Slashdot Mirror


Sites Shut Down to Protest Software Patents

blueser writes "I went today to TUTOS homepage to check for a newer version, and I was surprised to see that the author replaced the homepage by a 'Closed because of Software-Patents' page, with a brief explanation." Just one site? that's hardly a big deal, but there's more. maliabu writes "Knoppix is closed, apparently waiting for the European Parliament to decide about the legalisation and adoption of so-called 'software patents' in Europe." And still more. SLbigE writes "The Wine HQ website has temporarily shut down its webpage in protest to a proposed law in Europe regarding Software Patents." There's many more sites as well, these were just the first I was alerted to, Feel free to note some more in comments. Looks like they're doing a good job of illustrating what could be lost soon.

563 comments

  1. Rpm find by CompWerks · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is also shut down.

    --
    If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
    1. Re:Rpm find by Jellybob · · Score: 0
      Slashdot is not, however, even though some have requested it be taken down for the day...

      Thankfully though, OSDN is more responsible than that, pointing out the danger of causing mass insanity in the geek sector, due to a realisation that they have to work on a Friday.
    2. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. You just need to read the damned page.

    3. Re:Rpm find by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      wrong

    4. Re:Rpm find by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot is not, however, even though some have requested it be taken down for the day...

      Yes, and here's the reason why : since the protest is about European software patents, Slashdot doesn't give a toss.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:Rpm find by blibbleblobble · · Score: 4, Informative

      The list of websites that've shut down is here (two and a half thousand sites so far)

      My site is shut-down.
      Others include KDE, Gimp, gnu-darwin, GNU-savannah, and most of the French and German linux sites.

    6. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      None of these sites shut down. They simply replaced their index page with the statement, which also provided links to the old index. Hardly shutting down.

    7. Re:Rpm find by rknop · · Score: 5, Interesting

      These site shutting down in protest is not very professional. This is one of the problems with the free software community, politics plays too heavy of a role in their actions.

      If you are too timid to take actions that are going to inconvenience somebody you will never be noticed. Software patents are serious. You lose your Linux dodad today; software patents could eventually make you lose them forever.

      For instance, do you really believe that the labor movement would ever have gotten anywhere if they never held any strikes? That the civil rights movement would have gotten anywhere if they never got in anybody's face?

      The road to hell is paved with business as usual. Shutting down your websites may be "unprofessional", but it makes a meaningful protest that gets across the point of just how serious these sites believe the issue is.

      -Rob

    8. Re:Rpm find by luzrek · · Score: 1

      As is Gnome.org. However, there are links to its mirrors.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    9. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So what you're saying is you can't be involved in politics if you want to be a "professional"? Then I'd rather be an amateur who doesn't lose his freedom to make political statements, thank you very much.

      People like you just don't seem to realize shutdowns like this will become normal once the law is in effect. Downloading free software will become a thing of the past. The community has to take action and wake up the masses now, because once the law is in effect it's too late for whining...

      In the end, what you're saying is fighting for survival is unprofessional.

    10. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Is is true that slashdot is US-based, but it should be remembered that some of the support for such changes in Europe comes from US companies, and that US intitiatives such as DMCA help provide a precedent for similar moves elsewhere. It's a global world out there :-) . If the EU gets bogged down in this, it may come back to bite at people in the US. Maybe slashdot should carry a prominent link to the European protest pages, such as ffii.org, if it doesn't see fit to actually join in.

      Also, as others have said, the "closed" sites such as gimp.org are NOT totally inaccessible, they have merely replaced the home page with protest pages with links to the sites' normal pages. Good publicity and hardly onerous!

    11. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the problems with the free software community, politics plays too heavy of a role in their actions. ...because the authors are making a big stink about software patents, then guess what? Here comes Windows.

      And of course the Windows world is not filled with any politics. Microsoft is certainly an apolitical company... NOT!

    12. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are too timid to take actions that are going to inconvenience somebody you will never be noticed.

      Oh come on, how on earth does closing wine or rpmfind help win the argument over software patents? You think the politicians spend their spare time searching for the latest version of their favourite RPM? Or trying to run Word on Linux? Not likely.

      Target the right people, people!

    13. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, there is no verification on that site! You can add anything you want.

    14. Re:Rpm find by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but it should be remembered that some of the support for such changes in Europe comes from US companies, and that US intitiatives such as DMCA help provide a precedent for similar moves elsewhere. It's a global world out there :-) . If the EU gets bogged down in this, it may come back to bite at people in the US.

      It's not that it may come back to bite at people in the US, it's that it bites people in the US every day, because the laws being considered in the EU are not that different from the laws those of us in the US already have to live with.

      If Slashdot's going to protest, it should place more prominance on repealing or fixing the existing laws in the US than on preventing the laws from being enacted in the EU.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    15. Re:Rpm find by Tukla · · Score: 1
      how on earth does closing wine or rpmfind help win the argument over software patents?

      It informs people who otherwise may not have been aware of the issue. Besides, the sites weren't closed.

    16. Re:Rpm find by Bull999999 · · Score: 1, Funny

      And windows never crash. They simply replaced their desktop page with the statement, which provides debugging information (A.K.K BSOD). Hardly crashing.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    17. Re:Rpm find by TV-SET · · Score: 2, Informative
      wrong

      No, [s]he is not. The front page works, but statement is returned for any search query.

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    18. Re:Rpm find by alexq · · Score: 1

      like the other poster said... the strikes worked because they withheld something the companies wanted - work. if you shut down your website, you aren't withholding anything from the people making the laws (unless by chance). you're _just_ hurting the innocent consumers. it's almost like all bakeries refusing to sell cake because they don't like the speed limits.

    19. Re:Rpm find by dotwaffle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Slashdot doesn't give a toss.

      Ah. Still, might have been nice to have a little banner. Doesn't give Europeans a very nice view of America now does it? What's that, Channel 4 reports that in a huge poll in Britain, the USA is perceived as the greatest threat to peace, bigger than North Korea? No... Surely not, that would make America... Self-centered? Nah, just really unsympathetic to other nations.

    20. Re:Rpm find by arodland · · Score: 1

      Of course not. It holds back the very people who area already fighting in the first place, and makes no difference to the other people, because all of these sites are very targeted-audience.

    21. Re:Rpm find by nova20 · · Score: 1
      I see your point, but I have to agree with the poster before you. Shutting down these sites does not inconvinience the lawmakers in any way, it only serves to anger us nerds (who are already angered at the proposed law). It's kinda like burning yourself to protest a war. It only angers those that are already aware of the situation.

      /tim

    22. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are too many alternative sites that didn't shut down to make the protest seem anything more than disgruntled geeks crying "mommy".

      If you want to protest, use the channels that count. Hint: you might have to get out of your office chair.

    23. Re:Rpm find by nova20 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ok, who put goatse.cx on the list?

      /tim

    24. Re:Rpm find by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is one of the problems with the free software community, politics plays too heavy of a role in their actions.

      Um, Earth to TedCheshireAcad, come in TedCheshireAcad. The "free software" movement is a social movement-- everything that happens in the movement is a political act. Just writing software and giving it away is a political act. Your concerns about your "clients" sounds a lot more like the rhetoric of the Open Source movement to me.

      Besides, if you go to set up a "[GNU/]Linux-doodad for a client", maybe as a professional (and someone with half a clue) you should be prepared for network outages and things like that. Relying on a web site on the other side of the Atlantic is the worst risk management ever. You need to have all your software and tools readily available on CD-ROM, I think. I mean, were you going to install Windows over the net by just going to some web site?

      Moderators: please mod parent down in spite of his request that you "do your worst". Notes like that to moderators ought to garnish at least a -1 just for putting that little challenge to the moderators.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    25. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance, do you really believe that ... the civil rights movement would have gotten anywhere if they never got in anybody's face?

      It wouldn't have if Rosa Parks was kicking black people off the bus, which is analagous what these sites are doing.

    26. Re:Rpm find by 9mind · · Score: 5, Insightful
      People are forgetting the obvious, in shutting down the sites. It wasn't a protest against the lawmakers per se, but to make all the users of the software aware of what is going on.

      I for one knew nothing about it, or how it would affect me. Now I do, and if they ever needed a signature against it, I would sign. Because I was made aware though this protest.

    27. Re:Rpm find by Deusy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Software patents are serious.

      Yes, they are serious. I've been bombarding my local MEPs about it. And recently I got a very interesting response.

      It made me think that maybe we misunderstand the proposal - especially after it was recently been amended.

      I quote directly from Article 4a:

      Exclusions from patentability:

      A computer-implemented invention shall not be regarded as making a technical contribution merely because it involves the use of a computer, network or other programmable apparatus. Accordingly, inventions involving computer programs which implement business, mathematical or other methods and do not produce any technical effects beyond the normal physical interactions between a program and the computer, network or other programmable apparatus in which it is run shall not be patentable.

      Justification

      This, in conjunction with the corresponding recital, provides clarification that simply specifying technical means is not enough for patentability. There must be a technical contribution. It also makes it clear that the computer implementation of a business method simpliciter is not a patentable invention."


      IANAL but to me that satisfies everything we, as Free Software advocates, are seeking? Why are we so strongly opposing this? If you read the full directive, it sounds fairly sensible.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    28. Re:Rpm find by CompWerks · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Do a search.

      --
      If you can read this sig - the bitch fell off.
    29. Re:Rpm find by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      None of these sites shut down. They simply replaced their index page with the statement, which also provided links to the old index. Hardly shutting down.

      Who, here, would be wearing a big smile when they say to their boss, "Sorry, I can't get that information/patch/download for our production webservers, because the Apache site voluntarily decided that some political issue was more important than our business."

      In fact, it was/is/will be responsible and expected for widely-used and critical websites to say what they want while still allowing users to get to what they need when they need it. Anything less would be a much bigger kick in open source's nuts than any software patent.

    30. Re:Rpm find by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Unfortunately, there is no verification on that site! You can add anything you want."

      Good point. It's a wiki, so hopefully the moderators' efforts will outnumber those of the spammers for now...

      The list was at its most important on Wednesday though, when it was accurate. (it was timed to coincide with a trip to Brussels)

    31. Re:Rpm find by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Well it will result in many open source and proprietry projects being subject to legal action due to them using similar ideas.

      So anything that uses a Start button could be sued by Microsoft etc... Microsoft are already having to rewrite IE due them using a webpage embedded object system which has been covered by someone elses patent. These things will happen all over Europe once this bill gets approved. Huge chunks of Linux, KDE and Gnome will probably need to be rewritten.

      I thought it would have been a more appropriate protest to take down all the servers that will be affected by this new law, large sections of the net would be missing as a result.

    32. Re:Rpm find by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      Read the last part again - especially from "Many small companies..." onwards.
      Software patents are defended as protection to small companies, which is contrary to what experience suggests.

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    33. Re:Rpm find by dspeyer · · Score: 1
      KDE.org looks normal to me. Am I missing something?

      This is looking big. I just got Freeciv down. I wish tldp.org were down -- they probably get the most traffic from purely-technical-open-sourcers of anyone (or, if not down, at least with a notice like gnome or debian). If anyone reading this has influence at LDP, you might do something.

      Anybody know why gnu.org is up? That's just weird.

    34. Re:Rpm find by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, the statement is returned, but you can click thru it. The site is not "shut down".

    35. Re:Rpm find by Halo1 · · Score: 3, Informative
      You're entirely correct that it sounds very sensible when you first read it. The reason is that you interpret the terms that they use differently than they do. The two main ones are:
      • Industrial application: the EPO interprets this as "usable in a way that makes money". Don't believe me? One of the biggest proponents of software patents said so himself in the JURI meeting, when other proponents mentioned they were afraid that this requirement would exclude too many software patents.
      • Technical effect: first of all, the "normal physical interaction between a program and the computer" is nowhere defined. Furhter, technical is also nowhere defined (and they don't want to define it, they say it has to follow from case law). In other words, you need anundefined effect apart from something which is not defined, so what could that be? Plenty of things, it turns out (see the heading "When is something technical"). Examples: processing data representing an image, saving memory, increasing speed, using computers instead of humans to process secret/private/sensitive data and automating a known process if the automated process provides surprising speed or economy of scale benefits.
      Keep in mind that the directive is designed to legalise all software patents that have been illegally granted until now by the EPO. You can find some examples of patents which such "technical effects" here and here.

      For information on her other claims, please read the the English translation of the letter I sent to most Flemish MEPs, as well as this short overview of why software patents are bad.

      Thanks for writing your MEPs, and keep it up!

      --
      Donate free food here
    36. Re:Rpm find by rknop · · Score: 1

      like the other poster said... the strikes worked because they withheld something the companies wanted - work. if you shut down your website, you aren't withholding anything from the people making the laws (unless by chance). you're _just_ hurting the innocent consumers.

      Are the consumers innocent? I would argue that they are guilty-- their ignorance and apathy makes them guilty.

      We ostensively live in democracies. The EU is ostensively made up of democracies. Ultimately, the leaders are responsible to the people. And, indeed, when the people sit up, take notice, care, and express their care, the leaders have to pay attention to it. When the people don't pay attention or don't express their care, then the leaders are free to whore themselves out to whichever proprietary interest has the highest bid.

      We're not serfs. We're ultimately the people who put our government together. Because so much of the world-- even of the free-software using world!-- is ignorant of the danger of software patents (the damage in the USA, the danger in Europe), or are apathetic, we have trouble. Therefore, the people who are guilty of that ignorance need to be shaken out of it, so that they will inform their representatives what it is they want them to be doing.

      The very term "consumer" is ultimately insulting. It indicates that the masses of humanity are a big devouring maw that exist to serve some purpose in an economic system. They are the sheep out there who are to be led about by the various controlling interests. That is not the sort of world we (theoretically) live in, and it's not the world I want to live in. If the sheep are going to be led somewhere they won't like when they get there, anything we can do to help them see it before they get there should be done.

      The populace is responsible-- even if they choose to exercise it by ceeding responsibility. Therefore, it is reasonable to get the message out to them, and it is reasonable to inconvenience them.

      -Rob

    37. Re:Rpm find by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      The road to hell is paved with business as usual.

      I thought it was paved with discarded Lisa computers and copies of Microsoft Bob...

    38. Re:Rpm find by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
      Also included in the revised proposal -

      A further logical consequence of this approach is that although a valid claim may comprise both technical and non-technical features, it is not possible to monopolise the purely non-technical features in isolation from the technical features.

      The question is, how generic can they make this? Would they have been able to patent a routine that works with webcams under this proposal, thereby preventing any other operating system from using a webcam?

    39. Re:Rpm find by mynickwastaken · · Score: 1

      Hey Guys,

      They are protesting to inform all users about this idiot measure cooked by politicians.

      If you look better on the front messages of every site you can get through to the original index file.

      I think this will be temporarly in this way! Later if no one (politicians, etc) is taking into consideration the protest they will find another way to protest.

    40. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, see where it says "click here to enter this site"? Guess what that means.

      Rpmfind is not down, well maybe for dummies it is.

    41. Re:Rpm find by bisho · · Score: 1

      KDE was closed the 27th!

      http://xuni.be/shots/www.kde.org.html

      The most important sites have screenshots in this page of the wiki:
      http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/OnlineDemoInfo

    42. Re:Rpm find by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Hmph - if Linux development is hindered in Europe it directly affects users in the US.

    43. Re:Rpm find by revmoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and when you are PAYING to use apache, you have every right to complain about such things. However, last I checked, apache is free software, so get over it.

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    44. Re:Rpm find by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      and I supposed I'm supposed to care?

      It's the end of the world, let's patent a 'button to launch a menu of applications to be run on the system', we'll call it a 'start button', but the word start isn't required to be on a button. Next, let's patent a 'bar that contains a number of buttons for the applications currently running on the system', we'll call it a taskbar, though it doesn't matter what it's called. Oh, and a clock, that should be patented, too. Oh no, Linux development is now hampered because they can't make window systems that look like Windows. Oh, wait, there's prior art in about 20 million different places, but no one gives a shit.

      Think about it this way: I don't care that Europe is perfectly happy with PAL when I want HDTV, and I don't care if Europeans allow people to get stupid software patents. I, being a person living in the US, can not change what happens in Europe unless I manage to influence my government to invade Europe and forcibly control the entire continent. The EU is a fucked up place to live, in my opinion, and so is the US. Since I live in the US, I'm slightly more concerned about getting the government to stop fucking up the place where I live.

      Then again, if going to http://slashdot.org brings up some message telling me the site is down because the EU is being stupid, it really won't change much for me, unless they do it for the sub-sections as well, and pull the whole site down. Then I might have to, *GASP* go somewhere else.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    45. Re:Rpm find by kramer2718 · · Score: 1

      I took my site down, but I thought it was only supposed to be a one day protest, so I brought it back up. Are we supposed to keep them down until a decision is made?

    46. Re:Rpm find by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      Technical contribution is not defined. This is a trap. Law does not always mean what it says. Se for instance: http://swpat.ffii.org/papiere/eubsa-swpat0202/tech /index.en.html More on McCarthy: http://swpat.ffii.org/akteure/amccarthy/index.en.h tml

    47. Re:Rpm find by falzer · · Score: 1

      > Ok, who put goatse.cx on the list?

      It actually IS shut down! Go see for yourself!

      *snicker*

    48. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I, being a person living in the US, can not change what happens in Europe unless I manage to influence my government to invade Europe

      However Europe can help avoiding making your life even worse than it is. Because when the software multinationals know they can do what they want everywhere, they are more comforted in the opinion that they can enforce their own policy in their own country.

      Intellectual laziness is no excuse...

    49. Re:Rpm find by alexq · · Score: 1
      good points...
      i have to wonder about the unity though. what i mean is, unless everyone who can do so holds back the service, then the people who need these services will simply have to go elsewhere to find them. it's less trouble than becoming aware of what's going on.

      i don't think consumer is all that offensive - i consume, and i also produce. but that's besides the point...

      i feel that by doing this sort of protest, there's the danger of irritating people more than making them aware - it could be interpreted by many as a temper tantrum, especially if the reason for the protest is not made 100% clear....

      i think it's a tough issue :)

    50. Re:Rpm find by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      We could just block people who aren't seen as useful to the cause.. even if all we did was force them to request permission to join us before we gave them access. Some sort of shared login facility (not Passport!) shared between opensource sites. Force people to read a little statement before they can open an account or logon.

      I've sometimes considered adding a clause to my software that it was only available under GPL-like rules if the user ceeded all their own IP under an opensource-style license. It's probably a bad idea but for example that would have meant that SCO had absolutely no leg to stand on if any bit of software they had ever used had such a clause. I'm not sure if it'd hold up in court though.. it's awful broad.. but then so are many EULA's.

      I don't find being a consumer offensive.. I find the fact that often people are kept from being producers offensive.

      So irritate people. They aren't paying for our work. Most of them don't even submit bug reports. Just because we give our efforts away for free doesn't mean we have to play the part of the loyal slave.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    51. Re:Rpm find by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      That's what probably should be done. Just unplug all servers that run opensource software for a few days. See how well the world adjusts. Of course everyone would probably think it was another worm and would fail to notice. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    52. Re:Rpm find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would the USA be a great threat to peace. Oh yeah, cause we were fucking attacked. Get that through your fucking head.

    53. Re:Rpm find by instantnoodles · · Score: 1

      Well that is defacto shutting down. Their visitors can't do anything with the site, and the website cannot benefit from their visits. Its as if they didn't exist.

    54. Re:Rpm find by sg_oneill · · Score: 1


      If Slashdot's going to protest, it should place more prominance on repealing or fixing the existing laws in the US than on preventing the laws from being enacted in the EU.


      After all, they don't even have computers in europe don't they. :) USA #1

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    55. Re:Rpm find by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "I took my site down, but I thought it was only supposed to be a one day protest, so I brought it back up."

      That was the idea. Some people are leaving the sites closed until 1st september, when the EU parliament debate will be held; some people took sites down early to inform people, but the main idea of the protest was to have just that wednesday off.

    56. Re:Rpm find by Perky_Goth · · Score: 1

      thank you both for this. i think that's as much as i can take before doing something. However, i am not an eloquent speaker/writer and i wouldn't know how to start writing and how to give examples and such. If you could help me, i'd write to whoever i should.

      My lazyness must stop...

  2. Sign the petition by gagravarr · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://petition.eurolinux.org/

    Details of the campaign against software patents can be found at http://swpat.ffii.org/group/todo/index.en.html

    --
    This post will enter the public domain 70 years after my death, unless Disney buys another extension.
    1. Re:Sign the petition by Kyro · · Score: 5, Funny

      looks like the petition is down to protest against slashdottings!

      --
      save the GNUs!
    2. Re:Sign the petition by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      totally off the subject, but regarding your sig, you own the copyright to your post per the disclaimer at the bottom of the screen here:

      All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster.

      So, if you want it to go into the public domain right now (instead of 70 yrs [95 yrs for an anonymous coward, if i remember correctly] after your death) you can do that. In fact, the best way to do that is to change your sig to "this post, in its entirety, is in the public domain. No rights reserved." Voila.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    3. Re:Sign the petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sure didn't expect this kind of turnout. /.'ed.

    4. Re:Sign the petition by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the sig is intended as a release. I read it as a factual clarification- nothing more than a reminder of the law, current and probable.

    5. Re:Sign the petition by einer · · Score: 1

      jakarta.apache.org displays a similar message.

  3. This is ridiculous by baldass_newbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody patented or restricted the use of hammers and nails in construction.
    So why in the hell are algorithms considered 'patentable'?
    I can understand if they emulate a proprietary business methodology. Or an entire application (which really should fall under copyright law).
    But patents?
    Shakespeare was right. We should kill all the lawyers.

    --
    The opposite of progress is congress
    1. Re:This is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nobody patented or restricted the use of hammers and nails in construction.
      No, back then crafts were run by guilds. Try to do carpentry without being a member of the guild and you'd be run out of town, fined or imprisoned.
    2. Re:This is ridiculous by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      Nobody patented or restricted the use of hammers and nails in construction.

      This would be a dangerous point to raise in certain quarters. Wrap up the patent application in enough jargon, and the current patent office might well grant a patent now. Yes, I guess someone would be able to show prior art eventually, but this would probably be after a two year plus legal fight.

    3. Re:This is ridiculous by arivanov · · Score: 0, Insightful
      Some algorithms are very non-trivial as some math may be very non-trivial.

      (Read all of this before moderating)

      So frankly I see no problem in patenting an algorithm. I see no problem is patenting software. I see no problem in pathenting a business method.

      The problem is not in the fact that something is patented. The problem people see with the patent system is because of the current state of the USPTO where that trivial things with loads of prior art are being patented. And there is a reason for the US PTO having this problem and it is very plain and simple:

      Patent clerks in the US are paid a sum per patent reviewed and after that for patent accepted . If they reject an application they lose the second bit.

      So all that is needed to fix the system is for any patent applicant to pay at least 100000 deposit when applying (I think that it should be more). If the application succeds he gets back 80% filled up further by government small business innovation grants (they are around 0.5-1M$ in the US for example). If the app fails he gets shit. Clerks are payed per application submitted and application failed and they are payed at least 10000 for application whacked. They are not payed for applications that have been accepted.

      And that is all it will take to fix the system. There is no need for patent reform. There is need to reform the b*** patent office which is something completely different.

      And finding a loand for the 100000 deposit as well as insurance towards suing the PTO to accept it if they unfairly fail you should not be a problem whatsoever for anyone with a worthy invention.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:This is ridiculous by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Its not the hammer and the nail, but the stroke that counts.

      My nail stroking technique is far superior to yours, and I can build a house in half the time!

      If I was not able to patent this stroking technique, do you think I would have invented it??? (notwithstanding the fact that I can build a house in 1/2 the time...)

      Its just getting stupider and stupider. I wonder if we will reach a critical mass at some point.

    5. Re:This is ridiculous by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      I can understand if they emulate a proprietary business methodology.

      So you support the patenting of business model? That's even worse than software patents.

      Or an entire application (which really should fall under copyright law).

      So you don't approve of competition in the market either?

      Shakespeare was right. We should kill all the lawyers.

      Lawyers don't make laws -- government does. Lawyers (and corporations for that matter) only play the game which was designed and implemented by government. We need to attack the virus, not the symptoms.

    6. Re:This is ridiculous by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Patent for the wheel. There are others. The USPTO has gone beyond farce and reached a point where it's become simply too sick to live.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    7. Re:This is ridiculous by NormalVisual · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So all that is needed to fix the system is for any patent applicant to pay at least 100000 deposit when applying (I think that it should be more). If the application succeds he gets back 80% filled up further by government small business innovation grants (they are around 0.5-1M$ in the US for example). If the app fails he gets shit.

      You've just put all the small inventors out of the picture and restricted patents to those that already have a fair bit of disposable money to toss around. $100K for a patent application fee? Most legitimate small-time inventors have a hard enough time scraping together the $5-10K needed for a proper prior art search and other legalities. Good luck going to a bank and saying, "I need a loan for $100K, of which you'll get back $80K and maybe more if I can get a grant, and if the PTO finds prior art that we missed or otherwise turns us down you'll lose it all". Not gonna happen, and whoever modded this as 'insightful' needs a quick reality check.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    8. Re:This is ridiculous by gregmac · · Score: 1
      So all that is needed to fix the system is for any patent applicant to pay at least 100000 deposit when applying (I think that it should be more). If the application succeds he gets back 80% filled up further by government small business innovation grants (they are around 0.5-1M$ in the US for example). If the app fails he gets shit. Clerks are payed per application submitted and application failed and they are payed at least 10000 for application whacked. They are not payed for applications that have been accepted.

      While you have some good ideas, I'm not sure this will solve anything.

      Like someone else pointed out, $100k for an application is going to be extremely hard for an inventor or small startup to come up with, considering theres a chance they won't get it back (investors are less likely to fund this). At the same time, $100k for a patent for a large company is a lot easier. And if you're talking a company like MS, it's chump change.

      If they're getting paid per application rejected, then what do you think is mostly going to happen? Yes, there's going to be a lot less patents issued. The clerks don't have anything to gain from accepting an application. One of the first things that comes to my mind is the word 'Payola'. If a company like MS is applying for a patent, how hard is it for them to drop another $100k to the clerk to make sure it gets approved?

      I think what is needed is to get away from the commission system altogether. I don't know a whole lot about how the patent office works, but wouldn't putting the clerks on salary get rid of all of these problems? Each patent should be independently reviewed by two different clerks that have absolutely no contact, and only granted if they both agree.

      It would be nice to have some kind of public input, but that also opens things up for corruption as well, not to mention stealing trade secrets and getting an unfair jump on the competition.

      --
      Speak before you think
    9. Re:This is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nobody patented or restricted the use of hammers and nails in construction.

      Patents on generic hammers expired in 6200 BC. Of course, since "lawyers" weren't invented until 4500 BC, this is kind of a moot point.

      I don't think patents on algorithms are necessarily Evil, but I do think that patent offices and officers are poorly equipped to evaluate whether any algorithm is sufficiently novel to merit patent protection. I know I can't make that distinction, but then I see most software as fitting the description "Use a computer to do [electronic metaphor of physical world process]," which makes it not particularly novel.

    10. Re:This is ridiculous by dspeyer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well put, and we need general pattent reform badly, but even legitamate software pattents tend to be a bad thing.

      Consider GIFs. The algorythm there was (I believe) non-trivial. It was developed twice (IBM and Unisys?) arround the same time and pattented twice (oops!). It was also discovered independantly in academia a few times around then (once shortly before, but not widely enough published to be prior art, once shortly after, doing no good).

      So what did society gain for issuing a pattent on a (for practical purposes) new and genuinly nontrivial idea? Nothing whatsoever. We would have had the same algorythm shortly thereafter.

      What did we lose? We suffered over a decade of uncertainty, danger, and incompatibility in web images, ameliorated only by the fact that Unysis valued public relations over squeezing every last penny. Had Unisys' profits gone SCO-like, it could easily have been much worse.

      Software pattents are a bad idea because they don't work. Experimental evidence is clear: patents decrease technological development. Furthermore, programmers don't read patents; any benefit to be gained by learning about someone else's work that way is overwhelmed by the risk of discovering that your own work is patented by someone else. We don't need patents because barriers to entry are low. We don't need millions of dollars to test an algorythm, the way we do a medicine. Software patents just get in the way.

      P.S. I realize I'm a little light on evidence. I'm too rushed right now to hunt down links. They are out there.

    11. Re:This is ridiculous by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      I modded this funny, but it's true. On one hand I sorta agree with patents, but on the other hand, where does the stupidness end?

      An algorythm is like a virtual tool. With it's assistance, it can greatly reduce the work at hand. Research cost goes into developing a nice algorythm so one can argue that a patent is fully just. Problem is, some patents are granted for truely trivial things. By what measures can you say one thing deserves a patent and another does not? I think the answer lies in the lifespan of a patent. I think that when one applies for a patent, they must submit, in some quantified way, the cost of research. The patent lifespan is then set proportionate to that research cost. Of course, all this would have to be rigorously determined by an independant inquerry. That way when you get these trivial (yet useful) ideas developed, they don't get locked up by some greedy individual or corporation trying to milk it for all it's worth. The point is when you get a patent and you have a limited, but reasonible, set time to regain your investment. Not some endless milking mechanism we have today. Not all patents are the same and therefore the time to regain investments should be proportionate and reasonible.

    12. Re:This is ridiculous by alexq · · Score: 1

      i don't know if it's been covered elsewhere, but a lot of companies (i know Intel does this) would rather just keep a technology/algorithm internal than patent it - because they've found that software patents are incredibly hard to enforce.

    13. Re:This is ridiculous by alexq · · Score: 1

      very nice idea, but i think that they should be paid the same thing whether they reject or accept a patent - otherwise you might have more rejections than is correct. they should get paid the same no matter what, so it's a pure valute judgment...

    14. Re:This is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Builders are paid by the hour. Why the hell would they want to be able to build a house in half the time?

    15. Re:This is ridiculous by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Are you a moron or yes?

      What is the point of patenting something that does not bring any profits within the forseable patent lifetime?

      And what is the problem of finding an investor into your business if it can be profitable?

      Get a clue kid.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    16. Re:This is ridiculous by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Okay, go to your average VC or a bank and let us know just how easy it was to get a $100K unsecured loan just because you think you have a cool idea, 'k? And I'm not a kid, thanks.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    17. Re:This is ridiculous by privaria · · Score: 1
      Patent clerks in the US are paid a sum per patent reviewed and after that for patent accepted . If they reject an application they lose the second bit.

      That is simply not true.

      Patent examiners receive one "point" for picking up an application and another point for disposing of an application. A disposition can be an allowance, sure. But it can also be (and often is) an abandonment of the application, e.g., due to the applicant's failure to overcome a final rejection.

      Ed Suominen
      Registered Patent Agent
      Open-Source Software Author (yes, both)

    18. Re:This is ridiculous by Poeir · · Score: 1

      A quick glance at this web site indicates a filing fee of at least $760.

      If patents are a necessary evil, and I'm not sure they are considering the long period of time they weren't around and the number of inventions developed independently at approximately the same time, I'd rather see a "successful filing" fee of $760.00, and an "unsuccessful filing" fee of, say $1600.00. This would considerably increase the likelihood of not being awarded a patent, but with some of the absurd ones out there, I doubt very much this would be a bad thing.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    19. Re:This is ridiculous by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      So frankly I see no problem in patenting an algorithm. I see no problem is patenting software. I see no problem in pathenting a business method.

      Especially with the example of business methods, you're ignoring the very function patents were created to serve.

      Patents are meant to encourage disclosure of discoveries- to ensure that an inventor won't just use a creation in his lab for his own benefit, but share it with the world without risking immediate duplication.

      Something like a business method can have no use without disclosing it. So the original justification for patents then doesn't apply.

    20. Re:This is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can understand if they emulate a proprietary business methodology."

      You think business methods should be patentable? That's just the problem with patents: everyone wants things to be patentable only if it benefits them.

    21. Re:This is ridiculous by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      Shakespear was DEFENDING lawyers. The BAD guys were planning to kill all the lawyers so no one would have access to a good defense when they started to round up their enemies.

      Kill all the lawyers

      It is easy to mock lawyers - until you need one.

      The real problem is clueless legislators in thrall to the business world.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    22. Re:This is ridiculous by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      The problem with the patent system isn't that the barrier of entry is too low, the problem is that it's too high. To file a patent, you need either a lawyer or more legal knowledge than most programmers have. It takes a long time. Individuals, especially in the software industry, don't file patents. And if you're sued for patent infringement, defence can cost thousands, even if you're clearly right.

      Companies can afford this barrier of entry, so they can use patents as weapons. But individuals can't, so patents have only the power to restrain them, despite the fact that most real innovation comes from individuals.

      Copyright works much better, because there is no barrier of entry. But copyrights can only protect an expression, not an idea. If patents were "fixed" by lowering the barrier of entry, everything actually would be patented, which would obviously be bad. If you raise the barrier, patents just become more exclusively the weapon of companies against people. The system simply cannot work.

    23. Re:This is ridiculous by MetalOne · · Score: 2, Informative

      I skimmed the patent. It does not patent the concept of a wheel. It patents a particular implementation of a bicycle wheel, designed to produce less wind drag from the spokes. Previous attempts at this have resulted in wheels that suffered ill effects from cross-winds or were expensive to manufacture. This design apparently doesn't have those two problems. Whether the design would be obvious to a mechanical engineer, I cannot say. It is a non-obvious solution to me. It may also have prior art, but I have not studied bicyle wheels.

    24. Re:This is ridiculous by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      Actually Robertson screws (the ones with a tapered square to drive it) were patented. Not that I disagree with you about the patent thing, and this did occurr when the preferred method was to machine a slot across the screw, so I would call that innovative.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    25. Re:This is ridiculous by Tetsujin28 · · Score: 1
      No. This is not a "Patent for the wheel." It is a patent for a specific design of a bicycle wheel.

      I'm not making any comment as to the novelty of the invention or the reasonableness and validity of the patent, but calling this a "Patent for the wheel" is pretty misleading.

      --
      - - - -
      The real Tetsujin 28 is a giant robot.
    26. Re:This is ridiculous by arivanov · · Score: 1

      And here is where the difference between what I am saying and what your rudimentary thinking comes into play: Your idea does not have to be cool. It has to be profitable and patentable.

      Cool is for kids.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    27. Re:This is ridiculous by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Wow, already starting with the ad-hom attacks. Obviously you missed what I was saying, which was that the tough part in securing the financing is convincing your benefactor that it's profitable - what you think about it doesn't mean jack, it's what HE thinks that counts.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    28. Re:This is ridiculous by andrehazes · · Score: 1

      The whole idea behind patents is to stimulate (finance?) innovation. Something has gone wrong. Ideas how to repair it should therefore not be patented.

    29. Re:This is ridiculous by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      Yes. Quite simple patents are being generated for things which should only be Trade Secrets. Like the formula to Faygo Cola.

  4. FreeS/WAN closed too by erikmf · · Score: 1

    I went to the FreeS/WAN site yesterday and saw the same "closed" notice. I too thought that it was a single site, but I guess I was wrong.

  5. Microsoft wanted to protest aswell by jh_newroom · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft was planning on replacing there page to protest as well. Unfortunately now they are hosted on Unix, they don't have anyone in the company smart enough, who knows how to change the home page.

    1. Re:Microsoft wanted to protest aswell by Brobock · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Nor, can they post anything without a WYSIWYG html editor with frontpage extensions on the unix server.

    2. Re:Microsoft wanted to protest aswell by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      and don't forget clippy.

    3. Re:Microsoft wanted to protest aswell by NtwoO · · Score: 0
      "they don't have anyone in the company smart enough"

      Remember, underestimating your opponent will be your first mistake.... We might (in great numbers) see M$ as a well organized team of goons, but goons can be very shrewd and clever.

      --
      ! /* */
    4. Re:Microsoft wanted to protest aswell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, microsoft.com is listed

    5. Re:Microsoft wanted to protest aswell by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I heard they're just going to switch their websites over to IIS and wait until the servers take themselves down.

      --Dan

  6. Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by fruey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wine is working for me.

    As has been said in previous article comments, SlashDot could close too, that would have a far larger ranging effect than Knoppix or Wine anyway.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by ralphclark · · Score: 1
      SlashDot could close too

      Could somebody with mod points please mark the parent as insightful? Thanks.

    2. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by ctellefsen · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. Slashdot should close.

      The reason - Out of tens of thousands of currently illegal patents, I am sure someone has a patent related to the organization of newsgroups and discussion forums, the layout or functionality of the content menu, your database engine, using pictures to identify sections, including URLs in postings, your color scheme, dupes, or something.

      You could be shut down, be forced to have core functionality removed, or forced to pay royalties for the next 20 years.

    3. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      SlashDot could close too, that would have a far larger ranging effect than Knoppix or Wine anyway.

      no it wouldnt...

      all these sites closing are preaching to the Choir...

      What needs to close down with a protest banner on the front page is CNN, MSNBC,GOOGLE,YAHOO.... sites that the general public looks at daily.

      Shutting down sites that only those that already know the problem is really not effective..

      so if you run a site that non-geeks use... Like a site about S10 pickup trucks, or how to repair your delorean, or underwater basket weaving... shut it down..

      It's much more effective to force non-geeks to read about it than to simply inconvience those that already know about it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by VapourFloppy · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit disappointed that Slashdot isn't closed - I wouldn't have missed it for a day or so, and it's in a good cause! Perhaps goes to show how interested the people who run this place are in the actual issues that we discuss here?

      Oh, and the search facilities on RPMFind are closed as well.

      --
      -- "There's no explaining the things that might happen; there's now a new home for technology in fashion."
    5. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by ShadeARG · · Score: 1

      Better yet, Slashdot could close all other sections of the site and leave this discussion on the front page. That would get attention and everyone would be informed as to why.

      But I guess all that ad revenue is too hard to forfit for the cause..

    6. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by CuteAlien · · Score: 1

      No a side which tries to act as independant media should not close, because of such a topic. While most of us certainly don't like Software patents (and it's fine for each of us to close our own sides), this still is not a black/white affair like rassism, rape or similar ethical problems. A newssite should (and this one does) report about the topic, it can even have some bias which sort of articles it will publish, but on a such a topic it should not take such a unambigous stand. I'd prefer to hear both sides on software-patents and i wouldn't trust a newssite to give me any good counter-arguments even if they'd exist, after it had closed down to protest.

    7. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1

      I totally agree that slashdot should close. and why not use the poll option to confirm that that is what most people want - at last, a meaningful poll!!!

      --
      tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
    8. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 3, Funny
      SlashDot could close too

      And soon after, heard like some weird air raid siren, from the all the unemployed geeks, "Noooooooooooo!"

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    9. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by jldrew · · Score: 1
      SlashDot could close too, that would have a far larger ranging effect than Knoppix or Wine anyway.

      I agree completely.

      Not only will we make a strong statement about software patents, but we might actually get some work done.

    10. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by T-Kir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even though the parent is modded +5, pity we couldn't have the option to remove the cap.

      As with other responses to this parents thread, even if /. closed for a bit or plastered a huge protest notice at the top of the site... this needs as much coverage as possible.

      Plus, if /. shut down for a couple of days, we could get a break from the SCO stories and dupes... mind anything that removes SCO from the headlines for over a day must be a good thing.

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    11. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by BESTouff · · Score: 1

      Hey, EU software patents are *good* for the US economy, so why do you want /. to cooperate ?

    12. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by MrSkunk · · Score: 1

      Show me one thread in this article or any of the previous 5 slashdot articles regarding software patents where someone took a stance on the side of software patents. If you do happen to find this needle in the slashdot haystack, let me know what the moderators thought of it.

      Slashdot has shown itself time and time again as being a site that is anti-software patents. Do you think more people will learn about this issue if the site is taken down, or if an article is posted on the front page? People will still be able to draw their own conclusions.

    13. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by lewger · · Score: 2, Funny

      The closure of Slashdot in a protest against patients has resulted in a huge boost of productivity in the IT industry as IT workers have nothing better to do than work. The government is now looking at more ways to get slashdot closed down.

    14. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      Wine is working for me.

      It was closed yesterday afternoon until this morning GMT (I emailed jer to get it closed after I saw GNOME/KDE and Mono were all doing it :)

      As has been said in previous article comments, SlashDot could close too, that would have a far larger ranging effect than Knoppix or Wine anyway.

      Seconded.

    15. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by The+Revolutionary · · Score: 1

      No, what needs to protest is whatever can motivate constituents in the EU to quickly fire off their positions to their representatives, those who have the power to stop this.

      EU Slashdot readers, perhaps of anyone, are the most likely to get on this, if they just had a bit of nudging, or more so the jolt of Slashdot replacing its front page; that isn't something you see every day.

      If EU readers see that Slashdot of all places (US-centric, profit) can do this one thing, that these readers surely can write an email or make that phone call to their representatives.

    16. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would be nice to have a short message about that posted on google. Now THAT would give exposure.

    17. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has cnn.com closed? How about msn.com? This protest is a joke because the only sites that will close are the ones that serve your miniscule IT demographic. Stop shooting yourself in the foot.

    18. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by dspeyer · · Score: 1

      There's another group of significance: the "serious" technical professionals who would never think about freedom or society directly but use Linux/gcc/Gimp/whatever just because its the best tool for the job (or the best tool under budget). When they see that the developers of these tools care, and that it's not just a handful of loudmouthes, maybe they'll start paying attention.

    19. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

      Count my vote in! Close SlashDot, SourceForge, big sites that make mainstream news. Knowing this would be happening I made sure to have whatever software I would need ready, burned to CD. We need to make our collective voice heard, and this is an effective way IF we can reach the critical mass needed for mainstream media to sit up and take notice.

      --

      You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
    20. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      I think CNN or MSNBC shutting down would be wildly inappropriate - they are, ultimately, online newspapers, and such political activism would be quite inappropriate for their frontpage.

      Now what would be good would be some opinion pieces on both sites about this, and some front page coverage of the issue - facts, details, and quotes both for and against.

      But a large scale protest like that would be quite inappropriate.

    21. Re:Wine isn't closed - Slashdot isn't closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What needs to close down with a protest banner on the front page is CNN, MSNBC,GOOGLE,YAHOO.... sites that the general public looks at daily.

      At least you could still access those sites from the Google cache. Oh, wait...

  7. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be a european thing, as I can still get to WineHQ and rpmfind.net both. The other two do appear to be down.

  8. Gimp by MP3Chuck · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gimp is another...

    1. Re:Gimp by Accipiter · · Score: 1

      As is Xine.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    2. Re:Gimp by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      +5 informative?

      Go to the gimp.org and click where it says "proceed to the site".

  9. Qemu too... by mirko · · Score: 3, Informative

    We had an interesting thread about Qemu...
    It's closed too...

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Qemu too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GO QEMU!!! (Sorry, had to, big fan. ;)

  10. MRTG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MRTG has also joined the fight.

    1. Re:MRTG by TEB · · Score: 1

      Finding myself needing MRTG yesterday I was unhappy to see this notice. After doing some brief digging I found the mirror sites were still up. That may not last but at least some of this software is still available.

      --
      Karma: Positive. Mostly affected by the lack of a karma joke in your sig.
    2. Re:MRTG by colonwq · · Score: 1

      I needed the site yesterday too.
      There was no need to search for a mirror. They had a link to the rest of the web site in the paragraph.
      They are back to normal today though.

      :wq

      --
      -- Phase 1: Collect under pants Phase 2: ? Phase 3: Profit
  11. Noticed it yesterday by MagicMerlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I noticed the protest yesterday on this site although it appears the protest has been removed today. I was thinking about asking him what it was all about.
    PicoSQL seems to be the home of an up and coming open source SQL server.

  12. Freshrpms.net is also closed by tuxroot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just adding this one to the list Freshrpms.net

  13. freevo by rtgree01 · · Score: 1

    Last time i checked freevo's site, it put up a new homepage.... Although they did have a link to the regular page.

    my $.02

  14. I hold a patent by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hold the "Words on a webpage" patent. It turns out that all of you will have to pay me royalty fees! I want 1 penny for every word on a webpage... I should be a trillionare by the end of the hour.

    Seriously though, does anybody have a link to the actual patents filed that contain references to "scrolling within a window", or "progress bars"? I'd be interested in looking over the legal ramifications in the US...

    --
    "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    1. Re:I hold a patent by Channard · · Score: 0, Redundant
      I hold the "Words on a webpage" patent. It turns out that all of you will have to pay me royalty fees!

      Trouble is, I hold the 'Placing comments regards an item of news on a flexible message archiving system' patent, which I'm willing to waive fees on except in your case. So going by the amount of posts you've made on the forum, you owe me quite a tidy sum of money. Shall I send the baliffs round, or shall we call it quits?

    2. Re:I hold a patent by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      I hold the "Words on a webpage" patent.

      Sorry, I would pay you but I already gave all my money to SCO so I can continue using Linux... ;-)

    3. Re:I hold a patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously though, does anybody have a link to the actual patents filed that contain references to "scrolling within a window", or "progress bars"? I'd be interested in looking over the legal ramifications in the US...

      Dunno about those exactly but googling for xor cursor i found the following:

      http://www.base.com/software-patents/disputes.ht ml

    4. Re:I hold a patent by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      Sorry guys, but I own the patent on posting humorous comments on /. claiming to hold ridiculous IP patents. You and about 15,000 other slashdotters owe me.

      Seriously, I can see this getting old quicker than the "I, for one, welcome..." jokes.

    5. Re:I hold a patent by telstar · · Score: 1

      You're using a Christian Slater quote in your sig and you expect us to pay you money? Surely you jest...

    6. Re:I hold a patent by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      You're using a Christian Slater quote in your sig and you expect us to pay you money? Surely you jest...

      Would the quote be any more or less true if it were said by someone else?

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
  15. RPMfind by PEdelman · · Score: 3, Informative

    RPMFind and its mirror sites are closed as well. Not the front page, but after a search query you get the warning. They say it's temporarily though.

    --
    Like science? Comics? Wicked...
    Funny By Nature
    1. Re:RPMfind by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      It's not closed. On the warning page there's a link "click here to enter this site". Try putting your mouse over the link and clicking on it.

      Windows and Linux users should click with button-1. Mac users should be able to figure out for themselves which button to use.

    2. Re:RPMfind by runlvl0 · · Score: 1


      Windows and Linux users should click with button-1.

      Now, I'm assuming that the buttons are labeled left-to-right... button zero, ah! Button one!

      Wait. All I'm getting is context-sensitive help. Either you're counting from right-to-left, or...

      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

      --

      Carthago delenda est!
  16. MRTG did it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That network tool that everybody uses, but pubically denies doing so (or just hides the window behind a fancy HP OpenView screen).

    I almost crapped when I thought I couldn't download the software

  17. What's the point of this? by goldspider · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Honestly, I don't get it.

    What message is this supposed to send? Why would the EU change its mind because a few sites decided to protest? How does the absence of a few sites hurt the EU? More likely, they'll only hurt themselves.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:What's the point of this? by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fair point. Mind you, European politicians are still very mindful of Europe-wide protests since they are a relatively new trend and, since they get a lot of coverage over here they appear in the news a lot. However, unless a "big" site decides to close for the day, this will pass off as a joke.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    2. Re:What's the point of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with the blinkered natured of the EU, why would they notice anyway?

    3. Re:What's the point of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the law was suppose to pass end of September and protests postponed it to September. 1st.
      The site-shutdown-stuff has been good enough, because it's again postponed, to the end of September.

    4. Re:What's the point of this? by kerry-buckley · · Score: 1
      What message is this supposed to send? Why would the EU change its mind because a few sites decided to protest?
      I guess it's more aimed at publicising the campaign against European software patents than directly pressurising the European Parliament. Judging from the susprised reactions here, it doesn't look like many people were aware of the campaign before, so it seems to be working.
    5. Re:What's the point of this? by timbloid · · Score: 1

      There was a proper protest too on the 27th (Wed)...

      > What message is this supposed to send?

      That we don't want software patents...

      Something has to be done... Sitting whining about other people protesting (in whatever form they choose) isn't going to help anything...

    6. Re:What's the point of this? by goldspider · · Score: 1
      I don't have a problem with them protesting; in fact I believe their cause is just.

      I suppose if their only purpose behind this protest is to gain publicity for their movement, they've been successful. But beyond that, I don't see how this puts any real pressure on the EU.

      Maybe I just can't relate to the protestor mentality.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    7. Re:What's the point of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not designed to pressurize the governments and EU institutions, it is to let YOU (the royal "you") the (european) geek who is too apathetic to do anything about it. Apathy let the DCMA through in the US, so stop being so negative when people try and stop it happening here.

    8. Re:What's the point of this? by timbloid · · Score: 1

      I agree that publicity is about all they can hope for... If this hits the non-geek media (BBC, etc) by this afternoon, millions of people across europe will read about it on the 3 hour pre-weekend slacking ;-)

    9. Re:What's the point of this? by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      Honestly, I don't get it.

      What message is this supposed to send? Why would the EU change its mind because a few sites decided to protest? How does the absence of a few sites hurt the EU? More likely, they'll only hurt themselves.

      In the words of Berthold Brecht:

      "Wer kampft kann verlieren, aber wer nicht kampft, hat schon verloren."

      (anybody knows why Slapdash insists on adding spelling mistakes to my comment?)

      Actually, we are makeing quite some progress, not just with this action, but also with other actions undertaken:

      • real-world petitions (with pen and paper! has more impact than an electronic one)
      • meetings with national politician (who then convince their European peers)
      • counter-lobbying directly at the European institutions
      • protest events, such as the one last Wednesday in Brussels
      Taken together, these actions have resulted in several postponments of the vote, and at each proposed date, the number of votes of the pro-patent lobby is dwindling...
    10. Re:What's the point of this? by Telex4 · · Score: 1

      What message is this supposed to send? Why would the EU change its mind because a few sites decided to protest? How does the absence of a few sites hurt the EU? More likely, they'll only hurt themselves.

      As somebody who has shut down a GNU/Linux web site he runs, and who was lobbying inside the European Parliament yesterday, let me explain.

      This web protest is one part of the picture:

      * On wednesday, there was a real demonstration outside the European Parliament in Brussels. This helped raise the profile of our cause in Brussels, and particularly amongst MEPs who will all have hopefully noticed or heard/read about it.

      * There has been an on-going petition with over 16,000 small businesses and many more individuals signing it, giving weight to our claims and putting pressure on MEPs

      * There has been an on-going lobbying process, intensified this week, writing to, phoning and talking face-to-face with MEPs, trying to convince them of our arguments. As of yesterday, it looks like we're suceeding in widening splits in the PPE-DE conservative alliance and the PSE socialist alliance, and we've already won over the greens, the far-left socialists and the far-right liberals.

      * Many web sites have displayed little images or text links to get more petition signatures and raise the profile of the campaign

      * Finally, this web protest is aimed at pushing the profile of the campaign even higher, getting many more geeks involved, and hopefully others who come across web sites they visit often and see the protest page. Doubtless few MEPs will see this, but it is raising the profile (as this /. story is doing) which is a very good thing at this critical time

    11. Re:What's the point of this? by moranar · · Score: 1

      Well, when the few sites amount to some thousands (or at least some hundreds) I'd say it's a good way of maing yourself heard. A powerful silent scream, as it were.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea!"
      Gandhi, about Internet Security
    12. Re:What's the point of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What message is this supposed to send?

      If Apache can become the world's most popular web server, and lead the field in a number of ways without the use of patents, and giving away their code to anyone who wants it, and explicitly states that they should not have the option of protecting themselves against competition in this way , then perhaps it will make people take notice and start asking questions. Important questions, like why are we doing this?

  18. Kudos to SCO by $rtbl_this · · Score: 4, Funny

    SCO obviously felt so strongly about this that they got started a few days early! They're good folks, always doing their best for the community.

    --
    "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
  19. Economists wrote an open letter on the directive by file-exists-p · · Score: 5, Informative

    This letter is worth reading ...

  20. gtk by den_erpel · · Score: 4, Informative

    gtk is another site that is protesting. Good though, if you look at the rubbish pattens which are already registered (illegally) in Europe, ...

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    1. Re:gtk by seann · · Score: 1

      In response to your sig.. Why not?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:gtk by den_erpel · · Score: 1

      Well, it's rather a complex explanation,but you might start with this this link, watch the episode and then contemplate again over the relevance of this signature in an IT dominated envorinment...

      Google would have helped you on the way though, ...

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  21. Vote delayed by mrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apparently this protest (and the physical one) may have had some effect, in that the EU vote has been delayed according to LWN. Let's hope this additional time is beneficial to the anti-patent cause...

    1. Re:Vote delayed by Katchina'404 · · Score: 1

      Confirmation of the parent post... The vote has been posponed to the end of September. Check out this article (in French).

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
  22. Europe shows the US what to do... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Come on guys, this is what the US community should have done to protest the DMCA, and the range of RIAA abuses that are being seen.

    Lets not be silly and take it down for ever, but why not have an official protest day? Slashdot, Freshmeat, maybe even some of the Corporates.

    And the time for this ? How about we start it on the same date as the end of the First World War ?

    November 11th, starting at 11am GMT, for 24 hours, we declare the internet closed for business.

    Are we in ? Slashdot.... are you listening ?

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the vote happening on the 1st of September?

      As such shouldn't any public protest happen before then, rather than a couple of months after?

    2. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by MosesJones · · Score: 1


      This protest is a EUROPEAN one. What I'm talking about is a US focused equivalent.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    3. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by salesgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think its not to late to execute this kind of protest against DCMA. It would be smart to do so.

      * Explain what is at stake for the common citizen.
      * Explain who will use DCMA against them: RIAA, the porn industry and opportunists.
      * Explain that there is no due process.
      * Explain that your children are the target.

      --
      -- $G
    4. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 'perspective' on slashdot certainly has changed because of this action.

      For a while now thousands of sites are closed. By now its 2500+ and only now is some slashdotter noticing it and it becomes slashdot news???

    5. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 1, Funny
      November 11th, starting at 11am GMT, for 24 hours, we declare the internet closed for business.

      Surely keeping slashdot ONLINE is better for halting the internet? :) Seriously though, the EU are very pro open source, especially Germany. Why would they shoot themselves in the foot by helping commercial offerings and hindering free ones?

    6. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beware.... Inciting such an stunt in the US could be seen as Terroristic Activity. I'll be seeing you in Guantanamo Bay.

    7. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a protest of some description is highly appropriate. However, I think an equivalent effect on public opinion could be achieved by a 30 second delay screen before allowing access to the site. Particularly for news organisations (and I put slashdot in this category) it may be too extreme to completely close the site.

    8. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good question, only few people in Europe asks that question - thats the problem

    9. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by usotsuki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If a large number of people don't protest they won't know that anyone gives a damn.

      I say go for it. 2003.1111, 6AM EST 3AM PST, for 24 hours? Go for it! Everyone in the US rename your pages and slap up a simple INDEX.HTM, you can toss together in a minute with notepad. 24 hours, forget it, I'll have it up for 72 ;)

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    10. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by CoolQ · · Score: 1

      You've surely noticed the "Enter this site" links on all the closed pages, haven't you?
      --Quentin

    11. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shutdown internet .... cooooooooooooooool yah.

      karthik bala guru.

    12. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean the DMCA? Retard.

    13. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
      Explain that your children are the target.

      Oh, yes, please think of the children.

      The rallying cry of everybody who sees something which offends them on the Internet. "Hey! I was out taking a stroll with my kid-- up the face of this sheer cliff, through barbed wire, a minefield, and across a hundred feet of tight rope, and do you know what my child was exposed to? So stop that!"

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    14. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by BESTouff · · Score: 1
      I think a protest of some description is highly appropriate. However, I think an equivalent effect on public opinion could be achieved by a 30 second delay screen before allowing access to the site. Particularly for news organisations (and I put slashdot in this category) it may be too extreme to completely close the site.

      I second that vote ! Could the /. editors explain *why* they don't want to put their money where their mouth is ?

    15. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so. It's the browser which would be waiting, and there are many ways to go through the wait manually if you know the code, turn javascript, or whatever has been used. Besides, people would just switch to another tab and continue browsing another site while this one loads up. In fact, you usually tend to do that with a modem dial-up connection.

    16. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      Exellent Idea! I'd shut my site down... if it had anything on it to start with or visitors for that matter ;)

      Turn off the Net.. November 11th 11am GMT for 24 Hours!

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    17. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm - Doing this after the fact achieves nothing. Why didn't you organise this earlier? knee-jerk-jump-on-the-bandwagon-activist-wannabe?

    18. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by frp001 · · Score: 1

      For a while now thousands of sites are closed. By now its 2500+ and only now is some slashdotter noticing it and it becomes slashdot news???
      Well... actually there was a previous posts several days ago ... and here also

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    19. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      children are the target because they are by default ignorant, and restrictive legislation has at its heart the perpetual ignorance of those bound under it. those who are not ignorant (through experience) cannot be made ignorant again, but those who never learn of their ignorance can be kept that way easily.

    20. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      Explain that your children are the target.

      Oh, yes, please think of the children.

      The rallying cry of everybody who sees something which offends them on the Internet.


      Actully, this isn't at all about being offended. It's about actually protecting my kids from an organization that will financially destroy my family and my kid's education over downloading a song worth at most $1.00. This is much more serious that the censorship zealots and so on because RIAA/MPAA/Porn Feasers are all going to be out for the wallets of Mom and Dad. After all, I'm the one with the broadband internet account, the network of six computers and so on.

      Cause -> Action -> Outcome
      Exposing kids to porn/bad ideas -> discussions you need to have -> Child learns and grows.

      Exposing kids to RIAA -> lawsuit-> no college fund.

      --
      -- $G
    21. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by Famatra · · Score: 1

      I don't think its too late either to protest the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act).

      Perhaps a date should be setup an offical day of protest.

      As well, you can help protest in Europe too, don't just count on websites like Slashdot to protest, mail 5 friends, post to the newsgroups, take down your own site. In fact what you can do is create/borrow a protest html template ready to be put up just for such an occasion :).

    22. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Um, because I hadn't thought of it maybe?

      Not everyone has a 275 IQ. I have about half that.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    23. Re:Europe shows the US what to do... by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      This is the United States. When we don't like something we first whine, whimper, and complain.. we keep doing that way to long.. then eventually we go postal and kill, steal, and break stuff.

      What we really need is something of a geek union.. not (just) for jobs.. but for political power. Get enough of our population to join that we can do things like just shut down large sections of the Internet in protest. We need enough people that we have members in every major company throughout the world.. enough people that if the people in IT shut down the servers for a day they just can't be fired for doing it.. because nobody (that wasn't a member) would know how to turn the servers back on. Just stop the Net, stop inventing new stuff, stop fixing stuff, etc.. give the world a week of that and see how they like it.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  23. Many sites closed by golan · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can find a list of sites closed at this link but I suppose many more closed on Ago 27th.

  24. Our feathered friends by buddha42 · · Score: 2, Informative
    All the apache projects sites have a message about this in their front page.

    www.apache.org

    1. Re:Our feathered friends by bigjocker · · Score: 1

      This is great ... I wish I had a highly visited web-site to join this protest.

      Anyways, apache joining is a great step, it is a highly recognized organization, but how about linux.com, linux.org, kernel.org, gnu.org, fsf.org, etc next?

      --
      Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
    2. Re:Our feathered friends by cascadefx · · Score: 1
      Any website can close itself down or replace their front page with a message about the issue. Just cut and paste and replace your index.html.

      That's what I did: http://www.cs.bsu.edu/~gjjones/administrivia

      I am not as popular as most but I do get 50 or so visitors a day for some of my tech support workarounds. Every little bit helps. I think it would be more of a statement if hundreds of thousands of pages had similar protest pages instead of just high-profile sites.

      If you uncle goes by your site to look at pictures of your children, raising his awareness isn't a bad thing.

  25. This 'protest' needs some HUGE commercial... by cnelzie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...players to be of any use. To the regular, tax-paying/voting citizen, if a Free Software web-site is off the web for a few hours, days, weeks or even months, it doesn't affect them anymore then if a sports team in a sport they don't watch disolves.

    Now, if Microsoft's European branch went off the web or Netscape or any number of other software companies that are BIG on the commercial radar were to join in on this protest, then more people would notice... But, that's not likely to happen...

    I see this too often. We geeks, as a political body, are simlpy blind to reality. Most of the sites that are currently 'down' are only going to affect fellow computer geeks. We hurt ourselves more then we hurt the opposition. There has got to be a better way to actually take some ground in a battle like this one over software patents.

    Who seriously came up with this idea with the honest belief that cutting off the Free Software community from Free Software sites would somehow affect the GREATER MAJORITY (That use Proprietart y software) that simply could care less about Free Software?

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:This 'protest' needs some HUGE commercial... by Telex4 · · Score: 1

      The campaign is not limited to this web site protest; it is one of many tactics we are using, to some success, to change the EU's mind.

      * On wednesday, there was a real demonstration outside the European Parliament in Brussels. This helped raise the profile of our cause in Brussels, and particularly amongst MEPs who will all have hopefully noticed or heard/read about it.

      * There has been an on-going petition with over 16,000 small businesses and many more individuals signing it, giving weight to our claims and putting pressure on MEPs

      * There has been an on-going lobbying process, intensified this week, writing to, phoning and talking face-to-face with MEPs, trying to convince them of our arguments. I was in the European Parliament lobbying yesterday, and many hackers have been in the building talking to MEPs for some time now. As of yesterday, it looks like we're suceeding in widening splits in the PPE-DE conservative alliance and the PSE socialist alliance, and we've already won over the greens, the far-left socialists and the far-right liberals.

      * Many web sites have displayed little images or text links to get more petition signatures and raise the profile of the campaign

      * Finally, this web protest is aimed at pushing the profile of the campaign even higher, getting many more geeks involved, and hopefully others who come across web sites they visit often and see the protest page. Doubtless few MEPs will see this, but it is raising the profile (as this /. story is doing) which is a very good thing at this critical time

    2. Re:This 'protest' needs some HUGE commercial... by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      How about Google? They use Linux in very large quantities, and have traditionally wanted to do the right thing, their top brass (Sergey Brin?) typically has strong moral views on right and wrong.

      I think it'd be worth a shot. Who wants to email Sergey?

    3. Re:This 'protest' needs some HUGE commercial... by ThyTurkeyIsDone · · Score: 1

      This protest is not directed at the general public but Members of the European Parliament. Except in the committees where the directive has been discussed already, the matter of software patents and their harmful effect may not have registered of the radars of many ordinary MEPs. If we can point to a few thousand sites shutting down in protest for a day, some of them may take anoth^H^H^H^H look at the issue and swing the vote in our favour.

    4. Re:This 'protest' needs some HUGE commercial... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent's poster is making a very good point, our democracy is: listen to big companies, don't listen to the people.
      This must be changed. We should not be ruled by companies, we should be ruled by a democratically elected government that thinks about the people iso money alone.

    5. Re:This 'protest' needs some HUGE commercial... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about Google?

      Umm... Google owns software patents. Sergey is listed as an inventor. Other companies are now resuming the fight for web-search dominance, and this patent is part of Google's defense.

      It means that no one else in the US can use their highly-successful ranking algorithm. Google stands to benefit greatly from software patents- I can't expect them to take such an expensive moral stand.

      (Amazon.com CEO Jeff Bezos stood against software patents, even though his company benefits from them. But there's much more to Amazon.com than a piece of software. Google basically justs rents access to that algorithm and their webcrawled database- and other companies have equally extensive databases...)

  26. 'Shut down' by Channard · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Has anyone got any links inside the sites that are supposedly shut down? Are the sites really shut down or has the index.html just been changed?

    1. Re:'Shut down' by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Christian Ghisler replaced the front page of www.ghisler.com yesterday, but still allowed visitors to get in via a link. I guess the decision on how to support the protest is up to the participant.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  27. Same here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, im a small independant programmer, and my site is closed as well... and i do not plan for the front page to change until they have voted on the patent issue...

    next thing you know, and someone patents how to boot a comp. in software....

  28. Some proof? by hotspur_fan · · Score: 1

    Let's see some articles about small companies put out of business for no reason by large companies with software patents. I'm not convinced this happens that much. I'm don't mean MS fighting back at a company that tries to sue it. I'm talking about IBM hearing that a new company exists and just suing it out of the blue (no pun intended).

  29. More sites by unixmaster · · Score: 1

    KDE website was down too to protest software patents, Turkish computer related site www.fazlamesai.net was down too yesterday.

    --
    Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again
  30. Knoppix Not Closed by DASHSL0T · · Score: 1

    It just put up a new index page noting the protest. We did the same thing too on 8/27.

    Just click the hyperlink that says Knoppix on the page and you are in.

    --
    Freedom Is Universal
    Linux-Universe
    1. Re:Knoppix Not Closed by varslot · · Score: 1

      You did not get the point did you? The point is not to deny access. The point is to make a statement.

      --
      There arises from a bad and unapt formation of words a wonderful obstruction to the mind. (Francis Bacon)
    2. Re:Knoppix Not Closed by DASHSL0T · · Score: 1

      I got the point quite well as I actually participated. Did you?

      The article summary is WRONG as knoppix isn't closed.

      Some people chose to close completey, others like myself, Apache and Knoppix chose to put up a prominent notice and still allow click-through access.

      --
      Freedom Is Universal
      Linux-Universe
  31. It's worth the fight by cjcormack · · Score: 1

    It has been proven that Software Patents don't work the way that they were meant to because software systems are so big and complex. They are only good for big companies (look at how many Patents IBM have, if I was to write a clever bit of code that affected their business, I would probably infringe some of their patents).

    1. Re:It's worth the fight by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      look at how many Patents IBM have, if I was to write a clever bit of code that affected their business, I would probably infringe some of their patents

      I will bet 90% of the sites on the Internet probably, in theory, infringe IBM patents. In practice, IBM only ever uses software patents in self defense. Of course, this is not true of some other companies. Grrrr...

  32. More than 2550 sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only in this list, more than 2550 sites currently protest against software patents
    http://www.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/OnlineDe moPartner sWebsites.php

    Maybe a site like slashdot can participate too.
    I don't ask to close slashdot, but to put an informational page like debian did http://www.debian.org/

    Oh, yeah, it would be good to have non-geek oriented websites with us. Software patents are not bad only for free software.

  33. Total Commander has re-opened by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    The Total Commander site has been reopened again and was closed yesterday. Wrote about it in my journal.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  34. This protest is SCO's IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been protesting for days, apparently!

  35. PHP's own news item by PrImED73 · · Score: 1

    Even though they're not closed probably due to corporate reasons, php.net had an article on this too acknowledging the threat.

    European Open Source Development Threatened!

    [27-Aug-2003]
    Today sees an international day of protest against the move by the EU to make obtaining a patent easier within Europe. Such patents may cause Open Source software such as PHP to infringe on existing licenses and new ones, meaning we would no longer be safe to distribute PHP within Europe. Contact your EU Representative to get this cruicial vote blocked. Find out more at the campaign website

    --
    --Mods giveth, Mods taketh away--
  36. mplayer and ffmpeg by Comsn · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.mplayerhq.hu and http://www.ffmpeg.org are both 'shut down'. but they still link to thier old homepage.

  37. Apache too by inepom01 · · Score: 1
  38. An MEP Replies by maroberts · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wrote to my MEP to protest and got this back - the only problem is, that like a typical politicians speech, I'm not quite sure at the ened of the day what its saying. I get the impression this is a little double edged. See what you make of it.


    Dear Mr Roberts,

    Thank you for your email, which has been passed to me as your local MEP from Philip Bushill-Matthews MEP.

    Conservatives in the European Parliament have supported the objectives of the Directive to set out and defend the status quo in Europe following changes to the patent system in the USA and also planned for Japan. There is a clear intention across the EU Member States to see that Europe does not follow the USA and Japan in allowing widespread patent availability for software and business methods. Copyright will remain the principal method of protecting intellectual property in these cases. I and my UK Conservative colleagues support the general line that the Commission has taken which builds on and clarifies the existing patent law across the European Union and makes it clear that only software which forms part of a technological process will be patentable. This will allow patents to be provided for genuine technical inventions and stimulate European economic development in areas of economic strength like mobile telephony, digital television and computer controlled machine tools to name just a few possibilities. Contrary to the impression given in your letter there is no intention what so ever to allow generic patenting of software in Europe.

    The amendments agreed by the Legal Affairs and Internal Market Committee last week, and supported by Conservative MEPs, have clarified the test conditions for software (deciding whether it has a technical effect) before authorising a patent. The Parliament amendments improve the text while ensuring that its principles are supported. Codification of the existing position will also avoid raising complicated issues of the validity of existing patents across Europe or allowing current unpatentable technologies to claim new patents. This will allow European businesses the chance to develop ideas with certainty as to their legal position. It will also reduce the pressure from companies holding permissive American software patents who wish to gain an extension of their patent rights in Europe.

    Finally, I must point out that the Directive contains detailed provisions for review of its operation and for early revision should its provisions not work as intended. If it is clear, from the type of inventions being patented or from ongoing legal cases, that the goals of outlawing generic software patents are not being met, then a process of revision can be implemented quickly.

    Yours sincerely,

    Roger Helmer MEP
    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:An MEP Replies by buford_tannen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, it is quite double edged. A summary:

      He thinks your concerns about the software patent directive are unfounded. He is certain (in his own mind) that the Directive will have no impact on software development, because it has "protections" to "prevent" "generic software patenting".

      Basically, he is saying that he knows what is best for you and that you are full of crap. But, since he's a politician, he has to hide that under a mountain of words.

      As a 'merican, I wish you the best of luck at saving your continent from the patent hell we have over here. You're going to need all the luck you can get, if this letter is any indication.

      Jon

      --
      Buford "Mad Dog" Tannen
    2. Re:An MEP Replies by neillewis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well it's rather vague and definitely boilerplate, I got exactly the same thing from John Bowis MEP (another Conservative.)

      From Glenys Kinnock (Labour) I got a paraphrased version of one of the directive's author Arlene McCarthy's own (self-praising) letters which is already posted on seveeral mailing lists. (I doubt Glenys uses Google much, or she'd be a little more careful what she sends out.)

      After receiving these two, I got seriously annoyed that this vague and partial directive would pass due to a mixture of horse trading, lobbying special interests and the old pals act, so I'm glad to hear it looks like it's going back to the committee stage.

      On a brighter note, Conservative Richard Balfe sent a thoughtful reply saying we should 'move carefully' and that he would 'take on board' my points when voting.

      Jean Lambert sent me the most positive response I've had, which shows the Greens are very strongly onside, and noting that "The influence of the Business Software Alliance (whose main members are Microsoft and IBM) behind the project has been widely condemned."

      At least these people actually bothered to answer, other MEPs haven't so far.

    3. Re:An MEP Replies by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That letter reminds me of a poor student essay, lots of buzzwords, no evidence of understanding, and no sign of any original thought. Take the phrase "makes it clear that only software which forms part of a technological process will be patentable." Can anyone tell me of any software that doesn't form part of a technological process. Clue, any piece of software run on a piece computer (i.e. a piece of technological equipment) is transformed into a process.

      Now look at this bit, "This will allow European businesses the chance to develop ideas with certainty as to their legal position." WTF patent laws create uncertainty you need to know if your work is already covered by a patent, is that patent valid, and anything which involves courts and the legal system always introduces an element of uncertainty. On the other hand no patent law means absolute certainty, if you can do it you're allowed to do it

      Finally look at the phrase, "I and my UK Conservative colleagues support the general line..." which can be translated as ' I do what the party tells me and you as a mere constituent are stuffed because all the major parties are following the same line.' Isn't democracy wonderful.

    4. Re:An MEP Replies by Simon+X. · · Score: 1
      This shows that at least some MEPs are just repeating the disinformation they have been fed.

      This guy is (or wants you to believe he is?) under the impression that the directive only allows patents on software that is part of a technical device (e.g. embedded software that controls an intelligent car braking system) and not on software in general that is executed on a PC or an internet server.

      However, there is nothing in the proposed directive that prohibits such types of general software patents (note that recently, a broader version of the Amazon "one click" patent was granted by the EPO. This kind of patents would become enforceable once laws based on this directive are passed. There are many many more patents like this granted by the EPO waiting to become activated).

      I cannot see in article 5 (page 20) and its explanation on page 15 anything else than an insidious attempt to defuse "free speech" objections. It can be interpreted in such a way that writing and publishing software cannot be patented (hence free speech would be protected), but actually running the software makes you liable to patent claims!

      Having a revision option does not help if you could already know that accepting the directive will be a major mistake. Innovation will be stifled instead of stimulated. A bunch of patent lawyers, patent pirates and big companies will profit at the cost of small and medium software makers and the consumer. Voting for the directive is not in the interest of the European citizen.

      Read it for yourself, the text of the directive is here:

      http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/en/ind prop/comp/com02-92en.pdf
    5. Re:An MEP Replies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you send a follow-up to force him to personally address the issue?

  39. Listing of website participating in the action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://wiki.ael.be/index.php/OnlineDemoPartnersWeb sites for a full list of website participating in the action. You can also add your web site if you participate in the online action against software patents.

    1. Re:Listing of website participating in the action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm.... the AEL has many faces. ;)

  40. Meaningless sites by uradu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I applaud each site's initiative, obscure nerd sites are hardly going to influence the decisions of techno-illiterate politicians likely to vote on this. Now if amazon.com, wsj.com or freshyoungboys.com closed down, they might take notice.

    1. Re:Meaningless sites by mt-biker · · Score: 1

      No, the politicians won't notice the lack of gimp.org.

      But we do. And the IT magazines will. It's all just part of spreading the word. I bet it'll even get some TV coverage here in Germany.

    2. Re:Meaningless sites by pbettendorff · · Score: 1

      The techno-illiterate politicians may be convinced by sending them emails or faxes. The responses I got from my countries' MEPs were along the line of "I haven't given this yet a lot of thought". So if you're an EU citizen, write them. Some may listen. btw. Closing the sites got this story onto /.

    3. Re:Meaningless sites by uradu · · Score: 1

      > But we do. And the IT magazines will. It's all just part of spreading the word.

      Sure, but the industry press has already been spreading the word for a long time. This issue has been written about extensively, yet we're still here. Heck, even news mags like Spiegel occasionally mention software patents. Now if Spiegel went down in protest, that might be something.

  41. Bit late ... by ldm · · Score: 2, Informative

    It should be noted that the "official" day for doing this was the 27th August, and that all the sites I've seen have not shut down, but simply replaced their front page with information on the protest, and then included a link to the original project anyway.

    1. Re:Bit late ... by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Some of the sites did it at the right time. Slackware was closed 2 days ago, on the 27th.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    2. Re:Bit late ... by ldm · · Score: 1

      Yes, I saw a bunch of places closed on the 27th, I think xbox-linux.sf.net is the first one I came across, I meant this _story_ is late =)

  42. No more patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes... because it's sooo much better when anybody can rip off years of your hard work/research and incorporate it into their own software without giving you so much as a dime.
    I guess I should prepare to get modded down, because I know this opinion isn't popular here ...

    1. Re:No more patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "when anybody can rip off years of your hard work/research and incorporate it into their own software without giving you so much as a dime"

      Doesn't copyright prevent that? Surely you can license out your work for some money, even with "just" a copyright.

      Even the hippie GPL allows charging for your work, as long as you sell the source with the binary. (IIUC.)

      And, Sir fellow AC, contrasting views are good for the discussion! :-)

  43. The Ant Project as well by pbur · · Score: 1

    http://ant.apache.org/

    Although, it looks like this was only supposed to be on August 27th, but they have kept theirs up.

  44. don't get me wrong, i think this is great but... by naph · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... really... who's gonna notice? if it ain't ebay shutting down, or msn.com or some other site like that then i don't think it's gonna make much of a splash.

    sure us nerds know about it, but joe public or mr european parliament bozo? don't fink it's gonna change their day.

    but still, kudos to the sties that did.

    --
    "if i'd known it was harmless, i'd have killed it myself"
  45. Re: Slashdot is not down by MuParadigm · · Score: 4, Informative


    "Slashdot is not, however, even though some have requested it be taken down for the day..."

    Well, someone has to be up to let people know what is going on.

  46. i haven't found any site to be closed by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    I've been to several sites with the protest page, but they all had a "click here to enter" link.

    1. Re:i haven't found any site to be closed by paroneayea · · Score: 1

      I closed down my site. It does have a thing that says "to enter click here"... but here leads not to my site, but to the website of the protest.

      --
      http://mediagoblin.org/
    2. Re:i haven't found any site to be closed by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      ok, now i've found one ;-)

      I was getting a little irked at the spreading misconception that people couldn't get to some of the big sites like rpmfind.

  47. short term memory problems? by ZorroXXX · · Score: 1

    This protest was already discussed earlyer this week here, so perhaps it should not come as such a big surprise.

    --
    When you are sure of something, you probably are wrong (search for "Unskilled and Unaware of It").
  48. Call to Arms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot is not, however, even though some have requested it be taken down for the day...

    I really don't want to sound like a flamebait, but Slashdot editors are completely oblivious to the issue that's only 2 days away from being voted on. Every day there are couple of SCO related stories on the front page, but the most important issue is being overlooked for some reason.

    This is what happens when editors don't follow the current developments. For them it's business as usual. Americans don't understand the implications of this horrible law if it passes. Even EFF does not have an alert on their page. I've searched their entire patent section and the major categories with no mention of European Commission's Software Patentability Directive Proposal (CEC/BSA).

    It's time to call to arms. There is not much time left and people need to mobilize and go to Brussels on Sept 1st.

    If this passes, everyone loses. DMCA would look like a fucking joke compared to this patent mess.
    1. Re:Call to Arms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't understand the implications of this horrible law if it passes.

      Sure we do...but you have to remember that misery loves company.

    2. Re:Call to Arms by Izago909 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Americans will have to live with this also. International copyright and patent laws can affect anyone in any country that 'respects' the 'work' of others.

  49. softwar gangsters/unprecedented evile gear up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..efforts to preveNT free speech, in any form, morons comply.

    as for va lairIE/robbIE's censoring/infactdead PostBlock(tm) devise, anywon can see that doesn't work, &/or cannot be shut DOWn, due to the mortgages held on them buy their fellow corepirate nazis. lookout bullow.

    that's right, they've (lairIE/robbIE) blocked ip addresses throughout the northeast/central parts of US, in sum inane effort to block the planet/population rescue initiative/suck up the their corepirate nazi sponsors. either behaviour is not good/doesn't help.

    no matter. the badtoll for their behaviours will be repaid by you/us.

    fuddles'.con is running linux now. no DOWt about that.

    fauxking phonIE payper liesense stock markup FraUD execrable/hive that they are.

    that's right, after the walking dead finish exterminating themselves, & sadly enough, some of us, it won't take long to clean up this cesspool of greed/fear execrable.

    we're calling it the planet/population rescue program (formerly unknown as the oil for babies initiatve).

    the Godless wons are helping by continuing to show where their hearts lie.

    fortunately, mr stallman et AL, etcetera, is now offering comparable/superior software, to the payper liesense spy/bug wear feechurned models, in almost every circumstance. there'll be few, if any more softwar billyonerrors, as if there's a need for even won. tell 'em robbIE. you are won of the last wons whois soul DOWt, right? .asp for va lairIE's whoreabull pateNTdead PostBlock(tm) devise?, used against the truth/to protect robbIE's payper liesense stock markup bosses/corepirate nazi 'sponsors'. yuk.

    back on task.

    what might happen to US if unprecedented evile/the felonious georgewellian southern baptist freemason fuddite rain of error, fails to be intervened on?

    you already know that too. stop pretending. it doesn't help/makes things worse.

    they could burn up the the main processor. that would be the rapidly heating planet/population, in case you're still pretending not to notice.

    of course, having to badtoll va lairIE's whoreabully infactdead, pateNTdead PostBlock(tm) devise, robbIE's ego, the walking dead, etc..., doesn't slow us down a bit.

    that's right. those foulcurrs best get ready to see the light. the WANing daze of the phonIE greed/fear/ego based, thieving/murdering payper liesense hostage taking stock markup FraUD georgewellian fuddite execrable are #ed. talk about a wormIE cesspool of deception? eradicating yOUR domestic corepirate nazi terrorist/gangsters will be the new national pastime.

    communications will improve, using whatever power sources are available.

    you gnu/software folks are to be commended. we'd be nearly doomed by now (instead, we're opening yet another isp service) without y'all. the check's in the mail again.

    meanwhile... for those yet to see the light.

    don't come crying to us when there's only won channel/os left.

    nothing has changed since the last phonIE ?pr? ?firm? generated 'news' brIEf. lots of good folks/innocents are being killed/mutilated daily by the walking dead. if anything the situations are continuing to deteriorate. you already know that.

    the posterboys for grand larcenIE/deception would include any & all of the walking dead who peddle phonIE stock markup payper to millions of hardworking conservative folks, & then, after stealing/spending/disappearing the real dough, pretend that nothing ever happened. sound familiar robbIE? these fauxking corepirate nazi larcens, want us to pretend along with them, whilst they continue to squander yOUR "investmeNTs", on their soul DOWt craving for excess/ego gratification. yuk

    no matter their ceaseless efforts to block the truth from you, the tasks (planet/population rescue) will be completed.

    the lights are coming up now.

    you can pretend all you want. our advise is to be as far away from the walking dead contingent as possible, when the big flash o

  50. Patents by maroberts · · Score: 1

    .. government should only grant patents becuase of a need to force advances out in the open, otherwise it should not interfere. Judging by the fact software seems to progress forward quite nicely without such patents, why do it?

    I guess I should prepare to get modded down, because I know this opinion isn't popular here
    You're an AC, why do you care about being modded down?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  51. Hmmm... by FrankNputer · · Score: 1

    I wondered why this didn't make /. when OSNews posted this on Wednesday...

    1. Re:Hmmm... by cioxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the editors are out of touch. They don't understand the scope of the issue. This is the kiss of death to the OSS model, if in fact it goes through.

      I've submitted 3 separate articles regarding EU patent initiative since 25th and all of them have been rejected. This is just another case of ignorance on part of American OSS supporters ignoring what goes on outside of US, and later bitch and moan for years why the laws are unjust.

      For fuck's sake, I live in California and I'm horrified of the fallout that might result from this.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      If i lived in california i'd be more afraid of the fallout that would occur when arnold makes steroid use mandatory.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  52. Close Slashdot by MrSkunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I totally agree with the parent poster. CLOSE SLASHDOT. A majority of people on these forums are always complaining about software patents and how they are going to stop any and all innovation in software development. Well, here is a chance for slashdot to spread this message far and wide.

    If slashdot closed down in protest, there is a good chance that some news agencies would pick up that story. This would be good because it get this message out to people who don't normally visit slashdot, gimp, or wine hq.

    Grow some balls slashdot. Shut your doors in protest!!

    1. Re:Close Slashdot by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      How would that help? SlashDot is repeatedly demonstrating that it is a USA-based site.

    2. Re:Close Slashdot by MrSkunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just because slashdot has a US-centric bias, does not mean that slashdot does not have a large foreign readership. I see posts on here all the time from Australia, Germany, England, and Soviet Russia.

      If large sites start closing in protest, this story has a large chance of making it into the mainstream media. That will mean that people who don't usually visit sites like slashdot, gimp, wine, freshRPM will start to hear about software patents and why they are bad for everyone. They will see that the software community is not going to sit idly by while politicians take away our ability to develop software.

      Slasdot's closing in protest would be a very good thing. It might even cause some people to venture out into the light since they will not have their favorite site to read.

      Come on, say it with me. CLOSE SLASHDOT!!

    3. Re:Close Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I totally agree with the parent poster. CLOSE SLASHDOT"

      Black out slashdot with a stylesheet change. "body{background-color: #000000;}".

      It's a communication channel, so taking it down would cause more harm than good, but hopefully it reaches enough website authors to further the campaign. Perhaps nobody in the slashdot editorial team is a member of EuroLinux, but the sites should have been down by Wednesday, and stay down until 1st September

    4. Re:Close Slashdot by hackstraw · · Score: 0

      Soviet Russia

      Slashdot is only something like 5 years old. The Soviet Union broke up in 1991, and Russia, per se, has never been Soviet.

    5. Re:Close Slashdot by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Lose that advertising revenue!

      You're thinking of 1996 or so. In 2003, Slashdot is an advert server with some blog code attached.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:Close Slashdot by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      I've blocked so many of the images sent by Slashdot in Mozilla that I hadn't noticed. They're still displaying banner ads?

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    7. Re:Close Slashdot by RichN · · Score: 1
      I see posts on here all the time from Australia, Germany, England, and Soviet Russia.

      Yeah ... But in Soviet Russia, posts see you!

      --

      Rich

    8. Re:Close Slashdot by psychofox · · Score: 1

      I am prepared to burn Karma and say it with you.

      CLOSE SLASHDOT!!!

    9. Re:Close Slashdot by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      soviet russia huh? funny, i remember the soviet bloc falling in 1991, when i was but a wee lad. slashdot has its first entry in the wayback machine at 1996, and the first page in 1997.

      so unless the reds developed time travel, youll be hard-pressed to find posts from soviet russia.

      more likely: you are experiencing idiots making bad jokes.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    10. Re:Close Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't agree. When software patents got approved in the USA no major action was taken by websites in Europe so I think it's quite fair that now they ignore us.

    11. Re:Close Slashdot by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      (*) Close Slashdot
      ( ) Close Wired news
      ( ) Close the BBC
      ( ) Close Microsoft.com / MSDN (using a worm?)
      ( ) Close gnu.org
      ( ) Send CowboyNeal to the Brussels demonstration

    12. Re:Close Slashdot by Famatra · · Score: 1

      It was genius to close down sites in protest, esp. regarding software patents in Europe.

      The icing on the cake would be if Slashdot would close down, even for a few hours, to protest the up and coming law in Europe.

      We live in a globalized economy now, and what goes on in Europe affects what happens in North America. Perhaps if Europe would have helped protest against American software patents, the law would not have passed here. It is time to correct that and help them from repeating the same mistake.

      Close Slashdot in protest of software patents!

  53. Mplayer by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    mplayer isn't actually closed, but has a "what if" 404 page.

  54. I saw this yesterday by mainguym · · Score: 1
    and attempted to post a note about it, but it got lost in the ethernet.

    I think it is a good thing that they are drawing visibility to this issue.

    Remember this ? Personally, I wouldn't have to pay royalties every time I wrote a gif editor.... oh wait.

    Well, then I wouldn't want to have to pay royalties if I wrote something that uses LZW compression, oh wait...

    It seems very problematic to attempt to patent an IDEA, even though it seems to happen pretty often.

    information wants to be free

    1. Re:I saw this yesterday by timbloid · · Score: 1

      Do you remember this?

      It's slightly more recent...

  55. Apache Software Foundation page by saforrest · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm surprised nobody's mentioned that Apache is down too.

    Sigh... they had to choose the last bloody day I can download anything before I move (after which I'll be without Internet access for a week).

    (Then again I can probably hold off on installing a webserver until my net access is back.)

    1. Re:Apache Software Foundation page by mainguym · · Score: 1

      Apache is actually still up, you just need to wait 60 seconds or click on the link...

    2. Re:Apache Software Foundation page by jdreed1024 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm surprised nobody's mentioned that Apache is down too.

      That's because it's not. Their front page talks about the issue, but then they have a continue on to apache.org link which takes you to index2.html. This is also the case on their sub-sites, like httpd.apache.org. If you click on that link, you'll see that the Apache site is there. Sometimes we do need to read beyond the first setence of websites, even if this is Slashdot.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    3. Re:Apache Software Foundation page by TeXMaster · · Score: 1

      Many of the website that adhered to the protest have not physically shut down the system. Most of them have replaced their first page with a page saying "This is what could happen if the law passes" or something of the sort; this was for example the case of Total Commander's webpage (www.ghisler.com). Being informative without being "obstructionists", if I can say so. Maybe /. could do something like this too.

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
  56. wow by stardome · · Score: 1

    i managed to deface some webpages and keep people talking positively about them

  57. List of Online Demo Partner Sites by popierius · · Score: 2, Informative

    List of participating site can be found here.

    Join in, and contact your MEPs if you are a citizen of an EU member country.

  58. Will shutting down sites matter? by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems to me that a lot of the sites that are shutting down for the day are ones that are frequented by people who are already aware of the issue. Also, they aren't sites that most people would visit on a daily basis. It would be nice to see some more general, more widespread sites shut down for the day. I'm not talking about geek sites, I'm talking sites like google, BBC, Yahoo, E-bay, and other big name sites. Could you imagine the effect of these sites closing down? I think it would get the attention of a lot more people, and people who weren't already aware of the issue.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by larien · · Score: 1

      Nice thought about the BBC, but that would involve the BBC taking a political stance which would violate a lot of what they stand for. Hopefully, however, they can at least report on the issue to alert people.

    2. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was really just trying to think of sites that a lot of people visit, and also something that would affect europeans. It would be nice to see a nice big headline front page story though. I'm not sure how the BBC is, but i'm from Canada, so I see a lot of United Statesian media. They always take a political stance, although they are usually not as blatant as shutting down their websites and stuff.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice to see ... google, BBC, Yahoo, E-bay, and other big name sites down

      I think the BBC has chosen their political battles
      http://washingtontimes.com/world/20030801-114819-7 505r.htm

    4. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      Seems to me that a lot of the sites that are shutting down for the day are ones that are frequented by people who are already aware of the issue.

      Don't assume that. During my last three technical jobs since 1998 (ops, dev, dev), of the people I worked with, I met only one other person who knew what the DMCA was. There are a whole lot of admins and developers out there that are completely unaware or completely indifferent.

    5. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by jldrew · · Score: 1
      Seems to me that a lot of the sites that are shutting down for the day are ones that are frequented by people who are already aware of the issue. Also, they aren't sites that most people would visit on a daily basis.

      True. However, we use these "geek sites" in our day-to-day, professional and academic careers. If project X is delayed because I can't access some website that provides open source component Y, I get an opportunity to tell my boss or professor why. Information will spread. Someone influential will hear about the protest, and we will have done some good for the world.

      It would be nice to see some more general, more widespread sites shut down for the day.

      I agree. Maybe, by the above phenomenon, a higher-up at one such organization will realize how much he/she depends upon open software, and they'll join the protest.

    6. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      What kind of information will get through to the PHBs?

      • that community is unreliable since they are unavailable to our urgent needs because of politics
      • that whole open source development model will soon collapse due to conditions we can't change
      • that pesky Linux advocate doesn't get things done, either
      Kiwaiti
      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    7. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by travdaddy · · Score: 1

      Could you imagine the effect of these sites closing down?

      Google? Are you serious? That would just make a lot of people pissed off. Leave it to sites that would not affect people negatively, like the ones presently in the protest, or entertainment sites, or anything that would not be vital to anyone for a day. Google IS vital IMHO. So is E-Bay, some people make their living off that site.

      --
      Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
    8. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think the BBC should be unbiased. Slashdot can be biased and thus shut their page down. BBC should report news fully independed, it should not take a stance by shutting their page down.

    9. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I think that's the whole point. If people realize how vital Open software is to their lives, maybe it will finally hit them. I'm not sure about the specifics of Google and Ebay. But many vital sites use Open source software (think Apache). Software patents will be detrimental to projects like this in the future. Going one day without google would be tough. Could you imagine going without it forever? Because of some stupid software patent.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    10. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Google could add a banner.

    11. Re:Will shutting down sites matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how long this protest is supposed to continue, but a few more central sites would be great as it both would spread the word and cause other webmasters shutting down theire sites.

      Slashdot is one such central site - there are several other technial news sites that rely on Slashdot as a heavy source, and a lot of CS professionals that read it.

      Source forge would be another great site that could make more people, and more important people that are directly affected by the directive, aware of the campaign and maybe participate too.

  59. Making the wwworld safe for oligarchy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the aftershocks of U.S. aggression continue to wreak havoc on the people of Iraq, another war has been waged on the people of the U.S. It's a war against democracy waged by the military industrial complex. Power has been taken from the hands of the people and given to a small group of corporations, aka, the walking dead.

    predicted sentence for ALLEGED worm writer:

    probation, & a box of worth less sco stock. although painful/embarrassing, that hardly qualifies as 'a world of hurt'.

    remember the hurricane?

    as for sco, as they are obvious FraUDs & stock markup felons/grand larceners, they'll likely get to keep all the monIE they've stolen so far, without any reprecussions.

    lookout bullow. this continuance of the georgewellian fuddite corepirate nazi execrable/unprecedented evile, will be addressed as part of the planet/population rescue initiative.

    as for va lairIE/robbIE's fauxking whoreabully infactdead PostBlock(tm) devise, byte me.

  60. Re:European patents != American patents by iapetus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slashdot has a large contingent of non-American readers. It's News for Nerds, not News for Nerds Who Live in the United States of America. Stories about Brazil's attitude to open source and the UK's plans for built-in monitoring of cars make the front page, so why not this sort of demonstration?

    Anyway, plenty of people outside the US have protested against the many moronic decisions taken there in recent years (DMCA, Skylarov etc.) - I'm sure there are plenty of people in the US who'd like to reciprocate. Stupid software laws are bad wherever they're passed.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  61. Re:European patents != American patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Until someone can satisfactorily explain to me how this legislation will affect American sites and developers based entirely in the United States, I see no reason why Slashdot or any other company on this side of the pond should participate in the protest.

    I guess you don't have software which has European code in it. Here's a revelation: somewhere around half of the code in your linux kernel comes from Europe. Imagine that nullified and declared illegal.
  62. OSDN by colinramsay · · Score: 1

    OSDN should be taking part in this. Can we get some kind of official line? At the very least Slashdot and Sourceforge should be.

  63. MOD PARENT UP by geekster · · Score: 1

    I was about to post the same thing, seems like there was a broad interrest in that protest... *ahem*

  64. Just shut down gPHPEdit.org by sd4l · · Score: 1

    It's only a small project and I'm a bit late shutting it down, but just shutdown www.gphpedit.org for this protest.

    I hope more authors of free software do this.

    --
    -- Andy Jeffries Scramdisk for Linux (Change the orgy to org to reply)
  65. no, email your MEP by misterpies · · Score: 5, Informative


    If you live in the EU, don't just sign the petition - email your MEPs explaining why they should oppose the motion (and reminding them - gently - that they want your vote!). Yesterday I emailed all 10 MEPs representing London explaining my concerns, and I've already received 2 thoughtful responses -- one of which was seemed convinced by my arguments.

    Probably the best arguments to use are those against patenting algorithmic business methods (also covered by the directive) rather than software per se, as they're more likely to be appreciated by politicians. My example was patenting an 'algorithm' that uses a number keyed in by a bank customer to verify their identity against the account details held on their bank card. Hey presto, your "software patent" gives you a monopoly on ATMs.

    You can find a list of UK MEPs at the European Parliament's UK Office. For other countries, check out the main EU parliament website. Note that each constituency is represented by several MEPs, allocated between different parites by proportional representation. The vote on the directive is next week, so email your MEP today!

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    1. Re:no, email your MEP by frp001 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I'm still struggling to find email for MEP's in France. If anyone has got a link, it would be appreciated!

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    2. Re:no, email your MEP by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about Europe but if you are serious about doing something, don't email. Call or write a paper letter CC'ed to newspapers and media outlets.

      Emails and electronic forms don't have the impact of something in the "old fashioned real-world".

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:no, email your MEP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/ep5/owa/p_meps.short_ list?ilg=FR&ictry=FR&ipolgrp=&iorig=

    4. Re:no, email your MEP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its worth doing, the replies are informative if only to get a demonstration of how corrupt some of our politicians are.

      Four of my six regional MEPs made it clear they've considered the issue carefully and decided to oppose the patents. The new labour ones (I'm in the UK) made it clear they've considered, then listened to a few businesses that will benefit and decided to support big business anyway. The reply is full of meaningless promises to resist the spread of patent applicability while fundamentally supporting the idea of software patents if it helps a few UK businesses profit. If any thought when into how many it would harm there's no sign of it but politicians are never good at adding up all the numbers.

      I came away from it with the impression supporters (like new labour) know they're shafting the public but don't care what we think, they'll be able to spin their way out of it. Remind them you exist and care.

    5. Re:no, email your MEP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks.
      Doesn't seem to work for the moment... :( But I shall try later.

    6. Re:no, email your MEP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an extra space in the URL. Still. It does not contain emails addresses.

    7. Re:no, email your MEP by Davorama · · Score: 1

      But maybe you should read this first.

      --

      Davo -- Free speech, free software, AND free beer.

    8. Re:no, email your MEP by stefarn · · Score: 1

      Also, try to get the news media interested. Mail your local web newspaper. Politicians tend to ignore protests unless they are covered by the media.

  66. Lawyers aren't the problem by psxndc · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Kill all the lawyers"

    I hate that phrase. First, lawyers don't create laws; Legislators/Congress(wo)men do (and judges interpret them). Secondly, lawyers' clients are the ones that hold the patents, not the lawyers. Thirdly, the USPTO (or the european equivalent in this case) is the one granting the patents. Lawyers are the middle-(wo)men in all this. Removing the lawyers won't solve the problem.

    Sorry but I see people saying this all over slashdot. I think it's an unjustified statement that people like to throw out there when legislators make bad laws, judges interpret the law incorrectly, or the PTO grants patent they shouldn't have.

    Anyone can be a patent agent. There is a separate patent-bar that just about anyone can take. You don't even need to go to law school or have passed the state bar exam.

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't find a reference, but from what I have read when Shakespeare wrote that he was refering to the Law Creators and not about the people who represent you in court.

    2. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by hamster+foo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lawyers/patent agents are at the very least part of the problem.

      Yes, the people in the system that create the laws, interpret the laws, and perpetuate the patent system in its current state all share a large portion of the blame for the problem, but lawyers also play a part in the perpetuation of the system.

      If lawyers/agents started saying no to filing ridiculous patent lawsuits and representing clients in the pursuit of said lawsuits, it would send a message not only to the corporations, but to the law makers and decisions makers that this needs to be changed. As long as lawyers are gaining from these lawsuits and helping to facilitate them, they can not be considered innocent middle men.

      --
      - b
    3. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by psxndc · · Score: 2, Interesting
      True, lawyers are not "innocent", but "kill all lawyers" makes them out to be _the_ problem, not part of it. Why not say "kill all that cause frivilousness"?

      As for saying "no" to ridiculous lawsuits, patents, etc. it _is_ done, probably moreso than most think. Secondly, it is not always in an individual lawyer's ability to do so. If a lawfirm partner says "ClientX, who is a very valuable client, has 23 valid IP patents and 1 so-so patent. But someone is infringing on the so-so one. Go get them Associate-Boy" it's not like the associate can say "Sorry Mr. Partner-Man, no can do". They could, but it would be like an IT person in an all Windows shop saying "We must switch over to Linux because Windows is Non-free". There is moral merit to the argument, but it doesn't make business sense and it's not really the whipping boy's decision to make.

      Again, I don't absolve all lawyers of guilt in the matter, but I want people to recognize and point fingers at the other parts of the problem

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    4. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by calethix · · Score: 1

      "Lawyers are the middle-(wo)men in all this. "
      Those poor innocent drug dealers are middle men too... they don't make the drugs or create the need for them.

      "Removing the lawyers won't solve the problem."
      I'll agree with you on that. Lawyers may not be the sole problem but they are far from innocent in perpetuating the problem.

    5. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I hate that phrase. First, lawyers don't create laws; Legislators/Congress(wo)men do (and judges interpret them)

      Funnily enough, 39% of Congress are lawyers. I believe that this is lower than usual. Perhaps some of them have been disbarred because of all the fraud, assault, drug use, shoplifting and drunk driving that they like to indulge in.

      Lawyers and Congress are two sides of the same tarnished coin.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by drugdealer · · Score: 1

      Looking at these two sentences:

      > If lawyers/agents started saying no to filing ridiculous patent lawsuits and representing clients in the pursuit of said lawsuits, it would send a message not only to the corporations, but to the law makers and decisions makers that this needs to be changed. As long as lawyers are gaining from these lawsuits and helping to facilitate them, they can not be considered innocent middle men.

      I'd say that the second sentence explains why the predicate of the first sentence in unrealistic. If lawyers can gain from the lawsuits, why would they stop filing them? If there is a way to gain from these lawsuits, then if we killed all of the lawyers, we'd probably get non-lawyers (perhaps unemployed people) filing the lawsuits. Change the laws, not the lawyers. The lawyers are just there to argue the law. The action required here is political, not homicidal.

    7. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      I hate that phrase. First, lawyers don't create laws; Legislators/Congress(wo)men do (and judges interpret them). Secondly, lawyers' clients are the ones that hold the patents, not the lawyers. Thirdly, the USPTO (or the european equivalent in this case) is the one granting the patents. Lawyers are the middle-(wo)men in all this. Removing the lawyers won't solve the problem.

      OT: I know this if off topic, but I'll give my own feelings towards lawyers. As a profession, I think it's a little warped. You're paid to defend someones elses belief. By belief I mean someone elses innocence or guilt or basically someone elses concept of what they think is right or wrong. On occasion, a lawer may actually agree with the belief that they're defending, but really that has no bearing. They're paid to influence the court on what someone else (the client) believes is right or wrong.

      I'm sure one can argue that some lawers are decent people. Maybe they are. The profession I think is alittle warped. So what can you say about people who choose that type of profession? It's like saying you can be bought to defend principles that you don't even believe in. Think of the innocent lawer that defends a known killer. The lawer is so good that he gets the known killer off in court because they weren't read their rights. The lawer has a clean concience because they were only doing their job. The cops can be blaimed for being sloppy.

      I'm sure one can give several examples on how people in other professions can perform acts that would go directly against a morally right decision. But they make the morally wrong decision because it's their job. In the case of the lawer profession, it's a direct corelation of how one's moral decisions can be directly bought. By definition, it's what they do. So I agree with all those lawer jokes out there. Not because I dislike them as people. It's the design of their profession. What they're paid to do. And before I get flamed for my remarks, it's just my perspective. From a high level view of the lawer profession, I see no wonder why there's so many jokes and distaste for them.

    8. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      Since lawyers are those who profit most from that system, they are also the ones to make sure it doesn't improve / it gets worse.
      "Coincidentally", they are also the only ones to really understand the system.

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
    9. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had the unique experience of being the on-site computer guy for a medium-sized law firm for the last three years. Being on the inside of a law firm, and seeing what lawyers actually do has given me a very different perspective from the parent.

      Everyone is always quick to characterize lawyers as ambulance chasers or as people who get criminals off. However, there are a lot more aspects of law than personal injury and criminal defense. For example, one attorney at our firm focuses mainly on work for the humane society - doing whatever he can to protect pets and animals. Another attorney handles family law, cases of divorce, custody, etc. He believes he is helping people because they can turn to him and he can advise them on what they need to do to make sure they are not given the short end of the stick. One attorney focuses on estate law, writing wills and power of attorney documents for people.

      In all cases, lawyers are used by people because they understand law more than the average person. Likewise, a businessman may be a "power user" with his computer, even changing out the memory, but he will still get the expert when it comes time to do something more complicated. Same thing.

    10. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by psxndc · · Score: 1
      "Coincidentally", they are also the only ones to really understand the system.

      Actually, there has been a movement in most US law school's over the last decade to make legal writing a little more "plain" so that everyone can understand it.

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    11. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1


      Gee, it used to be that lawyers were the majority party.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
    12. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by pmz · · Score: 1

      Lawyers are the middle-(wo)men in all this. Removing the lawyers won't solve the problem.

      True, but you cannot ignore that lawyers, as middle-men, have very serious financial interests in favor of complex and antagonistic legislation.

    13. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your error is in placing morality as the be-all end-all goal of society, it ain't. Get over it. Ethics are far more important, and yes, some lawyers are unethical, they are the ones who advertise the loudest, and are generally hated/disdained by the members of their local bar. Basically you're arguably that prosecuting attorney's are the only good lawyers. Do you have any idea how uniformly slimy they are as a group? Good criminal defense attorney may have really crass senses of humor, but they are good, highly intelligent people. Prosecuting attorneys and Police officers are far more slimy, lying and disgusting, they are unethical by nature. They lie, and violate the very laws they purport to enforce.

    14. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by 2short · · Score: 1

      A disproportionate number of Congress people are lawyers? I'm horrified! Do the voters actually think it makes sense that the people making laws should have training and experience in the law? What crazy thing are we going to do next, have our bridges designed by people with degrees in structural engineering?

    15. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by bogie · · Score: 1

      " It's like saying you can be bought to defend principles that you don't even believe in. "

      "In the case of the lawer profession, it's a direct corelation of how one's moral decisions can be directly bought"

      Nobody's morals are being bought and your views pretty well off from reality.

      "The cops can be blaimed for being sloppy."

      Then blame the cops for not doing their job. Not the lawyer for pointing out that proper procedure wasn't followed. Thank God we don't let things like that slide. Its the only thing keeping the police and other people honest. If we were to starting convicting people based on compromised evidence and just "let things slide" when it comes to procedure the world would be a much worse place. Nobody liked seeing O.J. getting off, but at the same time I'm glad the cops can't use half-asses evidence to convict.

      "But they make the morally wrong decision because it's their job. "

      Umm no? What is morally wrong about defending someone? We don't live in a world where everything is so black and white.

      It's not "morally wrong" to defend someone no matter what the charge. Our country is founded on that premise. Sometimes the people are ugly, but you either support rights for everyone or not at all. I'll always pick the former. Also just because a lawyer gets a client who committed a crime a tells the lawyer he did it, doesn't mean representing that client compromises the lawyer's morals. Our legal system is setup specifically so that everyone is presumed inoccent and until proven guilty. You simply can't look at the role lawyers are put into when defending someone and say they are being "bought". That arguement shows a fundemental lack of understanding of how our legal system works. They are simply acting out thier role in a framework which forces them to defend the client to the best of their ability. It also ignores the fact that most lawyers are very ethical people. Sure you get people like Johnney C. who makes all lawyers look bad, but pick any field and there are bad apples in the bunch.

      "From a high level view of the lawer profession..."

      That actully really does show. I'm sure your a decent person and my intent was not to be nasty, but the legal profession simply isn't like the stereo-typical view your espousing. That probably won't help the next time you see a lawyer defeding someone you don't like but like I said its not so black and white.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    16. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by drugdealer · · Score: 1

      A thought to consider: if we eliminate all of the lawyers, who is going to defend you when someone falsely accuses you of murder, embezzlement, patent violations, etc.? Perhaps you can adequately defend yourself. But what if you have a learning disability, don't speak English fluently, or have been denied educational opportunities due to financial hardship or racial prejudice? Or maybe you are too busy with your job to read up on the relevant laws, while your accuser is some unemployed guy who has lots of time on his hands for threatening people with lawsuits - in a brave new world without lawyers.

    17. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it represents a conflict in interest. To use your example, it's like asking a structural engineer whether or not a bridge is needed in a given place. An unethical engineer might say we need bridges every 15 meters, because he'll be paid to build them. You should ask a city planner or traffic engineer instead.

    18. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      It's not "morally wrong" to defend someone no matter what the charge.

      That statement pretty much sums up your perspective vs mine. No right or wrong here...it's just a matter of perspective :)

      I think the term "bought" may also have been improperly used or understood. Lawyers do their job. Yes, plain and simple. If a criminal tells their lawyer in confidence, "yeah, I did it". Or the lawyer, through investigation can determine without a doubt that their own client is guilty. It all doesn't matter. Their job is to defend their client no matter what their personal or moral feelings are. That's what I mean by bought. Even if the lawyer wanted to do what they felt was morally right and inform the judge or prosecutor, then they would be guilty of being a bad lawyer and probably disbarred for breaking client confideniality. My views are towards the profession in general. It has a warped sense of moral duty. Now, from your statement above being applied to my views, I'm to interpret that you're saying it's "morally" ok to defend someone even if you think "morally" they're wrong?

      You're right, the legal system does work this way. Your comment on sloppy cops are to blame and thank god they can't get away with not following procedure 100% has merrit, but then again you did mention the world isn't so black and white. Which way is it?

      I'll say it again. It's nothing against lawyers as people. I'm sure there are many who try to do the right thing. But their profession has a way of putting their morals in a very compromising position. And their escape it just to do the job they're paid to do. You're saying it's ok, it's how the legal system works. I'm saying fine, I don't sympathize with any lawyer recieving a bad rap for their profession.

    19. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by 2short · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't buy it. I don't think there are any lawyers out there who think they would be making more money if only there were more laws. A fair number of laws probaly reduce the work pool for lawyers by removing ambiguities.

      In your take on my analogy, you suggest asking a city planner or traffic engineer about a bridge. Both of these are people with training and experience in the question at hand, so if the question were about laws instead of bridges, they would be lawyers too. "Lawyer" encompasses a wide range of specialties just like "Engineer" does. For some reason, most people judge all lawers by one fairly small subset: "Unscrupulous Plaintifs Attorney". I would guess that former plaintifs attorneys are not particularly likely to be in Congress (as opposed to say, prosecutors).

      Anyway, laws effect all segments of society. What profession would you like Congress people to come from? Would people from that background really have enough less conflict of interest to balance out not having any training in the job you're electing them to do?

      In any case, I don't vote based on someones previous proffession, nor do I expect many others do. I would guess people who are interested in law are more likely to become lawyers, and theose same people are more likely to run for office, so naturally the candidate pool is biased toward lawers. I can see that you might disagree with my opinion that that is a good thing, but I don't see that it's a particularly bad thing, and it certainly doesn't look like a conspiracy.

    20. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but, if a tree fell in the forest and hit a lawyer... would anyone care?

    21. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Kpau · · Score: 1

      Um..... interesting theory but: 1) Legislators/Congress == mostly lawyers. 2) Judges == mostly lawyers. 3) Clients == ones who have patents because lawyers suggested it. 4) USPTO == encircled by patent attorneys who make more in a month than an inspector makes in a year. The system is *infested* with lawyers, who have a self-oriented interest in ensuring their continued "need". Its kind of like the MSCE who fails to protect Exchange behind a fortified gateway smtp handler.... guarantees job security from fearful PHBs. Blowing my moderator status to answer this, bleh.

    22. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by psxndc · · Score: 1
      To correct a couple things: See the post in this thread that only 39% of congress are lawyers. That still leaves 61% that aren't. Judges are all lawyers as far as I know. I'd be really surprised if there was a judge that wasn't one. And lawyers don't go to clients preaching IP. Clients come to lawyers because the client thinks they have something potentially worth protecting. As for the USPTO, what does money have to do with it. Because attorney's make more money per year, a PTO investigator shouldn't do his job?

      Out of curiosity, how many lawyers do you know? I know two personally (one IP, one corporate) and seeing my friends be lawyers has definitely changed my perspective. It's a lot easier to hate something you don't understand.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    23. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Kpau · · Score: 1

      Lawyers have the same problem doctors have: poor policing within their own. It doesn't take many bad lawyers to color the profession poorly. Pharmacists tend to police their profession more thoroughly. If 40% of Congress are lawyers... why do we repeatedly get such wretchedly written laws? And how many congresscritters keep lawyers on staff or have lawyer lobbyists "reviewing" bills for them? Its the companies that keep lawyer "on staff" that tend to be the worst about "protecting" stuff... they need to justify their job. I worked a couple of places where the IP lawyers would wander around like weasels on the hunt for eggs hoping to create IP. "NO! Prior art abounds! Go away!" should have been stitched on our shirts. Pertaining to the USPTO... now you're spinning. You well know that you get what you pay for. The USPTO admits to understaffing and underqualification issues, but they won't stop issuing junk patents. Myself... I know 4 lawyers, one in the family. One is family law, one is civil rights, the other two are public defenders -- none are feelthy reech. Finally, I don't *hate* lawyers, but there are lawyers I detest. The Shakespearean quote so happily tagged is also taken out of context and really means something quite different.

    24. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by psxndc · · Score: 1
      Finally, I don't *hate* lawyers, but there are lawyers I detest

      Understandably. There are going to be sleezy lawyers, doctors, construction workers, salespeople, anything. I've met my fair share of lawyers that I despised. My gripe is with the blanket "All lawyers are bad" that permeates slashdot and the US as a whole.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    25. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Gee whiz, perhaps if we had more laws written by non-lawyers, we wouldn't need so many lawyers to interpret them for us poor humble Joes. You savvy?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    26. Re:Lawyers aren't the problem by 2short · · Score: 1

      So if more computer programs were written by non-programmers, we wouldn't need so many programmers to debug them?

  67. As long as it's not SlashDot.org by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    Or, I'd have to get work done. Or something.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  68. Far larger ranging effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My site, http://goatse.cx was also shut down. Needles to say the politicians in Brussels were in a state of panic and despair yesterday and we now expect this law to be thrown out. We just had to show them what they'd lose if they passed it.

    Sincerely,
    Goatse Man

  69. Re:European patents != American patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be like saying SCO's victory in US court declaring GPL to be invalid would have no effect on European market and OSS model worldwide. Your reasoning is flawed.

    Get real.

  70. 2 site i saw... by arcanumas · · Score: 1

    www.alsa-project.gr
    www.linux.gr
    Notice that most sites provide means for you to enter throught a link. They are not completely closed.

    --
    Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    1. Re:2 site i saw... by Snags · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I saw ALSA as well. I'm glad I could still get my drivers, but I guess the inconvenience would have been part of the protest.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
  71. xboxmediaplayer.de closed too by Zilch · · Score: 1

    Great software - hope it's back soon...

    Zilch

  72. Who is this protest reaching?? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Most of my coworkers (computer science academics) are oblivious to the whole issue. As another post noted, this is preaching to the choir. Some geeks get inconvenienced, so what?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  73. Re:European patents != American patents by __past__ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you write software that violates a european patent and distribute it in europe (for example by putting it on a globally reachable web server), you can be sued. Not to mention that I'm quite sure that you are using software written by european developers that would certainly be affected. So stop being such a narrow-minded dork, if you will.

  74. GraniteCanyon joining in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like granitecanyon.com is down too. My site quit working yesterday and after checking everything, realize the DNS server didn't work...thanks granitecanyon.

  75. MOD PARENT DOWN ----- TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD DOWN TROLL!!
    It was shown that MS was not usin a *nix based web server. This is a troll!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN ----- TROLL by nova20 · · Score: 1
      ...or maybe he was just trying to be funny. Just a thought.

      /tim

  76. Re:you'll need insurance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'll be seeing you in Guantanamo Bay.

    You'll want travel insurance...probably an annual policy, with automatic renewal. Don't forget to add a friend or relative as the contact, you may be hard to get hold of. Don't answer the "Are you 18 or older?" question, it doesn't matter at Guantanamo.

  77. Slashdot isn't closed - mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "all these sites closing are preaching to the Choir..."

    Exactly! Anyone visiting these sites are likely well aware of this issue, so this effort really accomplishes nothing.

  78. I'm just glad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just glad that Europe is such a more free place than America. You know, how, blah blah blah. Europe>America. FREE KARMA!

    GIVE IT TO ME!

  79. How's this for proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine you own a small software company. You have written a powerful piece of software. This software is a creative combination of 1000 abstract rules (algorithms) and a lot of data. The rules take a few minutes or hours each to [re]invent, whereas developping and debugging the whole work took you 20 man-years. 900 of the rules were already known 20 years ago. 50 of the rules are now covered by patents. You own 3 of these patents. In order to obtain these patents, you had to rush to the patent office, disclose your business strategy and pay lawyer fees. IBM and Microsoft are meanwhile already turning your patented ideas into profit. You want them to stop? Their lawyer teams say you are infringing on 20-30 of their 50000 patents. So you reach a gentlemen's agreement: 3% of your annual sales revenues go to IBM, 2% to Microsoft, 2% .... Nonetheless, one day you enter the profit zone. You are now an attractive company. A patent agency approaches you. You are infringing on 2-3 of their patents, they say. Their claims are very broad. They want 100,000 EUR. Litigation could take 10 years and cost 1 million EUR. You pay. A month later, the next patent agent knocks on the door .... Before long you are broke. You seek protection from a big company. Microsoft offers to buy you for a symbolic fee. You accept. Under a copyright-only system, you would now be independent and rich. But by means of patents, Microsoft and others were able to steal your intellectual property.

    Does this help you understand why many software creators feel that BSA and their patent lawyer friends at the European Commission are among the world's biggest software pirates?

    1. Re:How's this for proof? by hotspur_fan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's a great example. Show me proof of when MS, IBM, Dell, Sun, etc has done this.

  80. SourceRally - SCO Rally by kerneljacabo · · Score: 1

    There is a huge rally being planned to take place in front of SCO headquarters. SourceRally. They shut down their site as part of the protest as well.

  81. Re:European patents != American patents by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 1


    wow.

    How about the fact that a whole load of the linux kernel comes from outside the good ol' us of a.

    seriously, think global....isn't that what the internet is about anyways ?

    --
    tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
  82. Re:MOD PARENT TROLL DOWN ----- TROLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was shown that TROLL was not really trolling. This is a AC

  83. Support this protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the sites are not closed they just have an extra cover page saying something about the protest.

    also a lot of the protesting sites are keeping these notices up untill the european parliament votes on this.

    If you haven't done so already please sign the petition, and consider placing a similar notice page up on your site.

  84. Overview of protesting web sites by Simon+X. · · Score: 1
    More than 2500 web sites participate in the online protest.

    The overview can be seen at http://www.eurielec.etsit.upm.es/OnlineDemoPartner sWebsites.php

    It's possible that a number of those websites removed the protest page again after wednesday 27 august. I've decided to leave mine up at least until the vote.

  85. Re: Slashdot is not down by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Lame excuse.

    Perhaps it interfers with their revenue model.

    My VU meter is tilting on slashdot.

  86. VIM is also down by NtwoO · · Score: 0

    Vim.org was also down....

    --
    ! /* */
  87. And it worked... by dazk · · Score: 1

    The original vote was scheduled for Sep. 1st. The european parliament resceduled the vote to either the 22nd or the 26th of september. I don't know yet what exactly will be done in the meantime but it seems they will discuss the issue once more and maybe decide about changes.

    The rescheduling took place because of the protests which means they were heard. Hopefully they will have deeper effects than just another date for the vote.

  88. What's the solution? by criquet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone have a plan for getting rid of software patents in the US? I mean, you can't just one day say "Ok, no new software patents and all old software patents a null and void". It'll never happen. There's simply too much money involved and that money is being used to ensure software patents continue.

    I think the only way to change things is to convince big business that they are hurting themselves more by patenting software than by allowing it to be free. But to do that when companies are making millions from patents right now?

    1. Re:What's the solution? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the whole idea of Free as in Libre software? Isn't the idea of Free as in beer software to avoid legal disputes?

      if it's Free (L) then everyone sees it and can use it... massive adoption.

      If it's Free (B) then no one is accountable for IP vioaltion as long as it is clean room developed... ie: avoid SCO infringement...

      there's no one specific to target and everyone has a stake in it because of such massive adoption.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  89. OMG it is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figured it was a lame attempt to get me to look at that horid pictuer but figured I would check. Sure enough the gapaing anus is gone. Way to go.

  90. Down != splash screen by jdreed1024 · · Score: 1
    OK, people, some clarification is needed.

    Very few of these sites are "down" as in you can't get any information of them. Most of these are simply splash screens about the patent issue, and then down at the bottom they say "if you still want to continue, click this". rpmfind.net is working just fine if you follow their "if you still want enter, click here" link - I just downloaded RPMs from there. apache.org is doing the same thing.

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
  91. Another one closed by Manip · · Score: 1

    Also closed >> http://www.adminmod.org/

  92. What the heck by Agent+00p · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'll shut mine too!
    I couldn't care less about them patents!
    But now I finally have some time to make the switch to PHP.

    --
    when the shit hits the fan, it is not equally spread
  93. Please explain to me then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the above, If you can.

  94. Island? by mrw28 · · Score: 1

    I was trying to send off the petition but couldn't find my country - unless I'm willing to accept that I now live in Island, and not Ireland as I previously thought.

    Another victory for spellchecking software perhaps, or just ignorance? Call me a picky bastard, and you'd be right.

    1. Re:Island? by cafard · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, i just signed it myself from the same island. I suggest you have a look at 'Eire' :).

      --
      This post is awesome.
    2. Re:Island? by mrw28 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction. Maybe I should have read the page before posting my little rant. Actually, no, reading the page is against /. protocol!

      Vindicated!

  95. KDE.org as well by Juju · · Score: 1

    KDE's website is protesting as well.

    --
    Black holes occur when God divides by zero.
  96. To paraphase THHGTTG by Luveno · · Score: 1

    "We'll go on strike!" yelled Geek Website #1.
    "That's right!" agreed Geek Website #2. "You'll have a national Geek Web Site strike on your hands!"
    "And who might that inconvenience?" said The Rest of the World.
    "Never mind who it will inconvenience! It'll hurt, buster, it will hurt!" yelled Geek Website #1.

  97. 57200 sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what google says (Well maybe a little biased...) searching for "Page Closed Software Patents".
    I've checked the first 10 pages and all are correct page closings due software patents....
    Amazing

  98. xine by gooofy · · Score: 1

    xine is also protesting. patents are really bad for multimedia players - essientially xiph's ogg/theora/vorbis is the only really free multimedia format available. luckily they're doing a great job, however the world out there is using other, patented formats like mpeg most of the time.

    --
    time is a funny concept
  99. Re:European patents != American patents by Raphael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is an example: although the GIMP web site is hosted in the US, several of the most active developers are living and working in Europe. So after some discussion with the other developers, I decided to close the home page of www.gimp.org. Even if you live and work in the U.S., you could be affected because some software developed by many contributors from all around the world could cease to exist because of software patents affecting these developers.

    Allowing patents on software and business methods in the U.S. was a bad idea. Several studies have shown that software patents in the U.S. have had a negative impact on the industry. But so far, the damage has been limited because these patents are not accepted worldwide. So in many cases, a company that was more interested in litigation than real innovation was not able to sue the developers who (unknowingly) infringed on its patents because some or all of them were not in the U.S. But this could be different if these patents were valid worldwide (WIPO). The patent holders would have a bigger chance to hit the small companies and small developers, especially those working on Open Source or Free Software (because they cannot buy a license or pay royalties for all potential users).

    This protest against the changes in the European law would also be a good way to promote a necessary reform of the U.S. patent system. A growing number of economists in the U.S. are raising their voice against the patentability of software. A clear sign coming from Europe could also help the U.S. industry in the long run.

    Some people hide in their shell when their neighbors are threatened. Some people try to help them because they know that they could be affected directly or indirectly. The choice is yours.

    --
    -Raphaël
  100. Re:PBS Details Decline of the Middle Class by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With experts estimating that 3.3 million white-collar jobs will be sent overseas by 2015, is America's middle class being hollowed out?

    Only a couple of decades ago America's middle class was full of the blue-collar "Joe Sixpack"'s people so lovingly talk about here.

  101. mplayer and xine were fake closed by FuzzyFurB · · Score: 1

    mplayer and xine websites were pseudo-closed with what-if fake 404 pages that you could click through. libxslt and libxml sites also had these pages, which is quite annoying when you are trying to flip through documentation...

    --
    Will Stokes Album Shaper http://albumshaper.sf.net
  102. Jakarta shutdown as well by javajoe99 · · Score: 1

    Apache has change a bunch of their homepages to support the protest

  103. Re:To the point.... by botzi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Absolutely right. We're talking about sites intended and visited for/by developers. Unless a high-traffic news site(but not for nerds;oPPP) shuts down(very unlikely and NO I'm NO talking about DoS;o))) this whole thing will pass unnoticed. I don't believe that even /. stopping for a nap will change something, but I do believe that the NEWS of /.(and others BIG ONES) actually shutting down will make it to some of the mentionned news sites, that way more people will learn that this law is being prepared(let's face it, nobody knows shit for the moment)....

    Anyway, none of this will ever happen....

    --
    1. No sig. 2. ???? 3. Profit!!!
  104. Why ???! by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

    Why? WHY?

    How is shutting your site down supposed to be a protest? All it means is that I can't access the sites I want (and, what's more, now I think this one OSS project is stupid because its site was shot down for protest on the day I found out about it).

    Do the lawmaker people use any of these shut down sites? I doubt it. Whose mind is changed here? Not mine, I was already against software patents. Who would have converted from in-favour to against, based on this?

    This is not even comparable to a hunger strike. The site owners sure aren't suffering (in fact they might enjoy the lower traffic bill).

    1. Re:Why ???! by dazk · · Score: 1

      Well protests were heard as I wrote earlier and the vote is rescheduled. That's at least a start. Shutting down/hiding the sites is just one of the measures taken.

  105. cross license. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    For a small fee I will make a contract that will aloow you to cross licence your patents. That is way more professional than "call it quits". And is the way all big compagnies do it!

  106. Re: Slashdot is not down by brokencomputer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have software patent laws in the US and slashdot is in the US so slashdot would be protesting a law that were already enacted in the US. I dont think it would be helpful to shut down slashdot. if slashdot were shut down, a lot of people would not know about the protest and lots of other news.

  107. Time to dig out and dust off the blue ribbons. by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1

    The IP assault (insult) to our rights is coming at us from every direction lately -- Software Patents, DMCA, RIAA, MPAA, SCO....

    It's time to protest the whole stupid mess. Let's fight back against them all. This will get everyone who is being assulted involved at once.

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  108. This is an interesting idea but... by arazor · · Score: 1

    All the sites mentions seem to cater to geeks only or people who already know why software patents are a bad idea. Some major site should shutdown like suse or mandrake. Those are the only major open source companies I could think of that operate in europe off the top of my head.

    -
    Thoughts on usage of the word "spam" check my journal

  109. your MEP will love you for it by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    You don't have to remind them that they want your vote (however gently), and you don't have to use paper mail. Just be polite and argue well.

    The MEP's are in general toally ignored by the population at home, even the EP is gaining more and more power. They tend to be happy that anyone back home know they exist.

    1. Re:your MEP will love you for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course, the MEPs don't do much. they mostly just defer to the leadership of the council of ministers.

      jon

  110. Watch governments crumble by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 1

    Yes I can just imagine all those lawmakers up on Capitol Hill trembling in their boots as they discover Knoppix downloads are unavailable.

    1. Re:Watch governments crumble by dazk · · Score: 1

      You are aware that Capitol Hill is not the targeted audience?

    2. Re:Watch governments crumble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The European Parliament (or whatever it's called) is just s#!tting bricks over few whiny nerd-crybabies closing their websites.

      NOT!

      Now go back and suck your thumbs, my little whiny babies!

  111. preaching to the choir by mboedick · · Score: 1

    Is this really the best way to make this point? Anyone who uses or even knows of the existence of things like Wine and Knoppix probably already has a pretty good idea that software patents are bad.

    I can't see the politicians and bureaucrats being moved to action because 0.0000001% of their constituents can't reach the Knoppix website.

    1. Re:preaching to the choir by dazk · · Score: 1

      Yawn. All those comments questioning wether the protests are seen/heard. It is clear they were heard. The vote was already rescheduled because of the protests. So there is no question.

  112. FAX by Elektroschock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FAX Is more appropiate. Document what you did in the community tool http://aktiv.ffii.org Dont' spam. Be polite. Ask for amendments to McCarthys proposal. So read the texts on swpat.ffii.org first. Demand a definition of technical in the directive. Tell them you don't want Amazon vs. Barnes and Noble in the EU. Or MS vs. Eolas (500 mio $) or other patent privateers. Tell them what the W3C says.

  113. It'll move these EU folks to write their reps. by The+Revolutionary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, closing Slashdot may be preaching to the choir, but at this late stage in the game, this is exactly what can be most effective.

    We need the EU folks reading Slashdot to get a jolt, to say, "Hey, this really is something Big." We need this, because this is the only way that many of them -- just like Americans -- will take the time to fire off their position to their representatives who have both the duty to represent their constituents and the power to stop this in its tracks.

    And Slashdot, what is going to earn you more good will among your readership than taking a bold stand like this? Perhaps there would be more willing to subscribe -- at least for a month -- if they were to see you as politically active and not just a disinterested for-profit news portal.

    C'mon Slashdot, even just a prominent alert that could stay at the top of front page. Isn't it for the good of everyone?

    1. Re:It'll move these EU folks to write their reps. by aeoo · · Score: 1

      Closing Slashdot is not preaching to the choir! What it is, is a kick in the pants to get off our lazy arses and DO something!

      Yea, everyone here knows that software patents are bad. But maybe, just maybe, closing Slashdot will energize people into action who otherwise would do nothing.

    2. Re:It'll move these EU folks to write their reps. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Slashdot, what is going to earn you more good will among your readership than taking a bold stand like this? Perhaps there would be more willing to subscribe -- at least for a month -- if they were to see you as politically active and not just a disinterested for-profit news portal.

      I know at least a half-dozen *PAYING* subscribers to Slashdot in this very office who support software patenting initiatives.

      Why do some many loudmouths here think the entire /. readership is in lockstep with their views? I suggest you take your fist out of the air and your head out of your ass; there's a big, big world out there beyond your university's or high school's?) walls.

    3. Re:It'll move these EU folks to write their reps. by ninewands · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm opposed to software patents as much as any European /. reader is, but I think there would probably be more of an impact in the EU if The Register were to close its website or at least put up a notice like this one.

      Why should /. close down when The Reg doesn't?

  114. OpenSource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the nice thing about open source. You can just shut down your website and screw the people who need your software because you're not worried about getting their money. Another reason why businesses should not rely on open source software.

  115. Change the Law by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The section of my article called Change the Law in Links to Tens of Thousands of Legal Music Downloads explains steps you can take to change the laws.

    While it focusses on reforming copyright laws, most of what I say applies to patents. Note that in the U.S. at least, patents have the same legal foundation as copyrights, being authorized by the same clause in the Constitution.

    The steps I suggest are:

    • Speak Out
    • Vote
    • Write to Your Elected Representatives
    • Donate Money to Political Campaigns
    • Support Campaign Finance Reform
    • Join the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    • Practice Civil Disobedience
    Well I don't think the EFF deals with patents but they do a lot of other good work.

    The above article is going to be put under a Creative Commons license to encourage copying as soon as I have the final draft done. I expect that to happen this weekend. So check back and copy the article to other websites when it's ready.

    Also I closed my consulting business website a couple days ago and will keep it that way a couple more days.

    While I don't get a huge amount of traffic to my homepage, I also don't expect most of the people visiting it to already be free software enthusiasts who know all about the patent controversy.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
    1. Re:Change the Law by po8crg · · Score: 1

      Just a comment on the differences between the US and European political systems:

      # Speak Out
      # Vote
      # Write to Your Elected Representatives

      These three are good general advice to anyone living in a democracy. For those of you unfortunate not to do so, I have no idea how politics works in non-democratic systems. Coups d'etat are an option, though.

      # Donate Money to Political Campaigns

      Not in general effective here in Europe. We don't have separate political campaigns that you can fund, so your money just drops into a big pool in a political party.

      Much better option: Join a political party. You can vote in the internal elections then; if you influence even a small number of people then you can often shift the party's policy - especially on an issue that is (from the politicians' perspective) essentially peripheral like software patents. Ten or twenty thousand party members can win the vote in even a major party like the SPD or Labour; a few hundred well-organised articulate people can shift the policy.

      # Support Campaign Finance Reform

      Well, maybe. Take a look at party financing in your country and decide what reforms it needs.

      # Join the Electronic Frontier Foundation
      # Practice Civil Disobedience

      Both good options.

  116. others by Eil · · Score: 1


    Some more that I've noticed:

    apache.org
    k-meleon.com
    Several European OpenOffice.org sites
    fvwm.org

    The Slackware and KDE sites are also supposedly taking a part in this, but their pages are still up at of 9:15AM EST.

  117. sites are only 'shut down', not shut down by irfco · · Score: 1

    i saw this a couple of days ago. most of the 'shut down' pages have links to their normal, live pages, and the normal content is accessible. at least that's what i noticed w/ tutos, rpmfind and the imap sites, anyway.

    1. Re:sites are only 'shut down', not shut down by Schreckgestalt · · Score: 1

      i noticed rpmfind... how did you get to the actual packages?

    2. Re:sites are only 'shut down', not shut down by irfco · · Score: 1

      hmmm. well, it was pretty obvious for me. i'm in the us - i wonder if it's different for people in the eu.

      for rpm find, there is a line near the top which reads 'You will be redirected to swpat.ffii.org in 20 seconds for more information. To enter this site, click here.'

      so if you click 'here', it takes you to the original search form (http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.orig.php ), and from there you can pretty much access all the rpms.

  118. Re:European patents != American patents by Lonath · · Score: 1

    If Europe refuses to allow software patents, and their software industries surge ahead of US software companies then maybe the US will see that software patents are bad and limit or get rid of them. OTOH, if Europe decides that software patents are ok, then there's nothing to compare the US system to. (Example: plugins work in Europe, but not in the US.)

    I just wish that Eolas injunction had been handed down a few months ago, so European MP's could see how bad software patents can be.

    The most important issue is this:

    Most people don't understand computers and don't think about how to make them do cool things.

    (Hypothetical Example: Oh, I'm a power user, I use email, and the www, and I put my digital pictures online, and I use Kazaa, and I use Word, Excel, and ppt!)

    For a person who gets computers, these are interesting up to a point, but they're probably not the "neatest" things you ever tried to make computers do.

    They want to do stuff and that's it, and will try out new "cool" things if a product already exists. If they don't get to do some potential thing that doesn't exist yet because of software patents, then they won't notice. They probably never thought about doing that thing anyway so they aren't missing anything.

    OTOH, if they have something, like Ebay or plugins, and they LOSE it, then they will notice. That's the time to explain to them the evils of software patents and how there are lots of other cool things that they might have had if not for these evil things. That's why I wish that Ebay had decided not to pay money or licensing fees, but instead just decide to shut down. THEN the general public would understand how evil these things are. Same with Eolas and plugins. I hope MS just eviscerates IE and screws up the whole Internet for everyone. Then people will see how evil software patents are. Unfortunately, they will probably try to mitigate the damage.

    So, I think theoretical arguments about possible loss of freedom don't count for much because most people don't get computers anyway. You have to point to specific examples of cases where they lose things that they already have. That makes it concrete instead of abstract. (Cmon MS: gut IE! :))


    Oh, and another thing, I don't think Eolas has a chance in hell of ever making a product. If IE gets nerfed, then Eolas will have pissed off just about everyone in the world, and a lot of those people will have patents that Eolas will need to infringe to make a real product. Therefore, I expect them to get stopped for refusing to "play the patent game" correctly by just taking their extortion money (oops, I meant their rightfully earned patent infringement penalty fees) and going home.

  119. You got my vote on this. by SharpFang · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and in the meantime, link main page of Slashdot to the EU parliament, asking people to write petitions, visit all its pages etc... Effectively slashdotting it to a crawl - showing what REAL POWER stands behind the protesters.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:You got my vote on this. by Simon+X. · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Methods such as spamming are not the way to get your point across.

      I don't think anyone will be impressed much by your opinion if you express it by making a nuisance of yourself.

    2. Re:You got my vote on this. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about Spamming. Make that a virtual picket - activity that does not block normal activity but can't go unnoticed. I doubt if anyone of EU parliament will notice Knoppix is down, but if he will have to wait 1-2 minutes for his schedule to load, that will make them think.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  120. add linux.ie to the list by mannionh · · Score: 1

    The Irish Linux users site is also down in protest.

  121. slackware closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    the slackware page is closed too.

  122. Now the real question is... by dazk · · Score: 1

    Are the organized protests of the people and many small and medium sized organizations strong enough to win against lobbyorganizations like the BSA.

    We have individuals mailing members of the european parliament, we have small and medium businesses like Magix (Musicmaker, and other tools) voicing ther opinion. We have sites being hidden. We have political parties in the EU government like the Greens that oppose the change of the patent laws.

    It is known that there are forces in the EU government that promote the use of open source software for governments which means members of parliament who want to inform themselves about opensource might even stumble over protesting websites.

    Hopefully the rescheduling will give those that are in doubt enough time to see that pushing through a BSA authored change to european patent laws is not backed up by large parts of the people and hopefully all those personal letters and mails will have a stronger impact than whatever it is, the lobby people offer the parliament members.

  123. WineHQ by tilleyrw · · Score: 0

    I just checked and as of 0935 EST, WineHQ was operational. What's up?

    I personally don't see the impact of shutting down a website besides irritating a few web surfers who have minimal impact on legislation.

    Perhaps that's a US-centric mode of thought.

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
    1. Re:WineHQ by cdo · · Score: 1

      wine, kde, gnome, etc... gnome has a protest page, but you can still access their site. wine and kde simply have a little free patents banner on their site.

  124. RPMFind.net by serialdj · · Score: 1

    Just tried to search RPMFind.net and they have temporarily closed in protest as well.

  125. Why don't you do that? by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    It was, afterall your own idea...

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  126. Another Site by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    I noticed the home of my distro of choice: Slackware had this page up the other day. I checked back a few hours later and it was gone. I thought maybe it was an isolated protest, but based on this story I guess not.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  127. Won't someone think of the USERS!!! by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Really this protest is just preaching to the choir.
    And harming the very people who are already against software patents.
    Shutting down a pile of OSS sites isn't going to make the closed source users care any more.

    Actually as such a user I would look and say "see they just shutdown and prevent you from doing anything for political aims, how unreliable can you get"

    Arbitrary shutdowns are dumb.

    1. Re:Won't someone think of the USERS!!! by dazk · · Score: 1

      Have you even visited one example? Nearly all sites are not really down, they just show the protest note and offer a link to reach the original site.

  128. OpenOffice.org (Denmark), too by Frodo420024 · · Score: 1

    We've replaced the front page, not quite closed the site (we need it for our OOo work).

    --
    I'm in a Unix state of mind.
    1. Re:OpenOffice.org (Denmark), too by broeman · · Score: 1

      godt sa :)

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
  129. What about a "Thought Bank"? by Ridgelift · · Score: 2, Insightful

    BTW, Debian is still up, but the top of the fold indicates their support of the protest.

    Maybe this is totally naive, but what if we setup a "thought bank". Most patents holders need to show their idea was theirs first don't they? If someone else can show prior art (ie. newspaper article, widely available source code, etc, anything to prove that someone else thought of the idea first) then the patent is invalid.

    People who think of an idea who don't want someone else to patent it can describe their idea in the thought bank. It would then digitally sign the idea and post it for search engines and archive.org to catalogue it, and thereby providing a central place to create "prior art".

    Any comments on why this is a [good|bad] idea?

    (and just so you know, I'm patenting the idea of a "thought bank"...just kidding :-)

    1. Re:What about a "Thought Bank"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe this is totally naive, but what if we setup a "thought bank".

      shouldexist.org

  130. Re:European patents != American patents by princewally · · Score: 1

    What are the chances that the US will want to harmonize its laws with Europe? The US doesn't do anything to make life easier for anyone else anywhere.

    --

    -
    "Vengeance is fine," sayeth the Lord.
  131. Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the European Parliament gives a flying fuck what a bunch of Internet hippies does! Get over it! Better to go and protest in person.

  132. Seconded. by ThyTurkeyIsDone · · Score: 1

    Slashdot, this is your chance to take a stand and really make a difference.

    1. Re:Seconded. by giminy · · Score: 1

      Loretta: I agree. It's action that counts, not words, and we need action now.
      Slashdot: Hear Hear!!!
      Reg: You're right. We could sit around here all day talking, passing resolution, making clever speaches, it's not going to shift one IP law.
      Francis: So let's just stop gabbing on about it, it's completely pointless, and it's getting us nowhere.
      Slashdot: Right.
      Loretta: I agree. This is a complete waste of time.
      --------[Judith runs in, paniced.]
      Judith: They've arrested the coders!!
      Slashdot: What?
      Judith: They've dragged them off. They're going to crucify them.
      Reg: Right. This calls for immediate discussion.
      Judith: What?!?
      Anonymous Coward: Immediate.
      Another Anonymous Coward: Right.
      Loretta: New motion?
      Reg: Completely new motion. Eh, That, ah. That there be, ah, immediate action,
      Francis: ... ah, once the vote has been taken.
      Reg: Well, obviously once the vote has been taken, you can't act on a resolution 'till you've voted on it.
      Judith: Reg, for God's sake, let's go now, please!
      Reg: Yeah, yeah. Right, right. In the, in the ligh of fresh information from ah, sibling Judith.
      Loretta: [Who's taking notes.] Ah, not so fast, Reg.
      Judith: Reg, For God's sake. It's perfectly simple. All you've got to do is to go out of that door now, and try to stop the courts nailing them up. It's happening, Reg. Something's actually happening, Reg. Can't you understand? Aaawoooooo!!!!!
      [She rushes out in a rage.]
      Francis: Ooh. Ooh dear.
      Reg: Hello... and a litle ego-trip for the feminists.
      Loretta: What?
      Reg: Ah, oh, sorry, loretta. Aah. Aah, read that back, would you?

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  133. Is preaching to the choir all we can do? by ralphclark · · Score: 1

    This all seems too much like preaching to the choir. The only people who visit these sites are already of the geek persuasion. It's these faceless career politicians that we need to get to, and that means convincing Joe Public. Who doesn't generally run Wine, or even Linux for that matter.

    Our only real hope rests with those heroes who managed to find the time and resources to get to Brussels and protest in person. But I'm guessing they will be so few in number that the bastards behind this legislation will find it all too easy to brush it off completely.

    I'm not sanguine about a positive resolution. In fact I despair totally.

    With very few exceptions (Gun-toting ESR and stubborn old RMS), the geek community are easy meat. It's in our nature. We're just too focussed on our artificial little techno-world and just don't have the cojones to get out there and fling half-bricks at the police.

    Some will no doubt pontificate about doing the right thing and writing letters to MEPs but I've tried this already and the arrogant bastards only ever get some underling to write back confirming their support for the proposal and explaining why they are right and you are wrong. And that's if they even bother to reply at all, which isn't often. They are far too busy sucking co^H^H up to big business lobbyists to give a damn about the public at large, let alone a minority they unthinkingly dismiss as "techies" or "weenies".

    Democracy? There ain't no such thing.

    Bear in mind that this is just one legislative issue among many threatening the tech community, and there are many many other ways in which government is attempting to stiff local communities, middle income earners, small businesses, and the public in general. Take your pick.

    I don't know about you lot but I just don't have the time or energy to fight every issue individually, especially when all the lawful means of resistance are so utterly useless. And it's hard to pick just one.

    It makes you ask yourself: what is wrong with this system that we're under attack on multiple fronts from the establishment *all the time*? What the hell do we have to do to get some peace so we can just get on with our lives? Anything's got to be better than this.

    Most people would rather try to ignore what's being done to them and just immerse themselves in what remains of their comfort zone. But we can't postpone confrontation indefinitely. It's just a matter of how much of our lives and liberties we're prepared to let our "elected" "representatives" feed to the sharks, before we will finally find our balls and stop burying our heads in the sand.

    If we can't find a peaceful way to take back the political process soon (and I doubt that's even possible now as the existing establishment's grip tightens daily) I suspect many of us will be practising our ballistic bricklaying skills before our lives are done. Just try to remember while you hide in your comfort zones, people, that the longer it takes to get to that point the bloodier it will be for all of us. You included.

  134. You still are missing the point... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    Why would the MEPs be concerned about what amounts to 'personal' to 'small community' pages to the 'Greater Majority' of web users?

    How many general Windows users, you know the kind that barely know how to use Windows Update, visit the affected web-sites? How many of those people vote? Are they a bigger or smaller voting block then the geek population?

    Until this affects those people in the hundreds upon hundreds of thousands. Then they will likely continue to be uncaring and those MEPs can vote however they wish to vote. While it is true that some vocal minorities can gain favor in politics, if that vocal minority isn't going against Monstrously HUGE corporate interests.

    In this case, this is a case of going against HUGE corporate interests. I do hope that this campaign succeeds and hope that it raises awareness, but I don't see it raising the general population's awareness all that much.

    Capturing the minds of the general population will make this protest work. Cutting off Free Software sites from the people that would actually visit those sites and care about those sites doesn't do anything to capture the minds of the general populace. All it does is inconvenience the people that use those sites.

    It is a protest within a bubble that gets geeks riled up, but doesn't expand into the rest of the world's mind.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:You still are missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MEP's should not only listen to the public. They should also make the right decisions in the best interest of the general public if the general public does not have a clue what the consequences are.

      Besides this, I think governments do not inform the people enough about the impact of various decisions they take or are going to take.

  135. Is This Really Effective? by suwain_2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have to question the impact this will have. Sure, we who already dislike software patents are upset by it. But will anyone in the closed software world be upset by this? If anything, I think some larger companies will be delighted that their 'competition' in the Open Source world is taking their site down.

    Don't get me wrong; I'm against software patents too. But this seems no different than if, say, abortion clinics closed their doors to protest potential anti-abortion legislation -- it's going to make the other side happier, and I doubt anyone in the EU would even notice. Frankly, I think all this is doing is inconveniencing those in the OpenSource community who are trying to download the programs, forcing those who really need it to find a closed-source (and patented!) equivalent. They're hurting their cause, not helping it. The petition someone here linked to would be a far more effective way of protesting.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  136. This protest violates my patent! by ivanmarsh · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am issuing an immediate cease and disist order re: my patent #654335436543

    Which states in part:

    "A method or system for demonstrating political opinions through an electronic medium."

    You bastards all owe me money!

  137. So it's not limited to the web... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    Again, that doesn't explain how having this protest on the web would affect the average citizen. The web protest only affects geeks, these are people that are already concerned about the issue.

    How many regular computer users will actually come across those web-sites? I would hazard to guess that the number would be small. They may start to read the page, most of those readers, if any, would simply surf somewhere else to look for the software or whatever they were looking for.

    How many times have you gone to a web-site looking for something, not found your answer quickly and then left that site, never to return? Probably hundreds of times more then you could remember. I have probably done that well over a thousand times myself.

    This /. story isn't raising the general awareness. This site isn't MSNBC or CNN or Reuters... It is just a web-site for a niche group of people. Sure, there are several hundred thousand registered users, but it is still geared and designed for a VERY tight portion of the populace.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:So it's not limited to the web... by Telex4 · · Score: 1

      It raises awareness amongst geeks, who might not know very much about the subject, let alone that the lobbying and campaigning is reaching a critical point now that the directive is going into Parliament for its first reading very soon.

      Doing anything, even if it only reaches a small audience, is better than nothing. We don't have any contacts who will shut down big sites like MSNBC or CNN, so we will have to make do with the sites we can shut down, which, we hope, will still generate more interest amongst those most likely to be affected by the directive.

    2. Re:So it's not limited to the web... by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      Geeks are most likely to be moved into action by this, so they are among the primary audience. I didn't know I could do something as part of an organized effort until I saw this /. story.

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
  138. Really Bad Idea by krysith · · Score: 1

    The idea of having a huge deposit required to get a patent is a Bad Thing. I doubt that my old company would have paid for my first patent, and I certainly couldn't have afforded to apply for my currently pending one, which I had to pay for myself. Maybe ~you~ can afford $10^5, but I can't. Loan officers aren't very good judges of what makes a good patent ("what's a deconvolution?").

    Also note that if you reward a patent examiner $10,000 for each rejected patent, none will get through. I can reject patents all day for $10,000 a pop.

    However, I can see where you are going with it. It would be helpful to have an incentive for patent examiners to award only proper patents. Currently, it is very easy to get a bad patent awarded. All it really takes is time, some money, and persistence. I know a guy who got a ridiculous patent (of the "perpetual motion" type) by effectively browbeating the patent office and not giving up. Of course, what do we care if someone gets a patent on something that doesn't work? We don't. But it shouldn't have been awarded, according to patent office policy. There are a hundered thousand examples of bad patents which shouldn't have been awarded, and everyone knows it. So what do we do to stop it?

    1) Get Congress to stop using the USPTO as a money machine. Let them keep the money they receive to hire new patent examiners; four years is too long to wait for a patent!

    2) Provide incentives towards granting proper patents. When a patent is overturned in court, assign a penalty (what that penalty should be, I leave to heads wiser than mine). I think that having the current incentive to process more patents quickly is a good thing, it just needs to be counterbalanced by a quality factor. Good old Quality vs. Quantity.

    3) Hire more patent examiners!

    4) ???

    5) Patent! ;)

  139. New patent madness by K'hatarlan · · Score: 1

    So - what's the smallest atomic unit that can be patented? If this hasn't been decided yet, I'd like to announce my EU patents pending for algorithms on addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. K'hat

  140. Encountered the same thing by Itsik · · Score: 1

    I have encoutered the same thing when I visited the open source anti virus web site http://www.openantivirus.org. Truthfully I realize that something needs to be done. The question is, Do the law makers truly care? Or are they truly affected by such a protest? I want to believe that in our jaded world they would, but I highly doubt it.

  141. Many linux distro/package sites... by GatorMan · · Score: 1

    Including rpmfind.net...search for a package and you get:
    This page is temporarily closed in protest against software patents. Websites may soon be closed down regularly due to software patents. Software patents can get you prosecuted for publishing texts you wrote yourself! ahhh I need an rpm for gcc 3 to use glibc2.3 to use imagemagick!!

  142. So *now* you care! :-) by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1

    Funny...

    Slashdot cares so little for Europeans that we aren't even allowed to use our own currency symbols and accented characters in our posts.

    But when something happens in Europe that might affect the US, suddenly we're big news!

  143. Re:European patents != American patents by smcn · · Score: 1
    It's News for Nerds, not News for Nerds Who Live in the United States of America.

    Yes it is.
  144. This might work with the linux techno-elite... by usa35 · · Score: 1

    But really, I am actually shocked that anyone thinks this site-closing protest helps.

    It may, in a small way, help the cause du jour. But, at the same time it most definitely hurts the site/business which is shutting down to a greater degree.

    Take GIMP for example. If I were interested in GIMP, especially from a user perspective, and I get to their site and find it shut down, guess where I'm going? Bzzzt! Wrong answer, I'm not going to give a crap, and I'm going to the Adobe site to order Photoshop. I'm Joe average pixel-painter, and I need to get this work done so I can buy my kid the G.I. Joe with the Kung-Fu grip. Your closing your site just sent me off to the site of a software-patent supporting proprietary for-profit vendor.

    Congratulations! You've just eroded your user base and hurt the cause more than helping it. You've managed to hurt several open source and free software causes, actually. Major Kudos!

    Here's a better idea - devote a major portion of your homepage to "the cause", and make it so it's almost impossible to not read a little about it. Suck some people in... Then, let those who don't or can't care at that time still get to what you have to offer, grow your user base, and produce more users who might give a rat's-ass in the future!

    I'm really not attempting to cause a flamefest here - I'm just at a loss as to why folks think this is an effective protest in the big scheme of things.

    -- I survived the IPO rush of '99

  145. AROS by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    The AROS (Amiga Research Operating System) site is also shut down.

  146. Slashdot effect by hashwolf · · Score: 0

    Well. since the sites are down in protest..... they won't mind the slashdotting, at least this for this time.

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  147. What about that goat site? by gitfiddler · · Score: 1

    There is one site that we would all enjoy taking a little break

    --
    .sig
  148. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what I wanted to hear -- something real happening after all :)

  149. Might as well hop on the bandwagon by dknight · · Score: 1

    I'm not European, nor have I ever lived there. My website is not hosted in Europe. Really, I have no reason to get involved. However, I believe in the cause, and so I too am shutting down my site in protest. Admittedly, I run a very very small site, so I doubt anyone will care, but hey, every voice counts, right?

  150. Re:European patents != American patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Stories about Brazil's attitude to open source and the UK's plans for built-in monitoring of cars make the front page, so why not this sort of demonstration?

    Because we don't like you.

    Maybe when Europeans learn the difference between dissent and flamebait, Slashdot won't have to cover its ass with the "US-centric" label.

  151. Why is anyone surprised Govts are moving this way? by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, lets think about this logically:

    Most 'Free Enterprise' governments are members of the WTO (world trade organization).

    Most 'Large' media conglomerates are members of the WTO.

    Most 'Large' corporations are members of the WTO.

    Now, given that the WTO meets once a year, in private, and from leaks from past meetings we have seen the focus is on two things: instability in revenue streams, and Terrorism (which causes instability in revenue streams), is it any wonder that these organizations are making a concerted effort to protect their revenue?

    We are niave if we think that a sea-change that is taking place in the most profitable business in the world (software development and sales) will not be fought against by the people who benefit from the old way of doing business. Since they have contacts in high places (WTO etc.) is it any wonder that they are courting governments in various ways to artificially maintain the status quo? If you can't beat them fair and square, then throw litigation at them is their current mode (patent laws, copyright laws, SCO lawsuit, etc...).

    How can we combat this if they succeed in making free software illegal? Are those of us with families willing to put it all on the line - to be subject to censure, loss of the ability to find work, arrest, and persecution? I would have to think long and hard about my carreer choice. It would be the dawn of a digital dark age - when technologists truely become serfs of the corporations that employ them and hold all of the software patents.

    Now is the time to do something if we truely value our freedom. Something that impacts everyone in the world would probably do the trick:

    On a certain date, all IT workers, programmers, network gurus, web masters, technical support - anyone who considers themselves techno-geeks - everyone the world over arrive at work, and after checking in, simply walk out for a week - take sick leave, or vacation.

    No phone support.
    No servers brought back up.
    No network routers configured.
    No communications corrected.
    No batches run.
    No software written.
    NOTHING; NADA; ZIP.

    If everyone did this (no scabs) it would send a clear signal to Governments, Businesses, and the Media - as well as the public in general, that the geeks deserve a little respect and consideration for all they do to keep modern society humming along. Perhaps software patents are a bad thing. Perhaps we should reconsider how we view software as a key component of growth and development for society and the public good, instead of as a money making proposition, to be kept locked up in a vault for strategic purposes by rich corporations.

    Of course, this is all fantasy, just a plot for a novel. Geeks don't have what it takes to change the course of history, and it would be stupid to think they did.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  152. The protest did work at least a bit? by Letar · · Score: 1

    According to http://www.vim.org the vote on Sept. 1st is going to be postponed due to protests...

  153. Just recieved my new Patent. by Nautica · · Score: 1

    Just got granted the patent for software process that monitors and keeps track of patent law suits. WooooHooo! Gonna be rich now!

  154. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  155. It won't close by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I said this before. Slashdot is a corporate-owned business. It can't just go and shut down its business for a day. It needs to keep posting "Microsoft hole," SCO, and amateur rocket stories to get page hits and money.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  156. Prelude Hybrid IDS by casp_ · · Score: 1

    The Prelude Hybrid IDS project is closed too...

  157. Sensei's Library by tesmako · · Score: 1

    Sensei's Library, a very useful and complete WIKI-site for information related to Go (the boardgame) also has such a patent-law protest as its frontpage currently.

  158. Would you prefer payoffs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > These site shutting down in protest is not very professional. This is one of the problems with the free software community, politics plays too heavy of a role in their actions.

    First, the protest has nothing to do with Free Software. That's a misguided assumption on your part. The people taking part in the protest could be anyone in the software industry who understands the danger of software patents.

    Second, if you don't believe in public protest, then what would you suggest is the "professional" way to influence a political decision? Would you prefer backroom payoffs, like Bill Gates and company?

  159. This is what they actually want to happen by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You forget, that part of the goal of the companies pushing this would be to wipe OSS off the face of the earth..

    So you bozos go out and do it for them.. really smart..

    *They* DONT CARE about your protest..

    While here we all may be for it, the people that are already bought ( ie, legislature ) dont really care.. nor will they notice...

    If you doubt me, when was the last time a well meaning protest actually made a difference, other then get a 5 min spot on the evening news..?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  160. How MEPs emails are made up by Kinniken · · Score: 1

    If you know the name, its easy, it goes: first letter of surname + familly name attached @europarl.eu.int Hence, the MEP Jean-Louis BOURLANGES has for email jbourlanges at europarl.eu.int You can also try looking them up on their french political party's page - I got the list (with emails) of UDF MEPs of their website without problems.

    --
    What do you know about World Politic? Find out in this quiz
  161. Hmm, this seems familiar ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Is this like when ethnic neighborhoods burn their own houses down, to protest "the Man" holding them down? ;)

  162. The coming Digital Dark Age... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Worse case senario: Free software is defeated.

    Free software goes underground. Geeks start sharing software through encrypted peer to peer networks. Non-geeks end up buying high priced crud from M$.

    M$ and the RIAA companies get richer, and root out the last vestiges of free software on the net. Geeks build elaborate screen savers that look like a M$ windoze box - for when guests are around, but run Linux and free software underneath the hood.

    The Senate convenes a new 'Un-American Activities' commitee, and brings prominent geeks in for public 'questioning' (ridicule). These geeks are blacklisted, and can not find work. This serves to make other geeks 'tow the line', or at least pretend to.

    After a decade of low wages, persecution, and social programs intent on 'Microsoftizing' the populance, the well of available geeks runs dry. Geeks, themselves, no longer pass on the arcane subjects of computers to their children, instead opting to teach them candle making, and send them to seminary.

    Over the next 20 years all remaining geeks retire from the workforce. There are no new systems built. All existing systems are kept running by non-geeks who use cargo-cult methods, not really understanding how it works. If a system breaks down - it does not get fixed. Slowly the network deteriorates; world wide communications become extinct. The Digital Dark Age lasts for ten thousand years, until some proto-geek reinvents the computer and the silicon chip.

    Is this the future we want for our children? Make a difference - now!

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:The coming Digital Dark Age... by Hamstaus · · Score: 1

      And then, the Tinfoil-Hat-Net Bill is passed. The system goes on-line August 4th, 2027. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense. Tinfoil-Hat-Net begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug.

      Too late! Everyone is now a candle-maker.

      Sheesh.

      --
      I moderate "-1, Fool"
    2. Re:The coming Digital Dark Age... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      Don't take it so seriously, Hamstaus. This was just a HHOS post...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  163. Please consider this for /. !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why /. does not consider joining the demonstration ?

    Shutting down the service might be too restricive for world wide user, but pushing this as a frontpage might be better and should not hurt !

    Please /. admins, show you care about software patents. Join the demonstration !

    An EU Tux fan.

    1. Re:Please consider this for /. !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because /. is for whiners, not doers. /. itself would never inconvinience itself or it's readers to even protest open source being made illegal by all nations.

      If you haven't realized this by now, you haven't been here long...

  164. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not called email anymore, it's called courriel.

    1. Re:Um... by frp001 · · Score: 1

      Good point... It just goes to show it is about time to cut the crap!

      --
      May I use your sig please?
  165. eh..... by psxndc · · Score: 1
    I understand what you're saying, and I think the intention is correct, but I don't entirely agree with it. Criminal and civil matters are quite different. I personally could never defend someone that is a "known killer". But the system has been set up to (ideally) avoid abuses. The example you gave, Miranda rights, are a part of that system and everyone is entitled to them: killers, fraudulent CEOS, and people that shoplift. That being said, I DOUBT a lawyer that defended and freed a known killer because their Miranda rights weren't read has a clear conscience. What they did was correct in the eyes of the law, but they know it is still "wrong". But this is where your statement of the profession being warped comes into play. It doesn't seem right that a lawyer would help free a murderer.

    There are two sides of every coin. For every lawyer that is defending something they don't believe in, there is a lawyer that fully believes in their client's side. For every known murderer that is freed, there could be an innocent person that is jailed. The system isn't perfect, but it is designed to make everyone equal. If people do not do their jobs, like in your example a cop not reading an offender their rights, the system breaks down.

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:eh..... by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      , like in your example a cop not reading an offender their rights, the system breaks down.

      I know I only gave an example of a criminal case, but my perspective applies to any case. It's the general mentality that lawyers do what they're paid to do regardless of their moral obligation (whatever that is). It's works for some people, generally the people that become lawyers, it just doesn't work for me. I'd make a horrible lawyer.

      Going even further off topic......Is it me or is the whole Miranda rights thing just a loop hole? Think of it. I get arrested for committing a crime. The first thing I do is tell a cop I did it. Say I wasn't read my rights. Why should I be totally amazed that the cop would testify against me in court. And even if a cop did testify against me for something I said, it'd be my word against his word. I think they'd still need some sort of evidence to convict right? I'm not a legal expert and I'm probably just being totally stupid here, but doesn't the whole Miranda rights do nothing more than state common sense? That being said, is it even more obtuse that a court case could be thrown out based on common sense not being stated early on? This wasn't flame bait or anything. Just some random, probably misguilded, thought for the afternoon.

    2. Re:eh..... by psxndc · · Score: 1
      OK, here's a hypothetical for you: A drug dealer, one that everyone in the neighborhood knows is responsible for the addiction and subsequent death of three eleven year olds, is shot in a drive-by. Is the doctor morally obligated to save his life? If he does, won' the dealer go kill the people that did the drive-by and potentially some bystanders. What if he continued selling dope to kids? Everyone has to make moral decisions in everything they do. I once told a client that I wouldn't write a spam-bot for them because spamming their customers was a really bad idea. But then on other projects, the client had a really good business case for direct e-mail marketing their customers (not spam, it was truly an opt-in mechanism). I think you'd be hard pressed to find a job that people rarely have to make moral decisions. Should a librarian stock a book that outlines the propaganda of the Nazis? It has historical signifigance, but it could also spread the Nazi message to a new generation. I could go on and on.

      The Miranda rights are not a "loophole", they are there to inform someone who may not know their rights, of those rights. Not everyone knows they have the right to remain silent. Most people start saying "I didn't do it! I was [at Bob's]". Well if it turns out you panicked and you just said the first name that came to mind and you weren't in fact at Bob's, then you look a lot guiltier in court, even if you aren't. Secondly, confessing you did it has a whole mess of implications: did you do it under duress, what state of mind were you in, etc? I wish I could tell you exactly what the purpose of Miranda rights are, but I'm too lazy right now to google for it. The rights themselves are there to protect the individual and let them know explicitly what rights they are entitled to.

      And "common sense" to you is probably not common sense to a lot of people. In fact, I find that people with real common sense are pretty uncommon.

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  166. Not just a handful by too_bad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just google for "closed because of software patents" and there are so many
    companies doing the same.

    --
    DO NOT PANIC
  167. slashdotted by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1


    It's getting harder and harder to get through to the petition.

    (Who, me? I just want to watch the number of petitioners get bigger.)

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  168. New collaboration software by Dunkirk · · Score: 1

    Just an aside, but you might want to check out the new OpenGroupware.org. It's a recently open-sourced collaboration application. I downloaded TUTOS, but while reading up on all the commercial and non-commercial options, I stumbled upon it. The setup isn't for beginners, but it's working really good now that I've got it running.

    --
    Acts 17:28, "For in Him we live, and move, and have our being."
  169. Debian by ninewands · · Score: 1

    While it is not shut down, the Debian website has a LARGE statement in support of the protest on it's home page.

    I've also noticed that the anjuta website is closed.

  170. Further support... by blueforce · · Score: 1

    It seems that Rackshack, SCO and OsiruSoft are unwillingly participating in the "shutdown" as well.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
  171. mod parent insightful by lpret · · Score: 1

    It's actually starting to get to me how commercial this site is starting to feel...

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:mod parent insightful by sevensharpnine · · Score: 1

      Nah, you're just paranoid. See my rebuttal on page two, and my reinforcement of opinions on page three. Pages four and possibly five will have counter-points to my argument.

      --
      "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
  172. vim.org by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    VIM.org had a new splash front page for at least a few days, but now it's just the first "news" article there.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  173. Another MEP Replies by haeger · · Score: 1
    I got this letter from a representative, I've sent a few.

    I've made a rough translation. Yes I know the english is bad. If You don't like it just read the swedish original. Don't complain about my bad english without being fluent in swedish please. And if You are fluent in swedish, feel free to make a better translation.

    I don't really know how to respond to this letter since I can't really understand (nor have I read) the McCarthy report. Does anyone have suggestions for me on how to respond?

    --------

    "Hello.
    Thanks for your question.
    It looks like the voting will be prosponed and that there will be no voting next week.

    We have listened to both sides in this question. It looks like we're going to support the report by McCarthy and thereby support the EU-commisions suggestion about software patents.

    The large majority here in the building don't want to see a development towards the american legislation. This is why we believe that the current suggestion is a good one. It keeps the current european law (with precident from EPO in Munich) which means that software in itself can't be patented, only technical contributions/implementations.

    Kind regards

    Sofia Strand"

    -------------

    Perhaps someone else can make a better translation, letter is here:
    "Tack for din fraga. Det ser ut som om omrostningen om mjukvarupatentet aterigen kommer att skjutas upp och att det darfor inte rostas i nasta vecka.

    Moderaterna har lyssnat mycket till "bada sidor" i den har fragan. Det lutar dock at att Moderaterna kommer att stodja rapporten av McCarthy och darmed stodja EU-kommissionens forslag till direktiv om mjukvarupatent.

    Den stora majoriteten har i huset vill inte se en utveckling mot amerikansk lagstiftning. Man anser darfor att forslaget fran EU-kommissionen ar bra. Det bibehaller ju nuvarande europeiska rattslage (med praxis fran EPO i Munchen) och innebar inte att mjukvara i sig kan patenteras, endast tekniska bidrag/losningar.

    Med vanliga halsningar

    Sofia Strand"

    .haeger

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Another MEP Replies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please continue to try to persuade this one to our side. It is EXACTLY the unknowledgeable yet apparently unmalicious parliamentarians we need to focus on.

    2. Re:Another MEP Replies by Wolfbone · · Score: 1

      You can get help by emailing europarl-se@ffii.org - show them the letter you got.

  174. It's still fucking moronic by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    "For instance, do you really believe that the labor movement would ever have gotten anywhere if they never held any strikes? That the civil rights movement would have gotten anywhere if they never got in anybody's face?"

    That's totally different. It's one thing to stop working on a production line, and temporarily kill a physical product that isn't easily replicated. You're hurting The Mans pockets that way.

    Who are these protesters hurting by shutting down their own fuckin' web sites? Themselves, and you that support them. You think proprietary software companies or governments give a flying fuck about Knoppix shutting their website down? Please.

    And software companies will just take advantage os this by saying "See? Those open source people are fanatics. You can't depend on them. If they don't get what they want, they'll cry and take their ball home. You can always rely on the steady, rock solid support of *insert software company name here*".

    This is just like rioters that disply their rage by destroying their own homes and communities. After its all over, where the fuck are you going to live? Same principal here.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  175. Re:European patents != American patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, without software patents, the gimp would be allowed do CMYK!

    I've been periodically tempted to make a "EuroGIMP" fork with CMYK capability, for use only outside the USA (honest, guv...)

  176. Website shutdowns by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 0

    Now we know why the SCO website is down sometimes.
    They are protesting the free software protesters.

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  177. Everyone will be affected by this legislation... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    Whether they know about it or not. It will be imperceptible, unless they routinely look through the offerings at their local software store...

    One day, they might notice that the number of available office applications will shrink futher, or they will notice that there is now only one MP3 management software on the shelves, instead of 6 or 7. They might see only one DVD "Mastering" software for the home user, instead of 4 or 5 that I have seen on shelves today...

    They might notice, they might shrug their shoulders and furrow their brow and wonder why all the other packages of software disappeared... Then they will come to the 'logical' conclusion that those other packages must have sucked and the developers of those other packages went out of business... They might not even give it that much thought...

    So, what is needed is something that will raise awareness to EVERYONE. Not just the niche geek group... Soemthing has to be done to raise everyone's awareness of that law now... Otherwise, it will likely pass and there will be nothing to do about it.

    Of course, after the law is passed, if a handful of rather slick geeks were to have hold of a few crucial patents...

    Then it would be possible to get some MAJOR commercial vendors to cease shipment of this or that MAJOR software package, like MS Windows, then the regular populace will notice and will likely want to repeal the law.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  178. Petition slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's really a bad thing is that the maintainers of the petitioning site didn't count on heavy load. I'm sure this makes the total amount of signatures quite a bit less than what would've been possible.

    Many people don't bother voting if it isn't easy.

  179. my USA sites are bannered in support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my USA sites are bannered in support.

    kausi.com
    kausi.mpls.mn.us
    revlac.com
    kcgroom ing.com
    poem.kausi.com

    (ya i know posting ones weblink is asking for trouble on /.)

    posted as coward since i cannot wait for my password to be e-mailed.... DANG! SOMEONE PATENT E-MAIL IN THE EU?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!!

    **sniff** i am a coward forever **sniff**

  180. Slashdot closed too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think no one has mentioned it but Slashdot closed its website too. Well, I think so 'cause I was busy all the day preparing things for the demonstration and I couldn't check it myself but I guess I'm right.

  181. EU software patents might be a good thing. by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1


    The overreaching of the IP monopolists is already creating quite a bit of backlash. EU software patents might just be the straw which breaks the camel's back -- and sends their whole stupid house of cards crashing. (Taking the RIAA, MPAA, etc. down with it.)

    In any event, protest all this IP bullshit, not just patents.

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  182. Self-generated protest? by phorm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if SCO is joining the protest, their website seems to be down lately a lot too!

    It's up right now. Perhaps if enough slashdotters could visit them and help them protest a bit more?

  183. What's wrong here? by evanbd · · Score: 1

    So why isn't Slashdot participating? Everything that gets posted suggests they support the position; why not participate? Do the editors really only support it enough to get readers and comments? I know your readers are generally informed, but that's true of a lot of the sites that are participating. Come on Slashdot, you can do better than this.

  184. VIM Site Reports Postponement of Vote by sillypixie · · Score: 1

    Yesterday, the VIM site was participating in the protest, but today, Bram has posted that the vote has been postponed due to overwhelming protest, and points to ffii.org for more information! And yet, when I go to ffii.org, I don't see any information about anything being postponed... Anybody have more details on this? Egads, life would be a shade darker without VIM on my laptop )-:

    --
    don't mess with those geekgrrls
    1. Re:VIM Site Reports Postponement of Vote by Halo1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the vote has been postponed till the plenary meeting of 22nd September. The reasons are that the major political fractions (conservatives, socialists and liberals) are all divided on the issue... with more and more coming to our (anti-swpat) side as time passes by :)

      --
      Donate free food here
  185. Re:your first link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would the occasional carriage return kill you?

  186. This isn't about Open Source by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One thing that disappoints me is that at least one of the pages that I saw (Apache), talks about this as a threat to Open Source.

    It is, but the problem is bigger than that. Software patents are a threat to Open Source in much the same way that nuclear war is a threat to beekeepers. Almost everyone who writes software has this sword hanging over their necks, the only real exceptions being people who are at companies who have large patent portfolios and can cross-license. Those programmers are a minority.

    I develop and maintain proprietary software for a living, and like every other programmer in the world, I have no idea how many patents I routinely violate every week. The only reason it hasn't been an issue (so far) is that our source is closed so it would be pretty hard for a hostile outsider to know what patents I violate, too. But if there ever were a conflict that somehow resulted in us having to reveal our source, the risk .. well, the risk is unknown. And that's pretty scary.

    A litigeous situation like that is unlikely because we're so small and our competition isn't very heated. No one has much to gain from harming us. But I can easily imagine situations where larger companies who are battling for big stakes, could find patent violations in one another products. (Look at how IBM responded to SCO. Never mind that SCO were the bad guys in this fight -- IBM could have done that to anybody.)

    The kind of patent violations I'm talking about aren't "IP theft" or lazy followers copying true leaders' work. It's just people doing their jobs and solving problems the way any programmer should solve problems. Problem solving is what we do every day. And it's not like we're all these brilliant Edisons and Franklins who are inventing these insightful things all the time; it's just that with software, there's a simple process (that does not require genious) for arbitrarily piling layer upon layer to create immense complexity. And whatever you come up with, there's a reasonable chance that someone might have a patent on it. This is not what patents were intended to cover!

    Anyway, what I'm getting at is that most proprietary and internal services programmers should be just as concerned about software patents as Free Software and Open Source developers. This is a much bigger problem and I think the publicity needs to get that message across.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  187. Some of them aren't completely shut down by Twister002 · · Score: 1

    GNU II Win was open, they just replaced their front page with an explanation. You can click through after you read it and get to the main site.

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
  188. What about the USA? by semanticgap · · Score: 1

    I really hope this will help to turn public attention in the US to the issue of software patents.

    The only US initiative I found was Nader's, and (you may not like it, but it's true) the guy has no political credibility whatsoever and only makes the issue worse.

    It'd be really nice if there existed a grassroots effort to abolish software patents in the US so that it wouldn't be a partisan issue.

    Alas, there is none...

    1. Re:What about the USA? by Sphere1952 · · Score: 1


      Just tie it into how the kids feel about the RIAA and you'll get plenty of supporters.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  189. Also freshrpms.net and rufus.w3.org (rpmfind) by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 1

    ...although with rpmfind, you'll only see the
    "outage" notice when you submit a search.

    (....also irked that I submitted this story two
    days ago and it was rejected....grumble)

  190. I'm puzzled. by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1
    Because although this proposal does appear to have the capability of creating too many loopholes to prevent large companies obstructing small/medium size developers and the open source community, it does state that the exercise of a patent covering a computer-implemented invention should not interfere with the freedoms granted under copyright law to software developers by the provisions of the Directive 91/250/EEC - i.e. that making of a back-up copy by a lawful user cannot be prevented.

    Does that mean we Euros *can* legally break 'copyright protection' then?

  191. If slashdotters really want to have an impact by Sphere1952 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Accidentally hit reset on a few well chosen machines all at the same time -- say maybe midnight GMT tonight.

    I bet the shock to the Internet would be nothing compared to the political earthquake of headlines reading "Slashdot readers bring down Internet in protest over software patents."

    --
    Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  192. Meanwhile by Bakajin · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA, that's only the 312th time I've seen that!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!

    2. Re:Meanwhile by Bakajin · · Score: 1

      I know! Isn't it great! Something never get old!

  193. oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where will I find software/support for my open-source software projects?

    Oh yeah, that's right - nobody supports them anyways.

    I say we have another shutdown to protest shitty documentation and tepid support for open source projects as well.

  194. Re: Slashdot is not down by gurisees · · Score: 1

    No one's closing any pages, they're just changing the homepage with a reivindicative one, and then link that to the usual homepage.
    Not such a big effort, IMO.

    --
    ... information wants to be forwarded ...
  195. Just wait... by AcquaCow · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for the first Slashdot story about Amazon.com patenting online methods of managing a Flash Mob....whats next!?

    --

    up 12 days, 22:30, 2 users, load averages: 993.20, 994.21, 994.56
    *makes note to limit user processes...
  196. KDE by xerid · · Score: 1

    >>Others include KDE, Gimp, gnu-darwin, GNU-savannah, and most of the French and German linux sites.

    KDE doesn't look like they are down due to a protest. Perhaps someone should inform them.

  197. Apache too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, so they just have a notice on their main page, but it's still enormous, considering they have 60% of the market share for public websites.

  198. Others too... by Izago909 · · Score: 1

    Many listings on RPMFind.net bring up the same message. Also, many of the projects they list display it. The sites aren't truly closed down. On the notice, there is a hyperlink to continue on to your destination, but it won't forward you automatically.

    It's a good way to get attention to te cause, but I feel that they are only protesting to the geek crowd. They should find ways to enlist the help of the not-so-geeky websites to get more fo the common folk involved.

  199. One other link to protest by llebegue · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://linuxfr.org/

  200. When it is implemented, will US patents apply. by pantherace · · Score: 1
    I live in the US and dislike software patents (how the hell can you sell an idea?), but a thought just occured to me: given all the copyright, etc standardization by treaties would this include patents, and therefore the US's already large (and stupid) collection of software patents? I can see all sorts of problems competitively for the EU, where US companies use patents already obtained to legally tie up any EU firm they don't like.

    As an example, if this were true someone could sue Suse, because unlike RedHat (which has a bunch of defensive patents) they hace no way to defend themselves, aside from getting the stupidity revoked (or better yet: not have it pass at all!)

  201. WTF?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all the bitching people on /. have done regarding the patents amazon.com has gotten for simple shit....you don't like the EU approach of not allowing software patents? Just because you can't patent it doesn't mean you can't trademark and/or copyright stuff to prevent other people from infringing in your ideas and such.

    Oh...wait...I forgot...most of us don't obey or respect software/music trademarks and copyrights...why should we expect anyone to respect ours?

  202. Re: Slashdot is not down by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
    "Slashdot is not, however, even though some have requested it be taken down for the day..."

    Well, someone has to be up to let people know what is going on. From the few sites i've seen, Apache, winehq, and a couple others, it's only the first page.. then it says "You will be redirected to the actual site after 20 seconds" (or 60, on apache).. So slashdot could do the same thing.. it's basically just an informative splash page..

    -matt

  203. Dumb Q by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does one shut down a website? I mean I can always change the index.[s]htm[l]. But what about other book marked pages? Is there a way I can 'shout down' all links to a website?

  204. Re: Slashdot is not down by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

    Think of how many hits per day Slashdot gets. Now multiply that times the size of even a small HTML page on the issue. I'd that with as large an audience as Slashdot has, doing something like that would be prohibitively expensive from a bandwidth standpoint, especially considering how many people obsessively reload the front page.

  205. Re: Slashdot is not down by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
    Think of how many hits per day Slashdot gets. Now multiply that times the size of even a small HTML page on the issue. I'd that with as large an audience as Slashdot has, doing something like that would be prohibitively expensive from a bandwidth standpoint, especially considering how many people obsessively reload the front page.

    Very true.. Maybe they can put an ad on the front page as a CYA type deal.

    -matt

  206. Mono also shut down its site by btakita · · Score: 1
  207. Re: Slashdot is not down by spinister · · Score: 1

    Indeed, "a lot of people would not know about... lots of other news." But if /. were to modify their homepage, I think it's safe to say that plenty of people would know about the protest.

  208. linalco.com is also closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was an almost complete list somewere with the sites registered, but i do not remember were it was.

    BTW, the fact that slashdot do not close annoyed me a lot. I'll not read it anymore ;-)

  209. European patents != American patents by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    Shutting down web sites to protest idiotic American or European Community laws is not a good action.

    In this transistion to the information age, a major battle is going on between the forces of old, who use politics as a means for controlling individuals and the forces of new, who use information technology as a means of liberating individuals. We should avoid using the tactics of the political forces because it means that we will always lose, because they are controlling the legal mechanisms of engagement.

    In other words, by shutting down our web sites we are doing exactly what they are trying to get us to do, which is shut down our websites. The fact that the web site is down because of its operator's protest as opposed to an arbitrary decision of the political forces (i.e. a software patent) is irrelevant. The point is that the web site is down.

    Which, in the information age, means that the politicians have won this engagement.

    It would be to our advantage to prove our strength to our website users and followers by ensuring that our websites are ALWAYS up, running, and available to provide service. To show that we can keep our websites running, regardless of whether the politicians have decided that they must be shut down for one arbitrary pseudo-legal reason or another, would show the world the strength of the global technical community in the information age.

    Shutting down our websites to protest a political decision is counterproductive, because it shows that we exist only at the whim and mercy of the political forces and are limited in our response to political oppression by useless symbolic protest. Keeping our websites on-line, through means of third-world mirror sites or advanced internet routing techniques, shows the world that, in the technical fields that world has come to depend on, we are stronger than politicians.

    It also shows the world that if the politicians have a disagreement with the way that we choose to provide our services to the world, then they should engage us in civilized dialog in an open international forum instead of assuming that they can simply crush us through violence or its threat.

    I would recommend the book 'The Sovereign Individual' by James Dale Davidson and Lord Rees-Mogg for a detailed, advanced, and thrilling discussion of the transfer of power from political forces (using violence) to civilized forces (using technology) that is beginning to occur now.

    Thank you,
    Simonetta

  210. Sorry Mr. Einstein, You can't publish that. by Wolfbone · · Score: 1

    Just how do you distinguish between 'maths' and 'algorithms'? Who decides what is trivial and what is not? No doubt the satellite based GPS systems use 'non-trivial' 'algorithms' to make the corrections to their calculations that are necessary due to G.R.

    Suppose Albert Einstein hadn't gotten around to the G.R. theory yet, but the GPS satellite people had - and had patented every algorithm they could think of that might possibly be of use to them, constituting in effect a statement of the theory. Then for starters you could kiss goodbye to modern cosmology and G.R. textbooks and if Professor Einstein had tried to publish his theory, he would have spent his last days in prison, courtesy of the DMCA.

    You may be happy to live in a foul dystopia in which maths and science - ideas - are owned by commercial interests but I for one will fight to the last drop of my blood to prevent the realisation of such a monstrous vision.

  211. Fight by Buskaatt · · Score: 1

    There are more people than cops! I still don't get why people don't just ignore stupid laws. Sure, if I get a summons and I don't show up to court, I get my head dented by some "trigger happy peace clown." But if everybody did it ... And yes. I'm listening to punk right now.

    That's my kind of protest. Did people cut off their feet to keep from being drafted? No they burned their draft cards! Show some balls software world. Fight. Dirty.

  212. Consequences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what will happen if software patents are allowed (in sequential order):
    1) LARGE companies start emeting lots, and lots of patents.
    2) LARGE companies start beating small companie (their competitors), and possibly open source producers (when it becomes more then a niche market), into oblivian.
    3) A monoculture of products will apear, choice will cease to exist. Prices for these products will skyrocket and the quality will drop.
    4) All money will flow to those large companies. The economy will start depending on those same large companies, who can then do nearly anything they want (best example: Microsoft)
    5) Corporate states are born (example: the U.S.)

    Please note: in my definition a corporate state is created at the moment big companies control what happens in national politics.

  213. Only against local patents? by zoeblade · · Score: 1

    It'd be bad if everyone could patent software. It'd be even worse if some people could, and others couldn't, based on which country they live in.

  214. Apache is too, and solution to all patent problems by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody posted about Apache which has been protesting this for several days now.

    And now for the solution to all patent issues (if respected countries would just enact it):

    Patents are devised to protect an entities investment in their research and promise the possibility of gain from doing the research. Unfortunately patents last an arbitrarily long time, and can really stifle advancement in the field (duh). So all we need to do to counteract these problems is to provide monetary incentive to companies without sacrificing the rest of the market. To suffice this equation: all you need is a R&D market. People invest in the R&D market on problems which they think have a likelihood of being solved. This finds a natural balance of urgency which companies see and invest their time and money into finding the solution to the problem. First company to the solution, files with the R&D, R&D verifies, then company gets paid. Thats it!

    --
    Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  215. the Apache site by gstein · · Score: 1

    Sure, code from the Apache Software Foundation may be free, but that does not mean that our core purpose -- providing softwre to the public -- should be held hostage to political demonstrations and statements. We altered our web page because we care about the EU patent situation (well, anywhere really!). But to completely shut down our site would fly in the face of our entire reason for existence. The ASF is a public charity, chartered to help people. Just because we make our software available for free doesn't mean it is right for us to deny access to it whenever the whimsy strikes us.

    -- Greg Stein, ASF Chairman

  216. Re:European patents != American patents by iapetus · · Score: 1

    That depends why you're shutting down the websites (or, as in this case, mostly adding an extra page to explain the patent problem). Obviously your MEP isn't going to be jumping up in outrage at the fact that the Gimp website is showing a different homepage for the day. This is about spreading awareness among people who are going to be hit by software patents, but don't yet know it.

    The idea that the best way to protest is by doing absolutely nothing (making sure that websites that are up every day stay up), which you're suggesting, is frankly laughable. What you're suggesting is only of any relevance if we wait until the decisions have been made and don't bother protesting until we're directly effected by the new laws - and until the sites that we're trying to keep up are illegal. Call me old-fashioned if you will, but despite anything Lord Rees-Mogg might have to say (and judging by the synopsis of the book at Amazon he has many offensive and misguided things to say) attempting to address problems proactively is far better than merely being reactive.

    If the politicians have a problem with how we choose to provide our services to the world, then if the laws back them up, they can arrest us, confiscate our property, drive our companies out of business or whatever. We've already seen some of this happen in the US. I'd rather try to avoid that in Europe, if you don't mind.

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  217. Patent/Copyright ... outdated by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fact of the matter is that Copyright and Patent law is completely outdated and can no longer effectively cover the sphere of creativity in the marketplace. 100 years ago, the scope of what was a written work and what was an invention was pretty easy to comprehend. It was also very clear who was the patent holder, the originator of the work.

    Today, the issue is a real mess.

    Software-
    Software is a written work that becomes a machine when compiled and executed. It is a work that spans the two and should clearly have it's own category. Software patents for REAL innovation is appropriate. However, applications of derivates of well known concepts are simply not deserving of 17years of exclusive use.

    I once had a colleague who had effectively patented the bit. Basically he had determined a scheme by which a record would either be a "summary" or a "detail" if a bit was switched. They actually successfully sued AT&T and succeeded in getting royalties.

    While the use of such a technique does show a level of adaptivity and creativity, it doesn't rise to the level of "NEW IDEA". Certainly not one warranting 17 years of exclusive rights. The fact is that fundamental computer science is MEANT to apply to a limitless number of scenarios.

    As far as copyrights go, it's pretty foolish to copyright something that you don't publish. Software code is virtually NEVER published. It's really a bad fit for copyright as no-one has a clue as to whether they did or did not infringe.

    Clearly a new classification of intellectual property is needed in this category.

    Bio-Tech-
    A tremendous new force is emerging to literally turn biological information into machines. The pharmeceutical industry has existed for nearly a century treating drugs as "inventions".

    The thing about modern pharmeceuticals is that their is way more at stake than the invention itself. Pharmecuetical production involves

    1) Identification of a substance (or class of substance) that produces specific effect in anatomy.

    2) Processes to synthesize that agent in a manner that is cost productive.

    3) Development of an appropriate delivery agent.

    4) Clinical trials to determine the efficacy of the product so that it can be marketed.

    Each of these steps require uniquely different skills and techniques. In a way, each represents a uniquely different type of intellectual property.

    Furthermore, when we look at the real "new age" biotech, there core product is often "knowledge". For example, knowledge of the human genome and how individual genes effect human anatomy. Our law is now recognizing the patent of individual "genes". Those are FACTS.

    Patents aren't supposed to recognize scientific facts and truths, only inventions. However, patents are now issued to biotech firms for the knowledge of functions for individual genes or clusters of genes.

    Clearly this fundamental research is a form of intellectual property. But it clearly IS NOT an invention since the knowledge does not produce a workable product, device or machine. It certainly is not a copyright, only god could copyright the human genome ;-)

    Again new forms of intellectual property law is warranted to account for expensive research. Such a research is VERY valuable to humanity and an economic incentive may clearly be warranted (though perhaps not 17 years worth of protection).

    Beyond that, perhaps research that produces new uses for older "inventions" should be relevant. For example, pharmeceutical companies simply will NOT invest research into known substances going of patent. There is no economic motivation. Perhaps a "IP" that would allow royalties for NEW uses of existing substances would be appropriate.

    Another aspect of biotech firms is "process". The concept of "process" is embodied quite boldy in patents now. Though their relevance and applicability is often questioned. Indeed, I would claim that the a GUI software appli

    --
    -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  218. How the EU directive on software patents stinks... by ecsnl · · Score: 1

    I do not think people understand how sneaky this directive is... I suggest you drop by here...

    BTW if this directive is good ?
    Why is the one click amazon patent now also approved by the EPO ?

    Read this

    http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/tec h/ index.en.html

  219. Are the PHP folks participating also? by The_Real_MrRabbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Simply cannot get to the web site today... It's pingable, can browse site initially with telnet://www.php.net 80 and do a GET /index.html. Elsewise, no cookie when using browser... Just hangs... =8-(

  220. Hack the system by mic256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've heard an opinion recently, that the GPL is just a hack around the normal legal system. Basically, the free software movement did not start with changing the law. It wasn't like there were demonstrations or petitions against copyrights. Instead the legal system was simply hacked. I just wondered if that could be done again, this time with patents. Wouldn't making simple adjustements to the GPL work? Here are my (very rough) proposals
    I) if you agree to use this software you must not claim infrigments of any of your patents by any software covered with the GPL 3 or greater
    Also, the FSF, OSDN or whatever free software organization could register patents and then license them under the GPL with the following another adjustement
    II) you are free to use the patents no. aaa, bbb, ..., in any program covered by this license free of charge, however you are forbidden from using this patents in any product not covered by this license
    I am writing this from mozilla, so I have some
    simple patents proposals (I don't know if they are valid)
    a) type ahead search
    b) spam filter
    c) mouse gestures
    I know they are stupid (just like every patent out there). Imagine next time a nuisance like SCO happens (hey, but you infringe 100 of our patents :)). Basically, what I am saying - if you cannot change the system, use it to your advantages. Any thougths on why did would or not work?

  221. OT: KDE's K fixation by SaberTaylor · · Score: 1

    What is up with the need to start off all their proggies with K's anyway?

    Reminds me of...

    "With new membership came new names and titles: Klavern (brick meeting house), Kleagles (organizers and recruiters), Exalted Cyclops (president), Klaliff (vice-president), Kligrapp (secretary) and Klandom (entire organization).
    Shortly after, the Klandom was designated 'The Invisible Empire'; the president became known as the Grand Wizard. His cabinet was composed of ten Genii. Their internal system became Klancraft and their language was termed Klanguage."

    There was a better quote, but none of the search engines are availing it to me. :o/

    --
    If you need text styles to communicate then you don't have a message.
  222. Trial lawyer lobby by yerricde · · Score: 1

    First, lawyers don't create laws; Legislators/Congress(wo)men do (and judges interpret them).

    As Rogerborg pointed out, 39 percent of U.S. federal legislators have been admitted to some state's bar association at one point. If that's not enough, remember that legislators have little free will nowadays. The biggest lobbying organization in the U.S. Congress is the American Trial Lawyers Association, whose members' job security depends on having laws that are too long and too complex for the layman to follow.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  223. Cash and carry ... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    Software patents in the USA has done great harm to the IT industry. Most every software program, user interface, and algorithym worth a tinker's damn is based (at least in part) on prior art. The short-term winners are the monopolistic companies, that have extended their reach with DCMA and RIAA. What possible reason to extend copyrights, beyond things like sweezing more cash from Mickey Mouse (how old is he?). The other big short-term winners are the politicians who have been bought and paid for by these same monopolists. Of course, one of the best examples of this is Sen. Hollings, of South Carolina. It is all the same tactic of "pump and dump" that brought us AOL-TW, Enron, WorldCom, etc. All the parties guilty of breaching the public trust are bailing out with their ill-gotten gains. I think it was Samuel Clemens who said "Congress has provided us with the best politicians that money can buy."

  224. Nope, it's back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still as ass-inine as ever. If goatse.cx was down, it was brief.

  225. Google by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Close Google for a day or two and see how many people notice. They use opensource software a lot so they'd be a good example. If only someone could convince them to do it.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  226. Re: Slashdot is not down by rastos1 · · Score: 1
    Obviously you did not spend much time thinking about it.
    If a site with hundreds thousands of visitors a day changes the front page, than a lot of people would know about the protest. Also the suggestion never said to shutdown the site completely. It says you should replace the front-page with information about the protest and this replacement page may link to usual site front page.

    what was the saying: first they came for ... and then there was nobody to speak for me ...

  227. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion