I'd be inclined to drop the whole thing as a waste of time. Clearly upon the basis of the lack of death and dismemberment. People in a panic to leave the point of a thermo nuclear detonation, if it really worked a lot of people should have died and been injured trying to escape it, the system simply does not work. Sure warn for hurricane or tsunami, where you have some time but a missile that will strike any second, seriously what the fuck are you meant to do with that. About the only sensible thing bend over and kiss your arse good bye and probably try to light a joint and go out high. Some things sound like a good idea but they are stupid and cause more harm than they prevent, a self evident example.
Regulated,hmm, how many people went to jail, none, bwa hah hah, no regulation there chump, you have just been scammed. So how come I can not steal money for years, invest it for profit and when I am caught, pay apparently some of it back, pay a tiny fine, keep much of what was stolen and keep all the profits generated by that invested stolen money. That's not regulation against crime, that's regulated free loans for the rich and greedy.
When they start handing out custodial sentences I call that regulation, when they pay small fines for mass theft, I call that a permit fee for legalised crime.
Claim regulation, then how many went to jail, that is the only answer people want, who went to jail and how long will they be going there for. How about confiscation of assets associated with crime, you steal people's cars for a bag of weed, for conspired fraud against millions of citizens, where it the confiscation of assets of the executives involved who earned bloody bonuses based upon those crimes. Not even going to go for the bonuses. Wells Fargo just paid a permit fee to steal of customers, just like the next one they will pay and the one after that and on into the future, as long as they pay a kickback to pimp lobbyists and the string of politic prostitutes selling rides to corporations, riding the taxpayers into the ground.
Taking into account the reality of the 'er' reliability of software within the current warranty no warranty arrangement. The longer they run the more unreliable they become, they should auto complete reboot at least once a week. Android gets worse over time if you don't reboot. You also have to clear the main system cache and never forget individual application caches. Should do this on any OS upgrade (they should do it by default) because they can become really unstable. So auto reboot with auto cache clear, system and applications and it likely should occur at least once a week.
So the cost of developing software is distributed across the entire economy for use by the entire economy in order to substantially reduce the cost post development and avoid wildly inflated licence costs based around monopoly control of segments of the digital market place.
This further extends into a properly founded education model. Where as students learn, they can contribute to existing open development software, to learn, demonstrates skill and gain employment opportunities. This is crippled by a lack of standards in operating systems and coding languages, standards that should be able to be applied internationally in order to create a sustainable, secure, stable, low costs international digital infrastructure. Computers should enhance the economy, not be a vampiric drain upon it, a destructive one, like the eg. M$ (not only exorbitant extortionate licence fees but poor business practices, invasion of privacy, attempts to control society via compulsory software install, corruption of standards, a generally practice of lies and deceit, poor software security, forced very expensive upgrades not just software licences which is a fraction of the cost, but retraining, document conversion, installation costs, the hah hah suckers costs, paying huge costs so M$ can get a tiny percentage of those capital losses as profit).
Open source software is very much a locavore model http://www.dictionary.com/brow... ie from M$, eat your own dogfood. The developmental control shifts to any local body able to sustain it ie a coalition of universities, sustaining, maintaining and developing the code with government funding at a fraction of the cost of the current model because even though the local effort is controlled locally (do you really want the US government to have a off switch on your digital economy, or any other country), the development effort is shared internationally, good for peace and stability.
They do not compete with the current business model, in point of fact, they were created by and are totally exploitable by the current business model. What they are is competitors to a new business model. Energy backed crypto and the way is being cleared for it's launch. Venezuela tried to get in early but they can not compete against an international exchange for approved kWh backed cryto currency, sure they'll be able to get on that exchange but they will not be able to effectively create their own. The real ponzi-currency under threat is not even bitcoin, that's a delusion as a result the pure marketing nature of bit coin, backed by nothing but non-redeemable advertising, sure if you could exchange it for advertising dollars, advertising space, maybe but as already expended advertising, it's worthless, an inevitable fad once the advertising collapses. The real threat of energy backed crypto currency is to the US dollar, just kills it, an international monetary exchange based upon the future trade of multiple energy sources. Hydro-electric, solar and wind (are big players, because once capital goes in, future capital beyond maintenance is not required ie fuel costs, so you can more readily buy into those projects and exchange the future energy currency on the international energy exchange market once performance metrics have been establish ie how much energy can they actually generate). What kills the US dollar is those corporations stuck in the fossil fuel market can trade off the energy futures of their fossil fuel as an energy backed crypto currency and hugely mitigate their losses, this versus killing the US dollar as a fossil fuel exchange currency (they can trade off fossil fuel energy against other energy forms and create an energy investment which mitigates the impact of falling fossil fuel prices, that is shifted to unwise investors). Trading fossil fuel futures as a cryto currency backed by an international exchange with access to the actual energy, leaves no space for the US dollar in the market ie the US dollar just buys kWh backed crypto currency at market rates of exchange (just like any other country), the trade for the energy is done via exchanges of crypto currency, one form of energy for another, the sale of currency or the direct purchase of energy or more accurately demanding the supply of energy that you already own, priority of supply, it's your energy, your own it, when you demand it, they can not try to sell it to someone else, that's real capital value and not a marketing delusion.
So it's kind of fun. On the one hand the fossil fuellers love the US dollar that pays for the US military which allows them to steal fossil fuel resources through force of arms. On the other hand, fossil fuel is not looking that good going forward and they need to be able to sell what is still in the ground (and on their balance sheet as capital value) and the US dollar does not help that, in fact it hinders it at the moment. So rather than fossil fuellers and the war industrial complex being partners in crime, the fossil fuellers must contest against the war industrial complex to diversify their international energy capital and the currency that allows that must go against the US dollar.
Of course if they get in their first and fast and patent the business method. They can buy up a shit bucket ton of kWh backed crypto with a soon to collapse US dollar and invest back into the mess post collapse with kWh crypto, for massive returns. So what will they do, hmm:?
They will bring exactly the same thing to the game as the current tech giants did, when the replaced the previous tech giants, as in the future when the new tech giants who replaced the current tech giants are replaced by future tech giants. Tech giants has much more to do with marketing and public relations than it has to do with reality. They way they crap on about corporations of what ever ilk, is just ludicrous. The only reason it is so loud, is because their customer service is so bad. Seriously I wonder if one day they will wake up an realise that good customer service is cheaper than advertising and far more profitable. I know that wont show up in some psychopath douche bags spreadsheet, as they try to pump up the bonus by saving money cutting service and support but it's a lie and advertising to hide shite service and support is far more expensive than providing service and support, which in reality provides free sales staff for life.
I just love that headline, "Windows 10 is now the most popular operating system from 'Microsoft", hmm, interesting, note the exclusion, just from M$, no other companies OS's. So how is Windows 10 really performing for you M$. Obviously on the mobile phone it is totally shite, dead as dead can be. On servers, well, your screwed there to. Appliances, windows 10, yeah not so much. How about tablets and TVs, oh wow, again a complete blow out. So on rapidly losing market share 'desktops', M$ is winning, against 'er' itself, what the fuck does that even mean.
So just use something else https://askubuntu.com/question.... Just because it is popular does not make it good, which is why the disease reference. Just because it is wide spread, does not mean you don't want to get rid of it. In this case M$ has a terrible reputation for invasion of privacy, corrupt practices, a willingness to install software they know you don't want. So a communications app, ask one question, do you think M$ will listen in or not, now or some time in the future based upon past and current practices, you can lie if you wish but you know the real answer, of course they will.
Fake left, reality is left = workers vs right = bosses. This has been distorted by identity politics to drive policy away from public discussion, the hugely unfair lack of balance between workers and bosses, to favour who can hack away the genitals the most. Hey, if you want to do it, I'll rent you the knives, scissors and blow torch to hack away at your genitals in what ever way you wish, I just have no desire to discuss it or deem it worthy of political discussion, when wars, climate change, economic disparity, corruption of politics and corruption of law all exist. I mean to say, which toilets or which pronouns, basically they can go fuck themselves with their new fake genitals and new fake genders. As for somehow the lie of liberal main media when it is all 100% by far right corporations, we are talking fascist far right corporations, they are the left, WTF?!?
The new strategy has opened up, associating age old left wing political ideas, as being far right, to drive the left from the left. It seems the US democrats are pushing a political party for women the fake left and a political party for men the fake right, all at the behest of fascist corporations, to ensure no voice for workers. SJW is not about social justice it is a PR fabricated marketing strategy to silence workers and prevent workers from taking over the Democrats from the corporations that currently own them.
This is why big money is being blown on shite content projects. Not to sell content to new audiences but to divide and polarise them to keep them exploitable. It is not working real well and they are losing money and just making themselves look worse and worse.
You missed the bit about eating their enemies and cladding their ships in dead bodies but if you eat them, how can you clad your ship with them, have you cake and eat it to, hmm, I suppose empty coffins. To be fair, I watched only one episode by accident, I thought is was something else, so how come male crew do not have female names, are the producer discriminating against men or does Nancy boy not sell well. So why can't the male captain be called princess Tiffany, how disgustingly political incorrect of them (you could guess it will be the only episode of STD I watch, keep in mind they named it that on purpose because they thought it was funny that they would give all white male computer nerds who watch it an SJW STD, hah, hah, hah). I did not enjoy that episode and the current versions of Klingon are shite and no fun at all, a big part of why I can't watch it.
Please note, neither of those operating system invade you privacy not demand the right to install what ever software they want when ever they want. M$ is shite and so is their operating system, seriously, it is the stuff of og George Orwell's 1984 and I can not understand why foreign countries allow it, when the US can issue a security letter to M$ and crash you countries computers at a whim. Windows 10 in it's current state is entirely unacceptable and you are a fool for accepting it.
You do understand that a human goal is for people to die of old age and not in their youth at the abattoirs?
Hey if it is good for the poor than it is good for the rich. One in, all in. I have no problem with compulsory vegetarianism via economic extortion but lets make the rich pay a price that impacts them as well.
The idea that the rich can consume and waste resources like insane freaks and generate pollution at thousands of times of the average user has to stop. Want more vegetarianism, then make meat consumption illegal for everyone. If in the most psychopathic fashion imaginable you just want meat to be an exclusive for the rich along with thousand dollar bottles of shite wine to piss against the porcelain, than, eat the rich.
The exams I have found the most interesting are not trick questions but exams where many questions will never be answered because the exams contains about twice the number of question that can be answered in the allotted time and grading is on a sliding scale, get the most right answers and you get 100, the rest being a percentage against that 100, so not too cruel but hell those exams really focus your thoughts, not for the weak.
You could of course imagine the snow flakes protesting wildly about that kind of exam but the exam is meant to teach the pressures of real world competition, to make it part of the curricula. They soon sort the wheat from the chaff, can't handle the pressure of that kind of exam and you can't handle the pressure of similar circumstance in work.
Describing GTA V multiplayer is as simple as this, you start with a pistol and a couple of clips of ammo and your real world wallet, you go up against people with machine guns with exploding ammo who have already emptied their wallet. Sure you can grind, but grinding anything what so ever is entirely dependent upon the charity of other players who already have gear, ohhh yeah fun gaming. Other than that, walk up to a player let him kill your character and repeat, see how many times they will do it before they get tired of you indifference to it, generally about 5 times but for some it come be double digits. Get bored and get police to chase you, as many as possible as the idiot game threatens you with "every player will attack you". The whole game is targeted at sharks cards pay to win and nothing else, the single player is OK and the only thing worth paying for, wait until the game hits 1/3 normal price, the only time worth buying it, as the multiplayer is shite, except for the very juvenile, psychopaths and narcissists for whom cheating is winning (buying shark cards as basically legalised cheating) and fair play is stupid but the single player is fun, I guess because you get to avoid juvenile psychopathic narcissists, except of course the ones you play in the game.
Dude the one and only fucking reason this did not cost thousands of lives is because most fucking people ignored it. Instead of panicking and running away as fast as possible no matter who was in the way because they were about to be killed by a thermonuclear device. If the system had worked as intended many people would have died and many, many more would have been injured. Thankfully the system failed to work as most people ignored it.
Warning people about an incoming thermonuclear device, yeah, kind of fucking pointless, you will either live, die or be horribly injured, trying to drive away at maximum speed, to make use of the warning and driving like that will probably die or get horribly injured. Stopping it from happening is the way to go, warning people it is going to happen mere seconds before it happens, kind of fucking pointless. Honestly better all round not to warn people, unless the whole idea is running warning exercises every time defence spending comes up for vote, oh noes, you're all going to die unless you representative votes for more tanks and less roads, more planes and less bridges, more ships and lower quality tap water for citizens who can not afford bottled water.
Likely more money to be made in understanding the limits of the object avoidance and guidance system, gaming them with a limited impact and suing crap out of the company. Simplest one off the cough, get big people to stand close to street corner to obscure detection around the corner, vehicle will continue to turn as person steps out from detection shadow and turning vehicle reacts to late and a minor collision with server neck and back trauma occurs. So things like blinding the vehicle, cause false impact avoidance collisions. All sorts of stuff. Gamers, game games, all of them time. Find non intended game interactions to make it easier to complete the game or just have fun, they find thousands and thousands of ways to do it. Automated delivery will be gamed like it is going out of style, ways to steal loads, hack the unit, generate accidents and watch out for insiders, they can really run riot with the system. Think of the delivery driver as, van security, on site van repair, customer relations, problem solver and really quite difficult to hack once properly instructed in their role. That auto driver will do what ever it is told to do, no matter how fucking stupid it is to do it, once that instruction get loaded in, done it will do it. At least a real driver should say, nope I think it is a really bad idea to suddenly drive to this warehouse for no reason at all, with a fully loaded van and then go to sleep, I will continue with my assigned deliveries instead and notify management of the weird instruction, instead of obeying it.
More importantly, the issue is a non user replaceable battery, which saves Apple money and generates big profits at replacement. So if more people noticed bad battery and more people replaced them, more people would be pissed off about the price. So in terms of longer term outcomes, the idea of non user replaceable batteries, designed obsolescence, loss of user capital worth in the products, also need to be checked. Should expensive phones need to last say a decade, with reasonable care and repair. How much repair should an end user have access too, replace screen, replace battery, replace sim, replace memory at minimum. Are laws required.
I just read the headline and like what the fuck Google, you allowed 700,000 bad apps onto you platform, 70% more than 2016, you are getting fucking worse and what you take pride in it? Shit google you know how many bad apps you should be 'taking off' your platform, fucking zero, you idiots. Google, you fucking idiots, you want to brag about a headline, it's one that says, Google blocked access to 700,000 bad apps, to the Google play store. I even checked the article, yep, Google are taking pride in allowing 700,000 bad apps onto the platform, fuck over Google's customers and then taking them off.
Google you are meant to be the fuckers in charge, you should fucking check this stiff before fucking selling it, are you getting your customers money back from the bad app and adding something in for allowing that bad app on your store in the first place and you fucking selling it to your customers without properly vetting it. Apple are kind of making you look like total shite now and stupid shite at that.
700,000 fucking bad aps on the google store, well, I ain't going back there any more. Apparently goggles method for testing apps, see how many customers complain, meh, free quality control (it's in beta so shut up).
How do health care 'er' cough, cough, make money. They charge more in premiums than they allow in payouts. Hmm, compulsory health care for company employees, how do you reduce cost, deny payouts. I doubt very strongly that if my healthcare was dependent upon a company who first and only goal were returns for shareholders and they were deciding whether they would pay out or not, that I would be willing to work for that company.
Think about euthanasia laws, how many corporations would put you down, if there return on your future employment was lower than the cost of health services, if they could get away with it (just remember all it takes is a tiny handful of them to bring in those laws, couple of hundred control freaks and no matter what tens of millions say, it happens).
Single payer sounds a whole lot better, than allowing my employer decide whether I live or die, especially when their publicly declared number one priority is returns to shareholders and their desire is ZERO payouts.
More sensibly, it is kind of stupid for any military to allow their personal into the field with a non-military mobile phone with a specific range of set apps and fully encoded data transmissions. Don't let the military deploy with their personal phones, gather them up and replace them with durable military issue units and take out naughty apps and install military apps.
People who get their news from Facebook should not be considered critical thinkers. As such no matter the news presented, they will either 'believe it' or not 'believe it' based upon their pre-existing preferences for what they believe is the truth. Facebook can fuck with the news all they want, it will pretty much change nothing.
It's the opposite affect when government propagandists target slashdot. They are presenting stuff to critical thinkers who will check everything presented to them or ignore it, based upon their own mood. The propagandist think they win, think they dominate with first post nonsense but they win nothing.
Interesting on Facebook the news people don't like is ignored on Slashdot the news people find boring and not worth checking via the many resources of the internet is ignored, in either case presenting news marketing, propaganda is totally pointless. With slashdot is all about presenting ideas and challenging, no one believing anything. On Facebook, it is about existing beliefs that people already have and they believe nothing that challenges them, if fact they will attack it, regardless of facts or truths.
There is a way out of this. It is really rather nasty and has to do with legally targeting the law firm. Fund all cases against the Law Firm. Find all of their cases and help fund the opposition and let everyone know, use that Law Firm and you will likely lose because IBM will fund the opposition for a share of the action. Let's see who toughs it out then!
So what they arrest him for nothing because they didn't arrest him for charges that have now been dropped. So what would they lock him up for, for failing to be arrested for nothing. No charges placed, just an extradition and if they wanted they could have tried extraditing him from Ecuador. So he breached bail as is bound to the penalty for breaching bail, ie the fiscal penalty http://www.infolaw.co.uk/partn.... So they can arrest you for failing to appear but only to make sure you appear but if you don't have to appear, then they can no arrest you for nothing.
There is no penalty, other than arrest and holding you to ensure you appear in court for what ever reason you need to appear in court, in this case extradition too Sweden on trumped up charges at the behest of the US government and Sweden has tens of thousands of rapey migrants to worry about and could no longer give a crap about the US (who supplied those rapey refugees) or Julian Assange.
So it is about timing, no arrest and Julian goes overseas to where ever. Have an arrest to hold him for the US to try to Trump up charges, keeping in mind a US senator recently did say, what right do foreigners have to report US government crimes on US owned social media ie it is illegal for foreigners to report the crimes of American agents in those foreigners countries. So upholding the law in your own country is a crime when you report illegal activities by US agents in your country or in a country you are visiting which by the laws of that country you are required to do (accessory after the fact) or face penalty (only truly arrogant Americans could dream that one up). There is no distinction between privately or publicly reporting that crime, which is exactly what Wikileaks did UPHOLD THE FUCKING LAW, they publicly reported the crimes of many corporations and governments.
You have to take it too the next step, more to do with complexity, how complex can the information be in how small a space. So the question is, how small can a particle be before it ceases to exist, crosses the boundary from existing to not existing, to small to react directly with larger particles but still with an inherent field affect. Think of the universe as being in between, being stretched out between infinitely big and slow (multi verse) to infinitely small and fast (quantum space). So bring your thumb and forefinger tightly together and in that nothing space between your thumb and forefinger you have a quantum universe, a virtual infinite space for complexity (nothing what so ever like what we appreciate of our universe but still a real part of it).
Now your ability to connect to that will be tied to your genetic ability, the ability of your mind to be altered by quantum consciousness. How that quantum consciousness expresses itself into your consciousness likely more an influence or possibly even new ideas or cough, cough, shared ideas (subject to genetic ability and training, you know like Jedi, heh heh).
So a weirdness dimension that allows your individual brain cells, to behave like one brain or in terms of humanity, allows many humans to act as a human society with a shared thought gestalt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... More than just bio-chemical interchange a real quantum conscious choice engine (more influencing, rather than direct control, well at least at a mud monkey evolutionary level). Some more than others, some less and well accidents, disease, toxins and lack of training take their toll. Likely outlasts the carcase too, it's a complexity thing and how long it lasts and where it goes, when it comes back, how it links with still bound consciousness, you know all the really weird stuff. You could imagine for really advanced societies the difference between life and death could be quite slippery ie bound quantum consciousness and unbound quantum consciousness.
Upon that basis copyright is entirely artificial, a fraud, the artificial ability to sell an item more than once beyond it's initial creation, a lie based upon greed. You get paid for the perfomance, that is all beyond that is entirely unnatural. So you allow limited restrictive selling, to promote development of worth while content, for only that reason, promote development of socially worth while content. Otherwise you are using artificial means for no other reason than sheer unadulterated greed, putting content of no social worth upon the same basis as food, water, clothing and housing. Content as a drain upon socially productivity for no other reason but greed, oh yes, apparently also ego and poseur status as if that has public worth.
Why should taxpayers fund content that is not of social worth. Why should taxpayers fund destructive content. Why should taxpayers protect content that attacks social values and worth. Who is fooling who here.
Slashdot Mirror
I'd be inclined to drop the whole thing as a waste of time. Clearly upon the basis of the lack of death and dismemberment. People in a panic to leave the point of a thermo nuclear detonation, if it really worked a lot of people should have died and been injured trying to escape it, the system simply does not work. Sure warn for hurricane or tsunami, where you have some time but a missile that will strike any second, seriously what the fuck are you meant to do with that. About the only sensible thing bend over and kiss your arse good bye and probably try to light a joint and go out high. Some things sound like a good idea but they are stupid and cause more harm than they prevent, a self evident example.
Regulated,hmm, how many people went to jail, none, bwa hah hah, no regulation there chump, you have just been scammed. So how come I can not steal money for years, invest it for profit and when I am caught, pay apparently some of it back, pay a tiny fine, keep much of what was stolen and keep all the profits generated by that invested stolen money. That's not regulation against crime, that's regulated free loans for the rich and greedy.
When they start handing out custodial sentences I call that regulation, when they pay small fines for mass theft, I call that a permit fee for legalised crime.
Claim regulation, then how many went to jail, that is the only answer people want, who went to jail and how long will they be going there for. How about confiscation of assets associated with crime, you steal people's cars for a bag of weed, for conspired fraud against millions of citizens, where it the confiscation of assets of the executives involved who earned bloody bonuses based upon those crimes. Not even going to go for the bonuses. Wells Fargo just paid a permit fee to steal of customers, just like the next one they will pay and the one after that and on into the future, as long as they pay a kickback to pimp lobbyists and the string of politic prostitutes selling rides to corporations, riding the taxpayers into the ground.
HOW MANY WENT TO JAIL?!?
Taking into account the reality of the 'er' reliability of software within the current warranty no warranty arrangement. The longer they run the more unreliable they become, they should auto complete reboot at least once a week. Android gets worse over time if you don't reboot. You also have to clear the main system cache and never forget individual application caches. Should do this on any OS upgrade (they should do it by default) because they can become really unstable. So auto reboot with auto cache clear, system and applications and it likely should occur at least once a week.
So the cost of developing software is distributed across the entire economy for use by the entire economy in order to substantially reduce the cost post development and avoid wildly inflated licence costs based around monopoly control of segments of the digital market place.
This further extends into a properly founded education model. Where as students learn, they can contribute to existing open development software, to learn, demonstrates skill and gain employment opportunities. This is crippled by a lack of standards in operating systems and coding languages, standards that should be able to be applied internationally in order to create a sustainable, secure, stable, low costs international digital infrastructure. Computers should enhance the economy, not be a vampiric drain upon it, a destructive one, like the eg. M$ (not only exorbitant extortionate licence fees but poor business practices, invasion of privacy, attempts to control society via compulsory software install, corruption of standards, a generally practice of lies and deceit, poor software security, forced very expensive upgrades not just software licences which is a fraction of the cost, but retraining, document conversion, installation costs, the hah hah suckers costs, paying huge costs so M$ can get a tiny percentage of those capital losses as profit).
Open source software is very much a locavore model http://www.dictionary.com/brow... ie from M$, eat your own dogfood. The developmental control shifts to any local body able to sustain it ie a coalition of universities, sustaining, maintaining and developing the code with government funding at a fraction of the cost of the current model because even though the local effort is controlled locally (do you really want the US government to have a off switch on your digital economy, or any other country), the development effort is shared internationally, good for peace and stability.
They do not compete with the current business model, in point of fact, they were created by and are totally exploitable by the current business model. What they are is competitors to a new business model. Energy backed crypto and the way is being cleared for it's launch. Venezuela tried to get in early but they can not compete against an international exchange for approved kWh backed cryto currency, sure they'll be able to get on that exchange but they will not be able to effectively create their own. The real ponzi-currency under threat is not even bitcoin, that's a delusion as a result the pure marketing nature of bit coin, backed by nothing but non-redeemable advertising, sure if you could exchange it for advertising dollars, advertising space, maybe but as already expended advertising, it's worthless, an inevitable fad once the advertising collapses. The real threat of energy backed crypto currency is to the US dollar, just kills it, an international monetary exchange based upon the future trade of multiple energy sources. Hydro-electric, solar and wind (are big players, because once capital goes in, future capital beyond maintenance is not required ie fuel costs, so you can more readily buy into those projects and exchange the future energy currency on the international energy exchange market once performance metrics have been establish ie how much energy can they actually generate). What kills the US dollar is those corporations stuck in the fossil fuel market can trade off the energy futures of their fossil fuel as an energy backed crypto currency and hugely mitigate their losses, this versus killing the US dollar as a fossil fuel exchange currency (they can trade off fossil fuel energy against other energy forms and create an energy investment which mitigates the impact of falling fossil fuel prices, that is shifted to unwise investors). Trading fossil fuel futures as a cryto currency backed by an international exchange with access to the actual energy, leaves no space for the US dollar in the market ie the US dollar just buys kWh backed crypto currency at market rates of exchange (just like any other country), the trade for the energy is done via exchanges of crypto currency, one form of energy for another, the sale of currency or the direct purchase of energy or more accurately demanding the supply of energy that you already own, priority of supply, it's your energy, your own it, when you demand it, they can not try to sell it to someone else, that's real capital value and not a marketing delusion.
So it's kind of fun. On the one hand the fossil fuellers love the US dollar that pays for the US military which allows them to steal fossil fuel resources through force of arms. On the other hand, fossil fuel is not looking that good going forward and they need to be able to sell what is still in the ground (and on their balance sheet as capital value) and the US dollar does not help that, in fact it hinders it at the moment. So rather than fossil fuellers and the war industrial complex being partners in crime, the fossil fuellers must contest against the war industrial complex to diversify their international energy capital and the currency that allows that must go against the US dollar.
Of course if they get in their first and fast and patent the business method. They can buy up a shit bucket ton of kWh backed crypto with a soon to collapse US dollar and invest back into the mess post collapse with kWh crypto, for massive returns. So what will they do, hmm :?
They will bring exactly the same thing to the game as the current tech giants did, when the replaced the previous tech giants, as in the future when the new tech giants who replaced the current tech giants are replaced by future tech giants. Tech giants has much more to do with marketing and public relations than it has to do with reality. They way they crap on about corporations of what ever ilk, is just ludicrous. The only reason it is so loud, is because their customer service is so bad. Seriously I wonder if one day they will wake up an realise that good customer service is cheaper than advertising and far more profitable. I know that wont show up in some psychopath douche bags spreadsheet, as they try to pump up the bonus by saving money cutting service and support but it's a lie and advertising to hide shite service and support is far more expensive than providing service and support, which in reality provides free sales staff for life.
I just love that headline, "Windows 10 is now the most popular operating system from 'Microsoft", hmm, interesting, note the exclusion, just from M$, no other companies OS's. So how is Windows 10 really performing for you M$. Obviously on the mobile phone it is totally shite, dead as dead can be. On servers, well, your screwed there to. Appliances, windows 10, yeah not so much. How about tablets and TVs, oh wow, again a complete blow out. So on rapidly losing market share 'desktops', M$ is winning, against 'er' itself, what the fuck does that even mean.
So just use something else https://askubuntu.com/question.... Just because it is popular does not make it good, which is why the disease reference. Just because it is wide spread, does not mean you don't want to get rid of it. In this case M$ has a terrible reputation for invasion of privacy, corrupt practices, a willingness to install software they know you don't want. So a communications app, ask one question, do you think M$ will listen in or not, now or some time in the future based upon past and current practices, you can lie if you wish but you know the real answer, of course they will.
Fake left, reality is left = workers vs right = bosses. This has been distorted by identity politics to drive policy away from public discussion, the hugely unfair lack of balance between workers and bosses, to favour who can hack away the genitals the most. Hey, if you want to do it, I'll rent you the knives, scissors and blow torch to hack away at your genitals in what ever way you wish, I just have no desire to discuss it or deem it worthy of political discussion, when wars, climate change, economic disparity, corruption of politics and corruption of law all exist. I mean to say, which toilets or which pronouns, basically they can go fuck themselves with their new fake genitals and new fake genders. As for somehow the lie of liberal main media when it is all 100% by far right corporations, we are talking fascist far right corporations, they are the left, WTF?!?
The new strategy has opened up, associating age old left wing political ideas, as being far right, to drive the left from the left. It seems the US democrats are pushing a political party for women the fake left and a political party for men the fake right, all at the behest of fascist corporations, to ensure no voice for workers. SJW is not about social justice it is a PR fabricated marketing strategy to silence workers and prevent workers from taking over the Democrats from the corporations that currently own them.
This is why big money is being blown on shite content projects. Not to sell content to new audiences but to divide and polarise them to keep them exploitable. It is not working real well and they are losing money and just making themselves look worse and worse.
You missed the bit about eating their enemies and cladding their ships in dead bodies but if you eat them, how can you clad your ship with them, have you cake and eat it to, hmm, I suppose empty coffins. To be fair, I watched only one episode by accident, I thought is was something else, so how come male crew do not have female names, are the producer discriminating against men or does Nancy boy not sell well. So why can't the male captain be called princess Tiffany, how disgustingly political incorrect of them (you could guess it will be the only episode of STD I watch, keep in mind they named it that on purpose because they thought it was funny that they would give all white male computer nerds who watch it an SJW STD, hah, hah, hah). I did not enjoy that episode and the current versions of Klingon are shite and no fun at all, a big part of why I can't watch it.
Please note, neither of those operating system invade you privacy not demand the right to install what ever software they want when ever they want. M$ is shite and so is their operating system, seriously, it is the stuff of og George Orwell's 1984 and I can not understand why foreign countries allow it, when the US can issue a security letter to M$ and crash you countries computers at a whim. Windows 10 in it's current state is entirely unacceptable and you are a fool for accepting it.
You do understand that a human goal is for people to die of old age and not in their youth at the abattoirs?
Hey if it is good for the poor than it is good for the rich. One in, all in. I have no problem with compulsory vegetarianism via economic extortion but lets make the rich pay a price that impacts them as well.
The idea that the rich can consume and waste resources like insane freaks and generate pollution at thousands of times of the average user has to stop. Want more vegetarianism, then make meat consumption illegal for everyone. If in the most psychopathic fashion imaginable you just want meat to be an exclusive for the rich along with thousand dollar bottles of shite wine to piss against the porcelain, than, eat the rich.
The exams I have found the most interesting are not trick questions but exams where many questions will never be answered because the exams contains about twice the number of question that can be answered in the allotted time and grading is on a sliding scale, get the most right answers and you get 100, the rest being a percentage against that 100, so not too cruel but hell those exams really focus your thoughts, not for the weak.
You could of course imagine the snow flakes protesting wildly about that kind of exam but the exam is meant to teach the pressures of real world competition, to make it part of the curricula. They soon sort the wheat from the chaff, can't handle the pressure of that kind of exam and you can't handle the pressure of similar circumstance in work.
Describing GTA V multiplayer is as simple as this, you start with a pistol and a couple of clips of ammo and your real world wallet, you go up against people with machine guns with exploding ammo who have already emptied their wallet. Sure you can grind, but grinding anything what so ever is entirely dependent upon the charity of other players who already have gear, ohhh yeah fun gaming. Other than that, walk up to a player let him kill your character and repeat, see how many times they will do it before they get tired of you indifference to it, generally about 5 times but for some it come be double digits. Get bored and get police to chase you, as many as possible as the idiot game threatens you with "every player will attack you". The whole game is targeted at sharks cards pay to win and nothing else, the single player is OK and the only thing worth paying for, wait until the game hits 1/3 normal price, the only time worth buying it, as the multiplayer is shite, except for the very juvenile, psychopaths and narcissists for whom cheating is winning (buying shark cards as basically legalised cheating) and fair play is stupid but the single player is fun, I guess because you get to avoid juvenile psychopathic narcissists, except of course the ones you play in the game.
Dude the one and only fucking reason this did not cost thousands of lives is because most fucking people ignored it. Instead of panicking and running away as fast as possible no matter who was in the way because they were about to be killed by a thermonuclear device. If the system had worked as intended many people would have died and many, many more would have been injured. Thankfully the system failed to work as most people ignored it.
Warning people about an incoming thermonuclear device, yeah, kind of fucking pointless, you will either live, die or be horribly injured, trying to drive away at maximum speed, to make use of the warning and driving like that will probably die or get horribly injured. Stopping it from happening is the way to go, warning people it is going to happen mere seconds before it happens, kind of fucking pointless. Honestly better all round not to warn people, unless the whole idea is running warning exercises every time defence spending comes up for vote, oh noes, you're all going to die unless you representative votes for more tanks and less roads, more planes and less bridges, more ships and lower quality tap water for citizens who can not afford bottled water.
Likely more money to be made in understanding the limits of the object avoidance and guidance system, gaming them with a limited impact and suing crap out of the company. Simplest one off the cough, get big people to stand close to street corner to obscure detection around the corner, vehicle will continue to turn as person steps out from detection shadow and turning vehicle reacts to late and a minor collision with server neck and back trauma occurs. So things like blinding the vehicle, cause false impact avoidance collisions. All sorts of stuff. Gamers, game games, all of them time. Find non intended game interactions to make it easier to complete the game or just have fun, they find thousands and thousands of ways to do it. Automated delivery will be gamed like it is going out of style, ways to steal loads, hack the unit, generate accidents and watch out for insiders, they can really run riot with the system. Think of the delivery driver as, van security, on site van repair, customer relations, problem solver and really quite difficult to hack once properly instructed in their role. That auto driver will do what ever it is told to do, no matter how fucking stupid it is to do it, once that instruction get loaded in, done it will do it. At least a real driver should say, nope I think it is a really bad idea to suddenly drive to this warehouse for no reason at all, with a fully loaded van and then go to sleep, I will continue with my assigned deliveries instead and notify management of the weird instruction, instead of obeying it.
More importantly, the issue is a non user replaceable battery, which saves Apple money and generates big profits at replacement. So if more people noticed bad battery and more people replaced them, more people would be pissed off about the price. So in terms of longer term outcomes, the idea of non user replaceable batteries, designed obsolescence, loss of user capital worth in the products, also need to be checked. Should expensive phones need to last say a decade, with reasonable care and repair. How much repair should an end user have access too, replace screen, replace battery, replace sim, replace memory at minimum. Are laws required.
I just read the headline and like what the fuck Google, you allowed 700,000 bad apps onto you platform, 70% more than 2016, you are getting fucking worse and what you take pride in it? Shit google you know how many bad apps you should be 'taking off' your platform, fucking zero, you idiots. Google, you fucking idiots, you want to brag about a headline, it's one that says, Google blocked access to 700,000 bad apps, to the Google play store. I even checked the article, yep, Google are taking pride in allowing 700,000 bad apps onto the platform, fuck over Google's customers and then taking them off.
Google you are meant to be the fuckers in charge, you should fucking check this stiff before fucking selling it, are you getting your customers money back from the bad app and adding something in for allowing that bad app on your store in the first place and you fucking selling it to your customers without properly vetting it. Apple are kind of making you look like total shite now and stupid shite at that.
700,000 fucking bad aps on the google store, well, I ain't going back there any more. Apparently goggles method for testing apps, see how many customers complain, meh, free quality control (it's in beta so shut up).
How do health care 'er' cough, cough, make money. They charge more in premiums than they allow in payouts. Hmm, compulsory health care for company employees, how do you reduce cost, deny payouts. I doubt very strongly that if my healthcare was dependent upon a company who first and only goal were returns for shareholders and they were deciding whether they would pay out or not, that I would be willing to work for that company.
Think about euthanasia laws, how many corporations would put you down, if there return on your future employment was lower than the cost of health services, if they could get away with it (just remember all it takes is a tiny handful of them to bring in those laws, couple of hundred control freaks and no matter what tens of millions say, it happens).
Single payer sounds a whole lot better, than allowing my employer decide whether I live or die, especially when their publicly declared number one priority is returns to shareholders and their desire is ZERO payouts.
More sensibly, it is kind of stupid for any military to allow their personal into the field with a non-military mobile phone with a specific range of set apps and fully encoded data transmissions. Don't let the military deploy with their personal phones, gather them up and replace them with durable military issue units and take out naughty apps and install military apps.
People who get their news from Facebook should not be considered critical thinkers. As such no matter the news presented, they will either 'believe it' or not 'believe it' based upon their pre-existing preferences for what they believe is the truth. Facebook can fuck with the news all they want, it will pretty much change nothing.
It's the opposite affect when government propagandists target slashdot. They are presenting stuff to critical thinkers who will check everything presented to them or ignore it, based upon their own mood. The propagandist think they win, think they dominate with first post nonsense but they win nothing.
Interesting on Facebook the news people don't like is ignored on Slashdot the news people find boring and not worth checking via the many resources of the internet is ignored, in either case presenting news marketing, propaganda is totally pointless. With slashdot is all about presenting ideas and challenging, no one believing anything. On Facebook, it is about existing beliefs that people already have and they believe nothing that challenges them, if fact they will attack it, regardless of facts or truths.
There is a way out of this. It is really rather nasty and has to do with legally targeting the law firm. Fund all cases against the Law Firm. Find all of their cases and help fund the opposition and let everyone know, use that Law Firm and you will likely lose because IBM will fund the opposition for a share of the action. Let's see who toughs it out then!
So what they arrest him for nothing because they didn't arrest him for charges that have now been dropped. So what would they lock him up for, for failing to be arrested for nothing. No charges placed, just an extradition and if they wanted they could have tried extraditing him from Ecuador. So he breached bail as is bound to the penalty for breaching bail, ie the fiscal penalty http://www.infolaw.co.uk/partn.... So they can arrest you for failing to appear but only to make sure you appear but if you don't have to appear, then they can no arrest you for nothing.
There is no penalty, other than arrest and holding you to ensure you appear in court for what ever reason you need to appear in court, in this case extradition too Sweden on trumped up charges at the behest of the US government and Sweden has tens of thousands of rapey migrants to worry about and could no longer give a crap about the US (who supplied those rapey refugees) or Julian Assange.
So it is about timing, no arrest and Julian goes overseas to where ever. Have an arrest to hold him for the US to try to Trump up charges, keeping in mind a US senator recently did say, what right do foreigners have to report US government crimes on US owned social media ie it is illegal for foreigners to report the crimes of American agents in those foreigners countries. So upholding the law in your own country is a crime when you report illegal activities by US agents in your country or in a country you are visiting which by the laws of that country you are required to do (accessory after the fact) or face penalty (only truly arrogant Americans could dream that one up). There is no distinction between privately or publicly reporting that crime, which is exactly what Wikileaks did UPHOLD THE FUCKING LAW, they publicly reported the crimes of many corporations and governments.
You have to take it too the next step, more to do with complexity, how complex can the information be in how small a space. So the question is, how small can a particle be before it ceases to exist, crosses the boundary from existing to not existing, to small to react directly with larger particles but still with an inherent field affect. Think of the universe as being in between, being stretched out between infinitely big and slow (multi verse) to infinitely small and fast (quantum space). So bring your thumb and forefinger tightly together and in that nothing space between your thumb and forefinger you have a quantum universe, a virtual infinite space for complexity (nothing what so ever like what we appreciate of our universe but still a real part of it).
Now your ability to connect to that will be tied to your genetic ability, the ability of your mind to be altered by quantum consciousness. How that quantum consciousness expresses itself into your consciousness likely more an influence or possibly even new ideas or cough, cough, shared ideas (subject to genetic ability and training, you know like Jedi, heh heh).
So a weirdness dimension that allows your individual brain cells, to behave like one brain or in terms of humanity, allows many humans to act as a human society with a shared thought gestalt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.... More than just bio-chemical interchange a real quantum conscious choice engine (more influencing, rather than direct control, well at least at a mud monkey evolutionary level). Some more than others, some less and well accidents, disease, toxins and lack of training take their toll. Likely outlasts the carcase too, it's a complexity thing and how long it lasts and where it goes, when it comes back, how it links with still bound consciousness, you know all the really weird stuff. You could imagine for really advanced societies the difference between life and death could be quite slippery ie bound quantum consciousness and unbound quantum consciousness.
Upon that basis copyright is entirely artificial, a fraud, the artificial ability to sell an item more than once beyond it's initial creation, a lie based upon greed. You get paid for the perfomance, that is all beyond that is entirely unnatural. So you allow limited restrictive selling, to promote development of worth while content, for only that reason, promote development of socially worth while content. Otherwise you are using artificial means for no other reason than sheer unadulterated greed, putting content of no social worth upon the same basis as food, water, clothing and housing. Content as a drain upon socially productivity for no other reason but greed, oh yes, apparently also ego and poseur status as if that has public worth.
Why should taxpayers fund content that is not of social worth. Why should taxpayers fund destructive content. Why should taxpayers protect content that attacks social values and worth. Who is fooling who here.