It sounds like you are pretty far from any CO. You are in range for IDSL but not regular ADSL. To be at that range you must be pretty far out. There are benefits and drawbacks to anywhere you live. You dont have to deal with as much congestion and people are but you don't get easy broadband. If its not a worthy tradeoff then move.
Well the tour de france is still the worlds most watched sporting event that happens yearly or more. Cycling doesn't suffer despiute the cost of a bike. I personally would love to participate in a sport that it only costs $550 to be competative at. One thing to remember is something i learned from cycling. At the point in which you need the high end equipment it will be payed for by someone else. When you are a recreation cyclist you probably wont be winnig by margins where the bike matters. The same is true for swimming. You can train and work your way up in a much cheaper suit. If you are losing in the low levels of swimming by a fraction of a second then you are never going to be great regardless of what you wear.
I hate to break it to you but all high end bicycles are the same as it is now anyway. Any bike over $3000 from your local store can win the tour de france. It is a human sport, its not about the equipment. This is coming from a guy with a $6000 bike. I just like to ride something nice but it doesn't help me win.
I have heard a lot of people talk about how cardio makes you more efficient. It is a tiny reduction. I am a competitive cyclist and i WISH i could get more efficient easily. Instead i have to train very specifically for 6 days a week for hours a day just to go from 23-24% efficiency. If you are not training to be more efficient it wont happen. This whole argument again cardio stinks. Yes you burn slightly less calories for the same amount of work when you train cardio but consider this; Once you are in great cardio shape you go from burning maybe 100 calories an hour to several times that much. That is a much bigger difference than just saying you go from burning 100 calories an hour to 198. Oh sweet you gained efficiency and burned 2 less calories. That doesn't hurt your plan at all.
In all seriousness if you are at 380 lbs and eating that little food i think i know what is wrong. When you eat so little your body becomes hyper efficient. You need to eat more to lose weight. Eat slightly more and start exercising longer and possibly easier. If you are shocking your body into thinking you are starving yet must work hard you will become very efficient. This will teach your body that body fat is very important because you live in times of starvation and overwork. You will never lose your fat until your body think you are living in the land of plenty.
Re:Technical explanation; didn't rtfa.
on
How Do Geeks Exercise?
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Having greater muscle volume does lead to greater calories burned without doing anything. This however is a pretty small gain. With aerobic exercise you can burn a ton of calories and most importantly you directly burn fat. When you burn the short term energy stores (sugar) of the body it effects you hunger. When you directly burn fat you feel less hungry after working out. This is why aerobic exercise is best for losing weight. Resistance training will work but it takes more will power.
Because when compared to any race that could travel across the universe at FTL speeds we would be the stone knives and bearskins. But as always this is my 02c,YMMV
You are probably right but consider this; what if we invent FTL travel within our the next few years. Wouldn't that make an entirely different scale of possibility be worth mentioning? I think its safe that if we assume there are aliens (something which we have no direct evidance of) then it is safe to assume FTL travel is possible (something we also have no direct evidence of). So this leads me to think that if we invented FTL travel very soon we WOULD use it to explore and we would find life thats out there if it exists. We could narrow down some candidate planets quickly and find some monkeys with stone axes. If we found them we would surely take a close look.
Just because they want a particular person as president does not mean its actually good for them. I think they would be better off with McCain as president. He would keep the troops there that are a huge recruiting tool. Obama may or may not pull them. The country is probably going to fall into a civil war eventually. It would be much harder to recruit suicide bombers to blow up their own neighbors.
The best human input i cna imagine would be something only a human thus far can judge. It has to be something completely arbitrary such as "is this dog cute or ugly?". Then put a picture of a dog. A computer might be able to guess its a dog, but probably not if it is ugly.
I was under the impression that Obama is not perfect but that he would always admit if he was wrong and quickly qork towards the right direction. I think this will be a big test of him in my eyes. If he never turns around on this issue it means he is clearly as stubborn as the rest. If he can admit he is wrong then hes better than someone who started out agreeing with me more.
Accepting stolen property is only a crime if you know its stolen.
Nope. Possessing stolen property is a crime regardless of if you know it's stolen or not. Sounds ridiculous but its true. The sane part of this whole deal is that you wont be probably wont be prosecuted as long as you cooperate. There is no guarantee of this although its your best chance.
The RDA requirements are the bare minimum to not get deficiency disorders most of the time. You might not agree with megadosing of vitamins but as Ray Kurzweil says in one of his books if you are compromising an already compromised plan you wont do yourself any good.
Hey i made a post on the internet. I was not trying to write a published book. I was typing fast to get an early response because i thought what i had to say was critical. I hit submit as my hand went on auto pilot to the button.
Criminals are not caught this way, amateurs are. This guy is clearly not a seasoned criminal and he should not be treated like one. I hope he does not get jail time from this. This is obviously just a kid making a mistake.
Then you shoudl be smart enough to not fall for a cute chick who is gorgeuos and seems cool but really just used you for your money right? Look it happens to the best of us because it is ingrained in us. Women who are abused are not the ones to blame. They are the ones who have the power to stop it but they are not really to blame.
They dont need to actually hide it. Nobody checks this stuff anyway. Sure mod me down however you want, i dont intend to be funny or ironic. Honestly im just depressed about this stuff.
Just because you saw it before us doesn't mean we should not be alarmed by its contents. When you consider how much more openly the current administration supports these tactics it makes you wonder what is really going on today.
Can yopu first list a source before hand that you wont claim is biased after the fact? The GP is absolutely right but i dont know what sources you will believe. Should i have you give me a list of sources you wont claim have a "liberal bias"?
Slashdot Mirror
Sure you can, in Washington (my state) and man others you can require overtime and fire someone if they don't do it.
whooooooooosh.........
It sounds like you are pretty far from any CO. You are in range for IDSL but not regular ADSL. To be at that range you must be pretty far out. There are benefits and drawbacks to anywhere you live. You dont have to deal with as much congestion and people are but you don't get easy broadband. If its not a worthy tradeoff then move.
Well the tour de france is still the worlds most watched sporting event that happens yearly or more. Cycling doesn't suffer despiute the cost of a bike. I personally would love to participate in a sport that it only costs $550 to be competative at. One thing to remember is something i learned from cycling. At the point in which you need the high end equipment it will be payed for by someone else. When you are a recreation cyclist you probably wont be winnig by margins where the bike matters. The same is true for swimming. You can train and work your way up in a much cheaper suit. If you are losing in the low levels of swimming by a fraction of a second then you are never going to be great regardless of what you wear.
I hate to break it to you but all high end bicycles are the same as it is now anyway. Any bike over $3000 from your local store can win the tour de france. It is a human sport, its not about the equipment. This is coming from a guy with a $6000 bike. I just like to ride something nice but it doesn't help me win.
I have heard a lot of people talk about how cardio makes you more efficient. It is a tiny reduction. I am a competitive cyclist and i WISH i could get more efficient easily. Instead i have to train very specifically for 6 days a week for hours a day just to go from 23-24% efficiency. If you are not training to be more efficient it wont happen. This whole argument again cardio stinks. Yes you burn slightly less calories for the same amount of work when you train cardio but consider this; Once you are in great cardio shape you go from burning maybe 100 calories an hour to several times that much. That is a much bigger difference than just saying you go from burning 100 calories an hour to 198. Oh sweet you gained efficiency and burned 2 less calories. That doesn't hurt your plan at all.
In all seriousness if you are at 380 lbs and eating that little food i think i know what is wrong. When you eat so little your body becomes hyper efficient. You need to eat more to lose weight. Eat slightly more and start exercising longer and possibly easier. If you are shocking your body into thinking you are starving yet must work hard you will become very efficient. This will teach your body that body fat is very important because you live in times of starvation and overwork. You will never lose your fat until your body think you are living in the land of plenty.
Having greater muscle volume does lead to greater calories burned without doing anything. This however is a pretty small gain. With aerobic exercise you can burn a ton of calories and most importantly you directly burn fat. When you burn the short term energy stores (sugar) of the body it effects you hunger. When you directly burn fat you feel less hungry after working out. This is why aerobic exercise is best for losing weight. Resistance training will work but it takes more will power.
Because when compared to any race that could travel across the universe at FTL speeds we would be the stone knives and bearskins. But as always this is my 02c,YMMV
You are probably right but consider this; what if we invent FTL travel within our the next few years. Wouldn't that make an entirely different scale of possibility be worth mentioning? I think its safe that if we assume there are aliens (something which we have no direct evidance of) then it is safe to assume FTL travel is possible (something we also have no direct evidence of). So this leads me to think that if we invented FTL travel very soon we WOULD use it to explore and we would find life thats out there if it exists. We could narrow down some candidate planets quickly and find some monkeys with stone axes. If we found them we would surely take a close look.
They used to have this. It is called the steering column. Many drivers were skewered once upon a time.
Just because they want a particular person as president does not mean its actually good for them. I think they would be better off with McCain as president. He would keep the troops there that are a huge recruiting tool. Obama may or may not pull them. The country is probably going to fall into a civil war eventually. It would be much harder to recruit suicide bombers to blow up their own neighbors.
How about showing multiple pictures and asking for the total number of cute animals.
The best human input i cna imagine would be something only a human thus far can judge. It has to be something completely arbitrary such as "is this dog cute or ugly?". Then put a picture of a dog. A computer might be able to guess its a dog, but probably not if it is ugly.
Its ok to break the law as long as your catching a bad guy right?
I was under the impression that Obama is not perfect but that he would always admit if he was wrong and quickly qork towards the right direction. I think this will be a big test of him in my eyes. If he never turns around on this issue it means he is clearly as stubborn as the rest. If he can admit he is wrong then hes better than someone who started out agreeing with me more.
Accepting stolen property is only a crime if you know its stolen.
Nope. Possessing stolen property is a crime regardless of if you know it's stolen or not. Sounds ridiculous but its true. The sane part of this whole deal is that you wont be probably wont be prosecuted as long as you cooperate. There is no guarantee of this although its your best chance.
The RDA requirements are the bare minimum to not get deficiency disorders most of the time. You might not agree with megadosing of vitamins but as Ray Kurzweil says in one of his books if you are compromising an already compromised plan you wont do yourself any good.
Hey i made a post on the internet. I was not trying to write a published book. I was typing fast to get an early response because i thought what i had to say was critical. I hit submit as my hand went on auto pilot to the button.
Criminals are not caught this way, amateurs are. This guy is clearly not a seasoned criminal and he should not be treated like one. I hope he does not get jail time from this. This is obviously just a kid making a mistake.
Then you shoudl be smart enough to not fall for a cute chick who is gorgeuos and seems cool but really just used you for your money right? Look it happens to the best of us because it is ingrained in us. Women who are abused are not the ones to blame. They are the ones who have the power to stop it but they are not really to blame.
They dont need to actually hide it. Nobody checks this stuff anyway. Sure mod me down however you want, i dont intend to be funny or ironic. Honestly im just depressed about this stuff.
Just because you saw it before us doesn't mean we should not be alarmed by its contents. When you consider how much more openly the current administration supports these tactics it makes you wonder what is really going on today.
You're right. Commercial sources claim to be fact checked very carefully. Commercial sources claim to be strictly unbiased.
Wikipedia strives for those goals but at least you are not deluded into thinking they are there.
+1 about the power requirements...
Can yopu first list a source before hand that you wont claim is biased after the fact? The GP is absolutely right but i dont know what sources you will believe. Should i have you give me a list of sources you wont claim have a "liberal bias"?