No, he opposes special laws just for LGBTQ people.
Here's what I don't understand about your stance: you want to deny rights to gay people (you're advocating FOR the heritage foundation here), by prventing them from marrying and getting the same legal protections and rights as straight people.
But yet you swear blind that that isn't anything against gay people.
You clearly think gay people deerve fewer rights because you are indirecly (but not very indirectly) advocating to use the force of law to deny those rights. But your you know that's wrong because you wish to hide those actions by claiming the opposite.
Why?
If you think it's OK, the come out and say it and stop pretending otherwise. if you think it's not OK, the nstop advocating for it.
Not exactly: they didn't necessarily too any of those things.
Under the US system common tactic of prosecutors is to fling vast amounts of bogus crap with really high sentences at someone accused to the point where it's worth falsely admitting to the a crime because a conviction of one of the others had such a harsh penalty.
The internet is large and it's usually possible to find someone who'll say just about anything. Even given that I'm calling bullshit. I don't think you can find anyone making that claim.
Unless of course more people start using those places as they get richer. I mean I prefer using websites if possible, but a lot of them seemed determined to make my life as miserable as possible through the awesome power of JavaScript. It's kind of impressive that they can over come my innate desire to not deal with actual people, but there you go.
I've found as I've advanced in my career, got paid a bit more and have less tube that there's value in being able to chuck some money at something and have it done for you hassle free.
It's like I lead you to water and then you turn around and hell at me how there's no water.
So you don't enjoy hanging around in stained sweatpants? Why not? They're comfortable and I assume you don't actually enjoy doing laundry.
And you don't like it because you don't like the look? It's almost like you are not being (to use your bizarrely aggrieved reasoning) honest with your appearance after all time putting effort into it.
At this point you should realise that both men and women put effort into their appearance.
Eh. Women did exist I tinder, plenty of them. Mate of mine is a regular there and seems to have no problems. He's not tall either, maybe 5'7".
I don't really see how fake profiles would work on it. So presumably you swipe right(?) And the fake profile auto swipes right. Then you message and... Nothing? Then what?
Quite how they didn't realize when she apparently experienced no pain during childbirth is a bit of a mystery.
She's 71. The medical establishment especially back then didn't have a reputation for paying the blindest bit of attention to well just about anything to do with women.
Red Pill is a term used by the "Manosphere" ("MRAs", Incels, etc) to describe their version of the world, which is a reference to an old, classic, movie from decades ago called The Matrix whereby the hero takes a "red pill" and suddenly finds out that the world is fake.
The ironic thing is that a big part of it is that the identity forced on you by your surroundings is fake and instead identity comes from within. This is the compete antithesis of what red pillers seem to believe.
Re watching the matrix 15 years later knowing the directors are both trans made some of the themes that were always there a lot more obvious.
Nah just the double standards I'd expect from you.
Any non trivial group will have an extremist. You don't like feminists so you essentially paint the extremists as representatives of the whole. But you identify as right wing yet you don't paint the extremists as representative of you.
Just another blowhard with double standards.
What you'll most likely do now is excuse me of something random (because SJW or some such nonsense) and then utterly fall to present any evidence for it.
You have an over developed sense of something. All I see is someone correcting someone else about their net worth. If that's your favorite tweet then you have an incredibly dull sense of humor.
This doesn't seem to be sticking it to anyone particularly hard.
Seriously why on earth do you think this is such a marvelous tweet.
Seriously why the heck is this modded troll? I presume because I'm not blindly agreeing with the parent, but I've still literally no idea what I even should be agreeing to.
Maybe it's because its referencing some meme I'm not familiar with or perhaps there's some context I am missing due to Twitter's aggressively poor user interface.
RoHS is for consumer electronics. Aerospace is very much exempt and will still use leaded solder. While many components aren't available with lead free balls, even pretty small contact manufacturers will have reballing kit. It's the same in the medical industry which is where I know this from.
She will probably forget about all these ideas fast, should she get elected.
This is why we're screwed. Even when someone from the "other side" comes up with something you really like you cannot bring yourself to say anything positive at all. Enjoy your partisan hellhole.
I have switched to LED bulbs for other purposes, but for the overhead fill lighting I've never been able to find a good LED replacement. The main problem is that they are pretty much all way, way too directional - they shine very brightly down instead of filling an area.
Where on earth have you been looking? LED filament bulbs are very omnidirectional. Or get a corn bulb, they're covered in small directional lights but all pointing in different directions. The corn bulbs tend to be more expensive light industrial units so they have excellent heatsinking and 50,000hr rated MTBF.
Slashdot Mirror
Tolerance for me, but not for thee
Looks like another 12 year old has discovered the "paradox of tolerance".
No, he opposes special laws just for LGBTQ people.
Here's what I don't understand about your stance: you want to deny rights to gay people (you're advocating FOR the heritage foundation here), by prventing them from marrying and getting the same legal protections and rights as straight people.
But yet you swear blind that that isn't anything against gay people.
You clearly think gay people deerve fewer rights because you are indirecly (but not very indirectly) advocating to use the force of law to deny those rights. But your you know that's wrong because you wish to hide those actions by claiming the opposite.
Why?
If you think it's OK, the come out and say it and stop pretending otherwise. if you think it's not OK, the nstop advocating for it.
Either way your position makes no sense.
You must be one of those constantly-offended, angry
So kind of like your original post then.
Yeah but how many miles of sprawling suburbs do they have? I'd bumped my daily commute up to 150 miles so I can stick with gas. Suck it libs.
Not exactly: they didn't necessarily too any of those things.
Under the US system common tactic of prosecutors is to fling vast amounts of bogus crap with really high sentences at someone accused to the point where it's worth falsely admitting to the a crime because a conviction of one of the others had such a harsh penalty.
Land of the free indeed.
The internet is large and it's usually possible to find someone who'll say just about anything. Even given that I'm calling bullshit. I don't think you can find anyone making that claim.
Unless of course more people start using those places as they get richer. I mean I prefer using websites if possible, but a lot of them seemed determined to make my life as miserable as possible through the awesome power of JavaScript. It's kind of impressive that they can over come my innate desire to not deal with actual people, but there you go.
I've found as I've advanced in my career, got paid a bit more and have less tube that there's value in being able to chuck some money at something and have it done for you hassle free.
Your lack of self awareness is staggering.
It's like I lead you to water and then you turn around and hell at me how there's no water.
So you don't enjoy hanging around in stained sweatpants? Why not? They're comfortable and I assume you don't actually enjoy doing laundry.
And you don't like it because you don't like the look? It's almost like you are not being (to use your bizarrely aggrieved reasoning) honest with your appearance after all time putting effort into it.
At this point you should realise that both men and women put effort into their appearance.
Style and clothing is equally transformative.
As is shaving.
I mean you wouldn't go on in stained sweatpants and a 6 month hobo beard.
If you want really brutal honesty, you'd advocate for that too.
Eh. Women did exist I tinder, plenty of them. Mate of mine is a regular there and seems to have no problems. He's not tall either, maybe 5'7".
I don't really see how fake profiles would work on it. So presumably you swipe right(?) And the fake profile auto swipes right. Then you message and... Nothing? Then what?
If they're hungry, they should just eat cake, right?
Quite how they didn't realize when she apparently experienced no pain during childbirth is a bit of a mystery.
She's 71. The medical establishment especially back then didn't have a reputation for paying the blindest bit of attention to well just about anything to do with women.
Sounds like their militia is pretty well regulated.
Your guy won the election. Why are you so incredibly sore about it?
Red Pill is a term used by the "Manosphere" ("MRAs", Incels, etc) to describe their version of the world, which is a reference to an old, classic, movie from decades ago called The Matrix whereby the hero takes a "red pill" and suddenly finds out that the world is fake.
The ironic thing is that a big part of it is that the identity forced on you by your surroundings is fake and instead identity comes from within. This is the compete antithesis of what red pillers seem to believe.
Re watching the matrix 15 years later knowing the directors are both trans made some of the themes that were always there a lot more obvious.
Nah just the double standards I'd expect from you.
Any non trivial group will have an extremist. You don't like feminists so you essentially paint the extremists as representatives of the whole. But you identify as right wing yet you don't paint the extremists as representative of you.
Just another blowhard with double standards.
What you'll most likely do now is excuse me of something random (because SJW or some such nonsense) and then utterly fall to present any evidence for it.
You have an over developed sense of something. All I see is someone correcting someone else about their net worth. If that's your favorite tweet then you have an incredibly dull sense of humor.
This doesn't seem to be sticking it to anyone particularly hard.
Seriously why on earth do you think this is such a marvelous tweet.
Seriously why the heck is this modded troll? I presume because I'm not blindly agreeing with the parent, but I've still literally no idea what I even should be agreeing to.
Maybe it's because its referencing some meme I'm not familiar with or perhaps there's some context I am missing due to Twitter's aggressively poor user interface.
Seems unremarkable to me. What secifically are you referring to?
RoHS is for consumer electronics. Aerospace is very much exempt and will still use leaded solder. While many components aren't available with lead free balls, even pretty small contact manufacturers will have reballing kit. It's the same in the medical industry which is where I know this from.
She will probably forget about all these ideas fast, should she get elected.
This is why we're screwed. Even when someone from the "other side" comes up with something you really like you cannot bring yourself to say anything positive at all. Enjoy your partisan hellhole.
Lol, I love it when young engineers "discover" decades old designs
They built a hell of a thing. It's incredibly small and incredibly low power.
But this is slashdot: the lace where the incompetent love to shit arrogantly on the competent.
Hell regenerative receivers are past the century mark now.
This is more involved than "simply" a transmitter with ositive feedback.
Fuckwit, go look up democracy and understand what it means, representation is key, if those MEPs aren't representing then it's not democracy.
Right: it's not a democray because you don't like what they've passed? Literally nothing is a democracy then.
How about the portmatards who like sticking "tard" on the end of words?
I have switched to LED bulbs for other purposes, but for the overhead fill lighting I've never been able to find a good LED replacement. The main problem is that they are pretty much all way, way too directional - they shine very brightly down instead of filling an area.
Where on earth have you been looking? LED filament bulbs are very omnidirectional. Or get a corn bulb, they're covered in small directional lights but all pointing in different directions. The corn bulbs tend to be more expensive light industrial units so they have excellent heatsinking and 50,000hr rated MTBF.