Slashdot Mirror


User: Poeir

Poeir's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
369
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 369

  1. Re:Funny... but be careful! on Sweet Revenge On Nigerian Scammers · · Score: 1

    Hey, I thought they were welcome here.

  2. Re:Apple approved fix on iTunes for Windows Breaking Older iPods · · Score: 1

    If it was "built at the same time during the second world war," then they weren't built any sooner than 1939. If they weren't built any sooner than 1939, then one John Vincent Atanasoff had been working on a computer for two years. According to this page, the Colussus was built in 1943-1945, which means it was started a year after the Atanasoff-Berry Computer was finished.

    And before anyone brings up the ENIAC, Honeywell Inc. vs. Sperry Rand Corp. overturned the patent due to prior art from the ABC.

    Tragically, both the Colussus and Atanasoff-Berry computer have been destroyed. The Colussus because it was top secret, and the Atanasoff-Berry because Atanasoff was convinced the standard door size was 36", when they're actually 33". It was dismantled to free up office space.

  3. Re:The old saying on Microsoft Defies EU Commission · · Score: 1

    I thought it was a mule with a spinning wheel...

  4. Re:It's their buisness on Replace Your Music....Again · · Score: 1

    Yes, and that new format is called MP3 (or Ogg Vorbis, whatever). It provides portability and arbitrary song order, even between albums, and allows a conventional CD to hold several times what it used to. Plus, it's free if you already have the CD, staying entirely with in US law. Oh, sure, you lose a little quality, but not so much I'd ever noticed, and there are lossless compression options.

  5. Re:So... on IBM and Its Thoughts on Desktop Linux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, when's Microsoft releasing Office for Linux?

    Can't point the blame at the operating system for not having particular software available for it. Point it at the producers of the non-ported software.

  6. Re:Unfounded? on The Matrix: Resolutions · · Score: 1

    That was so much better than the entire film under discussion.

  7. Not Trying to Win on SCO to Take On Hollywood · · Score: 1

    Remember when IBM was sued by SCO, and everyone presumed that it was just to get bought out and go out quietly? That when IBM responded with legal action, SCO started panicking and kicked in the pum-and-dump scheme? SCO's out of options on "Get bought out by IBM" front. Now they're trying to get bought out by someone who doesn't know as much about technology. And who knows less about technology than the people running the movie studios?

  8. Re:The "Don't Pirate" movie ad on Feature-Length Matrix Spoof to be Released Soon · · Score: 1

    I'll bet those DVDs also didn't have any unskippable commercials, did they?

  9. Re:Similar Project at Iowa State University on UCB, USC To Build (And Hack) A Model Internet · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, at this stage I've heard that there's not enough space on campus to actually put the lab anywhere.

  10. Re:Skeptical on Linux Based Tablets Are Coming · · Score: 1

    And for people who want a wearable computer right now, a company called Charmed sells them. Bit pricey, though.

  11. Re:Overstock.com on The Complete Far Side Archive · · Score: 1

    What does it cost if you order internationally?

  12. Re:Just a guess... on SunnComm Says Pointing to Shift Key 'Possible Felony' · · Score: 1
    If every Slashdotter boycotted a product, don't you think the company producing the product would feel the bite (assuming that it was a tech product)?
    No, I think they'd start suing people for "piracy."
  13. Re:That silly on Company Files Motion to Stop IE Distribution · · Score: 2, Funny
    Incidentally people have lived for millennia without browser plugins...
    Who are these people? What's their diet like? Is their long lifespan genetic?
  14. Re:Maybe they should look at their TV advertising. on Microsoft Wants to Project "Cool" Image · · Score: 1

    And on top of all that, there's a clock in the background. It says 5:10, if I remember right.

  15. Re:Yeah but... on Y: A Successor to the X Window System · · Score: 1

    It sounds like it's missing something.

  16. Re:Way to go! on States Push for Net Sales Taxes · · Score: 1

    I'm sure if you ask any legislator, once the sales tax is in place, the 9% state income tax should be lowered to 9%.

  17. Re:OMG! Google got slashdoted! on Google Adds Location Targeted Searching · · Score: 1

    Then they suggest you try again in a minute or so.

  18. Re:Good question on Now We Have the Internet, But Why Do We Need It? · · Score: 1

    Going where?

  19. Re:It's not a worm, it's a virus on Microsoft "Swen" Worm Squiggles Into Sight · · Score: 1

    Wyrms?

  20. Re:The bset prat on Can You Raed Tihs? · · Score: 2, Funny

    He swapped the "e"s.

  21. Re:Welcome To The New World, Geek Fewl... on RIAA Bits · · Score: 1

    D'oh, didn't hit Preview. Here's the link.

  22. Re:Welcome To The New World, Geek Fewl... on RIAA Bits · · Score: 1

    The RIAA provides a list of the member labels.

  23. Re:Let's try an experiment... on What The RIAA Gets Out Of File Sharing · · Score: 1

    Here, you can use this.

  24. Re:Two Weeks of TV... on Sony's Linux DVR Can Record Two Weeks of TV · · Score: 1

    200 channels and nothing but cats.

  25. Re:This is ridiculous on Sites Shut Down to Protest Software Patents · · Score: 1

    A quick glance at this web site indicates a filing fee of at least $760.

    If patents are a necessary evil, and I'm not sure they are considering the long period of time they weren't around and the number of inventions developed independently at approximately the same time, I'd rather see a "successful filing" fee of $760.00, and an "unsuccessful filing" fee of, say $1600.00. This would considerably increase the likelihood of not being awarded a patent, but with some of the absurd ones out there, I doubt very much this would be a bad thing.