On the contrary, I think it will strengthen Damore's case, because Google has tacitly agreed that there has been unacceptable behavior from the so-called "diversity" camp. In which case, firing Damore shows even less justifiable bias against his position.
Are there more anti-Clinton videos than anti-Trump videos on YouTube? If so, most Bayesian methods will recommend you an anti-Clinton video... unless if you apply a completely partisan bias that enforces equal time for both sides (or even mute out the other side).
In my opinion, the reason there are more anti-Clinton videos on YouTube is simply because there are just too many people who can't find their views represented in the mainstream media. So, if the mainstream media will just stop calling everyone who doesn't echo their agenda an "alt-right", and instead, reason with them, the videos will most likely just go away.
Today Democrats still have close to the entire mainstream media firmly behind their narrative, and Colbert's show is still the most viewed on YouTube. So why the paranoia?
Remember, strike out their voices, and they will become powerful than you could possibly imagine.
They won't. This is the perfect opportunity for them to solidify their dominance of the market. PyTorch people would be stupid to not respond with a port quickly.
What do you mean "calling for the extermination of people"? Like those "Let's band together to kill all men" or "All I want for Christmas is white genocide"? that proliferate mainstream academia/media?
If so, then golly, you are right and I must have missed them since I browse at +1.
How I miss those days when not everyone is a Nazi... where there are hot grits everywhere, frosty piss in all your base, and the Soviet Russia, caveman Ogg were all still alive.
But seriously, don't want to see people fight back SJWs, don't post SJW stuffs. Have you noticed that just 1 or 2 slashdot users are responsible for 100% of the SJW posts?
When I first started reading Slashdot about 20 years ago, I was impressed by the wonderfully liberal ideas that abound in the comments section of the site, for example,
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." (Benjamin Franklin)
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)
They gave me character, and shaped my world view.
Fast forward 20 years, and I find this generation to be more than willing to give up their freedom for a little convenience, or to be with the trendy in Silicon Valley, or simply because they can't stand a certain politician.
In a neutral sense, this is fine. Everybody likes to be like.
It is the approaches which companies like Google and Facebook take to stop negative stories (censorship, demonizing dissenting voices, commissioning hit pieces, play along with the MSM's agendas) that scare me.
I got "triggered" by the term "social construct" -- it is so often used by postmodernists these days to obfuscate ideas and justify the deconstruction of almost any concept... concepts of trememdous utility.
But clearly, I am the one who is over-sensitive in the present case. Terribly sorry.
OMG. A Japanese is a citizen of Japan. That's all.
Sometimes, we discuss about the Japanese race - in which case, it refers to the complicated genetic origin of what makes up the current people of Japan.
Look, keep your gender studies and postmodernism within American campuses. The world doesn't want them.
Have you read WaPo lately? First, they went all clickbaity. Then they started providing saucy stuffs for the angry anti-Trump mob. For a while, for some reason at around the same time they showed up as the top news on every topic on Google news. But then, that also made them attract a lot of comments from people who are fed up with their over-the-board anti-Trump rhetorics.
Now, they made the comments section exclusive to only subscribers.
Slashdot Mirror
And now it's a "sensational" news outlet!
C'mon. As much as I despise them, I'm sure there are script-kiddies who can code Keras or PyTorch at Microsoft.
https://www.kaggle.com/gaborfo...
https://github.com/Cadene/pret...
It's because of the competition. The subject became much more competitive in the course of the last 20 years.
No hard feelings. If you want to make the subject less competitive... well, I won't let you.
Why did Google fire Damore instead of Tim in August? Since later in November, Google agreed that Tim demonstrated disruptive behavior.
Calling this "desperate reach by a floundering lawyer" betrays your impartiality.
On the contrary, I think it will strengthen Damore's case, because Google has tacitly agreed that there has been unacceptable behavior from the so-called "diversity" camp. In which case, firing Damore shows even less justifiable bias against his position.
Interesting. You seem to think that geeks play with He-Man.
LEGO, my dear SJW, LEGO is the geek's only friend. Notice that it has no gender. Nerd geek, babe geek, all geeks are welcome.
He-Man, Barbie, are just tools to get SJWs all excited.
Are there more anti-Clinton videos than anti-Trump videos on YouTube? If so, most Bayesian methods will recommend you an anti-Clinton video... unless if you apply a completely partisan bias that enforces equal time for both sides (or even mute out the other side).
In my opinion, the reason there are more anti-Clinton videos on YouTube is simply because there are just too many people who can't find their views represented in the mainstream media. So, if the mainstream media will just stop calling everyone who doesn't echo their agenda an "alt-right", and instead, reason with them, the videos will most likely just go away.
Today Democrats still have close to the entire mainstream media firmly behind their narrative, and Colbert's show is still the most viewed on YouTube. So why the paranoia?
Remember, strike out their voices, and they will become powerful than you could possibly imagine.
They won't. This is the perfect opportunity for them to solidify their dominance of the market. PyTorch people would be stupid to not respond with a port quickly.
Yes... if you want hot grits on Natalie Portman.
Errr... do you know how popular Trump is to the Chinese?
Obama, on the other hand, is hailed as a loser who wants men to go to women's bathroom.
Good! I don't want to see another tweet to the sound of
"All I want for Christmas is white genocide."
Or
"Band together to kill all men."
What do you mean "calling for the extermination of people"?
Like those
"Let's band together to kill all men"
or
"All I want for Christmas is white genocide"?
that proliferate mainstream academia/media?
If so, then golly, you are right and I must have missed them since I browse at +1.
How I miss those days when not everyone is a Nazi... where there are hot grits everywhere, frosty piss in all your base, and the Soviet Russia, caveman Ogg were all still alive.
It's you, Hentai007.
But seriously, don't want to see people fight back SJWs, don't post SJW stuffs. Have you noticed that just 1 or 2 slashdot users are responsible for 100% of the SJW posts?
I remember that. I remember Governor Schwarzenegger. I remember Occupy Wall Street. And I remember Joe the Plumber. I am a news junkie.
I just missed the point of time when silicon valley hipsters start to label undesirable speech as "haram".
When I first started reading Slashdot about 20 years ago, I was impressed by the wonderfully liberal ideas that abound in the comments section of the site, for example,
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." (Benjamin Franklin)
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." (Evelyn Beatrice Hall)
They gave me character, and shaped my world view.
Fast forward 20 years, and I find this generation to be more than willing to give up their freedom for a little convenience, or to be with the trendy in Silicon Valley, or simply because they can't stand a certain politician.
What you can do, is to ask Universities and mainstream media outlets to go debate them and show to us that they are mistaken.
But you won't. Cause you'll lose.
Mainstream media is leveraging its total control of the press, and _violence_, to silence reasons.
Good. That will filter out many WaPo articles. Just need to make sure Google applies them to everyone instead of just RT.
In a neutral sense, this is fine. Everybody likes to be like.
It is the approaches which companies like Google and Facebook take to stop negative stories (censorship, demonizing dissenting voices, commissioning hit pieces, play along with the MSM's agendas) that scare me.
I see. My apologies.
I got "triggered" by the term "social construct" -- it is so often used by postmodernists these days to obfuscate ideas and justify the deconstruction of almost any concept... concepts of trememdous utility.
But clearly, I am the one who is over-sensitive in the present case. Terribly sorry.
My microbiota friends beg to differ.
OMG. A Japanese is a citizen of Japan. That's all.
Sometimes, we discuss about the Japanese race - in which case, it refers to the complicated genetic origin of what makes up the current people of Japan.
Look, keep your gender studies and postmodernism within American campuses. The world doesn't want them.
Is this reply called for? Nobody likes Trump but a _newspaper_ cannot just write shit any how they want. That's my point. JOURNALISM 101.
You punks have no discipline.
Have you read WaPo lately? First, they went all clickbaity. Then they started providing saucy stuffs for the angry anti-Trump mob. For a while, for some reason at around the same time they showed up as the top news on every topic on Google news. But then, that also made them attract a lot of comments from people who are fed up with their over-the-board anti-Trump rhetorics.
Now, they made the comments section exclusive to only subscribers.
You can verify all these yourself.
There is something fishy with WaPo.
But it's a good link. More interesting than anything that a topic like Captchas can pique me.
Let's keep it that way as an Easter egg.
It's called Wall Street. Last it went down was in 2008.