The data capacity of a wireless system actually isn't dependent on the transmission frequency (the 100GHz frequency you specced for the first technology). It's dependent on the signal to noise ratio (which can depend on where in the frequency domain you're operating), and the available bandwidth (range of frequency on which you're transmitting data). A signal with 6MHz of bandwidth (TV channel sized) can carry the same data if it's mixed to 100KHz as at 100GHz (given the same SNR).
1) That's what air traffic control is for
2) Even if it's not open to the public, how would that stop terrorists from flying into it?
Go back to hiding in your hole, idiot.
Let me guess, you're not an electrical engineer and have no experience with any kind of electronics engineering? There's nuances to handling electrical signals, parasitic capacitances and inductances, frequency response, and all these little changes can make a big difference, even the structure of the cabling can (up to a point). There's a reason a lot of cables are shielded and have a choke at the end (to supress EM emmissions)
Just when corporations try, and succeede in patenting things like clicking a mouse inside a window, patents are meant to protect creative intellectual property, not to divvy the basic workings of the world up to corporations.
I'm actually on a reconfigurable computing project, which focuses on this, the simple fact is that right now we don't have good methods for generating HDL for a given task, as well as lacking the necessary tools to properly swap tasks into/out of an fpga while maintaining a reasonable communication speed to them. It's being worked on, but it will take time to develop the tools, and even longer before software makers start using them.
Even if a terrorist has a valid ID, so long as they're not on a watch list, they can get on the plane, they're not real worried about being IDed after they hijack the plane, since, in all probability, they'll be expecting to die when they crash the plane. Idiot.
As far as I know, there's no HDTV card for the PC that will handle HD signals over cable here in the US. I've seen them for other systems, such as Australia's, but nothing for the US. You could certainly get an Direct TV system to record off of or just stick with a normal capture card, the hauppage pvr series is good, as it has an onboard mpeg 2 encoder.
Still criticize them? Strange, since I've never posted anything criticizing them before (check my comments if you don't believe), perhaps you meant that the internet community in general still criticizes them? No, that still wouldn't make sense since I only posted my own opinion rather than a blanket statement attempting to speak for everyong. Nope, I'm sorry, but I have to call shennanigans on your post.
CI
Open source developers will root out all their bugs for them, they pay nothing, and whenever something goes wrong, guess who's going to get blamed (hint, it's not the microsoft developers)
Slashdot Mirror
Upon even further inspection, I notice that you work for a networking lab, and probably already knew all that. *sigh*
On further inspection, it probably wouldn't be wise to mix a 6MHz channel to a center frequency of 100KHz. Let's say you mix it to 10MHz instead =)
The data capacity of a wireless system actually isn't dependent on the transmission frequency (the 100GHz frequency you specced for the first technology). It's dependent on the signal to noise ratio (which can depend on where in the frequency domain you're operating), and the available bandwidth (range of frequency on which you're transmitting data). A signal with 6MHz of bandwidth (TV channel sized) can carry the same data if it's mixed to 100KHz as at 100GHz (given the same SNR).
Why exactly should you not let a leaving sysadmin on your system?
Then why are they releasing a cell based blade server next spring?
Was that even english?
Mostly US? Last I checked a LARGE portion of OSS developers were from Europe.
Excepting that slander is a civil offense, not criminal.
1) That's what air traffic control is for 2) Even if it's not open to the public, how would that stop terrorists from flying into it? Go back to hiding in your hole, idiot.
Let me guess, you're not an electrical engineer and have no experience with any kind of electronics engineering? There's nuances to handling electrical signals, parasitic capacitances and inductances, frequency response, and all these little changes can make a big difference, even the structure of the cabling can (up to a point). There's a reason a lot of cables are shielded and have a choke at the end (to supress EM emmissions)
No, linux isn't the reason the xbox is so hackable, it because they used off the shelf commodity hardware and didn't properly secure their design.
hahahahhaahahahahahahahahaha *gasp* hahahahahahahahahahahah *collapse*
Just when corporations try, and succeede in patenting things like clicking a mouse inside a window, patents are meant to protect creative intellectual property, not to divvy the basic workings of the world up to corporations.
I'm actually on a reconfigurable computing project, which focuses on this, the simple fact is that right now we don't have good methods for generating HDL for a given task, as well as lacking the necessary tools to properly swap tasks into/out of an fpga while maintaining a reasonable communication speed to them. It's being worked on, but it will take time to develop the tools, and even longer before software makers start using them.
Even if a terrorist has a valid ID, so long as they're not on a watch list, they can get on the plane, they're not real worried about being IDed after they hijack the plane, since, in all probability, they'll be expecting to die when they crash the plane. Idiot.
Good luck removing heat from a 3D structure easily. That's the principle reason we don't have processing cubes instead of chips in our computers.
Yes, a terabit = 125 Gigabytes, which is 31.25 DVDs
Given that 2048x1080 is the resolution of the signal and not the sampling rate, probably not.
Is when will it be in my LIVING ROOM *drools at high res goodness*
As far as I know, there's no HDTV card for the PC that will handle HD signals over cable here in the US. I've seen them for other systems, such as Australia's, but nothing for the US. You could certainly get an Direct TV system to record off of or just stick with a normal capture card, the hauppage pvr series is good, as it has an onboard mpeg 2 encoder.
Not use fat because it's evil?
Now remember, submarine patents are only funny when used against big corporations!
First Post! Why would they deliberately call a missile Satan?
Still criticize them? Strange, since I've never posted anything criticizing them before (check my comments if you don't believe), perhaps you meant that the internet community in general still criticizes them? No, that still wouldn't make sense since I only posted my own opinion rather than a blanket statement attempting to speak for everyong. Nope, I'm sorry, but I have to call shennanigans on your post. CI
Open source developers will root out all their bugs for them, they pay nothing, and whenever something goes wrong, guess who's going to get blamed (hint, it's not the microsoft developers)