You agree not to display on the same Web page in connection with which any Ad Unit, Ad, Link, or Search Box is displayed (a "Serviced Page") any advertisement(s) that an end user of Your Site(s) would reasonably confuse with a Google advertisement or otherwise associate with Google. If You have elected to receive content or Site-based Ads, You further agree not to display on any Serviced Page any non-Google content-targeted advertisement(s). If You have elected to receive Search Results on any Site(s), You agree that Google will be the exclusive provider of Internet search services on such Site(s).
I read this as:
- You can't try and confuse the user into thinking that non-Google ads are fromn Google (when both appear on the same page)
- If you are receiving site-based ads, you cannot mix google & non-google ads on the same page. As best as I can figure, most sites (especially smaller ones) receive content-based ads, so I read this as not applying unless you're in the Adsense Premium programs (you get bazillions of visits per month)
- If you receive search results on the site, you agree that google is te exclusive provider.
In short, most people can (and do) display google & non-google ads on the same pages.
"DOS Ain't Done til Lotus Won't Run" - I can't say that I've ever heard that phrase before, but it definitely sounds like something the Slashdot crowd would say.
This is a social problem, not a technological one.
You need to fanatically develop a culture where secrecy surrounding a source's identity is sacrosanct. Reporters don't keep real names in notes. Nothing about real names of sources is written down. Communications involving sources is done verbally and face to face... etc...
Slashdot Mirror
It's that he thinks he's so much better than everyone that he ignores anyone elses opinions or suggestions or ideas.
Making him the biggest megalomaniac since Captain Ahab.
Too bad its author is so off-putting as to drive poeple away from both in droves.
I get cold contact requests from these guys on LinkedIn all the time. I imagine if you sign up, you can find them pretty easily too.
So it would be probably more akin to cloning deer or somesuch in the US.
I don't know about Korea, but I can tell you that in the parts of China I have visited, the black dog's meat is the most highly regarded.
Why dampen sensationalism with the facts? :)
Cosmic rays from the sun?
:)
Why don't they just go at night?
From the TOS:
You agree not to display on the same Web page in connection with which any Ad Unit, Ad, Link, or Search Box is displayed (a "Serviced Page") any advertisement(s) that an end user of Your Site(s) would reasonably confuse with a Google advertisement or otherwise associate with Google. If You have elected to receive content or Site-based Ads, You further agree not to display on any Serviced Page any non-Google content-targeted advertisement(s). If You have elected to receive Search Results on any Site(s), You agree that Google will be the exclusive provider of Internet search services on such Site(s).
I read this as:
- You can't try and confuse the user into thinking that non-Google ads are fromn Google (when both appear on the same page)
- If you are receiving site-based ads, you cannot mix google & non-google ads on the same page. As best as I can figure, most sites (especially smaller ones) receive content-based ads, so I read this as not applying unless you're in the Adsense Premium programs (you get bazillions of visits per month)
- If you receive search results on the site, you agree that google is te exclusive provider.
In short, most people can (and do) display google & non-google ads on the same pages.
The Siemens brand will be used by BenQ for the next 5 yrs, much like Lenovo and IBM. SE has BT turned off by default. How can that be poor security?
Announcement is here. It includes instructions on how to get a fix, but it does not appear to be available for download.
You need to look at merket capitalization (number of shares outstanding * share price)
GOOG $83 billion
MSFT $289 billion
If you want to look at big numbers, look up BRK-A. Warren doesn't see the rationale behind stock splits.
If he were alive today we'd flame his spelling. :)
From the first comment to the article:
"DOS Ain't Done til Lotus Won't Run" - I can't say that I've ever heard that phrase before, but it definitely sounds like something the Slashdot crowd would say.
Ahh to see yourselves as others see you....
Here's the short answer. You can't.
This is a social problem, not a technological one.
You need to fanatically develop a culture where secrecy surrounding a source's identity is sacrosanct. Reporters don't keep real names in notes. Nothing about real names of sources is written down. Communications involving sources is done verbally and face to face... etc...
Take your pick.
Reading /. to keep skills and perspective current is akin to getting balanced perspective on current events from Dan Rather.
Doesn't working at MS isolate you somewhat from the OSS community? What do you do to keep your OSS perspective and skills current?
I think if you factor in the time value of money, he probably got a better deal with his then-salary.
I don't think it would fit you.
All I get is some searchsquatter web design firm
Um, as a matter of fact, I am invited and going to a party this evening. :)
here . Though I doubt that that a review of Linspire is going to get slashdotted late on a Friday afternoon.
It almost sounds like a normal sw dev process.
Let's see.
When somebody posts about an Cisco security exploit, it's a good thing.
When somebody posts about a workaround to get past Microsoft's licensing it's a bad.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
it still changes the phrase
The print heads rotate 360 degrees while ejecting green ink at great force and saying, "your mother svcks cocks in hell".