> Even before the error, theÂnumber of students qualifying >Âfor gifted seats â" 9,020 â" was far higher than the number > of seats.
It doesn't make a difference -- this is the real stupidity. It's long since been shown society would get much more bang for its buck devoting just a fraction of the money it spends making sure every last yokel can count to ten to accelerated education for people who actually invent stuff.
But those yokels, as adults, are amenable to claims that that is elitist, by other yokels seeking their support in power grabs.
Libertarians do not object to government; they rely on it in their political philosophy. You are thinking of anarchists. Scams are wrong in a liberterian world, too.
The pictures of those two were couched in terms of conspiracy theory -- look at their huge bags which have a white spot like some blown-up thing! Oh my! These aren't the official suspects!
- Wake up sheeple! Government is blaming it on some innocent teens! These real guys over here are government agents, see them hold their hands to their ear like TV?
- Here's a statement from an agent who fears he will lose his job for saying this, but gubberment plans to blame it on innocent young men who they will conveniently kill when arresting!
I really don't want zombie rotting meat smells, nor assal-derived ones.
I'm fine with Anne Hathaway or any other starlet's freshly-unholstered areolar or underboob scents, though, which I imagine is like a slightly musty fallen log found in the woods when you went on a hike some years ago.
How is his corporations' fault? It's good old government normality: Trying to void rights, and the same way Hitler did, by appealing to emergency needs.
All the corporations did was, reasonably, seek legal protection for governments abusing this power.
The correct solution is to forbid government this power to begin with. That, more than anything else, is the core teaching of the US Constitution.
Is it interesting? Corporate profits keep shelves jammed with things.
The real evil is the privacy laws doesn't extend to government, which continues to root through things.
Are you in Europe? Ask your grandma. She has experience with governments peeking when they shouldn't, and/or "wonderful" places that outlawed corporate profits.
Are we so diseased we assume "control by government" is the natural and proper base from which to start thinking about topics? It's a truism that government, AKA people in power who want to maintain it -- including those in the US -- will automatically assume so.
"Notably, however, lawmakers dropped from the legislation the phrase “free from government control,” which had threatened to derail the April 11 markup by the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology.... [Democrats argued] it could undermine the U.S. government’s ability to enforce existing — or future — laws online.'"
Sorry, Democrats. Even your congenital desire to hold up cardboard with "Commerce Clause" on it the way a rainbow-haired guy holds up John 3:16 isn't enough to override the First Amendment.
Strange bedfellows -- what do you and the John 3:16 AKA religious folk have in common? 500 word paper due to tomorrow, turn in to Madison and Monroe.
Slashdot Mirror
I had no idea you could go backwards on the bases.
As a software engineer, I blame it on poor requirement documents and insufficient use case permutations.
"Please stay indoors and off the roads unless you have a really good reason."
"May we search your house for him?"
Holy shit! The horrors!
> Even before the error, theÂnumber of students qualifying
>Âfor gifted seats â" 9,020 â" was far higher than the number
> of seats.
It doesn't make a difference -- this is the real stupidity. It's long since been shown society would get much more bang for its buck devoting just a fraction of the money it spends making sure every last yokel can count to ten to accelerated education for people who actually invent stuff.
But those yokels, as adults, are amenable to claims that that is elitist, by other yokels seeking their support in power grabs.
Is this thing B&W? It isn't worth $20 to me if it's B&W.
Apparently someone missed my sarcasm and thought I was being serious.
Or...
Apparently someone got my sarcasm, and realized I was mocking their beloved theory.
Hey! The US is still great! We have over $800 billion a year in annual regulatory burden!
Four are dead, 160+ injured, some badly. It was a miracle more weren't. Also, massive response has a purpose beyond the immediate.
Were any houses besides the dead suspect's searched without warrant or a knock on the door and asking?
The question of safe to go out is moot. It's Friday night and these are nerds.
Also, these are the people hanging out on 4chan. So it's double-moot.
Wai, how convenient. This is 4chan. It's triple-moot.
Flip him end over end to calculate a metric equivalent of the Smoot. At very high speed.
Libertarians do not object to government; they rely on it in their political philosophy. You are thinking of anarchists. Scams are wrong in a liberterian world, too.
Including government ones.
> "Yet when Marc Hedlund took the helm of Etsy’s Product Development
> & Engineering department, 97% of the engineering department were men."
Huh. That is a pretty low ratio...of men.
The pictures of those two were couched in terms of conspiracy theory -- look at their huge bags which have a white spot like some blown-up thing! Oh my! These aren't the official suspects!
- Wake up sheeple! Government is blaming it on some innocent teens! These real guys over here are government agents, see them hold their hands to their ear like TV?
- Here's a statement from an agent who fears he will lose his job for saying this, but gubberment plans to blame it on innocent young men who they will conveniently kill when arresting!
I really don't want zombie rotting meat smells, nor assal-derived ones.
I'm fine with Anne Hathaway or any other starlet's freshly-unholstered areolar or underboob scents, though, which I imagine is like a slightly musty fallen log found in the woods when you went on a hike some years ago.
How is his corporations' fault? It's good old government normality: Trying to void rights, and the same way Hitler did, by appealing to emergency needs.
All the corporations did was, reasonably, seek legal protection for governments abusing this power.
The correct solution is to forbid government this power to begin with. That, more than anything else, is the core teaching of the US Constitution.
I believe you answered your own question.
I would get introduced to family of a headhunter I used 8 years ago once.
> In Iceland, Tap Cellphones To Avoid Incest
"Well, that's what we thought they'd use it for. Turns out 99% of people used it to find close relatives they didn't know to bang."
The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence + I hate daddy syndrome.
With a straight face, people bitch about capitalism using their iPhones, then drive to McDonald's to shove Big Macs down their 250- lb. gullets.
This is what news organizations have been doing long before social media.
The evening of the bombing, CNN was already analyzing Obama's speech w.r.t. whether he did a good job or not. Meta-analysis.
That's fine for a politics class, but a news show?
I don't know but got that feeling from CNN this morning, that it was happily minding its own business in BFE and people built houses around it.
Is it interesting? Corporate profits keep shelves jammed with things.
The real evil is the privacy laws doesn't extend to government, which continues to root through things.
Are you in Europe? Ask your grandma. She has experience with governments peeking when they shouldn't, and/or "wonderful" places that outlawed corporate profits.
Wow! Antares is 470 light years away. Private space companies are advancing faster than I thought.
Are we so diseased we assume "control by government" is the natural and proper base from which to start thinking about topics? It's a truism that government, AKA people in power who want to maintain it -- including those in the US -- will automatically assume so.
Sorry, Democrats. Even your congenital desire to hold up cardboard with "Commerce Clause" on it the way a rainbow-haired guy holds up John 3:16 isn't enough to override the First Amendment.
Strange bedfellows -- what do you and the John 3:16 AKA religious folk have in common? 500 word paper due to tomorrow, turn in to Madison and Monroe.
"Well!" think half the other MPs, "Thank god I don't even know how to use a computer."