Re:Difficult question?
on
Linux Radio
·
· Score: 1
Potentially, a kernel developer could debug code while away from the computer. Perhaps this hypothetical kernel developer is out for a jog and would like to debug code at that time. Perhaps this developer needs to mow the lawn, or is on a long trip. It may also come in handy for someone learning how the code is structured and is in the same situation. It's a giant stretch, and certainly not the purpose of this, but could potentially serve some use.
BAC.40% -.50%:
You are probably in a coma. The nerve centers controlling your heartbeat and respiration are slowing down, and it's a miracle if you survive.
The problem is when the network is down and they want you to answer their emails.
That doesn't sound like a problem at all. If the network is down, you won't get their e-mails. When you get those e-mails, the network is up, and you can respond that it is now working. Sounds perfect to me!
I'm just looking for other options here, but (according to google) 155 kph = 96.3125348 mph. That sounds low for a governor to me, but not outside of reason.
Bitches about killing in war as his party wants to dole out abortions to everyone.
How is killing something that isn't alive as bad as killing something that is alive?
First off, it's quite obvious that you can't kill something that's not alive. Second, if you're arguing that a fetus is not alive, you're ignoring science. Whether you believe it is sentient is a judgment call (I believe that since it has unique human DNA, it should not be killed), but it's obviously alive.
Back on topic: I think these e-mails should have never been missing in the first place. I mean, a competent IT person could set it up to archive e-mails as they come in, and copy them to a network server, a tape drive, or DVDs. Realistically, that's a days project with maybe an hour or two upkeep a week. I hope they set something like that up for the next president, and so on. Whether it was intentional or not, there should really be a big push for realistic data retention, and being proactive instead of reactive.
I shamelessly stole this idea from a comment a friend's blog, but I think an interesting way to force a discussion on this issue is for a president to pardon everyone who has committed a drug-related crime. The sheer amount of media coverage would bring the topic to the forefront of discussion. I'm not one to partake in the use of drugs, but I think a discussion (without FUD!) would be a healthy way to see where the law should change. I think it would be interesting to watch.
Guess I must be the only one here using Chrome. No other comments yet.
But seriously, the speed difference is noticeable. When I'm on my mac, I miss using it. Plugins are hard to come by, but other than that, it's great. Quick as Firefox used to be.
PSS There is mom and pop dry cleaner in my neighborhood that hangs bad checks on the wall. Those are ripe for the theft!
I think if I were in the market for writing fraudulent checks, I'd try to avoid the ones that don't have any money in the account. You know, to try to get some reward for the risk.
That reminds me of a late friend of mine who often said that if he were to be sentenced to prison, he'd get a tattoo on his lower back that said "Exit Only." Realistically, it would probably be seen as an invitation, but the humor is there. RIP Gordo.
Before your brain had developed sufficiently, you didn't exist. At best, there was the possibility of you developing, but there's little difference between preventing that possibility from being realized by abstaining from sex or preventing it from being realized by letting the embryo develop.
The same could be said for kids up to the age of about 2. If they can't walk or talk, then they're basically worthless to society, so why not get rid of them then? Perhaps we should be able to get rid of people before they get a job and contribute to the economy. Although burger flippers don't contribute a lot, so let's just come up with a nice round number, like 18. Until you're an adult, society should be able to dispose of you.
The point I'm trying to make is that the cut-off of birth is really just an arbitrary point in the development of a person. Other cut-offs are equally arbitrary. I think that the only logical change is from when the DNA changes from being an exact copy of the parents' DNA into a combination of the two, and has a unique DNA signature. That is to say the moment of conception.
My question for you is, where would you draw the line? When is the point that the brain has developed sufficiently? For those with developmental disorders, would that point come further along in the pregnancy?
Slashdot Mirror
Potentially, a kernel developer could debug code while away from the computer. Perhaps this hypothetical kernel developer is out for a jog and would like to debug code at that time. Perhaps this developer needs to mow the lawn, or is on a long trip. It may also come in handy for someone learning how the code is structured and is in the same situation. It's a giant stretch, and certainly not the purpose of this, but could potentially serve some use.
Don't forget about the male models.
Judging from the users I've dealt with, if it says XXX, they will hit yes. No matter what.
That's why I'm glad I have a Kin!
Don't forget Zombie Ronald Reagan
Then again, maybe setting up a network is one of the first things they need.
The original use of bank, in terms of elevation, came into use around 1150-2000 AD.
I can probably narrow that slightly further, as I remember that being used in the 1980s. Perhaps you meant 1200 AD?
In other news, car thieves prefer exotic sports cars.
So, you drive like you're in a coma? Strange...
The problem is when the network is down and they want you to answer their emails.
That doesn't sound like a problem at all. If the network is down, you won't get their e-mails. When you get those e-mails, the network is up, and you can respond that it is now working. Sounds perfect to me!
That makes me wonder. What exactly is the region code for orbit? Would that fall under region 8?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD_region_code
I'm just looking for other options here, but (according to google) 155 kph = 96.3125348 mph. That sounds low for a governor to me, but not outside of reason.
Plug it in at your mom's house, rsync your local fileserver with that one every night at 4am.
But what happens if the fire spreads upstairs? With heat rising, that's likely to happen.
Is there a correlation with fewer boys raised by single mothers in these low crime states compared to higher crime states?
I'm curious about not only single mothers, but double, triple, and quadruple mothers, too. Seems like we're looking in the right area...
Bitches about killing in war as his party wants to dole out abortions to everyone.
How is killing something that isn't alive as bad as killing something that is alive?
First off, it's quite obvious that you can't kill something that's not alive. Second, if you're arguing that a fetus is not alive, you're ignoring science. Whether you believe it is sentient is a judgment call (I believe that since it has unique human DNA, it should not be killed), but it's obviously alive.
Back on topic: I think these e-mails should have never been missing in the first place. I mean, a competent IT person could set it up to archive e-mails as they come in, and copy them to a network server, a tape drive, or DVDs. Realistically, that's a days project with maybe an hour or two upkeep a week. I hope they set something like that up for the next president, and so on. Whether it was intentional or not, there should really be a big push for realistic data retention, and being proactive instead of reactive.
I shamelessly stole this idea from a comment a friend's blog, but I think an interesting way to force a discussion on this issue is for a president to pardon everyone who has committed a drug-related crime. The sheer amount of media coverage would bring the topic to the forefront of discussion. I'm not one to partake in the use of drugs, but I think a discussion (without FUD!) would be a healthy way to see where the law should change. I think it would be interesting to watch.
Guess I must be the only one here using Chrome. No other comments yet.
But seriously, the speed difference is noticeable. When I'm on my mac, I miss using it. Plugins are hard to come by, but other than that, it's great. Quick as Firefox used to be.
PSS There is mom and pop dry cleaner in my neighborhood that hangs bad checks on the wall. Those are ripe for the theft!
I think if I were in the market for writing fraudulent checks, I'd try to avoid the ones that don't have any money in the account. You know, to try to get some reward for the risk.
Carrying that to its logical conclusion, you wouldn't be the recipient of one of those fancy checks anyway, right?
So, you're saying that we're looking at a Gimped photo?
I'm sorry, I believe you're thinking of Austria.
I think you parsed the sentence differently than intended.
Your way:
Now, if I could pay just $5 dollars and ((get MP3s to play) on my ipod)...
Mex's way:
Now, if I could (pay just $5 dollars and get MP3s) to play on my ipod...
That reminds me of a late friend of mine who often said that if he were to be sentenced to prison, he'd get a tattoo on his lower back that said "Exit Only." Realistically, it would probably be seen as an invitation, but the humor is there. RIP Gordo.
Actually, "literally" can also have the nearly the opposite of its expected meaning: see Definition 2
Isn't that ironic?
Before your brain had developed sufficiently, you didn't exist. At best, there was the possibility of you developing, but there's little difference between preventing that possibility from being realized by abstaining from sex or preventing it from being realized by letting the embryo develop.
The same could be said for kids up to the age of about 2. If they can't walk or talk, then they're basically worthless to society, so why not get rid of them then? Perhaps we should be able to get rid of people before they get a job and contribute to the economy. Although burger flippers don't contribute a lot, so let's just come up with a nice round number, like 18. Until you're an adult, society should be able to dispose of you.
The point I'm trying to make is that the cut-off of birth is really just an arbitrary point in the development of a person. Other cut-offs are equally arbitrary. I think that the only logical change is from when the DNA changes from being an exact copy of the parents' DNA into a combination of the two, and has a unique DNA signature. That is to say the moment of conception.
My question for you is, where would you draw the line? When is the point that the brain has developed sufficiently? For those with developmental disorders, would that point come further along in the pregnancy?