This is just another company trying out the old "This isn't realy a toy. It's a high tech, streamlined, multifaceted entertainment device." Yeah, it's a video game console. Yeah, it's designed to play video games. Maybe it has other stuff with it, maybe not, but the bottom line is it would be pure idiocy for Sony to design a gaming console not engineered to perform well with games.
Movies are cheaper, funnier (sometimes), I don't have to leave my house, there are no messed up lines (Except for Jay in Clerks), and there are better sets, because they don't have to move them back and forth in 12.6 seconds. Plays are dead, until they come back as an elitist trend.
On the one hand, I agree that graphics don't really matter for most games, but on the other hand, I can't help but hate the PS1 when I get slowdown playing Rayman...
Chicks always seem to pick on each other.
If only they could put aside their petty differences and all join forces (instead of gathering in groups of 4-7), they would have us eating out of their hands. Man, they could unionize and everything...
Look, if someone says they're going to create a full-fledged, amazingly detailed console with an online distribution system, I'm gonna go ahead and believe them, just like I believe the guys who post on forums about their "great MMO where you can do everything ever OMG!!!11"
You guys are so doubting...
Re:How about a revolution in licensing?
on
PS3 vs. Xbox 360
·
· Score: 1
That's a really good idea! All this time companies have been trying to make money off their products, when they should have been giving them away for free!
Yeah, but wouldn't that restrict your online play? I mean, if I jump online for a quick bout of ->INSERT GAME-, and my 3 friends who have the game are offline, where does that leave me?
And what about large team VS team matches?
In other news: Pacman still boring! In all seriousness, why didn't they give him some some cool weapons, like frickin' laser beams or something? Everything's better with frickin' laser beams...
Okay, here's how I break it down:
Women = 51% men = 49%
Men = 10% gay.
Women = 1% gay.
Are you with me? We're winning, guys! Now, if just a few more of you guys take one for the team and become gay, come out of the closet, or die in an unnecessary war or two, we can get a big enough population difference for every straight guy to have at least two chicks each, as long as no one's hogging.
But wait, what about the lesbians? Won't the women turn to each other for emotional and sexual comfort??
It's a man's world, right? We make the rules, right? So we invoke a new national law: No unsupervised lesbianism.
This is one of those things where if we all come together, as a gender, we can all succeed. The gay guys get more potential partners, the straight guys get more chicks! Everybody wins!
Really? That's news to me. See, I always thought Christianity was about love and peace. I always figured you wouldn't have to try to show your superiority to your enemy to fell good about yourself, or make him feel bad. I kind of always figured you would try to show him the light, not let him rot in Hell, if you believed in such a place.
I sort of feel that Christianity was Jesus's way of trying to help people get along. I never really thought it was about Heaven and Hell, if good people go to Hell, and bad people who 'repent' get to live forever.
This whole "I'm holier than thou. I'm going to Heaven. You're going to hell. Hah!" thing really bothers me, I must say.
Slashdot Mirror
What's this "upside to Bittorrent" thing? Isn't the upside to Bittorrent the ability to download lots of illegal software/video quickly?
Er, I mean... go Big Corporations! Woo!
and bagged.
...And then you stab whoever used the word "chillax" in the eye. Hard.
That pretty much sums up my mornings.
This is just another company trying out the old "This isn't realy a toy. It's a high tech, streamlined, multifaceted entertainment device."
Yeah, it's a video game console. Yeah, it's designed to play video games. Maybe it has other stuff with it, maybe not, but the bottom line is it would be pure idiocy for Sony to design a gaming console not engineered to perform well with games.
Movies are cheaper, funnier (sometimes), I don't have to leave my house, there are no messed up lines (Except for Jay in Clerks), and there are better sets, because they don't have to move them back and forth in 12.6 seconds. Plays are dead, until they come back as an elitist trend.
This is either Insightful or Flamebait...
I can't decide.
On the one hand, I agree that graphics don't really matter for most games, but on the other hand, I can't help but hate the PS1 when I get slowdown playing Rayman...
What, with like, a "sky" and stuff?
If we only made fun of people who wanted to have sex with us we would all have a lot of pent up aggression.
Chicks always seem to pick on each other. If only they could put aside their petty differences and all join forces (instead of gathering in groups of 4-7), they would have us eating out of their hands. Man, they could unionize and everything...
Look, if someone says they're going to create a full-fledged, amazingly detailed console with an online distribution system, I'm gonna go ahead and believe them, just like I believe the guys who post on forums about their "great MMO where you can do everything ever OMG!!!11" You guys are so doubting...
You shut your fucking mouth. You son of a bitch. You shut your mouth and you never open it again.
Did anyone give grandpa his medication?
Hey man, don't dis the Zapper!
That's a really good idea! All this time companies have been trying to make money off their products, when they should have been giving them away for free!
The computer world is changing? OMFG!!
Yeah, but wouldn't that restrict your online play? I mean, if I jump online for a quick bout of ->INSERT GAME-, and my 3 friends who have the game are offline, where does that leave me? And what about large team VS team matches?
It would have been better without the crappy Blackthorne/Out of this World controls.
In other news: Pacman still boring!
In all seriousness, why didn't they give him some some cool weapons, like frickin' laser beams or something?
Everything's better with frickin' laser beams...
Well there goes my last chance.
Okay, here's how I break it down: Women = 51% men = 49% Men = 10% gay. Women = 1% gay. Are you with me? We're winning, guys! Now, if just a few more of you guys take one for the team and become gay, come out of the closet, or die in an unnecessary war or two, we can get a big enough population difference for every straight guy to have at least two chicks each, as long as no one's hogging. But wait, what about the lesbians? Won't the women turn to each other for emotional and sexual comfort?? It's a man's world, right? We make the rules, right? So we invoke a new national law: No unsupervised lesbianism. This is one of those things where if we all come together, as a gender, we can all succeed. The gay guys get more potential partners, the straight guys get more chicks! Everybody wins!
Yeah, I hate that about my iPod. I just wish it were a bit smaller, you know?
It's time for somebody to take a trip to Boneville.
http://www.boneville.com/
Really? That's news to me. See, I always thought Christianity was about love and peace. I always figured you wouldn't have to try to show your superiority to your enemy to fell good about yourself, or make him feel bad. I kind of always figured you would try to show him the light, not let him rot in Hell, if you believed in such a place. I sort of feel that Christianity was Jesus's way of trying to help people get along. I never really thought it was about Heaven and Hell, if good people go to Hell, and bad people who 'repent' get to live forever. This whole "I'm holier than thou. I'm going to Heaven. You're going to hell. Hah!" thing really bothers me, I must say.