I bothered logging into my ISP account).

    Got me a Notice of Copyright Infringement via email today. For the 5 minutes I was using BT to grab a copy of the ep.

    So stupid, no? And by stupid, I mean me. I already pay for HBO. HBO has made an online version available. And yet I still was so lazy I went the BT route when I missed an episode.

    My point? Not entirely sure, I guess. But I thought I could at least answer the question posed by the title.

  31. Personally by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    This season is a major let down. Too many sub plots, not enough time. Changing to someone else every 5 minutes has gotten tedious and really isn't making for a smooth flowing story line.

    1. Re:Personally by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      This season is a major let down. Too many sub plots, not enough time. Changing to someone else every 5 minutes has gotten tedious and really isn't making for a smooth flowing story line.

      Ahh, so it's pretty much following the books exactly then... Just wait until season 4, it'll make season 2 look awesome.

    2. Re:Personally by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Yup, this is a major, major problem with the books too. The further the books go on, the wider they get and the smaller steps they have to take because there are just too many characters doing too many irrelevant things.

      I mean, WTF is Daenarys doing for the last few books and WTF does it have to do with any storylines we actually care about?

    3. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it is basically the same as the books: Extremely long setup for one huge badass finale.

    4. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, also to much nudity and sex. I think they went a tad overboard. The first few episodes of each season where ok but then it got to be to much where the sex and nudity became the entire show. I didn't know i was buying into a porno. I bet some of the actresses are hired porn stars too.

    5. Re:Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always suspected George R. R. Martin suffers from mild schizophrenia and his books reflect that. It could be worse though, he could have been as insane as L. Ron Hubbard and written something akin to "Dianetics".

      Luckily there seems to be a thread of commonality you can desperately hang on to...Tyrion Lannister and Jon Snow. Its a rather tired formula but writers like to focus on a normally unimportant and initially uninteriesting character and make them the nexus for an entire storyline arc. So Martin after all isn't a genius, he's quite formulaic in his presentation, he just hits you with a kitchen sink of characters, Tolkein-style.

  32. A week? Try a year! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Aussies have to wait a week to see a new show? Well, be glad you're not in dubbed Europe. You may rest assured that you will wait at the very least a YEAR until you get to see a show. That's because next to negotiations, you have to wait until they're done dubbing the show... and dubbing it BADLY. There are a few webpages dedicated to translation bloopers and joke explanations so you finally have a chance to even fathom just WHAT the authors wrote when (not if) you just can't figure out what the fuck's going on.

    It's also "only" a year, mind you, if, and only if, a network here decides to pick up the show. In other words, it's one year from the moment they actually WANT to show it. That is not necessarily a year after it's broadcast in its country of origin.

    And now think about this: You have internet access, and you use it regularly. There is a show out there that you watch religiously and it depends on suspense and NOT knowing what's going on next week. Think LOST, or worse, Bab5. Now imagine you're watching the first season of Bab5 while everyone on the 'net is discussing the outcome of the Vorlon/Shadow war.

    Can you see why people download shows?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:A week? Try a year! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't spoil the outcome of the Vorlon / Shadow war. I am waiting for the Klingon dub...

    2. Re:A week? Try a year! by __Paul__ · · Score: 1

      That's because next to negotiations, you have to wait until they're done dubbing the show... and dubbing it BADLY.

      I love how this implies that there is good dubbing ;)

      All dubbing sucks. I don't know how anyone who lives in those areas can stand it. Especially friggen Poland, their style of one-guy-talking-over-the-original-soundtrack is utterly hilarious until you realise that people have to put up with this, every day of their lives.

      The Dutch / Flemish / Swedish / Danish / Norwegians / Finns have got it right: subtitling. It's cheaper, and it doesn't ruin films.

      --
      worldmobilenet.com -- World Prepaid Wireless Internet plans
    3. Re:A week? Try a year! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, there is good dubbing. The Persuaders was a flop in its original makeup, but a cult in Germany due to the dubbing which often not only improved the dialogues and enriched them by adding some uncouth undertones, they also regularly broke the 4th wall ("You gotta talk way faster or you'll get out of lip sync") or made self references ("People were already complaining about the way you talk" "People who want to hear the original dialogues shouldn't watch dubs"), which was quite a bit funny in the 70s.

      The series itself wasn't that great, honestly, and despite being humorous to begin with, the German dubbing actually made it good.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Or.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know.. They could just be missing it when it airs on TV.. or maybe it simply doesn't air where they live. Maybe if they made a proper service to watch TV on demand with ads for free or paid monthly instead of trying to blame everything on piracy, there wouldn't be seeing so many people downloading it.

  34. i'm not downloading it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry dudes who are fans of it, but the series doesn't measure up to my expectations.

    The books are far far better, and I've already read them. I haven't even touched the comics.

    The series? Other than the opening is pitiful. The settings are fake and artificial, the acting sub-par, and the script is only the worst hack job I've ever seen.

    I think from all the swooning fans, that HBO must be bribing the critics and brainwashing the fans.

    1. Re:i'm not downloading it. by BatGnat · · Score: 1

      I actually thought Season one was very close to the book. Season 2.....Very Very not so.

  35. Because HBO costs $90 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting HBO costs $90 in the US. HBO itself may only costs 15, you can't just pay $15 dollars for the service. You must pay the $90 for the cable package that includes it. I don't want cable, I don't own a television that could play it, I do pay for netflix and would pay for HBO too, but they just won't take my money.

    1. Re:Because HBO costs $90 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add us to the list, too. Soon we'll be 2 households for a couple years.

      HBO, you're a bunch of idiots who are leaving oodles and oodles of cash money on the table. Sell access to INDIVIDUAL SHOWS on your site for, say $1-2 an episode, put commercials for your other shows before and after, or in between segments, and release the DVD sets very soon after the show ends (while the hype is still high!) and you would be rolling in more money than you know what to do with.

      But you know what? You won't. I know you won't, because you've hired some MBA or marketing dingbat to dictate your policy on this stuff. If GoT doesn't do as well as you'd like, don't blame pirates. Blame yourselves.

  36. Why I pirate Game of Thrones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in France. I download it from IRC. Because DVD sets are way too expensive for my limited budget, also because if I had to wait for a traditional TV broadcast it would take, dunno like 2 years? What's worse the episodes wouldn't necessarily be broadcast in the right order (episode 6 before 4, happens rarely, but happens) and I would have to listen to the dialogues in French.

    I get a nice Xvid.avi of 500 megs, unpack the tarball, check the sfv and merge the rars. Then I grab a subtitles file (in English) and voilà. A side effect is that it helps to familiarize myself with English (yeah, still a lot to do). Need information on airing dates? Thanks Wikipedia.

    Do I harm anyone? IMHO, not in the slightest. I couldn't have bought the DVDs anyway, and frankly, I wouldn't have watched it after traditional TVs butchered it. Lost sales? Nope. In fact, I could have been useful as an advertizer as I speak about the series around me but then again, all the other folks torrent it or get it from eDonkey (Hadopi? LOL).

    The solution? Get rid of these stupid country restrictions and allow me to watch the series for a few bucks per episode. In other words, offer me the convenience I already have by other means. I love the series and would happilty contribute what I can to get more of it. Just allow me to do so.

    1. Re:Why I pirate Game of Thrones. by Kergan · · Score: 1

      Oh please, be honest with yourself and others. A "way too expensive for [your] limited budget" DVD sets cost under 30 euros at leading electronics stores in France. You also have a DVD player on your computer, unless a MacBook Air somehow managed to fit into your limited budget. The truth is that you like to hang out with script kiddies on IRC -- you'd pay nothing no matter what.

      Also, call me dumbfounded that script kiddies still use .rar files in 2012... The .rar file format became popular in the 1990s because its archives were split on 3.5" floppy disks sized chunks. Insofar as I'm aware, that was it's only use. Irrespective, it evidently survived the CD-burner, the DVD-burner, and peer-to-peer networks. That's a quite the resistant dinosaur.

    2. Re:Why I pirate Game of Thrones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it or not, paying 30 euros for a DVD set right now would be outright irresponsible given my situation. The truth is that I already paid for stuff I liked when I could have avoided to do so (among which LimeWire PRO just to support them, don't laugh), so you're wrong when you say I wouldn't pay nothing no matter what. Additionnally, I have no pirated software (Ubuntu fits my needs). What I'm trying to tell is that I'm no longer young enough to pride myself for getting stuff for free, if I can actually pay I will.

      Also, call me dumbfounded that script kiddies still use .rar files in 2012... The .rar file format became popular in the 1990s because its archives were split on 3.5" floppy disks sized chunks. Insofar as I'm aware, that was it's only use. Irrespective, it evidently survived the CD-burner, the DVD-burner, and peer-to-peer networks. That's a quite the resistant dinosaur.

      Yeah, many people are ranting about that but the scene rules being what they are, you still have 20 meg rars. Apparently the main reason is that it eases resuming uploads to FTP servers if something goes wrong (you don't have to upload everything again).

      So you may despise some people calling them script kiddies, refuse to recognize that 30 bucks for a DVD set might be expensive for some people. That's your right. The thing is, it doesn't help to grasp the reality or at least some part of it and to react accordingly. Besides, these "script kiddies" do a hell of a job when it comes to encoding and compressing but hey...

  37. Still inexplicable. by tpstigers · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I watched the first episode of Game of Thrones. The first 10 minutes were interesting. The rest was unmitigated garbage. I can't imagine breaking even the most stupid of laws just to watch even a minute of this crap.

    1. Re:Still inexplicable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this season is a bit less exciting than the last one, for me it's all the torture they seem to be adding in (not pleasant or enjoyable in any way really). They keep deviating from the story, and some of the writing seems to be really killing a couple of the characters.

    2. Re:Still inexplicable. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      And do you like any Tv/Movie ?

      GoT is as good as anything out there.

      Maybe it's the genre. You may not enjoy a show about politics and conquest set in a fictional world. If you do like this genre then I'm curious as to what other example meets your high standards.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:Still inexplicable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Nurse Jackie?

    4. Re:Still inexplicable. by tpstigers · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think I'd rather enjoy a show about politics and conquest set in a fictional world. Game of Thrones, on the other hand, is a poorly-written soap opera. It tries to be about sex and violence, but its authors are so incredibly ignorant on both these subjects that the whole fiasco plays like some masturbating teenager's deranged fantasies.

    5. Re:Still inexplicable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got into the show, but it took me about 3-4 episodes of season one. I wouldn't have gotten into it had I only seen episode one.

    6. Re:Still inexplicable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, aren't you just a special rebel.

    7. Re:Still inexplicable. by zachie · · Score: 1

      Care to elaborate, with specific examples? I'm very curious and hopefully your points will not remain unsubstantiated.

    8. Re:Still inexplicable. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I thought the same of Firefly. Different strokes for different folks, mate.

      Thanks for the condescension, though.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    9. Re:Still inexplicable. by tpstigers · · Score: 1

      Condescension? I'm sorry - did you write or direct it?

    10. Re:Still inexplicable. by Builder · · Score: 1

      Some people have different tastes than others. Most of us consider this to be a good thing.

    11. Re:Still inexplicable. by tpstigers · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming you're not just some troll trying to pick a fight and aren't asking me for specific examples of why Game of Thrones is garbage. If you are, I already answered - just watch the first episode after the first 10 minutes. It's all crap.

      One the other hand, if you were asking for examples of good stories about politics and conquest set in a fictional world, there are tons of fine examples (in book form, at least). My personal favorites are Dune by Frank Herbert, The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer Bradley, and Roger Zelazny's Amber series (both series are good, but I like the first one better).

    12. Re:Still inexplicable. by tpstigers · · Score: 1

      Some people have different tastes than others. Most of us consider this to be a good thing.

      As do I. Did I say otherwise?

    13. Re:Still inexplicable. by zachie · · Score: 1

      I'm also assuming you are not a troll. I would still like you to point specific examples of what in these 10 minutes stems from the author's ignorance on the subjects of sex and violence. Not trolling, just wondering what points I missed. Thanks for the recommendations though.

  38. I'm Downloading Them and For Cause by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    Since HBO refuses to allow me to view any of their content on any 3rd party service such as iTMS until AFTER the DVD release, I have no other choice.

    Sure, it may "technically" be wrong, but since HBO wants to try to fuck me in the ass with HBO Go, which requires servitude to Comcast or other greedy cable operators, I see them as trying to force me to buy products from companies I refuse to buy from -- which is a form of extortion -- and as such need to push back against their greed and cronyism.

    I HBO were to remove the requirement for the Comcast ass-rape to access HBO GO and offer it at a reasonable price level (say $50/month) then HBO would get my money. But they've made it clear they are staunchly anti net-neutrality and will not participate in a free and open media market where the consumer can decide how and where to access media content legally.

  39. Because it's easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I download mkv's of all my favorite TV shows via newsgroup or Bittorrent (if that's my only option) even when i could easily watch the show on TV or DVR it. When I download the mkv I've got a copy in my Plex library that I can access anytime. So that's why.

  40. no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy ends cable TV which ends the shows which ends piracy. Problem solved!

  41. Delay... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not so much the delay, but rather the fact that I can't be bothered scheduling my time around when it airs.
    So I download it and watch it when I can, on my tablet on the way to work or on a sunday afternoon sitting in the back yard.

  42. How about... by definate · · Score: 3, Informative

    So from the sounds of it, you think waiting a week is reasonable.

    How about waiting a month?
    How about waiting a couple of months?
    How about waiting a year?

    Before pirating in Australia, it used to be a regular thing to have to wait up to a year, before you'd get the latest movies and TV. Even then, we'd only get a small fraction of what was in the US.

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And also pay double the price.

    2. Re:How about... by NoMaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most likely this, plus the fact it's on pay TV (not big in Aus compared to the US; subscription rates have been hovering around 30% of households for the last 5 years), plus habit.

      S1 aired 3 months later in Aus - a month after it had finished in the US - so anyone who wanted to see it quickly got into the habit of downloading it. S2 is 2/3rds over, and I only learned a week ago that Foxtel's showing it a week after the US.

      I heard today that Go! (FTA channel) is about to start showing Fringe S4 soon. I didn't even know until I just looked that Movie Extra is currently showing Mad Men S5 about 2 weeks out of sync with the US. It seems that in Australia, after initially being driven by a historical combination of long delays, random schedule changes, deliberately incorrect start & finish times*, and minimal penetration of pay TV, downloading is now an entrenched habit.

      (* I used to be amazed when I saw people in the US & UK complain about shows being 2~5 minutes off the scheduled start/finish time. In Australia, 15 ~ 30 minutes is not unusual by mid prime-time. Even if you record to watch later, to be reasonably (90%, not 100%) sure of seeing a program you have to pad each end by 30 minutes. Any wonder why Australians have started treating Bittorrent as a big, world-wide PVR?)

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    3. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, "pirating" from finalgear.com is the only way I can watch Top Gear Austrailia.

    4. Re:How about... by Corbets · · Score: 1

      So from the sounds of it, you think waiting a week is reasonable.

      How about waiting a month?
      How about waiting a couple of months?
      How about waiting a year?

      Before pirating in Australia, it used to be a regular thing to have to wait up to a year, before you'd get the latest movies and TV. Even then, we'd only get a small fraction of what was in the US.

      I don't get everyone who says that waiting is t possible, whether it's because of social networking or whatnot. My girlfriend hasn't finished book 2 yet, so we're not watching it yet, and it's not difficult. Everyone who uses the day to justify downloading is just looking for an excuse. Man up and admit that you're downloading because you're cheap.

    5. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How bout we move the TV to the internet and put everything on demand. We can call it "Netflix"

    6. Re:How about... by definate · · Score: 2

      I pay a LOT of money to pirate. Probably more than the books cost. I also probably spend more on movies, TV, and possibly books, than you and your girlfriend put together. So that's not it.

      There's many reasons why, they've been discussed in every pirating thread on Slashdot, ad nauseam.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    7. Re:How about... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Convincing Netflix that we in the nether regions of the world inhabit the United States is non-trivial. Getting past that whole "Hah! That credit card is not from an American bank!" step of signup is a bit of a bitch to circumvent.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    8. Re:How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live on a penal colony. Move.

  43. Not available in P.R. China by RobertinXinyang · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is not available in P.R. China through any authorized channel. Even if it were, it would be edited to nothing. The real odd thing to me is that it has recently been featured in the national student newspaper (21'st Century) in a two page spread . The article was mostly an attempt to explain the program and to help students understand the names.

    What I found interesting was that there was a full two page article on a program that is not even officially available and contains a significant amount of material that would be censored even if it were available. All that being said, it is not popular with the Chinese students that I know. The plot is too complicated for the male students and it is too violent, and overtly sexual, for the female students. However, it seems to be popular with many of the westerners here; further, considering that the article was written, I expect it is popular with some Chinese, just not here.

    1. Re:Not available in P.R. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. Poor Aussies have to wait a week to see it on their TVs. Try waiting a year to see it with poor dubs, IF at all. I download this and other programs because I live in Japan, and don't want to see it in Japanese. Also, no commercials, any time I want, etc.

    2. Re:Not available in P.R. China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not available in P.R. China through any authorized channel.

      I live in Tianjin, and I've seen the second season of GOT playing in one of the 5 star hotels over here.

      I admit that it is a pay TV channel, but it is definitely available over here.

  44. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 week * 10 shows a season

  45. Re:What happened to self-control? by santax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, fans of something can't do all these things. Maybe someone without any feelings could, but normal people can't. Some have it with a tv show, others with Diablo 3 and some with reading slashdot, getting an icecream, going to church, or just seeing their partners. People love things and love is a powerful emotion that will subject you when it comes for you. These things make us humans.

  46. I'm format shifting by SilverJets · · Score: 5, Funny

    I already own the paper version. I just download it so I have a copy that plays on my other devices.

  47. I have a subscription which includes HBO... by Yosho-sama · · Score: 1

    ...and I torrent because I'm rarely at home and torrent downloads are higher quality and easier to put on a big screen than HBO GO, which is often unusable because Comcast's user authentication is hit-or-miss whether or not it will accept my information. No joke, I've had half a dozen comcast calls about this issue. I stopped calling after I saw how good the quality of the torrents were.

    --
    My kingdom for a donkey!
    1. Re:I have a subscription which includes HBO... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or so pixellated that it's unwatchable with brighthouse.

      oops, I guess they gotz my IP....

      never mind

      jr

  48. Re:What happened to self-control? by dwillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, it's they can't avoid forums until after all episodes of the season have ended, as they are always a week behind the series, and thus unable to participate in the fan discussions of any of the episodes until after the season has completed. Of course by that point the major fan discussion of the prior episodes will be considered old and out of date.

    Thus they have a very legitimate complaint.

    --
    I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  49. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    no, 1 week lag, then same wait as everyone else.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  50. I think the Oatmeal noted it best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://theoatmeal.com/comics/game_of_thrones

    Just too many hoops. Most of us younger folk don't subscribe to standard Television service (I know I don't watch TV unless I'm at the bar). If you don't provide a way to watch it online legally, we're going to pirate it. I would probably use NHL Gamecenter, but unfortunately since I live in the viewing area of Root Sports Pittsburgh, it is blacked out. Of course, RSP doesn't have their own online steam, so it forces me to use JTV for everything.

  51. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    You're describing addiction, not fandom.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  52. Re:What happened to self-control? by multiben · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Your powers of reasoning are very weak. So I avoid forums for a week, and then watch the show unspoiled. Then what? I avoid forums for another week so I can see the next episode unspoiled. Then what? I avoid forums and... Do you see a pattern forming here? I must avoid forums for as long as I want to watch unspoiled tv.

    You can get books 1-4 as a set for $20 right now ($10 second hand on ebay).

    Yes, and I can buy a set of dominoes for 50c from a garage sale and throw them at cats if want as well. Doesn't mean I want to.

  53. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 2

    You would get spoilers from people who've read the books in any case. The solution is therefore to have separate forums for those discussing the books, and those discussing the show. Having separate forums for Australian audiences would logically follow.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  54. I'm trying to turn the tide. by Nethead · · Score: 1

    The one show that I do download each episode of, six days a week, is MasterChef Australia. Best damn cooking/contest show out there. I torrent it because I live in the US and TEN (the AU network) blocks video from non-AU IP addresses. GoT? I've never seen it, so happy to trade them for it.

    Anyway, if you want to watch a good cooking show that isn't 'Housewives' with food, or Gordon Ramsey yelling, catch MasterChef AU. Real people that actually cheer on their competitors.

    (Tried MKR but we couldn't get that interested in it, don't know why.)

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:I'm trying to turn the tide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the original british version! Better cooking/competition, less Big Brother emotional drama.

  55. The only way HBO will get paid from torrents by mattbee · · Score: 1

    Product placement: Joffrey sipping an ice cold Coke while abusing prostitutes? Cersei sneaking off to use her CVS-branded paternity test kit? They're just not being very imaginative about how they market to pirates.

    --
    Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
  56. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    Forums are already being spoiled by those who have read the books. Applying whatever solution is used to mitigate that problem to the problem of Australians watching on a time delay would be both logical and trivial.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  57. who and why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who, a pirate , why cause the utter crap that is on its at least fun to watch.
    ALL THE GARBAGE has reached such a bad state anything is in order....
    and until they toned down the nakedness and sicko bits i was calling it

    GAME of PRON

  58. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of question is this? Why do people want to watch a series that isn't available any other way than through the internet?

    DuuuUUUUHHHH!!! What the fuck dumbass question is that? The same thing happens with Doctor Who. That shit is an entire season behind in America.
    Why do we download it? Because I can't wait 6 fucking months for American boradcasters to find thei rtiny cocks with both hand.

    So fuck them and fuck you too.

    Piracy is the great equalizer, just like Colt. So eat a dick and die.

  59. I've called HBO about that. by multicoregeneral · · Score: 1

    I've offered to pay extra for their internet based service. Unfortunately, it's simply not available without buying cable, which is something I won't do. I have no desire to have cable when my Roku and Apple Tv do a better job for a fraction of the price. So I guess I can live without HBO, it's just a shame, that's all.

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank.
  60. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot.

    Day 0 - Episode 1 shows in the US - start avoiding forums you like to frequent.
    Day 7 - You get episode 1, US gets episode 2.

    Thus, avoiding forums you like must continue for 10 weeks if you don't want to see spoilers for the show. There ARE things happening in the show that did not happen in the books. They are more irritating to me than interesting, but I can see that a) some people might like them, b) the audience for the show is much wider than that of the books.

  61. $1.99 an episode on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $2.99 for HD. Grow up folks. It costs a lot of money to make the show. Sure, it would be nice to have other purchasing options, but if you a Windows or Mac platform, there is no excuse for pirating this show. Most of the talent is lesser known British/Irish actors and actresses too.

    1. Re:$1.99 an episode on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize season 2 isn't available on iTunes, and likely won't be for months, right? Also, the prices for season 1 are $2.99 SD, $3.99 HD. And, it's very likely that even if season 2 were available, it still wouldn't be available internationally until after it airs in a particular country.

  62. Afful cable service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have HBO here. My dad watches game of thrones every Friday night.
    I can't wait and pirate it to watch monday night.

    The difference:
    He watches in SD, dubbed in portuguese (there's no option for subtitles).
    I watch it in 720p 5.1 original audio.

  63. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    Yes, and I can buy a set of dominoes for 50c from a garage sale and throw them at cats if want as well. Doesn't mean I want to.

    The complaint is over the time lag, which is a matter of convenience. I provided the books as an example of a more convenient alternative. You're saying this is unacceptable. Let me guess, you don't read books?

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  64. Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by DrDitto · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $2.99 for an HD episode on iTunes. Stop the FUD. I haven't checked, but there are probably other purchase options as well besides HBO/cable subscriptions.

  65. Gobsmacked... by confuscan · · Score: 1

    Let me put on my suit and think like an evil, profit driven businessman. I have 3-4 million pirated downloads per episode x 20 episodes to date = 80 million pirated episodes. Let's go for $2.00/episode (Amazon rate) and assume about a 50% conversion (people that would pay versus pirate if it was easy to get). That's still $80 Million in cold hard cash (ok, it's electronic, but you get the idea). I am gobsmacked that HBO simply walks away from this easy cash all to protect possible DVD and network sales. Do both! Rake in the cash from tech-savvy viewers while the show is hot and then pick up the remainder with DVDs. I'm I missing something somewhere?

    1. Re:Gobsmacked... by multicoregeneral · · Score: 1

      It's not just Hbo. Watching them behave this way, it really does seem like the entire entertainment industry no longer understands their business model, or how to execute it. It's like I keep saying. All they have to do is hire me in the lower six figures, and I could easily work all this stuff out for them. This is probably the 900th time I've said that, and not one phone call. Would you believe that?

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Gobsmacked... by sqrt(2) · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Want an example of an industry that "gets it"? Porn.

      They "closed the loop" by buying up the popular streaming sites that were taking their content and distributing it for free. They then control the ads on those sites. So the ads on the free sites pay for the production of content which they then sell in a higher quality and more convenient form for people who are willing to pay.

      This would be like the MPAA buying ThePirateBay and letting it keep running, distributing movies. Yeah, they're not getting sales from it buy they are making at least *something* from the ads, which is more than they were making before by letting the underground market operate independently. And people will still go to see movies in the cinema and buy DVDs.

      But this would require them to admit that copyright is basically a dead letter. The suites are too old, their minds too fossilized in 20th century media biz paradigms to even think of such a thing. "My God, you mean ANYONE could use Mickey Mouse without paying us?! The horror!"

      The porn industry is younger, more willing to innovate and take chances, more "liberal". The regular entertainment industry is conservative, and they don't like change (that's what conservative means). Unfortunately for them, the world is going to change regardless of their inability to keep up or respond to it.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:Gobsmacked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The porn industry is younger

      And thank fuck for that too, I wouldn't want to watch those old MPAA guys fuck each other.

    4. Re:Gobsmacked... by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Another option they could go for would be globally available streaming/download at the same time (synced with whenever they air them) and actually letting people pay for the content they want to watch.

      As for channel "packages"? How about per-season packages where you pick the shows you want to follow? If you only want one show you pay $X/season, next package up is "pick your favorite three shows" and pay $X * 2.5/season, next step up is "pick your favorite ten shows" for $X * 6/season. I'd be willing to pay for a package like that.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    5. Re:Gobsmacked... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Your math is wrong. It doesn't factor the non-zero number of people who would drop HBO from the cable plan if they could buy the shows online.

      If the total revenue from the streaming service is less than the total amount of lost revenue from people dropping HBO from their cable plan (both cable company payments and advertising dollars) then HBO looses money.

    6. Re:Gobsmacked... by brit74 · · Score: 1

      I bet porn movies cost as much as the movies created by the MPAA, so that system would totally work. Ha ha ha ha ha. Oh god, that's funny. I crack me up sometimes.

    7. Re:Gobsmacked... by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Actual customer service? Keep on dreaming!

    8. Re:Gobsmacked... by Walterk · · Score: 1

      Want an example of an industry that "gets it"? Porn.

      Isn't it ironic that it's the porn industry that isn't trying to screw their customer base?

      It's like ten thousand spoons..

    9. Re:Gobsmacked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are 100% correct and I was just moaning the other day about how videosz.com is a very easy to use website that is 100% easy friendly and you can find exactly what you want with no effort, and download it fast - yet there is no similar thing for "real" movies.

      The music industry and movie/tv industry need to perk up and pay attention to the porn industry. No one takes them seriously. These are the people [the porn industry] that literally said in Spring 2011 "Our goal by this time next year is to eliminate online piracy." What happened not 12 months later? CISPA, SOPA. PIPA, ACTA - these things almost entirely destroyed internet piracy and the only way to get things now is private trackers, other random torrents, and the occasion that a free host site doesn't delete everything.

      People would happily pay 24.95 a month for a site that lets them download movies. Okay, maybe the industry doesn't get the same 25 bucks a bluray that they would get traditionally, but it's something.

    10. Re:Gobsmacked... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The porn industry is younger, more willing to innovate and take chances, more "liberal".

      There are so many places I could go with that...

      The porn "industry" is like this because there are no barriers to entry. Quite literally, anyone can set up shop in a basement or garage, and shoot a porno. Anyone can set up their own webcam and people will pay them to jerk off. This means three things:

      First, there is no scarcity, artificial or otherwise, controlling the consumption of the product. There are no entrenched interests. There are no gatekeepers. There's no rating organization, no union, no one that decides whether something should be made and released or not. There are no theaters with limited screens and limited time that production companies need to fight over to get their film shown.

      Second, competition is fierce and constant. The only thing that's important in a porno are genitals, and everyone has those (in fact, some fetishes don't even involve genitals). There's not much natural differenciation (except maybe size, but that can be augmented), so innovation in delivery is used instead to create that differenciation. If someone does not quickly innovate or catch up to the leaders of the industry, some up and coming person will eat their lunch.

      Third, both risk and reward are fairly low. Producing a porno is cheap. At the same time, pornography isn't going to be pulling a billion dollars a film. Innovation generally involves very low risk, both in money spent, and revenue lost. Change happens easily, quickly, and painlessly. Failure is only possible by not innovating.

      The movie and TV industry are the opposite of this. The production cost of a movie or TV show is hundreds to hundred-thousands of times the cost of a porno. Distribution is severely restricted and controlled. Demand is much smaller (viewers are pickier). All of the companies have been around for a long time, and there is very lower turnover, making everyone subject to contracts and agreements accumulated over time. This makes innovation risky. Change does not happen lightly or casually.

      In many ways, the movie and TV industry look to the porn industry to see what works and what doesn't. The necessary criteria for consuming porn is not all that different from the criteria necessary for watching a movie or TV show. If an innovation is successful, then the industry adopts it for a more general audience. If it isn't, they move on. It's slower, but reduces the chance of failure.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    11. Re:Gobsmacked... by confuscan · · Score: 1

      You have a point that I failed to account for that potential revenue loss. I wonder how much it is though?

  66. Re:What happened to self-control? by santax · · Score: 1

    What is the difference? Except for the fan trying to convert others and the addicted trying to keep it to himself ;)

  67. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    An Australian audience sub-forum would solve this problem.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  68. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    .. and why would you want to discuss the show with Americans anyway?

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  69. Just my $0.02 bitcoins by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

    I simply don't agree with the concept of paying money for digital goods. I don't recognize the legitimacy of the construct known as "intellectual property" or copyright and since there exists a mechanism in this age to reproduce digital information infinitely at nearly no cost I have no qualms or ethical hangups about taking as much as I can.

    The rules of physical objects simply don't transfer to the internet. It's immoral to attempt to impose those rules on the higher plain of existence of pure thought.

    And I fully recognize that there's no current method for these big, multi-million dollar, productions to get made if everyone thought and acted as I do. So be it. If such projects can't be made and distributed ethically then they shouldn't be made at all.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:Just my $0.02 bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overrated is not meant to express disagreement, coward mod.

    2. Re:Just my $0.02 bitcoins by Ylleks · · Score: 0

      And I fully recognize that there's no current method for these big, multi-million dollar, productions to get made if everyone thought and acted as I do. So be it. If such projects can't be made and distributed ethically then they shouldn't be made at all.

      Wtf ... so you're saying that because you're unethical that nobody should make digital goods.

    3. Re:Just my $0.02 bitcoins by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. I am not unethical. The system I promote is the ethical one, contrasted with the one we currently have which is not. One of the consequences of switching to the ethical production/distribution model that I and others advocate is that expensive works such as Game of Thrones might not be possible. But they shouldn't ever have been possible to begin with, since they only came into being through exploitation and an immoral economic model.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    4. Re:Just my $0.02 bitcoins by brit74 · · Score: 1

      You sound like a libertarian complaining about how all taxes are theft and, therefore, inherently immoral. I also consider you equally bad at figuring out how to create a decent society or country since any good system relies on violating some "first principle" that you hold dear. It's like you've tied yourself up in spurious logic. Then again, maybe there's a method to your madness: you've figured out a way to pirate shit and salve your conscience with this kind of thinking.

      I wonder if I can try it: hmmmm. Our food is the result of thousands of years of our ancestors' selective breeding. The earth and the sun and the air are what makes plants grow, and the earth belongs to all of us. How dare they charge us money for something that comes from nature and thousands of years of human farming? Damn it! I deserve to get everything I want from the grocery store for free! I understand that grocery stores can't survive with this kind of thinking, but the whole system is rotten and unethical from the ground up! It is not my fault that the system is unethical. I like your thinking, sqrt(2)! I could go a long way with these ideas!

    5. Re:Just my $0.02 bitcoins by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2

      You actually struck something profound there, with your hyperbole. If some company made a type of seed that would grow, but not not reproduce viable seeds, that'd be immoral. Or imagine a company creating an organism that would spread promiscuously from field to field, and then suing farmers who's fields were cross-polinated from those organisms. You actually don't have to imagine it, such a company exists: Monsanto.

      But if you grow fruit and grains and bake a pie, I don't have any choice but to pay for the pie if I want that one you made ethically. If I take the recipe you use and make my own, I haven't stolen your pie. I've done nothing wrong.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    6. Re:Just my $0.02 bitcoins by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      If such projects can't be made and distributed ethically then they shouldn't be made at all.

      I'm not sure what you mean about being distributed ethically, but if everyone believed the way you believed then they wouldn't be made at all. And the only thing we have left to entertain ourselves with is the amateurish tripe on youtube, and icanhascheezburger.
      You obviously feel that the digital goods have some sort of value, otherwise you wouldn't be taking them. So your argument that they are valueless is false, and you just don't want to pay for it, because you are greedy.
      You know it takes time and effort and money to produce the digital good, that as I mentioned you feel has some value. Because it cost money (and physical objects) to generate the content, it is immoral to just take a copy of the content, if it isn't freely offered. This trumps your "it is immoral to attempt to impose those [physical object] rules in pure thought. Also we aren't talking about pure thought.
      It just amounts you are greedy and want your entertainment for free.

  70. Re:What happened to self-control? by multiben · · Score: 1

    So explain to me the "logic" of how avoiding forums for *one* week is an effective solution to the problem.

  71. Re:What happened to self-control? by multiben · · Score: 1

    So you think that reading a book is a more convenient alternative to watch a 1 hour tv episode? I'm not sure what you think convenient means. Let me guess, you believe that books make you a more sophisticated and intelligent person, whereas TV dulls the mind? As it happens I read a lot of books, but I like TV too.

  72. Delay isn't the big issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delay isn't the big issue, it's the lack of quick, affordable, user-friendly distribution channels. The Oatmeal covered this already. To see GoT, you either have to have cable & HBO and either the time to watch it or a DVR, or you have to wait a year to purchase it on DVD at an insanely high price. Outside of the USA people can't get it on Amazon or Hulu or from the HBO website.

    All the content creator would have to do is let people purchase the episodes from their own website at a reasonable price (offer a free version with ads, maybe) and copyright infringement would drop off. It's simple, the torrent websites are providing an easy to access product at a reasonable price in a timely manner. Until the studios do the same, they will continue to see their potential customers get the content elsewhere.

    1. Re:Delay isn't the big issue by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      It need to be available as an aggregator or automatic service, too. I didn't realize how much this mattered until I had DirecTV, Hulu+, iTunes, and Netflix all at the same time. It's a royal PITA to find your stuff and then download it and watch it (or pray that the streaming service will work).

      Then I got Sickbeard and none of it matters any more - who, what, where - I just tell it the shows I want, it passes them to sabnzbd, sorts and saves them into Plex-friendly folders, and when I want to watch something I go to one place. Would I pay a subscription price for that (I'm already paying for usenet, though it's a pittance)? Yeah, if it were cheap. $1 a show isn't going to cut it. Maybe $0.50 a show as a single, $1-2 a month (weekly vs daily content) while it's running. And I want it on my computer where I control it. Not streamed, so I can't see it if I'm someone else is surfing the net. Not time limited - there are times when I may not get to see TV for 2-3 weeks (or longer) at a time. Not DRM'd so I can't re-code it for a portable device to take with me.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  73. So what defines a "life" anyway? by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know you're just trolling, but seriously? I can say "It's just a stupid ..." about practically anything people enjoy watching or participating in. (I'm often tempted to say it about major league sporting events, myself. It's just a bunch of adults playing a game originally designed for kids, kicking a ball around, and getting paid huge salaries for it. How stupid! Can't people get a life?!")

    Others would surely tell all of us to get a life, because we're sitting around reading stories on Slashdot.

    I'm not really a TV watcher myself, but I've seen a few episodes of Fringe, and thought they were pretty interesting. I started downloading more episodes as I was able to get ahold of decent copies of them. I haven't really had the time to watch more of them, but it's nice knowing I have them on my hard drive, so I can eventually get around to checking them out if and when the opportunity arises.

    The point I guess I'm trying to make is -- people can't constantly be in "go, go, go" mode, trying to actively do or achieve things. We all need downtime too, and I'm not just talking about sleep. Entertainment is crucial to a fulfilled life, and it takes many different forms. Not everyone likes the same things, but that's why there are so many options around. I find that half the time, I'd rather play a video game than watch a TV show -- but others get *nothing* out of gaming. So someone following these shows (and probably discussing them with friends too) would certainly be motivated to get new episodes in a timely manner.

    1. Re:So what defines a "life" anyway? by letherial · · Score: 1

      I am with you on the sports...I am working on getting my son into science and looking up to people who do something for the world; Parents who encourage there kids to worship sports figures are not doing there kids any favors as well as the world.

      but alas, parents only have so much control...so my son still may end up being one of those people who think that the latest super star is somehow important to the world, all i can do is point out how ridiculous looking up to figures like that really is.

  74. Another reason: Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Malaysia. Malaysia bans everything you can dream about. They even bleep out "Jesus" on the radio if it's in some songs. Game of Thrones would be so censored in Malaysia it's not even worth watching.

    That's why I pirate Game of Thrones. I won't buy the box sets either as those would be censored too. Blah.

  75. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $3.00 is kind of high, isn't it? I mean the DVD works out to be able to same amount at that rate. Plus iTunes doesn't work across all operating systems.

  76. I am willing to pay for HBO and Showtime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not want any other cable channels. This is not available to me, or anyone in the US.

  77. HBO and iTunes and a story of not pirating by Roogna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My wife and I didn't pirate it, but did finally purchase the entire first season when it appeared on iTunes. This gave us good quality, and commercial free. For a hell of a lot less money than cable and HBO runs in our area. But, now here's of course why so many pirate instead.... we had to wait over a year to -PAY- HBO for the show. If we'd been in any rush to see it (Which the Networks seem to be desperate to have people rush to see their content, given how hard they try to get people to have cable to see it the day it airs) we would have had no choice except to pirate it. Now for us, we weren't in a rush we've got plenty of other entertainment so their show is welcome to sit on the back burner until they make it available. Except here's the thing, now that season 2 is on we're again waiting... which is no problem for us, but the obvious thing would be for HBO to make season 2 episodes available immediately after airing on iTunes. If they did, we'd again be paying for it already! Instead I guess we have to wait until the season 2 dvd's are available... which means that we may not purchase at all if by that time we've found something else to watch or do.

    The moral of the story: If you want people to pay for it, then SELL it to them. If you drag it out and keep telling people they can't buy, then yeah they're going to either steal it, or just ignore you.

    1. Re:HBO and iTunes and a story of not pirating by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      My wife and I didn't pirate it, but did finally purchase the entire first season when it appeared on iTunes. This gave us good quality, and commercial free. For a hell of a lot less money than cable and HBO runs in our area. But, now here's of course why so many pirate instead.... we had to wait over a year to -PAY- HBO for the show. If we'd been in any rush to see it

      Or, if you lived in a different country, where Apple does not have rights to distribute it

      we would have had no choice except to pirate it.

      Note that in most other countries (outside North America, and possibly the UK), there is *no* legal way to download TV shows. No TV shows on iTunes. No Netflix, no Hulu, no content available on Amazon.

      You would think the production houses would have figured out that the same technology which allows a few people to distribute large content to millions of people around the world for very low costs would allow them to reach their customers directly, without many different 'distribution' companies, license agreements, thousands of lawyers (or the Apple 30% tax), and allow them to both serve the customers better, understand what the customers are prepared to pay for, all allowing them to make more money.

      Why don't they just run private trackers and RSS feeds with subscriptions available per-season, in the $1 to $3 per show range?

    2. Re:HBO and iTunes and a story of not pirating by vawwyakr · · Score: 1

      Exactly, my wife and I bought it on Amazon after it was out (we hadn't really heard much about it before then so no real wait there). My wife really liked it so she bought the books but now she is getting frustrated that we can't watch the next ones until sometime probably almost a year from now. She has already started talking about pirating it and she isn't even the type of person who knows much of anything about these sorts of things. She would be happy to pay for it but we can't unless we want to pay an additional $60+ a month just to see it.

      The entertainment industry is shooting themselves in the feet trying to force everyone into a small box. If they'd just open up and say that your internet access is your medium and everything else is either individual shows or even service packages you can pay for (thus they could still bundle) then they would be doing fine. Now they're just driving potential customers away.

    3. Re:HBO and iTunes and a story of not pirating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot get it legitimate without an ugly satellite dish on the side of my house which is something I won't do - I have the top cable package you can get it only on Sky Atlantic which is only on satallite. (I never actually watch it but I figure I should pay them something). Everything I watch comes via astranews. Thinking about killing the cable and just buying the bluerays for what I do actually want which is very few shows. (I am in the UK).

      If I could subscribe to a HD HBO service I would do it. (I won't subscribe to skyplayer for Sky Atlantic because there are only a few HBO shows on it).

  78. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 0

    I didn't offer it as a solution; I mocked a "1st world problem" example of having zero self-control. I'd like to ask, if the book readers are also on the forums why still go?

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  79. Two reasons by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

    1. I don't own a TV
    2. I want to see the original English version

    1. Re:Two reasons by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Oh, and just for the record, I am still going to buy the DVD set once it is released. Again, for two reasons:

      1. Better quality
      2. My girlfriend will still want to see it in German

  80. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    Convenient as in can be picked up anywhere and anytime. You don't need a power source. Convenient as in about $30 for 4 more years worth of shows that you can read and digest as many times as you want, at the pace you like. I can understand the convenience of a book on tape vs reading, for when you're driving or working. Explain how the books aren't convenient compared to the show.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  81. Re:What happened to self-control? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .. and why would you want to discuss the show with Americans anyway?

    Good question. Why don't you post it on slashdot.org.au and find out?

  82. Let Me Ask a Different Question by DaKong · · Score: 1

    Why do all the cable TV networks, and producers, and actors, and writers and all the people associated with movies and such think that they deserve to be wealthy for what is essentially putting on a puppet show? Lives don't depend on what they do. Nations will not rise or fall on the next episode of Family Guy. Far less of far less importance rides on *any* form of entertainment than, say, the guy who keeps the local electrical substation in my part of Brooklyn running. So why the *F* does the schmuck producer in Hollywood think he gets to make many multiples more than the doctor who saves his kid's life?

    It's high time that every last piece of work in the entertainment industry gets cut down to size. (Of course, the same must also be said of bankers and politicians, but that's a different conversation.) It would be super if we had governments that would cooperate on that score and end copyright, but since that's not gonna happen piracy will have to be the vehicle to get it done.

    So pirate away, world! Pirate like the dickens. Take a pledge to pirate every blessed piece of music, film, TV show, and what have you for 5 years until the RIAA, MPAA, and all the rest of their ilk are gone for good.

    --
    If not us, who? If not now, when?
    1. Re:Let Me Ask a Different Question by Y-Crate · · Score: 2

      Why do all the cable TV networks, and producers, and actors, and writers and all the people associated with movies and such think that they deserve to be wealthy for what is essentially putting on a puppet show?

      What is it about people always trying to argue the rank and file make "too much"?

      And why do you think that people who work on TV shows and films get wealthy from it?

      Time for a little reality:

      The vast majority of people involved in TV / film production work very, very hard. Many work ridiculous hours (Get home at midnight, be back on the lot ready to work at 5:30am -- weekends off? LOL! ), get laid-off every few months, live uncertain lives where they're never sure where the next paycheck will come from... or when. It's not glamorous, it's not easy, and it's the kind of thing that pushes you to the point of complete physical and mental collapse.

      And for most, the pay is NOT that great. Especially when you take into account the long stretches of unemployment.

      But yeah, whine away about how we're undeserving of paychecks that keep us above the poverty line most of the time.

      As for the people who make more, let's look at the writers for your average TV show. It's true, they get paid a lot more than a PA or production coordinator, but I've also heard of them locking themselves in their offices for days at a time to get scripts delivered / endless notes addressed on time. As in: They don't stop working and they don't go home. At all. Every day they have producers, actors, executives, agents and talent's hangers-on sending in notes about every last comma. That's not even hyperbole.

      Then they lose their jobs within a few months or years. And "I just finished writing for X" doesn't necessarily get you much. There's always thousands of newer and hungrier writers scrambling to take the job they were hoping to get next.

    2. Re:Let Me Ask a Different Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps all the people who actually make the shows we watch should get a small but real percentage of the show's actual profits. Instead, thanks to the magic of Hollywood accounting, the only ones who makes any money from television and film that grosses billions and billions of dollars are a tiny clique of money-priests at the top of the relevant corporate pyramids.

    3. Re:Let Me Ask a Different Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But we want to pay, it's just that we can't.

      I don't have cable, it's just not wired to my house, sure, I could (theoretically) pay 25k to get it there, then start at the other costs, but that is not really an option.
      Sadly, my memory is too good to have forgotten the spoilers after a year. I could wait until it fades, and start viewing the series in my retirement home, live my life offline and plug in coworker-canceling earbuds, or I could view it as it comes out, and buy the boxed set when it becomes available.

      It is not hard to see what I'd prefer.

    4. Re:Let Me Ask a Different Question by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      You speak the truth, but without proving your point. A few people are getting rich off tv shows, if the money is being unfairly divided or the people are getting worked too hard, the solution is not simply to charge consumers more. You are asking me to buy a dvd set for $100. How much of that will you see? How much of that will the writers or the people working ridiculous hours see? In most cases probably $0, they get paid an hourly rate. I want brilliant passionate people to make good quality entertainment and get paid a good living wage for it. There is virtually nothing I can do that would make that happen short of donating money directly to the people that are underpaid, which would involve a huge amount of research even finding out who they are. Also I am already getting paid less than the worst paid of them myself, and cannot spare the money.

  83. And he nails is by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    Some people are going to pirate your shit no matter what. They either don't have the money to pay for it, just download everything because they can, think they are making a statement or whatever. Those people you ignore, because there's shit you can do about them.

    However there's another group of people who will give you their money for a product instead of pirate it, if a few things are true:

    1) It needs to be worth what you what. Worth is, of course, an individual measure and some people aren't reasonable but most are. If you sell them TV at a reasonable price, they'll buy it, if you want a shit ton per episode, they'll go elsewhere.

    2) It needs to be easily and quickly available. It needs to be there when they want it. Not when you think it is best for market segmentation, when they want it. When they look they need to find right away.

    3) It needs to be available without too much bullshit. This is important and what the comic really demonstrates. Someone needs to go and be able to buy it just by clicking "buy" on Amazon or iTunes or Steam or whatever various service is relevant.

    If any of these get too out of whack they may well say "Fuck it, I'll just pirate it." That option is always there and you are stupid if you think you can get rid of it. There's been a massive war on it, utterly failed, as such your shit will be there too.

    So keep the stuff available, the bullshit level low and the PRICE REASONABLE and you'll see online sales. Start to have the idea that there is the One True Way(tm) to watch your shit, and people will just elect to nab it elsewhere.

  84. Did none of you people read the book? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    So first off: You know these shows are based off of a series of books, right? The first one shares the name: A Game of Thrones.

    I've not watched the series, but all the things I hear people chattering about are all, well, how the books are. Just like this. One feature of the books is they don't seem to have a main character. They have multiple characters that you follow, and you jump from character to character. Also, as the series goes on, more and more characters get introduced and the sub-plots get to monkey-fuck retarded levels.

    1. Re:Did none of you people read the book? by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      I'm perfectly aware and all I'm saying is this season is a mess in trying to tell the story.

  85. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Why?

  86. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Having to fragment discussions into regional sub-forums just to accommodate a single TV show is clearly ridiculous.

  87. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be the case in USA, but not necessarily the rest of the world.

  88. Re:What happened to self-control? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    That's not love, that's marketing.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  89. me, well kind of by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    i do have a subscription to hbo, and have for over 10 years (since the original airing of band of brothers). the reason that i also download it is to have a hard copy of it. if they would just make is super easy to dump the stuff from my dvr to my pc, it'd be a non-issue. sure, i could buy the blu-rays when they come out, but they already got my money. i was able to capture the analog stream back in the day without issue and to vcr before that. quality of product, lack of degradation, and bonus revenue streams have no relevancy in the discussion. the ball is in their court.

    --
    ...
  90. Re:What happened to self-control? by arose · · Score: 1

    People do discuss popular culture outside of designated forums. That, and the sub-forum will torrent it, which brings us back to the discussion at hand.

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  91. Re:What happened to self-control? by poity · · Score: 1

    It would be a solution to spoilers, and it would be trivial to implement. What's really ridiculous is complaining that Americans are spoiling the show for Australians when those who have read the books are spoiling it for everyone at the same time in the same forum.

    --
    your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
  92. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not season 2, you douche bag.

  93. Or by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I don't have HBO.

  94. Re:What happened to self-control? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2

    The solution is therefore to have separate forums for those discussing the books, and those discussing the show. Having separate forums for Australian audiences would logically follow.

    Segregate the internet because it's convenient for media companies?
    Dumb ideas like that are why piracy is flourishing and Big Media is fighting a losing battle.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  95. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by rwhite5279 · · Score: 1

    Ummm, no. Not the current season. Season 1 only. People who don't have cable/HBO have no legal option for purchasing the current season of Game of Thrones.

  96. hbo go standalone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pirate because I can't buy HBO Go by itself.
    They will only sell it to me if I have a cable subscription.

  97. Re:What happened to self-control? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Explain how the books aren't convenient compared to the show.

    TV shows or movies have much higher "bitrate". That is, if you made a movie from a book, it would be faster (for most people) to watch the show than to read the book.

    Also, at least for me, reading a paper book is less convenient physically than watching a movie. The books usually are made so they close by themselves unless I put a heavy object on them (I use an old battery from a UPS), but then I cannot read the text that is under that object, so I have to move it to read that portion of the text. Then lift it, turn the page and put it back down. On the other hand, I can just start the movie/TV show on my PC or VCR and watch it while doing nothing (or eating, or putting some device back together after repairing it or something else).

  98. Re:What happened to self-control? by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Because sending the episode to Australian broadcasters, via this new fangled thing called the internet, would take longer than an hour, and certainly would not be available for immediate viewing.

    See, this is the problem with people applying MicroEcon's market segmentation when they don't understand economics.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  99. HBO needs to learn how to make more money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not pay for a HBO subscription. I don't even have cable. I have to wait one month until Game of Thrones is subbed and released for non-english speaking countries. But, when I went to NY and walked by the HBO store, I decided to go in and buy LOTS of GoT merchandise. They really need to change their view on customers - if I want to watch just this series, I see no reason in paying for subscription to 50+ other channels. Having it broadcast online (and internationally) at the same time as on TV, by paying a small fee per episode (I would happily pay $3 for each one), would sure increase their revenue.

    1. Re:HBO needs to learn how to make more money by mrxak · · Score: 1

      I think you've stumbled upon something, and no, it's not the $3 per episode deal. It's the merchandize. Why not just give away the TV series for free to everyone, then sell physical goods to the biggest fans? Maybe sell DVDs with special features or extended scenes, if you want to go that route, but give the fans something extra they'll be willing to pay for.

      Bands rarely make that much money from CD sales, but when they put on a live concert and sell tickets and T-shirts, their biggest fans give them boatloads of cash. Then those fans wear those T-shirts and talk to people about those concerts, which converts new people to fans.

    2. Re:HBO needs to learn how to make more money by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 1

      Why not just give away the TV series for free to everyone, then sell physical goods to the biggest fans?

      Because there is no equivalent of concert tickets for TV shows. DVDs would be the closest comparison, but they are just the same show people have already seen. One of the big reason people pay for expensive concert tickets is because a live concert is a very different experience from listening to a CD.

      Funding a show like Game of Thrones with DVD and tshirt sales would be an incredibly risky venture, if not completely impossible. DVD sales are a long tail revenue stream so you would have to fund the whole first season speculatively and then potentially wait years to recoup those costs. Then 12 months later people are expecting a second season, where does the money for that come from? The percentage of people who will run out and buy the DVDs for a show that just finished on TV is pretty low.

      I think a lot of the people posting these 'alternative business models' vastly underestimate how much a show like Game of Thrones costs to make. The estimated budget for the first season was about $45 million

  100. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Cimexus · · Score: 1

    An entire season behind. And you can rest assured the cost in other markets is a lot more than $2.99. US iTunes store prices are way less than anywhere else.

  101. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess. You have cats?

  102. Mainly its pirated for the nudity by dsio · · Score: 1

    Seriously, its awesome

  103. I pirate every TV show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At first, it was wanting to watch things that just aren't on TV anymore. I'd use Netflix to get DVDs en masse, then rip them to watch later. But Netflix didn't have everything I wanted, and DVDs were too slow in the mail. Netflix's streaming content was just laughably inadequate.

    So I turned to Hulu. For a time, Hulu was good. But Hulu was slow. Ongoing shows would not have content until sometimes more than a month after the show aired. There were no back episodes if I didn't watch for a while. Hulu failed.

    So I turned to pirated video files. Suddenly, I could get high quality content, better than I'd ever get from Netflix or Hulu, and most importantly, there were no delays. I could decide to watch a new show I'd just heard of, and minutes later I'd have every episode ever made, queued up to watch in my media player of choice on any device in my home. For ongoing series, I could now download and watch, interruption free, almost immediately after it airs, but most of the time I'd time-shift to days or weeks later. Shows that are not out on DVD, but not showing on TV either, I have full access to whenever I want.

    I am currently paying for cable, a DVR, and even some non-basic channels. So I don't really feel bad about pirating every TV show I watch.

    For the producers, there is no difference. I could very well be DVRing the shows. The ad-based model is make-believe anyway, based on false, unverified assumptions. Even before DVRs allowed me to skip ads, I never watched ads anyway. Ad breaks were when I used the bathroom, went into the kitchen for a snack, or talked with family. Heck, with VHS I was time-shifting and skipping ads for most of my TV-watching life, anyway. The only time I ever watch ads, ever, in my entire life, has been when ads themselves are part of the entertainment. In other words the Super Bowl. Sporting events are basically the only thing I do watch live. So hey, those Super Bowl advertisers are getting their money's worth. For every other show, I might as well not exist because I'm not providing the advertisers the eyeballs they think are there. Am I stealing from the TV companies every time I leave the room during an ad break? The advertiser model is make-believe, and for the TV producers, there is no difference.

    For me, though, there's a huge difference. There is a massive convenience factor that I cannot get through any legal means. I can watch any episode, any time, on any device. Sometimes I watch on my desktop, sometimes a TV, sometimes on my laptop in a hotel room with no internet.

    I should point out, I still buy DVDs. I get and watch them for the special features, and then watch the shows themselves streamed from my local media server box where I've stashed my pirated content.

    HBO shouldn't be so upset by the pirating numbers, because chances are a fair number of those pirates are subscribers anyway who feel too restricted by HBO on how and when they can watch. The others are probably talking to people about the show, which is causing more people to subscribe to their network or buy the DVDs.

    It will be interesting to see if TV companies can adapt to the changing technology or if TV will simply die out as advertisers realize nobody is actually watching their ads (and haven't for some time) or people stop subscribing to cable and premium channels since they can get better service through piracy. I'm ambivalent. Even if no new TV content is produced, there's more pirated content out there than I could possibly watch in a lifetime. If it does run out, there's plenty of web originals out there and growing fast. Still, it would be nice if the industry reordered itself to break free of time constraints and dated business models. Just produce and sell your original works a la carte in a high quality DRM-free digital format for a fair price.

  104. It's available on iTunes in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Game of thrones seasons 1 and 2 are available on iTunes down here, I believe each episode is available the day after it airs in the US. At a price of $30 (BTW 1AUD ~ 0.99 USD atm) it is more than competitive with the cost of season 1 in dvd form ($59 at JB hi-fi). The only problem even at $30 it is more than 60% more expensive than the equivilent US price for a episode of a comparable show and 50% more than the UK price. So I am still mulling over if I will buy it or not. If it cost $20 i would buy both seasons today.

    The 60% price differntial is generally consistant across the whole range of downloadable media in Australia. As far as I can work out this is due to the iTunes prices being set 7 or so years ago when the Aussie dollar was worth 20-30% less and the fact that Australians have historically paid more for media, due to a range of factors including small volume, high transport costs and high minimum wages as well as cartel and monopolistic practices. With the internet all these differences whould dissapear and then only reason we are paying more is because either we are getting price gouged or we are suckers.

    So until this discrepancy closes I will be much more reluctant to pay for media through these services, I will be buying them on eBay from overseas, I will be waiting on Steam for computer games to drop from $90 for new releases to under $20 and I will be borrowing and watching or watching with my mates their copies of media (how ever obtained). I will even be renting dvds from the local dvd store (e.g. $5 for 2 episodes of the new BBC sherlock homes rather than $8 an episode from iTunes).

    On a side not there are a buch of good online book stores (like Baen) where you can buy electronic copies of their books for $5 and other sites where real copies can be had for under half the price of australian bookstores (such as book depository) which I will continue to happily support.

  105. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we don't read in Australia

  106. Here is the answer by mattr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know this show and am not interested in viewing it. However I can think of two models that will work.
    MODEL I:
    Copy iTunes or Mubi.
    But it probably will not deliver enough viewers to fund the series by itself.
    So, on to...

    MODEL II:
    1. Ideally create one global launch date for all languages/regions and stick to it. This will provide maximum social networking and minimal spoilers. This would require sales to other markets starting after the pilot is made but before a whole season has been created. In other words, a new global sales strategy. So talk to a global ad agency. The other option is to make one global launch date per language, but you may get pirate versions I would imagine.
    2. Insert reasonable number of advertisements into market-specific versions, e.g. EN-US, EN-UK, EN-AU, etc.
    3a. If you can just provide speedy downloads from your site and akamai then do it. But that is going to be awfully expensive.. unless you have an amazing contract with ISPs all over the world already.
    3b. Instead, create a bittorrent for each format, with many seeders of the appropriate version within each region's territory. This way Australians can download the Australian version with Australian advertisements fastest due to having many seeds provisioned within its continental LAN. A few college kids could do this, but if you ask the ad agency to do it, they will charge you the same as or slightly less than the cost if you had hired akamai.
        Video quality should be 720p or higher. The easier the delivery is made, the less important and moralistic will any other pirate versions (undoubtedly somebody will edit out ads and make an uninterrupted version. Maybe the honest version will only have ads at beginning end and same points as TV version, so people may still prefer it and give back to the creators.)
    4. Create websites and social networking to advertise and link it all up. Word of mouth / magazine / twitter all linking there. Websites point to the torrents. Also sell via app stores, amazon, etc. Try to get fans to sign up. They can read blogs, teasers, special cilps on the website, post in forums, ask questions and maybe even help guide the series. Imagine if Joss Whedon was doing this.
    5. Offer extra things to purchase, maybe Amazon wants to do a special product deal.
    6. Offer DVD, Blu-Ray box sets and 1080p files as standalones or full season download via bittorrent or app stores. These products have no advertisements and will include special extras like making of clips, interviews with director and actors, printable pamphlets, maybe desktop wallpapers, 3d printable models, suscriptions to follow the different actors, blogs by the fashion designers or whatever. Pricing of the collections should however be the same price or cheaper than the current box sets if buying the digital version since no physical distribution is then necessary.
    7. $$$

    1. Re:Here is the answer by mattr · · Score: 2

      typo: add "seem" -> "the less important and moralistic will any pirate versions [seem]."
      Also forgot to say, no DRM. The point of the above strategy is to understand network technology routes around congestion and so DRM gets treated as a speed bump. So we drop all barriers to zero and boost convenience through the roof. People generally will pay for a reasonable deal and those who want it free will still pay by watching the ads. There is no justification whatsoever for adding DRM. By using good timing and avoiding rapaciousness there is no reason this should not work and generate more profit.

  107. Please let me pay for good TV! by goodmanj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want to pay for Game of Thrones. I'm proud to pay for great TV, music, books, and news.

    HBO won't let me. I'm standing here with dollars in my fist yelling "TAKE MY MONEY", but they won't do it, because they insist on the ludicrous, outdated concept of "subscription" and "scheduled programming".

    1. Re:Please let me pay for good TV! by chrismcb · · Score: 0

      "Your Honour."
      "I was standing in front of the Bently Dealership, waving fistfuls of cash at them... I wanted their car, but they wouldn't take my money. So I took the car instead."
      Judge: "You waved fistfuls of $10,000 dollar bills?"
      What you are saying is, you are willing to pay, but now as much as what HBO wants you to pay? That doesn't give you the right to just take it.

    2. Re:Please let me pay for good TV! by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      You'd have a great point if I had used my argument to justify downloading Game of Thrones torrents. I haven't. I've just sat, waiting, for a year, for Game of Thrones to come out on DVD, gradually hating HBO more and more.

  108. I think we're overlooking the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The show's awesome, its on an amazing show on a pay channel most people dont have

    1. Re:I think we're overlooking the real reason by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      I don't think many people are disputing that.
      Most of HBO's show are pretty decent. For a variety of reasons. Fewer FCC limitations, and more money. But they have more money because you have to pay for the shows. If people aren't paying for the show, they shows will be cancelled.
      Wait, isn't MPAA saying they are losing money to piracy?

  109. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See above link to the comic on theoatmeal. The HD episodes you can buy on itunes are a year old.

    The episodes are not released to viewers without cable and an HBO subscription for one year, even though I would cheerfully pay them for it now. Ditto for some excellent shows on showtime.

    I actually wait a year, or go watch with friends who subscribe.

    Funny thing is, I'm watching it legitimately for free that way, when what I really want is to *PAY HBO FOR THEIR SHOW* so I can watch it legitimately at home without the cable extortion rates.

    Then again, it helps me stay in touch with those friends. :)

  110. obvious by DSS11Q13 · · Score: 1

    tl;dr bc i dont have hbo

  111. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not available on iTunes until a while (days at least) after it's released on TV.

  112. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it is not. You are probably thinking of season 1.

  113. DMCA Takedown notices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen anybody anywhere mention this, or I'd have replied to a thread instead of starting one.

    I've gotten 5 DMCA takedown notices from my ISP for being in Game of Thrones bittorrent swarms. I haven't seen one of those notices in 4 or 5 years prior to this. So much for assuming that Big Content had figured out it isn't worth the time and expense...

  114. Re:What's a television and an HBO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another serious question.
    Why do you feign ignorance and naivete to an audience who sees right through it?

  115. Why pirate television at all? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Disclaimer, this post is probably going to offend some people.

    I don't care. Really... I mean it. I had given some thought to trying to be say this delicately, but then I realized that there really wasn't much of a point.

    So to that end... why bother pirating a TV series at all?

    I mean, everything on television that is actually worth watching (and there certainly isn't very much of it) is more than likely going to be worth waiting a few months for to get the entire season on DVD.

    But oh noes! Then you can't watch it right now! Really? Is your life so devoid of anything with meaning and direction that you can't pull yourself away from yet another mindless TV show? That, to me, doesn't say that the TV series is necessarily any good... all it does is speak volumes about people's priorities and lack of self-restraint.

    That said... given this show's obvious popularity, I do think it's incredibly self-defeating of HBO to not put the episodes up on iTunes at least within a few days of airing. They could stand to make a killing.

    1. Re:Why pirate television at all? by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      But oh noes! Then you can't watch it right now! Really? Is your life so devoid of anything with meaning and direction that you can't pull yourself away from yet another mindless TV show?
      If you are having dinner with your friends, and they want to talk about the ending of Avengers, are you the guy who puts his fingers in his ears saying 'la la la la' don't tell me anything, and shutting down the conversation your friends are having? Or do you simply not care about any fictional stories so don't care if the plots are spoiled?

      Some people participate in pop culture shows, books & movies, and the conversations surrounding that pop culture is very time sensitive. If your friends are into something and keep talking about it, and encouraging you to watch, it drives you to stay current rather than wait for DVD's.

    2. Re:Why pirate television at all? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If you are having dinner with your friends, and they want to talk about the ending of Avengers, are you the guy who puts his fingers in his ears saying 'la la la la' don't tell me anything, and shutting down the conversation your friends are having?

      No... I'm the guy with friends who have far more interesting things to talk about than just the ending to a popular TV show or movie they happened to recently see, so they will usually ask if I've already seen it and if the answer is no, it's no loss for them to not talk about it right then and there.

    3. Re:Why pirate television at all? by avandesande · · Score: 1

      For all we know HBO has exclusive agreements with the cable companies and contractually cannot do this.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  116. Yes, you can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your option, though, is illegal.

    1. Re:Yes, you can do that. by EllisDees · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure, it's illegal, but most people simply don't consider it wrong. No amount of propaganda will change this.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    2. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, it's illegal, but most people simply don't consider it wrong. No amount of propaganda will change this.

      And some people DO consider it wrong, and no amount of propaganda will change THAT, either.

    3. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Sorthum · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Replying to do erroneous moderation (was aiming for insightful, whacked redundant instead).

      The difference between "illegal" and "right and wrong" are two very different things; the further they diverge in a given society, the more dysfunctional that society appears to the broad brush of history.

    4. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are entitled to your opinion.
      It would seems however, that we are not.

    5. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In my country I have to wait a year before the series airs and if I'm lucky they will use subtitles instead of local actors with voices that hardly match the original.
      It is users like me who would even like to pay to see the show as it is.
      But the big media agencies just make it impossible for us to pay to see the show, no matter how much we would like to see or pay for it.
      I know it is wrong to download the show but in some cases there is no other way.

    6. Re:Yes, you can do that. by radja · · Score: 4, Informative

      legality will differ by country. In the netherlands this is perfectly legal.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    7. Re:Yes, you can do that. by ballfire · · Score: 0

      Are you aware that there are other legal systems besides yours that do not consider illegal downloading copyrighted material if it is for private use?

    8. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      And this is where we brave dutch people come in, downloading here is legal, uploading isn't, but it's not me committing the crime :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    9. Re:Yes, you can do that. by AVee · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Additionally, in large parts of the Netherlands it's impossible to get an HBO subscription anyway. So for lot's of people here it's either download or wait for the DVD, nothing in between. That will probably change as HBO is rolling out across TV providers here. If it comes with proper on-demand and a reasonable pricetag I'll subscribe.
      Frankly, I'd rather have the on-demand stuff over the internet without all sorts of strings attached. I'll happily pay to for on-demand HBO if I can watch it from within XBMC without having to install windows. Untill that happens Sabnzbd + XBMC is simply far more convenient then any legal option.

    10. Re:Yes, you can do that. by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      They are in the minority; according to a study I read around the SOPA blackouts, something like 70% of the public sees no moral issues in sharing media with family and friends. The law is at odds with mainstream society.

    11. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between "illegal" and "right and wrong" are two very different things; the further they diverge in a given society, the more dysfunctional that society appears to the broad brush of history.

      The reason why this issue needs to be at least perceived as wrong, is so that people who have the means to pay for such content will continue to do so.

    12. Re:Yes, you can do that. by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      yes! any media company that would pass up the opportunity to make cash off cases like this and instead reach for the lawyers needs to find some other line of work.

    13. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the customer is ALWAYS right!

    14. Re:Yes, you can do that. by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      But draconian ISP policies and harsh criminal penalties will.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    15. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Jozza+The+Wick · · Score: 1

      And, many viewers would be happy to pay a reasonable price to download the episodes legally and watch on day of release, if they don't have the appropriate cable subscription. They would much rather go the legal route if were available - and pay money to do so. But that's not being offered as an option. It's not an excuse for breaking the law, but HBO could stop trying to turn back the tide and instead benefit from it instead...

    16. Re:Yes, you can do that. by alexo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your option, though, is illegal.

      So was consensual oral sex between married couples in Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, Utah, Virginia (and possibly other states) until as recently as 2003.

      Please forgive us for being critical of laws coming from a nation that bills itself as "the land of the free" yet still criminalized going down on your spouse in the 21st century CE.

    17. Re:Yes, you can do that. by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Not entirely. Downloading would be legal, under the private copy regulations. But with bittorrent you upload as well as download, and that's not legal.

      For me, the entire format of weekly episodes is just wrong. Create the season and put it all on some view on demand service. If you want to watch all episodes in a day and then a year of nothing, that should be your choice. Maybe bring out the DVD after 2 months or so.
      I understand HBO needs money from advertisers, but I see that as a failing business model.

    18. Re:Yes, you can do that. by Lissajous · · Score: 1

      If you're getting it from TPB, you're not the customer.

    19. Re:Yes, you can do that. by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's illegal, but most people simply don't consider it wrong. No amount of propaganda will change this.

      I know a lot of people who have openly said they would actually rather pay to watch this show rather than download it for free, as long as they don't need to buy months or even years worth of other shit. The other consideration is it must be a reasonably low amount of effort required to legally stream etc to justify not just downloading it for free with minimal effort.

      When they sell something to a single outlet that most people don't have access to, they shouldn't pretend to be surprised that people will find other ways of watching it.

  117. Not a GoT fan, but the principles remain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing that the industry seemingly has not gotten a grip on yet is the concept that physical file transfers are not necessarily easily supplanted by streaming services. My commute to work is 45 minutes long on mass transit, i.e. exactly the length of an hour long show...

    Netflix takes at least a minute and a half to buffer, and God help you if at any point during the train ride other people start using their phones to watch a show as well. Amazon Prime is similarly hampered. The network TV websites either don't load at all because they don't like my IP address or browser, load but use Flash and as a result my phone is half dead by time I get to work, buffer ridiculous amounts, have unreasonable quantities of commercials that require their own minute-long buffering times only to be followed by additional buffering of the series, or any number of other technological issues that prevent their product from being viable.

    iTunes is closer, but doesn't work on my Android phones at all, and on my laptop it causes my CPU to require 20-40% load (as opposed to 3-7% for an xvid file), so my battery is a question mark...plus iTunes and Quicktime both suck as video players, and their super locked down video formats make it impossible to use anything else.

    PlayLater looked like the most promising compromise out there...until I tried five times to download the same episode only to have it fail each time, so I can't yet comment on how well that does or doesn't work.

    I'd be happy watching certain shows on DVD even if they weren't a year behind, but the DMCA has made it illegal for me to rip my own DVDs to watch in this manner.

    It's like there's no feasible way to watch these series that doesn't involve killing batteries, missing a large quantity of the content, buying devices I don't want, testing the limits of my 'unlimited' data plan, violating some flavor of copyright law, or in most cases a combination of the above.

    The glimmer of hope I have is this: Litigation aside, the RIAA seems to have mostly gotten its act together insofaras I can purchase 100% DRM-free MP3s from Amazon, 100% DRM-free AAC files from Apple, stream music I know from Spotify for free, and stream music I may-or-may-not know from Pandora/Slacker. Again, I'm not forgiving their litigation crap, but there's at least a semblance of attempting to meet halfway. Back in 1997, however, we had Napster and we had LiquidAudio. The latter of which allowed for legal music downloads, but only allowed it on one computer, three transfers to a portable device (even the same device, keeping in mind that MP3 players of the day often had 64MBytes of storage or less), and one could only burn it to CD twice. To them, this was palatable for consumers; clearly it was not. If it can happen to the RIAA, i wouldn't put it past other entertainment industry companies to eyeball what happened. However, I do think it will take much longer for them; no one has seemed to attempt DRM-free video purchases, so it's clear that it will be many, many years - if ever - that the MPAA or HBO take a stab at it.

  118. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well the good news is that i have checked. The series is 8 eps into season 2. only season 1 is avail on itunes and that is AFTER dvd release. and there are not other purchase options besides hbo/cable subscriptions. hence this thread with almost 400 comments.

    trolls throwing grenades deserve shotguns.

    not fud - facts.

  119. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Australia. I'd like to consider myself a good consumer. I buy all my favourite things on the Blu-rays, and I have many favourite things.

    The reason I pirate GAME OF THRONES is essentially because I'm sick of waiting for distributors to recognise that it's a changing/changed world with the advent of the internet. The way free-to-air and cable television works at the moment, which I will freely admit these companies have built their business models around over many years and might find the prospect of change particularly frightening, just can't work in this ever-changing world of ours. Our lives are busy and we want the convenience of watching shows when we want, and we don't want to have our favourite shows spoiled by having to wait even a day.

    The best businesses see a need and fill it, right?

    We already know the capabilities, and we know where this is going. Television content will be delivered over TCP/IP to our IPTVs, and television shows will have release days and times rather than airing days and times. (Content will probably have expiry times to begin with, but as physical media goes away...) We consumers will get the convenience we're shouting desperately for, and networks and distributors will still make their money, whether by a subscription fee or maybe there are still ad-breaks. They'll even have a perfect record of who's watching what, which will help them target their advertising even better.

    I'm massively okay with this. Here's my money. Here's my age bracket, gender, and region of residence. You can have these things. Just get with the fricking times.

    Oh, there's politics and licensing that needs to be worked out? Don't care. Make it work. It's actually in your interest.

  120. Re: "I simply can't justify spending that sort..." by jbov · · Score: 2

    I am offended that the majority of the money I spend would go to subsidizing all the shit programming that is aired on all these other channels.

    Even more offensive is the paid programming. It seems my provider doesn't air anything late at night when I can actually watch TV. Most of the channels are either listed as "Off air" or "Paid Programming", which is some pathetic attempt to sell me a new folding pocket knife, blender, or push-up bra. As if commercials within shows weren't bad enough, late night viewer selection is greatly limited to hour long commercials.

    TV broadcast pricing is the most common bundle scheme going. Other industries try it, like the insurance companies that will not sell you Liability Insurance without also including coverage for tools, office supplies, and everything else except computer equipment, which must be purchased separately. I'd like to only purchase the products or services that I want and the market rate for those products and services. I don't want to pay for shows I will not watch, nor thousands of dollars worth equipment insurance for equipment I do not have.

  121. Country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see a lot "its available a week later in Australia". Ok it's fun and all, but actually in most countries it's just *not* available.
    Main reason for pirating it, is that otherwise you're denied access to that kind of media for a few years and sometimes simply forever. I personally believe that access to most things should be a worldwide freedom, but then again, everyone's debating how countries are nice limits for stuff, such as their religion, ideas, way of working, etc.. oh and tv shows too. (and I think that's b/s and that we should all have equal possibilities)

  122. Surprise, an inept car analogy! by jbov · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank you for the excellent example of the logical fallacy known as a False Analogy.

    A more fitting analogy would be wanting to order a steak, but instead only having the option of buying an all day catered dinner, during which the time slot for getting served a steak falls within a one hour window. You still have to pay for each item served, regardless of whether you ordered it, ate it, or even attended the serving. If you pay for the upgraded DVR package, you will be given 3 take-home containers. If you would be willing to enter into a contract to do this every day, then I'm sure broadcast television pricing makes perfect sense to you.

    All analogies, including mine, have faults. The thing is, no analogy is needed for what OP said. He explained the position very well without using any. Your bumbling, unrelated car analogy does nothing to detract from his point.

  123. Coincidence is a warm and fuzzy thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While reading the comments on this story (here in Australia) my iPhone just sent me a notification via Boxcar from Sickbeard running on my Ubuntu MythTV Backend at home to let me know that Episode 8 of Season 2 of Game of Thrones has just been successfully downloaded and will be at home waiting for me when I finish work (i.e. get sick of reading slashdot comments).

    Now if only I could find the time to watch episodes 1 through 7.....

  124. Re:What happened to self-control? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    The complaint isn't "american viewers are ruining the experience for australian viewers", the complaint is "why is the licensing so messed up that for half the world the convenient and sane option is to download the show illegally?"

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  125. I dont but I do have HBO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And even then, i would still just "pirate" the first season if i was interested in watching it.

    It's easier.

  126. Why bother? by Rix · · Score: 2

    It's in the torrentsphere now.

  127. Flawed statistics. by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Statistics of the top-ten are seriously flawed. Sure the number of downloads is highest in Australia, but there are a few small countries in the top-ten list too, and anyway population sizes vary vastly between the countries in the list. We should really correct for population. Doing so gives me a very different result, with a number to give the download rate corrected for population - the US rate indexed as 1:

    1 Norway (24)

    2 Australia (14)

    3 The Netherlands (8.5)

    4 Greece (8.4)

    5 Canada (7.1)

    6 United Kingdom (3.9)

    7 Poland (2.5)

    8 Spain (2.2)

    9 United States (1)

    10 Philippines (0.95)

    Most notable is how the US falls down to the bottom of this list. Australia down to #2, Norway all the way on top, and Netherlands on #3. This I think says more about the relative popularity of a show in an area than plain download numbers.

    The lower end of this top-ten is probably not accurate as there are plenty more small countries that may move up further but I don't have the numbers. The number of downloads from the US is actually quite small compared to it's population size.

  128. in the usa there is a FCC law limited + hbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in the usa there is a FCC law saying you can get limited + hbo.

  129. disney channel needs to go premium ESPN as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disney channel needs to go premium ESPN as well

    Why can't there be a ESPN theme pack as well as a local RSN theme pack.

  130. Months for synchronisation I couldn't care less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll have to wait months / years till a series gets aired here. They have to find enough interest to translate to german and then show it. Community, for example, started last month, with Season 1.

    I like the original voices and the original language to learn something, and I like to watch all of a series. Often, in germany, they only air it for as long as it's making money THERE, which means, typically, I won't even see all the seasons. If at all.

    If i would be able to legally watch that stuff (including paying for it), I would. But I can't even buy the original versions say on iTunes.

    - davepermen

  131. One week ? pffft. by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Some of us are only seeing the first season *now*. In some country we see the newest TV show *YEARS* after the first showing in the US. Heck some show *never* come here in Germany. "One week to wait is too much" come off as very weak willed on some people side.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:One week ? pffft. by CowardlyAnomalous · · Score: 1

      Don't feel too bad, Right now in Australia we get to watch 15 year old episodes of Inspector Rex, in German.

  132. It is not the itnernet which sucks outside the US by aepervius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What sucks is the partitioning of the world in small zone, and that some of the vendor you mentioned refuse (or are not allowed to) to sell or show stuff from the US. The Internet has long been balkanized by copyright and region release staggering.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  133. Me, Me, I am! by Hackysack · · Score: 1

    Tho I feel I'm not actually pirating it.

    I paid for the Cable Subscription required to get access to HD HBO for the period of Game of Thrones.

    I like the show and want to pay for it, I want them to make more of it.

    I also download it every week to archive a copy, because it's less hassle than pulling it off my PVR.

    It bugs me that AMC also gets money for my liking Game of Thrones, and that HBO gets money for other crap from my liking Game of Thrones. I don't want gritty political dramas, I don't want witty comedies; I want good Fantasy and good Sci Fi. I will pay for it.

    I hope everyone out there that only downloads it, finds a way to contribute to the economic success of the project; to encourage it to keep going. Rather than the way of Rome.

  134. A week of waiting? Seriously? by Sven+Jacobs · · Score: 1

    In Germany we have to wait at least a year until a new (season of a) US TV show starts, if at all.
    So don't whine when you just have to wait a week ;)

    In case of the second season of Game of Thrones the situation has improved as it begins airing in two days on German Pay TV.
    However I recall other shows where we really had two wait at least a year, like Breaking Bad for example.

  135. Awesomeness by Vlaix · · Score: 1

    Why ? Because it kicks some serious ass, that's why. I'm a diehard ASOIAF fan, I'm eating my fingers waiting for The Winds of Winter and in the meantime GoT is the best substitute. I refrain myself from sleeping every Sunday night (I'm French, so the episodes usually come out of the HDTV scene @ 4.30 am, Paris time) to get it WHEN IT'S AVAILABLE. Now mark my words, because every fan feels the same : I don't care of the means, as long as I get it soon as possible. Were there a legit way to watch it at roughly the same time as you yanks do, I'd pay good money for it. But there's not.

  136. 1 week? Whiners. by Andtalath · · Score: 1

    In sweden, we have to wait close to a year for most shows.
    That's why everyone who knows how pirates stuff, being a year behind is absurd in an online world.

  137. Part of why good shows die by phorm · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is why good shows die. Not the piracy, but the high cost of initial adoption.
    I spent many years disconnected from the tube. I did go to the theatre here and there, and bought/rented a few movies, but by-and-large didn't pay much attention to TV series.
    Subsequently, there are a *lot* of good shows out there that I haven't watched. Rather than watching something that costs $100+/month for a cable subscription that shows in [insert obscure and inconvenient timeslot here], I manage to pick up all the slightly older stuff I haven't seen at a reasonable price for box sets etc.

    Of course, by this time the series are several seasons in. My purchase counts little towards whatever stats they use to determine popularity, and they usually get cut (or start to dry up). I know *tons* of people that by the big box-sets for shows (usually a short time after release when they're a bit more reasonably price) but - like me - don't want to pay for overpriced, commercial-ridden, inconveniently-timed cable/satellite runs or overpriced singles.

    On the other hand, most of us are more-than-willing to pay a reasonable price for stuff like Netflix etc. Even in the busy summer when my own TV-viewership is near nil, I don't mind keeping the subscription running (both to support the service and for the odd time when I have my niece over for cartoons, etc).

    I stopped by a relatives and *tried* to watch a show with them but the amount of commercials made me feel ill.

    On-demand subscriptions (and to some extent physical releases for us collectors) are where it's at. Netflix is great.
    For more up-to-date programming, I would be more than happy to pay a reasonable fee per-episode to watch on-demand. No, not the $5.99 for a movie B.S., but a buck or so, maybe two for an episode. I'd even stomach a few (a few, mind you) commercials at a non-deafening volume. In the digital age, they could probably even profile people pretty easily and start having *more effective* commercials by targeting them better to area and interest.

    Modern TV packages need to die. Once they go to the tar-pits, everyone wins. The viewers who get the shows they want, and TV companies and studios who could likely sell a shit-load of programming and actually see an improvement in the effectiveness of advertising as well. Hell, they could adopt the gaming model where you pre-buy "credits" and then use them to watch the shows you want. Sell X credits at $Y, or have a credits subscription on a monthly basis for a slightly discount price.

    I get the shows I when. They get money. Their advertisers get eyeballs that actually result in sales. They get stats on who likes what shows, and perhaps less good shows die.
    Everyone wins. Sounds good to me.

  138. "HBO loses billions by being from the past" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That should be the actual title of this story. Why, oh why, can't HBO sell streaming service to customers worldwide like the market obviously demands?

  139. In the UK Game of Thrones is a Sky exclusive by GauteL · · Score: 1

    It is only legally available in two forms:
    1. Sky Atlantic on Sky TV. Not available on any competing TV provider. If you're on Virgin, FreeView or whatnot, you have only option 2.
    2. Wait a year for the box sets.

  140. Jet Lagged.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead they can sell it 5$ per episode, they can make more money than Titanic by the end of the season even if quarter of the people pay....

  141. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Manip · · Score: 1

    GoT Season 2 isn't available on iTunes at all as of the time of writing. Season 1 was only added when it was released on DVD. This post is talking about pirating the currently airing season 2...

  142. Because It's Not Available Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well at least it's not available unless I pay for a Satellite Dish, Installation and take out an expensive monthly subscription for a year.

    All because Sky TV want exclusivity and I'm on a Cable subscription.

    So people are going to pirate it because unless they want to wait a year for it come to out on DVD that's the only way they will get to watch Game of Thrones.

    I would happily subscribe to HBO but because I am in the UK they don't want my money.

    Yup that's crazy isn't it, a TV company won't take my money so they force me into using other means to watch their programmes which I would happily pay for if I could.

  143. Obviously anyone outside the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And for equally obvious reasons.

    Here in Europe, we are not allowed to see the show at launch, first of all we can't take H.B.O and secondly we are not see the show on netflix or wherever it is available from legally either. One choice is to pay around $250US/Year to see it 4 weeks after on payment channels here, or we can download it via bit torrent and see it within hours of release (After all it is not aired at convinient times for us anyway)

    If you want neither of these, we can see it about 1 year after on cabel channels here...

  144. I cant get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the show, but its not avaliable where i live at all. I have a pile of cash i would be willing to spend to get at Game of Thrones but nobody to give it to. Go figure it out.

  145. Money and Numbers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am not a Neilsen Family. Whether I watch a show on free-to-air, or have a subscription to cable and HBO (which I do), however I watch a Television Show means nothing. If I download an episode of "The Big Bang Theory" because Tivo managed not to get it, so what? I'll watch Game of Thrones however I can, and with my HBO subscription I'll watch it on my Tivo... if I can. If Tivo doesn't forget.

    In the end, with a Television Show, what matters is whether I actually buy the DVDs at the end of the year. I do. On Blu-ray. I will next year as well. For a show that is dumped out on cable, like water over a damn, they have no way to measure how many people actually sit down and watch it. They have no way to measure the actual eyeballs that see the show. Neilsen Ratings be damned, as they are worthless in today's world. A Television Studio Head who pays attention to Neilsen Ratings as the only measure of whether their show is good has their head up their ass...

    But guess what? With rampant "piracy" for a Television show (free or cable) they actually have a way to measure What's Hot, and What Isn't So Much. Game of Thrones is most Pirated? That turns into "Holy Shit! We need to renew this for another season, and get those DVDs out there ASAP!" As opposed to "Eh, the crusty old Neilsen Families didn't watch it much."

    Money is what matters: Buy the DVDs. Numbers is what matters: Measure the number of downloads (if you can).

    Also, I bought all the books. George R.R. Martin owns me.. and I hope he'll finish up with the next book. :)

  146. Convenience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get the torrents because:
    1. I'm not in the US so I'd have to wait.
    2. The torrent release comes without advertisements.
    3. I can watch the torrent release when I have the time, instead of when they choose to air it.
    4. I don't like to pay for things I only watch once and then forget (and I do forget, and I don't like watching the same thing twice)

  147. I'll wait untli they are not Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and if they never make it there - whatever.. Will add to my list of "no, I never got into that show either.."

  148. Official online viewing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would help if they would release them on the internet in the first place. It's clear how many people WANT to watch them from an online source. Why are they too stupid to even attempt to capitalize on it?

  149. Pirate from Germany checking in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to wait for the shitty translation so I'd rather pirate the original. An alternative would be to wait until it is out on DVD but I am not going to wait for that.

    Yes I am a filthy pirate but I only pirate the things I want but can't get in a format I can accept.
    Same goes for games. I'll only purchase DRM free titles nowadays which means that I'll pirate the major releases.

    I would like to pay but I don't like to get fucked in the process.

  150. TV in general by Tom · · Score: 1

    The main reason is that since TV sucks so badly these days, I don't own one anymore. I have a video beamer shared between my home cinema and Wii, but no cable or other TV reception. And since you can't legally buy the episodes anywhere - there could be a webcomic link here, but by now we all know the one - piratebay it is.

    As soon as media companies understand that the Internet is the distribution system they've always dreamed about, they will see the light at the end of the tunnel. The music industry had to be forced to accept that fact, but right now, around 40% of all music sales already happen digitally. A few years from now, they will make more money on the evil Internet than through their old channels. Just like they once fought the VHS tooth and nail and today most movies make more with the DVD version than at the box office.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  151. Re:What happened to self-control? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Wow, can't avoid forums for a week? Can't do something else for a WHOLE WEEK?

    It's not a week, though is it? The show airs once per week so you have to do it all week, every week.

    --
    No sig today...
  152. Legal torrent please. by yes+it+is · · Score: 1

    Hello, Australian "Consumer" here. Never had cable tv. Previously a light user of the video rental channel. Use the BBC ABC, SBS and NPR (state broadcaster's internet streaming facilities). Now I tell you want. Find me something I'm really interested in. Charge me $5 per torrent to get my hands on a convenent, fast, legal download (and give me a choice of file size - say 250mb to 1.5gb per hour of broadcast) and I'm in. While you're there, don't stuff me around with DRM bullshit.

  153. Like alcohol during the prohibition by sirlark · · Score: 1

    Almost noone thinks it's wrong... and maybe it's time to reflect that in the laws we live by?

  154. Because I want to watch it, and keep all my money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am, because I can. No other justification is needed.

    Next up on Slashdot: which lions eat which gazelles, and why!

  155. No option for HBO by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

    I live in rural Netherlands, this means we have only CanalDigitaal satellite TV. They don't offer HBO. So I download (wich is legal) and I bought the DVD box from S1 to watch it again before starting on S2 (I can't believe I missed that much). I will do this again before I start watching S3 (buying S2 and watching it). I don't want to wait a year before I can watch S2 because my friends have seen it and I want to join the conversations. I use the only way I have to pay for it.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  156. Commercial overload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am in the UK and have Sky (the satellite TV provider here). I watched Game of Thrones Season 1 thanks to a friend's recommendation some time after it aired (and missing it) via downloads. I very much enjoyed it and greatly looked forward to the second season and started watching that on Sky Atlantic - the channel which basically airs hot new US shows. There's a 24hour delay from when it airs in the US, but I don't particularly care.

    However, the amount of commercial airtime in it is absolutely repugnant. It has not been lost on me that a 45 min show has been stretched to 1hr 15m (beyond the usual 'rounded' padding of a show to 1hr) since it is evidently a popular show. 30mins of advertising is just too much and utterly destroys the experience of watching it. We now just record it (with Sky+) and watch it an hour after airing in order to ensure we can skip past the crap, but it still takes you out of the experience. The last couple of weeks I've gone back to just downloading them.

    This is the *only* thing I've wanted to watch (I don't usually watch TV/Sky and the subscription is mostly for my wife) but frankly the shittyness of the experience has really made me question wtf I am spending my money on each month.

    1. Re:Commercial overload by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

      However, the amount of commercial airtime in it is absolutely repugnant. It has not been lost on me that a 45 min show has been stretched to 1hr 15m (beyond the usual 'rounded' padding of a show to 1hr) since it is evidently a popular show.

      Well, unless they're editing it, there's no way they could add any commercials and keep it under an hour. It is an HBO original series, which airs without advertisement interruptions. (HBO Being a premium channel, the ads they run are for their own shows, and are run between shows, not during them) With the exception of the pilot, most of the episodes run 56 minutes or so. So, really, at 1 hour 15, SKY is only adding 19 minutes of ads, which is only a touch over the normal hour padding of 15 minutes.

      --
      Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
  157. Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in germany where all TV Programs are dubbed. I *hate* it. I dislike the voices, I dislike the voice acting and some meaning gets lost in translation (especially with jokes).
    So for me it's more a problem created here in germany than a problem with HBO.
    Waiting a year for the DVD release becomes very unattractive when it is now that all your friends and colleagues watch and talk about it.

  158. Re:What's a television and an HBO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an ancient technology, still used by the elderly and the feeble-minded to obtain single-media entertainment and unsourced information in a serial, time-oriented fashion. It's the precursor to the on-demand random access entertainment and information sources we have today.

    Actually, is "television" still in use? I thought it was from the last century. Can you stop it to go peeing for example? Or re play the parts you didn't quite understood? or show subtitles in any languaje?

  159. Game of Thrones in NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have no idea if GoT is on free network TV, but if it is then it will probably be at least half a season behind the American release. We have a channel on SkyTV (our only significant paid-TV service) called SoHo which has GoT, which is more likely to be closer to the America release, but SoHo costs NZ$10 extra on top of the $45 a month for the actual SkyTV service. (HD is around an extra $10.) So the cost to those who are only interested in GoT is quite expensive.

    I don't watch it myself, but a friend of mine would always bug me to download it for him (he's not much of a downloader) as soon as could on the day it was out, so I'm thinking that timing is indeed a big thing. I remember when Heroes first came out, it took a while for it to even come out on NZ TV, so watching it online or downloading it was the ONLY way we had to see it. (This was when Heroes was still exciting.)

  160. Germany by pjlehtim · · Score: 1

    I live in Germany... Firstly, every legal source for anything is blocked here by a fascist organization called GEMA. Secondly all TV programs have German voice overs which make them unbearable to watch. Thirdly, the Game of Thrones airs here more than 6 months after the original airing in the US. So yeah. I torrent it. Then again If I had an alternative that was as easy as torrenting TV shows I'd gladly pay a reasonable fee for it. Sadly there are no legal sources.

  161. Much longer than a week in Korea by crossmr · · Score: 1

    if I only had to wait a week that'd be fine, but here in Korea the only choice is to pirate everything I want to watch. Occasionally very interesting shows do get picked up by Korean TV, but out of say all the network and cable shows out there, the amount that get picked up which aren't CSI or prison break are pretty low.
    it's always at least a year later, possibly longer.
    You've got a 1% chance you can see the show a year later at some unspecified time or I can just download what I want to watch when I want to.

  162. A different tack by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    I have a somewhat different point of view to most posters on this thread

    The HBO producers paid money to make this show. Lots of money. They probably spent more on it than you'll earn in your lifetime.
    It's their creation, they made it. They have the right to show it when, where and how they want. They have the right to use a business model you think is doomed. They have the right to charge $25/ep.

    The sense of entitlement from most posters on this thread is staggering.

  163. Ladette to lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does not explain why ladette to lady is shown at 1 am. Serious wtf considering the crap on tv at 10:30pm to 1 am.

    Good thing is that it can't be canceled, they have to make the whole season. Bad news is that hour does joe tv executive know I love this show more than a bryony loves his pony?

  164. Missed a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year it was available on iTunes .. I for one subscribed for the season .. this year it isn't .. I think the whole story is people are willing to pay $0.99 or so, they aren't willing to wait a week or play, join HBO or play other games just to watch it, so they download

  165. Re:TV Stations by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    I agree it would be a nightmare to try to simultaneously broadcast a show on all the networks everywhere at the same time. The question that comes to mind is, why exactly do we need those TV Stations again?
    Put each episode of a series up on the web, make it legally downloadable and watchable for say $1 US per episode. Make the regional ones for markets where the economy is considerably worse available with dubbing in the local language or subtitles available for a comparable amount in that economy. No TV Station required, just an internet connection and some device that can download it.
    I would rather pay $1 per week for the 2 or 3 shows I consider watchable at any point in time than shell out $50 more for a cable connection that allows me to watch reams of mindless shit that the TV stations are throwing at us - or spend another $30 per month to get the 2-3 channels that offer quality programming. Its not worth it.
    Until the Entertainment industry realizes that people might be willing to pay for things if they were offered at a very affordable rate, in a very convenient manner, and that while some people will still pirate stuff, the majority would be willing to pay quite willingly if it was convenient to them, delivered in a format that was easily accessed, and available when they want it, without ads.
    I *DO NOT* watch TV shows at all on cable. I refuse to be inundated with 5 mins of advertising every 15 mins - particularly when they have to edit the content and cut out bits to make room for it.
    Piracy will cease to be a factor of any concern, when the Entertainment industry realizes it needs to design its delivery services to reflect the customers preferences. Once its as easy to download and watch something legally (but pay a nominal fee for it) as it to download it and watch it illegally (via piracy), I bet most people will pay. As long as the Entertainment industry continues to put major obstacles and very expensive limits on the availability of the content consumers want to watch, piracy will thrive, because a lot of people don't think its a big deal to download something.
    I think we are at the point where TV Stations are an anachronism we could do without. I wouldn't miss any of them for even a second. I get all my entertainment online and most of my TV content from Netflix.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  166. Oh yeah I can do this by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    Why would I?

    Just as not offend the copyright holder? I don't give a fuck about copyright holders. So why would I?

    1. Re:Oh yeah I can do this by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      This really is the best answer. The fact is, there is absolutely no reason for the public to give a shit. As for the "stealing" argument, well, I have a hard time feeling bad stealing from the MAFIAA, who themselves are thieves on a global scale.

  167. Not buying anything with DRM by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    Ever. Besides I can't even watch anything with DRM, except on my iPad.

  168. Going to be waiting anyway... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    You're all going to end up waiting at the end because the author has never written an end to the story.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  169. It's the delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most TV shows round here come out on DVD about 15 minutes after the final episode of the show is broadcast.
    If that was the case for GoT I wouldn't even think about 'Pirating' it.
    Instead they chose to leave it a year. So I download it, watch it, buy the DVD as soon as I am able.

    Net loss of income to anyone involved? Not. One. Penny.

  170. Re:A week? More like months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Sweden many shows are 6 month after the US, as I mostly watch series with good plots and where you often want to know what happens next, its really hard to not get the next episode from the net, and the next... until I'm in sync with the US schedule.

    At the same time I can't get streaming shows in Sweden as its always blocked here.

    Another thing is the commercials, a episode without commercials and without the recap and intro is usually around 40 min, but on TV with all these crap its 60 min. So why should I waste my time on commercials? I really can't stand commercials except the time wasted it also disrupts the episode. I rather pay extra to skip them, but the cost should be in line with what the channels get for one person looking at the commercials during one hour!

    Also for shows that run on the standard channels, eg do not require an extra fee, the show is financed by commercials and its legal to record the show and then skip the commercial, but to download it from the net is...

  171. I "pirate" Game of Thrones by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    ...by going to my friend's to watch it. I don't have cable TV. But I do like the show. I'm sure there's someone in the entertainment industry who considers that a form of piracy.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  172. Mostly coal & iron ore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which we then subsequently import back as value-added products for 1,000 times the price per tonne.

    The reason we can get away with this, of course, is that we only re-import a tiny fraction of what we export.

    Well.

    Of what the multinational corporations who are pillaging our natural resources export, while paying a pittance in taxes & fees, and whinging about how expensive it is to mine ores in Australia.

    You know, that place where they were highly-profitable mines a decade ago, when iron ore fetched about a tenth of what it does today...

  173. If HBO provided a version with Ads by Danathar · · Score: 1

    Sure, many people would still get the ripped version, but I'd bet a large amount of people if they COULD GET a legitimate copy even with some ads in the video stream would.

    Of course, how you have ads that cover everybody worldwide is another story. I suppose if it were for something like Coke that would be easy since it's sold everywhere.

  174. Many reasons by captainpanic · · Score: 1

    1. The show is addictive. That's why I can't wait a whole week. I'll watch it as soon as it's available anywhere
    2. It might be broadcast when I am not available (I don't know actually)
    3. Downloading / streaming a movie/series is not against the law where I live.

  175. Paying *and* downloading by timftbf · · Score: 1

    I have a Sky subscription. I already pay for Sky Atlantic (which shows Game of Thrones and a bunch of other HBO stuff).

    If I've missed something because of a clash on the DVR (can only record two channels simultaneously), or fat-fingered deleting the episode I've just watched *and* the next one, or simply didn't know I wanted to watch a series until a few episodes in, or ran out of space on the DVR, damn right I'll torrent it.

    As far as I'm concerned, morally if not legally, anything that's previously been broadcast to me, on a channel I have an active, paid subscription for is fair game. It's effectively getting someone else to do my time-shifting for me.

  176. It's mostly non-english speaking countries by loufoque · · Score: 2

    One week late in Australia? That's nothing.

    In most European countries, american TV shows are usually at least two seasons behind, and we have to suffer a low-quality dub (except in nordic countries, where people have been educated to subtitles). Downloading, and fan translation and subbing, are the only reasonable ways for people to enjoy such series to their fullest.

  177. ask the television, cable, and satellite companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not ask the television, cable, and satellite companies why they can't offer their services world wide in a global economy?
    They will tell you that they can't infringe upon the rights of different countries!

  178. Somewhat tempted myself and I'm an HBO subscriber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very recently, I started subscribing to HBO. Actually, very recently I started subscribing to pay cable. Yeah, I understand all of the criticism that comes from that decision, but this isn't about that. What it is about is that I really liked the first season of GoT (paid for the dvd set when it released). I really want to watch the second season, but all I've been able to discover since I subscribed is the most recent episodes that are airing (meaning from this date forward). There is no way to go back and get the older episodes, so the only way I have to watch this show is to start in the middle of the season legally, or I can illegally grab the already aired programs and THEN watch the ones that air legally. Unfortunately, I can't find a place that actually lets me watch the shows. I can't use HBO Go because my cable provider isn't one of the "approved" ones for that channel, so even though I pay full price for HBO, I'm still not able to access the backlog of shows they air. Basically, they've made it very difficult for people who actually paying for the content. Now, granted, I probably won't bit torrent, mainly because I'd rather not risk viruses and all that trying to figure it out, but I can easily see why someone might.

  179. Germany by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

    I don't know why Australia is the example here, it sounds like things have improved drastically. I used to live in New Zealand and it wasn't uncommon to wait 6 months for a tv show to air. I now live in Germany. Normally shows are only given to the German dubbing teams on release so it takes a month when they really rush it, and over half a year in many cases. Then I have to find out what channel it is on, and watch it on my tiny little tv interspersed with ads and in German, at some very specific point in time several months from now, assuming I am home and not busy that night. Or I could watch it with the original actors voices in the original language ad free right now streamed on the internet. Of course as I am not a criminal I will not be doing that, but those are my options.

  180. HBO is inconvenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a subscription to HBO... it's inconvenient to watch it on tv for me since I'm not around a tv set much and to watch it online is an unholy pain in the ass. I torrent it because its easy and there are no barriers to get in my way..I can watch at my leisure with the video application of my liking :P) I will continue to pay for HBO as long as game of thrones is on, and i will continue to torrent it as my distribution means; so even if that's not technically legal my conscious is clear.

  181. Cable Co. & HBO cause this problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now I pay $45/mo for my internet service and get basic (and I mean REALLY basic) cable bundled with that. If I want to upgrade from there, I have to first switch to digital cable (tv) then add an HBO subscription -- so you're talking another $50-$75 a month just so I can watch ten episodes of one show. Sorry, I'm not going to do that for Game of Thrones any more than I would for Robot Chicken.

    To be fair, I did look all over the place for a way to purchase a subscription to the show itself or even to HBO without having to upgrade my whole cable subscription. There is nothing. Now, a year later, I can get the first season -- but sorry, it's too late; I "solved" the problem long ago.

  182. I can't get it otherwise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in the uk Game of thrones is shown on the Sky Atlantic channel. The only way to see that channel is if your tv supplier is SkyTV, who have around 10 million subscribers nationally. My tv and internet supplier is virginmedia, and so the channel is not available to me.

    I repeat: no season of Game of Thrones has been broadcast to non-sky customers. The only way for us to see GOT would be to change our supplier, and that's not always possible (sky uses a satellite receiver, building regs disallow those in many areas). It's a physical lock out.

    So, I download it, because otherwise I wouldn't have the opportunity to even see series 1, never mind series 2.

  183. Those shows still get adverts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just that now you can see nobody is watching rather than just assume everybody is.

    But you still have 100% of the adverts being watched 100% as many times as before.

    So how will proper itemised purchasing cause "some shows might now generate absolutely no revenue"?

  184. television packages suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm American. I download GOT after I watch Mad Men. I will not pay for an overpriced channel package by 1 of 4 of the cable service providers in my state, nor will I pay for the entire HBO catalog. HBO and the like, need to get with the times and allow people to pay for the shows they want to watch with various tier prices...on their website.

  185. Not pirating it is pretty easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already get my internet from the cable provider, and TV + HBO only cost me $5 / mo more (via a promo). I can justify the extra $5 to watch the show legally.

  186. Interpol by tepples · · Score: 1

    The FBI doesn't have jurisdiction in the Netherlands

    A lot of discs come with an Interpol warning as well. What industrialized country isn't an Interpol member state?

  187. Who is saying "rank and file"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vast majority of people involved in TV/film production DO NOT get anything other than the salary they get whether the product is sold or not. Those who benefit from high sales are NOT THOSE PEOPLE.

    The ones hurt by it are mostly not those people too. Even with rampant easy piracy, you can still make a profit better than the ROI off saving in a bank or betting on the stock market, therefore you will still put your money there, just with a lower ROI. And that means you STILL need gaffers, second boy, tea lady, et al.

  188. Jam for the little guy. by lexsird · · Score: 1

    They say it's intelligent to leave some jam on the bottom shelf for the little guy. I think it's right.

    I would venture it's poor people who have Internet access, yet can't afford pricey cable and HBO fees. They wouldn't be buying it anyway, so there is no real loss other than your poor get a bit of "culture" (yes, let's laugh together at that one) and entertainment for free. Is that such a bad thing? Let us consider what happens if that door gets slammed on their fingers.

    First it really lets them know how much of a gap there is in their lives and what little there is to do about it. They are poor, and such things as "Game of Thrones" should be beyond them. How dare they peak into where their kind can't afford? Just another little "fuck you" waved in their faces. So, instead of looking the other way when they are peaking, lets slam the door in their faces and break their little fingers.

    Let them get pissed and down load bomb making instructions instead, after all, if we are going to force them to dream, lets make them dream big. Instead of watching some damned TV show and going to sleep that night on their empty stomachs, with a dream in their heads to satisfy them, lets jar them out of their dream worlds and into the hard reality of just how pathetic and fucked their worthless lives are.

    By all means, lets keep fucking with the poor until they have nothing left to lose and we have it all. That always works out so well, it helps everything run so damn smoothly and we get to run headlong into progress, impeded only by mass eruptions of anarchy. There is an old saying amongst the old draconian powers; "When wringing the blood from the peasants, make sure none of your own spills." Let's not defeat the wonderful purpose of our modern "bread and circuses", by pricing it out of the hands of those it was meant to placate nor break the mechanism for it's delivery. It's so wonderful, they actually feel like they are "stealing" something and it's actually less than air, it's all an illusion via the magic of 1s and 0s. They are satisfied and their knives aren't at our throats, lets take a solid win and let sleeping dogs lie.

     

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  189. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by blueg3 · · Score: 1

    In the US, iTunes is Season 1 only. It was only made available when the Season 1 DVDs came out.

  190. Before you pirate this show by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    Ask yourself this question. WWJLD? (What would Jamie Lannister do)

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  191. Other channels owned by Time Warner by tepples · · Score: 1

    Yes, and the owner of HBO probably wants you to buy TNT, TBS, TCM, CNN, HLN, truTV, Cartoon Network, and the rest of the Turner package before being allowed to buy HBO.

  192. personally... by spitzig · · Score: 1

    For a while, I paid for cable, while gradually watching more shows from torrents. It was easier to control what I watch. This included very old shows and current ones. Some copied from VHS, some from digital sources.

    I never cared about watching shows NOW, but did consider it a minor benefit that I got to watch the new Battlestar Galactica before my friends in the US-if I recall correctly, it was broadcast in Australia first. But, for me, it just came up on my list of shows to watch.

    At one point, I moved to another apartment. I didn't really see the point in paying for cable anymore.

  193. A week? Evolution:0 Gratification:1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're losing our evolutionary advantage to sitting in tall grasses for long periods of time, waiting for prey.

  194. More expensive first copy by tepples · · Score: 1

    Stop using scarcity with something that is an unlimited resource.

    Acting, writing, and directing are not an unlimited resource. If the first copy is several orders of magnitude more expensive than subsequent copies, how do you recommend funding the manufacture of the first copy?

  195. Streaming is the answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if these brilliant channels got into online streaming it wouldnt be pirated...they just have to allow global streaming not restrict to to USA only. Other TV stations got the clue and now stream their shows.

  196. I'd pay for JUST an HBO subscription by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    "The fact that the show is only available to those who pay for an HBO subscription doesn't help either."

    It's worse than that. An HBO subscription is only available with a cable subscription. That generally comes with a cable box subscription. That generally comes with an upsell for the DVR version. That generally comes with another upsell for an HD compatible box and HD DVR. All conveniently priced such that, after the initial outlay for the basic service, you'd be stupid not to add these very small and reasonable charges on top.

    I'll happily pay HBO or Showtime's monthly fees for access to their HBO Go and Showtime Anywhere services. But I can't without paying another ~$60/month for a cable service I don't want.

    Game of Thrones, Californication, True Blood, Dexter, they're all great shows. But they're not worth an additional three quarters of a grand a year on top of HBO and Showtime's subscriptions just to be allowed access to pay for those subscriptions.

  197. Bread and Circuses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rome is burning.

    Mind-warping entertainment is going to be easily available for as long as there is a corrupt state. It's just TOO useful and effective for controlling the masses.

    If they can charge a bit for it, then fine, but you can count on it being easily available even if you're not paying a penny for it. In fact, it's really hard to *avoid* the stuff if you are so inclined.

    There are only two ways we would ever find ourselves without TV/movies.

    1) After some kind of apocalypse, (likely brought about because we were all too distracted by TV to turn off the gas).

    2) After they find an even *better* way to keep us docile and stupid.

  198. Back to Pirate Bay for me by DerangedAlchemist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Excitedly rush to iTunes to buy Game of Thrones Season 2 - I didn't know I could buy it!

    2. Discover AC is a lying, prick.

    3. Return to paying criminals who actually know how to provide a service

    I would love to be able to vote with my wallet. I see that's not possible through legal means, at least where I live. I hereby declare my downloads to represent a lost sale caused entirely by being unable to give money for the product I want.

    1. Re:Back to Pirate Bay for me by chrismcb · · Score: 0

      The general consensus on Slashdot is "piracy doesn't cost the owners money, because people typically won't buy it anyways, or people learn about new things, and then maybe buy them." But reading this thread seems to prove that the MPAA and RIAA are correct. Piracy is costing Game of Thrones a LOT of money. The sad thing is, a lot of people who do pirate this series, know it is wrong, illegal, and could potentially kill the series.
      But really, people are just as greedy as they claim the MPAA and RIAA are, and they don't care. They just want their Game of Thrones free.

    2. Re:Back to Pirate Bay for me by Aethelred+Unread · · Score: 0

      You can vote with your wallet! Join ImmortalSeed or another private torrent site and donate! The private sites provide a very good service for donations. You're just voting for "Criminals" is all. Actually, lets take a page from Reagan; Torrent users are "Freedom Fighters."

  199. That reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to go and download last nights episode...thanks Slashdot

  200. Either iTunes doesn't work or I'm an idiot by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    People keep saying it's for sale on iTunes. That's exciting! There's just one little problem...

    Putting aside the season 1 vs 2 issue, here is the link Google gave me for Season 1: GoT Season 1. If anyone has a better link, please share it. Let's bend over backward trying to find an alternative to piracy, looking at the publisher's efforts in the very best light, with the assumption that there's no dishonesty and that they are actually willing to sell what people want.

    The above link takes me to a page that describes season 1, but is prefaced by an ad for some application software called iTunes (wait, is "iTunes" a store or an application?). Pretty much every link on the page turns out to take me to a page that tells me to get this application, except of course it hasn't actually been ported to anything except two OSes, neither of which is what I use.

    How important that is, though, I'm not sure. So far, I have not found a link to a page I fill out some web form to arrange payment and they'll then let me download a file (which I assume would work in mplayer (ideally) or vlc or something). That doesn't mean the web page doesn't exist, merely that google and bing and wikipedia and hbo.com's own pages don't know about this link yet, so I don't know it either. Does anyone have it? Just because I can't find it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Maybe I'm an idiot.

    I'll consider the publishing of this link to be HBO's Open For Business sign, even if they are trying to hide it. I know lots of businesses with truly shitty marketing, which are nevertheless intended as for-profit businesses. How an entertainment company could be one of them, I don't know, but that's beside the point. Maybe they just need our help. Anyone got the link?

    Has anyone bought the GoT files from Apple without having to use a special client? How did you do it? Got an URL?

    Some people have mentioned Amazon, but all I have found over there (so far!) is a shitty Flash streaming service.

    This particular defect in Amazon may be totally irrelevant, of course. Amazon does, in fact, sell music in a variety of ways that work excellently and require no bizarre player or client. They sell CDs, every one of which has been compatible with cdparanoia, and they also sell downloadable mp3s (which aren't what I prefer, but are good enough). I just can't find where the sell the video files, though. (And the Blu-Ray discs they sell have DRM, so it's illegal to read them, in addition to being a pain in the ass. So please, let's not talk about Blu-Ray discs until that tech becomes ready.)

    Has anyone bought the GoT files from Amazon without having to use a special client? How did you do it? Got an URL?

    It all sounds so promising, as though HBO were really open for business. But either they keep failing to close the deal, or I'm too dumb to see where they do it, or somewhere in the middle where we're just not communicating. What's going on?

    On thing's for sure, though: the premise where we look at HBO in the best light and assume they are honestly trying to sell the product, does require they are at least up to mid-1990s tech for their store. Somewhere there's gotta be a page where I can give payment info (whether it's credit card info or what .. maybe HBO is too smalltime so they only take paypal, and if so, that's acceptable for now, and maybe they can their little startup out of the garage over the next year) and they will let me download the file. The post I'm replying to comes close to implying this is possible, but stops short of actually saying it, fading into weird terminology ("open iTunes"). Surely someone is about to give me the huge enlightenment+smackdown by posting the mystery URL.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  201. Re:What happened to self-control? by DerangedAlchemist · · Score: 1

    Wow, can't avoid forums for a week? Can't do something else for a WHOLE WEEK? It must be somebody else's fault! You can get books 1-4 as a set for $20 right now ($10 second hand on ebay). Who needs to wait hours for one single episode when you can read at your leisure any time?

    You want my impulse buy money? No? Well then STFU.

  202. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you chose to mock however, isn't a problem for us. It's an ex-problem. We solved it with downloading the damn shows.

    The media companies have the 'problem' - or so they say.

    Speaking of self-control, have you ever considered applying any and not trolling folk irrelevant crap?

  203. Because no money for an HBO subscription [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because no money for an HBO subscription [nt]

  204. Get more done: Watch at double speed! by donaldh · · Score: 1

    I have lot's of interests, but little time to indulge them all.
    A while back I discovered I could watch series and movies at 1.5x speed, with sound(!), on my PS3 and even faster using the VLC media player (on my Mac). Once you're used to the 'faster' sound, you hardly notice the difference (or at least I don't).

    Regular TV does not offer me the option for faster playback, so for me downloading is the only option even if I could watch the slow show through 'legal channels'.

  205. Cable Television, a subscription to HBO by krischik · · Score: 1

    or a HBO equivalent which you might not get for less no money in some countries. Not even on Satellite.

  206. Spoilers and other crap.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So i like the show... I don't like to get spoilers before i watch it...

    If i want to watch it here in Sweden i have to wait ~1 year before it gets shown... So the only way i can enjoy it is to pirate it... I would love the option of being able to buy it for a reasonable price..... I would love to not having to resort to things that are considered illegal...

    Another thing about shows here in Sweden is that it's never sure that the show will actually find it's way here... So i have 2 options..
    1. Wait 1-3 years and not being sure if it will ever get here and then maybe be able to buy it..
    2. Download it a few days after release and enjoy it without commercials and spoilers..

    I would be more than happy to pay say $10-15 per month to view all the shows i like without commercials..... But i want it less than 2 weeks delay from being first aired.. I watch around 5-10 shows per week depending on the time of year with all those season-breaks etc... So on average maybe 4-6 shows per week.. Ie ~$2.5 per episode... But what i do want is some extras like 4 free episodes on each series so i can decide if i actually like the series and i do want them in a format i can use on whatever playback device i want to use... No crappy DRM and/or web-browser only crap..
    What i would prefer would actually not to be a per episode pricing, but a view all you want for X amount because then i have the possibility to view whatever i would like... new or old series, it's all there without the need to buy each episode... See Spotify as an example... perfect layout..

  207. Because: HBO Go XBOX Requires a Cable Subscription by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to use the HBO Go, but they require that you subscribe to an entire cable package of garbage, for a least $45/month, not counting the $15/month charge, for HBO.

  208. Unfair licensing and distribution policies. by Gel214th · · Score: 1

    Download the episodes and watch them all at once, back to back?

    Others will not be able to afford Cable, may have to wait to view the current episode, or have no digital availability in "your region" etc.

    Make these shows available worldwide, at the same time digitally and otherwise and piracy will drop.

    Or at any rate, those that pirate will not have been customers able or willing to purchase in the first place.

    I'd love to know what countries pirate game of thrones the most, whether it is the United States, or countries outside the US.

    What the MPAA and the Networks have yet to explain is why:

    A) I pay as much or More for my cable television living outside the US?

    B) The US Channels including HBO, Showtime (simply not available), Starz, Discovery, National Geographic and educational channels show premium recent shows and the channels I get outside the United States show older series and movies?

    C) Why I speak English yet I am lumped in Latin America where many shows are in Spanish with no subtitles, and foreign language films are unwatchable because there are no subtitles.

    D) My Cable companies publicised that they tried to negotiate with US firms to allow them to show the US Feeds and were told that they simply were not available outside the US, fullstop. Pay a million, pay 40 million...they aren't available, take this content which we package for you because we have already shown it to our own people.

    E) Why does Netflix Latin America lack over 25,000 movies and series titles that are available on Netflix USA, but I pay the same subscription fee?

    F) Why is the content on Hulu not available worldwide?

    G) Why can I pay 800USD for an iPhone, 250USD for a Kindle Fire, and 800USD for an iPad but I can't purchase the latest apps or add my credit card to the iTunes store because I do not live in the United States?

    H) Why can I purchase a Kindle Touch but cannot purchase over 30,000 books because I am not a US citizen? Why when the Kindle was first available was I paying a dollar more for every book purchase from Amazon?

    I) Why are unabridged DVD and BluRay collections in some cases available only in the United States? Why is Amazon prevented from shipping them outside the US?

    I'd love a follow up question to the so called "authorities" as to why Foreigners are made to pay more for substandard services and products (in my view, showing old movies at current prices is a scam) and this is not considered a violation of Trade agreements. Under WTO agreements you cannot sell a higher quality product to your own citizens and create an inferior product for export (and especially not at the same price).

    Answer those questions, and then we can start talking about why non-US citizens (i.e. the other 6.7 BILLION people in the world) may pirate content when they may be able to afford the products.

    Secondly, take a look at this Oatmeal comic which brings the point home as well: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/game_of_thrones

    Sorry, no sympathy for an industry that made record breaking profits last year while crying about how much money it was losing, and doing its best in my view to racketeer profits from overseas markets through an opaque system of IP licensing and distribution.

    --
    -Gel214th
  209. impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think there currently even is a legal way to watch the show in my country. I watch the pirate version now and purchase the Blu-Ray when it becomes available.

  210. Re: Women and violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True in general, but a surprising number of women I've met enjoyed "300".

  211. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do you need this explained to you?

    A) HBO is a premium channel. People do not want to pay for a premium channel to watch a show 12 weeks of the year and hope something else might come on that makes it worth it.

    B) People have lives. We do not like being tethered to our TV on the night an episode airs.

  212. Another reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of television pirating occurs for additional reasons to the two I mentioned above.

    C) Shows either take forever to be released in different markets, or, the manner and time frame in which they are released, or the pricing model is terrible. Example:

    Lost blu-ray: 200 dollars. BSG blu-ray: 200 dollars (prices are lower right now because of sales). ST Voyager DVD boxset: 100 ish dollars, same with all box sets. This is on top of the fact that you have to wait absolutely forever and then you have the pleasure of them releasing multiple versions of box sets. It's not that people don't want to purchase the physical item, they do.

  213. TPB by abassim · · Score: 1

    Viv La Piratebay

  214. Got busted by my ISP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ISP is Timewarner. They were able to tell the exact file and time I downloaded from Torrent Freak. I was sent a strongly worded letter which said I would be banned from my ISP if I coninued downloading their content from the torrent site. I guess I'll be waiting until next year to get season 2 of GOT. I too face a 50-60 a month increase if I want to upgrade to an HBO level cable subscription.

  215. Re:What happened to self-control? by Elldallan · · Score: 1

    What for? When the episode is readily available worldwide a few hours after airing in the US there is no point to regional sub-forums etc.

    It is not the viewers that needs to adapt to the corporate overlords, it is the corporations that needs to adapt to their customers if they still want to have a market, if they don't the viewers will find alternate routes as is readily apparent by this discussion.

  216. Game Of Thrones Piracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine- who gets HBO- often pirates it (Game of Thrones) - he has a DVR on one TV- but not in the bedroom- where he likes to watch it to keep the nudity away from the kids. Another DVR will cost him- forget- but certainly not free-

    Its just easier to Bit torrent the damn thing.

    I used to pirate Doctor Who when it took weeks or months to get to the US- but now that its on BBC America at the same time (well- baring the Earth's rotation) - I just watch it on my set.

  217. Re:What's a television and an HBO? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

    It's an ancient technology, still used by the elderly

    We just had this discussion in a meeting at work today, when the "old folks" were the only ones who had cable. The main reason I have cable is for ESPN (and for the handful of network shows, that the networks don't show online)
    There really isn't a good (HD) option for watching sports, but ESPN (and the other sports networks). Now I know a some people thing that sports are stupid, (and those same people probably spends lots of time and money play World of Warcraft, so...) But that isn't relevant, as we all have different tastes in entertainment

  218. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by acooks · · Score: 1

    iTunes is 2 Episodes behind.

  219. How about one year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, you are upset about one week delay?
    How about one year?
    Game of thrones as just appeared in the Portuguese/EU this year, and it was like 2 months ago..
    And you better have cable/sat tv or you wont see anything in the free tv channels!

  220. it works better than the offical channels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an HBO subscription, I live in the US, I can stream right from HBO. A few weeks ago I missed an episode and decided to watch it on my laptop at work. The problem I ran into was my cell phone had limited download speed and couldn't watch it in HD on HBO's website. If I tried it would just load and pause, load and pause. So went to a torrent site set it up to download and watched it in HD when it was done with no lag.

  221. Availability by zodwallopp · · Score: 1

    It's all about availability, I don't have HBO or cable television so I have to either wait for DVDs or Netflix. I don't see why I have to pay a cable provider for 100 different channels I have no interest in when I want to watch a handful of shows. The industry has to start thinking about individually packaging and selling series like this instead of forcing you to buy into everything at once. If HBO or Showcase had their own streaming service, like Netflix or Hulu, I'd signup in heartbeat.

  222. You are an idiot by Snaller · · Score: 1

    The people who make this could make money NOW if they wanted to. They don't want to. Then they lose it.

    People want it know - just because you are so layabout who can't be bothered to take part in the world doesn't mean you matter , you are a tiny minority.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  223. Re:Pure FUD. Available on iTunes by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Funny, I just checked itunes and it sells for 3.99 per episode. But only for season 1, so if you want to see season 2 you are apparently out of luck. Oh look latest episode in hidef and I can download it in a couple of minutes. Thank you pirate bay!

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  224. Re:What happened to self-control? by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

    Since the word "fan" in the context of enjoying something a lot is a shortened version of the word fanatic, I would say he's describing pretty much the same thing.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  225. delay schmeelay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most people that download (pirate) original programming found on premium (subscription) networks is because they're too fucking cheap to pay for the necessary service(s) (here, a few hrs from chicago, it's a minimum of $75 monthly* to get hbo/max/sho/starz via cable) to watch them legitimately.. or are not only too cheap but also too impatient to wait and pay for the whole-season dvd releases when they become available.

    * $25 basic cable, $5 digital receiver, $15 per premium (hbo+max | sho+tmc | starz+enc)

  226. Lost killed it for me. Now I pirate by Builder · · Score: 1

    I remember back when I was watching Lost. This was the last show that I watched on broadcast TV when I had friends and colleagues in the US watching it. We were a few days behind the US for most episodes. After a specific episode, one of the non-media related websites I read had a headline to the effect of "Why Charlie had to die in the season finale of Lost". This wasn't a TV news site, and it was a headline, not a line in a story. It was almost impossible to miss.

    The writers / creators of that show put some (debatable!) amount of effort into creating a story and telling that story, but due to their US centric view of broadcasting, it was ruined for thousands of people around the world.

  227. HBO has failed to collect my money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bought all the books. read them 3 times through. then bought all the audio books. i'm a fan, and i think i'm pretty supportive.

    but i'm not going to get cable/satellite for 1 show. and i'm certainly not paying HBO another $35 a month on top of that, just for 1 show. i call them all the time to offer them money. just to let them know i still have dollars i want to give them, if only they'd let me watch the one and only TV show i want to watch. but they always say no. i have absolutely no interest in anything else on TV, cable, or whatever other crap HBO is showing these days. i just want my Game of Thrones, and i don't want to wait a year for it.

    also, it is not available online where i live for money. i'd pay any reasonable price. but it IS available online for free.

    HBO has failed to collect my money. maybe i'm justifying things? but i see this as HBO's fail.

  228. I would if I could ... by choke · · Score: 1

    I don't have TV, at all. I don't have cable even less so. I think this series is brilliant, but to watch it I have to find a friend who has cable and be there when it airs.

    In a world with such ubiquitous connectivity and an already existing HBO-GO infrastructure, as well as netflix streaming and whatnot - it's flatly stupid that I can't pay for these episodes and watch them - which I would gladly do.

    I want to support this kind of thing being made but I have no way to do that.

    --
    "No good deed goes unpunished"
  229. What I've Been Pondering by PerfectionLost · · Score: 1

    It would cost me an addition $30 a month to get HBO added to my cable/internet conbo, via the various packages. That works out to roughly 8 bucks a show, considering 4 shows a month. How much would I be willing to pay for HBOgo? Netflix is ~8. Would I pay $15? Or is the real value of HBO $30/mo?

    What would you pay for HBOgo if you could buy it directly?

  230. WHAT?! (Re:A week?) by Garwulf · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, but what planet are you living on? I live in Canada too, and unless you're living in the Arctic circle, there is no way these figures are right.

    Here are the rough costs in Eastern Ontario, to do what you want, assuming you have a television set but don't have the receiver or cable service.

    1. Purchase a cable or satellite system package (fees vary) - around $50/month
    2. Select a package with HBO - around $10-15/month
    3. Rent or buy a receiver with DVR abilities (about $15-20/month for rental, about $350 for purchase)
    4. If you want HD, get HD - around $10 per month.

    You would NOT have to spend close to a thousand dollars to watch Game of Thrones. In fact, if you rented instead of purchased (which with a lot of the DVR receivers is the better way to go due to a lot of them being on the flakey side), you could do it for as little as $110 per month.

    Seriously, dude, I own an HD receiver (non-DVR), and I get cable and HBO, and I'm paying less than $100 per month - and drowning in on-demand while I'm at it (which, by the way, each episode of Game of Thrones is available on about two days after its first airing).

    --
    Robert B. Marks
    Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
  231. Bypass Major networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let the little studios sell direct streams to the customer, they'd probably profit more once they make a good show... im suprised i havnt bumped into it yet... oh well.. i seen the future. call me a prophet.. or profit.. :p

  232. Android Developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such a good one. I’d like to read a bit more concerning this matter. good luck to you guys.

    Thank you to
    http://www.daffodilsw.com/android-application-development

  233. Re:It is not the itnernet which sucks outside the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the problem is not just release staggering for some products. It's just plain rip-off the foreigners.

    Example: I'm in europe. When Windows 7 was released I liked it enough to buy a copy. The following prices are for the Pro version back then:
    Buy it on a US site like Amazon US for $200,- but they will not ship outside US (there's the zoning again!). $200,- was about euro 140,- back then
    Buy it on any european site for euro 300,-, no less.

    Right. So I asked around for a couple of weeks and found a friend traveling to the US and you can guess the rest.

    Hey America, it's not like we here in Europe earn twice the wages you know.

  234. HBO is the Joffrey of TV. by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

    I'm an american living abroad and I buy everything I watch through my US iTunes account except Game of Thrones. Why? Because we get every HBO show months or years later. In the meantime, everyone at work has already seen it. I did finally buy Season 1 on iTunes, but that was well after I watched it.

  235. An idea: Don't watch the damn show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't watch the damn shows. Fuck pop cultural. Yes, it might be a great show but there are so many more important things that need to be discussed. Don't watch it on HBO, don't discuss it, and don't pirate it. When their ratings drop to 0 and when they have no more income they will listen. Companies only listen to one thing YOUR WALLET. Vote with your fucking wallet.

  236. Re:What happened to self-control? by causality · · Score: 1

    That's not love, that's marketing.

    Absolutely. The difference is simple, too: it's marketing if you "love" something that cannot love you back.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  237. Re:What happened to self-control? by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'd pay good money to see dominoes thrown at cats (as long I didn't have to wait a week to see it)

    --
    while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();