Obviously you are a right-wing cohort who is blind to Bush's usage of tax money (paid primarily by the poor) to subjugate the blacks and rip away funding from the schools, funneling it to the Zionist conspirators who want to infiltrate the corporate(*GAG*RETCH*) media and thereby train an Army of butchers out to exterminate all the Arabs and their children.
Plenty. The new generatoin of "plastic" planes like Cirrus and Lancair, which cost around the $300K range, started out as kits, but are now certified and selling like hotcakes.
Come on, is this an article about optics or military equipment? For all conventional intents and purposes, "near-instantaneous" is correct and "gravity-free" almost so. And you know what? In four words, the article has thoroughly described this system's advantages over other weapons.
Of course, you are probably being facetious and my extreme boredom has driven me to type this reply.
Has anyone figured out how to kill the mouseclick delay? Looks like it would make a great tinkertoy game, but the interface is absolutely unusable for any longer than it takes to select a plane, an airport, weather, and go.
Ah, remember the days when Gamesy Arcade was just Gamespy? Er, wait... remember QUAKESPY? Those were the days before.... whatever it is that happened to them, when they pioneered the whole game server browser concept.
See, in the real world, we have something called criteria that decisions are based upon. Someone demonstrating that he is about to (intentionally) kill or rob you is a criterion in the decision that he must be stopped, with deadly force if necessary. "I think" is not.
*Sigh* I didn't think that I would have to explain this. What is it that you're trying to demonstrate, again?
That's funny -- I differentiate between tragic accidents and people defending their lives and property. The very fact that you think nobody deserves to die (by being shot) indicates to me, [sic] that you are a fucking insane idiot, and possibly a criminal.
Yeah, he'll be remembered for the goodness of his heart because of coaching little league, volunteering at the church, selling baked goods for the PTA, and.... fixing his ex-employer's LAN? Wait, there seems to be something out of place here...
The article said mentioned $400M gross earnings, and that Stan Lee sadly hasn't gotten a penny of the action because there were no profits, but why not just report the expenses? Wouldn't that everything make a bit easier? Or is there something to be hidden?
Yeah yeah, I guess I should bitch less and do a litle research, but 1) I have 2 minutes to hightail it out of here to school and 2) Something as essential to the issue should have been mentioned in that article, no?
Slashdot Mirror
Obviously you are a right-wing cohort who is blind to Bush's usage of tax money (paid primarily by the poor) to subjugate the blacks and rip away funding from the schools, funneling it to the Zionist conspirators who want to infiltrate the corporate(*GAG*RETCH*) media and thereby train an Army of butchers out to exterminate all the Arabs and their children.
What's your question?
As opposed to the Air Force version? ;)
It's an F/A-18, but yes.
http://www.cpa-iraq.org/essential_services/electri city.html
Actually, Iraq has more electricity now than it did before the war.
That's peanuts, here's DeCSS in Brainfuck.
Maybe they're loosing money at their lawyer, but that's about it...
You missed his point. He presented those problems because they exist; he didn't take any of their positions as his own.
Plenty. The new generatoin of "plastic" planes like Cirrus and Lancair, which cost around the $300K range, started out as kits, but are now certified and selling like hotcakes.
In other words, the George Costanza method :)
Oh... had me fooled, thanks for clearing that one up.
Sooooooooo, the solution to collateral damage is to not use more accurate weapons?
Come on, is this an article about optics or military equipment? For all conventional intents and purposes, "near-instantaneous" is correct and "gravity-free" almost so. And you know what? In four words, the article has thoroughly described this system's advantages over other weapons.
Of course, you are probably being facetious and my extreme boredom has driven me to type this reply.
Oh, shut the fuck up!!
Sometimes, it is beyond rational arguments, beyond saying anything meaningful...
Sometimes, all you can say is.... just, shut the fuck up.
Small note: Scaled only uses the graphics engine from X-Plane... they have their own realtime CFD engine for the flight dynamics.
Has anyone figured out how to kill the mouseclick delay? Looks like it would make a great tinkertoy game, but the interface is absolutely unusable for any longer than it takes to select a plane, an airport, weather, and go.
Ah, remember the days when Gamesy Arcade was just Gamespy? Er, wait... remember QUAKESPY? Those were the days before.... whatever it is that happened to them, when they pioneered the whole game server browser concept.
OH GOD NO, if this gets popular... here comes a whole new Goatse deluge!!
Hahaha, funny!
(damn, that sounds sarcastic... but it's not.)
Dude... heh... I was going for "funny" on that one....
(And I meant to say "raping a prostitute," it fits in with the analogy a lot better.)
If "software is like sex, it's better when it's free," then is software piracy rape?
See, in the real world, we have something called criteria that decisions are based upon. Someone demonstrating that he is about to (intentionally) kill or rob you is a criterion in the decision that he must be stopped, with deadly force if necessary. "I think" is not. *Sigh* I didn't think that I would have to explain this. What is it that you're trying to demonstrate, again?
That's funny -- I differentiate between tragic accidents and people defending their lives and property. The very fact that you think nobody deserves to die (by being shot) indicates to me, [sic] that you are a fucking insane idiot, and possibly a criminal.
Yeah, he'll be remembered for the goodness of his heart because of coaching little league, volunteering at the church, selling baked goods for the PTA, and.... fixing his ex-employer's LAN? Wait, there seems to be something out of place here...
The article said mentioned $400M gross earnings, and that Stan Lee sadly hasn't gotten a penny of the action because there were no profits, but why not just report the expenses? Wouldn't that everything make a bit easier? Or is there something to be hidden?
Yeah yeah, I guess I should bitch less and do a litle research, but 1) I have 2 minutes to hightail it out of here to school and 2) Something as essential to the issue should have been mentioned in that article, no?