Slashdot Mirror


Beer Added To The Food Pyramid

Alehound writes " Beer Is Food: The US Government labeled beer(alcohol) as a drug, BeerAdvocate.com begs to differ as they inform their reader that beer can be a part of your diet in a healthy way. Beer does a body good? So the "Beer Gut" is a myth? So why the hell do I have a gut? And yes these guys do drink beer for breakfast." It's only 10 in the morning, I'm dumping out the half pot of coffee left, and cracking open a Boddingtons! Do it!

393 comments

  1. mhm by Tirel · · Score: 5, Funny

    So why the hell do I have a gut? Just a thought but, do you sit in your chair from dusk till dawn? That could it be you know.

    1. Re:mhm by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 5, Informative

      That article is a load of BS.

      For example "And for the record, beer is not fattening" - yeah right, any absorbton of calories above what are expended is turned into fat, plain and simple.

      Remember, there are 7 calories per gram of alchohol to consider above the carbs (I think 1 pint/550ml of beer has around 200 calories in total).

      The simple truth is, a balanced diet, mixed exercise and sufficient rest are the way to health. If you have these, beer shouldn't matter.

      Oh, I won't even go into their "hops can also be found in teas" BS - only in poncy flavoured teas. Tea leaves are the only ingredient of tea.

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    2. Re:mhm by da2 · · Score: 1

      is a pint not 568ml?

    3. Re:mhm by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, but since claories depends on whether it is 4.5 or 5 (or whatever) percent or the type of brew, such pedance doesn't matter.

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    4. Re:mhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To learn the difference between a beer belly and other forms of paunchus maximus, google for ascites and dropsy.

      Barney

    5. Re:mhm by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1

      so what I've had such a gut, since 1985, until this year I never drank at all (I was a member of the salvation army, and then I developed an allergy to the stuff), I still don't drink beer (hate the taste), anyhow the gut has nothing to do with beer. Males of our kind tend to put weight on in the gut in that fashion, Beer or no Beer.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    6. Re:mhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends where you are. Sissy Americans like their pints to be small.

    7. Re:mhm by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      lighten up, it's not like this article was posted under the "highly scientific food studies" topic?

    8. Re:mhm by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      is a pint not 568ml?

      No...it's 473 mL. (1 qt=946 mL.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    9. Re:mhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you must be one of those sissy Americans mentioned below. In civilized countries a pint of beer is 568ml, and the beer is worth drinking. Strange that you have followed a different strategy with beer than with every other product - usually when you people take a good idea and turn it into shit for the mass market you compensate for its blandness by vastly increasing the quantity.

    10. Re:mhm by mogh1701 · · Score: 1

      Just a thought but, do you sit in your chair from dusk till dawn? That could it be you know.

      What??? You mean to say that clicking the refresh button a thousand times a day to see the newest article on /. doesn't constitute a full cardiovascular work out.

      --

      "Its too hot out for a Penguin to be just walking around. - Billy Madison"

  2. WooHoo by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally I have a chance of getting to the top of something !!

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:WooHoo by stefanb · · Score: 1
      Finally I have a chance of getting to the top of something !!
      I guess it makes sense you also frequent Slashdot...

  3. Mmmm...sunday morning corn flakes and beer! by Danathar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've decided to try one beer with each type of cereal I have in my cabinet. I can honestly say that my cereal is MUCH better with beer!

    1. Re:Mmmm...sunday morning corn flakes and beer! by error502 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should try adding beer to your beer. Mmm... double the beer goodness. If one beer is healthy, are two beers twice as healthy? ...What about twelve?

    2. Re:Mmmm...sunday morning corn flakes and beer! by 199 · · Score: 1

      this is one of the more inspiring articles of late. had to crack out an IPA with my onion bagel.. not sure about the vanilla yoghurt yet though..

    3. Re:Mmmm...sunday morning corn flakes and beer! by mdielmann · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is quite likely a limit, and only one way o find out. Test, test, and test again! I recommend a particularly inefficient test, start with one or two, and add one a day. This may not take increased tolerance into account, but should get particlaurly enjoyable after the first week or two.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    4. Re:Mmmm...sunday morning corn flakes and beer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's called a "Black and Gold"! 1/2 Dortmunder Gold and 1/2 Guiness :)

  4. The old story again... by Ozan · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Buy my product - it is healthy!" Who do they think they can fool with this crap?

    1. Re:The old story again... by dtldl · · Score: 3, Funny

      I need no excuse to drink beer, but its nice to have one.

    2. Re:The old story again... by gilesjuk · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Scientists have found that shooting yourself in the head helps reduce blood pressure. Funded by the National Rifle Association the evidence was gathered over a period of five years....."

    3. Re:The old story again... by littleghoti · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also, in them olden days, you couldn't trust the water. As hops are an antiseptic, you knew the beer was safe.

    4. Re:The old story again... by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 2, Informative
      Close, but not quite accurate. Hops are a very mild antiseptic, but not enough to really be effective.

      What made beer important in the olden days is that you had to boil the water to make good beer, which killed off any baddies in the local water.

      Once the water was clean, the yeast has a "clean playground" to propogate in vast field of sugar with no competition from other lil' nasties.

      Once the yeast has finished its job and turned sugar in the the better things in life (alcohol), the alcohol itself takes over acting as a preservative.

      So you really have two reasons why beer is "purified water": boiling it cleans it, alcohol keeps it clean.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    5. Re:The old story again... by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Hops are a relatively recent addition (historically)... only a few hundred years ago, certainly less than a thousand. The ancient Mesopotamian (etc) beer was hopless.

  5. okay beer is a food by mfchater · · Score: 5, Funny

    So are we going to start seeing the fancy labels which are on all the other foods? I wonder what they will consider the recommended serving size? Personaly,I would like to see them use 6 cans as the RDA.

  6. Beer by Luigi30 · · Score: 1

    And now I quote the Monsters of the Midday from WTKS: Beer, beer, beer! Let it flow like water!

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Beer, beer, beer! Let it flow like water!

      (Gee, thanks for quoting the Beer Song first! :-D

      "Beer is proof, that the good Lord loves us,
      And wants us all to be, (wants us all to be...)
      Happy! Happy!"

      Ya know, Jim Koch of Sam Adams has been on Russ'
      show several times, getting Bubba drunk in the
      process every time. And the Beer Song is always
      played at least once during the show!

      QillerPenguin (now QillerDaemon)

  7. Mmmm....beer... by Enry · · Score: 4, Informative

    I actually found a good use for budweiser. Not for drinking, but for cooking. You can make a real good gravy using 1/2 part bud and 1/2 part stock (chicken or beef).

    Otherwise, make mine Guiness or Sam Adams. Aside from unfiltered beers or home brew, beer does not contain any yeast, and the carbonation is a result of injecting CO2 into the beer before capping it. You'll know if there's yeast in it if you find crunchies at the bottom of the bottle.

    Oh yea, beer is just mostly empty carbs. Almost no nutritional value. At best, I'd put it down in the same category as 'snack food'.

    1. Re:Mmmm....beer... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Aside from unfiltered beers or home brew, beer does not contain any yeast, and the carbonation is a result of injecting CO2 into the beer before capping it.
      Actually, this should be rewritten as
      aside from American Beers, all contain yeast and are loaded with nutritional value
      Truth is that is commercial american beers (and ones sold to our markets) that have no real redeeming value other than a bit of a taste and an expensive drunk. Funny enough, well drinks are actually cheaper for getting drunk with. Other than Coors beer, all the commercial beers contain the same alcohol as a 3.2 beer.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Informative

      Boil the brauts in bud and onions, grill for a couple a minutes on the grill:

      No second guessing if the brauts are cooked all the way though and it tastes GREAT!

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    3. Re:Mmmm....beer... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      Other than Coors beer, all the commercial beers contain the same alcohol as a 3.2 beer.

      Wrong! In some states, beers are limited to 3.2%, but they are the exception rather than the rule. Even in Alabama, I can go to the grocery store and buy A-B's Natural Ice, which is 5.9%. Of course, it tastes like ass, but that wasn't the point. Oh, and I can't go buy it today, because the stores can't sell alcohol on Sundays unless I drive to another county. But that wasn't the point either.

      By the way, what would have made you think that Coors had some magical exemption to this imaginary 3.2% rule?

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    4. Re:Mmmm....beer... by marko123 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh yea, beer is just mostly empty carbs. Almost no nutritional value. At best, I'd put it down in the same category as 'snack food'.

      Not sure where you are from, but in Australia, beer seems to put back in all the things beer leaches from my body - carbs, vitamins, essential minerals... and if you can combine it with greasy food, you have basically completely reversed any ill effects from the night before, come out ahead, and got the girl (even if she isn't so pretty now)...

      Sorry about that rant. It's 1am and I just got home from the pub. Um, I look at this in the morning and maybe clarify a few things...

      Cheers, mate!

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    5. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Boil the brauts in bud and onions, grill for a couple a minutes on the grill:

      No second guessing if the brauts are cooked all the way though and it tastes GREAT!


      Isn't this the part where you're supposed to tell me than "Johnsonville is Heaven on a Bun...?"

      Just asking...

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    6. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's also good if you cook the pig-steak in a sauce of beer(sweat typ) (credit goes to my superior).

    7. Re:Mmmm....beer... by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Test the actual achohol content on american beers ( I have as part of a class). On all of them except for coors (not coors lite), are less than 3.2 (coors is ~ 4.5). All of the A-B's are even below 3, including Natural Ice. BTW, the laws, which you are basing your info from, reads that the beer is below 3.2 or below 6.0. It does not read that it will meet a certain level. Several years ago, Coors wanted the alcohol content to be labeled on the beer and wine similar to all other alcohol. A-B, Miller, etc fought it. They won.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    8. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that explains why I can't get an easy buzz off of American beers, as I would a few bottles Grolsche.

    9. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that explains why I can't get an easy buzz off of American beers, as I would a few bottles Grolsche.
      Actually, nobody gets drunk on Americans beers (except with a case of it, but then you spend your time in the restroom; "we don't sell beer; we rent it"). These ppl are such assholes that others assume they are drunk.

    10. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And make sure that it is brauts from Southern Wisconsin or Germany. Big difference between what is called a brauts (Johnsonville) and what is.

    11. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All non-American beers are unfiltered? Hmm (looks at the bottom of his bottle of Ayinger Celebrator...no yeast...). Bzzzzt! Try again!

    12. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Bud Ice is 5.9% alcohol by volume.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I put a little bit of butter and salt along with the beer + onions.

      Some people say to poke the brat with a fork prior to boiling, but I never do. I also find that a pale brew like rolling rock imparts a lighter, sweeter flavor.

      Experimentation to find what suits your taste best is highly encouraged.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    14. Re:Mmmm....beer... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1

      Make your gravy with Guinness too. Then you'll make GREAT gravy. Steak and Guinness pie anyone? Leave the Bud for the unwashed masses. Blech. Most cooks use wine they would want to drink to cook with rather than that horrid cooking wine stuff. Their version of GIGO, I guess.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    15. Re:Mmmm....beer... by gid · · Score: 1

      Most packaged brauts are already pre-cooked (or at least the ones I usually buy), it should say it on the package if they are or not. So I usually just toss em on the Grill and give em a nice singe, no worries. I'll have to try boiling em in bud and onions, tho, that sounds good.

      Can you drink the bud afterwards if run thru a strainer? If not, then that's on the borderline of being classified as alcohol abuse.

    16. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not live in Wisconsin. No one here would ever admit to buying precooked brauts. And, we drink the most alcohol per person and it's mostly beer.

    17. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      These laws are state laws, not federal laws. Since you didn't listen to what ShavenYak said, maybe you will probably not believe this link either, but it shows that very few beers are under 3.2%.

      Labeling laws have a long strange history. Feel free to do some google searching. You have a lot to learn.

    18. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Ptraci · · Score: 1

      The alcohol would be boiled away. You could make a tasty sauce out of it though.

    19. Re:Mmmm....beer... by sbszine · · Score: 1

      Not sure where you are from, but in Australia, beer seems to put back in all the things beer leaches from my body - carbs, vitamins, essential minerals...

      I know your post was intended as a joke, but the Aust. government actually looked into enriching beer with vitamins etc to offset the negative effects of Australians' incredible love of beer.

      In the end they decided it would be easier just to put the same stuff into staple foods that people considered 'healthy', e.g. white bread and sweetened OJ. This is why the dodgier brands of orange juice have vitamin C added in Australia -- people think they're healthy, so by law they must become so, in order that we may keep guzzling Cooper's 24-7.

      --

      Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

    20. Re:Mmmm....beer... by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      I save winter beers to boil my brats in.

    21. Re:Mmmm....beer... by simong_oz · · Score: 1

      It's 1am and I just got home from the pub. Um, I look at this in the morning and maybe clarify a few things...

      Mate ... if the first thing you think about after getting home from the pub at 1am is posting on slashdot I'd suggest you haven't drunk nearly enough beer. :)

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    22. Re:Mmmm....beer... by gfim · · Score: 1

      Back in my uni days, we calculated that you'd have to drink 130 or so cans of VB to get your daily requirements of vitamins and minerals!

      Graham

      --
      Graham
  8. Homer Simpson is actually smarter than he looks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always suspected that.

    If you're thinking of adding donuts and pork chops to your diet...

  9. Boddingtons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You get that northern slop in the U.S? Odd.

    1. Re:Boddingtons? by Bushcat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I think there's probably a Boddington's god somewhere who will track you down and do you a little mischief.

      My first ever beer was a Boddington's in the Old Vic, St. Annes. I was young enough not to realise that a bar with sawdust on the floor, a pile of assorted inconvenienced people laying in a somewhat disshevilled heap around the entrance and pool tables where there were more half cues than cues, was a bad sign. Ah, the nectar of Boddington's. The Cream of Manchester.

    2. Re:Boddingtons? by DrLudicrous · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a Caffrey's myself, but they don't have it in the States anymore, not since 1999 or so.

    3. Re:Boddingtons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You get that northern slop in the U.S?

      No, not really. There is no true bitters imported into America.
      As manky as the Boddingtons is abroad, it's much, much worse in the States.

    4. Re:Boddingtons? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Not true. It's rare like the spotted, speckled dancing [insert animal species], but it does exist in the US. A friend of mine has to go to Kansas to get it, but he can get it. I'm not sure if it's an "American" version but it's a Caffrey's.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Boddingtons? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You can get it in the US, but you have to know where to get it. When I went to school in Austin, Central Market had it. But they also had something on the order of 100 beers from around the world.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    6. Re:Boddingtons? by madpierre · · Score: 1

      Boddingtons is garbage. Get some Theakstons Old Peculiar down yer neck.

      As to the article, as soon as I saw the can of Guinness I knew they
      were BS merchants. Guinness tinned and draught is one of the most disgusting
      over hyped 'keg' brands available. To call that crap beer is blasphemy.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    7. Re:Boddingtons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local liquor store has Caffery's. It's in Bloomington MN. I think there are others nearby that do too.

      You should look a little harder. It's available. Make friends with your local store guys an ask them to carry it.

    8. Re:Boddingtons? by nonamenobody · · Score: 1

      >> Get some Theakstons Old Peculiar down yer neck.

      Theakstons Old Peculiar...... Very good choice, my favourite beer ever (I quite like their Best and XB too).

      As for Boddies, I have never quite worked out what is going on with that. They call it a bitter, but it doesn't taste or look like any other bitter. It doesn't taste like a lager either. The only thing it tastes anything like, IMHO, is soap; which I have always put down to Cussons factory being a couple of miles up the Irwell.

      Maybe their export version tastes better?

      BTW, has anyone tried their mild? I have often wondered what their mild is like but the only place I have every seen it is advertised on a board outside the Brewery Tap (the pub next to the Boddies brewery). I have never ventured in to try it, maybe I will next time I am in Manchester.

    9. Re:Boddingtons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not Boddington's Bitter...it's some crap they call "Boddington's Pub Ale". It's a little bit better than the slop (not much).

    10. Re:Boddingtons? by Bushcat · · Score: 1

      Theakston's were taken over by Scottish & Newcastle a few years back and the bulk of production was shifted to Newcastle. Paul Theakston set up Black Sheep Brewery in Masham, so you might want to check that out. 3.8% ABV on draft, 4.4% ABV in bottle.

    11. Re:Boddingtons? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Paul Theakston set up Black Sheep Brewery in Masham, so you might want to check that out.

      Look for Black Sheep Ale and Monty Python's Holy Grail Ale ("tempered over burning witches")...they're good stuff, and they are exporting it (found it in Vegas, at least, and I think I saw them in a store while I was up in Portland last weekend).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    12. Re:Boddingtons? by Theranthrope · · Score: 1

      Where did you find it? I one of the casinos' bars? Or an actual importer in town? I live in Las Vegas (sorta) and I'm always looking for new and unusual ways of getting pissed. (Plus drinking the Monty Python labal would have major brag factor with my weirdo freinds)

    13. Re:Boddingtons? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Where did you find it? I one of the casinos' bars? Or an actual importer in town? I live in Las Vegas (sorta) and I'm always looking for new and unusual ways of getting pissed.

      Lee's Discount Liquor...you want to go to the one on Lake Mead (between Tenaya and Buffalo), as it has a wider beer selection than the others. If Lee's doesn't have a beer, you probably can't get it in Las Vegas.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Boddingtons? by Theranthrope · · Score: 1
      I live out by Nellis Air Force base and I usually don't have any reason to go near summerlin or the lakes. Well, I have a reason now.

      Thanks for the information.

  10. No, beer is not a drug. by Magic+Thread · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Alcohol, on the other hand, is. That's an important distinction.
    Of course beer is a beverage, as the majority of its composition is water; however, given that it's also made with cereal grains, hops and yeast, all of this combined goodness is oftentimes a meal in itself.
    So why don't you drink water and eat cereal and yeast? It seems like that would be a much more healthy breakfast.
    1. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by KingJoshi · · Score: 1
      Alcohol, on the other hand, is. That's an important distinction.

      was that sarcasm I missed??? Cigarettes aren't drugs either because of the paper (versus water for beer)? Alcohol is in beer, if alcohol is a drug, then beer is too (unless the amount is so diluted).

      But I'm one of those few slashdotters that don't drink alcohol. I wonder how many of us there are...

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    2. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by error502 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So why don't you drink water and eat cereal and yeast?

      Simple. Because you can't get drunk off of water, cereal, and yeast.

    3. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by Ayandia · · Score: 3, Funny

      No chemicals at all? Perhaps you'd be interesting in signing a petition to ban Dihydrogen Monoxide? Just check out their FAQ...dangerous stuff! Plus, it's also IN BEER!

    4. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Or can you...hmmm. *Rushes off to buy mass quantities of water cereal and yeast. Especially yeast*

      --
      Why not fork?
    5. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Almost all of my beers are Reinheitsgebot. No Dihydrogen Monoxide for me.

    6. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by Racine · · Score: 1

      Reinheitsgebot doesn't allow for the addition of dihydrogen monoxide (h2o)? How the hell do they make it, then? Of course, I'm sure you're just joking :)

      --
      Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    7. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by Ayandia · · Score: 1

      On the contrary! Dihydrogen Monoxide is specifically allowed by the Reinheitsgebot and the definition of German purity in 1516 hasn't been tightened to restrict this chemical.

    8. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Hehe. ;)

    9. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by Eminor · · Score: 1

      You can't get drunk off of American beer either.

    10. Re:No, beer is not a drug. by merlin_jim · · Score: 1

      Because you can't get drunk off of water, cereal, and yeast.

      Well you can; you just have to wait a while before consuming...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
  11. Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by xinot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this the same Bods that I get on tap in England? If it is I've got to say that Boddingtons is THE most flavorless beer I've ever had in my life. Period. That stuff SUCKS! I'll drink lager before I'll drink a freakin' Bods. No hop bitterness, no maltiness. Nothing. As soon as I see Boddingtons I know I'll be having a Stella or 1664 or something. Unless there's a nice guest ale...

    Boddingtons. Oh My God.

  12. Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by Zetta+Matrix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The FDA determines the proper adult dose for a drug by giving increasingly higher doses to a bunch of rats until 50% of them die.

    I know this because I was told about a supplement that tried to get FDA approval as a drug, but it failed because it could never kill the rats. Therefore it could only be approved as a food (having strange effects on the product's marketability).

    So perhaps the FDA got some rats really drunk and they actually got half of them to die...

    1. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      it's called the 'LD-50', or the lethal dose that kill 50% of the rats. go fuck yourself.

      we do experiments like that all the time; we usually inject a drug directly into the brain of an animal (such as a stray cat or dog) and evaluate the drugs effect.

    2. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to inject a drug directly into your brain and see the effect! You wouldn't mind, would you? I mean, it's necessary to do creatures like you, because otherwise actual people might take too much of the drug and die.

    3. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by AgentPhunk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool, that means marijuana isn't a drug. There is no known letal dose for it.

    4. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Oh, everything has a LD50 (Lethal Dose for 50% of sample). Some of them are just really really high. Water has a LD50 if you inject enough of it.

      If having a ludricrous LD50 would keep things from being regulated as drugs, then marijuana would be legal, and so would most psychedelics like LSD.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From the MSDS for THC: 666 MG/KG ORAL-RAT LD50

      As I said in my other post, everything has an LD50, some are just really really high.

      That one for THC is 66.6 grams for a 100 Kg person, assuming similar LD50s in humans. Since most pot is between 2-8% THC, it's about the same as consuming a pound or two (0.5-1kg) of pot. Not likely to happen with recreational use.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      it's about the same as consuming a pound or two (0.5-1kg) of pot. Not likely to happen with recreational use.

      Hah! You must not hang around with musicians. Especially drummers.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    7. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by marko123 · · Score: 1

      Though it may affect your educational performance (read spelling)

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    8. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by r00zky · · Score: 1

      Right. You'll get inconscient(sp?) before smoking all that pot (even 1/4 of it)

      Probability of death by smoking pot is zero.

      Is not like alcohol or other drugs, which can kill you by overdose. AFAIK there haven't been any reported deaths for smoking too much pot.

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
    9. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never thought such a completely non-subtle troll could attract a bite, but I guess all that tofu really affects the minds of the PETA bunch!

    10. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I'm as much of a fan of the pot as the next left-wing college student/musician, but it is important to consider that it is not completely safe to smoke pot. Anytime you are inhaling smoke like that, it's usually not a good idea. I've read various things on this (and of course, just how bad they say it is depends on the source), but many say that smoking a joint is at least as bad as a cigarette. They fail to mention that pot smokers will smoke much less frequently than cigarette smokers (on average, at least from my knowledge). Also, you don't always know everything you're smoking is pot. True, if you grow it yourself, then your chances of ODing on pot is zero, but you never know what it might be laced with. So everone, smoke up, but be careful.

    11. Re:Beer is likely a drug by the FDA's definition by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      This is cockamamie nonsense. The *LD50*, which is a measure of toxicity, is determined by the method you describe. Dosages are determined through clinical tests. There are certainly drugs with no dterminable toxicity levels that are still regulated as such.

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
  13. Awesome! by v_1_r_u_5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I have an excuse when I show up to work drunk...

    "But beer, boss does the body good," I exclaim as I show my boss an upside down picture of the revised food pyramid.

    1. Re:Awesome! by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Funny

      I used to drink a good sized dose of vodka (or sometimes some hard stuff) before work each day.. just so I could stand to keep going. Not much point in drinking beer.. it takes to many to give you even a slight buzz.. all you end up having to do is pee.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  14. all excuses ... by ignatus · · Score: 1

    beer is healthy? Who the hell needs a reason like that? It's tasty and there's alcohol in it. All other arguments are redundant.
    /me takes another drink of his fresh cold hoegaarden ;)

    --
    - Never underestimate the power of human stupidity.
  15. um by dema · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a suprise, beeradvocate.com is trying to promote beer.

    What does advocate mean again?

    And why is this news on /.?

    1. Re:um by error502 · · Score: 1

      And why is this news on /.? It's Sunday morning and makes us feel less guilty about how much we drank last night?

    2. Re:um by dema · · Score: 1

      yea i can just see the g33k drinking scene

      DrUnK GeEk 1: DUDE F M$, THAT B*TCH HAS SCREWED ME OVER SO MANY TIMES
      DrUnK GeEk 2: YEA! LINUX HAS A NICER ASS ANYWAY

    3. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a foot icon. It's funny, laugh. It's much more enjoyable than bitching about /.

    4. Re:um by 13Echo · · Score: 1
      It's Sunday morning and makes us feel less guilty about how much we drank last night?


      No. However, it made me go to the refrigerator to get a Danish lager.
    5. Re:um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is this news on /.?

      Dude, a website called "UtterlyFullOfShit.com" could post an article that said playing video games increases your IQ by thirty points and prevents cancer, and slashdot would post it as news.

      Although it doesn't answer your question, I hope this gives you a bit of perspective.

  16. A beer drinker's diet by groove10 · · Score: 1

    Here's a Beer Drinker's Diet that includes beer as a "non-starchy vegetable" in the food pyramid. Note: The link goes to a website that wishes to sell a book on the topic. That seems like quite a reach to me as I don't think beer posesses the antioxidant or vitamin content of other items in this group.

    But the fact of the matter is that the carbohydrate content is not listed on the bottles or cans or packaging of beer here in the US. I haven't found a website in my quick searching that listed the carbohydrate content of common beers.

    --
    MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth
    1. Re:A beer drinker's diet by r00zky · · Score: 1

      No need for a book, I have already heard about a beer-drinking diet, it's:

      1. Don't eat for a week.
      2. Instead drink beer (and water, optionally)
      3. ???
      4. profit! err... weight loss!!

      And remember: talk to your medic before trying any diet...

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
  17. Smart move Mr. Coors by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Why didn't tobacco manufacturers try that trick the alcohol industry did with the study that declared beer/wine is good for you?
    Call me crazy but I think a cellular poison could never be healthy in any amount. I have no problem with anyone drinking but to call it healthy?

    1. Re:Smart move Mr. Coors by groove10 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There has been more than one study that shows the effects of moderate alcohol consumption to be beneficial to cardiovascular health and in particular reducing the risk of stroke and Type II diabetes.

      Also of interesting note, there is what is referred to as The French Paradox (which has nothing to do with French military might and their place in NATO). Instead it refers to the fact that the french have a diet high in saturated fat (think cream and cheese) and high high rates of alcohol consumption (think wine) yet have low rates of morbid obesity comapred to other nations (and especially to the US).

      --
      MMORPG fan-boy? Prove your worth
    2. Re:Smart move Mr. Coors by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Call me crazy but I think a cellular poison could never be healthy in any amount.

      Vitamin A is poisonous in excessive quantities.

    3. Re:Smart move Mr. Coors by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

      It's certainly healthier than anything served at McDonald's. Real drunks, such as GW Bush, are usually intoxicating themselves on liquor, not beer or wine, though it also happens.

    4. Re:Smart move Mr. Coors by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Almost anything can be harmful if abused and many things we eat are toxic to some degree. Most plants have some degree of toxicity and ask any born again vegetarian to tell you the loads of nasty crap in meat. Somehow I don't plan on stopping my bad habit of eatting plants and animals though. Likewise, if I felt like it I'd drink an alcoholic beverage. I'd rather have milk or juice though usually.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Smart move Mr. Coors by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      Yes but that's more wishful thinking on the part of people who want to see it; the people who drink.
      Southern France has a Mediterranean-style diet, which is healthier. They skew the results and make the whole country appear healthier.
      I'm sure we could all spin it to our own advantage and find studies to support our own positions. MSNBC story
      Link
      You'll die without Vitamin A, you won't die from lack of alcohol.

  18. Oh yeah, bring on the babes! by MyoTechie · · Score: 4, Funny

    So the "Beer Gut" is a myth?

    Much like a girlfriend if you keep suplementing with the physique enhancing beverage!

    1. Re:Oh yeah, bring on the babes! by Phil+John · · Score: 1

      I hear that it works for Ron Jeremy... ;o)

      --
      I am NaN
  19. arguing over semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    regardless if its classified as a drug, its a very dangerous substance. Just ask the millions of dead victims of alcohol abuse and drunk drivers. My brother-in-law bled to death in his home at 38 years old because he knew if EMS showed up, they have him detox, the thought of going clean longer than a day was too much and he died curled up in a corner of his house.

    1. Re:arguing over semantics by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      I could say the same about almost anything you can eat or drink. Peanuts for example. The facts are, BILLIONS upon BILLIONS have managed to drink alcohol for Millenia without problems. The fact that some eliminate themselves from the evolutionary pool on occasion from abuse does not mean somehing is bad.

    2. Re:arguing over semantics by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Alcohol is no more dangerous than anything else. You could kill people with huge amounts of feathers. Would we blame the feathers and call them a dangerous substance or cry feather abuse?

      I'd say alcohol has no blame whatsoever in drunk driving cases.. less than motor vehicles at any rate. It's the humans fault and they solely are to blame.

      Not to be mean but it sounds like your brother in law was a raving looney that didn't have the will power to even make an effort to save his own life. You can hardly blame anybody or anything but himself.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:arguing over semantics by toddestan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's interesting to watch how the government cracks down on various drugs. The US Government has deemed smoking as pretty bad, yet smoking does not cause drunk driving, nor does it cause men to go home and beat their wives. An addiction to tobacco does not ruin someone's life the way an addiction to alcohol can. I hear lots of complaining about the costs smokers create in terms of health care, but I never hear about the costs associated with heavy drinkers, not to mention rehab programs.

      What's really interesting is how they make marijuana illegal, when in many ways it is not as bad as smoking or drinking. In terms of health, people say marijuana does less damage than all that tar and chemicals they put in cigarettes. Some people say it's even less addictive than tobacco, though I would not know. Marijuana also does not make you overconfident the way alcohol will - making you think you are the best driver in the world when in reality you should not be anywhere near the controls of a vehicle. The government likes to say that marijuana use just leads to usage of dangerous drugs like cocaine, but that is not true - just like alcoholics generally don't move onto cocaine either.

      I'll probably get modded down for this, but I feel the world would be a better place without alcohol. But that simply will not happen. People will not give it up, just look at when they tried prohibition in the US.

    4. Re:arguing over semantics by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "In terms of health, people say marijuana does less damage than all that tar and chemicals they put in cigarettes. Some people say it's even less addictive than tobacco, though I would not know."

      I can answer these two issues.

      Pot has roughly twelve times (!!!) the tar of tobacco. That's bad!

      On the other hand, here in Canada the worst of the chronic medical pot smokers aren't likely to go through a 'pack' of joints a day. One guy who is repeatedly on the news smokes I believe 4-6 joints/day. The net tar intake is probably the same as a relatively heavy (tobacco) smoker.

      And THC is not addictive. Period. Nicotine is. Period. End of discussion.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    5. Re:arguing over semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should imagine sucking your pot smoke through a bong reduces that tar intact considerably, too.

    6. Re:arguing over semantics by Frater+219 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The US Government has deemed smoking as pretty bad, yet smoking does not cause drunk driving, nor does it cause men to go home and beat their wives.

      It's interesting you chose that particular slander for your post, since it was the early 20th-century equivalent of "reefer madness". One of the driving rhetorical points of Prohibitionism, and the reason that it was embraced by some elements of what became the women's movement, was just that: "Alcohol causes our responsible men to become irresponsible and beat their wives. If we get rid of booze, there will be no wife-beating!"

      Naturally, it didn't work that way. Sober men are just as capable of rage as drunk ones, and neither beer nor gin can make a violent man from a peaceable one. Moreover, blaming a man's misdeeds on the drugs he consumes, rather than on his own character, does nothing to cause him to correct himself. A violent person who can excuse his behavior the next morning by saying, "It was the bottle talking," sees no reason to become less violent.

      The remedy for domestic violence is not to dissuade men from drinking, but to convince them (as has thankfully been done in society at large, thanks chiefly to feminism and the law) that domestic violence is wrong, shameful, and criminal. Only by ascribing responsibility solely to the individual -- not to his drug, and not to "society" -- can the problem be corrected. Why? Simple: The booze doesn't make decisions; individuals do.

      Leave beer alone, for -- as with marijuana -- the vast majority of users enjoy it responsibly. Lay the blame for wrongdoing on the wrongdoers -- and shame on you, if you let them blame it on the bottle.

    7. Re:arguing over semantics by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Don't count on it. Yes you do filter out some of the tar, but you also lose substantial amounts of THC, which leads you to...consume more!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    8. Re:arguing over semantics by zymurgyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's also interesting that they've turned "drug" into a bad word. Anything labelled a drug by our media and culture is automatically colored as something dangerous or bad to some degree. They're simply chemicals. Some have potential for abuse. Some have more of this potential than others.

      Some drugs are really misclassified based on this perceived level of "badness" mainly because of misguided politics (you mentioned marijuana). I really wonder which schedule the gov't would put alcohol/beer/wine/etc. on. Or maybe more acurately, what position will the liquor lobby pay for it to be classified under. In terms of potential for abuse and harm it can cause, it would be better suited for Schedule I than a lot of the "evil drugs" that currently reside there.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    9. Re:arguing over semantics by potuncle · · Score: 1
      And THC is not addictive.

      On the contrary, 10% of the population can easily become addicted to marijuana. Trust me, it can happen. Quitting for an addict is hell. If you don't believe me, check out a few MA meetings and listen to what marijuana addicts had to go through to quit and stay quit.

      That aside, I do believe marijuana should be either legalized or decrimalized. This way those who can enjoy pot can do so legally. Also, the awareness of marijuana addiction would increase, threfore treatment for those addicted would be more availible.

    10. Re:arguing over semantics by Spl0it · · Score: 1

      drunk drivers is not the result of alcohol, its the result of stupid people, and poor decesions.. I enjoy drinking, sometimes even getting wasted till I can't walk... do I make poor decesions to drive under the influence No... do I drink all day long, no.. because my brain tells me that can/will cause problems. Use your head. Alcohol is not a problem. Only stupidity can make alcohol a problem.

      --

      No, this is
    11. Re:arguing over semantics by nr · · Score: 1

      Well, no. THC as a substance is not soluble in water. Agree that smoke in your lungs are not healty whatever smoke it is. Better to eat it (baking cakes/cookies or using it in food) or use a vaporizer.

    12. Re:arguing over semantics by nr · · Score: 1

      Yes, water bongs removes some of the dangerous stuff in the smoke. There are even multi-chamber bongs that filter the smoke not only once but twice.

      You can not make sucking smoke into your lungs 100% safe as it will always be health issues with that, but you can aleast make it as safe as possible.

    13. Re:arguing over semantics by nr · · Score: 1

      Its not physicaly addicted like substances as nicotine, alcohol and opiates. But it can be psychically addicted if you have a weak personality.

      But on the other side you can also get addicted to coffe, tea, cocacola, chocolate, sex, food, training/exercising, etc.

    14. Re:arguing over semantics by nr · · Score: 1

      Good post. +karma

    15. Re:arguing over semantics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet! I can't wait for prohibition, fire up the ol' still and I'll be rich!

    16. Re:arguing over semantics by indulgenc · · Score: 1

      Aside from the effects of drugs physically, there is a huge effect economically as well.

      This is somewhat off-topic, but the war on drugs is a costly and losing one, and even some law enforcment professional will agree.

      -indulgenc

    17. Re:arguing over semantics by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      Please site sources.

      Since there were ads on US TV about some smoking drug (joints?) having more nicotine(? tar?) than cigarettes *and* causing some kind of comparable number of accidents to alcohol, I tend not to believe any of it. I've never had those experiences, but media propaganda makes me disbelieve their words, not concurr.

      I'll continue to do so until... well, probably after I've seen someone's biased statistics and until I see some hard evidence.

      8-PP

  20. Beer industry NOT responsible by xyloplax · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ads for Low-Carb beer show fit-n-healthy folks in the middle of various inviogorating excercises. Alcohol may have some good effects on the body according to recent research, but the ads make beer look like Powerade for chrissake. Moderation is good. Preying on stupidity, suggesting that beer is healthy, is irresponsible.

    On a similar note, I saw a print ad for Bud Light that showed a condensation-covered label; on that label was a strategically-placed water drop that just happened to make "Budweiser" look like "Bloweiser". Yeah right, just a coincidence. And no, I wan't looking for it.

    --
    -- "You can lead a yak to water, but you can't teach an old dog to make a silk purse out of a pig in a poke" - Opus
  21. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

    Boddington is bad but Budweiser (the US stuff, rather than the tasty Budvar) is truely the worst lager in the world.

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  22. Re:Linux not yet up the Babe Pyramid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was rated off topic, but beer is the only way he could get the twelve yearold he keeps posting to give him the time of day.

  23. Maltose is the problem by tigre · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unfrotunately, beer does itself contribute to the beer belly. It's not just a matter of how much carbs something has but what kind of carbs they are. Beer has maltose, which is actually one of the more troublesome carbs because it is digested quickly, spikes your blood sugar level quickly and brings with it an associated spike in insulin, which then brings your blood sugar level down low, and makes you hungrier. So, it is in fact the other stuff that makes you fat, but the beer often contributes to your wanting the other stuff. Different types of beer have different elements which modify the digestion process, so the effect varies. A nice stout seems to fill me up quite nicely, so it must have something going for it. But I have lost 25 pounds on my low-carb diet, so until I reach my target weight, I'm gonna hold back on the Guinness.

    1. Re:Maltose is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so why are they making pot smokers who have cancer smoke pot to get them hungry?
      why don't they feed them beer?

    2. Re:Maltose is the problem by JDevers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Beer SHOULDN'T have maltose...wort definitely, beer no (or at least such a very small amount that you could say none). Afterall, like you said, maltose is a very quickly digested sugar but that also applies to yeast. The majority of the carbohydrates in a beer come from dextrins or other starches, not simple sugars.

    3. Re:Maltose is the problem by zymurgyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe. Depends on the beer. Maltose is the main fermentable component of the wort (pronounced wert) from which a beer is made.

      Depending on the style of beer in question, the level of residual maltose, sucrose, (in some cases even lactose) etc. varies widely. A nice Octoberfest, for example, will have a much higher level of residual maltose, than say, a Bud Dry. Most of the calories in any beer come from the alcohol anyway.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    4. Re:Maltose is the problem by Spanky+Lovesalot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very good point. Also consider that beer is alcoholic, and alcohol causes problems with hormone levels. Lower testosterone levels (specifically T3) lead to higher fat cell retention. One beer can lower testosterone levels for up to 24 hours.

      So not only are you putting something into your body that's not good for it nutritionally, you're adding something to it that encourages the body to keep it around.

    5. Re:Maltose is the problem by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      why are they making pot smokers who have cancer smoke pot to get them hungry?

      They don't. Pot is a good painkiller, and can allieviate the nausia that some illnesses cause.

    6. Re:Maltose is the problem by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Beer also contibutes to "bitch tits". Seriously. The alcohol helps the body convert testosterone to estrogen. Men do actually have many of the same glands that femail brests have and the increased estrogen can change the shape of them.

    7. Re:Maltose is the problem by UltimateZer0 · · Score: 0

      femail brests? You must be a /. Veteran. . . you've got the typos down to an art.

      --

      --- I'm going to get a score of -1 for this post because the mods are fuckers.

  24. American beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't most american beer pretty low in alchoholic content? I've heard stories of American sailors coming to Australia and getting wasted on a few beers because they're not used to the high alchohol content.

    1. Re:American beer by phelddagrif · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've found that belgium beer is usually pretty high in alcohol. Sometimes up to 10 or 11%. I know that gulden drakk is around 9.x% And it is a mighty fine fruitful beer that has a beautiful aftertaste.

      Overall commercial american beer is shite. I've heard americans saying that molson's canadian and labatt blue are 'good' beers. Which I guess they could be if you're used to drinking dog pee. But there are a ton of good canadian beers. You just have to look slightly farther than the tip of your nose.

    2. Re:American beer by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      There is alcohol in American beer? I can drink a 12 pack without getting buzzed. Lousy waste of money. :P

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    3. Re:American beer by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Why does this joke get modded up every time an article on beer or america or both is posted? Ok ok, maybe its true, but I think it probably reached "In Soviet Russia" levels of saturation long before it even appeared on slashdot.

      --
      Why not fork?
    4. Re:American beer by stubaggs · · Score: 1

      Nah, Been living here USA, for a while now, the run of the mill beer is pretty much the same.
      There are some wierd laws about the maximum content of alcohol, that differ from state to state. Subsequently even brew pubs will not have a strong (i.e over 7%) ale.
      quick google for some figures here.
      Oh, we (aussies) definitly drink MORE beer, at FASTER pace, perhaps that why some americans lose their heads (and they think we are AA candidates).

    5. Re:American beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: Why's American beer served chilled?

      A: So's you can tell it from piss!

    6. Re:American beer by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      I understand why everyone wants to bash American beer - it is substandard in MOST cases. But you guys have the facts about these laws COMPLETELY WRONG.

      As I posted above somewhere or other, Trippel contains about 9% alcohol. I can go right down the street and buy a 6 pack of this stuff (but it's not actually that great), because only some backwards ass states have laws about the alcohol content of beer, and Nebraska ain't one of them. Most states I have visited lately also would appear to have no such laws governing their beers, so I'm a little confused as to why VERY MANY foreigners in this forum seem to think that all of our beer in this country is 3.2 shite.

      We have good shit and bad shit just like anyone else - it's just that only the U.S.'s bad shit seems to get exported. Like I said though, I'm not really defending American beer here so much as trying to provide some clearer facts about the subject.

    7. Re:American beer by Thjorska · · Score: 1

      Why does this joke get modded up every time an article on beer or america or both is posted?

      Because American beer is just that awful.
      --
      Current Karma Status: Roadkill
    8. Re:American beer by stubaggs · · Score: 1

      Hence the link to the table showing typical alcohol content of beers.It clearly shows what you are trying to say (again).
      Also check out Silly beer laws for the types of stuff that some unknowing visitor may find if they end up wanting a beer in, say, Georgia.
      I know there are good beers here (and defend it when I get visitors), that was what my pint[sic] was meant to be. (any other recommendations other that Trippel?)

    9. Re:American beer by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      Okay, I'm sick of this.

      Look, American beer isn't awful. Yes, Bud, Miller, Coors, and the other megabrews are flavorless, bitterless, little bottles of swill, but if you think that's all American beer has to offer you've demonstrated that you're far too ignorant to even comment on the subject.

      If you love beer, I really don't think there's a better country to live in, with the exception of Belgium of course. America has an incredible variety of excellent, excellent beers, in an incredibly diverse range of styles.

      You like bitter English ales? Try Hopdevil's IPA or Rogue's Brutal Bitter ESB, or Sierra Nevada's Harvest. You want clean, smooth lagers? Steigmaier's 1857, Brooklyn Brewery's Brooklyn Lager, or Cricket Hill's East Coast Lager will do you. Hefeweizen? Live Oak and Brooklyn turn out excellent ones. Hell, even Coors turns out a decent one, Blue Moon.

      American breweries turn out ales, lagers, stouts smoked stouts, rye beers, porters, Scotch ales, barleywines, chocolate stouts, oatmeal stouts, altbiers, kolsch, weizens, weizenbocks, pilseners, bocks, doppelbocks, eisbeers, maibocks, rauschbier, scwarzbiers, vienna lagers, red lagers, amber lagers, ciders, perries, melomels, and even friggin' braggot. With the obvious exception of lambics, if there's a style of beer anywhere on the planet, there's a brewery in America turning out an excellent example of it.

      So all of you "fucking close to water" morons can bite it. You have no idea what you're talking about, assholes.

    10. Re:American beer by gid · · Score: 1

      Yes, Bud, Miller, Coors, and the other megabrews are flavorless, bitterless, little bottles of swill

      You just described the reasons that I like American beer. Bitter has to my least favorite taste ever. I just could never develop a taste for most "real" beers. I like a few, but forget anything that's bitter.

      Sure miller light is fucking near close to water, but hey, I like water. It's water that gives you a buzz, and there ain't nothing wrong with that.

    11. Re:American beer by gid · · Score: 1

      Guess I should clarify what's meant by "American beer". There's actually two definitions of as I see it.

      1) Bud, Miller, Coors, the megabrews as you call them, these are traditionally known as "American Beers", because Americans invented/perfected them. The reason they're so successful is *gasp* because a lot of Americans like them. Sure there are other beers made in the US, but most weren't invented here, and aren't nearly as popular.

      2) Any Beer made in America.

      I of course meant definition 1, you're referring to definition 2.

    12. Re:American beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aww come on, in the little Canadas (the northern snowy states) the beer isn't that bad.

    13. Re:American beer by Quikah · · Score: 1

      I have a better question, why do the people from our European offices (Ireland and France mostly) ALWAYS order budweiser when they come to the states?

      --
      Q.
    14. Re:American beer by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Any recommendations?

      I like Fat Tire a lot (same company as Trippel). I've had a few good microbrews from Seattle like Red Hook (sold pretty much everywhere) and Pike's Pale Ale, which I've never seen outside of Washington State. And believe it or not, we have a few good beers in Nebraska if you're ever up this way like Cortland Wheat and pretty much anything of the Empyrean line (bottled at a little restaurant/brewery in downtown Lincoln). I find that all of the major American brands are nothing special, though I drink them anyway because they are very cheap compared to imports and microbrews.

      Sorry about misunderstanding your post before. I do that sometimes.

    15. Re:American beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bud, Miller, Coors, the megabrews as you call them, these are traditionally known as "American Beers", because Americans invented/perfected them. The reason they're so successful is *gasp* because a lot of Americans like them.

      OK, so perhaps the perception that American beer tastes like watered down urine is because most Americans favour beer that tastes like watered down urine?

      You can hardly blame people for making a sweeping generalization based on the most popular and mass produced beers, while not having tried any of the tiny-market versions.

    16. Re:American beer by OscarGunther · · Score: 1
      Amen.

      Boddington's, Taco? At least it's not swill. Here in Philadelphia we have Monk's Cafe, a freakin' temple to beer. A world-class selection of Belgian beers you've never heard of, tremendous food (the fries rock), and great atmosphere. Try a Rochefort 10--chewy, malt-heavy--it's liquid bread. Brewed by monks who undoubtedly figure that if you can't have sex, you can at least have strong beer. Manly beer, not the pablum the conglomerates brew.

      As far as whether beer is healthy, I couldn't give a rat's ass whether it's healthy or not--they can have my Orval when they pry the bottle from my cold, dead fingers.

      Life is too short for bad beer.

    17. Re:American beer by gid · · Score: 1

      As far as "American Beer" being more watery, maybe yes, American's like that more. Personally I like beer with my meal occassionally, and a stout is too filling for that.

      As far as tasting like urine, I wouldn't know, although there are people who do that.

    18. Re:American beer by mosschops · · Score: 1

      why do the people from our European offices (Ireland and France mostly) ALWAYS order budweiser when they come to the states?

      "When in Rome..."?

    19. Re:American beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about when around the world? sorry to burst your bubble, but anheiser-busch accounts for 43% of all beers sales in the world. I'm not saying what they make is good (though a few labels they make arent bad) - but point is they sell way more than anyone else anywhere

  25. It is a food by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Informative

    It was originally concieved as a way to preserve grains that would otherwise rot through the winter. Beer is rich in carbs and B vitamins. You could live for months on beer alone if you had to. It certainly has a place in a healthy diet. I think wine might be better for you though...

    Not that I'm condoning drinking American beer, mind you... there is real beer just across your northern border, ppl...

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:It is a food by mrscorpio · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What, do you mean like Labatt Blue or Molson? That shit is at least as bad as Bud!

      Oh, you were going to name some microbrew? Well there's tons that are good in the US too.

      Editors aren't on the ball today, or don't know their slashdot history...informative + flamebait = troll.

      Chris

    2. Re:It is a food by dAzED1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      oh sure...you could live for months off beer....

      if all you needed in your diet was carbs and b vitamins

      the fact that its drawing other nutrients out of your body is unimportant. You'll be too drunk to notice, and you'll be "healthy." Never mind that you can't get your fat ass off the couch - you're in top shape!

      [sarcasm][taunt]And screw this "american beer" vrs "real beer" crap. Its all crap. Beer is crap. Real men drink liquor. You're all nuts.[/taunt][/sarcasm]

      there's two major movements going on right now - we're in what I call the "age of reconcilation" where a few nut balls think that I need to pay for what my great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather did to someone else's great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather or whatever else nonesense crap brought on by liberal self-loathing due to feelings of guilt for things they personally did in the present, and then there's the "screw you all, I'll do what I want to" crowd that tries to justify any act, regardless if it is self-destructive or harms others, with nothing other than "I wanted to." Beer as food/a healthy part of your diet...whatever. Like I said in my last post - its getting harder and harder to tell if people are just being silly, or stupid, these days...

    3. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we have lots of beer other than molson and labatt and microbrewers.

      molson and labatt take less than 5% of the beer floorspace in supermarkets.

    4. Re:It is a food by BitHive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except it is commonly known that alcoholics who put your idea into practice, that is, get all of their nutrition from beer, suffer from thiamine deficiencies and develop Korsakoff Syndrome. So if you're going to go on that liquid diet, at least take supplements, or drink German beers, which have plenty of thiamine.

    5. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could live for months on beer alone if you had to

      I am livong proog of thus.

    6. Re:It is a food by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I didn't suggest that you SHOULD live off beer, just that you COULD if you needed to (like if all your crops rotted by January and you couldn't hunt worth a crap) Would you say that V8 is a food? It counts as 2 serves of vegetables... but you can't live off it indefinately either.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    7. Re:It is a food by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Molson XXX is like freaking moonshine, compared to bud. It's like 12% alcohol by volume or something like that.

    8. Re:It is a food by Zebbers · · Score: 3, Funny

      we have a northern border?

      damn it those mexicans are getting sneakier

    9. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beer is rich in carbs and B vitamins.

      Uh, simple carbs maybe (ie. sugar). Those types of carbs suck. Complex carbs is what you want and you ain't gett'in much of it from beer. For the most part, simple carbs just make you fat and give you diabetes.

      And alcohol drains your body of B vitamins. Beer may contain some, but the alcohol will kill much more. B vitamin deficiency is one of the causes of a hangover. Ever notice weird twitches in your body after drinking heavily for a while? B vitamins help regulate your nervous system (not to mention brain function).

    10. Re:It is a food by robkore · · Score: 3, Funny

      Molson XXX is like freaking moonshine, compared to bud. It's like 12% alcohol by volume or something like that.

      7.3%. I've told you a million times not to exaggerate.

    11. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you have your equation wrong. informative + troll = flamebait.

    12. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [sarcasm][taunt]And screw this "american beer" vrs "real beer" crap. Its all crap. Beer is crap. Real men drink liquor. You're all nuts.[/taunt][/sarcasm]

      At least you correctly nested your idiocy. Real men drink Guinness, it was even in the picture.

    13. Re:It is a food by Hrothgar+The+Great · · Score: 1

      Trippel, (bottled by New Belgium Brewing Co. out of Colorado) is more than 9%, and I have yet to see any beer stronger than that one.

    14. Re:It is a food by Eskarel · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hangovers are caused by dehydration not B vitamin loss(though you probably lose water soluble vitamins while becoming dehydrated). Alcohol is a diuretic, which is to say it inhibits some of the hormones which control your kidneys so that, rather than appropriately balancing your salt/water levels, they produce urine which has a higher water content than it usually does which dehydrates you.

      As for complex versus simple carbohydrates, all complex carbs are just made up of simple carbs and have to be broken down before they can be used anyway, for that matter since the enzyme which breaks down starches and the like is present in your saliva, you're unlikely to get anything more complicated than a disaccharide past your stomach anyway.

    15. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      even the wimpy french drink wine...its a good 3 times stronger than the "best" horse urine (aka "beer") out there. Me, I'm a bourbon, cognac/brandy, and mixed drinks kind of guy.

      You know, if they'd just let me mod my own posts to 0, I wouldn't do the sidebars as anonymous coward...

    16. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the old 120 minute IPA or WorldWide Stout from Dogfish Head, 21% and 23% abv respectively.

    17. Re:It is a food by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Informative
      It was originally concieved as a way to preserve grains that would otherwise rot through the winter. Beer is rich in carbs and B vitamins. You could live for months on beer alone if you had to. It certainly has a place in a healthy diet. I think wine might be better for you though...

      Let's get the facts straight. Beer was a food. In Sumaria and Egypt the main staples of their diet was bread and beer. However the beer was made of a combinations of fermented bread and barley. It was actually a thickish mush, a little bit like alcoholic oatmeal, that they would drink through a straw.

      So if you want to ferment your oatmeal and get out a straw, feel free to call it breakfast. Keep in mind though that the people who lived on this diet had an average lifespan of 40 or 50 years at best, and that's with averaging the upper classes in as well.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    18. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'La Fin du Monde' a quebec beer is 9.1% I believe. Fjear ;)

    19. Re:It is a food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hangovers are caused by dehydration not B vitamin loss

      No shit. I said it's one of the causes for a hangover.

      (though you probably lose water soluble vitamins while becoming dehydrated).

      Vitamin B is well known to be destroyed by alcohol. Just search for "alcohol vitamin B" on Google (here is one link). Some B vitamins like niacin are used by your liver to break down the alcohol, therefore "using it up" as it were. Do some research before spouting off.

      As for complex versus simple carbohydrates, all complex carbs are just made up of simple carbs ...

      Uh, right... That's like saying gas and motor oil come from the same place, I'll just fill up my tank with 10W40 next time.

    20. Re:It is a food by smithmc · · Score: 1

      So if you want to ferment your oatmeal and get out a straw, feel free to call it breakfast. Keep in mind though that the people who lived on this diet had an average lifespan of 40 or 50 years at best, and that's with averaging the upper classes in as well.

      That's because they hadn't learned about washing their hands with soap yet, not because they drank beer.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    21. Re:It is a food by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      That's because they hadn't learned about washing their hands with soap yet, not because they drank beer.

      Yeah, that's it, it was all cause of soap. If we sent a few hundred tons of soap back to 3000 BC everyone would suddenly start living into their 80s.

      Sorry, lack of soap had something to do with it, but so did lack of other sanitary measures, regular outbreaks of war, the ground stone that made it's way into the flour they cooked bread with, spending their off seasons pushing large blocks of stone up pyramids, and among a myriad of other such similar details, the lack of a good diet.

      So no, drinking beer alone probably won't kill you at 40, neither will not washing your hands before meals for that matter. For the Egyptians brewing bread and barley into beer was a good because it helped preserve food that might have spoiled otherwise, but for modern people in first world contries the alternative to beer is not moldy and maggot filled bread and grain. Even with the option of the comparitively healthy Egyptian beer, you'd probably be better off going down to the supermarket and buying some fresh food with a wider nutritional profile. Given the nutritional "value" of a lot of modern beers, you'd probably be better off getting some fast food.

      The real objection of course is that just because the ancients did something doesn't mean that it's good for you. All it means is that, with a few obvious exceptions, it probably won't kill you too quickly. There are some things the ancients did that was probably pretty good for them, but there were a lot that were neutral or downright bad for them. In some cases they didn't know any better, in others they didn't have any better alternatives.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    22. Re:It is a food by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      Drinking strong beer only because it's strong is idiotic (unless you're an alcoholic). There's a point where it just doesn't taste good, though some darker beers can be pretty strong and still taste good. Better to pick beer by taste alone and drink more of them.

    23. Re:It is a food by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Trippel, (bottled by New Belgium Brewing Co. out of Colorado) is more than 9%, and I have yet to see any beer stronger than that one.

      There are much stronger beers than that. The current record holder, I believe, is Sam Adams MMII Utopias, at 24% ABV. Jim Koch has pledged to achieve 25% in the future.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    24. Re:It is a food by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      No it's not, there are only three monosaccharides or simple sugars, all other sugars and carbs are made up of these three sugars. As previously stated the enzyme which breaks all complex carbohydrates down into their disacharide components is introduced in the mouth, don't believe me suck on a potato and it'll disolve. This basically means that almost immediately the carbs in beer are broken down into exactly the same components as a complex carb like starch. By the time anything is absorbed there is no difference whatsoever.

    25. Re:It is a food by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Not that I'm condoning drinking American beer

      [Bud|Miller|Coors] != American beer. You'll get booed out of nearly any homebrew club meeting just for mentioning one of those.

      We have plenty of real beer here...it's just not advertised with multi-million-dollar ad campaigns that try to convince you that their products will make you more attractive to the opposite sex. You probably have some brewpubs in your town that'll have the freshest beer you can get. You more than likely have one or two liquor stores in town that stock a wide variety of local and regional microbrews. You probably haven't heard of most of them, and most of them aren't pilsner-like light lagers...but most of them are pretty decent.

      (My drinking preferences lean toward pale ale, amber ale, porter, stout, and trippel...but some Arrogant Bastard Ale is also good once in a while, too. (In fact, I just bottled a Bastard clone this morning.) If you can track down some Sam Adams Utopia, that stuff kicks ass...it's kinda like scotch, but smoother.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    26. Re:It is a food by qlippoth · · Score: 1


      Trippel, (bottled by New Belgium Brewing Co. out of Colorado) is more than 9%, and I have yet to see any beer stronger than that one.


      Killer Penguin (bottled by Rockies Brewing Co. out of Colorado), is 9%, spiffy penguin logo included.

      --
      Mmmm, -funroll-loops
    27. Re:It is a food by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Trippel, (bottled by New Belgium Brewing Co. out of Colorado) is more than 9%, and I have yet to see any beer stronger than that one.

      <voice style="comic-book-guy">
      This year's Sam Adams Utopia is 25%. You're not going to get much stronger than that without distillation (at which point you're no longer making beer). Double Bastard Ale usually runs about 10%, while Samichlaus (highest-alcohol import I know of) gets about 14%.
      </voice>

      Haven't had New Belgium's tripel yet, but the ones from Chimay and Val-Dieu are pretty decent. On the domestic tripel front, I have a bottle of MacTarnahan's Gran Luxe Tripel that I haven't opened yet...their other stuff has been pretty good.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    28. Re:It is a food by pmz · · Score: 1

      You could live for months on beer alone if you had to.

      I would if I could...but I'm married.

  26. Re:Boddington's? by jobsagoodun · · Score: 1

    Fantastic! CmdrTaco drinks Boddies! Do you have gravy wit' chips n'all mate?

  27. Bears on top of the food pyramid by wastaz · · Score: 1

    In recent news, after the shocking news that beer was good for you a lot of canadians started living on beer alone. This much to the pleasure of a nearby flock of grizzly bears who had a giant feast on the now weakened and permanently drunk population of beer-a-holics.

  28. Maybe... by jherubin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So why the hell do I have a gut?

    Maybe because when you drink beer it's 6-10 at a time and you sit at a desk all day. In large amounts these calories add up.

    I doubt that a semi-active person that has a couple beers here and there would get a gut from drinking this tasty beverage. In moderation, beer, just like soda, will not make you fat.

  29. appetite by fredopalus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have a gut, not because of the beer, but what you eat with it. Beer stimulates your appetite. Read about it here.

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
  30. Australians have know this for ages by Jardel · · Score: 1

    Beer here is counted as "poor food"... which is approxiamatley the same catagory a McDonald's Cheeseburger is in if you scrape off the pickles. Fosters even has section of their web page devoted to the nutritional/health aspects of beer within a healthy diet: http://www.fosters.com.au/beer/about/nutritional/b eer_health.asp

  31. Beer Is Food by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1
    .


    Well, DUH !

  32. Does... by stubblehead · · Score: 5, Funny

    "...whiskey count as beer?"

    --

    Rock!
    1. Re:Does... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      "...whiskey count as beer?"

      Actually, whiskey is essentially the same as beer. Just substitute soot for the hops, then concentrate the final product by a factor of 10.

    2. Re:Does... by stubblehead · · Score: 1

      (It's actually just a Simpsons quote)

      --

      Rock!
  33. American beer by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 5, Funny
    Q: What's common to American beer and love in a canoe?

    ...



    ...


    A: It's fucking near water!
  34. My 0.02 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Try saving the nature:

    Save water -- Drink beer

  35. For that matter... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why the heck don't beer, wine, and liquor have to have the nutriton information label on them like all food does in the U.S.?

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
    1. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Big liquor has a powerful lobby. Why do you think the government has come down so hard on tobacco in recent years, but basically leaves alcohol alone?

    2. Re:For that matter... by marko123 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry to break it to you, buddy:
      It's the same reason cigarettes don't have ingredients on them.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    3. Re:For that matter... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be very informative in any case. Alcohol is 7 calories per gram, carbohydrates are 4 calories per gram. Knowing that, you can pretty much figure out everything else you need to know trivially.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:For that matter... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
      I was going to ask the same question! All other food and drug products have very involved labels, but not any of the booze we consume. My best guess why not: the Liquor Lobby. The various brewers, distillers, vintners, etc, in the US have assembled one of the most powerful lobbying presences on Capitol Hill of any industry in operation today.

      Sadly, modernization of the processes they use really makes labelling desireable, IMHO. If brewers in the US were restricted (or restricted themselves) to Reinheitsgebot standards, we'd know what was in there without a label (malt, water, hops, yeast). And really, do we really want any more than that in our beer?

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
    5. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Australia, some premixed & cola drinks have nutritional information on them!

    6. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, meant to say "premixed & cola drinks". Oops.

    7. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed Hornsby's starting carrying the labels on them. Same amount of cider in two different types, one had 170 calories, one had 210 (roughly). I don't remember the ingredients list but it wasn't informative, other than the information you already get from the separate "contains sulfites" label. I bet some other "boutique" style beer makers will start carrying labels, too. As I've noticed with some of the local pre-made deli foods, once one starts adding the labels, others tend to follow suit.

    8. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the heck don't beer, wine, and liquor have to have the nutriton information label on them like all food does in the U.S.?

      Beacuse nobody wants to pay 3x the price for something that is essentialy flavoured water.

      Because vanilla based hydrogenated grape syrup with blown in CO2 containing more than just "a little of" the Exxx series chemicals (E541, E170, ...) used for coloring, taste enhancement, and achieving shelf-life, doesn't have quite the ring of the "Natural Californian Merlot".

      And just maybe because % of alchocole in liqour is basically all you realy want to know about it. Trust me, you really don't want to go into the details of liqours

      And lastly, you can propell cars on ethanol (so much about the energy stored into C-H molecules), but you don't get even a measurable bit of that energy by putting it into your body. Unless you happen to have a 6-valves installed in all of your cells, you can't burn it.

      For all what matters, you don't want to ingest things that don't have nutriton information label on them, or contain the items that you disapprove of. That is fine. If I were you, I would try not to eat anything coming out of USA. It is simply too prone to be "spiced" with excessive chemistry, fat, shugar, or who knows what. If you live in USA, too bad... It might be cultural difference, but USA food appeared to my taste, not like chiken, but like styrofoam. And yes, I didn't liked it, so I didn't even want to consider staying on USA soil more than absolutely needed.

    9. Re:For that matter... by gid · · Score: 1

      And that reason would be?

      Hell, even bottled WATER has nutrition information on it.

      Just because it's "bad" for you doesn't mean it shouldn't list nutrition information.

    10. Re:For that matter... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that there is more to beer than alcohol, sugar, yeast and hops (etc)?

    11. Re:For that matter... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Since when? Alcohol has 7 calories per gram. That's energy you can use.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:For that matter... by j3110 · · Score: 1

      Because alcohol already took one, and shrugged it off. We have public intoxication when it comes to alcohol, so we can't annoy people with nasty drinking habits. A drunk person bothering me in public is breaking the law. Most people blowing smoke in my face, though I'm allergic, aren't breaking the law. It needs to be evened out now. Then we can move on to making marajuana legal again in private, because a druggy could smoke pot until he died of it, and it wouldn't have any effect on you. Freedom to do what you want so long as you don't interfere with other people that don't want you to be interfered with is what we need again. I want to breath clean air, but I don't care what you do in your own home, or a place that a majority of the people agree it's ok to do it in (IE seperate smoking sections). When one's nasty habits cause me real discomfort, they shouldn't be legal.

      Also, it's not even legal to buy bear for some adults. Why does the government discriminate against age and claim that justice is blind. Some 16 year olds get tried as adults, but they don't have the freedoms of adults. Only the rules apply to you, none of the freedoms. I liked the arguement, "If you can be drafted into the army and die for your country, at least you should be able to drink". I think it originally applied to voting, but I think it still holds true.

      --
      Karma Clown
    13. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised no one answered your question. It's pretty simple. Not all foods have nutriton information labels. Only foods regulated by the FDA are labeled. Food regulated by the USDA don't (all raw meat and some cooked). The federal government does not regulated alcohol because the constitution expressly forbids it.

    14. Re:For that matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First of all, I'd like to know how much alcohol is in my beer. That isn't labeled in my state. It's actually illegal to put it on the label, but the courts have said it's a 1st amendment thing, so the law didn't stick.

      There's a lot more in beer than alcohol and water. Good beers have significant carbs. I think the other stuff is too small to deserve labeling, but I'm not sure about that.

    15. Re:For that matter... by marko123 · · Score: 1

      Legalized drug industries seem to be able to lobby effectively against most efforts to put more information on their labels. Only the baccy industry has had to make significant concessions. IAASBD (I am a smoking beer drinker) , but I wonder why the physiological effects of drinking don't appear on bottles in a similar way to cigarettes.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    16. Re:For that matter... by marko123 · · Score: 1

      I need to view the html source to see if there are sarcasm tags there :)

      If you were German, you would be serious.

      But in Australia, if a beer doesn't have additives and preservatives, it is advertised as a feature. I still love it though.

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    17. Re:For that matter... by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      That does make me wonder - why is it the Food and Drug Association versus the Department of Alcohol, Drug, and Firearms?

      Are they really fighting over the same drug territory, or is it "Medical" drugs versus "Outlawed" drugs? Er, was it Congress who decides what is outlawed?

      8-PP

    18. Re:For that matter... by alleycat0 · · Score: 1

      Alcoholic beverages are regulated in the U.S. not by the Food and Drug Administration, but rather by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. BATF does not *allow* nutrition information to appear on the labels of alcoholic beverages because (they claim) the appearance of such might convey the (false, in BATF's thinking) notion that these products are a source of nutrition.

      --
      I am not a number - I am a free man!
    19. Re:For that matter... by CentrX · · Score: 1

      For all intents and purposes, it is impossible to die due to the consumption of cannabis.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  36. Re: Boddington's by Crusty+Oldman · · Score: 1

    BTW, you should always pour Boddington's ale into a glass, so that you can see the gorgeous upside-down cascade effect of the foamy bubbles.

  37. How we stereotype the word drug by red+elk · · Score: 1

    "The US Government labeled beer(alcohol) as a drug, BeerAdvocate.com begs to differ..."

    Ok, so all of the sudden, advocates don't want to label beer or alcohol a drug, but if you have a website called maryjaneadvocate.com, you are controversial...

    1. Re:How we stereotype the word drug by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Well they didn't call their site brewskieadvocate.com did they? Or coldoneadvocate.com. Its all about presentation.

      --
      Why not fork?
  38. Founding Fathers by yintercept · · Score: 4, Informative

    A friend who researched the education of the founding fathers (she spent a ton of time reading diaries, etc.) told me that the morning meal for many a US patriot was a cup of ale. Apparently the ale they drank was a lot heavier and meal like than what we drink today.

    It makes sense. In the days before chlorinated water and refrigerator, ale would have been one of the more reliable ways of preserving foods.

    1. Re:Founding Fathers by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you're using chlorinated water to preserve food?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Founding Fathers by yintercept · · Score: 2, Insightful
      you're using chlorinated water to preserve food?

      I was thinking ahead of myself again. Before we had good, reliable safe drinking water, it was better to drink the beer. Water born vectors still take out a good portion of people in developing countries.

      Students visiting Mexico on Spring Break know this inherently: Don't drink the water...drink the beer.

    3. Re:Founding Fathers by LimeColoredSloth · · Score: 1

      We also invented rum, which isn't a light drink at all. Today we pasteurize beer - before this practice became mainstream, beer used to be pretty unsanitary. I doubt it was any cleaner than well water.

    4. Re:Founding Fathers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Today we pasteurize beer

      No, only behemoth breweries with crappy product pasturize.

    5. Re:Founding Fathers by japhmi · · Score: 1

      My family has a copy of the manifest of the ship that brought one of my ancestors over to America. They had more beer than water.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
  39. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, in the US, beer is just another word for brown water with alcohol, it seems.

    I've yet to taste any American beer that has the least bit of flavour to it.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  40. Home Brewers by kongjie · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I imagine there must be a good number of home brewers among the /. nerdus maximus population. If you have done any substantial home brewing (and by substantial I mean beyond the kits that even the malls have offered), you'll know that beer is indeed food.

    It can be a wonderfully complex process and by learning it you are taking part in a time-honored tradition. Plus, you get cheap, good drink.

    1. Re:Home Brewers by zip+the+pinhead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is indeed true.

      Especially if you do not use the "liquid" malt kits as you mentioned.

      The combination of malt, water, hops and yeast is all that is really needed to create beer. It just happens that alcohol is a "by product" of the process. Not that there's anything wrong with that :-)

      You'll also note that in trying to create stronger beers, they usually turn out tasting only "so so" if you're lucky. Beer is meant to be somewhere in the range of 4%-6% alcohol maximum.

      If you want something even more like "food" try brewing meade. Honey is yummy.

      Cheers
      zip

      --

      "The answers are always inside the problem, not outside"- Marshall McLuhan

    2. Re:Home Brewers by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'd take minor issue with the stronger beer statement. With some care, an imperial stout (typically 7+%) or a barleywine (8-13%!!! but ferociously difficult to make) are some of the finest beers out there.

      But for most beers, most of the time, you're right.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    3. Re:Home Brewers by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1
      Stronger beers are possible, and in some degree easier to make. It is vastly more difficult to produce a clean crisp Bud clone than say a strong pale ale. (The lightness and lack of flavor makes any techincal errors exceedingly appararent.)

      For stronger beers, the only trick is letting them age properly. A barelywine that's less than a year old is usually harsh. Let it sit in the basement for a year or two, and magic happens. Some goes for cider, which is ridiculously easy to make.

      Brewing takes patiences, more than anything else.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
  41. "Food" Festival by rleyton · · Score: 1
    Well, in that case "food" lovers in the UK should make a bee-line to the Great British Beer Festival (Here's the google cache, as the site's been a bit flaky the last day or two).

    It starts this Tuesday at London's Olympia, and in previous years is said to be the largest pub in the world in terms of selection of beer, and IIRC, number of customers :)

    See you there :-)

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
    1. Re:"Food" Festival by tgma · · Score: 1

      I went to this a couple of years ago, and found myself in heaven! There are hundreds of different types of beer (I can remember two, called "Hammerhead" and "Old Fart" ). If you like your beer warm and dark, there is no finer place to be. Of course, it has a cement floor, nowhere to sit, and the male to female ratio is about 9 to 1, but then, that's what gives it the authentic pub atmosphere.

  42. No chemicals? by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    Man, WTF do you eat? Can't be any of those carbrohydrate, protein or fat chemicals? How do you breathe? none of those oxygen chemicals? Get a clue- everything is made of chemicals, some are good, some are bad, but use the word properly, for fucks sake.

    1. Re:No chemicals? by Magic+Thread · · Score: 1

      This from someone who can't even spell "fish"!

      No, seriously, I was half-joking in that post (as evidenced by the obvious goatse link), but you do know what I meant. If you really wanted to be a smartass, you could also have pointed out that I am under the influence of chemicals in my brain all the time.

    2. Re:No chemicals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your daily intact of Vitamin C? Iron? Silica? Do you know if you're eating too little, or too much?

      Too much of a good thing can be just as bad as a bad thing. Just saying "I don't eat anything with chemicals in it" is just nonsense and doesn't mean that you're healthy or fit.

  43. Bingo by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's nothing wrong with drinking in moderation. It's more the amount of activity you put into it. You don't do much more than sit around when you binge drink. Do marathon runners get tossed a bottle of Aquafina or a can of Blue Ribbon?

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
    1. Re:Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with drinking in moderation, but moderating while drinking should be avoided.

    2. Re:Bingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats is, next marathon I run I'm wearing my 'PBR me ASAP' shirt!

  44. Beer is Good, Plus its healthy. by HanzoSan · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I've been told by my older and wiser elders that drinking a guinness per day provides protection from impotence.

    I also notice that people who drink a couple of glasses of beer each day live longer. I know people who are 80, 90, 100 years old and still drinking, so it must be healthy if people can drink for 100 years with no side effects.

    Just dont drink too much.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Beer is Good, Plus its healthy. by panurge · · Score: 1

      Consider cause and effect. It may be that people with excellent biochemistry live longer, and as a side effect they can continue to drink beer. People with bad biochemistry may have shorter life expectancy associated with lower alcohol tolerance. You would need to do some rather intrusive tests on identical twins for a very long time to make an open and shut case.

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    2. Re:Beer is Good, Plus its healthy. by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      I also notice that people who drink a couple of glasses of beer each day live longer. I know people who are 80, 90, 100 years old and still drinking, so it must be healthy if people can drink for 100 years with no side effects.

      I read an article that mentioned that alchoholics who die of cirrhosis often have very clean arteries. This type of thing is why researchers are wondering if moderate alchohol consumption is actually good for us (enough to help the heart and arteries, but not too much to damage the liver).

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    3. Re:Beer is Good, Plus its healthy. by Coplan · · Score: 1
      George Burns...case-and-point!

      Lives to be 100 smoking cigars and drinking martinis like water. I want to be just like him (except I don't like martinis).

  45. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try a Shiner Bock or Shiner Double Bock. Used to be independent Texas made untill Anheiser bought them ought a few years ago.

  46. beer..not just for breakfast anymore by fermion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't remember which ad this came from. Probably a German breakfast beer

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  47. A Guinness per day keeps impotence away. by HanzoSan · · Score: 1, Interesting



    Or so I've been told.

    But even if it doesnt, drinking alcohol also lessens your chance of heart attack.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:A Guinness per day keeps impotence away. by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not just impotence, it keeps strokes and dementia away.

      A drink or two a day of wine, beer or liquor is, experts say, often the single best nonprescription way to prevent heart attacks -- better than a low-fat diet or weight loss, better even than vigorous exercise. Moderate drinking can help prevent strokes, amputated limbs and dementia.

    2. Re:A Guinness per day keeps impotence away. by belroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      The best regime seems to be moderate exercise (enough to raise pulse to fat burn/cardio border) for 30 mins a few times a week, combined with a few glasses of wine a day (or equivalent), and a balanced diet. By balanced diet I mean the usual low-fat low-salt low-sugar five portions of fruit/veg a day and reasonable carbs.
      And the single most important factor - don't smoke .

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  48. It is like powerade by littleghoti · · Score: 1

    At least, beer is isotonic, so the fluids are adsorbed quickly.

    1. Re:It is like powerade by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      At least, beer is isotonic, so the fluids are adsorbed quickly.

      IIRC, all alcoholic drinks are also diaretics, so said fluids are expelled quickly. Experienced session drinkers have a couple of glasses of water at some point during the proceedings.

  49. Too much by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    College taught me one thing;

    There's just too much copulation in beer for it to be a healthy part of the food pyramid.

    Just think of the STDs and the WMDs.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  50. Video Professor? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2, Funny



    Hahaha, your line "Buy my product" reminds me of video professor begging people to PLEASE buy his software and then trying to convince everyone how useful it is.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  51. Common sense prevails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean alcohol will finally get the attention it deserves- as the gateway drug? I'm so sick of weed getting that sad, sad title.

  52. American beer: a Multitude of Sins by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Isn't most american beer pretty low in alchoholic content? I've heard stories of American sailors coming to Australia and getting wasted on a few beers because they're not used to the high alchohol content.

    "American Beer" covers a multitude of sins. You can get all kinds of beers here: local and imported, weak and strong, good and bad.

    It's true that there's a variety called "three-two beer", after the alcohol content. It's not real beer, in my book, but some people drink it. In fact, I'm sorry to say, a lot of people drink it.

    Unfortunately, the big-name mass-marketed beers -- Millers, Bud, Pabst -- are all pretty dreadful, as beers go: filtered, highly processed, force-carbonated ... and lower alcohol content.

    As to American sailors getting wonky in Australia ... after six months at sea, in close quarters with no one but other sailors ... hell, I'd get wonky on shore leave.

    --
    -kgj
  53. It's about time... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    we saw some good sense from an advocacy group around here. As for myself, I'm enjoying the Breakfast of Champions ATM.... another cold one.

    --
    C|N>K
  54. Beer has always been one of the 4 major foodgroups by SUPAMODEL · · Score: 1

    along with:
    * sugar (gotta get that energy to keep reloading slashdot for t3h frist post; also can be counted as part of beer)
    * salt (how else do you raise your blood pressure enough to push blood through your arteries)
    * fat (nothing tastes bad with fat)

    After all, how else do you get a physique like this without some form of controlled diet.

  55. Liver Removed From Food Pyramid? by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    How about removing liver from the food pyramid. Think how much it's like beer: tastes bad, and it's full of toxins.

    I'm told (by my brother, the hunter) that fresh moose liver has a mood-altering effect. Small wonder, considering that it's full of chemicals the moose was trying to eliminate ....

    --
    -kgj
  56. Newcastle Brown Ale. . . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . .now THIS is a "Nuke" that needs to be proliferated. . .. .

    1. Re:Newcastle Brown Ale. . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newky is what teenagers drink once they're tired of cheap cider.

  57. Its your round ! by strangedays · · Score: 1
    Well of course beer is a food! Duh.

    Any fool can take water, malted grain, hops and yeast and come up with something boring like bread, or some such pointless item. It takes a real genius to make a great beer.

    I hail from Macclesfield in Cheshire UK, so I was naturally brought up to see beer as a foodstuff, expecially Boddingtons! just one of the local nectars, and never dreamed any misguided folks thought differently until I moved to the USA.

    Unfortunately, much as I love the place, beer is quite rare in the USA. The sad liquids called beer here, are usually strange chemical fluids the marketing folks reluctantly pay to put in the cans so their lite-weight flavorings and stabilizers dont just blow off the shelf. US beer is mostly ersatz, semi frozen, colored water, reminiscent of used mouthwash.

    Nil Desperandum! Fortunately, Boddingtons is now here in the good ol USA, and better than ever (or maybe I just needed a real beer). Its brewed at the Strangeways brewery Manchester and imported from England by those excellent beer folks at LABATT USA. Boddingtons has genuinely advanced Draughtflow(r) System beer technology. Now thats what using technology is all about!

    Any beer distinguishable from Real Draught Pub Nectar, is unsufficiently advanced.

    Advanced real beers should be enjoyed cautiously by beer newbies unfamiliar with beer concepts such as having an actual taste, the complex concept of a creamy head (thats bubbles folks) and a reasonable alcohol ratio (thats where the food calories are). A real beer is a freind, treat it with respect and it will feed and look after you.

    IANABM (I Am Not A Beer Marketer)

    Cheers Slashdot!

    --
    There is no god; get over it already! Never exchange a walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage.
    1. Re:Its your round ! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Mass market beer in the US is garbage and should be treated as such.

      However you don't need to go to England to get good beer, there are a number of fine US breweries with names like Victory, Stone, Rougue Ales, Great Lakes and Kalamazoo that hold their own with the best from anywhere. The aforementioned web site "Beer Advocate" has reviews of beer from all over the world, including some top American brands.

  58. Boddies by isorox · · Score: 1

    How the hell can you "crack open" a boddies? It's designed to be drunk from a tap (via a glass if you please).

  59. "Cheers" Proof that Beer is goood for you. by hopbine · · Score: 5, Funny

    In one episode of 'Cheers', Cliff is seated at the bar describing the
    Buffalo Theory to his buddy, Norm. (I don't think I've ever heard the
    concept explained any better than this....)

    "Well you see, Norm, it's like this... A herd of buffalo can only move as
    fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest
    and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection
    is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the
    whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members.
    In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the
    slowest brain cells.

    Now, as we know, excessive intake of alcohol kills brain cells. But
    naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this
    way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making
    the brain a faster and more efficient machine. And that, Norm, is why you
    always feel smarter after a few beers."

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
  60. Good beers are like Swiss wines by panurge · · Score: 1
    If there is any left for export, they can't really be that good. There is a certain level of production beyond which a real craft beer is just not possible anymore, and if a half decent salesman can't get rid of the lot in a 20 mile radius, something is seriously wrong.

    IANAB-but craft breweries use my software.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  61. Sweet, Sweet Beer by Ranger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People used to drink beer because the water was unsafe to drink. Cholera or Beer? You decide.

    Samuel Smith's Oatmeal Stout is almost a meal in itself. Guinness Stout is pretty darn close too. You might have drink 3 or 4 of them though. Boddington's is an ale but has the same consistency as Guinness. I'm partial to Fat Tire.

    Beer. It's the reason I get up in the afternoon!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Sweet, Sweet Beer by cruachan · · Score: 1

      Bleurgh. Boddingtons like Guinness? Guinness is a stout, Boddintons is a 'bitter' or ale. Nothing alike at all.

      Of course, the best beer in the world is Marstons Pedigree servered anywhere within 20 miles of the brewery straight from the wood. :-)

    2. Re:Sweet, Sweet Beer by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Britain's oldest brewer with a politically incorrect sense of humour. Master Brew, Bishop's Finger, yum!

    3. Re:Sweet, Sweet Beer by Ranger · · Score: 1

      Bleurgh. Boddingtons like Guinness? Guinness is a stout, Boddintons is a 'bitter' or ale.

      I said nothing about taste. Of course they are different. I said Boddington's was an ale (it's not bitter at all) and Guinness a stout. I said it had the same consistency or rather texture. They are both thick and full bodied and have a nice creamy head that lasts a long time. And I like them both.

      And where is Marston's brewery praytell?

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    4. Re:Sweet, Sweet Beer by cruachan · · Score: 1

      Marstons is in Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, England. Beer - well ale - capital of the World ;-). Grew up in the place.

      Marstons is the only place left using the Burton Union system - nice article here - http://www.beerhunter.com/documents/19133-000132.h tml. Unfortunatly most of the rest of the beer now brewed in Burton is the same commercial rubbish as elsewhere. Hell even Bass is owned by Coors now (when my parents were children there were over 50 breweries in Burton, there's now just two giants which can be dismissed, Marstons - which is a mid-sized regional brewer, and a Micro-brewery or two).

      Until I left home my local was 'The Union', which was about a hundred yards outside the brewery gate, although the better pint was served about 5 miles away where they just had the barrels in the back room and poured direct from the wood. Like many Burtonians I've always been of the opinion that Pedigree doesn't travel, but that may just be local bias ;-)

    5. Re:Sweet, Sweet Beer by clarkc3 · · Score: 1
      I just always had a problem with Guinness's labeling. Its a stout - yet it says 'serve cold' on the bottle/can - does anyone else who likes stouts see a problem with that?

      Also nice to see someone else mention Samuel Smith - their Oatmeal/Imperial Stouts were great, and their Taddy Porter was pretty damn good too

    6. Re:Sweet, Sweet Beer by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      Actually, I can't stand the taste of beer - f'ing horrible since I live in Wisconsin with tons of homebrew and microbreweries. So I'll take the cholera with sprinkles, please.

      8-PP

  62. MOD PARENT UP (+Insightful) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you are on crack!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP (+Insightful) by gl4ss · · Score: 1
      Unless you are on crack!**

      but remember, crack addicts are pretty slim.

      .
      beer isn't that bad, compared to most stuff people drink when they could be drinking water, if you don't drink it constantly, like first on breakfast, then few on some breaks and then few more later. we at finland have long ago learnt(through quite hefty taxation) that beer is best used for getting drunk and not this civilized mumbo jumbo drink along the day(of course unless you're trying to be drunk all day). you can get that beer belly other ways too, a sandwich there and another there, besides than that is beer belly really that bad? it's not like it's huge unless you have some serious other weight problems as well and the ladies don't stay pretty all their life either, so screw their opinion ;) .
      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  63. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    I hate Boddingtons too (smells like puke), but it certainly isn't a LAGER.

    I'm quite partial to Bombardier since Brakspear's stabbed us in the back.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  64. Pot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SO they can take POT off the drug list?

  65. All hail the Beer God by shplorb · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Beer is good, beer is great. We all know it, and here are some of the reasons why - I really can't put into words why, it just is:

    • An icy cold one is a great way to relax and refresh yourself after a hard day's work.
    • Having a quiet one down the pub with a couple of mates. (I don't know what the female equivalent of this is.)
    • Having a beer with your dad or brother.
    • A beer with your lunch or dinner. Beer goes well with pretty much any dish.
    • There's so many beers to try.
    • Getting shitfaced.

    Hrmm... there's many more positives to beer. Beer really is a social drink... it's the man's drink. Beer and pubs go together well.

    Contrary to the article though, beer can be fattening... you have to remember that you're only going to put on weight if Ein != Eout - the body processes sugars and carbohydrates are broken down into sugars before being processed - that's why carbohydrates are a long-term energy source and sugary things like fruit and chocolate are short-term energy sources.

    Six schooners have enough energy to run your average male for day. So drink in moderation and make sure to keep up the exercise and maintain a balanced diet. (And fat people wonder why they're fat when they eat McDonalds everyday and drive or take the lift everywhere!)

    Finally, an article where my signature is at home! =]
    --
  66. Beer == silicon by akorvemaker · · Score: 1

    A few months ago I read about a study (done in England, I think - they seem to do all the weird/cool studies there) that looked at dietary sources of silicon. In years gone by, all the silicon we needed came in our water supplies. However, because of the method we use for water treatment, it all gets removed. In today's world, beer is one of the best dietary sources of silicon and they actually recommended it for young adults to encourage bone strength.

    That said, there's always the moderation issue. Let's try not to forget that.

    And, just for fun, here's the top google search result for "beer dietary source silicon". I'm sure you really wanted to know that.

    1. Re:Beer == silicon by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot...we could all just probably eat an old CPU or two if we need silicon

      (yes, I know there's other crap in a CPU...but it's a joke =P)

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  67. Yippy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More government hypocrisy on drug policy. I think beer should be banned, along with cigarettes, chocolate, coffee, tea, sugar. Somewhere, someone could abuse one of these substances and harm themselves, so it's only logical that the government should stop beating around the bush (no pun insteaded) with this "classification" bull and just ban the production, sale, importation, and consumption of all of it.

  68. I think it's great by squarefish · · Score: 1

    the article and the fact that taco is encouraging early sunday morning drinking. the only problem I see is that it's still too early to see drunken' posts, as this would be way more interesting if it came out at say midnight or so...

    Have you ever posted drunk? other than all the obvious tactics, it's a great way to drop karma like crazy. Of course you can always post AC, but then you never remember when or where you made the comment you want to see again.

    *drinking a sierra nevada pale ale in basement*

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  69. Boddingtons? by andy1307 · · Score: 1

    Is that a beer? It sounds like a store selling womens lingerie...

  70. define beer by golgotha007 · · Score: 1, Troll

    How exactly does the US Government define beer? Anything from the BudMilloor company is not beer. It's more like a carbinated, rice beverage with alcohol.
    The only choices Americans have for good beer are local breweries (or micro-breweries) or anywhere outside of the US.

    When I first moved from California to Germany and had my first real beer, I didn't like it. Fact is, I didn't realize what beer was because I grew up subjected to marketing blitz by Budweiser, Miller and Coors.
    However, after a couple more German Karlburgs, I really started to appreciate what a good beer could be.
    Now, I am completely and utterly repulsed by anything from BudMilloors.

    1. Re:define beer by zymurgyboy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sorry you missed out on the Anchor beers from SF before you left. That's one of the few truly American styles of "real" beer. Since you're in Germany now and have been getting good German beer, you'd probably appreciate the origins of Steam Beer even more. It was developed by German immigrants to the area who came from lager brewing traditions. Problem was, is mid-19th century California, getting the ice they need to lager their beer for the appropriate period was prohibitively expensive, if not impossible.

      Fortunately, lager yeasts (which ferment between 40 and 50 degrees F) will ferment out at ale tempuratures (aound 70 degrees F) as well. Doesn't work the other way. The important thing here is that they could still use the yeasts they had been using for generation. They merely needed to adapt the process (and to some extent, their yeast cultures) to the conditions in which they found themselves. So, german immigrants to the bay area made german style beers with lager yeasts fermented at ale temperatures. Voila, new style! It has a nice malty character, characterisitic of many german beers and is rather hoppy, but not overly so. It has a clean taste, characteristic of a larger and a little hint of the fruity taste you get from top-fermenting ale fermentations.

      While not comercial in the sense of Miller Brewing Co., Milwaukie, WI, it is a commercial beer with national and international distibution (dispelling the myth that all American non-micros suck).

      I don't know how the US gov will define beer, but that's how they should, IMNSHO. With the explosion of good micros, brewpubs, local styles, etc. in the US, maybe need something equivalent to the French DOC in America, only for beer.

      It's taken a long time to undo the damage done, by Prohibition. The government could acutally (Shock) do something good here if they define it this way (i.e. something of local repute, high quality, specific process for manufacture using the most exacting standards and best ingredients).

      That would be cool.

      --
      If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  71. Life is good by andy1307 · · Score: 1
    Evidence Mounting That Moderate Drinking Is Healthful

    Thirty years of research has convinced many experts of the health benefits of moderate drinking for some people. A drink or two a day of wine, beer or liquor is, experts say, often the single best nonprescription way to prevent heart attacks -- better than a low-fat diet or weight loss, better even than vigorous exercise. Moderate drinking can help prevent strokes, amputated limbs and dementia.

  72. Logic by pmfp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everything is poision in the right amounts. Beer is no different. Matter of fact is that it's loaded with nutritients. As stated, however, in the right amounts it is no longer good for the body. True story: A scientist was once asked what food he would bring to a desert island. What did he answer? Beer. I, on the other hand, suggested to my unit that we should ask our commanders if we could bring a keg out in the field.

    --

    "So unmerciful is life, that everything afterwards is too late."
  73. PIlgrim's Pride by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Beer as food was well known through the ages. It's only in modern times that we forget the wisdom of out elders.

    The Pilgrums landed at Plymouth because they were running low on beer and needed to land to replenish their supplies. The rest is history.

  74. Re:mhm/good thing we've invented wire-less. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good thing we've invented wire-less.
    now you can walk, drink AND WORK ant the same time!

    but then maybe they want you fat and and un-attractiv (woman on top is a different story). less change of becoming a threat to their multiplying wants and a potential buyer of drugs (parkinson, alzheimer all the heart-diseases).

  75. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

    Yeah, typo, writing about beer and drinking lager is not a good idea.

    Bombardier is a nice bitter - and is becomming more and more widespread.

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  76. beer is not good for your body.. by root_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beer is the worst thing you can eat/drink. Because of its high glycemic index you get fat from drinking it. Hot tip for all overweight geeks: Read the food book by Michelle Montignac, "Eat Yourself Slim". There you'll find the real truth, how to keep fit just by eating certain stuff. This guy Montignac wrote this book without the main intention of getting any profit, thats why it reveals the truth. If everyone started to listen to this dude a lot of capitalist would be very unhappy, (because then their usless diet pills or other stupid diet "campaigns" will go to hell).

    --
    Information wants to be free, piracy rules, bla bla bla..
  77. American beers are made of piss by passion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a rather good explanation for this. Not that I'm defending it, but rather explaining it to understand it and adress it at the root cause.

    Prohibition was a scary time for Americans, particularly breweries - most of which went out of business. Prohibition was created by women marching in the streets, complaining that their husbands had become drunks in the saloons. Who could blame them - during the depression, there weren't many jobs to keep them occupied.

    When prohibition was repealed, the breweries wanted to create beer that would appeal to women, so that they would become consumers and not vote again for prohibition. So they made their beers lighter, and specialized in the lager field that they felt was more approachable for those who weren't accustomed to drinking beer.

    Sadly, America's beer development was stuck on training wheels until about the 80s, when certain individuals started experimenting with brewing their own. This launched a movement where people started becoming more interested in flavor rather than just getting drunk.

    In case you haven't been to this side of the pond recently, there are many wonderful breweries that severly stomp on most European breweries which are stuck doing things the way they did around the time that America was discovered. I'd highly reccomend checking out some of these breweries:

    --
    - passion
    1. Re:American beers are made of piss by squarefish · · Score: 1

      Prohibition was created by women marching in the streets, complaining that their husbands had become drunks in the saloons.

      Prohibition was created with the 18th amendment and women received the right to vote with the 19th amendment.

      now I don't have the exact dates and don't feel like looking them up, but from how I think amendments are ratified, this does not agree with your statement.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    2. Re:American beers are made of piss by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      Have you been to Europe recently. English beer sucks, I know I live here but the mainland. HAve you tried Belgian beer or German or Czech. you have to go to those countries and get it fresh to really appreciated. Bottled and sent half way round the world doesn't do it justice.

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
    3. Re:American beers are made of piss by passion · · Score: 1

      I've toured Germany, and yes they make really good lagers and Weisses, but I'm not really into those styles. I'm a much bigger fan of IPAs, porters, stouts, barley wines, and strong ales that have so much hops, that they kick your ass.

      Belgian Lambics, Dubbels, and Trippels can be awesome too.

      Oh, and the real Budweiser - from Budjoweiz (sp?) is a pretty good beer too. If I ran that shop - I'd be furious that some crappy corn and rice shop in the States was watering down my brand name.

      --
      - passion
  78. Re:Maltose is the problem - exactly! by root_1 · · Score: 1

    Exactly! Thats why I recommend Michelle Montignac's book "Eat yourself slim". He explains all of that stuff in the book.

    --
    Information wants to be free, piracy rules, bla bla bla..
  79. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by toriver · · Score: 1

    You have apparently not tasted any bottles that said "brewed by Samuel Adams Breweries" or something like that. Sam Adams is the king of beers over there IMHO.

    (Or you could try one of the many brewery-pubs, I personally liked the products of Steelhead at Fisherman's Wharm, San Francisco.)

  80. Obligatory Monty Pythons quote by Ian-K · · Score: 1

    Why is American beer like having sex in a canoo?

    - It's f*cking close to water.

    --
    I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
    1. Re:Obligatory Monty Pythons quote by Ian-K · · Score: 1

      OK, don't flame me. I just saw it further down. I searched for "monty" and "python", found none and posted the parent.

      Trian

      --
      I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
  81. Re:how about something more accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vitamin C is a poisen at high enough concentrations, and I can kill you with air alone. Guess we best ban them both, too!

  82. You have a gut because by hikerhat · · Score: 1

    You probably sit in front of slashdot all day eating cheetoes and drinking soda, drive the the bar at night, stuff your face with a basket of chicken wings while drinking beer, drive back home and go to sleep, no? Try walking the long way to the pub. 'Course after all those sodas and cheetoes you are going to have to walk about 100 miles. Maybe eat carrots and drink water while reading slashdot.

  83. Mixing Poison and cereal ? by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Does mixing Arsenic with my cereal make the resulting stuff food ? No ? I thougth you would answer so. Do not forget, Alcohol , is a poison for the organism (particulary for the brain and liver). It does not matter whether there are all vitamin of the universe and all oligo element in your beer. Fact remain this is a poison to your organism and has a negative effect on you. This is what should rule it as a drug, not the rest of its composition. Oh, and before you yell at me by saying alcohol is fun or whatever, we are speaking here not whether people LIEK or DISLIKE beer, but we are speaking of the governement recognizing beer is not an Essential stuff, and can be downright nasty due to its component.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  84. Believe it or not by tgma · · Score: 1

    My high school, which is in England, and has been around a long time, used to have a brewery for the students. The top student got around 4 pints a day, IIRC. The brewery shut down about 200 years ago, and is now a library.

    Mind you, back then, the senior prefects were allowed to beat the others with canes, so it wasn't all gravy.

    1. Re:Believe it or not by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's funny, in American high schools the seniors are still allowed to beat the others.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Believe it or not by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      That's funny, at my old HS you went to jail if you were in a fight. Rural public school, circa 1994.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:Believe it or not by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Not in any american high school I've heard of. It was never allowed in school. After school many students got into fights, but it wasn't on school property. Just a bunch of idiots going to a park to fight. Easy to avoid if you aren't stupid enough to want to join.

      Actually it is the freshmen who want to fight most. Hormons are peaking, and they haven't learned to deal with it yet. Seniors have matured a little bit, and gotten over the "enjoyment" of beating up someone not as tough as them.

    4. Re:Believe it or not by yintercept · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the beer people drank for food wasn't quite as strong as what we brew today-for entertainment. Today's brewery's work for a higher alcohol content, breakfast beer was probably more like a fermented barley soup and brewed for a lower alcohol content.

      I personally think it would be great if we recognized alcoholic drinks as a food source, since it would encourage people to think more about the nutritional content of what they drink. Hmmm, we might someday have Total Beer commercials..."You would have to drink 4 pints of Blatz to get the same vitamins as one pint of Old Totalovski's..."

    5. Re:Believe it or not by fshalor · · Score: 1

      Cien porciento! I think you've hit it. Part of the whole point here is that intelligence and knowledge is the determining factor. Someone can get messed up on Apsrin too! And there are legal foods which are worse for a person than beer. A good ale/wine/beet has its place at times. Some of the US populations seems to be hung up about never drinking becasue of thoughts of all those rowdy college students drunk as skunks driveing around in cars their daddy's bought them. And then there are college students, drunk as skunks, becasue their parents told them "Alcohol BAD, don't DRINk anything." rather than, "Alcohol can be bad, but it has some health benefits. If you drink too much, however, you can fry you liver ..."

      Ah well, I really need an ale right now, but will contain myself with a cuppa of coffee.

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    6. Re:Believe it or not by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Today's brewery's work for a higher alcohol content, breakfast beer was probably more like a fermented barley soup and brewed for a lower alcohol content.

      You need to go to better breweries. A good brewery is going to brew for flavor of a beverage, not to get their patrons drunk. There are a lot of issues with serving alcohol to intoxicated folks, as far as the liquer control commission goes.

      I would recommend trying out real breweries, where you can see the actual brewhouse, and see what gets produced.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    7. Re:Believe it or not by RisingSon · · Score: 1

      You would have to drink ONE MILLION cans of Blatz to get the same nutrition as one can of SUPER COLON BLOW Old Totalovski's. Hehe...seriously...Blatz is some great cheap beer. Its hard to find in bottles nowadays...even here in Milwaukee. But its still great on tap at the local establishments. A $5 pitcher of local brew is hard to turn down, even if it is Blatz. Unfortunately, a Blatz hangover may be the worst hangover acheivable. Bleh. And it produces an equal volume of stool. Cheers.

    8. Re:Believe it or not by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      Beer being drunk for breakfast would have been far different from a beer you get in a pub now. A common breakfast staple of armies throughout the renaissance was "smalle beere", a much weaker form beer. One of the reasons beer was popular was because it contained Hops, which was an important medicinal herb.

    9. Re:Believe it or not by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "with a cuppa of coffee"

      SYNTAX ERROR
      >

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:Believe it or not by jolshefsky · · Score: 1

      It wasn't "seniors" as much as it was other, more valuable students like star football players, average football players, anyone else on or associated with the football players, and anyone whose daddy was a cop or in the mob--double if both. If you were there to get an education, or, say, get an ASE certification so you could get a job when you graduated, well, you just weren't worth enough to keep in school if you got in a fight.

      --
      --- Jason Olshefsky

      Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  85. Beer has many good uses by Metex · · Score: 1

    Personaly I agree that beer should be labed a food product. Besides the variouse listed reasons the article gives, most of the by products from the brewing process, such as left over yeast is made into world renowned food substances like Vegimite.

    --
    Never could figure out why my girl liked my bitch tits, then I found out she was a lesbian.
  86. Beer Fest by bbq_jedi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reminder for Canucks, Toronto Ontario Beer Festival happens August 8,9,10 at Old Fort York.

  87. BAILEY's and Cereal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, for geeks, you sure missed that one!

    No sugar required, and corn-flakes taste mind-bendingly good!

  88. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by cruachan · · Score: 2

    Has to be said as a long-term real ale fan born an raised in the beer capital of the world (Burton-on-Trent ;-) I must agree with you on that one. I always found Boddingtons to be so poorly hop'ed it tasted sweet and the smell reminiscent of vomit.

    OTOH Marston's Pedigree rocks.

  89. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by cruachan · · Score: 1

    Yah! I've always thought Bods smells of Vomit myself. Nice to find someone else independently with the same opinion.

  90. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. I'm not the only one that things that Boddington's is bad? It smells like Foster's Bitter, saved only by the gimicky "Guiness-style" tap system.

  91. From the article... by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
    "The definition of food doesn't say anything about "chewing." Beer is food for the soul and mind."

    By extension, no one would question that milk is food, and yet there's no chewing there either. Well shouldn't be, check the date stamp.:-)

    I would take that a step further and say it's food for the body as well. If you think about it, in its most basic form (malted barley, water, yeast), it's just liquid bread. But better. I've never heard of a "lawnmower bread." It's nourishing, in limited quantities it's good for you, and it's refreshing.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  92. Caffrey's by DrLudicrous · · Score: 1

    Well, I heard that there is one place here in town that has it, but so far I've had no luck in finding it. And a little bird told me that Coors might be bringing Caffrey's back sometime soon. Who knows if that means within a year, or within five, but the sooner the better.

  93. Re: Um...where is this in the article? by gooru · · Score: 1

    The US Government labeled beer(alcohol) as a drug

    OK...so where in the linked article does it actually say this??? Does anyone else realize the government has nothing to do with this?

  94. Did The Author Just Wake Up From A Coma? by thelizman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Beer (and other forms of alcohol) IS and have been part of a food pyramid for nearly 4 years!

    Some Background For The Uninitiated

    The concept of the Food Pyramid was proposed by researches at the US Department of Agriculture, who needed to convey the idea of a healthy diet (according to the dogma of the time) in terms of proportion, variety and moderation. Thus, the pyramid graphic was presented. The problem is that word, "dogma".

    The USDA is by far not even close to the leading edge of nutrition and dietary research. Their food pyramid represented a diet heavy in breads, with a little less emphasis on fruits and vegetables. Meat was eschewed, as was diary, and fats, oils, and salts were placed at the top of the pyramid to emphasize that they were to be used sparingly.

    Two problems with the Food Pyramid were immediately obvious. First, it ignored contemporary research and accepted medical though which stated that diets high in fish and poultry were beneficial. The USDA assumed that all means were bad because of their high animal fat content. But research at the time (and subsequent) proved that not all fat was bad, and not only was some fat good, but actually necessary. Also, the Food Pyramid didn't differntiate between breads that were healthy (whole grains) and those that were unhealthy (white rice, bleached flour, corn startches, pasta, and processed grains in which the fiber had been stripped chemically). They simply lumped all grains together.

    The second problem was that the food pyramid tried to convey a sense of proportion by giving recommended serving amounts. But these serving amounts were meaningless to the average person. They needed to know what a serving was. Was it a gram, kilo, cup, pound, ounce, or something else?

    Enter the Diet Fads

    Actually, "Fad" diets aren't new. The term is used for just about any new diet which proclaims a principal not accepted in contemporary circles - so fad diets are not inherently bad, but most turn out that way. Fad diets did for Americans what the USDA didn't with thier Food Pyramid or "Four Food Groups" of prior years. It gave people a guide to how much of what should be eaten. The other problem is that these fad diets were targeted towards weight loss. Most of them worked for most people who tried them to some degree, but their failure came when the diet was over. Without a sense of proper nutrition, people reverted to their unhealthy ways of eating. Thus was coined the term "Yo-Yo" dieting, where a person loses weight, then gains it back, and loses it again. This constant state of flux is not healthy, and coupled with the sedantary lifestyle of the average American, it has lead to an epidemic of obesity.

    The word "diet" itself has become synonymous with "trying to lose weight", and likewise has become eschewed by the very diet industry that gave rise to that misconception. Instead, they are using terms like "nutrition system" or "program".

    Fighting Fat With Knowledge

    Enter the molecular biologists, who have put the American diet and the human metabolism under a microscope. Some of the results they have come up with are startling, and have been used to construct a New Food Pyramid to counter the USDA's Food Pyramid. A notable development is the recognition that there are cultural differences that prevent a food pyramid for the American diet from being at all practical for other cultures.

    Healthy, as in Beer

    Beer, and other forms of alcohol, were discovered to be healthy in moderation. Moderation, of course, is the key to everything in a diet. A glass of wine daily can reduce risk factors related to heart disease and stroke. Beer was found to have a phytoprotein that actually aids in repairing cardiac muscle tissues. Red wine, long given to Soviet Nuclear Submariners, can protect the body from low levels of ionizing radiation (though potassium iodide is b

    1. Re:Did The Author Just Wake Up From A Coma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason soviet submariners were given red wine to protect them from radiation was because the soviets were too damn cheap to install the proper amount of shielding around their reactors.

    2. Re:Did The Author Just Wake Up From A Coma? by gillbates · · Score: 1
      Beer was found to have a phytoprotein that actually aids in repairing cardiac muscle tissues.

      Do you have a link, please? I'd really like to see scientific evidence of this.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  95. The Litany by KoshClassic · · Score: 3, Funny
    This seems like a good time to recall the Litany Against Beer (repeat after me...)

    I must drink beer.
    Beer is the mind killer.
    Beer is the little death that brings total obliteration.
    I will face my beer.
    I will permit it to pass over me and through me, and when it has gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
    When the beer is gone, there will be nothing.
    Only I will remain.

    With due credit to the guy who wrote this, if this is indeed the original.

    --
    Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
    1. Re:The Litany by Quikah · · Score: 1

      More like credit to Frank Herbert who wrote it orignally, just substitute beer with fear and you get the quote from Dune.

      --
      Q.
    2. Re:The Litany by duct_tape_n_wd40 · · Score: 1


      Beer is the centre of everything.
      Everything revolves around beer.
      When you drink beer, everything revolves.
      Therefore, beer is the centre of everything.


      --
      .siggy .siggy .siggy .siggy hoi hoi hoi - Prosit!
  96. Beer added to the food pyramid? by ninejaguar · · Score: 1
    I say, why not? Beer was essential in BUILDING the pyramids!

    As beer was part of their salary, you might even say the pyramid builders worked for beer.

    In fact, the workers who built the pyramids took their love of beer to their graves.

    "Many workers were also buried with jars of beer, Hawass adds, picking up one such rough red-clay pot lying on top of a nearby grave. 'They made a beer from barley, and that was their daily drink. They didn't want to be without it even in the afterlife, so they often put in one of these jars.'"

    http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/data/2001/ 11/01/html/ft_20011101.5.html

    = 9J =

  97. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CmdrTaco: So the "Beer Gut" is a myth? So why the hell do I have a gut?

    Taco: I'm looking for something loose and billowy, something
    comfortable for work.
    Salesman: Work, huh? Let me guess. Computer programmer, computer
    magazine columnist, something with computers?
    Taco: Well, I use a computer.
    Salesman: [quietly, to self] Yeah, what's the connection? Must be the
    non-stop sitting and snacking.

  98. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to find regional craft brews. Here in the Boston area, we have a fantastic Belgian style white ale brewed in Maine called Allagash White Ale. Holy shizznit is that stuff good. Crisp, clean, refreshing, not too bitter, nicely carbonated... total beer heaven.

  99. actual marijuana research and facts by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Special section on the New Scientist site

    --
    Arbitrary sig
  100. Well, Moosehead is tolerable by georgeha · · Score: 1

    it has the suggestion of body, which is more than I can say for Molson, or Labatts.

    They still can't compare to a Saranac, or Sam Adams, or most of the microbrews that I tried last night (yummm, Flying Bison Cask Conditioned red, yumm, Southern Tier Hefeweizen).

  101. Don't Do It; It's AMERICAN beer! by W2IRT · · Score: 1
    And yes these guys do drink beer for breakfast." It's only 10 in the morning, I'm dumping out the half pot of coffee left, and cracking open a Boddingtons! Do it!

    Don't Do It!! Read the post again -- it's American Beer! Real beer, like Boddingtons, will give vastly different results!

    "Wait; don't go! Is's a COOKBOOK!"

    --
    Cheers, Peter, W2IRT
  102. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1

    Used to be independent Texas made untill Anheiser bought them ought a few years ago.
    Got a press release on that? The Spoetzl Brewery (makers of Shiner Blonde, Shiner Bock, etc...) is as far as I know still independent. There's nothing on their labels (got a 12 pack in the fridge right now) or around Shiner (just down the road) to indicate any affiliation with the Microsoft of Beers.
    A-B Has their terrible "ZiegenBock" as a competing brand, but i wouldn't use that even for cooking.

    --
    Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
    -- Cicero
  103. Low-Carb beer is Low-Alcohol beer by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
    I'm poor these days so I've taken to drinking Natural Ice ($5/12 pack, and it's 5.9%).

    Thinking of my gut, I decided to try Natural Ice Light, which conspicuously does not have the alcohol percentage on the label.

    I believe it's about half the regular, since I normally drink 6 and I ended up drinking the whole 12 pack! (Yeah, I'm a lush and I need help, but that's a different story...)

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  104. Well duh. by shish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > The US Government labeled beer(alcohol) as a drug,

    It affects your body chemistry, so it's a drug

    > beer can be a part of your diet in a healthy way

    yes, it can.

    > BeerAdvocate.com begs to differ

    No they don't. The govt say beer is a drug (good drug or bad drug is unspecified), beeradvocate say's it's a good drug.

    Just because something is a drug doesn't mean it can't be healthy :-P So what's the point of this story?

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    1. Re:Well duh. by kraut · · Score: 1

      So does sugar.

      Or protein.

      Or vitamins.

      Or water.

      Does that make them all drugs?

      Agree with the last line tough.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
    2. Re:Well duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > The US Government labeled beer(alcohol) as a drug,

      It affects your body chemistry, so it's a drug

      Are there any foods that aren't drugs?
  105. Heroin Added To The Food Pyramid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Heroin Is Food: The US Government labeled heroin(diacetylmorphine) as a drug, herointimes.com begs to differ as they inform their reader that heroin can be a part of your diet in a healthy way. Heroin does a body good? So the "Heroin Withdrawal " is a myth? So why the hell do I have nausea? And yes these guys do shoot up for breakfast."

  106. Beer as a civilizing force. by Cordath · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now for an alternate take on things... Beer is the root of civilization. Yes, that most lovely of liquids: the Wobbly Pop. Hang on to your brews boys.

    Most traditional archaeologists tend to think of civilization as a sort of ladder, and the first few rungs were actually quite slippery. Here's one possible ladder: (there are several)

    First, if you want to have a town with art, politics, hookers, etc. the first thing you need is a food supply that is reliable and doesn't move around a lot. Deer, elk, tapirs, camels, elephants, etc. all move around most vexingly. Turnips do not. Agriculture seems like the way to go, but first you need a crop to cultivate. 30,000 years ago that wasn't an easy thing to find. Beans, squash, wheat, turnips, you name it, are all highly domesticated plants that we've been selectively breeding for thousands of years. When agriculture was starting out the ancestors of today's crops just weren't that productive. Take corn for example. Today a stalk of corn puts out great big honking cobs chock full of juicy kernals. 30,000 years ago the stuff looked a lot like grass. It is in fact, more than a little bit unlikely that you could have lived off the stuff back then. (more on that later) So if no suitable crops existed, we had to breed one.

    Here we hit a major hang up. Breeding massive changes into plants isn't exactly a speedy process when you *know* what you're doing. How exactly our ancestors ever managed to develop a crop suitable for agriculture is actually quite a hot topic of debate! Still, somehow we managed, but it probably took a while. Even for relatively smart people, it is not inconceivable that this took tens of thousands of years before there was any sort of payoff. So what kept our forefathers going?

    Beer.

    Living off of primitive wild corn would probably have been impossible. However, collecting relatively small ammounts to ferment into chicha (BEER!) for those important social events (religion?) was a much more reasonable undertaking. Of course, excessive beer consumption does tend to make one lazy, so naturally our fastly-becoming-religious ancestors decided to start throwing a bunch of seeds together in one place so they didn't have to look all over the bloody planet to round up enough for a good er... mass. Gradually they tossed the crappier grass out and the better stuff got inbred, mutated all to hell, and gradually become more and more like the corn of today. Eventually, we got a crop good enough to actually become a dietary staple. Someone might then have said "Hey guys! We can eat this stuff too! F@$* this hunter-gatherer walking-around-all-day BS. Let's just stay here all the time. There's BEER!"

    So we have a nice town springing forth from the wilderness. Art, culture, and all the trappings of civilization are flowering forth... and people are shitting in the river. This is baaad. People are getting sick! Fortunately, achohol tends to be safer to drink than brownish water! While the high-proof Canadian beers of today would be a tad difficult to live on, the watered down chicha of the day was just the thing for daily consumption. To this day there are still countries where beer is cheaper than safe drinking water. As a beneficial side effect, people with beer tend to be easier to talk into paying taxes, running off to kill people they've never met before, building pyramids, etc...

    Of course, archaeology itself would be nowhere without beer. Seriously, how many major archaeological digs are carried out without beer? Almost any site that has ever been completely excavated is within a short distance of a pub. Occasionally people mount expeditions into the jungles of Yucatan, etc. to discover these fabulous lost cities. They dig for a bit, the beer runs out, and they go home. To any government officials out there who are trying to get some remote lost city excavated, build a pub next to it. The archaeologists will come.

    1. Re:Beer as a civilizing force. by Arandir · · Score: 1

      The way I understood it, was that the first cities were formed around the production of beer, rather than first forming and then trying to figure out what crops to cultivate. They formed because barley was already being cultivated. Barley makes a crappy bread (not enough glutin) but an excellent beer.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  107. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by belroth · · Score: 1
    I agree on both main points - Boddingtons is naff and Pedigree is good, but better from Marston's is Merrie Monk - they called it a mild but it has so much flavour I don't care that it's not a bitter. Even better (my personal favourite when available) is Owd Roger (draught of course) - nectar. My friend went to the bar in the Sun in Holborn and ordered two pints and forestalled the barman by saying "Yes I know what it is, I know what it costs and I'd still like two pints please", of course we weren't saying anything very intelligible afterwards.(7.6% for the curious)

    Other favourites include Wadsworths 6X, Gales 5X and HSB (known as 'brown sticky'). I haven't tried the Usher's version but I drank a lot of Gibb's Bishop's Tipple too. I quite like Speckled Hen too. Draught of course.
    It may be concluded by our friends in the North that I am a Southern Jessie, but I don't see the point in a head on beer - it should be nearly still with just a little head - that way you can get more beer in the glass.

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  108. Prohibition began in 1919. by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

    Prohibition was a scary time for Americans, particularly breweries - most of which went out of business. Prohibition was created by women marching in the streets, complaining that their husbands had become drunks in the saloons. Who could blame them - during the depression, there weren't many jobs to keep them occupied.

    The 18th Amendment was ratified in 1919, and the Volstead Act was passed in the same year. The Great Depression, which began in 1929, was not the cause of Prohibition.

    The Great Depression helped to bring about the repeal of Prohibition, however - the economic benefits of the "new" brewing and distilling industry was one of the arguments in favor of the 21st Amendment, which was ratified in 1933.

    ASA

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    1. Re:Prohibition began in 1919. by passion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you got me there. Too lax to do my research on a sunday morning. I was more interested in the rant. ;)

      Still, it's an interesting period of history that continues to dominate the reason why more marketed American beer continues to suck. Hell, I halfway considered using a leftover keg of bud as a substitute for water when I brewed my next batch of homebrew.

      --
      - passion
  109. Cast down the Beer God by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 1

    Beer is good, beer is great. We all know it

    Beer is a venomous slop, which looks and smells like moldering bread. It consists largely of a poisonous chemical, which affects the body by interfering with neurotransmitters which drive the functioning of the nervous system. Its primary physical effect is to cause the nervous system to malfunction, causing disorientation and cognitive impairment. It frequently cases brain and liver damage after enough use. Its users are frequently stupid enough to continue imbibing until the body, recognizing that it is being poisoned, tries desperately to remain alive by expelling the contents of the stomach.

    Enjoy.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
    1. Re:Cast down the Beer God by shplorb · · Score: 1

      You're only saying that because you either don't like beer or can't hold your piss.

  110. Less tinfoil please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So as you can see, government is the last place to get your daily dose of dietary dogma. If you listen to reason, anecdotal evidence, and take in as much research as possible, you'll discover that diet is all about variety, and there is room for everything edible or potable."

    There isn't a single big, bad government health worker that will so that beer or wine in moderation isn't good for you. There are actually government studies that will extoll the virtues of a glass of wine. It isn't always the government's fault. Clueless little twink.

  111. Re Beer Gut by Arbogast_II · · Score: 1

    Kinda ironic, I was watchin an interview with an NFL player (Patrick Kerney, a "small" lineman if it matters). He doesn't drink beer because it contributes to him losing weight. Of course, I suppose he gets a bit more exercise than the average /.er???

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com
  112. What a load of garbage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has been theorized and research is still progressing, but the simple conclusion looks like a "beer belly" is a genetic disorder.

    People with beer bellies tend to love beer.

    How long has this been going on? Well there was beer at the time of Rameses III, so it's pretty much ingrained into the European lifestyle.

    BOTTOM LINE: People with beer guts will have decendants with beer guts. Alcoholics who mainly drink beer and are thin, will generally not have decendants who get beer guts till one of their decendants marry a person with the beer gut gene.

  113. Anonymous -Troll- MINION by thelizman · · Score: 1

    Whatever...just keep sucking the tit of big government...

    1. Re:Anonymous -Troll- MINION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll suck on any big tit I can, thank you very much.

  114. STFU. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "nor does it cause men to go home and beat their wives."

    And beer does?

    Would that humanity would learn to take responsibility for its own actions.

  115. Not new for Germans like me..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....German scientists from Weihenstephan University (place of a big German brewery) proved the healthiness of beer just a couple of months ago. But remember not to drink more than a litre a day.
    I don't know if it also counts for beers not brewn in the German tradition of beer brewing (the famous "Reinheitsgebot" from 15 hundred something). At the brewery near my hometown in Lich (Ihring Melchior Brewery, they brew Licher Bier) they even suggest drinking alcohol free beer for sportsmen.

  116. Beer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To hell with beer! I like to have a glass of good wine with my breakfast.

  117. no myth by elmegil · · Score: 1
    Maltose, the primary sugar in beer, has a glycemic index of 150. That is among the very highest concentration sugars you can ingest. It spikes your insulin levels and generally will cause your body to react in ways that make you store as much energy as possible to your gut.

    To put it on the acceptable food pyramid is crazy, if you ask me. That doesn't mean I don't think people should drink beer, I like a few from time to time too. But reality is, it's not very good for you at all.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  118. Parent is flaimbait troll food by zymurgyboy · · Score: 1
    Whoever marked you informative must have followed Taco's suggestion and started at 10 this morning.

    First, it's pale yellow water with alcohol. But since all you seem to have taken the time to acquaint yourself with are the mass-market American lagers, this clearly isn't an area of expertise for you. Understandable if not forgivable.

    Secondly, take a look here for real American beer:

    http://www.brooklynbrewery.com/

    http://www.bellsbeer.com/

    http://www.anchorbrewing.com/

    http://www.peteswicked.com/

    Go out, try some. Then come back and actually add something to the discussion other than the same old lame, tired-ass meme.

    --
    If you never make mistakes, it's probably because you're not doing anything.
  119. pot and driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A cops TV reality show showed a guy high on pot driving 5 mph and thinking he was driving normal.

  120. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Kargan · · Score: 1

    Informative, eh? Hardly. Your comment is far more ignorant than informative. The United States should be considered beer nirvana for any true beer fan as American craft brewers have the full spectrum of beer styles covered, from the truly experimental and style-defiant to beers that are so traditional and historical that they're rarely still seen today. Let's see if you've had any of the Top 25 American beers, as rated by the friendly beer geeks at RateBeer.com.

    --
    Palaces, barricades, threats, meet promises
  121. Hops contain estrogen - helps fat storage by lpq · · Score: 3, Informative

    Beer made from Hops contain estrogens (plant derived). The estrogen content tends to influence your body to store more fat. The herb, hops, by itself has a 'relaxing effect' in herbal medicine, and, BTW, is in the same family as the cannibis plant -- a family noted as 'advanced' as it has two sexes. I'm not familiar with maltose or how much it is used in beer production, so I can't comment on how much it contributes, but herbal books will warn that phytoestrogens in hops can cause fat to be deposited into the classic "beer-belly" pattern (this effect is independant of alcohol other than alcohol having 7 calories/gram that can be converted to and stored as fat).

    Plant estrogens can also cause gynomastia (breast/nipple development and fat storage around nipple/breast area) as well as lower testosterone levels. They are also linked to erectile dysfunction in some men. I would speculate that they could also lower libido and sperm count.

    Women with estrogen related disorders, especially cancer, should avoid phytoestrogens as they can stimulate cancer and/or tumor growth. Also, women who are pregnant should avoid phytoestrogens (not just in hops, but also some soy products, licorice and others) since they can interfere with fetal development.

    I could speculate that taking products with extra estrogen effects could especially hinder male fetus development. That's why there are BIG cautions about pregnant women even handling drugs like propecia which block the testosterone derivative DHT (I think that's Di-hydrotestosterone). If testosterones are blocked during fetal development, an XY-"chromosoned" baby might develop as female (since all babies start out as 'female', and only testosterone surges during certain stages of development result in the baby developing male sex characteristics.

    It's been noted that there are two large surges of testosterone during male fetus development -- the first is associated with genital development. The 2nd occurs later on during brain development and is _speculated_ to affect how the brain develops.

    I'd be cautious about considering 'beer' as some generic food group component,
    (which doesn't mean an icy cold beer on a hot day doesn't taste good, though technically, it has a dehydrating effect...:-( ).

    Reminds me of problems with chocolate -- how can something that tastes so good be bad for you.... ;-).

  122. Re:Boddington's? by ansonyumo · · Score: 1

    ARGH! Boddington's is shit! Make mine Guinness, Bass or a Sammy. Pilsner Urquell, Red Hook or Old Speckled Hen.

    Anything, almost, but a Boddington's!

  123. Boddingtons! by EverDense · · Score: 1

    While I am sure there are worse beers around than Boddingtons, I haven't tasted them yet.

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  124. Re:Boddington's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heineken. Either that or Jack Daniels whiskey.

  125. Caution: Beer Drinking Leads to Baldness by nzyank · · Score: 1

    Look real close at the pictures of the beer guys in the link. What do you see? Looks like the beer is making them lightheaded in more ways than one. Is there a correlation?

  126. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by Arandir · · Score: 1

    I've yet to taste any American beer that has the least bit of flavour to it.

    Then I guess you haven't had many American beers then. Ignore the Budmilloors brand, and try some real beer made by people who love beer.

    Anchor Steam Beer is probably one of the finest beers in the world. And it's made in San Fransisco. If you're not used to beer with hops in it (and why would you be, drinking that Budmilloors and crap), then try Gordon Biersch Marzen, then work your way up the ladder with Shiner Bock, and Anderson Amber. Graduate with Redhook ESB, Redtail Ale, and Sierra Nevada Pale Ale.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  127. Relax! by Arandir · · Score: 1

    Relax, don't worry, have a homebrew!

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  128. beer as food by troutsoup · · Score: 0

    when i was younger i went camping with a friend and took only beer as our "food" we got by mostly fine for a week. did want snacky-cakes and stuff but.... eh such is life.

    proof enough for me that beer is a food!

    --
    -- troutsoup.com
  129. Re:American beer != Bud by grimner · · Score: 1

    Ha! Ha! very funny. Would be accurate if you replaced 'american beer' with 'budmillors' (budweiser, miller and coors) but definately not true for 'american beer'. People, there are plenty of very good american beers out their, in fact I think you will find a greater variety and higher quality beer in america than anywhere else. Ever been to the pacific northwest? Tons of good local beers. Brew pubs and microbreweries across the country have been brewing outstanding beers for over a decade now. For beers that may have a wide distribution, here a few standouts: Sam Adams: not the best but started to break the "american beer is water" routine. Rogue: many high quality beers from light ales to strong ales to porters. Harpoon: Make a standout IPA. Sierra Nevada: Lots of hops for the hop head. Brooklyn brewery: Make an awesome barelywine, a delicious Heffe Weissen (sp?), a solid Pale ale. Dogfish head: My latest favorite. Very good IPA and specialty beers. Ommegang: Belgian style ales brought to you by a brewery in upstate NY. This is just a start, there are many many others. Try something local or not made my Anheiser Bush. For those of you north of the border, Canadian mass produced beer is just as aweful as budweisser.

  130. Stout ... by wobblie · · Score: 0

    Well, this article seems pretty stupid, but if you can't stop drinking beer and have a weight problem, you might try stout, it's very low in calories and alchohol. Guinness or Beamish are about 350 calories a pint and only ~3% alchohol, believe it or not. Google for the proof, I'm feeling lazy ...

  131. Sanitary, was Re:Founding Fathers by bourne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Today we pasteurize beer - before this practice became mainstream, beer used to be pretty unsanitary.

    Pasteurization has nothing to do with sanitary in beer. Homebrewers never pasteurize their beer.

    Firstly, let's talk about unsanitary. Unsanitary - back then - meant things like cholera, which lived quite happily in water and was a serious health threat. The alcohol in beer kills things like cholera. There are no known human pathogens that can grow or live in beer, so you can't mess up and brew something that'll hurt you. So, in the context of unclean water, beer _is_ sanitary - the alcohol kills germs.

    Secondly, let's talk about pasteurization. In milk, pasteurization kills off certain bacteria that are present in the production chain (read: cow) but bad for humans in some cases. In beer, pasteurization kills off the yeast (not bad for humans, BTW) which insures that the fermentation will stop and the flavor of the beer will reach stasis. It does not kill of nasties; nasties can't live in beer. Again, homebrewers don't pasteurize, they don't need to, and it's too hard to do without killing the flavor. In fact, unpasteurized beer with yeast residue has lots of vitamin B, which helps with hangovers.

    In short: beer didn't used to be unsanitary, water did. Beer still isn't. Water may be, depending upon where you live.

    1. Re:Sanitary, was Re:Founding Fathers by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1

      The alcohol in beer kills things like cholera.

      I don't think that the amount of alcohol in small beer is sufficient. I doubt that the amount in modern beers and ales would be enough, either.

      What made beer much safer than plain well-water, was the process: boiling the water to extract the sugars from the grain killed many of the bacteria and amoebae.

      Add to this the phenol compounds found in the hops, which helped to kill the other single-celled organisms that would turn the beer sour, and maybe also make the drinker ill.

      Any brewer who has made beer from chlorinated tap water, without boiling the water sufficiently, will have smelt the easily identified smell of tri-chloro phenol, commonly known as TCP.

  132. No labels, sez the FDA by bourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    So are we going to start seeing the fancy labels which are on all the other foods?

    Nope. The BATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms) will not allow brewers to put anything that might be (correctly or incorrectly) intepreted as health information. The Yakima Brewery in Washington had to deal with ATF harrassment when they had the temerity to list calories, protein, carbohydrates, fat, cholesterol, sodium and potassium.

  133. And then would you shut the fuck up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  134. My morning... by makoffee · · Score: 1

    make coffee, spark up, go to work, remember that I forgot to take the coffee with me.

    hehe

    --
    -makoffee
  135. "Meh"... by Theranthrope · · Score: 1
    I don't know, booth girls seem to be more about (I apologize in advance for my crudeness) cock teasing, than say, cock pleasing.

    Look, but don't touch and all that.

  136. Re:Boddingtons? EWWWWW! by simong_oz · · Score: 1

    Unless there's a nice guest ale...

    amen to that my friend. After living in Yorkshire for almost 2 years I've been completely converted to real ale and bitter. Love the stuff. I only drink lager if there isn't a decent alternative or guest ale to try. And best of all, ale doesn't seem to give me a hangover!

    As for favourites? Well, there's no doubt that Timothy Taylor Landlord is the gold standard, but Ten Gun Salute is also good one and Jennings Snekbiter is a superb drop as well.

    --
    "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
  137. Breakfast is too early for beer... by floydigus · · Score: 1

    ...I prefer cider.

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  138. No offense intended .... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ...but to me all beers smell is reminiscent of vomit.

    But that may be because drunken people that vomit (eek) do so under the influence of beer nad not of wine or whiskey?

    Who knows...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  139. Bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Show your eveidence that it si harmful in moderation or shut up.

    Or are you one of those religious zealots?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  140. Aegir Ship-Bane by Ygg · · Score: 1

    Aegir, Norse God of the sea's, brewed ale for the gods after Thor brought him a large kettle. Every winter the gods would drink beer at Aegir's home. He was, therefore, famed for his hospitality. Instead of having a fire, gold was put onto the floor of the hall to provide light. Gold is refered to as Aegir's fire. The mugs of beer in Aegir's hall were always full, magically refilling themselves.

    1. Re:Aegir Ship-Bane by Cackmobile · · Score: 1

      now thats my idea of valhalla....a mug of beer that never empties. hopefully its always chilled as well

      --
      -- Karma Karma Karma Karma, Karma Chameleon - Boy George
  141. Alcohol content by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Isn't everything.

    I prefer beer that tastes good to beer that gets me drunk.

    Nothing by Molson, Labatt's, or any of the "major" US breweries with the exception of Sam Adams and Sierra Nevada are even tolerable to me. SA and SN are OK, some of their beers are pretty good, some are just average.

    On both sides of the border, the real good stuff is the microbrews.

    USA - New Jersey: High Point Brewery brews some *amazing* wheat beers. River Horse is kinda blah, too watery for me. One brewery in NJ (I forget which one, I think it's in Princeton) has a rye ale that is VERY unusual and quite good.
    New York State: Lots of breweries all over. In the Finger Lakes region, both Ithaca Beer Co. (Ithaca, NY) and Wagner Valley Brewery (Part of Wagner Vineyards in Lodi, NY) are amazing. Ithaca Stout and Wagner Sled Dog are my two favorite beers.

    Up in Canada, there are plenty of good microbrews too. If you're in the Canadian Rockies (Near Yoho National Park in BC), look for a honey pilsner called Fire Weed. Good stuff, the ONLY pilsner I've ever liked.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Alcohol content by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      OK, and for another person's irrelevent preferences ...

      I hate microbrews. They suck. There is a *reason* that some brewers have been making beer for hundreds of years, and some only as long as fancy labels and funky names have been all the rage. I find that microbrewed beers have a very unfinished and unrefined taste. And I've tasted alot of them. They're typically sweeter and less complex in flavor. They almost all have that characteristic "we don't know what we are doing" over-sweet, over-ripe flavor. Crappy.

      I get the feeling when I read about people's opinions of microbrews it's more about finding that "cool brew" that you don't think anyone else has probably heard of and thus makes you that much cooler to know about, than it is about actual *good beer*. It's kind of like people who say, "oh, you've never eaten pizza until you've eaten at [insert the name of some random pizza joint in some random city here]." And it's not really that the pizza is any better there, it's just that people love to think that they have the corner on some special knowledge about something. Microbrews are like that. So many people have told me, "you've gotta try Red Tree Frog Extra Special Blah Blah Blah Dark Ale. It's this little itty bitty microbrewery in the middle of nowhere and it's just the best!" And then I try it and it's the same old microbrewed drivel.

      In my book, there is nothing that can beat a good, established British brew. Bass Ale is the closest to perfection that any beer will ever be.

      Let me finish by saying that this was mostly just a rant, and I really don't have anything against microbrews per se, or the people that like them, I just get a little sick of hearing about them all of the time when I don't think they are anything special. Which I guess is kind of a rant in and of itself.

  142. Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Just substitute soot for the hops, then concentrate the final product by a factor of 10

    I'll assume by concentrate you meant distill, which is really more of a separation. But you left out the aging in oak casks for at least 10 years before bottling.

  143. This is not new for other parts of world by boky · · Score: 1

    I don't know about US, but in Slovenia (and I think EU, also), beer *is* food, along with wine.

    Where do I get this information from? There are only two VAT rates in EU: the low one for food and similar and the high one for everything else. Beer and wine are in the "food VAT section". Generally speaking, since the alchohol level is less than 20 it is still considered food (so, strong drinks - Whiskey & co. - are not).

    Finally, it is quite normal to drink a glass or two of wine / beer with your meal while drinking a glass or two of Scotch is certanly not :-)

    --
    boky
  144. 9% and over by clarkc3 · · Score: 1

    Unibroue has a nice list of beers they make along with % alcohol by volume listed - fin du monde is 9% and still quite good, terrible is 10.5%, but I've never bothered to try it. Judging from the name, not sure I want to

  145. C'mon! Are you kidding? by Kratore · · Score: 1

    I can't believe the posts arguing over quality of beer in each country... Especially since the mass of the posters tend to sound like they are most interested in the quantity, anyways. There are few of us who seem to disagree that there are better (tasty) and worse (watery) beers.
    Few people have gone into the thing that really matters most when it comes to beer -
    Do you drink it to get drunk?
    Or do you drink it because you like it?
    The reason that the three Mega brews in the US (Bud, Miller, Coors) are so popular is because of the vast numbers of folks that drink it for reason #1, and if thats all you want it for then why pay more than $10/12 pack.
    Now the Microbrews are definitely good stuff, we don't want to get drunk off of that for many reasons -
    i.e. Why spend $50 bucks getting drunk, feel like crap, and have the runs for three days?
    The funniest thing about this thread is even as a beer lover (quality NOT quantity) I keep seeing many posts that make me mutter - "LOSER!"