I hope you're selling other products, or you've got another job lined up, since you're probably cutting into your sales with that. Thanks for the tip though.
While rsync can modify the read time on the data, it's no more so than the tar/netcat that the reviewer is saying is suggested (tar reads the data to create the tarball as well).
Court forensics would have to add the same write protection that would be used forany such tool that would be used. rsync would not be a replacemnt for those devices/tools.
Transfering for forensics
on
Computer Forensics
·
· Score: 3, Informative
Rsync will do this simply and efficiently, plus it can resume transfers and also tunnel through ssh.
Also you can pipe dd through gzip/bzip2 and netcat to give you a loopback mountable, unmodifiable image that you can look at in case you want to grab the whole drive before putting it in the evidence locker.
>>Most of the enlightened stuff comes from "Anonymous".
>Precisely the opposite of reality.
Actually, Anonymous logins can be very enlightened on GL. Most notably is Qutrmass (sp) who always posts anonymously. Makes it harder to find his posts, but it's worth it. Also, there are other examples of Anonymous postings at GL that are well worth reading. It's what keeps me from using the option to remove anonymous posts from view.
Didn't these dorks read the USLvBSDi settlement terms? The release of these is HUGE and a death blow to the SCOSource license program especially section 3c:
"c. USL agrees that it shall take no action against any person who utilizes any methods and concepts in the Restricted Files which as of this date have become available to the general public by acts not attributable to the University, its employees or students. Nothing in this provision shall limit USL's rights against a third party arising out of a breach of any license agreement with USL or AT&T."
SCO *can't* sue except for breach of contract, as the "successor in interest" to this agreement. (See a lawyer)
That's why dburns work on getting this settlement out to the world is so important.
Peep Eyes on the Prize
on
SCO.com Defaced
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
This defacement takes away from the very damaging info in the USL/BSD sealed settlement that was put out for the world to see. The defacement takes away from the serious legal issues that are shown by the release of the settlement - that SCO *can't* sue anyone who does not have a contract with them, and that SCOSource is useless. Linux threats are a joke. See your lawyer, and read section c.:
c. USL agrees that it shall take no action against any person who utilizes any methods and concepts in the Restricted Files which as of this date have become available to the general public by acts not attributable to the University, its employees or students. Nothing in this provision shall limit USL's rights against a third party arising out of a breach of any license agreement with USL or AT&T.
Stop cheering illegal acts and pay attention to the house of cards falling. SCO is sure to get more press out of the defacement than the effect of this clause if they have anything to say about it (and they have plenty to say). I wouldn't be suprised if this was timed intentionally (did they deface their site?) to take away from the *real* issue that came up this weekend.
In case Groklaw is asked to take this down, anyone want to post it on their favorite P2P application? I've only used bittorrent to publish, and I don't thing iBiblio/Groklaw needs help with a 1MB file.
I tried to post the full text as an AC, but it's not getting in, since it's probably to big at 119k for the edited text.
I've used this system before, and if you have the pager or cell number of those you want to call, then it works fine.
The annoying part is the emergency phonecalls that might come from something related to my kids. A school probably doesn't know I keep my ringer off and to call my pager first, and with a 911 extension so I know it's not just some number I don't recognize. Since the DNC list, I've been able to turn the ringer back on, and it's been nice.
My son is getting phone calls now, and I doubt his 1st grade friends would want to page his dad to talk to him, so this is a good thing, and I'd hate telemarketers to turn my phone back into my inbox.
OK, this is now off topic, but trying Google is coming up empty, and rather than dig more, I figured I'd ask. What is this JAK of which you speak and what to they have to do with the FOP?
Think of it as the difference between arson on an abandoned warehouse catching the security guard, or the homeless man, versus leaving the stove on by accident. One is an accident, one is a crime. I hope a crime that causes additional harm means more severe charges.
I didn't say 911 wasn't important, but merely pointed out that there was another way, in a joking manner. You know that "whipper snapper" in my post? Kids these days, once upon a time we used 300 baud modems - and we liked it!
"small town centric"? How about your NYC centric? I've lived in both small towns and cities w/o 311, in the slums, and out. Being a Navy brat, then finally having the Chief retiring can do that to you. If you want to tell them 911 is down, then there is another way. You ever try to find the single on duty cop in a rural area? How about finding a cop that gives a damn in the slums of Norfolk? I thought not. If you don't know where your precinct is, then you probably know where you can find a cop and see if they know about the outage already. I hear they have radios now, and can talk to each other, and can probably tell you if they know it's down. It's not like he said how do you handle an emergency w/o 911.
Stop accusing others of being centric if you're doing it yourself.
(I should have known better than to make a not 100% verifable, backed up by research from all corners of the world lighthearted comment at Slashdot. Probably be modded down for a typo)
Damn shame his site marked on the picture only has one shot on it. I'd love to see the pictures he's got. I don't care if Elena's story isn't true, the disaster and the Ghost Town is, and I haven't seen any documentuaries on it, so the more picures the better. (More accuracy is nice though.)
I haven't held an Enclopedia to be authoritative on any subject since 6th grade or so. As a starting point to *find* authoritative sources it has it's uses. For some interesting reading it can be useful as well. How can something be authoritative with no sources cited? This question goes for paper and electronic encyclopedias (and any other source as well). I've seen more sources cited in Wikipedia articles than in any Encyclopedia (though I haven't picked up a paper version in ages - don't even know where they are here at the univ. library).
In short, if you're using just one source for anything important, you should stop. Look around for multiple sources. This goes for news, academia, or just keeping informed. If not, you're not doing "the information age" justice.
Too many people are trying to correct that article right now, so that corrections are stepping on each other. (Note how the history list shows it being sorrceted, but later revisions are over writing it with other corrections.) I'm sure, by the time this slashdotting is over, the dispute over Hamilton's date will be well presented.
It, VPCWin, VS.net, and an old Entertainment Pack Chess game are their best work
MS Streets, bought from another company (my wife owned the Mac version before they were bought). VPCWin, bought from another company (Connectix) VS.Net (ok, they might have developed this, but it may be derived from another company AFAIK) Chess, a basic computer program that has been written so many times, why *wouldn't* they buy it from another company.
"their best work" - pick something more original / innovative (personalally their educational CDs are pretty good, to be fair).
This is not the case. I have things shipped to my business all the time, since I'm here and not at home. Many other in my office do this as well. It may depend on the retailer, but I've yet to run into one where this is the case.
What's really a shame is that something like this gets put up on/., then the flaws of it our pointed out and some think that a lame methodology "survey" actually will tell you the most connected schools. According to Forbes, I don't have a job. I guess I can go turn off the course streaming servers now.
You see boss, Forbes tells me we don't stream classes, so I guess I'll just use these new machines to use for gaming servers then.
(Va Tech for the interested, and boy do they have pretty much every "no" wrong for us as well.)
Slashdot Mirror
I hope you're selling other products, or you've got another job lined up, since you're probably cutting into your sales with that. Thanks for the tip though.
While rsync can modify the read time on the data, it's no more so than the tar/netcat that the reviewer is saying is suggested (tar reads the data to create the tarball as well).
Court forensics would have to add the same write protection that would be used forany such tool that would be used. rsync would not be a replacemnt for those devices/tools.
Rsync will do this simply and efficiently, plus it can resume transfers and also tunnel through ssh.
Also you can pipe dd through gzip/bzip2 and netcat to give you a loopback mountable, unmodifiable image that you can look at in case you want to grab the whole drive before putting it in the evidence locker.
OK, I'll bite. WTF is trollback magazine? Google isn't turning up much I feel like digging through just to learn more about the troll of the month.
>>Most of the enlightened stuff comes from "Anonymous".
>Precisely the opposite of reality.
Actually, Anonymous logins can be very enlightened on GL. Most notably is Qutrmass (sp) who always posts anonymously. Makes it harder to find his posts, but it's worth it. Also, there are other examples of Anonymous postings at GL that are well worth reading. It's what keeps me from using the option to remove anonymous posts from view.
In Soviet Russia, old people eat hot grits, while SCO news reads you welcoming our new DC overlords.
Didn't these dorks read the USLvBSDi settlement terms? The release of these is HUGE and a death blow to the SCOSource license program especially section 3c:
"c. USL agrees that it shall take no action against any person who utilizes any methods and concepts in the Restricted Files which as of this date have become available to the general public by acts not attributable to the University, its employees or students. Nothing in this provision shall limit USL's rights against a third party arising out of a breach of any license agreement with USL or AT&T."
SCO *can't* sue except for breach of contract, as the "successor in interest" to this agreement. (See a lawyer)
That's why dburns work on getting this settlement out to the world is so important.
This defacement takes away from the very damaging info in the USL/BSD sealed settlement that was put out for the world to see. The defacement takes away from the serious legal issues that are shown by the release of the settlement - that SCO *can't* sue anyone who does not have a contract with them, and that SCOSource is useless. Linux threats are a joke. See your lawyer, and read section c.:
c. USL agrees that it shall take no action against any person who utilizes any methods and concepts in the Restricted Files which as of this date have become available to the general public by acts not attributable to the University, its employees or students. Nothing in this provision shall limit USL's rights against a third party arising out of a breach of any license agreement with USL or AT&T.
Stop cheering illegal acts and pay attention to the house of cards falling. SCO is sure to get more press out of the defacement than the effect of this clause if they have anything to say about it (and they have plenty to say). I wouldn't be suprised if this was timed intentionally (did they deface their site?) to take away from the *real* issue that came up this weekend.
http://bittorrent.com/guide.html
In case Groklaw is asked to take this down, anyone want to post it on their favorite P2P application? I've only used bittorrent to publish, and I don't thing iBiblio/Groklaw needs help with a 1MB file.
I tried to post the full text as an AC, but it's not getting in, since it's probably to big at 119k for the edited text.
I've used this system before, and if you have the pager or cell number of those you want to call, then it works fine.
The annoying part is the emergency phonecalls that might come from something related to my kids. A school probably doesn't know I keep my ringer off and to call my pager first, and with a 911 extension so I know it's not just some number I don't recognize. Since the DNC list, I've been able to turn the ringer back on, and it's been nice.
My son is getting phone calls now, and I doubt his 1st grade friends would want to page his dad to talk to him, so this is a good thing, and I'd hate telemarketers to turn my phone back into my inbox.
OK, this is now off topic, but trying Google is coming up empty, and rather than dig more, I figured I'd ask. What is this JAK of which you speak and what to they have to do with the FOP?
Think of it as the difference between arson on an abandoned warehouse catching the security guard, or the homeless man, versus leaving the stove on by accident. One is an accident, one is a crime. I hope a crime that causes additional harm means more severe charges.
I didn't say 911 wasn't important, but merely pointed out that there was another way, in a joking manner. You know that "whipper snapper" in my post? Kids these days, once upon a time we used 300 baud modems - and we liked it!
"small town centric"? How about your NYC centric? I've lived in both small towns and cities w/o 311, in the slums, and out. Being a Navy brat, then finally having the Chief retiring can do that to you. If you want to tell them 911 is down, then there is another way. You ever try to find the single on duty cop in a rural area? How about finding a cop that gives a damn in the slums of Norfolk? I thought not. If you don't know where your precinct is, then you probably know where you can find a cop and see if they know about the outage already. I hear they have radios now, and can talk to each other, and can probably tell you if they know it's down. It's not like he said how do you handle an emergency w/o 911.
Stop accusing others of being centric if you're doing it yourself.
(I should have known better than to make a not 100% verifable, backed up by research from all corners of the world lighthearted comment at Slashdot. Probably be modded down for a typo)
losing service in telephone terms does not mean that they're all calling at once. Probably an estimate based on the effected exchanges.
When 911 is doWn, you just call your local police station - they do have a phone there after all. There was life before 911 - young whipper snapper
Damn shame his site marked on the picture only has one shot on it. I'd love to see the pictures he's got. I don't care if Elena's story isn't true, the disaster and the Ghost Town is, and I haven't seen any documentuaries on it, so the more picures the better. (More accuracy is nice though.)
I haven't held an Enclopedia to be authoritative on any subject since 6th grade or so. As a starting point to *find* authoritative sources it has it's uses. For some interesting reading it can be useful as well. How can something be authoritative with no sources cited? This question goes for paper and electronic encyclopedias (and any other source as well). I've seen more sources cited in Wikipedia articles than in any Encyclopedia (though I haven't picked up a paper version in ages - don't even know where they are here at the univ. library).
In short, if you're using just one source for anything important, you should stop. Look around for multiple sources. This goes for news, academia, or just keeping informed. If not, you're not doing "the information age" justice.
Too many people are trying to correct that article right now, so that corrections are stepping on each other. (Note how the history list shows it being sorrceted, but later revisions are over writing it with other corrections.) I'm sure, by the time this slashdotting is over, the dispute over Hamilton's date will be well presented.
It was named something else at the time, and was in the Windows 3.1 days. http://www.eskimo.com/~samoyed/maps/maps_products. htm
It, VPCWin, VS.net, and an old Entertainment Pack Chess game are their best work
MS Streets, bought from another company (my wife owned the Mac version before they were bought).
VPCWin, bought from another company (Connectix)
VS.Net (ok, they might have developed this, but it may be derived from another company AFAIK)
Chess, a basic computer program that has been written so many times, why *wouldn't* they buy it from another company.
"their best work" - pick something more original / innovative (personalally their educational CDs are pretty good, to be fair).
This is not the case. I have things shipped to my business all the time, since I'm here and not at home. Many other in my office do this as well. It may depend on the retailer, but I've yet to run into one where this is the case.
That seems to show a blank page, and searching for netatalk shows a blank page as well. -1 wrong. Still nothing listed for fink either.
What's really a shame is that something like this gets put up on /., then the flaws of it our pointed out and some think that a lame methodology "survey" actually will tell you the most connected schools. According to Forbes, I don't have a job. I guess I can go turn off the course streaming servers now.
You see boss, Forbes tells me we don't stream classes, so I guess I'll just use these new machines to use for gaming servers then.
(Va Tech for the interested, and boy do they have pretty much every "no" wrong for us as well.)
Bugs Bunny beat Bush in that poll.
I also find that really ironic with the gobushcheny.com website is advertised in a banner ad there.....
Bugs Bunny and Scully going on a date is high on the list of national threats.