Slashdot Mirror


What To Do With a Hundred Hard Drives?

Makoto916 writes "In five years with my current employer as the IT administrator, I've amassed a sizable cabinet of discarded hard drives; just shy of 100, in fact. All of the drives range in size from 20GB up to 300GB. They've all been stored in anti-stat bags, and spot checks of even the oldest ones show that most of them still work. Individually, they're mostly useless for our line of work, which is digital video production. However, the collective storage potential is quite significant. They are of varying size and speed, but the one commonality is they're all IDE. What is the best way to approach connecting all of these devices and realizing their storage potential? On a budget, of course. Now, I'd never use such an array for critical data storage, but it certainly would be useful as a massive backup array to our existing SAN that does store critical data. I have several spare and functioning PCs, but not nearly enough to utilize their internal IDE controllers; even with multiple add-in controllers, it still wouldn't be enough. Not to mention the nightmare of managing a bunch of independent PCs. I've looked into ATA Over Ethernet and there's a lot of potential there, but current 15 to 20 bay AoE cabinets are expensive, and single device enclosures are so rare that they're also expensive. Are there any hardware hackers out there who have crafted their own home-brew AoE systems? Could they scale to 100 drives? Is there a better way?"

487 comments

  1. Thumper by neccoant · · Score: 2

    A Thumper or Drivebox RAID system.

    1. Re:Thumper by fuzzix · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A Thumper or Drivebox RAID system. Or you could turn 'em into Thom Yorke..
    2. Re:Thumper by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of sectors suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

  2. 2 Words... by ElboRuum · · Score: 4, Insightful

    e Bay.

    1. Re:2 Words... by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

      This is actually a good idea. Sell enough of them to raise the funds in order to buy the expensive AoE cabinets that you want but can't afford.

      --
      "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    2. Re:2 Words... by uniquename72 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Porn backup.

    3. Re:2 Words... by ksd1337 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now you can install Vista and actually run it.

    4. Re:2 Words... by iron-kurton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you crazy?? You need to dedicate at least two, redundant backups, and off-site tape storage for that...

      That's like putting all your savings under a mattress -- you won't need to use it until one day, you get really desperate, but realize it's all gone

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    5. Re:2 Words... by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      There are slide in hard drive trays for individual units that are very inexpensive. Usually the female portion runs about $30. or even less then the trays that slide in and out run only about $5. or $6. dollars each.
                        You would have the disadvantage of being limited to filling one drive at a time with data. However it is a very secure way of storing data.
                        You might also have difficulties with the length of time that the female portion of these drives lasts if you are constantly changing the males. There are some slightly more expensive units that may serve you better. TigerDirect.com tends to carry quite a few of these pull out tray systems.

    6. Re:2 Words... by Guybrush_T · · Score: 2, Insightful

      e Bay ... well maybe. Searching ebay for 3ware escalade cards, you may find some 8 ports or 12 ports IDE controllers. With this, you should be able to connnect 20-40 drives per PC. Hard to find however, but often not so expensive (IDE cards are no more wanted).

      After that, the last issue would be the power supply, but I guess this is just simple DIY.

    7. Re:2 Words... by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Funny

      You might also have difficulties with the length of time that the female portion of these drives lasts if you are constantly changing the males. You could call an escort and ask her.
      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    8. Re:2 Words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad to see mods have a sense of humor.
      Every time I dare to obliquely diss a Microsoft product under my name I get modded -1 FLAMEBAIT or -1 TROLL --- especially in that VISTA router crashing post a few days ago. PHEW! --- Talk about rabid frothing MS defenders!

  3. Bunches of small drives by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I doubt its worth using a bunch of old smaller drives.

    between the power requirements and all the extra hardware needed to run them i would just sell them all on ebay and take the $ to buy a couple of huge drives, mirror and do iscsi with them.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Bunches of small drives by ElboRuum · · Score: 5, Funny

      But d0000000d, yer missing the point. He wants to do something 1337 hAxXoRz with all these drives. I mean, really, selling them on eBay would be what the n0rmLz would do.

    2. Re:Bunches of small drives by packeteer · · Score: 1

      +1 about the power requirements...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    3. Re:Bunches of small drives by daveywest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think selling them on ebay is a good idea. You never know what kind of data might be recoverable.

      Honestly, if you can't use them in-house, then keep collecting them and let your replacement deal with the mess when you leave for another job.

    4. Re:Bunches of small drives by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      If you use the software approved by the DoD for 'cleaning' you should be safe.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:Bunches of small drives by wtfispcloadletter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep, just not worth it. The magnets are worth more than the drives. Take 'em apart and sell or use the magnets. Destroy or recycle the rest of the drive.

    6. Re:Bunches of small drives by multisync · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you use the software approved by the DoD for 'cleaning' you should be safe.


      Who has time to do that on almost 100 drives?

      I use the sledge hammer method myself. Hit it until it sounds like a maraca when you shake it.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    7. Re:Bunches of small drives by Kraeloc · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      *whoosh*

    8. Re:Bunches of small drives by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      We do that many on a regular basis during server ( and san ) upgrades.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    9. Re:Bunches of small drives by adioe3 · · Score: 1

      Why not? It's not that hard to shred all data on those disks and I honestly doubt people buying hard disks on eBay would go through the trouble ... Sell the damn things and venture into something you could use better ...

      --
      Finding and fixing subtle flaws in complicated software is a lot of fun. (openbsd.com)
    10. Re:Bunches of small drives by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true coward.

      --Toll_Free

    11. Re:Bunches of small drives by LurkerXXX · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who has time to do that on almost 100 drives?

      Probably a guy who is trying to figure out how to hook up 100 ide drives into a backup system.

    12. Re:Bunches of small drives by grommit · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who has time to do that on almost 100 drives?

      People that don't actually stare at the screen the entire time a disk is being wiped.
    13. Re:Bunches of small drives by dmsuperman · · Score: 1

      DOD wipe them before selling them, and you don't need to worry.

      eBay seems like the best idea.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };: Go!
    14. Re:Bunches of small drives by BigFootApe · · Score: 4, Informative

      Rebate them with the manufacturer. That way, they're out of circulation (in case of privacy concerns).

    15. Re:Bunches of small drives by wooferhound · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    16. Re:Bunches of small drives by Idaho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. The correct answer is "throw them all away and buy 10x1TB drives for $1000" or something to that effect. Unless your time really is worthless, that will save you time, trouble and money.

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    17. Re:Bunches of small drives by wagnerrp · · Score: 3, Informative

      The drives alone will consume close to 1000W. It's probably another 1000W for the equipment to run them, plus whatever the hardware costs are. When you add in A/C costs, thats going to come to around $8-10/day, and depending on the average drive size, you're going to end up with less than 10TB of redundant data.

      Now the alternative is 12x1TB RAID6. It will consume around 250W, and cost around $4000. That's around two years before before the power budget catches up assuming you already have all the necessary hardware. Since you have to buy all the hardware, you'll catch up in under a year.

      This isn't at all considering the limited lifespan of the already used equipment.

    18. Re:Bunches of small drives by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't have to sit there the whole time. Set a few drives up for a DoD wipe and go home. Do that every night before you leave for home and it'll be done in no time.

      Use a couple of old spare crappy PCs left lying around. Every business has at least a few of those.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    19. Re:Bunches of small drives by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If storage is not a problem, there is no reason to use all the drives now or discard them simply because they are old.

      RAID controllers with 12 or 16 channels are dirt cheap on eBay now. Jeantech make some really cheap cases with good cooling and room for 12-16 drives. That would make an excellent NAS, if not for you for a charity or user group, and you have an endless supply of redundant drives to keep it going.

      Just because a drive is old, does not mean it is unreliable. Drives do not age much when not in use and stored properly, and besides which you have enough for multiple redundancy (RAID 50 maybe?).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    20. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I use the sledge hammer method myself. Hit it until it sounds like a maraca when you shake it. Damn, it feels good to be a gangsta!
    21. Re:Bunches of small drives by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2, Informative

      yep... DBAN (Darik's Boot and Nuke) FTW!!! I just DOD-wiped about 75 old 10-20-40GB drives that we're gonna be excessing. It took me a bit over two weeks.. You bet your bippy I didnt sit there and watch them wipe...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    22. Re:Bunches of small drives by Lost+Race · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Take 'em apart

      I agree that it's not worth trying to build a hundred-obsolete-drive array, but I strongly disagree with turning them into garbage prematurely. Sell or give away on ebay/craigslist/freecycle/whatever instead. There are lots of people who can make good use of a few end-of-life-but-still-working medium capacity drives. Just make sure you erase them thoroughly first. Realistically 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda' is plenty; to be absolutely sure give them one pass with a fast random number generator first.

      If you want magnets you can take them from failed drives.

    23. Re:Bunches of small drives by koafc · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why, an intern of course!

    24. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

    25. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is precisely the opposite.

    26. Re:Bunches of small drives by dickens · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will they blend?

    27. Re:Bunches of small drives by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could do this : http://jwtioh.bluesonic.net/misc/gurthang/P8260315.jpg
      http://jwtioh.bluesonic.net/misc/gurthang/
      That was an old setup with mostly 250GB IDE HDDs

    28. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, at least it's not like the Windows 98 defrag utility, where you could stare for hours until you realized you've been doing nothing but staring at the screen the whole time.

      Time well wasted, I guess...

    29. Re:Bunches of small drives by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      We wipe thousands of drives a year when we do rollovers. It doesn't take much effort. Most of the time you don't have to sit there in front of it.

    30. Re:Bunches of small drives by patches · · Score: 1

      Or could try degaussing. could do quite a few at a time, and only takes a few seconds.

      --
      The worst part of being athiest.... You don't have anyone to talk to during orgasm!
    31. Re:Bunches of small drives by Iron+Condor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      -1 on the power requirements.

      Get yourself a nice RAID-box to hook'em into and use the thing for backup. Hard disks have a pretty good life span when they're powered down. And their power requirements are zero in that case. Bring it up once a year and run your favorite disk-scan over the array and power it back down. Cheaper than tape backup.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    32. Re:Bunches of small drives by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually it is butt simple if you do it like I do. I simply keep a couple of old 233Mhz SFFs with the tops off in a corner. If you boot them off a floppy you can use all 4 IDE slots for drives and just round robin them until they are all complete. If you don't want to go that route you can always leave a cd rom on one of the IDE slots and fill the other three with drives. Then just use whichever tool you prefer(I like this one) and check/switch drives every couple of days. Before you know it you'll have a pile of clean drives without hardly doing anything at all.


      But I have to agree with the previous posters about the power required. If you have a bunch of 300Gb it might be worth it,but less than 100Gb you'll end up wasting more than you gain. What I usually like to do with them is if I have an extra slot on the HD IDE I put the smaller drive as a dedicated swap. Takes some of the wear and tear off the main drive and gives you a nice little speed boost as well. But that is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    33. Re:Bunches of small drives by __aahurc460 · · Score: 1

      If they are retired hard drives from a business they _should_ have been zeroed out. I'd sell 'em for sure.

    34. Re:Bunches of small drives by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      I know this sounds great and all, but you go through the trouble of setting this up when you can get a 1TB drive with gigabit network connectivity and USB for $200. If redundacy is an issue, there are other options.

      Wipe then sell the drives. I looked into this before with a cabinet of drives. New drive cost/GB and power consumption said it wasn't a good bargain.

    35. Re:Bunches of small drives by code4fun · · Score: 1

      You could always sell the logic boards. There may be people that can use them. Or, keep 'em for parts. You may need 'em some day (can you tell I'm a pack rat?)

    36. Re:Bunches of small drives by merphant · · Score: 2, Informative

      That link on removing the magnets gives a lot of difficult solutions. Here's what I do:

      * Bend open plate with the magnets and clamp it into a vise. (Usually the plate is a "U" shape, with the magnets inside the U.

      * Heat up the plate with a heat gun: the magnets are glued on there, and this will melt the glue.

      * Pull off the magnet with some pliers.

      Easy, and it works every time.

    37. Re:Bunches of small drives by Christophotron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I strongly disagree with turning them into garbage prematurely. Sell or give away on ebay/craigslist/freecycle/whatever instead. There are lots of people who can make good use of a few end-of-life-but-still-working medium capacity drives. First reasonable comment I've seen here yet... WTF is wrong with you people, thinking that these drives are useless and "the magnets are worth more than the drives" ????? I still have abundant uses for any drive 40GB and above. Several of my systems run their OS on a 40GB drive. Hell, that's even enough for Vista! And 300GB is nothing to sneeze at! I run my RAID array of pr0n on 2x300GB Maxtor PATA drives. I first started to use Linux seriously on a computer that was pulled out of a dumpster (P4 1.7Ghz Prescott, 256MB RAM, 40GB HDD, crappy POS Albatron motherboard). By all means, sell them on eBay and if they are cheap enough I will snap many of them up. So will many other people. Just because you are 'privileged' enough to have modern hardware doesn't mean people can't appreciate the stuff you treat as 'garbage'.
    38. Re:Bunches of small drives by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Where do you get a 1 TB drive with all that for $200? I just searched on froogle, and everything under $200 was two 500 gig drives in a case to make it look like 1 TB externally (sorry I don't know the correct terminology for that).

      The 1 TB NAS drives looked to be at least $275, which is around what I remember people mentioning 1 TB drives in various Tivo upgrade forums I read.

    39. Re:Bunches of small drives by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      I have nothing against anonymity... Cowardice is completely different.

      --Toll_Free

    40. Re:Bunches of small drives by rssrss · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the blisters he would get for 100 of them. Makes me hurt to think about it.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    41. Re:Bunches of small drives by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or could try degaussing. could do quite a few at a time, and only takes a few seconds.

      We experimented with that at the shop. Your typical degaussing ring doesn't generally have the field strength to wipe 'em. Heck...in our test, after zero-writing 'em, and checking 'em after 5, 10, 30, and 60 seconds of D-ring exposure we didn't appear to lose a bit.

      Note: dedicated hard drive degaussers can get really expensive, too... It's MUCH cheaper to stick with software methodology. Have a look here for details on both methods...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    42. Re:Bunches of small drives by tylernt · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you boot them off a floppy you can use all 4 IDE slots for drives and just round robin them until they are all complete.
      Wouldn't it make more sense to do them in parallel? DOS probably couldn't do it (unless you wrote the app yourself) but perhaps you could PXE network boot to a small Linux shell (or waste one IDE slot on a Linux install/LiveCD), then fire off

      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdb bs=1M &
      dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdc bs=1M &

      etc., substituting /dev/urandom or /dev/random and adding a loop or two, depending on how paranoid you are.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    43. Re:Bunches of small drives by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While that would probably work,most businesses I've had dealing with really really like the knowledge that you are doing a DoD wipe. I've had quite a few that weren't willing to donate drives with their machines until I told them I would use the DoD wiping procedure on premises. With the amount of ID theft going on nowadays you can't really blame them. So whether your suggestion would work in this case would depend on how paranoid the owners were about the data on the drives. But most of the owners that I've dealt with are of the opinion that "If it is good enough for the Dod,it is good enough for us!". But that is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    44. Re:Bunches of small drives by Jarik_Tentsu · · Score: 1
    45. Re:Bunches of small drives by BillX · · Score: 1

      It also works if you've gotten 2 of the magnets stuck together by mistake. Once they reach their curie temperature they come right apart! :-)

      Kidding aside - I just put a tiny screwdriver where the magnet is bonded to the plate and bop it with a hammer. It pops right off, and I haven't damaged a single magnet in the process so far. They're great with an energetic gerbil/wheel and thin magnet wire.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    46. Re:Bunches of small drives by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Taking them out and busting them up yourself is also pretty awesome. It's great stress relief, and useful if you've got your mind on a problem you can't quite wrap around as a distraction.

      And then there's also using the old drives as ballistic testing material.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    47. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. You *always* have to stare at the screen. Don't leave it alone for even a minute. In fact you need to stay in the room until they're *all* done. Otherwise you never know if some schmuck will swap your drives and walk away with some of your data! Security = 1 / Convenience, you know.

    48. Re:Bunches of small drives by Nimey · · Score: 1

      But... imagine a Beowulf of all those hard drives!

      OK, I'll go shoot myself now.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    49. Re:Bunches of small drives by amddude · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. i would take a few of those just for backup or extra storage when i need it

    50. Re:Bunches of small drives by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I first started to use Linux seriously on a bunch of 386SX boxes. I believe they had 40 meg hard drives, but I could be wrong. It was a good way to learn networking. Back in the good old days when linux distros were essentially 'open' and you could hang a bunch of boxes together on a coax thin-net and learn how to make them work together.

    51. Re:Bunches of small drives by multisync · · Score: 1

      There's a GNU tool called shred that works quite well too. You can even pass a -z to tell it to zero the last pass.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    52. Re:Bunches of small drives by pclminion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Degaussing the drives would be pointless. It destroys the low level formatting, possibly permanently. If the intention is to resell the drives, what's the point of rendering them unusable? Just zero the dang thing. If the data is so important that you're afraid of people with high-tech equipment to recover data from a zeroed drive, maybe you shouldn't be selling them in the first place.

    53. Re:Bunches of small drives by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the sledge would end up taking longer. This is slashdot, he would need a breather every 15 seconds.

    54. Re:Bunches of small drives by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1
      http://tweakers.net/pricewatch/159094/western-digital-my-book-world-edition-ii-1tb-(7200rpm-raid-usb20-en-1000mbps-8mb).html , might be 2x500 as well (couldn't be bothered to check for proper details.) But the reviews are at best mediocre, and if I were to buy a 1 TB for backup purposes (or otherwise mission critical), I wouldn't let the price guide me. An extra bit of money well-spent could be worth dozens of hours of frustration).

      I like a bit of quality.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    55. Re:Bunches of small drives by ImaLamer · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I usually like to do with them is if I have an extra slot on the HD IDE I put the smaller drive as a dedicated swap. Takes some of the wear and tear off the main drive and gives you a nice little speed boost as well. But that is my 02c,YMMV

      This is always a good idea. Move the swap and the Windows temp to this drive and keep it formatted FAT32 (or lower). If you can, partition the disk up and give it two 2 gig partitions. Each partition should be formatted FAT16 (aka: FAT, no 32). FAT32 and FAT16 need to read/write to the disk less for each transaction than NTFS and is much faster for it. Since it's just swap and temp files, you don't need NTFS.

      If you do this, you leave the rest of the drive open for users' personal files or whatever. The two partition setup should be one for swapfiles, the other for temp files. You can get more creative and create another for a web browser cache, but as you create partitions the drive head has to move farther to span the space and slows down the operation. A large FAT32 partition works well if you dig deep and move a lot off onto this second drive. Another thing to keep in mind is what people are going to be putting into their temp directory. Video work might create files bigger than the partition. In this case, create a 2 gig swap partition at FAT16 and leave the rest FAT32 for normal files.

      I always get a second drive now for this reason. Helps in both Windows and Linux. For even better results, keep the drives on different IDE channels. Just think, the overall strategy is to keep one disk working on program data and the other working on the memory swap data - a major bottleneck, especially at IDE speeds.

    56. Re:Bunches of small drives by paulkoan · · Score: 1

      If you use the software approved by the DoD for 'cleaning' you should be safe.


      The whole "multiple-writes else information can be gathered from the residual magnetic domains" thing is pretty much debunked.

      Writing zeros is sufficient.
      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    57. Re:Bunches of small drives by nbritton · · Score: 1

      Personally, I melt them down to reclaim the aluminium. If you need guaranteed data destruction, send them to me.

    58. Re:Bunches of small drives by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      I use the sledge hammer method myself. Hit it until it sounds like a maraca when you shake it.


      Sledge Hammer method indeed.
      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    59. Re:Bunches of small drives by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Umm... if you could sell them for an average of $10 each, that'd be $1000.
      Selling them in a big lot saves lots of time & trouble.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    60. Re:Bunches of small drives by Guspaz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Or you could just do the normal thing and use a swap partition. Are there any actual benefits to using a swap file on a file system instead of an actual swap partition?

      I mean, sure, it's incredibly useful in certain circumstances when you CAN'T make a swap partition. My VPS has one big partition, stored on a SAN, and I can't repartition anything. Being able to make a swap file was super handy. But in a real computer, this shouldn't be a concern.

    61. Re:Bunches of small drives by Atario · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or he could go the lazy way: take them down to your local computer mega-store and look for the DriveStar machine. Dump them in, the machine counts the space, and gives you back a few large-capacity drives (minus 8% for their profit, of course).

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    62. Re:Bunches of small drives by julesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But d0000000d, yer missing the point. He wants to do something 1337 hAxXoRz with all these drives. I mean, really, selling them on eBay would be what the n0rmLz would do.

      Absolutely. My advice: there are open source designs for processors, IDE adapters and gigabit ethernet controllers that can be loaded onto FPGAs. There's not a lot you need to know beyond this to go and do it yourself.

    63. Re:Bunches of small drives by Idaho · · Score: 1

      Umm... if you could sell them for an average of $10 each, that'd be $1000.
      Selling them in a big lot saves lots of time & trouble.


      Yes, but who is interested in buying a hundred or so old, used harddisks some of which may or may not even work?

      It will take you time putting it up on e-bay, or even more if you're going to sell them somewhere else in person. Then there'll be the shipping, people inquiring about particular disks, brands etc., you'll have to check that they actually work or you will have people getting angry at you, you'll want to securely erase them because who knows what might still be on those disks, etc. etc.

      So I'd say just pick out the bigger (newer) ones, give them to some charity project that may have the "free" time to invest in it perhaps; or give them away to family members with older computers. Then buy a couple new disks.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    64. Re:Bunches of small drives by mpeskett · · Score: 1

      That defragger was hypnotic... all the little broken files being made whole and blue and cool-looking.

      XP's defrag is just a let-down after that.

    65. Re:Bunches of small drives by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

      I use the sledge hammer method myself. Hit it until it sounds like a maraca when you shake it. Seller shipped broken disk that sounded like a maraca when shaken. Would not buy again.
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    66. Re:Bunches of small drives by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

      Although it may not be worth it power consumption-wise, you could finally tell us all what it's like having a Beowulf cluster of something.

      --
      stuff |
    67. Re:Bunches of small drives by Znork · · Score: 1

      That way, they're out of circulation

      Doubtful. Refurbishing drives is standard practice, and getting replacement drives with other peoples data isn't exactly rare.

    68. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do if you punch a clock, and make $9/hr

    69. Re:Bunches of small drives by harry666t · · Score: 1

      I second that. But 40GB? Man... One year ago I've squeezed a sufficiently featured Debian installation into 640MB HDD and it was my primary development workstation for a few days, and I was fine. Emacs, gcc, Python, Xorg, Wmii, some minor utils, and I've still had plenty (more than 60MB) space for some of my files. At the time that computer was bought (1996? 1997?), 640MB was a dream.

      The only drawback of that computer is that it now has a fscked COM port and I can't use a mouse (it has no USB). But hey, who needs a mouse?

    70. Re:Bunches of small drives by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would second that, except that instead of that, you should pass it out to friends. In fact, I suggest putting them all on a big shelf on your wall.

      You can have friends come over, and starting with 100 harddrives, just take one down, pass it around, and before too long you'll have 99 harddrives on the wall.

      Why does this sound familiar? Hmm...

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    71. Re:Bunches of small drives by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      Actually it gives you a really nice performance increase,especially on older machines on IDE. While I can't give you a benchmark score(as I've always preferred to do real world testing) I can tell you that on a 1.1Ghz Celeron moving swap to a FAT32 partition on the front of the second drive cut backup times by 20%. And on my 3Ghz Celeron I created 3 FAT32 partitions,one at the front of each drive(so WinXP can use the drive that isn't being used,typically the D: if I'm editing video or the SATA E: drive if I'm playing a game) and by doing so I cut a good 20 minutes off a DVD to Divx video conversion and my games load about 10% quicker.


      While I haven't tried making the partitions FAT16,but I will when I build the 1.2Ghz Duron I have sitting in the closet,I can tell you that FAT32 does make for a better swapfile in Windows. And I can tell you it can make a dramatic difference in Linux too.I often get these old 233-600Mhz boxes given to me from SOHO shops upgrading their oldest machines,and by putting an old 2-10Gb IDE drive on the second channel formatted to FAT32 as a swapfile it really makes the Puppy Linux I install on those machines zippy. Usually I'll leave it a dual boot with whatever CAL came with it (usually Win98) but when I run into the single moms or charities I gave them to all they gush about is how fast and easy their Puppy PC is. On a 233Mhz with 96Mb of RAM and a second drive as swap it is dang near instant booting. And it is a great way to keep these old but running PCs out of the landfill. But that is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    72. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you have access to deep water (>1000 fathoms), the best technique I know of is smashing the spindle three times with a #4 ballpeen hammmer, and using the resulting pancake as a skipping stone.

    73. Re:Bunches of small drives by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      I forget where I read the article, but I read one where someone took his PC in to be fixed, they said "you need a new HDD", replace it and then a month later he received a call from the new owner of his HDD telling him he should be more careful.

      I think he sued the company that did the replacing. You need to wipe the drives everytime you get rid of them.

    74. Re:Bunches of small drives by Barryke · · Score: 1

      Software? I figured the DoD only used hdd shredders.

      A nice read considering the The U.S. Department of Defense 5220.22-M standard:
      http://www.guard-privacy-and-online-security.com/how-clean-off-the-hard-drive.html

      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    75. Re:Bunches of small drives by Cjstone · · Score: 1

      Well, in a situation where I had to destroy that many drives, I'd pick up an SKS and a 300-round box of military-surplus ammunition, then take the things out to a shooting range and put some holes in them. Something tells me that the drive getting hit by a 7.62mm FMJ round would, for all intents and purposes, make the data it contains unrecoverable.

    76. Re:Bunches of small drives by rootooftheworld · · Score: 1

      <quote> 20 to 300 GB </qoute>
      that makes an average of 160 GB per drive, even pesimistick estimate - 100 gigs per drive gives you 10 TB storage, quite something even at todays standarts, and speedy if you sum it up, judgng drive sizes you would get about 80 mb/s x 100 =
      8 gb/s, format with zfs, and you have an enterprise server storage aray, with a tad of power-hungryness, but hey?, what isnt these days

      --
      I know full well that tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack
    77. Re:Bunches of small drives by multisync · · Score: 1

      The whole "multiple-writes else information can be gathered from the residual magnetic domains" thing is pretty much debunked. Writing zeros is sufficient.


      I don't know about it being debunked, but I would tend to agree writing zeros is sufficient in most cases. If you have military secrets that someone would be willing to invest a lot of time and money in to recovering, then the DoD standard might be warranted. For the most part, the 'dd' method described above or zeroing out the drive would be sufficient for most people's needs.

      As I mentioned elsewhere, GNU shred works real nice. It uses several different patterns, you can specify how many passes you would like it to make, and you can write zeros on the last pass (so it doesn't look like the drive contains encrypted data).

      If I was going to sell or give away an old system I would use a knoppix or Ubuntu boot disc, let shred do it's thing overnight and put a fresh copy of the OS on the machine when it finished. More likely, if it was an older/smaller/likely-to-fail-soon drive (like, say, an old Maxtor) I would use the sledge hammer method on it and put in a new 500 gig drive for $89.99.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    78. Re:Bunches of small drives by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That's actually not a bad idea if such a thing really existed. I usually pawn that sort of stuff off on friends and family though. You'd be amazed at the junk I've managed to foist on unsuspecting friends and relatives.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    79. Re:Bunches of small drives by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      All i can tell you ( i don't work in the retirement department ) is that we have software we are required to use by legislation, and part of the deal is that it was DoD 'approved'.

      Its some boot floppy they use to do the job. Then the PC or server gets sent off to the surplus group to be auctioned off.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    80. Re:Bunches of small drives by multisync · · Score: 1

      Seller shipped broken disk that sounded like a maraca when shaken. Would not buy again.


      That's funny ;)

      As I mentioned elsewhere (after you posted your coment) if I was going to sell a drive I would boot the system with a Knoppix disc and use shred on it. I just don't have the time or inclination to do this with a hodge podge of a hundred or so 20 - 80 gig drives that "mostly work." Too many other hobbies, I've got half-finished projects at home, at work etc.

      If someone does have the time and figures they can get enough in return for the drives to justify hooking each one up, shredding it, then selling it on ebay more power to them. The HD manufacturers are certainly not making smaller size drives available, and sometimes that's all you need. I'm all for recycle and reuse, but I find a lot of older "consumer" or desktop grade drives are simply too prone to failure to justify the effort. But that's just my experience.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    81. Re:Bunches of small drives by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda

      would be a little better and on most machines not take any more time.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    82. Re:Bunches of small drives by multisync · · Score: 1

      Use a couple of old spare crappy PCs left lying around. Every business has at least a few of those.


      Yeah, they're in my office, waiting for me to fix them. Hence the lack of desire on my part to futz around with a box of old drives ;)

      Seriously, anything with a plug that someone thinks might be useful some day gets left on my desk (usually without so much as a post-it note on it telling me where it came from and whether or not it works. Oh, and no power cable). A regular house cleaning is necessary just so I can have a level surface to work on.

      Some of those old drive could be put to use, and certainly someone with the time to wipe them could sell them at a swap meet or on eBay.

      Otherwise, it's Hammer Time!
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    83. Re:Bunches of small drives by finiteSet · · Score: 1

      You forgot:

      A----------- !!

      --
      If we start buying CDs then the terrorists have already won.
    84. Re:Bunches of small drives by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Informative

      A caveat with FAT. It does not support Unicode, so if you use software that tries to save files with Unicode (i.e. different to your OS locale) names it will fail.

      NTFS is not significantly slower than FAT, and in fact can be faster due to improved caching and resistance to fragmentation. Sure, sometimes more data need to be written to the disk than with FAT, but in practice it just gets cached until the disk is free to write it without interrupting anything else.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    85. Re:Bunches of small drives by dotgain · · Score: 1
      There's a bit more to it than just multiplying the speed of a single drive by the number of spindles. There's going to be some overhead in striping over that many spindles, parity calculation (you're not going to RAID0 the lot are you?), never mind getting IO to all those controllers.

      Reusing the old drives just seems to become less and less viable with time.

    86. Re:Bunches of small drives by paulkoan · · Score: 1

      There was a "suggestion" that "magnetic force microscopy may be able to recover such data".

      I am not convinced that anyone has actually done this, and the cheapo Zero Challange http://16systems.com/zero/index.html has not been attempted (perhaps because it is cheap).

      In any case the 35 writes of the DoD standard is to cater for all kinds of drives, including old MFM drives - so the whole thing is not necessary when you know the drive type.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_remanence

      DOD recommend degaussing or descruction for sanitisation, and overwriting sufficient for clearing.

      NIST say a single overwrite is sufficient for modern drives and refer to remenance recovery on a modern drives as "urban legend".

      But bear in mind, a sector marked bad by the hard drive will remain untouched during a complete overwrite with zeros, hence the degaussing method preferred by DOD.

      But essentially, a single writing of zeros is good enough for anyone unless it is ultra sensitive, then no amount of writing is good enough - you must degauss or destroy.

      --
      This signature intentionally left blank
    87. Re:Bunches of small drives by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "If you have military secrets that someone would be willing to invest a lot of time and money in to recovering, then the DoD standard might be warranted."

      But in that case, is it not the DoD standard just mechanically destroy them to small pellets? Software sweep is only valid for low level private information, not the kind of "military secrets that someone would be willing to invest a lot of time and money in to recover".

    88. Re:Bunches of small drives by novakyu · · Score: 1

      And, if you are an experimental scientist, build a shutter ('sorry, but you do need some sort of subscription to access the journal page).

    89. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Rebate them with the manufacturer. That way, they're out of circulation (in case of privacy concerns)."

      How does that put them out of circulation? Isn't "rebate them with the manufacturer" equal to "give them to an untrusted stranger"?

    90. Re:Bunches of small drives by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      It sounds, though, that your performance gains come from moving swap to a separate drive, not from using a file on a FAT32 partition rather than a swap partition.

    91. Re:Bunches of small drives by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Do them all at once, and to DoD spec: boot nuke http://dban.sourceforge.net/

    92. Re:Bunches of small drives by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      Uh,you do know in Windows it is always a swap file,right? In Win9X it is a Win386.swp file,and in any WinNT based it is pagefile.sys.And the reason to use FAT32 over NTFS is the lack of security and timestamps,which just slow down the swap and every little bit helps when you are talking about machines in the MHz range. But when I set up the Puppy it gets its own swap partition,though. Is that what you are talking about? Because no matter how you make a Windows swap there is going to be a file. At least I have never heard of a way to make one without a Win386.swp or pagefile.sys and I have been working on these things since the old DOS days.


      But if you know how to make a Windows swap without a file please share,as I often get donated machines which I refurbish to give away to single moms and charities and anything that'll net a speed boost I'm all for. Although I have to admit I've never had a speed complaint on any of the Puppy systems, even those with just a 233MHz and 64Mb of RAM. But I am the first to admit there is always new things to learn so if you know a way to get better performance out of these old Windows boxes please share. And as always this is my 02c,YMMV

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    93. Re:Bunches of small drives by TrueKonrads · · Score: 1

      Darik's Boot and Nuke (Hard Drive Disk Wipe) implements the DoD and other standards for disk wipe. A 80 GB disk takes about 18h to wipe in my tests. Boot it from PXE or CDROM. Erase in batches, sell in batches on e-bay. Buy new toys :)

      --
      Lone Gunmen crew.
    94. Re:Bunches of small drives by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I was focusing on the Linux part of "Helps in Windows and Linux".

    95. Re:Bunches of small drives by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Just the idea of moving the swap whatever, file or partition to a second drive is a good idea. Geez'ol petes, I figured the linux users wouldn't need a primer.

    96. Re:Bunches of small drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here! Heck, 4 or 6 GB drives are even useful! I help people with upgrades all the time, or even putting systems together out of crap. Not everyone can afford a new computer.

      Definitely DO NOT trash those drives. There's tons of people out there who can make use of them.

    97. Re:Bunches of small drives by WindShadow · · Score: 1

      I suggest using DBAN disk nuker instead. Performas anything from a light random pass to DOD, DOE, RCMP removal. Perhaps a tad faster than just dd, uses less CPU, and can be adjusted to whatever level you find balances comfort and time (and paranoia).

  4. hard diskus throw by mytrip · · Score: 5, Funny

    spin around in a circle and see who can throw them the greatest distance

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be particular about who it makes friends with.
    1. Re:hard diskus throw by harry666t · · Score: 1

      HDs are easily broken, but it's literally hard to really damage them. Long time ago a few dudes from my school had a hard drive smashing contest. They've treated it with everything but a screwdriver (including dropping it from the fifth floor) and they couldn't even open it :P so much energy wasted to deal with only ONE hard drive.

  5. magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The magnets are fun to play with!

    1. Re:magnets by Colz+Grigor · · Score: 1
      The magnets are fun, and once upon a time I'd make wind chimes out of the platters. I tried that with a hard drive from about three years ago, however, and I found myself in a very displeasing and dangerous situation, surrounded and covered in shards of glass...

      ::Colz Grigor // A little bit wiser now...

    2. Re:magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's an idea: glue the magnets to a wheel and then opposing magnets on the wheel housing. The opposing forces will spin the wheel--instant generator! It's a far cry from a perpetual motion machine, but it would be an amazing battery: lots of power and I bet it would last longer than most batteries too!

    3. Re:magnets by Faylone · · Score: 1

      That would only work if you had infinite magnets.

  6. If I may... by TheSubAtomic · · Score: 0

    I'll take em off your hands. Just toss me a message or something. If not, I'm smelling a fun raid array.

  7. Not worth the trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, just throw them away. You're going to spend
    more time and money trying to cobble them together
    than if you just built a mutli-terabyte SAN. We spent $8K on a 30 disk 6 TB SAN.

    1. Re:Not worth the trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you spent $8K and only got 6TB? I am totally in the wrong business. Is there anything else your company needs that uhm... I can rob you blind over?

    2. Re:Not worth the trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You've obviously never priced an enterprise level SAN. The GP quite obviously works for a very, very, very large company and got a huge price break, or purchased a lower end enterprise/mid-sized SAN. Joe blow mid-size company would've have spent $30K or more for the same or less for an enterprise level SAN from Dell or the like.

    3. Re:Not worth the trouble by RickRussellTX · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that probably includes redundant drives, redundant controllers, redundant fiber connections, redundant power...

      Sure, you could build your own 6TB external drive array for $1000, but it would have redundant nothing.

    4. Re:Not worth the trouble by afidel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most SAN's aren't built with IDE/SATA drives, they are generally built with fast Fiber Channel or dual port SAS drives so that they don't have a single point of failure even in the backplane. The applications that are hosted on most SAN's care about I/O's per second as much as they do storage space. If you don't care about performance then there are cheaper solutions like a Sun Thumper or an HP DL320s that get you pretty good TB/$ while still being more reliable then most DIY whitebox storage projects. I have plenty of storage on SAN, medium speed direct attached storage and on a couple DL320s's, you use what's most appropriate for the job at hand if you're doing your job right and your management allows.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Not worth the trouble by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      We are using a pair of Thumpers (T-humper as we call it) as a "secure high capacity transport device".

      In other words, we configure it with NFS/SAMBA, send it in a road case to a site, plug it in. Dump data till they are full, ship them back.

      Only problem is when I open it to replace a failed drive... it keeps saying something about "My mind is going Dave... I can feel it."

      Stupid computers.

      Oh yes... and SANs. High end SANs can do things like sustain 64GBit per second transfer rates to and from attached machines. Each machine is limited to 4GB per second per channel, but it is damn fast.

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Not worth the trouble by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hehe, yeah ours is but a baby SAN (176 drives) and it can do 16Gbit per second (most I've actually observed is 1.2GB/s but that's still damn fast).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Not worth the trouble by mlts · · Score: 3, Informative

      SAN drives are also generally smaller in capacity, around the 250 GB range, and a 2.5" form factor. The reason for this is to maximize the spindle count. For example, having five 250GB drives with RAID 5, each running at 10,000 RPM can handle a lot more I/O (especially random seeks) than one 1TB 3.5" SATA drive. SAN drives also have a lot more cache. The reason that a most SAN companies have moved to 2.5" for their drives is because even though the platters have less capacity, the data is faster to get to on a physical basis, and case engineers have more room to engineer around the drives, especially in 1U rack enclosures than 3.5" drives.

      Enterprise drives are definitely more expensive, but in this case, one gets what they pay for -- a lot more speed (especially with large, random seeks), and decent redundancy. The drives themselves are in the million to 1.4 million hour MTBF range, while consumer level drives, either don't have a rating, or the MTBF is hard to find, so the best guess is 250,000 to 500,000 hours, although some drives do have a million hour MTBF.

      The key is to figure out the task at hand, and one's budget, and decide that way. Some tasks, just hooking up drives to the motherboard and using software RAID is more than workable. Other tasks are so time dependent that one has to have full hardware RAID with as many low-capacity spindles as possible to distribute the I/O far and wide. This is why Flash drives are making a good dent in the enterprise RAID market -- they are not perfect, but there is zero time wasted waiting for the head to move, and the right sector to float by.

  8. Play dominos by r_jensen11 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Granted, you have a few less than others, but it's worth giving a shot

    1. Re:Play dominos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw man... I was going to post that :)

    2. Re:Play dominos by darkfire5252 · · Score: 1

      Hrmm, it's probably a minor issue, but am I the only one who ended up thinking that the hard drives falling into the lake/river at the end are going to end up being some very damaging pieces of litter?

  9. AUction them off by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    to other employees, give the proceeds to Charity.

    There really just a waste of company space and time.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  10. Free Geek by paroneayea · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Would be a super generous donation, but if you honestly don't have a practical idea, perhaps donate to your local Free Geek chapter? Good drives at that size could help in the fight for bringing technology to those who couldn't afford it otherwise.

    --
    http://mediagoblin.org/
    1. Re:Free Geek by drspliff · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm going to have to second this, but probably more towards the charity side.

      It's quite easy for computer recycling charities to get working computers, but because of data security policies at a lot of companies they are not allowed to recycle hard-drives. This means that a disproportionate number of computers to hard-drives float around until they're finally scrapped (which overall costs the charity more time, effort and money).

      For example, I have a 9gb and a 26gb drive in my main development machine - with a few 40gb and 125gb drives waiting for me to upgrade to (80% /, 67% /home used so far) - without working drives it's next to worthless and unusable.

    2. Re:Free Geek by industrialvegan · · Score: 0

      Yeah, agreed. Would be a super cool donation. My local free geek chapter will let anyone build a machine for free if they volunteer 24 hours of time at the store. For many people this is a great way to get a pretty nice decked out (as much as possible) system running Linux that they would not otherwise be able to afford. Granted, some of the machines are less than adequate for much, but at our chapter at least, they get p4's and up. In fact the last time I was down there they were even starting to get x86_64 machines. I say go for it. Just hope you can make people happy that the discs have been sufficiently wiped.

  11. Seriously? power requirements are high to scale. by artifex2004 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ebay and use the revenue to buy a few very large size drives. Running a ton of tiny drives on standby all the time just makes no sense from both a power and heat standpoint.

  12. Something a little more worthwhile... by voss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.thementoringctr.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=pages.Digital&

    Im sure you could donate the hard drives to them and get a tax writeoff...or
    find something similar in your community

  13. sell em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ebay?

  14. Earn a little extra on the side by NoobixCube · · Score: 3, Informative

    With almost a hundred hard drives, the gold leaf discs inside them must really add up in weight. What's gold trading at now? $850 or something per ounce.

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    1. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gold leaf? Did I understand you correctly? The stuff that's 1/250000 of an inch thick, or the really thin stuff? There's probably not any gold inside the drives worth recovering--if it is still used in hard drive manufacture. I am struggling to find a reference for that, but I would expect it not to be the case. Gold is used increasingly rarely in electronics these days, as it's rather expensive.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    2. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      IC bond wires are made of gold, and PCBs are gold plated very often these days. But IC wires are minuscule, and the PCB coating is so thin that it immediately dissolves when you solder to it.

    3. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      Even if it's a tiny amount in each drive, nearly a hundred hard drives must have at least an ounce of gold between them. Probably more. Not much value of gold per drive, otherwise they'd be a lot more expensive, but if you're not going to do anything else with them, that's still an ounce of gold to turn into cash. It's cash you didn't have before.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    4. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by taniwha · · Score: 1, Informative
      well assuming that it is 1/250,000 inch thick and that it's actually the platter that's plated - assuming 2 sides that's 2 x 4 /250,000 cubic inches of gold that's 0.00052 cm^3 density is 19.3 g/cm^3 so 0.0101 grams so .00036 ounces

      you're going to need about 280,000 disk drives to get your ounce of gold ....

    5. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by taniwha · · Score: 3, Informative

      oops included the 100 drives twice - 2,800 disk drives

    6. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      If you want serious amounts of gold scrap, you need a heap of Pentium Pro processors. Intel was just throwing gold around back in those days.

    7. Re:Earn a little extra on the side by (H)elix1 · · Score: 1

      It shocked me a bit, but this is actually a good way to 'mine' for gold. It is far easier to extract gold (and other precious metals) from old electronics than it is to get it from ore. Go figure.

  15. 100 ata hard drives? forget going green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can't imagine the power to run 100 hard drives. recycle the hard drives and buy a drobo, 4TB at your fingertips.

    1. Re:100 ata hard drives? forget going green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      i can't imagine the power to run 100 hard drives. Imagine no more!

      power_to_run_100_hard_drives = 100 * power_to_run_1_hard_drive
    2. Re:100 ata hard drives? forget going green by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Average HDD power consumption varies but 5W at idle and 8W under load is probably a reasonable average.

      500-800W to run 100 HDDs. Some PCs use that much alone. Even these days, it's still worth using older HDDs, because the cost of replacing them with bigger and more energy efficient ones is still not low enough to cover the cost of running an older drive for a few years. Especially if your NAS supports power saving.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:100 ata hard drives? forget going green by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Double that.
      You need the fans, you need an extra controller card for every 4 of them, the mainboards, etc.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:100 ata hard drives? forget going green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

    5. Re:100 ata hard drives? forget going green by parkman47 · · Score: 1

      that's freaking hilarious

    6. Re:100 ata hard drives? forget going green by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      800W just to run a few mobos, fans and RAID cards?

      A standard desktop mobo can easily run at under 50W idle. Either an older P3/P2 board or an underclocked and undervolted Sempron. Not even expensive, in fact free from your local dumpster.

      Let's see. 1 mobo has 4 IDE ports. Presumable some of the drives are SATA as well, so let's say an average of six drives per mobo. RAID cards from eBay will take at least 4 more, but you can easily get ones with 8 or 12 ports. Let's say again an average of 6. Say an average of four PCI slots per mobo, so thats 6 + (6 * 4) = 30 drives per mobo. Three or four mobos, say an average of 60W each to be pessimistic and cover the power consumption of the RAID cards gives you 240W. Hardly double.

      Of course, thanks to Wake On LAN the entire power consumption for four machines can be reduced to about 20W most of the time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  16. I feel ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I were staring at 100 hard drives and several unused computers I would have the same urge to make them do something cool/useful. But fight it and get rid of them to charity or ebay. You aren't using them because they are useless to you.

  17. Target practice at a gun range. by tgd · · Score: 1

    Seriously, disk space is dirt cheap these days.

    You won't save much using those and may cost a lot more when you deal with replacing them as they die.

    1. Re:Target practice at a gun range. by mark72005 · · Score: 1

      the money you save powering them rather than buying a new setup would be lost in electrical expense over a year or a few years.

    2. Re:Target practice at a gun range. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PULL!

  18. Don't bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send them to charity, the recycling bin, or e-bay.
    It is very unlikely that you can find an effective way to power them, control them, and aggregate them that would be cheaper than a couple of 1 Terabyte SATA-II drives from Best Buy for $259 each.

  19. freeNAS by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    freenas + old motherboard + all pci slots full of cheap IDE cards.

    works great, dont bother with IDE drive size versus Motherboard/Bios as freenas does not use the bios.

    I have made a couple of 2TB arrays from less than a couple hundred bucks and a bunch of free 250gb hard drives.

    You can do a software raid5 which gives you some peace of mind.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:freeNAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah I'd have some fun with it and run a Solaris NAS with ZFS

    2. Re:freeNAS by greatgreygreengreasy · · Score: 1

      where the hell do you get free 250 GB hard drives?!?

      --
      LRN 2 SWM
  20. umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered Coraid's offerings? It doesn't matter how you slice/dice this problem... 100 disks will be expensive to link up. It might serve you a bit better to group the drives by speed and size then you can build individual boxen using various commodity components. You'll just need some add-in cards that support ATA RAID.

  21. art project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    donate them to an artist. some burning man type sculptors

    with 1TB drives for $175, i cant imagine the time it takes to string together 100 drives would be worth it.

    good luck tho

  22. Give them away by WinkingChicken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't imagine the storage is worth the time to set up something that can use them all given new 500GB drives They are probably most useful in cheap USB to IDE enclosures as additional external storage - nice for convenient system backups, offsites, and extra storage.

  23. shred them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you will just waste money on the power supply.

    it's cheaper to buy terrabyte satas and raid them to do the same thing. i bet your array wouldn't even be that large.

    we have ours physically shredded - that way security and utility are maximized as they are recycled.

  24. Shoot them! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    They aren't worth jack except to you as playthings. You can't build up any worthwhile box to hold them, being IDE.

    I take off the circuit boards and shoot them, then pick up the pieces for the trash. Got a half dozen waiting to be "wiped" as soon as I get around to it.

    1. Re:Shoot them! by Nimey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What do you shoot them with? I've got several hundred rounds of steel-core 7.62x54R and an old Mosin.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:Shoot them! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a Mosin, also a Steyr 8x56R, and Garands sure make a mess of them. Got a cheap .308, ought to try that. I wonder if the newer drives, which I understand have glass platters, would shatter when hit, and whether .22LR would do the trick on them.

    3. Re:Shoot them! by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a lot of the new drive platters disintegrate, not just shatter.

      Haven't tried a .22, but a .40 hollowpoint makes a nice hole.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  25. Not reliable, energy inefficient by 18_Rabbit · · Score: 1

    There are several good reasons not to employ these as a backup solution. Using lots of smaller capacity drives will use significantly more power than fewer, larger drives. Also, these drives are old, which increases the probability that they will fail as they move along the bell curve. Save yourself the headache and powerbills, and donate 'em.

  26. Unpopular choice: by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Destroy them. If they stored what you describe, you do not want proprietary information leaking out. Especially, if you are the one that is in charge of "doing something with said HD's". Safer to destroy them.

    Of course, all slashdotters would say either build an array or donate. In reality, the company should keep the biggest for desktop usage and shred the rest.

    Safer for you and the company in terms of liability.

    --
    1. Re:Unpopular choice: by R2.0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      "Destroy them."

      Suggestion: take them to a shooting range and hang them from the backstop. Connect them all to a 12v garden battery to get them spinning, and then fire away. Second Amendment FTW!

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:Unpopular choice: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I find it excruciatingly difficult to believe that they could not be scrubbed of the data, given the amount of technical information on the web to do so.

      You could make a few (dozen) passes with Linux, or other *ix, doing dd's from /dev/zero (or your own pattern or file filled with whatever), and reformatting the disk with various different filesystems (FAT32, NTFS, reiserfs, ext2, ext3, ext4), and then switch to Solaris or even HPUX or something else off-the-wall and using their filesystems. No usable data would remain after a concerted effort, I'm sure.

      Then format the drives with ext3, build a Linux system on them and donate them to some organization needing to build a small server for a classroom, preferably in an impoverished third-world country, so they can make use of the OLPC's they're trying to educate their kids with.

      Destroying them to reclaim the gold and/or the magnets should be considered a very last resort because the rest of the drive might or might not be recyclable for its raw materials and would probably add to an overburdened landfill.

    3. Re:Unpopular choice: by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      If you had a well paying job in IT, would you risk the liability on "scrubbing the HDD's well"?

      I wouldnt.

      --
    4. Re:Unpopular choice: by harry666t · · Score: 1

      for i in $(seq 1 42); do dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hdx; done

      Hm?

    5. Re:Unpopular choice: by Nimloth · · Score: 1

      Not to mention GP's suggestion takes up at LEAST 100 hours of said high-paying IT job.

  27. Not technically legal, but by cunina · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pry them open, remove those awesomely strong magnets, and stick them all over some douchebag's Hummer.

    1. Re:Not technically legal, but by denzacar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why would you give away perfectly good magnets to a douchebag when you can just as well key his hummer?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    2. Re:Not technically legal, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thumbs up for the use of douchebag and Hummer together.

    3. Re:Not technically legal, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Make it a true geeks trick. Put the magnets on the inside of the fender spelling out "Very Small Penis". Then shake some iron filings over it. It'll keep trying to reform the words as he wipes it off and each day when you walk by it just sprinkle some more filings over the spot to keep the joke going. See how long it takes him to figure out they are on the inside or he sells the Hummer. If you can get inside the Hummer you could also stick a fist full inside the drivers seat cushion so they demagnetize his credit cards. Once again the gift that keeps on giving as it keeps demagnetizing each replacement set of cards.....In short magnets are useful for tormenting yuppies.

    4. Re:Not technically legal, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So the "douchebag" with a hummer then takes his vehicle to be repaired.

      Repainting a vehicle releases a relatively large amount of toxic chemicals into the atmosphere.

      Congratulations: because of your dislike of his vehicle's atmospheric pollution, you've just caused more atmospheric pollution. Who's the douche now?

    5. Re:Not technically legal, but by cunina · · Score: 5, Funny

      I stand humbled by your brilliance. If there were a Nobel Prize for malicious pranks, it would be yours.

    6. Re:Not technically legal, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      becouse its fun

    7. Re:Not technically legal, but by radish · · Score: 1

      Hey! As a self proclaimed yuppie I take offence at you equating me to a Hummer driver!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:Not technically legal, but by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey... at least it will be off the street for a while.
      Just imagine all the atmosphere you could save by also slashing his tires?
      Breaking windows and windshield? Or by cutting his breaks?

      Ah... screw all that.
      Just wait for him to show up and club him to death.

      Now... A wooden bat or one made out of aluminum? Which one is more environment friendly?
      Yes. A tree did die to make that wooden bat, but it takes a shitload of power to make that aluminum bat.
      Ah fuck it. Just get a large rock and crack his skull with it. Rocks are environment friendly.

      What were we talkin' about again?

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    9. Re:Not technically legal, but by hublan · · Score: 1

      Congratulations: because of your dislike of his vehicle's atmospheric pollution, you've just caused more atmospheric pollution. Who's the douche now? The Hummer owner. Doucheness is not transferable.
      --
      My spoon is too big.
    10. Re:Not technically legal, but by ami.one · · Score: 1

      I second that ! Made me realize we can never ever make an AI which can think such things up - so No singularity ever.

    11. Re:Not technically legal, but by Playos · · Score: 1

      bowing profusely, wondering where I can find iron shavings on the cheap

    12. Re:Not technically legal, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried to pry those suckers off a flat surface? He will be scratching up his own douchemobile to no end. Purely diabolical.

  28. ATA over Ethernet by target562 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh, come on. iSCSI... ATAoE is one of those really horrible ideas that should have never made it out of some geek's basement when there was a standards-track solution already available. I'd take them apart and use the magnets for an art project -- and use money you've saved from NOT running all of those ancient drives and buy a few modern 1TB ones.

  29. Rock concert by De+Lemming · · Score: 1

    With the low price of current new 1TB HDs, I think your project will cost more than buying new hardware (I may be wrong).

    So I suggest building some enormous speaker arrays with the drives, as e.g. demonstrated in this video of Radiohead's Nude (the hard drive array kicks in around 1'40").

    Building instructions.
    Another demo.

  30. Here's a thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What To Do With a Hundred [old] Hard Drives? Get ahold of a .50 cal Barret and use them for target practice while calmly singing:

    A hundred old hard drives stood up on a wall!
    A hundred old drives on a wall!
    BANG!
    Ninety-nine old hard drives....
    1. Re:Here's a thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the dumbest idea I've ever heard.

      I mean. Do you have ANY idea how expensive Barrett Ammo is?

  31. How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    I got a $20 enclosure with 17 drive bays in it, and a 300W power supply. I've got a dozen SATA drives, each drawing under 10W, and 5 EIDE, drawing under 20W each.

    At first I just got a dozen SATA/EIDE USB slaves for $10 each, and plugged them all into a USB hub, with just the single USB cable stretching out of the case over to another full PC's USB socket. But that is so slow, especially when copying big music or video files between drives (and through the single USB cable to the CPU and back). Playing multiple media files to different terminals in my house is too much bandwidth for the single USB, too. Running 4 USB from the big enclosure to the 4 sockets in the server PC isn't much better, because it all goes through the same CPU and PCI bus.

    So I got 3 Sabrent SBT-SRD4 4xSATA controller PCI cards, because they were $25 each. But when I tried to boot them in a few different motherboards (pre-HP Compaq P3/1.2GHz, IBM P4/3.2GHz), none of them got past the POST to even start booting the OS. I want to use them with Linux, but with the failure to even boot I'm not hopeful about driver support, either.

    I bought them from CompUSA (still alive, online only), which hasn't replied to (email only - no phone available) tech support requests. Nor has Sabrent itself. I'm not hopeful that they'll refund my money, since everything else about this transaction has sucked.

    So what I want to know is what cheap motherboard (no need for graphics or anything else other than at least 3 PCI slots and 100Mb-1Gb ethernet) will work with these SATA cards? If they're really duds, what is the cheapest way to get 12 SATA drives controlled, even if they're not that fast, over to 100Mb/Gb ethernet? Either SATA cards + motherboard, or even a fat mobo with a dozen SATA ports. I'd even settle for just 4-8 SATA ports to get started. I'm talking under $200 if possible.

    Ideas? If it works, then 8-9 of them should support the 100 HDs the original question was asking about.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The CompUSA online is not the same company. Some really shitty company bought the name because their reputation is already lower than CompUSA's was. Don't hold you breath waiting for that reply.

    2. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "I got a $20 enclosure with 17 drive bays in it, and a 300W power supply."
      WOW.. mind telling us where you got that?
      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    3. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problem with my SiI3124 pcix sata card. You have to go to SI's page and get a BIOS update for the SiI3114 chipset.

      http://www.siliconimage.com/support/supportsearchresults.aspx?pid=28&cid=15&ctid=2&osid=0&

      use the system BIOS (b5403.bin) in the zip to flash the card. that might fix your problem with the drives not showing up in post.

    4. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by michrech · · Score: 1

      You didn't specify processor, so:

      Intel

      AMD

      There was only one AMD board and 35 Intel boards that have 8 SATA2 ports. I'll leave it to you to decide which board to choose. I happen to have an Intel "Bad Axe 2" (975XBX2) board and love it, though I don't have anywhere near 8 drives in it at the moment.

      These are just what I found with newegg. You can do your own searching from there. :)

      --
      bork bork bork!
    5. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I wish I could, but I can't find the vendor info right now. However, there are plenty of 10+ bay towers with power supplies for $20 and up.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      It is indeed a Silicon Image chip (and almost nothing else, just a few caps/resistors).

      How do I flash the card, when the machine won't boot with the card in its PCI slot? Oddly, some of the mobos will boot through most of POST, and show the drive ID#, then halt before continuing. Some will halt before showing the drive ID, but if no drive is connected to the SATA the boot will continue to show no drive is connected, then halt.

      Ideas?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      SuperMicro AOC-SAT-MV2 with the BIOS yanked out. Cheap and DAMN effective, unlike the crappy Silicon Image controller cards that shit bricks when a >= 750GB drive is plugged in (like the OP, also bought 3x 4-port controllers, got burned)

    8. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by The+Cisco+Kid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dont try to boot from the drives on the funky addon controller. Connect a drive to the mobo's standard built-in controller, and boot (Linux) from that, then use the additional drives for other mounts- Linux doesnt need the bios in order to access drives for storage.

    9. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not booting Linux from the SATA drives (the one I attached is blank). I'm booting Linux from the mobo's IDE drive, which boots fine when the SATA cards are not in the mobo PCI slots. And on the IBM mobo, the board boots most of the way through POST, even showing the attached SATA drive's ID#, before freezing.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Google never heard of a AOC-SAT-MV2 . Where do I find one? And how do I yank out the BIOS?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Try using just one card, and don't boot off it.
      Then, get yourself SATA Port Multipliers.

      Since that means you can chain 5 drives per sata port on your host adapter, you can easily get 20 off a 4 port adapter using 5 multiplers.

      http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/ad5sahpm-e.asp

    12. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought 2 Promise SATAIITX4 cards (pci, 4x sata) for about $50 each, and hooked up 8 300GB drives with a software raid5. Just shy of 2TB, but it cost me ~$900 a few years ago (the drives cost $100 each).

      Just so you know, 100mb ethernet is WAY slower than the drives. Even the pci bus is quite a lot slower than the drives. Having 8 sata ports on the motherboard would be best, but I haven't been able to find a good, cheap motherboard with that many ports.

    13. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Running 4 USB from the big enclosure to the 4 sockets in the server PC isn't much better, because it all goes through the same CPU and PCI bus.

      Your 3 SATA cards will still be sharing a PCI bus (and a CPU) as well. Unless the box has PCIe and you get some 1x SATA cards, you're really not going to exceed 100MB/sec to RAM in that kind of setup, and while USB will add latency, it won't slow you down if you use a few individual controllers (since the hard limit of 133MB/sec still applies.)

      if you're not in a position to get some 4-port PCIe 1x SATA controllers, 4 individual USB buses is probably the best bet (as long as you make sure you plug each set of disks into a port that doesn't share its bus with any other set of disks,) you'll be laughing.

      Of course, if you ARE in a position to get some of the aforementioned 4-port 1x PCIe SATA cards with a linux supported chipset, that's what i'd be doing.

    14. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I have a generic P3 with 9 HDDs in it totaling just shy of 4 TB of data. (most of the drives are 500 GB) They are all ATA drives, so I have a couple of ATAPI cards (with two IDE ports on each) giving me 8 drives. The 9th drive is a junker drive on the MB IDE port from way back when that only holds the O/S and the backup scripts. (CentOS 4.x) For whatever reason, it won't boot from the PCI IDE cards, and I don't care to fight it.

      Works a real treat for nightly offsite rsync backups coordinated with the backup scripts I wrote some years ago, which manage backups, automatically running every night, use hard links to save disk space, and automatically use as much of the disk array space as possible for as many backups as there is space to support.

      One advantage of disk-to-disk backups is that you can recover a file or two from backups with almost no hassle. We've actually incorporated this capability natively into our application allowing any of our users to recover any file to any of the available previous versions with a mouse-click. They love it!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    15. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you boot from an ide disk you will not have any problems with seeing the sata controllers if they are supported from linux... How have you concluded they will not have drivers support? have you tried booting a linux livecd with the drives attached?

    16. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by confuciou · · Score: 1

      You can connect 5 drives to one eSATA port using a port multiplier... http://www.google.com/search?q=sata+port+multiplier

    17. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      I got a couple of these Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3114 chipset.
      Work out of the box under fedora (4+). I used them in conjunction with an Icy Dock sata backplane to fully equip my media server. The server runs FC4 and uses a lowly 40GB IDE drive for the os. the SATA ports have a Seagate 200GB, 250 GB, 500GB, and a Samsung 750GB attached. As the first 2 drives use the motherboard connectors, I have only used 2 of my 8 available card controlled connections. Can't get much cheaper really.

    18. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you're running out of space to copy the ROMs into memory, which is preventing the computer from POSTing.

      http://www.dansdata.com/io082.htm

    19. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3ware makes a controller that can run twelve IDE drives per controller in RAID. Assuming you can get 4 controllers per box, a network of 30 systems should be able to run the drives. Custom enclosures would have to be built to hold them all and you might want to buy old ATA power supplies to spin them up, but it is feasible. Using that number of cables could be a logistical nightmare for airflow. This is the only supplier of cards that run 8 or 12 IDE drives.

    20. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Oops, getting a bit dyslexic :P
      It should be the AOC-SAT2-MV8 : http://www.supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AOC-SAT2-MV8.cfm

    21. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not booting off the drive on the SATA card, just the IDE drive of the mobo IDE. I don't even have a drive attacked to the SATA card, and it freezes the machine during POST (without any clues).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    22. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Looks like those Promise TX4 cards still cost $50 each (except a few dubious offers on eBay). And 300GB drives still cost about $100 each. Are you posting from the future?

      SATA is 1.5Gbps (SATA2 is 3Gbps). How is that slower than 100Mbps ethernet (even if the ethernet does really max at about 60Mbps)?

      Does SATA slow down in the future, or does 100Mbps speed up?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    23. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The PCI bus is no slower than the ethernet card sharing it. USB interconnect to the CPU and other peripherals is usually through that PCI bus, even if there are multiple USB buses to that point.

      But copying between multiple drives on the same SATA card should not have to go over the PCI bus, just across that shared card, if the card is smart.

      None of this is that important, because I need only something like 4Mbps (500Kbps * 8 streams) from the cheapest mobo that works.

      What I need is a mobo/SATA combo that supports at least a dozen SATA drives at all.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    24. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm booting from an IDE disk attached the mobo's IDE controller, which boots fine until the SATA card is in the PCI. With the SATA card in the PCI, the mobo doesn't complete the POST before it freezes. It never gets to boot Linux, so Linux drivers isn't my problem yet. Mobo compatibility with the SATA card is my first problem.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    25. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      That card you got looks identical to my card. But though mine says "SBT-SRD4", the Sabrent SBT-SRD4 NewEgg sells looks a little different (the jumper block at the left end is missing on mine and yours).

      What mobo are you using?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    26. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I need controller(s) for 12 SATA drives, not PATA.

      Their SATA controllers (other than a cheaper one that's only 2 ports) are really expensive. Unless I were transferring a lot of data frequently among multiple drives on a single card, I'd be better off just buying a few 2 port SATA cards for over $150 for every 4 ports, plus the cost of the card itself.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    27. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Now that's what I'm talking about. 8 ports for about $100 that works is better than 4 ports for $25 that doesn't work. If no one's got a mobo that my SiI/3113 cards will work in, then you've won the sweepstakes in this subthread :).

      What mobo have you got those AOC-SAT2-MV8 working in?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    28. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Evidently, that problem comes with an error message saying that's what's happening. I don't get that message, or any other clue. Just the board reports it's starting up, then (on some mobos) if there's a drive attached its ID# comes up, then it freezes before POST completes, before it can show the next screen (bootloader starting, which doesn't).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    29. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The AMD mobos you pointed out doesn't have a price, because it's a "deactivated item" (not in stock), and was an "open box" item when it was in stock. Don't expect to see it again.

      The Intel mobos you pointed out all start at $200 for an 8 port onboard SATA. For $50 each I can get 2 4-port Promise SATA cards, and a $100 mobo.

      The PCI/SiI3114 cards that I got claim to support 4 ports for $25. Probably the Promise cards are the right option. Though if I'm starting from scratch, I should get a PCI-e mobo, maybe with onboard SATA, and PCI-e cards.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    30. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by darkonc · · Score: 1

      Try booting off of an attached drive in a USB enclosure. Most Motherboards will boot off of that these days. You can install on the drive with another (working) system.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    31. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by michrech · · Score: 1

      I don't know what list of boards you are looking at, however, the cheapest in the list I linked is $119 with nomail-in rebates/etc, and has 8 ports. It's a Socket 775, which means you could do a Celeron 430 (Conroe based core, 1.8ghz) for 39.99 and be well under your $200 figure. Add a Sapphire 1001 (Radeon x1550) PCIx16 video card for $19.99 and Corsair XMS2 1gb (2x512) memory, and you've got your base system.

      I chose the video card I did to keep the PCI slots free (in case you wanted to add some of the SATA controllers you mentioned).

      The four items listed below are $203.96 ($216.98 shipped to my door -- your shipping costs may alter the price ever-so-slightly).

      Now, assuming this is just going to sit and serve files, you'll be fine. You could, obviously, substitute a different processor/memory/video card if you were also going to use this as your "main" machine (or if it had some other primary purpose), but this *does* fit your original posted criteria. I'll leave, to you, the task of finding a case/power supply of proper size/power to actually hold all of this.

      Gigabyte board: N82E16813128086
      Processor: N82E16819116039
      Video card: N82E16814102737
      Memory : N82E16820145040

      --
      bork bork bork!
    32. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      That's not the half of it ;) I got two controllers about 2-3 months back when they were ~$50 each. Whiteboxed and included 8 SATA cables.
      I've got one paired with an ABIT AB9 Pro (to get 16 total SATA ports) and another with an ASUS P5B Plus, both generally with Hitachi 1TB and Seagate 750GB drives attached.

    33. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to boot off the SATA drive. I'm booting off the mobo's IDE. But with the SATA card in the PCI, the machine doesn't even finish the POST before freezing, even if I don't have a SATA drive connected.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    34. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the thorough answer. The mobos in the list to which you linked mostly didn't list their SATA ports in their "front page" entries, except a few that were more expensive.

      I'm thinking about going your way. How does it compare with a cheap mobo with some SuperMicro AOC-SAT2-MV8 cards in it?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    35. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a winner. But what do you think about this other suggestion, Gigabyte mobo based platform in comparison to yours?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    36. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by pruneau · · Score: 1
      Well, I got one of those cheap Sabrent sata controller, albeit with only two sata Ports. lspci show: 01:0b.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3512 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 01) Subsystem: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3512 SATARaid Controller

      I had no problem booting off it, even with a older promise-based PIII mobo, but I had to change machine anyway because random writes where corrupted, apparently due to some irq managment problems (go figure). So I bought an old DELL optiplex GX 1115 (for ~$70, this is great hardware, by the way), kept just one ide dvd, and got the machine to work/boot without too much ata-related problems. The only "funky" behavior is SMART, which seems to be missing some otherwise common options. Oh well.

      --
      [Pruneau /\o^O/\ warranty void if this .sig is removed]
    37. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by michrech · · Score: 1

      Every board in the list I linked to has 8 SATA ports. The list wouldn't have been much good otherwise. :)

      As for the board, well, I couldn't tell you anything about it. You'll have to do some (insert search engine here) searching for your specific situation (I have no idea what OS you'll be using, or specifically what you'll be doing with the system).

      If it turns out that particular board won't do what you need, there's a whole list of others. Surely ONE of them will work. ;)

      --
      bork bork bork!
    38. Re:How About Just a Dozen? by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Okay, go into the bios, and disable all the devices you're not using. Like serial, parallel, sound, usb (if you don't need it). You want to free up as many IRQs as possible, and have each SATA card on it's own PCI interrupt line.

      And then try booting with the SATA card in different slots. I had this problem with trying to put 2 SCSI cards on my old board which had too much stuff on it to begin with.

  32. One idea... by rcw-work · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One idea I've been tossing around in the back of my head for a while is a backup-to-disk device which is kind of a cross between a tape library and a raid enclosure. It would emulate a tape robot and drives so that normal backup software could talk to it, and would just power up drives as they are needed and read/write to them. The advantages are that there is no expensive robot with moving parts, only a few drives need to be powered up at once, the drives will probably last longer if they stay off most of the time, "tape seeks" would stay nearly instant, and you don't need RAID controller ports for every drive you have (just a switching fabric for routing the ports you have to the drives you want to talk to.)

    It'd probably only be practical with SATA or SAS (fewer wires and availability of multiplexing chips).

    Maybe someone can do me a favor and steal my idea so I can buy some hardware like this fairly soon. :)

    1. Re:One idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here you go.
      http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/storage/tape/virtualization/index.html

    2. Re:One idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be easy to do if you're willing to improvise...one idea would be simply to use relays that cut off all but the ground cable. In this case you'd have the extra protection of having your disks completely disconnected when not in use. Get some cheap usb i/o interface to drive the relais.

      A different way of doing it would be to leave all disks connected, but simply to stop them from spinning when not needed using software commands. Wonder how many usb mass storage devices you can have connected together without getting into trouble.

    3. Re:One idea... by afidel · · Score: 1

      There's already a product out that does exactly what you described, COPAN has a MAID (Massive Array of Idle Disks) system with a tape library emulation option. Our SAN vendor suggests them to customers who want to go tapeless. They've been doing it for a long time so I'm sure their early products were IDE based but I'm sure they used edge connectors like those is some laptop drives.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:One idea... by BillX · · Score: 1

      Was going to reply to all the idiots going on about "how stupid and wasteful it would be to put the drives to use, spinning 100 drives would take 1000W power...", but you beat me to it. Probably the best application for old mid-capacity drives is for offline / near-line backup, in which case you'd rarely if ever have need to spin more than 1 at a time, or more than a couple hours a week (or whatever backup interval) for that matter. I'm actually a bit surprised nobody has chimed in by now saying they had actually designed such a multiplexer and some quick-n-dirty software to switch drives and keep track of where the data was.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  33. Sort them and build software raid arrays by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    First thing I would do is sort them by their capacity. Anything under 100gb isn't really worth using as their capacity versus power consumption is poor. Either throw them out, give them away or sell them in bulk lots on ebay. Next thing to do is either buy multi port ata cards which are increasingly harder to find/expensive or get ata-to-sata converters and use multi port sata cards. Multi port sata cards can be had in 16 or even 24 ports and three or four cards in a single system could give you a serious storage platform. Plus sata equipment is cheap and esata enclosures, cables and adapters can easily be had for a few dollars.

    Also consider ata-sata adapters will enable you to use a port multiplier that will split one sata port into five. On newegg you can buy a Supermicro eight port sata card for about $100. So with eight fan out bridges you have the ability to host forty drives on one card. Eighty with two cards in a single machine. It wont be a fast server thats for sure but it will do the job.

    As for software I like MDADM on Linux but you want to scale up with iata or iscsi. I haven't used iata/iscsi but assemble your drives into arrays and get them up and online. Then install your iata/iscsi packages and get them talking to your servers.

    1. Re:Sort them and build software raid arrays by mrbooze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I was every to actually try something like this, this is exactly the kind of thing that I would try with ZFS first.

      Not just for the simple software raid and all that, but for the automatic block checksumming, something I would be concerned about with a big pile of really old drives.

    2. Re:Sort them and build software raid arrays by sprintkayak · · Score: 1

      One problem with MDADM is that you'll need disks to be the same size. I'm assuming that we're just going to throw a bunch of disks together and let redundancy take care of the problem of expected failure. You could group the disks by size and run RAID5 on each one with sufficient spare devices, then put the RAID groups together with LVM.

      I've been looking at Sun's ZFS a bit lately (I don't think Linux ZFS is ready yet, but it runs on OpenSolaris). It basically does the same thing as RAID and LVM with its zpools. It has the added bonus of checksumming every file and reporting drives with errors.

      My own SAN is an NSLU2 with three 500GB USB drives in RAID5. It's slow as it is, but I only use it for long term storage. And it should theoretically scale to 128 devices. Actually, it has two USB ports, so it may be 256, but I'm not sure if each port is its own controller or not.

  34. Re:magnets (how to keep them?) by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    Yes, these strong little magnets are cool. I have a bunch of them and wonder how to keep them, so that they keep their strength.

    Do magnets loose strength over time? I had the impression they do. But what factors influence this?

  35. There is huge potential... by MiniMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think this is how Google started. Throw in some other random hardware and wait for the VC to come rolling in!

  36. Rail Gun by WeirdJohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pull them apart, and use the magnets to make a magnetic rail gun. Or some other fun game. There has to be a lot of fun (and destruction) in 200 ceramic magnets.

  37. Limited number... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if you could scrounge up a bunch of old Parallel IDE quad-port Promise cards (pretty hard to do anymore, they were pretty rare even when they were in production) you can usually only get a max of three of those cards to work in a typical legacy PCI mobo due to various chipset and hardware resource conflicts. That gives you 12 IDE ports on the cards, plus two on the mobo, and at two drives (master + slave) per port, you would have a max of 28 possible drives connected and that's it.

    Better have a heck of a power supply to feed 28 hungry old legacy IDE PATA drives and some fans to keep them all cooled.

    1. Re:Limited number... by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      Excellent. I did just that, but I paired them all up with like drives. So, altough I have 18 Drives, I only have about 1.5TB of space, because of the mirrors. some in striped sets of four, six and eight. Raid lvl 10, so the stripes are mirrored. Have had two drives fail, but I think it took a few hours to get back to full efficency... I dont know. I just took it down, replaced the drives, and brough it back up, and had it rebuild.

      Its in an old Thermatake box with a 450w power supply.

      Try using only the largest 20 or so, and look into the promise cards. I got 4 promise cards for $6/per ::))

  38. "Fling!" by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    *blam*

    "I love my data!"

  39. You won't get any hard drive space out of it... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But you could make a hard disk generator I've seen several designs and some are better than others, but there isn't a great way to string out hundreds of IDE drives without a cluster and multiple processors. After weeding out a number of the large drives for storage, it may be a fun project to mess around with.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  40. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't given thought to the hardware side, and the logistics of physically connecting the drives, but once you do, have you thought of using something like VMware that will allow you to virtualize the drives into one (up to 2 TB per .vmdk) virtual drive? Then, using a VMware virtual machine you could then access the virtual storage. Dunno if this helps...

  41. Hallway Drag Racers by hardburn · · Score: 1

    Give everyone some tools and some batteries, and see who can make the best drag racer out of the parts.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  42. Send a couple to me! by maharvey · · Score: 1

    I could use a 300 GB drive or two.

  43. ZFS? by star3am · · Score: 2, Insightful

    would be nice to see how they run with ZFS, figure it's as good a reason as any :p

  44. Send me a few 300gigs by Zorque · · Score: 2

    I'll put them to the best use there is: porn.

  45. idea by mark72005 · · Score: 1

    skeet shooting

  46. off the wall by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

    there may be more value in the data than in the drive mechanism itself. you said they were used for video production...maybe there are some interesting outtakes or bloopers your employer would allow on youtube.

  47. That's not old... by themushroom · · Score: 1

    I spent last weekend wiping a stack of hard drives I'd accumulated so I can be charitable. They range from 500mb to 15gb. Guess it's a matter of opinion (and needs, as you point out) what is "too small".

    And Tumbleweed [ http://ask.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=583611&cid=23786219 ], we can share the 1gb SCSI that sounds like a jet engine and 600mb Compaq IDE that clicks like a card in bike spokes... I haven't been skeet shooting since I was 15. :-D

  48. ROTFL! by rdschouw · · Score: 1

    This really made me laugh!

    I have actually two modded xboxes at home. They work great as media centres.

  49. 1 word: magnets by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hard drives have very powerful magnets. 100 of them could be a hell of a lot of fun.

    You could build a climbing suit for climbing steel, build a generator,....

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:1 word: magnets by wagnerrp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Even better, they're monopoles (Halbach Arrays). Build your own maglev toys.

    2. Re:1 word: magnets by Everyone+Is+Seth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Umm, we don't even know if a magnetic monopole exists. Currently, theory is the only place you can find one.

    3. Re:1 word: magnets by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Ok, wrong choice of words. Rather those are one-sided magnets.

    4. Re:1 word: magnets by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What? Moebius-shaped magnets? How geeky!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    5. Re:1 word: magnets by Iron+Condor · · Score: 2, Informative

      A "one sided magnet" would be a monopole. Draw your magnet, draw the field lines: these lines must end up being closed loops, neccessitating one sout pole and one north pole for every magnet.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    6. Re:1 word: magnets by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      The opposite pole must be on the inside of the magnet then.

    7. Re:1 word: magnets by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      One sided just means the magnetic field on one side is nearly completely canceled out. Check out the wikipedia link in my original post.

    8. Re:1 word: magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Err, monopoles, no. They are one-sided flux devices though.

    9. Re:1 word: magnets by LeafOnTheWind · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Uhh.. What? Slashdot should know Maxwell's Laws. A monopole is theoretical at best. Many physicists don't think they exist or, if they do, they're so large we'll never actually encounter one. In that case, the following law would hold.

      âo (surface integral) B dS = 0, i.e. the magnetic net magnetic flux over any surface S equals 0, thus requiring the same number of fields entering as leaving, making a magnetic monopole impossible.

    10. Re:1 word: magnets by Iron+Condor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Impossible.

      Just because you don't grasp physics doesn't make it go away.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    11. Re:1 word: magnets by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      What absurd nonsense -- this is just a bunch of horseshoe magnets laid next to each other. You get both poles, they just happen to point in the same direction.

      Let me suggest that you lay off three-syllable words like "monpopole" until you've learned at least to look them up on wikipedia...

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    12. Re:1 word: magnets by odoketa · · Score: 1

      one sided flux capacitors?! I know exactly what you can do with them, if you happen to have some uranium....

    13. Re:1 word: magnets by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 5, Informative

      (geek)

      There are no magnetic monopoles in theory, either. Maxwell's four equations that define all of Electromagnetism, includes Gauss's Law of Magnetism. This law states that magnetic fields don't in net diverge.

      Its usually written in differential form as: del * B = 0 (del dot B = 0). Note that Physics students from bush-league universities might write the equation in integral form, but that's either a product of their deficient education or maybe some kind of genetic defect.

      More here (wikipedia):
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss's_law_for_magnetism and here:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations

      Yeah, I suppose magnetic monopoles might exist and then we'd re-write the laws, but there's no reason to assume so. There is a natural temptation to look at magnetism the same as electricity (individual charges, like electrons and protons, being analogous to "North" and "South" monopoles), but probably the most useful way to think of magnetism is as a relativistic effect of electrostatics... once you do that, there's no reason to assume any kind of magnetic monopole at all.

      (/geek)

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    14. Re:1 word: magnets by Nimey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Bullshit. Magnetic monopoles don't exist. Have you got a perpetual-motion machine stashed somewhere?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    15. Re:1 word: magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me suggest that you lay off three-syllable words like "monpopole" until you've learned at least to look them up on wikipedia...
      Damn right! 'cause personally, I *hate* people that misuse words such as "monpopole".
       
      Might I suggest proofreading? Spell check? A nice red wine to go with your serving of crow?
    16. Re:1 word: magnets by papna · · Score: 3, Interesting

      GP was correct in claiming "Umm, we don't even know if a magnetic monopole exists. Currently, theory is the only place you can find one." It is correct that the theory regarded as describing the universe correctly (div(B)=0; dB/dt + curl(E) = 0) discounts magnetic monopoles, but magnetic monopoles have certainly been theorised before. Because we've not observed magnetic monopoles, we generally don't use those theories, but I believe they are even fairly well-explored.

    17. Re:1 word: magnets by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plutonium, not uranium.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    18. Re:1 word: magnets by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      we have to destroy a lot of drives in my line of work- I have a row of the HD magnets stuck to the office wall where the steel supports are- sometimes when we are bored we take an old case (steel) put a target on it and play lawn darts with them

    19. Re:1 word: magnets by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Although it's not a strong reason, the existence of a monopole would require charge to be quantized.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    20. Re:1 word: magnets by Irvan · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Ubuntu" is an African word meaning "Slackware is too hard for me" lol

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    21. Re:1 word: magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (more geek)

      As you write, the fifferential form of Maxwell's equations contains: del * B = 0.

      However that does not make Maxwell's equations entirely inaccurate in the event a (or many) monopoles are found. If you think about the above equation, it states that the total magnetic field through a closed surface is a net balance. In the world as we know it this is a correct equation. But if monopoles exist the zero would be replaced by a variable (say m for the imbalance in magnetic particles). This is similar to del * D = p describing the electric charge within a volume but with a calculation for the magnetic field. But since the known universe

      So Maxwell's equations would require a very minor tweak to account for magnetic monopoles by changing to the equation del * D = m. Why don't we do that now? Becuase as far as we know based on our present knowledge of the universe, m always equals 0.

      Of course there's nothing to say that the FSM hasn't intelligentily designed our part of the universe to hide the instances of m not equalling 0 from us....

    22. Re:1 word: magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wikipedia links? Talk about being bush-league...

    23. Re:1 word: magnets by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Given enough Uranium we could just make our own Plutonium.

    24. Re:1 word: magnets by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Let me suggest that you lay off three-syllable words like "monpopole" until you've learned at least to look them up on wikipedia."

      You can't really blame the GP. I just checked WP and found the "monpopole" page has been censored!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    25. Re:1 word: magnets by a_nonamiss · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure I do. It's sitting in my closet on top of my copy of Duke Nukem Forever.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    26. Re:1 word: magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that maxwells laws are a classical theory of EM only - whereas it is assumed generally that the behaviour of EM fields would really be determined by a grand unified theory that included all the other forces/particles also in a single framework. This as yet un-discovered GUT could make subtly different predictions to the classical EM laws. Interestingly Dirac put forward a quantum mechanical argument that said if even a single magnetic monopole existed in the universe it would force electric charge to be quantised (which indeed does appear to come in units of 1/3 of the elctron's charge)...

    27. Re:1 word: magnets by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Actually, Ubuntu is an African word meaning "I'd rather have a social life."

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    28. Re:1 word: magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (/geek)

      For some reason I'm skeptical.

    29. Re:1 word: magnets by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      At the current metal prices, selling them to a metal dealer would provide more $$$ then compared to what they could be put to use.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    30. Re:1 word: magnets by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Actually, Ubuntu is an African word meaning "I'd rather have a social life."

      Which itself translates to "I'm not really a geek."

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    31. Re:1 word: magnets by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      So be it...

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  50. SATA and port multipliers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use SATA port multipliers to put many disks on a single PC. Each port multiplier allows you to plug 5 disks on a single eSATA port. You can find cheap PCI SATA controllers with 4 eSATA ports. If you can find a PC with 5 PCI slots, that's a hundred disk.

    Here are the ones I use on my NAS:
    - port multiplier: http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/ad5sapm-e.asp
    - SATA controller (PCI-X but works on PCI slots): http://www.addonics.com/products/host_controller/ads3gx4r5-e.asp

    You also need one IDE to SATA bridge per disk. Maybe in bulk you can get good prices.

  51. Dominos by gbh1935 · · Score: 0

    setup some Hard Drive Dominos, and post the video on youtube.

  52. Data recovery services by Loualbano2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I would call your local data recovery service as they sometimes are interested in buying old drives of no particular size to use the controller cards on them.

    Apparently, a lot of failed hard drives are not bad because of their physical platters, but because of the drive logic. These places need old drives for replacement controllers that you probably can't buy from the manufacturer.

    ft

    1. Re:Data recovery services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, give your company secrets on working and non-working drives directly to the only people who are able to recover them.

  53. Two Words by macslas'hole · · Score: 1

    Firewire ZFS Put them in firewire boxes and RAID them together with ZFS. IIRC firewire supports 64 devices per bus. I'm not sure if a dual connector card would have two busses or one.

    --
    Life's a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
  54. Setup 1 machine and USB/Firewire them by IcephishCR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pick the largest and buy up as many usb or firewire interfaces and drop them in a tower case with a psu for the HD's (get bus powered usb/firewire interfaces) and have a decent sized external array...

    or use the larger ones as customer throwaways - when the video needs to go to the customer and its really big - ship them a cheap usb/firewire enclosure with a disc in it loaded with their video - if it doesn't come back then you've got more to spare....

    --
    Life is but a Beta test...
  55. Drobo, of course by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    I think what you're looking for is something like the Drobo, but like me you would prefer it were a rack mountable 14+ drive enclosure. More like a cross between the Drobo and perhaps an Apple / Promise RAID unit.

    Play around with the Drobo configurator on their website - it's interesting. Seems like four drives really don't open up the usefulness of their system. I'm sure the more drives there are the more effective it would be.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  56. Options by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Giant domino rally

    Freecycle

    eBay.

  57. Careful with the magnets by mangu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Take 'em apart and sell or use the magnets

    Just keep in mind these are *STRONG* magnets. When you take it apart the magnets may smash into each other. This could send particles flying away in a direction that, according to Murphy, is where your eyes are. I know this by experience, lucky for me I wear glasses. And if some of your flesh is between the magnets, it's painful.
    1. Re:Careful with the magnets by rubah · · Score: 5, Interesting

      since they're strong, they should donate them to the local university physics students so they can build their electric motors!

      I wish we would've had some nice hardcore magnets when that project came up!

    2. Re:Careful with the magnets by pwizard2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just keep in mind these are *STRONG* magnets. Yep, they sure are. I learned real quick not to put it close to any flat metal surface unless I wanted to pry it off with a screwdriver AND leave a gouge on the metal object. I also found out that these magnets can scramble a 3.5 floppy disk so badly that it won't ever format right again.

      I took apart a old 1GB hard disk (practically less than worthless these days) just to get the magnet out. It now holds my cell phone case closed (the weak magnets that were on there were crap and my phone kept falling out.) Now, it won't come apart without a strong tug. A strong magnet and a weak magnet make the perfect latch without being too strong.

      The strong magnetic field hasn't affected my cell phone at all. (it's been exposed to the field practically all the time for the past few months except when I'm making a call )

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    3. Re:Careful with the magnets by hardburn · · Score: 1

      But aren't you worried about getting cancer from holding a magnet up to your head?

      Or possibly cure cancer. Depending on who you ask.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    4. Re:Careful with the magnets by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Just make sure if you're carrying that cell phone in the same pocket as your credit card that either the cell phone or the credit card is kept in a mu-metal container.

    5. Re:Careful with the magnets by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      Just make sure if you're carrying that cell phone in the same pocket as your credit card that either the cell phone or the credit card is kept in a mu-metal container.
      It's one of those cell-phone holsters that clip to a belt, and I wear it opposite to the pocket my wallet (and cards) are in.
      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    6. Re:Careful with the magnets by caldodge · · Score: 1

      I extract the magnets and slap them on the fridge. A typical hard drive magnet is strong enough to keep a legal pad stuck there.

    7. Re:Careful with the magnets by scruff+the+pup · · Score: 1

      between the magnets? i did that with my nipples once... it felt good for a second... then ouch!

    8. Re:Careful with the magnets by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to donate them make your own gauss cannon!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    9. Re:Careful with the magnets by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or if he's lucky, he'll get super powers. It's gotta happen eventually, right?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    10. Re:Careful with the magnets by Elledan · · Score: 1

      Moderation: -1, Disturbing

      Seriously, that was one hell of a mental image you just conjured :P

      --
      Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
  58. Probably not worthwhile by holophrastic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm actually thinking that it's a waste of effort. If they average, say, 100Gb each, then 100 drives means 10TB. 10TB these days is worth what? $2'000.00 worth of 1TB drives? Even less? More like $1'700.00 or so -- and that's for brand new drives, faster, better, more reliable, modern technologies, SATA, etc etc etc. Power consumptions too.

    By the time you're done connecting all of these, and powering them, and cooling them, and dodging the broken ones, and finding a good use for it, and controllers to run them all, I can't imagine you'll be saving many dollars for storage, if any. Not to mention your time -- although it would be fun to spend.

    So in the end, you'll have all of the benefits of a massive raid solution, but it'll be expensive to build, expensive to run, and take up a rediculous amount of world space (the real storage requirement).

    I don't think they can compete as functioning hard drives. I think you should use them for some other purpose -- like art, or coasters, or to hold up your table.

    For example, I have about 500 issues of national geographic from the 80's. They even have those file volume collection thingies so ten get held tegother as a set. I have some rediculous number like 50 sets. These things are totally useless to me -- unlike my nintendo power issues from the '80s that my mother sold about fifteen years ago -- so I got a piece of nice glass, and now have a coffee table that sits on these magazines instead of on legs. It's a nice piece of furniture from which you can reach in a pull out a blast from the past as you sip that coffee.

    1. Re:Probably not worthwhile by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous, not rediculous. KTHX

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    2. Re:Probably not worthwhile by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Note, while you can easily get 1TB drives, they max out at around 85MB/sec for data transfer.
      Older drives still have a fair amount of speed based off what I remember from my past drives. 20GB can maybe 15MB/sec. 40GB gets around 30MB/sec. 80GB gets probably 45MB/sec.

      If you take 10 of these drives and stripe 5 of them together, and then mirror them across the other 5, you're bound to be able to build a file server which can now serve much more data to multiple machines.

      If you take 100 of these and use ZFS, which should more reasonably mirror and strip, you're able to build a file server which will be much more expensive to power and set up, but more reliable because each drive that dies is a smaller percentage of the total, and accessing all these drives in parallel will be magnitudes faster than a small set of 1TB drives.

      That's the advantage point of the massive array of crappy drives.

    3. Re:Probably not worthwhile by holophrastic · · Score: 1

      You agree then that it would be much more expensive to power and set up. So the question I guess then is, dollar for dollar, what's more effective: these hundred crappy drives, versus the number of modern drives you could have for the same money.

      I'd bet that the modern drives would be the better bet, even with the no-cost crappy drives. I could, of course, be very mistaken.

  59. Google Do by mrslacker · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Now, I'd never use such an array for critical data storage,

    Why not - Google do for GFS. Indeed, I worked for a search engine company and wrote something that had significant similarities to GFS - that is, a distributed high-performance redundant file system. Of course, you still need a machine for every 4 drives, but it can be done. Still requires manual maintenance however - the chance of individual drive failure if you run lots of them becomes quite high (your data is safe due to redundancy). Look around the net for references to GFS and Google data centers.

  60. Lets talk "deal" by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    I have more than 100 matchbox SCSI external cases also with drives. They need a home.

  61. Be practical -- screw the smaller drives. by merreborn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not just use the largest 10 or 20, and leave the rest of 'em in the closet for now?

    Either your 10-20 drive pilot project will be a raging success, and your boss will be beating down your door to get the other drives plugged in, or it'll prove to be a huge waste of time, in which case you'll be glad you didn't bother with the smaller drives.

  62. play with a clustered filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe have a go at a cluster filesystem. GlusterFS has been around for quite a while, however I have been using ceph stably for about a month now and it is amazing.. mind you it is still in the testing stages its worth checking out http://ceph.newdream.net/ .

  63. Re:magnets (how to keep them?) by profplump · · Score: 4, Informative

    Generally speaking, time alone will not reduce the strength of a permanent magnet. Heat, vibration, magnetic flux, and other forms of energy exposure can weaken permanent magnets. But in a box in your cabinet they are unlikely to encounter any sufficiently strong energy source to have a significant impact.

  64. ZFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ZFS Pool them. Network them somehow.

  65. Laptop Backup Drives by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These sizes are still useful for putting in external USB enclosures and using as a laptop backup drive (with something like Ghost).

    1. Re:Laptop Backup Drives by Skal+Tura · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These sizes are still useful for putting in external USB enclosures and using as a laptop backup drive (with something like Ghost).

      Ghost is useless nowadays, when symantec bought norton, they screwed it up. Remember to take an very old version :)

      How they screwed up?
      A) You can't even easily do full drive images with it anymore
      B) Where's the DOS based tools?
      C) Even recovering from it's "backup" is a doomed failure without installed OS + Ghost.

      Ghost is a ghost of itself from back when it was usefull.
    2. Re:Laptop Backup Drives by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

      Use G4U instead then.

    3. Re:Laptop Backup Drives by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      You don't even need the external USB enclosure. Use 'em with a USB-to-IDE cable, and treat the bare drives like a stack of backup tapes.

  66. Make friends with a computer recycler by multi-flavor-geek · · Score: 1

    Someone who for the trade of taking some of the other junk hardware off your hands (the company may pay a fee in here somewhere, but its the responsible thing to do) he will give you a stack of identical old hp's, with ata 133 cards for each, and even an extra nic so they can all be channel bound... Think of the power if you have 8 2 ghz hp desktops sitting in a channel bound stack with 8 drives a piece in them? Then just make all of them boot off the same linux image, or do seven hard drives and a modded Ubuntu live cd in each and your ready to rock!

    --
    Like arts? Like cheesy little Indie mags? Check out www.artwerkmag.com, and don't laugh at the bad coding please.
  67. PULL! by Jager+Dave · · Score: 1

    Get out that 12-gauge pump shotgun, a bunch of shells, perhaps some friends, and head for the range....

  68. trash them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Recycle them in some environmentally responsible fashion.

    Old drives = worthless

  69. Unintended Wikipedia humor: by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1
    From the AoE link:

    AoE specification is 8 pages compared with iSCSI's 257 pages.[citation needed]
    uhh...the specs in question?
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Unintended Wikipedia humor: by julesh · · Score: 1

      From the AoE link:

              AoE specification is 8 pages compared with iSCSI's 257 pages.[citation needed]

      uhh...the specs in question?


      [original research]
  70. Imagine... by A440Hz · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of... Nevermind.

    1. Re:Imagine... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      I kind of saddens me that only one person thought to post this, and it went largely ignored. Come on, there's still a place for the classic trolls!

  71. Listen to your inner BOFH.... by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

    Load them up with all kinds of pr0n, then scatter them throughout the offices of auditors/beancounters/CEOs/local politicians/whoever else is getting on your nerves lately.

    --
    Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
  72. Turn them into speakers by WarJolt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw this a while ago, but never got bored enough to try.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp4jQNa_9sY&feature=related

  73. Re:magnets (how to keep them?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't

  74. USB by victim · · Score: 1

    USB to IDE controllers are cheap ($5 buy-it-now on ebay). USB 2.0 hubs are cheap (7 port $10). USB PCI controller cards are cheap. PC power supplies are cheap, use the 4 pin molex fanout cables to get as many connectors as the supply will support drives. Something like 100 USB IDE adapters, 15 hubs, 4 quad USB pci cards, and 10 power supplies should cover you.

    Should get you going for under $10/drive. You'd end up with about 20T of unreliable storage for $1000, but man it will be cool. (Note: You won't fit on a single 15A 120v circuit, plan for multiple circuits.)

      You can put all of the drives on the same linux machine. I'd recommend you use LVM and some sort of raiding.

    Cases will blow your budget, you might think about just screwing them between some vertical steel straps.

    1. Re:USB by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      The thing is, you neglect the chassis /cases for the drives. They can easily add up to $10 per drive.

      And with a average of 100GByte/drive (very generous for a 20-200 distribution, which _always_ seems to favour the smaller models), this would account to at least 20c /Gbyte.

      You can get brand new sata discs for a lot less than that...
      Plus you only need 10 instead of 100.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    2. Re:USB by victim · · Score: 1
      Perhaps why I said:

      Cases will blow your budget, you might think about just screwing them between some vertical steel straps.
  75. get the magnets by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Look, it's not worth trying to hook them all up and get the equivalent of two or three modern hard drives' space. But pull them apart and get the cool rare-earth magnets out of them.

  76. If only they were SATA... by Time+Doctor · · Score: 1

    Then you'd just need 25 drobos.

    --
    Check out ioquake3.org for a great, free, First-Person Shooter engine!
  77. big drive array by wasabii · · Score: 1

    Well, I've always wanted to make a mass hard drive back plane thing for old drives. Do something liket ake a 5U rack mount drawer, put a backplain on the BOTTOM, build seperators and mounting stuff, and then find some source of hot swap trays, to mount vertically. Probably using a lot of IDE to SATA converters, which are unfortunately expensive. Then SATA multipliers. Then Linux LVM and MD. My main problem is I'd need to actually engineer the backplane and stuff by myself, and I don't have the EE experience to do it.

    1. Re:big drive array by wasabii · · Score: 1

      Oh, and before somebody complains about power: I agree. I'd have them spin down after 5 minutes. This would mainly be for some large movie/music/media storage stuff. A single movie or something might only be spread across 3 drives, so to watch it you'd only have to spin up 3. I think this is reasonable. Probably only have to spin it up enough to buffer a 4GB movie into RAM, too. Stick 8GB in the machine or something and that solves that.

  78. Usb dongle by zx-15 · · Score: 1

    You can buy a bunch of usb dongles, usb 2.0 pci adapters, and some duct tape, you can build a kick ass freenas server.

  79. ZFS loves cheap disks by bahamat · · Score: 1

    That number of drives will make one awesome ZFS storage pool. In which case you could make mission critical storage with it.

    1. Re:ZFS loves cheap disks by hjf · · Score: 1

      just don't delete large zvol clones... I hit a bug where ZFS tries to load to RAM the whole list of blocks to release and 3GB of RAM weren't enough.

  80. Re:magnets (how to keep them?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Typical Rare Earth magnets have a maximum temperature of 150F. Other than abuse, heat or water getting inside the outer shell . . . magnets have a very long life.

  81. Donate? by pluther · · Score: 5, Informative
    Drives that size would be an awesome donation for a charity such as (blatant plug) Geeks Without Borders.

    A lot of our donated computers don't come with hard drives, so we're always in need of hard drives more than just about anything else.

    We wipe all drives to DoD standards before ever putting them in anything, too. (Well, anything other than the machines we use to wipe 'em.)

    If you don't want to ship them all the way to Eugene, there's lots of other charities that do the same kind of thing, and probably have the same disproportionate computer to hard drive donation ratio.

    --
    If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    1. Re:Donate? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Seconded!

      I'd hate to see such a large number of drives wasted.
      As everybody else has already stated: Trying to use them for a normal storage system would be a huge waste of time and money since you can buy the same capacity in much fewer drives for cheaper today.

      So either make something really cool of them (and I don't consider ripping the magnets out "cool"...) or, by all means, donate them to some charity that will put them to good use.

      If your employer is paranoid then take the time to wipe them with some "DoD-grade" disk-wiping tool. All you need is two old PCs, stick 4 disks into each of them before you leave and let the software work overnight (hint: you can surely find some linux livecd that includes a disk wiping utility). It will only take 12 days that way, or less if you can find more than two "old PCs"...

      I did this a while back (with 50-something disks) and consider it kind of rewarding - how often do you get a chance to do something good with so little effort?

    2. Re:Donate? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the tax writeoff. Between that and the high energy costs of running that many drives, you'd recoup your investment rather quickly while putting the old ones to good use.

  82. Screw Ebay by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Send them to one of the services that recycles systems from businesses for schools and disadvantaged families.
    A lot of corporations are afraid that their systems contain priveledged info but since yours had large chunks of decompressed video, most of which has liscencing attached and has been released, you are in a unique position to provide HDs.

    500 GB Hd's cost $100 buy 4, donate the smaller drives, and save the recyclers thounsands of dollars.

    -D

  83. Ummm in a word.... no by Allnighterking · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry but if you are serious your steps should be.

    1. Call a recycler and dump the drives. smaller than 200GB (keep the largest ones to give out to other employees for their home systems)

    2. Buy 2 or 3 1TB HDD's

    3. Install them in a box.

    4. Done.

    Start with the shear cost the additional equipment, then add in the cost of the electricity to run the drives and their controller. then add in the cost of HVAC to keep the room they are in cool. Will by far exceed the cost of 2 or 3 1TB drives. Not to mention the cost of your time to build, deploy and maintain.

    In short. Nothing you can do with these drives will save your employer money. However proper recycling might bring in a buck or two. Not to mention the good will when you hand the largest drives to fellow employees to use at home.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    1. Re:Ummm in a word.... no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short. Nothing you can do with these drives will save your employer money.
      But what if he works in government? I strongly suspect he does, as who else would have 100 perfectly good unused hard drives on the shelf? Government cannot donate assets, only "smash & dump". (See the beauty?)

      Sounds like a great summer contract for cousin Joe to me. Post it publicly of course, but write it up so only Joe can get the contract.
    2. Re:Ummm in a word.... no by d0mokun · · Score: 1

      5. ??? 6. Profit! First time i've doen this. woohoo.

  84. RARD by MountainLogic · · Score: 1
    Redundent Array of Redundent Drive

    You'll have to speak British to get this.

  85. Windows Home Server by naoursla · · Score: 1

    Windows Home Server lets you hook up any number of heterogeneous drives and it treats them all as one logical partition and automatically does backup between them.

    1. Re:Windows Home Server by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      And as a bonus it randomly eats your data!

  86. Environmental Impact by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    Let's say the average size is 100GB, that means you have 10,000GB, or 10TB of storage. You can do 10TB of storage with 10 drives, which will use 10% of the energy of the 100 drives you have. You'll also be using new drives and have a lower probability of failure.

    Assuming you sell the drives for $20 each, you can probably get close to 10TB of new storage for $2k, although I haven't checked prices lately.

  87. How about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can never have enough hard drive clocks.

  88. That was supposed to be +1 by empaler · · Score: 2, Informative
    Argh! Sorry, wasn't supposed to be Troll. Godsdamnit, this should reverse it. As a sidenote, I had to disable Discussion2 to get around this note:

    If you continue to post this comment, all moderations done to this discussion will be undone! Are you sure you want to post?
  89. Do Like Kevin Mitnick! by rocketPack · · Score: 1

    Remove the covers (expose the platters) and hang them from the walls of your cube as decorations, like Kevin Mitnick's character in the movie Takedown. Any other use would be a pitiful waste.

    (Every self respecting nerd must know what I'm talking about, right?)

  90. Dirty Pics and Vids by WamBam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lord of the Rings cosplay pron. If you haven't seen 'Shire Backdoor Freaks', you don't know what you're missing!

  91. Send them to Africa! by CDR-80 · · Score: 1

    Find a computer minded NGO and get them send to Africa. Getting usable spare parts in East-Africa is a mayor problem. A shipload of drives would really help.

  92. About $1000/year energy alone to operate by jurgen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One hundred drives, drawing 10W or more each (older drives were a bit more power-hungry, nowadays they're a bit under 10W) makes for 1000W. At $0.10/kWh that's $876/year. Add the power consumption of the other hardware you'll need to attach them to, and you'll surely be over $1000/year in energy costs, not to mention the purchase cost of said hardware.

    You said 100 drives ranging 20-300GB... that doesn't tell us much about the total capacity, but let's say it's 10TB. A terabyte disk costs less than $200 these days, a 4-port SATA PCI card can be had for $40, so with two of those and the 2 SATA ports on any cheap mobo you have a system that'll serve up your 10TB for $2000, two years of just the energy cost of your 100 disc system.

    And that's not counting the headache of building your 100 disk array, the maintenance cost, and the reduced capacity due to inevitable failures with such a large number of older discs.

    In short, although a cool project in theory, in practice it's not worth it today. A few years ago it would have been, but the price of storage has just dropped too steeply in the last couple of years.

    I work with a group that "recycles" old machines in a developing country to provide access to young people who couldn't afford it otherwise, and even here, with free (donated) hardware it's hard to beat the falling price/performance curve of computer hardware these days. Although we could use your discs... discs (and memory) are shortest in supply. If you want to donate them to us, drop me a line. :j

  93. DBAN & Sell/Donate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just run Darik's Boot and Nuke on the drives, then sell or donate them. You probably can't make much use out of them as-is, so why not give them away or make some profit?

  94. Use Secure Erase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're going to donate/dispose of them, use ATA Secure Erase. It's part of the drive's firmware, truly secure and much faster than a 7-pass overwrite.

    You can access this firmware capability here:

    http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/HDDErase.zip

    Also, if you want to try to make an array, 3Ware has some interesting IDE RAID devices to try. They have a 12-port adapter for $600.

  95. If you don't want it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll take it!

  96. Compilance horror by kosmosik · · Score: 1

    WTF? Who are you? These drives (I assume) came from desktop PCs. You say you keep them in antistatic bags. They *still* hold data. Maybe that data is not security critical but it is compilance critical.

    What you should do is either destroy them - you can buy disk destroying machines (but DO install them in the cellar). Such machines will literally shred them to pieces - great stuff for health-dangerous confetti at the party.

    You can also wipe them out - but keep in mind that procedure would mean like fewteen hours of processing per disk (an all maintainance of operator).

    Really - just WTF? No responsibility, no security policies. Just plain horror.

    And I come from post soviet countries and still your attitude for the matter scares me...

  97. Hard drives? We need hard drives! by bencyberedge · · Score: 5, Insightful
    You know, you could provide a great service with those drives.

    We refurbish computers and put them in the homes of low-income people, nonprofits, churches, senior centers, etc. We always need drives, and late-model computers to keep our refurbishers busy. We are a nonprofit and feel that this is an important way to bridge the digital divide.

    I don't know where you're located, but we would love to have those drives, and will wipe them to Mil-spec and reuse them. that keeps them out of landfills (good for the environment) and puts good computers into the homes and tech centers of low-income communities (good for our communities and your kharma). We'll pay shipping if you would like to donate them to us.

    Check us out on the web at www.ReliaTech.org. and give me a call at 510 236-7000 to discuss donating those drives and/or computers.

    By the way, that donation gives you a tax deduction, too.

    thanks!

    Ben

    1. Re:Hard drives? We need hard drives! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax deduction? WOW!!!

      This is the best choice, EVER!!!

      You end up helping people, and getting your money back. This way you can buy serious SSD drives.

      What can be best than this?

  98. Donate them... by Enoxice · · Score: 1

    ...to me.

    Please? If not me, you can probably donate them to some charity .

    --
    Anyone else think the comments just weren't rendering right before they turned off ABP and saw ads?
  99. Suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes there's nothing to be gained by holding on to outdated technology. Daisy chaining the drives together only ensures that at some point, you'll have a failure somewhere in the line. It's far more economical IMHO to recycle the drives - free geek, Ebay or your state recycling program. In California, the Goodwill thrift store chain is an authorized recycler of computers and electronic components, meaning you can drop off your outdated tech items and they actually benefit, as the state reimburses them for this service.

    Replace the drives with a single terabyte drive (unbelievable, isnt it?) or a couple of 500 GB external drives. The latter are available at Staples and Office Depot for less than $200, and on sale have been under $100 recently.

  100. Wipe and donate or destroy and have fun by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two solution:

    * Wipe the drives then donate them to charity. Plan on a few hours per 10 GB for a good wipe.

    * Physically destroy the drive then have fun with the pieces. Unless you are going to destroy the platters completely I recommend at least a 1-pass 0-overwrite.

    Ways to have fun physically destroying the drive:

    * Heat: Thermite never looked so cool!
    * Chemistry: What happens when iron mixes with NODON'TDOTHATYOU'LLBLOWITUP
    * Physics: Hey kids, let's see what sandpaper does to metal!

    As for the pieces, you can do arts and crafts, have cow-chipping, er, I mean drive-tossing contests, use them as props in the next company improvised-comedy day, or whatever.

    When you are done, you can sell the metal for scrap.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  101. Hardware solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inspired by this thread, I have been thinking about some AoE designs.

    My current single channel IDE design consists of
    DM9000B + ATmega 8515 + GAL16V8
    As the harddisk and the ethernet chip can be made to basically talk directly to each other (with the GAL doing the MDMA handshake), it should be possible to nearly saturate 100Base-T. The ethernet chip can do jumbo frames as well.

    To now expand this to several channels, one just has to follow the recommentations about "dual port cabling" from the ATA standard. You can find it as well in Annex C.2.8 of the ATA 4 draft. Given enough drivers and multiplexers, a lot of channels should be possible. One has to weigh the cost of these drivers/multiplexers against the cost and additional bandwidth of more units.

    Old small CPLDs might be an alternative to GAL+multiplexer+driver.

  102. One big switch by S-100 · · Score: 1

    It would be impractical to provide power and IDE controllers for 100+ drives simultaneously, but if you're mechanically handy, you could create a robotic handler to insert up to four drives into a standard PC, using off-the-shelf removable drive cases.

  103. Hard drive speaker? by yasny_jp · · Score: 1

    Maybe you could do something like this video? Unfortunately, I cannot access the site from work but the link description is "Video of old computer hardware playing Radiohead song," and the author uses a bunch of old harddrives as a type of primitive speaker.

    --
    Treat every day like it's your last; delete your browser cache before going to bed.
  104. Crush them! by frickell · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this is a great de-stresser:

    http://www.edrsolutions.com/

  105. what else do you have available? by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you've got a bunch of old cases that you can get your hands on then you might be able to do something useful.

    1) Don't expect to use the smaller drives - turn the platters into coasters!
    1) (a) If some of them are 7200rpm drives (or raptors), you could roll them out to individual workstations as swap space
    2) Get all the 3.5" enclosures out of the old cases, attach together, put into some sort of sturdy frame. Voila, lots of 3.5" drive space. Find a motherboard which has 2 IDE connectors and as many PCI slots as you can find. And get stuffing them with IDE controllers. Now, you need a motherboard with a pci-express slot as well, and either onboard graphics or onboard gigabit LAN. Try for the former as onboard network adapters are notoriously flakey. You then get a PCI-express dual, or quad, channel network adapter.
    With 4 PCI slots and the onboard controllers, you now have 10 IDE controllers = 20 drives (+1 new SATA drive for the system to run on). Pick the 20 best drives and fit those to your shiny drive rack. (If you don't fancy that, buy a new case, though I can't find any that will fit more than 18 drives (a Lian-Li), don't forget to get internal enclosures to fit extra drives in 5.25" bays). You'll also need to get a beefy power supply.
    3) Do some totting up an realize that the whole scheme has cost substantially more than buying a bunch of new drives.

    A few of the bigger drives may be good for medium storage requirements; see if you can buy your employer out of them if you want to build a MythTV box at home; but other than that, I'd say that you've saved yourself a turkey. Which is the basic rule of thumb when saving any consumer-grade hardware

    --
    FGD 135
    1. Re:what else do you have available? by Catalina588 · · Score: 1
      Assumption: we are using company money and the end result does not have to pass a 15% return on capital threshold. In other words, this is for play.

      Use Microsoft's Windows Home Server to manage this Just a Bunch Of Disks. WHS is designed to make use of a random collection of (old) hard drives in what I can best describe as software RAID. I have 1.6 TB on 5 drives which backs up every PC in the house nightly. Also duplicates key personal files in public folders.

      So, for the fun part of this hypothetical exercise, I would throw some of the 100 drives into WHS servers rather than network attached storage. IMHO.

  106. firewire by dissy · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can get a bunch of firewire to ide bridge boards, and run scsi over firewire.
    Keep in mind this will be noticeably slower than native ide once you get more than a certain number of drives on a single bus, but for some applications, fast disk access isn't as important.

    Technically speaking, you can use USB for this too, however there are many more downsides.
    Many times slower than firewire, due to the method usb uses to communicate bidirectionally.
    Its not that much cheaper, and also you cant use nearly as many drives per bus.

    As an example, try http://www.fwdepot.com/
    Their prices are a bit high i admit, but you can build a shopping list there and look around for best price.

    4 BUS firewire cards. Note that a 4 -port- card is not at all the same. That will be one bus, with a 4 port hub built in. The less drives on each bus, and the more buses you have, the more bandwidth is available to each disk, and the speed up is exponential.

    One bridge board per hard drive, a few hubs and some cabling, and spread them out over your few spare pcs.

    Then run something like http://evms.sf.net/ to cluster the machines together and create one giant pool of storage space out of all the drives over all the machines.

    It's probably as cheap as possible for getting use out of them storage wise. Any other 'better' solution will cost a lot more too.

    Of course, useful for storage and just plain useful are two different metrics.

    A lot of others already mentioned donating them.
    Just remember to hook 4 up at a time to a spare pc and run a good HD wipe app like http://dban.sf.net/

    But there are many options to get rid of them to others with.
    Charity donations for a tax write off, local community projects in need of hardware, friends, family, stocking stuffer for the staff, make a craigslist post and offer them for free (or next to), buyer comes to get it or pays shipping, do the ebay dance, etc etc

  107. Why Not Recycling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can we change the culture to include recycling and more important, component reuse? Do you have any idea the work and materials it takes to build these things? Just because it is common doesnt mean it isnt expensive in real terms. I say wise up and move on from extract - create - dump product cycles. *sigh*

  108. Fun Possibilities by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

    Besides the time you've wasted thinking about it, there are 160+ comments on this story resulting in probably near $10k in lost engineering person-hours. Seriously, into the trash with them.

    If they have to be like fridge leftovers, and sit in a pile until the guilt diffuses out of them, OK, but dont dwell on it.

    If it helps to let go, give them a purpose discarding them... load them with porn, put some in the bosses trash, and call HR. Bury them all behind the competitions offices and call the EPA. Load them with Google Earth images of military bases, distribute them to 100 Chinese restaurants, and call Homeland Security. Or just fill them with random file names with random data and mail to the NSA for decryption.

    Or, like, seriously, throw them away.

  109. Retro Computing... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    If the security of the data is really important, you can only destroy them, but if the data on it is not something that is really worth worrying about, I would look at selling them to retro computer users. I know the old Amigas have something like a 4 gig usable size limit. Many of the people using them, hate the idea of putting in a 500 gig drive just to use 4 of it. I assume that some of the other old machines have similar restrictions.

  110. 100 Baseballs!! by jaguth · · Score: 0

    You can save on buying 100 baseballs buy using hard drives! Just don't bean the batter! Ouch!

    Or duct-tape 5 together and you have 20 soccer balls! Just don't juggle it on your head! Painful!

    Or you could use them as Frisbees! 100 Frisbees! How far can you throw it?! Challenge your friends!

  111. would (not) be useful as a massive backup array by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Now, I'd never use such an array for critical data storage, but it certainly would be useful as a massive backup array to our existing SAN that does store critical data."

    You mean "would not," right? You want your massive backup array to be reliable when you need it...

    Check the warranties, 5 or 6 or 10? years. Assume they have a problem and get warranty replacements. Use those instead of drives from the pile.

    If the pile is still growing, make a plan to track every new drive, and manage its path. If a replaced works and isn't or won't be needed for another machine, configure it as a second drive, to get some use out of it instead of growing a pile that just sits there...

    At this point, scrub the data and give them away to other company employees who want them for their home machines. First come, first.

    A Data Destruction Service will contract to safeguard the data and destroy it during recycling of valuable materials.

  112. Take a vacation by nanospook · · Score: 1

    If you stack them vertically and apply pressure from all known six dimensions, you wjll travel jnto another unjverse

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  113. try something like that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  114. Recycle them by baomike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    http://www.nextsteprecycling.org/home.php

    A search for "nextstep" on google may turn up a location near you.
    Most of the equipment here came from Nextstep.

    Computers, drives, hubs, switches , etc ...

  115. Wipe when removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A decent IT shop will have a policy of wiping drives if they're operational when they're taken out of commission and tagging them as wiped. I work in government and this is routine procedure for us.

    If the drive doesn't work, it's shredded.

  116. Take apart, direct recycle and normal recycle by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Take them apart. The pure platters are extremely usefull for all kinds of stuff. If you add thick felt to one side using doulb-sided carpet tape you'll have luxury coasters that go/sell well as avantgarde accessoire.

    The aluminum distance rings are great for all kinds of purposes such as (but not limited to) replacing broken, bad, cheap D-rings on outdoor equiment, high tech juwelery, key rings, rope thimbles, etc. Replace all your plastic d-rings and ladderlocks on your baggage gear with those and it will look tres chic and much cooler.

    The magnets are usefull for all sorts of creative non-sense, such as deleting the platters (and credit cards), building motors, etc.
    The torx screws may be handy for someone who needs that sort of sizes.

    And last but not least the casings and such are valuable raw materials that can be recycled. Seperate and collect the controllers too. The electronics contain gold and other precious substances that special shops recycle aswell.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  117. Wind Chimes, Beer Openers, Scrap Aluminum, Magnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have made wind chimes, 5.5" platter on the top five to six 3.5" platters, and the spacer rings as the striker all tied together with fishing line or twisted pair.

    Another time, I have used an oxy/acetylene torch to melt them for fun, (http://youtube.com/watch?v=oOIf0JmZfrQ)and later to make cast aluminum bottle openers (they almost worked!)

    I have also heard of people making wind generators out of the magnets on a brake drum or other rotor, usually encased in epoxy. The blades are another matter... http://www.theworkshop.ca/energy/hdgen/hdgen.htm

    After removing all the magnets platters, and circuit boards you could sell the aluminum for a scrap at enough to pay for all the beer you drank taking them apart! Today it would bring you $1.30 a pound, not worth it for one but 200 might be worth it.

  118. Get a few discarded PSUs too, and... by Gnavpot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...turn the lot into a bulky and noisy 1 kW room heater. Remember to have an air gap between all drives to allow for air circulation.

    1 kW may not be enough to keep you warm during winter, but it may help you survive if every other heat source fails.

  119. FREEGEEK.ORG will put them to good use by LandGator · · Score: 1

    freegeek.org will put them to good use. It's a 501(c)(3) so donations will result in a tax break, and they will go into PCs reloaded w/ Ubuntu and donated to schools & other non-profits. Some machines (laptops, mostly) are sold in the Thrift Store to keep the lights on and pay the rent, and some go to volunteers to keep them motivated, but the vast majority go to worthy causes. Anything which doesn't run is recycled responsibly.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  120. File Farm? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Our organization has a similar problem. It would be nice if we had a "file farm" where older drives could be just plugged into it in a modular fashion to act like a giant file server. And some kind of redundant or auto-backup would be nice. Being that they are older drives, they're bound to have a few problems.

  121. hmm by g0at · · Score: 1

    I'd never use such an array for critical data storage, but it certainly would be useful as a massive backup array to our existing SAN that does store critical data So in other words, you would use such an array for storage of critical data?

    -b
  122. instruments by megabulk3000 · · Score: 1

    You could always turn them into musical instruments, like this guy did, using "vintage computing hardware including a Sinclair ZX Spectrum (rhythm & lead), Epson LX-83 dot matrix printer (drums), HP Scanjet 4c (bass) and a hard drive array to mangle vocals and effects."

  123. Same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking about the same problem.
    Is there a cheap way of doing it ?

  124. Why I rarely read slashdot beyond the headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A guy asked a serious question about how to make use of a significant amount of hardware sitting around gathering dust, and what does he get? A bunch of juvenile, smart-assed answers. I think most people just use this bored in an attempt to show everyone else how "smart" they are by being a sarcastic and assinine as possible.

  125. How much is your time worth? by ozphx · · Score: 1

    At about $200AU a TB for new sata drives (with warranty) that means you are going to have to be salvaging ~500 gig of reliable and tested space per hour.

    Bugger that off. Dump the lot in salvage for a few k, and buy new kit.

    With the US economy tanking and the price of hardware at rock bottom, you'd be crazy to even be considering secondhand gear.

    --
    3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  126. zpool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would use ZFS and create a massive zpool, or several small raidZ-2 zpools, and create some very reliable secondary storage.
    Works great for obsolete arrays that used to use (Veritas) volume management. It extends the life expectancy of old
    storage hardware and gives you some practice on a next generation file system.

  127. An Idea? by Plekto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Make a bunch of chess sets out of the various parts.

    Something like this.
    http://www.novica.com/itemdetail/index.cfm?pid=121771

    The platters of could serve as the white squares maybe?

  128. 100 drives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha -- 100 drives. Imagine the "theoretical" possibility of sitting on 100,000 drives.

    What then?

  129. iSCSI, FTW! by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    You've mentioned ATAoE, but have you thought about throwing LVM over top of a bunch of them and serving them over iscsi using Iscsi Enterprise Target? You could use Microsoft free iscsi initiator or one of the many Linux implementations.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  130. Two Different suggestions by Peter+(Professor)+Fo · · Score: 1
    1. Make it known that you have a goody bag of bits to company employees. Some will be nice to you and ask about 'free stuff'. They take an interest... You take an interest... They take more interest and with any luck you have made some useful bridges into the user community that could be worth the drives many times over. (And they'll buy you a beer.)
    2. If there is something you'd like to leech from the network which is a reasonably steady flow of data AND isn't likely to need to be accessed - but might once in a while prove valuable - Such as logs or who accessed what web pages. Now you could swap in a hard disc in less than a minute and now you have a week's data gathering capacity sitting waiting for you to snoop. Moral of the story: You don't have to use all this storage at once.
  131. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if i were u, id sell them for a few hundred bucks, and go free some slaves ....

    http://matador.org/10-shocking-facts-about-global-slavery-in-2008/ ....and you be happy knowin that you had turned a pile of useless crap into something priceless .....

  132. Get a real backup solution by Arethan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Disk based backup solutions are worth the effort, so I can see why you're leaning this way. Unfortunately, trying to utilize ~100 PATA drives for this is going to give you nightmares for ages. Find a way to reclimate them for cash, either directly or indirectly. Hell, you can donate them to charity for a tax writeoff if you like (just make sure you DoD wipe the disks first). Take the reclimated capital and buy yourself a new data-deduplicated VTL, or a NearStor, or similar. Backup solutions need to have some level of trustworthiness to be useful, and I doubt you'll find that in a pile of aged PATA disk.

  133. USB and ZFS by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    100 USB to IDE cables (maximum of 126 devices that can be connected to the same bus), and ZFS.

  134. DoD now specifies to degause or slag drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you use the software approved by the DoD for 'cleaning' you should be safe. First off, the DoD is no longer responsible for writing the standards, NIST is. Their document that covers this is NIST 800-88.

    The standards for data sanitization is more stringent now. Anything that is more sensitive than Classified, and leaves the control of the organization disposing of the drives, needs to be either put through a degauser, chopped up into tiny pieces, or turned into slag. If the media is simply going to be re-used with-in the organization then wiping is okay.

    1. Re:DoD now specifies to degause or slag drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that is more sensitive than Classified, and leaves the control of the organization disposing of the drives... Um - three levels of USG classification (confidential | secret | top secret). They will never leave control of the organization disposing of the drives in a working state. Period.

      Actually,

  135. Build a fort! by Cathoderoytube · · Score: 1

    Build a fort! (in case you didn't read the subject)

    --
    I have nothing compelling to say
  136. I can't believe nobody's said this yet by xcham · · Score: 1

    But this sounds like a golden opportunity to try out ZFS and benchmark it using a large amount of old-ish commodity hardware. And get yourself a nice little storage center in the process. From what I understand, ZFS loves old disks.

    --
    When life gives you lemons, you CLONE those lemons, and make SUPER-LEMONS. -- Dr. Cinnamon Scudworth, Ph.D
  137. Sports! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Crack 'em open, separate the platters, you've got anywhere between 300 and 500 tiny disks that you can use to invent the sport of indoor skeet shooting. Yay, aluminum, ceramic, or glass pigeons!

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  138. Use them for backups. by $kr1p7_k177y · · Score: 1

    Size your filesystems to match the predominant size among your drives, and use them for offline FS backup. IE: I have a stack of 80GB drives here... So at my latest rebuild, I grew my /home to 80GB, and I use the drives to take a backup of my user data every month.

    A USB-> Ide adapter that I got off of ebay saves me the trouble of cracking the case.

  139. My suggestion by Pentium100 · · Score: 0

    If I had 100 hard drives I wouldn't need tapes for a long time :) My suggestion would be: 1. Get a large case, IDE controller cards and use the drives as NAS or SAN (I use hard drives this way, but only 7 of them, 2TB total) 2. If you do not need that much space at once, use the drives as tapes for backup or archiving. Fill the drive, the put it someplace safe (I use tapes for that since they are cheaper (per gigabyte) than hard drives). When I see the suggestions of destroying working hard drives I can't stop thinking how some people have too much money...

  140. USB by Tik0 · · Score: 1

    Use a combination of IDE to USB2 converters and USB hubs to hook together all the drives into whatever ports the computer has. Perhaps a few of the drives could be ebayed to cover costs?

  141. Donate them to Helios' friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helios just sent out a desperate plea for hard drives (and RAM) for a school that needs them for their hopeful conversion to Linux

    http://linuxlock.blogspot.com/2008/06/standing-one-edge.html

  142. ZFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Solaris' ZFS (BTW, Apple and FreeBSD ported ZFS to their own OSes) has the concept of storage pools. Perfect for lots of unreliable hard drives.

    In fact, Sun's x4500 uses 48 off-the-shelf SATA hard drives for mission crtical storage.

  143. Re:Speaking of Tivo by unitron · · Score: 1

    Speaking of Tivo, the original poster's collection of drives sounds just right for increasing storage on a whole bunch of Series 1 and 2 Tivos.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  144. iSCIS + Sun's ZFS = Cheap Network Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A solution we use is that of iSCSI + Sun's ZFS. You can distribute the drives in different boxes or off the shelf systems you have laying around, load iSCSI on all the boxes and use one host machine to initiate them all. Then use the ZFS file system which will allow you to pool multiple devices together (like a high efficient RAID) and you can create whatever size/distribution of file systems you want. You said your application was video production. iSCSI and ZFS have been used for this application and heavily documented: http://blogs.sun.com/constantin/entry/x4500_solaris_zfs_iscsi_perfect

  145. Use em like memory sticks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    get a few cheap usb adapters and let everyone know the drives are available for sneakernet duty

  146. VC rolling in? Are you sure we want that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly I don't see what how having a bunch of Vietcong after you would be a good thing.

  147. oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's not a monopole! He's got a bunch of horseshoes and they're pointin' in the same direction!"

  148. Put your sensitive personal info on them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make 100 copies and leave them all over the place. Now if you forget your SSN or credit card info, you can have easy access!

  149. Troubleshooting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want to do would be more trouble then it was worth. Do what I do, take them "troubleshooting" and by "troubleshooting" I mean you take the trouble and you shoot it. Repeatedly. I use my local rifle range. (no overseers, it's a wonder nobody has died up there... yet)

  150. mhddfs by elyk · · Score: 1

    if you want a simple, software-based quasi-raid and you're running *nix, try mhddfs - the only drawback is that it doesn't support splitting large files across multiple volumes (so it may not work for video production, depending on whether you've got a couple huge files or a bunch of smaller ones)

    --
    MS-DOS: Most Severe Denial of Service
    Free Online Backup
  151. Unless he works for the CIA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've heard too many IT guys advocate the destruction of old drives as the safest method of data privacy. I say bah hum bug.

    Unless you work for the CIA, the information on your companies drives can be safely destroyed simply be zeroing the drive. After the drive has been zeroed, the drive isn't going to be able to read the information any longer, a simple fact.

    Is the information still there? BARELY! Sure, a drive recovery center *might* be able to recover some data by removing the platters and examining them with highly sensitive equipment, but really, the cost is so prohibitive.

    Who's going to spend several hundred dollars to maybe recover a few pieces of Cindy's calendar from 2003? Not even Cindy.

    Zero the drives and give them to people who could use them.

    1. Re:Unless he works for the CIA... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Fine. Get approval from your superiors. Be prepared to hang if there's any way to get that data back and the drives are out of your hands.

      As long as I work for IT in a company, I advocate keeping the largest and shredding/shooting/detonating the rest. These days, with Sarbanes Oxley and HIPPA in effect, it's not worth the liability.

      --
    2. Re:Unless he works for the CIA... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      A little perspective helps. He says he's in the line of work of "digital video production". Who's going to buy some random hard drive from eBay and try to recover it after it has been wiped? And what will it gain them?

    3. Re:Unless he works for the CIA... by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      depends on whether they can get free pr0n out of it.

  152. Your prices are old. by Tatarize · · Score: 1

    640s cost $100 (due to the platter density I highly recommend the 640) whereas the 500s cost about 80 currently.

    --

    It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
  153. Simple solution... by confusedneutrino · · Score: 1

    AK-47. Hard drives make very fun targets for sufficiently powerful firearms. Shotguns not advised, unless firing slugs. Trust me on that.

    --


    --RIAmAses! Let my MP3ople go!
  154. Distributed Filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MogileFS? Yet to play with it as my boss shot me down for suggesting another time waisting project.

    At most I know digg uses it.

    "MogileFS is our open source distributed filesystem"

    http://www.danga.com/mogilefs/

    1. Re:Distributed Filesystem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dyslexia kicking in. Time wasting project.

  155. Use shred by Cato · · Score: 1

    Just use shred(1) - it's in most Linux repositories including Ubuntu and Debian at least: shred -n10 -z /dev/sdg will shred the whole hard disk overwriting it 10 times, with last pass being zeroes.

  156. Use them to keep your users in line by Kwesadilo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fill them with contraband media of various types and give them out to your users (and lusers). You could systematize it. If someone goes six months without "breaking" their computer by changing the settings, not liking it, and forgetting how to change them back, that person might get a 4-gig full of random music that you pulled off of Gnutella (or whatever). If a user goes a year without unintentionally creating a security risk, he gets 50 GB of unsorted porn. For the god of a man who has gone his entire career without a trouble ticket and is miraculously using ten-year-old hardware with no failures, you could have a 300 GB drive with all of the best video games, modern and classic.

    And for the jackass who wants a new monitor because he changed the display resolution, tries out script-kiddie hacking tutorials on his coworkers, constantly demands faster equipment for him to do nothing with, looks at thumb drives he found in the parking lot, and gives up his password for a candy bar, you could stealthily replace his hard drive with a very small one containing Windows ME.

    --
    This space reserved for administrative use.
  157. sell them as scrap alumnium by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    It would be more expensive to connect them all in any meaningful way than it would cost just to buy a rackmount SAS filer with a dozenish drive bays and 300gb drives.

    IDE is cheap but you can only do 4 drives per controller card (2-ports per) and maybe 3 controller cards per motherboard. that's 16 drives per mobo. that's going to be the cheapest way to interface them. And it would be a huge pain in the ass to screw around with 7 systems and all those ribbon cables.

    You could just buy 100 firewire cases and load them all up too, and try to get 20 firewire ports on one system and just chain the drives out to 5 levels deep. Not useful for performance but maybe you could have a big JBOD ftp server. but the little wall transformers for the drive chassis are going to be a nightmare.

    Then you have to think about the power that any setup you do will waste. I think I recommend you just harvest the aluminum out of them and get maybe $200 for all scrap.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  158. try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not try this:

    http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1797936/

  159. build your own! by mousehouse · · Score: 1

    A buddy of mine made a media server with bunch of drives (8 I believe) on a single controller. The trick he used is that he switches on and off individual drives through a small PCB he made that uses a relay for switching power. Data connections for a bunch of drives are merged together. The board is controlled through the parallel which theoretically enables him to do 64 drives I hink (2 control signals and 6 for which drive to apply the command to). Small PCB and seems to work nice. So there is a strict setup routine which drives can be on/off managed on BSD through a perl script. One drive is allways on and used as a buffer disk. A script finds the file you're looking for using an Index, starts the drive, copies the file to the buffer disk and powers-off the drive again. Power-friendly solution as well ;-)

  160. Give them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not send them to some help organization that can hand them out in some country where they can be of use?

  161. Swap space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raid 0 like 4 to a workstation and use it as swap space for your applications.

    It'll hopefully give you a boost on super-memory intensive applications.

  162. Wooooooaaa by indi0144 · · Score: 0

    cool video! I don't mind being rick rolled after seeing this... thanks.

  163. Donate them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are some organizations that use spare hd, cpu, etc contributed by people to create PCs and send them to countries or places where are needed for free.

  164. try to recover data ... by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 1

    then sell it / blackmail people. ;-)

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  165. Google style file system!! by Serpent6877 · · Score: 1

    You can build a Google style filesystem with them that would perform very fast. Check out this opensource solution: http://hadoop.apache.org/core/ Good luck.

    --
    When all else fails, hire me!
  166. redundant backup by gebbletook · · Score: 1

    1. get an ide/sata to usb connector. 2. backup all your favorite files,videos,music. 3. label the hard drives. 4. seal hard drives, store in attic. hard drives also make great geek gifts. i'd have kittens if someone gave me a spare hard drive.

  167. uip + avrlib by jopsen · · Score: 1
    I had a little luck using atmega644, enc28j60, MagJack and an SD-card to create a webserver (I only tested it over LAN)...
    On software side I used:
    • uip (tcp/ip stack)
    • a modified version of mmc from Procyon AVRlib
    • Tiny FatFS
    • A modified enc28j60 driver from Procyon AVRlib
    I can see that Procyon AVRlib has a IDE/ATA driver too. I've never tested it and don't know if it works... But if it does it should be a pretty simple project.
    If it's something you want to play with there's a working uip port for atmega in this SVN repository:
    http://code.google.com/p/avr-uip/

    But as others mentioned I don't think a hundred 20-300GB disk are worth much... Storage costs next to nothing today, just take a look at Amazon S3.
    I'd imagine that it'd be a lot easier and cheaper, both in terms of hardware and power consumption, to buy bigger disks.
  168. How about you... by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

    Download the internet? 100 Hard drives should be more than enough!

  169. AoE vblade by Pegasus · · Score: 1

    There's a userspace AoE "server" that you can run on linux and export any block device (disk, lvm, md, dm, crypt, ...). It's available on sourceforge" along with some other nifty aoe related tools. My /home lives on vblade exported aoe device for more than a year now :)

  170. Off-line Back-ups by Strake · · Score: 1

    While the power requirement to run all of these drives continuously would indeed be great, you don't necessarily need a back-up _array_ - instead, use them for off-line back-up media. A single PC equipped with a removable HDD enclosure or three would do the job nicely.

  171. Sell them in working condition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As it has become hard to get smaller hard drives, I suggest you sell them (wiped clean, of course) in working condition. If anyone wants to get the magnets, they can take the drives apart themselves...

    But I do think that there are a lot of people who need to replace disks in simple Linux desktops, where 8 GB would suffice, and who'd rather take cheap old hard drives than Flash cards with adapters.

  172. Probably not economical by arnie_sama · · Score: 1

    For a while I've been thinking about something similar on a personal scale.
    Take a mainboard like this one (Via NAS 7800-15LST):
    http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/mainboards/motherboards.jsp?motherboard_id=610
    It's got 12 SATA connectors and two times GBit ethernet. Of course you'd need PATA to SATA connectors on each hard drive, at around 10 dollar each.
    So, at around 1000 dollars already, as someone pointed out earlier, it's probably more economical to just buy a big new fast HD with lower power draw.
    You'd still need at least 8 of these boards and probably some casing, PSUs and cables which makes the bill more likely above 2000 dollars.
    Regarding the power draw... I think that shouldn't be too bad if used for backup, since the disks can be kept spun down most of the time.
    While not economical for a business, for home use it might be a different situation. Especially if, like me, you don't have any real backup at all.
    Put the mainboard with all your old HDs in your cellar, run ZFS on it, and voila, no worries about dying hard disks.
    Only problem is you can't buy the mainboard as an end user. Oh well. Just wipe and donate them already ;-)

  173. Extreme Hard Drive destruction story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a friend who worked for the Hubble Space Telescope Institute in Baltimore. At the time (early 90's) he had a Silicon Graphics Onyx computer under his desk for graphics that were created for the Institute. He got it from the firing range at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland. He was there one day visiting a friend and saw 20 Onyx computers on the firing range. He was shocked and asked "WHY???". They had been used for M1 Abrams tank designs and they wanted to destroy the computers because of the top secret info. I think they were worth hundreds of thousands of $$$ each - not sure. He explained that all they needed to do was pull out the hard drive and run it over with a tank. The officers said he could have one of the computers minus the drive and because orders were orders they blew up the remaining 19 computers.

  174. Gverbanck by alainq · · Score: 1

    Harddisk throwing contest in your village ?
    The winner gets them all and can ask the same question.

    --
    Hanging meat lasts longer !
  175. Better than Guttmann Wipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  176. If they work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just donate them to several schools for them to repair malfunctioning computers.

    Or deliver them for recycling.

  177. lost person hours? No, a nice engineerng excercise by pablochacin · · Score: 1

    Besides the time you've wasted thinking about it, there are 160+ comments on this story resulting in probably near $10k in lost engineering person-hours.

    Lost engineering person-hours? How do you think we engineers learn? Just playing with problems like this. I've learned some interesting things in the 30 minutes I've been reading this thread.

  178. Reuse them after running spinrite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a similar, if not smaller problem. It turned out that at a company I worked at, it was deemed easier to buy new drives than try to fix any corruption/trivial disk error, so they had about 50 drives. At least they didn't trash them or give them away with sensitive data, right?

    Ok, so I would spend about 15 minutes a day setting up and running spinrite from http://www.grc.com/spinrite.htm on them. Some took just a few hours - others a few weeks. Over 80% of them were fixed with ZERO ISSUES remaining. There was no need to replace the disk, it was simply a lack of maintenance or logic error that made them appear broken. Not bad for a $89 software investment.

    I have no affiliation with GRC other than as a satisfied customer.

  179. off-line storage by wayne606 · · Score: 1

    What about using them for off-line backup? Anybody know how medium-sized (few 100GB) drives compare with tape and writable blu-ray in terms of cost/byte, shelf-life, and performance?

  180. Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an application for the Beowulf cluster...

    \yes, I'm posting as AC

  181. The size isn't the problem by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Small drives have much lower data density, which equates to being much slower than new drives. I don't need much more than a few hundred GBs of space, but I'm still upgrading to much larger drives because of their speed.

  182. external cases for backup devices by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 1

    I am using lots of firewire and usb external cases for such old drives, mostly for backups and archive storage. And with Linux's software RAID, different size nor sub-prime reliability of individual drives is not an issue.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
  183. Local One-Touch Backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could install the harddrives (like I did) into cheap one-touch backup cases (a-la StarTech, Buffalo, etc.) and put them on workstations.

    Tell the users to just close out their apps and hit the button before they logout or during lunch and they can back up their documents and such.

    I started a pilot with discarded drives where I work and it seems to be going well. I'm going to do a mass roll-out with the drives I have left over from old systems here pretty shortly.

    -WarpKat

  184. Externals? by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

    Any drive under 80-100GB probably isn't worth your time anymore, even as a donation or for eBay. But for the larger drives, either of those options is viable.

    If you want a use for them in-house: instead of putting them on the network, why not put them in USB enclosures for local external storage. They wouldn't really be good for traveling due to their 3.5" form factor, but lots of laptops that are a couple of years old have only 80 GB drives, so these could be good for external backup drives. If they are too small for your video folks, your support teams (marketing, accounting, HR and the like) might still get some use out of them.

    --
    We are the 198 proof..
  185. USB, Firewire, Firearms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you really want to use the drives, USB. There are fairly simple little plugs that will convert your IDE into a USB drive. Sure, the best interfaces will only be around 30 megs/second, but it will work. Alternatively, I hear that equivalent Firewire devices are faster, so that may be a better option.

    Of course, I wouldn't touch anything smaller than 100 gigs myself, and really, anything smaller than 500 gigs probably isn't even worth it with 1TB drives running under $200 now.

    If you have access to firearms, you can always put a few bullets through the drives as a somewhat-effective counter to most data recovery attempts.

  186. 20 Dollars buys a good sledge hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had between 30 - 40 hardrives from old computers. I like you wanted to do something with them but the time it would take to securely wipe them didn't sound appealing to me. So,,, Realizing that life is too short to run boot and nuke on each drive, I bought a good sledge hammer. Wrote "Harddrive eraser" on the side in silver sharpie and found a cinder block with not a flat top, but with protruding sides, kind of looked like an H. I stood the block upright, and placed each drive on top of the H shaped sides. Now the drives had about an inch space below them as they rested on the high sides of the block. It's kind of hard to describe,, Anyway, I stood back, stupidly didn't wear safety glass and took a whack. The drives bent into the opening creating a slight U shape. I was satisfied when I could see into the drive and see the platters were bent. I got pretty good after a few and with one strike snapped the casing bending the contents inside. I always turned it circuit board side up to destroy the electronics . I would have been nice to recycle the materials but I didn't know of a place that would take such a mixed bag of metals.

  187. 100 hard drives... by free+and+free · · Score: 1

    ... = excellent mini-trebuchet ballast.

    --
    we're doomed...
  188. That magnet prank will fail by KWTm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Make it a true geeks trick. Put the magnets on the inside of the fender spelling out "Very Small Penis". Then shake some iron filings over it. It'll keep trying to reform the words as he wipes it off and each day when you walk by it just sprinkle some more filings over the spot to keep the joke going. See how long it takes him to figure out they are on the inside
    It seems to me, intuitively, that this will not work due to the ferromagnetism of the fender, which is presumably metal. That very property which allows the magnets to cling to the inside of the fender will also capture most of the magnetic field lines, meaning that it won't attract the iron filings (or will attract them evenly, so that they don't spell out any words).

    For the words to appear, the material separating the magnets from the iron filings would have to be unaffected by magnets; for example, if you put the magnets under a sheet of plastic or wood, then the iron filings will clump according to the placement of the magnets. On the other hand, if the fender is made of plastic, the magnets won't stick to it in the first place.

    That's just my intuition; can anyone correct me on this?
    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  189. Donation, Donation, donation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should really consider donating it, there are lots of people who would find such amount of hard drives usefull, if you were to use them you would not waited this long to do so. http://www.freegeek.org/

  190. Electromagnetic Wankel rotary engines! by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall there is a way to use the magnets and rotating disc inside a hard drive to design a kind of Wankel rotary engine. Now *where* did I see this...? What you need is a bunch of magnets to power the disc, and one or perhaps two electromagnets to work as "spark plugs", to make the disc spin on. You also need software or software-controlled hardware to control WHEN the electromagnets should kick in, and in what sequence. Just like the electronics that control the dual spark plugs in a Wankel. Good, eh?

    --
    Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
    1. Re:Electromagnetic Wankel rotary engines! by Cannelloni · · Score: 1

      And please don't laugh at my use of the word "Wankel". That's very naughty, you know, since the inventor was German and that was his real name.

      --
      Beauty is in the beholder of the eye.
  191. DONATE THEM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    putting any real effortinto trying to use all those old hard drives is PENNY-WISE and DOLLAR-FOOLISHdonatethem to a school or worthy charityif your company has a decent accountant you can write off enough to buy some cheap 500gb drives

  192. My best suggestion: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    My best suggestions is to either:

    1) donate it as several previous posted suggested, or,

    2) have fun like the guys at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YocnQ0NMTUA&feature=related did.

    Using those disks for backup can be more expensive in power than buying a single large disk.

  193. A fine idea for scrapped platters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.evilmadscientist.com/article.php/WindChimeStory

    Sorry I'm such a noob with the linking action.

  194. First Thing That Comes To Mind.... by SIR_Taco · · Score: 0

    1) Get a large container that wont damage the drives
    2) Load drives into container
    3) Pack the drives snug so they don't get damaged
    4) Make coffee
    5) Call UPS make postage out to me
    6) UPS MAGIC
    7) Happy Me

    Best I can come up with. ;)

    --
    I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
  195. Paul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, first of all a couple or triple or more than four 1TB HDD's would be much better than using hundred or more of old ones. Just copy from old ones to new ones and that's it. Five 1TB HDD's in one massive would be a big and nice advantage for info storage over years.

  196. Re: what to do with a hundred hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont think this is so complicated. first, triage the inventory:

    1. Discard all drives older then 5 years or so; all drives fail eventually, and the older they are the more likely they are to reach their failure point.
    2. Discard or give away all drives smaller then 160GB or so; lower platter density means lower performance and very likely high power draw per gig.
    3. from the remainder, group the disks into matching capacities. capacity groups with only a few drives can be discarded or given away.

    What remains is likely a dozen (maybe 2) drives that can be tossed into a cheap box or an ebay'ed server with an older ATA based RAID controller card- instant network storage appliance.

  197. If you're asking how to best go about backing up your critical data to a bunch of old flaky drives... it only begs the question where you got the 'dro :P

    But seriously, why?

    --
    I have spoken'eth.
  198. Data recovery all the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those logic boards are worth it in a huge way. When you have a bad one it can be kind of a pain to find another one of the right board. At my last employer, we had over 400 drives, including mobile drives, and about 1/4 of the time we could find a match, all the rest of the time we couldn't.

  199. Pull them apart by wtansill · · Score: 1

    Each drive has at least four platters. Skeet shooting, anyone?

    --
    The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
  200. Maybe offsite backup? by MyForest · · Score: 1

    Yep, this works well for me. I have a slew of 160GB drives and I use them for offsite backups at other family members' houses. I gave up with DVDs when I got to 40GB. Having so many obsolete drives made me able to have multiple offsite backups which is always nice.

    However I did go to the dark side first and set up big RAID arrays with them that were very fast. The only snag was I had to do that in each machine else I got upset copying files around as I wasn't using the fast drives efficiently. Then of course you have to get GigE to keep things rolling. Then you realize your time could be better spent posting to /.

  201. Not worth it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just not worth it. Save the bigger ones, trash or find a non-profit to donate them to. The power pull and potential issues will just add headaches.

  202. USB raid array by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    Why not build a lvm of usb drives. Put them directly into drive cages and use ide/sata to usb converter's. You could use a fairly modest machine, preferably with a few pci slots and load those slots up with usb cards to give you additional bandwidth to usb.

    Outside the case use the drive cages and pc power supplies solder additional connectors from dead power supplies to load additional drives onto the good power supplies. You could also use firewire, but usb is cheaper.

    I'd do it under linux and use the hdparm command to tune the spin down timer on the drives to conserve power, accessing the drives *should* spin them back up.

    It might be a good way to back things up as it won't be fast.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  203. Buy a bunch of Drobos by epeius · · Score: 1

    Data Robotics, Inc. makes a storage robot that's called Drobo. You can plug up to 4 SATA drives of varying size into it and then hook it up to a network with a Drobo Share base. http://www.drobo.com/

  204. Food by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    Sell them for $1 each. Then buy 100 tacos for $100.

  205. Spare Drives by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a candidate for testing RAID 50, and iSCSI.

        I've been talking to someone who does extensive work over iSCSI, and I started performance testing his gear. It tested very nicely.

        So, if you were to take say 15 300Gb drives and make it a RAID50, you could have a nice 3.6Tb array. iSCSI performance is great, assuming you take a few things into account (namely bandwidth).

        Enjoy.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  206. What happened to Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 years ago people would have been suggesting massive raid arrays or installing every Linux distro there is. Now it's all about recycling and data security. What happened to you Slashdot? You used to be cool.

  207. my 2 cents worth by marros · · Score: 1

    You can get ide-usb converters, ones that do 40 pin 3.5" ide, 44 pin 2.5" ide to usb. They are not external cases, just a converter iwth a cable, and a power supply...very minimal but works great. Get enough for all the drives and connect them with a bunch of cheap usb hubs and plug them into a linux box. Make 1 large volume with LVM and viola!