3D cards aren't needed for movies...it's all CPU. Pixar will port Renderman to whatever they need to. I'm sure Pixar's contract has a way out...all contracts do...if you know how to find it.
"Multiple versions of the same library could be installed with the same filename simultaneously. An application would see the correct versions of the things it needs, and it would see only the things it needs, despite what else might be installed."
Didn't.NET Assemblies promise something like this?
No voting unless you pay taxes. Shareholders pay money for a share in the company and get to vote on the leadership...taxpayers are like the shareholders in the government. Why should non-shareholders get to control things?
Interesting points..the only time I've ever seen a port 25 block was for my ISP...and it seems like they did the exact OPPOSITE of what they claimed. (They only seemed to muck up access to their servers instead of general SMTP traffic- installing a localhost SMTP to send mail out directly got outgoing e-mail to work again)
The Unicode-enabled version is due out in beta soon...they basically rewrote the Pro version *again.* (They did it when pro first came out...and now again, so give them some leeway.)
Why exactly do we *need* OUTGOING SMTP servers? WHy can't mail clients pull the MX record for the destination domain on their own and just send it straight there? They already use SMTP to communicate with the outgoing server now...so just have them call the receiving server directly. This would mean that SMTP servers could just accept e-mail...there wouldn't be any need for them to send outgoing mail. Instead of hijacking open relays, spammers would need huge-ass pipes because they'd be stuck sending the mail themselves.
I thought Hotmail supposedly had a McAfee thing going...for the *longest* time, Hotmail seemed to say "This e-mail scanned with McAfee..." (then I started using OE to get in to Hotmail).
Slashdot Mirror
This is Slashdot...we could all just probably eat an old CPU or two if we need silicon
(yes, I know there's other crap in a CPU...but it's a joke =P)
Haven't you ever heard of the concept of civil disobedience?
I take it you've never seen the size of the freaking heatsink on an Octane's CPU. I have...it's HUGE.
3D cards aren't needed for movies...it's all CPU.
Pixar will port Renderman to whatever they need to.
I'm sure Pixar's contract has a way out...all contracts do...if you know how to find it.
No one knows what SCO is disputing...SCO won't tell anyone.
"Yes, I'd like to restrict voting to the people who actually pay taxes"
Agreed.
Chances are you can nerf the 2 second gap with your burner software. I know I've seen the option, but it's been so long since I burned an audio CD.
"and are based on the same principle as hyperspace engines and gravity plating."
You mean the "made up for the storyline" principle?
"Multiple versions of the same library could be installed with the same filename simultaneously. An application would see the correct versions of the things it needs, and it would see only the things it needs, despite what else might be installed."
.NET Assemblies promise something like this?
Didn't
Power over IP: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3251.html
The closest you're gonna get is Vendetta. http://vendetta.guildsoftware.com
OS X AND Linux clients fully supported! And it's free for now (now being the indefinite foreseeable future - the game is nowhere near done)
Note: I am not a dev...just a Vendetta player.
Check Linksys's products page...they have a LOT of stuff.
No voting unless you pay taxes.
Shareholders pay money for a share in the company and get to vote on the leadership...taxpayers are like the shareholders in the government. Why should non-shareholders get to control things?
"Opteration" - are you a closet AMD supporter? =P
But you'll pay more too.
Wait...so "online ebonics" != 1337?
7|-|47 15 50 |\|07 1337!!!!!1!!!!!!1!!!!!1!!111!!
7|-|47 5|_|>0|2z!!!
"Web and file browser in one."
Didn't a company in Redmond, WA try this already?
alpha AXP...1992, I think
Do you have your DNA copyrighted?
Knoppix's home page does have a link to source somewhere...I saw it once.
Interesting points..the only time I've ever seen a port 25 block was for my ISP...and it seems like they did the exact OPPOSITE of what they claimed. (They only seemed to muck up access to their servers instead of general SMTP traffic- installing a localhost SMTP to send mail out directly got outgoing e-mail to work again)
The Unicode-enabled version is due out in beta soon...they basically rewrote the Pro version *again.* (They did it when pro first came out...and now again, so give them some leeway.)
Why exactly do we *need* OUTGOING SMTP servers? WHy can't mail clients pull the MX record for the destination domain on their own and just send it straight there? They already use SMTP to communicate with the outgoing server now...so just have them call the receiving server directly. This would mean that SMTP servers could just accept e-mail...there wouldn't be any need for them to send outgoing mail. Instead of hijacking open relays, spammers would need huge-ass pipes because they'd be stuck sending the mail themselves.
Cisco flaming wall of poop? You use RFC1149 wireless stuff from Cisco?
I thought Hotmail supposedly had a McAfee thing going...for the *longest* time, Hotmail seemed to say "This e-mail scanned with McAfee..." (then I started using OE to get in to Hotmail).