"and even if they do not communicate with one another"
Well that can be the case with people, too, can it not? Except that when people do not communicate with each other, I don't believe that it can be said to be colluding, by definition. So why is it collusion when algorithms do it?
How does the browser know when the certificate isn't the "right" one? Presumably, the false certificate's root is installed as valid on the system. Will this warning come up any time a page is viewed that relies on a non-bundled root certificate?
You're right that this usage is weird. The other posters are correct about what number range the word "several" might represent, but they're ignoring its connotation. You're exactly correct that it has the sense of "more than expected".
"There are still several years left", or "This established feature has been there for several years" all make sense. "It was just several years ago" does not make sense.
The trend lately is for colleges to set a ridiculously high price, then give "everyone" a discount. They're taking as much as they can from everyone. In what other field do companies get away with that? What a scam.
Slashdot Mirror
You're not confusing the final tax-day reconciliation (refund vs owing) with the actual tax burden, are you?
Your browser has permission to overwrite itself? Seems like a bad idea.
They can opt out, but they can't go for permanent DST without Congressional approval.
I'm curious: does your Pi-hole MitM your HTTPS connections in order to do all that?
"and even if they do not communicate with one another"
Well that can be the case with people, too, can it not? Except that when people do not communicate with each other, I don't believe that it can be said to be colluding, by definition. So why is it collusion when algorithms do it?
Does that mean all SSL connections have to wait for this other new connection to succeed?
If that other service is out, do all SSL connections fail? Or is defeating this new "feature" as simple as blocking those connections?
The linked article has no technical details.
How does the browser know when the certificate isn't the "right" one? Presumably, the false certificate's root is installed as valid on the system. Will this warning come up any time a page is viewed that relies on a non-bundled root certificate?
There are plenty of domains in heavy use for things other than the Web. Classifying these as "unused" is probably not right.
"Ain't" certainly is a word; it's the contraction for "am not". Members of the British aristocracy still occasionally use it as such.
Often it's used incorrectly as standing for different words. "He ain't nice" is incorrect, but "I ain't interested" is correct.
A Slashdot article that links to the very previous Slashdot article??
You're right that this usage is weird. The other posters are correct about what number range the word "several" might represent, but they're ignoring its connotation. You're exactly correct that it has the sense of "more than expected".
"There are still several years left", or "This established feature has been there for several years" all make sense. "It was just several years ago" does not make sense.
Being able to spy on and manipulate other VMs on your VM's host is a plenty big enough exploit.
I'm pretty sure that Hillary would have been champing at the bit to sign on to this ridiculous accord. Trump is not. So... We lucked out?
Yes it does:
"CNBC's Brian Sullivan reported this weekend Amazon could split the proposed workforce and investments between Austin and Northern Virginia."
Although in this case, IIRC, Rice has a big endowment, and tuition isn't very high anyway.
The trend lately is for colleges to set a ridiculously high price, then give "everyone" a discount. They're taking as much as they can from everyone. In what other field do companies get away with that? What a scam.
Horrifyingly, the good option here might be Microsoft.
Yes, bbc.com and your site do need encryption.
Do you not want any guarantees that your news is unaltered from the source?
I do want to censor. I am a censor. I want to keep my 10 year old children from seeing awful things they can't unsee.
What is the best way to achieve this?
Seems like a VPS instance could easily use this to break into its host or to sibling VPSes.
Still waiting them out on my x220, waiting for real keyboards to return.
Believe me, somewhere in this hospital the anguished oink of pig-man cries out for help!
They do:
https://www.freefilefillablefo...
Wrong, you can get an automatic extension, but you still have to pay anything you owe by April 15 (or 17).