Slashdot Mirror


Judge Says U.S. Money Violates Rights of the Blind

An anonymous reader writes, "The United States is one of the few countries in the world whose currency isn't distinguishable by blind people. Most other nations use raised text, different-sized bills, or other methods to assist blind people in spending their money. If a recent decision by a federal court in D.C. survives appeal, however, that will soon change. Under Sec. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, federal programs cannot deny 'meaningful access' to people with disabilities. Because blind people are unable to distinguish U.S. currency without assistance, the court held that they are denied meaningful access to their own money. U.S. District Judge James Robertson ordered the Treasury Department to come up with ways for the blind to tell bills apart. He said he wouldn't tell officials how to fix the problem, but he ordered them to begin working on it." How Appealing notes that Judge Robertson opened the door to a speedy appeal of his ruling.

898 comments

  1. Money Reader by Ice+Wewe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, you have to carry it around, but there are machines out there that when a bill is scanned through them, will report it's value. So, is there really a need to redesign the bills so that they're accessable to the blind?

    1. Re:Money Reader by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      are the readers free?

    2. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't need a complex solution to this problem. All that needs to be done is perhaps that you add raised bumps to the next generation of bills.

      And you should note that accessibility to the blind also means that a blind person can act as a cashier. I used to go to a shop with a blind cashier where all of the customers told the man what their purchases were and how much money they gave him. Being able to quickly sort through different bill sizes (and verify the correct values) would have been extremely valuable to him.

    3. Re:Money Reader by BenjyD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doesn't it make sense to have easily distinguishable notes anyway, blind or not? Finding the correct note in your wallet is much slower with dollars than Euros or pounds.

    4. Re:Money Reader by eggoeater · · Score: 4, Funny
      are the readers free?
      Yes, they are.
      They're called debit card readers.

      Seriously, I worked with some blind people in college and they would just use a credit/debit card for everything.


    5. Re:Money Reader by Z1NG · · Score: 1, Insightful

      are the readers free?
      Are wheelchairs?

    6. Re:Money Reader by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no but the wheelchair ramps that do the actual allowing access are.

      get it?

    7. Re:Money Reader by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 1

      Aussie money is great as well, but I disagree about British pounds.
      If you have a high denomination note like £50, then first you have to unfold it a few times.
      I understand they want to differentiate based on size, but the £5 note is their only note that will comfortably fit in my standard-sized wallet.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    8. Re:Money Reader by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 1

      Raised bumps will be too easy to forge with the aim of tricking blind people as people with full vision will ignore the bumps.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    9. Re:Money Reader by 91degrees · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but the £5 note is their only note that will comfortably fit in my standard-sized wallet.

      Wallets are designed to hold money. Not the other way round. Mine holds a wad of £50 notes quite easily.

    10. Re:Money Reader by Gibsnag · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish I could verify that with my wallet.... :(

    11. Re:Money Reader by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mine holds a wad of £50 notes quite easily. Where do you live?

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    12. Re:Money Reader by just_forget_it · · Score: 1

      The texture of a dollar bill is extremely unique. I would think that someone who is blind would experience this even more than you or me. The paper used to make US money is a cloth-based (that's why it can survive a washing machine) formula that is very hard to duplicate. Oftentimes, a counterfeit is discovered because it just doesn't "feel" right.

    13. Re:Money Reader by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I absolutley love the fact that Aussie money is totally waterproof, I wish the UK would do this too ( fair enough we may not have as many beaches but we make up for it in rain ).

      I've no problem fitting £50 or any other notes into my wallet.

    14. Re:Money Reader by pnewhook · · Score: 5, Funny

      Blind people don't really need free wheelchairs...

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    15. Re:Money Reader by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the last three months, I have had even less access to my money than a blind person (who knows his PIN) would have. I've been using my bank card on all purchases, something a blind person is just as capable of doing.

      How does a blind person know that the amount they are being told they are paying actually matches what they are paying? The terminals don't have a display a blind person can "read" or a voiced amount, so they could still be ripped of by unscrupulous people.

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    16. Re:Money Reader by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The summary suggests that an appeal might be on its way, and I imagine the ruling will be shot down. To make any changes to currency would not only require completely recirculating the billions of papers out there, but it would probably require drastic changes to the printing process. Different shapes, sizes, or including braille print sound like expensive alterations.
      other countries already do theese things with thier bills (partly for difficulty of copying as well as blind access), i agree requring them to immediately replace every bill in circulation would be going too far but requiring small changes to the printing process that would also improve security (i've heared stories of people bleaching US bills and reprinting them to higher values) for new runs seems perfectly reasonable to me. The old bills would probablly be mostly out of circulation in a few years anyway due to normal wear and tear.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:Money Reader by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      To make any changes to currency would not only require completely recirculating the billions of papers out there, but it would probably require drastic changes to the printing process. Different shapes, sizes, or including braille print sound like expensive alterations.
      Every other country seems to cope with the idea of not helping people fleece the blind and partially sighted. There's no reason whatsoever other than laziness for not modernising the US currency.
      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    18. Re:Money Reader by eggoeater · · Score: 2, Funny
      How about patterns of holes in the bills?
      So could you use the chads as coins?
      Also, the bills that came out of the Treasury with hanging chads would be worth more as a collectors' item.

    19. Re:Money Reader by jimstapleton · · Score: 2, Informative

      My mom, who is blind, has been trying to get one.

      They are around $200, and she does not have the money for that.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    20. Re:Money Reader by Hennell · · Score: 1

      Send me a £50 note and I'll check out my wallet's capability's.

    21. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or that's what you've told her
      sorry

    22. Re:Money Reader by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      The summary suggests that an appeal might be on its way, and I imagine the ruling will be shot down. To make any changes to currency would not only require completely recirculating the billions of papers out there, but it would probably require drastic changes to the printing process. Different shapes, sizes, or including braille print sound like expensive alterations.

      Any transition would not be overnight. It'd basically just involve new bills, no mass callback. The mint's printing methods are changing all the time; however they take care not to change the superficial appearance. So the cost would be minimal. Paper money wears out fairly rapidly and after a few years most currency in circulation would be compliant. America is oddly conservative in its currency. Most countries redesign, sometimes radically, every 10 or 20 years.

    23. Re:Money Reader by hawg2k · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing. While I think this is a valid concern for the blind, I personally use actual cash for so few things anymore that this almost seems "too late" technology wise to even bother.

      There could be considerable expense incurred in designing and implementing changes to our paper currency.

    24. Re:Money Reader by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds like you've never hired a builder to install an access ramp.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    25. Re:Money Reader by pizzach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree with you on changing money would be expensive. But on the other hand, the US waisted all of this money on making quarters with random pictures on the back and invested in machinery to make a whole new dollar coin that never even became popular. THIS money should have gone into development of making US money better for the blind. It's not like we couldn't slowly change the money over time.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    26. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How does she know? (Couldn't let that one go I'm afraid)

    27. Re:Money Reader by Sox2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not everywhere takes credit/debit: try using one on a coke machine or at a hot dog stand and prepare to go thirsty/hungry. The inability to distinguish notes is quite a big deal to the substantial number of people with sight discibilities. The US currency has a history of being slow to adopt sensible measures - only relatively recently was a realistic attempt at address forgery added to the greenback.

    28. Re:Money Reader by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To make any changes to currency would not only require completely recirculating the billions of papers out there, but it would probably require drastic changes to the printing process. Different shapes, sizes, or including braille print sound like expensive alterations.

      I doubt the courts would require all currency to be recalled, especially since much currency has only an 18-month lifespan. And since we're redesigning the larger bills (5 through 100) every 7 years or so, we've already committed to spending a certain amount of money on redesign. Incorporating some raised devices (as on Canada's currency) would be a trivial addition to the next round of redesigns.

      Changing the size of currency would obviously cost a lot more, but the Treasury is constantly looking at new printing technology, and so that could also be spread out as they replace equipment. Nobody said this had to happen overnight. And, oh, we've done this before -- in the 1920's we changed from a large format currency to the current small-sized notes. And before anyone brings up vending machine and ATM manufacturers' complaints, differing note sizes hasn't hurt anyone in Europe (where ATMs regularly dispense bills in four or more denominations, each a different size).

      And this might finally be what lets Congress stand up to lobbyists and kill the dollar bill. Not only are we out of step with the rest of the world on blind access to currency, we're just about the only major country stubborn enough to still use currency for our primary currency measure -- everyone else, Pounds, Euro, Canadian Dollar, Australian Dollar, have coins for 1 and 2 unit, and sometimes even 5 unit, denominations. I read recently that eliminating the dollar bill would save half a billion (BILLION) dollars a year, and that was a 1995 study, so it's probably even higher. But lobbyists (primarily for the unions that produce the paper) have consistently stopped cold any attempt to switch to coins only.

      Anyway, I think the Judge is right and, though this wouldn't be free, it wouldn't be an undue burden.

    29. Re:Money Reader by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There's no reason whatsoever other than laziness for not modernising the US currency.
      You seem to have neglected the millions that the Bureau of Engraving and Printing would spend modifying their processes, not to mention the billions it would cost to upgrade all the cash-counting machinery owned by private businesses.

      Hey, since you're so generous, why don't we just draft you and others who share your opinion to be full-time money-handling assistants for the blind? Think of the warm, fuzzy feelings you'll get from actually helping people yourself instead of just waving your hands and proclaiming that a problem exists only because of laziness!

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    30. Re:Money Reader by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Most countries redesign, sometimes radically, every 10 or 20 years.
      And they even use different colours!
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    31. Re:Money Reader by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      The summary suggests that an appeal might be on its way, and I imagine the ruling will be shot down. To make any changes to currency would not only require completely recirculating the billions of papers out there, but it would probably require drastic changes to the printing process. Different shapes, sizes, or including braille print sound like expensive alterations. And yet somehow us Australians managed to do it. It all depends on how much your government cares about your disabled.

    32. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a MASSIVE wallet as 50quid notes are like a4 size :p

      (and no im not american, im australia, our money is skinny!)

    33. Re:Money Reader by StatusWoe · · Score: 1

      If the point of this is to prevent people from swindeling the blind, an "over time" solution likely wouldn't help very much for quite a while. All someone needs to say is that it's not one of the new bills.... I still have some cash in a jar from like 10 years ago, it would be tough to enforce a " must have money changed in 1 year " but it might be the only solution, if one is needed at all with the drastic decline in cash usage that has been taking place.

      --
      "drink deeply the illusion of your safety"
    34. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And now we hit upon the Great Slashdot Self-Absorption.

      Because you don't use cash any longer, no one does.

      This premise can be expanded by stating that if anyone still does do the thing you don't do (or, conversely, doesn't do the thing you do) they are morons.

      To ward off the sample size critics you could state that no one you know uses cash either.

    35. Re:Money Reader by aedil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hm, I have yet to see a free money or debit card reader anywhere. For bills, money identifiers are quite expensive and a bit bulky. As far as debit card readers, those are not free either. Sometimes state agencies for the blind may be willing to pay for one, on an individual basis, but that certainly does not apply to the majority of blind people.

      Also, note that you can't just use debit cards for everything. There are quite a few things in life that you do need cash for, and blind people should not be excluded from being able to use regular money.

      Finally, making bills accessible isn't really rocket science. Looking around at other countries around the world, the US is really far behind in this. Unfortunately for the blind, the US treasury has a very large loophole (although it could make for an interesting legal battle): all US currency ever printed remains legal tender, so even if new bills are made accessible, there will remain a large amount of inaccessible bills in circulation for a *long* time. Other countries have been able to replace bills. On the other hand, that also means that it is even more important for the US to act on this immediately, because the problem only gets bigger (and they already missed the boat on the last bill redesign (using colour) that went through recently).

    36. Re:Money Reader by jcr · · Score: 1

      For example, the owners of places of public accomodation are prevented from discriminating on the basis of disability, but there is an upward limit on what they must implement.

      Regrettably, there's no limit on how many frivolous lawsuits can be filed against a business owner using the pretext of the ADA. Some people make a living suing businesses they've never even attempted to visit.

      This particular case will probably be rendered moot by the congress exempting the Bureau of Engraving and Printing from the ADA.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    37. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't get rid of the dollar bill, think of the strippers!

    38. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, you don't even need a device. Show me a seeing-eye dog that can't read the number on the note and bark that many times!

    39. Re:Money Reader by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      Everyone is talking about "every other country" like they have been to them. One person says it so it must be true. I lived in Brazil for quite a while and their money is just as discriminating as US money. Jamaica has the same problem. That proves that not every other country is in the right. Just a guess but there are probably many countries in Africa and Asia that are in the same boat. Anyone know about china and india?? (Brazil is the 5th largest country by population just so you don't say the ones that don't do it are small and don't count)

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    40. Re:Money Reader by lazyl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Changing paper money does nothing to resolve this.

      What are you talking about? Ofcourse it does. With paper money a blind person knows exactly how much he's paying, and if the bills had raised text (like the rest of the world) he'd know exactly how much change he's getting back. He might be charged more then the price on the tag but at least he knows how much it is so he can refuse if he knows it's wrong. With a debit reader he has now idea how much he's being charged; the clerk can say $10 but type in $100.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    41. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, instead of posting here on /. you could get out of her basement and get out and earn some money and buy one for her. Just a thought.

    42. Re:Money Reader by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      Even with debit, can't the blind consumer still be scammed? He can't verify the amount he's paying by looking at the debit machine, or read the amount on the receipt he's signing.

      To me, it doesn't solve the problem. The blind person is still at the mercy of the merchant.

    43. Re:Money Reader by geoffspear · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is a page describing the accessibility features of all of the world's currencies as of 1995. Note that the US is the only country on the list that didn't have a single one of the 4 features they look at, and Brazil was very rare in using just bill color (which is obviously useless to people who are completely blind) to distinguish bills. China's currency includes a tactile recognition symbol, and India's uses a different size bill for some denominations.

      Besides, a more fair comparison would be not to similar-sized countries, but to other industrialized democracies. But, for the record, almost every country in Africa has (or had, in 1995) more accessible currency than the US.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    44. Re:Money Reader by afidel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's why you use Crane's Crest Fluorescent White paper as your stock. It's made by the same people that make the paper used by the US Mint using a similar process. It doesn't contain the security strip, watermark, colored threads, etc of a real bill but it will pass the feel and iodine pen tests used by most cashiers =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    45. Re:Money Reader by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Sure, if your right wing nutjob buddies ever get control of Congress again.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    46. Re:Money Reader by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      See introduction of Euros. Except in this case, a crossover period would be even easier because the actual value of the currency wouldn't change (Unlike with the Euro crossover, when PoS systems had to do conversion all kinds of ways (Price in Euros, paid for in Francs, change in Euros etc).

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    47. Re:Money Reader by kokojie · · Score: 0

      I'm from China. The Chinese currency has a large size difference, has raised text, has five different languages printed on it.

    48. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In India all new notes have been visually-impaired friendly for 5-10 years now.
      (started off with the higher denomination notes. and now extends to all currency notes)

      Until a few years ago currency notes used to be stapled while bundling. That was outlawed and it's very rare to come across notes which have been stapled these days.

      Currency notes get replaced at regular intervals anyways.. unlike what people are claiming about them being in circulation forever.

      How many notes over 10-15 years old do you come across everyday?

    49. Re:Money Reader by FinalCut · · Score: 1

      Brazil is just a small country so it doesn't count! Fifth largest - please.

      On a serious note I think most of the discussion of "other countries" has revolved around those European nations that were referenced in the article summary. Just because there are plenty of nations with "discriminatory currency" doesn't mean it is OK for the US to be in that boat.

      I actually heard about this on NPR this morning and the entire issue surprised me. I had never considered the difficulties of the standard commerce system for the blind. Price tags aren't very accessible; particularly in grocery stores where it is just a sticker, cash registers and debit card readers aren't either since they don't provide an audible price total, and neither is our currency.

      Fixing the money is a start to solving the problem but it definitely won't resolve it completely.

      As a software developer who is constantly battling the accessibility issue with my companies creations (it is often hard to make things accessible) it is interesting to see these issues pop up in other parts of society. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

    50. Re:Money Reader by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "They're called debit card readers. Seriously, I worked with some blind people in college and they would just use a credit/debit card for everything"

      You know..the first thing I thought when seeing this, was "Ok, what's next? Do we not have to have all credit card swipe readers somehow display the digits raised so blind people can read the digits too?"

      Look, I feel for the handicapped....and I'm for helping them when it is practical, but, when it comes to something like changing all our money, something the overwhelming majority of people can deal with....do we have to cater to every minorities needs?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    51. Re:Money Reader by PDAllen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Notes remaining legal tender isn't really all that uncommon. What everyone does is to simply stop reissuing the old variety, so every time an old style note goes into a bank it gets destroyed, and a new style note comes out in its place. Give it six months and you still see a few old style notes about, but not very many - think about how long you normally hang onto a note for: a few days at most. This is also why you don't see too many ripped and tattered notes about, banks destroy them when they get them.

    52. Re:Money Reader by JohnSearle · · Score: 1
      Blind people don't really need free wheelchairs...


      Perhaps they don't need free wheelchairs... but I'm sure it wouldn't hurt. Might even make them happy.

      Hell, give me a free wheelchair. I say that walking is for suckers.

      - John
    53. Re:Money Reader by Gospodin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not at all - he's simply saying that because one can get by pretty easily these days without using cash at all, then changing our entire system of money seems a bit extreme. I admit I find this a pretty compelling argument.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    54. Re:Money Reader by clickety6 · · Score: 1

      Note to self:

      PoS System = Point of Sale system and not Piece of Shit system...

      Been working on the latter far too long ;-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    55. Re:Money Reader by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, the US doesn't seem to mind spending billions of dollars they don't even have; and for things around the world that will probably made worse for their actions. How much better to actually care for her own citizens for once.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    56. Re:Money Reader by makomk · · Score: 1

      Regrettably, there's no limit on how many frivolous lawsuits can be filed against a business owner using the pretext of the ADA. Some people make a living suing businesses they've never even attempted to visit.

      This particular case will probably be rendered moot by the congress exempting the Bureau of Engraving and Printing from the ADA.


      Hmmm, interesting - that website you linked to is run by some organisation called Ascervus Enterprises, who also run "www.legislativedisgrace.com" and "www.adalawsuits.com and appear to be linked to "www.sdcala.org" (see the list of board members) and possibly "www.occala.org". I'm not sure who they are (their website just says they "provide administrative, governance and other support to a group of affiliated firms"), and the whole thing reeks of an astroturfing campaign. I wonder who's behind it...

    57. Re:Money Reader by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      OK, there are other countries that have as idiotic banknote design as the US - the Euro however is fantastically done, and a comparable scale (i.e. not off by orders of magnitude) to the US. Plus its introduction was insane compared to what would have to be done in the US for some new banknotes. Vastly simpler for the US to do so than it was for European countries to changeover on various exchange rates to a new currency and get all the old banknotes and money withdrawn in a short timescale.

      Even in the US you introduce new banknote versions anyway for upgraded anti-countfeit measures etc. Apart from design costs there isn't much issue besides vending machines. The latter issue is far far from a showstopper for something so essential - unless your politicians or public are a slave to the lobbying by those responsible for vending machines.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    58. Re:Money Reader by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      The US has tried to get rid of the dollar bill more than once and the populace didn't accept it. The Susan B. Anthony was one attempt but it failed because it was too similar to the quarter. They tried again with the sacagawea but that didn't go too well either. Their latest attempt will be with the founding fathers dollar coins. We will see how that goes.

      I personally don't like dollar coins or any other coins simply because of the weight compared to paper.

      --
      Gone!
    59. Re:Money Reader by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    60. Re:Money Reader by Albanach · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?


      There are still a whole host of low value transactions where cash is the most appropriate way to pay. Perhaps you have changed your lifestyle to fit your no cash utopia, but to suggest that others do likewise because they had the misfortune to be born blind or to have lost their eyesight is plain wrong.

      The US is the onlycountry on earth with notes that are indistinguishable from one another for the blind. Here's a hint, it's not because the rest of the world is waiting to catch up to the United States...

    61. Re:Money Reader by Feyr · · Score: 1

      the OP's point is still valid, the blind guy knows how much he's paying, but the cashier could have quoted him an artificially inflated number, one that's higher than the register's, and pocket the money

    62. Re:Money Reader by ikkonoishi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah for one thing you can't stuff debit cards down a stripper's thong. And clubs already charge extra for blind people.

    63. Re:Money Reader by balsy2001 · · Score: 1

      I think you are giving politicians way to much credit.

      --
      GENERATION 27: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    64. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, there are groups that /should/ be paying for that, but they arent.

      Yeah, like her family.

      I could buy her one, but she needs to learn to be responsible for herself...

      Like having the gubbmint pay for it will teach responsibility.

      It's funny how you're a "pull yourself up by the bootstraps" Reagan conservative when *you* have to pay, but when the money can come out of someone else's pocket, you're a nanny state Jimmy Carter liberal.

    65. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?
      Nope.
      Nope, haircut place takes credit.
      Don't read the newspaper, but if I did, the local stand takes credit.
      Nope, coffee place has a swipe-it-yourself thing at the register.
      Don't ride the bus (I walk to work), but if I did then I'd use credit to get the monthly pass.
      Nope, I run a tab in bars and pay it all right when I leave. Usually they know me, but if they didn't, handing them a card would be enough for them to hold open a tab.

      I'm with the above poster on this one, cash is an outdated form of payment. I make an ATM withdrawl about once a month, usually only for $20-40. Most of that money goes into vending machines for sodas, after one token purchase somewhere which converts it into $1 bills. Everything, and I mean everything, else is paid for with a card swipe.

      There are still a whole host of low value transactions where cash is the most appropriate way to pay.

      I honestly cannot think of any. In this always on, always connected world, it just takes a swipe and 3-5 seconds. For anything less than $20, I don't even have to sign a slip of paper afterwards.

      Cash is dead.

      That said, I agree that the US needs better currency. Different sized bills, different primary color schemes (to help the partially blind, who can see somewhat, but not clearly enough to make out text), etc. Other countries currency is decades ahead of ours.

    66. Re:Money Reader by daeg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tell that to the working class poor who don't make enough money to bother with banks, or to the inner city poor who have to pay rent with cash or those living out of week-stay live-in motels.

      Want to see something sad? Next time gas prices are near $3/gallon, go inside a convenience store. Don't pick a nice one... pick one that you normally wouldn't go to. Now watch the stream of people file in and pull a single $5 out of their wallet and pre-pay for their gasoline. None of those people have a debit card.

      Blind people come in all walks of life.

    67. Re:Money Reader by Kangburra · · Score: 1
      Look, I feel for the handicapped....and I'm for helping them when it is practical, but, when it comes to something like changing all our money, something the overwhelming majority of people can deal with....do we have to cater to every minorities needs?


      Yes, you do. Almost everyone can be a minority in some way, at some time, and when you're discriminated against because of it you'll hate it.
      --
      Common sense is not so common
    68. Re:Money Reader by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      No, but this group said they would pay and so they should. Honestly, I do not think I agree with them paying for it either, but they did agree to it, even if they arent following thorought. Care to be any more ignorant while hiding behind the AC blinds Mr. Coward?

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    69. Re:Money Reader by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if this trend is happening elsewhere, but many stores in my area charge a fee to use debit cards.

      Some have a fee no matter what you owe. Some charge if it's under $x. Some don't charge at all, but it's becoming much more widespread.

      I've gone from being a debit card whore (hadn't carried a bill in my wallet in about 5 years) to cash again because of this.

      I wouldn't want to be forced to use my debit card and lose more money with every transaction just because I'm blind. There's not always another store a) nearby or b) carrying what I want.

    70. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct about quite a few places still refuse to take debit or credit cards.
      Example when I go to renew my Driver License I have to pay in cash or check.
      Another example when I go to pay my ad-valorem tax they only take cash or check, no debit card allowed.
      The state government, local county government, and local city government are much slower than the federal government when making changes for the better.

    71. Re:Money Reader by greoff · · Score: 1

      Sure, they could be scammed, but not without leaving a paper trail.

      If a cashier gives a blind person 2 5's instead of 2 20's, then later it is just the blind person's word against the company (since the blind person probably has no idea who the cashier was).

      Now, if the same thing happens with a debit/credit card, there is an auditable trail left -- the blind person leaves with a receipt and their bank has a record of the transaction.

      Not being able to read the receipt or the bill being padded with bogus charges are still problems that changing the money does not fix -- but those are not really problems wihtin the scope of this discussion.

      --
      I had the best sig, ever. But some fool tried to measure it. Now it is ruined.
    72. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather not see any blind people prepaying for gas... Unless it's for a lawn mower or something...

    73. Re:Money Reader by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Eliminating the dollar would simply provide an excuse to raise prices.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    74. Re:Money Reader by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1
      Raised bumps will be too easy to forge with the aim of tricking blind people as people with full vision will ignore the bumps.

      Two things...

      First, no matter what method a government uses to increase recognition of bills, the blind will always be more susceptible to fraud than others simple because money, by design, requires 2 or more people to make it 'worth' anything. Money has to 'change hands'. An 'evil' cashier is just as likely to report the wrong price as a blind person is to hand over the wrong value that the 'evil' cashier is to return (on purpose) the wrong value.

      Now, I worked as a cashier for a local grocery chain in High School. Cashiers can easily make mistakes, and commonly due at some point, where they, themselves return the wrong amount of change. For instances, I've bought beer at a bar with a $10 and received $12.50 back in change (plus the beer). The honest people, when they notice it, will point that out to the bar keep. But honest people night not notice it. They themselves will just grab the bills and stuff it into their pockets.

      So, the point I'm trying to make is, problems with money 'recognition', so to speak, occurs naturally by 'human error', irrelevant of visual abilities. Transactions requires 2 people, if one is blind, they can still be fooled by the 2nd party or make a natural mistake themselves. Changing the size of money doesn't necessarily mean these issues will magically go away.

      My second point would be simply... why not? Sure, there are always people resistant to change, but what good reason should the U.S. government not start making different sized money? Speaking from someone who's live a short time, as a student, in the London area, different sized money was barely noticeable by me. Which also makes me think, how much of a size difference is required for the blind to actually pickup the difference and to what are they comparing it with? "oh, I know this is a 5 note, and this bill is smaller so it must be a 1 note and this is larger, so it must be... either a 10, 20, 50, or 100 note".

      Also, a radio station I listen too on my morning commute was talking about this and a caller explained that blind people are taught to fold their bills certain ways to understand their value and when they receive their money at a bank they ask the cashiers to fold it for them. Also, this called claimed that the majority of blind people have a guide who go with them to places to avoid problems.

      Lastly, so a judge says that money is illegal... so, what should we do? Stop using money? Well, in America, that's not so hard, I've got a wallet of plastic I can choose from. =)

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    75. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blind people come in all walks of life.

      True, but hopefully, they aren't driving.

    76. Re:Money Reader by spathi-wa · · Score: 1

      India has had vision-impaired friendly currency for a few years now.

      For each of the notes listed here, you can see the symbol at your mid-left when viewing the front side, which is embossed and the security thread also has unique tactile feedback. I don't know how secure this is but its very helpful to the blind.

    77. Re:Money Reader by fitten · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have seen a few vending machines that take plastic. The hotdog vendor on the corner probably doesn't, though... but you shouldn't be eating those anyway :P

    78. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's aboout equality. If your argument really holds water, then you'll have no problem with this solution: Outlaw cash.

    79. Re:Money Reader by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Not at all - he's simply saying that because one can get by pretty easily these days without using cash at all, then changing our entire system of money seems a bit extreme."

      Then use your plastic to buy a new deflector beanie, because yours isn't working if you don't mind using a payment system that allows others to track any and every purchase you make.

      Personally, I've been getting a lot of cash from work in the form of tips, and I like the idea of using it and being off the grid.

    80. Re:Money Reader by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      How many 10^N hours are lost each year in the U.S. alone because of a trivial issue like this?

      Consider a supermarket queue with 10 persons in line for each counter. If each person could save 1 second fetching the correct currency with accessible notes, every single person in the queue saves 10 seconds that day.

      As any programmer knows, a super-efficient operation which is executed 100 million times is no longer fast.

    81. Re:Money Reader by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      This is not a politically correct opinion, but I would much rather this be your mom's $200 problem than mine (and every other taxpayers). I personally think that we have gone way overboard in this country catering to everyone and all their problems.

      To be honest, $200 is really a small amount in the grand scheme of things, especially if this helps her live her life. I am sure she spent many times that amount on medical care or training.

      Hell, you are her son, buy her one for Christmas!

    82. Re:Money Reader by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      The problem is if you keep the existing paper currency in circulation and production while producing a different type, the populace probably just keeps on using the current style. Likewise, as a maker of machines that handle the money, why expend money to change them to the new system when the old stuff still works?

      You have to discontinue the paper equivalent if you want people to use the coins.

      Cost wise it saves us a couple hundred million a year in production costs by going to dollar coins, mostly because the lifespan of coins is much greater than that of paper bills.


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    83. Re:Money Reader by Lumpy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Because you don't use cash any longer, no one does.

      Translation: I am a self adsorbed snob that wants all the poor people to go to jail or get their dirtyness away from me. Handle money? Gawd! what uncivilized planet are you from?

      Where do they find these people with no idea of reality and why the hell do they bring them here?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    84. Re:Money Reader by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      Actually, my problem is more along the lines of $200 is a ridiculous amount to spend for something like that. The comment was mostly in regards to the person asking how much it costs. $50-$100 seems a lot more reasonable given what it does.

      As for $200 not being much - that depends entirely on how much you make.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    85. Re:Money Reader by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't cost millions to change the processes, nor "billions" to change cash-counting machinery. I'm baffled as to why MY post gets pegged as flamebait and your doesn't. As pointed out by others better informed than myself, the US currency fails to support the needs of the visually impaired and, since the law states that discrimination against the visually impaired is illegal, should be replaced. Even if it costs you an extra dollar this year, which I take it is what you are really complaining about.

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    86. Re:Money Reader by winnabago · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you are, but there is a big difference between debit-as-debit and debit-and-credit. In almost all cases, with only a few exceptions that I've ever seen, debit with a PIN number is free, because the bank pays for the transaction. If you hit "credit", then the normal Mastercard 30 cents + 3% is charged to the store. This is why we see credit card minimums everywhere, but abundant offers of "cash back" with a debit card - because it's free for them. Are they really charging you for the right to use a debit card? I would stop shopping there, it's a scam.

      --
      Dammit Otto, you have lupus.
    87. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent meant that slashdot readers are blind.

    88. Re:Money Reader by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I think the fed has a policy never to recall currency. That's made the dollar one of the most stable currencies in the world, current fiscal policy notwithstanding.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    89. Re:Money Reader by thrillseeker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Want to see something sad? Next time gas prices are near $3/gallon, go inside a convenience store. Don't pick a nice one.

      When I visit just such a convenience store once a week to buy gas, and have to pay cash about every other time because the damn pump card reader is out-of-order, I see just such people walking in and cashing government checks - and then buying 2 cartons of cigarettes and $100 of lottery tickets. My sympathy meter is pretty much broken.

    90. Re:Money Reader by acvh · · Score: 1

      this kind of behavior most likely violates the terms of whatever merchant processing service they use. tacking on a charge to use credit is definitely not allowed, and as most debit cards get processed through the same system I'd bet that one is not allowed either.

    91. Re:Money Reader by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      We change our money with some frequency as it is. A phase-in need not be that painful.

    92. Re:Money Reader by UdoKeir · · Score: 1

      Have you seen a stripper with her knickers full of dollar coins? It's not a pretty sight, let me tell you.

    93. Re:Money Reader by Thansal · · Score: 1

      The thing that alot of peopel are not mentioning are low population areas. You will find alot mroe places that dont' take CCs in those areas.

      An as everyone points out, any place that works on selling a high volume of low cost items (hotdogs, coffe, icecream, etc) will not take CCs, or will have a minimum purchace.

      I used to work in an icecream shop in a college town, all of the college kids (my self included) had debitcards, and never caried cash. The guy who ran the store did get a CC machine, but placed a $5 minimum, as he literaly would lose money on each transaction otherwise.

      we also had a guy who was blind (worked for the college) that came in relatively frequently. It was not uncommon for one of us to pick out the proper bill from his wallet, or let him know just what he had, otherwise he just worked on memory of what he had, and hoped people were honest with him.

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    94. Re:Money Reader by Nf1nk · · Score: 1

      The Iodine pens that is why I spray starch my 1s and 5s it gives them a nice crispy apearance and makes any 20s + tha rub against them give a false positive. hail Eris.

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
    95. Re:Money Reader by Gospodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I never said that I never use cash; I said (actually, OP said) that it was possible to use no (or very little) cash. All the examples you gave are quite easy to pay for with a debit card. (The newspaper is the most problematic one, although bookstores and convenience stores sell them and take debit cards. And I should note that you aren't buying newspapers from street corners if you're blind.)

      So here's the deal. On one hand, we can spend huge amounts of money to change our money system. This means changing money readers in vending machines, retraining sales clerks, changing our printing systems, dealing with fraud during the changeover, etc., etc. It's simply a huge project. On the other hand, we could ask the blind, who have been dealing with this without the benefit of ubiquitous debit cards ever since paper money has been around, to keep dealing with it in an environment more convenient for them than ever before. Maybe I'm hardhearted, but this seems like a really simple choice. We shouldn't have to make huge changes to accommodate every handicap people have.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    96. Re:Money Reader by x_MeRLiN_x · · Score: 1

      You don't need to be blind for that to be a problem if the store doesn't price the items on the shelf. Most people have a general idea of an item's worth and would obviously not be happy handing over $100 for a candy bar for example.

    97. Re:Money Reader by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      Not everywhere takes credit/debit: try using one on a coke machine or at a hot dog stand and prepare to go thirsty/hungry
      i don't think it's fair to count vending machines due to the fact that : 1. many take coins which blind people can sort out just fine, 2. the machine won't take one bill and say it's another
    98. Re:Money Reader by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Funny

      What I want to know is, where is this gas station, where blind people are lining up to pay $5 in cash to get gas for their car? I don't want to be ANYWHERE near where blind people are driving!!!!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    99. Re:Money Reader by CommunistHamster · · Score: 1

      Notes are not the only form of cash. I pay for those things that you mentioned with coins, which are perfectly distinguishable by the blind.

    100. Re:Money Reader by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      Yes! And we must protect a blind persons ability to buy pot. I mean, they could go even more blind!

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    101. Re:Money Reader by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      If you can't see the striking impracticality of paying for everything with coins, I'll give you a hint; it rhymes with 'ass'.

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    102. Re:Money Reader by Alphager · · Score: 1

      Such a card-only lifestyle would be unthinkable in europe. Not because of lack of vending-points(you can pay practically everywhere with your creditcard), but because of the lack of privacy: Your card-issuing organization has a profile of your buying-habbits.

    103. Re:Money Reader by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 1

      Yes, they really are charging for debit use. I have no credit card accessibility from my bank card. You'll see signs posted "$0.25 fee for purchases under $5/$10". The Subway down the road from my work charges $.25 per transaction. The variety store beside it does the same. Some places, if you are a regular, don't bother with it but it is practiced.

      I work about an hour and a half from where I live and the same thing goes on at stores back at home, too. Southwestern Ontario.

      Your comment about not shopping there is easier said than done. I live in a city of about 350K people. I can pick and choose much more easily there than residents of small communities can.

      I know there are a fair number of Canucks on /., perhaps some of them have seen this in their neck of the woods.

    104. Re:Money Reader by syrinx · · Score: 1

      Except they actually *made* money on the quarters thing. (More people saving them = free money for the mint).

      And the dollar coins would be fine if they'd STOP PRINTING DOLLAR BILLS. Can't figure out why they won't. (Oh right, because Sen. Kennedy represents the paper industry, and Sen. Lott represents the cotton industry, both of whom would lose out if the government stopped making as many 'paper' bills.)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    105. Re:Money Reader by Sayan · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that Indian currency has different and logical sizes for both notes and coins.

      I was surprised to see that US coin size / thickness has nothing to do with the value of the coin. The dime (10 cents) coin is smaller than the 5cent coin or the 1 cent coin! Absurd !

      and don't even get me started on the metric system. The United States is an original signer of the 1875 Metric Treaty, however it shares the unique & dubious distinction along with Liberia & Myanmar of not implementing the metric system.

      --
      resurrect my .sig
    106. Re:Money Reader by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      are the readers free?

      Well, you can use a cell phone camera to do OCR on the giant "20" in the corner of a $20 bill, and you can get a cell phone with a camera for free from most cell phone companies, so I'd say yes (more or less).

    107. Re:Money Reader by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking of the U.S. Coinage Act of 1965, which disallows demonetization of U.S. coins or currency. It doesn't disallow taking them out of circulation, though, which just means you'll have the bills floating around for a while. But yep, unless the law is changed, they'll always be legal tender.

    108. Re:Money Reader by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps you have changed your lifestyle to fit your no cash utopia, but to suggest that others do likewise because they had the misfortune to be born blind or to have lost their eyesight is plain wrong."

      I agree that we ought to have more easily distinguishable currency, both for the blind and for other practical reasons, but this is a pretty poor argument. These days, doing without cash is a perfectly viable option. As you pointed out, there are plenty of situations where it isn't the MOST preferable option, but it is a perfectly good one. It is not "just plain wrong" to suggest that a small percentage of the population might choose an alternative that works better for their circumstances.

      In essence, you are saying that it isn't enough to make sure that the handicapped are accomodated -- that we should instead go to great expense to change our infrastructure so that the best option for you is also the best option for them. Fact is, their circumstances are different, and there is a perfectly good alternative for them, there is nothing wrong with suggesting that the expense to the country of changing our currency outweighs the convenience benefit it would provide to a small minority of the population.

      You make it sound as though expecting a handicap to change someones lifestyle is a nazi attitude or something.

      We expect the blind to use a cane or a seeing eye-dog when walking around town. We don't remove all the curbs, bumps, fire hydrants, and mailboxes so that they won't have to. We publish books in braille so that they can be read by the blind, but we don't mandate that every book you open have printing on one line and braille right below it so that they won't have to order the braille edition. We build "doorbells" that come with flashing lights for the deaf, but we don't insist that all doorbells be installed with one so that they won't have to go out of there way to get the special kind. We put ramps and elevators in our buildings so that people in a wheelchair can get up and down, but we don't replace every staircase.

      If we decide it's "wrong" to expect the differently abled to choose different options, what do you have in mind for automobiles? How do you think we should change them so that nobody has to adopt mass-transit just because they had the misfortune to be born blind? How do you think we should change the radio so that the deaf can listen too?

      In the particular case of our currency, I happen to agree with you in thinking that changing it is worthwhile. It isn't that difficult or costly, and there are a lot of good reasons to do it, of which convenience to the blind is just one. But it isn't unreasonble or elitist for us to question where that cost to benefit ratio lies.

      Your argument is unsound.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    109. Re:Money Reader by joto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, nobody is asking you to "make huge changes to accomodate every handicap people have". What is suggested is something that will benefit everyone. If a blind man can't feel the difference between different coins and bills in his wallet, neither can you. And if a blind man can feel the difference, so can you. No longer will you have to fiddle in bad light, trying to determine which is which. All you have to do is put your hand in your wallet, and you will immediately feel which coins/bills you have there.

      Basically, this is a common sense thing, that everybody else in the world does already. But I guess, America, Gods chosen country, the land of the free, etcetera, etcetera, really want to discriminate against as many disabled groups as possible, and in the process make life more cumbersome for all.

    110. Re:Money Reader by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Because you don't use cash any longer, no one does..I'm sorry, but I'm the other way around, I prefer to use plastic as little as possible. Why?
      Simply because I have no interest in giving all my shopping habits to banks and credit card institutions. Same with store reward cards that give you a miniscule discount, but allows the stores to know exactly what you are shopping, when you are shopping etc.

      Cash leaves no trails and you spend less when using cash than when using plastic.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    111. Re:Money Reader by jcgf · · Score: 1

      Blind people don't usually pull up to gas pumps regardless of what a gallon of gas goes for ;)

    112. Re:Money Reader by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The inability to distinguish notes is quite a big deal to the substantial number of people with sight discibilities.

      If a Coke machine can be designed to tell the difference between a $1 and a $10, then a pocket-sized bill scanner can be designed to do the same thing.

      The government could build these and distribute them free of charge to any sightless person who requested one for far less money than overhauling the entire bill production system.

    113. Re:Money Reader by idonthack · · Score: 1
      are the readers free?
      Are wheelchairs?
      No, but neither are eye transplants.
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    114. Re:Money Reader by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      I have never, not once, experienced a time when I needed to use paper money but couldn't read it. You can choose not to believe this if you wish.

      As for the second part of your post, it's just silly anti-Americanism that I'm not going to stoop to responding to.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    115. Re:Money Reader by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about gas? Blind people drive?

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    116. Re:Money Reader by Columcille · · Score: 1

      The US is the onlycountry on earth with notes that are indistinguishable from one another for the blind.

      Somehow I doubt that you really know that. You've examined the currency from every country on earth?

      --
      I love my sig.
    117. Re:Money Reader by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I use a credit card for all of those things. Your unsubstantiated claim that cash is best for low-value transactions is absurd! I much prefer swiping my card to counting and keeping track of change. It is faster, easier, less prone to error... it beats cash in EVERY way. Why on earth would you prefer to wait for them to open the register and count change when you buy coffee? Nothing is gained. Time is wasted.

      Have you ever been to a bar? You don't swipe your card for every drink. You hand them your card when you get your first drink and say "leave it open."

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    118. Re:Money Reader by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've been getting a lot of cash from work in the form of tips, and I like the idea of using it and being off the grid.

      Also known as tax evasion? I'm assuming tips are taxable income.

      --
      I love my sig.
    119. Re:Money Reader by drew · · Score: 1
      Hm, I have yet to see a free money or debit card reader anywhere


      That's funny, because I see a free debit card reader at every store I walk in to. About the only time I ever use cash is on road trips (mostly for drive-throughs) or if I'm buying something for my wife that I don't want her to see on the credit card statement the next day (and occasionally if I don't want to get harassed about buying a new computer game).

      My sister in law isn't blind, but she can't use cash- she gets a skin rash from handling coins (except pennies, i think) because of one of the metals that they use. She literally puts everything she ever buys on a card, so it's certainly possible.
      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    120. Re:Money Reader by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Tell that to the working class poor who don't make enough money to bother with banks

      Two words....Credit Union. Their goal is to serve the underserved. The exact people that you are referncing and the banks don't want.

    121. Re:Money Reader by joto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Such a card-only lifestyle would be unthinkable in europe. Not because of lack of vending-points(you can pay practically everywhere with your creditcard), but because of the lack of privacy: Your card-issuing organization has a profile of your buying-habbits.

      Huh?

      What the fuck do you mean? Where did you get the idea that every single european was a rabid privacy-nut trying to out-nut even EFF?

      There are plenty of people I know that use this card-only lifestyle. It's convenient to not have to carry a wallet. On the other hand, you have to balance it against the convenience of using small coins for buying a coke at a vending machine. This has nothing to do with being european or not. The things most people care about when deciding whether to use cash, or credit/debit card is:

      1. Does the bank/card-company take a processing fee, i.e. is cash cheaper?
      2. Hmm, this is a large purchase. I prefer to use a card so I don't have to walk around with all this cash in my pocket.
      3. Oh, I'm afraid of these card-terminals with all the scary buttons, what happens if I push the wrong one? And do I remember my pin-code?
      4. Wow, I should really pay for everything with my card. This way I can see what I wasted money on at the end of the month, and maybe in time get my finances sorted out, somewhat...
      5. I'm afraid to use a card. That way I don't get to "feel" how much money I spend. If I instead withdraw a fixed amount every week, I feel more in control of how much I spend.

      And that's about it. Privacy doesn't enter most peoples minds. Except perhaps to avoid having "unnecesarry" purchases show up on the bank transcript so their significant other can see how they waste their money.

    122. Re:Money Reader by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      and invested in machinery to make a whole new dollar coin

      If by "machinery," you mean "made coin dies", then, yeah, there's an investment. But it's not huge. The actual coin dies could fit in a soup can, and each pair of dies can mint thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of coins. They just install dies in a standard press, send blanks in, and get dollar coins out. when not making dollar coins, the same presses are used for other coins, so there's really no new infrastructure for the dollar coins.

    123. Re:Money Reader by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?
      Now that you mention it, I think the barber shop and the vending machines at work are the only place I ever use cash anymore. Fast food places, drug stores, grocery stores, etc. all take credit cards. I LOVE having the credit card purchases because I can track them via Quicken after downloading my transactions from the bank. I used to have $300 or $400 worth of cash withdrawals from ATMs to pay for lunch here or there but not I can track exactly where and when I spent money on food or goods and services.
    124. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Not because of lack of vending-points(you can pay practically everywhere with your creditcard), but because of the lack of privacy: Your card-issuing organization has a profile of your buying-habbits.
      The UK has cameras on every street corner... I really think they have bigger privacy concerns than you spent X number of dollars at store Y. It's not like Visa gets a detailed receipt of what you bought at a store so just avoid places like "Larry's House of Homosexual Love Toys".
    125. Re:Money Reader by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?"

      I never use cash. Hair Cuttery takes credit/debit cards (even for the tip). Wawa (like a 7-11, only better) sells newspapers and coffee and takes credit/debit cards (with no minimum purchase). I don't ride the bus, but I pay tolls with EZ-pass (which gets money transferred to it from a checking account or credit card). Bars I go to will either swipe the card every time you buy or will keep your card on hand and run a tab for you, then swipe your card when you're ready to settle up with them.

      I don't live in a major city, and I don't generally hang out in cities (not very fond of them). What planet/century is it that debit/credit cards aren't accepted for everything? Hell, even cab companies take them now.

      "Perhaps you have changed your lifestyle to fit your no cash utopia, but to suggest that others do likewise because they had the misfortune to be born blind or to have lost their eyesight is plain wrong."

      Why is it wrong? It's not my fault they're blind - complain to God about it. They should be thrilled beyond belief that they were born in a time and place where they can function as readily as they can in society, and that things have been made so much easier by inventions such as the credit card. Some people just don't seem to get that the word "handicapped" has a meaning, and it isn't "special". The word means that there are some things you can't do, and some things that are more difficult to do. It's not the government's fault, not my fault, and not anyone else's fault that you were born blind/without legs/attached to your twin/whatever. Sucks that you had the bad break, but get over it and be happy you live in a time when parents generally don't just leave handicapped children in a field to die. Be happy so many accomodations have been made to make your life easier instead of constantly bitching that everyone isn't bending over backwards far enough to erase the fact that you're handicapped. Holy mother of Christ - between this and the Target website thing, I'm about ready to start campaigning for the repeal of the ADA and a return to how handicapped peoples' complaints used to be handled (ie ignored).

      "The US is the onlycountry on earth with notes that are indistinguishable from one another for the blind."

      Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.. .. WWWWWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaa.... Other countries have money that looks so much like monopoly money that I honestly don't get how their people tell the real stuff from the counterfeit. With the direction our money design is already going without this garbage, I see plenty of people who look at it now and wonder out loud whether it's real. Every time they add a watermark or a hologram or some other ridiculous "security feature", it serves only to put yet another version of our money out there and instill a sense amoung the population that it's impossible to tell the fake stuff from the real stuff. GREAT job, US Treasury Debt - just great.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    126. Re:Money Reader by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      1 year is probablly cutting it a bit tight.

      a staged system would probablly work better, something more like (where T is the introduction time)

      T+1 year =banks must only give out new currency
      T+2 years=shops must only give out new currency
      T+4 years=old currency may only be changed at banks

      A system like that would allow the bulk of money to leave circulation normally through banks replacing old notes while still fixing the issue fairly rapidly.

      i suspect that the ammount of money stored as cash in jars for long periods is only a very small fraction of the total money in circulation.

      As for cards i dunno what its like in the US but here in the UK small shops do not like cards (afaict small shops pay much higher fees than the big chains) and often either don't take them at all or only take them for purchases over a certain value.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    127. Re:Money Reader by jafac · · Score: 1

      The judge didn't say we have to FIX the problem.

      He said we had to start working on it.

      And besides, the Roberts Supreme Court is expected to strike this ruling down on appeal anyway.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    128. Re:Money Reader by tapehands · · Score: 1

      I'm in agreement, here...the only time I've ever heard anyone argue against debit/credit cards is when they think it's not "polite" to use it for small transactions, or when they think that everyone is going to steal their card's number to run up a bill.

      In response to the first issue, if a place is going to have a problem with small transactions, they usually post signs that state what their minimum required transaction is. If you don't feel like spending a minimum of $5 or $10 to shop at a location, either withdraw money from the ATM using your card, or shop somewhere else.

      As for the second one...would you rather be a blind person with a credit card, and possibly some small bills to handle the above case? Or a blind person with $500 in cash in your wallet? Heck...even $100 in cash would be a juicy target for someone with low moral standing. If every crook in the US knew that we were making it easier for blind people to carry cash, wouldn't that be a Bad Thing?
      (Yes, I am incredibly pessimistic when it comes to crimes. I'm sure it wouldn't change the crime rate against blind people at all, but if everyone stopped using cash, and started using something that required some form of security before it could be used, it would probably cut down on at least some crime - I suppose it'd be too much to ask the treasurey to come up with a biometric-secured card system to replace the current paper system.)

      The only real problem I haven't heard spoken of would be, "What if the cashier overcharged the blind person?" Worst case scenerio on this is that they'd have to call their bank/credit card company, and say that they'd been taken advantage of. It'd probably show up as duplicate charges, or a cash-back charge, which would be rather obvious - the bank/credit card company refunds the appropriate amount of money, and does the appropriate thing to make sure the person that caused the overcharge doesn't get to do it again.

    129. Re:Money Reader by jafac · · Score: 1

      There *IS* a lot of talk lately about eliminating the dollar bill.

      I think it's the lowest-value paper currency in the industrialized world - by something like a factor of 4.

      One thing would be nice though - if they'd stop making dollar coins the exact size of quarters.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    130. Re:Money Reader by igb · · Score: 1
      My wallet is actually a US one, book at Brookstone. As I like to think of myself of an international man of mystery, liable to be summoned to save the world on any continent, it doesn't just contain UK currency (tens and twenties: unless you're a criminal or a cashier you probably don't see fifties, and I doubt I've seen one in ten years). There's $10, 20 Euro and 5000 Yen in there as well. All the notes fit. I've seen US wallets which don't take UK notes, but here's a clue: the depth of the wallet might possibly be designed to match the depth of the notes.

      To me, the conclusive proof that American notes (except for the $20, I think) are indistiguishable is that US cashiers always, always say ``from ten'' or whatever as you hand the money over. That's unheard of elsewhere.

      ian

    131. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, being 10 year old data, it is out of date. The US is already phasing different colors into currency, and provides large unstylized numerals on the back. Only the 1 and 2 dollar bill have not gone through these redesigns.

    132. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing you MIGHT be suffering from man-purse syndrome.

    133. Re:Money Reader by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's out of date, but the different colors in new currency are designed to prevent counterfeiting, not for accessibility, and none of the changes do anything to help blind people. In any case, the link was posted to counter the argument that everyone else's currency is just as bad as that in the US; even if the colors were there from accessibility, we'd still be even with Brazil and just about no one else.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    134. Re:Money Reader by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Your unsubstantiated claim that cash is best for low-value transactions is absurd!

      Can you really use a credit card for all transactions in the US? In the UK most places won't accept cards for transactions under 5ukp since the credit card company charges the retailer for every transaction. Also, what to you do if you're giving a small amount of money to another individual? Do your friends all carry around credit card readers?

    135. Re:Money Reader by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Doing a blind-friendly redesign oughtn't be that hard really. We can already insert holograms and magnetic threading in them. Putting some raised dots in the corners--braille for the denomination--shouldn't be that hard at all. Most people probably wouldn't even notice. But the blind could just feel the corner and distinguish between a $1 and a $50.

      But since we're slowly moving to a cashless society, I don't really see this as a high priority. By the time the newly redesigned blind-friendly bills enter circulation widely such that blind people can always tell the denomination at least a decade or two will have passed. By that time we'll all be using wireless RFID chips implanted in the back of our necks to automatically debit our accounts (and allow the illuminati access to our movements/thoughts/soul).

    136. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss the point entirely. The guyn doesn't say he doesn't use cash. He says those who can't read the bills use a debit card. This is a problem WITH A SOLUTION. A solution that doesn't cost taxpayers and businesses billions to fix.

    137. Re:Money Reader by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Okay, I don't respect this anti-business attitude. There are dozens of low-margin businesses (usually small stores and restaurants) in my city and others in the US that DO NOT ACCEPT payment by credit or debit cards. They ONLY accept cash. So what you're really saying is that it's perfectly okay that those business owners are unable to serve customers who are blind. That's unfair not only to the blind potential customers, but also to the businesses.

      So here's the deal. On one hand, we can spend huge amounts of money to change our money system. This means changing money readers in vending machines, retraining sales clerks, changing our printing systems, dealing with fraud during the changeover, etc., etc. It's simply a huge project. On the other hand, we could ask the blind, who have been dealing with this without the benefit of ubiquitous debit cards ever since paper money has been around, to keep dealing with it in an environment more convenient for them than ever before. Maybe I'm hardhearted, but this seems like a really simple choice. We shouldn't have to make huge changes to accommodate every handicap people have.

      No, that is not the deal. Does the phrase "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private," sound at all familiar to you? Cash is the universal tender that you are falsely asserting credit and debit cards are. You are right; it is a simple choice. We must improve our money in order to support business, fulfill a moral obligation to not deprive our citizens who certainly did not choose to be blind (including people who born blind, as well as thos who lost their sight in industrial accidents or fighting to protect our country), and to obey the laws that we have created to ensure access for all citizens.

    138. Re:Money Reader by mrbester · · Score: 1

      Other countries have money that looks so much like monopoly money that I honestly don't get how their people tell the real stuff from the counterfeitNo, that would be the States, where the notes are all the same size (as in Monopoly). Enlightened countries have different sized notes, different coloured notes, raised areas IN THE SHAPE OF THE NUMBER so anybody can tell what note they are holding without being able to see it. Bunch of backward colonials is all you are.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    139. Re:Money Reader by elphins.son · · Score: 1

      The problem with debit/credit for blind people is that as technology improves, more and more systems are going to touch-screen setups... which blind people cannot see. Walk into any Target store across the US, and you will find that their card readers are nearly inaccesible to the blind, because to do anything with the card reader, one must push the completely visual buttons on the touch screen.

      Yes, this system can be worked around... it is possible to have the checker hit the proper sequence of keys to mark the purchase as a credit transaction, and then place the "pen" on the screen to let the blind person sign in the appropriate place. The point of the ruling as I read it though, is that while it is possible for the blind to use paper currency or work-arounds, it places and undue burden on them. It would seem to make sense that forcing the blind to use cards has the same effect, thus be something the ruling is intended to avoid.

      Now, to clarify... I personally don't believe that we need to redesign the currency. I would not be opposed to seeing it happen though (even at increased cost, including cost that I partially pay for), because yes, the US is behind most of the rest of the world in that regard.

    140. Re:Money Reader by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      Access improvements in general help everyone.

      Most slashdot folks are not old enough to remember things before the ADA. Lots of people complained bitterly about having to phase in curb cuts and ramps for wheelchair access when they started. They really used the same sort of words we see here.

      If you don't think you would miss them, don't take advantage of them when biking, boarding, or rolling equipment arround. There were no curb cuts in most towns when I was born.

    141. Re:Money Reader by FrostyWheaton · · Score: 1
      The United States is an original signer of the 1875 Metric Treaty, however it shares the unique & dubious distinction along with Liberia & Myanmar of not implementing the metric system.

      Being one of three does not make you 'unique'.

      --
      Comments should be like skirts. Short enough to keep your attention, but long enough to cover the subject
    142. Re:Money Reader by outsider007 · · Score: 1
      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    143. Re:Money Reader by Bob+Gelumph · · Score: 1

      When I came over to the UK with travellers cheques and was cashing them for £50 notes, I had to fold them in half to fit them in. Even £20 notes get majorly frayed at the top.

      --
      I'm gonna need a spec.
    144. Re:Money Reader by FrostyWheaton · · Score: 1
      You have an interesting definition of 'exact'.

      --
      Comments should be like skirts. Short enough to keep your attention, but long enough to cover the subject
    145. Re:Money Reader by itcomesinwaves · · Score: 1

      "How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?"

      No... You hand them your card when you order your first drink. You get it back when you're done and you pay. It's called a tab.

    146. Re:Money Reader by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I don't usually give my friends cash. If I want to buy them a drink, I just put it on my tab. If I want to give them money, I write them a check (or use my bank's web site to send them a check).

      There are some mom-and-pop restaurants that are cash-only or have $10 minimums for credit cards. Those are rare. I avoid them. The only time I carry cash is if I am going to a bar/club with a cover charge.

      When I am out-and-about I usually only take a credit card and a driver's license. It's all I need. And it doesn't leave a lump in my pocket.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    147. Re:Money Reader by mbstone · · Score: 1

      Blind people also need cash to pay for their discounted hunting licenses.

    148. Re:Money Reader by donaggie03 · · Score: 1

      But in order for this chain of reasoning to be valid each store would have to be required to display all thier prices in braille. Blind people can't read the printed prices on anything right now, so if they want to buy an item, a dishonest salesperson could quote a higher than actual price. This type of fraud would be just as easy as quoting the correct price and just charging more, or giving less change, etc. And the $100 candy bar isn't a very good argument either. This type of fraud is more likely to occur when a shirt costs $30 but the salesperson charges $40. Not that hard to notice the scam here is it?

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    149. Re:Money Reader by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 1

      ...dude, if you're going to be one of those self-serving assholes that hasn't yet caught up to the modern virtue of the pursuit of equality for all whenever possible, at least don't be the bitter kind. You are one of these people that make so many good points but for some reason think they have to be all inflammatory to get them across and in doing so simply make themselves very hard to relate to. And did you really just complain about how money looks? If you never use it, why do you care? Even if you do use it, why do you care? Is this just because it's a competition with other countries? Are you a teller or a cash register operator or someone else who is in a line of work in which it is important to be able to tell the difference between real and counterfeit money? I can't understand why you have such a strong opinion about this - it baffles me.

    150. Re:Money Reader by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Finding the correct note in your wallet is much slower with dollars than Euros or pounds.

      Well, if you arrange all your money to be oriented in the same way and increasing denomination, then you have no trouble or lost time getting your money out. If you are in a hurry on the way out, then you just jam the money in your pocket loose and put it in when you have time. This lowers errors and decreases access time.

    151. Re:Money Reader by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      If I want to give them money, I write them a check

      People still use cheques? wow, how quaint :)

    152. Re:Money Reader by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's taxable, and yes, I do report it. That doesn't change the fact that nobody but me really knows where, when and how I spend it.

    153. Re:Money Reader by Gospodin · · Score: 1

      Did anyone say that blind people aren't allowed to use cash? They certainly can - they simply have to get a little help or be a little ingenious. Some ways are to mark the bills by putting pin pricks in them, or keeping different types of bills in different pockets, or sticking little adhesive tabs to them. You could probably come up with dozens of methods if you gave it some thought. Failing all this, they can always just ask the sales clerk for help - most people are willing to help a blind person, especially if they're already in a service position.

      And for crying out loud, if every matter of inconvenience were a major moral issue, I could come up with any number of inconveniences to whine about. There's no question being blind is inconvenient. Changing our entire currency is far more so, though.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    154. Re:Money Reader by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?

      Did you just come from 1970? Who the heck still reads newspapers? Who rides the bus?

      There are still a whole host of low value transactions where cash is the most appropriate way to pay. Perhaps you have changed your lifestyle to fit your no cash utopia, but to suggest that others do likewise because they had the misfortune to be born blind or to have lost their eyesight is plain wrong.

      While I don't disagree about having the option of using cash, I don't see how cash is more "appropriate", or even easier, than using a debit/credit card for any of these things. Even for small things like a coffee (actually a Chai tea latte), I pay with a card. Why fumble with a bunch of change when I can just swipe a card?

      This isn't "changing your lifestyle", this is the way things are now. It's simply simpler and easier to pay with a card than with cash. If you still use cash, then you're making a choice to do so, and going to a lot of extra trouble to do so.

      BTW, I cut my own hair, I don't buy newspapers or bus tickets, and bars are for losers. If you go to a modern city like NYC, you buy your subway ticket with a card using an automated machine, not with cash.

      The US is the onlycountry on earth with notes that are indistinguishable from one another for the blind. Here's a hint, it's not because the rest of the world is waiting to catch up to the United States...

      Here's another hint: the ubiquity of debit/credit card acceptance has made any deficiencies with cash a very minor issue to most Americans (except those that like to operate under the radar of the IRS). Many of us just don't carry very much of it around--only for those very few places that are cash-only. Even McDonald's takes credit cards now, which wasn't the case 10 years ago.

    155. Re:Money Reader by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      When visiting the US I hate the currency. In the UK, most people don't look at the numbers on the notes. Blue is £5, brown is £10, purple is £20 and the rare £50 is red. Easy. Much easier than having to look at the numbers on each greenback. Faster too. As for the sizing, why on earth is this going to be a problem. Do you have that many cash readers that would object? After all most people think cash is dead so there cannot be that many of them around to convert over....and most UK cash readers use the notes size to actually determine the value, once it's scanned the Queens head or whatever it does to authenticate it as a real note. This is not flamebait although people may not see it that way. I've never understood why the US has bills the same size, being as no other country to my knowledge does it this way (and please correct me if I am wrong). It just seemed perfectly obvious to me that increasing size with increasing value benefits everyone and disadvantages no-one, unless of course you are stuck with a legacy system that you need to change.

    156. Re:Money Reader by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Also, note that you can't just use debit cards for everything. There are quite a few things in life that you do need cash for...

      Like what? Buying pot?

    157. Re:Money Reader by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Access improvements in general help everyone. Most slashdot folks are not old enough to remember things before the ADA"

      I think I remember...

      I guess I'm starting to get a little sensitive myself, to things like the ADA being abused. Seems that recently that a store, I think Target, was actually being sued because their website wasn't 100% compliant with a text reader. While it is nice to do that...does a site really by law have to have extra coding to make it work with text readers? What about other things that are more inheritly geared towards sighted people? Should the movie theater be sued since they don't have some method for describing to non-sighted people what the picture looks like...I mean, they can't see the actors facial expressions...and they might be closed captioned for the deaf..so, we're catering to the deaf and not the blind??

      Not trying to pick on the blind here...just was an example compared to the article. I'm for giving reasonable access to everyone..I agree it is in the best interest...it certainly would for private industry since they want everyone's dollars...but, that said, you need to draw the line at a reasonable point. Lets face it...a person with no arms, isn't going to be a good candidate for working on an auto assembly line. A deaf person isn't going to be well suited being a recording engineer...should these industries have to go out of their way to spend the time, and expense of figuring a way to let the handicapped people work there?

      Well, there is a huge expense in converting the money over...at least if they want this done quickly. I'm not against research for seeing if they can do raised lettering on the bills...but, they way money gets abused in its lifetime, I'm not sure if that is really a viable option. One suggestion was to make the bills all different sizes. Well, that not only cost the time and expense to the govt. for altering the printing/cutting methods...but, what about all the machines out now that would be instantly outdated for the new bill sizes they'd have to handle?

      Again, I'm not against trying to help handicapped people, but, at some point, the needs of the many, outweight the needs of the few...a simple thing like changing the bills could force major expenses on everyone, just to keep Vinny from getting ripped off getting a $1 back instead of a $20.

      I'm just asking, at what point does common sense kick in, and you admit you cannot accomodate everyone?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    158. Re:Money Reader by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      The next time I see a blind person prepaying $5 for gas, I'll be sure to let you know... :-)

      But seriously, you are 100% correct. There is a rather large population in the US that just can't / won't work with plastic money. That said, redesigning all US bills for a very small percentage of the population also doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I would think that impressing ridges somewhere on the bill would be fairly easy, but could open the door to fraud (false impressions.) Changing size would create a real problem for automation systems. I like the idea of a reader device - for the few "legally blind" people out there, they should be able to get one for little or nothing from the government / local bank / etc.

    159. Re:Money Reader by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You never use cash?

      Less than 2% of my gross income is spent as cash. 0% of my income is spent through checks. If you exclude the transactions with friends, less than 0.5% of my income is spent as cash. I know because I get cash as ATM withdrawls as my only source of cash and can track them back online for the past 7 years. So, between credit cards and online bill pay, I pay out around 60% of my gross income. What is left are taxes, direct deposits, bank transfers, and such. I may be unusual (I'm the only person I know with a checking account that writes less than one check a year), but I am where people are headed. Cash is annoying and certainly no longer necessary, though it is the preferred way for many people. With only the slighest of inconvenience, I could do away with cash completely (I would have to start writing checks again, though to get exactly the same effect), or with minor but noticable inconvenience, I could do away with both and be credit-only. I know some people that are. It is a marriage requirement because he has a spending problem and can only use credit so that it may be tracked by her (no, he's not whipped, he's irresponsible).

      Once there is an easy way to do garage sales without cash, cash will be gone. For now, cash is just about for garage sales only, and other such person to person sales.

    160. Re:Money Reader by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't that machine to handle different sized bills is hard, it's that you would have to replace ALL the hunderds of thousands / millions of machines that are currently in use which will cost tens to hundreds of billions of dollars. I agree that multi-colored money would be good, but that doesn't address the problem for blind people.

    161. Re:Money Reader by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The last time I was at the Department of Motor Vehicles, they did NOT accept plastic.
      And yes, blind people need to go there too, both because they can own a car even if they don't drive it, and because most state IDs are issued by the DMV whether you drive or not.

      Other places unlikely to take plastic include libraries, parks, prostitutes and churches (but I repeat myself).

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    162. Re:Money Reader by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase? "

      In a bar...I generally hand them my card when I go in...and run a tab. It makes it much easier to just drink as I want...trade rounds with others...and at the end of the night, just settle up, and give a good tip.

      I VERY rarely use or carry cash. It is a PITA to have to find a money machine usually...not one of my banks machines close by..and I refuse to use another ATM and pay fees to get at my own money.

      I like to use my Amex for pretty much everything...it IS my cash. At the end of the month, I can easily see where my money went, and pay it off in full.

      Now, to go 180 degrees on you...if I could find a more convienient way to get at my cash..i'd use it more...just to keep from being tracked by so many people on my spending habits. I'm starting to now use a toll bridge to go to the new job...and I'm having to make a weekly trip to an ATM to pay the $3 daily which sucks...so, maybe now that I'm forced to go to my bank..I'll use more cash, but, I really dn't like carrying cash..easy to lose or get ripped off...but, it does keep you anon.

      But, back to the post...sure, it is very easy to be virtually cashless...especially in a bar.

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    163. Re:Money Reader by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      Even as a libertarian, I agree that this is a better solution. If they changed the size of bills, the whole infrastructure would have to be remade. Giving vision-impaired folks a personal solution, while still costly, would be way smaller than a total re-do of currency.

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    164. Re:Money Reader by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      It drives me NUTS to be behind someone who uses plastic to buy a pack of gum. A 5-10 second transaction for $1.25 now takes 60 seconds or more. Yes, this happens. Happened several times in a row while I was waiting in line at an airport shop. I don't go anywhere without at least SOME cash for incidental purchases.

    165. Re:Money Reader by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      You hand them your card when you order your first drink. You get it back when you're done and you pay.

      I would NEVER EVER hand anyone my card to anyone for an extended period of time - especially in a situation as you described. In fact, I have never even heard of that practice.

    166. Re:Money Reader by pangloss · · Score: 1

      There *IS* a lot of talk lately about eliminating the dollar bill.

      I think it's the lowest-value paper currency in the industrialized world - by something like a factor of 4.If China is part of the industrialized world, then the one jiao note has the dollar beat quite handily:
      10 jiao = 1 yuan (RMB)
      8 RMB = 1 USD (or thereabouts)

      I even remember using two one-jiao notes to pay an attendant at the subway station in Beijing to park a bicycle at the subway station when I went to visit a friend last year.

    167. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand to a point that not everyone's from America, but for crying out loud, this is a discussion of American currency. Our grocery stores have lines not queues and dollars are bills not notes. On a more serious note, since there seem to be alot of international slashdoters commenting here, there have been several jokes made, but I havent seen an answer. If you have no lower valued "notes" what do you put in the stripper's g-string? (or are your strippers just really well paid?)

    168. Re:Money Reader by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "The problem with debit/credit for blind people is that as technology improves, more and more systems are going to touch-screen setups... which blind people cannot see. Walk into any Target store across the US, and you will find that their card readers are nearly inaccesible to the blind, because to do anything with the card reader, one must push the completely visual buttons on the touch screen. "

      How long before Target and other stores are sued into oblivion for these discriminatory card readers that are so visual? I'd say I was joking...but, it is only a matter of time.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    169. Re:Money Reader by Alphager · · Score: 1

      Huh?

      What the fuck do you mean? Where did you get the idea that every single european was a rabid privacy-nut trying to out-nut even EFF?

      I never said that.

      There are plenty of people I know that use this card-only lifestyle. It's convenient to not have to carry a wallet. On the other hand, you have to balance it against the convenience of using small coins for buying a coke at a vending machine. This has nothing to do with being european or not.

      Using cards in europe is as convenient as in the usa. However, cash is still the most-used payment form.
    170. Re:Money Reader by macdaddy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about all the primary education text books that will have to be changed to reflect the completely different styles of currency.

    171. Re:Money Reader by Don853 · · Score: 1

      I'm from the northeastern US, and the "$1.00 fee for credit transactions under $5.00" isn't exactly commonplace, but I've definitely seen it some places.

    172. Re:Money Reader by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Well, if my friend is particularly hip, I could buy Linden Dollars in SecondLife, then we could both log in to the game, and we could transfer them in virtual reality... That's the polar opposite of "quaint" :-)

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    173. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you're not an American. We'd say 8.5 x 11 or Letter sized paper :)

    174. Re:Money Reader by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      I agree, hence the last comment in my OP. Mind you the UK successfully stopped two large coins and added three more to all it's coin operated machines over the course of a couple of years (the resizing of 5p, 10p, 50p and additional of the £2 coin) so it presumably cannot be that hard provided they run in parallel.

    175. Re:Money Reader by Spud+the+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Canadian paper currency is all the same size, but it is of different colours. It also has raised dots which I thought was Braille denomination marks, but now that I look more closely, they seem the same on my 20 as 10 bills. Also, they seem to last as long as the note, especially if subjected to folding.

      --
      You can never put too much water in a nuclear reactor.
    176. Re:Money Reader by Spud+the+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Ah.. the dots do indicate denomination, they're just not Braille.

      --
      You can never put too much water in a nuclear reactor.
    177. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After completing a degree at wright state university, i am finding out that i miss the whole put money on your id and swipe it at all the vending machines and stores at the place. Currently at UIC for another degree (yes i'm crazy, i'm playing pokemon, gotta catch em all) and all the vending machines take is money, and most of the time they won't take dollars (they have the acceptors but they say correct change only). I sometime wish they'd just make it so you can use a debit card at the vending machines, would make it more convienient.

    178. Re:Money Reader by Sayan · · Score: 1

      point taken... its not unique but what about 'dubious' ? ;)

      --
      resurrect my .sig
    179. Re:Money Reader by lionforce5 · · Score: 1

      I'd probably stay away from a gas station that had blind people pre-paying for their gasoline. But that's just me.

    180. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't want to be ANYWHERE near where blind people are driving!!!!


      I recommend staying out of California, then.
    181. Re:Money Reader by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      WOW! Just recently I was talking with someone about how the US is so advance in so many ways yet the BLIND have no easy way to manage paper money. I even asserted that the Blind should have an organization to outright SUE the US government into action. IIRC, the person I spoke with is of Asian heritage, and I was told that in Japan (or maybe it was Korea) the paper currency has a texture or risen symbols to assist the blind know what they are handing to clerks or to others. Now, weeks later, this particular article is on Slash. So much for advancement in the US. Paper money IS costly to make, and the number of blind is vastly small, but that is no excuse to leave them at the mercy of any mischievous or mean clerks.

      A quick search of some possibly interesting URLs:

      How Does a Blind Person... ?
      http://www.blind.state.ia.us/curious/howdoes.htm

      "How does a blind person identify money?
      Coins can be distinguished by their size and the texture of their edges. Paper money is identified by folding the denominations differently."

      ---------

      Human Resources Code, State of Texas:

      http://tlo2.tlc.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/HR/conte nt/htm/hr.005.00.000094.00.htm

      ---------

      Does the US suck at design?
      The Difference Between the US and Switzerland
      http://headrush.typepad.com/creating_passionate_us ers/2006/07/does_the_us_suc.html

      ---------

      Blind Citizens News, January 1998
      http://www.bca.org.au/news9801.htm

      "There are so many wonderful things happening in Australia which NFBCA is taking the lead in promoting. We do not have a simple means of identifying paper money here."
      That was 1998; I don't know about now...
      -----------

      Bon...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    182. Re:Money Reader by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      At bars one just runs a tab--hand over the card, then at the end of the evening pay up. I found it rather annoying when in London none of the pubs would let me run a tab, so by the end of the night I'd piles of change.

    183. Re:Money Reader by joto · · Score: 1

      I never said that.

      Then please explain whatever else you may have meant by the two sentences quoted at the top of my post. Such a card-only lifestyle is not unthinkable in Europe. And if people choose to still use cash, generally, it will not be because of privacy concerns, but for practical reasons.

    184. Re:Money Reader by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Oops I missed your point, I follow now.

      --
      I love my sig.
    185. Re:Money Reader by dangitman · · Score: 1
      So, is there really a need to redesign the bills so that they're accessable to the blind?

      I'd say there is, even if it doesn't affect a lot of people. But US currency needs to be redesigned for other reasons as well. It is one of the easiest world currencies to counterfeit. The currency needs to be redesigned for this reason alone. This can be achieved with polymer currency that includes security mechanisms. Polymer currency also has the advantage of being more durable, and less of a health risk - they are easily washed, and don't absorb contaminants as easily as paper money. It's about time that US currency got with the times, it's quite backwards. Which is ironic for a currency that has such global importance, from a country that is considered a technological leader.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    186. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. Treasury, when it isn't releasing new notes, is designing new notes, to further prevent forgery. It would not be a problem at all to produce a new note, in fact it would be better for the security of the economy as it were, as the forgery artists would be put off for at least a little while by the new designs. However, making BIGGER notes might be an issue, as you would get less notes out of the same amount of material. Once its started though, no further adjustments required, so a one-off thing shouldn't be too much of a problem, and also different sizes would further confuse forgery artists.

    187. Re:Money Reader by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      ...Vending machines?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    188. Re:Money Reader by rootEToTheIPi · · Score: 1
      much currency has only an 18-month lifespan

      If that's true, then why do I keep seeing bills from the 80s and 90s? I work in a convenience store and I see a lot of bills.
      --
      When it comes to pastry theft, I take the cake.
    189. Re:Money Reader by mehgul · · Score: 1

      Boo-boo ! A few years ago, 11 countries of the EU almost all simultaneously changed their coins and bills in a matter of a few weeks*. Surely, a strong big boy like the US can do it, no?

      *Not only that, but even before the Euro, several countries (I'm thinking e.g. of Germany and France) used to change coins and bills regularly, to up the difficulty against counterfeiters.

    190. Re:Money Reader by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I've seen plenty of vending machines with card readers, especially on college campuses.
      Besides, who wastes money in vending machines on a regular basis anyway?

    191. Re:Money Reader by Gospodin · · Score: 1
      A few years ago, 11 countries of the EU almost all simultaneously changed their coins and bills in a matter of a few weeks.

      Yes, and it cost around $100 billion. Not really a great argument in favor.

      Also, changing bills and coins regularly makes it easier to counterfeit, not harder. Think about this for two seconds.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    192. Re:Money Reader by dangitman · · Score: 1
      What about the cost of leasing the card reader? That's usually pretty substantial for smaller businesses. The credit/debit systems tend to have the worst impact on smaller operations - the places where you still get friendly face-to-face service, and the money goes more directly to help the family/community. Changing the money (and the ATM machines, vending machines etc.) mostly impacts the huge companies who provide anonymous/poor service and already have piles of cash.

      I know who I'd rather have the burden fall upon.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    193. Re:Money Reader by dangitman · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how often both abbreviations are relevant.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    194. Re:Money Reader by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Which would mean we can charge for different colored iPods based on the color of your notes! What's not to love?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    195. Re:Money Reader by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      ...High-school students?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    196. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an exaggeration. Besides most of those cameras are of low quality so likely would not reliably identify me, also there is no practical way of using those cameras to actually track my movements, you have to first suspect that I was somewhere and then check the footage on the camera. Using a card pinpoints my location at the time I was using it. There isn't any real reason to hide my movements, but there isn't any real reason for other people to know them either. Mainly I prefer cash because I don't want shops using my card to track my spending habits, and to a lesser extent in that it helps me keep an eye on how much I'm spending.

    197. Re:Money Reader by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1
      Does the phrase "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private," sound at all familiar to you?

      That doesn't compel businesses to accept cash. All that means is that any debt adjudicated or compelled by a US court must be accepted in US currency.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    198. Re:Money Reader by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      "Now watch the stream of people file in and pull a single $5 out of their wallet and pre-pay for their gasoline. None of those people have a debit card."

      Unfair I say! I buy gas $5 at a time, and I've got 3 debit cards! Granted I'm an outlier since I live 2 miles from work and I drive an econobox.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    199. Re:Money Reader by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      "you spend less when using cash than when using plastic."

      Really? (not tring to be or sound sarcastic) I've found that cash has a magical property that burns a hole in my pocket, where as plastic (I use only debit) pretty much sits there and I don't spend nearly as much.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    200. Re:Money Reader by Kesh · · Score: 1
      Did you just come from 1970? Who the heck still reads newspapers?

      Well, at least we can lump you in with our esteemed President. Point of fact: if people didn't read newspapers, newspaper companies would be out of business. Given the sheer number of newspaper companies across the nation, I'd say people are buying plenty of 'em.

      Who rides the bus?

      Anyone who can't afford a car, can't find reasonable parking, doesn't want to drive, can't drive for a medical reason, car has broke down, etc.

      If you still use cash, then you're making a choice to do so, and going to a lot of extra trouble to do so.

      You're not even trying, now. Not everyone has a credit line for a credit card, or a bank account. Cash is still the default for a lot of transactions in this country.

    201. Re:Money Reader by jcr · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't cost millions to change the processes, nor "billions" to change cash-counting machinery

      Oh well, if you simply deny facts, then anything is possible! Have you priced bill counters? Do you have any idea how many businesses have them?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    202. Re:Money Reader by Xaria · · Score: 1

      Nonsense - US currency is one of the easiest in the world to counterfeit. Ever had a look at an Australian note? DAMN hard to counterfeit. I laugh at your paper currency - HA HA HA HA

      Seriously, though - it's not that big a deal to change currency. Transition over a period of a year or two. And while you're at it, get rid of $1 and $2 notes and switch to nice compact coins ;)

    203. Re:Money Reader by mehgul · · Score: 1

      Your link is a bit light on details, especially when it's been written 3 years before the real appearance of coins and notes. I haven't been able to find a clear figure, but let's assume yours is right. In this article, however, some economist seems to imply that the cost will be recouped within 5 years. It's specifically for Dutch businesses, but I don't see why it would be different everywhere else.
      Now, I think the cost of changing mere bits of paper and metals must have been chump change compared to the lost ability to run deficits or devaluate, for example (Germany seems to have suffered a lot from that).

      In addition, $100bn might look like a lot to us mere mortals, but if you spread it over countless businesses (the small article actually doesn't even say if the affected businesses include those of UK, Sweden, Denmark, others), it probably is much less impressive. Just think about the war in Iraq, more than $300bn and counting, and it doesn't look to me like the population of the US is starving, neither are the businesses collapsing. Plus, the US is not in the same situation as the EU, and it's absolutely not needed to change everything in just a few weeks: a few years would do.

      Now, honestly, I don't care that much if you change your bills or not, as I'm not planning on simultaneously going blind and moving to the US anyway. I was just saying, if the EU can do it without being too affected (and honestly, we don't hear that many businesses complaining on this side), it's not out of reach of the US.

      Finally, and sorry for this long piece, I'm sorry but I absolutely don't see how raising the bar makes counterfeiting easier. It's not like the banknotes and the coins were changed each and every year and confusing the hell out of the people. It's more like with home scanners and printers getting so advanced, it would have been really easy for any dude with less than $500 equipment to be able to start counterfeiting if no change was introduced.

    204. Re:Money Reader by Gospodin · · Score: 1
      ...some economist seems to imply that the cost will be recouped within 5 years.

      Sure, but that's because there was a tangible benefit to creating the Euro zone: lower transaction costs, for one thing. There is no such benefit to changing our currency. Making it harder to counterfeit is a benefit, but we're already taking steps to do that without radically changing our system.

      Just think about the war in Iraq, more than $300bn and counting, and it doesn't look to me like the population of the US is starving, neither are the businesses collapsing.

      The implication seems to be that any plan that doesn't cause widespread economic collapse is a bargain. Is that really what you meant?

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    205. Re:Money Reader by IdleTime · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is a fact. There has been numerous studies on the topic and they all show the same.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    206. Re:Money Reader by mehgul · · Score: 1
      Sure, but that's because there was a tangible benefit to creating the Euro zone: lower transaction costs, for one thing. There is no such benefit to changing our currency.
      You'll get no argument from me on that point. I never thought the contrary. You probably won't gain much. Don't do it.

      Making it harder to counterfeit is a benefit, but we're already taking steps to do that without radically changing our system.
      I guess it would be possible not to change radically your system and still have different sized bills. Like only changing the length and not the width? Some other people in this discussion were talking about colors or more depth.

      The implication seems to be that any plan that doesn't cause widespread economic collapse is a bargain. Is that really what you meant?
      No. You're pushing it and you know it. I'll say this again, very clearly I hope: nobody in Europe ever talks about the cost of having had to change for new bills and coins, neither in direct or indirect cost (like changing vending machines modules, training people, reprogramming ATMs, etc). It probably means that it wasn't that difficult to bear after all. Actually I'd say it was more like "business as usual", since it was the same cost as getting new national banknotes and coins, and those things were happening more or less regularly anyway.

      I'll summarize in a few words my main idea: it's doable, and probably looks much more difficult than it really is. But I'm neither an American voter or taxpayer, so I'll shut up here.
      Good night, it's getting late.
    207. Re:Money Reader by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      If the US treasury is any good at its job then it already has plans in place to change the currency. There is a continual change in banknote design anyway so much of any additional cost would disappear into the existing budget for upgrading the existing notes.
      1 billion dollars buys 3,731343 ABC1150 Commercial Bill Counters which, it must be pointed out, comes with the ability to cope with different sizes of banknote. This allows for 1 new bill counter for every 100 people in the US - a ratio I am sure that does not need to be met. There will be many, many bill-counting machine in use that will not need to be changed when the currency does.

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    208. Re:Money Reader by terrymr · · Score: 1

      To quote my bank. "Credit card minimums and surcharges are prohibited by Visa/Mastercard merchant agreements and are illegal in many states. Do not purchase anything from such a merchant and report it to us."

      I'm in the USA btw.

    209. Re:Money Reader by djp928 · · Score: 1

      Or, alternately, maybe she *does* have the money, and just can't tell.

      -- Dave

    210. Re:Money Reader by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      The US is the onlycountry on earth with notes that are indistinguishable from one another for the blind. Here's a hint, it's not because the rest of the world is waiting to catch up to the United States...

      Not to mention they can even be difficult to distinguish at a quick glance by a sighted person. Most countries also use wildly different colours and/or shapes to distinguish denomination.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    211. Re:Money Reader by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      So here's the deal. On one hand, we can spend huge amounts of money to change our money system. This means changing money readers in vending machines, retraining sales clerks, changing our printing systems, dealing with fraud during the changeover, etc., etc. It's simply a huge project.

      {yawn} Sure. It's a huge process. Canada has changed our paper currency no less than twice in my lifetime. Our economy didn't crash as a result.

      Training sales clerks? Why, because the bills are different colours and have raised print in the corners? Money readers? Nay. The identifying marks are still on the bottom portion of the bill. New readers are enhanced to look for the more modern counterfeit devices. Changing printing systems? BFD. Fraud? The new bills have more anti-fraud technology than the old ones. p.s.; U.S. currency is so easy to counterfeit your government would probably save billions by updating it to the standards your International friends enjoy. There goes your printing systems argument.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    212. Re:Money Reader by Demiansmark · · Score: 1

      By government checks I assume you mean food stamps, which cannot be used to buy either cigarettes, lottery tickets, alcohol, or pre-made food (i.e. a sub at public). So either the gas station you go to is acting illegally or you're just one of those 'all poor people are poor because they're living it up off of government money' kind of bitcher without any real knowledge of government programs, poverty, and economics.

    213. Re:Money Reader by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Point of fact: if people didn't read newspapers, newspaper companies would be out of business.

      That's what advertising is for; after all, your $0.75 probably wouldn't cover the printing and distribution costs of a newspaper if it weren't for all the ads inside.

      That's why all the newspapers now have these cool new things called web sites. When I want to read the news, I go to my local newspaper's website. It's free, it's much faster than messing with paper, and I don't get that nasty newsprint residue on my fingers.

      Given the sheer number of newspaper companies across the nation, I'd say people are buying plenty of 'em.

      Most of these companies have the aforementioned websites. The NY Times is one of the biggest. I believe the number of actual newspapers being sold has declined in the past decade; most of the people still buying them are probably older people who don't use computers.

      Who rides the bus?
      Anyone who can't afford a car, can't find reasonable parking, doesn't want to drive, can't drive for a medical reason, car has broke down, etc.


      This assumes that the person lives in a place where bus transportation is available and usable. There's a lot of places in the US where this just isn't the case. I guess you never leave whatever dense urban area you live in.

      You're not even trying, now. Not everyone has a credit line for a credit card, or a bank account. Cash is still the default for a lot of transactions in this country.

      No, at all the places I go to regularly, most people pay by credit or debit card, though some use cash. While cash is still available, I wouldn't call it the default. And what's more important is how often are you forced to use cash? There just aren't very many places that do any more.

      No, not everyone has good enough credit for a credit card, but there's no reason for anyone to not have a bank account, unless they're some kind of criminal or something. Most regular jobs now require you to have a bank account for direct deposit or else you won't get a paycheck.

    214. Re:Money Reader by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut?

      They take plastic.

      Buying a newspaper?

      I have a subscription, and that's paid for with online bill payment.

      Buying a coffee?

      I brew my own, from freshly-ground beans. I even have a roaster and can go from green beans to coffee in 15-20 minutes, but I've not fired it up in a while. Friends don't let friends buy Charbucks.

      In any case, last time I was in one, even Charbucks takes plastic.

      Buying a bus ticket?

      What are those? I drive to work...and yes, the gas pump takes plastic. It's more convenient than cash, as you'd have to go inside to pay cash, pump your gas, and then go back inside for your change.

      How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?

      No. I start a tab and pay for whatever I ate and drank at the end.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    215. Re:Money Reader by Mouse42 · · Score: 1
      You never use cash? Not for getting a haircut? Buying a newspaper? Buying a coffee? Buying a bus ticket? How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?

      ... Yes. The only time I ever have cash is when someone gives it to me. Then I promptly deposit it in the bank.

    216. Re:Money Reader by mattshadbolt · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't have to be so extreem... Australian notes fit comfortably into any wallet.

    217. Re:Money Reader by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      There are still a whole host of low value transactions where cash is the most appropriate way to pay.

      True, and time is a factor as well. Paying electronically for things like lunch, bus tickets, etc. generally takes 5 to 10 times longer as it does with cash. That's important when there is a queue.

    218. Re:Money Reader by smilingirl · · Score: 1

      I've used cash for all of the above except buying a bus ticket b/c I don't ride buses. Even fast food places have credit card swipers. Hell, Sonic has a credit card reader at the drive up menu. And yes at bars, you start up a tab on your card and it only gets swiped once, not for each drink. Not a big deal. I hardly ever use cash; I don't think there are many places at all were credit cards aren't an option anymore except maybe a vending machine. I even use a credit card to buy things at Goodwill! Us young'uns don't use cash for much anymore. I typically don't even carry more than 20 dollars. However, I am not disputing the point that the US should differentiate the bills to be discernible for the blind. That's fine. Just disputing your argument's basis.

      --
      The Present is the point at which time touches eternity. - C.S. Lewis
    219. Re:Money Reader by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "Enlightened countries"

      Oh goodie, do please tell us who it is that is so very "enlightened"?

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    220. Re:Money Reader by limit · · Score: 1

      First, you're generalizing that a large number of welfare recipients spend $160 on lottery and smokes every time they cash a check. Second, you're inferring that that $160 is better spent on something else. If their rent is covered, what do you care what they buy? If your "sympathy meter" is so delicate, you're a cold-hearted bastard who doesn't deserve to have one. Go back to your plentiful lifestyle.

    221. Re:Money Reader by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is because you don't buy crack in dark alleys. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    222. Re:Money Reader by overkill1024 · · Score: 1

      Also, I have yet to see free glasses or contacts anywhere. Glasses are quite expensive, a bit bulky, and need to be replaced often due to loss or a change of perscription. As far as contacts, those are not free either. Sometimes medical plans cover the cost, on an individual basis, but that certainly does not apply to the majority of visually-impared people.

      So some blind people can't afford a computer with a dynamic braille displays or a guide dog. Despite the extent of their disability the blind likely recieve more assistance than other "disadvantaged" groups. I find the fact that a blind person can (more or less) live an independant life impressive. They can use money as it is and they might end up folding different sized money anyway. If someone wanted to, it wouldn't bee too hard to use a debit card for everything by going where they're accepted.

      Regarding the proposed change in US currency, while it may not be rocket science it itself would have a significant cost atached. There would be the cost of printing and swapping out the money as well as the cost of adapting existing macienery to the new bills. Vending machiene readers, money sorters/counters, etc. would become obsolete. In the meantime, the entire US population would be inconvinienced, blind people included, and the ecomomy would take a hit. For the cost of the legal procedings and the aftermath we might as well hire full-time assistants for the blind.

      I don't mean to sound unsympathetic, but it's just not practical, even in the long run. Then again, the government isn't exactly the voice of reason.

      Off-topic, but this reminds me of the movie The Day of the Triffids (1962) where the world's population is blinded by aliens. Not the best movie but an interesting take on armageddon.

    223. Re:Money Reader by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      Or he could, you know, live in a place where they give out money, not food stamps.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
    224. Re:Money Reader by dangitman · · Score: 1

      But it wouldn't work, because of competition and inflation.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    225. Re:Money Reader by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "hasn't yet caught up to the modern virtue of the pursuit of equality for all whenever possible"

      I do believe all people should be treated equally, but as I'm sure you know, not everyone is born exactly the same. I can't jump very high, couldn't hit a 3-pointer to save my life, and don't have just great defense either; should I get to play in the NBA? Why not? What happened to everyone being equal? Some people are simply born with better hand-eye coordination, the ability to jump higher, the ability to run very fast, and/or other physical abnormalities that make them better suited for sports or other such activities. They tend to carry the burden of managing several million dollars by the time they're old enough to vote. Others are born with or later develope the flip-side; that being physical or mental abnormalities that restrict their participation in even every-day activities. This is sad, and we all recognize it as such.

      That being said, there is a question raised as to whether people and/or society in general should be forced to expend (in varying amounts) time, effort, and money to make special and out of the ordinary accomodations for those unfortunate enough to have been born physically or otherwise handicapped. The pro-handicapped lobby has somehow shifted the language of the debate to talking about "equality" when what we are actually talking about is business owners, the government, and others having to make changes to support the "special needs" of a group of people.

      No one, to my knowledge, has ever said that handicapped individuals are not allowed to enter their business, and no one has said that the handicapped are not allowed to shop with them, so let's just stop with any talk about 'discrimination' or any other such nonesense right there. If an individual who is handicapped has difficulty or finds it impossible to frequent a certain place or to shop at a certain store because of their own personal, physical failings, it is the fault of the handicap and not the business owner. The business owner did not specially design their place of business to exclude those customers who cannot see or walk; they merely designed them the same way places of business and residence have been designed throughout the ages. No one has trained their employees in not using sign language; most people simply don't know it and would need special training in it to use it.

      In other words, business owners and the general public did nothing to cause the problem, but are somehow being expected to put forth extra time and money for special building designs/modifications and special employee training to make special accomodations for the specific individuals who have some form of handicap. Let's get something straight: we're not talking about making things equal, we're talking about making everyone identical (in terms of their abilities). The argument being put forth is that it is the responsibility of business owners and the general public to ensure that everyone has some pre-defined and wholey arbitrary minimum capability with regard to everyday life, regardless of their particular handicap. The conclusion drawn from this argument is that a store owner is shirking their responsibility as a member of society if they can't/won't spend $5,000 retrofitting their 80-year old store with a handicap ramp on the off chance that someone, at some point, who chooses or requires a wheelchair for mobility happens to decide that they want to browse the store's offerings for a while.

      This is, frankly, absurd. It is, however, not the least bit unexpected from a culture that prides itself on instilling a massive entitlement complex within all its people.

      "You are one of these people that make so many good points but for some reason think they have to be all inflammatory to get them across and in doing so simply make themselves very hard to relate to."

      I had just woken up when I wrote this after having

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    226. Re:Money Reader by NIckGorton · · Score: 1

      That is the whole point of disability accommodation. You need to actually go to a certain amount of cost and inconvenience to make society accessible for everyone.

      Does it cost a lot to make buildings accessible to people in wheelchairs? Yes. Could you get around it by just having the wheelchair-ambulating person ask for a lift up when he got to a place with stairs? Yes. Would it be wrong to expect this person to be limited in this way despite the fact that it otherwise causes a significantly greater cost to fit public buildings with ramps? Also yes.

      Part of the reason that we as a society accept that more must be done to make those with disabilities more fully able to independently act is precisely because of the effects that dependence produces. And that goal of greater independence is valuable enough that it merits our effort and cost.

      Moreover, I for one am sick of being the country that is always last to adopt international standards. The lack of metric standard units in the US is embarrassing enough. Can we PLEASE not drag our knuckles on this one too? Someday I'd eventually like to travel to the EU without having to wear a tasteful maple leaf ensemble.

    227. Re:Money Reader by ojustgiveitup · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I don't think I'm really going to engage the first part of your argument, not because I'm disregarding it, but because it's a valid opinion that you are very entitled to (hey look, there's some of that horrible entitlement this country enjoys). I'll just say that I'm happy we live in a time and place when and where there is so much wealth that we can afford to spend some of it to make life easier for those who were not as fortunate as ourselves. And yes, I recognize your qualm with the usage of "equality" so I won't use it anymore, but what I don't have a problem with is a shop-owner spending 5,000 dollars to make his store more accessible to to handicapped people. He/She should have done it in the first place without being forced to, or the community, or a charity, but if it takes a governmental fire lit under the proverbial ass of America to make this a better place for a subset of its citizens for whom life is already terribly hard, and if the total cost is relatively low, then I don't think I have too much trouble with it. Even Adam Smith recognized that while the most free market creates the most wealth, it does not solve all of society's problems. But here I am, engaging your argument, when I simply meant to say "agree to disagree."

      At least on that subject. I still think your whole thing with the money is silly. This is not the 1860's. We did not just have a Civil War during which time banks and people lost faith in the government due to uncertainty about which government to have faith in. This is post WWII America - superpower America. Yes, counterfeiting is still a huge problem, and the government has to deal with that, but people losing trust in the value of money? Really? Of course people who actually accept the money need to be trained in what it should look like, but everyone else just needs to have it taken from them in exchange from services. So I get my first goofy-European-looking 20 dollar bill from a bank teller or an ATM or a grandmother in a birthday card (like you - probably the latter). Of course I'm skeptical, after all it looks goofy and fake. Am I skeptical enough to not try giving it to someone? No. Does the person I give it to take it in exchange for goods or services? Yes, because they were trained to recognize the new bills. Voila, I have immediate faith in the new absurd looking 20 dollar bill. Each time this happens the faith increases. Like I said, this is not Abe Lincoln era America (though we may wish it were), we have the infrastructure and the information dissemination capabilities to train everyone in the country that must handle bills for a living, and people trust the government and the banks enough to at least accept the bills and *try* them and will gain immediate trust when they work.

      Now, I agree that massive amounts of counterfeiting would throw a wrench in the entire system I just described, and as such, you have a valid, as you say, "for function's sake", argument if it is actually easier to counterfeit these bills. The difference here being a *real* rather than *perceived* corrosion in the value of money. So would it actually be easier to counterfeit these new bills. If they simply make them all colorful and change their size, I see no *technical* reason why it would be any easier or harder. If they do something fancy like make raised numbers (I don't really understand how they do that, I've never seen one, but people seem to talk about it, so I'll assume it's real) it seems to me that it would be slightly more difficult to fake. In any case, I can't see where any change of this nature would make it drastically easier or less costly to produce fake bills. You bring up a pretty good point in your creation-of-the-secret-service example in that the presence of many different "trusted" bills makes it more difficult to spot an "untrusted" bill, and you rightly qualify your statement by saying that this is a big problem for *untrained* people. I think you already know how I feel about our modern ability to train the people that need to be trained, and also about how unnecessary it is for untrained people to be able to spot a fake in the current market, so, while I am no longer baffled at your strong opinion, I now simply think it is silly.

    228. Re:Money Reader by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      are the readers free?

      [SNIP]

      Seriously, I worked with some blind people in college and they would just use a credit/debit card for everything.

      They're not free; they incur a charge of 2.5 to 5% per transaction (varies by CC company and transaction value). Check out the all too-common signs in small shops warning you that CC/DC transactions (sometimes below a certain value) will incur those charges on the bill, not swallowed by the trader.

      That makes "magic plastic" a suitable solution for rich blind people.

      Now, I know that you're talking about college students, and I suspect that you actually mean rich college students (since most countries prevent the poor from getting as good an education as the rich, by one means or several), but the article in question was about blind people, not some sub-set of "people" discriminated in favour of by measurement of wallet thickness.

      Anyway, must go to work. Stopping off at the corner shop for a packet of cigarette papers (22p) and a newspaper (35p), which I'll pay for with cash, because the corner shop doesn't accept credit card payments of less than £10. Then I'll get on the bus (£3 for a day ticket), which doesn't have a credit card reader. If I used the bus every day, a £50 monthly ticket might be worthwhile, but with an average £30 monthly bus bill (for which I need receipts anyway) it isn't worthwhile.
      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    229. Re:Money Reader by jcr · · Score: 1

      If the US treasury is any good at its job then it already has plans in place to change the currency.

      Yep, keep waving those hands, that will make the costs go away.

      Do you work on Capitol Hill, by any chance? You seem to be a natural at this.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    230. Re:Money Reader by jcr · · Score: 1

      The website I linked to is the first one I hit when I googled for "ADA abuse". I first heard about the problem about ten years ago, when I read a story about some shyster who was systematically shaking down bars and restaurants in Denver.

      the whole thing reeks of an astroturfing campaign. I wonder who's behind it...

      Do you work for a trial lawyer, by any chance?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    231. Re:Money Reader by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      why do I keep seeing bills from the 80s and 90s? I work in a convenience store and I see a lot of bills.

      I said *much* currency has only an 18-month lifespan. :) Dollar bills and $20s are the quickest to get worn out. Better yet, here's some info from the Fed (courtesy of moneyfactory.com, yes, that *is* the official site of the Bureau of Engraving and Printing!):

              $ 1 .............. 22 months
              $ 5 .............. 24 months
              $ 10 .............. 18 months
              $ 20 .............. 25 months
              $ 50 .............. 55 months
              $100 .............. 60 months

      Hm. the $20 lasts longer than I'd expected. And you'll always see the occasional bill that's been lost in a drawer for a while.

      Finally, remember that the dates on currency aren't like the dates on coins. Current policy (about the last 20 years or so) are that with every minor design change (or when the Treasurer of the US changes) they change a letter. So Series 2003 becomes Series 2003-A. When there's a major design change, or when the Secretary of the Treasury changes, then the series number itself changes. I think they printed Series 1995 bills well into 2000.

      And you'll very rarely see something even older. A couple years back, a co-worker was complaining that he managed to get a counterfeit $10 (was turned down at three places with it, one of which ran a pen across it). I took one look at the bill, gave him $10 for it, and put it in my collection. It was from the late 50's / early 60's, and just looked different enough that nobody would take it. And of course the pen didn't work -- it was 40 years old!

    232. Re:Money Reader by Rob+Nance · · Score: 1

      You never use cash?

      No

      Not for getting a haircut?

      What, at the corner barber off main street? What is this, 1950? Absolutely No.

      Buying a newspaper?

      A physical newspaper? How...nostalgic.

      Buying a coffee?

      No, why would I? to hold everyone up behind me? Cash is the new check. There is no signing on debit or credit cards under a certain amount anymore, so it's WAY faster. I keep all my receipts, and keep my checkbook balanced since I know you'll bring this up.

      Buying a bus ticket?

      Again with the nostalgia.

      How about buying a beer in a bar - do you pass your card to be swiped for each drink you purchase?

      This to me is the funniest one. Who the heck doesn't run a tab? I'd much rather start a tab with a card than sit there and fumble with cash for every beer.

      I can't believe you got modded 5 insightful. I'm sure I'll be modded flamebait, but oh well. I have a hard time not being sarcastic when the questions are so absurd. The only time I use cash now is my wife and I get $20 when we get groceries on the weekend, and each spend our $10 for lunch out once a week. That is literally the only cash that ever enters or leaves my wallet, and it's just more of a thing to keep ourselves regulating how much we eat out.

    233. Re:Money Reader by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is, where is this gas station, where blind people are lining up to pay $5 in cash to get gas for their car? I don't want to be ANYWHERE near where blind people are driving!!!!

      How else are they supposed to get to the drive-thru ATM with Braille instructions? :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    234. Re:Money Reader by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I've found that cash has a magical property that burns a hole in my pocket, where as plastic (I use only debit) pretty much sits there and I don't spend nearly as much.

      Here's another advantage for plastic: If your wallet with a credit card or two gets lost or stolen, you call it in and get replacement cards sent to you in a few days. You're liable for no more than $50 in bad charges; with some banks, you're not liable for anything. OTOH, if your wallet with a few hundred dollars (or more) in cash is lost or stolen and not recovered, you're frakked.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    235. Re:Money Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you haven't noticed that we've been changing the money in recent years. Incorporating features that would accomodate blind people at the same time as the other modifications would have been the smart thing to do, don't you think?

      You might have also noticed that the "confirm you're not a script" scheme that Slashdot uses is not user-friendly to blind people either, but hey, we don't care about the minority opinion anyway, right?

    236. Re:Money Reader by malilo · · Score: 1

      You can cash gov't checks at the convenience store?! Well hot damn, here I am living below the poverty level and I didn't even know that.

      --
      "sometimes he felt that his whole life was a dream, and he wondered whose it was and whether they were enjoying it."
    237. Re:Money Reader by Kesh · · Score: 1
      I won't even bother with your newspaper comments. If you believe that advertising and website hits subsidise enough of a publishing business that newspapers can survive without subscribers paying them, you need to brush up on your economics.

      This assumes that the person lives in a place where bus transportation is available and usable. There's a lot of places in the US where this just isn't the case. I guess you never leave whatever dense urban area you live in.

      Again, you'd be wrong. I live in rural Kentucky and had to buy a car for the first time because I couldn't ride the bus when I moved out here. Until that time, it was more affordable and practical for me to ride the bus. You're reaching.

      No, not everyone has good enough credit for a credit card, but there's no reason for anyone to not have a bank account, unless they're some kind of criminal or something. Most regular jobs now require you to have a bank account for direct deposit or else you won't get a paycheck.

      You're very good at making assumptions about other people's lifestyles, when you've apparently no real-world experience at all. I've known people who don't trust banks, can't get a bank account due to past bounced checks (some through no fault of their own, other people deliberately), and until the last decade or so, a number of banks in this area had minimum balances to keep (which doesn't work for those living paycheck to paycheck). Now, it's more common for banks to offer $0 minimum accounts, and employers are moving to direct deposit. Yes, that makes it easier... but until recently, it wasn't always an option.

      You've really made a lot of bad assumptions about people and the way they live. You're quite free to disregard it as "their fault" if you wish, but that doesn't make you any more right about real-world living.

    238. Re:Money Reader by rootEToTheIPi · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I hadn't considered some of the those factors.

      --
      When it comes to pastry theft, I take the cake.
    239. Re:Money Reader by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because his sympathy meter is so delicate that he is a cold hearted bastard, you insensitive clod!

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  2. What about the nation's forgers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    US currency is the easiest to forge in the world. You take a $1 bill, wash it clean and reprint it with a $100 bill. This will really increase the costs to forgers, and they should sue the treasury for loss of earnings.

    1. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to forge away. I'm sure the treasury dept will be more then happy to award you an all expenses paid long term vacation to the prison of their choice. :)

      Actually, the dollar is constantly being made harder to forge. One of the problems with North Korea is they were caught forging dollars. The bank that was fronting for them has been isolated from the global market and no other bank will deal with the NK's. That killed one of their sources of income.

      I do agree that adding braille to the bill would add to the problems of counterfeiters, I just don't know how to implement it.

      Of course the ruling will be overturned, either in the courts or by Congress. The criminal class, I mean the Congress doesn't like people telling them how to make or spend money. ;)

    2. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by bogeyjlg · · Score: 1

      Seeing as the ink in US currency is made to handle being put through extreme conditions (the wash for instance), I fail to see how you can "wash it clean" without destroying the bill entirely.

    3. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by aphaenogaster · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure a mix of benzene, acetone, and ethanol would probably do the job.

    4. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by arivanov · · Score: 0

      Whoever had modded this funny really did not have a clue. This used to be true at least at some point.

      It has been a while since I lived in a country where the green buck is the main black market currency so I do not know to what extent are any of these still true. In fact it has been nearly 7 years since the last time I held a green buck.

      The washing trick used to be true for all denominations up to 20$ (50$ and higher had extra protection measures introduced in the 90-es). It did not get a lot of use because the washed notes were not the primary source of counterfeit money on the market and they could usually be picked out using a UV pen. The primary source of counterfeit money was Iraq monetary printing yard (in Saddam's days) closely followed by a number of printing houses operated by the North Koreans in the far east.

      The only way to distinguish between the Saddam dollar, Kim dollar and the real dollar was actually exactly this - the denomination printed in braile alphabet for the blind. Only the US dollar had it. So frankly, I am quite surprised by this article. I remember having to feel every dollar note for this damn braile when handling it. Granted, these become difficult to read after a time, but they are supposed to be present on the buck.

      Strange actually...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    5. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wash it clean, eh? So THAT'S the money laundering I keep hearing about. Michael Bolton sends his thanks.

    6. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this "interesting" has never seen a US Dollar. There's no Braille printing on any of them. Parent is either a troll or an idiot.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    7. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to print a million dollar bill. If I had a million dollars, I'd two chicks at the same time, man.

    8. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by zen-theorist · · Score: 1
      The only way to distinguish between the Saddam dollar, Kim dollar and the real dollar was actually exactly this - the denomination printed in braile alphabet for the blind. Only the US dollar had it.
      dang, it looks like i am stuck with only banknotes of evil. i have been peering at the bills in my wallet for 15 minutes now, and feeling them all over, and getting odd stares from people around me.
    9. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Neither. While apparently it is not Braile and is useless for blind which I did not know till today (mea culpa), the US printed dollar has a very characteristic feel to the touch which allows you to distinguish it from Saddam and Kim prints which were identical visually (even under UV). It is also a standard check which cashiers in countries with a large population of Saddam prints employ even today. In fact the "feel" difference even gets a Wikipedia mentioning. Overall - strange. To go through all that effort and not do braille. Just does not make sense.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    10. Re:What about the nation's forgers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would probably also kill Roger Rabbit pretty handily.

  3. About time too ! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The bills in the US are difficult to distinguish under conditions other than blindness, it's about time we caught up with the rest of the world. We make coins different shapes, sizes and textures, why not bills.

    1. Re:About time too ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian bills have brail imprints on them, seems like the easiest solution. I suppose there's an issue with money counting machines/slot machines/etc but those technologies are always being upgraded.

    2. Re:About time too ! by Phreakiture · · Score: 0, Redundant

      We make coins different shapes, sizes and textures, why not bills.

      Yes, we do! We even make threedifferentdollar coins, each with a different size, colour or texture than the other two.

      ...and they're about to introduce a fourth!

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    3. Re:About time too ! by paanta · · Score: 1

      Because the wallet makers association lobby is incredibly powerful.

    4. Re:About time too ! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      In what situations other than blindness and low-light conditions is this difficult? Do you have trouble confusing the nubers "10" and "20" in centimeter-tall letters? Does Alexander Hamilton resemble Andrew Jackson in some strange way?

    5. Re:About time too ! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually the Susan B and Sacagawea dollar coins are the same size, weight, and have the same electrical characteristics. This was an important part of the design of the Sacagawea coin as the mint realized that there was no way vending machine manufacturers were going to ever support the dollar coin unless they were consistent in their design.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:About time too ! by pedalman · · Score: 1
      We make coins different shapes, sizes and textures, why not bills.
      Why should we? You are forgetting that we are a country that is so arrogant that we still have not made a complete transition to the metric system (unlike the rest of the world). Ironic; considering that like the metric system, our currency is based on the number 10.
      --
      Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    7. Re:About time too ! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      how about the odd $1 bill smuggled in a handlful of $10's, or $2 in $20's.

      You don't handle much cash do you ?

    8. Re:About time too ! by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

      "We make coins different shapes, sizes and textures, why not bills."

      I would like 20's to be about as thick as sole, soft, squishy and in the shape of my foot.

      That way when I stash my allowance in my shoe it is a comfy step!

      Same with 10's so I can break my 20 and have an even footing. ~CYD

      --
      //Nothing to see here, please move along.
    9. Re:About time too ! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      how about the odd $1 bill smuggled in a handlful of $10's, or $2 in $20's. You don't handle much cash do you ?

      Then pay the hell attention if your money is worth anything to you, or get a sorter. And anyway, the font/size on the $1 is completely different than the new-style $10s, same for $2s vs. $20s.

      Sure, you get the occasional story about how someone cut out the number 10 from somewhere, taped it on a $1, and passed off on a Dante-in-Clerks style convenience store clerk. However, the Gov. can't outlaw stupidity.

    10. Re:About time too ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like the metric system, our currency is based on the number 10.

      Would you prefer it were octal? Binary? Hex?

    11. Re:About time too ! by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      Then pay the hell attention if your money is worth anything to you, ...
      Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you were a fucking idiot

    12. Re:About time too ! by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry, I didn't realize you were a fucking idiot

      Wow, is that really the best you can do? Oh, that's right, you're the moron working at a convenience store who can't tell a $1 from a $10.

    13. Re:About time too ! by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Actually the Susan B and Sacagawea dollar coins are the same size, weight, and have the same electrical characteristics.

      This is correct. They differ in colour and texture, though, which means that they differ for identification-by-human purposes. The Sacagawea was actually very clever in this regard, because it solved the problem Susan B's had of being too similar in appearance to a quarter.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  4. FINALLY by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see quite well with glasses, and this very thing has annoyed me plenty of times. Why the hell are all our bills the same size, shape, and color?
    Make them more distinct, and you'll speed up all cash transactions.
    If nothing else the fast food industry will thank you :)

    1. Re:FINALLY by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Australia notes are all different colors (red, green, blue, pink etcetc) to make it patently obvious which note is which. It might not help blind people, but it prevents silly mistakes and makes money easily identifiable!

      For blind people they are slightly different lengths, which doesn't really effect non blind people.

    2. Re:FINALLY by KokorHekkus · · Score: 3, Informative

      And if you add some kind of relief on the bills as well then you will most likely cut down on counterfeit bills as well. Swedish bills have the numbers printed with reliefs and it's very easy just to run your finger over them to make a preliminary check if the bill is real.

    3. Re:FINALLY by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 4, Informative

      In Australia notes are all different colors (red, green, blue, pink etcetc) to make it patently obvious which note is which. It might not help blind people, but it prevents silly mistakes and makes money easily identifiable!
       
      The polymer that Australian Bank Notes are made from also has raised areas to help the blind and the clear windows are also different shapes with a smoother texture. Not just handy for blind people; they're also good anti counterfeiting measures.

      The Wikipedia article on the Australian Dollar has a nice chart of the Polymer Series. Having lived in Germany (post Euro), Australia and the U.S.A. I can honestly say that Australian banknote technology is something that the U.S.A. and many other countries really should look into licensing.

    4. Re:FINALLY by jaweekes · · Score: 2, Informative

      The British Pound (£) has a lot of features to help the blind. The notes are a different size; different colours; the denomination is in big numbers in the corner; different shapes (the £10 has a diamond, I think the £5 has a circle); and the back is not just a different picture, but is completely different (colors, shapes, etc). All of which make it really easy to tell what the note is.

    5. Re:FINALLY by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      They also have the denomination encoded in brail on the note. If you run your finger along the top you can feel it.

    6. Re:FINALLY by mcvos · · Score: 1

      So does European money. 5 euro notes are really tiny, and color is enough to identify the value of the note. It was the same with Dutch money before the introduction of the Euro. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if Dutch money had some of the first brightly colored bank notes in the world; I've heard stories about banks in Africa not accepting them because they though it was Monopoly money. But back to the topic at hand, both European and Dutch money also have bumps and ridges that make them easy to identify by blind people. And Dutch money used to have a lot of other security features that weren't included in the Euro notes because French money printers couldn't handle them.

    7. Re:FINALLY by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 1

      Depends on what sort of british note you're talking about....
      The english bank notes are different entirely to the various different scottish bank notes, and the northern irish ones are different again.
      I think they;re all the same size though (as in £10's are all the same, £20's are all the same etc). Then again, I haven't seen any english notes in a while, so I wouldn't know for sure. I think they changed design a while back...I occasionally see english £5's, and they've all got holograms and stuff now. The Clydesdale notes don't, and are different in colour, ditto the RBS ones....
      Last time I went down to england, I tried to spend some money, and the gormless checkout staff were like "is this real, can we take scotch (sic) notes 'ere?". I had to patiently explain that since it has the words "pounds sterling" on it, and because scotland, england, northern ireland and wales are all in the UK (along with the likes of Jersey et al, not sure, if they have different notes, but they certainly have their own unique coinage), then yes, scottish money is just as valid to spend in england as english money is here.

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    8. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is legal currency down here in England, but a lot of places don't accept them. We've had a lot of problems with forged scottish notes because people aren't familiar with what they should look like. I don't accept them when given as change from a shop, I ask for coins or an english note.

    9. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that are made out of a plastic material that can stand going though the wash as many times as you care to try. Being made of plastic also means it is very hard to tear and allows a plastic window to be imbedded into the note to protect against forgery, as well as being able to print quite intricate designs compared to paper.

    10. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ow!

      I did what you suggested and now I'm bleeding! This is the last time that I take advice from someone on /.

    11. Re:FINALLY by hoy74 · · Score: 0, Troll

      So Monopoly money works in Australia huh? Now alls I need is $800 for a plane ticket and I can take a real 2 week vacation.

    12. Re:FINALLY by bloobloo · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It's up to the retailer. And you don't have to accept Scottish notes in change in England or Wales either. Most shops of course won't refuse it as long as they know it is genuine. From the BoE website: Are Scottish & Northern Irish notes legal tender? In short 'No' these notes are not legal tender; only Bank of England notes are legal tender but only in England and Wales. The term legal tender does not in itself govern the acceptability of banknotes in transactions. Whether or not notes have legal tender status, their acceptability as a means of payment is essentially a matter for agreement between the parties involved. Legal tender has a very narrow technical meaning in relation to the settlement of debt. If a debtor pays in legal tender the exact amount he owes under the terms of a contract, he has good defence in law if he is subsequently sued for non-payment of the debt. In ordinary everyday transactions, the term 'legal tender' has very little practical application.

    13. Re:FINALLY by LocoMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Venezuelan money does too (though not sure for how long it has had it). The denomination number is raised, as is the face and other features to help blind people distinguish them, and it really helps... I've seen blind people recognize the bills as fast as non blind by rubbing their thumb on the bills as they receive them.

      The coins also have different ridges on the sides for that (the 50Bs. coin has ridges, the 100 one has a smooth edge, and the 500 one has alternating ridged and smooth areas).

    14. Re:FINALLY by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I can neither see nor feel anything along the top of either the 5 or 10 pound notes I have in my wallet at the moment; are you sure about that?

    15. Re:FINALLY by doofus1 · · Score: 0

      The British Pound (£) has a lot of features to help the blind. ...different colours; the denomination is in big numbers in the corner...

      Brilliant!
      FYI - blind people cannot see.

    16. Re:FINALLY by Jtheletter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why the hell are all our bills the same size, shape, and color?

      Well, this may not be the actual truth, but I seem to recall that this is what I learned in grade school. When the US government finally standardized the monetary system they made a conscious decision to make all bills the same size and color to prevent them from being easily recognizable from a distance as a security measure. The idea was if someone pulls out a wad of bright orange $100 bills, as opposed to blue $1s then a mugger could spy this and know just who to rob. Of course, I always thought this was a bit silly because a wealthy mark gives themselves away in other ways such as quality of clothing, jewelry, etc. which is why I'm not sure this is a real fact. More likely, I think, is that it was easier and cheaper to use just one ink and one size on the cutting machine. I'll bet wikipedia probably has a better explanation but I leave that as an exercise to the reader. ;)

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    17. Re:FINALLY by srmalloy · · Score: 3, Informative

      One of the things that has prevented the adoption of many of the newer innovations in currency design for US paper currency is the 'crumple test', where a bill is rolled tightly, then inserted into a cylinder and crushed with a ramrod, then removed, rolled the other way, and crushed again. This process is repeated a total of 16 times; the note must remain recognizable. Prospective currency changes also go through a number of other durability tests -- being washed with eight cotton towels, being soaked in a variety of chemicals (such as bleach, sulfuric acid, and gasoline), 'rub tests' with a two-pound weight with a pad after bills are soaked in the chemicals, and others. So far, only relatively minor innovations, like the color-changing ink, have survived the durability tests -- for example, image holograms, IIRC, fail the crumple test badly.

    18. Re:FINALLY by Stween · · Score: 1

      Even better, Scottish notes aren't legal tender in Scotland (no banknotes are considered legal tender in Scotland). There are other fun little rules, that allow the shop to refuse payment over certain amounts in certain denominations (for example, I seem to recall more than 35p in coppers could be refused). Of course, these are rules seldom exercised.

      When I did bar work, my rule of thumb was that if the note said "pounds sterling" on it, then I took it. The most bizarre was the plastic Irish Northern Bank note. As far as I was concerned, it was money; if the bank didn't know what to do with it, then that was a problem beyond me.

    19. Re:FINALLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conversely, their coinage makes no sense (har har) to me. A friend recently returned from a business trip to Australia and I requested him to bring me back one of each denomination bill from $20 down and a set of coins.

      Australia has coins denominated as $1, $2, 5 cents, 10 cents, 20 cents, and 50 cents. First off, props for ditching the penny, that's a good move. However, the first thing you'll notice with a handful of aussie coins is that they are extremely heavy as far as coins go. Secondly, the sizing is a little goofy. The 50 cent piece is the largest. Now I know what you're thinking... so's the US 50 cent piece. However, the $2 coin and 10 cent piece are nearly the same diameter. Thirdly the $1 is bigger than the $2. Fourthly, a 20 cent piece??? wtf, over?

      It'd be nice if we used the Australian "paper" currency, and the equivalent of the Canadian coins. I found the Canadian coins to be the most practical of the three.

      To all you $1 coin naysayers: try visiting Canada, where you can pay for a whole meal with nothing but pocket change. You will end up spending most of the coins in your pocket in a typical day, so the change bucket at your house will be a thing of the past. The reason is simple: you have real buying power in your pocket, so you dig that out first, result: less pocket change. In the US, you are more likely to whip out your wallet and pay for whatever with the next largest bill over the amount your being charged, and pocket the change, because it's more hassle to whip out your wallet and then shuffle through a bunch of change in your pocket to get close to the actual amount. Rinse, repeat. In theory it sounds like a paper dollar is better than a dollar coin in terms of weight, but in reality the coin is far more practical. The only reason our dollar bill sticks around is that dollar coins (and also $2 bills, which are still minted today) are seen a novelties. People hoard them rather than spending them. The opposite would be true if people were used to spending dollar coins and then the mint started all of a sudden making paper bills.

    20. Re:FINALLY by rnelsonee · · Score: 1
      Except for one thing -- US currency is the only currency in the world that makes that distinct crumpling sound when it's handled. No other currency or (very few) people have successfully duplicated it. Which is why it's the US's #1 counterfeiting technique, and it appears to be part of the reason why there's been so little change.

      Now, agreed, they should be different colors, sizes, and have textures. And personally, I wouldn't mind plastic money, as it could be washed. Just playing the devil's advocate here. The US seems proud of its money, and I suppose it *is* rather recognizable, so the US is just very slow to adopt change.

    21. Re:FINALLY by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Which is why it's the US's #1 counterfeiting technique, and it appears to be part of the reason why there's been so little change.

      This is probably the one test your average person doesn't think of doing. Visual clues are better than audiable ones.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    22. Re:FINALLY by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Not being anti-Austrailian or anything, I just thought this would be a nice place to post my rant on colored money.

      I'm sure it's very helpful and prevents mistakes, but this one scenario really bugs me.

      Say I go into a liquor store / restraunt / whatever and have a wad of $1, a few $5, maybe a $10. It's not that much, and nobody is really interested in watching me count my $1's. Some kids like to appear rich to their friends by putting a $20 over a bunch of $1's, maybe in a different situation it'd be wise to put a $1 over a bunch of $20s. In each case I could have a $100 hidden in the middle and nobody would suspect it.

      Now let's say instead we've all got colored money, $5 is green, $10 is orange, $20 is purple and $100 is red. You see the problem now? One glance at somebody counting their $$ at a register and you immediately know if the guy is loaded. Let's say one day some fool has a stack of reds in his hand, you can be sure all the wrong people will notice it.

      That's my problem with colored money, it screams "ROB ME!!" whenever you have any significant amount with you. Of course you shouldn't carry too much at one time, or should spread it around over the body, blah blah... plenty of reasons it's "my fault" for having too much on me. Still, I don't like my money advertising to people what it is.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    23. Re:FINALLY by elliott666 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of when Australia first introduced the new plastic notes back around 1990. The first plastic note was the $10 bill and they went through all sorts of tests on it and finally released them just to find out that if you left them in your car in the summer they would shrink! Needless to say they re-released the notes with a different type of plastic.

    24. Re:FINALLY by himi · · Score: 1

      Most legally blind people can see at least a little, just not well enough to be able to deal with everyday life by vision alone (think of all the people with tunnel vision or similar, for a start). Why do you think things like screen magnifiers and large print books are useful? And hey, if you can tell what denomination a note is simply by recognising that the splodge of colour you can see is orange rather than blue or green, you're ahead.

      himi

      --

      My very own DeCSS mirror.
    25. Re:FINALLY by illfated · · Score: 1

      "In Australia notes are all different colors (red, green, blue, pink etcetc)" Discrimination!! We who are Red/Green color blind will not stand for this! I must be accomodated! I request, no, I DEMAND that all bills be implanted with a button that says the denomination aloud. Lets also get rid of traffic lights. Come on, red yellow and green?? Are you out to get me? I say we all just use hand gestures to communicate at intersections. I already use several gestures on my morning commute!

    26. Re:FINALLY by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      (and also $2 bills, which are still minted today) No they're not. No bills are minted at all, anywhere. Unless there's some place with metal bills, I guess.

      Try "printed".
  5. Credit cards by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    No one should be handling cash anymore. It is filthy and sucks for all the reasons mentioned in the article.

    Credit cards and direct deposit now exist and you can stop living in fear that someone is going to mug you for your cash. It also gives you a good excuse to feel no guilt as you walk past a homeless person.

    Got change?
    No. I got debt.

    Integrating the blind into our cashless society would be a far better thing than to stick them with those dirty rags we call greenbacks.

    1. Re:Credit cards by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      That's great...except for me. And everybody else under 18 who can't have a credit card legally. And vending machines still only take cash.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Credit cards by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      That's a technical problem. Vending machines can be replaced and anyone can get a debit card (even if you're under 18).

      It does require that you join society and actually have money, but since we're talking about people who have trouble with the money they have, I think that is a given.

    3. Re:Credit cards by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So you want to use your credit card
      • In a taxi
      • to pay for a newspaper costing less than a dollar
      • For that round of drinks in a bar (well, OK, maybe that one)
      • To give a minor donation to a charity you approve of
      I run nearly cashless, but I still can't do without it. And, as an example of the problems with US currency, I once, on a business trip to the states, tipped a waiter $100. Fortunately he took pity on this rather tipsy foriegner and pointed out my mistake.
      Oh, and by the way, if you come to my home poker game, bring cash!
      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    4. Re:Credit cards by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      So, use e-cash instead. Chargeup a card. Everyone who sells goods or servies has an inexpensive reader. Touch the card on the bar. Drinks are paid for. Touch card on the door of a taxi. Journey is paid for. Give charity collectors readers.

      The poker game is a bit harder.

    5. Re:Credit cards by Draelen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why sure, make all your money electronic, where the only proof of your hard earned money is just digits on a computer somewhere, every single little transaction you make logged and tracked, where the bank can freeze it for little reason, soon a profile of ALL your spending habits is out in the open for all agencies to see. What a great idea!

    6. Re:Credit cards by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Ecash systems don't need a central server. You can devise a system where everything is stored on the card. This just requires confidence in the authenticity of the card.

    7. Re:Credit cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should u feel guilt when u walk past a homeless person? ...Are u a tax collector?

    8. Re:Credit cards by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiment, but I would be remiss if I didn't point out that I can use my debit card for each and every one of those tasks, and not by going to some out-of-the-way services, either.

    9. Re:Credit cards by fishter · · Score: 1

      The following story might make people think twice about going completely cashless:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/16/hsbc_atm_o ut/ :
      HSBC's cash machine service turned on customers this weekend with many people complaining that their accounts were held hostage and others saying ATM boxes ate their cards. The issues also extended to HSBC's credit cards with thousands of people affected, The Register can confirm.
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/10/18/hsbc_atm_l etters/ :
      For HSBC, keeping thousands of customers from their money is just part of doing regular business with the bank. The company explained away Sunday's multi-hour ATM and credit card outage by telling us that it resulted from a "standard server" issue. HSBC issued no apology and called the whole kerfuffle "a minor" incident.

    10. Re:Credit cards by rubycodez · · Score: 5, Funny

      and for more improvement, we could print the value of the card on the outside of the card. and have a bunch of cards in varying amounts of money so if you lose one you don't lose all your money. we could make them green to distinguish them from other cards. maybe put some pictures of dead presidents on them.

    11. Re:Credit cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like cash don't use it. I use cash almost exclusively for offline transactions. My girlfriend asked me why I don't use debit, 2 weeks later her mom is wondering why her debit card was being used in this state when she was supposed to be on the other side of the country. She ended up having to admit to her mom that she was in town but didn't want to visit to keep her mom from starting an identity theft investigation. If I wanted people tracking my every movement and purchase, I would move to the UK.

    12. Re:Credit cards by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I only use my credit card for online transactions. I wouldn't even know how too use it for everything else (and very few shops even accept them over here). I pay almost everything by pin, which is pretty universally accepted, but there are a few vending machines and that only accept chip cards (as did the cafeteria at a bank I worked a couple of months ago), and banks are pushing chip cards on us, so now I have one of those too.

      Anyway, I hardly need cash at all, nowadays.

    13. Re:Credit cards by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      I've never even heard of that. Why would I expect a taxi to take a form of currency that I've never even heard of?

      I think you've got the cart before the horse, here. He says 'I can't use my credit card in a taxi' and you say 'in the future, you might be able to use some obscure currency'. It's much more likely he'll be able to use his credit card in the taxi that another kind of card.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    14. Re:Credit cards by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 1

      Most UK stores refuse credit/debit cards for payments under £10 ($18 or so). The associated costs are too high. Additionally it takes quite a while for the payment to go through. So, if I go to the corner shop for a pint of milk or a copy of the paper it's quicker, easier, and cheaper to pay cash.

      And what's wrong with cash, particularly in small amounts? The technology has been proven over millenia. It works, it really does.

      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    15. Re:Credit cards by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with it at all, except that you have to remember to carry it at all times, and in appropriately small amounts. Particularly frustrating: parking meters, toll plazas, pay phones, and vending machines. These are some of the most logical places for cash (because of the low amounts) but also the most illogical (it's often difficult to foresee that you'll need to use these services). Maybe the garage is full, as are the few free spots on the street, and you don't have time to drive around--and don't have change.

      Using some sort of fob or card is just substantially easier and inherently more universal (and cheaper than having to sort and store cash/coins). The problem is the fee structure which makes them less appealing to small businesses. I don't see any real reason why the fees can't be capped at 1% and paid to the bank/financial service on a monthly basis, rather than the current minimum of $0.25 per transaction or whatever it is.

    16. Re:Credit cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and by the way, if you come to my home poker game, bring cash!

      And why do you think God made poker chips?

      But oh no... in the US, most poker chips are the same size. I suppose you wouldn't trust yourself to use them correctly.

    17. Re:Credit cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why sure, make all your money electronic, where the only proof of your hard earned money is just digits on a computer somewhere, every single little transaction you make logged and tracked, where the bank can freeze it for little reason, soon a profile of ALL your spending habits is out in the open for all agencies to see. What a great idea!

      Er, does your employer pay your salary in cash???

      If not, then yes, you are relying on 'digits on a computer somewhere'.

    18. Re:Credit cards by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      When you find out the difference between a payment method and a currenmcy, come back and let us know. Maybe then we'll take your opinions seriously.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    19. Re:Credit cards by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      When you learn to read, come back and let us know. Maybe then we'll take your opinions seriously.

      WTF were you thinking? He talks about 'e-card' and using it as an RFID device. That's not currency, that's a payment method, JUST LIKE A CREDIT CARD.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    20. Re:Credit cards by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your girlfriend should stop using her mother's account. Or get her own account at a bank where her mother doesn't work. Having people be able to track your movement and purchases is irrelevant as long as they don't particularly care what those are, and won't sell the information to people who do. If your bank gives account records to anyone without a court order, you should probably consider legal action.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    21. Re:Credit cards by joshetc · · Score: 1

      Our system of credit is a complete ripoff anyway. They make a mint off the debt people are in from interest then make another mint by gouging the companies that bring in their main source of income. If anything retail outlets should be paid to accept credit, or at the very least recieve services for free or dirt cheap. Its all about greed and the fact that they can..

    22. Re:Credit cards by Senzei · · Score: 1

      Er, does your employer pay your salary in cash???

      If not, then yes, you are relying on 'digits on a computer somewhere'.

      Even if they do pay the salary in cash, they probably don't store the money that way.
      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    23. Re:Credit cards by dcam · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could print the current live president on them. Then people would want to spend the money as fast as possible, stimulating the economy.

      --
      meh
    24. Re:Credit cards by Mr2001 · · Score: 1
      Most UK stores refuse credit/debit cards for payments under £10 ($18 or so).

      That's against the credit card merchant agreements, at least here in the US: Visa forbids merchants from setting a minimum payment. I can go into any grocery store and buy a 30 cent pack of gum with my credit card - not that I would, but I do regularly use plastic for transactions of less than $10.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    25. Re:Credit cards by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      or maybe everyone would be wiping their ass with them and flushing them. that would cause deflation of the money supply.

    26. Re:Credit cards by illfated · · Score: 1

      As a one time taxi driver I can only say that I accepted credit cards for payment. It did take about 30 secs to get the approval but that was over a year and a half ago.

    27. Re:Credit cards by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      I can read perfectly well. For the benefit of anyone else who can, here's what you wrote: 'in the future, you might be able to use some obscure currency'..

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  6. Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by tezza · · Score: 3, Funny
    Surely RFID tags in each note are the anwser??

    Then blind people can carry around a conveniently sized RFID reader.

    Just swipe past the reader and it'll tell you how much money is in your wallet. Or is that the amount in the next person's wallet? Ok, forget it.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    1. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would also be convenient for thieves. I think I found a new profession: Selling RFID readers for more effective thievery. Never again will some rich tourist walk through my town unmolested!

    2. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      OK, the OP got modded as funny, but it's not so far off the mark.

      Currently, there are billions of bills in all denominations. They have a relatively short lifetime for the smaller bills, but years for the largest. Replacing these is not all that doable and extremely expensive because of re-tooling, re-design (yeah, government may re-tool before re-design :P), etc..

      The other option is to provide the relatively fewer numbers of people suffering from blindness a small device that can read/distinguish the currency. The electronics already exist and is in wide use (look at any vending machine). It's not ideal for these people, but can be done relatively quickly. The government already has programs to provide similar devices.

    3. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Replacing these is not all that doable and extremely expensive because of re-tooling, re-design (yeah, government may re-tool before re-design :P), etc..

      Europe did something like that, uh, a couple of years ago. Some European countries did something similar even longer ago. Are you saying there's something Europe can do that the US are incapable of ?

      It's perfectly doable to phase out old bills and phase in new ones.

    4. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by Skater · · Score: 1

      In fact, the US Mint did just redesign most of the bills, and now you see both the old and new of each variety in circulation. So it's possible even in the US.

      However, I'm sure they considered all these options (different sized bills, etc.) and rejected them. I wonder what their rationale was.

    5. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is why sometimes countries get behind in technology. Instead of embracing the idea and seeing it as a challenge, they say, "nope no can do, too expensive, [insert excuse here]."

      The Euro was introduced relatively quickly, and many other countries switched currencies without problems. In fact many countries regularly switch currencies without problems.

      When you are required to change the change can be painful, but often it is for the better.

      Or how about a conspiracy theory twist. MAYBE the Treasury does not want to switch the bills because it would cause financial chaos. http://www.fas.org/irp/gao/ggd96082.htm

      Completely replacing a currency will mean accounting for all of the monies in circulation and that might prove problematic.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    6. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by MojoRilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there are already hand held optical bill readers for the blind.

    7. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by MadMorf · · Score: 1

      Just swipe past the reader and it'll tell you how much money is in your wallet.

      Yup.
      You and everyone within earshot...

      Just what we need, more convenience for crooks... :)

    8. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      However, I'm sure they considered all these options (different sized bills, etc.) and rejected them. I wonder what their rationale was.

      Same reason you don't go metric.

    9. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by aslate · · Score: 1

      Uhhmn, that's taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut. Why not simply cut the notes into different sizes? $1 being smaller than $2, $5...

      That costs a whole...nothing!

      When i was on holiday in the US keeping my wallet in order was a pain. I had $1 nested between $50 and had to look at every note to find its denomination. Different sizes make this so damned easy (And different colours help too).

    10. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The government operates currency functions very conservativly because they do not want to take any risks that could reduce the percieved legitimacy of the dollar as the world's primary reserve currency (one of the major reasons for that is the nation's financial stabilty). Changes to the currency while very minor risk reducing that percieved stability.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    11. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by iamblades · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The US Mint is kind of traditionalist, and value stability and trust very highly. That and people are just comfortable with the good old fashioned greenback. It's probably mostly aesthetic and irrational, but there is something about american currency that feels reassuring compared to foriegn currency, regardless of how many security features and hideous color schemes they have. You heard all the controversy about the new $10 and $20 bills when they were introduced right? The color scheme on those is mild compared to much of the world's currency.

      Put simply, people like their money to look like money, and when americans think of money they think green ink intaglio printed on cloth paper 6.14 inches by 2.61 inches.

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
    12. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by PeterAT · · Score: 1

      That is a fantastic idea, that way when I am out late at night "working" I can find out how much money my "clients" have before I waylay them!

    13. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Blind people already have a conveniently sized reader called their hands (and some eyesight). It just requires notes and currency to be distinguishable by touch or partial vision.

      Using RFID would be rather annoying for blind people (who must keep a reader) and a massive intrusion of privacy for everyone else. Though I'm sure muggers and pickpockets would be very grateful for a device which lets them see how much money you have in your pocket.

    14. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by dzelenka · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points when I need them???

      Giving one of these to each blind person would cost a fraction of what it would cost to change our money. Think of what it will cost to change all the ATMs alone.

      --
      Bah!
    15. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Just swipe past the reader and it'll tell you how much money is in your wallet. Or is that the amount in the next person's wallet? Ok, forget it.

      You're not thinking like a politician... The solution isn't to forget it (you do, after all, need to spend money on -something-).

      The solution is to issue everyone a tin wallet---so the amount can only be read from close proximity when the wallet is open. Didn't a similar solution work wonders for passports?

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    16. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      There are other considerations. The American currency was recently redesigned. Part of the new process includes some good anti-counterfeit features. This was important because the $US is the most counterfeited bill in the world. At some point before the visual redesign, there was other stuff put in (a plastic strip, some miniature letters). There's magnetic ink (hold a magnet up to a dollar to see what I mean).

      So you have the same problem you face with updating software. There's a huge legacy user base. How do you retool the country to use the new bills? Vending machines will have issues. Copy machines, printers, commercial software, etc.. will need to be updated. So it's not just a matter of printing the new money, but all those other devices in the US and elsewhere, will need to be updated. Sure, not necessarily the government's task, but it's a responsibility.

      Personally, I would like to see more widespread use of the $1 coin, and introduction of a $5 coin. Just in printing costs alone, it may pay for itself after a few years since coins can stay in circulation for a lot longer.

    17. Re:Didn't anyone think of RFID ?!?! by hillebmw · · Score: 1
      Those are all good points about the retooling.

      Don't forget the other major change that all retailers would have to make. All cash drawers and the insertable tills(money trays) will have to be re-sized so that the new currency fits inside them. Most cash registers don't have any extra space and can't be adapted easily.

      Vending machines would not only have to be reprogrammed to read the new bills, the slots would have to be widened to accommodate the resized currency. Not to mention the effect this will have on the wallet industry if it passes.

      It's not as simple as just printing different sized bills. The associated costs of a change of this magnitude are unreal.

  7. Re:Don't do what china does by Zebadias · · Score: 2, Informative

    China are hardly alone here! For example Euros and Pounds Stirling are both use different sizes for different amounts.

  8. Re:Don't do what china does by Svippy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Exactly what they should do. Most currencies today are done like that, stacking currency is only done in the same bill, so you can tell the difference. Hence most other currencies uses different colours for each note.

    The US is behind.

    --
    Clicked pie.
  9. RFID Implants for everyone! by yamamushi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know, Why don't we just have RFID tags implanted in all of our hands. I mean, wouldn't swiping your hand under an RFID reader be so much easier ;)

    --
    - Aetheral Research -
    1. Re:RFID Implants for everyone! by petabyte · · Score: 1

      "Give me your wallet."

      "Well, ok, but now I carry all of my money in this chip embedded in my hand."
      *Lops off your hand and runs off with it*

      Am I the only one that saw that problem coming?

    2. Re:RFID Implants for everyone! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Be Well, Warden Smithers"



      -demolition man

    3. Re:RFID Implants for everyone! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one that saw that problem coming?

      Everyone with a brain saw that one coming (congratulations on your brain, though).

      That's why the "unremoveable tracking bracelet for kids" idea always terrified me so much.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  10. Re:Don't do what china does by Zebadias · · Score: 1

    For 'are both' read 'also' :)

  11. Why appeal? by wizrd_nml · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is the Treasury Department appealing this ruling? They should embrace it and start solving the problem.

    Who exactly is harmed with this decision? I don't even see why it went to court in the first place.

    1. Re:Why appeal? by jbourj · · Score: 1
      Because Robertson's decision didn't just say the Treasury department was in the wrong, it ordered the Treasury Department
      to start discussing within 30 days potential remedies, including different note sizes for different denominations and raised numerals and perforated dots on the bills.

      That's a time scale, which is very short for bureaucracy.

    2. Re:Why appeal? by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      Who exactly is harmed with this decision?
      I would be if they make the bills different sizes because I wouldn't be able to use them for vending machines.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    3. Re:Why appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Finland we DO have vending machines that accept Euro bills and they are of different sizes.

    4. Re:Why appeal? by TheRealSync · · Score: 1

      No worries - vending machines do exist in other countries too, even here i Europe with our differently sized notes.

      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    5. Re:Why appeal? by clickety6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Euro notes of different sizes and European vending machine handle them OK. make your $100 dollar bill the same size ass your current $1 and make all the rest somewhat smaller and you'll be fine...

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    6. Re:Why appeal? by Skater · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the ones in the US aren't set up to accept different-sized notes, so they'll all have to be changed.

      A lot of that headache could be avoided by making the $1 note the same size - most vending machines only accept ones anyway. But some do accept $5 bills and higher, and these are the ones that could hit organizations much harder. For example, DC's Metro has machines that you can slip in bills to buy a farecard, but the readers don't look to me like they have extra room for wider bills. So, cash-strapped Metro will have to spend money replacing hundreds of bill-readers.

    7. Re:Why appeal? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      zOMG, someone on ./ spelt bureaucracy correctly!

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Why appeal? by TheRealSync · · Score: 1

      True.

      However, I would imagine, that the companies manufacturing the bill-readers are not limited to selling their equipment in the US, and I don't believe they would make custom parts, that are too different from the rest of their standard products, for each country.

      I can, of course, only speculate, but I would think replacing the reader with one that is able to handle differently sized bills is a pretty simple opreation.

      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    9. Re:Why appeal? by Chacham · · Score: 1

      I don't even see why it went to court in the first place.

      Exactly, you insensitive clod!

    10. Re:Why appeal? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Appealing because 30 days isn't enough time to make a phone call or two? Riiight.

      30 days to start talking about possible remedies for the situation is plenty reasonable.

      --
      No Comment.
    11. Re:Why appeal? by alexhard · · Score: 1

      zOMG, someone on ./ spelt bureaucracy correctly!You, on the other hand, misspelled "ZOMG"

      --
      Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
    12. Re:Why appeal? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That's not the only thing I messed up on. Hail Eris.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    13. Re:Why appeal? by OfficialReverendStev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have mod points but had to reply. *sigh* IUTWBEP (I Used To Work for the Bureau of Engraving and Printing) There are several reasons why the Treasury Department would resist this change: 1. There has just been a recent currency redesign. Each one usually takes ~10 years from start to finish. 2. The time it takes has little to do with "retooling" the machines. In fact, during the last changeover there was no gap in production. That is, the old 20's were printed right up until the time the new ones started. The reason? The new currency is printed on new machines. 3. Instead the time is taken by the actual design and preparation process. It takes years to actually get a design that everybody involved (more than you think) will accept. There are always minute details that get changed or massaged until all of the needs and wants are satisfied. Many special groups (in this case, for the blind) will be called in to consult. That frightens federal workers because a. most federal employees don't really care for contractors, despite what they tell you and b. it always takes longer when a consultant is involved, in the federal government or not. 4. The cost of changing the currency is astronomical. It's figured into the budget (my uncle is the chief of budget there... I didn't work for him though, no nepotism) over the course of that ~10 years. To mandate a change in the middle of a cycle will cause serious budget issues. 5. The vending machine industry will vehemently protest because every machine that accepts a bill will need to be changed. Sure, you could propose that we keep the $1 bill the same so that the vast majority of machines won't have to be updated and you're probably right. Unfortunately the vending machine companies will still protest. 6. Assuming this does get passed it will still take years to have it implemented, especially without specific instructions as to how to proceed. 7. If the project is rushed by court order or Treasury mandate the job will not be done well, or will blow the roof off of the budget. Oh yeah, by the way, BEP is NOT funded by Congress. The Federal Reserve buys the currency from them. Therefore, if the budget skyrockets Congress can't just step in and add more cash, unless there's... well an act of Congress. And quit it with the "they can just print more money" lines. Nobody who works for Treasury has ever though that was funny or clever. 8. If it's ordered to be done quickly and there is no budget increase it will be done poorly. Keep in mind that BEP employees, especially those working the presses are some of the finest in their field in the world. However, as anybody in IT will know, it doesn't matter how good you are at your job; if you're rushed and not properly-funded to meet the rush the job suffers. That's what I came up with off the top of my head. There are probably more problems. Maybe this can be worked into the next redesign but that should be a few years underway already. It's hard to change gears in the middle of a long-term project. Don't get me wrong though, I'm all for accessability. I think that it should be done, but now is not the time.

      --
      A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Neitzsche
    14. Re:Why appeal? by honkycat · · Score: 1
      Thanks for an informative post... one thing, though.

      I think that it should be done, but now is not the time.
      It's never going to be cheap, easy, convenient, and popular to make a change like this. It's one of those things that you just have to do or it'll never get done. Note that the order doesn't say they have to fix it immediately, only that they have to start working on it, and the judge went so far as to basically ask that his ruling be appealed.

      I think the thing to do is immediately add these accessibility features to the plan and roll them out on a time scale that's consistent with the economic realities of the process. It's going to be more expensive than not doing it, but that's exactly the reason we have laws that protect the disabled -- the economic pressure to help them is usually in the wrong direction.

      Oh, actually, two things -- line breaks would have made your post a lot easier to read.
    15. Re:Why appeal? by OfficialReverendStev · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree with you that it needs to be implemented. No argument there. The thing is that it can be done easily and within budget if it's done at the right time. Now is, unfortunately, not the right time. It's good that the judge wants this appealed. That will hopefully either, due to the speed of our judicial system delay the process until it can be done easily and within the normal cycle or bring to everyone's attention how hard it would be to implement it now and have an ordered delay.

      Sorry about the lack of line breaks. Very. I was typing in a hurry, hit -enter- without thinking and didn't realize my mistake until after the post was submitted. That's what the preview button is for, right?

      Will do better next time.

      --
      A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Neitzsche
    16. Re:Why appeal? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Damn straight.

      I have always thought that ubiqutous braile might even allow some sighted people to learn it through daily repetetion. Imagine it on door handles (not just rest rooms) so that every time you open a door in a public place you are learning to identify braile. Also imagine dual text/braile books available to children as they learn to read in every school.

      The payoff comes when the power is out or (worst case secnario?) there is a fire and visibility is zero and you need to identify a safe exit route. Or, when old age arrives and macular degeneration (or some other malady) takes your sight, you are already prepared. Even reading glasses would become almost unnecessary if everyone learned braile; provided menus and other reading materials were dual braile/text. Even someting as simple as reading a book in the dark would be a benefit.

      Making money more easily identified will, in much the same way as the scenario I describe above, not only help the blind but will help the sighted as well. The results will be fewer mistakes with change, being able to check your pocket cashflow by feel, and drug deals could be conducted in complete darkness.

      Ok that last one may not be a benefit for most of us but I am sure someone will appreciate it.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    17. Re:Why appeal? by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      Just an idea, but....

      I don't know enough about the use of braille but would a simple machine that pushed raised dots into existing banknotes be considered? What if they had to be holes instead of raised bumps; would braille users still be able to identify them? How large would the bumps need to be to be identifiable, and would this affect auto-sorting machines?

      Seems that the Treasury Dept could easily require that Banks (of a certain size) be responsible for retrofitting the bills by simply passing them through this little device. Et Voila, the bills are now satisfactorily identifiable by the non-sighted.

    18. Re:Why appeal? by OfficialReverendStev · · Score: 1

      It has. There's a problem though. The paper that's used for currency (OK, it's not really paper exactly...) won't hold the dots long enough. Just being put through a dollar slot in a vending machine could press the bumps right out. They could, however, embed something into the paper that would cause a raised bump. As for holes, sure, it's possible but would it be easily-readable by the blind and visually-impaired? I honestly don't know.

      As for requiring banks to do anything with currency as far as modifying it, you're pressing pretty hard against certain laws against defacing currency. Yeah, if it's backed by a government program that could be circumvented. But then you have the problem of quality control. Essentially, the BEP would have almost none, if any at all. That's a Bad Thing. Currency in the U.S. is made to excruciating tollerences. That's why its production hasn't been outsourced to a company yet (making the components, i.e. paper, ink, etc. has).

      --
      A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Neitzsche
    19. Re:Why appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several reasons why the Treasury Department would resist this change: 1. There has just been a recent currency redesign. Each one usually takes ~10 years from start to finish. 2. The time it takes has little to do with "retooling" the machines. In fact, during the last changeover there was no gap in production.
      Br It's not like blind people just appeared yesterday. Sadly they've resisted too long and now much be forced to do it, even if it costs us all more money to fix what should have been a trivial thing to do.

    20. Re:Why appeal? by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      an adhesive maybe? something that would put some 'grit' into the feel of the area on the bill. And braille would probably be the wrong encoding. I see the 1, 2, and 5 differ mostly in orientation so the rotation of the bill in the hand would be pertinent. I guess in the best world each place where a number is printed would have a tactile imprinting that the non-sighted could 'read' and the serial number of the bill would probably be encoded as well. Adhesive would allow using a side of the bill for each purpose.

      I dislike the idea of $1 coins replacing paper bills and also having the bills different sizes. I'm hoping that some other solution is found. It would be great if the solution were so simple as some spots of glue, eh?!

    21. Re:Why appeal? by OfficialReverendStev · · Score: 1

      Glue you say? For bills that stack, you say? In automated machines, you say? What could go wrong?

      Seriously, though, you might be on the right track. You mentioned 'grit'. What about fine-grit sandpaper? As in, apply small strips (or squares, circles, dodecahedrons, whatever) to a part of the bill that will denote the denomination. Say, one strip for a 1, two for a 5, 3 for a 10, 4 for a 20, so on. Or at least a pattern.

      I started to mention something in an earlier post that I didn't really explain well. Since the bills already have a small nylon strip (which does NOTHING to track the bill, take off the tinfoil hats. Seriously, I've seen the contract with the company that makes them, they're exactly what the government says they are. The little blue and red fibers, on the other hand... ahem...)

      Anyway, the nylon strip... it seems that they could use small dots of nylon, thicker than that used for the strip, and embed that inside the paper in a Braille pattern. in this case the system relies on two real-world-proven technologies and simply combines them in a simple fashion (the nylon, proven to be durable in current bills and Braille, proven an adequate alternative to printed text).

      --
      A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Neitzsche
    22. Re:Why appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who exactly is harmed with this decision?
      Tax payers.

    23. Re:Why appeal? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Why not just roll these changes into the next round of currency revisions that were already going to happen? There's already two revisions of the $20 within my living memory, and I'm just 21. One revision of every other bill except the $1 and $2. We can just keep the $1 the same, stop printing the $2 (since nobody uses it anyway), and take the next bill that hasn't been redesigned already (the $50? $100?) and work those features into the redesign.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    24. Re:Why appeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop printing the $2 (since nobody uses it anyway)

      You'd be surprised. Strip clubs love 'em -- the dancers get double the tips.

    25. Re:Why appeal? by rhendershot · · Score: 1

      >>Glue you say? For bills that stack, you say? In automated machines, you say? What could go wrong?

      I was thinking of a spot of compound that would penetrate into the substrate and provide a slightly raised surface. Your idea of nylon embedding is similar but requires releasing new bills. Likely much less cost than redesign of sizes and such. If remediation of existing bills can't be made to work then I'd be happy with your solution.

      Of course, in the grand scheme of things, one wonders about postage stamps, tax forms, etc. etc. etc. The legislation should have probably exempted certain class of things like this.

      ---
      Read The Bills Act - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Read_the_Bills_Act

  12. It's expensive by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cost to retool the machinery is significant. I don't know where they'd be able to scrape together that sort of cash.

    1. Re:It's expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, it's not as if they have a license to print money or anything. Oh, wait...

    2. Re:It's expensive by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      I don't know where they'd be able to scrape together that sort of cash.

      LOL.

      As it stands they won't be able to keep up with the crooks without some reengineering. But they are doing that, aren't they?

    3. Re:It's expensive by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Considering that they have blown (how much?) money redesigning the bills semi-annually to thwart folks bleaching ones and printing 20's, I can't understand it either. If they actually DID make the bills different sizes conterfieters wouldn't be able to do this.

      Just remember Treasury dudes: Print the smaller denominations on smaller paper than the big denominations because lord knows we all know what a paper cutter is for.

      And for God's sake don't ditch the dollar coins... AGAIN. We are finally getting vendomats that will take them.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:It's expensive by caveman · · Score: 1

      The UK manufactures banknotes for a number of countries other than itself (we make Euro coins too, despite not actually being in the 'EuroZone'). The USA could outsource it's money production to a cheaper country, or a country already set up to print secure currency.

      If the notes are redesigned, they would hopefully be designed to the latest anti-forgery standards, with holograms, embedded or overprinted strips (reflective, temperature sensitive, holographic, interwoven etc.), partial designs on opposite sides (so that if both sides are printed even slightly off-centre, the note looks completely wrong when held up to light)

      Besides, machinery like that can pay for itself, literally ;-)

    5. Re:It's expensive by natrius · · Score: 1

      They're not getting rid of the dollar coins any time soon.

      Presidential Dollar Coin Program

    6. Re:It's expensive by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Can you see how hard it is for the Treasury to ask Congress for money? There are so many jokes to be made (intentionally and not) that they barely get to speak. I wish there were a CSPAN highlights channel.

    7. Re:It's expensive by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny
      The USA could outsource it's money production to a cheaper country, or a country already set up to print secure currency.
      Seconded. And while they're at it they could switch to the Euro which already comes in several sizes, colours and with blind friendly features. It would make life easier for tourists and it's not like the dollar is worth anything much anyway... ;)
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:It's expensive by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well lately they have been remaking the currency every 5 years, to keep up beat the counterfeiters. So making a different size currency shouldn't be a major issue.
      Here are my recommendations.
      Drop the production of pennies. They are to small of a currency to carry around. After purchasing items if they need to do cash they round to the nearest 5 cent. As well the difficulty of people carrying pennies, so most people just store them in jars. Drop them on the floor... so we can assume that there is a large amount of money that is not in circulation. So lets get rid of them. Life will just be better because of it.

      Drop Paper Dollars and Expand Coin Dollars. The Dollar Coins are easier for blind to recognize over the other paper money. As well they stay in circulation longer they can last an average of 30 years other then 5 for bills.

      $5.00 bills should be smaller around a playing card size.
      $10.00 bills will be kept the same.
      $20.00 bills will be the same size but the edges will have rounded dips. (Like a cross section of water ripples.)
      $50.00 bills will be the same size but with triangle edges along the side.
      $100.00 bills will be the same size but hourglass shaped.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re:It's expensive by Thraxen · · Score: 1

      I don't really like the idea of dropping paper dollars in favor of dollar coins. I don't know anyone that wishes they had more coins to carry around.

    10. Re:It's expensive by afidel · · Score: 1

      reflective, temperature sensitive, holographic, interwoven etc.), partial designs on opposite sides

      Uh, we already do most of that.... We have transflective ink on the denomination mark in the corners, interwoven security strips that are UV sensitive(different color per denomination), offset designs, watermarks, microprinted features, and have introduced color into the current generation of designs (blasphemers). The greenback is not the same note today that it was a decade ago.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:It's expensive by honkycat · · Score: 1

      That's only because they can't even PAY people to use the damn things...

    12. Re:It's expensive by chaoticzen · · Score: 1

      Exactly! The cost of retrofitting all the machinery to accommodate a small population of the greater whole is more than likely cost prohibitive. Am I the only one that really sees this as a frivolous lawsuit?! Do we really have time to deal with these things when there are so many other important things going on that can better use our tax dollars and court time? What next? A lawsuit saying that radio is discriminatory to the deaf? Clothing manufacturers are discriminatory to amputees because everything has two sleeves and two pant legs? Fashion designers are discriminatory to the color blind because they make clothes in colors they can't see? Where does this end? When you try to accommodate everyone you end up alienating the majority. I see the point about the money being difficult for the blind, but I also fail to see why it is the fault of the government and their responsibility to fix it. I just can't get over how petty and ridiculous this is...I can't wait for people to try and sue as many web pages as they can, like Slashdot, for not "doing something" so the blind can surf the web too, like making all pages in audio or something.

      --
      Reality is for people that can't handle drugs. So do your part, just say no to reality!
    13. Re:It's expensive by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Speaking of expensive things, have you SEEN the prices for a pound of marijuana lately?

      I know it doesn't grow on trees or anything but...oh wait...

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    14. Re:It's expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes I think 'Oh, wait...' kills jokes.

    15. Re:It's expensive by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately most countries money costs more to make than it's worth.

      Since the U.S. money printers are private they'll lose money. This decision could force the U.S. to institute public sector currency production

    16. Re:It's expensive by still+cynical · · Score: 1
      ...but I also fail to see why it is the fault of the government and their responsibility to fix it.


      Maybe because it's the government that MAKES the money?

      I really hope this was intended a a joke.
      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
  13. Fold your $! by Fecal+Troll+Matter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always did wonder how, in the U.S., blind people dealt with money. I ended up meeting a friend of my father's who was blind, so I asked him. He told me that he has someone (someone who can see, obviously) fold his money a certain way -- singles get folded in half, 5's got folded into an L-shape, 10's got folded another way and so on so that he always knew what denomination of money he was taking out of his wallet.

    1. Re:Fold your $! by Builder · · Score: 1

      That's fine for money that he already has, but how does he know he's not getting stiffed when people give him change?

      Damn, I thought SA was backwards, but we've had excellent support for the blind with regards to currency there for years.

    2. Re:Fold your $! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this what the comic book character Dare Devil did to keep track of his money?

      Because blind people are unable to distinguish U.S. currency without assistance, the court held that they are denied meaningful access to their own money.
      Of course someone can always assist them, but the point is there should be currency that doesn't require assistance.

    3. Re:Fold your $! by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      I also know someone who does this.

      Really, once it's folded, no two denominations can be confused. Each is a distinct shape/size.

      Before anyone mentions it, though, this wouldn't really work in general, because if you did this with all bills (for non-blinds as well), then money wouldn't fit in a wallet, a cash drawer, etc., and everyone know how Americans hate change.

    4. Re:Fold your $! by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      It's not that hard, as long as you have near exact change.

      If I give you $20 for a $16 purchase, I expect four bills back. How are you going to stiff me? Slip me a five instead?

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    5. Re:Fold your $! by zen-theorist · · Score: 1
      I always did wonder how, in the U.S., blind people dealt with money. I ended up meeting a friend of my father's who was blind, so I asked him. He told me that he has someone (someone who can see, obviously) fold his money a certain way -- singles get folded in half, 5's got folded into an L-shape, 10's got folded another way and so on so that he always knew what denomination of money he was taking out of his wallet.
      i say, dont fold those singles in half. crumple them up to relieve your frustration when you find they dont buy even a coke or a strippers smile.
    6. Re:Fold your $! by woztheproblem · · Score: 1

      If you give me a $20 for a $14 purchase, and I tell you I'm giving you a $5 and a $1, will you trust me?

    7. Re:Fold your $! by joshetc · · Score: 1

      Since you cannot see and already know that is a problem you make sure you keep enough to pay exactly or within the dollar. Counting change without being able to see is fairly trivial. If something costs $55.39 and you give them a $50, $5, and $1 bill you would expect a small stack of change (two quarters, a dime, and a penny I guess) and not get conned..

    8. Re:Fold your $! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you Muddie?

    9. Re:Fold your $! by Saxophonist · · Score: 1

      I recall in elementary school, in a unit on inventions, being told of a local inventor who patented some sort of braille tab that could be attached to bills with the intent that banks would add and remove these tabs for blind people. The reason they were not successful was exactly what you described -- the device was deemed unnecessary because of folding the bills.

      (That was long enough ago that I'm almost positive the patent has expired now, for the record.)

    10. Re:Fold your $! by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      Ray Charles used to insist on being paid in singles because he didn't trust anyone including his manager.

    11. Re:Fold your $! by Builder · · Score: 1

      I still think South Africa and Europe have it better on this - each note and coin is simple for the blind to identify, even in the absence of other bills or coins to compare to.

    12. Re:Fold your $! by ndogg · · Score: 1

      How does he avoid deception? For example, how can he be certain that the cashier he's dealing with is honest enough to do that and not, say, fold a dollar bill into an L-shape to give to him, and then pocket four ones to keep the books straight?

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  14. Accessibility is good for everybody by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ramps built into buildings for wheelchairs make it easier to get heavy gear in and out. Braile on ATM keyboards and lift buttons make it easier to distinguish between keys. Audio-tactile devices on pedestrian crossings provide a better UI for people regardless of whether they can see or not.

    Trust me. US currency will be better for everybody if it accomodates blind people.

    1. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I keep looking at the handicap ramps and think "That's going to make life so much easier for a tracked or wheeled robot."

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Yep. The Daleks' only weakness is they can't climb stairs.

      Why destroy our only chance of survival?

    3. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      ...and you thought your childhood treehouse was a pointless flight of fancy! But wait, kids today don't even have treehouses. We really ARE screwed.

    4. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > I keep looking at the handicap ramps and think "That's going to make
      > life so much easier for a tracked or wheeled robot."

      Well, don't come whining to *me* when the Daleks can get in your house.
      I tried to warn you.

      Chris Mattern

    5. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Absolutely.

      Another place where this is true is with software. Properly designed accessible software is much easier for everyone to use. Funny story, the company I work for has some contracts with state-run agencies in the US. We recently just released an e-commerce site to one of them. We take styling cues from the agencies own existing presence and do our best to provide a service that is as close to seamless for the end user as possible...with caveats however.

      Our site was designed to cover 508 compliance, something that these agencies are going to be required to include in future contracts. Their sites currently use medium-light grey text on a medium-dark grey background...I find it hard to read, never mind certain people with certain vision impairments. We used black on white as it is the only truly reasonable choice for accessible reasons, in particular when there is no additional info being conveyed by colour. The head of this particular agency refused to sign off on the site until we changed it to the way their site looked. We had to find a user that was willing to sue this agency if they didn't ensure that the service they were providing was fully accessible. Would have been kinda funny if they'd forced the issue though...they could have ended up in a position where they'd have to sue themselves for non compliance of their own service ;)

      But anyways, there really is no good reason not to make software accessible. Once you know what is required, it becomes standard practice to just do the right thing in the first place and there is really no overhead to compliance.

      --
      No Comment.
    6. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Very true. Expanding on what the sibling poster said, website designers who use more minimalist designs compatible with screen readers (like Craigslist, Google, and most websties as of 1997) scare fewer non-disabled viewers away and can better interface with search engines. They also have fewer tech support/maintenance problems, less bandwidth required, and are least likely to be incompatible with a given browser.

    7. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by powerlord · · Score: 1
      Yep. The Daleks' only weakness is they can't climb stairs.

      Why destroy our only chance of survival?


      Real daleks don't climb stairs, they level buildings.
      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    8. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by bmajik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But, it has a cost. I don't know how often you've tried to use cash-accepting vending machines in the US, but even with our uniform sized notes, my entire life I've come to expect that there is a 5-20% failure rate on a given machine accepting a given note. Imagine my total surprise when i found that machines in Germany had no problem accepting the different sized Euro notes without trouble.

      Significant retooling will be required by all commercial entities in the US that deal with automated cash handling machines. ATMs, food vending, etc etc.

      Analagously, ADA rules have prevented my wife from opening a small business - the mandatory changes required to the building simply destroyed the budget for the project.

      ADA Compliance / Accessability has a cost, and it tends to be an up-front cost.

      On the positive side, it may have unintended benefits later - for instance, the pervasive keyboard/accessibility support in the Windows platform and applicatinos make UI automation of Microsoft programs somewhat easier than some other systems.

      I think people fall into a trap and use emotional based reasoning too often. There are real costs and real disadvantages to making things Accessible. From a business perspective, it is often "not worth it". Certainly there exists some disability such that it is completely ridiculous to try and support persons with that condition.

      There's been a lot of "innovation" in US currency lately. The people that work on this sort of stuff are being paid with tax dollars... tax dollars that might be better spent elsewhere.

      Ok, who am I kidding. My tax dollars never get spent well. Might as well use it on resizing currency notes :)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    9. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me. US currency will be better for everybody if it accomodates blind people.

      Sure, I'd be happy to trust a random stranger on Slashdot.

    10. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Significant retooling will be required by all commercial entities in the US that deal with automated cash handling machines. ATMs, food vending, etc etc.


      I'm not so certain of that. Canada has dealt with this issue by stamping braile (at least I assume they are braile) raised-dots onto all of the bills. They are only raised enough to be tactile, and I doubt they would interfere with any existing automated cash machines.

      It seems to be a pretty good system...
    11. Re:Accessibility is good for everybody by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Daleks can LE-VI-TATE now. Their weakness is no longer stairs--it's now dei ex machinis.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  15. This is an easy thing to solve... by tgd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Scratch and sniff.

    Make each bill smell like something else. Make a five smell like coffee, since thats what a coffee at starbucks costs. Ten smells like pizza. Twenty smells like chinese food, and a hundred smells like fine leather.

    The one doesn't smell like a damn thing, since you can't do much with it anyway.

    1. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Alkonaut · · Score: 2, Funny

      The one doesn't smell like a damn thing, since you can't do much with it anyway.Aren't they mainly used for tipping strippers? Oh wait.

    2. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by gamer4Life · · Score: 1

      Change the $1 to a coin - in Canada, they started using coins for the lower bills to reduce cost, since coins last longer.

      A positive(?) side effect is that many people start to spend more because having $1 and $2 coins in their pockets weighs them down.

    3. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      They tried to do that in the US, but it never really took of. I think it is quite hard to make such a change in the US, most people are very resistant to change, like using the metric system.

      The US mint wanted to use coins, it would have saved them about $25 million a year, but nobody liked it. They really should have just forced the issue, like they did in Australia and the UK. Of course, everybody hated it, but we all got used to after a while.

    4. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 0

      You can buy a song from iTunes with a dollar so make it smell of apple.

    5. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Informative
    6. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      My wallet is going to smell pretty raunchy at the end of the week.

      Besides, when all the bills rub together he scent is going to transfer. Plus you can make any bill smell like the 100 with a cheap can of "New Car Smell"

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, that's always annoyed me.
      Treasury Accountant: Hey! If we use 1$ coins instead of 1$ bills, we'll save X million dollars a day!
      Treasury President: Brilliant idea, let's get on making some new 1$ coins right away. ... time passes...
      Treasury Accountant: Well, no one is using the 1$ coins.
      Treasury President: But we spent X billion dollars on marketing them! Damn, I guess 1$ coins just won't work.
      Repeat every decade or so.

      If you want people to stop using 1$ bills, STOP PRINTING THEM.

    8. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by masnare · · Score: 0

      I think most one dollar bills already smell like a stripper so we have a head start!!

    9. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      Then again, the main reason sited for not liking it in the US is that the silver dollar looks too much like a quarter.

      People are used to having distinct sizes and shapes on their change even if they're not on their money, and it's not happening there.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    10. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by dosius · · Score: 1

      Well, there is no confusing a Sacagawea dollar for a quarter (as it's a different color, somewhat like a Canadian looney). So that's no longer an excuse.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    11. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Woldry · · Score: 1

      But then why did the Sacagawea dollar coin fail? I really liked those -- different color, significantly thicker feel, smooth edge (unlike the serrated edge of the quarter).

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    12. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by GamerCowboy · · Score: 1

      Yea, I don't know if I would like that smell very much.

      --
      void
    13. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > But then why did the Sacagawea dollar coin fail? I really liked those --
      > different color, significantly thicker feel, smooth edge (unlike the
      > serrated edge of the quarter).

      Because people don't like $1 coins. $1 bills are much more convenient. Using
      coins for denominations worth approximately $1 worked elsewhere because equivalent
      bills were discontinued, giving people no choice. $1 coins will work here only
      if $1 bills are likewise eliminated.

      Chris Mattern

    14. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Flamekebab · · Score: 0

      Slight problem..
      Some of us, such as myself, have crippled senses of smell. Often I can't smell anything, or when I can, I can't identify what the smell corresponds to.
      For example I might smell liquorice and not be sure whether it's that or cinnamon. It's quite odd, but I'm used to it.

    15. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins haven't become popular simply because they are inconvenient to use. Who wants/needs a pound (0.454 kg) of dollar coins jangling around in their pants pocket or purse?

      Also, I'd rather my appreciation of exotic dancers be accomplished with nice warm dollar bills, not little hard dollar coins.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
    16. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Some of us, such as myself, have crippled senses of smell. Often I can't smell anything

      I've always been interested by the fact that there's no common equivalent of "blind" or "deaf" that refers to a deficient sense of smell. Do you find that not being able to smell interferes much with your ability to get around in the world, aside from enjoyment of food?

      An olfaction researcher recently told me the technical term is "anosmia," which is a pretty cool word.

    17. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Znork · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "If you want people to stop using 1$ bills, STOP PRINTING THEM."

      You're assuming it's the treasury that's actually printing the $1 bills.

      Seriously tho, it's been done lots of times in a lot of countries; you not only stop printing them, you set a deadline for validity. After that, shops wont take them and you have, like, a year or something during which banks will trade them in. Then you have several years when it's possible to trade them in at the treasury, or something. After that, it's the collectors market.

      Personally, I suspect that the invalidation is what scares the treasury and/or politicians. With the dollar (unlike more regularly upgraded and less distributed currencies), there's the risk that there's actually so much unaccounted for mattress and black market (real and/or counterfeit) currency that its sudden reentry into circulation might even cause fluctuations in the exchange rates, which would further devalue the dollar as a general exchange medium.

    18. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by iknowcss · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, fishy.

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    19. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it failed? The post office gives them out for change from their vending machines and there are other vending machines that take them now.

      The problem is that there are 4 different ways to give someone a single piece of currency valued at $1. There's the $1 bill, the old Eisenhower silver dollars, the Susan B Anthony coin, and the Sacagawea coin. The SBA's failed miserably because they are indistinguishable from quarters by the average cashier who sees thousands of quarters each day, and maybe two SBA's the entire year.

      Another poster had the crux of the issue. The reason $1 coins aren't more common is because there's still plenty of paper $1's around. If the paper $1's were slowly removed from circulation, people would get used to accepting the $1 coins unless they really prefer 100 pennies.

    20. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example I might smell liquorice and not be sure whether it's that or cinnamon. It's quite odd, but I'm used to it.

            I'd have that brain tumor looked at if I were you...

    21. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Surely people aren't storing all their cash as $1 bills in their mattresses.

    22. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      That is why they have coin slots.

    23. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      People keep saying that, but it hasn't been set up to succeed.

      The US has very regularly had 1 dollar coins available. They have never decided to make that their standard form of currency though. This is the furthest they've ever gone with 1 dollar coins sure, but it's not far enough for it to become standard to use, and not even close to enough to usurp the current paper dollar.

      The only way for the 1 dollar coin to really come into it's own in the US is to deprecate the paper dollar. Anything less will continue to relegate any 1 dollar coins to niches, which fosters less support for it, which fosters less acceptance by people...etc etc.

      Either move to dollar coins, or continue to release curiosities and collectibles. I'd suggest that now would be the ideal time to do the former...one denomination instantly compliant.

      --
      No Comment.
    24. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by mdemonic · · Score: 1

      Your at starbucks, but you cant find your fives because of all the coffee smell, your about to pay the pizza guy, but you cant find your ten anymore because of the pizza smell... It would make blind people go nuts

    25. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      It's not that people don't like coins...people simply aren't used to them. By their nature, people resist change.

      Everywhere I've encountered that has replaced lower denomination bills with coins, people have gotten very used to the idea. No one misses 1 and 2 dollar bills in Canada, that's for sure.

      Trust me, the first time you dive into your pocket for coffee change and pull out enough value for a decent lunch, you'll be hooked. Or stick a single coin in the parking meter for the afternoon instead of digging for and hoping to find enough quarters to do the same. Much easier to send the kid to the store for a bag of milk without worrying about them having enough change to buy a couple chocolate bars. Perfect for kids allowances...paper money just doesn't hold up very well in kids pockets ;)

      It's a good thing, but unfortunately yes, for it to be accepted it has to be forced initially.

      --
      No Comment.
    26. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Paco103 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem at all with the $1 coin - but it's absolutely useless when no vending machine takes it. When vending machines and strippers take $1 coins. . . people will be more receptive to them!

    27. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by LordEd · · Score: 1

      Had to check, but i heard that many bills had traces of cocaine. Still want scratch and sniff?

      (not enough to have any effects, but the myth is listed as true

    28. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      I was in the Denver Mint a few years ago, and they said that the $1 coin was a huge success as far as they were concerned. They are a profit-generating branch of government, so I'm inclined to believe them even if I rarely see the coin itself.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    29. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Flamekebab · · Score: 0

      It's quite odd, my sense of taste doesn't seem overly affected and sometimes I catch the odd whiff of something, but it vanishes in moments. It's almost as if my sense of smell has a very short attention span. In the same way that the human ear "tunes out" background noise, my nose "tunes out" smells into the background, even prominent ones last no longer than a very brief moment.

      I wouldn't say I have true "anosmia", but generally it's easier to say "I pretty much can't smell anything" than to explain the fine details!

      My father has been curious about the name too for many years as my mother seems to have the same thing. I didn't get it until more recent years, I think, or at least I only started noticing it in the last few years. Generally it doesn't cause me too many problems, it just means smells that I'd like to be able to keep smelling (such as my girlfriend's hair) don't stay. On the plus side, I live in a flat (or apartment if you prefer) with four other guys (at university) so it's not always a bad thing!

    30. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Congress is currently looking at the 'Coin Act' which would phase out the penny. Due to inflation the penny costs 0.13c to make, which is costing the mint too much. The Act allows the mint to look at using other cheaper materials such as aluminum.

      Btw printing a dollar bill costs 3 cents. Now thats good value, for.. money.

      The Act also extends the Federal Reserve's power to mint the US currency, -so that the Treasury would no longer mint the currency as well as control the currency.

    31. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by ohearn · · Score: 1

      The main problem with the $1 coins is that collectors grabbed so many of them that not enough stayed in circulation. This at least is according to an article I read last week when they were talking about making a new $1 coin. Sorry, I don't remember were the article was from.

    32. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ex Post Facto.

      By title, the dollar bill is guaranteed to be a functional currency. You can stop printing them, but by law, you cannot invalidate the old bills.

    33. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They tried to do that in the US

      No they didn't. the US only introduced the coin, but they never stopped printing the $1 bill.

      Canada has actually had a $1 coin for a _VERY_ long time, but it was not until they introduced a $1 coin that was intended to completely replace the bill that its usage actually started increasing. The mint reduced circulation of $1 bills, ultimately ceasing printing them completely, and bills that found their way to a bank were to be turned over to the mint and replaced with coins to ensure increased circulation. As a note of interest, this coin is, as most are doubtless aware, often called "The Loonie" by the public, which at least originally was a pun name, because the coin portrays a loon on the tails side of the coin, and when they first announced intent to replace the bill with the coin, most thought that the idea was a crazy one. Because of this reaction, many people horded $1 bills that they came across in respectable condition, possibly hoping that they would grow in value. This hording reduced the number of $1 bills that the mint was able to successfully recall out of circulation and as a result, the Canadian $1 bill is _STILL_ only worth about a dollar to collectors, even though the Canadian $1 bill has been out of circulation for nearly 20 years. The Royal Canadian Mint only recently (this year) secured the legal rights to the name "Loonie". Prior to this time, its proper name was just the "$1 coin".

      The US mint wanted to use coins, it would have saved them about $25 million a year, but nobody liked it. They really should have just forced the issue, like they did in Australia and the UK.
      ... and Canada. People are the same, everywhere... nobody likes change. But when the issue is forced upon people, they do most certainly adapt to it.
    34. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      You eat hundred-dollar leather? Ew.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    35. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and a hundred smells like fine leather.

      I thought it was common knowledge that hundred dollar bills smell like cocaine. Or is that just an urban legend?
    36. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by 2short · · Score: 1


      I've no doubt the various dollar coins have been a great success when it comes to selling them to coin collectors. But I for one don't see competing with private makers of collectible trinkets as a terribly good role for government.

      A good role for government would be replacing low-denomination curency with more cost effective coins, saving the country money. By which measure, if you rarely see the coin yourself, it has failed; no matter who says otherwise.

      Whoever told you dollar coins are a success ought to consider that maybe the US Mints mission and measures of success ought to reach beyond their own gift shop.

    37. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by BiggerBoat · · Score: 1

      That's correct, and the law you're referring to is the U.S. Coinage Act of 1965, which applies to all U.S. coins and currency. U.S. currency can be taken out of circulation, but it cannot be demonetized, at least not under current law.

    38. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      Dollar coins haven't become popular simply because they are inconvenient to use. Who wants/needs a pound (0.454 kg) of dollar coins jangling around in their pants pocket or purse?

      How do you explain Australia and Canada then? I've spent a week vacation in AU and simply loved the currency there. It's so much more intuitive.

      I think one major problem with a $1 coin though is the sheer lack of $2 currency. The way it is, you'd need FOUR $1 coins to bridge the gap between the low end dollar values. With a $2 bill (or better yet, a $2 coin) you'd only ever *need* one $1 coin and you'd be more motivated to spend it when you get it.

      The treasury should start phasing out mass production of the $1 for starters, probably down to 33% of current levels and raise the $2 to the same level, that being 33% of current $1 production. This would maintain the same amount of currency in circulation but with 33% less bills printed. The initial cost would be trivial as it simply requires replacing the plates on an existing $1 machine. (Not taking account any future change in shape, but that'd be sweeping anyway, so wouldn't make a difference with this. Just make more $2 plates than $1 plates.)

      As far as the exotic dancer argument, with more and more states passing 'no touching' laws, you might end up being relegated to dropping it in a hat on the runway soon anyway.

    39. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckily the USA has a team of people whose job it is to make new laws! Whoever came up with that system must have seen this coming.

    40. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Myopic · · Score: 1

      A $1 bill could smell like the crack of your ass. Or, even better, George Washington's ass.

    41. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Seriously tho, it's been done lots of times in a lot of countries; you not only stop printing them, you set a deadline for validity.

      Aside from the fact that it is currently not legal to invalidate currency in the U.S., why would you want to do this? The lifespan of paper currency that's actually involved in the economy isn't terribly long, and has to be replaced frequently. It would be replaced with coins, and the paper would naturally fade out. The only paper $1 bills left at that point would be those that are not changing hands in any appreciable way.

      With the dollar (unlike more regularly upgraded and less distributed currencies), there's the risk that there's actually so much unaccounted for mattress and black market (real and/or counterfeit) currency that its sudden reentry into circulation might even cause fluctuations in the exchange rates, which would further devalue the dollar as a general exchange medium.

      That money still exists no matter what you do. If you invalidate the $1 bill then you simply give an incentive for everyone posessing these $1-bill stuffed matresses to dump them all onto the market within a short time period, causing exactly the problem you're trying to avoid. The solution: Don't invalidate them. Slowly, over time, they will re-enter the economy and most likely be replaced very quickly. Market disruption is minimized, and even better nobody gets screwed finding out in fifty years that their grandmother's secret stash of $1 bills is now worthless because it is not recognized currency (instead it is worthless because of inflation).

      All you have to do to replace the $1 bill is stop printing them. Personally, I'm not convinced that's a good idea, but it would work.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    42. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by nilbog · · Score: 1

      Well the "one" will end up smelling like a stripper's ass crack anyway. Problem solved.

      --
      or else!
    43. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You could change that today, but you are still left with 41 years' worth of money that can't be declared valueless.

    44. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised. A friend had a grandparent pass away and they found over $8000 in coins and small bills when they cleaned out the house. Takes all kinds.

    45. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1
      I think one major problem with a $1 coin though is the sheer lack of $2 currency.
      If you are talking about US currency, you are incorrect. The USA does have a $2 note - see United States two-dollar bill for details.
      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    46. Re:This is an easy thing to solve... by Volante3192 · · Score: 1

      It exists, but it's a redheaded stepchild compared to the other six denomination. Might as well not exist. (As a note, I did say 'raise the printing level of the $2s' but I can see how the deeper meaning of that could've been missed...I'm not always a clear writer without the benefit of a lengthy editorial process)

      There's $8.7 Billion in $1 bills circulated, and $1.5B in $2s (for 750M paper bills). Despite that many $2s, though, they're rarely circulated. Most are 'collectables', either purchased directly from the treasury or previously circulated ones held on to as a keepsake. To compare, there's 2 billion in $5s circulated.

      What needs to be done is get about 3 Bil in $2s and 3 Bil in $1s circulated, more or less. (I have my almanac! I can check actual numbers! Yeay for reference materials...) That keeps the amount of currency in circulation the same, but 1/3rd less the physical bills created. With more $2s in circulation, wear and tear on $1s would go down so they wouldn't have to be destroyed and reprinted as often.

      That would be a perfect time to start phasing out the $1 bill entirely and replace it with more durable coinage.

      One personal anecdote, when I took a trip to Australia and hit the exchange, I just happened to have a $2 US with me. They had never seen one before.

  16. Fool non blind people too by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    Have a wad of $1's and put a $100 note in either side. Or just have 1 odd $1 in the pack and short change the sucker by $99

    1. Re:Fool non blind people too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you EVER paid for something with a 'wad' of $100 bills? O_.

  17. Declining dollar by wicho661 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Accessibility of the physical dollar to the blind is the least of the Treasury's problems. How about addressing it's declining value?

    Also, speaking as a business owner, changing the bill's size would cost me time and money. No thanks!

    1. Re:Declining dollar by DaAdder · · Score: 1

      First of all I'm not entirely sure the treasury department has much to do with the declining value of the dollar. Unless they start printing solid gold bills, I doubt there's much they can do to raise its value.

      Secondly, if your business suffers noticably from having bills provided in slightly varying sizes, then darwin has stated that your business was not fit to be.

      I'm sure less mistakes in the money handling and disables people having an easier time making purchases would make up for any inconvenience to you. If not, then see above.

    2. Re:Declining dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addressing it? The fed causes it, they are the ONLY cause (of inflation). They print more money (or the equivalent), buy real assets with it, they get something for nothing you get money thats worth less as prices rise. This operation is not economically any different from counter-fitting.

      Historically this wasn't allowed by banks because of the boom bust cycles it generates. Its only recently ~100 yrs or so this has been allowed - resulting in bigger longer more damaging boom bust cycles. These detrimental effects have been know about for millenia - several well known presidents put stops to it in the past.

    3. Re:Declining dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accessibility of the physical dollar to the blind is the least of the Treasury's problems. How about addressing it's declining value?

      Also, speaking as a business owner, changing the bill's size would cost me time and money. No thanks!

      Gee, Einstein, hasn't it occured to you that the dollars ugliness and boringness is the reason it is so weak? Who wants to trade in something so unasthetic?

      If you want the dollar to do well on the international market, you have to prettify it.

      Stupid americans.

    4. Re:Declining dollar by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Also, speaking as a business owner, changing the bill's size would cost me time and money. No thanks!
      You're one of those business owners who counts the paper clips and keeps the employee bathroom stocked with the cheap toilet paper, aren't you?

      Speaking as a business owner, I'm very much in favor of anything that makes it easier for more people to give me their money, and I also just like being gracious and accessible to as many people as possible. Any decent business owner knows that some things are worth shelling out an initial expense for.
    5. Re:Declining dollar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'd certainly hate to inconvenience you to make it easier for someone less fortunate to function in society. I mean, it's the basis of the country since I'm pretty sure the U.S. Constitution said something about "things should be convenient for business owners"

      PS: love euro's and Aussie dollar notes, hate pounds notes (too damn large). U.S. money is dull and old fashioned. But when it comes to it, I'll take money however ;)

    6. Re:Declining dollar by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      I don't know... the declining dollar makes US good cheaper and non-US goods more expensive. Sounds like a good deal for the US to me.

  18. How about adding Braille by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or some easily distinguishable raised section?

    this has the added benefit of adding an extra anti-forgery mechnaism.

    1. Re:How about adding Braille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of using different paper or braille, use something more simple, like different colors.

    2. Re:How about adding Braille by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new (post-2002) Canadian bills have Braille embossing in the top right corner.

    3. Re:How about adding Braille by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Does Braille last on currency? I'd think it would get squashed flat after being stuffed into wallets and things.

  19. Euro banknotes by polar+red · · Score: 1
    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
  20. I don't understand what the problem is by JumperCable · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About 8 years ago I working in a building that had a blind man (none of this legally/partially blind bs) running the convience stand. He showed me one day how he determined the value of the currency handed to him. He felt the ridges on the corners of the bills. He could also feel the patterns of the faces.

    Pull out an old style $1 from your wallet. This the type of bill he was working with at the time. The black ink is slightly raised. The newer bills have slightly raised black ink too with different patterns. Run your finger nail across them to feel the ridges.

    1. Re:I don't understand what the problem is by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slowly slip your finger into the crease. Rub the tips of your index finger along the outer edge and blow softly to smooth over the fibers.

      Now wet your finger with your tongue and ever so delicately pinch the corner between your thumb and forefinger.

      That's it. Slowly. Just like that, baby. Mmm..

    2. Re:I don't understand what the problem is by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

      Though I surely can't tell a bill's denomination the way you describe it, I can tell the denomination of newer bills that use the color-shifting ink on the bottom right ($10-$100). They are different sizes, and quite easy to distinguish by just brushing your finger over them. The ink for this is much thicker than the regular printing ink.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    3. Re:I don't understand what the problem is by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw that movie to, pretty funny. See no evil, do no evil.

    4. Re:I don't understand what the problem is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      ridiculous.

      anyone who has ever been anywhere outside of the U.S knows and understands that the U.S currency is the worst to handle in the entire world.

      Even if you can see, its all the same size and colour. its the only currency i'm aware of that you actually have to look at the front face of each note to determine its denomination.

      determining a notes denomination based on the thickness of the ink used to print it seems far fetched to me.

    5. Re:I don't understand what the problem is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why can't you just look at the back? don't let the latin scare you, i swear there are numbers in the corners.

  21. ATMs by tttonyyy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Come to think about it, ATMs must be nigh on impossible to use too.

    Inserting the card and entering a PIN sounds doable blind - but then you're presented with screens to navigate via soft keys (and it's different between ATMs). No chance.

    Funny the things us sighted people take for granted.

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    1. Re:ATMs by Alkonaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ATM:s here (Europe) have Braille buttons and one button switches on a speaker voice reading the instructions on screen.

    2. Re:ATMs by dogwoodwind · · Score: 1

      I wanna see the blind guy that drives up to the ATM. If he can drive, he can see money. Seriously though, Currency carries GERMS and is NASTY. Everyone should be using ATM / DEBIT cards. It's more secure, safe and wouldn't infringe on blind folks.

    3. Re:ATMs by mgblst · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finding a hot chick must be pretty hard as well. I mean, I guess you feel her to make sure she doesn't have any moles or a moustache, but how can you feel pretty? Can't be done.

    4. Re:ATMs by Diamondback · · Score: 1

      Almost every ATM I've seen where I live (Michigan) has a button with braille under it that will cause the ATM to read everything on the screen to the person using it.

    5. Re:ATMs by Lissajous · · Score: 1
      but how can you feel pretty? Can't be done.

      Ask Maria from West Side Story. She feels pretty.
    6. Re:ATMs by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      how can you feel pretty? Can't be done.

      AFAIK blind people indeed feel what someone looks like. They can basically swipe their hand across your face and visualize the facial features. Why should tactile information (in 3D non the less) be inferior to a bunch of photons hitting your retinas?

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    7. Re:ATMs by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      Why would prettiness matter to a blind person in the first place?

      Better to just find someone who was soft in all the right places.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
    8. Re:ATMs by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Funny the things us sighted people take for granted.

        I hate it that ATM's all have different interfaces, you'd have thought they would have aggreed on some standard one (just for getting your money out, not for all the other features) so that blind people could use them and everyone else doesn't have to look to use an ATM.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    9. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wanna see the blind guy that drives up to the ATM. If he can drive, he can see money.

      I'm not blind but I generally walk to ATMs. Why would he need to drive? I'm sure I must be missing something.
    10. Re:ATMs by putaro · · Score: 1

      What makes you think your ATM card is all nice and clean? You're sticking it in the same reader everyone else is putting theirs in. When someone sneezes on their card and stuffs it in the ATM I'm sure the next person gets some of that snot on their card.

    11. Re:ATMs by clickety6 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I'm not blind but I generally walk to ATMs. Why would he need to drive? I'm sure I must be missing something.

      you're probably missing the extra 200 pounds the lard-assed American at the drive-in ATM has ;-)

      (Please feel free to mod as flamebait ;-)

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    12. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Audio Jack + braille keys

      Hope you carry around a pair of headphones, though

    13. Re:ATMs by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Come to think about it, ATMs must be nigh on impossible to use too.

      Inserting the card and entering a PIN sounds doable blind - but then you're presented with screens to navigate via soft keys (and it's different between ATMs). No chance.


      Not exactly true. With the exception of small ATMs at mini-marts which I have not looked at in great detail as I always hunt for my bank or "a" bank atm, they have brail instructions. I've also noted a headphone jack on some machines. I've not tried it "but" I imagine if one is blind, one would talk to their bank, and get a walkthrough as to how to use it. I would also imagine that other blind users would need help finding other cash machines, and if worse came to worse they could dial the phone number of their cell and get instructions, but if I was blind, I would stick to my own bank or use a debit machine.

      Now... the funny thing is retrofitting ATM machines designed for the drivethrough, and slapping brail on them, ignoring the pedestrian to car accidents at these locations with sited people. I'm not talking spiffy new ATMs, i'm talking old green screens with burn in getting slapped on brail labels. When I asked the teller about the subject she said, "Oh, that's for blind people driving cars".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    14. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or hard in all the right places, if that's what you're into.

    15. Re:ATMs by hanssprudel · · Score: 1

      Why would prettiness matter to a blind person in the first place? Better to just find someone who was soft in all the right places.

      This sounds like a good choice for the rest of us, too...

    16. Re:ATMs by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Aren't all of your ATMs more or less identical? I've never been to a Wells Fargo ATM I had to look at, and here in California all the Bank of America ATMs I've seen have the exact same layout. When I lived in Canada, there were two basic layouts. I guess I just don't see them as being very much differentiated, and I'd wager that most people also haven't noticed.

    17. Re:ATMs by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      It's actually just because ATMs are interchangeable. When they're made or serviced or replaced, it's easier not to have to worry about where they can and can't be placed. Additionally, I've known a blind person who used drive-through ATMs. She had her driver pull forward and used the ATM from the rear passenger seat, because getting out of the car at a busy bank and finding the appropriate line and then back to the car is tedious, and at deserted ATMs at night, potentially unsafe.

    18. Re:ATMs by mgblst · · Score: 1

      What are you, racist? What about blind chicks!

      And anyway, prettiness would still matter, when you were showing her off to your blind friends!

      ____
      I am allowed to make fun of blind people, because I fell in love with a blind chick!

    19. Re:ATMs by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

      Trust me, my best friend is blind, and this is something that should have been done a long time ago. As far as accessibility for ATM's go, quite a few have headphone jacks in my area. The biggest point of contention is the people that had you the money. My friend keeps track of his finances in his head and has been ripped off a couple of times by underhanded scum working a register, and it is not as though he has a lot of money as it is. The real question is: when will it happen, not if it'll happen. I seem to remember a lot of people bitching about building wheel-chair ramps for access to buildings before they were common place, but it had to be done. Most of all, this is the friggin' governement and they should be setting the standard; not trying to avoid it.

    20. Re:ATMs by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, Currency carries GERMS and is NASTY.

            Do you autoclave your ATM card several times a day? Your very own mouth contains about 2.0 x 10^7 bacteria per cubic millimeter. Most of them are cocci with a high potential for being pathogenic - a case in point: human bites almost always get very badly infected. This doesn't seem to stop you from swallowing though.

            Give me an example of disease that has currency as a risk factor?

            Yours is a weak argument.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re:ATMs by trainsnpep · · Score: 1

      Almost all new ATMs have a headphone jack on them.

      --
      --<Mike>--
    22. Re:ATMs by gte910h · · Score: 1

      There is a headphone jack. Take earphones with you next time you go and listen. The menus are read (sort of)

                      --Michael

      --
      Want to see every step I took to start my company? http://www.rowdylabs.com/blogs/pitchtothegods
    23. Re:ATMs by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people don't think of the UK as part of Europe, but it is, and I've never seen an ATM like that here. I also didn't notice anything like that on the one I used in France last year, but given that had been tampered with anyway (as I later discovered, fortunately at no cost!) I'm not taking it as representative.

    24. Re:ATMs by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Drive in ATMs??! I've never seen one in my entire life, then I live in the UK, so it must be a USA only thing. Here, I have to use my legs and walk to the nearest ATM, in fact the entire City Centre in my City is pedestrianised so there would be no where to drive to. However I've not seen "drive in" ATMs even in other Cities.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    25. Re:ATMs by famebait · · Score: 1

      Here in Norway a lot of ATMs have a small jack to plug standard earphones into. You'd have to carry the phones yourself, but that shouldn't be a big deal, and it offers better privacy. Somehow they seem to have forgotten to put braille on the keys, though. Duh.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    26. Re:ATMs by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Ripping off a blind person is about as low as you can go, IMHO. That's just wrong. And yes, this is long overdue.

    27. Re:ATMs by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      In the UK every bank has a different layout.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    28. Re:ATMs by Colonel+Angus · · Score: 1

      Also available in Canada...

    29. Re:ATMs by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Seems like an easy way for banks to cut costs--no more customized configurations for ATMs, so all the banks can buy "off the shelf."

    30. Re:ATMs by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Ask Maria from West Side Story. She feels pretty.

      Dangit. Beat me to the joke. I was going to ask, "But can you feel witty or gay?"

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    31. Re:ATMs by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      what frightens me is the ATM's with the speech and braille in the DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW....

      Some of the old people around here drive bad, but I expect them to at least be able to see!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    32. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more visually impaired people than totally blind. Depending on the state's laws, you can see well enough to drive but still have trouble reading the print on ATM buttons or the screen for that matter. Some of those screens are dim, prone to glare, have poor contrast, etc.

      My vision is just barely good enough to drive in my state, and then only in day time.

    33. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However I've not seen "drive in" ATMs even in other Cities.

      Have you ever been outside of a city? We have a lot of that sort of thing in the US, and most of it isn't particularly pedestrian friendly. This is one of the reasons why so many of us own cars, which in turn is the reason why so many types of businesses have drive-through windows. And of course there's the whole cycle of increased auto traffic making travel on foot or by bike more dangerous (a great many roads lack sidewalks and/or bike lanes, and a great many drivers are just a bit inconsiderate and/or inattentive). It isn't a difficult concept to grasp when you are familiar with the environment.

    34. Re:ATMs by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      ATMs must be nigh on impossible to use too.

      I don't know how widespread they are, but over the past couple years virtually all of the ATMs I've used have been adding headphone jacks to the console, to allow audio navigation of the soft menus. My eyesight is fine, but I'm tempted to bring a set of earbuds one of these days just to see what the experience is like.

    35. Re:ATMs by Mignon · · Score: 1
      what frightens me is the ATM's with the speech and braille in the DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW....

      Don't be scared - just hop in your K-car and drive back to the '80s where that freakin' joke came from.

    36. Re:ATMs by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      If you look closely at most ATMs (at least the ones I've seen) you'll notice that all the keys and informational placards have Braille stamped on them so the blind/vision-impaired can read them. Many ATMs these days also have a headphone jack where you can plug in a standard set of headphones and have the system read the screen to you.

    37. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nearly every ATM I've ever dealt with recently has a braille raised section on next to a jack that accepts any regular set of headphones, specifically for use by the sight-impaired. None uses soft keys for that very reason. And all keys are on the side and clearly marked with raised braille markings.

      I'm sorry, but was this another manufactured "oh look how much more sensitive and smart I am than anyone else EVAR" attempt?

      Because you FAILED. FAILED. FAILED BADLY.

    38. Re:ATMs by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I know a lot of people don't think of the UK as part of Europe, but it is, and I've never seen an ATM like that here.

      They generally use induction loops, the same technology used for deaf people (and bootleggers) in the cinema. But I've also seen the headphone jacks on some newer machines.

    39. Re:ATMs by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Ray Charles would feel their wrist to determine if they were a fatty or a nubile pretty young thing. Seemed to work fairly well most of the time.

    40. Re:ATMs by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Have you never noticed the audio jack and braille on all ATMs?

    41. Re:ATMs by joshetc · · Score: 1

      I agree. Maybe we should sue god for not making all ugly chicks flat chested so it is easy to tell the difference.

    42. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha you so funny! oh you got him there! Wooo! you da man!

      oh wait, I'm sorry I called you a man. You are a little kid (probably 8) who has nothign to do all day but troll on slashdot.

      Me? I'm an unemployed CTO from ePets.com I havent shaved in a month, havent bathed in a week and I still wipe my ass with $100.00 bills left over from what I got out of that comapny...

      HA! I spend my days poking at the different trolls that wonder slashdot... it's fun!

    43. Re:ATMs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bank opened a new branch a couple of years ago, and I noticed that the ATM had a headphone jack. Assuming that it was meant for the blind and curoius how it worked, I retruned with a set of headphones. You know what happend, nothing, the headphones didn't make a peep (and no they weren't broken, I tested them as soon as I got home as that was my first thought). Somewhere, I'm assuming those heaphone jacks work, but not everywhere.

    44. Re:ATMs by tttonyyy · · Score: 1

      Nearly every ATM I've ever dealt with recently has a braille raised section on next to a jack that accepts any regular set of headphones, specifically for use by the sight-impaired. None uses soft keys for that very reason. And all keys are on the side and clearly marked with raised braille markings.

      I'm sorry, but was this another manufactured "oh look how much more sensitive and smart I am than anyone else EVAR" attempt?

      Because you FAILED. FAILED. FAILED BADLY.
      As another poster pointed out, here in the UK the banks use different layouts. And they definitely use soft keys. The same soft side-key (braille-less) can mean "accept"/"withdraw cash - no receipt"/"£20" over different screens, and this soft-key layout varies between the banks.

      So sorry, no - not a manufactured attempt, but genuine curiousity. And I honestly hadn't spotted that they had audio jacks, which I'll keep an eye out for in the future.

      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    45. Re:ATMs by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      I live near a small forest, so I'm familiar with the countryside, however I doubt it's anything like the USA. Our cities, towns and villages are nearly all pedestrian friendly to some degree. However, the Motorways between cities obviously have no pavements (what you call sidewalks) or cycle lanes either. But we're a much smaller country, So I can go from here to the next nearest city in 20 mins on the train, half an hour in the car. For long car journeys (5 hours, we stop once or twice at service stations (Wikipedia tells me you call them rest areas). So as you can see there isn't a huge call for drive in businesses here in the UK, in fact the only place that I can think that does drive thrus is fast food places, so people can grab a McDonald's or whatever on their way back home from work.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    46. Re:ATMs by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      Men and women are different races now? :P

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
  22. Get rid of low denomination bills by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 0

    I am surprised that the US still uses bills for $1 and $5. Equivalent value denominations in Europe are generally (and I am talking about pound sterling and Euros) coins. As an occasional visitor I have noticed that US bills have the least variety across the range I have every come across. It's probably time for a redesign.

  23. Re:Don't do what china does by saintm · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would you want to stack different denominations of currency? It would have to be quite a high stack to pose a 'topple' risk due to the difference in sizes.

  24. Re:Don't do what china does by gamer4Life · · Score: 1
    Why even mention China at all? Why not say, "Don't use different sizes"? Does the fact that you used "China" add extra weight as to what *not* to do? Maybe there's some subconscious xenophobia at work here.

    Never mind the fact that 25 countries in Europe use the Euro.

  25. Finally take the $1 bill by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and turn it into a coin. Not this half-assed production of a few coins and predominantly bills. Get it over with and make it purely coins. It'll make vending machines more convenient. Coins are easily distinguishable.

    On mony, just have an imprinted (raised) mark whereever the denomination number is printed. It doesn't have to be elaborate - just dots like braile.

    I'm surprised this didn't come sooner with the Americans with disabilities act, or some such.

    1. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by rolfwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I forgot to add, also raised the portrait in the middle through imprinting and make it slightly 3d. This will help if the dots get worn or screwed with.

    2. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

      If we get rid of the dollar bill, what are people supposed to use at strip bars? A five is a little bit much for most people and I can't imagine having underwear full of coins is helpful when dancing. Please people, think of the strippers.

    3. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      At this point, the dollar is so inflated that you by all rights should be tossing 5's. Or you REALLY need to raise your standards.

      Or just put a tip cup up in front of the stage for the coin.

      Ooo,ooo or how about a coin-bandeleer thong type thing.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by heroofhyr · · Score: 1

      The plan to change the 1USD bill with a coin is already underway. It was in the news a few days ago. They will feature a different dead president every 3 months with Nixon being the last already-planned coin in 2016. Personally, I like the way the euro currency is designed. The coins increase in size and change colour based on value (penny being the smallest and 2eu being the biggest), as do the bills. So when it comes time to pay a waiter, you can just reach into your pocket and feel whether or not you have enough 1- and 2-eu coins to cover it without taking them out and showing everybody how pathetically broke you are. Not to mention one time I got paid in cash at work and I have to admit I felt like a pretty big wheel down at the cracker factory when I was folding up that enormous 500eu bill.

      Here is the article about the 1$ coin:

      http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?typ e=domesticNews&storyID=2006-11-20T134325Z_01_N2025 2060_RTRUKOC_0_US-ECONOMY-COIN.xml&WTmodLoc=NewsHo me-C3-domesticNews-2

      --
      brandelf: invalid ELF type 'KEEBLER'
    5. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by ari+wins · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent up, because the $1 bill is soon to be dead, and the sooner people realize and embrace this, the better we'll all be. Except when we go to strip clubs, because they get PISSED when you drop a coin in the G-String. Oh, them crazy Canadian Girls!

      --
      Don't worry if you're a kleptomaniac, you can always take something for it.
    6. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by fluffman86 · · Score: 1

      HELL NO. I HATE COINS! Why the Hell would you want to carry around pockets full of coins, anyway? Don't you remember the Sacajawea Dollar? It was a miserable failure! Or maybe you carry a purse, which is fine for coins. But me - I carry a bilfold, knife, lighter, and contact eye drops...I don't need anything else in my pockets. In an actual response to the devaluing of the $1 bill, the treasury has released many more $2 bills - so head on over to the bank and get you some of them.

    7. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Use Monopoly money... or something to that effect: just let the patrons buy the fake money (and provide lots of vending machines throughout the club) and let them spend it. Of course allow them to change it back to normal currency after their patronage. It has other benefits too: the clubs can print out whatever they want on their "money", and if they make it out of washable materials they can ensure their, uhm, employees' hygiene.

      Wow, maybe I should do consulting for the live adult entertainment industry.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    8. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Depends how you define failure. Since the government doesn't push it and make a decent amount, everybody expected the $1 to stay. For the $1 coin to become a "success" it has to be on full production with the $1 stopped, and perhaps pulled out of circulation (though just pulling the old, tattered one like they normally do might be kinder and let in more of a transition time).

      Anyway, if you want less coins in your pocket, carry around $5 bills and advocate abolishing the penny - since that worthless thing is also costing everybody money. This will have the double benefit of freeing a coin slot in the register for the $1 coin:P

      And I have not seen a $2 bill the last ten years. Maybe 10 times in my life in normal transactions. It would have even more resistance as that would require another slot in the existing cash registers (especially troublesome if you don't get rid of any existing currency.)

    9. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by ArieKremen · · Score: 1

      The other day NPR had a story how two (2) dollar bills are more frequently used in strip clubs.


      Another sign of inflation...

      --
      -- Cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
    10. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by seann · · Score: 1

      in canada we have a "toonie slide"

      http://www.brockpress.com/media/storage/paper384/n ews/2004/09/14/Features/Shakin.Ass.To.Pay.For.Clas s-718407.shtml?norewrite200611290831&sourcedomain= www.brockpress.com

      "Good is an understatement. Christy has mastered the tricks of the trade in a hurry, specializing in the toonie slide - a move that sees a person lay on the stage with a toonie in his or her mouth, and the stripper dance over and slide along the person before seductively removing it - and an ultra-smooth upside-down twirl on the pole that is sure to make a few jaws drop."

      Sometimes they don't use that "mouth"

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    11. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by cjb-nc · · Score: 1

      Have you tried to tell the difference between a Susan B Anthony, and Sacagawea and a quarter in the dark? Or in the light for that matter? Until the treasury learns to quit making dollar coins that look like quarters, they will fail to catch on.

      PS. To that Orlando toll booth that took my last Sacagawea and said I was still short 25c on the toll, not overpaid by 75c... bite me.

    12. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This makes alot of sense in other ways as well. Since the dollar is now the new "quarter" it will make the weekly laundry less of a coin drop festival.

    13. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      Coins suck. I have to carry a wallet, no real choice. Carrying anything else other than a small swiss army knife is annoying. The first thing I do whenever I get home and have coins is to throw them in a jar. They are a nuisance for anybody but kids. I understand that paper money has a more expensive lifecycle, but it's also more convenient. It would also help if more things rounded to the dollar in cost.

    14. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by hamburger+lady · · Score: 1

      it's easy. the sac is bigger than the quarter, and the susan b has that 11-sided rim.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    15. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by way2muchsense · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Lame. Heard this argument, if you could call it that, about a million times. Who really gives a damn about the strippers? I don't.

    16. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by fluffman86 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I could go with that: remove the penny, move $1 to coin, and Add $2 bills.

    17. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by jafac · · Score: 1

      At this point, the dollar is so inflated that you by all rights should be tossing 5's. Or you REALLY need to raise your standard

      I don't know about your standards, but the US is statistically the most obese country in the world, so, really, fivers are a bit much for most of these cows.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    18. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by wdh662 · · Score: 1

      Well, up here in Canada you just throw the 1 and 2 dollar coins on the stage and afterwards the stripper has a large magnet on a rope which she quickly drags around the stage to collect it all.

    19. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine having underwear full of coins is helpful when dancing

      'Insert coin in slot' ... ;)

    20. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by joshetc · · Score: 1

      Dude that is a manly collection. All you need now is a pack of smokes and a "What would Chuck Norris do?" handbook. You are so badass.

    21. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the hottest stripper will still accept $1. If she doesn't accept it, she doesn't accept tips in general.

    22. Re:Finally take the $1 bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If we get rid of the dollar bill, what are people supposed to use at strip bars?

      $2 bills?

  26. Re:Don't do what china does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Europe does the same thing, unfortunately.

    I'm from Europe, but when I lived in the US for a while (year), I really preferred USD.

    The coins are part of that though. For some reason I always ended up having less useless change in my pocket than i have in Europe.

  27. Never mind the blind! by Tx · · Score: 4, Funny

    On a trip to the states a while back, in a dimly lit strip club, I accidentally gave several $20 bills to a stripper instead of $1s, got a bit more than I bargained for. Wouldn't say it was a waste exactly, but you can't claim that shit back on expenses!

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Never mind the blind! by Rufty · · Score: 1

      Yes you can, just get the receipt for "Hardware interfacing"

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    2. Re:Never mind the blind! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but you can't claim that shit back on expenses!

      So you gave her a Cleveland steamer?

    3. Re:Never mind the blind! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      you did not go to the right strip club. A couple of places in Chicago will print a receipt for many different restaurant names on it. they even will enter in your "tip amount" as other items if you want.

      gotta ask the locals what kind of places that have really good lap dances that can be expensed.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  28. AllOfMoney.com by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 0

    I hate the US Treasury and everything it stands for. I buy my dollars from a perfectly legal Russian website for 10c on the dollar.

  29. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  30. On the shoulders of giants... or something... by Ranma21 · · Score: 1

    You don't have to put bumps etc on the notes. In Australia each note is 3-4mm longer than another of lower denomination, but they are all the same width. That way, it's easy to handle with vending machines (width) and easy for blind to sort out (length. And they stay nicely. They are also polymer-based, almost indestructible and carry vastly more electronic counter-measures than the old US currency. Don't re-invent the wheel, just check out what other countries have come up with (after countless iterations).

    1. Re:On the shoulders of giants... or something... by husey · · Score: 1

      ... and *almost* indestructible, the Aussie dollars. You can't tear or soak them. However, they are not impervious to my mate's lighter as I found one drunken night in a hostel in London.

    2. Re:On the shoulders of giants... or something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does a blind person know if he has a $1 & $5 or a $50 & $100 in his wallet? carry a ruler?

    3. Re:On the shoulders of giants... or something... by Kamineko · · Score: 1
      > They are also polymer-based, almost indestructible and carry vastly more electronic counter-measures than the old US currency


      Wow... that's pretty cool.


      Although I can't say anybody's ever fired a heat-seeking missile at my wallet before.

  31. Limited options by Programmer_Errant · · Score: 1

    You can't change the size or shape of the currency. There's way too much currency handling equipement, e.g. bill counters, bill changers, and atm's, in place to be able to be able to handle that. Any encoding scheme like OCR, magnetic ink or rfid would require a reader device which might be awkward. The only thing I can think of is to punch holes in the money, a sort of negative braille. You'd have to arrange the hole patterns so that any attempt to modify them would produce an invalid pattern. And you'd want to reenforce the holes slightly so they wouldn't tear too easily.

    1. Re:Limited options by Bronster · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, changing to plastic notes which behave different in many respects didn't kill us here in Australia. Think of it as a business opportunity for the manufacturers of replacement bill readers.

      Sure it will cost a bit, but damn it's a good excuse for you sorry lot to update your currency from the least attractive and most counterfeited currency in the world to something with basic security and longevity built in.

    2. Re:Limited options by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK we've survived multiple changes in currency size and shape over the years.

    3. Re:Limited options by adnonsense · · Score: 4, Informative

      At the beginning of 2002 vast swathes of Western Europe managed to change not just the size and shape of their notes but introduced a completely new currency at the same time. In Germany (and possibly other places) they even managed to fix it so that ATMs gave out Deutschmark right up until midnight on Dec. 31, 2001 and as soon as 2002 rolled over, pumped out shiny new Euro notes.

      Other countries such as the UK regularly replace their currency designs, usually every 10 - 15 years or so.

      If the US did the same, it would benefit maybe not just blind people but keep e.g. the North Korean counterfeiters on their toes.

    4. Re:Limited options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are countless money handling machines outside the USA and theu all deal with multiple sizes.
      Hell, we got ATMs in Europe last year, and I hear there are a few vending machines in Japan.

    5. Re:Limited options by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      You can't change the size or shape of the currency. There's way too much currency handling equipement, e.g. bill counters, bill changers, and atm's, in place to be able to be able to handle that.
      So always make sure, if you're travelling to [Germany|France|Italy], to bring some [Deutschmarks|Francs|Lira] with you. And if someone tells you they all switched over to Euros, tell them it's impossible for the reason you stated above.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    6. Re:Limited options by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Thats very interesting... over here banks have stopped accepting or giving out $100 bills (!). Anyone know what thats about?

    7. Re:Limited options by jimicus · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Limited options by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      they even managed to fix it so that ATMs gave out Deutschmark right up until midnight on Dec. 31, 2001 and as soon as 2002 rolled over, pumped out shiny new Euro notes.

      An idea clearly put forward by an old fart. A younger person would never have done it at midnight on New Years. Generally it's not a good idea to switch currency at the one point where more people in your country are drunk than at any other time.

      On the other hand, I'm sure the run-up to the bells was fun, as everyone attempted to spend the last of their own currency!

    9. Re:Limited options by adnonsense · · Score: 1

      There was a two month changeover period afterwards (I think in other countries it may have been up to 6 months). The biggest problem, as I recall, was taxi drivers and restaurants not having enough Euro change in the early hours of January 1.

  32. Re:Don't do what china does by MicrosoftRepresentit · · Score: 1, Funny

    Different sizes doesn't help at all, blind people are completely incapable of judging size anyway as it has no meaning to them; theirs is a world without size, colour, distance or space. I have a blind friend, so I am well aware of their plight. What I do for him is to regularly cut his money into different shapes, for example I would cut all his £5 notes into stars, £10's into zigzags and £20's into smiling faces. He has no trouble distinguishing his money now, although it is no longer legal tender and serves no purpose.

  33. What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, what's next? Will they require money to be discernible by quadriplegics? Will they require radio to be accessible to the deaf? Where will this stop?

  34. Re:Don't do what china does by servies · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So the size of the bills determines how much useless change you have in your pocket...
    If that's the case you're not an Anonymous Coward but an Anonymous Idiot...

  35. Poor decision by a bad judge by will_die · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is just a really poor decision that should be blocked by the next court up the chain. Reading the decision the judge goes into how bad it is that the bill are all the same and how it places a hardship, which it does. However devices are available which allow around which allow the money to meet the law. The judge should of told the people sueing that they should go take it up with thier congressmen; instead of doing this stupid soapbox speech.

    Some other decision by him:
    Private unions cannot expell members who spread "falsehood and misrepresentation" because that breaks the members freedom of speech.
    Has through out a few cases for companies giving expensive gifts to government officials.
    In various court cases has just ignored major case points on various parties and ruled based on older laws that had been superceded.

    1. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      However devices are available which allow around which allow the money to meet the law.

      Yeah. Next thing you're saying is that handicapped access isn't necessary because all the dudes in wheelchairs can bring their own crane, huh ?

      Needing a device to deal with an everyday item like cash is a pain in the ass. Also, those devices are hardly available for free.

    2. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by oberondarksoul · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here in the UK, all our banknotes are different sizes and colours, and have a unique symbol on them as well (the £5 note has a blue square, the £10 a brown diamond, and so on). Frankly, as you're rifling through your wallet trying to find the right note, these distinguishing features are a godsend; when I was in the USA on holiday, it was much more time-consuming, although having said that the uniquely-blue $20 note helped a lot.

      Having easily-discernable banknotes will save everyone time, and will help the partially-sighted or blind a great deal. Why should they need to buy a device when it can be done by the money printers to everyone's benefit?

      --
      And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
    3. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Builder · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to be an ass, but your spelling and grammar have really diluted your point. I had to read quite a few sentences more than once to understand them.

    4. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For fuck's sake, learn to spell.

    5. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having grown up with US money, I can assure you, its not something that takes any thought at all. It's a problem which has already been solved. A great many people only carry a modest amount of cash for emergencies, and basically use their debit/credit cards. I am one such person, because, particularly with self-checkout, it really cuts down on my talking with people unnecessarily.

      The freedom of access to one's money is vastly improved with electronic cash/credit. This is undenable. That's why this idiots decision will be overturned. Not withstanding the few effective strategies the blind already use. You know what the real fucking hardship about being blind is? Not being able to see. There's a couple things that can be done about that. Do what's _easy_ to help them and ask that they use their other uniquely human gifts to adapt, or we can put everyone else's eyes out too so we can suffer together. Personally I've found that if people are expected to acheive and find solutions they will. If they're coddled, they'll just feel entitled.

    6. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by oberondarksoul · · Score: 1

      But if we add identifying features to the money, it's hardly putting your eyes out; it harms you not a jot. It can, however, enable the blind or partially sighted a chance to use these gifts you laud. You seem to be against changing the currency's design purely because you have no problems with it - but how does changing it hurt you?

      --
      And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
    7. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by tttonyyy · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry to be an ass, but your spelling and grammar have really diluted your point. I had to read quite a few sentences more than once to understand them.What sort of heresy is this?

      Rules for posting on slashdot:
      • Skip TFA (it's pretty boring anyway, and posting early is the way to get moderated)
      • Skim lightly over every other line in the comments
      • Post a strong opinion about why the parent was wrong

      Actually READING the article and then the comment several times? My friend, you're on a level above.
      --
      biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
    8. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      The newest run of $20s are mixed green/peach. They're green on the edges with a peach color-ed center. The newest run of $10 are a straight yellow-ish color, and the newest run of $50s are kind of a mixed pink, yellow, and blue thing.

      Unfortunately there's still way too much old money in circulation, but the US is slowly changing over to having the different denominations have different colors.

      The U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing has a webpage on the currency changes with low-res pictures.

      However, while the latest batch of bills does indeed have low-vision features, the bills are all still exactly the same size and texture, making them totally inaccessible to the blind. But the latest bill designs do attempt to make it easier to tell the bills apart.

      If only they were actually in wide circulation...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    9. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by JayBlalock · · Score: 1
      Uh... what, PRECISELY, do you think a judge's job is, then? There is a law saying the blind cannot be discriminated against. He found that the Treasury WAS discriminating against them. Ergo, in the interest of upholding the law, he ordered them to cut it out.

      In what way is this not in a judge's job description?

      In fact, to turn that around and say, "Well... they aren't being discriminated against THAT MUCH." would be TOTALLY WRONG. *That* would be judicial activism.

      And they don't need to take it up with their Congressmen, because the law already exists. It is extremely bad governance to pass a tiny little law for every possible exception or instance that can crop up. The law is already on the books regarding discrimination against the blind, he found it to be violated, and he ruled to uphold it.

      And if you disagree with his ruling, then YOU are the one who should be lobbying your congressman. It's not the judge's fault the law is on the books. If you feel the public interest is so compelling as to legimize discrimination against a protected group, then by all means, go tell the Hill about it. At this point, it would be on THEM to change the law, not the judge.

      /sheesh, do they not teach civics any more?

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    10. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Builder · · Score: 1

      Sorry... I consider myself to be suitably chastised... I'll go and flog myself shortly...

    11. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spending millions reprinting money, spending millions more replacing all the cash drawers in every check registers in every grocery store, gas station, and every cash box used for every pancake breakfast and bakesale to solve a non-problem DOES harm me. Retooling every cash machine, every currency protection measure, and counting machine employed in every bank, for what? In fact it harms everyone a little bit, for nothing. For a problem that already has multiple effective solutions. "Why can't the world bend to my whim? Other peoples' efforts are worth nothing too me." I know you idiots aren't going to pay for it all yourself with wishful thinking and starlight. Overhauling the infrastructure is expensive, labor intensive, and must be carefully considered at every step. Even if it's failing, and in this case it's worked brilliantly (by most economic measures better than any other similar attempt in human history), it's rarely worth it to just scrap everything that one's already built and start anew with little reason.

      The money is better spent on research into artifical sight, or practically anything else.

    12. Re:Poor decision by a bad judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... the £5 note has a blue square, the £10 a brown diamond, and so on ... when I was in the USA on holiday, it was much more time-consuming ...It depends on what you're used to. If you could print a picture of Abraham Lincoln on the £5 note, it would speed up my European vacation immensely...

  36. Never. Never. Never. It's sooo un-American. by Ihlosi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ain't going to happen. Europe does it (as well as integrating a whole bunch of additional anti-counterfeit measures), so it must be un-American. Never mind the blind, God (with a capital G) must hate them or they wouldn't be blind, right ? Also, it could help the terrorists. Dollar notes are just fine the way they are.

    1. Re:Never. Never. Never. It's sooo un-American. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      It's not that God hates the blind - it's just that they brought it on themselves by masturbating too much!

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Never. Never. Never. It's sooo un-American. by Demona · · Score: 1

      Why bother? It's already counterfeit.

      --
      Fuck Slashdot
  37. The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE BANK. by gd23ka · · Score: 0

    The way I see it the Federal Reserve is outside that court's jurisdiction. The Federal Reserver (misnomer)
    is not a "Federal" but instead a privately owned bank, large shares distributed across the usual suspects
    from Rockefeller to the Rothschildts themselves to the Bank of England.

    Maybe the new "Amero" bills will be a little more friendly to the blind http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amero

    1. Re:The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE BANK. by Creepyguywithastick · · Score: 1

      Yeah, screw using the standard currency, i'll stick to my crude bargaining system. Lets see, is it three goats and a berry for an iTunes song, or is it four?

    2. Re:The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE BANK. by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Fed determines how much money is in circulation and places orders for paper money with the Bureau of Engraving & Printing, which is part of the Treasury Dept. (as is the US Mint which produces the nation's coins). The Treasury Department determines what the money looks like, because the Treasury Department is responsible for the security of the dollar.

      The US Mint and Bureau of E&P produce money, and the Fed is their only customer.

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    3. Re:The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE BANK. by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      And youd be wise to do that because a cow is still worth four goats or eight pigs at the end of the month
      while the paper "doller" buys you less and less.

    4. Re:The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE BANK. by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Until the mad cow epidemic comes, people stop buying cows, and the value of cows goes down. Oops, you can only buy two goats or four pigs. As opposed to the paper dollar, which doesn't become worthless because of mad cow disease.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    5. Re:The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE BANK. by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      No paper doesn't ever lose its value, now does it? Here. I have a 1 Million Reichsmark note in my desk so Herr Hitler
      still owes me that Villa just outside Berlin. Oh wait. That was 1934. A billion Reichsmark didn't even buy you
      a loaf of bread in 1945 even _IF_ you had ration coupons. That sucks, but that's what happened. First the allied
      bombers took out the villa and most of Berlin, most of Germany so there wasn't any value to back up the
      Reichsmark in circulation and on top of that Herr Hitler kept the money printing presses going because he
      needed Reichsmarks to pay for the war effort... so all that was left in the end was paper to wipe your ass
      with. If you wanted that loaf of bread then you had better have to offer something of 'value' in exchange, like gold,
      jewelry, or yourself should the other side be interested.

      This is why smart people don't trust in paper money and instead have a small cache _nobody else knows about_(!) of rare metals
      and other goods to trade and barter.

  38. Re:Don't do what china does by McWilde · · Score: 1

    Since most stores have dropped the 1 and 2 cent coins here in Holland I sure end up with a lot less red coins. I used to drop the red ones into a mug on my desk at the end of each day. These days I tend just to leave them in my wallet. I never get more than two.

    --
    Maybe
  39. Re:Don't do what china does by jez9999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    blind people are completely incapable of judging size anyway as it has no meaning to them; theirs is a world without size, colour, distance or space.

    I can agree with you on colour, but without size, distance or space? I don't think so; they'd have trouble doing anything at all if they couldn't perceive those. Check out this guy.

  40. Reminds me of a comment by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    Back when I was in elementary school, they had a blind lady visit and talk with us. She said something similar. But she added "and I don't let $100 bills out of my hand."

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  41. Aussie currency... by bezza · · Score: 1
    In my recent around the world trip, I had to pay attention to the different type of currency I was dealing with every day.

    By far the worst was US currency. Tough to tell which was which without pulling it out and looking at it, and generally it was of poor quality too, especially the $1 notes. I was relieved when I got some $1 coins but they were few and far between.

    Even Croatian currency was much easier to deal with. Different colours and sizes made it easy. I found the euro and pound to be ok, but they were too large of a size to fit in my wallet properly. This seemed to be a common porblem because they were always ripped on the ends indicating that it wasn't only me with this issue.

    Still the best currency I have dealt with is Australian currency. It is made of plastic so it always in great shape and was in distinctly different colours and sizes to make it easy to use. It was small enough to fit in any wallet too. Must be a hard currency to counterfeit because of the clear plastic windows and such. I find it hard to believe the largest economy in the world can't change to this new technology!

    --
    WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
  42. Re:Don't do what china does by GateGuy · · Score: 0
    Hence most other currencies uses different colours for each note.
    Doesn't this discriminate against color blind people?
    --
    Maryland State Motto: If you can dream it, we can tax it.
  43. Why fucking bother with the god-damned Blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not let natural selection take its course instead?

    Go AHEAD FUCKING FLAME AWAY OR WASTE YOUR G0D-DAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARDED SHITDOT SHEEPLE!

    1. Re:Why fucking bother with the god-damned Blind by MisterSquiddy · · Score: 0

      Natural selection doesn't seem to have worked in your case.

    2. Re:Why fucking bother with the god-damned Blind by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Natural selection doesn't seem to have worked in your case.

            Bravo!

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  44. Stupid idea alert by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    and turn it into a coin. Not this half-assed production of a few coins and predominantly bills. Get it over with and make it purely coins. It'll make vending machines more convenient. Coins are easily distinguishable.

    On mony, just have an imprinted (raised) mark whereever the denomination number is printed. It doesn't have to be elaborate - just dots like braile.

    I'm surprised this didn't come sooner with the Americans with disabilities act, or some such.

    No. Not going to happen because not all vending machines accept dollar coins. Its one of the reasons why the coins never caught on.
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
    1. Re:Stupid idea alert by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's funny - the EU countries had no problem changing their vending machines around once the Euro came. They didn't even change the machines, the money accepting mechanism is modular (woah!).

      Keeping the $1 is costing money for taxpayers. If it becomes standard, vending machines will start accepting it fast. The government has the power in this case of the chicken or the egg.

    2. Re:Stupid idea alert by Bake · · Score: 1

      ... Which is funny, because quite a few vending machines seem perfectly happy with RETURNING a dollar coin.
      This has happened to me on more than on occasion, where I put in a dollar, an item was sold out, I hit the button that is supposed to return the money, but it returned a dollar coin. Inserted the dollar coin again, and it was rejected by the machine.

    3. Re:Stupid idea alert by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      Rubbish!

      In the UK we had the £1 coin introduced in 1983. Sure, many vending machine would not initially accept these coins, but this wasn't a big problem.

      Since that time we've had several other changes in coinage. Our 5p, 10p and 50p coins have all shrunk. The 20p coin was introduced in 1982, and the £2 coin entered general circulation in 1997 (although they've been around since 1986).

      The £1 coin is fatter and smaller in diameter than a modern 10p, and that smaller size probably helped its adoption. Additionally £1 notes ceased production in 1984, and removed from circulation in 1988.

      Vending machines got quickly adapted to cope with the changes in currency we've had. They also coped just fine with all the transition periods where we had two different coin sizes in use.

      It should also be noted that Canada has $1 and $2 coins (colloquially known as loonies and twonies), and whilst I believe their old $1 and $2 notes remain legal tender (unlike in the UK) they are *very* rarely seen these days. Canada stopped printing the old notes a couple of years after introducing the coins.

      The problem with US $1 coins is essentially that they have not been produced in very large quantities, and the dollar bill remains in circulation. Additionally the size/weight may be a bit large.

    4. Re:Stupid idea alert by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not going to happen because not all vending machines accept dollar coins.

            The tail does not wag the dog. Vending machines would have to adapt if such a coin came into widespread use.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Stupid idea alert by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, but I just thought I'd add that Scotland still has their £1 note; don't ask me why, but when I'm up there I always try and get some, just to confuse local shop assistants (they remain legal tender in England).

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    6. Re:Stupid idea alert by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      almost all newer vending machines in the past 3 years accept $1 us coins. The OP simply has not taken the time to pay attention to that fact. every vending machine I have came across for the past few years has accepted them. (the susan B dollar has been out for decades, the gold one is the same exact shape,size and weight just spraypainted in bronze) except for a old coke machine in northern minnesota that you had to open the door and yank the bottle out... but that thing was 50 years old.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Stupid idea alert by DrXym · · Score: 1
      That's funny - the EU countries had no problem changing their vending machines around once the Euro came. They didn't even change the machines, the money accepting mechanism is modular (woah!).

      Not even modular - programmable. Most vending machines here in Ireland switched from accepting Irish coins to euro coins practically overnight. Some even accepted both coinage with the appropriate exchange rate for a few weeks. After a trip abroad I was almost stuck in a long term airport car park at 1am on 1st January 2002 because the machine only took euro notes. Fortunately Mr Credit Card came to the rescue.

      If something like 300 million Europeans can totally dump one currency for another in the space of a few months, I'm sure the US economy can cope with some new coins and redesigned banknotes. Even if the old notes are in circulation for a while, the banks / casinos will gather 99% of them up, in the space of a year just through the course of normal business.

    8. Re:Stupid idea alert by 1110110001 · · Score: 1

      In Austria Ferry Ebert, who is famous for his vending machines, stopped producing them in 2002, because the changeover would have been to expensive. There went an almost 50 year old business with the new currency.

  45. about time by timmarhy · · Score: 1

    it's true, american money is ass when it comes to telling what note is what. how hard could it be to make each note a different size?

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  46. Re:Don't do what china does by cornjones · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    wow, i sense that somebody touched a nerve. When I read it, I assumed he was unfamiliar w/ the EU currencies but had seen (and disliked) the chinese currencies. Maybe there is some subconscious victimization complex at work here.

  47. Re:Don't do what china does by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

    Don't do what China does and start offering money in different sizes. It's really annoying to use, and hard to stack.
     
    Then the Chinese must be using sizes with large differences between them, which the Wikipedia article on the Renminbi does not show.
     
    Australian banknotes are different sizes (comparable to the Chinese sizes) and I've never had a problem sorting, stacking or using them.

  48. Simple solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just emboss the paper with "IN GOD WE TRUST, THIS ISN'T SPECIFICALLY CHRISTIAN BTW" in a different corner for each bill. Problem solved!

  49. Correct me if I'm Wrong by Veretax · · Score: 0

    But I thought the Treasury was preparing to start using colors other than the standard green on certain denominations. That still wouldn't help a blind person though. Visually impaired maybe.

  50. Here in South Africa... by n1hilist · · Score: 1

    What? America is only doing this NOW??!! Sheesh! All our bills are different colours, sizes and can be handled by blind people. The only thing I really don't like, is the coins we have here: 5,10,20,50 cent coins which are TINY! and a R1, R2 and R5 (Rands) coins and then upwards it's bills. I have low vision, (to the degree of -20 diopters in each eye) and I struggle to manage the small coins, I usually end up throwing them all in a big cup, and once a year I make the effort to count them out and get "real money" (bills) for them at the bank. Just out of interest, it's about R7 (South African Rands) for $1 (USD)

  51. Don't mess about, join the Euro by ebcdic · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What's the point of creating new bills when there's already a standard? It's time to switch to the Euro. And with your currency in free-fall, you'd be better off too.

    Of course, it would have saved a lot of trouble if you'd switched a few years ago, when the dollar and Euro were equally valuable.

    1. Re:Don't mess about, join the Euro by Malc · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to take on all their economic problems? That will only cause you problems. That is the real reason for the decline of the USD. Look how bad the economies of France and Germany are, and the EUR is still doing well... should make you terrified of the US - their economy is so bad that the world's reserve currency is devaluing. Latest are rumours that China will start off-loading some of it's 1 trillion USD holdings. The profligate US government has huge debts that it's got away with because the USD is the world's reserve currency.

    2. Re:Don't mess about, join the Euro by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      It's time to switch to the Euro.

      As a coin collector, I've thought about this before, from the standpoint of coin design, which is even less likely to change than currency, but I digress. But the possibility of dropping the Dollar for the Euro is, I think everyone agrees, nil. Hell, even the Brits have yet to give up their Pound.

      On a more serious note, though, I wonder if we'd even be *allowed* to join. I'm pretty sure that the US doesn't qualify to join the European Union, because we have capital punishment. Kind of a sobering thought, isn't it, that we can't even join a trans-national union that includes several former Soviet Satellites?

  52. fwiw, size/color has not been a problem for me by punkish · · Score: 1

    I wholly support doing what needs to be done to make the bills more accessible to the blind. But, interestingly, I have never found size/color to be a problem. Being from another country originally where bills are all manner of size and color, it was a shock to see bills exactly the same size and color. Interestingly, what happens is that one gets used to being more vigilant and checking the printed number and letters. The differently colored and sized bills were a huge problem -- you got used to one size and color for one kind of bills and then, bam!, new size and color were introduced and you had to train yourself differently. Mistakes were made all the time. Never, never once any mistakes with the USD.

  53. Re:Don't do what china does by bhaak1 · · Score: 1
    Hence most other currencies uses different colours for each note.
    Doesn't this discriminate against color blind people?
    Only if they can't read the numbers. Any decent design of colored money should take color blindness into account. I don't know of any that doesn't.
  54. Re:Money Reader - Found step 2! by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Use hole-punching so blind can read bills.
    2. Punch the $100 hole pattern in current $1 bills.
    3. Profit!

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  55. Primary sources (JURIST) by Macblaster · · Score: 1

    This JURIST article:

    http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/11/fede ral-judge-rules-us-currency.php

    has some primary sources readily available...

  56. As a recent Australian visitor to US shores... by nexu56 · · Score: 1

    ...please forgive me for offering my opinion when I say that I US currency sucks. All US bills are roughly the same size and colour. Besides the accessibility issues mentioned in TFA, I walk away from every transaction with "Did I Give Her A 20?" anxiety.

    I humbly submit that Australian bills are superior, and you should consider upgrading. Australian bills:

    * Have raised text, water marks, and a "clear window" security feature
    * Are all different colours (leading most Americans to refer to our currency as "monopoly money", however it makes it a hell of a lot easier to tell a 5 from a 50 when you're drunk)
    * Are made from a polypropylene polymer. Besides the geek cred, this makes them extremely resistant to tearing. Even better: leave it in your pocket, if it goes through the wash, its perfectly fine.

    You might also like to take a leaf from our book and phase out 1 cent pieces. Trust me, your economy can survive without them. Just FYI.

    1. Re:As a recent Australian visitor to US shores... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then they wouldn't be able to charge $X.X9 per gallon of gas!

    2. Re:As a recent Australian visitor to US shores... by hb253 · · Score: 1
      • All US bills are EXACTLY the same size
      • A kindergartener can tell the difference between different denominations of US money. Anyone who says otherwise is blowing hot air. However, I do understand the challenge to blind people.
      • US currency is washable. When you wash it, it comes out nicely crisp and clean. It's made of cotton BTW, not some non-biodegradable plastic.

      In my travels, I have found it very annoying to deal with different sized paper currency. Makes for a mess in the wallet or pocket - especially since non-US money seems to be made of notebook paper and gets all wrinkled and gnarled.

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
  57. Should have happened a long time ago... by lordperditor · · Score: 1

    I have wondered for a while why the US money was so similar, most other nations have different colour and size notes.
     
    Check out the Aussie money for example, it is excellent, the US money by comparison is very backwards.

    http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/currency.html/

    1. Re:Should have happened a long time ago... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      So wait, we'll have 12 pence to a shilling, and 20 shillings to a pound? Fuck that. You can take your nondecimalized billshit and shove it. We've had enough trouble trying to get rid of pints and ounces and miles and other crappy british legacy.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Should have happened a long time ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read more than the first paragraph, fucktard? Aussie money is decimalised.

  58. Automated Bill Readers by DeltaHat · · Score: 1

    What about the cost to merchants when they have to replace every bill reader on all their vending machines, laundry card recharge stations, subway ticket machines, etc? These readers are everywhere.

    1. Re:Automated Bill Readers by ledow · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's obviously why they won't tell them WHAT to do, just to do it. And there isn't even a need to change the reader, most probably. A simple embossing of a small area of the bill will be sufficient, I should think. There wouldn't be any need for any machinery changes to handle a different embossing or texture - it wouldn't need to be used for "verification" of the bill in an electronic device, just so that a blind human can tell the difference between them (the issue of whether blind people can spot a forged 20 from any country is a different question altogether).

      And this is something that I've always questioned about the US currency - in the UK we have different designs, patterns, textures, embossing, sizes and colours on each of our denominations. It doesn't generate any problems in terms of carrying or using the money and blind people can probably tell quicker than a sighted person what denomination the note that they have in their pocket is. I've always wondered how the bloody hell you are supposed to tell US bills apart if you are blind.

      Incidentally, coins in the UK are similar to our notes - different sizes, metals, embossings, shapes etc.. I think almost every country has done this with coins, though, even if only for reasons of economy (e.g. the 1p coin not costing more than 1p to produce).

    2. Re:Automated Bill Readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What about the cost to merchants when they have to replace every bill reader on all their vending machines, laundry card recharge stations, subway ticket machines, etc? These readers are everywhere.

      Who cares? Probably half of all bill readers in the US are broken and should be replaced anyway.
  59. Good for drunks too by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 1

    As someone who on more than one occassion has accidentally lefts a couple of tens instead of a couple of ones for a tip at a bar, I certainly would welcome anything which allows me to discern bills more clearly when I have trouble focusing.

    1. Re:Good for drunks too by hb253 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should drink less - or have a designated tipper :-D

      --
      Self awareness - try it!
  60. One of the few countries? by houghi · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity, what are the other countries that have same coloured and same sized bills?

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  61. Makes Sense by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Heard this on the radio on the way into work. Actually sounds really reasonable and plenty of examples abroad on how to do it. But then again, I almost never use cash now. Federal Reserve Debit Cards?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  62. Good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A simple embossing of text could prove to be a benefit to counterfeiting. U.S Mint should look into it.

  63. Re:Money Reader - Found step 2! by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is modded 'funny', but instead I would mod it 'horrifying'. This is EXACTLY how the system would be exploited. The only use for this system is to make it so blind people don't need to ask for help to verify the money is legit. This con would then make it so they still need to ask for help. How did anything improve?

    Okay, I suppose if they want to count the money in their wallet, and they KNOW it's all legit, this would help. But they each probably already have a system for that, anyhow. Different folds, dog-ears, etc. At the expense of the whole of the United States, we can help them NOT ONE BIT.

    Sounds great, let's do it.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  64. this would ruin the strip club experience by tkavanaugh · · Score: 1

    just think you walk into the strip club and bam they already know how much money you have on you, and you get service accordingly...

  65. Re:Don't do what china does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which part of "that's part of it (it meaning my preferring US money)" didn't you understand, idiot with a name?

  66. Re:Don't do what china does by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Don't do what China does and start offering money in different sizes. It's really annoying to use, and hard to stack.

    By China you mean virtually every other country in the world. Besides, if US used coins for 1 & 2 dollars (and got rid of dollar bills) you wouldn't have as many bills to stack. Nor is stacking a necessity. My euros are usually crumpled up and stuffed in my pocket. I don't even need to unfold them to know what I have - a grey one is a five, a red one is a ten, a blue is a twenty and so on. By contrast the similarity between US bills makes sorting and folding a virtual necessity.

  67. Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by benhocking · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But the solution to the aforementioned problem is to make the highest currency bill have the least holes. Therefore, you could turn a $100 bill into a $1 by punching holes, but not vice-versa. There are other problems with the idea, of course.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
    1. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hole-punching could also be done to already-existing bills in circulation, once the Official Patterns had been defined. The idea is retroactively applicable. The shapes of the holes could be varied, too.

    2. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Total+Cult · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The OP suggested that holes could be punched in current (i.e. holeless) bills, so your suggestion doesn't help unless all the new bills are a different shape from the current ones - in which case, you might as well make them different shapes from each other, as done so successfully in other countries.

    3. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by zoney_ie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about just using a wacky scheme like other countries; have each note in a different colour (helps partially sighted "blind" people who can distinguish colour, not to mention helping everyone else distinguish quickly), have each note a different size (helps everyone even if not the only measure to be taken), have tactile surfaces (helps blind and is another non-trivial mechanism that counterfeiters have to copy), have the numbers written large and clearly (again, helps everyone, and helps a lot of partially sighted, incl. even just longsighted).

      Seriously, this stuff is not rocket science. I sincerely hope that this judgement means the US govt. will stop living in past centuries, at least when it comes to banknotes. The US is so *old* when it comes to so many things - I was astonished when I visited there! "Old Europe" is nothing like old, so much upheaval in the last century.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    4. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      > There are other problems with the idea, of course.

      Let me guess that one of them is the following movie-plot weakness: the Mafia could start to use blind people as unknowing couriers for large sums of money by punching extra holes in the bills that are being transported.

      Yes, I know it's not very probable.

    5. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by virtualchoirboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, sales of tape would go through the roof as people tape over holes to turn their $1 bills into $100s...

    6. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "...you might as well make them different shapes from each other, as done so successfully in other countries."

      Changing the bill size would be an option... other than the fact that we probably have millions of hardware bill scanners already out there in vending machines, automated checkout lines, and so on.

      Not to mention the fact that every ATM in the country would have to be reworked.

      Then we have every cash register and cash drawer to consider...

      But hey, great idea!

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    7. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      "Changing the bill size would be an option... other than the fact that we probably have millions of hardware bill scanners already out there in vending machines...Meh. While the rest of your examples are indeed problematic, this one is easy: simply retain the one-dollar bill as it currently is while changing higher denomination bills. I don't see too many people shoving anything higher than singles into vending machines.

      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    8. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by PixelCat · · Score: 1

      Sure, that's a great idea, changing the size of currency. And now we have to replace very cash register and vending machine in the country, to make life easier for a tiny minority of people.

    9. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, different notes are different sizes and colours. This doesn't just help blind people, it helps everyone. I've just got back from two months in the USA, and it was a huge pain trying to find the correct note in my wallet; if I accidentally put a $5 bill in the middle of a load of $20s, then I would not find it again until I had spent all the $20s.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      A lot of people stick $5 bills into them. ESPECIALLY the ones that just break the bill into change(quarters) like in laundromats, carwashes, and other such locations that require you to use change but in higher ammounts than most vending machines.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    11. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Are you aware that US money is the easiest to forge in the world? This is really helped by the fact that the paper is easy to get hold of (you can bleach a $1 bill, and then print on it to get a $100 bill, which you can't do for other currencies where the larger notes are physically larger).

      Changing vending machines isn't that difficult. In the UK, we've changed the size of 5, 10 and 50 pence pieces in the last 20 years (the 10s and 5s were changed at the same time), and the vending machines adapted. The benefit from making forgery harder might well make it worth the effort.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    12. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Lurker187 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...and so the hole-punching gives you a way to scam the blind based on the old joke "Do you have two tens for a five?"

      No, the "marking" will have to be something much harder to fake, so it can't be done casually or quickly.

      I'm thinking bumps in the paper; not raised, like Braille, but extra paper pulp pressed into bumps, ridges...actually, the more complex the better. The extra paper will not wear down easily. Maybe even plastic pressed into the paper, like the current plastic strips, but thick enough to cause "speed bumps" on the paper. That might be harder to fake.

      --
      [command INSERTWITTYQUIP failed: insufficient wit]
    13. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by suggsjc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But hopefully the increase in GDP from tape manufacturers would offset the loss due to fraud...

      I'm all for equal opportunity and everything. But this exact debate has come up time and time again. How much should the general population be subjected to via gov't mandates to accommodate disabilities?

      I'm sure when we began mandating wheel-chair access there was an outcry because the cost of an average building was going to increase by a factor of X. And in all likelihood X would be larger than the returns provided the building owner due to increase sales of to people using the wheel-chair access. So, in that sense we are forcing inefficiencies on businesses (this is just one of the many ways gov't forces itself upon us and we wonder why its hard for businesses to succeed). But now wheel-chair access is an accepted stipulation for all new construction and its costs aren't even directly noticed/tracked. Does that mean that accommodating disabilities is a bad thing? No. Would it be better if it were up to the individual business owner? Maybe, but who would willingly spend money they know would never be recouped...probably no one (except nursing homes, hospitals, etc...because they would actually benefit from that). For a quick tech side-note the same ideas apply to web design (screen-reader friendly design, etc)

      So to wrap up a post that could/should go on for a while. Accommodating disabilities does create inefficiencies (don't think there is an argument to that). However, the real question should be whether or not those inefficiencies are acceptable to mandate on society (some are, some aren't). Anyone that thinks we should accommodate ALL, should just go ahead and be deported. Everything would have to be colored black and white (to accommodate color blindness). All visible notices would have to be combined with as audible counterpart (for the blind) because braille would still not accommodate the braille illiterate. You see the point...its hard to determine where the line should be drawn.

      I personally don't think the economic impact would be justified due to the fact that we are becoming less and less dependent on physical access to paper money. A better solution would be to either make all ATMs blind accessible (although audible interfaces would be bad for privacy) or provide free braille friendly debit card interfaces (not even sure how that would work). Again, a difficult situation.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    14. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by N3Roaster · · Score: 1

      If bills are made smaller, there's no need to change the cash registers. The smaller bills will still fit in the bins designed for larger bills. Vending machines will be where you'll have resistance. They're why we have such a stupid size for our current $1 coins. Personally, I'd still be in favor of multiple bill sizes and while we're at it, perhaps aesthetic considerations could go into the next bill redesign. Maybe we could have women on money that people use?

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    15. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 1

      This seems very similar to the system used in New Zealand; different size money, raised textures, different colors. There is a bit of problem with the plastic currency sticking together, however, due to static cling.

      -- Brian Boyko -- Network Performance Daily

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
    16. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Columcille · · Score: 1

      I don't see too many people shoving anything higher than singles into vending machines.

      An increasing number of gas pumps allow bills to be inserted, automated charge payment stations at parking garages, self-checkout lines of grocery stores, etc etc. A few years ago you'd have been right but more and more devices are accepting large bills for large charges.

      --
      I love my sig.
    17. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Columcille · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've just got back from two months in the USA, and it was a huge pain trying to find the correct note in my wallet

      People adjust to what they're used to. I'm quite used to looking at the numbers, you're used to looking at the colors. Different colored currency wouldn't be too big an adjustment, thought for most people in the U.S. it's just as easy to look at the numbers. Varying the size of the currency would be a major pain, I'd hate to have to jumble different sized bills. Yet for many people around the world it's not a problem at all. They've gotten used to it. We could get used to it too if faced with it long enough. They could get used to our system if faced with it long enough.

      --
      I love my sig.
    18. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      have each note in a different colour
      New $20 bills are green, new $10 bills are yellow/orange. New $5 and $1 bills to follow soon.

      have each note a different size
      Huh, that would suck while flipping through unsorted money. Besides, I doubt blind people can measure absolute sizes very well, you'd need sizes to vary too wildly.

      have the numbers written large and clearly
      New US notes have, in one of the corners, the numbers written big in a standard sans-serif font.

      Seriously, this stuff is not rocket science. I sincerely hope that this judgement means the US govt. will stop living in past centuries, at least when it comes to banknotes. The US is so *old* when it comes to so many things - I was astonished when I visited there!
      Time for a new visit.
    19. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'd argue that we use the size more often. You can find the note you want out of a bundle with little effort. When they are in my wallet I cannot see the size or the colour without opening it up further.

      Plus, we get none of that " 98 x $1 bills wrapped in two $100s " con over here! ;-)

    20. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Columcille · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plus, we get none of that " 98 x $1 bills wrapped in two $100s " con over here! ;-)

      Yeah, that one got me just last week. :/

      --
      I love my sig.
    21. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Get rid of the one-dollar bill and make it into a coin then you have vending machines that you need to update.
      Also slots machines bill scanners that can take bill form $1 to $100

    22. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Puff+of+Logic · · Score: 1

      An increasing number of gas pumps allow bills to be inserted, automated charge payment stations at parking garages, self-checkout lines of grocery stores, etc etc. A few years ago you'd have been right but more and more devices are accepting large bills for large charges.Fair enough. I had thought more along the lines of candy and soda vending machines when commenting. For any other purpose, such as grocery store self-serve checkouts or the other examples people have given, I'm in full agreement. Of course we *could* just make everything with only card-swipe payment as an option. That way the FBI, CIA, and NSA can keep careful tabs on patriotic purchases while inconveniencing the terrorists who use cash for their subversive and antisocial "private" transactions.

      --
      P.P.S. I'm doing Science and I'm still alive.
    23. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Gingernads · · Score: 1

      "Let me guess that one of them is the following movie-plot weakness: the Mafia could start to use blind people as unknowing couriers for large sums of money by punching extra holes in the bills that are being transported." ...yes but try spending your $1 bill with the $100 holes punched in it. Immediately illegal tender I would suggest.

      Mafia etc are not interested in notes that cannot be spent, surely? That would be a rubbish movie, it could be called 'Gone in 60 Holes'. ...I have a better idea for a plot for that film though!

      --
      Your optimism strikes me like junkmail addressed to the dead.
    24. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Therefore, you could turn a $100 bill into a $1 by punching holes, but not vice-versa. There are other problems with the idea, of course.

      For example, giving someone a $100 turned into a $1, then buying it back from them with four quarters.

      Holes won't work because existing money doesn't have holes. So any existing bill can be turned into whatever you want with holes.

      If we didn't have this problem, you might be able to use holes by using a different hole location (always along the same edge) for each bill, and only one hole. Any bill with multiple holes would be suspect and you'd take them to your bank (or a friend) for assistance. But this only works if we also increase the size of bills (decreasing doesn't help, because again, existing bills can be cut down to fit.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      if I accidentally put a $5 bill in the middle of a load of $20s, then I would not find it again until I had spent all the $20s.

      The solution is to periodically sort your wallet. It's annoying, but then having the bills in order makes it easier to make a particular combination of bills anyway, and you can always do it when you'd otherwise be thumb-twiddling. Sometimes cashiers are good enough to give you your bills in the proper order anyway (in order, largest bill with green side out) and then it's easy or at least easier to integrate them into the sort order in your wallet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that these changes affect more than vending machines. The machines used to count money will have to be changed significantly to account for money with bumps, to say nothing of how they have to change to accomodate different sizes of money. A lot of banks use automatic cash-dispensing machines at the teller windows and those will have to be revamped. Every ATM in America will need to be replaced or upgraded, and there's a lot of them. Every cash drawer in America, likewise. Practically every slot machine - few of them actually deal with coins any more. There's probably tons of other examples but I think that's sufficient for eye-opening...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by gid · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I use $5 bills in vending machines a fair amount. I even use $20 bills sometimes, like at the post office, where the change they give you is $1 coins. I kinda like using the coins anyway, so that's what I do when I buy stamps. :)

      Punching holes seems to be the best way... Sure you can mess people up by punching extra holes in dollars, but you can also mess people up by cutting a larger bill to a smaller size, emboss a bill with extra text, etc.

      Nothing will be full proof, so do what's easiest. You have to have a certain sense of trust for people if you're blind in the first place.

    28. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by bmwm3nut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think there's a difference between mandating all public buildings to have wheelchair ramps and changing the money so blind people can use it. In the first case, you're making a regulation that affects a private business. If I own a business and don't want to have wheelchair ramps, that may make me a jackass, but it shouldn't be illegal. And disabled people can choose not to do business with me. However, the government owns the monopoly on money. If people are forced to live under our government and use the money that they says is the legal tender, then by all means it should be such that it's usable by as many people as possible with whatever disability. There's no excuse for the government to be issuing money that blind people can't use. Any interaction with a private business should be under the terms of the business and you, any interaction with the government needs to be lowest common denominator so that everyone who has to live under the rule of the government can also get the benefit that their taxes are supposedly paying for.

    29. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Huh, that would suck while flipping through unsorted money. Besides, I doubt blind people can measure absolute sizes very well, you'd need sizes to vary too wildly.

      You'd be surprised how sensitive blind people are to tactile input. If they can read braille just by passing their fingers over a surface, they can certainly tell banknotes apart by slight size differences. All they'd need to be sure is a single reference note to compare to.

    30. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by mackyrae · · Score: 1

      Metro card machines take up to $20 bills. (change "metro" to BART if you're in SF, T in Boston or Pittsburgh, "the tubes" in London, etc)

      --
      look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
    31. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by walt-sjc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The gov gave the $1 coin a very crappy introduction. They SHOULD have said that all $1 bills will be pulled from circulation in 5 or 10 years. I have only seen the modern $1 coin in circulation ONCE - and it was because some individual gave one to me. I have never been to a business or used a machine gave them out in change.

    32. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by BeanThere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't think there's any economic benefit to helping blind (and other disabled) people participate productively in the economy? Do you think it's cheaper for taxpayers to have them all be totally dependent and helpless? Or what do you suggest? You look and you only see costs. It's not as black and white as you suggest.

    33. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by suggsjc · · Score: 1
      Good points. I was mainly trying to get across the fact that accommodating disabilities *generally* causes inefficiencies. Whether or not they are acceptable will be a difficult choice. The wheel-chair ramps analogy was just an easy to visualize example.

      any interaction with the government needs to be lowest common denominator so that everyone who has to live under the rule of the government can also get the benefit that their taxes are supposedly paying for
      Agree and disagree.

      First, I agree because if you are paying (through taxes) then you should be able to receive the same benefits as everyone else who also pays (taxes). However, (really not sure on this so correct if I am wrong) there a tax breaks, etc for people with disabilities. So in so sense the fact that they can't receive all of the benefits of gov't programs is *somewhat* accounted for.

      Disagree because the lowest common denominator would be VERY low (remember that whole inefficiencies thing?). As such it would be back to my original post. Could we not have public showing of movies because blind people would not be able to see it? Or would we have to also provide sign language interpretation for any public speech? AND THEN, what if the deaf person couldn't understand sign language...how are THEY supposed to be able to receive the benefit? Which leads into the question about the illiterate. If there are some people that can't read, then how are they supposed to be able to understand any of the written law (constitution, etc). Do we have to provide audio transcripts for them? What about the people that can't understand it (not even mentally challenged people, just average people who don't understand legal/technical jargon)? Do we have to provide free education for them on any topic of gov't that they don't understand (we kinda already do...but somehow still have those illiterate people)?

      So anyway, kinda ranted a little but the fact still remains that the decisions are pretty much always going to be difficult and someone, somewhere is going to be left out/screwed...again, if you try to accommodate *ALL* then you *WILL* fail as a gov't.
      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    34. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. The problem they're trying to solve is how to ID a banknote in isolation. If you're gonna accept a solution of the form "all they'd need is..." then you might as well tell them that "all they'd need is a banknote scanner".

    35. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Huh? How hard is it to carry an extra $1 bill with you?

      This is exactly how they do it in other countries. The bills are slightly different sizes. How else would you tell the difference, blind, between different-sized notes if you don't have a reference to know what size is of one particular denomination?

      If it works for other countries, I don't see why we can't do it.

      Of course, there's other things that can be done to remove the need for an external reference, like the differently-shaped plastic windows on some counties' currencies, but just making the bills slightly different lengths would solve most of the problem in the interim. Again, it's not hard to carry a single $1 bill. Comparing that to carrying a banknote scanner is just a red herring.

    36. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by suggsjc · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I tried to make sure that I said that it wasn't a black and white issue and that each case needs to be thought through carefully.

      I'm not trying to be "disability hating" or harp on the wheel-chair accessibility subject (as it one of many aspects) but do you really think that a majority of publicly accessible buildings actually recoup the costs of making the building wheel-chair accessible from sales of products to people with the need? I could be misguided in my thinking but I would doubt it.

      AGAIN, I AM NOT SAYING MAKING BUILDINGS BEING WHEEL-CHAIR ACCESSIBLE IS A BAD THING...BUT...IT DOES CREATE INEFFICIENCIES.

      The question isn't whether or not we should accommodate disabilities. The question is, which ones and to what extent. Accommodating ALL is flat out wrong and will fail 100% of the time. Accommodating none is also probably wrong. I don't know what the magic number/percentage/ratio is. In an ideal situation everyone would be equal and this converstaion/issue wouldn't exist/be valid. But since that isn't the case, I would think the next best case would be one where the decision to accommodate would fall more on the service provider. However, most would choose to cut corners/costs and the people who were unfairly disadvantaged would pay the price. However, even then I would hope that they would be accommodated relative to their respective (potential) return.

      Wish I had more time for this...as that last little bit needs a lot more explanation.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    37. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How else would you tell the difference, blind, between different-sized notes if you don't have a reference to know what size is of one particular denomination?
      By using sizes that vary wildly.
    38. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by dangitman · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned before, sight-impaired access is not the only drawback of the US currency. America loses millions of dollars to counterfeiting. A new currency would solve that problem, among many others.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    39. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by dangitman · · Score: 1
      And now we have to replace very cash register and vending machine in the country, to make life easier for a tiny minority of people.

      Wouldn't that benefit the economy, by pumping more money into manufacturing and technical service? It's not like the banks and large retail chains are hurting for business - but the manufacturing sector isn't doing that well these days.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    40. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, in the US, mutilated currency notes are valid until the point that either less than 50% of the bill remains, or the bill is unidentifiable.

      From the Department of the Treasury website:

      Both the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the Treasurer's Office frequently get questions from people wondering what to do with mutilated currency. Mutilated currency can be redeemed through the BEP. It can be mailed or personally delivered to the Bureau. A letter should be submitted stating the estimated value of the currency and an explanation of how the currency became mutilated. Experienced mutilated currency examiners will carefully examine the currency to determine the amount and value of the damaged note. The Director of the Bureau has final authority over the settlement of mutilated currency claims.

      The scheme would probably work, at least for a while...

    41. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      London's tubes accept US currency?

    42. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by PixelCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ever heard of the broken windows fallacy? It works like this: someone breaks a store window. The shopkeep comes out, upset, until the glass man comes by and points out that by buying that new window, the shopkeeper is stimulating the economy. Well, that's all true--but the money he spent on the window, he might've used for more supplies, or towards a bigger shop or something, that would've provided a more far-reaching economic benefit.

      Every dollar spent replacing perfectly fine cash registers and vending machines is a dollar NOT spent on inventory, salary, expansion, etc.

    43. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by PixelCat · · Score: 1

      I didn't say "difficult," I said "expensive." Not just vending machines, mind, but I mentioned cash registers as well. How many millions of units is that, I wonder, all of which cost probably hundreds of dollars.

    44. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by PixelCat · · Score: 1

      True about smaller bills; not sure that's the way they'd go. Note that this isn't a problem for bills with holes in them instead.

      As for vending machines, I'd need to see a more authoritative source: cash registers vastly outnumber vending machines.

      I'm not objecting to putting women on money, but there should be a better reason to do it than for the sake of doing it.

      I've lived in places were the $1 Sacajawea and SBA coins were in moderately widespread use.

    45. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Copid · · Score: 1
      For example, giving someone a $100 turned into a $1, then buying it back from them with four quarters.
      Errr... Don't you now just have your original $100 back (with some damage) minus four quarters?
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    46. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Not if you gave it to them as change, because you owed it to them. Now you have their $100. Come on, display a little imagination here. Or did you spend all your intellect trying to find flaws in my statement?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently the most common form of colour blindness is to shades of red, so as long as you left red out of the colours you'd be fine. Having colour blindness doesn't mean you can't see colour at all.

    48. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Copid · · Score: 1

      Ahhh. I see. They give you the $100 for some sub-$100 purchase and you give them their $100 back modded as a $1 as part of the change. Now $99 of value has disappeared from their wallet, and if you can dupe them into purchasing something worth $1 from you (or getting change for a $1), you can snag the $99 of disappeared value for yourself. From your original post, I was reading:

      1) Mod a $100 to turn it into a $1
      2) Give the fake $1 to a blind person for something presumably worth $1 (you're now out $99)
      3) Buy the fake $1 back for $1 (cash or something else) and get your original hundred back with some extra holes in it.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    49. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Raptoer · · Score: 1
      Also the US mint uses gradual changes, if they changed all the currency at the same time, not only would it be a pain with 2 types of money, but people would start to question their money, as that is devestating. In reality US dollars are worthless if they are not trusted, and changes lower trust in money.

      As for other changes in the US there are 3 causes.

      1. politicians sometimes don't know how to do actual research into finding a new way to do something or between two different options

      2. US companies who have a good profit margin on the old ways will pay to keep it that way rather than come up with a new way.

      3. the majority of US people are lazy (Yes I do live in the US, and no, the readers of slashdot are not whom I'm talking about)

    50. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by identity0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but it's still pretty bad that the bills have basically the same designs except for the portarit and the face in the corner. I know they have new designs for bills now, but they've made it consistent across the different bills again, which does not help things.

      You could look at typical playing card designs, which are designed so that it's very hard to mistake one card from another. In addition to the numbers in the corner, the picture in the middle are made very different so you don't have to look closely at a tiny number to distinguish. They are also colored, which is redundant because of the suites, but helps to quickly identify them. In general, having multiple ways of differentiating a card or a bill helps with identification and makes scams using taped-over numbers harder.

      I don't see why the U.S. has to lag behind just because "We've always done it this way."

    51. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by fingusernames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I traveled throughout Europe this summer, and Australia and New Zealand in '99. I'm sure I am just too accustomed to my American money, but while the Monopoly money was entertaining, I also found it annoying. Way too many coins in the Euro-zone and England. The pound coin in England is cool. The multiple colors weren't bad for notes, but the varying sizes were irritating. Not due to any problem innate with the bills, but due to habit.

      I'm accustomed to just flipping through bills, lined up neatly, and knowing the denomination from the corner, which is in the exact same place on each bill. Of course you need to be a bit anal about putting the bills in the wallet in the same orientation. But with bills of various sizes, unless you order them in your wallet from small to large or vice versa (granted, something which also anal people overseas probably do), there are issues.

      First, as you flip through, you can miss some of the tiny bills. Second, the corners are all in different places, making it far less easy to identify the bills quickly -- also granted that if you grew up with that system, you likely can very quickly identify the bills by some other characteristic. The point being, though, that a change to a European style of currency here would meet great popular resistance, making it HIGHLY unlikely to being implemented.

      Oh, and a funny story. At dinner one night in Sydney we were debating just this subject. This Australian girl talked about how advanced their new plastic money is, and said you can't rip it -- then she proceeded to demonstrate and ripped a bill right in half.

      Regarding doing things the old way, I believe that one factor in that is that Americans are less open to making wholesale changes by fiat. As a people, we don't mind change when it happens due to market forces, but change by legislative design doesn't go over well, unless there is very broad consent. So while in Europe lots of things appear to change because of legal mandate without terribly much fuss, similar attempts here get hung up by political or legal challenges. Our political system is largely like what you Europeans consider "unstable" coalition governments, like what Germany apparently has right now. In such a government, difficult/controversial agendas are quite difficult to advance. While apparently in Europe having such a government is considered undesirable, in the US we tend to like our government institutionally divided and thus restrained. I see the recent election not just as a repudition of Bush due to dismay over Iraq, but as a reaction to a unified federal government under one party and the excesses that accompany that, regardless of party.

      Larry

    52. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by PagosaSam · · Score: 1
      I think you guys are missing the point. A business doesn't just provide access for disabled customers but disabled workers. ADA attempts to remove barriers to employment for the disabled. The disabled worker has long been discriminated against but by removing barriers, society saves a ton of support money and at the same time collects new tax money.

      As to the question of bills for the blind, I suggest new bills be braille imprinted and banks be issued braille embossers for old currency. Soon all the bills will be marked in a way that is hard to circumvent.

      --
      :q! Oh crap, not again...
    53. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Like hanging chads?

    54. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Starayo · · Score: 1

      Oh, and a funny story. At dinner one night in Sydney we were debating just this subject. This Australian girl talked about how advanced their new plastic money is, and said you can't rip it -- then she proceeded to demonstrate and ripped a bill right in half.

      A common misconception. Australian notes are not advanced because you can't rip them - which you can, it's simply more difficult, but because the method of making the notes is a secret, so it's difficult to convincingly forge them.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    55. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1
      People adjust to what they're used to. I'm quite used to looking at the numbers, you're used to looking at the colors. Different colored currency wouldn't be too big an adjustment, thought for most people in the U.S. it's just as easy to look at the numbers. Varying the size of the currency would be a major pain, I'd hate to have to jumble different sized bills. Yet for many people around the world it's not a problem at all. They've gotten used to it. We could get used to it too if faced with it long enough. They could get used to our system if faced with it long enough.


      However, as an American who has gone to Europe, I found myself instantly understanding and appreciating the different colors and sizes of the bills there. I'd be shocked to ever hear of a European feeling the same way coming here. No, it's not just different. Ours is very arguably inferior. Just because we *can* use it doesn't mean it is just as good.
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    56. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better example might be, the costs the government goes to to prevent counterfeiting and to print new money every year to replace easily worn out paper money. These are a drain on the economy that benefit NO-ONE and that money is spent every day to counter act NOT having modern money.

      These are economic arguments for new US currency, I believe the cost of updating US currency could be minimized enough to make it irrelevant to the benefits of reduced counterfeiting, increased hardiness of non-paper currency (less costs for government FOREVER) and the inclusion of more people to be easily able to spend their money anywhere; This only makes our economy more dynamic and more prosperous for everyone.

    57. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      One Dollar Coins? Then what the hell am I supposed to stick between the strippers obscenely fake titties? A five? Sheesh, you think I'm made of money or something?

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    58. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      insert the coin into. . . eh, nevermind

    59. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by BrotherLuigi · · Score: 1

      Wait.But the solution to the aforementioned problem is to make the highest currency bill have the least holes. Therefore, you could turn a $100 bill into a $1 by punching holes, but not vice-versaDo you really want me turning $100's into $1's?

      Ex: Blind person holding $100 bill thinks its a $1 bill because more holes have been punched in it. Blind person buys a pack of gum, gives clerk what (s)he thinks is a $1, but is really a $100. Blind person doesn't wait for change, clerk is dishonest. Clerk = +$99, Blind person = -$99.

    60. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by loraksus · · Score: 1

      You should go to Canada, where loonies and toonies ($1 and $2 coins) are everywhere. I can't really explain how annoying it is to find out that you have $42 in change in your pocket.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    61. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by dacaldar · · Score: 1
      Therefore, you could turn a $100 bill into a $1 by punching holes,

      And thus convince a Blind person to hand over their modded $100 for a chocolate bar and expect no change! Good work...

      (actually it was the grandparent poster who had it wrong - depending on whether the blind person is giving or receiving the money in the transaction, and trying not to get screwed).

    62. Re:Not that I'm advocating the hole punch method by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1
      But now wheel-chair access is an accepted stipulation for all new construction and its costs aren't even directly noticed/tracked. Does that mean that accommodating disabilities is a bad thing? No.
      Like many things, it can cost a lot when done as an afterthought, but if done from the start the cost is usually minimal. It could even save you money.

      Don't forget, wheelchair ramps don't just benefit wheelchair users. Anyone who's had to move heavy things like beer crates, fridges or photocopiers will agree.

      In fact, when constructing a building, the wheelchair ramp should be among the first things you make. I wonder how many builders struggle to carry heavy boards, heaters etc, and then build the ramp at the end?
      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  68. Hmm.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    So, where in the constitution does it say "The blind have the right to tell different bills apart"?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:Hmm.. by Elkboy · · Score: 1

      Where does it say seeing people have the right to tell them apart?

    2. Re:Hmm.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should go back to using different weighted coins of precious metal?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to feed trolls, but I'll bite.

      Amendment XIV

      Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      Amendment IX

      The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    4. Re:Hmm.. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. It is however a ruling taken directly from federal disable rights laws, which were passed by Congress under their Constitutional authority to regulate the workings of the federal government, to regulate the transfer of funds from the federal government to state & local governments, and to regulate interstate commerce.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  69. Judge Says U.S. Money Violates Rights of the Blind by tonicblue · · Score: 1

    ...So does clothes

    --
    $ cat /home/tonic/sig
    cat: /home/tonic/sig: No such file or directory
  70. God, that's a horrible idea by Saint+V+Flux · · Score: 0

    Do you know why both attempts at using dollar coins have failed? Because people HATE coins. Coins are ridiculously annoying to have. Who wants a huge heavy pocketful of coins when you could have a much lighter wallet? Besides, have you ever seen paper money bounce off the floor when dropped and roll under a vending machine / down a crack where you can't get it / etc? If you want to suggest an overhaul of our money, get rid of coins entirely.

  71. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  72. I can't explain it... by shaneh0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...But my great grandfather, who went blind at 60 to Glaucoma, was able to identify a denomination with 100% accuracy. It was a dinner-party trick that always delighted the crowd. He lived until 90 and, while I'm not sure if this was an acquired skill, as long as I knew him (the last 10 years of his life), he was never wrong. So there must be SOMETHING to it. I always speculated that it could've been that he could actually feel the boundries of ink in the paper, or something like that. I once thought that he was just guessing based on how worn the bill was, but crisp bills worked just the same.

    Also, this was with the pre-clinton era currency.

    Maybe he was a freak, but have they actually asked any blind people about this?

    1. Re:I can't explain it... by david_g17 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was a freak, but have they actually asked any blind people about this?

      yes, but no one completed the questionnaire.

    2. Re:I can't explain it... by raoul666 · · Score: 1

      I hate to be the one to tell you, but your grandfather was never blind. He just pretended to be for 30 years so he'd have an awesome party trick.

      --
      When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl
  73. Counterfitting by sorak · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't such a move (assuming that they use raised lettering, or some kind of thread pattern that can make bills easy to distinguish) make it more difficult to counterfit the bills? How much money have we spent on all these "new" bills, just to prevent counterfitting?

    Of course the judge didn't say they had to use a raised lettering system. One poster suggested changing the shape of bills, which would accomplish their goals much more cheaply.

  74. Re:Don't do what china does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the grandparent is correct, albeit a bit too abrasive. The average person would have used, "Use the same-sized currency. I've used Chinese currency before and it's hard to stack the bills." Your subject would be considered off-topic and possibly inflammatory since the main point of the issue is the size of the currency, not the actions of China.

  75. Nothing's free. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You might as well ask if seeing eye dogs are free, or Braille computer terminals are free. Of course they're not free. Adaptive equipment is expensive. But redesigning the world around a small minority of people who aren't within a range of commonly-accepted norms would be more expensive.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Nothing's free. by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's also human to take care of the nations minorities. Nevermind that they are a substantial minority, anyone could be added to the group at any time, and the measures taken to help them, help everyone. If you don't believe me, see how much easier streetscapes, buildings, public transport or in fact money is in European countries for everyone because of measures to help the disabled.

      Talk about inhuman and unfeeling - I find it shocking that a country with such a large Christian population continues to have such draconian and uncaring policies not just at government level, but supported as a ideology by most of the population. No wonder there are so many leftists and socialist radicals in South America, Europe, etc. when they look at what goes on in the Capitalist USA. I don't agree with that either; I believe Social Democracy (of a brand somewhat between the extremes in IRL/UK and continental Europe) can have the right balance between economic prosperity and social welfare. Besides, if you really have economic prosperity, surely the government can afford to care for its citizens who are lacking not only opportunity, but basic human rights and needs?

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    2. Re:Nothing's free. by udderly · · Score: 1
      Talk about inhuman and unfeeling - I find it shocking that a country with such a large Christian population continues to have such draconian and uncaring policies not just at government level, but supported as a ideology by most of the population

      Being fairly bought into the idea of a Social Democracy, I was with you there for awhile, but don't you think that the bringing Christians into it was a little gratuitous?

      You might be interested to know that some recent research indicates that conservative Christians give more to charities than self-identified liberals, regardless of income. From the above-mentioned article:

      When it comes to helping the needy, he writes: "For too long, liberals have been claiming they are the most virtuous members of American society. Although they usually give less to charity, they have nevertheless lambasted conservatives for their callousness in the face of social injustice."

      While I'm sure that there is more than one side to the story, your broadbrush treatment of Christians in this regard is simply unwarranted. As a Christian, I will readily admit that we are, as a group, rather hypocritical and self-serving in many ways, but this does not appear to be one of them.

    3. Re:Nothing's free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what, if you're lucky enough to age normally you'll experience some of same sort of perceptual and mobility limitations that these sorts of accommodations help compensate for. Even now, presbyopia is gradually making it harder for you to focus on close objects, presbycusia is reducing your ability to hear high frequencies, and sooner or later walking is going to be difficult, too.

      Maybe an appeal to selfishness will work better for you: don't think of it as catering to a "small minority of people who aren't within a range of commolny-accepted norms," you'll be there too some day, better make sure you'll be accommodated, too.

    4. Re:Nothing's free. by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

      > don't you think that the bringing Christians into it was a little gratuitous?

      Not really, I'm a Christian, and find attitudes of some *Christians* in the US very hard to reconcile with even a cursory glance of say, the gospels. It's not even a matter of interpretation, there is no possible way that some views of stereotypical US evangelical Christians stand up to any form of reconciliation with the Bible.

      Note too that I am not saying these people aren't Christian. I'm reasonably convinced that even Bush is a Christian, though it is not my place to judge. I'm nevertheless appalled at what he has overseen in the last number of years. It's akin to being certain that some of those partaking in the violent excesses of the Crusades were nevertheless indeed Christians.

      I am well aware of the statistics wrt. giving. But that should not in fact be a source of pride. It is a failure for only a segment of the population to be giving so much, and the government to be performing poorly. I do not understand the US evangelical Christian attitudes towards government; i.e. supporting individualism and anarchistic principles as opposed to strong governance. They don't seem to follow the clear reasoning in the Bible (OT & NT) for having strong government, even if said government is oftimes flawed. Christians should be supporting authority, praying for it and seeking to better it, in fact, doing everything for the government apart from that which would be disobeying God. Just because a government acts in ways that Christians cannot condone does not mean Christians shouldn't respect their authority. They should not be seeking to lessen the governments influence in society. Government is just about the only thing holding society together; it's why God instituted government in the first place.

      --
      -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    5. Re:Nothing's free. by udderly · · Score: 1

      Gotcha. Clearly I misunderstood your inference. Mea culpa.

  76. we lost our way. by CDPatten · · Score: 0, Troll

    Somewhere along the line our nation went from a Republic to an odd politically correct hybrid of socialism where the rights of the few outweigh the rights of the many. 1% of the population can now dictate and control 99% of the population. That simply isn't right.

    I'm certainly not for making the life of Blind people harder, or anyone with a disability. However, the disabilities act just is abused. This is a perfect example. Look, it sucks to be blind I'm sure, but it is not your god given right to have a society bend around you to meet your needs. It is your responsibility to find a way to work in the society. I can't ride in little sports cars, because I'm too tall... does that mean the automakers are violating my "right" to drive in their cars? The disabilities act may have been passed with good intentions, but it's just another example of liberals who are short sighted (or worse).

    Blind people can use a money reader, or they could use credit cards, etc. Blind and people with disabilities often have to by special equipment, and there is nothing wrong with that. Frankly they aren't the only people in society that can't do things like normal people. Hell, if you are too tall, you have to go to specialty stores to buy clothes. The Government shouldn't be able to pass a law and mandate Wal-Mart carry all Big and Tall sizes.

    The truth is this isn't about Blind people. This is about some a-hole lawyer/firm trying to make a name for themselves. Even worse a bunch of liberals, the self proclaimed "knower's of what's best for everyone else" will jump on board and give this some weight. This will cost society big $$ for no good reason.
    I'll tell you one thing; this kind of stuff sure as hell isn't what the founding fathers had in mind when they founded the nation, that's for sure. Don't even get me started on legalized discrimination, a.k.a. Affirmative Action.

    1. Re:we lost our way. by BCW2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      True, to damn true. Be politicly correct, cater to the lowest common denominator, watch country go down the toilet.

      The whole PC idea is to lie about everything so no one gets offended. Well that concept offends me so it failed!

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    2. Re:we lost our way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am blind, deaf and have no hands. Now I demand you make the money accessible to me.

    3. Re:we lost our way. by radish · · Score: 1

      You're seriously comparing being a couple inches taller than most people to being blind?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:we lost our way. by Sinistar2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a difference between making money accessible and mandating a store carry a robust big and tall selection. The money is created, distributed, and managed by the federal government. As such, it carries certain restrictions and regulations that must apply to the entire nation or to anyone outside of this nation who converts it between currencies. Wal-Mart is a corporation and, as such, chooses its product selection to best result in profitability. The government does not directly regulate product selection.

      Does it set rules for how the building is constructed, how the employees are treated, how Wal-Mart's practices impact the citizenry? Sure, but that's far different than telling Wal-Mart whether or not to carry large pants. The two are not comparable.

      Before I continue, let me go ahead an proclaim my bias. I have a nearly 5 year old son with cerebral palsy who requires the use of a wheelchair.

      I find interesting the statement that we're in a situation where the "rights of the few outweigh the rights of the many". I rather think of it as "the rights of the few supplement the rights of the many". What rights have been denied people so that those with handicaps might better interact with our society and contribute to the economy? Buildings with ramps and elevators still have stairs. Money printed to be accessible will still be visually discernible. Electric outlets placed slightly higher on a wall do not make them any less useful for others. Lowered curbs can still be traversed by those able to walk.

      The only right denied is, possibly, the right to deny. In the case of this possible alteration to currency, you are stating that it absolutely should be the case that the US government should shun some millions of its citizens to avoid easing their spending and decrease their independence. But why should it do that? What sense does that make?

      According to numbers from 1995, 37.7 million people in the US have a disability that impedes them from engaging in normal activity (http://www.infouse.com/disabilitydata/disability/ 1_1.php). The ADA is meant to set standards that make life a little easier for those folks. It also helps the likely 70 million other people that provide care for those people. Because of the ADA, my wife and I are able to wheel my son into stores, restaurants, libraries, and recreation areas so that we may enjoy time together in the same environments as everyone else. Certainly, there are many areas still off limits to us with a wheelchair, but we wish there weren't.

      I should say, however, that when we run into that situation, we choose simply to not patronize such businesses. I wouldn't feel quite as laissez faire about running into the same restrictions in a government building, though. We understand that not all of society should bend to the benefit of our son, but we're very thankful when society enables us to participate. THAT is what the ADA is all about - participation. It does so in a heavy-handed way by legislating standards of access, but if it did not exist, those 37.7 million people would just be SOL.

      Suppose we did go back to those old Republic roots. The nation's disabled citizens would either be institutionalized or kept at home. Considering the fun I've had with my son going camping, hiking accessible trails, flying to DisneyWorld, browsing for books, shopping for Halloween costumes, standing at the base of a towering Lincoln, et cetera, I'm glad that there is something in place to lessen our obstacles as we experience our neighborhood, our state, and our nation.

      I would like for my son to one day be able to hold a job, be able to vote, be able to travel, and be able to have a home with his family. The ADA aids in all those things.

    5. Re:we lost our way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently, you have no idea what it's like to be blind - if you did, perhaps you'd reconsider your post.

      The problem is that despite nice inventions like money readers, credit cards, etc., society just doesn't give a crap about the disabled. For all the advantages that credit/debit cards have for the blind, we essentially have rendered those moot by having flat, touch-screen interfaces for their use. Been in a grocery store lately? The flat-screen POS systems aren't blind friendly in the slightest, and that's just the tip of the iceberg.

      The ADA is one of the few tools the disabled have to help make sure that technological advances actually help people, instead of provide another system that's not usable by all. It's not a perfect act, but it's also one that's under constant attack just because people are too lazy to spend 5 seconds thinking about someone else's needs. Don't even get me started on the current wave of "therapy dogs" and what this is doing to hurt the rights of legitimate guide dog users and service animals.

      If you had ever worked with or associated with blind people, you would understand the amount of faith and trust they put in the sighted to assist them with something as trivial as buying something with cash. Disputes happen often, sometimes because the blind individual may have made a mistake in identifying a bill, but many times because unscrupulous individuals are taking advantage of the individual. It's ridiculous that we can't do something with our paper currency to rectify this inequity.

      Oh, and driving is a privledge, not a right.

    6. Re:we lost our way. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      1% of the population can now dictate and control 99% of the population. That simply isn't right.

      "Requiring the barest consideration for" is the same as "being controlled by". The mantra of the privileged majority.

      I'm certainly not for making the life of Blind people harder, or anyone with a disability. However, the disabilities act just is abused. This is a perfect example.

      Yeah, this is a perfect example of the disabled wanting to have the most basic of concessions -- the ability to tell what money they are carrying instead of depending on the honesty of a sighted person -- and a non-disabled person feeling put out by it.

      Why?

      Because now you won't be able to lord your money-counting ability over the blind? Because you won't be able to rip them off by handing them three ones instead of a ten and two ones for change? Because a simple feature of currency that basically every other country has and that should have been in the currency for decades is just asking so much. We'll redesign the currency every ten years to incorporate the newest in anti-forgery technology, sure, that's great! But raised bumps for the blind? Fuck no! Where do they come off trying to control me!

      Yeah, this is a perfect example all right. A perfect example of a privileged member of the majority whose sense of privilege has morphed into a sense of entitlement, such that anything that threatens their advantage becomes an assault.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:we lost our way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you have the good fortune to live out a normally long life, you too will find yourself dealing with impaired perception and mobility - it's a part of normal, natural aging. Even now, presbyopia and presbycusia are at work in you. The closest point you can focus on is getting farther away, and the highest frequency you can hear is getting lower and lower. So since selfishness seems to be your motivator, think of it as preparing for the day YOU have trouble telling bills apart because they all look the same. If you live long enough, that day'll come, buddy.

  77. Monopoly money by dcroxton · · Score: 1

    I've been dreading this for years: U.S. money comes to look like monopoly money. I really value the standard size and color. (And I don't see where color changes would help the blind, or the color-blind, for that matter.) If they have to make a change, I hope they do it in the form of adding texture (Braille?) or, if absolutely necessary, changing the length only, as the Australian posters have suggested. I definitely do not want a mess of different-sized bills to go through when sorting money.

    --
    Sincerely, Derek

    A curious little blog
    1. Re:Monopoly money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. When I have to count my cash the different sized notes we use the UK add a huge amount of complexity to my life. Not only that but the poor cashiers in the banks and post office have huge problems counting notes really fast. Vending machines that take notes don't work and we can't by petrol properly. It is not hoodies and single mothers that are bringing down this country it is our oddly shaped money. /sarcasm

      I swear you Americans are a right big bunch of girly drama queens.

  78. There are requirements for joining Euroland by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    One of them is a maximum budget deficit of 3%.

    1. Re:There are requirements for joining Euroland by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      You can get round that by pretending to be France.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  79. About time by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Like the submitter says, most countries have done this for years. This isn't a new concept (though will be marketed by the treasury dept as "innovative" and "groundbreaking").

    It's kinda sad the courts need to get involved in this. I'm convinced the Treasury dept intentionally makes currency confusing, so that people (especially foreigners) need to examine it, and hence make it stick in their minds.

    You know how many tourists confuse coins in the US?

    You know how many Americans confuse the "dollar coin" with another coin of less value? Among other popular mistakes.

    Here's a hint: just about all at one point or another.

    It really is sad that our country is so behind the times... yet it bills itself as being decades ahead. What next? Affordable prescriptions?

  80. Easy fix by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Just ban currency.

    Make everyone carry a fedreal government provided 'funds card' that only works in government controlled ( and monitored, and taxed ) readers. Oh, and tie them to an individual person so you cant 'share' your funds.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Easy fix by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Oh, good. Because nothing helps defend freedom and liberty like government tracking of every single financial transaction you make and thus every location you travel to. That's not a recipe for totalitarianism at all, is it? Oh, and just wait until the government considers your records sellable (or more likely giveable) resources to financial and marketing companies with good lobbyists.

      In no way would this data ever be abused. Man, that sounds like such a better idea than tactile marks on paper currency.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Easy fix by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      I was being sarcastic.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Easy fix by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I have a friend who practically believes that same thing with no sarcasm, so it didn't register. With someone with more sense, it'd be a mutually agreed banned topic for discussion in each other's presence, but he really hates cash intensely and honestly thinks the world would be a better place without it and never lets a potential argument get in the way of a good opportunity to complain when inconvenienced.
       
      ...and I can't let advocacy for the elimination of a form of privacy go unchallenged, so I'm as much to blame, much to the chagrin of our mutual friends.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  81. Re:Don't do what china does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wikipedia article doesn't do a very good job of showing sizes, but there is actually quite a difference. The largest banknote, the 100 yuan, is 155x77mm (around 6 inches x 3 inches), while the smallest common banknote, the 1 jiao (0.1 yuan), is 115x52mm (around 4.5 inches x 2 inches). You can stack them easily though, because the size (and colour) difference makes them easy to sort, and you can just put the small ones on top of the big ones. I do this in my wallet anyway to make it easier to find the right change.

    There are also some even smaller banknotes, 1 fen (0.01 yuan), which are 90x42mm (2.5 inches x 1.5 inches), but they're hardly ever used because the value is so low - I see one about every 3 months.

  82. US notes are colored. by amightywind · · Score: 1
    I can see quite well with glasses, and this very thing has annoyed me plenty of times. Why the hell are all our bills the same size, shape, and color? Make them more distinct, and you'll speed up all cash transactions.

    Have you looked at the $10's and $20's lately? They are colored. The $20 is blue/yellow and the $10 is red. I think the treasury is doing a great job keeping the forgers off guard while keeping our currency as classy and confidence inspiring as it has always been. Adding few braille dots are no big deal. The idea might even be combined with the security strips that were added a few years ago.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  83. different is better by webbod · · Score: 1

    It's a lot easier with different sized bills, a bit of colour doesn't go amiss either.

    I was in Detroit last year, a homeless guy posed for a photo, asked for a dollar, so I pulled out a greenish bill - he skipped off down the road singing my praises - I felt sorry for the guy, a dollar made such a difference to him, only noticed my mistake back at the hotel - I'd given him a 100 dollar bill.

  84. Who uses cash anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next, all receipts must be in Braille so that they are not getting ripped off on their check card transactions?

    1. Re:Who uses cash anyway? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      How about 99% of people under 18 who can't legally have a credit card?

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  85. Re:Don't do what china does by graveborn · · Score: 1
    Don't do what China does and start offering money in different sizes. It's really annoying to use, and hard to stack. By China you mean virtually every other country in the world. Besides, if US used coins for 1 & 2 dollars (and got rid of dollar bills) you wouldn't have as many bills to stack. Nor is stacking a necessity. My euros are usually crumpled up and stuffed in my pocket. I don't even need to unfold them to know what I have - a grey one is a five, a red one is a ten, a blue is a twenty and so on. By contrast the similarity between US bills makes sorting and folding a virtual necessity.
    yeah but if got rid of the $1 bill, then how would you tip strippers (err.. exotic dancers.. my bad)? those coins don't fold on the g-strings well ;) also, 1's are used in abundance, instead of a light weight bill, you carry around a pocket full of change? no thanks.. I am down for the different size and type of bills. I also read some time back that the Treasury is working towards the polymer bills anyway.
  86. Here how it's done in (not Soviet) Russia by jdoeii · · Score: 1

    Look at the item number 3 in the picture.
    http://www.cbr.ru/eng/bank-notes_coins/bank-notes/ main.asp?file=priznak_2004_eng/Opisan_50R_eng.htm

    That's not Braille, but a similar scheme, a raised pattern. The same pattern can be easily added to the dollar bills. It won't cost much and won't require any adjustments to the bill readers.

  87. "Reasonable accomodation" by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1
    Here's the rule for the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for when complying with the Act would cause an undue hardship on the employer:

    An employer does not have to provide a reasonable accommodation that would cause an "undue hardship" to the employer. Generalized conclusions will not suffice to support a claim of undue hardship. Instead, undue hardship must be based on an individualized assessment of current circumstances that show that a specific reasonable accommodation would cause significant difficulty or expense.(113) A determination of undue hardship should be based on several factors, including:

            * the nature and cost of the accommodation needed;
            * the overall financial resources of the facility making the reasonable accommodation; the number of persons employed at this facility; the effect on expenses and resources of the facility;
            * the overall financial resources, size, number of employees, and type and location of facilities of the employer (if the facility involved in the reasonable accommodation is part of a larger entity);
            * the type of operation of the employer, including the structure and functions of the workforce, the geographic separateness, and the administrative or fiscal relationship of the facility involved in making the accommodation to the employer;
            * the impact of the accommodation on the operation of the facility.


    I'd say that redesigning the money supply would qualify as an undue hardship imposed on the Federal government.
    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:"Reasonable accomodation" by Sinistar2k · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, what you just quoted relates directly to accommodations made by an employer for a disabled employee.

      Currency is not an employee of the federal government, nor are the users of said currency. Undue hardship, as defined in your example, does not apply.

  88. Drive Through Tellers by lazarus · · Score: 1

    Never mind the actual bills. Can someone please tell me why the keys on drive through instant tellers have braille on them?

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Drive Through Tellers by idamaybrown · · Score: 1

      Plenty of people here in Texas drive like they are blind!

    2. Re:Drive Through Tellers by nuxx · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's likely because a standard keypad / face is used for ATMs, and that is used on both walk-up and drive-up machines.

    3. Re:Drive Through Tellers by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can someone please tell me why the keys on drive through instant tellers have braille on them?

      You're blind. You get a taxi to the store, stopping at the ATM on the way. Do you want to give the cab driver your card and PIN?

  89. Not blind and can't identify bills? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, I feel sorry for the blind who can't tell which bills they are handing over - but what is with all of the posts from people who think visually identifying a bill by the printing on it is difficult? My kids learned their numbers in pre-school and have no problems identifying a $1, $5, $10 from each other.

  90. Undue hardship? WTF? by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    Given that the US Treasury redesigns existing paper money on a regular basis and given that this change would be relatively trivial compared to the anti-counterfeiting mechanisms being placed into current redesigns, I'd say that this is certainly no undue hardship. Something as simple as raised print on the numbers to make different denominations of bills feel different would suffice.

    Now if the judge had ordered that all existing stocks of money be recalled, you might have a point. But taking blind people into account during redesigns that are going to happen anyway is hardly an undue hardship.

  91. for starters by tank3544 · · Score: 1

    Well a great start to this would be to stop making freakin' pennies. We'd probably save enough money there to convert the machines to print with slightly raised numbers.

    Pennies have become completely useless and a major nuisance. Back about 10 years ago there was talk of convenience stores doing away with them to save time on transactions. There was no problems with price setting in the store, the problem came with gas purchases. I suppose now with most gas purchases being done with credit/debit this idea would be more feasible. Set the gas pumps for force the pump to the next multiple of 5.

    Anywho, my Aunt is blind. She folds her bills a certain way to know what is what. I'm sure she'd really appreciate raised numbers on the bills.

  92. strip clubs already do this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    posting AC because i don't feel like burning karma on something offtopic, but yes, strip clubs already do this (sortof). Spearmint Rhino is just one chain I know of minting their own chips (vegas-style gambling chips) for purchase with credit card to use to pay for dances. this may not be abroad yet, but i know it is prevalent on the westcoast of the US. it's a great little scam for them too, as they tack on (iirc) a 20% surcharge to your credit card, and then also charge the dancers 10% or 15% (forget which) to "cash" the chips. Probably something in the latter half of that transaction is illegal, but i'll save that for others, as IANAL. The only upside to the customer is the ability to use your (corporate? hehe) credit card, which in addition to convenience, allows you to write this off as a business entertainment expense since it will usually be billed by "Inland Venture Ent, LLC" or some other innocuous-sounding entity.

    as a side-note, most strippers do at some point have a customer attempt to pay them occasionally with change while onstage.. and they hate it. if you've ever wanted to figure out how to get an exotic dancer to spontaneously attempt to beat you with her shoe, simply toss her a quarter while she's onstage.

    1. Re:strip clubs already do this. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1
      and then also charge the dancers 10% or 15% (forget which) to "cash" the chips. Probably something in the latter half of that transaction is illegal

      It's pretty standard for the club to charge dancers a fee on their earnings at the club anyway. It's in the contract--the dancers aren't employees but rather contractors, which is why you pay them and not the club. That's pretty much the only way most clubs even make money, other than drinks (in some states you can't serve drinks in a strip club so scratch that) and cover charges.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  93. 12 countries use the Euro by jenik · · Score: 1

    erm... it's not 25, it's 12 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurozone in the Eurozone plus Montenegro.

  94. Re:Money Reader - Found step 2! by gwm · · Score: 1

    ...and just think of the money to be made in Florida with all hanging chads!

  95. A couple of questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before I start my questions, let me just say I am a US citizens and I don't give a flying fig if US money gets changed as long as it is done in an intelligent manner (which rules out most Congress critters) and not god awful ugly. I've been in non-US countries and haven't minded different sizes, colors, etc, although in some countries, the smaller denominations are awful easy to lose.

    The judge used a law that talks about federal programs to mandate his requirements for changes. I ave assumed programs are things like after school stuff, food stamps, etc. You know, laws Congress established by passing laws supposedly based off the constitution to get stuff done. Can anyone honestly tell me that printing money is a federal PROGRAM ? I kind of thought the minting/coining/printing of money was something mandated in the constitution as solely Congress' responsibility and as such does not fall under the program moniker. If it isn't a program, then the judge is full of hooey.

    Not being a wise guy here, but since it is now unfair to discriminate in coining money, what about people who are blind and have lost their hands ? Different colors and different sizes won't work for these folks. I know that sounds ridiculous and like I am an elitist snob or horse's back side, but just how far should this be carried?

    Finally, given the separation of powers that is supposed to exist in the constitution, how does the judge get off telling Congress how to live up to the laws Congress passed ?

  96. US banknotes are ugly by MichailS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here - take a lesson from Sweden:

    http://www.banknotes.com/se62.htm

    1. Re:US banknotes are ugly by iamblades · · Score: 1

      Are you joking?

      I prefer my money not to look like it was designed by Jackson Pollack on LSD.

      But what do I know?

      --
      Shit adds up at the bottom...
    2. Re:US banknotes are ugly by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I actually think that US money looks fine. There is a simple elegance to them. The multicolored overactive graphics on most Non-US based currency looks horrible or worse, like really bad play money. The Swedish 50K bill in your post is an excellent example of money trying to be too much.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  97. I can't say I've ever seen a wheelchair ramp ... by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    ... that charged admission for use.

    While modifications for accessibility are certainly not free to a business owner, neither are modifications for the non-disabled such as doors, windows, lights, etc. And most of these amenities are free to the clients.

    Not to mention that in some jurisdictions, the government will give grants to business owners making adaptations for the disabled.

  98. Yeah, see there I can't help you by benhocking · · Score: 1

    Good point. How cynical of you to think that someone might try to take advantage of the blind by abusing this otherwise perfect system, however. ;)

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  99. Answer in a flawed movie. by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 1

    From "Eye of the Beholder":
    (paraphrased since it's been a long time since I've seen it)


    Waiter: "Here's your drink, sir. That'll be six fifty."

    Blind man: *hands him a folded bill*

    Waiter: *lying* "Uhh...this is a five."

    Joanna: *glances over* "No, you asshole, it's a TEN."

    Waiter: "Oh, m-my mistake." *hurries off*

    Blind Man: *smiles* "It's alright dear. I knew. See, I fold the fives the short way, and the tens the long way."

    --
    Caffeine is my anti-drug!

    Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
  100. Better save up. by Creepyguywithastick · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eight of those will make a Starman.

  101. Also in the news by kahrytan · · Score: 1


    Foxnews has a report on the Judge's ruling. It should be added to article.

    --
    \
  102. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see Daredevil have any problems with his monetary tokens. And what's good enough for a crime-fighting, toxic waste surviving superhero is good enough for me.

  103. Dreamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does your crack dealer take credit too?

  104. The problem isn't the money, its the non-blind by vortoxin · · Score: 1

    We are looking at this form the wrong position. It is not the money that is discriminating. The problem is that we are all not blind. After the 30 sit down session from the government the only logical way to make this fair is to require Americans to gouge out their eyes so everyone is equal.

    I'm sure the eye gouging stations will be brought up in the next congress hearings. And I'm sure riders will be added to protect Haliburton stockholders and a random crushing of some freedom that is seen as obsolete.

    Really I am looking at the positive side of this....

    --
    When I was your age we didn't have music file sharing utilities. We had to go out to a store and shoplift the CD.
  105. Re:Money Reader - Found step 2! by dlim · · Score: 1

    How would anyone profit if the blind hand them a $1 bill to pay for $100 worth of goods or services?

  106. What about Vending Machines? by gmletzkojr · · Score: 1

    In a place I used to work, the candy vending machine had braille on the buttons, which correspond to "D", "1", etc. Great idea, until you realize that "D1" wasn't always the Twix bar - the guy that fills the machine is free to put the candy in whatever row he wants to (as long as it has the correct price). So, to the blind, it was pot luck candy dispensing. Just another 'not too well thought out' idea, I suppose.

    --
    I for one welcome our new [insert main topic] overlords.
  107. Braille maybe? by MikeyVB · · Score: 1

    Why is it so difficult to put some simple indentations in the bills? Can't decide a standard, why not use something that all (or most) blind people already use, like...oh, I don't know, BRAILLE maybe?

    Canadian bank notes are all the same size, but differ in colour. In the upper right hand corner of each note has its value in braille that a blind person can just simply feel so they know what note it is.

    Even the ATM's and debit machine all have brail on the number pad. It can't possibly be so difficult of a change for a currency (pardon the pun) to include brail. It can still look the same, but a tiny section is what might feel different.

    Of course, sometimes it makes you wonder, since even the drive through ATMs have braille buttons....

    1. Re:Braille maybe? by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      Braille can be spoofed pretty easily and impedes machine based sorting and stacking. I would suggest a notching scheme on the side of the bills with a different orientation for each denomination.

  108. A business owner who can't tell its from it's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My business goes elsewhere, and that also costs you money.

  109. Re:Raised Dots. by mightybaldking · · Score: 1

    I just checked the six $20 (CDN) bills in my wallet.
    They were new from the atm on Saturday, and I don't sit on my wallet.
    All the raised dots are so flattened out that I can't feel them. The only way I can find them is to hold the bill edgewise to the light and glance along the edge of the bill.

    Sorry, doesn't work.

  110. Why not get rid of paper currency altogether? by hey! · · Score: 1

    The big advantage of paper currency is it is easy to carry a lot of it around. When I was a kid I knew a bookie who carried a couple thousand dollars in wads of twenties. He must've paid a fortune to the mob for protection because so far as I know he was never robbed.

    But bookies aside, most large transactions are done by plastic, and paper is used for small transactions. So why not replace paper money with coins?

    The most money I ever carry around in cash is about $200; if there were coins in all the same demonminations as bills up to $50, a person could easily carry several hundred, even a thousand dollars around.

    We'd save a ton of money in printing. They'd be less convenient to counterfeit (imagine a suit case full of coins),and the larger coins could have electronic countermeasures to counterfeiting built in.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  111. In God We Trust by ColonelPanic · · Score: 1

    While we're changing the money to make it more usable for those
    poor folks that Jesus decided not to heal of their blindness,
    could we maybe take off this little piece of free advertising
    for churches? We put IN GOD WE TRUST on the money in 1954 to
    piss off the Communists, but we don't need it any more since
    God and Ronald Reagan scared them off. Perhaps it could be
    replaced with something like the First Amendment.

    --
    "Skill shows through where genius wears thin." -Wittgenstein || Religion: uniting aviation and architecture.
    1. Re:In God We Trust by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      I think we should replace it with what we already had as our motto before McCarthy: "E Pluribus Unum". Out of many, one.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  112. This wont help all that much by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Unless the US government does what the Australian government did when they replaced the old paper notes with new fancy (and good looking IMO) plastic banknotes and withdraws the old notes from circulation (replacing them all with new notes). Unless they do that, what will happen is that the people who are having trouble distinguishing between notes will continue to have trouble since they will continue to get the old (and hard to recognize) notes from ATMs, banks, shops and wherever else.

    The other advantage of replacing all the notes is that you could make them much harder to counterfit and stop the bad guys from copying them.

    Of course, it can never happen considering how many foriegn countries use the US dollar either as some kind of state sanctioned currency or (such as is/was the case in russia IIRC) as currency that isnt state sanctioned but is accepted by shops and stuff (in some cases even more so than the state currency) because the local currency isnt accepted by the rest of the world. And because of how many USD banknotes are in circulation worldwide.

  113. Obvious and Simple . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1

    There is an obvious solution. You see, the Constitution actually prohibits paper currency. While even the most strict interpretationalists would balk at the notion of the Court repealing it's Tender holdings, I think this is a good step. We'll just use coins for all currency. While not as portable (weight being a factor), at least it's easier to tell a penny from a quarter. We can create a 1, 5, 10, 20, 100 dollar coin.

    However, I think this will likely be overturned. Why? Because checks only come in one size. Or, more specifically, the size of the check has no bearing on the value it represents.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  114. Mod Parent Up by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    C'mon. Exactly how often does someone from the Treasury Department reply to a thread on Slashdot?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > C'mon. Exactly how often does someone from the Treasury Department reply to a thread on Slashdot?

      Seemingly not often enough to learn to preview before posting.

  115. We're All Blind by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Accommodating the blind, like every service for disabled people, serves everyone. Not just because it gives "abled" people more easy access to disabled people without hassles in the transactions. But because we're all blind sometimes. Like when we want to handle cash without waving it around in front of our faces, like when paying in a dangerous area. Or when covertly getting a tip to someone. Or just in a dark room, where several cash-only transactions are popular.

    And remember that machines are practically blind, too - machine vision doesn't accommodate all the conditions cash comes in when its handed to the machine, as anyone feeding wrinkled singles to a vending machine will tell you. These recognition systems can help machines to recognize bills more quickly and accurately.

    Helping the blind helps everyone. It's long overdue, especially on something so universal and essential as handling cash.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  116. Also Unfair... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Hey, paper money is also unfair to poor people. It discriminates against them in favor of more well off Americans.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  117. Solving the wrong problem by onyx00 · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I think the larger problem here is that we cannot trust cashiers to tell a blind person they gave them a $20 bill instead of a $5 bill...

  118. Re:Money Reader - Found step 2! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    People are thinking about the other side of the equation -- blind people get paid in money, too.

  119. Re:Also Unfair...You're right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, paper money is also unfair to poor people.

    You're right! We need a judge to fix this right now!

  120. Changing is not a bad idea by hodet · · Score: 1

    If it helps the blind then what is the big deal. In Canada we have $1 and $2 coins that replaced paper bills years ago. Everyone hated the idea back then but now nobody cares. The looney and the twooney are a part of Canadian culture now. We still use them an nobody thinks twice about it. There was talk about a $5 coin and people were rolling their eyes. If it happened nobody would ever think twice about it ten years down the road. They are more economical then paper money (last for decades) and are easier to distinguish for blind people. No matter what form money takes, people will still love having it in their pocket.

  121. Why not coins larger than $1? by bjdevil66 · · Score: 1

    The U.S. Mint should try minting $5/$10/$20 coins - like they did with gold coins a long time ago. Don't make them bigger in size (have you ever put 4-5 Eisenhower dollars in your pocket?), and they don't have to be made of gold or be gold-colored - it is fiat currency, after all. Just make them bigger in denomination. It's better to try the larger denomination coins than keep minting dollar coins that get tossed after 1-2 years of minting...

  122. It's all about geopolitics by fremsley471 · · Score: 1
    C'mon folks, there's TRILLIONS of dollars stuffed into mattresses/under floorboards/Swiss bank accounts all over the world.

    What will happen to the US economy when this all gets traded up for the new shiny stuff...

  123. Not going to happen anytime soon. $1 bill = icon by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Remember that this is the dollar bill we're talking about. Thousands upon thousands of machines only take dollar bills, not dollar coins; they would need to be refitted / reprogrammer. Then there's the fact that "singles" slip into strippers' garments - coins not so easily ;)

    But, more important than anything else... it is an icon. It is not just a 1 Dollar bill. It is THE Dollar bill. That entire bill is the embodiment of The Dollar.

    That said - sure, it can be done. Hell, entire nations dropped their -entire- monetary units and associated coins+bills for a new one (hello Euro). There's no specific reason the U.S. can't either. But imho, they're not about to.

    On the other hand, maybe they would like to fix their coins. The Euro got them all messed up, too, of course (why is the 5ct greater than both the 10ct and the 2ct? Why do we still have those pointless 1ct and 2ct coins? At least in the U.S. there's places to go with your 1ct 'pennies' ( wishing ponds / pennny stretch machines ;) )

  124. Re:I can't say I've ever seen a wheelchair ramp .. by BlewScreen · · Score: 1

    No - nothing is actually free to clients/customers.

    If you complete eliminated my cost of doing business, I'd be able to sell you my product for almost nothing. If I have to install a ramp, an extra door, etc, it's for the convenience of my customers - and therefore, MAY bring me more customers. However, if the increase in business due to the existence of a ramp on the front of my building does not allow me to realize enough profit to justify said ramp, then it's costing ALL my clients because I'm going to have to raise my prices to recoup my costs.

    I could keep my costs lower by selling stuff from a non-climate controlled barn, but the number of customers I'd lose wouldn't justify the savings in my costs. So, the door the non-handicapped client uses is a convenience that has increased my costs in order to retain customers who would be willing to pay slightly more to be able to purchase my product from inside a "real" building, and not a drafty barn.

    So yes, there's no one "charging admission", but as soon as someone's cost of doing business increases, expect the cost to be passed on to their customers.

    To stay on topic - we COULD force businesses to provide the blind with bill counters, but I'd rather leave it up to the business owner that wants to attract blind customers to come up with a way that is convenient and low-cost in such a way that everyone benefits.

    -bs

    --
    That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
  125. No -- minority rights have ALWAYS been our way. by Valdrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somewhere along the line our nation went from a Republic to an odd politically correct hybrid of socialism where the rights of the few outweigh the rights of the many. 1% of the population can now dictate and control 99% of the population. That simply isn't right. [...] I'll tell you one thing; this kind of stuff sure as hell isn't what the founding fathers had in mind when they founded the nation, that's for sure.

    Strange. Where in reading the Constitution and the early works of the founding fathers do you get the impression that majority will was always more sacred that minority liberty? Have you never heard the phrase "tyranny of the majority" as popularized by John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Toqueville? What do you think Madison was talking about in Federalist Paper no 10 when he said the following?

    "Complaints are everywhere heard [...] that the public good is too often disregarded in the conflict of rival parties; and that measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice, and the rights of the minor party; but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority."

    Why do you think that we have amendments specifically protecting freedom of speech, press, and religion from the popular will of the people if minority interests weren't intended to be preserved? Why has the minority party in the Senate always enjoyed the right of filibuster to preserve their interests? Why does the Senate itself even exist except to protect the interest of the smaller states against the larger? Why did we pass the 14th Amendment to protect the rights of all people at a time when people of one skin color and creed were by far the dominant majority?

    Plurality and respect for the needs of the few over the wants of the many has been a central principle to the American democracy since its inception. If anything, it's the insistence on majoritarian dominance that is the greatest betrayal of our nations founding principles in our times as with it goes away all the rights and liberties that distinguish us from a totalitarian government.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  126. Daleks by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I'm afraid your knowledge of Dalek military weaknesses is severely out of date. I can only assume you're not aiming for a job at the Torchwood Institute.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  127. Debit down by phorm · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the US but here there's been at least three situations in the last week where various stores have had their debit/Visa stations go down. In at least one case, I was told the situation was Canada-wide. Your plastic doesn't do much good if the machines that read it are non-functional, and Christmas shopping season is a not-uncommon time for the networks (debit/visa) to get slightly overloaded.

    Furthermore, there are still some small shops around - even in big cities - that take only cash. These tend to be cafes, small eateries, or specialty shops, but I don't think anyone here has the right to say that those who are vision-impaired should just "shop elsewhere."

    I can understand how forcing websites overall to be blind-friendly is a dumb idea - some sites/products cater to a visual audience - but for things such as cash and the necessities of life, you're damn tootin that it should be accessible to all.

  128. Cost. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    It's cheaper for manufacturers to buy one set of keypad components for drive-up and walk-up ATMs than to buy two separate supplies and to manage the inventory.

    Personally, I've always wondered how a blind person is supposed to read what's on the screen. Are their ATM cards flagged in some way to prompt the system to start reading options aloud to them?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Cost. by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      There are ATMs with headphone jacks, so a blind person can plug in and get verbal directions that way (privately).

  129. A good decision by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    While the cost of retooling the printing machines and the whole printing process will definitely cost money, the overall costs of printing money bills should outweigh that. Blind people have a right for easy recognition of Dollar bills. The Euro has a recognizable relief in Braille for every bank note (don't know how well this works, if the bill is old or have been washed inadvertently). Furthermore, the Euro notes all differ in size. Should not be too difficult to (re)introduce that.

  130. re: how blind people handle money by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough, I used to be friends with a blind guy who insisted he was able to tell the difference in denominations of paper bills by their feel. I was totally amazed, but I was able to hand him $1 or $10 or $5 bills and he could tell me which was which.

    The only thing I can figure is that maybe the smaller bills get used more frequently, so the paper has a slightly more "worn" feel to it. Of course, this probably doesn't do him any good if you hand him crisp, new $1's ... but I guess it's something he learned to effectively use the majority of the time - if someone with sight wasn't able to tell him which bills were which.

  131. partly en route by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=dollar%20coin& ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn

    there are a new series of dollar coins on the way...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  132. I don't have the time for that thanks by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I travel round different countries on work. I'm afraid I don't have the time to learn half a dozen different currencies by knowing the texture pattern of the faces. I am not from the US so I have no idea what the difference is between a new/old dollar bill. I just want to fly into an airport, take out some cash from an ATM, put it into my wallet and not have to spend five minutes in every shop/ bar pulling out all the notes and flipping through them to find the right ones to pay for my purchase. Every time I do that I feel like I've got a big neon sign over my head saying "mug me". As a fully sighted person, I find clearly different colours with distinct designs and a clear numerical value work for me. Plus I'd agree with other posters, get rid of one dollar notes and bring in coins for ones and twos.

  133. You've clearly never been to a bar by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Does "closing the tab" mean nothing to you?

  134. about time by steveo777 · · Score: 1
    I had a blind neighbor for my first 12 years or so. Back when there weren't bank cards for direct payment. You had credit, cash, and check. Now, most of the time she would be out with her husband or kids and if she was buying something she could just ask them what the cash was. Occationally she'd hand over her wallet to us and tell us to take a five and get some milk from across the street. She never really griped about it. She wasn't all that independent, however I know she would have rather been able to do it on her own. It was back in 92 that we moved away from those neighbors but we kept in touch.

    For those of you who think the cash card helpd: she started using that frequently but would often be 'incorrectly charged' because asshole clerks would just scan something onto the list for themselves (pack of smokes here, pop there). But she was very good at counting blips and beeps so she'd ask the clerk to re-scan everything. Very shrewd woman. Still, it didn't always work and she'd have her husband marching down to the corner store and whatnot on occation to demand money back.

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  135. Obligator by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Also, note that you can't just use debit cards for everything.There's nothing stopping them from using mastercard.

  136. No Patent? by Grashnak · · Score: 0

    Oh, I thought this was an article about how some blind guy patented money and was suing the US for not paying license fees. Never mind then...

    --
    Life needs more saving throws.
  137. Use $2's by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

    Duh!
    And the strippers will think they're $20's if they don't look carefully, and will be VERY nice to you.

    (I learned this from my girlfriend. Yes, I'm serious. Well, at least about the who-I-learned-it-from part. And the weird thing is that it wasn't even the ex-stripper girlfriend who told me this.)

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  138. Totally Stupid by trakwebster · · Score: 1

    There may be good reasons to make currency in different sizes.

    However, it seems crazy to force all cash-register-using merchants in the us to throw away the old machines and buy new ones. It seems crazy to make every ATM across American useless. Likewise machines that sell cigarettes or stamps or anything else that accepts bills, or bill changers. It seems lunatic to cause the kind of chaos to manufacturers of any kind of machine that processes bills.

    This is causing chaos to the multitude to provide special privilege to the small group, and it's crazy. Or, more exactly, it's just stupid. It is roughly equivalent to outlawing CRT monitors or paintings in museums because blind persons cannot see them.

    If you also think it's stupid, then give the judge's office a call and let him know it's stupid. The phone number is (202) 354-3460. (I'm not blabbing any secrets. Web search on 'U.S. District Judge James Robertson' presents the phone number to you.)

    --
    == buddha is as buddha does ==
  139. Mod Parent Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Informative +1

  140. Heck, I'm fully sighted... by itsdapead · · Score: 1

    ...and when I visit the US I find the banknotes hard to distinguish. However, is there not a theory that hard-to-distinguish banknotes deter fraud (because you have to look carefully at them you are more likely to spot an iffy one)?

    --
    In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
  141. Won't Someone Please Think of the Magicians? by airship · · Score: 1

    If they change U.S. currency to different size bills for different denominations, that will break dozens of popular bill-transformation magic tricks.

    Hasn't anyone given any thought to how this would affect the livelihood of the hundreds of professional and semi-professional magicians in the U.S.?

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  142. Damn my waking subconcious... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    And if you add some kind of relief on the bills as well then you will most likely cut down on counterfeit bills as well. Swedish bills have the numbers printed with reliefs and it's very easy just to run your finger over them to make a preliminary check (please) if the bill is real.

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:Damn my waking subconcious... by KokorHekkus · · Score: 1

      Well damn you for making me wonder if my subconcious is up to something... ;-p....

  143. Size and colour by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    The big problem with USA notes is that not only are they the same size, but they are the same colour. There have already been studies showing the interpretation of text on a bank note is actually done after colour or size. This is why many countries use both size and distinct colour (blue vs green, as opposed to green vs some other shade of green) as clues to their different values. Examples: The EU bank notes does both, the UK bank notes are different colour, as are the Canadian bank notes are also of different colour. Add to all this the Australian bank notes, which are not only different colours, but are made out of plastic!!!

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  144. Accessability vs Stability by WimBo · · Score: 1

    I would be interested in knowing how stable various currencies have been historically to compare with how accessible they are. I'd guess that the more accessible they are, the more likely they are to have been changed because the previous currency became devalued in world markets.

  145. The solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The solution, of course, is to buy a car or bicycle instead of using a taxi, read your newspapers online (hey, it saves some trees, too!), get others to buy the drinks at the bar and skip donations to charities that only accept cash (what are they doing, supporting terrorism?).

  146. solution by spongman · · Score: 1

    easy: make the bills different colors!

  147. Execute the Judge by E++99 · · Score: 1

    This judge needs to be taken out and shot. He may be right that it would be a good thing to change our currency to be more blind-friendly, but it is certainly not mandated by Sec. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. This kind of behavior by judges is in stark opposition to the U.S. Constitution which they are sworn to protect, and is why we are living in less and less of a republican (democratic) system of government. He is the very definition of a "domestic enemy of the Constitution".

    1. Re:Execute the Judge by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      Pitchforks at dawn!

  148. This is slashdot by krell · · Score: 1

    "Lets see, is it three goats and a berry for an iTunes song, or is it four?"

    Make that three goatse and a Blackberry, and you're on!

    --
    Where were you when the voynix came?
  149. Hmmmmm... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Coins and strippers. That *would* be a shame ... maybe.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  150. Resistance to Change by goofyspouse · · Score: 1
    We could get used to it too if faced with it long enough.


    Is anyone else envisioning this stirring up the same kind of drama that arose back in the Carter administration when there was the big push to make the U.S. join the rest of the world on the metric system? That went over great.

    What needs to happen is this: Associate our current uniform currency color/size with terrorism in some way. Then we will happily change over to beads and shells if necessary.
    1. Re:Resistance to Change by Columcille · · Score: 1

      There would be a slight difference. Anyone can use any system of measurement they wish without any great consequence (ignoring the whole Mars thing). If the currency was changed then everyone would HAVE to change with it. People might not like it at first but eventually they'd get used to it. But my real point was the opposite, if people from Europe came over and started exclusively using our currency for a long enough period, they might not like it at first but I argue that they'd get as used to it as they are to their own currency now.

      --
      I love my sig.
    2. Re:Resistance to Change by adavidw · · Score: 2, Insightful
      if people from Europe came over and started exclusively using our currency for a long enough period, they might not like it at first but I argue that they'd get as used to it as they are to their own currency now.

      Unless, of course, they're blind.
    3. Re:Resistance to Change by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Point taken

      --
      I love my sig.
  151. This is so backwards... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I *hate* coins. They are heavy and cumbersome. Want to save money? Get rid of them.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:This is so backwards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I *hate* coins. They are heavy and cumbersome. Want to save money? Get rid of them."

      They are not more expensive just because you don't like them. In fact, coins are probably cheaper, as they have a *much* greater lifetime (for starters, they don't have that big a problem with being in the washing machine).

  152. You forgot the BEST PART! by Krishnoid · · Score: 1
    The polymer that Australian Bank Notes are made from

    I can't believe nobody mentioned the best part of having polymer bills -- get a nylon wallet and you can launder your money while you launder your clothes -- no more emptying your pockets on laundry day!

  153. thank goodness by gkearney · · Score: 1

    I have watched my wife for years struggle with telling one bill from another. Hardly a day goes by that she does not come to me to do the simple task of separating out bills. It about time this was done. Here's some simple ways that this might be accomplished.

    Eliminate the $1 bill in favor of a $1 coin. That means we stop printing $1 bills. In a few months they will wear out and disappear. The reason $1 coins have never recived wide acceptance is that we keep printing the bills. Stop printing the bills and people will use the coins.

    Change the dominate color of the bills, many blind persons can still detect color so if we have red $5, blue $10, green $20 Yellow $50 and white $100 many people could quickly tell.

    Have the bill slightly different sizes as they increase in value.

    Print in 10 point Helvetica type on each side of the bill the value of the note. So each note would have "five dollars" for example. This would permit the blind to use reading devices which are common in public libraries to read the bills many blind persons, including my wife, own such devices and there are portable ones as well. This would avoid having to purchase a special device just to read currency.

    Braille on bills would seem to be problematic to me. How do we keep it from becoming crushed down and unreadable. Perhaps a Canadian here can tell us if this is an issue with their currency.

  154. Be like Canada! by Pope · · Score: 1

    Make all the bills different colours, that'll help!.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Be like Canada! by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      You're obviously trying too hard to be funny, but denomonations are different colors already.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  155. It's expensive retailers too by Chas · · Score: 1

    The thing is, this also impacts retailers as well.

    They now have to buy all new cash drawers to accomodate newly resized bills.

    And while not horrendously expensive, the amount of money spent for this with larger establishments will be non-trivial.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  156. Re:Money Reader - Found step 2! by Abreu · · Score: 1

    In many countries the different bills are different sizes, no way to easily defeat this.

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  157. Don't iron them by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Funny

    After a trip to Aus and NZ I had some left over bills. A little wrinkled, but fit for framing (I've got a frame with currency from about 25 nations). I hadn't paid enough attention to realize they were plastic based (hats off to the folks making them. Great quality)) and ironed a NZ $10. It contracted like a piece of shrink tubing.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  158. You don't even have to be blind by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1
    US Money is very confusing to anybody who hasn't got long familiarity with it. In most countries bills are different sizes and colors so its easy to tell (say) a five from a one. In the US you actually have to check the numbers.

    Even if you are familiar with it, its real easy to make mistakes. I've even seen it happen to my wife, and she's lived in this country all her life.

    Now in Russia, when you change US money, they put every bill under a loop, to check if its fake. So not only is it currently hard to tell one bill from another, but its also easy to fake.

    --
    Squirrel!
    1. Re:You don't even have to be blind by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      French is very confusing to anybody who hasn't got long familiarity with it, so?

      You could also check the artwork. In any event, the need to check the numbers is
      not unique to U.S. currency. It's not as if picking up some random Yen or Euro
      bill or coin you have an instant understanding of its value. We have no genetic
      memory saying "a piece of paper of these dimensions is one milkshake or three apples"

      Brilliant logic, if people check to see if it's fake they must be easy to fake!
      It couldn't possibly be that perhaps historically it was easier to fake, or that
      it's so widely used and historically strong that it's worth faking... could it?

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  159. Another Bad Judge..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

    Judges are NOT activists. This is another swing at judicial credibility that causes people to stop taking the rule of law seriously..... and I don't blame them.

    Judges are becoming just as slimy as personal injury lawyers. They are believing that they have to make something of themselves in order to justify their occupation and give their career some meaning. Well, that's not how it works. You become a good judge by interpreting the law fairly, not by becoming an activist judge and defaulting to the less fortunate and/or more popular party.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  160. BTW..... by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 0

    If they start changing money fit this ruling, I'm just going to start removing the changes or ironing out the Braille or embossing just out of sheer spite of this judge and his ruling.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  161. Let's fix the coins, too by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    While we're talking about accessible currency, pull some American coins out of your pocket and tell me how much each is worth. Now pretend you're trying to do it with only a passing knowledge of English. It's tough. The coins we have in circulation don't have digits indicating their worth. The quarter? It just says "Quarter Dollar". You need to know that the word "quarter" means "1/4". The penny and nickel? Not quite so bad, reading "One Cent" and "Five Cents", though "1 Cent" and "5 Cents" would be a lot better. But the worst is the dime. What's printed on it? "One Dime". Great! WTF is a "dime"!? It says "one" -- Must be $0.01, right? After all, it's the smallest coin, it should have the smallest value...

    Travel someplace where you don't speak the native language, and you'll be glad for actual Arabic numerals on the money!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:Let's fix the coins, too by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Accessible does not mean "universally comprehensible".

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  162. Low light Blindness by BryanL · · Score: 1

    I have a hard time seeing in low light. This will be great when I am tipping a stripper or paying a prostitute in a dark alley.

  163. ONE WORD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judicial Activism.

    How dare these judges legislate from the bench? Matters such as these should be left to the legislative branch, not the judiciary. How can we achieve equality with such activist judges?

    I will write to my local congressman and ask him to impeach this activist judge.

  164. Blind by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    Realistically, a few little braille bumps on America's currency would be appallingly easy to add. And isn't the US in the process of replacing its currency anyway, to improve the security features and whatnot? No better time.

    Now this is just a personal grudge, but ... could y'all make your currency a little bit less ugly? I get the occasional American note from a tourist (call me a bad person if you must, but I savour the heartbroken look in their eyes when I tell them that American currency exchanges at par now), and they look horrible. Maybe they could be brightened up a bit? American coins aren't too shabby, but the bills look like some kind of econut's toilet paper. Green inks aren't that much more affordable than the other colours. Put some pictures of great American scientists on them, some bright colours. Maybe some unicorns and rainbows on the $50 to make homosexuals happy, a picture of Betty Page on the $5 for the rest of us, a cute little cocaine sensor on the $20 ... it would be fabulous!

    1. Re:Blind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Braille in the currency: good idea. Giant screed: bad idea.

  165. Good by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Drop the penny, drop the dollar bill, redesign the 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100, and call it good. There is no reason for the penny still existing, and no reason for there to be paper dollars. Well, there is one reason, we are resistant to change.

    1. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drop the penny, drop the dollar bill, redesign the 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100, and call it good. There is no reason for the penny still existing, and no reason for there to be paper dollars. Well, there is one reason, we are resistant to change.I don't know, I'm not resistant to having too much change in my pocket :-)

  166. fixed costs are usually close to free by brokeninside · · Score: 1

    Once you divide the cost of a ramp by the number of customer visits, it comes pretty damned close to being free to the consumer. Outside of egregriously high fixed costs, vendors only need to worry about marginal costs. Tens (or even hundreds) of thousands of dollars spread out over tens or hundreds of thousands of customer visits is a negligible cost.

  167. old symbology by slashrogue · · Score: 2, Funny

    What I want to know is, will we finally be able to ditch the Illuminati pyramid and eye and get rid of the crazy Latin phrases?

    Maybe something more American, like "Either you're with us or you're against us." ha.

    1. Re:old symbology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...speaking of blind people and their money..

      they can't do that.. they're too busy distracting you from the fact that they looted the wtc of all it's gold and thus the currency is now bankrupt.

      after all, it does say "new world order" on the bill... in latin

  168. heaven forbid by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...that someone needs to look carefully at their money before they spend it?

    What a heinous idea.

    Oh, and y'know, there are lots of things blind people cannot do that sighted can. That's why it's called a HANDICAP.* What's next, we're going to complain that 'foul balls (in baseball) are unfair to blind people, who risk injury even TRYING to catch them, therefore they should be banned/prevented from happening"?

    * for those benighted neaderthals that aren't politically correct.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:heaven forbid by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      Oh, and y'know, there are lots of things blind people cannot do that sighted can.
      Those things shouldn't be things necessary in modern society. Personally I think your kind should be thrown into that Vonnegut story where people are artificially handicapped.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  169. And if this were submitted as a software bug... by HellYeahAutomaton · · Score: 1

    Works as Intended. Will Not Fix.

  170. PLEASE - Make an improvement for all of us by 200_success · · Score: 1

    US bills are the worst designed in the world. All the bills look so much alike, even normal people make mistakes. See this video, in which a police officer abuses a drive-thru clerk because the officer thought the clerk short-changed him.

    The silly thing is, these days, they redesign the bills every few years to stay ahead of the counterfeiters, and the new bills are just as indistinguishable as their predecessors. Pathetic.

  171. Take out a wad of bills and it doesn't matter by crovira · · Score: 1

    what color they are... Your ass is grass.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  172. How about the FOURTEENTH FUCKING AMENDMENT? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property"
    I'd say that having things such that it's impossible for the blind to properly use cash money abridges their privileges, especially since cash money is essentially the only way to make a purchase while protecting their privacy granted in Griswold v. Connecticut.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    1. Re:How about the FOURTEENTH FUCKING AMENDMENT? by E++99 · · Score: 1
      "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property"
      I'd say that having things such that it's impossible for the blind to properly use cash money abridges their privileges, especially since cash money is essentially the only way to make a purchase while protecting their privacy granted in Griswold v. Connecticut.

      What??? You're trying to use the 14th Amendment -- I'm sorry, the 14th F-ing Amendment??? First off, states don't mint their own currency, the Federal Government does. Second... there is no second. By accepting irrational arguements, you allow the unelected to make arbitrary law. Whether you or I think that law is good or bad is irrelevent.
  173. Judges are supposed to be activist by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    Go read the Constitution, and read what the Founding Fathers had to say about judicial terms. Do you know why judges aren't elected? Because otherwise they'd have to worry about getting elected and they'd have to bow to popular pressure where they should instead be bowing to the Constitution.

    I remember seeing someone with a sig saying What those who desire activist judges fear is rule by the people.My response? What those who hate activist judges fear is rule by the Constitution.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  174. RFID by Yonder+Way · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked no one has said it yet.

    This is potentially a *good* use of RFID. Face it, RFID is coming to paper money. It's not a matter of "if" but "when".

    Then blind folks will be able to scan with a portable RFID scanner and have the denomations read off to them.

    1. Re:RFID by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      And why is RFID necessary? If you're going to use a gadget to read bills, why not the
      existing technology of optical scanning a la vending machines? Or detecting the security band.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  175. Vending Machines... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    I think the vending machine industry would LOVE different sized currency.

    Because they would get to sell new machines to all their customers.

  176. Ah but... by Traf-O-Data-Hater · · Score: 1

    You're applying US money-counting methods, where you have to see the face of the note, ie. take it out of your wallet or spread it wide enough to see the figures. You can count aussie currency without taking it out of your wallet and without spreading the wallet wide. It's less visible to others near you. Edge on, it's easy to count. So in this regard, it's more secure even from a personal carrying point of view.

  177. That's crazy talk! by msimm · · Score: 1

    Anyway, by 'getting rid of them' I don't mean replacing them with paper currency.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  178. Re: teh tubes! by shani · · Score: 1

    "the tubes" in London

    I assure you cannot pay for a ticket on the Tube with a $20 bill.

  179. Re: teh tubes! by mackyrae · · Score: 1

    hahah that was just a point of reference for what the heck a "metro" is to us in DC. I think they take a 20-pound bill there though ;-)

    --
    look! it's a bird, it's a plane, it's....a girl? yes, a girl browsing Slashdot on Linux
  180. Re:Not going to happen anytime soon. $1 bill = ico by RobinH · · Score: 1

    Remember that this is the dollar bill we're talking about. Thousands upon thousands of machines only take dollar bills, not dollar coins; they would need to be refitted / reprogrammer.

    In Canada this took all of about 1 year for almost all vending machines to be switched over. Until then they were quick to deploy change machines that gave you quarters. However, if you notice, the Canadian one dollar coin is exactly the same size and shape as the US Sakajawaya (or whatever the hell you call it). Therefore, the hardware has already been designed - deployment could be nearly instantaneous with advance warning. In fact I saw some vending machines in the US that took the US $1 coins.

    Then there's the fact that "singles" slip into strippers' garments - coins not so easily ;)

    All I can say to you is if you haven't been to some of the seedier Canadian strip clubs, you have no idea... Two things: (A) Canadians also have a larger $2 coin, and (B) strip clubs in Canada are fully nude. I won't go any farther than that. Human imagination has no limits when it comes to erotic entertainment.

    --
    "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
  181. Fifty smells like a hooker... by ebers · · Score: 1

    Also, issue a three dollar bill, which smells a bit queer.

  182. Can we finally have some 1 and 2-dollar coins? by Palal · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of carrying 1-dollar bills! It's about time we got rid of them and switched to $1 and $2 coins. This means less change to carry around and a 'slimmer' wallet with the same fat content. Look at the Canadians, they don't have any problems with Looneys and Twoneys!

    --
    -Palal
    1. Re:Can we finally have some 1 and 2-dollar coins? by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Then maybe you should get a clue, we've had dollar coins for some time.
      Most of them aren't particularly well designed though.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  183. And Numbers on Coins by jdubois79 · · Score: 1

    While slightly off topic, I think another thing that should be added to our currency is numbers denoting the value of each coin.

    Look at a quarter, penny, or dime (I think).
    They proudly say on them:
    One Quarter
    One Cent
    One Dime

    --
    --------
    Nothing can be done before the tremendous power!
    RabidComics
    1. Re:And Numbers on Coins by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      *Slightly* off-topic? Try 100% irrelevant. Coins are distinguishable by heft, size and edge ridge pattern.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  184. Re:Don't do what china does by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    Well excuse me if you're so hyper-sensitive. I mention China because I have lived there. I've never been to Europe so I wouldn't know about the Euro.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  185. Re:Don't do what china does by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    Of course stacking is done by the same denominations. Howevere, it's really easy for money to get lost in the wallet when I don't have time to sit down and sort my money (say if I'm in a rush or in a store).

    When there's a small bill hiding behind two large ones in my wallet, it becomes really easy for the small bill to slip out or fall out when I am trying to get the large one. Plus it's hard to find the small bills hiding behind the large ones.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  186. Re:Don't do what china does by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    No kidding.

    You'd think that someone who's familiar with the Chinese currency has probably lived there. Logic would tell you that people who go out of their way to go and live in another country would hardly be considered racist toward the host country.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  187. Discrimination by fait · · Score: 1

    Since you are suggesting that we go ahead and burden the American people with the taxes that will be needed to make all these changes for our blind brethren (and sisters), could we go ahead and leave the "In God We Trust" off the money so that us Atheists can feel that we aren't being discriminated against by our government (the one that is suppose to have a seperation of church and state?).

  188. Forgery is good for the economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The benefit from making forgery harder might well make it worth the effort."

    Large-scale forgery may be a problem as it removes confidence in a currency, but a certain amount is manageable and can go unnoticed.

    FACT: If the Federal Reserve creates more bills the value of each US bill in the world-market goes down*. Forgery increases the amount of currency in circulation without being declared. More currency in circulation is good for the economy. Therefore you are helping the economy by bleaching $1 bills and turning them into $100's. Do your bit for the economy, and help America grow! - excerpt from "How I got Rich helping the economy (and why the government was wrong to put me in prison)"

    Next week: War is Peace (How America is bringing peace to the middle-east)

    * For further reading see the whole private organization/inflation is a tax on your savings meme.

  189. And give privacy up? by One_6453 · · Score: 1

    I would rather keep some purchases that I have made, and places I have been to myself.

  190. actually... by 311Stylee · · Score: 1

    modern bills all have strips that fluoresce under UV light in a different color and location (except for $1).
    just get a reader and you are all set. "seeing" people would benefit by checking the authenticity of large bills with the same hardware, or in an environment where it is hard to see. Example:

    I was passed off a phony $5 canadian bill at a gas station. when I tried to buy a falafel pita in ottowa, the pita lady told me my (last and only) $5 was fake! She pulled a good $5 out of her cash drawer and showed me the size, color and texture differences. My travelling companion graciously purchased my falafel for me and suggested I pass off the bill in a darker place. Getting drinks at the dance club later that night (unlike many slashdot users, I am actually not a total loser, but I couldn't C++ my way out of a wet paper bag...) I passed off the bill no problem. The barkeep was younger and sharper-eyed than pita-lady, but he didn't spot the fake because of poor viewing conditions. Therefore, a bill-reader that takes advantage of current UV or IR security features or future tech such as size, texture, would help detect frauds AND be a feature for disabled people.

    Consider also that it would be a lot cheaper (and much faster) to distribute a device to authenticate money than to change the whole money supply... although they do that pretty frequently too...

  191. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  192. Don't forget about coins by jacquems · · Score: 1

    Also, note that you can't just use debit cards for everything. There are quite a few things in life that you do need cash for, and blind people should not be excluded from being able to use regular money.

    The US has perfectly good coins in denominations up to $1, which can be distinguished by blind people. If people are mainly using cash for small (for example, under $5) purchases, and cards for everything else, why not promote the use of coins for small purchases more?

  193. Easy solution... by garwain · · Score: 1

    Blind people who use cash already have methods to tell bills apart. The only one I'm really familiar with is folding the bills in different ways. If you get the money from a cash counter, you will probably ony get 20s now (at least anywhere I go you do) so you have your starting point... If you need other denominations, no point in asking the teller at the bank to help you, just ask for 5 tens, then ask for 10 fives... Actually, this method works fairly well, except when getting change back, if you receive a mix of bills, but the solution is simply to carry around enough of each bill to be able to come close, and know which bill you are getting back... ie I need to pay $26, so if I give $30, I'll have 4 $1 bills, but if I hand over $40, I could have a ten, or 2 fives and the 4 ones... even then, counting the bills should tell you what you got, and if the person at the cash is any good, the largest denominations should be at the bottom. If you don't want to ask for help, just shove the bills in another pocket, and then go to the bank at the end of the week, and have the teller write out the deposit slip for you...

  194. But who punches the holes? by benhocking · · Score: 1

    If you can get the blind person's $100 bill to punch the holes to make it a $1, then you can just take the $1 bill. If it was punched prior to the blind person receiving it, then the blind person would either have received it as a $1 bill (so he's out no money), or he would be aware that he had a $100 bill that felt like a $1 bill and wouldn't be so casual about it. Again, not that there aren't plenty of other problems...

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  195. Benefits vs Costs by AUDIOMIND · · Score: 1

    The real question is, does completely changing the way $$$ is produced (which includes the huge $$$ amount associated with such transformation & implementation = tax dollars) outweigh the benefits it would be to those that are blind.

    To the blind maybe, but to others I'm not sure changing US currency would be completely justified considering the enormous price tag.

    How many people are blind in the USofA? Is there an estimate somewhere?

  196. Sounds like a job for the hacker community :-) by FishinDave · · Score: 1

    OK, let's see how we can make currency accessible to the blind with a minimum of government involvement.

    A cheap, do-it-yourself, pocket-sized Braille money marker was patented in 1997. But the vendor seems to be out of business, and I can't find a similar product for sale today. Makes me wonder just how painful the problem really is.

    http://tinyurl.com/ymsxdo

    Today's tech would easily enable a battery-powered money reader and Braille marker about the size of an iPod and costing far less than the $30 for which this non-reading manual embosser was offered. We're talking about an extremely simple optical character recognition subsystem that can read the large unique numerals in the corners of bills, and six solenoid-driven pins to emboss the Braille marks for 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, or 100 (the only denominations currently in production). Stick any or all corner(s) of a bill in the device and it automatically reads and embosses.

    I'll wager that such a thing can be built with mail-order parts and open-source software by any State's high school science fair semi-finalist. (Well, maybe not Mississippi's. ;-)

    The Treasury should publish standards for such a process, allowing entrepreneurs to build competing devices. Competition will keep prices down and encourage innovation.

    Let the IRS give a tax credit to anyone who submits a receipt with his 1040, even if he's not blind. Anyone who chooses to help the blind (and the Treasury) by spending his spare moments embossing currency deserves a tax break, too.

    This plan would get the job done faster and at less cost to taxpayers than the bureaucratic alternatives. Also, we'd learn just how badly blind people and their advocates really want Braille-encoded currency.

  197. But how would you mod their $100 bill? by benhocking · · Score: 1
    And thus convince a Blind person to hand over their modded $100 for a chocolate bar and expect no change! Good work...

    If you could get their $100 bill in order to mod it, wouldn't you just keep it? (Assuming you're going to be dishonest, that is.) If they received it already modded, then they would either have gotten it as $1 so no loss to them, or (more likely) they would know that they had a faulty $100 bill in their wallet and make sure they weren't giving that one away as $1.

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?