Slashdot Mirror


Melting Coins Now Illegal In the U.S.

A number of readers have noted the action by the U.S. Mint to outlaw the melting down or bulk export of coins. This has come about because the value of the precious metals contained in coins now exceeds their face value. The Mint would rather not have to replace pennies (at a cost of 1.73 cents per) or nickels (at 8.74 cents). The expectation is that Congress will mandate new compositions for some U.S. coins in 2007.

778 comments

  1. If this keeps up... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Funny

    If this keeps up, .002 cents really will = $.002

    (Sorry, but it had to be said...)

    1. Re:If this keeps up... by abe+ferlman · · Score: 5, Funny

      If I had a nickel for every time I heard that one...

      --
      microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
    2. Re:If this keeps up... by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      .05 cents? Let us know when you've reached 20 and maybe somebody will send you a penny for your thoughts. :-D

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:If this keeps up... by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      I was (am) under the impression that it is illegal to destroy any kind of U.S. money, coin or currency, not to mention generally stupid. Although being able to double my investment by getting pennies and melting them is an incentive to do that. Pennies once were made of copper, and are now just copper clad, I wouldn't think that the metal in them is worth more than a penny.

      Actually, I think we should just get rid of pennies altogether. When businesses start putting little dishes of coins on the counter for you to take one if you need it or leave the ones you get in change, then it is time to do away with those coins.

    4. Re:If this keeps up... by stfvon007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The price of zinc has gone up - which is what the penny is mostly made of.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    5. Re:If this keeps up... by basscomm · · Score: 1

      If it was illegal to modify currency, then you wouldn't see those machines at all the tourist traps where you can squash a coin and get a ridiculous little picture.

      My understanding is that it's only illegal if you try and spend the currency you've modified.

      --
      http://crummysocks.com
    6. Re:If this keeps up... by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      I was (am) under the impression that it is illegal to destroy any kind of U.S. money, coin or currency, not to mention generally stupid

      Only if it's done fraudulently.

    7. Re:If this keeps up... by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Zink! Come back Zink!

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:If this keeps up... by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those are illegal. It's just that no one actually cares enough to enforce it.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    9. Re:If this keeps up... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Section 331 of Title 18 of the United States code provides criminal penalties for anyone who "fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the Mints of the United States." This statute means that you may be violating the law if you change the appearance of the coin and fraudulently represent it to be other than the altered coin that it is. As a matter of policy, the Mint does not promote coloring, plating or altering U.S. coinage: however, there are no sanctions against such activity absent fraudulent intent.

      See usmint.gov.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:If this keeps up... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those are illegal. It's just that no one actually cares enough to enforce it.

      It's only illegal if you intend to use/distribute them as 'money'. Novelty items are OK.

      (Text as of 2/19/02) 18 U.S.C. 331:
      Whoever fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates, impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales or lightens any of the coins coined at the mints of the United States, or any foreign coins which are by law made current or are in actual use or circulation as money within the United States;

    11. Re:If this keeps up... by basscomm · · Score: 4, Informative
      From the US Mint FAQ (emphasis mine)

      60. Is it illegal to damage or deface coins?

      Section 331 of Title 18 of the United States code provides criminal penalties for anyone who "fraudulently alters, defaces, mutilates impairs, diminishes, falsifies, scales, or lightens any of the coins coined at the Mints of the United States." This statute means that you may be violating the law if you change the appearance of the coin and fraudulently represent it to be other than the altered coin that it is. As a matter of policy, the Mint does not promote coloring, plating or altering U.S. coinage: however, there are no sanctions against such activity absent fraudulent intent.
      --
      http://crummysocks.com
    12. Re:If this keeps up... by penguinrenegade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder what the feds think of this penny pressing site?

      pressedpenny.com

      What is the government definition of "bulk"?

    13. Re:If this keeps up... by penguinrenegade · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's actually okay to mutilate coins as long as the intent isn't fraudulent.

      Pressed Penny FAQ

      It takes some doing, but it's possible to have fraudulent intent to mutilate. For instance, making a 4-legged buffalo nickel into a 3-legged (rare) variety is fraudulent. Dropping pennies in a machine at Disneyland for souvenirs is perfectly okay.

    14. Re:If this keeps up... by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

      Every one I've seen has a sign proclaiming them to be legal, with a reference to some section of federal law, which I never was curious enough to look up.

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    15. Re:If this keeps up... by Ucklak · · Score: 1, Funny

      Getting rid of the penny has got to be the most ridiculous ideas that is popular amongst those that are `inconvienced` by a penny.

      First of all, we're not on the gold standard so we won't even go there.

      Secondly, what would you base the dollar on? It can't be worth 100 cents once you remove the penny. You might as well get used to a new decimal system based on 20ths.
      $100.99 can't exist so we'll call it $101.00 or $100.95. Well $100.95 can't exist since 95 percent of a dollar doesn't really exist anymore so we'll call it $100.19.
      Then that makes $100.20 = $101.00.

      Credit card companies would have a field day with it and interest rates would be false unless they were adjusted to a 20th system.

      You've got to have a lowest common denominator and the penny is it.

      If you're tired of lugging around your pennies, save them and buy stamps. The post office vending machines take pennies. Once a year I deposit all my pennies to get stamps.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    16. Re:If this keeps up... by kesoil · · Score: 0

      Ofcourse you can remove the coin. 1 hundreth of a dollar would still be used in calculations. No?

      For example here in Finland we don't use 1 euro cent or 2 euro cent coins at all. Total sum is rounded at the cashier if you pay with cash. If you pay with credit card then the exact price is charged.

    17. Re:If this keeps up... by Sparr0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Getting rid of pennies has nothing to do with getting rid of cents. The two are distinct. Most banks already handle transactions down to the 6th decimal place. My bank account at any given time could have a certain number of thousandths of a cent in it. The only time it has to be converted into coins is when I withdraw it. Getting rid of the penny just means that physical money transactions have to be rounded. The same thing happened when we got rid of the 1/2 cent piece. When you buy something and the total comes to a non-nickel-aligned amount, it gets rounded. Easy, simple, any idiot can handle the math.

    18. Re:If this keeps up... by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First, getting rid of the penny would not affect electronic / check transactions.
      The only change would be cash transactions, which would be rounded (probably up) to the nearest nickel.

      When the half-cent was abolished in 1857 it was worth more than eight cents in today's currency. It's time for the penny to go, along with the paper dollar. In another 20 years or so, they may as well get rid of the nickel too.

    19. Re:If this keeps up... by BeBoxer · · Score: 0

      Somebody mod parent up! As funny that is. And whatever you do, don't tell him what that little nine means after the price of a gallon of gas.

    20. Re:If this keeps up... by irenaeous · · Score: 1

      Yes, and what about the 0.002 cents? 1/500th of a penny? Get 1,000 of those and we will have more that our two cents worth in precious metals.

    21. Re:If this keeps up... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You work for Verizon, don't you?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    22. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Australia manages just fine.

      You just round to the nearest 5 cents. If something costs $13.23 then you end up paying $13.25 if you pay cash, if it costs $13.27 then you also pay $13.25 if you pay cash. When paying by EFTPOS (think swiping your debit card in the US) or credit card or cheque (think check it the US :) you pay to the exact cent. Actual prices are still specified to individual cents, the rounding is done on the total purchase not on each individual item.

      It works perfectly well, sure you can get 2c worth of free petrol (gas...) by putting $40.02 in the tank, but no one does because it's 2c... Sure you could try buying 2c (or 7c) worth of petrol over and over again, but no one does that either because it's retarded.

      Just because you remove something from cash transactions doesn't mean you change the "base" of your currency - to claim that is just being moronic. Amazingly Australia didn't collapse, the banks didn't have a field day with "false" interest rates, in fact the only thing that changed is you don't end up carrying 10kg of coins at the end of the day...

      Inflation means that a penny now is a *much* *much* finer resolution on prices. People managed perfectly well 50 years ago with a much coarser price scheme... Seriously who gives a stuff if something costs $12.32 or $12.33 - can you even tell the difference at the end of week?

    23. Re:If this keeps up... by Associate · · Score: 1

      What about the fractional cents charged for things like gas now? They don't alter the base numbering system we use for currency now. They barely affect the price we pay for anything. And counting up to twenty and noting it in decimal format is confusing. What would happen if pennies and nickels were phased out would be price adjustment and rounding. That happens now, due to various rates attached to purchases and other monetary transactions. Didn't you see the Superman movie with Richard Pryor?

      --
      Someone hates these cans.
    24. Re:If this keeps up... by jcorno · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you're joking or not. The dollar is not defined in terms of the cent. The cent is defined in terms of the dollar. It's 1/100, hence the name. You don't need pennies for cents to have meaning.

    25. Re:If this keeps up... by Zach978 · · Score: 1

      you would have 8.74 cents worth of metal for each time...

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    26. Re:If this keeps up... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that the government likes this, just like it likes you collecting states quarters, because that's one more coin they're never gonna get back, and thus have to subtract from their budget (every time they mint one, they add it to their bank account as only they legally can, and every time they melt one down, they have to subtract it. There is a warehouse with $450 million of Susan B. Anthony dollars, still legal tender, in it because the government doesn't wanna go oops, -$450 million to any year's budget. It's good to be the king.

      But the downside is that, if the metal is now worth more, the government would lose money vs. melting it down and selling the metal (and presumably recasting a replacement with a cheaper amalgam.) So it is no longer in the interest of the government to let you crush your pennies in those machines or on train tracks. Mercifully, there probably isn't enough of that for them to notice and take the publicity hit on "crushing the groove of kids everywhere" by outlawing it.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    27. Re:If this keeps up... by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Well what we really ought to do is change the way we compute sales tax. Prices on the shelves should be given with tax included, and they ought to be divisible by at least 5. Then you'd never really need pennies. At which point you could discontinue them, but it wouldn't be an issue, because nobody would end up getting stuck with them.

    28. Re:If this keeps up... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Most banks already handle transactions down to the 6th decimal place. My bank account at any given time could have a certain number of thousandths of a cent in it.
      I've worked in the USA, Europe and the UK. I've never had a bank account with more than 2 decimal places. What's more, I work on business & accounting software, and the only times I've seen that use a resolution finer than what's available in the local currency is for highly specialised functions - and even then, it's only for internal, intermediate calculations.

      To put it another way: I call bullshit.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    29. Re:If this keeps up... by slashbob22 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Zink! Come back Zink! I don't zink he's coming back.
      --
      Proof by very large bribes. QED.
    30. Re:If this keeps up... by sdriver · · Score: 1

      I find that very unlikely, $450 million is chump change compared to the Federal budget...

    31. Re:If this keeps up... by technothrasher · · Score: 4, Informative

      've worked in the USA, Europe and the UK. I've never had a bank account with more than 2 decimal places. What's more, I work on business & accounting software, and the only times I've seen that use a resolution finer than what's available in the local currency is for highly specialised functions - and even then, it's only for internal, intermediate calculations.
       
      You really need to get out more. Gasoline, cheap electronics parts like resistors, mutual fund values... lots of stuff is accounted for at greater than 2 decimal point accuracy.

    32. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Secondly, what would you base the dollar on? It can't be worth 100 cents once you remove the penny. You might as well get used to a new decimal system based on 20ths.

      Man, what? The penny's value is based on the dollar, not the other way around. You could get rid of everything but quarters, and they'd still be "quarter dollars," and worth precisely .25 of a dollar. And for all electronic transactions you could certainly count them down to a penny (or farther) of accuracy.
    33. Re:If this keeps up... by crlove · · Score: 5, Funny

      My bank account takes those little remainders and puts them into another account. It's just like taking pennies from the tray.

    34. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like an honest business (who hasn't seen such a machine in an amusement park or something) but it is now costing the government money every time you do it. I suspect that while a person putting a penny on a railroad track won't be a crime, a business making money off destroying currency (and costing the government money) might be.

      I could see them allowing it to go on if they paid the government back 2 cents for each penny destroyed. The machines I've seen all charge about 50 cents per use anyway, so I'd guess the government will want their extra bit.

    35. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "It was all a dream. Thank goodness I still live in a world of telephones, car batteries, hand guns, and many things made of zinc!"

    36. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last I heard a few years ago, the official currency subunit was the mill ($0.001). That is one reason why gasoline is sold to 3 decimal.

    37. Re:If this keeps up... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      What's weird is that for many years when those things came around, they had a penny tray next to them with another country's pennies in it. In Canada, you'd always find US pennies ready to be crushed, and in the US, Canadian pennies. Lately (past couple of years) I've seen this behaviour stop and it's the resident country's currency.

      Was this some sort of urban myth gone haywire? I've done a tremendous amount of travelling in North America and these penny squashers have always fascinated me. It (the "wrong" country's currency) was very consistent for years.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    38. Re:If this keeps up... by Adriax · · Score: 1

      It should be, do you have any clue how many people walk right past the line to the registers and demand I drop whatever I'm doing so they can get $5 worth of quarters and a dime worth of pennies for those damn machines?
      Even better when they want that change out of a $100 bill or travellers check...

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    39. Re:If this keeps up... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1
      Easy, simple, any idiot can handle the math.

      I guess this means Verizon will be outsourcing its billing department.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    40. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously who gives a stuff if something costs $12.32 or $12.33 - can you even tell the difference at the end of week?

      Will you be able to tell the difference at the end of a year?

      Say you're buying a $5.23 lunch, five days a week. You're actually paying $5.25 a day.

      Ten cents a week.
      $5.50 a year.

      Add up all the pennies you lose by not being able to pay the penny amount, on all of your cash transactions - you might find that it's not insignificant over long periods of time. The ashtray of my truck is basically full of pennies - and every once in a while, I find that having a couple of dollars worth of pennies around is handy.

      I would bet the store you're giving those two or three or four cents to does not see it as insignificant, considering that they may be getting that extra one to four cents on hundreds of transactions in a day. Free extra revenue, from people who think that pennies don't matter!

    41. Re:If this keeps up... by turbidostato · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "a business making money off destroying currency (and costing the government money) might be [a crime]"

      Yes, it should be a punishable crime... and some public workers should pay for it.

      How is it possible to have things so upwards?

      It is *not* "costing the government money"; it is costing the *taxpayers'* money. It is the government the one that is using something to guarantee something of less value. It is the government's fault and it is the government the one that should pay for such a deep arrogance about thrashing away tax-payers' money.

      Well, the government declares owing me a cent by means of an item called "a cent". OK, that's the government side of the deal; it had all the powers to choose a piece of paper or a Ferrari to stablish its debt against me. But then, someone else offers me 1.73 cents for such a token. Why shouldn't I accept it? Despite what the government says, the *thruth* is that I'm liberating the government of a "contract" with me. In what crazy world is the debtor able to punish the one that wanted to condom the debt?

    42. Re:If this keeps up... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Free extra revenue, from people who think that pennies don't matter!

      It would be rounded up or down as necessary. $1.02 rounds down to $1.00. $1.07 rounds down to $1.05. $1.08 rounds up to $1.10.

    43. Re:If this keeps up... by shaneFalco · · Score: 1

      I don't know.... I've worked retail for 6 years (2 as a cashier, 3 as a supervisor, and 1 in a pharmacy). You my friend give people too much credit.... Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers.

    44. Re:If this keeps up... by nighty5 · · Score: 1

      I am Australian and I think that the rounding of the 1c and 2c coins was a very insightful thing to do.

      But I didn't agree with changing over $2 notes to $2 coins. I can understand changing over $1 coins but I think the mint went too far with $2 coins. If anything thats made a difference to how much weight in coins we carry in our pockets.

    45. Re:If this keeps up... by mattjb0010 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Say you're buying a $5.23 lunch, five days a week. You're actually paying $5.25 a day.Sure, but your morning coffee costs $1.82. You're actually paying $5.25+$1.80=$5.23+$1.82 a day.

    46. Re:If this keeps up... by violet16 · · Score: 1

      I remember hearing about a guy who took his groceries through the supermarket checkout one item at a time, to benefit from rounding on each individual item, not just on the total. (The supermarket's policy was to always round down, never up -- most large Aussie retail stores seem to do this.)

      So after however long it took to do all that, he maybe saved, what, a buck. The supermarket honoured this, then banned him.

    47. Re:If this keeps up... by vakuona · · Score: 1

      The actual real solution is to rebase the currency. But that is a huge exercise, and not politically advantageous to say the least. It is actually now quite cheap to do so, given that most money is bits in some computer. If you rebase a currency, then those pennies are now actually worth something.

    48. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Say you're buying a $5.23 lunch, five days a week. You're actually paying $5.25 a day.


      You conveniantly ignore all the occassions you buy a $5.27 lunch and save 2c. Or you're too stupid to read a simple post. Or maybe to stupid to understand what rounding means.

      It averages out - sometimes you pay a cent or two above the total price. Sometimes you pay a cent or two below the total price. If you really care about 2c you can always arrange to be paying less, you just have to add/remove items with non-multiples of 5c prices until your total ends in 1c, 2c, 6c, or 7c.

      Of course no one does because, they know it evens out in the long term (heck even in the short term).


      I would bet the store you're giving those two or three or four cents to does not see it as insignificant, considering that they may be getting that extra one to four cents on hundreds of transactions in a day. Free extra revenue, from people who think that pennies don't matter!

      You can't seriously be that dumb, there are only 5 possible results for an individual transaction.

      1. the price paid is exactly the total price
      2. the store gets an extra 1c
      3. the store gets an extra 2c
      4. the customer gets an extra 1c
      5. the customer gets an extra 2c

      There is no 3 and 4 cent option, as is pretty obvious if you think for about a quarter of second instead of just making shit up.

      And if you are retarded enough to care, then just always arrange to but things which total $X.02. Congratulations, you save 2c on every transaction you make. Of course the time required to make sure the transaction ends in 2, and the extra items you have to buy to do so will probably make it not worth while - but feel free to stick it to the man!

      For everyone else it averages out.
    49. Re:If this keeps up... by TDRighteo · · Score: 1

      Well, at the time, maybe there wasn't a reason. However, maybe the mint was taking a long term view.

      Tried buying anything from a vending machine recently? The $2 coin is small enough to routinely put two in your wallet, which should cover the cost of anything in a machine without a note reader. Note readers are also too large and complicated for parking meters, so without the small $2 coin you'd have to carry a pocket full of $1 coins. Eventually that's going to get as silly as carrying a pocket full of US quarters.

      Overall, I think it makes sense for this application - 2x$1 would weigh 18g, while a $2 coin weighs 6.6g. The dimensions are also favourably smaller: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_coins

      The only downside is (as you've pointed out) that the maximum weight of coins you should end up from one transaction is ~54g instead of the 50g you'd have with a $2 note.

    50. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of such a policy - it'd be stupid to do since the law says how to round so that is isn't detrimental to the store or the customer. None of the large retail stores I shop at do that anyway.

      What you can do is combine items so that it always rounds down. You'll save 50c and spend 2 hours at the checkout. You'd be better off spending 15 minutes begging for change outside the store...

      About the only time it makes sense is to put $X.02 of petrol in your car instead of $X - but know one I know bothers.

    51. Re:If this keeps up... by Knos · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not sure about the legal currency precision for the dollar, but what I do know is that you have to make a distinction between prices and amounts. Prices can be defined with an arbitrary precision, and are used in calculations only. But you cannot exchange prices, only amounts. And once you go from the world of prices to the world of amounts, you have to use the currency's official precision.

      --
      . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
      may u!sh 2 sm!le at dz!z bad nn.!m!tat!ion
    52. Re:If this keeps up... by micpp · · Score: 1

      Personally I maintain that the fact that the $2 coin is smaller than the $1 coin is non-intuitive, as one would expect a coin of the same material and larger value to be a larger size.
      But now I think about it, if the $2 coin was introduced after the $1 coin, making it larger would not be an option, as it would then be too big to be convenient.

    53. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law doesn't say how to round, it suggests how to round. Big supermarkets have to go that way since if they round 1c up, all the cheapskates will go to the other market down the road that doesn't. When the coins were dropped, consumer perception of who did rounding what way was far more prevalent than actual pricing.

      And yes, I mean cheapskates - If you do $100 odd worth of shopping, and you're on a $.01 final price... you lose four cents. Wow. Even if you make ten separate purchases that day, and you're on 1c for all of them, you lose 40c. wow.

      Now, to sit back and wait for someone to tell me how much you lose if you make ten separate purchases a day AND they all come out to 1c final prices AND they purchase ten items every day for a year... If you make 3650 separate purchases a year, you will probably not be affected by the cost of the rounding.

    54. Re:If this keeps up... by pdbaby · · Score: 1
      There is a warehouse with $450 million of Susan B. Anthony dollars, still legal tender, in it because the government doesn't wanna go oops, -$450 million to any year's budget.

      Completely false. About 900M of them were produced in 1979 and 1980, most staying in the vaults until the 90s when most vending machines tried to give dollar coins as change where possible. They used the reserves until 1999, when they ran out. Instead of waiting for the coins due to be minted in 2000, they minted some more SBA dollars (although of a different colour).

      This numismatic lesson brought to you by a bleedin' foreigner

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    55. Re:If this keeps up... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      You would have $874,000 in precious metals!

    56. Re:If this keeps up... by JakusMinimus · · Score: 4, Funny

      In what crazy world is the debtor able to punish the one that wanted to condom the debt? In what crazy world would one want to condom the debt ?
      --

      You can be an atheist and still not want to succumb to some weird cross-over sheep disease -- AC
    57. Re:If this keeps up... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      And what about percentages for monetary amounts? They always come out that clean? Sweet!

      (Of course, most RDBMS keep 6 decimal places for currency regardless of what the user is asking for or inputting, IIRC)

    58. Re:If this keeps up... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      And it's already being done in other countries. In Australia, every cash transaction is rounded to the nearest 5c already. We ditched our 1c and 2c coins in 1991.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    59. Re:If this keeps up... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Sure you could try buying 2c (or 7c) worth of petrol over and over again, but no one does that either because it's retarded.

      Speak for yourself big spender! It may take me an hour to pump my gas, but that's $29.83AU savings on a 64 litre tank!

    60. Re:If this keeps up... by profplump · · Score: 1

      Since apparently missed the rounding lesson in third grade, here's your entire post transposed to reflect an equally likely scenario. Enjoy.

      --

      Will you be able to tell the difference at the end of a year?

      Say you're buying a $5.22 lunch, five days a week. You're actually paying $5.20 a day.

      Ten cents a week.
      $5.50 a year.

      Add up all the pennies you gain by not being able to pay the penny amount, on all of your cash transactions - you might find that it's not insignificant over long periods of time. The ashtray of my truck is basically full of pennies - and every once in a while, I find that having a couple of dollars worth of pennies around is handy.

      I would bet the store you're getting those one or two or three cents from does not see it as insignificant, considering that they may be paying that extra one to three cents on hundreds of transactions in a day. Extra expenses, paid to people who think that pennies don't matter!

    61. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just buy a drink for $1.18

    62. Re:If this keeps up... by non-sequitur · · Score: 1

      Apparently smugness isn't just an American affliction -

      You may be partially reight, but you need to be put in you place a little -
      No SBA dollars were minted after 1999. And only one color was ever produced for circulation.
      In 2000, the US Mint struck the Sacagawea dollar coin in a gold color.

    63. Re:If this keeps up... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1

      Actually, normal rounding rules are biased to round up and so on average they do result in a slight increase, which is why in accounting a value of .5 used to be rounded to the nearest odd number (or even, depending on whose system you're using); over time this averages out.

    64. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please see the 1991 guideline by the Prices Surveillance Authority, The Withdrawal of Copper Coins, which said codified the "round to nearest 5" approach.

      If you think the PSA (now ACCC) don't treat their guidelines as law, try not following them (to the detriment of consumers) and see how fast they manage to frame it as a breach of the Trade Practices Act. If a supermarket tried rounding up from 2c to 5c they'd be in court quicker than you could say "the Trade Practices Act 1974". Of course they could choose to always round down, since you're allowed to charge less than the marked price - but since there was a well known and advertised guideline as to what to do at the time, why would you do any different?

      The big supermarkets are all part the Australian Retailers Association whose much more recent Code of Practices for Computerised Checkout Systems includes the language from the PSA guideline:

      """
      With the withdrawal of copper coins it was necessary to develop Rounding Guidelines to ensure that prices
      are still fair and accurate, as prices still contain denominations that are no longer in use. Under the
      Rounding Guidelines the following rounding principles apply to cash transactions:
        1 & 2 cents - rounded DOWN to the nearest 10
        3 & 4 cents - rounded UP to the nearest 5
        6 & 7 cents - rounded DOWN to the nearest 5
        8 & 9 cents - rounded UP to the nearest 10
      Where a consumer elects to pay by way of cheque, credit card or EFTPOS it is unnecessary for businesses
      to round the total value of the transaction, as the consumer is able to pay the exact amount. Rounding on
      these types of transactions may constitute a breach of the Trade Practices Act
      """

      So again, why would any such store not follow their own guidelines - that all their competitors will since they all signed the thing?

    65. Re:If this keeps up... by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1
      Say you're buying a $5.23 lunch, five days a week. You're actually paying $5.25 a day.

      In practice, this does not occur for many businesses in Australia. Small businesses like cafes, bakeries and the like set their prices to the nearest 5 cents or 10 cents, so no rounding occurs. Most supermarkets still price to the nearest cent, but rounding is not an issue because people generally buy many items at a time from supermarkets and over time the rounding balances out.

      The increase in costs of manufacturing coins has to be addressed eventually. Britain reduced the size of their coins several years ago. New Zealand did the same this year, and also changed their coins to plated steel and removed the 5 cent coin from circulation. Eventually the US will have to address this issue too. Removing the pennies from circulation and making the nickel smaller would be worth considering.
      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    66. Re:If this keeps up... by advs89 · · Score: 0
      I suspect that while a person putting a penny on a railroad track won't be a crime

      Umm, I'm pretty sure it already is...
      --
      Rirelobql xabjf gung EBG-13 vf gur yrnfg frpher rapelcgvba rire, ohg jbhyq lbh jnfgr lbhe gvzr npghnyyl qrpelcgvat vg???
    67. Re:If this keeps up... by non-sequitur · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't say I've ever seen what you describe (every one I've come across requires that you supply your own coin).

      I suppose it's possible that those 'foreign' coins were left behind by tourists who discovered thay'd been carrying them, but didn't want a souvinir of a 'domestic' attraction on a 'foreign' coin?

      seems to be an unlikely orchestration of individual behaviour, but then it fits the data.....

    68. Re:If this keeps up... by EinZweiDrei · · Score: 1

      ...Spice World?

      --
      Perhaps life really is full of possibilities.
    69. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love putting my debts in condoms. It allows be to *splirge* at will.

    70. Re:If this keeps up... by illuminatedwax · · Score: 2, Funny

      So wait - where did that extra dollar go??

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    71. Re:If this keeps up... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      There are still a sizeable number of US cents in circulation from before the plated zinc cents were introduced in mid-1982. The specific gravity (actually, the weight, since the volume remained constant) of the coins makes it relatively easy to sort out the high-copper cents for processing.

      It's interesting to note that prior to the US zinc cent program, the most prominent countries throughout history who had zinc coins were the failing countries during World War II. There were a lot of zinc German coins produced 1942-45. Zinc coins don't really promote national pride. The US, of course, concealed it beneath a thin coating of copper.

    72. Re:If this keeps up... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      Every one I've seen has a sign proclaiming them to be legal, with a reference to some section of federal law, which I never was curious enough to look up.


      If it wasn't legal, then they would not have a couple of those machines in the upstairs food court at the Pearl Harbor Navy Exchange.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    73. Re:If this keeps up... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1
      Getting rid of the penny has got to be the most ridiculous ideas that is popular amongst those that are `inconvienced` by a penny.


      Gee. I wonder if there was somebody like you ranting and raving when the US Mint decided to stop producing the Half Cent back in the mid 19th century. "Whoah! Now how are we going to make change when somebody buys something that costs a fraction of a cent?!?" I am sure there was someone like you carping about it.

      I prefer the odder denominations. The copper Two cent piece, the silver and nickel three cent pieces. And, of course, from before the 'Nickel' five cent piece (which became known as the 'nickel'), the half dime. Don't even get me started on the twenty cent piece.

    74. Re:If this keeps up... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      The last I heard a few years ago, the official currency subunit was the mill ($0.001). That is one reason why gasoline is sold to 3 decimal.


      I'm surprised no one has yet, just to be an asshole, purchased exactly one gallon of gas (like, at say $2.444 per gallon, going by typical prices where I live), paid $2.45, then demanded their 1/10th of a cent in change.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    75. Re:If this keeps up... by sbben · · Score: 1

      So does this mean that all of those old pennies we cut up in AP Chemistry for analyzing their percent silver content were OK?

    76. Re:If this keeps up... by Scarletdown · · Score: 1
      (like, at say $2.444 per gallon, going by typical prices where I live)
      I meant, $2.449.
      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    77. Re:If this keeps up... by aoeuid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In practice, this does not occur for many businesses in Australia. Small businesses like cafes, bakeries and the like set their prices to the nearest 5 cents or 10 cents, so no rounding occurs.

      In Australia & NZ the tax is included in the price of each item, whereas in Canada & USA the tax is applied afterwards. Prices in Canada / USA usually end in a 5, 0 or 9, but it is the tax being applied which gets you one of the other digits in the penny column. They would have to adjust to a system of including taxes in the price, which I have never seen anywhere in Canada/USA. Or they could start listing odd prices which don't end in a 5, 0, or 9, which would also be quite unusual for us.

      Here in Mexico they have 10, 20 and 50 cent coins. Only the 50 cent coin is in common usage. A common thing to do here at grocery stores and 7/11 style convenience stores is to round up for charity. If your total comes to 100.56 pesos, they ask if you want to donate the 44 cents to charity, you pay 101 pesos and the tiny charity donation is listed on your receipt, and gives you a nice round number. The larger chain stores will give out those 10 & 20 cent pieces, or round, but all the small stores just set their prices to the nearest peso. But the sales tax is included in the price here, so they can do that easily without having to quote people odd prices (listing the price as 6.09 @ 15% tax to get $7.00, for example).

    78. Re:If this keeps up... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      That's only when you're rounding to the nearest whole number (e.g. the nearest cent, dime, or dollar):

      .0 -> 0 (no change)
      .1 -> 0 (you save .1)
      .2 -> 0 (you save .2)
      .3 -> 0 (you save .3)
      .4 -> 0 (you save .4)
      .5 -> ???
      .6 -> 1 (you lose .4)
      .7 -> 1 (you lose .3)
      .8 -> 1 (you lose .2)
      .9 -> 1 (you lose .1)

      For this system to be fair, you have to round .5 to 0 half the time, and 1 the other half of the time, as you noted. But as the GP noted, there's no built-in bias when you round to the nearest five cents (or the nearest half cent, 50 cents, etc.).

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    79. Re:If this keeps up... by oopsdude · · Score: 1

      Or maybe to stupid to understand what rounding means.

      Or two stupid too spell?

    80. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 1

      Only if there is a number in the exact middle. If you are rounding to the nearest 5 though there is no middle number. 1,2 go down. 3,4 go up. There is no 2.5 and hence no problem with bias.

    81. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 1

      too lazy in reality...

      But yes my spelling is pathetic, but laziness prevents that from ever being corrected.

    82. Re:If this keeps up... by Gryle · · Score: 1

      As preventative measure against splurging. Or against rubber-stamping.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    83. Re:If this keeps up... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      My bank account takes those little remainders and puts them into another account. It's just like taking pennies from the tray.

            The tray for the crippled children?!?

    84. Re:If this keeps up... by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 1

      But in this case, when you are rounding whole numbered pennies to the nearest five, the bias is not present.

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
    85. Re:If this keeps up... by drsquare · · Score: 1
      People managed perfectly well 50 years ago with a much coarser price scheme...

      50 years ago, the pound was divided into 960 divisions, now it's only divided into 100.
    86. Re:If this keeps up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have an account that displays more than two decimal places but banks and other financial institutions certainly do calculate with greater precision.

      I once wrote an amortization program and was having difficulty over results that varied somewhat from my banks calculation even though I was using the same formula. I surmised the differences were due to rounding errors brought about by insufficient precision and indeed the bank confirmed that. My bank calculates amortization with interest rates specified to four decimal places.

    87. Re:If this keeps up... by mpe · · Score: 1

      I am Australian and I think that the rounding of the 1c and 2c coins was a very insightful thing to do. But I didn't agree with changing over $2 notes to $2 coins. I can understand changing over $1 coins but I think the mint went too far with $2 coins. If anything thats made a difference to how much weight in coins we carry in our pockets.

      The reason is that coins are rather more durable and longer lasting than notes. Even plastic ones.

    88. Re:If this keeps up... by mpe · · Score: 1

      The increase in costs of manufacturing coins has to be addressed eventually. Britain reduced the size of their coins several years ago. New Zealand did the same this year, and also changed their coins to plated steel and removed the 5 cent coin from circulation.

      British "copper" coins were changed to plated steel some years ago. The older coins (many of which are still in circulation) are now worth more than their face value as scrap metal.

      Removing the pennies from circulation and making the nickel smaller would be worth considering.

      The only effective way to remove coins from circulation is to change their physical size.

    89. Re:If this keeps up... by kybur · · Score: 1

      No, that's the jar...

    90. Re:If this keeps up... by rynoski · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Or two stupid too spell?
      b You fucked the grammar, too. Who cares?
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: 1) those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.
    91. Re:If this keeps up... by jthayden · · Score: 1
      In what crazy world would one want to condom the debt ?



      Well you don't want it to go forth and multiply.

    92. Re:If this keeps up... by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Dunno about over there, but in the UK, most prices end with 99 pence.

    93. Re:If this keeps up... by alexdw · · Score: 2, Informative

      The smallest unit of currency in the United States is the mill, or .1 cents.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._dollar

      --
      Deliver yesterday, code today, think tomorrow.
    94. Re:If this keeps up... by rbarreira · · Score: 1
      I've worked in the USA, Europe and the UK

      Europe and the UK? :)
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    95. Re:If this keeps up... by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      So if one really wants to save money, one should pay with cash every time the amount would be rounded down, and with card every time it would be rounded up...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    96. Re:If this keeps up... by Heian-794 · · Score: 1

      The genuine actual real solution is to return to backing currencies with precious metals, so that the value of people's money isn't so closely tied to their own countries' governments.

      It is not a coincidence that there has been inflation in almost every single year since the US dollar was divorced from gold or silver.

      The very rich can often escape inflation thanks to real estate and stock investments (which, in times of inflation, grow more valuable since they function as a hedge), but the poor do all their dealings in cash and bear the full brunt of currencies losing their value.

      I'd much rather have a guarantee that the dollar would have intrinsic value* than any guarantee about stopping the much-more-discussed national ID plans, or CCTV cameras on the streets, or biometric passports.

      When your savings has intrinsic value the world over, you're a lot safer from anything your government might try to do to you.

      (*: Yes, I know that humans might stop valuing silver or gold, and that thus "intrinsic" is a relative term. But they haven't stopped valuing them at any time in human history so far.)

    97. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 1

      Same over hear, however usually you buy more than one thing at a time... Buy three items for $1.99 and the total is $5.97 which rounds to $5.95...

      If the rounding was done on individual items it would be stupid - all prices would be $X.X8, but since it's done on the total it evens out.

    98. Re:If this keeps up... by sholden · · Score: 1

      The US used pounds in the 1950s? Did you slide in from a parallel universe?

    99. Re:If this keeps up... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Is that REALLY the genuine actual real solution, or perhaps there was a reason why most every government dropped that idea... Hmm.

    100. Re:If this keeps up... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      The thing is, I'm talking about a penny tray that is built right into the machine (yeah, I've seen a few where you supply your own pennies).

      Also, I'm not talking a small plastic tray holding a dozen pennies. I'm talking hundreds of foreign pennies, and yes, I've dug through them to confirm this :)

      Very bizarre, at any rate.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    101. Re:If this keeps up... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      [slashdot.org] = $.002...

      Two thoughts:

      - yikes, the share price has dropped yet again

      or

      - now I know why my /. subscription ran out so fast

    102. Re:If this keeps up... by jesboat · · Score: 1

      Damn your sig. :-)

    103. Re:If this keeps up... by jesboat · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea, but I posted here already... :-(

    104. Re:If this keeps up... by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      lots of stuff is accounted for at greater than 2 decimal point accuracy.
      I'd say a gasoline price to 3 dp that then gets multiplied by the quantity counts as "internal, intermediate calculations". Likewise electronic components at 23c per hundred. Likewise credit card interest and foreign currency conversions.

      In none of those cases does it follow that the final, overall transaction occurs in your bank account to that number of decimal places.

      I mean, why would they bother - for the fun of explaining it to people over and over again when they ring up to complain why their account is always a couple of pennies out of balance because it shows 1.01 plus 1.01 make 2.01, when internally it's 1.006 + 1.006 = 2.012 ?

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    105. Re:If this keeps up... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I've checked interest calculations on several bank statements and from the rounding that takes place when it occurs interest is acrrued to at least 11 places (even if the printed statement only shows 2).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    106. Re:If this keeps up... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Because being on a precious metal standard restricts the ability of the government to raise funds (via inflation). Governments can simply print new money and spend it which taxes everyone who uses the currency). If you have to acquire additional gold, that option is gone. An additional factor is that gold sitting in a vault cannot be used for jewelry or electronics.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    107. Re:If this keeps up... by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      Actually, the coffee cost $1.77 until they went with this rounding scheme, so we raised the price to $1.82 so everyone would think they were getting a deal when it is rounded down to $1.80...

      And besides that, I use cash to buy my coffee, but my debit card for my lunch, so it costs me $5.23 + $1.80 a day...

  2. Only in Government...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you spend $.02 to make $.01

  3. obscure simpsons quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    let the good times roll

  4. Paper? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I continue to light my cigars with hundreds?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot to get my change out of a vending machine today and was about 20 feet away when I realized it. I had to think about it for about 15 seconds whether or not it was worth expending the energy to go back and retrieve the quarter from the change slot. I don't know if that's a testament to how worthless coins have become these days or how lazy many people have become. Probably a little of both. I don't even bother to pick up any coins on the ground unless it's a quarter or higher... anything less and I just imagine someone has glued it to the ground and is there with a video camera making a bloopers film to see how many dolts they can trick into trying to retrieve the penny.

    2. Re:Paper? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'll give you a good deal on the C-Notes that I use for TP.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:Paper? by Thansal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      we all laugh, but I thought that destruciton of currency was ALREADY illegal. Serachign around tryign to see if I can find a link....

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    4. Re:Paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It isn't that crazy. Since 1930 the US dollar has dropped in value roughly 14-fold. A quarter is 2 old cents, a dollar is 7. A penny, nickel, or dime are hardly worth anything. It is about time we eliminate the hundredths point on our currency. It has no meaning.

    5. Re:Paper? by merreborn · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a classic 'net argument. Long story short, the destruction of currency *with intent to defraud* is illegal.

      There's a great google answer here:
      http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=77 334

      "You are correct, that the only criminal statute regulating the destruction or defacement of U.S. currency requires fraudulent intent." ... well, until this law was passed.

      There are a few famous classroom science experiments that involve the destruction of pennies. Here's hoping that's still legal.

    6. Re:Paper? by Thansal · · Score: 1

      Awsome, thank you for clearing this up!

      --
      Do Or Do Not, There Is No Spoon, There Is Only Zuul. Everything in the above post is probably opinion.
    7. Re:Paper? by operagost · · Score: 0, Troll

      Until you need change for an item which comes to 11.97 after sales tax. You'll be tired of being ripped off two or three cents every transaction.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Paper? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US military overseas has done away with pennies in all use except the Post Office. Round the register price up or down as needed. Works just fine.

    9. Re:Paper? by jridley · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of rounding? Tax is currently rounded to the nearest penny. If it's rounded to the nearest nickel, dime, or even dollar, it's still a wash in the long run unless for some reason you purchase things often that result in rounding up more than rounding down.

      When I get pennies in change, I check for pre-1982 (copper) pennies to use in coin-smashing machines, and throw the rest into the next give-a-penny bin I see, and I take from there as well. So for all intents, I've already gone to the "no pennies" economy. I give up pennies given in change, and I take a few when available as well. I probably come out a bit behind on the deal in the long run but I don't really care.

    10. Re:Paper? by merreborn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I'm guilty of not reading my google answer link in full.

      "You are correct, that the only criminal statute regulating the destruction or defacement of U.S. currency requires fraudulent intent." only applies to *coins*

      Further down, there's a statute related to bills, which our researcher
      "Note that this is also an intent-based crime. An element of the offense is "...intent to render such [currency] unfit to be reissued.""

      So lighting your cigar with a bill might just be illegal after all. However, under these laws, dissolving a penny in acid isn't.

      There's a bit more here:
      http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=42 6715

    11. Re:Paper? by pluther · · Score: 1
      Until you need change for an item which comes to 11.97 after sales tax. You'll be tired of being ripped off two or three cents every transaction.

      No I won't:

      Figure 3c per transaction. Average maybe three transactions a day. 9c per day, or about $2.70/month.

      Or $32.85 per year.

      That's a dinner out for two at a cheap restaurant once per year. Not really a noticeable amount, even if every single thing I buy with cash ends up losing money by rounding and it's never in my favor.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    12. Re:Paper? by homebrewmike · · Score: 1

      If you're lighting your cigars with hundreds, then you already own the government. So, hey, no worries.

    13. Re:Paper? by John.P.Jones · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see, you are saying that buying pennies and melting them down and selling the scrap at a profit at taxpayer expense isn't 'fraudulent intent'?

      I disagree, I stipulate this scenario is already covered under the existing law, making a profit off selling currency as scrap is deffinately fraudulent.

    14. Re:Paper? by trb · · Score: 1
      Until you need change for an item which comes to 11.97 after sales tax. You'll be tired of being ripped off two or three cents every transaction.
      Right, and what about my gasoline that costs $n.nn9 a gallon? If they round it up, that's another penny per (10 gallon) tank!
    15. Re:Paper? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      Gasoline is actually the most consumer-friendly example here (along with other self-metered products). If the meter shows cents then you can run it up to $10.02 and save 2 cents. If the meter itself does the rounding then you can still squeeze a little extra out after it hits $10.00 before it ticks over to $10.05 (i already do this at the 1-cent level, just because i can).

    16. Re:Paper? by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see, you are saying that buying pennies and melting them down and selling the scrap at a profit at taxpayer expense isn't 'fraudulent intent'?

      I disagree, I stipulate this scenario is already covered under the existing law, making a profit off selling currency as scrap is deffinately fraudulent.


      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      How can it possibly be fraudulent if there is no deception involved? (And considering there is no need for deception, I don't see why it would become involved.)

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    17. Re:Paper? by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      How is selling a metal at its market value remotely fraudulent?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    18. Re:Paper? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      pre-1982 (copper) pennies to use in coin-smashing machines

      Does it make a difference?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    19. Re:Paper? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      I'll give you a good deal on the C-Notes that I use for TP.

      Lights twice as fast! Burns twice as long!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    20. Re:Paper? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Oh, I see, you are saying that buying pennies and melting them down and selling the scrap at a profit at taxpayer expense isn't 'fraudulent intent'?

      No, I was saying that lighting a cigar with a $100 bill wasn't fraudulent intent.

      However, now that you pose the question, I think it's worth noting that this new law wouldn't be necessary if your logic held.

    21. Re:Paper? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Federal tax has the option of rounding to the nearest dollar -- but you have to either drop pennies in everything or have pennies in everything.

      State taxes (well, my state anyway) has a printed "00" in the cents column -- you don't even get a choice of calculating to the penny accuracy.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    22. Re:Paper? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Especially given that coins were precious metals precisely to give them legitimacy, such that you could go sell them as precious metal should the government collapse. It was also a hedge against inflation -- few people would ever try to demand six pounds of gold for a loaf of bread, it would never get that far.

      Governments did forbid scraping metal off the edge of the coin, or other such defacement oriented around stealing the metal, or even directly melting it down. But if the government collapsed, nobody was gonna enforce that anyway, and you still had your value.

      I find it interesting that the government thinks of this as a profit measure -- oh golly, it now costs us more to make the coin then we get writing +1 cent on our bottom line when we stamp it out.

      Well that's what you get for deflating your value rather than letting the intrinsic value of the metal buttress the perceived value of the coin. Ironically, making it illegal will only hasten the collapse of value.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    23. Re:Paper? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      By the way, this is pretty much why they yanked the money off any gold or silver standard -- the contractual wording on printed bills stating there was a chunk of metal in a vault somewhere you could trade it for in theory.

      They wanted inflation to "monetize the debt", and finally the value of the money was not up to what was represented in the vaults. There wasn't enough gold for X number of printed dollars, so it became worthless as a promise, a printed statement on the bills. Now they've reached that stage with a copper coated zinc slug.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    24. Re:Paper? by Don853 · · Score: 1

      More recent pennies are zinc in the middle. It looks funny in coin smash machines because sometimes the copper coating gets spread out enough to show the zinc through, which is a different color.

    25. Re:Paper? by Pedrito · · Score: 1

      dissolving a penny in acid isn't.

      Funny you should mentioned that. Over the summer, I took a chemistry class and found out that hydrochloric acid will react with zinc and not copper. So I took a penny, made a small cut in the side of it, and dropped it in hydrochloric acid. Pennies are zinc with a thin film of copper on top. After a couple of days of bubbling away (it was a tiny hole), I was left with a hollow penny that I crushed with the tweezers trying to recover.

      Glad I did that before this law was passed. Otherwise they woulda called me an enemy combatant and shipped me off to Guantanamo.

    26. Re:Paper? by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      Even if not, you could still use Issue #1 of Detective Comics, or a string of pearls.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    27. Re:Paper? by igny · · Score: 1

      Err no, destruction of currency is ok. Printing the currency is not ok.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    28. Re:Paper? by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      As a parent of young children, I would like to suggest simply stopping minting coins that are a loss to mint (penny, nickel) as opposed to stopping minting & collecting and melting them. Kids under the age of three love pennies (not under 18mos, though, choking hazards are bad) and they make great bribes for good behaviour.

      That, and I don't want the coins my daughter likes to toss into fountains to really be able to add up to something (a handful of dimes / quarters adds up fast!).

      Just my two dimes.

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    29. Re:Paper? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      This is a classic 'net argument. Long story short, the destruction of currency *with intent to defraud* is illegal.

      So destruction of currency with the perhaps misguided but well-intentioned and non-fraudulent intent to destabilise the economy is just fine.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    30. Re:Paper? by honkycat · · Score: 1
      So lighting your cigar with a bill might just be illegal after all.
      Nah, his intent was just to light his cigar. Plus, isn't paper currency fit for reissue as long as you have more than half of it intact? Just blow it out before that point has passed...
    31. Re:Paper? by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

      Actually in England, the bank notes still say:

      Bank of England
      I promise to pay the bearer on demand £10

      However, last time I physically went to the Bank of England to demand my £10, I was politely asked to leave and told I should try spending it in a shop. The did claim to be willing to offer me a replacement bank note, but no gold or sterling silver.

    32. Re:Paper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, if you're rich enough to afford lighting cigars with $100 bills, the law doesn't really apply to you anyway.

    33. Re:Paper? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      One wonders if it still represents an actual pound of gold or silver or whatever (what was it a pound of anyway originally?) Or if it just represents an (arbitrary sound that sounds like "pound"), deflated, of gold, i.e. a few grams worth.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    34. Re:Paper? by jridley · · Score: 1

      also, zinc is a bit softer, so it tends to flatten out too much and the smashed pennies have a tail.

  5. "precious metals" in pennies? by plasmacutter · · Score: 5, Informative

    They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

    they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

    Dare i say it shouldn't just be oil we should be concerned about running out?

    JUNK METAL coins are now worth more than their face value... I think this is a sign that asteroid mining could be feasible (the average nickel iron monster is worth several trillian.. not counting any incidental precious metals)

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by pthisis · · Score: 1

      I thought it was 1980 when they switched from copper to copper-clad zinc.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    2. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative
      They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

      they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

      No to both of those, as it says in the article. They stopped making pennies out of copper in 1981 and they're now made of copper coated zinc.

    3. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Mindwarp · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think this is a sign that asteroid mining could be feasible (the average nickel iron monster is worth several trillian.. not counting any incidental precious metals)

      It could be worth significantly more than that if you threaten to smash it into somewhere important!

      One MILLION dollars! Muahahahaha! Muahahahahahaha!

      *ahem*

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    4. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Gonarat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pennies were 95% copper until they changed the composition to copper coated zinc in 1982 (I think the 1983 penny was the first year they actually made pennies with the new mix). Dimes, Quarters, Half-Dollars and (I think) Dollars were silver until 1964. That is why you don't normally see any dimes or quarters from before the '60s in your change.

      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    5. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Informative

      They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

      I'll give you some slack for finals week, but you are off by three decades. Pennies were made of 95% copper until the mid 80's. Dimes, quarters, half-dollars and full-sized full dollars (i.e. not sacagawea-sized) were made of silver until 1963.

      (Yes, I am a coin collector)

      they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

      Zinc, actually, not nickel.

      Dare i say it shouldn't just be oil we should be concerned about running out?

      Well, not exactly a misplaced point, but we can recycle metals, hence the very problem the article was about. We can't recycle oil once it's been burnt.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    6. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by pthisis · · Score: 4, Informative

      Found it. 1982 they switched from 95% copper, 5% zinc to 97.6% zinc with 2.4% copper plating.

      The previous composition (95% copper/5% zinc) went back to 1962. 1864-1962 it was 95% copper/5% zinc/tin alloy, except in 1943 they were zinc-plated steel.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    7. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      That junk metal coins are now worth more than their face value is mostly the result of declining value of a dollar rather than the rarity of the metal contained within.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    8. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep.. youre the third person to point it out.. i'll put on my dunce cap and sit in the corner ; )

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    9. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by djh101010 · · Score: 0, Troll

      They stopped making em out of copper before the 50's (I forget exactly when its finals week XD)

      For values of "the 50's" which equal 1982.

      they make them out of an electroplated nickel alloy now..

      Only if your "nickel alloy" is "pure zinc".

      Dare i say it shouldn't just be oil we should be concerned about running out?

      Well I can't help but think we're in no danger of people pulling guesses out of their ass, pretending they have answers, and then:

      JUNK METAL coins are now worth more than their face value... I think this is a sign that asteroid mining could be feasible

      ...coming to an unsupportable position based on incomplete understanding of the situation.

    10. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      I could swear it was copper and nickel.. but then again they formulate the alloy to be cheap.. they could have easily changed the formula again.. oh well.. you got me on the pennies... my bad.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    11. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the average nickel iron monster is worth several trillian

      The only trillian I know of is hitchhiking her way through the galaxy and as far as I'm concerned she's worth way more than any nickel iron monster :)

    12. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by interiot · · Score: 1

      It was 1982.

    13. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by ToxikFetus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      If such moderation existed, this comment would be modded +5 Coin Collector Dorkbox.

      Pennies were 95% copper until 1982, until that composition was replaced with a zinc alloy interior and copper plating (however, in 1943 the copper penny was replaced with a steel penny due to needs of the war effort). Not only has the composition of the penny changed to save costs, the actual size has changed as well. Compare the thickness of a 1960 penny with a 2000 penny. The latter-year pennies have been slimmed down considerably.

      Nickels experienced a shift to a copper/silver/manganese alloy during WWII, but otherwise contained the same metallic makeup through history.

      Dimes, quarters, and half-dollars were mostly silver through 1964. From 1965 onward, dimes and quarters were copper/nickel clad, except for some San Francisco 1976 bicentennial quarters, which contained 40% silver. Half-dollars continued to use a lesser amount of silver through 1970 (and 1976 bicentennial), after which they transitioned to the same makeup as the quarter. Some of the earlier Eisenhower dollers also contained a silver mixture.

    14. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      When I was 21, I worked at a movie theater. When I started my shift I counted the money in my drawer, there was a shiny uncirculated 1964 half-dollar in there. I pulled a dollar out of my pocket and made myself some change. I probably made more money in an "even exchange" than I got working that day.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'll give you some slack for finals week, but you are off by three decades. Pennies were made of 95% copper until the mid 80's. Dimes, quarters, half-dollars and full-sized full dollars (i.e. not sacagawea-sized) were made of silver until 1963.

      Maybe they were made in 1963(I am not sure) but the ones marked 1964 were still silver.(On this I AM sure)

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    16. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by mingot · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. Half dollars, though, were actually 40% silver from 1965-1969. You can still pick these up in circulation on rare occasions.

    17. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were made in 1963(I am not sure) but the ones marked 1964 were still silver.(On this I AM sure)

      Confirmed. My bad.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    18. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by griffjon · · Score: 1

      What about the high school science experiment where you dissolve the zinc core?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    19. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Half-dollars continued to use a lesser amount of silver through 1970 (and 1976 bicentennial), after which they transitioned to the same makeup as the quarter. Some of the earlier Eisenhower dollers also contained a silver mixture.

      You can actually still get current production US silver coins. The "silver proof sets" are available, cost more than the standard proof sets, and may or may not be more collectable a few decades out. Here's a link. I've found a few of these very new proofs (half dollars) in circulation. Some meth-head or kid is cracking out the coin sets, I suppose.

    20. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by xkenny13 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Dimes, quarters, half-dollars and full-sized full dollars (i.e. not sacagawea-sized) were made of silver until 1963.

      (Yes, I am a coin collector)


      Hey!! Can I buy all your 1964 non-silver Dimes, quarters and half-dollars?? I'll give you face value... :-)

      (Yes, I am a coin collector too ... but one who knows that 1964 was the last year they made 90% silver coins for general circulation)

    21. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If you found it in the cash drawer at a movie theatre, it was hardly "uncirculated".

    22. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      Dimes, Quarters, Half-Dollars and (I think) Dollars were silver until 1964. That is why you don't normally see any dimes or quarters from before the '60s in your change.

      Clarification. They were either kept by coin collectors, or they were melted down because they are worth much more in either form than their face value.

      Money is a very funny (ha-ha funny) topic. Its real and not-real at the same time. What is also interesting is how new the new fiat currency is as a practice.

    23. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      He said it was at the start of his shift. The cash office probably got them in their bank withdrawal and loaded the trays with them that day. It's entirely possible it was uncirculated in the literal sense, although I don't know the numismatic definition.

    24. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, in the time it took you to type this out, he was corrected and accepted it.
      Mr. Fast typer, you are.

      And Clever, I see.

    25. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Your information is totally wrong, and of course you were modded up for it. Penny content changed to steel and maganese in 1942, bronze in 1943, and in 1982 to copper-plated zinc. That's it.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    26. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Of course, they did make 40% halves from 1965 to 1970 (90% silver in the 1970 proofs) so those are also worth more than face in all grades.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      Yes, in the long term scale of thing.
      No, for the last decade.

      Just look at the prices of all those base metals the last few years (not only copper, but that one is extreme).

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    28. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Crap... I'm about the fifth jerk to point this out. *hides*

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    29. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1
      One MILLION dollars! Muahahahaha! Muahahahahahaha!

      One could demand that the ransom be paid in pennies, then you could melt those down as scrap, for double the illegality!

      Sir, you're on to a really money-spinner here. I salute you.

      (Although maybe, just maybe, ask for a billion dollars?)
      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    30. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Your information is totally wrong, and of course you were modded up for it. Penny content changed to steel and maganese in 1942, bronze in 1943, and in 1982 to copper-plated zinc. That's it.

      Good lord. Yet another person imperiously posting completely incorrect information when the real info is so, so easy to find. Makes me question the credibility of those posters when I'm reading what they pull out of the sky on topics I'm not as familiar with.

      Oh, and to the guy who keeps modding me "troll" for posting corrections? Why don't you grow some cahones and tell me why you think I'm wrong. Facts are a wonderful thing, try some with me. Let's talk.

    31. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is inflation (declining value of money), not increasing scarcity of metals.

      Any estimate of the value of mining an asteroid has to estimate the effect of increasing the supply of the metals in question, way back when Spain was hauling gold back to Europe by the galleon load, there was actually gold inflation.

    32. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by TheJorge · · Score: 1


      "Uncirculated" is the second-from-highest quality of a coin (second to "Proof", which is typically sealed from the mint and in the case of many coins, of higher quality than a coin that was about to go into circulation). It can in fact have exchanged hands, ie been circulated, but you shouldn't be able to tell from the state of the coin.

      These definitions are from a decade ago when I was more involved in coin collecting, but I don't think the hobby is so fast-moving as to change its definitions.

    33. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by TheJorge · · Score: 1

      ...they changed the composition to copper coated zinc in 1982 (I think the 1983 penny was the first year they actually made pennies with the new mix)

      I may be wrong, but I believe they made this switch mid-1982. I have faint memories of an assorted set of tests you have to put '82 pennies through to determine which kind they are... IIRC, none of the ones I used were very consistent.

    34. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil isn't always burnt. You should recycle used oil.

    35. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Intron · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they switched part way through the year, so there are at least four different 1982 cent coins: copper vs. zinc, and large date vs. small date, from two different mints: Philadelphia and Denver. Some variations are rare.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    36. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      (you probably already know) Half-dollars were still 40% silver until 1967. I used to make a reasonable amount of money buying $20 of halves, sorting out the 40% silver ones, and reselling them for their silver value, which was greater than their face value.

      Melting down coins for their metal value has been going on for 100 years. It was especially bad before the US government let gold and silver prices rise to market values because within the US, it wasn't worth melting them, but if you exported them you could make an enormous amount of money, since the market value of gold and silver was 5x what the controlled value was in the US. I think the US stopped that in the late '60's?

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    37. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They were steel in '43, and the so-called shell-casing bronze in '44-'45, and the more standard bronze the rest of the run until 1982.

      By the way, if you stack some pre-'81 pennies alternating with post-'82 pennies and heat the whole mass over a bunsen burner, when the zinc melts the whole works fuses with a blue flash and you can pry big pretty pieces of brass out of the mass. It works much better if you melt the old ones, then drop the new ones into the melt, because the zinc dissolves before oxidizing, but it takes *quite* a burner to melt a bunch of copper.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    38. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by HBI · · Score: 0

      Your definition is correct, but generally an Uncirculated coin is graded based upon Mint State designation on the 0-70 scale the ANA adopted about 30 years ago. MS-60 is a poor condition uncirculated coin while MS-70 is perfect, which not many coins are. Bag marks, poor strike, incomplete or poor luster and bad post-Mint handling (water, oxidation, etc) impact this number.

      Some crappy looking coins can be MS-60 and above, and some really beautiful specimens can be AU.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    39. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Poruchik · · Score: 1

      The correct term would be 'Almost Uncirculated'.

      --
      $signature =~ s/$signature//;
    40. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Dare i say it shouldn't just be oil we should be concerned about running out?
      Does this mean we should start to be concerned that plastic coins may soon be worth more than their face value?
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    41. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by megaditto · · Score: 1
      Only if your "nickel alloy" is "pure zinc".


      That would depend on what the meaning of "is" is.
      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    42. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Don853 · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be hard if you have a good balance. The copper ones are heavier [3.1g vs. 2.5g]. You can also cut it in half, which makes it pretty obvious which you're working with, but is not so good if you're trying to collect a set of each. I think they sound a little different when dropped, too, but I could be wrong on that one.

    43. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by pthisis · · Score: 2, Informative

      1968-1982 they used the 95% copper/5% zinc formulation which I think is the same as "shell casing bronze" (the earlier bronze had tin as well).

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    44. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

      They switched the design on the back (reverse) side of the US penny from the classic "wheat penny" to the newer Lincoln Memorial design in 1959.

      --
      Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
      The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
    45. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what happens to the price per pound when you suddenly flood the supply of nickel/iron with a small asteroid you managed to drag back home?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    46. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Oh, geez, I'm sure you're right: I was just thinking about wheaties. It's been too long since I've played with coins (other than very destructively.)

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    47. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by cagrin · · Score: 1

      I started saving 'old' Canadian coins (older than 2000) that aren't the plated steel kind close to a decade ago(i also 'toss' the plated zinc pennies) Kind of amazing when you look at the precious metal charts over the last decade.
      http://www.lme.co.uk/copper_graphs.asp

      --
      ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
    48. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by cagrin · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall seeing a chart saying a 1910 penny was the equivalent to about 4 of todays dollars, but i can't find the chart anymore...i may not be remembering this correctly, this was a few years back. It's also interesting to look at some stock index charts that have been inflation adjusted. http://home.earthlink.net/~intelligentbear/com-dj- infl.htm

      cheers ;)

      --
      ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
    49. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give you some slack for finals week, but you are off by three decades. Pennies were made of 95% copper until the mid 80's. Dimes, quarters, half-dollars and full-sized full dollars (i.e. not sacagawea-sized) were made of silver until 1963.

      (Yes, I am a coin collector)


      Well, if you were in finals week as a coin collector, you'd have flunked those three questions.

      Pennies went from copper to zinc mid-year 1982 (the date went from "large" to "small" with the changeover).

      Quarters and dimes last year of silver was 1964; in 1965, they went to the current copper sandwich. Half dollars in 1965 went to a silver/copper sandwich which had about 40% silver in total; they went to the same base composition as the others in 1970.

      Full-size dollars stopped being minted in 1935, the last year of the Peace dollar. (And with Hitler climbing the ladder in Europe, not a moment too soon). They returned in 1972 as the full-size Eisenhower, in the copper-sandwich alloy.

    50. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the drop test is a good one. Take a pre-1982 cent, and a post-1982 cent, and drop them on a hard surface. The copper one will ring, and the zinc one will make more of a thud sound. Once you get the hang of that, telling 1982 cents apart from your change is easy.

      Also works well for silver (1964 and earlier) coins versus the later clad coins. I can definently tell from the way a handful of coins sound if there is a silver one lurking in there.

    51. Re:"precious metals" in pennies? by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Well, if it is a reasonably small asteroid, you could get paid to drop it in the right places.

      DEAR FRIEND,
      I HAVE AN ASTEROID MADE OF NICKEL WORTH ONE TRILLION DOLLARS! ...

      Though you could just drop it on Florida or Redmond.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  6. Just get rid of pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A worthless coin anyway.

    1. Re:Just get rid of pennies by pudro · · Score: 1

      It would be silly to only get rid of pennies. First off, we would then have to count by fives when dealing with money. Secondly, the nickel already costs more to make than it is worth. If we get rid of both then we can just cut off the second decimal place, and our lowest monetary unit will be tenths of a dollar. We can finally get rid of cents all together. Between cost of living increases, inflation, and the incredible loss in the value of the dollar in the world market, that second decimal place has pretty much lost all meaning anyway.

      --
      Freedom is assumed. Then they try to take it away. The degree to which you resist is the degree to which you are free.
    2. Re:Just get rid of pennies by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      Between cost of living increases, inflation, and the incredible loss in the value of the dollar in the world market, that second decimal place has pretty much lost all meaning anyway.
      Damn, just when Wall Street is getting the hang of it.
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    3. Re:Just get rid of pennies by pudro · · Score: 1

      I don't quite get what your point is, especially using the word "just" when linking to a six and a half year old article. And if that article proves anything, it is that it has nothing to do with how we use our currency - as their previous use of fractions proves.

      --
      Freedom is assumed. Then they try to take it away. The degree to which you resist is the degree to which you are free.
    4. Re:Just get rid of pennies by BarkLouder · · Score: 0
      A worthless coin anyway.

      At the current rate, the dollar bill won't be far behind.

    5. Re:Just get rid of pennies by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      I don't quite get what your point is, especially using the word "just" when linking to a six and a half year old article.
      Sarcasm. WHOOSH! You'll find it a lot around here.
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
  7. Intrinsic Value by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dada21 will be along to spout something about precious metals, followed at 11 by a film.

    --
    Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  8. How much does it take to refine the metal? by east+coast · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As much as I can understand why they do not want people melting down these coins, how much is the metal really worth in it's "raw" form unrefined?

    My second question is how much would it cost to refine these metals to make them worth the most? Copper prices are sky high right now but a lump of melted pennies probably wouldn't be able to be sold as a "copper" since there are a number of other metals involved. Is this something that can really be profitable?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    1. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Informative

      As much as I can understand why they do not want people melting down these coins, how much is the metal really worth in it's "raw" form unrefined?

      About 1.7 cents for a current penny, about 2.3cents for a pre-1986 penny, about 7.5 cents for a nickel.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    2. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zinc is the metal most used in U.S. coins these days, not copper.

    3. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by drpimp · · Score: 1

      Refining the actual metals (precious or not) aside, I was already under the impressions that destruction or US currency (which melting and refining would be classified under) is already illegal. So what is new here? Just the fact that the metals have reached some threshold? Someone please provide a real answer. Now that they are publicly announcing this, I would think there will be more people attempting it, fine/penalties or not.

      --
      -- Brought to you by Carl's JR
    4. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by djh101010 · · Score: 2, Informative

      My second question is how much would it cost to refine these metals to make them worth the most? Copper prices are sky high right now but a lump of melted pennies probably wouldn't be able to be sold as a "copper" since there are a number of other metals involved. Is this something that can really be profitable?

      That's a really great question. The deal is, at least for silver and gold coins - they are kept in their coin form but traded at or near melt value. There are several reasons for this. First, a US coin (silver dime/quarter/half/dollar), or penny or nickel, will have a known alloy. You _know_ that this object is, say, 90% silver, or 90% gold, or 95% copper. You don't have to have it assayed for purity to find out what it's got; the mint took care of that when it was made.

      Another reason to leave them in coin form, is that people _do_ collect the coins at a premium to the melt value. I've been buying "junk silver" coins for years, going through them, picking out the good ones, and selling 'em on eBay. Once found a silver half in a junk silver buy, that I sold for $230 or so over there. If ya melt them into ingots, they're just not as interesting. Coins are also easier to count, store, handle, and so on. Bulk metals investing, sure, go buy that 100 ounce silver bar, but it's a BIG chunk of money to swing at one time in either direction - can't just sell a roll of silver quarters and get 100 bucks, or whatever. Coins are a convenient form factor to have them in, so melting costs don't enter into it - because they're rarely melted.

      Now for copper, which is a base metal and used widely in industry, melting would probably happen more often. The spot market would then reflect this, and when copper gets to the point where it's worth melting, this regulation may be gone and a spot market will develop with prices to reflect processing costs. It all evens out in the end. In the meantime, 20% or so of the circulating pennies in this part of the country are the 95% copper type. If only there were some way to distinguish them automatically using an electromagnetic signature or something (ahem), one could sort them at a rate of 5 coins per second, store the copper, turn in the zinc ones, and play the numbers. The ban on melting screws that up a bit...

    5. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      So what is new here?

      Nothing. They're still retarded laws.

    6. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by nucal · · Score: 1

      Current melt value and composition of US coins can be found here: http://www.coinflation.com/

      If you look back at the older silver coins, you can see how the amount of silver used to be proportional to coin value.

    7. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      It *was* only illegal to deface currency if the intent was fraudulent -- I guess trying to cast a nickel into two dimes, or making a $1 look like a $10.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    8. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "If only there were some way to distinguish them automatically using an electromagnetic signature or something (ahem)"

      How about by weight? A copper penny is 3 oz., while a zinc penny is 2.5. Seems ideal for a coin-sorter type device.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    9. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Refining the actual metals (precious or not) aside, I was already under the impressions that destruction or US currency (which melting and refining would be classified under) is already illegal. So what is new here

      Destruction of "minor coinage" hasn't been illegal until now.

    10. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      As much as I can understand why they do not want people melting down these coins, how much is the metal really worth in it's "raw" form unrefined?

      About 1.7 cents for a current penny

      I just checked scrap zinc prices at the London Metals Exchange, it's about $2.00/lb. A sandwich penny is only about 2.5g, and so I figure 1.1 cents.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    11. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      How about by weight? A copper penny is 3 oz., while a zinc penny is 2.5. Seems ideal for a coin-sorter type device.

      Grams, not ounces, of course. Problem with weight, is a balance is going to be SLOW. Unless I had come up with a strain gage and some sort of solenoid to kick the coin one way or the other. Turns out they behave extremely different in a high magnetic field. So I have a contraption with a pair of old hard drive magnets across some hotwheels track, and a couple ramps. Coin down ramp, then horizontal and through magnets. Copper ones slow down MUCH more through the magnets due to the induced eddy currents. They fall on the first ramp; the zinc ones don't lose as much of the horizontal vector, so the fly out to the second ramp. Processing time is as fast as the coin counter can space them on the track. Zinc ones go byebye back to a different bank than I get bags of pennies from, copper ones go into a bucket. All the interesting ones from a collecting standpoint are pre-1983 anyway. Then if someone wants to go through for dates or varieties or for melting, the bucket on the left is full of copper cents, you don't have to waste time digging through zinc ones to find the good ones.

      Another sorting mechanism which seems like it would work, but didn't for me, would be to differentiate by density. Copper is slightly more dense than iron, zinc is somewhat less. It would seem to work that a handfulls of pennies into a vibrating container filled with iron pellets (OK, BB's), would let the copper pennies sink, the zinc pennies float. Doesn't work, I don't know why. But the magnets and hotwheel track works great.

    12. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by newt0311 · · Score: 1

      economys of scale. if you melt enough of them, you will make a (small) profit. There is no significant overhead cost in purifying 1 coins of 1,000,000 coins but with 1,000,000 coins, its only 1/1,000,000 of the cost per coin. This law will atleast limit any operations of that kind until the composition is changed. Once the composition is changed, those new coins will proably take over since bad money drives out the good money and this won't be a problem anymore.

    13. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Howserx · · Score: 1

      if a penny is 3 oz. then I'd sure like to sell you some pot...

      --
      I support the troops. I pay f'ing taxes.
    14. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      How about by weight? A copper penny is 3 oz., while a zinc penny is 2.5. Seems ideal for a coin-sorter type device.

      Grams, not ounces, of course. Problem with weight, is a balance is going to be SLOW. Unless I had come up with a strain gage and some sort of solenoid to kick the coin one way or the other. Turns out they behave extremely different in a high magnetic field. So I have a contraption with a pair of old hard drive magnets across some hotwheels track, and a couple ramps. Coin down ramp, through magnet. Copper ones slow down MUCH more through the magnets due to the induced eddy currents. They fall on the first ramp; the zinc ones don't lose as much of the horizontal vector, so the fly out to the second ramp. Processing time is as fast as the coin counter can space them on the track. Zinc ones go byebye, copper ones go into a bucket. All the interesting ones from a collecting standpoint are pre-1983 anyway. Then if someone wants to go through for dates or varieties or for melting, the bucket on the left is full of copper cents, you don't have to waste time digging through zinc ones to find the good ones.

      Another sorting mechanism which seems like it would work, but didn't for me, would be to differentiate by density. Copper is slightly more dense than iron, zinc is somewhat less. It would seem to work that a handfulls of pennies into a vibrating container filled with iron pellets (OK, BB's), would let the copper pennies sink, the zinc pennies float. Doesn't work, I don't know why. But the magnets and hotwheel track works great, and has the benefits of being elegantly simple, and somewhat rube-goldberg'ish at the same time.

    15. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Magnets and track is just one of the methods used in your vending machine mech.
      WHen I was a young lad I worked in a large coin mech place and would routinely get trays of domestic and foreign currency (both real and fakes) to test.
      A normal mech will have additional sections to test the coin - the track itself has a maximum size, coins too large will not fit, coins too thin fall through, some are filtered by magnetic elements as you suggest, others by electronically listening to the sound a coin makes after hitting a piezo element at the end of the run.

      It was ingenious how accurate they were even back then..

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    16. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      "Problem with weight, is a balance is going to be SLOW."

      When I was a kid, a buddy of mine had a coin sorter where the coins slid on their side through a track. There was a trap door held up by a spring that opened for a certain coin, but let others roll over it. I forget exactly which coin triggered the door, but needless to say, it was triggered by weight. So the spring was tuned to support weight up to a certain point.

      You don't need to know exactly how much a coin weighs, just that it weighs more than 2.5 grams. I would guess if your spring is tuned to 2.7 g, it would be pretty good at selecting 3g pennies and letting 2.5 g pennies slide by.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    17. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by mugnyte · · Score: 1


        Figuring in the costs of melting the coins: 100 pennies(1 ounce) -> melting temp(1984.32 F) = ? Joules, delivered from ? powersource = $ cost.

        I doubt this is profitable. Then again power is cheap, or even free in some scenarios. Thieves are mostly concerned with spools found near industrial power infrastructure (thefts have sometimes been, um, sparky!)

    18. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by codepunk · · Score: 1

      A while back I was looking to melt some for cheap zink.

      As it turns out the best way to tell the difference when sorting is to bounce them on a table. Give it a try
      the zink pennies have a different ring to them then the copper ones. It would be fairly easy to create a sorter that used a sound signature to sort them.

      --


      Got Code?
    19. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      A normal mech will have additional sections to test the coin - the track itself has a maximum size, coins too large will not fit, coins too thin fall through, some are filtered by magnetic elements as you suggest, others by electronically listening to the sound a coin makes after hitting a piezo element at the end of the run.

      Interesting. I get bags of pennies from the local bank - they're glad to be rid of them, as they have to pay to have them taken away otherwise. So I know they're all pennies before I get them. But, I use an older coin counter as a hopper/dispensing system anyway, so they're checked again for mechanical size that way. Sometimes a dime shows up in the penny bags, it comes out into a different hopper of course. One other mechanism I've looked at, bought, and not used yet, is a "coin comparator", as used in slot machines to detect bogus coins or tokens. You put a known "good" sample coin under the sample coin, and then the coin being tested passes through a slot. The coin generates a signal in the sense coil which they compare to the sample coin with some wonderfully elegant circuitry, and if it matches, it drops through. If it doesn't match by a certain amount, a little solenoid kicks it to the other slot (return hopper). If the magnet & track thing didn't work this well, I'd probably fire up that sucker.

      Of course, now that it's illegal to melt the copper ones, the value of this exercise is in the joy of solving an interesting problem, and in pre-sorting out all the zinc so I can go through just copper pennies, which is where all the wheat cents and interesting dates/errors are anyway. Right now, it's just gallons of pennies for "someday if ever". If copper goes to 10x where it is, the decision to sort or sell gets really easy. And keep in mind - even if it's illegal to melt them, the coins have a melt value, and it's not illegal to _trade_ at that value, just to destroy them.

    20. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Pennys have only a thin copper coating; they're mostly nickel. I've had one on my keychain for so long that almost all of the copper has worn off.

      They've been a ridiculous indulgence for years though. What the hell can you buy for a penny? Just round everything up to the nearest nickel and use the tax revenue to help lower the goddamn national debt or something. That they still make and distribute this worthless currency is beyond me.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    21. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      grind up the pennies and heat to somewhat over zinc's melting point, then strain out the copper? Alternatively, draw the zinc from the top. I dunno how hard this would be from a profit perspective, but separating the metals isn't all that involved.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    22. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by autophile · · Score: 1

      Very interesting -- where does one find "junk silver" coins?

      I collect wheat-ears and pre-WWII pennies just for the heck of it. Back when I was a wee lad working the register, one of the pennies someone paid with was a 1910 penny. I replaced it with a "modern" penny and gleefully kept the 1910.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    23. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by djh101010 · · Score: 1

      Very interesting -- where does one find "junk silver" coins?

      You can go in to your local coin dealer and pay about a 10% premium for them, or you can order from someone like apmex.com in the "wholesale lots" screen to get it a bit closer to spot price. In the case of the 1921-D half I found, it was on a week when silver was peaking (back in May), and the coin dealer was a freaking zoo - busy, buying a lot, no time to check through the incoming stuff for key dates. So I took a bit of a hit on the per-ounce cost but got much better coins than most weeks. I don't know if apmex goes through for dates, I'm guessing they do. It's very random.

    24. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by syncrotic · · Score: 1

      Copper and zinc easily form an alloy commonly known as brass. In liquid form they'd be fully soluble: you couldn't use density-based separation. Think of it as alcohol and water - significantly different densities, but your bottle of vodka doesn't separate out into layers when left on the shelf.

    25. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      So I'd need to disolve the Zinc in HNO3, then separate that mixture chemically, right? The Copper would be easy that way, as I'd be left with some fairly clean granular copper.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    26. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably pre 1983 - the switch to zinc cores was made in 1982.

    27. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It is already "refined" - it an an alloy of known composition. To make your final different alloy you throw it into a crucible with however much copper or whatever to make up the difference and you wouldn't bother making anything that involves removing a metal from the mix becuase that takes a lot of energy. Metal ores are usually oxides and it takes a huge amount more energy to remove the ovygen than it does to just melt an existing metal.

    28. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      IANAM, but with melting points over 600 degrees C apart, I still think the "grind and melt" approach would be much more simple than getting other chemicals involved. Just control the smelting temperature to a consistent 600 degrees C (about 200 degrees above where Zn melts and about 400 degrees below where Cu melts) and you would be golden.

    29. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by Bourdain · · Score: 1

      I'm no expect in metallurgy, but I can imagine it can be very profitable Assume that only the penny and nickel are "mispriced" and that there's no difference in cost of refining the contents (as a propotion of the return)... pennies have a 73% return while nickels have a 74.8% return so, if I were a savvy/unethical foreign investor and wanted to melt these coins (btw, not having read the body of the article, is it illegal to melt US coins outside of the US, because, given the potential returns, it might be worthwhile to ship these), I had a team prepare a possible business plan to essentially "arbitrage" this opportunity in the most efficient manner possible. just my two nickels

    30. Re:How much does it take to refine the metal? by deblau · · Score: 1

      For current prices of base metals on the open market, check out Kitco metals. For the relation to US currency, see coinflation.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  9. get rid of pennies altogether? by jimfinity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It might just be more feasible to get rid of pennies altogether.

    here is an article i have found to be particularly illuminating.

    http://www.straightdope.com/classics/a981009a.html

    1. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by owlnation · · Score: 1

      In Europe not all countries use the Bronze colored Euro Cent coins. Holland for example doesn't. In Germany where I live, the bronze coins are pretty much useless - I give mine to charity.

    2. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by ubergenius · · Score: 1

      Except it seems to me that they lose MORE on nickels than pennies... Why not just ditch coins altogether? The answer is the same reason why we won't be completed cash-less for a long, long time: They're too useful. It's fast, convenient, and accepted everywhere, and are tangible (their value can't be lost because of a computer crash). Coins and bills aren't going anywhere for a while. Someday, it will probably happen, as technology becomes more reliable and internet truly ubiquitous, but for now, it won't happen.

      --
      Student Manager - Take control of your education!
    3. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I've been living in Germany for the past 18 months and I still have to look at the coin to determine the difference between 2 cent and 5 cent coins....and the one cent are small compared to American coins.

    4. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by pthisis · · Score: 1

      In the US, pennies are pretty useless too. The sooner they're officially eliminated the better. There are a couple of ways that the market's phasing them out already:

      Many stores have a little dish next to the register--if you get pennies in your change, you drop them in the dish; if you need pennies to pay you take them from the dish. So if, say, something costs $1.02 you pay a dollar and grab 2 pennies from the dish. If it costs $.97 you pay a dollar and drop your 3 pennies change into the dish.

      Even better, a lot of places I shop now just ignore the pennies. If they ring something up and it's $1.76 they'll say "a buck seventy-five please". If I know a place is like that I'll do the same if it's $1.74.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    5. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why stop there?

      Why not get rid of nickles and dimes as well?

      And why we're at it, let's get rid of all paper currency, replacing it with coins in the following denominations: $1, $5, $20, $50. Then we can stop printing money to replace all those torn dollar bills.

      Think of the affect on crime. While you could carry a couple thousand dollars on your person if you really needed to, the drug kingpin who wants payment of a million in cash is going to need a forklift, not a suitcase. Similar issues of phyiscal inconvenience will deter counterfeiting.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their value can't be lost by a computer crash. They CAN be lost by a hole in the pocket, though.

    7. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Ehm, The Netherlands (not Holland, which is a province of The Netherlands) had the bronze-coloured eurocent coins in circulation . I had some in my wallet already. As probably pretty much everywhere in Europe, you just don't see them very often. The lowest coin I see in regular usage is the 5 cent coin, and I only see it very rarely.

      The only country I know of that didn't release the smaller 1 and 2 cent coins is Finland . Those coins only were minted for collectors. That's it.

      So, while The Netherlands don't issue the smaller 1 and 2 cent anymore, they did exist in circulation. Oh, and in *all* countries of Europe, they must accept the 1 and 2 cent coins from other countries, even in Finland and The Netherlands. (I bet most shop owners don't know it and will bitch, but well, that's life)

    8. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Programmer_Errant · · Score: 1

      They can't. The American public is so stupid that they think they're being cheated if prices got rounded to the nearest 5 cents. Yes, stores could price everthing at 3 or 8 cents on the last digit but unless you buy everything a single item a time, things will work out. But lets say for the sake of argument that stores always got 5 cents extra. That just works out as part of the profit margin and unless you think there is no such thing as competition, stores will adjust their prices to compensate. In fact they should pass a law that stores have to truncate instead of rounding off. Stores will raise prices to compensate and stupid consumers will think they're getting a deal anyway. Win, win!

    9. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      This has been my thinking for a long time. Honestly, I generally feel like it's not worth my time and attention to keep track of pennies, and not worth the feel of extra things in my pockets. Whenever I have pennies, I get rid of them as soon as I can, and have even just dropped them on the street before in the hopes that, if anyone is desperate enough for pennies that they want to pick them up, they can have it.

      I might be an extreme case, but I feel like nickels are bordering on being considered "more trouble than they're worth," too. The only coins that I specifically hold on to are quarters, and that's for vending machines, laundry machines, parking meters, etc. So if pennies disappeared, I'd be happy. The only time I like having nickels is when I have two times and want to exchange them for a quarter. For the most part, if all my transactions got rounded to the nearest quarter, I'd be fine with that.

    10. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by emarkp · · Score: 1

      I think a bigger indicator is that the "leave-a-penny-take-a-penny" dishes are being manufactured and sold with the intent printed on them. Which means businesses are paying money to not deal with money.

    11. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      except there is already a pretty healthy black market to step up and take it's place. Gems and precious metals, among others. Although it would help. It'd also push us more and more into debt card realm. As good or bad as that may be.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    12. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Moofie · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because creating an inconvenience for law-abiding citizens is OK, if it also inconveniences criminals.

      Or we could, I dunno, not do that.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "American public is so stupid that they think they're being cheated if prices got rounded to the nearest 5 cents"

      No. The American public is smart enough to know that prices won't get rounded to the nearest five cents...they'll get rounded up.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      How about we just use the subset of your idea that actually makes sense:
      Kill pennies, nickles, and dimes. Replace dollar bills with dollar coins.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    15. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Whenever I have pennies, I get rid of them as soon as I can, and have even just dropped them on the street before in the hopes that, if anyone is desperate enough for pennies that they want to pick them up, they can have it.


      Well, thank goodness you aren't putting them in those 'help-my-kid-buy-a-new-lung-because-we-don't-have- medical-insurance' scams I see at the checkouts of my local stores.
    16. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Because we already have dollar coins and they're a pain in the ass? Why in the fuck would I want to carry around a pocket of coins when paper bills are infinitely more convenient?

    17. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Need a penny? Take one.

      Need two pennies? Get a job.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    18. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      How much is that worth in tax dollars?

      In any case, do you really think that trading 4 types of coin for two types is a bad deal? Would it make your pockets *more* full of coins?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    19. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      You think without the penny all those $3.99 items will become $4.00? I think $3.95 is more likely. Of course, unit prices on items not sold commonly in bulk should not be allowed to be priced in unavailable currency.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    20. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      No. The American public is smart enough to know that prices won't get rounded to the nearest five cents...they'll get rounded up.

      They're also greedy enough to see that when the register says $1.52, and they only give the cashier $1.50...."Hey, I got away with 2 cents!"

    21. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The place where I get my coffee prices it so that with tax it comes out to $1.31. Why? I have no fucking clue, since usually they just round it to $1.30 and we're all happy. But this week, they've started giving me four pennies as change....

    22. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lets get rid of morons who overreact for no reason.

    23. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by dweebzilla · · Score: 2

      Off topic I know...

      If we eliminated paper money and had only coins, it really would make going to a strip club just that much more interesting.

      --
      Get your tagline off my lawn.
    24. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Loco+Moped · · Score: 1

      It might just be more feasible to get rid of pennies altogether.

      Nooooo! Then when I buy that 29.99 WalMart special, I'd actually know I'm going to be paying $30 whole dollars for it!
      I'd NEVER spend $30 for that piece of crap!

    25. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      And then, all the sales taxes will get rounded to 0%, 5%, or 10%. Guess which?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    26. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Go to Europe, there are no bills for less than 5 euro. (Same in the UK, with pounds.) The 1 and 2 unit coins are infinitely more convenient than bills. It also saves the government (that is, you) a ton of money. The reason no one uses dollar coins now is because they keep printing bills too.

    27. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Wow, got a preconception to feed?

      I betcha that, just as frequently, people drop their pennies in the tip jar. If the merchants don't have an issue, why do you care?

      Oh, it must make you feel good to assume people are greedy. Okay. Now it makes sense.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    28. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by bhima · · Score: 1

      perhaps it would be better for the dollar to regain its value?

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    29. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the fact that it costs about $450 million per year to keep up with the demand for dollar bills that have an average life span of only 13 months? Or the fact that dollar coins last 20 years? Dollars have no real significance anymore so there's no point to having paper dollars anymore. It's simply antiquated thinking that keeps them around. Many countries around the world have eliminated their equivalent to the dollar bill.

    30. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by bano · · Score: 1

      They gas station I worked at, figured tax into the prices, since it's a static rate.
      Example Candy bar= $0.55 not $0.50+tax or whatever. When tax or wholesale went up we adjusted the prices of the items to the new tax/wholesale to round up to the nearest $0.05.
      This is much like how gas is priced, only more rounding.

      Then again that made it easier on me because I was the cashregister, with my wallet of money and change dispenser.

    31. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not necessary. Sales tax around here is something like 7 3/8%, so it is already impossible to pay the exact tax on a $1 transaction. And even with a 5% or 10% rate, the tax must be rounded only items. (10% of 99 cents is 9.9 cents, but you probably pay 10)

    32. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by edmicman · · Score: 1

      I'll remember that next time I go to the strip club and slip sockojaweea's in the girl's g-string. Or pull out my $50 bill to pay for a stick of gum because that's the lowest denomination in my pocket. I'm not going to waste using a credit card for a $1.27 purchase.

      There is still a market for petty cash/coinage, and carrying petty cash is much better than carrying petty coins.

    33. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by mfrank · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can't fold a dollar coin in half and stick it behind a G-string.

    34. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by bjk002 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you could create a whole new experience. Think back to the quarters game you played in college with beer...

      --
      Opinion:=TMyOpinion.Create(Me);
    35. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Pennies should have gone away a long time ago. Possibly nickels as well (but vending machines take nickels so they aren't quite as useless as pennies - at least people tend to dispose of their nickels in vending machines).

      Pennies simply get hoarded by most people - there's no point fishing them out to pay with exact change, so I suspect (on average) every American has at least a buck's worth of pennies they won't ever spend. That's just a useless withdrawal from the economy of $300M or so.

      The UK did away with the 1/2 penny (worth about 1 US penny) back in the mid 1980s.

    36. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      -Strip clubs start selling paper scrip for tipping at the door. -You buy your gum with the Sacagawea you didn't stuff in her G-string.

    37. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Pennis is a start. Nickels too. The lowest coin we should have is the dime, and we can just round up or down to a dime. After a while even that will be pretty worthless (if it isnt already) and we can use quarters as our smallest change.

    38. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by wakingrufus · · Score: 1

      agreed. we got rid of the half penny once it became worthless, now lets get rid of the penny too! the only thing i ever use pennies for is to throw at people.

    39. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Strip clubs start selling paper scrip for tipping at the door.

      Like strippers don't get fucked enough as it is. You think they won't start paying back progressively lower percentages of those tips when they turn that funny-money over for real dough? You underestimate the sliminess of the average "upstanding restauranteur".

    40. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I agree. Let me just point my cell phone at the register or vending machine and punch in an access code.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    41. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by NiceRoundNumber · · Score: 1

      You can't fold a dollar coin in half and stick it behind a G-string.

      Well, actually, you can. But it may not have much buying power afterward.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of letting other people have your way.
    42. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      You can't fold a dollar coin in half and stick it behind a G-string.

      But it'll still work for the slot-machine approach.

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    43. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

      It might just be more feasible to get rid of pennies altogether.

      If you're someone who doesn't like a constant drone of inflation (like me), then keeping the penny is a good thing. By keeping the penny, we have another motivation to keep the face value of the currency greater than the material value of the coinage that represents it. If we just phase out the coins/currency that costs us more than the value of the currency it represents, then we lose a motivation to aim for zero inflation.

      Now that we're past the value of the penny, the economic effects of deflation may be more painful than just giving up on the penny. Also, with the cost of copper unusually high, the cost of the penny may come back down a bit if copper returns near its original level. I don't know how much this will affect the cost of a penny.

      For those of you the like inflation, I can only assume that you owe more money than you have. Inflation benefits the person or entity who's in debt. You owe a dollar with interest today, you'll owe a dollar with interest tomorrow. If that dollar is worth less, and more so if you're on a fixed interest rate of what you owe, you will actually owe less tomorrow than what you other wise would have had owed. Inflation shrinks our national debt. This is why I don't buy bonds.

      --
      The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
    44. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Maradine · · Score: 1

      I accept your challenge.

      --

      trustedworlds.net - gaming, security, and the gunk that lives in between

    45. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Heh, you're too late, any large money transfer is reported by the bank to the feds because of the 'war on drugs'.

      On a more relevant note, having 100 and 500 yen coins ($1/$5) in Japan has not really inconvenienced organized crime all that much - you'd have to get rid of the higher denominations first, like $100 and $50. Not that it's likely to work, anyways.

      But I really wish they'd go for dollar and $5 coins in the U.S., and stop printing the bills. Coins are way more convienient for a lot of purposes...

    46. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Phuqem · · Score: 1

      You'd have dope dealers switched to the Gold and Platinum standard. People who make money doing illegal things will find more illegal things to keep making the money......

    47. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by couchslug · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That will not be missed as alternative coin-reception techniques have been developed.
      "Juicies" in the Phillipines have perfected a very entertaining way of picking up stacked change from atop a San Miguel bottle. The more skillful can return the stack coin-by-coin.
      Shouts to any Nipa Hut or Fire Empire patrons in da house! :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    48. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      No, but dollar bills don't have good aerodynamics, allowing for customer "target practice", as do 1 and 2 dollar coins.

    49. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Of course, unit prices on items not sold commonly in bulk should not be allowed to be priced in unavailable currency.

      Funny, I read that as "Of course, the government should be allowed to set price controls on items not sold commonly in bulk." Wonder why that is?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    50. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1
      Ehm, The Netherlands (not Holland, which is a province of The Netherlands)
      A province? Now I'm not Dutch or anything but I've only ever been to Noord-Holland and Zuid-Holland. I thought it hadn't been a single province/country/whatever for a long time (province or provincie being a purely political subdivision in the Netherlands).
    51. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modded +4 Insightful - WTF
      It was a joke!!
      I'm sure we can think up ways to reward strippers rather than stuffing actual one dollar notes under their G-strings.
      Hint: how about vouchers they later redeem. Or maybe get creative by buying gifts from a kiosk that are jewelry etc.

    52. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by danlock4 · · Score: 1
      Even better, a lot of places I shop now just ignore the pennies. If they ring something up and it's $1.76 they'll say "a buck seventy-five please". If I know a place is like that I'll do the same if it's $1.74.
      That's weird. Are you sure you're talking about the USA?
      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    53. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Chemisor · · Score: 1

      No, but there are other places you can stick it...

    54. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Technician · · Score: 1

      You can't fold a dollar coin in half and stick it behind a G-string.

      True, but have you ever seen one full of coins. Gravity starts to become interesting.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    55. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by bridgette · · Score: 1

      Getting rid of paper currency in the US woudln't deter crime. The currency of the black market would change to something more portable, like Euros. Are there any economists who could speculate on what impact (if any) it would have on the US economy if US currency were no longer common in the global underground economy?

      --
      - bridgette
    56. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pennies simply get hoarded by most people
      They do?

      there's no point fishing them out to pay with exact change
      Why not? If you do that, you won't have a "hoard" of pennies at home.

      so I suspect (on average) every American has at least a buck's worth of pennies they won't ever spend.
      Oh, really? If you pay with exact change, you'll never have more than about five pennies in your pocket.

      Problem solved.
    57. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by blake3737 · · Score: 1

      true, but most male strippers come with a built in coin pouch...

      once again...I"ll have to resort to whipping pennies at female strippers.

    58. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      You don't pay sales tax as a consumer. The store does. You pay the value of the item and then pay an additional amount to the store to reimburse them for the tax that they pay on the revenue.

      This may matter when rounding. Please tell me if the following is accurate:

      Let's assume a 7.75% tax rate. (actual rate in Clark County, Nevada)

      You and 99 other people buy an item sold at $1 (e.g. at one of the many "dollar" stores.)
      The store rounds up the 7.75 so you pay $1.08.

      The store gets $108 in money for $100 in transactions, but would only have to pay $7.75 on $100 so they pocket the $0.25 left over.
      That would get them in trouble because they'd have to pay tax on $100.25 so they'd have to pay the gov't $7.77
      Let's try $100.23 left over. Still rounds (up) to $7.77

      So the store gets $108 in for $100 of products, pays the gov't $7.77 on a reported revenue of $100.23 which is legal ($100.23 * 7.75% rounds UP to $7.77), so they get to keep $100.23 for selling $100 of goods because even though they have to round up to pay the government, the rounding impact is much less because it is only once (max $0.01) instead of per item which adds up.

      So the store makes $0.23 a day or $83.95 a year. Not bad.

      Sound low? Think about Wal*Mart and do the math.

      Some business don't add the sales tax to the price after they quote it to you, rather they factor it in beforehand. They still have to pay the gov't, they just say it is $1.08 tax included instead of $1.00 and then charge you to reimburse them on what they pay in sales tax. Gas stations do that, a $2.43 gallon of gas hear is really under $2, since about 55 cents is tax.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    59. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      You're an idiot. Go to Europe, there are no bills for less than 5 euro. (Same in the UK, with pounds.) The 1 and 2 unit coins are infinitely more convenient than bills.

      Whenever I've been into the eurozone I've been annoyed at the five-euro note. It's not worth enough, it gets passed around too much, and you end up with a wallet full of revolting little rags. Five euro should probably be a coin. Five pounds probably shouldn't, but give it a few years more of inflation and I'd say it should be.

      That said, there's a certain amount of difference of opinion here. In England we're used to coins up to quite a high value, notes starting at £5, so when I encounter the 5 note I think it annoying to have such a low value be on paper. But apparently Italians have not taken too well the the euro, because they're used to thinking of coins as entirely worthless: all denominations of their currency that were worth having were on paper. Suddenly they have pockets full of 2 coins which are of substantial value!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    60. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Jerrry · · Score: 1

      In England, the marked price already includes VAT and is sensible, like #1.50 or #2.00, not something like $1.99 or $1.49 like you see in the U.S.

      Gas prices in the U.S. are even more ridiculous--they always end in $0.009.

    61. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by pthisis · · Score: 1
      That's weird. Are you sure you're talking about the USA?


      Yeah. Washington, DC area. It's mostly smaller places, but even some chains are doing it now.
      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    62. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chuck Norris can.

    63. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    64. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I remember from a recent trip to Canada, the strip clubs sold US dollar bills (at an outrageous exchange rate).

      I'll tell you why the Federal Reserve has to keep minting new low-value coins -- BANKS charge depositors for "excessive" coin deposits and make them too expensive to be worth depositing.

      At my bank, I'm only allowed to deposit 100 coins per day before getting charged 10 cents per hundred coins (or fraction thereof) in excess of the first hundred. I have a 5-gallon water bottle full of pennies and nickels in a corner of my bedroom that's so heavy, I don't think the plastic it's made of is strong enough to survive a major move. Why are they there? Because I'd rather stare at a 200 pound jug of coins than pay the bank's extortionate surcharge for allowing me to deposit them. Stir, rinse, and repeat about 250 million times across the country...

    65. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Do you like carrying around a wad full of $1 bills too? The way things stand now, you shouldn't have to carry around more than 4 dollar coins at once. If we could convince people to use the $2 denomination, you would only have to carry no more than a single dollar coin at one time.

    66. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Kuvter · · Score: 1

      My mom (53y.o.) said they were talking about doing that when she was in high school.

      The problems included the need to re-model all computer systems to round to the nearest nickel. Secondly the US government would have to buy back all the now "worthless" pennies. It was estimated both those processes combined would take 10-20 years to effectively complete.

      The thought of getting rid of the nickel is a mathematical nightmare I won't even get into.

      --
      "To be is to do." --Socrates
      "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
      "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra
    67. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      The Mint has ruled that idea out. The Mint claims that they've banned melting pennies because all the pennies are needed for currency. (Same with nickels.)
      The Mint has also banned exporting pennies and nickels for any reasons not related to spending pennies and nickels.
      I wouldn't be surprised if all the penny-sculpting machines suddenly disappear. Those machines seem to melt pennies, if only a little.
      I recommend that anyone hoarding zinc pennies in jars reconsider his position soon...

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    68. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Shows that I'm not Dutch myself, eh? I thought it was one province, seems you are right. That's what one calls "Owned", I guess.

    69. Re:get rid of pennies altogether? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shouts to any Nipa Hut or Fire Empire patrons in da house! :)"

      Jesus Christ, who's shouting at this ungodly hour of the... day.

  10. Composition. by Fayn · · Score: 1

    lemme just grab some tin foil out of the kitchen....... Seriously though, I wonder what they will use for the new coins....

    --
    .-.
    1. Re:Composition. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lemme just grab some tin foil out of the kitchen....... Seriously though, I wonder what they will use for the new coins....

      Plastic?

      I mean, it's not like we're running short on oil.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Composition. by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, I wonder what they will use for the new coins....

      Some countries plug their smaller-value coins to reduce the amount of metal in their construction.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    3. Re:Composition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some countries plug their smaller-value coins to reduce the amount of metal in their construction.

      And some countries prefer to drive fuel efficient cars. But this is America we're talking about here...

    4. Re:Composition. by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the embedded RFID Tags, so that when you walk past a (soda)POP machine it will know if you can afford to purchase or not... If so it will start singing and dancing.
      Or the same for billboard advertisements and posters, etc...

      Airport.. Xray and match RFID's on coins to PHOTO ID at check in... If PHOTO ID Changes and coin doesn't register that it was used as a purchase or change then the person is useing a two ID system to get free upgrades, bypass security, etc...

      RFID Money with a history... Who used it last, what they bought, how much and was it legal.

      Hmm... Actually, I guess I should got Patent this instead of blabbing on slashdot...

      *(ok, Dating myself, I like the pop machine in the FIRST original robotech episode that would roll over to people when you called for it... "BUT I WANT A SODA!!!!!"...)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    5. Re:Composition. by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      I propose that America use wood for the new nickels.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  11. Devalue by HappySqurriel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how much of this is because of "increasing value of precious metals" and how much is "The devaluing of the American dollar" (I recognize that from the perspective of Americans this would be the same thing); if it is based on the dollars value, why wouldn't you attempt to correct the problem with the dollar (by not running a 1/2 trillion dollar deficit) rather than finding cheaper materials?

    1. Re:Devalue by Skreems · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, but that assumes that the government actually cares about the deficit, and would rather pay down the national debt than blow untold billions of dollars on pork barrel spending for their own states.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:Devalue by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Well, ideally they'd do both: combat inflation while saving money.

      But this is government we're talking about, when has a government actually done either?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Devalue by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      Yes, reshaping the federal budget and undoing 50 years of deficit spending would be much easy than changing the composition of a few coins...

    4. Re:Devalue by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      why wouldn't you attempt to correct the problem with the dollar (by not running a 1/2 trillion dollar deficit) rather than finding cheaper materials?


      Couple of things:

      - The "devaluation" of the dollar that would impact the price of metal has more to do with inflation than its international trade value. The latter is mostly artificial, and can be raised and lowered to keep an economy stable in the world market.

      - Deflation is a horrible thing to do to an economy. Most of today's economies depend on inflation to maintain long-term spending power. From the Wikipedia article
      A small amount of inflation is often viewed as having a positive effect on the economy. One reason for this is that it is difficult to renegotiate some prices, and particularly wages, downwards, so that with generally increasing prices it is easier for relative prices to adjust. Many prices are "sticky downward" and tend to creep upward, so that efforts to attain a zero inflation rate (a constant price level) punish other sectors with falling prices, profits, and employment. Efforts to attain complete price stability can also lead to deflation, which is generally viewed as a negative outcome because of the significant downward adjustments in wages and output that are associated with it.


      As a result, there's no good way to "adjust the value of the dollar" to make the metals more affordable. We simply must accept that money grows ever weaker as time goes on. The logical maneuver is to eliminate the penny at some point, though many countries have simply reissued new currency with a high new to old exchange rate.
    5. Re:Devalue by BytePusher · · Score: 0

      It also assumes that devaluing the American dollar is always bad thing. For Americans who have saved, it is trouble, but it increases exports at the same time providing jobs. One would imagine that eventually any particular product would essentially be the same price anywhere in the world. So essentially, all currency should come to be equal value. For the American dollar apparently it means it must be devalued a bit.

    6. Re:Devalue by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      Since the 90's the Canadian Federal (and Alberta Provincial) Governments have run balanced budgets and paid down the debt; the Alberta government ran balanced budgets when oil was below $20 per barrel and is currently "debt free" (oil royalties make up a large portion of Alberta's government income).

      Saving money is another problem though ...

    7. Re:Devalue by dpilot · · Score: 2, Informative

      That assumes that there is still something exportable still being made in America. As a nation, we've worked HARD to destroy our entire manufacturing and agricultural base.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    8. Re:Devalue by bigpat · · Score: 1

      For Americans who have saved, it is trouble, but it increases exports at the same time providing jobs.

      Americans who have saved? Luckily then devaluing the currency won't hurt too many people.

    9. Re:Devalue by Government+Drone · · Score: 1
      If there has been deficit spending for 50 years how did the US go from a deficit to a surplus during the 90s?

      The short version I heard is that in the early 90s Congress & the elder Bush hammered out a plan to try to at least keep deficits from getting larger (where he broke the "no new taxes" pledge; possibly very wise, but it hurt him later). Clinton essentially followed this plan, too (whatever ideas he had about spending/taxing more were frustrated after 1994). Then the economy grew a fraction of a percentage point more each year than originally forecast, & this meant that a lot more money than anticipated got into the US Treasurey from taxes. So, an overall policy of keeping deficits to a tolerable level ended up getting us very nice surpluses for a few years.

    10. Re:Devalue by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      If there has been deficit spending for 50 years how did the US go from a deficit to a surplus during the 90s? Note that I have ABSOLUTELY NO INTEREST in a discussion of whether it was Clinton's policies, Clinton reaping the rewards of Regan's policies or just a general uptick in the world economy, I am just curious how a half-century of adding -ve numbers together produced a +ve total in the middle. Is the US deficit/surplus total stored in a 43b signed counter or something? Ultimately, the surplus would have to be credited to the budget being well managed durring the Clinton Admisitration regardless of whether it was the policies of Regan that increased revinue/reduced spending; if Clinton wanted to he could have returned the American Government to deficit spending. I would use the same argument with the Canadian government of the time; the Conservatives in the 80's/90's enacted the policies (GST, NAFTA) which balanced the budget but the Liberals had the sense not to overspend in the 90's/00's.

    11. Re:Devalue by orangeaaron · · Score: 1

      > if it is based on the dollars value, why wouldn't you attempt to correct the problem with the dollar (by not running a 1/2 trillion dollar deficit) rather than finding cheaper materials?

      If the US is unwilling to correct its huge deficit for better reasons, the increasing price of minting pennies is unlikely to do the trick.

    12. Re:Devalue by jfengel · · Score: 2, Informative

      A devalued dollar has one particularly pernicious side effect: we're no longer _the_ money to invest in. Right now our economy is largely propped up by the fact that countries buy dollars because dollars are good, stable things to have, rather than anything they particularly want to spend dollars on.

      Should people decide that, say, the euro is a safer place for their money, the US government will have to raise the prices it pays to borrow money, and the economy overall will suffer a serious squeeze.

      But the cheaper dollars would make it easier to buy back all that old debt we'd sold. It could be the beginning of a substantial re-balancing of the US economy, albeit with a side order of massive pain along the way.

    13. Re:Devalue by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      why wouldn't you attempt to correct the problem with the dollar (by not running a 1/2 trillion dollar deficit) rather than finding cheaper materials?

      Well, I'm not an economist, but I believe the value of the dollar relative to other currencies is a LOT more complicated than the federal budget deficit. I thought it had a lot to do with the trade deficit, interest rates between countries, etc.

      The other thing is that the peny/nickel problem is really quite minor. You don't really consider changing the economic policies of an entire country because it's becoming expensive to make replacement coins. That's not to say our economic policies shouldn't be changed, just that fixing the coin problem is a pretty dumb reason to do it.

      --
      AccountKiller
    14. Re:Devalue by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Because everyone knows deficits don't matter! Right Dick Cheney?

      Well, that's what he said, but for some reason he has been protecting himself with a fund that hedges against inflation. So that means they're all scumbags and liars!!!!

    15. Re:Devalue by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      And what does any of that have to do with the coin problem? You're trying to make this into a larger issue than it is.

      --
      AccountKiller
    16. Re:Devalue by HappySqurriel · · Score: 1

      I was just answering the question ... screwed up on formating though

    17. Re:Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a number of ways to stimulate the economy that are far more healthy than running up a huge debt. Just because the result of our massive debt is not entirely bad doesn't mean that debt isn't entirely bad. If we could do away with the debt, we could still force the dollar to inflate at a relatively constant and controlled rate using interest rates and other well-understood practices for directing the economy.

      If we could do away with the debt, we could lower taxes and/or implement new social spending that would improve the lives of Americans. There are even things that the government could spend money on that would help American businesses deal with deflation (health care, lower taxes, subsidies, etc). Instead, we spend a large chunk of our tax revenue paying interest on the debt. That buys us nothing, only time.

      The US will continue our steady course towards third-world status unless the Federal Government balances the budget and starts paying down the debt. This country has a ton of wealth and natural resources, so it's going to take a long time, but it will eventually happen unless we budget better.

    18. Re:Devalue by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      During the Clinton administration. The deficit went to near zero during his term and we were well on our way to actually reducing the debt in the following presidency. Then, we got the "terrah" president in office and made a complete 180 with the fastest government spending growth in the nation's history. His presidency has increased the national debt by about as much as the TOTAL national debt at the end of Reagan's presidency. That's six years of Bush Jr. doing as much damage to our economy as the fifty years of deficit spending from 1938 to 1988, including the Vietnam/Korean Conflicts, World War II, and the entire cold war era PUT TOGETHER all in the course of six years of Junior's presidency.

      Never before in our country's history has a president allowed government spending to balloon in such an uncontrolled fashion as it has in the past six years. Even if he hadn't gotten us into Iraq, his economic policies alone would make him the worst president in our nation's history.

      Source: http://www.cedarcomm.com/~stevelm1/usdebt.htm

      ...and people wonder why our economy is in such sad shape.... Remember, kids: Democrats tax and spend. Republicans just spend.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    19. Re:Devalue by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      Shhh. The NSA might be listening. Ixnay on the eficitday.

    20. Re:Devalue by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      why wouldn't you attempt to correct the problem with the dollar
      We have to pay for the war in Iraq somehow. In case that doesn't make sense, consider the options:
      1) Raise taxes - which would probably hurt the economy and generate less revenue.
      2) Have some inflation for a while to make that debt easy to pay / less relevant.
      3) Let the dollar slide...
    21. Re:Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, i ment foreign central banks buy dollars to prop up the dollar and depress their domestic currency

    22. Re:Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are confusing the deficit/surplus for a particular budget year with the total national debt. The U.S. had a surplus for a few years in the 90s for the budgetary year; but the national debt was not eliminated, just reduced.

    23. Re:Devalue by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Oh well, hey, if Wikipedia says inflation is bad, I guess that pretty much settles it.

      *ahem*

      Alright guys, remember, when prices go down, that's BAD. The history of computers is pretty much a silent Holocaust. Remember to keep your money in an account that pays the inflation rate. I mean, you'll still have to pay taxes so ... hell, why not just spend all your money?

    24. Re:Devalue by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1
      Oh well, hey, if Wikipedia says inflation is bad, I guess that pretty much settles it.

      *cough* Wikipedia said inflation is good *cough*

      Do try and keep up?
    25. Re:Devalue by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Sorry, typo, meant "deflation". Why don't you try to keep up by reading in context so you can spot what's a typo?

      I noticed the error when it posted, and I would have corrected it, except I assumed ... well, whatever I assumed, it certainly wasn't justified in your case.

      Try again.

    26. Re:Devalue by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      countries buy dollars because dollars are good, stable things to have, rather than anything they particularly want to spend dollars on.

      Not true. OPEC oil is only sold in exchange for US dollars. Saddam was threatening to accept Euros as well as USD, and got his ass handed to him for merely making that threat. I would bet that Bush would be the highest-approved president in US history right now if he had simply told the truth about Iraq and alerted the American people to the economic threat Saddam posed. Instead, he's a warmongering, excuse-making lame duck with a low rating and a congress breathing threats of impeachment. In today's society, money is everything, and control of money is control of everything. There's a reason the US dollar retains that controlling position, and it's not necessarily "stability".

    27. Re:Devalue by Copid · · Score: 1
      Oh well, hey, if Wikipedia says [deflation] is bad, I guess that pretty much settles it.
      Well, history and general economic theory don't really have a lot of good things to say about deflation either.

      Alright guys, remember, when prices go down, that's BAD. The history of computers is pretty much a silent Holocaust. Remember to keep your money in an account that pays the inflation rate. I mean, you'll still have to pay taxes so ... hell, why not just spend all your money?
      I think you're conflating two different issues here. The history of computer prices is a good one. The buying power of the average consumer's income increased, making all of those consumers better off. Deflation is the general decrease of *all* (or nearly all) prices. That's a whole different ball of wax. Remember, your wages are a price. The amount of buying power that you get from your salary *does not* go up in that case. On top of that, simply sitting on money becomes a good "investment" which reduces the need to seek out riskier (but more productive) uses for the money.

      Thought experiment: You have a boatload of cash in an inflationary economy. What do you do? You invest it in a business that will provide better than inflation returns, even if it does so at some risk. Net result? That money goes into producing goods and services. Now, what would you do in a deflationary economy? Stuff it in your mattress. You get X% at no risk at all. Net result? That chunk of money stops working for the economy. Even worse, you exacerbate the problem by artificially reducing the money supply and increasing the value of the remaining money even more.

      Basically, if you throw an economy that was otherwise skipping along happily into deflation, you have the potential to grind it to a near halt. HTH.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    28. Re:Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't disagree with your sentiment, the US (not China) is still the world's largest exporter.

    29. Re:Devalue by Jehosephat2k · · Score: 1

      1) Go to the bank, get $1000 worth of pennies 2) Melt them down, sell them, get $1700 cash 3) Go to the bank, get $1700 worth of pennies 4) Melt them down, sell them, get $2890 cash 5) Repeat 6) ??? 7) Profit!!!

    30. Re:Devalue by LemonFire · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this law is a good idea. If we stop "losing" all these pennies just think about all the unemployed miners we're going to get. Just wait till the union figure this thing out.

      -- Can I still eat pennies? Or is that illegal too now? How about if my dog eat pennies? Will my dog go to jail?

    31. Re:Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only illegal to eat them if you poop them out for profit.

      If you're eating them because you're hungry that is not illegal.

    32. Re:Devalue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, kids: Democrats tax and spend. Republicans just spend.

      Almost correct. The GOP, who once stood for being fiscally conservative, has been co-opted by a raving douchebag who has decided that talking to false idols for leadership goals is the right idea, instead of following those in the party before him. The GOP today is not the GOP I voted for, even in 2000. If it weren't for the First Amendment not allowing a purge of these idiots from the party (preferably by fire and pitchfork), the GOP could return to the people who know what the fuck running a business (and the government) is all about.

    33. Re:Devalue by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Three words: trickle-down economics. In case you didn't notice, the GOP changed in the early 80s. While the sheer dollar figure that Junior has overspent is greater than any other president in history, the percentage of increase to the debt was greatest under the Reagan administration, I believe. That's when the GOP stopped being fiscally conservative and started buying everything on credit.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    34. Re:Devalue by k8to · · Score: 1

      While all the assertions you made are defensible (and I happen to believe they are likely, tinfoil hat or no), the statement you're responding to is absolutely true.

      Beware the false dichotomy.

      --
      -josh
  12. My question by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since they only penalty is a fine, can you pay the fine out of the money you made selling the metal from the melted down coins?

    1. Re:My question by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Handing them the actual lumps of melted metal would apparently be worth more.

    2. Re:My question by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      Since they only penalty is a fine,

      Sorry, that's wrong. It's a fine and/or 5 years.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    3. Re:My question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You would lose the money you gained from your illegal activity under forfeiture law. What you forfeit does not go to pay your fines.

  13. WTF? by 3p1ph4ny · · Score: 1

    Just another regulation. Why doesn't the government just make them worth less by changing the composition. If they can't, they should discontinue making them. I don't actually use pennies, I buy everything with a credit/debit card. That's my .73 they're wasting, and my $1,000,000 to enforce this law.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why doesn't the government just make them worth less by changing the composition."

      RTFA (at least the summary): "The expectation is that Congress will mandate new compositions for some U.S. coins in 2007". They can't change the composition of the coins that are already in circulation (unless you know a way of doing that?), they can only replace them, and that takes time. This regulation is supposed to stop people melting existing coins down before they are replaced.

    2. Re:WTF? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I don't actually use pennies, I buy everything with a credit/debit card.

      Bully for you. It's your privacy and your money. Sometimes, I prefer to be anonymous. Also, you can't buy a lot of things with credit cards. No street vendors. Many small stores and diners discourage purchases under $10 or $15 with a credit card since the fees get expensive. You don't want to use the card at bars either, since if you keep a tab on a card open, there are mooching asshats who will think that it's a good idea to drink on it.

      -b.

    3. Re:WTF? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      They're losing money on smaller denominations, sure, but the gain from large bills more than offsets it. The problem with widespread melting of coinage is that it will cause a greater need to produce the negative-profit small denominations, eventually upsetting the balance.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFSummary, it only BULK export they are banning. If people just happen to have a few coins on them or even a coin roll or 2 THEN it is illegal. Not too hard to discourage when they are looking for BULK amounts.

    5. Re:WTF? by Saikik · · Score: 1

      You forget some people still don't believe in credit/debit cards.

  14. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's also illegal to mutilate or destroy paper money. This is not much of an issue. I didn't know when slashdot became concerned over the money supply.

    1. Re:So what? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      It's also illegal to mutilate or destroy paper money.

      Incorrect in the US. It's illegal to do so with fraudulent or malicious intent. Ripping someone else's $100 bill to bits is illegal. As is ripping a bill in half in such a way so both halves look like more than 50% and trying to pass the two halves of the bill as valid currency.

      -b.

    2. Re:So what? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You are wrong and the parent post was right. Do some research before you use those bold tags.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:So what? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      You are wrong and the parent post was right. Do some research before you use those bold tags.

      Go get laid before you become such a condescending arsehole. Rudeness and condescension isn't conducive to good debate.

      -b.

    4. Re:So what? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      You are the fist one to be rude, fucktard.

      Not to mention that the GP poster would have ffound it very hard NOT to be condescending towards a dimwit like you even if he had tried to.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:So what? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      You are the fist one to be rude, fucktard.

      "Fist?" Learn to spell, boy. Or is that what you take up the butt from your master every night?

      Not to mention that the GP poster would have ffound it very hard NOT to be condescending towards a dimwit like you even if he had tried to.

      "Ffound?" Do you wet the bed as well as stutter? You're so cute when you're angry [pinches cheek]. Shoooo cuuuute.

      -b.

  15. Possibly do as other countries did... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And deprecate the coins equivalent to the penny and have the lowest monetary unit be 5 cents (it's obviously possible to make a coin for under 5 cents since a penny costs 1.75 cents to make). Also, encourage the use of $1 coins and create $2, $5 and possibly $10 coins as well (keep the $10 bills at least though). That way, it'll be easier for automated machines to give change. When I go to NJ from NYC, there's few things more annoying than the river of $1 coins that the ticket machine vomits as change when you put a $20 in to buy a $10.25 ticket!

    And for folks who'll ask, replacing cash with electronic transactions isn't the answer. I for one like the anonymity of cash and the fact that I'm carrying a physical object of known value that can handle some pretty heavy abuse before becoming worthless.

    -b.

    1. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by KiltedKnight · · Score: 1
      You don't necessarily need to eliminate the $5 bill... but you correctly state that you need a $2 coin if you eliminate the $1 note in favor of a coin. You have to have some way to keep $4 as two coins instead of four. This would also relieve a bit of your headache when buying that ticket.

      The issue with replacing the $1 bill with a $1 and $2 coin, however, has nothing to do with the feasibility or cost. It's very cost-effective to do use the $1 and $2 coins instead of the $1 bill. Rather, it has a lot more to do with people resisting the change... especially retail businesses. Think about it. They'd have to get new cash drawer trays to hold on to the coins. People manning the registers would have to learn how to make change all over again. The process would not be easy, but in the long run, the government would save a lot of money because of the durability and lifespan of a $1 coin vs the $1 bill.

      As for eliminating the penny, that's been suggested off and on for at least 10 years now. We'll see if that one goes anywhere, too.

      --
      OCO is Loco
    2. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Rather, it has a lot more to do with people resisting the change... especially retail businesses.

      If you don't actively withdraw the bills from circulation and maybe just gradually stop printing them -- say, in 2007, print 75% of 2006's volume, 2008 50%, 2009 25%, 2010 10%, 2011 0% -- then businesses will have time to adjust to the new conditions.

      -b.

    3. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by mspohr · · Score: 1

      How about... eliminate the penny and put the new dollar coins in the (now empty) penny cash drawer slot?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    4. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by east+coast · · Score: 1

      My problem with getting rid of the $1 bill... How do I pay the stripers?

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by flink · · Score: 1

      You can't stick coins in a G string... Won't some one please think of the strippers!

    6. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      My problem with getting rid of the $1 bill... How do I pay the stripers?

      Very carefully.

    7. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by myth24601 · · Score: 1

      "My problem with getting rid of the $1 bill... How do I pay the stripers?"

      Same way you pay a vending machine

      --
      No matter where you go, there you are.
    8. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Think about it. They'd have to get new cash drawer trays to hold on to the coins. People manning the registers would have to learn how to make change all over again.

      Yeah it took so long to learn in the first place...

      Most cash drawers have extra slots already. And businesses around the train stations (where machines give change in dollar coins) have no problem with it.

    9. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      A +5 insightful if I've ever seen one...

      Of course, there was this one chick at a Mexican strip joint (no pony shows, thanks) that did this interesting thing with a stack of dollar coins... she'd lower herself down, and then pick 'em up ("look ma! no hands!"), and then count 'em back to you. Saw one guy heat one up with a lighter and put it in the middle of a stack of 10... really pissed her off, got him ejected.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    10. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      Also, encourage the use of $1 coins

      Um, tried that. Twice. The Susan B. Anthony Dollar was a dismal failure (for a whole bunch of very good reasons) and Sacagawea Dollar isn't doing a whole lot better, even though they fixed most of the problems that they had with the SBA Dollar. People still prefer paper money.

    11. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by archen · · Score: 1

      I say that every time I go to Canada. I often make jokes about strippers and coin slots, but they just don't seem to find the humor in that.

    12. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by drew · · Score: 1

      I'm all for getting rid of pennies, but good God please, don't replace them with more coins. Coins are awful to carry around. I already pretty much ignore any coin smaller than a quarter, and I mostly only keep those so that I have a few around to feed parking meters on the rare occasion that I have a need to. It would be irritating as hell to have to walk around with a pocket full of coins that are actually worth something. If you're annoyed at machines that spit out a dozen coins in change, it seems that a far simpler fix would be to switch to a machine that gives you bills for change.

      That was something that I never quite got used to the last time I was in Europe- the sheer number of coins I ended up carry around. And I couldn't ever get rid of them, either. If I tried to give somebody in a store 10.32 for a 5.32 charge, they would stare blankly back at me for a second, hand me back the .32, as well as another 4.68 in coins, and I'd have three times the number of coins I started with. By the time I left, I had accumulated about 15 Euros in coins.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    13. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by shayne321 · · Score: 1

      My problem with getting rid of the $1 bill... How do I pay the stripers?

      I assume you were going for "funny" here, but just in case someone wants a real answer...

      Some strip clubs already use their own currency inside of the club.. You ask your waitress for $20 in "Naughty Bux" or whatever, and use that for tipping. The idea is the same as getting chips in a casino, or "disney dollars" in disneyworld - you don't think of it as your money, so you spend it more freely.

      --
      Today I didn't even have to use my AK; I got to say it was a good day -- Icecube
    14. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by CokeBear · · Score: 1

      Also, encourage the use of $1 coins

      Um, tried that. Twice. The Susan B. Anthony Dollar was a dismal failure (for a whole bunch of very good reasons) and Sacagawea Dollar isn't doing a whole lot better, even though they fixed most of the problems that they had with the SBA Dollar. People still prefer paper money.



      No, people prefer what they are used to when they have a choice. Canada made an effortless switch to a dollar coin (and later a $2 coin) simply by removing the one and two dollar bills from circulation. Its as easy as just stop printing them! Presto! 6 months later, no more dollar bills!

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    15. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      Why make the lowest monetary unit as 5 cents?

      I'd prefer to get rid of 'cents' altogether, and replace it with tenths of dollars.
      So you get rid of coins of value .01/.05/.25, and you're left with coins of value .1/.5/1
      Since $1 coins are now approximately the size of quarters, I'd also resize the 50c piece to approximately match the current size of a nickel, so that the coin sizes are such that .1<.5<1.

    16. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one like the anonymity of cash and the fact that I'm carrying a physical object of known value that can handle some pretty heavy abuse before becoming worthless

      Actually, since the US went off the gold standard the US $ has no "known value". The value of the currenct is arbitrarly set on the open currency markets.
      At that, the physical money doesn't actually represent any "value" at all, it's really just a share of the debt of the government. The phyiscal money is borrowed from the federal reserve banks who are not part of the government.

    17. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. So true. I remember the first time I took the PATH and threw a $20 bill into the ticket machine. I thought I had hit the jackpot. Then I realized I would have to walk around with 17 $1 coins in my pocket and have the equivalent of a cowbell in my pocket.

    18. Re:Possibly do as other countries did... by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      When I go to NJ from NYC, there's few things more annoying than the river of $1 coins that the ticket machine vomits as change when you put a $20 in to buy a $10.25 ticket!

      Serves you right for going to Jersey!

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
  16. How can they do this? by stry_cat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can the US Mint make something illegal, only Congress has the power to pass laws. Someone please explain.

    1. Re:How can they do this? by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1
      only Congress has the power to pass laws.

      Tell that to the FAA.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    2. Re:How can they do this? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      How can the US Mint make something illegal

      I don't believe that they can, except in their own minds. I don't remember voting for my mintmessperson last November.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:How can they do this? by jasmak · · Score: 1

      Apparently they have a set of "rules" that have to do with money that they can alter as they see fit and have real world penalties

      --
      It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
    4. Re:How can they do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Congress defers some authority to agencies such as the FCC or Mint do administer their areas of regulation.

    5. Re:How can they do this? by JJJJust · · Score: 1

      The way I suspect is that it's their coinage. They say what you can and cannot do with their coins. In essence, we are just using/borrowing them. Such in the way that paper money is known as a "Federal Reserve Note", they still own the note and it's still theirs to control and dictate what you can do with it. Perhaps this is why the use and exchange of money is called "circulation", we are just passing what they own around until they get it back. But, that's just my personal theory. -- And no, Congress is not the only body that can make something illegal. Congress is the only body that can pass Acts of Congress which later turn into public and private laws, but other government organizations can pass regulations and other things that, well... regulate.

    6. Re:How can they do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an executive agency, they have administrative powers of "rulemaking".

    7. Re:How can they do this? by psaindon · · Score: 1

      Usually how this works is Congress passes an incredibly vague law, like a law saying that the US Mint has the power to protect the value of our money, and then Congress adds that they leave it up to the administrative agency (the mint) to fill in the "details" of the law such as what protecting money means. The administrative agency then tells the world what this impossibly vague law really means, which has the practical effect of passing a new law.

    8. Re:How can they do this? by chaidawg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read up on administrative law. Administrations created by congress (FAA, FCC, SEC, Mint, etc) can pass rules that are binding as federal law. It is part of their charter as federal administrative bodies.

    9. Re:How can they do this? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      Read up on administrative law. Administrations created by congress (FAA, FCC, SEC, Mint, etc) can pass rules that are binding as federal law. It is part of their charter as federal administrative bodies.

      Umm, ya, I think I'll take a pass on that and go with my original assumption that they pulled it directly out of their asses. In the meanwhile, I melted a 1975 and 1995 penny for comparison. The '75 globbed up into a nice copper bead with just a little scale on the surface that was etched away quickly with acid. The 1995, with its mostly zinc composition, melted into a nasty pile of slag.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    10. Re:How can they do this? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Congress also has the power to delegate their authority in many cases.

    11. Re:How can they do this? by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      The FAA has the power to regulate, which is different from passing laws. They can not put you in jail, but they can take away a company's license to run a commercial air service.

    12. Re:How can they do this? by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      The FAA also has the power to levy fines which is what the treasury is doing for melting down coins./p?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    13. Re:How can they do this? by Pakup · · Score: 1

      The Mint's restrictions on melting, which are formally promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury, are of course specifically authorized by law.

      See 31 USC 5111(d), under which the Secretary of the Treasury "may prohibit or limit the exportation, melting, or treatment of United States coins when the Secretary decides the prohibition or limitation is necessary to protect the coinage of the United States."

    14. Re:How can they do this? by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      Congress gives away its power to regulatory agencies and departments. Thus the EPA can pass regulations making certain things legal or illegal without Congress having to get involved. Ditto for other agencies. Congress has been giving away its powers for a long time.

  17. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    The expectation is that Congress will mandate new compositions for some U.S. coins in 2007.

    IOW, the coinery composed a forbiddance against decomposing, but the newly composed representatives forbodes a coining of a new composition.

  18. Bah, I'm too busy anyways by TheWoozle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm too busy straining the gold out of seawater and reclaiming the platinum out of old catalytic converters to mess with melting down pennies and nickels...

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
    1. Re:Bah, I'm too busy anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or Polonium out of smoke detectors.

    2. Re:Bah, I'm too busy anyways by slowbad · · Score: 1
      straining the gold out of seawater and reclaiming the platinum out of old catalytic converters

      You probably smelt bad.

      Ebay has a guy who regularly starts no-reserve auctions at $99,999.99 for a hundred thousand catalytic converters that he has already stripped. I don't remember about shipping charges.

    3. Re:Bah, I'm too busy anyways by JonathanR · · Score: 1

      You'll get more out of dead Russians.

  19. Coming soon from the US mint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wiping your ass with worthless US currency now illegal.

    Keep those presses rolling, boys!

    1. Re:Coming soon from the US mint by rudeboy1 · · Score: 1

      What about Ass Pennies then?!?

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
  20. Pennies by Kelson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps it's time to start seriously thinking about withdrawing the penny from circulation. You can't buy anything with a penny anymore. You only really use them for two reasons:

    1. Stores like the $X.99 price point, because it subtly makes people think they're paying $X rather than $X+1. $X.95 is also popular, and could work with only nickels.
    2. Sales tax is based on percentage, so even if you have a round price like $1.00, you may end up with something like $1.07.

    OK, 3 reasons if you're paying for gas with cash. But note that gas stations already advertise prices to the thousandth of a dollar -- as far as I know, the US has never actually minted a mil -- and they already get rounded up to the nearest penny. I'm sure gas stations would be quite happy to round to the nearest nickel instead.

    Of course, given how many transactions are electronic these days, withdrawing the penny wouldn't necessarily alter credit or debit transactions.

    1. Re:Pennies by ubergenius · · Score: 1

      While I posted above that we won't get rid of coins because coins and cash are much too useful, I do agree that the penny should go away.

      --
      Student Manager - Take control of your education!
    2. Re:Pennies by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Informative
      Not entirely true - there WERE mills:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mill_(currency)

    3. Re:Pennies by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

      The Mil Token pictured is paper (cardbord). My Dad told me you could buy them by the sheet at the store register.

      I once dug a mil token up in the back yard when I was a kid in the 1970s (when they were already long obsolete), it was made of aluminum or some other really light metal. I didn't know what it was until my parents told me it was a "tax mil".

    4. Re:Pennies by demongp · · Score: 1

      We had the exact same thing happen in South Africa. I cant remember the details, but about 3 or 4 years it came out that our 1 cent and 2 cent coins were too expensive too manufucture. The government then simply phased out these coins, and we have now been going without that for quite a while with no problems.

      Seems like a really good, simple suggestion.

      In fact, there is a piece about this on wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_rand.

      (seems like you can find something about everything on wikipedia these days... :) )

    5. Re:Pennies by njen · · Score: 1

      In Australia we got rid of 1 cent and 2 cent coins years ago, and I tell you it was one of the best things ever decided on from a monetary point of view. There was all this opposition just before it happened, then afterwards, everyone was happy. anything that was $x.x1, $x.x2, $x.x6 and $x.x7 were rounded down automatically while $x.x3, $x.x4, $x.x8 and $x.x9 wre rounded up to the nearest 5c.

      The other thing Austalia got right as far as money was concerned was that we changed our bills to plastic. Now you can accidentally leave one in your pocket in the wash, and it's completely ok. Not to mention they last a lot longer, harder to rip and damage, and are much harder to counterfeit.

    6. Re:Pennies by Politburo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Because US money isn't made of paper (it's more like linen), it also survives the wash. But the other downsides (wear and tear) remain.

    7. Re:Pennies by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      Actually, in Holland we haven't had actual cents for decades now. Switching to the Euro gave us back cents, and that was horrible.

      Now we've removed cents and 2-cents again, and went back to a 5-cent unit. Prices are still advertised as X.99, and only totals are rounded off. It's a much better system.

    8. Re:Pennies by NereusRen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      OK, 3 reasons if you're paying for gas with cash. But note that gas stations already advertise prices to the thousandth of a dollar -- as far as I know, the US has never actually minted a mil -- and they already get rounded up to the nearest penny. I'm sure gas stations would be quite happy to round to the nearest nickel instead.
      Since I got a Prius, I have been keeping a record of my gas purchases. It turns out the two gas stations I go to often (a Holiday and a BP) compute the total price based on their thousandths figure, and then round the total to the nearest penny whether up or down. I was also surprised to see myself getting a fractional penny credit half the time, but empirical evidence beats preconceived notions (yes, even on Slashdot). Thus, gas stations would be indifferent to the change.

      Your actual points about using a nickel as the smallest physical piece of currency are all valid, and I would applaud such a move. I routinely throw pennies away (or in tip jars) rather than carry them home to my change jar, because it isn't even worth my time to do that. I would rather that stores simply not give them to me in change, so I don't have to deal with them. A few times at a local Chipotle they have given me a nickel instead of four pennies in change, which was a nice touch.
    9. Re:Pennies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct it is made from a cotton type of paper.

    10. Re:Pennies by whoisjoe · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are four--you forgot slugging people with a sack of pennies.

    11. Re:Pennies by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The zinc lobby (really) is opposed to the elimination of the penny. It's one of the major consumers of zinc.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  21. Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by gelfling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take them out of circulation, and then the Mint can do whatever they like with the alloys. Or if they're smart, they'll use alloys for a $1 coin and stop making the $1 bill.

    1. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by petabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the Mint doesn't do anything with $1 bill or any bill for that matter. That would be the Bureau of Engraving and Printing. The Mint does the coins and Bureau of Engraving and Printing does the paper.

      That said, I'm pretty much supportive of nuking the penny, making $1 a coin, and creating a $5 coin (but keeping the bill). But thats just my $2.

    2. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what will the strippers do? Think of the strippers!

    3. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by nine-times · · Score: 1

      They've tried to introduce $1 coins a couple times, but people don't seem to like them.

    4. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by Ranger · · Score: 1

      But what will the strippers do? Think of the strippers!

      Umm, put a coin in the slot?

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    5. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Removing the penny would seriously hurt the value of the dollar globally.

      Yes, that would all be do to an incorrect perception, but it would still hurt the dollar.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by bigpat · · Score: 1

      They've tried to introduce $1 coins a couple times, but people don't seem to like them.

      I think that is an incorrect characterization. It would be more accurate to say that people saw no reason to stop using dollar bills in favor of coins. I think if you introduced a 0.25 paper bill, then you would see a similar lack of acceptance which has little to do with the relative merits of coins versus paper money.

    7. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly am I supposed to stuff a $1 coin into a g-string?

    8. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should stay away from one dollar strippers. Just in case you might catch something.

    9. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Don't be a cheapskate, stuff a $5. :)

    10. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Again, why the fuck would I want to carry around a pocket full of dollar coins? It's not because the dollar bill is worthless, it's because carrying around 15 bucks in coins is a pain in the ass compared to 15 bucks in dollar bills.

    11. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by Inda · · Score: 1

      Why do Americans want to hang onto their paper $1 notes so much? I cannot imagine carrying around £0.50 in paper in my wallet.

      We've had £1 coins for, if I had to guess, 20 years. £2 coins for 5 years. Even our £5 notes seem worthless at times. You could even do without your $5 notes.

      No one tell me that it's because 'they rub holes in your pockets'. All the other small change builds up quicker.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    12. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by Mr.123 · · Score: 1

      Are you nuts? Do you know how angry the strippers get when you start throwing $1 coins at them? Have you ever gone to a strip club in Canada and have to deal with looney coins?

    13. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      You just have to go a bit deeper to find a place to deposit the coin...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    14. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Why would I want to carry around $15 in one-dollar bills? It's a pain in the ass compared to $15 in five dollar bills. Your argument is silly because switching dollar bills for dollar coins would not create a need for carrying more than four of 'em around at any time.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    15. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by FallLine · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Removing the penny would seriously hurt the value of the dollar globally.

      Yes, that would all be do to an incorrect perception, but it would still hurt the dollar.
      Says who? There is no good economic rationale for keeping it.

      1) Other countries have made similar moves without any significant pains (e.g., Australia).

      2) The vast majority of transactions are non-cash transactions these days and they can still be computed in cents (or, for that matter, even fractions of a cent).

      3) Even amongst cash transactions, the penny is of little use (virtually all vending machines, most customers get rid of them, etc)

      4) The nickel is worth about as much today as the penny was in 1970 after inflation is taken into account. If the lack of any currency with a real value of less than 5 cents in 2006 dollars didn't cause huge problems before 1970, why should any sane person believe it will now?
    16. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm, four paper bills or four coins jangling around in my pocket? Which would I prefer? Any change from anything immediately gets dumped into my car for use in vending machines or toll roads because I hate carrying change in my pockets. I'd sure love to be dropping dollars and higher into that box rather than pennies and nickels. Maybe it works for you and your purse, but thanks, I'll pass.

    17. Re:Do AWAY with pennies and nickles by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Seeing as most of the tolls I've been through recently have been of the order of dollars, I fail to see how a dollar coin is less convenient to that purpose. Two coins are a lot easier to find & toss than eight quarters or twenty dimes.

      Why not have paper quarters, dimes, pennies too?

      Fact is, coinage lasts a lot longer than paper money, so over its lifetime, a dollar coin is a lot cheaper to produce than the dollar bills necessary. Since the low denominations get traded a lot, they get worn out quicker, which is why coins are coins to begin with. Frankly, I'm willing to put up with the inconvenience of a dollar coin if it means I will have to send fewer actual dollars to washington for the purpose of replacing damaged currency.

      But I don't see it as entirely inconvenience either. Dollar coins are great for tipping street performers for instance. No worry about the money blowing away in a puff of wind. Or for use in vending machines where prices are regularly in the 1-2 dollar range.

      I hate carrying change in my pockets as well. So I think we should get rid of the worst offenders: everything smaller than quarters is no longer useful and should therefore be eliminated.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  22. Dada21 by srussia · · Score: 1

    Haven't seen Dada21 recently on /., but I'd like to take issue with the summary, where it says "because the value of the precious metals contained in coins now exceeds their face value." Pennies and nickels DO NOT contain "precious metals". We're talking about zinc and nickel, usually classified as "base metals"

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:Dada21 by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Dada21 was in rare form a couple days ago on a thread whose topic I currently forget. In the last several months, he's taken a slide into crazyland with his political and philosophical rants.

    2. Re:Dada21 by sjaskow · · Score: 1

      I stopped reading his drivel when he suggested that computer programmers be paid no more than minimum wage because of the decline in quality workers.

    3. Re:Dada21 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped reading his drivel the moment I read the same thing in several of his posts.

    4. Re:Dada21 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about zinc and nickel, usually classified as "base metals"

      Up until they became scarce enough to be considered precious.

  23. £1/£2? by caluml · · Score: 1

    How much is the gold in a one pound, or two pound coin worth? Enough to make it worthwhile?

    1. Re:£1/£2? by Hitman_Frost · · Score: 1

      Who says there's any gold in it?

      Content - 70% Copper, 24.5% Zinc, and 5.5% Nickel according to Wikipedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_One_Pound_coi n

    2. Re:£1/£2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no gold in the pound coins. They're about 95% copper and nickel.

    3. Re:£1/£2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when coins (sovereigns) were made out of gold, people got into the habit of shaving off a little gold and then spending the coin. After a little while, they had enough gold dust to make a profit and the Royal Mint had to withdraw the coin from circulation. Hence it was made illegal to deface the currency.

      Gold sovereigns still exist, but their value today is tied directly to the price of gold.

    4. Re:£1/£2? by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      Assuming it's made of pure gold, a one pound gold coin would be worth about $9,119.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
  24. Two problems by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem is that these metals are becoming more valuable, but the other half of the problem is that our money is now worth less than the metal it is printed on! Maybe if the borrow and spend president we have now would stop spending like a drunken sailor -- and stop borrowing billions of dollars from China and other fun governments, our money would not devalue quite as fast. Part of the reason why oil is so expensive is because you are buying it with US dollars that aren't worth as much as they used to be. When the Euro was introduced it was set to be equal to 1 US dollar -- look at the price now! If we don't get this debt in hand things are going to get a lot worse! And don't think you are going to get off easy just because you aren't an American the economies of the world are more closely tied than ever. Besides there is a chance that your market could get flooded with cheap American exports (at least we can hope that will happen.)

    1. Re:Two problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me get this straight... the dollar is weak compared to the euro. you call gas expensive because you're buying it with a weak dollar...

      WHY THE FUCK IS GAS SO COSTLY IN EUROPE?

      you make no sense.

    2. Re:Two problems by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

      Why is Gas so expensive in Europe?

      Taxes!

      And I think the US should tax gas as much (but see how much political capitol that would take!)

    3. Re:Two problems by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      It's not just taxes, it's also distribution and probably some collusion as well. Ever tried to get gas on a winding road on the côte d'azure? I'm amazed the gasoline can even be delivered to some of the stations I've filled up at.

  25. Pennies on a Railroad Track, Anyone? by Ranger · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'll bet there's nothing keeping you from placing all those pennies on railroad tracks and having a train stomp those suckers flat.

    And stop linking New York Times, you [expletive deleted]s. I don't want to fucking register nor do I want to have to take the goddamn time to go to bugmenot.com to get a NY Times uid & pwd. Here's some links that don't require registration to read: here , here , here , and here . Anyway, now that they said don't melt those coins, guess what they are going to do? Melt those coins.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Pennies on a Railroad Track, Anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really that difficult to register with a throwaway email account? Writing that post complaining about NYT registration and looking up a news article on alternate news sites took more time than registering would have. I registered years ago and I can't recall the last time they sent an email.

    2. Re:Pennies on a Railroad Track, Anyone? by Ranger · · Score: 1

      Is it really that difficult to register with a throwaway email account?

      I don't want to register. When there are dozens of other news sites that don't require registration that post the same story why make us go through unecessary extra steps? If NYTimes has an exclusive and I really want to read it, I'll use bugmenot.com. Oh and it works great for Youtube.com as well.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    3. Re:Pennies on a Railroad Track, Anyone? by Rufus211 · · Score: 1
      nor do I want to have to take the goddamn time to go to bugmenot.com to get a NY Times uid & pwd

      Ok, then go get the Firefox Extension that does it for you.
    4. Re:Pennies on a Railroad Track, Anyone? by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      That's why you get a bugmenot plugin for firefox. Whenever you see a login box that bothers you, you right click and pick "login with bugmenot". It does all the work of looking up a name+password for you.

  26. I know they aren't made of copper, but by aLii_h · · Score: 1

    anyone read this the other day?
    "Charles Bull recently woke to the overwhelming smell of gas in his house. It was a neighbour who noticed that the copper pipes that supplied the house with gas had been removed." http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6207410.stm

    i think the moral is "don't use copper if you can help it"

    1. Re:I know they aren't made of copper, but by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Heh. This one is even funnier.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  27. under what authority? by Speare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Under what authority can the US Mint create new law? The US Mint, the Secret Service and the Treasury are all in the enforcement, not the legislative branch.

    Some AC said it was illegal to mutilate or deface paper money. Uh, no, it's not. It's also not illegal to cut up a US coin in some artistic fashion and sell it for a higher amount; this is done all the time. In terms of defacement, you can't stick a picture of Kennedy on a quarter and try to redeem it as a half-dollar, and the same goes for gluing a "20" on the corner of a one-dollar bill. That's simple fraud, in this case called counterfeiting.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:under what authority? by qweqazfoo · · Score: 5, Informative
      Ever heard of Administrative Law? Most of the laws in this country are made by federal and state executive agencies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Administrative_Law

      And to blow your mind even further, the judicial branch makes law too! It's called common law. The federal judiciary and 49 of the 50 states operate under common law. If you don't like it, you have to move to Louisiana or France.

    2. Re:under what authority? by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2, Informative
      http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=42 6715

      These folks sure act like it's been illegal for a while now. In terms of cutting up a US coin and sell it for more, it's illegal, but not often enforced. Just like Speed Limit laws where it's illegal to drive faster then a particular speed, but is flaunted regularly.

      Kirby

    3. Re:under what authority? by im_mac · · Score: 1
      Actually it is illegal to mutilate or deface paper money, so long as it's "with intent to render such item(s) unfit to be reissued"(BEP). Cutting up bills to make fancy artistic crap would fall under that definition. The Bureau of Printing and Engraving frowns upon putting celebrity portraits over the actual portraits, though it does mention that "a determination of the legality of any particular celebrity note is a matter within the authority of the Department of Justice." BEP again


      Stuff like this happens since the punishment is "not more than $100 or imprisoned not more than six months, or both". Hardly worthwhile prosectuting people when people are out there printing stacks of $100s.

    4. Re:under what authority? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to destroy or render unusable any paper money.

      Coinage was under a different regulation that didn't forbid such things, it only forbade mutilation with intent to defraud.

      You are right though, without a legislative mandate for this new regulation, the mint is on shaky ground.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    5. Re:under what authority? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That guy was wrong about coins.

      It was legal to melt, deface, cut up, destroy or do whatever to coins you wanted (except try to defraud someone). That's why this regulation is news, because it was legal for coins.

      Paper money, it's always been illegal to deface that in a way that makes it unusable, it was under a different law.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:under what authority? by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      In terms of cutting up a US coin and sell it for more, it's illegal

      Then I break this law all the time. Just the other day I was at the aquarium and I put a penny and 2 quarters into a machine and it flattened my penny into a little plaque with a squid engraving.

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    7. Re:under what authority? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quebec also follows a form of civil law.

    8. Re:under what authority? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      It's also not illegal to cut up a US coin in some artistic fashion and sell it for a higher amount; this is done all the time. In terms of defacement, you can't stick a picture of Kennedy on a quarter and try to redeem it as a half-dollar

      What if you sell it to someone as "art" for fifty cents?

    9. Re:under what authority? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most of the laws in this country are made by federal and state executive agencies.

      Okay, but federal executive agencies can only make laws pertaining to those areas in which the legislative branch has delegated to them the authority to make laws.

      The Federal Communications Commission, for example, could not establish a law increasing the penalty for possession of marijuana -- it is not in their jurisdiction.

      The question, then, is whether the Department of the Treasury is authorized by Congress to prevent citizens from removing currency from the market by destroying or exporting it. The answer, as far as I can tell, is Yes.

    10. Re:under what authority? by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      How can they legally stop you from sending a ton of pennies to china if someone there is willing to pay for them?

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    11. Re:under what authority? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      No they can't. They can pass regulations and Congress can pass laws making it illegal to violate the regulations.

      Violations of regulations do not automatically make you liable to be fined, jailed or otherwise punished. It is the violation of the accompanying law that gets you. Every enforceable regulation has an enabling law. If the law is repealed or found unconstitutional or otherwise taken out of action the regulation loses its power. Courts can use regulations and decisions of an administrative agency to interpret a law, but the law still must exist and be enforceable (and actually enforced) for them to have any impact.

      Under what LAW did the Mint issue its regulation? If we know then we can find out if the law exists, is enforceable, allows such a regulation and what the penalties are.

      E.g. In Nevada there a regulations (NAC) and laws (NRS). Violations of the former are made unlawful by terms of the latter. So one can always look at the laws first and know what is illegal, since the only regulations one needs to be concerned about are refeered to by the laws.

      "Orphan" regulations without a law backing them are empty.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    12. Re:under what authority? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      I made another post arguing as such (regulations need laws behind them).

      They could try to reinterpret 18 USC 331 so that melting coins and selling the metal is considered fraudulent and hope they can get a court to swallow that very strained interpretation (courts can use administrative regulations and interpretations to interpret law, but it still must a correct interpretation - they can use it to resolve ambiguity, but not use something the contradicts the text of the law).

      Since the articles say a 5 years in prison penalty, that is consistent with 18 USC 331 (coins) and not the defacing paper money one (which might also apply since it says "other evidence of debt" which is a catchall) which says 6 months.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    13. Re:under what authority? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      How can they legally stop you from sending a ton of pennies to china if someone there is willing to pay for them?

      Heard of tariffs? Embargoes?

      It's been well established that the federal government can assert control over what is shipped in and out of the country.

    14. Re:under what authority? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Funny you should ask. The same "law" that bans melting pennies bans exporting pennies for any use but currency. In other words, no shipping pennies for more than one cent a US penny.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    15. Re:under what authority? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Maybe they just hope no one with bother to appeal it until they can get the statutory law changed in 2007.

      I don't know what's with these administrative agencies lately. Did you hear the CPSC is now claiming authority over all sales of everything? They are trying to ban sales of raw chemicals to individuals because they are a "dangerous retail product".

      Their supposed goal is to stop people from being able to get high grade aluminum powder and potassium perchlorate so that people can't make flash powder, but they are attempting to restrict the sale of a lot more than just those two things. In any case, the ATF has sole authority over the manufacture of explosives, legal or illegal.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    16. Re:under what authority? by jesboat · · Score: 1
      As an earlier poster in a different thread pointed out, under 31 USC 5111(d)(1),
      "The Secretary may prohibit or limit the exportation, melting, or treatment of United States coins when the Secretary decides the prohibition or limitation is necessary to protect the coinage of the United States."


      Share and enjoy.
  28. ripping other peoples money by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    seems like it MUST be malicious....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  29. Reverse split... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    They could always do a reverse split on the dollar 1:10... Then everybody would convert their existing dollars for New Dimes, and pennies would more.

    Other than being completely impractical, it's the perfect plan!

  30. Or the fed can contract the money supply... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    Thereby triggering deflation. While it's generally not good for the economy, it would solve the problem right? They could also consider alternative materials to metal.. a specifically engineered glass impregnated with various polymers to increase it's give and prevent shattering perhaps?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Thereby triggering deflation. While it's generally not good for the economy, it would solve the problem right?

      I'm not sure that eliminating the penny would trigger deflation. We're not playing with the *total* amount of currency in circulation. If anything, having the 5c coin as the minimum unit in circulation would ultimately serve to *decrease* its value. If anything like this is done, BTW, it would have to be over a number of years. Don't actively withdraw the pennies from circulation, just reduce the number of new pennies minted to zero over a number of years.

      a specifically engineered glass impregnated with various polymers to increase it's give and prevent shattering perhaps?

      That's actually a cool idea. You could make some really interesting looking coins that way. Maybe even make it a composite with dark fibers embedded so you could see a distinctive pattern while looking through a coin.

      -b.

    2. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      uuh.. i said contract the money supply.. not get rid of the penny..

      one involves selling a bunch of t-bonds to remove cash from the economy.. and possibly increasing the interest rate to decrease the money multiplier.

      less dollars means 2 things.. in all likelihood one after the other..
      first.. people get poorer.. because they have less money while prices are high.. but eventually we get to the
      second phase.. in which businesses realize they cant sell at those prices and are forced to lower them.

      it's that lag time between the two phases that really hurts though..

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure that eliminating the penny would trigger deflation.

      Nevermind, I thought you were discussing removing the penny, not contracting the money supply.

      Cheers,
      -b.

    4. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by bigpat · · Score: 1

      a specifically engineered glass impregnated with various polymers to increase it's give and prevent shattering perhaps?

      I'm not sure that sounds cheaper than zinc, but yes they can probably just start making it out of some other materials that cost less than a penny per penny.

      So what are the real options based on average price of materials over the past year or so?

    5. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by yoghurt · · Score: 1

      No, by all means just drop the pennies in one go. Eliminate penny for transactions, make banks accept them for a month or so. No one wants them now. They have been phasing out for 20 years already. It's time to say good riddance to bad rubbish - I have literally thrown them into a trashcan on more than one occasion.

      And then you can introduce a dollar coin. They keep trying to make one, but they keep failing to get it used. The biggest problem, imho, for the dollar coin is that cash registers now allot 4 buckets for coins. Get rid of the penny, you can have a dollar coin.

      --
      Yoghurt
    6. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Greetings, friends. Do you wish to get rid of your pennies? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So use it and send all your pennies to Penny Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay. Eternal happiness is just a few pennies away.

    7. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 1
      So what are the real options based on average price of materials over the past year or so?

      You could make them out of CS degrees.

      --
      Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    8. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could make them out of CS degrees.

      If someone is having trouble making a pretty penny with a CS degree, then it is a problem with the person and not the degree.

    9. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Contracting out the creation of money might make it cheaper, but do you really want private companies creating the country's currency? Although governments are often less efficient than private industries, at least they have the virtue of allowing far more oversight.

      Really -- just imagine if the company that gets the minting contract is another Diebold, Enron or Halliburton...

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    10. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by tsotha · · Score: 1

      I suppose, if by "generally not good for the economy" you mean "a huge effing disaster". Deflation is an economy-killer.

    11. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by kimvette · · Score: 1
      Or the fed can contract the money supply..


      They already do this: it's contracted to a privately-held company called The Federal Reserve. By having the word "Federal" in the name you'd think it's a government agency owned by the people, wouldn't you. . .
      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by domc · · Score: 1

      Well, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation, so I doubt that the manufacturing of currency by private corporations would make the situation any worse.

    13. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Well, the Federal Reserve is a private corporation,

      Not really. The Federal Reserve system includes some private banks that hold stock in the various Federal Reserve banks, but the upper levels are all run by government appointees.

      Anyway, this is beside the point. The Federal Reserve doesn't print or mint money. It manages the money supply, in part by controlling interest rates. The actual physical jobs of printing and minting money are given to the Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the US Mint, respectively.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    14. Re:Or the fed can contract the money supply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stupidity surrounding the dollar coin is as thick as a subamrine hull.

      The last two attempts at a dollar coin have featured an Indian and a feminist, in some backhanded attempt to make America
      more PC by apologizing for imagininary "issues" and soundbytes. Don't put the bald eagle, or the Liberty Bell, commemoration of the moon landing, or any of the founding fathers on it - that would make American proud of their rich heritage! No, we need to keep shoving these self-hating messages on the public (to protect them for teh evil LOL!1111) as to prop up the baseless self-esteem of these sycophants.

      If a $1 coin were minted with, say, George Washington on it, it might actually fly with the general public. But you have to wonder, how stupid or insane is the leadership at the US Mint to keep trying and failing at the same stunt over and over and over?

  31. Best solution by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

    I know it would be incredibly difficult to do in these modern days, but I'd love to see dollars revalued as 10 "new dollars" (or even more... 50/1, 100/1?). Inflation has devalued money so that anything under a dollar has so little value. The original dollar back in 1790 was a pretty good chunk of change. Even back in the early 20th century, a dollar was worth 10 or 20 dollars today. What's it even mean to be a millionaire these days? It's not a trivial amount of money, but you could barely live off it.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Best solution by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      If you make every dollar into 10 "new dollars", it would make the new dollar worth 10 times less.

      I guess you meant the other way around.

      In any case, why? There's no point in playing games with the currency like that.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Best solution by revlayle · · Score: 1

      invest that million wisely and it is equivalent of decent years salary. buy a treasury bill at about 4.25-4.5 percent rate, (not a lot, but a *fixed* rate at least) and get about 40-45K a year *tax free* (IIRC, dividends from treasury bills are non-taxable).

    3. Re:Best solution by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Nice try. You'll only really get $12-$18 a year if you intend to keep up with inflation. Since inflation is running 2.5-3%, you'd need 1.03M invested the next year to get a 3% cost of living raise, so you have to reinvest most of your "earnings" just to break even the next year.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:Best solution by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that'd fix the problem.

      Wait, what was the problem again?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Best solution by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Wait, what was the problem again?

      The problem is that our lowest currencies are so valueless that 1) they're worth less than the metal they're made out of, and 2) they're not all that useful as currency. Revaluing the currency is just another way of dropping pennies and nickels and whatever, except that we keep the same useful monetary scale of dollars and cents.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    6. Re:Best solution by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Gosh, I wonder if there might be some unintended (and disastrous) consequences?

      Please tell me that you understand that the penny can represent more than one cent of value, right? It gets used more than once.

      Maybe I should try to come up with some sort of visual aid.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Best solution by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Gosh, I wonder if there might be some unintended (and disastrous) consequences?

      Sheesh, you do realize that monetary revaluation has been done before in other countries, right? Mexico, as one example, revalued their currency in 1993 so that 1 "Nuevo" Peso was worth 1,000 old Pesos.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    8. Re:Best solution by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Oh, wow, that's genius. Let's make our economy more like Mexico's.

      Thanks, Reality Master! I don't know what we'd do without you!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Best solution by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Oh, wow, that's genius. Let's make our economy more like Mexico's.

      Yeah, because anything those "fereners" do has to automatically lead to ruin! U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    10. Re:Best solution by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the completely unwarranted conclusion you wish to jump to, you're more than welcome to it.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Best solution by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the completely unwarranted conclusion you wish to jump to, you're more than welcome to it.

      Considering that: 1) the whole idea of currency revaluation was completely unknown to you, 2) yet, you felt compelled to apparently conclude it was impossible, and 3) then you apparently assume that doing it would turn the US economy into Mexico's economy...

      That conclusion may or may not be unwarranted, but I think we can safely conclude that you could use a few more economics classes.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    12. Re:Best solution by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Do you apply this sort of brilliant insight to all facets of your life?

      "1) the whole idea of currency revaluation was completely unknown to you"

      Not sure what led you to this conclusion. It can be done. What makes you think it should be done? Whatever it is that makes you think that, you're probably wrong.

      "2) yet, you felt compelled to apparently conclude it was impossible,"

      Nothing's impossible. There are a large number of things that are bad ideas. This is one of them.

      "3) then you apparently assume that doing it would turn the US economy into Mexico's economy"

      No, I simply think that holding up Mexico as a paragon of economic good ideas is, well, silly. Not because they're not America, but because their economy is a shambles.

      "but I think we can safely conclude that you could use a few more economics classes."

      Um, if I was going to be responsible for deciding whether or not to re-value the American currency, yes. I would need a few more economics classes. Poking holes in your ridiculous assertions, though, I'm well prepared to do on my own, thank you.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:Best solution by MCZapf · · Score: 1

      Interest from U.S. Treasury Bills/Notes/Bonds are only non-taxable at the state and local level. You'll still pay federal income tax. Municipal bonds, however, are tax free at the Federal level.

    14. Re:Best solution by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      That's already happening.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    15. Re:Best solution by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      A yen is worth about a US cent, and the Japanese economy does pretty well. It makes things a little simpler not to subdivide the unit. Well, marginally. Hardly worth caring about. It would have helped that guy who had the argument with Verizon about 0.002 cents being $0.002.

  32. Follow Japan's lead by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    I guess if this becomes a long-term problem, they could always do like Japan (and probably other countries...) and start minting pennies out of aluminum, or some other cheap, affordable metal.

    (It still takes a lot of energy to produce, so why did aluminum get so cheap anyway?)

  33. Re:Two problems - Not Fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Fair!!!!

    Drunken sailors sepnd ther OWN money.

  34. It was going to be said eventually... by flitty · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our coin-purse overlords...

    --
    Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
  35. So, let me summarize... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    Copper Penny: $0.01

    Copper Washer: $0.10

    Making a copper washer by poking a hole in a copper penny: $10,000.00 fine

    That about it?

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:So, let me summarize... by corsec67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Realizing pennies aren't (any more) made out of copper: Priceless

      For everything else, life takes VISA(tm)

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:So, let me summarize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointing out facts in order to destroy somebodies imagination? LAME.

    3. Re:So, let me summarize... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Funny
      For everything else, life takes VISA(tm).

      Or, rather: For everything else, there's MasterCard.
      Watch some TV dude! :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:So, let me summarize... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      You can still get plenty of 95% copper cents at face value. Go get a few rolls from the bank, sort out the copper ones, spend or reroll the rest. I've heard that about 20% of cents are still the copper ones, but that might be a bit high as they get pulled out of circulation, lost, etc.

  36. pennywise... by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    pound-foolish?

    I wonder when digital pennies will be worth less and cost more than a byte in a file... At that point, how do we "implicitly value" the dollar, or any currency? Money only has worth because law and people writing the law say so. If it is counterfeited, and spends, and is taken out of circulation, in small amounts and limited instances, how will an economy collapse? Even the US is the biggest, authorized counterfeiter of cash, producing money that often NEVER goes into REAL circulation. Remember the multiple billions of dollars in Iraq alone, in the truck convoy? The US prints and distributes cash to dozens, if not many, many dozens of countries, much of which then sits in a vault, or is loaned to people who don't need it.

    Money only has value when your neighbor possesses more of it or more toys than you and throws it away faster than you can earn it. Some people are talented and can make money off of just about ANYthing, while others have lesser imagination and no access to resources (philanthropic, banking, lending, grant-issuing, etc.) and give up on trying to sell or introduce or even patent or copyright something that could be their ticket out of a hell-hole. (For example, I'm sitting on ideas either in my head or on paper, and I cannot do much with them out of fear or disappointment that all along the way, someone or some firm will try to nickel and dime me to death, reassign to themselves my IP the creation of which they had not a DAMN thing to do with, and so on. But, trust has to be found, earned or made at SOME point, so like all other fools or fortunate, I have to take the plunge at some point.... )

    Now THAT' when money/currency has value: Those who DESPERATELY need it, but have no credentials, have bad credit, are out of work, or are somehow not in a special category just won't have any without stealing it, begging for it, prostituting themselves, or resisting taxes to hoard every last penny.

    Would be nice if every 5 years or so, those who are DEEEEEEPLY indebted are just clean-slated. After all, if they can't find a job (meaningful, gainful, non-demeaning) and the creditor routinely writes off debt to clear the books, the debtor is still stuck with the 7-year (or longer, considering how many credit companies buy up each other or sell files to each other, meaning, effectively you can still be "punished" long after 7 years have passed...) stigma, but the creditor gave up.

    Considering how many multiple BILLIONS the USA (read: the power wielding minority of ultra wealthy, their lobbyists, and the corrupt politicians in on the game) prosecuting a war (read: persecuting those who don't "get with the program") but can't find a way to grant amnesty or some sort of significant debt reduction to tens if not hundreds of thousands of debt-ridden students, mortgage holders imminently in jeopardy of homelessness....

    I wonder how many times over the major cities' slums could have been torn down and rebuilt to modern living standards.

    Penny-wise and pound-foolish...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    1. Re:pennywise... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      OK, I've got karma to burn, so to the dumbass who modded me off-topic:

      -This is the POLITICAL thread!
      -This is about MONEY!
      -This is about the value of material used for MAKING the money!
      -This is about the IMPLICIT TRUST placed in not just the MATERIAL, but the THOUGHT and FEEL that makes money "worth" something!
      -This is about the national pride to protect CURRENCY value, but not to vigorously domestically instill pride in those who most desperately NEED economic recovery!

      It's OK for successive governments to spend OUR money out their ass and not really be accountable, but we who falter have dirty credit, dirty reports, become non-hired for many jobs requiring integrity, and worse.

      Heartless bastard/s. Off-topic... yeh, right. All the lame-ass comments on this site that never get marked as off-topic, and when something touches a nerve of some republicrats or whatever cans or crats, a poster gets sideswiped. What-e-v-e-r...

      If volumes people suddenly regarded currency as common hemp or cotton, and threw it away willy-nilly or burned it or did other things to devalue it, markets could crash. But they won't and even IF they did, lameassed economists would find creative ways to stave off an impending crash because this probably doesn't fit their neat and tidy model.

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  37. Inflation by zavyman · · Score: 1

    The mint is apparently upset that the older pennies have not been devalued like the rest of US currency due to inflation. They would prefer that holders of pennies be forced to accept devalued currency. If you can't melt the coins, then they will happily take them from you at below market value to melt at a profit.

  38. redundant posting? by plasmacutter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i've been a good sport to this point.. but you are now the 4th person to correct me on this without bothering to read the others.. mods.. if you want to mod my original post down for quoting the wrong figures feel free.. but when posts get both redundant and unnecessarily vicious they need it too..

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:redundant posting? by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      youre talking to a certified economist who is essentially done with the relevant courses at a top 20 institution.... who also happens to be on his 36th hour awake doing mind numbing research, papers, and studying for finals.

      Wow.. I made a mistake which, though avoidable, was not a high enough priority to me to avoid.

      Maybe I should be shot?

      seriously.. for all i know you could be just as tired and grumpy as i am.. but the attack was unnecessarily vicious.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:redundant posting? by Moofie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like somebody needs a hug. C'mere, big guy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:redundant posting? by lawpoop · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Maybe I should be shot?"

      Another option is to just ignore all the correcting posts.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:redundant posting? by harl · · Score: 1

      youre talking to a certified economist who is essentially done with the relevant courses at a top 20 institution....

      This is completely irrevelavant to the topic at hand. This statement accomplishes nothing more than you trying to stroke your epeen beack up to size after making a large public mistake.

      who also happens to be on his 36th hour awake doing mind numbing research, papers, and studying for finals.

      Based on the content of your post and responses you should consider stopping and getting some sleep. Work on the paper and finals will be more constructive when you are more coherent.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    5. Re:redundant posting? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      epeen is the funniest word ever.

      Me? I thought he had sand in his mangina.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:redundant posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > youre talking to a certified economist who is essentially done with the relevant courses at a top 20 institution.... who also happens to be on his 36th hour awake doing mind numbing research, papers, and studying for finals.

      Mmm. That translate to "you are talking to an economy strudent that haven't sleep last night".

      Seriously, man, you should get some sleep.

  39. Way to fix the problem, guys... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Pass a law that makes it illegal to do something that makes sense.

    Why not really fix the problem by:

    • finding a way to make the coins more cheaply, or
    • by upping the face value upon them, or (our dimes go to 11)
    • by re-valuating the existing values (why not make 10 bigger?)
    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  40. New design revealed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning: large image

  41. Please no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    $1 and $2 coins are the reason I moved from Canada to the US. If pieces of metal bigger than a quarter become mainstream currency in the US I'll have to find another country.

    1. Re:Please no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah, this man sure seems to have his priorities straight.

  42. Why? by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

    Why bother? Perhaps my economics is shaky, but wouldn't reducing the amount of currency in circulation increase its value? Seems like a self-correcting system to me.

    -Grey

    1. Re:Why? by Baba+Ram+Dass · · Score: 1

      Why bother? Perhaps my economics is shaky, but wouldn't reducing the amount of currency in circulation increase its value? Seems like a self-correcting system to me. Your economics seems to be solid, at least that which you've displayed. But here's the problem with reducing the amount of currency in circulation:

      The Federal Reserve--a quasi-private institution--is hired by the federal government to do something the government is supposed to be doing itself: coining money and regulating the value thereof. But that, in and of itself, is not the problem.

      The problem is that in return for granting them this monopoly on issuing currency, the Federal Reserve loans the government lots of money, which they then spend on all sorts of stupid things, like expensive vacations for Congressmen. The Federal Reserve spends like $0.05 printing a piece of paper that they proclaim is worth $1.00, making $0.95 for every one dollar note they print. So the Federal Reserve is happy, cause it's making money hand over foot, and the government is happy because it's getting money to spend.

      Neither the Federal Reserve nor the government wants to stop doing this; why would they? Eventually, as it happens with all central banks throughout history, the value of the US dollar will be completely destroyed. Because it's no longer backed by gold, people will find it more useful to use as toilet paper.

      Nevermind that inflation--printing more currency without more stuff to back it up with--is the most egregiously foul form of taxation; let's say the annual rate of inflation is %5. That means last year, a loaf of bread costing a dollar costed, well, a dollar. This year, it'll cost $1.05. If you have a dollar in your bank account, last year you were able to buy a loaf of bread, but this year you would be unable to--no one stole your dollar, rather they lowered your purchasing power through inflation: the Federal Reserve and the government effectively taxed you 5 cents without you really ever knowing it.

      The ultimate solution would be to destroy the Federal Reserve, and return to a commodity-based (gold, silver, etc.) currency so that inflation only happens when more of that commodity is found, and large deposits of gold are rarely found... thus we end up with a stable currency that will buy as much as it did the day you first got it, rather than losing its value every year as is the status quo.

      Another solution would be to use other forms of currency, such as the Liberty Dollar, which is backed by silver and has regular audits (unlike the Federal Reserve's currency).

      The Case Against The Fed is an excellent book and describes the ingenious craft of slight of hand the government and the Federal Reserve are playing with the American people.
      --
      Truckin like the Doo-Dah man...
    2. Re:Why? by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      Rather than trot out some quasi-rational, paranoid, right-wing rhetoric about how the Federal Reserve Bank is a giant scam (like the sibling poster, who thankfully has been moderated down), I'll give you the obvious reason why this doesn't really matter:

      Currency in circulation is a very small percentage of the overall amount of money in the economy that's handled in units of dollars. According to a quick google source , the total amount of U.S. currency in circulation in 1999 was about $470B. The US GDP was around $12T that year, so currency in circulation was less than 5% of our entire economic output.

      The use of checks, in particular, limits the amount of currency we actually need to transact business. Large purchases are rarely negotiated in cash, mostly for reasons of convenience. If you want to buy a car from me for $10,000, you would normally write me a personal check for that amount (or get a cashier's check from the bank, if I didn't want to wait for the check to clear). When I deposit the check, my bank would just clear the check through your bank, which is entirely a matter of record-keeping. No cash needed.

      Since bank deposits, asset valuations, lines of credit, securities and all sorts of other non-cash stores of value are counted in dollars, and are generally convertible to cash via some means, most economic activity (in terms of total value, not number of transactions) has nothing whatsoever to do with cash. Stock markets? Totally cashless. Mortgages on car and home purchases? Totally cashless. Hell, with Direct Deposit as common as it is, now, most people get paid wages without anything other than some record-keeping activity between banks.

      If we had a somewhat more cash-based economy, you'd be right. Simply by printing more or less hard currency, the government could adjust its value dramatically.

    3. Re:Why? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Various reasons prohibit this.

      First of all, it's the psychological effect. Plastic money has the touch of monopoly money. And today ain't the best time to give people a reason to doubt in their coin. Plastic feels "weak", and the Dollar isn't the strongest currency on the market today anyway.

      Then there's those coin operated machines, from vending machines to arcades. It is by no means trivial to replace all those coin slots, and it usually ends in bugs and exploits. Yes, that's not limited to new software, new hardware is at least as prone to failure and exploitable loopholes. This alone requires you to create coins that are different enough so machines can actually discriminate between the different values, and hard enough to copy so a clever forger can't simply duplicate them. One of the qualities used to determine whether money is real is its magneticism, this quality would be gone immediately if you make coins out of plastic. Not to mention that plastic coins wear more easily than metal coins, and the more they wear out, the less vending machines would accept them.

      And, let's be honest here, for what if not for our energy bar do we actually carry change around? If it wasn't for that vending machine, I'd have gotten rid of all the pebbles.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  43. casting and rolling my own tinfoil hat by ronanbear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Making melting down the coins illegal is one of those things that will just give petty criminals ideas.

    They should just add some sulphur to the coins. It makes them more machinable (not much use for stamped coins though) and utterly destroys their value for recycling.

    Maybe the real reason they're doing this is that they've added RFID chips to coins and they don't want people destroying lots of them.

    --
    the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    1. Re:casting and rolling my own tinfoil hat by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      Maybe the real reason they're doing this is that they've added RFID chips to coins and they don't want people destroying lots of them.
      That's why I always microwave any coins I receive before using them.

      ...

      In (more) seriousness, wouldn't a coin be a pretty effective Faraday cage around an RFID chip? :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:casting and rolling my own tinfoil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tinfoil hat is slightly askew.

      What you probably meant to bring up was the fact that we are moving inexorably toward an all electronic payment system. A classic tactic of the ruling set is to:
      1: plant the seed of an idea

      Witness the new Visa commercial in which there is feel-good music playing as people in a line move along happily swiping their cards and briskly moving on. Then, the music stops. Everyone in the room turns and glares at the one person in line pays with cash and waits for the cashier to give him his change. The next person uses their Visa check card, the music starts playing again, and everyone is dancing and happy again.

      This plants the seed of the idea that it is "better", "quicker" and "cooler" than cash.
      electronic payment = good/happy music/people dancing/things moving along smoothly
      cash = no music/no dancing/people waiting/uncomfortable stares

      2: The next step (once this seed has been given a chance to take root) is to poll the public so that they know when to institute a full changeover to the new system. Give it a few yrs to take hold and we will see polls about what the public thinks about changing to all electronic payments. The poll results dont even have to have a majority of people in favor of the idea, so long as they reflect a certain amount of willingness and/or apathy.

      3: Implementation.

      But the above will happen later than the below.

      Then there is the bigger issue about at the moment which is tied to the prohibition of melting down coins (stay with me). The dollar is going to collapse fairly soon. After this happens, we will see the emergance of the "amero" (something akin to the euro, it will be based on US, Mexico and Canada).

      The trend line in my M3-plus-debt chart is staggering. There has been a straight, long-term trend line of M3-plus-credit increasing since 2000. Long-term, we are creating inflation and the dollar has lost almost 98 percent of its value in the past 100 years.

      The national debt, the trade deficit, the fact that the world is awash in money and credit. The fed wants to hide the fact that liquidity is being pumped into the market and will continue to be as the economy slows even further. We are in a recession (just use your eyes). And the fed is in a tough spot because of this. The key right now is interest rates and they're not sure whether to raise or lower them and both of those actions will have serious ramifications.

      This week the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee voted to hold the overnight lending rates between banks steady at 5.25 percent. This was the fourth straight meeting the fed had voted not to change rates. In its rate announcement, the fed affirmed the economy had slowed.

      Almost immediately after the announcement of the fed's decision, the dollar weakened to a new 20-month low against the euro, with currency markets reportedly pricing in the expectation the fed will be forced to lower rates next year to bolster the economy. Following the announcement by the fed, the U.S. Dollar Index, or USDX, also dropped, with the dollar going below 83.

      The key in how low the dollar goes is the interest rates. In January, the fed is going to have to make a decision which way to go. If fed rates go up, the dollar will hold in the 78.33 range, but the stock market and the economy will tank. If next year the fed lowers rates to keep the economy from crashing, the bottom will fall out of the dollar, and it may go as low as 55. Once the dollar hits bottom, it will take the stock market and the economy right with it anyway. The fed is in a box they can't get out of.

      We in the US are going to be hit hard by this. In the severe "recession" we are entering, someone will argue that we need to form a North American Union to compete with the euro. Creating the "amero" will be presented as the solution to the recovery of the dollar. Once it is implemented, the dollar will simply be abandoned.

      So, as it now stands, coins are worth more than their face value. The wo

  44. I throw them away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I am cleaning up and find pennies along with other trash, I just toss them.

    Would you pick up a penny off the ground?
    A nickel?

  45. And you'll get screwed every time by rounding up by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    So they then apply sales tax which will come to a fraction of a nickle. Do you really think they will ever round down? No,they will always round up. You'll see your annual sales tax expenditure double (at least).

  46. Sucks to America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...

    The way your currency is going, you will soon have the same problem with your dollars.

    Long live the Euro, designed to kick America where it hurts most!

  47. Copper is NOT a precious metal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nor is nickel, and neither is zinc. Hyperbole, when will you leave?

    1. Re:Copper is NOT a precious metal by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Copper is NOT a precious metal (Score:-1) by Anonymous Coward on 12-14-06 10:38 (#17241010) Nor is nickel, and neither is zinc. Hyperbole, when will you leave?

      there is some speculation that we have reached peak copper. High-grade copper may in fact be a precious metal ere long.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Copper is NOT a precious metal by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1
      there is some speculation that we have reached peak copper. High-grade copper may in fact be a precious metal ere long.

      Copper's got a long climb to get there. It's about $3 a pound, compared to nearly $14/oz for silver (~$166/lb). And there are alternatives to copper for most purposes. If I had a nickel for every "peak XXXX" pamphlet I get, I could melt and recycle them for big bucks.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Copper is NOT a precious metal by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      there is some speculation that we have reached peak copper. High-grade copper may in fact be a precious metal ere long. Speculation by idiots, maybe. The justification for calling it "peak" is that the places where the highest quality copper ore reserves are "don't like us very much". As if copper isn't a global commodity, as if people in those "antagonized" areas would rather sit on the ore than sell it. Fucking ludicrous. That article is little more than a ridiculous market manipulation scam.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  48. Canadian cents by lawpoop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Time to start melting Canadian cents for all your copper-reclaimation needs -- 98% copper until 1996.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  49. Oh dear God no.... by StressGuy · · Score: 1

    It's painful enough watching your typical high school student working the cashier at MacDonalds make change as it is (especially if there's no auto-change dispenser).

    Tweaking the value of the currency would probably cause one or two of them to have an anurism on the spot.

    While it might be fun to watch...there has to be a better way.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  50. Defacement of money IS illegal if unit for use by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    If you're going to state something as fact, please back it up. Mutilation or defacement of money so that it is unfit for circulation is illegal: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=42 6715

    1. Re:Defacement of money IS illegal if unit for use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "so that it is unfit for circulation" is important.
      You can do an awful lot to it before it reaches that point.

    2. Re:Defacement of money IS illegal if unit for use by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      That's funny since as of a year ago, there was a coin smashing machine in The Alamo's gift shop. You would think they wouldn't be flaunting the law in a government building.

      Wikipedia seems to think it's quite legal: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smashed_penny

  51. What about the tourist Machines that flaten them? by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    I've seen several machines at tourist sites that you feed a penny (and a quarter). The machine then flattens the penny and stamps some design on the resulting token. Will these also now be illegal?

  52. Remember... by DorkusMasterus · · Score: 1

    When you outlaw melting coins, only outlaws will have... er- um...

  53. Re:And you'll get screwed every time by rounding u by throx · · Score: 2, Informative

    Err... no.

    Every nation that has done this rounds to the nearest nickel, not the next highest.

    --

    Fear: When you see B8 00 4C CD 21 and know what it means

  54. What you are not thinking about. by The+Neck · · Score: 0


    I work with melting glass in 300 pound furnaces as a hobby. Now that I have let you in my my sorid secret what everyone is thinking about is the amount of money that it will cost to bring these coins to a molten state. Energy around the globe is costing more, it is honestly not worth you time just from a cost perspective to even start melting them.

    You will need a furnace big enough to overcome the heating costs. Wire melter, gas combustion, Moly, of SiC Starbars. Any of these in a 300 pound range once you factor in the Firebricks, controller, and crucible will run well ove 18k just to build out. Lets not get into the amount of money it will take to fire one.

    Just guessing you looking at around 50 bucks to fire one up to melt heat, hold it long enough to melt them, pour them into ingots, time to let it cool. You are really talking about a shit load of work for very very little profit. Just my 2cents...A PUN! RUN!

    Neck.
    .

    1. Re:What you are not thinking about. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      All you need to do is line a kitchen microwave with kiln brick for insulation and run it for 10-20 minutes with your copper and crucible inside. So long as you properly insulate it you will be fine.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:What you are not thinking about. by The+Neck · · Score: 0

      Ok so for all your work, you have used maybe what 5 cents of power. Your firebricks(2 bucks each approx), your high alumina crucible(guess at 40 bucks), your microwave 50 bucks. So we are at about 100 bucks give or take a couple. 20 bucks worth of nickles because they have the highest delta for payout.

      So we will have 400 nickles that fill our crucible. Makeing a grand total of 400 x 2 cents or 8 bucks per run. Subtrace the power, wear and tear on the equipment, I think your kind of fighting a loosing battle unless you have nothing else to do. Don't forget your going to have to seperate the alloy from the melt as well, and I honestly have no idea how to do that. Net 8 dollar gain before you start factoring in ancillary issues.

      Anyway, point being it is not really worth your time. You could do it, but I would rather spend my time playing guitar hero or something...then again I guess I could be doing both....

      Neck.
      .

  55. Copper's value is up worldwide by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This isn't a problem of the American dollar devaluing (inflating) relative to some real standard. This is a problem of copper being increasingly more valuable relative to other commodities.
    Phone companies around the world are having problems with people cutting down their lines to steal the copper.


    The US had a previous round of making it illegal to melt down coins - for a number of years in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the US was on a bimetallic standard, with both gold and silver exchangable at a fixed ratio, so depending on the relative market value of gold vs. silver, people could play games with the rates, and some years it made sense to take dollar banknotes to the Treasury and get coins in one of the metals, melt them down, and sell the metal as bullion, so it was made illegal. This was also tied up in politics of farmers' loans (e.g. if you had a debt in dollars, could you pay with the cheaper metal or did you have to pay with the more expensive metal), mining interests, etc.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  56. So exactly how much can I get for the melted penny by baggins2001 · · Score: 1

    I'm not exactly sure this would be profitable unless I had somebody elses heat source. $40 coal $1000 dollar homemade furnace or $400 acetylene torch assembly. So 40000 pennies or or 8000 nickels. I'd probably still need another tank of acetylene. So where do I sell this glob.

    --
    He who said 1,000,000 monkeys on 1,000,000 typewriters would eventually type the great novel, never saw an AOL chat room
  57. Another Solution by rlp · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always thought that the mint should make all coins out of radioactive waste. It would solve the problem of nuclear waste disposal. It would encourage consumers to spend money - quickly. This would help the economy. And it would definitely discourage hoarding of currency.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Another Solution by slashjames · · Score: 4, Funny

      Gives a whole new meaning to having money burning a hole in your pocket...

    2. Re:Another Solution by bitt3n · · Score: 1
      I always thought that the mint should make all coins out of radioactive waste. It would solve the problem of nuclear waste disposal. It would encourage consumers to spend money - quickly. This would help the economy. And it would definitely discourage hoarding of currency.
      If the dollar keeps depreciating, that may be the only way to ensure that coins aren't worth more than their face value.
    3. Re:Another Solution by Indiana+Joe · · Score: 1

      I always thought that the mint should make all coins out of radioactive waste.

      That works until the point where the pennies saved in that big jar reach critical mass and explode.

      --
      I can't decide if this post is interesting, funny, insightful, or flamebait.
    4. Re:Another Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but using cash registers would risk reaching critical mass and setting off a nuclear chain reaction.

    5. Re:Another Solution by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      ... not to mention "economic boom"

  58. Remember This? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    Remember back in 1964 when the price of silver exceeded the face value of both United States and Canadian coins? The US made it illegal to melt US coinage, and Canada did the same for their own, lower silver content coinage. Anyone care to guess what happened next.

    (Hint: Each country only made it illegal to melt their own coinage.)

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  59. Shortages ? by Joebert · · Score: 1

    1.73 cents per cent ?

    Well, considering the bank charges $0.15 to buy a roll of change around here.
    0.50 * 1.73 = 0.865 - 0.15 = 0.715 - 0.50 = $0.215

    A 21.5% return is alot better than some some mutual funds, & blows a Collective Deposits' return of 4.25% (last I checked ages ago) out of the water.

    What are they going to do, start watching every single recycling plant in America ?
    Perhaps regulate the amount of theese metals recycling plants are allowed to process per-day ?

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    1. Re:Shortages ? by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Man, I boggled my terms all to hell in that post.
      NOT, 21.5% return, It's actually a 43% return & a 21.5 Cent return.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    2. Re:Shortages ? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      "Well, considering the bank charges $0.15 to buy a roll of change around here."

      Are you sayuny your bank would charge you $.15 to buy a roll of pennies? Therefore it costs $.65 to get $.50?

    3. Re:Shortages ? by Joebert · · Score: 1

      If the average Joe Bluecollar asked for a roll of change while cashing his check, no.
      On a commercial level, otherwise known as what they'll consider you if you go in there asking for a bunch of rolled change, yes.
      That's why all the stores around here hate to give anyone change to use phones or the like if they don't buy anything.
      I live in the Tampa Bay area of Florida.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    4. Re:Shortages ? by MooseTick · · Score: 1

      I would think banks would consider that a cost of doing business with retail commercial costomers. I would think they would love the fact that the average small business is depositing $1000-$5000 per day into an account.

    5. Re:Shortages ? by Joebert · · Score: 1

      I think this is Florida, where even the strings have strings attached.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  60. Sympton, not cause by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

    As others have pointed out, there are no precious metals in our pennies and nickels. There are zinc, copper, and nickel in them, all base metals. But the commodities boom caused by massive new demand in Asia combined with the plummeting dollar now means that even base metals are starting to look valuable. Of course the real causes of the declining dollar are our massive trade and budget deficits, about which Congress will do nothing at all. No politician gets reelected by saying he's going to raise taxes and cut your benefits. It is always much more expedient to rob people's savings and earnings by allowing inflation to happen. After all, if oil costs more in dollars you can always blame greedy oil companies and Middle Easterners. So Congress will "solve" this problem by reintroducing steel pennies.

  61. Just change the entire numeric system to base 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eliminate the concept of anything less than five, altogether. The Law of Fives, indeed. What a fine idea!

    Seven? that's five and two-fifths.

    Three? forget about it, it's too small to matter...

  62. Only the Legislative Branch can Pass Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, didn't anyone notice it was odd that the US Mint was going to create this "law". They are part of the executive branch of the government NOT the legislative branch. So this would be unconstitutional.

  63. Why would they make more anyway? by Katmando911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How hard is it to realize that if it costs your more than 1 cent (or 5 cents) to make something worth 1 cent (or 5 cents), then don't make it. Basic enconomics Duh, if the pennies and nickels are worth more as materials than they are as currency then we SHOULD melt them down and use those materials for some better purpose and find some cheaper material to make our coins.

    1. Re:Why would they make more anyway? by jbrader · · Score: 1

      The values of metals fluctuates much faster than the time it would take the mint to first determine what material to use, design the new coinage and produce it in useful quantities. Though id you had read the post, not the article just the post, you would have noticed something about them doin just that.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    2. Re:Why would they make more anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to sony! Hahahahahaha.

  64. penny-eating HNO3 by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

    What about the high school science experiment where you dissolve the zinc core?

    Well, make sure you have a post-1982 penny. You make a scratch that cuts through the copper exterior. Dump the penny in nitric acid (HNO3). Nitric acid can dissolve Zinc, but not copper. Thus, you're left with a shell of copper.

    If they want to bust a classroom of schoolchildren for killing pennies, go right ahead! I throw mine away.

    1. Re:penny-eating HNO3 by yoghurt · · Score: 1

      FWIW zinc pennies melt in a bunsen burner flame while the old coppers do not.

      --
      Yoghurt
    2. Re:penny-eating HNO3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1982 is not post-1982. ; )

    3. Re:penny-eating HNO3 by meltzroth · · Score: 1

      But could this possibly, in court, fall under "melting them down"? The Copper ions can be recovered as a solid by just placing an iron object into the mixture. If this is done on a large scale you could, feasibly, recover a significant amount of copper at a small expense. The worse case scenario is that a judge would repeat the same error that many introductory Chemistry students make and say that the solid metal is being turned into a liquid!

    4. Re:penny-eating HNO3 by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      Aha smart guy, only some of the 1982 pennies are zinc clad, some were still copper. So unless you think you can tell the difference (I usually can), then grab one that says 1983 or later!

  65. Trillian? by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 1

    Like the IM client or the character from HHGTG?

    :P

    --
    Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
  66. Scrap metal isn't that simple. by Pinkfud · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I used to be in the scrap metal industry about 35 years ago, so I know a bit about this. If a nickel is worth 2 cents over face value, then the "profit" from 100 nickels would be $2.00 - supposedly. But in fact, a nickel is (I think) 25% nickel and 75% copper. Those metals are very hard to separate. And you would have to separate them to (a) get the full value, and (b) to hide the origin of the metal. The process would cost considerably more than the supposed profit. Pennies would be easier to resolve into copper and zinc because zinc has a much lower melting point, but it's still not all profit.

    The truth is, any nation that mixes common metals (not say, silver or gold) in their coins doesn't need to worry about the melting-down issue unless the metal prices go through the roof. It just wouldn't be profitable. Now Canada, I believe their nickel-based coins are pure or nearly so. That might be a different matter.

    --
    The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    1. Re:Scrap metal isn't that simple. by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      Wish I had a "+1 informative" to spare...

      What I'm wondering is, do they explicitly mention "melting"? What if you hook up, say, a photovoltaic cell (because otherwise you end up paying all that money for electricity from "the grid") and electrolyze the metals apart? I'm pretty sure separating copper from zinc or nickel is pretty simple to do in readily-made solutions...

    2. Re:Scrap metal isn't that simple. by Pinkfud · · Score: 1

      Yes, you could do that. But then you're talking about a lot of time unless you have a huge operation. And if you build the huge operation, then I think someone would wonder what the plant does. You might be able to make some profit on a small scale, but it certainly isn't attractive from an industrial viewpoint.

      --
      The world is my oyster. That's why it's always in a stew.
    3. Re:Scrap metal isn't that simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no! Don't separate the metals. Instead, sell the alloy to someone who happens to need this exact composition, and charge them more because you did the mixing for them.

      Perhaps you can sell the alloy back to the Mint?

  67. Canadian by bastardknight · · Score: 0

    In Canada until 1997 they made the pennies of 98% copper and the lightest version weighed 2.5g ... using those numbers it will take 1.82 pennies to make a pound. I get $2 a pound at the scrap yard for copper. Thats a 9% ROI .... alot better then I get from my term deposits.

    Now using the 1942-1979 pennies that weighed 3.24g it will only take $1.40 in pennies to make a pound.... Thats a 30% return.

  68. Coins in Germany by Dareth · · Score: 1

    My father said that coin that people got in change at the train station was so insignificant that people threw them in the corner where they would pile up. He got a few of each kind for the kids.

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:Coins in Germany by megaditto · · Score: 1

      What was an ogre doing in Germany anyways?

      Particularly that one needs to be female to compete in a Miss Europe contest these days.

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Coins in Germany by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      Really?
      In that case, America will really be in trouble when we regularly see nickels in the penny dishes.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  69. It's there own fault by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Maybe if the government didn't let inflation go unchecked for so long a penny with only 0.0625 grams of copper (2.5g, 2.5% Cu) would be worth more than the copper and zinc it is made from. I've been waiting for plastic coins, perhaps with RFID identification tags embedded in them, the very short range kind of course.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  70. Like this is a new thing by kermit1221 · · Score: 1

    "...the value of the precious metals contained in coins now exceeds their face value..."

    Kinda like before, when they started making pennies out of zinc, and quit making silver coins out of silver? Nickels haven't been made out of nickel since like the '60's, right?

    I've long been under the belief that the anti-counterfeiting techniques used in making bills had to have put their cost at greater than a dollar. Meaning the multitude of "new" dollar bills were already operating at a loss. I mean, the little metal/plastic strip radio transmitter thingus, so the palm-tree-looking "cell phone towers" can keep track of the currency driving by them, those can't be cheap, right?

    I shit you not, "they" are building a new one of those towers down the street from my house, ingeniously disguised as a church! The palm tree and pine tree ones look pretty crappy. But, aside from the telltale little trailer-building, this one just looks like a new bell tower added on to an existing church. I'm not a religious man, but that's got to be blasphemous in some way.

  71. This is the kind of thing to expect by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    ...when you mint a coin that is worth less than the metals contained therein. Easy solution: remove an amount of US currency off the market to make a penny actually worth the face-value. Would this harm people? Sure, but that's an argument for another day.

  72. hard money == no inflation == no problem by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    The Constitution authorizes the government to mint, not print, money for a reason: paper money is worthless. A fiat currency doesn't represent value, it represents debt. It's only worth anything as long as people have confidence in it. Gold has intrinsic value based on its scarcity and usefulness.

    Get rid of the Federal Reserve and bring back hard money, I say. I, for one, would welcome the end of inflation. I'd love to be able to stick $10 in a mattress, come back in 20 years, and have the same purchasing power as I had before. That's simple and intuitive. If the Fed can rob your money of its value, it is robbing you! Paper money is just a scheme for legalized theft.

    1. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      So, basically, you want the economy to tank...

      Deflation was the hallmark of the Great Depression. Inflation is part of economic growth. If you don't have any inflation, that means no one needs money, which means that no one is investing in business growth. That means, you have no job to go to. So, your goods cost less, but you have no money to buy them. Not exactly a utopia.

      The gold standard is equally constricting. There is only a finite amount of gold int eh world. You cannot increase the amount of money (a prerequisite for economic growth) without mining for more gold. It artificially constricts the economy. There is a reason why the American economy grew substantially after we came off the gold standard.

      And this anti-fed sentiment is equally distrubing. I suppose you would like to have an economic depression every 8 years like we had in the late 19th and early 20th century. There is a reason the Fed was created. Would it be better to have a true national bank? Sure, it would, but there are too many reactionaries in America to allow it to happen.

      Thanks,

      Mike

    2. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Read the book. The Depression was a result of the Fed's bungling. The US was very prosperous in the 19th century. The US currently has negotiators in China trying to convince them not to dump their dollars on the market lest the value plummet and send us into a depression deeper than the 30s.

    3. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by erroneus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I more than agree with you and the very very few people who actually understand the tragedy of the US monetary system and how it's affecting the world. To that end, I recommend the following:

      At risk of sounding like Stallman, I suggest creating the habit of referring to the "Federal Reserve" as "The Federal Reserve Corporation." This will help to drive home the fact that the U.S. monetary system is in the private hands of bankers and not under governmental control which is supposed to be proxy to the people of the United States.

      Keep in mind that no one in the government or in the Federal Reserve Corporation are telling anyone any lies about it. They just aren't telling anyone anything they don't want them to know and they do everything they can to keep people thinking what they want them to think.

      At some level, everyone knows about it but they haven't made all the necessary connections. For example: Ask anyone what are the three areas of government? They'll likely answer Executive, Legislative and Judiciary. But we hear with every news show that "The Fed" is doing this, that or the other with "the interest rates" to do this that or the other with the economy. And exactly WHICH branch of government does "The Fed" work under? No one can answer it and it doesn't bug them that they don't know it either. There's talk about the president nominating the chair of the Federal Reserve [corporation!] and all this but they say nothing about what are the qualifiers might be for being nominated. They are bankers already a part of the Federal Reserve Corporation of course... they are just rearranging the deck chairs on our titanic and it really doesn't matter who they name -- it's all the same people.

      So please, for everyone who understands the nature of the problem, let's just stick to reporting the facts that no one seems to see in front of their faces. The Federal Reserve Bank Corporation is a Delaware corporation founded in the early 1900's (1913 was it?). It's a privately held corporation so you can't own stock in it. And *ALWAYS* refer to it by its full correct name. Not "The Fed." Not "The Federal Reserve." But by a name which will remind everyone where the interest lies: "The Federal Reserve Bank [Corporation]."

      (Also of interesting note: every time you hear about where individual income tax monies are being used, you have to know that the IRS collect money from individuals to pay down the interest on the loans that the U.S. Federal Government has taken out from The Federal Reserve Bank. All other taxes collected from other sources and loans taken from The Federal Reserve Bank corporation are how other things are paid for.)

      And finally, a question to those who know more than I do on this subject: Does the Federal Reserve Bank coporation pay taxes? If yes, how much? If no, why not?

    4. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> So, basically, you want the economy to tank...

      >> Deflation was the hallmark of the Great Depression.

      Wrong. The Federal Reserve caused the great depression. Ask Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, or Joseph Stiglitz.

      The way it works is the flood they economy with cheap credit and then engineer a financial collapse, then dramatically tighten credit and seize everyone's property (real wealth). It's the dramatic tightening of credit that caused the depression:

      http://blog.mises.org/archives/006018.asp

      Milton Friedman:

      'The Federal Reserve definitely caused the Great Depression by contracting the amount of money in circulation by one-third from 1929 to 1933'

      >> And this anti-fed sentiment is equally distrubing. I suppose you would like to have an economic depression every 8 years like we had in the late 19th and early 20th century. There is a reason the Fed was created.

      Wrong again. That's just the bullshit that they sell you in the public education system and in the cattle farms that pass for American universities. The banking problems were engineered by people like J.P. Morgan in order to create the federal reserve which solidified their monopoly on currency and completely enslaved the people of the United States. The federal Reserve act was written by J.P. Morgan (among others). See: the creature from Jekyll Island.

      America is being setup for a major financial collapse in order to usher in the Amero and the North American Union. They've been planning it for over 30 years (see: Trilateral commission).

      While your defending your bank, you might want to know that most americans could have probably retired by the age of 25 had it not been for our corrupt economic system.

      Get a clue and stop regurgitating your mindless propaganda.

    5. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> The Depression was a result of the Fed's bungling

      Please don't say 'bungling' it makes it sound like it was accidental rather than intentional.

    6. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      Tin foil hats for both of you!!!

      The fed was created as a result of the disasterous bank panics that plagued the latter 19th century, some of them as often as every 4 years. The country was increasingly concerned that J.P. Morgan was literally using his own personal funds to bail the country out. The Federal Reserve system was created in order to protect against these panics as well as stabilize monetary policy. It worked quite well--there has been only one bank panic since.

      Thanks,

      Mike

    7. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1
      Read the book. The Depression was a result of the Fed's bungling. The US was very prosperous in the 19th century.
      Well, the Fed did severely bungle the whole Great Depression situation, but that doesn't mean that the Depression isn't an example of exactly how hard deflation can burn you. As for the 19th century, gold stores were expanding, so there was no serious drag on the money supply at the time. By the late 19th century, the lack of gold discoveries were definitely putting the squeeze on gold standard economies. The US was not exactly what I would call "prosperous" in the 1890s. You just need to get used to that kind of thing when you put an upper limit on economic growth based only on mankind's ability to dig up a particular metal.

      The US currently has negotiators in China trying to convince them not to dump their dollars on the market lest the value plummet and send us into a depression deeper than the 30s.
      Cite? There's definitely a lot to think about when it comes to Chinese exchange rate manipulations, but I don't see any reason to think that the negotiations are exactly what you're describing.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    8. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      See news and links at 1 and 2

    9. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, you sound like a real swell fellow that was homeschooled by his white all-American parents in the mountains of Montana singing songs about the day the Arian race will regain the control of the land.

    10. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1
      There's talk about the president nominating the chair of the Federal Reserve [corporation!] and all this but they say nothing about what are the qualifiers might be for being nominated. They are bankers already a part of the Federal Reserve Corporation of course... they are just rearranging the deck chairs on our titanic and it really doesn't matter who they name -- it's all the same people.
      The President appoints members of the Board of Governors, just like any number of other positions. They're generally bankers and academics who--surprise--know about banking, economics, and international finance. The position itself doesn't allow them to enrich themselves, though. For example, the Board of Governors is severely restricted in the type of investment they can do while in office for one obvious reason: It's a severe conflict of interest. I get the impression from your post that you're suspicious of some sort of conflict of interest here. I think you may be unaware of exactly how little incentive the Board of Governors to make decisions that are not in the best interests of the US economy.

      As for qualifications, I suggest that you look at Dr. Bernanke's credentials. Sure, I suppose the President could nominate the head of the Arabian Horse Association if he wanted, but this job is a little more important than that, and even our current "Screw public opinion" administration had the good sense to nominate a highly qualified individual.

      And finally, a question to those who know more than I do on this subject: Does the Federal Reserve Bank coporation pay taxes? If yes, how much? If no, why not?
      The Federal Reserve is not a profit making entity. It can create or destroy money whenever it wants, so the whole idea that it should pay taxes or that it's somehow scheming to make a bunch of money off the backs of the people is nonsensical. For all practical purposes, it's just another government agency regulating another aspect of American commerce. It should also be noted that stock in the Federal Reserve Banks cannot be traded. It can only be owned by member banks, who are paid a dividend on their shares, essentially as compensation for the interest-free money that the Fed holds in the fractional reserve system.

      The fact that the Board of Governors is not directly answerable to our elected officials keeps them from being tempted to do exactly the sort of thing you seem to be accusing them of. If that weren't the case, you'd have the President or Congress manipulating the economy around election time. It would be a huge mess of political corruption and cronyism.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    11. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the always insightful third party "experts" at WND come to the rescue. I appreciate that they warned me that tofu will make my children gay earlier this week, and I'm equally glad that they're here to warn me that, contrary to all mainstream sources and reason, the Chinese are planning to tank their economy by making exchange rate changes severe enough to cause us to change our currency.

      The reality is, the Chinese prop up the dollar because it's good for exports, and they may reduce the degree to which they do it (due partially to US pressure to do so), but they're not going to simply dump dollar reserves and send our economy (and theirs) spiraling. Doing so would make no sense. And there is no conspiracy to create the Amero. The idea that there is may sell well to people who think that the UN is going to invade and make us all eat French cheeses and force us all into same sex marriages, but that's a whole different story.

      I get the impression that a lot of these ideas stem from confusion as to what a central bank is supposed to do and how it is different from other banks.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    12. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by erroneus · · Score: 1

      As for qualifications, I suggest that you look at Dr. Bernanke's credentials. Sure, I suppose the President could nominate the head of the Arabian Horse Association if he wanted, but this job is a little more important than that, and even our current "Screw public opinion" administration had the good sense to nominate a highly qualified individual.

      Pretty strong indication that he either doesn't have the choice about who he can select from and/or he doesn't actually make the selection himself. His history of cronyism shows where this is inconsistant with his normal behavior.

      The Federal Reserve is not a profit making entity. It can create or destroy money whenever it wants, so the whole idea that it should pay taxes or that it's somehow scheming to make a bunch of money off the backs of the people is nonsensical.

      Yeah, they are somehow "above" the money since they make it... what else could they be in it for? Uhmmm control? domination? Money is the tool and the means, not the object. Furthermore, why should government employees pay taxes since their income is supposed to come from taxes in the first place? They too should be exempt from paying taxes... they aren't. It's the duty and responsibility of Congress to audit the Federal Reserve Corporation and strangely, it has never happened.

      For all practical purposes, it's just another government agency regulating another aspect of American commerce. It should also be noted that stock in the Federal Reserve Banks cannot be traded. It can only be owned by member banks, who are paid a dividend on their shares, essentially as compensation for the interest-free money that the Fed holds in the fractional reserve system.

      Interest-free? Uh. Don't think so. The banks themselves have a profit motive requirement by law since they are for-profit organizations. Their aim is to maximize their profits through their activities. It's *NOT* a government agency and the fact that you'd assert that something that isn't one but "is for all practical purposes" is laughable. If that's true, then since we pay more than 50% of our income in taxes (and I mean ALL taxes, not just the IRS-collected stuff) then we're what "for all practical purposes?" "Slaves" isn't quite the right word for it, but it's the best I can do on short notice.

      The fact that the Board of Governors is not directly answerable to our elected officials keeps them from being tempted to do exactly the sort of thing you seem to be accusing them of. If that weren't the case, you'd have the President or Congress manipulating the economy around election time. It would be a huge mess of political corruption and cronyism.

      Do you buy gasoline? I know I do. Didn't you think the virtually unexplained drop in gasoline prices were strange just prior to election time? And then after the election it started creeping back again. I'd say that was a pretty strong amount of economical manipulation even if it was highly focused. As for political corruption and cronyism? Yeah, we're seeing that too.

      The Federal Reserve system is presently in its third incarnation. It had been cancelled two times already and the last time it was attempted was what? In 1963 I think it was? That didn't work out too well.

      It's not a theory when these sorts of details are there for anyone to see. At some level everyone knows the US government is not in control of its own money as the constitution allows and requires. Congress is not given the power to delegate that responsibility to other entities.

      But here's some crack-pot theory for you because by definition, it's a theory and I'm sure I'm not the only one to come up with the idea:

      1. recently paper currency is under attack by "blind groups" and soon we'll all need new paper money... and all the hardware that goes into using it. This is when they will put RFID into paper money and readers everywhere. We'll all be walking around with "cash" that is trackable and able to be cancelled.

      2

    13. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberal Handbook Rule 3: "If you can't argue on merits, (or don't know what they are talking about) Just call them a raciest! Works every time!"

    14. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked for who... are you saying it worked for the people of America who owe what.. 8 trillion dollars?

    15. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1

      Pretty strong indication that he either doesn't have the choice about who he can select from and/or he doesn't actually make the selection himself. His history of cronyism shows where this is inconsistant with his normal behavior.

      I would agree that politically, he doesn't have much of a choice. I was honestly expecting some sort of nutty, fringe pseudo-economist and was pleasantly surprised to find a highly qualified banking expert selected instead. Even the mighty George Bush has to bow to popular reaction to unpopular appointments from time to time (see Harriet Meiers). The Fed Chair is important enough that people wouldn't let it slide.

      Yeah, they are somehow "above" the money since they make it... what else could they be in it for? Uhmmm control? domination? Money is the tool and the means, not the object.

      Control and domination of what, exactly? Our precious bodily fluids?

      Furthermore, why should government employees pay taxes since their income is supposed to come from taxes in the first place? They too should be exempt from paying taxes... they aren't.

      Hmmm... no? The whole point is that value in money is a meaningless construct for the Fed, and allowing Congress to tax it would be giving Congress a blank check to print money (because that's *exactly* what the Fed would do to pay any taxes levied against it). Government employees pay taxes because the use government services like the rest of us do. You can't simply take taxes out of their paycheck beforehand because different taxes are earmarked for different programs. A government employee's salary typically doesn't come from an amalgamation of tariffs, duties, gas taxes, state taxes, sales taxes, etc.

      It's the duty and responsibility of Congress to audit the Federal Reserve Corporation and strangely, it has never happened.

      The GAO has audited the Federal Reserve a number of times. You can find the audits listed in the Fed's Annual Report.

      Interest-free? Uh. Don't think so.

      The reserves that the Federal Reserve requires member banks to leave on deposit accrue no interest. You're simply wrong there.

      The banks themselves have a profit motive requirement by law since they are for-profit organizations. Their aim is to maximize their profits through their activities. It's *NOT* a government agency and the fact that you'd assert that something that isn't one but "is for all practical purposes" is laughable.

      I strongly suspect that you're confusing the Federal Reserve Banks with Federal Reserve member banks. The two are not the same. The former are non-profit quasi-government organizations. The latter are private for-profit enterprises with none of the powers or responsibilities of the Federal Reserve system. The fact that you find it laughable is probably more due to confusion on your part than anything else.

      If that's true, then since we pay more than 50% of our income in taxes (and I mean ALL taxes, not just the IRS-collected stuff) then we're what "for all practical purposes?" "Slaves" isn't quite the right word for it, but it's the best I can do on short notice.

      I would say that we are citizens who pay for public goods (and a lot of pork). This statement doesn't follow from the above, though.

      Do you buy gasoline? I know I do. Didn't you think the virtually unexplained drop in gasoline prices were strange just prior to election time? And then after the election it started creeping back again. I'd say that was a pretty strong amount of economical manipulation even if it was highly focused.

      Are you blaming the Fed for changes in gas prices? I'd love to hear the mechanism you propose for that one. My theory: Yes, it was manipulation. Yes, it was done to affect elections. No, it wasn't the

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    16. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by erroneus · · Score: 1

      The following is taken from here: http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/2/fedaudit.htm

      However, the GAO does NOT have complete access to all aspects of the Federal Reserve System. The Federal Banking Agency Audit Act of 1978 stipulates the following areas are to be excluded from GAO inspections:

      (1) transactions for or with a foreign central bank, government of a foreign country, or nonprivate international financing organization;
      (2) deliberations, decisions, or actions on monetary policy matters, including discount window operations, reserves of member banks, securities credit, interest on deposits, open market operations;
      (3) transactions made under the direction of the Federal Open Market Committee; or
      (4) a part of a discussion or communication among or between members of the Board of Governors and officers and employees of the Federal Reserve System related to items.

      In 1993 Wayne D. Angell, then a member of the Board of Governors, submitted testimony before a House subcommittee on the reasons for the restrictions on GAO access. He commented:

      "By excluding these areas, the Act attempts to balance the need for public accountability of the Federal Reserve through GAO audits against the need to insulate the central bank's monetary policy functions from short-term political pressures and to ensure that foreign central banks and governmental entities can transact business in the U.S. financial markets through the Federal Reserve on a confidential basis (Reference 2)."


      Do you remember some of the events prior to the US invasion of Iraq? Remember how Iraq resisted UN weapons inspectors? How they wouldn't let them inspect everything? How that was used as part of the justification for the invasion? Here we have this "essentially government" organization that is actually exempt from many of the laws required for government organizations because it's NOT a government organization and at the same time has all these special exemptions from government audits well beyond the GAO and other oversight. That last quote says more about their intention to conduct secret government activities than anything else. We the people would like to see more government transparency and this does more to obfuscate government activity than anything else. And by having this areas of "you just have to trust us" I'd say there's more than enough wiggle room there to make just about any audit of "allowed areas" pretty meaningless.

      You did get me on the audit thing to a degree I didn't actually know there was "some" audit... just never a complete and meaningful one.

      But you seem to be a real supporter of the federal reserve bank corporation. Asside from the false notion of "keeping money out of the hands of the spenders" why would it be a good idea to have a federal reserve bank corporation that keeps its inner workings a secret from the U.S. people? And the reason I say false notion is that #1 the member banks, both foreign and domestic are regular contributors to political parties and candidates. Furthermore, the federal reserve bank corporation has actually done more to enable this spend-crazy government. We wouldn't have a deficit at all if we didn't have a huge revolving debt account with the federal reserve banking corporation. The money "owed" by the government to the federal reserve bank system is the DEFINITION of government debt.

      True. The congress and the president has ways to stop the federal reserve bank corporation if it "misbehaves." The last time I noticed any significant resistance to its will was JFK who was killed, by coincidence, shortly thereafter.

      Control and domination of what, exactly? Our precious bodily fluids?

      Uhm. Pick up a history book. People have been trying to dominate the planet for thousands of years in thousands of ways. Microsoft is our favorite enemy for global domination. But come on. The Roman empire? The Ottoman empire? N

    17. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1
      Gold has intrinsic value based on its scarcity and usefulness.
      What is the usefulness of gold that makes it intrinsically valuable? Can I eat a lump of gold? Or build a shelter using it? Use it to heat or light my home? Can gold purify my drinking water, or cure me if I'm ill?
      Apart from a few specialist industrial applications, the only uses of gold are decorative, and "ooh, shiny" doesn't strike me as a particularly good basis for arguing that something is intrinsically valuable. (I'm ignoring the use of gold as currency or a store of wealth, since that presupposes that it is valuable, which begs the question of why gold is intrinsically valuable.)
    18. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1
      The four points you mention are key to maintaining the independence of the Fed's decision making processes from political tampering. I'm sure that the Fed could be more transparent, but I should point out that at some of the points raised are not entirely accurate. FOMC meeting transcripts are eventually released, but they are released with a lag time of 5 years. Market watchers would *love* to know for certain what the FOMC is about to do and how it plans to do it because they could reap enormous profits my making such predictions.

      I guess the fundamental question here is, what type of transactions should we be looking for? Weapons inspectors are looking for very specific things when they audit a country. What, specifically, do you suggest the GAO should be looking at that is not currently available? Next, how are those things ripe for abuse, and what would the cost of making them public (in a timely manner) be? A lot of government organizations are exempt from a lot of types of oversight (think NSA). That doesn't mean that they are totally without oversight. I'm all for not trusting government any further than I have to, but you'd have to come up with a concrete description of the type of abuse you're looking for before I get too worked up over the fact that we're not looking for it. The types of abuse I would specifically be looking for are things like Ben Bernanke making investments in currencies or taking payments from currency speculators before the FOMC manipulates the money supply, and we're pretty careful about not letting that happen.

      You did get me on the audit thing to a degree I didn't actually know there was "some" audit... just never a complete and meaningful one.

      Your choice of sources and claims leads me to believe that most of your knowledge about our central banking system is not necessarily coming from the most mainstream of sources. You might want to consider doing some basic background reading on the topic before you delve too deep in with the "everybody is crazy but me" crowd. I suppose that a lot of people would have you believe that those sources are in on the conspiracy and that I, as somebody with an economics degree, am also either a dupe or in on it, but you might seriously want to dig into some of this stuff. See the above paragraph for discussion of whether or not the audits are meaningful.

      But you seem to be a real supporter of the federal reserve bank corporation. Asside from the false notion of "keeping money out of the hands of the spenders" why would it be a good idea to have a federal reserve bank corporation that keeps its inner workings a secret from the U.S. people? And the reason I say false notion is that #1 the member banks, both foreign and domestic are regular contributors to political parties and candidates.

      I support the Fed because it appears to be run by policy experts and the alternatives aren't pretty. As I see it, the alternatives are:

      1) Allow Congress to decide on the quantity of fiat money available in the market. This is ripe for abuse because Congress would try to protect their jobs by forcing us into an inflationary spiral that would tank our economy. Alternately, Congress would take payoffs for monetary policy the same way they take payoffs for crappy laws. Alternatively, Congress is full of angels who want the best for the country, but putting them in charge of monetary policy would be like putting a chimpanzee at the controls of a crashing starship.
      2) Do away with fiat money entirely and return to commodity money. It surprises me that people who are uneasy about letting a bunch of economists decide on the quantity of money in the economy are totally OK with allowing the ability of miners to find gold (read: very near random ass luck) decide the very same thing.

      Neither of those seems particularly palatable to me. As for your remark about "member banks" you still aren't understanding what that means.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    19. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by erroneus · · Score: 1

      My question is: Control by what mechanism, exactly? Threaten to inflate us to death? Raise reserve ratios until we agree to appoint Ben Bernanke Dictator For Life? If you were concerned about the Fed purposefully trashing the economy, I suppose that's a real possibility. I would say it's unlikely as the people running it seem to be competent and have no real interest in destroying the national economy. I would also point out that our President can order nuclear strikes, and Presidents are not nearly as well vetted for competence or as free of conflicts of interest as members of the Board of Governors. Perhaps we're worrying about the wrong things.

      Control by controlling the buying and selling of goods and services. If you're Christian (I'm not) I'd refer you to the book of revelations. But by controlling trade in the world, you control the haves, wants and especially the needs of the world. There are entire populations of the world starving and dying of diseases that would otherwise be rather trivial to treat if only the REST of the world were as "above money" as the Fed is.

      Life is meaningless to God since he creates it. Money is meaningless to the Fed since they create it. God enjoys the power of life because it makes him feel god-like and all-mighty. The Fed... well, you can see the parallels I'm drawing.

      I find it rather fascinating that you'd go through all of this detail for all other things and attempt to make little of humanity's most basic and fundamental ambition which is world domination at any and all costs. We kill for money on a regular and frequent basis. There is no end to the horrors people are willing to perform to get it. But somehow "the fed" is above that.

      The only thing we, the people have, is levels of accountability to control the people that regulate our lives. Where the fed is concerned, we have far less than we are willing to admit. And sure, the case is made frequently that the fed is virtually free from the influence of partisan politics and all that. But no one say anything about the influence and steering coming from the other side. This is the THIRD incarnation of the federal reserve system. It was closed down twice and still they manage to come back as if it were the first time. There were reasons back then that it was considered to be a bad idea and there are reasons why it's bad now. Why was it a bad idea before and why is it good now? Why would it require the same dirty tricks that got the DMCA and the Patriot Act passed to pass this other "great idea?" It's probably because it's not the will of the people and most people think it's a bad idea.

      It's good to know that you have a "tipping point" which would be the abolishment of cash as we know it. Depending on how you look at it, we're already there with all the laws against having "too much" cash and all that. (By that I mean the police having the power to confiscate large amounts of cash because it raises suspicion of criminal activity... only 'crminals' don't trust the banking system you know.)

    20. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1

      Control by controlling the buying and selling of goods and services. If you're Christian (I'm not) I'd refer you to the book of revelations. But by controlling trade in the world, you control the haves, wants and especially the needs of the world. There are entire populations of the world starving and dying of diseases that would otherwise be rather trivial to treat if only the REST of the world were as "above money" as the Fed is.

      The Fed is only "above money" in the sense that it doesn't have a limited amount of money to spend. On the other hand, it doesn't actually spend that money. If you had an organization that was creating vast amounts of money and spending it to acquire meaningful assets or services, that would be one issue. Since the Fed doesn't really spend money, the whole point is moot. There's a difference between money and wealth. The Fed only creates money. The problems you're referring to require wealth to fix. And the Fed doesn't control the buying and selling of goods and services. It merely keeps inflation more or less stable as our economy grows and shrinks. That's all.

      Life is meaningless to God since he creates it. Money is meaningless to the Fed since they create it. God enjoys the power of life because it makes him feel god-like and all-mighty. The Fed... well, you can see the parallels I'm drawing.

      Yes, but are they meaningful parallels? The Fed is just a highly regulated bank that sets a few constants in our economy. Nothing more. It's not a living, thinking entity. The people who run it have limited power for a limited time and tremendous responsibility comes with it.

      I find it rather fascinating that you'd go through all of this detail for all other things and attempt to make little of humanity's most basic and fundamental ambition which is world domination at any and all costs. We kill for money on a regular and frequent basis. There is no end to the horrors people are willing to perform to get it. But somehow "the fed" is above that.

      As I said, the Fed can create money, but it can't go out and spend the money. In fact, even if the Fed could spend the money it creates on anything other than open market operations, it wouldn't do any good in the long run, because in the end, money is money, not wealth. The Fed is simply not capable of dominating the world, and even though you seem convinced that it can, you can't seem to come up with a way it might bring about its dominance. The reason I went into the detail is because there are a lot of people who seem confused and mystified by the workings of what is essentially a large, non-profit bank whose job is to keep the economy running smoothly. I was hoping that maybe some people would learn something about how the system really works and why it's set up the way it is.

      The only thing we, the people have, is levels of accountability to control the people that regulate our lives. Where the fed is concerned, we have far less than we are willing to admit.

      If the Fed goes bannanas, Congress can shut it down before the end of the business day. If it starts acting funny, Congress can change the rules and audit every line of text the Fed has ever produced. There's no power beyond what Congress gives them, and there's no lack of accountability beyond what Congress allows there to be. If somebody can come up with a viable conspiracy theory that actually has a mechanism behind it, there might be reason for concern. As it stands, the people who seem to worry the most are the people who understand the least about how the system actually works.

      Where the fed is concerned, we have far less than we are willing to admit. And sure, the case is made frequently that the fed is virtually free from the influence of partisan politics and all that. But no one say anything about the influence and steering coming from the other side.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    21. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1
      they are just rearranging the deck chairs on our titanic
      Please use the Colbert-nomenclature of rearranging the deck chairs on the Hindenburg. Thank you.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    22. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Nope. I'm a high school dropout with a PhD. who wishes she had gotten a real education and I live in Ohio. And at least I can spell Aryan jackass. Of course, you don't have a fucking clue about anything which is why you can only resort to personal attacks:

      Your fascist position is indefensible.

      Do you know what the key to being right 100% of the time is?

      Know what you are talking about before you open your mouth.

      BTW jackass:

      Homeschooled children are the most intelligent and the most erudite (you probably don't even know what that means).

      http://www.google.com/search?q=Homeschooled+kids+a re+smarter

      And they're generally less prone to psychotic fantasies such as the beliefs you and lord_mike obviously posess.

    23. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you eat a dollar bill? Hea, if you don't want gold or money.. it I'll take it. lol

      thats value

    24. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1
      Worked for who... are you saying it worked for the people of America who owe what.. 8 trillion dollars?
      Exactly why do you think that our debt is the fault of the Federal Reserve system?
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
    25. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      The post I was replying to argued for a return to the gold standard, saying that gold has intrinsic value. Of course gold is valuable, I am not denying that, but the reason for its value is that people generally recognise it as being valuable, not because of any intrinsic property of gold. In that respect it is little different from paper money as a form of currency - both have value because they are generally accepted as being valuable, and both have a limited supply (gold because there is a finite amount of it, paper money because the production of it is restricted by law.)

    26. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by k1e0x · · Score: 0

      Well lets see here.. you could go look and see who owns the national debt.. because MOST of it is the Federal Reserve. Why is that? Because when America needs money for say.. a war.. we ask the Fed for a loan for full face value + interest + the printing cost. We could just have congress print the money as it states in the constitution and as we have done before. Both devalue the dollar but only one puts the government in debt.

      Why would we make debt when we don't have to? This system does not work out in the American peoples favor.

      Is it so crazy to suggest that congress just prints the money and makes it legal tender backed by its ability to collect taxes without paying a private bank a loan on it? I don't see why this is a hard sell to people and people who mention it are instantly labeled idiots and anarchists out to destroy this country. I love this place, but this long standing system of debt wrong.

      The good news is.. if the 16th admenment was ruled unconstitutional then.. it wouldn't start being against the law today.. it would have never been a law to begin with.. so we don't have to pay the debt at all.. (if that were even possible.)

      (I wrote the original.)

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    27. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by k1e0x · · Score: 0


      I read through this thread and it is a good read overall, you both make good points however.. comments like.

      Copid: "Some reforms may be a good idea, but the idea of having a well-regulated organization of experts maintaining currency stability and supply is a good one."

      That does not sit well with me at all for one basic reason, I'm being forced to have someone else balance my check book for me. Whatever my skill at math or my random luck may be... If I make $20 of wealth today, I want to have that same $20 of wealth in 50 years. This current system does not allow for that, and unlike The Fed (supposedly), that I am forced to support, I'm not responsible for all of business or all of the prosperity of the people of America, I'm responsible for only my own.

      I think that the aspect of controlling and regulating wealth itself is wrong and the Fractional Reserve Banking System itself can not work indefinably, because even though there is no finite amount of money there is a finite amount of wealth.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    28. Re:hard money == no inflation == no problem by Copid · · Score: 1
      Well lets see here.. you could go look and see who owns the national debt.. because MOST of it is the Federal Reserve.
      That's simply not true. Unless a *tremendous* amount has changed since 2000, the lion's share (90+ percent) of public debt is not in the hands of the Federal Reserve. In 2000, 8.7% of government bonds were held by the Fed. The Fed also rebates most of the interest back to the government.

      Why is that? Because when America needs money for say.. a war.. we ask the Fed for a loan for full face value + interest + the printing cost. We could just have congress print the money as it states in the constitution and as we have done before. Both devalue the dollar but only one puts the government in debt.
      What you're suggesting is a tax. The government could very easily change the way it operates and simply print money when it needed it, but the net effect is that when you need $X to get that done, you'll be decreasing the value of the currency out there by a net of at least $X through inflation. Essentially, you're taxing people who hold cash. If that's the policy you want, I suppose you're welcome to it, but destabilizing the value of currency in order to avoid simply working to balance the budget in the first place seems short sighted.

      Why would we make debt when we don't have to? This system does not work out in the American peoples favor.
      Currency stability. I agree that the better way to manage it is not to have huge budged deficits in the first place, but just printing money doesn't make the problem go away. It just causes the dollar to be unstable and acts as a back door tax on people who happen to be holding dollars at the time. Better to tax upfront with some sort of meaningful tax policy than to cause rampant inflation and let the chips fall where they may.

      Is it so crazy to suggest that congress just prints the money and makes it legal tender backed by its ability to collect taxes without paying a private bank a loan on it? I don't see why this is a hard sell to people and people who mention it are instantly labeled idiots and anarchists out to destroy this country. I love this place, but this long standing system of debt wrong.
      Well, yes, it is sort of crazy. Giving Congress the ability to issue money whenever they want gives total control over monetary policy to a governing body that (1) has no clue how to conduct healthy monetary policy and (2) has a strong incentive to print money without any regard for the consequences. As the system stands now, we're not really losing anything to the Fed, and any money that Congress borrows ends up in bonds on the open market. The net result is that there is a measurable amount of debt, the value of the dollar and rate of inflation are reasonably well controlled, and Congress has to *go into debt* when they do something stupid rather than running the presses and taking their mistake out on the American economy when nobody is looking. Anyway, the Fed is technically a private corporation, but it is a highly regulated non-profit system that is essentially just another government department. People who rail against it are often called idiots because it's pretty clear that they have no idea as to the particulars of how the system works. For example, where did you get the idea that the Fed was holding most of our debt??

      The good news is.. if the 16th admenment was ruled unconstitutional then.. it wouldn't start being against the law today.. it would have never been a law to begin with.. so we don't have to pay the debt at all.. (if that were even possible.)
      I don't really see what the 16th Amendment has to do with this, but I strongly doubt that any repeal of the Federal Reserve system would have a significant effect on the debt we have in bond form. Most of it is out there, circulating in money markets. If we just default on it, I'd consider it the beginning of the end for our economy. It would cause an international financial crisis of unheard of proportions.
      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  73. The current info is at coinflation.com by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    Check out Coinflation... they've been tracking this stuff for quite awhile now. You'll notice that the figures cited on the front page don't match what everyone has been cutting and pasting on here... that reflects the difference between replacement cost for the Mint, and raw melt value of the metal in the coin.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  74. Wrong. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
    Some AC said it was illegal to mutilate or deface paper money. Uh, no, it's not.

    Um, yes it is.
    1. Re:Wrong. by Koriani · · Score: 1

      As has been said before - It's only illegal if it's done with fraudulent intent.

    2. Re:Wrong. by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I kinda saw that later on in the thread on the Google link, but not till after I had posted it. But fraud and counterfeiting are separate crimes. If someone did deface money for fraudulent uses, they would be charged under one of the two in addition to "defacing money". It may be illegal to deface money only under certain circumstances, but it is still illegal nonetheless, so the parent poster is wrong to make the blanket statement it is alright.

      But in my own defense; I recently, has a sociology experiment, went shopping with uncut currency. To make the handling of the money easier I sought to have the bills perforated (yes, just like Steve Wozniak). But neither of the printers downtown would do it. Kinko's said they might be able to but the clerk said he would have to check with the D.A. first. So I walked up the street to ProPrint and they just flat-out refused, because it was money.

      Perforating the bills would not have been "defacing" under any definition, as it would have left them in fine shape for circulation, and the punching would have occured on lines that were normally cut anyway. So I wasn't marking or cutting any part of the actual bills, just the borders between them. It may not be an actual legal issue, but the chilling effect can be just as restrictive.

  75. Hmm. Any of you yanks have change for $10,000? by Nanoda · · Score: 1

    Hmm. Any of you yanks have change for $10,000?

  76. no hard currency by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
    a physical object of known value

    How does that hold up in the face of inflation? If the face value of the coin reflected the vaule of its material, I'd agree with you. But since the US economy is not currently based on "hard" currency, I don't think there is a good solution. We can push the problem off a few years is all.

    1. Re:no hard currency by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1
      Physical object of known value: How does that hold up in the face of inflation? If the face value of the coin reflected the vaule of its material, I'd agree with you.

      No -- I mean, I can count the bills and coins in my pocket *right now* and know how much money I have available. No need to call a phone # to talk to a robot or go to a bank's website. Plus, cash is never broken - you never hear "I'm sorry, our terminal is down". Cash till drawers can be opened manually with a key if the register fucks up or the power is out. I suppose they could take an imprint of your credit card like they did 20 years ago, but how many merchants still have the imprinting equipment and are willing to trust that they're getting something of value?

      -b.

  77. Which tells you everything you need to know by Scareduck · · Score: 1

    about inflation.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

  78. pennies by generic · · Score: 1

    So the $45.00 worth of pennies I saved since I was 7 is now worth like $80.00? Neat, now I can retire =P

    --
    Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
  79. Legal question? by isotope23 · · Score: 1

    From the link

    The United States Mint, concerned that rising metal prices could lead to widespread recycling of pennies and nickels, has banned melting or exporting them.

    Umm how can the US Mint "make" a law? Isn't that the perogative of Congress?

    It's funny and sad at the same time. I've been think about this for about a year. It's sad that we have devalued
    the dollar so much that pennies are now not worth their weight. We saw silver coins horded after 64, I think we'll
    see pennies and nickels go the same way.

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  80. In capitalist west by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In capitalist west, coins melt YOU!

  81. Gresham's Law will win out by ab762 · · Score: 1
    Gresham, of course, observed that "bad money drives out good", or that where there are two currencies with the same face value and differing intrinsic values, the one with the high intrinsic value disappears (by hoarding or conversion.) Gresham's law is why you don't see many old silver coins in your change.

    The rule in TFA is an attempt to avoid Gresham's law; it's left as an exercise to determine how large a profit on converting metals is needed to make the risk worthwhile. The orthodox economic prediction is either a shortage of small change or a reformulation.

    The case of the circulating penny provides a counter-example - there's a cost to conversion, and the roughly 100% excess value isn't quite enough for most people to horde the coin.

  82. HA! Too late! by sjs132 · · Score: 1

    Just about 2 days ago, I took 3grams of my Silver eagle (2005 Bullion) and 15grams of my 1trz gold bar along with 2grams of copper and alloyed it into 18Kt. Gold. Making a pendent for my wife. Guess I'll have to chop the rest of my eagle up really good so that they won't be able to tell what it is/was that I used for fine silver. ;)

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    1. Re:HA! Too late! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Um.. are those even real coins?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  83. as a capitalist, by dingDaShan · · Score: 1

    I must say that the US Mint needs some competition. Why does it cost so much to make a penny? If we just imported pennies from China, the mint would be able to actually make money.

  84. Replace them with coins made of artificial diamond by bazorg · · Score: 1

    that would be cool :D

  85. Where is our electronic currency? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    I don't see any reason we need pennies anymore. Even nickles are more annoying than they're worth. I'd suggest doing away with both and if people don't want to round off to the nearest 10 cents then they can use some form of check, credit card, or electronic cash. I have a big pile of pennies and nickles sitting in a drawer in my desk because it's to much hassle to spend them or convert them to more managable cash.

    It's about time the government offers us some form of electronic cash that we can optionally use. It's stupid for consumers and vendors to both be paying credit card companies and banks high fees in order to do basic commerce. If the government doesn't provide a form of electronic cash then they shouldn't complain if somebody else does it - with the obvious side effect of it making commerce very hard to tax if it's done by a third party.

    I'm shocked that no small country has figured out that electronic cash that is easy, secure, private, and doesn't have fees is the secret to making major profits. You don't have to offer the option to cash out so long as you can get enough businesses on board to begin with - easy enough as you can start your own. I've always imagined that instead of offering the ability to cash out of my electronic currency I'd set up some sort of online money market where others could convert between my currency and others while making a nice cut for themselves as part of the process.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Where is our electronic currency? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prices are up roughly a factor of 10 since the 1960s.
      In the 1960s we got along perfectly well with pennies,
      etc. So pennies and nickels now are completely useless
      and should be abolished. Give people a couple years
      to turn them in and then make them no longer legal.
      Then we could replace $1 and $5 bills with coins
      and have coins of useful denominations again.
      In another 40 years or so we can get rid of all
      coins less than a dollar and not worry about cents
      at all.

      Americans are paranoid about the appearance of their
      money, so this will never happen.

  86. I've got an idea! by wayward_son · · Score: 1

    How about a sane fiscal policy, for a change?

    "Borrow and squander" doesn't do much for the value of the dollar, does it?

  87. In other news... by uwbbjai · · Score: 1

    There is a sudden increase in the number of eBay auctions for the US penny.
    Starting bid at $0.02, will ship worldwide, seller ID USMint.

  88. why doesn't the government issue a recall by Katmando911 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, if you can pull a 2 cents per nickel profit by selling it as materials then why doesn't the government recall the current nickels (replace them with something cheaper to make) then melt them down 20,000,000,000 nickels X $0.02 cents profit per coin = $400,000,000 (minus of course the cost of the recall and the costs of converting the coins into raw materials)

    1. Re:why doesn't the government issue a recall by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you can pull a 2 cents per nickel profit by selling it as materials then why doesn't the government recall the current nickels (replace them with something cheaper to make) then melt them down 20,000,000,000 nickels X $0.02 cents profit per coin = $400,000,000 (minus of course the cost of the recall and the costs of converting the coins into raw materials)

      You're ignoring supply and demand. Doing this would hugely increase the supply of the metals without affecting the demand, and would therefore decrease the value of the metal -- possibly to the point where this would be a money-losing proposition.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    2. Re:why doesn't the government issue a recall by Katmando911 · · Score: 1

      POSSIBLY to that point, possibly still at a profit (400 million is the upper limit though) At the very least they should stop minting cents and nickels using the current formula. Even if that means temporarily stoping the minting of cents and nickels altogether.

  89. Australia and New Zealand by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    I believe this is why Australia and New Zealand did away with any value below 5c, if you are trading with coins and notes.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Australia and New Zealand by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      Actually we've now done away with 5c pieces in NZ as well. And shrunk the remaining 10c/20c/50c coins to a sensible size. My wallet feels a lot lighter :-)

  90. The copper standard by GrEp · · Score: 1

    Nice to know we are still on the copper standard :)

    --

    bash-2.04$
    bash-2.04$yes "Don't you hate dialup connections?"| write USERNAME
  91. Wow, I can be rich in no time by LM741N · · Score: 1

    I just take pennies, melt them down, and then sell them for more pennies. Repeat process over and over. Become rich!!

  92. Re:You are all wrong by djh101010 · · Score: 1

    I work for the U.S. Mint. So I am really getting a kick out of most of these replies.

    Fark.com called - they say they're sorry and they'll take you back.

  93. Re:You are all wrong by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    Have any information to share? We'd love to hear it.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  94. Electronic wallets by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of efforts to create electronic wallets, which are basically smart-cards that you can load from the bank machine and use in much the same way as a credit card. The problem for me with these things, is that they are usually owned and controlled by a private enterprise, rather than the national mint. If physical currency was ever to be phased out we shouldn't be locked into a system controlled by a non-state enterprise, since otherwise that enterprise would have to the potential to hold the country to ransom. Whatever negative aspects physical currency has, at least the exchange is limited to human error, and doesn't add an unnecessary third party for transactions.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:Electronic wallets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can all thank the War on Drugs(TM) for the Fed's complete lack of interest on eCash. About a decade ago, they were totally gung-on on the ideaa, and spent lots of money coming up with a brilliant implementation that facilitated convenient, anonymous transactions with electronic currency.

      The law enforcement agencies (DEA/FBI/Secret Service/fill in the blank) went berserk. Absolutely, totally, completely berserk. There's no way in HELL they'll allow a system that could enable a drug dealer to walk around with a million dollars in his or her wallet. Or shoe. The bastards weren't even content to let the Fed roll out anonymous eCash that could only hold up to a thousand dollars (like someone on vacation might easily spend in a weekend). They wanted every transaction to be recorded, with id-authentication along the way. The Fed gave up and walked away in disgust.

      Of course, there was one little dark side to the Fed's original proposal. Among other things, kidnappers could have gotten their eCash card to generate a large public key and mailed it to the victims' family (the key itself would be untraceable to the card... by intent and design) with a demand that they use that key to withdraw a million dollars from their own eCash card and generate a new, even bigger number authenticating the withdrawal and publish it in the local newspaper, whereupon the kidnappers could simply buy a copy, scan the number into their PC, and enter it into their eCash card, which would recognize a valid signature and add a million dollars to the kidnappers' card. Whereupon they could (with equal anonymity) transfer a thousand bucks into a thousand other cards... effectively laundering the money without a trace. All through the magic of asymmetric key encryption :-)

  95. Good read if you want to know more about the pb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This topic has been covered by a contributor of a citizen newspaper 2 weeks ago. His article is very well researched and explain the notions of inflation and debasement:

    http://losangeles.broowaha.com/article.php?id=435

    It's a very good read for anyone interested in the subject.

  96. What about souvenir coins? by bobl · · Score: 1

    So what does this mean for coins that have been stamped at those "souvenir coin" machines you see at popular tourist spots? Are you or are you not allowed to melt or export them? Stamping is not melting. Could a coin smelter/smuggler buy such a machine and run the coins through it first to avoid arrest? Or are souvenir coins now under legal protection?

  97. Debit cards reduce this more by CrazedWalrus · · Score: 1

    Until you need change for an item which comes to 11.97 after sales tax. You'll be tired of being ripped off two or three cents every transaction.

    No I won't:

    Figure 3c per transaction. Average maybe three transactions a day. 9c per day, or about $2.70/month.

    Or $32.85 per year.

    That's a dinner out for two at a cheap restaurant once per year. Not really a noticeable amount, even if every single thing I buy with cash ends up losing money by rounding and it's never in my favor.

    And all that assuming you're using cash for all of those transactions. I personally use a debit card almost always, and expect that to be the norm in the relatively near future. Computers deal with pennies just fine, and the electrons are cheaper than zinc! :-)
  98. A few corrections by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    The value of the currency has not dropped dramatically. As a matter of fact, it is too high by most estimates. And that is because China and other Asian countries are increasing foreign reserves to finance our trade imbalance. The federal deficit is actually less on a percentage basis than Japan and many European countries (France, Italy, Germany, etc).

    The reason coins are worth less than the metal is due to the spike in metal prices over the last several years. This you can blame on China for buying up every scrap of iron, aluminum, copper, and anything else they can get. Hey, they've got an expanding economy to feed.

    Oil is expensive because Opec got tired of $10 oil and everyone stopped investing in production. Throw in supply instability in Iraq, Nigeria, and Venezula; toss in higher demand from everyone; and you get a spike in oil prices.

    The higher euro is due to currency manipulation by Asian countries. Since the dollar is prevented from depreciating, the euro sees an odd effect and becomes overvalued.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:A few corrections by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

      There is a world of difference between deficit and debt. It is true that our debt as a percentage of GDP is not the highest in the world (althought the absolute value probably is the highest.) But our current deficit is so high that if we continue to go down this road we could just end up on top of the wonderful list!

      It is like a person putting thousands of dollars on the credit card each month and justifying it because they aren't as close to our limit as their neighbors are -- just wait a little while and everyone will all be in the same boat! I believe paying down the interest on the debt is already the second highest cost in the federal budget. Your tax dollars doing nothing thanks to supply side economics!

      I complained about us selling debt to China and others and the dollar dropping because of our trade imbalance and you say basically say: No it is ok because Asian countries (China) are manipulating things (buying our debt) so the dollar isn't as low as it should be (and the Euro is higher than it should be.) Isn't what you said pretty close to what I said but reworded to make it sound like it is a good thing? Correct me if I missed something.

      Look we are selling our country to China! Communist Red Evil Evil China! Weren't we supposed to have beaten the commies in the cold war? What gives? What do you think is going to happen if they demand their money back? They way out number us you know -- and they can kick our butts in ping pong :) And now they make all of our cheap electronic goods!

      And yes there are lots of reasons why the price of oil is high. One of those reasons is the devalueing of the dollar. Of course I would say that at least 9 out of 10 of the reasons for high price of oil can be blamed on one president. I am note sure if I can blame Katrina on Bush (maybe you can with global warming) but problems in the middle east, large profits by the oil companies, not cleaning up after katrina etc. etc. can be blamed on Bush.

      Listen I actually think it isn't a bad thing if the price of oil goes up because it could help us explore other energy sources. I brought it up because for some reason it gets Americans pissed to talk about it. Maybe it is because in the back of our minds we know the war should have lowered the price by now.

    2. Re:A few corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never said the debt was ok or that manipulation was ok. I was pointing out that you have your causes and effects wrong. You seem to be confusing federal debt and balance of payments (debt has far less effect on currency than balance of payments). Our coins are not worth more as metal than coinage because of currency revaluation, but because of metal commodities going through the roof (metals have tripled in price lately). Oil is not expensive because of currency shifts (or it would have remained cheap for others plus Bush is a minor factor in supply and demand).
       
      There's plenty to be pissed about, and I think you're pissed about the right topics. But geez, get your facts right.

  99. Pennies in a 100Kamp coil by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

    How about shrinking them?

    Oh, even better: melt down your pre-1982 pennies to make the copper shrink coil!

    --
    ---k--
    </stupid>
  100. Alternative explanation? by isotope23 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It may be peak copper, but there is another possible reason:

    Consider for a moment that gold and silver are normally used as a hedge against inflation. Over the last 20 years they have not kept up with inflation though. If you do any reading on the subject some claim this is due to central banks manipulating the price of gold/silver to help disguise inflation. If the above is true, gold and silver prices would stay depressed, but inflation would show up in other commodities. E.G. base metals as they have not been used as a typical investment hedge and thus the central banks would not have tried to manipulate their prices directly.

    The Fed quietly announced thanksgiving weekend in 2005 that they would no longer publish the M3 money supply figure. For those who don't know the M3 figure is the estimate of total US dollars out in the world. It was used by many as a direct gauge of US monetary inflation policy.

    Here is a link to a reconstituted M3 figure Some think the removal of this information was done to hide the true scope of the impending financial problems that are on the horizon.

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  101. Already been done by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    This was moderated funny, but back when dollars were worth a lot more than they are now, there were such things as thousand dollar bills. If they existed today there would be lots of demand for them. The highhest denomination is $100 to make it awkward to do big transactions with cash.

    1. Re:Already been done by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Actually, $1000 bills are still around and in use. They're only used for transactions between commercial banks and Federal Reserve banks. It's not yet illegal for others to use them, however, so if you really want one, you could probably get it.

    2. Re:Already been done by StressedEd · · Score: 1

      The UK also has one million pound notes (~two million USD these days), though they are for "internal use only".

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
  102. K Foundation burned one million pounds by Vainglorious+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No discussion of currency destruction is complete without mention of Bill Drummond and Jimmy Cauty of KLF burning one million pounds.

    --
    My next sig will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush
  103. But, Congress doesn't have the power... by msauve · · Score: 1

    to delegate it's authority, especially not to unelected bureaucrats. The entire mass of regulation is blatantly unconstitutional.

    It's one of those areas where the powers that be (all 3 branches) have simply chosen to ignore the Constitution (as if the Supremes stating that "Black is White" makes it so.), breaking the system of checks and balances in the process.

    The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.James Madison

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  104. Mod UP, Parent as funny as GP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously.

  105. Technically correct, but misleading by deblau · · Score: 1
    Before everyone goes insane (I know, this is /., it's already too late), read this article on the US Mint website. For those of you who are too lazy to RTFA:

    The US Mint published an interim rule blocking the melting of coins in the Federal Register, which is valid for 120 days. During the next 30 days, the Director of the Mint is required to accept public comments on the proposed rule. After 120 days, the Director will make a final decision. Anyone who has something to say that is more literate than "OMFGROFLBBQ! The US MINT is suxx0rzzzz!!1!11" is invited to comment at the website the government has set up just for that purpose, or submit comments in writing to:

    Office of Chief Counsel
    United States Mint
    801 9th Street, N.W.
    Washington D.C. 20220
    Make sure you get your comments in by January 14, 2007.
    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  106. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by mikeisme77 · · Score: 2, Informative
    While there's no denying that the value of US currency is on the decline, you must also factor in the fluctuation in value of the metals (copper in 1998 is not the same price as copper in 2006). I don't have the figure (and am too lazy to look it up), but likely the value of copper has gone up significantly since 1998 to help contribute to this rather large shift in value.

    On another note, kudos for linking to the Straight Dope (great site).

  107. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Shads · · Score: 2, Informative

    It isn't just a decrease in the value of a dollar, it's also an increase in the value of the metals.

    --
    Shadus
  108. Any truth here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this all real? Really, I want to know.

    1. Re:Any truth here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ask yourself these questions... you may understand.

      Who owns the federal reserve .. corporation ;)?
      What did Woodrow Wilson say about the Federal Reserve Act before he died?
      Why was there a Great Depression -after- the Federal Reserve Act if it was built to prevent such a thing?
      Was there another central bank in the United States.. and what is on Andrew Jacksons tombstone?
      Why does the government pay full dollar amount including the printing cost for "loan" if it has the power to print its own money debt free?
      Why is it impossible to pay off the national debit?
      Why is there no audit on the gold in Fort Knox? Or the even better question.. Why is there so little gold?
      If your grandfather put $20 in his mattress, and forgot about it, why do you only get $5 worth of buying power when you find it 50 years later?
      And lastly.. if you have $100 in your bank are you allowed to write a check to your friend for $700? How do the banks get away with that?

      Go and find the answers.. its not hard. The Fed controls the press, but not the internet.

  109. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Poruchik · · Score: 1

    It's a function of higher value of commodities as well as decline of US currency.

    --
    $signature =~ s/$signature//;
  110. A use for the new number "nullity"? by Javarufus · · Score: 1

    Just think if the U.S. Mint decides to stamp George W. Bush's noggin on the penny or nickel.

    Wouldn't that in effect devalue the monetary value of the coin to be less than $0.00? Maybe this would be the first "real world" application of the newly-coined (no pun intended) number "nullity"?!?

  111. When smelting is outlawed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...only outlaws will be smelters.

  112. Gold Standard by metalligoth · · Score: 1

    Section. 10.

    No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.


    People enjoy flaming me lately but I'll say this anyway: the Federal Reserve act was illegal. Unless you're in a territory of the Federal Government, gold or silver is the only thing that is legally money in the United States, period.

    1. Re:Gold Standard by flyboyfred · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Try reading that again. I clearly says "No State". Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power "...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof...". Of course states can't coin money, but the Federal Reserve Act isn't a state law. See also the Wikipedia entry on the Federal Reserve Act.

      --
      I might be indecisive, but I'm not really sure. What do you think?
    2. Re:Gold Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep .. Nonsense ..

      your opinion and Wikipedia are the final word on true and reality ..

    3. Re:Gold Standard by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      What makes your opinion any better?

  113. This regulation violates property rights by deblau · · Score: 1
    If this regulation is allowed to stand, it would be an infringement upon the right of the owner of property (in this case, currency), to use that property freely. It stands to reason that you can't wash a $1 bill and try to pass it as a $100 bill -- that's fraud. But you can wash as many $1 bills as you want, paint on them, and sell them as art. The same should be true for coins, and people already punch holes in coins and sell them as jewelry. I should be able to sell my pennies as copper if I want, because I'm not perpetrating a fraud or violating any public policy.*

    The government could come along and simply declare that currency is government property which it 'loans out' at no cost. Of course, doing so would be an incentive for people to use other currencies over which they have unlimited control.

    * For those of you who would argue that melting coins removes them from circulation, thereby interfering with Congress' power to regulate their value, I respond that if people want to melt them down, the government is doing a lousy job of regulating their value in the first place. Besides, the Congress derives its power from the People, and the People are entirely within their rights to promote public policy, and you can pick your favorite: private property ownership, limited government, efficiency in the copper and nickel markets, the right to exchange value for value...

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    1. Re:This regulation violates property rights by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Except you would be committing fraud if you tried to sell your pennies as "copper", because pennies are mostly zinc. The only copper in a penny is that portion contained in the bronze plating.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    2. Re:This regulation violates property rights by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I should be able to sell my pennies as copper if I want, because I'm not perpetrating a fraud or violating any public policy.

      So why isn't breaking a regulation against melting coins down a violation of public policy?

    3. Re:This regulation violates property rights by deblau · · Score: 1
      All US pennies minted from 1864 until 1982* are 95% copper. See this US Mint webpage. These pennies are worth more than 2 cents apiece.

      * Most 1943 pennies were zinc-coated steel, due to the need for copper in the war effort.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    4. Re:This regulation violates property rights by deblau · · Score: 1
      A public policy is a moral stance. A law or regulation is a rule that hopefully effectively implements a public policy. It is critically important to keep the two ideas separate. For instance, protecting human life is an important public policy, and we implement that policy by enacting laws against murder. One can argue that the laws against murder, or their enforcement by the police, are ineffective, but that argument does not undermine the importance of the policy against taking life. If one set of laws isn't working out, we can always enact a different set of laws without changing the underlying policy.

      Controversial social issues, such as abortion, arise because of a conflict between public policies. For example, abortion is such a contentious issue because it lies in an area of conflict between the important public policies of the right to live, and the right to choose how you live.

      Melting coins may violate a regulation, but it doesn't contravene public policy. As I explained in another post, there are several public policies that would be violated by taking away private coin melting, such as the right to use one's personal property however one sees fit, without interference from the government.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    5. Re:This regulation violates property rights by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      A public policy is a moral stance.

      Not according to any generally accepted definition I have ever seen.

      Here are a few from an internet search:

              * A set of action guidelines or rules that results from the actions or lack of actions of governmental entities.
                  www.cdc.gov/genomics/gtesting/ACCE/FBR/CF/CFGlossa ry2.htm

              * Related to the social or legislative ramifications of government policies. The corollary glossary term "political aspects" is customarily applied to the process of arriving at those policies.
                  lib.ucr.edu/depts/acquisitions/YBP%20NSP%20GLOSSAR Y%20EXTERNAL%20revised6-02.php

              * Is whatever governments choose to do or not to do (Thomas Dye 1992: 2). Such a definition covers government action, inaction, decisions and non-decisions as it implies a very deliberate choice between alternatives (see Hall and Jenkins 1995).
                  www.stile.coventry.ac.uk/cbs/staff/beech/BOTM/Glos sary.htm

  114. Selling Fork Lift Accessories by Dareth · · Score: 1

    ... oh, and the German word for fork lift is: Gabelstapler
    Just don't try and eat one. *wink*

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  115. Why? by Click+and+drag · · Score: 1

    Why make coins that are worth more than their value? Since we have a fait system, the coins could be made of plastic for all the efect it would have on the value.

  116. Penny press by empaler · · Score: 1

    I was thinking the exact same thing - I had a penny pressed when I was in the Empire State Building 8 years ago... Although someone mentioned something along the lines of destroying a legal tender being illegal.

    1. Re:Penny press by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      Destroying legal tender (or, in fact, damaging it in any way) and then trying to pass it for legal tender is illegal. Destroying it is not, seeing as, in theory anyway, the United States is a free country and you can do what you want with what you own. And surprisingly, money is not owned by the Government. However, it is illegal to deface money and then try to use it (this was used to stop people from "clipping coins" back when they were actually something valuable...like silver or gold. Now, there's less point to it, but if copper and nickel keep getting more expensive, who knows?)

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    2. Re:Penny press by LordSnooty · · Score: 1
      And surprisingly, money is not owned by the Government.
      Is that true? How about this: You own the monetary unit expressed by the coin, but the coin itself remains the property of the govt. They can recall coins any time they like, they decide if a particular coin is legal tender or not. They issue the coins and decide its composition.

      I would argue that the physical unit of currency is owed by the govt, and is given to you with the promise that someone will redeem it with goods to the value of the coin. However it is the govt's fault that the coins have lost their value, as the dollar continues the slide down the graph.
    3. Re:Penny press by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      I really am not sure how much the government owns the physical unit of currency. Sure, they can recall them, decide whether it is legal, make it devalue *oooh, they're good at that one* but I do not believe that they can prosecute you for doing anything to your money. It isn't illegal to burn your money. Or decide to melt down your pennies for the copper (well, at least, it wasn't when I did it...). Individual property ownership laws apply to any money you have in your possession. However, like you said, the government can decide if a coin is legal tender or not. I think what it boils down to is: if you intentionally mess with money, you are making it no longer money. So that's your loss, but the government isn't able to prosecute you for doing it.

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    4. Re:Penny press by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

      I would say you absolutely own the physical coin or bill. I the government might be able to decide to stop honoring them at some time in the future. (I say might because the bills say they are legal tender on them so they probably can't just retroactively void existing currency.) If they did this, you could still coins and bills with anyone who agrees to accept them, like the Liberty Dollars. I don't believe the mint has the authority to issue this rule because ti would be in direct conflict with standard property rights. The limits on exporting them is equally unenforceable.

  117. Mil rate, anyone? by ab762 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Traditionally North American property taxes have been computed on the "mil rate" - where the "mil" or "mill" or even "mille" is a "millidollar", or tenth of a cent. The lack of a mil coin has not particularly bothered anyone, although a half-cent coin apparently existed until 1857.

    All "hard money" is just an accounting fiction anyway. As are paper money and credit.

  118. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "While there's no denying that the value of US currency is on the decline, you must also factor in the fluctuation in value of the metals (copper in 1998 is not the same price as copper in 2006). "

    Cool...does that mean we get to mint steel pennies again?

    I actually got one in change a few years back...you just don't see them that often anymore unless in a coin collection.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  119. Real kingpins use gold not FDRs by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    All those movies showing cash suit cases are so funny.

    Money is hard to use in large quantities, its all serializes too.

    A 1000ounce bar = $650000 = 31Kg

    So 3 bars is nearly 2 million dollars, or 100Kg, yeah not quite easy to carry, but at least you can put it on a little old ladies shopping trolly.

    And guess what.... customs usually has no taxes duties or restrictions if you are transporting gold, but carry cash, and your toast.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  120. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Gyppo · · Score: 0

    According to the article, 1.7 cents is not the value of the metal in the penny, it is the cost of making the penny, which includes the value of the metal. Interestingly enough, it also says that the metal in pennies from 1982 and earlier (which are 95% copper) is 2.13 cents. I've always thought that the government benefits when coins are taken out of circulation since it increases the value the dollar. Which is clear since for awhile now people could profit now by melting down 1982 and earlier pennies. But now that the pennies cost more than 1 cent to produce, it is no longer beneficial. I wonder if this law will drop from the books once the composite in the penny is changed so that the metal value of a penny is once again less than 1 cent.

  121. Might I Suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  122. plastic by tacocat · · Score: 1

    plastic money?
    it's going to be hard to find any coin material that can cost less then the face value, be durable, and still large enough to find.
    maybe they can use slag.

  123. EULA by tygt · · Score: 1

    So is the EULA printed really small on the pennies somewhere and I just haven't noticed?

  124. Mod Parent Up! $1 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 coins! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paper is too easy to counterfeit.

    Money coins that cost almost as much as the coin's face value -
    removes the desire to make fake money.

    The $1 gold coin was a good start,
    $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 $500 $1000 coins would be great!

    Paper Money sucks. Coins are better - and a treasure chest full of phat loot looks better full of shiny metal!

    Coins last longer, and have a cheaper cost over the life of the coin.
    They wont bleach, rip, or otherwise get easily destroyed.

    Put 4 or 5 coins in your pocket and you have enough money for the whole night.

    Mass shipping of drug money becomes impossible - a man with a 400 lbs suitcase has a lot of explaining to do at the airport.

    Coins are better! Certain alloys can be tested to be the real thing.
    For quick and easy scanning - sandwich an RFID chip inside the middle of the coin with it's serial number and value. Easy to track.

    Far from funny - coins can be the solution to high tech crimes and eliminating easily duplicated cash.

  125. Canada by freeweed · · Score: 1

    Us Canadians aren't nearly so cheap when we go out.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Canada by Neoncow · · Score: 1

      Yeah but remember that one US Dollar is equivalent to.. ah.. Hmm.. you're right that's cheap.

  126. Nitric acid's effect on coins? by meltzroth · · Score: 1

    Would this apply to putting a coin into nitric acid since the resulting ions can be turned back into the metal through an electrochemical reaction?

  127. counterfeit coins? by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    unless they dramatically change how coins are made, it would probably be easier to fake one than it is to print passable fake paper currency. there are tons of presses sitting idle in this country that could turn out coins if somebody cared to make the dies. might not be as efficient as printing sheets of bills, but it could be done i would think. i am guessing the effort would only pay off for something like a $10 (and up) coin value.

    i don't know how true it is, but i remember reading something stating that there were more counterfeit $10 bills now because they are generally not checked like a $20 or $50 would be (with that magic pen). i know they exist to some extent because my housemate got one somewhere. it looked valid, but the paper was junky. it looked like it had been passed around a good bit though. he had no idea where he picked it up and got stopped trying to use it to buy his morning coffee.

  128. Better Solution! by Bob-taro · · Score: 1
    it wants to block wholesale export of coins to countries where recycling them for their metal content could be economically viable.
    Okay, I found some numbers and the profit (metal value - face value) is $1.08 / kg for cents, and $4 / kg for nickels. I don't know what the cost of melting and processing 1 kg of coins would be in the U.S., but I think shipping costs would likely kill any international coin melting efforts.

    It seems to me that the best thing the U.S. Mint could do for itself is to beat everyone to the punch - it should work with banks to collect, melt down, re-mint all the existing coins! Problem solved! The coin collectors would support this because their old coins would suddenly increase in rarity value!

    You know, I said that in jest, but the more I think about it ... I don't see a downside.

    --
    Prov 9:8 Do not rebuke mockers or they will hate you; rebuke the wise and they will love you.
  129. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by RKBA · · Score: 4, Insightful
    the value of copper has gone up significantly since 1998
    You have it backwards just as almost all so called "news reporters" do (including even financial reporters). The value of copper, gold, nickle, etc., hasn't changed at all. The reason copper and all other items cost more than they used to is because the value of the US Dollar has declined. One ounce of pure gold still buys a good quality men's suit just as it always has.
  130. a penny for your thoughts... by Dark+Fire · · Score: 1

    Even better, when you offer someone a penny for their thoughts, it might someday be worth more than your two cents. :)

  131. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by feepness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It isn't just a decrease in the value of a dollar, it's also an increase in the value of the metals.

    I'm sorry and this isn't personal but I'm amazed at how little financial acumen we collectively have. This is the financial equivalent of being surprised that 40% of all sick days are taken on Monday and Friday.

    The dollar being worth less and things costing more are exactly the same phenomenon. The value of the metals did not inherently increase. Were this lmited to a specific metal or commodity I would believe it, but it is very broad based and therefore can be traced to a monetary phenomenon (record low interest rates, loose lending practices, and increased consumer/government debt).

  132. How are they going to know? by edraven · · Score: 1

    Is there anything about a lump of copper that identifies it as former pennies?

  133. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could contract with the US mint to mint new coins as you remove old ones from circulation. Pull Cu pennies and mint Zn ones ;)
    Arbatroge baby!
    -nB

    --
    whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  134. then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I says, replace them with plastic chips.

  135. Oh well... by Dretep · · Score: 1

    Now I definitely have no reason to visit the US. I only went so I could collect change and melt it down at home...

    1. Re:Oh well... by dheera · · Score: 1

      yeah, what if you're a Russian citizen, visit the US, and take a bunch of nickels to Russia to melt down? the US can't pull you out of there because you didn't melt it while being subjected to their law.

  136. Re:Mod Parent Up! $1 $5 $10 $20 $50 $100 coins! by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    Money coins that cost almost as much as the coin's face value - removes the desire to make fake money.

    And introduces the desire to clip. Back when coins were made of silver and gold, people used to trim the edges of coins, keep the clippings and then pass the coin on at face value.

    DECUS ET TUTAMEN is written around the milling on the edge of a pound coin. Decoration, and protection. The milling is there because, historically, it would have revealed that a coin had been clipped. But I imagine modern counterfeiters would be able to melt down a gold coin, extract a little profit margin, and then re-stamp it with the very same design but imperceptibly smaller. While you can embed a whole lot of clever printing tricks and watermarks in a paper note, there's a limit to how well you can stamp metal and not expect the fine details to wear away.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  137. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This is the financial equivalent of being surprised that 40% of all sick days are taken on Monday and Friday. "

    Your analogy is flawed. While Monday and Friday represent 40% of the work week, there is nothing that statistically implies that the distribution of sick days over the work week is even (20% per day). It could be 40% of all sick days occur on Monday and Friday, but it may very well be 90% or 0%. Personally, I would think it would be higher than 40%, due to proximity of those days to the weekend, therefore I would be *very* surprised to find out that what you said is true.

  138. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by feepness · · Score: 1

    therefore I would be *very* surprised to find out that what you said is true.

    So would I. It's just an old joke.

  139. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His analogy WAS flawed, but not in the way you said. You DO realize that people work on weekends, right? While you're relaxing and taking in a movie, you DO notice the human beings who are selling tickets and popcorn, right? Monday and Friday are a little less than 29% of the work week, including weekends. Furthermore, there's no consideration being given to the fact that while Monday and Friday are 2/7 of the days in a week that an individual could work, that there may be a statistical bias as to which of those seven days are most often worked by the most people... which could also lead to a bias in the taking of sick days.

    That, and the fact (as has already been commented) that it's just an old joke ANYWAY, indicates that you should've thought your comment through a bit better.

  140. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    The dollar being worth less and things costing more are exactly the same phenomenon.

    Worth less what though? If $1 buys 10 potatoes or 1 lb of copper today, and then next week it buys 9 potatoes or .5lbs of copper, then we can assume (from our limited data) that the dollar has weakened AND copper has gone up in value, which are two seperate phenomenon.

    By the way, nickles are 75% copper.

  141. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by rrkap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The dollar being worth less and things costing more are exactly the same phenomenon. The value of the metals did not inherently increase.

    The value of metals DID increase relative to other commodities. So the parent post is right to say that it is a combination of a general decline in the value of the Dollar and an increase in the price of Zinc and Copper.

    --
    I like my beverages with warning labels!
  142. You might be right, but you're still a dick. [n/t] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO TEXT

  143. The Real Point .. by eyeb1 · · Score: 0

    your Missing the real point ..

    america and its $ are dying ..

    The old saying goes "not worth the paper its printed on"

    the US dollar is not even worth the materials that it is made of .. the US dollar is going to tank and take the Empire with it ..

    the things that have help america milk wealth from the rest of the world for decades are going away ..

    it must now import 75+% of it's energy demands ..

    it is losing is position as the black-market currency of chose .. through out the rest of the world ..

    it is losing it's power (by demand of the US) as the oil reserve currency in the world ..

    it will lose it place as the standard for calculating the valuing foreign debt ..

    pre 9/11 per person share of the US debt was about $40,000 .. currently it is about $300,000

    all china has to do is write off as a bad debt .. it debt with america and it is all over ..

    or the rest of OPEC .. minus the house of saudi of course .. beginning to trade in Eruo's

    and/or ETC. ..

    america is really nothing but the proxy of the Holy Roman Empire .. and they are both about to meet their end ..

    an over valued player on the world stage .. equal to less than 6% of the worlds population .. numbers do and will rule ..

    REV 18:11 "and the merchants of the earth will weep and mourn over her, for no one buys their merchandise anymore:"

    the LAW ..

    a Judaeo-Christian conspiracy designed to control the world and the common man ..

    the 2%(ruling Class) of the people who control 50% of the wealth .. allow 8% of the rest of us a 35%(royal court) share of the wealth .. to keep the other 90% of us brainwashed and from taking a democratic share of the wealth from the 2% ..

    the royal court .. the politicians .. the judges .. the lawyers .. the false educators .. the movie-makers .. the military .. the police .. ETC.

    without economic equality .. there can and will be no other equality of any kind .. ensuring a continual global state of WAR=We Are Right ..

    are all human-beings equal .. no .. but all human beings are worthy of equal treatment and opportunity ..

    democracy = the common man being in control of his own life .. not 50% + 1

  144. Few Thousand years too late by Xeth · · Score: 1

    The ancient Spartans used low-value, heavy iron money. They despised mercantile living and wanted to discourage it. It also made bribery more difficult.

    --
    If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
  145. Think about this logically by darrenadelaide · · Score: 1

    In Australia we did away with 1c and 2c coins sometime ago, which has made a lot of Common Sense.

    For Example when you go to the Supermarket, you bill isnt going to be $2.53 is more likely to be $102.53 which we round to $102.55, its just an accepted thing.. 1&2 go down to 0, 3-7 round to 5, 8&9 round up.

    We Dont need to carry these poxey little coins, and soon we will see the 5c removed from circulation. Its no problem.

    Maybe the US Government should look at no longer minting below 10c and apply rounding, eg 1-4 down to 0, 5-9 up to next 10.

    It seriously does not make sense to make cents.

    Darren

    1. Re:Think about this logically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no .. how about looking at it historicaly ..

      what does not make logical sense .. is the people accepting abstract moving values for currency ..

      currency without a fixed standard .. which is what allows for inflation ..

      in america and hence the rest of the practical monetary world started by Nixon because of his need to finance the vietman war WAR=We are Right ..

      my father as a boy early 40's .. could by a hamburger for 5 cent .. same for a chocolate bar .. they were about 100 grams by the way .. not the 30 to 45 grams of today .. a coke 5 cents also ..

  146. Burning piles of banknotes by smileytshirt · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of an article on wikipedia about Hyperinflation that I was reading yesterday. It has an image of a German woman feeding her stove with banknotes because the burning power of the notes is greater than the burning power of the wood that she could buy with the money

    --
    www.shortman.com.au - top shorted stocks on the ASX
  147. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

    Are you claiming the value of a dollar has decreased by a factor of 4 in the last three years the value of copper to increase by a factor of 4?

    While you are right that slippage of the dollar relative to other currencies will lead to increases in base metal prices in dollar terms, this clearly cannot be the only factor or the primary factor moving those prices, given what we've observed in the last few years. While the value of copper in some abstract sense may not have changed, clearly its price in real terms did (not to mention nominal terms), and that will apply in basically ever currency.

  148. The banks are evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, basically... your an idiot.

    The Federal Reserve (est: 1913) -caused- The Great Depression (1929) If it "prevented it" .. why did the depression happen almost 2 decades AFTER?

    Before 1913 business were expanding on profit alone, not on loans.. so in other words business were so successful that they didn't need to seek extra funding to expand. How exactly is that a bad thing? How do you account for America becoming the richest nation on earth, rivaling any other nation in only 100+ some short years? The reason is.. we had true economic freedom, a debt free money system and an abundance of resources. We went from having virtual nothing (except a huge debt to France) to being the richest nation in the world "basically" overnight.

    But it has little to do with a Gold Standard.. The problem is really Fractional Reserve Banking. Artificially creating money from nothing to fund economic growth creates a system that can not sustain itself. It causes the poor to get poorer by taking loans and the rich to get richer by issuing loans. Its so simple a child could understand it.. its shocking that a country that prides itself on being "smart" can't grasp this..

    Fractional Reserve Banking and the Federal Reserve are not only wrong they are evil. (If you conciser a slow and steady system of theft and slavery evil.. some people like that sort of thing.)

    I need a slashdot account so someone will read this..

  149. Okay but.. by eebra82 · · Score: 1

    In a hundred years:

    Can I still wipe my ass with bills or do I have to use the more expensive toilet paper I hear people talking about?

  150. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

    American nickels have little nickel in them. Which isn't bad, as nickel can be carcinogenic.

    Canadian nickels had (have?) enough nickel in them that they will stick to a magnet. Nickel and Iron are both attracted to magnets.

  151. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    Pennies are made of zinc, not copper except it's coating which is minimal. Haven't for a while. I don't think the other coins have a significant copper content.

  152. Credit Niven... by Farrside · · Score: 1

    When Niven is due credit.

  153. My kingdom for a mod point! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that "stick it to the man" comment put 2c of coffee up my nose.

  154. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    This is the financial equivalent of being surprised that 40% of all sick days are taken on Monday and Friday.

    That's simply not true. I take 100% of my sick days on Monday and Friday ;)

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  155. Inflation by geoff_smith82 · · Score: 1

    well just according to the us government Statistics CPI, the US dollar has lost 90-95 percent of it value. This should price gold today at around $800. Of course the CPI is manipulated to be lower than it really should be, so gold should really be higher than that. See Shadow Stats for more details on that. I can't find a graph now, but if you graph of the cpi you will see that it is fairly flat until 1913, when the Federal reserve was created on December 23rd 1913 (guess why on that date).

    The Fed is not there to stop inflation but to create it!!!!! They are the biggest counterfeiters and fraudsters (also in control of the biggest ponzi scheme)in the world (along with all the other central banks), helping steal REAL wealth from the masses and giving it to the banks, who receive the newly created high power money first. People know that communism didn't work because the central planners could not work out what was needed. Well what makes you think the "central planning" Federal Reserve can do any better. Finally with the Federal Reserves role as managing the currency as well as policing the banks is like a fox guarding the hen house.

    Finally the average life of a fiat currency is about 30 years, the US dollar in its current form is about due for demise.

  156. Under what authority? by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    Under what authority does the Treasury Department claim to be able to pass a regulation which is a penal statute? I am not saying agencies/departments of the executive branch cannot promulgate regulations. For example, the DEA can, with approval of the attorney general, decide to make a substance a controlled substance, which would then be illegall to possess, etc. But I do not see any statute that lets the Treasury Department (in which the Mint resides) decide that doing something with coins will be punishable by up to 5 years in prison. Where is the enabling statute? Such a broad declaration sure seems like a separation of powers issue; it is for Congress to decide that people can't melt down coins. In addition, I cannot find this proposed regulation anywhere. Not in the federal register http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html or at regulations.gov. Can anyone find the text of this proposal? It will say under what authority the TD claims to ban melting.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  157. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    No Canadian coins have any metal with intrinsic value in them any longer. There was an uproar in the Numismatic community awhile ago, I think within the last year, because the Royal Canadian Mint withdrew ALL the old coinage and replaced it with plated steel coinage. It was actually a moneymaking proposition for the Mint, as the value they recovered from the older coingage for it's metals was more than the cost of the conversion to plated steel coins. The RCM did it without saying anything to anybody about the process. They simply pulled all non-steel coinage out of circulation as it passed through the banks. In the process, they withdrew and melted a lot of nice commemorative coins that had made their way into circulation over the last decade.

  158. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by cagrin · · Score: 1

    Metals - precious or otherwise - have been in a Bull Market for about 5 years now. The price of copper, zinc, nickel, silver, gold, etc has skyrocketed over the last several years and there appears to be no stop to it yet.

    --
    ~ awaiting spiritual enlightenment ~
  159. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have it backwards just as almost all so called "news reporters" do (including even financial reporters). The number of people who don't understand that money is a commodity like coffee or copper is scary. Or should I say currencies are commodities, money is the value?

    However, gold, copper, nickle are also commodities which can change in relative value, just like money or coffee. It just depends where the value goes. You could think of them as a cloud of things all moving up and down relative to one another. There is no fixed point other than one you choose, like gold or dollars.

    At the moment, yes, the dollar is in freefall, demand for it is reducing and the supply is as high as it's ever been.
    --
    Deleted
  160. Inflation doesn't hit all commodities equally by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It's a mistake to think that a weakening currency hits all commodities equally, it doesn't. It has a proportionately larger effect on items which have a high demand, oil, property etc. So the copper may be in higher demand than the potatoes. The second thing is that the increasing price effect ripples through the economy just like a wave, it doesn't hit everything at exactly the same moment. In particular when suppliers increase their prices, the business then has to pass the increase on.

    It's the same phenomenon, you're just seeing the slightly different effects of demand and point in time.

    --
    Deleted
  161. hey, yeah! That was the plan, actually by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    Actually one of my friends is the big one on this idea.

    Step 1: Get access to a smelting plant on the US side of the border.
    Step 2: Get access to a nearby smelting plant on the Canadian side of that same border.
    Step 3: ??? (well, you can guess...)
    Step 4: Profit!

    Previously we had realized that the U.S. laws would probably let us get away with melting it all down on the U.S. side, but this change in laws just means back to Plan A, 'tis all.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  162. The US can't/shouldn't get rid of pennies by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    When the half-cent was abolished in 1857 it was worth more than eight cents in today's currency. It's time for the penny to go, along with the paper dollar. You see... The US Dollar is the world's reserve currency. This means that all over the world, trades are made in US dollars, including in countries where $20 per month is a good wage.

    In another 20 years or so, they may as well get rid of the nickel too. Only if the government continues to print money and run up huge debts with abandon. If instead they start to pay off the debt, the value of the currency will increase. Inflation is a feature of not paying off the national debt and/or printing more money. Both of which are completely within the control of the government. Supply and demand.
    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The US can't/shouldn't get rid of pennies by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      This means that all over the world, trades are made in US dollars, including in countries where $20 per month is a good wage.

      Most transactions are STILL going to be electronic and not physical cash. For example: I can buy a product from Australia (where they don't have pennies either) in US dollars with my credit card and have it shipped to me in the US (did this last month in fact.)

      It's irrelevant that some countries have crappy wages - they use local currency for paying people. Once you get enough local currency, you can trade it in for US dollars if that is your thing...

      Only if the government continues to print money and run up huge debts with abandon.

      And by looking at history, you somehow have come to the conclusion that they won't????

    2. Re:The US can't/shouldn't get rid of pennies by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Most transactions are STILL going to be electronic and not physical cash. Only in the west/developed countries. In many countries with crappy wages, dollars are preferred to local currencies. While US inflation runs at 2%->5% or so, the local currency inflation tends to run far higher, 30%, 50%, 1000% etc per anum.

      And by looking at history, you somehow have come to the conclusion that they won't???? God no. However it's a conscious decision to be made and if there ever happened to be a fiscally responsible government in place, it could go the other way.
      --
      Deleted
  163. Redesigning US coins is *SO* overdue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets face it - US coins, much like the paper money, are pretty unimaginitive. The State 25c series is Ok, and the new nickel designs are a fresh breeze in a stale room. A complete overhaul of US coin sizes and designs is long overdue, and very urgently needed. The shocking part is that certain politicians have the time to rather introduce a pet Bill (passed already) to effigize past Presidents on $1 coins over the next 17 years. Nobody wants the current $1 coins - never mind millions of new ones. The poor Post Office will land up stockpiling them. Imagine another 40-odd varieties of unwanted $1 floating about - yuck! So here is my idea: smaller, lighter coins all around. An Aluminum penny, light copper 5c, the current dime is Ok, a smaller quarter, scrap the $1/2 completely, and a maybe more practical bi-metal $1. Oh, and stop printing $1 bills if you want people to use the $1 coins.

  164. You think Pennies are bad? What about Half Cents? by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness that we got rid of the 'half cent' coin....

    Imagine scrounging up 200 of those to make a dollar... :-P

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
  165. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by shaitand · · Score: 1

    That can't be accurate for all metals. For instance, about 3 months ago I purchased a bar of silver. The last time I checked the silver was worth about 20% more than what I paid, not bad because I am using the commodity price and I paid a premium over that price plus shipping when I bought it. Real inflation is bad and certainly is higher than the so called 'rate of inflation' numbers, but the dollar did not lose 20-25% of its value in the past 4 months!

  166. I'd prefer to get rid of both of them by dara · · Score: 1

    When I type in 1945 and 2005 into http://www.westegg.com/inflation/, it shows an inflation of about a factor of 10. Given I don't think they had 1/10 of a cent in 1945, what the hell do we need with either of these stupid coins now? If it were up to me, I'd get rid of the quarter too and use the more sensible 1, 2, 5 progression of the Euro. So we can keep the dime as is, come up with a new design for 20 cents , 50 cents, 1 dollar and 2 dollar and then redesign the paper bills (5, 10, 20, 50, 100) to be telescoping in length as they should have been this last go around.

    Dara Parsavand

  167. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Sorry, you're mistaken. If you'd demonstrated any sort of perpensity for looking things up, you'd notice that over the past 8 years the price - or rather, the inherrent value - of precious and semi-precious metals have been climing an increasingly rapid rate for (oh) the last 5+ years (I can't immediately recall). This has been particularly marked in the the last year and a half to two years.

    This is mostly contributable to three factors, as near as I can tell:
    1) China's increasing industrialization, modernization, and militarization
    2) India's economy flourishing
    3) Static, or even dwindling, supplies

    I know this partially because I've researched it a bit, but also because I purchase a fairly large amount of goods with high quantities of copper and zinc - loaded firearm cartridges, which are composed of copper, brass, and lead (as well as gunpowder). Prices in this industry have gone up (I'd guess) close to 100% in the last two years, and there's been some supply problems as well.

    I've also heard from those in the construction business who say it's become necessary to keep guards on construction sites, or revise the way they're constructing buildings: people are breaking into job sites and ripping out all the copper wire from partially-built buildings, something that can and does cost the contractor tens of thousands of dollars.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  168. Against the law to deface currency? by drix · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case you're wondering like me why this wasn't already against the law, I looked it up and the relevant section of US code appears to apply only to bills and banknotes. I guess this also explains why those tourist-trap penny presses are also still around.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
  169. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

    the value of copper has gone up significantly since 1998
    You have it backwards just as almost all so called "news reporters" do (including even financial reporters). The value of copper, gold, nickle, etc., hasn't changed at all. The reason copper and all other items cost more than they used to is because the value of the US Dollar has declined. One ounce of pure gold still buys a good quality men's suit just as it always has. No, you have it wrong. Demand for copper has increased drastically in the last 3 years. Take a look at copper prices in relation to any currency. Look at the copper mines in Indonesia and Chile, which are currently struggling to ramp up production. The dollar has indeed dropped, but that's not the whole of it. Copper consumption has increased.
    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  170. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by feepness · · Score: 1

    Sorry, you're mistaken. If you'd demonstrated any sort of perpensity for looking things up, you'd notice that over the past 8 years the price - or rather, the inherrent value - of precious and semi-precious metals have been climing an increasingly rapid rate for (oh) the last 5+ years (I can't immediately recall). This has been particularly marked in the the last year and a half to two years.

    Your statement supports what I said in that it is happening to many metals, and the fact that it is accelerating does not contradict it. I've invested in platinum/gold/silver/copper for about 7 years now. But beyond metals, look at oil, lumber, sugar. Look at the price of homes. Look at milk. It may not hit everything at exactly the same time because economies are not instant feedback loops, but it is a monetary phenomenon that is happening across the board. About the only place it isn't happening is in wages and that is because of globalization.

    And yes, it is gaining speed.

  171. Coins are not legal tender by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    Coins are not legal tender, so those laws don't apply.

    1. Re:Coins are not legal tender by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      If coins are not legal tender, then why does the US Post Office sell 43 cent stamps?

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  172. The cost of melting a penny? by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    OK, a copper penny is worth 2cents... but the cost of sorting pre 1982 pennies and melting them is probably more than a penny per penny, right?

    That means the enterprise of melting old pennies probly isn't worth it, yet.

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  173. Signal to noise dropping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it my imagination, or is kdawson putting out higher-than-average (for a Slashdot editor) non-nerdy news items over his tenure? Case in point: this post.

  174. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 1

    Copper is expensive and generally high-demand, but the penny is made primarily from zinc -- a less valuable and more abundant metal. Has the price of zinc behaved similarly recently?

    (I'm not a numismatologist or however you pronounce it, nor a commodities trader, but I know it could be a possibility. What's zinc used for, also? The only things that come to mind for me are US pennies and trace additives to breakfast cereals... ;))

  175. do you know what this means? by sonk · · Score: 1

    the dollar is extermely weak. not news to anyone who follows the currency markets. this is proof of inflation - inflation is a monetary issue, not an increase in proce for goods and services - that follows inflation as the market adjusts.

    our current coins aren't really worth anything, anyway. too little metal. 1964 and earlier coins are 90% silver. silver is currently $13.76/oz. a quarter is a quarter-ounce, so a 1964 quarter is roughly $3.44 (might be less, -10% and maybe more for wear & tear). exchange your petty 1965+ funny money for the real thing, before silver is over $20/oz!

  176. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by trentblase · · Score: 1

    They are talking about the copper pennies, obviously.

  177. Sample letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To whom it may concern:

    I must protest your OMFGROFLBBQ! My associates and I have concluded that the US MINT is suxx0rzzzz!!1!11

    Sincerely,

    John Q. Public

  178. Coin melting ban is unconstitutional! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > outlaw the melting down or bulk export of coins

    This limit is clearly unconstitutional. Let's consider this specific scenario. You live in your farm in Nevada. Uncle Sam decides that Area51 needs to be enlarged, so they condemn your farm, send bulldozers to raze it and give you USD 1.327.859,25 in compensation.

    You take the .25 and melt it in the middle of Main street to protest against the razing. Police arrests you and in the court you argue that melting must not be illegal, since this would mean you did not receive fair compensation, as your unlimited use property (farm) was replaced by limited use property (coins) - note there is nothing to ban you from burning down your own farm to express political protest, unlike coins. Therefore coins given to you in exchange for your farm house must be legal to melt down. Coin melt ban law is therefore unconstitutional. QED

  179. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    any sort of perpensity for looking things up
    Mmm, irony. Coppery too!
  180. Isn't "defacement" already illegal? by lpq · · Score: 1

    I thought defacing (which included flattening coins under trains last time that was popular) money included melting them down? I seem to remember friends wanting to make jewelry by decorating clothing with coinage being told they had to use foreign currency, as drilling holes in US currency was illegal.

    1. Re:Isn't "defacement" already illegal? by sonk · · Score: 1

      no, defacement does not include melting of coins for their precious metal. drilling holes, however, would be classified as defacement. the metal really, modern coins are not worth anything significant. pre-1965 coins are.

  181. Lead Coinage!!! by lleffler · · Score: 1

    Lets mint all new coinage out of led and watch as the world gets even more crazy.

  182. And you could not post a link with an example? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    How lame is that?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  183. No problem (warning, mods: joke ahoy) by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    Print more paper money to cover metal losses.

    I'm a genius!

  184. This is Slashdot, you fool! by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    You mean:

    1. Melt a penny
    2. Repeat step 1 a billion times (formerly "???")
    3. Form ingots
    4. PROFIT!

  185. Copper is in short supply by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The value of the metals did not inherently increase.

    Yes it did. Copper is in worldwide shortage. Go do some research. This will get you started.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  186. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they're not. Zinc is the primary metal component of a nickle as well these days (IIRC).

    Quite simply, our currency, which is physically made of certain materials, has performed poorly compared to the value of those materials. A modern penny is currently worth nearly twice it's face value as scrap metal. An old-style copper penny hit that same point years back. Shortly before they switched to the modern composition, as a matter of fact.

  187. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...40% of all sick days are taken on Monday and Friday.

    Hmm. I believe another shocker is that 20% of sick days are taken on Tuesdays. 20% on Wednesdays. and 20% on Thursdays. For a grand total of... 100%! Oh noes, 100% of sick days are taken between Mondays and Fridays.

    lolz

  188. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 1

    But, again, there's no such thing as a copper penny, not since the 1950s or so...

  189. Re:Does anyone else here see the bigger problem? by trentblase · · Score: 1

    From 1962-1982 pennies were 95% copper. Those pennies are worth over $.02 in metal. And yes, zinc is getting pricey as well.

  190. Does anyone else here it? by jesboat · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else here that weird noise? It sounds like - no - it can't be... an airplane flying over my sofa, so it must be...

    the sound of the joke flying over your head!

    (Sorry.)

  191. Hey new currency comming... by digitaltripper · · Score: 1

    Pretty soon we won't need to worry about coins being melted etc...The Amero is comming !! Talk about not legal tender... http://www.amerocurrency.com/