Slashdot Mirror


The World of Blogebrities

Jeremy writes "The folks at Blogebrity have a unique take on the blog scene. Drawing a parallel to the glitz and glam of Hollywood stars, they've divided some of the better-known bloggers into A-, B-, and C-lists. Slashdot favorite Wil Wheaton is featured on the A-list, while some lesser-known bloggers such as Bruce Sterling made it to the B-list, and most of the non-geeks like comedian Margaret Cho can't seem to break out of the C-list. What does the slashdot crowd think of their choices?"

289 comments

  1. Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crimony. Another few years of the word-hackery that brought us "blogebrities", and we're all gonna sound like some freakish variant of the Smurfs.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by justforaday · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, you're just being blah-gy...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by QuijiboIsAWord · · Score: 0

      I think such a concept is smurftastic.

      --
      -Hmm...I got a G+ invite, better remember to remove the request from my sig...-
    3. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Is "blogebrity" uglier than "celeblogger"? Isn't this all just Vogon poetry?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      Bloggy Bloggers, Blogman!

    5. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a perfectly cromulent word.

    6. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No different from prefixing everything with 'e-' or 'i-'.

    7. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by falcon9x · · Score: 1


      Smurf 1: Yo, you have a good time last night?
      Smurf 2: Smurftacular!
      Smurf 1: Yeah I saw you leave with Smurfette.
      Smurf 2: Oh man, as soon as we got out of the bar, she started smurfing me.
      Smurf 1: Shut the smurf up!
      Smurf 2: Yeah!
      Smurf 1: Right in the smurfin' parking lot?
      Smurf 2: Smurf yeah!
      Smurf 1: Oh that is freakin' smurf.
      Smurf 2: You smurf it.
      Smurf 1: That is freakin' smurf
      Smurf 2: Yeah...

    8. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another few years of the word-hackery
      So, "hackery" is a word now?
    9. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by BlogPope · · Score: 1

      I am the new Blog Pope...

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
    10. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Whenever I think of the word "blog", somehow I associate it with some form of constipation.

      I am not against that form of communication, if it can be called that, I think that word and its variants are cumbersome.

    11. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Smurf 1: Oh that is freakin' smurf.

      I thought it was "Oh that is smurfin' smurf."

    12. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      Sure, it's a noun that means "A cart with wooden wheels, drawn by bullocks." Look it up!

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    13. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blogger 1: Yo, you have a good time last night?
      Blogger 2: Blogtacular!
      Blogger 1: Yeah I saw you leave with Blogette.
      Blogger 2: Oh man, as soon as we got out of the bar, she started blogging me.
      Blogger 1: Shut the blog up!
      Blogger 2: Yeah!
      Blogger 1: Right in the blogin' parking lot?
      Blogger 2: Blog yeah!
      Blogger 1: Oh that is freakin' blog.
      Blogger 2: You blog it.
      Blogger 1: That is freakin' blog
      Blogger 2: Yeah...

    14. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Sepphoria · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, does that make you the Blope?

    15. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they do say "freakin' smurf".

      Don't know why MacFarlane wrote it that way, though, "smurfin' smurf" would have been more appropriate.

    16. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by BlogPope · · Score: 1

      The Blog Pope is immune to your puns...

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
    17. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by vanman2004 · · Score: 1

      Googley blog google blog blog google?

      --
      -Siggy!
    18. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bloggie 1: Yo, you have a good time last night?
      Bloggie 2: Blogtacular!
      Bloggie 1: Yeah I saw you leave with CowboyNeal.
      Bloggie 2: Oh man, as soon as we got out of the bar, he started blogging me....

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    19. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Mad+Ogre · · Score: 1

      So would a blogging Smurf have a Smog? Just asking.

      --
      MadOgre.com
    20. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Seanasy · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...or 'k-' or 'g-'...

    21. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1
    22. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 1
      So would a blogging Smurf have a Smog? Just asking.

      ...since you asked, I like "blurf" more...

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    23. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Storlek · · Score: 1

      A celeblogger sounds to me like someone who posts online about a certain garden plant.

      To be fair, "celeblogger" is at least moderately pronounceable, unlike "blogebrity" which at first glance looked like "blow-guh-brightie" to me.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    24. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smurftastic, as in, way too much blue? Rather, way too much fame? I would have to agree. If someone is already a famous name in the real world, what's so great about them being famous in the blog world? Wouldn't it be so much cooler for a regular Joe/Joanna to *become* famous because of his/her amazing blog?

      There are some blogs that have risen to fame, but it's unfortunate that people are more interested in famous people's random scribblings than the individuals who might really deserve their 15 minutes in the spotlight.

      Some of the cooler blogs that have appeared are in the political realm, writing from within countries most people in the USA rarely even hear about. Lawrence Lessig is also another name that I suspect grew on blogs and slashdot.

    25. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by sweetfathairyjesus · · Score: 1

      ZOMFG people... it's a f**king BLOG... it's not like these cock-knuckles have cured cancer or anything. :slap:

    26. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My take? Who cares about all those blogs anyways? Read all about my reasoning in my blog.

    27. Re:Bloggin' Blogtastic, Bloggies! by timyang · · Score: 1

      This list is over representative of American hedonistic interests. Wait... I made the C-list???? ... Keep up the good work, guys!

      --
      http://timyang.com/
  2. I think words using "blog" need to die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously, "Blogebrities"?!?!?!

    WTF?

    1. Re:I think words using "blog" need to die by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      From the same people who brought you the Blogosphere.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  3. What do I think? by eln · · Score: 1

    I think blogs are a great way for B- C- and Z-list celebrities to get their names back in print.

    1. Re:What do I think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, who really gives a flying fuck. I don't care what most, if any, of these people has to say, and I'd venture that most of us don't. If you have time to read three or four blogs, post on slashdot, and read other new sites, you need to get a fucking job. J H. C, blogbrities?!?!

    2. Re:What do I think? by AnonymousNoMore · · Score: 1

      If your theory is correct, then how did Margaret Cho make any list all?

    3. Re:What do I think? by Mikkeles · · Score: 2, Insightful
      'What does the slashdot crowd think of their choices?'

      Yawn.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    4. Re:What do I think? by IBeatUpNerds · · Score: 1

      Yawn.

      *fart*

  4. Personal Preference by coop0030 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it still comes down to personal preference. My girlfriend wouldn't find too many of the geekier types very interesting, and would find the comedians, and entertainers more interesting.

    That is the biggest draw of blogging, you can find someone that is writing about what you like, and don't have to read articles that don't interest you. There is so much out there.

    I think trying to categorize bloggers is mostly useless.

    1. Re:Personal Preference by 14erCleaner · · Score: 4, Insightful
      That is the biggest draw of blogging, you can find someone that is writing about what you like, and don't have to read articles that don't interest you. There is so much out there.

      Except to find the ones you like, you have to read a lot of articles that don't interest you. Doh!

      I think trying to categorize bloggers is mostly useless.

      I think most bloggers would be categorized as "mostly useless".

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    2. Re:Personal Preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      And I think that most blogs can be categorized as useless.

      --
      free Mac mini

    3. Re:Personal Preference by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      It does look like they've tried to be fairly subject-impartial though, more so than the article seems to think: the A-List contains both a the very geeky (such as Wil Wheaton and "Nick DePlume") and the very un-geeky likes of Josh Rubin (a personal favourite of mine, runs the site "Cool Hunting", based around the best new things in art and fashion).

    4. Re:Personal Preference by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Categorizing bloggers in itself is not useless, as there are definitely themed blogs out there.
      What I -do- find useless, is categorizing them in 'celebrities' :
      In this world it seems the opinion of someone 'famous' seems to be worth more than your average Joe ; And now they are even taking over blogging.

      In my opinion (not too big a fan of blogs myself), the most interesting things in the end can be read on just those average Joe's blogs, as it would be more honest, and more recognisable than your average 'celebrity' blog.

    5. Re:Personal Preference by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 1
      Ouch, and forgot to add this, just-on-topic image that made me chuckle when I saw it last week.

      Freely it translates to :
      Fokke and Sukke are furious bloggers

      Am I reading it right on your blog that you lied about doing the dishwash last night !?!

    6. Re:Personal Preference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admit it. The only reason you posted that was to gloat to the slashdot world that you have a girlfriend.

    7. Re:Personal Preference by metlin · · Score: 1

      > I think most bloggers would be categorized as "mostly useless".

      That's too a broad statement to be making for everybody, don't you think?

    8. Re:Personal Preference by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      No, I don't think that's too broad. Blogging is just publishing without an editor, and most people don't write all that well. Like me. :)

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    9. Re:Personal Preference by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      I had to laugh out loud when I saw it that day. And reminded me why I never show people close to me where I write. :-P

      --
      home
    10. Re:Personal Preference by metlin · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps - but it would still cater to that particular demographic! :-)

      Useful is a very relative term, you know?

    11. Re:Personal Preference by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      I did say "mostly useless", not "completely useless" . :)

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    12. Re:Personal Preference by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      I think most bloggers would be categorized as "mostly useless".


      Which is why so many people are offended by "Blogebrity" -- it destroys the veil of egalitarianism that the "blogosphere" makes such a stink about. The fact that there are "A-List" bloggers, whether you make a list of them or not, is offensive to many bloggers.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  5. "Blogebrity?" by daveschroeder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Blogebrity: The Magazine. Coming soon to newsstands near you" (No, really, they're marginally serious. At least they're seriously floating the idea. And no, I don't really fucking care if they don't really intend to sell real paper magazines at real newsstands.)

    "Isn't it about time that someone talked about bloggers?"

    "Because, isn't it time that bloggers got some attention?"

    (Actual quotes from the site.)

    Jesus Christ.

    Give me a fucking break.

    1. Re:"Blogebrity?" by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean, arbitrary and completely domain intermixed groups of people, whose only commonality is that they write (on a computer!), doesn't interest you?

      This lame idea, and the transparent astroturfing that is occurring to advertise it, is retarded.

      Oh noes, now I'll never crack into the lucrative Blogebrities list!

    2. Re:"Blogebrity?" by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Are that many bloggers really that obsessed with the Entertainment Tonight genre of "infotainment"?

      This is pathetic. In such a short time, a community has taken everything despicable about celebrity worship and reimplemented it on the Internet. Worshipping a Hollywood celebrity is cliche, apparently; you need to blogroll yourself a blogebrity to be important now.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:"Blogebrity?" by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      As an aside, I read the blog and it turns out that it's a eyeballs site to apparently win the Contagious Media Showdown.

      Lame.

    4. Re:"Blogebrity?" by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I can't take it seriously anyway. To start with, I'm not on any of the lists. Nor are any of my Slashdot or LiveJournal friends. I mean, if it doesn't even have The_Mad_Poster, or cyranoVR, or even pudge for crying out loud, what value is it?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:"Blogebrity?" by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Grow a sense of humor. If you don't want to read it...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:"Blogebrity?" by UWC · · Score: 1
      In the Slashdot discussion about the aforementioned Showdown, someone noted that the homepage of the contest made the mistake of listing all of the competitors, and, even worse, displays them in order of current standings. I wonder if the person who submitted this story to Slashdot was aware of the site's status as a competitor.

      At least this one isn't one of the many that are [site-name].contagiousmedia.org

    7. Re:"Blogebrity?" by bnitsua · · Score: 1

      if this didn't interest you, you should check out their sister magazine: "Slashdebrity - News About Nerds. Stuff That Really Doesn't Matter."

    8. Re:"Blogebrity?" by Drey · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised to find out the person who submitted it to /. was affiliated with the site.

    9. Re:"Blogebrity?" by Threni · · Score: 1

      Why is all this blogging crap under `media`? Can't it be given it's own section, so that I can set my preferences to ignore it? Please?

    10. Re:"Blogebrity?" by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Hey, there's wisdom out there if you're looking for it. Myself I'm a fan of the Rude Pundit who says things that, though in a way your parents most probably wouldn't find "digestive", are more than more often than not right on the ball.

      Failed "Blogebrity" buzzword trial aside, this guy's worth a read.

      That said, I'd suggest "Blig" as a term for something Blog and cool.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    11. Re:"Blogebrity?" by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      *whoosh*

      The site's a gag, man. That's part of the joke. The magazine line should be a tip off not a starting point for some anti-blog comment.

    12. Re:"Blogebrity?" by UWC · · Score: 1

      Agreed. While it's far from damning evidence, note that the submitter ("Jeremy") did not include a personal URL.

    13. Re:"Blogebrity?" by dr.badass · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give me a fucking break.

      This is exactly why this made it to #3 on the Contagious Media Showdown, even before it was posted here. It's such a polarizing concept. Either you think it's tacky but cool (i.e., you're the kind of person that uses the term "blogosphere") or you think it's the stupidest thing you've ever heard of (i.e. you're the kind of person that lights others on fire for using the term "blog").

      Even if you're kind of neutral on the subject of blogs you have to either feel like you're just not cool enough to understand it, or that it's too stupid for you to want to understand it. You really can't not have an opinion on it -- and when people have opinions, they can't not talk about them.

      Now, if only people could see that this happens every day, Showdown or no Showdown, internet meme or mainstream media.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  6. Any good transhuman blogs? by Eunuch · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's the Stanford transhumanist society one. Can't think of any other good ones.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Any good transhuman blogs? by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not sure they all qualify as blogs, but here are some great sources for news related to interests such as tranhumanist discussions...

      Accelerating Times and their blog.
      KurzweilAI (one of my favorites).
      SL4
      Yahoo Transhuman Group

      Just to list a few...

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    2. Re:Any good transhuman blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does removing your balls, thus ensuring you will never procreate easily, transcend humanity? You really have some serious issues, and I'm sorry your Mum and Pop didn't love you.

    3. Re:Any good transhuman blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean there are actual groups of something called "transhumanism"???

      Shit, I found it a lot more comforting when I thought it was just one or two random whack-jobs out there who were spouting such nonsense.

      Oh well, I'm sure they'll all lace up their Nike shoes and try to catch a ride on the next comet out of there. These problems have a way of solving themselves sometimes.

    4. Re:Any good transhuman blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy tries to hijack every thread into something about transhumans, please read his post history. This is not an innocent question he is asking, it's more transhuman propaganda.

      Mod him down please.

    5. Re:Any good transhuman blogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dude, I am the anti-transhumanist AC. I see see you have also cottoned onto the enigma of the eunuch (gotta say it like "the mule" in the foundation series, right?).

      It is my belief he isn't a bad person. I am not sure if he chemically sterilised himself/cut them off, or if they were lost in some other accident and he now is using transhumanism as his last psychological grip on the world of partial sanity.

      I mean, he will, in evolutionary terms die off with no "offspring" unless he contributes code to the AI which eventually becomes a singularity (if such an event even occurs... why he assumes it will is beyond me). So to sum up, he's a dude with no balls raving who won't contribute to anything if he doesn't code.

      He still has time left to stop posting his idiotic ravings to slashdot. Stop thinking in terms of "transhumanism" and just learn to code and work on interesting AI projects. I doubt he will. I feel sorry for himm, but I will not let him spread any more transhuman propaganda, it's just plain stupid.

  7. Hmm... by InVinoVeritas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wish I had the last 30 seconds of my life back.

    1. Re:Hmm... by ZeroGee · · Score: 1

      Read the terms of service for slashdot. It states very clearly when you register:

      Section V, subsection ii(c): We will not refund the time required to read either our lead-in summaries or TFA itself. Most of what we share is drivel. However, some of our commentary and exposition is so exceptionally useful that clearly any amount of time wasted on the offending sections is well-compensated for by the supreme quality of those diamonds in the rough. Quit whining.

    2. Re:Hmm... by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      Oh, you'd only waste them anyway...(see, another 3 seconds down the crapper)

  8. \W/il by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mailing Wil a "get better" card - $3.
    Buying him weird medications over the Internet - $99.
    Trying to slashdot his server - Priceless.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:\W/il by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mailing Wil a "get better" card - $3

      I've seen a couple of the things he's been in since Star Trek. I'd like to mail him a "get a lot better" card.

      Seriously, it's not his fault that everybody hated Wesley Crusher, but that doesn't make him the next Marlin Brando. Hell, it doesn't even make him the next Marlin Wayans.

    2. Re:\W/il by digidave · · Score: 1

      Marlin Brando? What, will he be playing Gill Grissom in the new CSI?

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  9. What do we think about it? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We dont. Why are people so fascinated with celebrities? Are your own lives really THAT boring?

    OMG! BTW Did you hear that Nick and Jessica filed for divorce?

    1. Re:What do we think about it? by fdrake76 · · Score: 5, Funny
      OMG! BTW Did you hear that Nick and Jessica filed for divorce?

      As sad as it sounds I must admit, I actually searched news.google.com for "Nick and Jessica" upon reading this.

      (Score:-4, Pathetic)

    2. Re:What do we think about it? by WolfDeusEx · · Score: 1

      What did you find?

      --
      Shoot me
    3. Re:What do we think about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are people so fascinated with celebrities? Are your own lives really THAT boring?

      Yes. Yes they are. I would say something to support my point, but I gotta go set up my web "shrine" for Billie Piper, co-star of the new Doctor Who series. If I don't get it off the ground soon, it will never become popular enough for her to notice me.

    4. Re:What do we think about it? by painandgreed · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We dont. Why are people so fascinated with celebrities? Are your own lives really THAT boring?

      Do you really want your life to be that exciting? Just like soaps, movies, and books, it's escapism that you can live vicariously through because you don't really want divorce, scandel, murder, and heartbreak in your real life.

    5. Re:What do we think about it? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Apparently nick and jessica really are (or were or something) a celebrity couple, and google news is discussing their state.

      So the asshole criticizing bloggers for being self-involved knows more about celebrities than... probably most of the people on Slashdot.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:What do we think about it? by fdrake76 · · Score: 1
      Inconclusive information. Journalists are reporting it but Jessica is denying it.

      Excuse me while I light my eyeballs on fire with kerosene, or at least a variant of what those wacky Jedi teenagers came up with.

    7. Re:What do we think about it? by Otto · · Score: 1

      While I didn't actually google for them, I freely admit that I have no idea WTF they are. :P

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    8. Re:What do we think about it? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Why are people so fascinated with celebrities? Are your own lives really THAT boring?

      Isn't that self evident?

      If their lives were filled with excitement and adventure, they would be interested in THAT, wouldn't they? But they aren't, so, their lives, apparently, ARE that boring.

      Go listen to Joe Walsh, "Originary Average Guy"...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    9. Re:What do we think about it? by mattkime · · Score: 1

      not at all

      (Score: +5 Lucky)

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    10. Re:What do we think about it? by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      Are your own lives really THAT boring?


      Yes, they are. *sniff*

    11. Re:What do we think about it? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      Well.. this won't mean much but if you're looking for a non-celebrity blog and you're an avid golfer like myself (or just like the sport) check out The Jam-Boy blog.. he's a rookie Caddy working at an undisclosed but very exclusive golf course in Northern Virginia iirc. He's the perfect non-celebrity that carries bags for the rich & conceited... tells some great stories about the assholes he has to deal. It's good light hearted stuff with an inside perspective.

      *shrug* I've gotta pimp this one since it's one of my favourites and didn't make that goofy celebrity list :)

    12. Re:What do we think about it? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Originary?!

    13. Re:What do we think about it? by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      I would assume that they are two people who were/are married. Now that I think about it, I believe Jessica was associated with researching regarding the origins of buffalo wings.

    14. Re:What do we think about it? by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      Blogtastic! Blogtacular even!

    15. Re:What do we think about it? by drew · · Score: 1

      Who are Nick and Jessica?

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    16. Re:What do we think about it? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Just like soaps, movies, and books, it's escapism that you can live vicariously through because you don't really want divorce, scandel, murder, and heartbreak in your real life.

      You can get all of this in something called a 'book', available at these places called, interestingly enough, 'bookstores'. And it's a virtual guarantee that the quality of the writing will almost certainly far exceed anything found in 99% of the blogs out there.

      I know, I know, radical concept trying to pry your fat ass out of the computer chair to go do something in the real world - just thought I'd mention it for the more adventurous among you....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    17. Re:What do we think about it? by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Ask me about Atheist Fundamentalism"

      Is that where atheists get together and argue about what the god they don't believe in would be like if he/she/it did exist?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  10. Yea, okay...gimme a break. by sintacks · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think this whole blog thing is getting way out of hand. Who cares that much about someone else life? Most people can't even care for themselves...why should you be worrying about checking out the latest cell phone picture with a story about how the line at McDonalds is too long. Gimme a break.

    1. Re:Yea, okay...gimme a break. by russellh · · Score: 1

      I think this whole blog thing is getting way out of hand. Who cares that much about someone else life? Most people can't even care for themselves...why should you be worrying about checking out the latest cell phone picture with a story about how the line at McDonalds is too long. Gimme a break.

      You're reading the wrong blogs. Here's a few:

      http://defensetech.org/
      http://www.back-to-iraq.com/
      http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/
      http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/
      http://www.juancole.com/
      http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/
      http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:Yea, okay...gimme a break. by sintacks · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for the feedback. I hate reading the same crap all the time. Thank you.

  11. Who cares about Magawatzit Chow? by gmezero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I clearly know the name, but have now idea how to spell it... I'll be honest, I've never even seen her, but damn if her name doesn't get dropped like it's supposed to mean something.

    Who cares?

    1. Re:Who cares about Magawatzit Chow? by Shihar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      She is a comedian. If you really want to get into the nitty gritty sterotypes and some of the focus of her jokes, she is an Asian-American comedian. Her old stuff is great laughs for everyone. Culture clash jokes with her parents are funny, and the sterotyping of Asian-Americans can be side splitting. If you are an Asian-American (bonus points if you are a woman too, you will pretty much find it impossible to not laugh. ...all of that said, she now sucks. Right before the elections she came around to my town (Boston). I shelled out my entertainment budget for the month on a pair of tickets and a drink at the club ($15 - no, not worth it, even if I kept the glass). I was treated to a political rally. I wanted to claw my ears out. It wasn't funny. There are so many ways you can make fun of Bush's inability to speak or his last name before you are driven nuts. I was pretty sure I shelled out my money to see comedy, and instead I got a campaign speech by a comedian. I am not a terribly conservative guy either. I have a feeling the flamboyantly gay group of guys at our table were not Republicans in disguise either, and they too seemed to be struggling to get out a few chuckles.

      So, I figure that maybe she was just worked up by the whole presidency and forgot that she was a comedian, so I give it another chance. I rent her new comedy DvD. Dear god, put a gun in your mouth and pull the trigger. It turns up that she WAS worked up by the presidency. Unfortunately, the bad Bush jokes were much better then the stuff that was pushed aside. Sufficient to say, the DvD was awful, and even fans who desperately wanted to like it couldn't.

      All that said, pick up her old stuff. Good fun and plenty of laughs.

  12. for bloggers, all that matters by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    are your sitemeter hits and your TTLB ecosystem status. i'm currently a marauding marsupial.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  13. Contagious Media Showdown by Webs+101 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Correct me if I'm wrong - and I'm sure you will - but isn't this site amother entry in the Contagious Media Showdown?

    Does somebody want to do my homework and see if the person who sent this to Slashdot is the same as the domain owner?

    --

    "Even for Slashdot, that was a very obscure reference!" - Anonymous Coward

    1. Re:Contagious Media Showdown by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1
      No doubt! It is a competitor. But, this is a decent way to get the links they need to win.

      I was going to post this myself, too bad I have no mod points for you. +1 Insightful.

    2. Re:Contagious Media Showdown by belg4mit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes it is, good catch. And now it's #3.
      No idea about ownership.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:Contagious Media Showdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Instead of a slashdot dupe, slashdot has been duped!

      it's not even for real, it's a fake site trying to win a competition and thanks to slashdot (where there was an article about this very competition just five freaking days ago) this entry's gonna be moving up the ranks.

    4. Re:Contagious Media Showdown by superflippy · · Score: 1

      The more I think about it, the more I think this is absolutely the ideal entry. Many bloggers love nothing better than to compare status and talk about blogging. The Blogebrity site panders to both of these desires, plus, it has the added benefit of offending some people, thus guaranteeing plenty of linkage.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    5. Re:Contagious Media Showdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the person who submitted the article. I don't have anything to do with the site. I know a guy who knows a guy that's involved with it, and I thought someone might find it interesting. I didn't hold a gun to the editors' heads, you know.

      *shrug*

    6. Re:Contagious Media Showdown by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I didn't hold a gun to the editors' heads, you know.

      Wouldn't be any point. You need to target a vital organ.

      KFG

  14. Blogging for the wrong reasons by ZeroGee · · Score: 2

    I recently started a blog that I'm purposely not advertising anywhere, because for now I'm simply using it as a way to share my thoughts with just a close circle of friends. But I've been thinking about the issue of "blogebrity" for a few months now.

    I wonder what percent of bloggers start a blog out of some misguided attempt to achieve "celebrity" or acceptance among the cloaked masses?

    I'm sure many bloggers, well, blog because they actually do have something good to say, but at the same time there are tons of hacks out there just trying to get page-views and AdSense clicks that pollute the infosphere.

    Being a page-view whore isn't much better than being the jackass who yells and raises their hands in the back of a video interview.

    1. Re:Blogging for the wrong reasons by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'm actually reading some anonymous girls lifeblog semi-regularly. It's also a good lanugage practise, but what I also find interesting is that she writes a lot, but gets 1-2 comments per month. I suspect she has very few readers, which somehow makes the whole thing more natural.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:Blogging for the wrong reasons by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      That's why I like my "blog". It never needs to be updated but is always current. And no RSS feeds or anything to worry about. The other good thing is that it can be your blog too, if you agree with its views.

      Also, worst word of the past two years = "blogosphere".

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  15. I protest by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I looked under N, but I saw no Neal, Cowboy. This list is a fake.

    1. Re:I protest by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2, Funny

      This sir, is why we need to coronate you as King Vegeta SSJ4.

    2. Re:I protest by numbski · · Score: 1

      We can't do that. I don't think I could bear to stand around waiting while we all have to listen to him scream for hours while it powers up and hurls lame insults that aren't vaguely believable at his opponents.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  16. too good for the A-list by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't see groklaw mentioned.
    PJ is certainly a celebrity at this point--she even has her own stalker (Maureen O'Gara).

    1. Re:too good for the A-list by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I think that to be on one of these lists, you have to use your name as a conspicuous part of the blog. You'd have to read Groklaw for a while to know it's Pamela Jones. Likewise, you'd have to read OpinionJournal's Best of the Web for quite a while to know it's James Taranto's beat.

      Neither of those people were listed, despite their high level of popularity.

      I can only conclude that individual ego and a desire for personal fame are required to get on the list.

      D

    2. Re:too good for the A-list by lheal · · Score: 1

      Yup, I think:

      CmdrTaco, Roblimo, et al
      PJ
      Drudge
      Barry Bonds (*)

      are in a different class than other bloggers, for various reasons.

      ----
      (*) he'll always have an asterisk now.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    3. Re:too good for the A-list by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Like Boingboing.net, gizmodo.com, sploid.com, etc?

    4. Re:too good for the A-list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sites like Groklaw and Slashdot are more like communities than someone's personal blog, that's why they're not on there.

    5. Re:too good for the A-list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The text "Pamela Jones" is on every page of Groklaw. Is that conspicuous enough? Of course it's at the default location (the bottom), but anyone who doesn't check there shouldn't be making lists beyond "find a clue".

    6. Re:too good for the A-list by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Those blogs are either under someone's name or not on the list, so I think my point is reasonable.

      The overwhelming majority of blogs on the list are shown as individual's names.

      D

  17. Your opinion doesn't matter! by yotto · · Score: 1

    No, not your opinion, their opinion.

    Well, yours doesn't either, but that's now what I was talking about.

    Give me a list of blog sites with a recap of their content and let me decide if I like them. A/B/C categorizing of how "good" they are does me no good whatsoever.

    And please call them something else. 'Blog' is one of the few words I hate more than 'Podcasting'

    1. Re:Your opinion doesn't matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not your opinion, their opinion.

      Well, yours doesn't either, but that's now what I was talking about.


      Like anybody cares what you have to say about it. Sheesh!

      (I keed, I keed...)

      And please call them something else. 'Blog' is one of the few words I hate more than 'Podcasting'

      How about "blogcasting?"

    2. Re:Your opinion doesn't matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you read it change the pronunciation. When I read blog I pronounce it "be log".

      Sounds like a real thing as opposed to the sound a smoker makes when they wake up in the morning.

  18. I sure think... by hoka · · Score: 1

    That the RTFA'ers are upset that they are not on the A-List, since the site appears to be down.

  19. William Fichtner on technology and computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSNews posted an interview with actor William Fichtner yesterday. Maybe a simple blog engine would be great for actors like him who don't have a big computer experience.

  20. Listings by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 2

    Everytime some sort of a list comes out, whether it's top 100 songs, best ice cream flavor, all time movies, you're always going to have "aww man, X needs to be there," or "why did Y get there? they suck."

    It's a list man. It's opinion. It's a list of Blogs, and it's not that big of a deal.

    Maybe in blogebrity's eyes, Margaret Cho doesn't have anything to say? Maybe she says more than those D-Listers that DIDN'T make it.

    It doesn't look like they explained their system here.

  21. Ive never met by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    A blogebrities , but i know a fairf few Blogstards.
    Rollin rollin rollin , rollin rollin rollind P

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  22. "Blogebrities"? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dear god, I thought "blogosphere" was self-important.

    But hey! This opens up all kinds of future blog-related positions. Watch for these coming Slashdot stories!

    • Blardinal Petrus writes: "As first Blardinal of the Holy Cathoblogic Church, I hereby announce that I am taking applications for BlogPope. Email your resume, your blog URL and 100 words on "Why I should be Blogpope" to blogpope@cathoblogic.blog. And good luck!"
    • Bloggus Torvalds writes: "Ever wanted to start your own nation? Now you can! BlogNation is a new association of Blogizens that are disassociblogging themselves from ordinary, land-based nationstates in favour of a new alliance of Blogs. Run for Blogident, Blog Minister, or Minister of Blogging by signing up on our blog!"
    • Bloggy Hilton writes: "Help! I've lost the password to my blog. It was right there on my SideKick (you know, the one with the special blog attachment), but it doesn't seem to be there anymore! Has someone taken it? I'm totally desperate here!"
    1. Re:"Blogebrities"? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude I am totally blogging this.

      Did you get the "I'm blogging this" t-shirt I blogged about? I totally moblogged it when I was at BloggerCon.

      omg I want to be a Blogebrity! I am Wil Wheaton. Which Blogebrity are you? Find out at BlogMemes.blog!

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:"Blogebrities"? by ePhil_One · · Score: 1

      Dude, I totally call dibs on BlogPope

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    3. Re:"Blogebrities"? by BlogPope · · Score: 1

      Sorry, the role of Blog Pope has now been filled.

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
    4. Re:"Blogebrities"? by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Fine then. I don't need Rome telling me how to read the Blogible! I'm nailing my 99 most wanted Amazon wish list items to your door! With emoticon nails!

    5. Re:"Blogebrities"? by moitz · · Score: 1

      Bloggy Hilton writes: "Help! I've lost the password to my blog. It was right there on my SideKick (you know, the one with the special blog attachment), but it doesn't seem to be there anymore! Has someone taken it? I'm totally desperate here!"

      That's hot.

      --
      Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
    6. Re:"Blogebrities"? by Inthewire · · Score: 0

      Oh, shit, you've really opened a can of blog...can't wait to register in the new dot blog TLD.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  23. Time to wipe my hard drive. by Nytewynd · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have Wilwheaton.net in my browser history and cached on my drive. Never has their been a better reason to rub magnets on my hard drive than now.

    --
    /. ++
    1. Re:Time to wipe my hard drive. by GreatGreenGoo · · Score: 1

      Hey Wheaton Rocks.

  24. Why? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    I mean, really, why? If you like what someone has to say, read their blog. If you don't, then don't- its really not all that difficult. This really should have had the "Its Funny, Laugh" tag.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  25. I vote for Roland Piquepaille by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

    He's clearly got his finger on the pulse of technology, why don't you click here to read more!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  26. Was that a Joke? by fdevillamil · · Score: 1

    Loic lemeure being on the A group must be a bad joke isn't it?

  27. Jason Kottke by Teja · · Score: 1

    I'm curious to see who ends up in the top spots for the blogebriy top 100 (the superstars of blogging). I'm hoping to see Jason Kottke pretty high up there. I mean... quitting job to go blogging full time (and money made not through ads but a fundraiser in the style that of NPR). Jeff Jarvis also has gone blogging full time (well... more so consulting about blogging) and you can catch more on that here

    --
    - Teja
    1. Re:Jason Kottke by Otter · · Score: 1
      I'm hoping to see Jason Kottke pretty high up there. I mean... quitting job to go blogging full time...

      After looking at that site (OMG, he's watching old Dr. Who episodes!) I'd tell him not to quit his day job, but apparently he already has...

  28. Isn't she a porn star? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Or was that someone else?

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Isn't she a porn star? by Nytewynd · · Score: 1

      Look her up online. After you see her, if you still think she's a porn star, more power to you!

      --
      /. ++
    2. Re:Isn't she a porn star? by evenprime · · Score: 1

      Margaret Cho is a korean american comedian. She briefly had a series on TV. She's struggled with her weight throughout her life. A lot of her humor is sex related, and she has a large following in the gay community. There's more information on her here:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Cho

      --

      "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
      I think that goes for OS's too
  29. Next Up... by Skeezix · · Score: 1

    Blogrebrity Sex Video Scandals

    1. Re:Next Up... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Well, we already had Washintonienne....

  30. It's an entry in a viral-marketing contest. by kookbox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Blogebrity is one of the entries in that stupid viral-marketing contest. And it's not like I'm the one who broke this story, either. Aren't there any press releases to post today?

    1. Re:It's an entry in a viral-marketing contest. by bnitsua · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope their site is slashdotted so they have no chance of winning that stupid contest...
      who designed that site? a 12 year old girl with a lisa frank infatuation?
      what are they trying to market? all I could gather from their site is that they have no lives... at least magazines like us, people, etc. get paid lots of money to rank celebrities...

    2. Re:It's an entry in a viral-marketing contest. by NecrosisLabs · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point of the contest: The web site isn't about content, the web site is about getting content that will get people to hit the site. If Everyone is sending out links to friends saying "look how lame and self-indulgent this is", mission accomplished. Getting on Slashdot is a bit of a coup for them, contest wise.

  31. Who cares? Guys with penises do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Margaret is one fine mama, I defnitely would like to get a piece of dat shyt!

  32. Wil Wheaton? by dfn5 · · Score: 1, Funny
    The only thing that comes to mind is alt.wesley.crusher.die.die.die

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Wil Wheaton? by jhill · · Score: 1

      Modded up, b/c it was funny and I do remember.

    2. Re:Wil Wheaton? by BlogPope · · Score: 1
      If you mod up, only post anonymously in that story, lest your mod points spent be null and voided.

      In other words, posting here means your mod attempt was retracted (without refund, I might add).

      --
      My other car is a Popemobile
  33. Where's the D list? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    Someday I hope to be a D-minus blogebrity

    I dare to dream! =)

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:Where's the D list? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      The D-list is comprised of all the people that Don't Care about the celebrity du jour.

  34. Wait a second! by CypherXero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this website part of the Contagious Media Showdown that was posted a few days ago?! WTF? Isn't this considered cheating?

  35. Blogebrity? by Canthros · · Score: 1

    Never use that word again. Some neologisms man simply was not meant to know.

    --
    Canthros
  36. If I found my name on the list of blogerties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I found my name on the list of blogerties, or even had a blog, I think I would have to kick my own ass

  37. Should I have heard of many of these people? by dougmc · · Score: 1

    I look at the A-list, and only recognize very few of the names. Should I?

  38. B! by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great, not only do I have so little free time now because I have to keep up with my life along with all the lives of fabulous celebrities, now I have to keep up with blogebrities.

    I hope they make the B! Bloggertainment channel so I can get all my blogebrity news. I just have to know which blogebrities are "linking," if you know what I mean.

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  39. Blog-Eb-Ri-Ties by yotto · · Score: 1

    I just realized, from reading comments here, that it's not pronounced 'Bloggey-brites' but instead 'blog-eb-ri-ties'.

    That's sad. Not my not knowing the word, the word itself. It was bad enough when it was a nonsense word 100%, now that it means.... THAT... it's even worse.

    1. Re:Blog-Eb-Ri-Ties by HardCase · · Score: 1

      It was bad enough when it was a nonsense word 100%, now that it means.... THAT... it's even worse.

      Don't worry, it's still a nonsense word.

  40. I am shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darth Vader didn't make the A-list. or the B-list. or even the C-List.

  41. Executive Summary of Blogging by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    Jim Carrey on SNL playing Jimmy Stewart imitating Jim Carrey: "I need attention 24 hours a day! Look at me! Look at me!"

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  42. I'm sorry, but I just couldn't resist by billster0808 · · Score: 1, Funny

    I for one welcome our blogrebrity overlords!!

  43. Dave Barry Not on the List by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I've seen several lists in which Dave Barry's Blog has been recognized as one of the best (it's worth it just for the "24" synopsis) and he's not mentioned in any of the three lists.

    Looking through the names, I see a number I'd never consider and I can come up with a few more I would have liked to see. Like any "best of" list, this one is just somebody's personal opinion.

    myke

  44. Thanks, but no thanks by Shimmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wheaton's current entry is all about how lousy he felt when he got sick. If that's what it takes to be a blogging A-lister, I think I'll stick to the rest of the Internet for awhile longer.

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    1. Re:Thanks, but no thanks by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      True, but a couple of weeks ago he came out with this gem that makes his blog (ocassionally) worthwhile.

    2. Re:Thanks, but no thanks by Shimmer · · Score: 2, Funny

      That one is at least semi-interesting, but it's also about being sick as a kid and, golly, the current scratchiness in his throat.

      Does he discuss any other topics? Perhaps how the laundry is piling up? Or how he got stuck in traffic during rush hour?

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  45. Booed off stage... by Dareth · · Score: 1

    I remember her.. she was "booed" offstage at my Uni ( few years back) because the crowd wanted to hear the "good comedian" coming up after her...

    Didn't really care for any of them.. but the other guy whoever he was, now he was funny!

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  46. Blogs: Following the trend of trends? by k98sven · · Score: 1

    Interesting how, just today a columnist in Dagens Nyheter (largest newspaper in Sweden) wrote a column about blogging. He drew a parallel to other fads, the one he specifically mentioned was the early 90's Grunge trend.

    These trends were first hailed as something new and different, which would change the world, only to subsequently be adopted by the mainstream/the existing powers, and eventually died off without actually changing anything.
    (The anti-fashion 'grunge look' became the fashion, then went out of fashion, then things were as they were before.)

    The parallel he saw, was in the increasing amount of Celebrity blogging. People who are already in the mainstream media are increasingly starting to blog themselves, and that's corrupting the original visions of blogs being a kind of "even playing field".

    Now I'm not sure whether the columnist was right or wrong about this. (I can't and won't predict the future.) But I thought it was an interesting thought anyway.

  47. What's wrong with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the jackass who yells and raises their hands in the back of a video interview
    Hey, I am that jackass, you insensitive clod!

  48. Where is Ron? by alexandreracine · · Score: 0
    Jeremy writes "The folks at Blogebrity have a unique take on the blog scene.
    I can't find Ron Jeremy. Are you "working" again?

    (That's a porn joke ;)
    --
    No sig for now.
  49. Nonplussing by nugneant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh boy, yet another outlet for already-celebrities to get noticed. Boy oh boy, because, you know, not enough people know that Margret Cho is a fat, bitter lesbian asian-american with, you know, problems. And her take on things is really cool. Like that time when she saw that one homosexual and called him a silly fag, and then ended up eating a ham (or a tofu ham, sorry, I should probably read her blog to find out if she's vegan or not), while flashing back over how she was discriminated growing up. Okay, seriously, a lot of these people are pretty cool and say things that aren't outright lies. But does the world really need another portal? Why does Andy Baio merit an "A" while "THE" Isabella Wunder only get a "C"? Because some goon somewhere says so? It's like reducing the art of movie criticism to Beavis and Butthead. "Citizen Kane - 6T's! Awesome!" "Casablanca - B6(j7)! It's neat!" "Spellbound - 23.3! I didn't get that one scene!" Except without even the comments. With "indie" being all the trend, you'd figure (well, if human thought / capacity for getting stuff off the ground was anywhere near ideal) that there'd be a few more "indie" websites. Remember mp3.com? Now THAT was what the internet should be all about. Evidently we'd rather just know what everyone else is reading, and want it from more than just google and Alexa.

  50. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Meagermanx · · Score: 1

    This is either Insightful or Flamebait...
    I can't decide.

  51. What About Me? by Ranhert · · Score: 1

    What the hell, I'm not on the list! This is an outrage and an opportunity for a shamless /. plug www.internaldemise.blogspot.com

  52. Blog Toplist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's another blog ranking site:

    http://blogs.tomstopsites.com/

  53. Roland Piquepaille...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't even want to KNOW what list Roland Piquepaille is on.....

  54. pfft, no Kevin Smith... he's even been slashdotted by netsavior · · Score: 1

    The URL has changed but he was the first review of Sith.
    He ranks pretty high in my book.
    /fanboy

    blog is the worst word EVER omg/wtf/bbq/kfc

  55. Re:Nonplussing - Now with "but" and linebreaks!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh boy, yet another outlet for already-celebrities to get noticed. Boy oh boy, because, you know, not enough people know that Margret Cho is a fat, bitter lesbian asian-american with, you know, problems. And her take on things is really cool. Like that time when she saw that one homosexual and called him a silly fag, and then ended up eating a ham (or a tofu ham, sorry, I should probably read her blog to find out if she's vegan or not), while flashing back over how she was discriminated growing up.

    Okay, seriously, a lot of these people are pretty cool and say things that aren't outright lies. But does the world really need another portal? Why does Andy Baio merit an "A" while "THE" Isabella Wunder only get a "C"? Because some goon somewhere says so? It's like reducing the art of movie criticism to Beavis and Butthead. "Citizen Kane - 6T's! Awesome!" "Casablanca - B6(j7)! It's neat!" "Spellbound - 23.3! I didn't get that one scene!" Except without even the comments.

    With "indie" being all the trend, you'd figure (well, if human thought / capacity for getting stuff off the ground was anywhere near ideal) that there'd be a few more "indie" websites.

    Remember mp3.com? Now THAT was what the internet should be all about. But evidently we'd rather just know what everyone else is reading, and want it from more than just google and Alexa.

  56. pun time by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    What does the slashdot crowd think of their choices?

    To be frank, seems like a giant wiener waving contest.

    In all seriousness, this is what any form of media does best; tell us just HOW IMPORTANT media is. Bloggers are especially impressed with themselves, so it makes perfect sense.

    (PS: I don't mean media = press. Bloggers are as much journalists as gossip columnists, and about one step above "storytellers". Not surprisingly, in both camps there seems to be equal amounts of drama in the drivel they put out).

  57. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Golias · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I find hilarious is how this thread is stuffed to the gills with people who rushed a post on Slashdot to tell the world that people with blogs are pathetic for thinking their opinions are important enough to publish on the web.

    Mr. Kettle? There's a Mr. Pot holding for you on line two... says he wants to tell you something.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  58. There is no love left for the English laguage by Lord_Scrumptious · · Score: 1

    Blogebrity? Another abomination of the English language which is hardly surprising coming from people who work in New Media and the Web where everyone is happy to coin a new term if gets them some attention.

    Secondly, I'm not sure if this Blogebrity thing is slightly tongue-in-cheek, but if it isn't, it's enough to put you off the whole phenomenon of blogging for life.

  59. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

    Strangely enough, I'm voting Insightful. Wish I had points to enforce that with... who really cares about "blogebrities"? I've noticed that /. does this more and more frequently. "Oooh! They said blog! We must report!" or "Oooh! Today is day 7 of Star Wars in theaters, let's post another random article so /.ers can say Lucas raped their childhood memories!" Why can't we have more stories like the one this morning about Voyager?

    For the nth time,

    strcmp("Internet Junkie","Nerd")!=0

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  60. I read this as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this as blow-je-brite-ees

  61. Glaring Omission by EngMedic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who could forget the lovely and talented Ali Davis, author of True Porn Clerk Stories? I'm sorry, that's the best blog i've ever read, bar none.

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  62. THIS STORY IS A SCAM. by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 2, Informative

    This story was submitted as an attempt to gain clicks. The site itself is probably meant as a joke, but it is certainly an entry in the "Contagious Media Showdown." The showdown is "a competition to create the most viral website, as measured by the number of unique visitors from now until June 9th."

    Getting it submitted to Slashdot probably won it for those guys. Seems like ballot stuffing to me, though.

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
    1. Re:THIS STORY IS A SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that they aren't counting hits comming from slashdot. Either that, or less than 223 (as of this post) have clicked the link through slashdot. It isn't in the top 30 referrers.

    2. Re:THIS STORY IS A SCAM. by dolphinlover · · Score: 1

      Up to, oh, about 14,000 now.
      Imagine how much advertising money any other site would have to pay Google, DoubleClick, etc, to get 10,000 hits in one day off of one advertising campaign.

  63. Used For Their Money by SillyHatsOnly · · Score: 1
    F celebrities who thrive on status and F the people who base their lives off them. Like this world needs another status divide. They probably already have a domain that costs $30,000 a month to put your A list blog there. Only reason most it's created is to suck their money away.


    Sad that only cataclysmic events seem to give everyone a reality check as to what's important. Too bad memories are short.

  64. oh my god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...i need to know what celebrities are doing and blogging about every 15 minutes!!

    thank god for the interweb

    ---

    Kim Komando

  65. Big-name polibloggist by double_h · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somewhat related, I saw earlier today that http://talkingpointsmemo.com/ (a progressive political blog) is going to have a special guest blogger next week in the form of Senator John Edwards (John Kerry's right-hand man last fall); ought to make an interesting read.

  66. WTF is next? by Thaelon · · Score: 1

    eweblogebrityzine?

    (that's e-web-blog-ebrity-zine)

    Fuck that. Hell I even refused to call a web log a "blog" until it fucking exploded all over the internet and evolved into a new thing.

    btw, the site looks like a hacked together piece of crap trying to look like a magazine.

    --

    Question everything

  67. Whois info for Blogebrity.Com by Hulkster · · Score: 4, Interesting
    For those trying to determine if the submitter owns the site and/or is involved in the Contageous Media Showdown, the whois info is presented below. I actually thought it was a clever idea on their part to submit to (and get accepted by) Slashdot - I bet all the other participents (I'm not) are jealous they didn't think of it earlier! ;-)

    At least Wikipedia isn't being defaced/spammed as it was in one of those earlier SEO contests. It would be pretty funny if after all this publicity, they went ahead and DID publish a magazine. Read more of their thoughts in their blog.

    BTW, I noticed that Hulk's Blog isn't listed.
    Hulk might have to SMASH 'em! ;-)


    Registrant:
    The Gawp Network
    513 Wilshire Blvd.
    Suite 300
    Santa Monica, California 90401
    United States

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com
    Domain Name: BLOGEBRITY.COM
    Created on: 08-May-05
    Expires on: 08-May-06
    Last Updated on: 08-May-05

    Administrative Contact:
    Hermann, Robert
    Pivot Plane Inc
    810 S Flower st #308
    Los Angeles, California 90017
    United States
    3107654924 Fax --
    Technical Contact: SAME
    1. Re:Whois info for Blogebrity.Com by FatalTourist · · Score: 1

      Interesting exchange at Sean Bonner's blog.

      --


      Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
    2. Re:Whois info for Blogebrity.Com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT BLOG NOT HULK BLOG, http://incrediblehulk.blogspot.com/THIS BLOG IS HULK BLOG

    3. Re:Whois info for Blogebrity.Com by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      For those trying to determine if the submitter owns the site and/or is involved in the Contageous Media Showdown, the whois info is presented below.

      It's really not that hard to determine. You can just go to the Contagious Media Shodown site which has all of the contestants and their current ranking.

      I actually thought it was a clever idea on their part to submit to (and get accepted by) Slashdot - I bet all the other participents (I'm not) are jealous they didn't think of it earlier! ;-)

      The current front-runner, the frightfully contagious "Crying While Eating" site showed up on BoingBoing (the blog-world's Slashdot) on the first day. Somehow I don't think that it would have gotten posted on "news for nerds". I'm somewhat surprised that this one did.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  68. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yesterday's Voyager update: Still in space, moving away from us at a good clip.

    Today's Voyager update: Still in space, moving away from us at a good clip.

    Tomorrow's Voyager update: Still in space, moving away from us at a good clip.

    Friday's Voyager update: Still in space, moving away from us at a good clip.

    Saturday's Voyager update: Still in space, moving away from us at a good clip.

    Sunday's Voyager update: Still in space, moving away from us at a good clip.

    That should hold you at least until Monday. We can give you more updates then, okay?

  69. The good thing about celebrity blogs by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You get to see how, well, frankly stupid and ignorant they really are. I predict that within a year, most celebrity blogs will be closed or handed over to their agents to manage with the rest of their publicity.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:The good thing about celebrity blogs by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      It does depend upon the peronality.

      Most will have a laptop, and lots of folks write a diary or journal.
      If your going to write it anyway, why not make it look halfway decent and public.
      You never know where your next paycheque is coming from, and pouring your heart out or waffling about nothingness in a blog may just catch the attention of your future boss.

      I don't think they are going anywhere.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  70. Blogging has brought out a problem by ShatteredDream · · Score: 2, Interesting

    in our society, for Americans at least. One of the things that I have noticed about blogging is that it is quite hard for people who take unorthodox views to get any attention. The vanity that is often involved in blogging ends up causing people to shy away from real debates because they want to be flattered, not challenged. Blogging seems like a sexy thing to do for a lot of people more out of a sense of a dellusion of grandeur than any desire to write intelligently.

    I'm a political blogger of sorts, but I could really care less what happens in the Republicratic oligarchy on a daily basis. Most bloggers that I have seen that do write about politics end up obsessing about such mundane shit that they have no power over. Really, Bush's nominees aren't that interesting. Ideologically he is a continuation of the triangulation centrism of Clinton except with a pragmatic approach to using our military abroad against terrorists. Whoever Bush chooses won't end up being a true conservative, but rather a closet moderate or left-liberal like Clinton and half of Reagan's appointees. Until the LP, Reason Foundation or Cato vouches for some of those guys I won't give them more attention than a passive yawn.

    Part of the reason I read so few blogs is that I don't want to read what amounts to a political soap opera. That really is what it is all about in the end. Most bloggers act like housewives obsessed with the Young and the Restless and Days of Our Lives.

  71. Perhaps it's vindictive of me... by SwansonMarpalum · · Score: 1

    But I'm glad to see Roland Piquepaille didn't make the list.

    --
    "Give away the stone, let the oceans take and transmutate this cold and faded anchor." - Maynard James Keenan
  72. If this was really interesting news to /. then... by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    there would have been mention in the comments of one of the well established blog ranking websites. Figuring out who's who among bloggers based on anything but traffic and click-through rate is subjective to the point of meaninglessness. Ironic that something as unreal as advertising is about the only thing that offers any measure of the reality behind the hype about blogging as a new media.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  73. Never got this Blogging crap by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

    I mean, my life is boring and sucks, but I still would rather do almost anything than read the inane crap that people write in their "blogs" (lame-ass nonword).

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
  74. I think blogs are over-rated by dangerweasel · · Score: 1

    And ego stroking at it's worst, for the most part.

  75. I do by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

    Margaret Cho rocks!

    I saw one of her movies and I laughed so hard I cried.

    Maybe she cannot break out of the C-List because her stand-up comedy subjects include sex, sexual politics, homosexuals, transvestites, and tolerance.

    So mass appeal just isn't in the cards for her.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes Those Are Very Racy Topics I Was Attending A Meeting Of "Local Bitties" And In Between Our Sand-Shovelling-In-Twat Session To Protect Us From The Horrors Of Lubrication Ethel Said "I Saw Some Fat Chink Gook On The Tv And She Said Something About Men Who Dress In Women's Clothing!" And Then We All Cried "Scandalous!! My Word!!" In Unison And Began Knitting Up A Frenzy. She Is Very Unpopular In Our Community And Subjects Like Those Are Too New-Fangled For This Day And Age. Nobody Will Understand Them And What Will The Children Think And We Don't Need More Than 384K RAM Who Would Ever Want More Than That Think Conservatively People And God Bless.

    2. Re:I do by Golias · · Score: 1

      Maybe she cannot break out of the C-List because her stand-up comedy subjects include sex, sexual politics, homosexuals, transvestites, and tolerance.

      Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I'm just a cave man. I was frozen in ice thousands of years ago and then thawed out by your scientists.

      Your world frightens and confuses me! When I see a car, I wonder, "what is that strange beast, and how does it move so fast?"

      I don't know much, but if there's one thing I know, it's that comedy acts were including all those subjects before fire was invented.

      There is nothing new about Margret Cho's act. Talking about alternative sexual behavior in a comedy routine is downright stodgy and traditional at this point.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, please, somebody mod this up!

  76. Mod parent up by evenprime · · Score: 1

    If I had mod points I'd give them to you.....unfortunately, most slashdotters are too young to remember how much fun usenet used to be. I was a big fan of alt.sysadmin.recovery and alt.mensa.flame.flame.flame

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
    1. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should declare a day and submit all our regular /. comments to usenet. Hey, "take back the streets" was all the rage 20 years ago, and retro is still in enough to be a buzzword of sorts. Let's have a retro "take back the [futuristic] streets" campaign and clean up the ghetto that usenet's become.

  77. Clearly a case of art imitating my ass by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    n/t

  78. Stupid people by mc900ftjesus · · Score: 1

    I hate the word blog or blogging or I wish these people so hopelessly behind technology would take their blogetry and shut up. I wish the media was as smart as they think they are. "Christ, you mean if I put my worthless 2 cents on a webpage everyday, I can pretend it's important? Wait, others can do this too, it's like there's a big web of pages full of information that anyone in the world can read! I must join two words togther to form a catch phrase thus cementing this movement in the Big Book of Overrated Fads." Years earlier: Computer geek: "Hey, I made a log on my web page. Now I'm going to do something useful."

  79. Help! None of those words are in my dictionary! by Max_Wells_SH · · Score: 1

    It must be really out of date--how am I supposed to understand what people are saying? ...Hey wait a minute, are you just making those up?

    --
    I read Slashdot for the articles.
  80. Dear Diary... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    ...today, I learned that I am not alone in every so often having the urge to publicly post nothing of any value in case one out of six billion people on this planet care to read it.

    I suddenly don't feel so bad anymore.

    Of course, this merely confirms my long-standing belief that the Internet has become the fastest way for more people than ever before to say less than ever before.

    (insert pointless rambling here)

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  81. Zeldman by jaycontonio · · Score: 1

    I'm glad Zeldman made the list though...I think that's the only name I recognized in all three lists.

  82. Simply? by yfmaster · · Score: 1

    I really could not care less no matter how hard I tried.

  83. Where's SethF.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Where's Seth Finkelstein?

  84. Arianna Huffington? On the A-List? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HaHaHa!
    Her celebrity blog has to be one of the most stupendous failures of the year!

    They don't have some of my favorites mentioned, www.kimdutoit.com/ and www.sgtstryker.com/

  85. Initial Choices by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

    Wil Wheaton definatly is more interesting than Margaret Cho. Talk about a self-hating asian. I've never seen a chick talk more about dicks than when I watched one her comedy special, or I should say the few minutes I watched it.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  86. STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was inevitable, but, I couldn't care less about everyone's mental masturbation and compounded whining.

    However, this correlates to my complete lack of interest in talk shows (ads) and hollywood in general (bs).

  87. Bloggers Suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't stand bloggers, especially those anon..
    nm.

  88. These people don't know what they're talking about by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    Clearly the list is fraudulent. Maddox is on the B list? I've never heard of most of the A list but I'd think getting a book deal off of having a well read blog would put you on the A list of blogging. Afterall, that's the point of having one.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  89. my favorite blog atm by ultramk · · Score: 2, Informative

    My favorite blog at the moment has to be boingboing.net

    It's a collaborative blog from the likes of:

    - Cory Doctorow, one of the best voices in contemporary SF, and a co-founder (iirc) of the EFF.

    - Xeni Jardin, tech culture journalist and regular contributer to Wired and NPR. (oh, and not that it matters, but she's spectacularly cute)

    - Mark Frauenfelder, writer and illustrator.

    - David Pescovitz, well-known science and tech writer.

    - John Battelle, web search pundit. ...they're all smart, funny and cool. If my best friends had time to get together and make a blog, it would look like this.

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  90. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Max_Wells_SH · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I find hilarious is how this thread is stuffed to the gills with people who rushed a post on Slashdot to tell the world that people with blogs are pathetic for thinking their opinions are important enough to publish on the web.

    What are you talking about? I set my threshold to 5, and it's like sitting at a table with the philosopher kings here.

    (Sorry, not a flame, just friendly jab. Sirs.)

    --
    I read Slashdot for the articles.
  91. bootstrapped celebrities by PMuse · · Score: 1

    First ask, are they famous because they blogged or did they blog because they're famous?

    --
    "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
  92. Blogs, Reality TV, etc by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    It seems this is all the rage in todays pop culture. An undying sense of "reality" through celebrity. It's an oxymoron to be sure and hopefully another quietly exiting fad. I mean, not to sound elitist, but when I find a blog as well written as the NY Times, perhaps I'll be intrigued.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  93. Bukkake blog? by friek · · Score: 0

    Did no one else notice that there is someone in the C list named Kitty Bukkake? I mean really - what kind of name is that?!?

    Although... that might be a blog I would actually read.

  94. Blogs that simply didn't make the list by British · · Score: 0



    The Scott Baio "baiolog"

    Your Ex-girlfriend who HATES YOUR GUTS! blog

    "Your best friend who loves to reveal all the secrets you confessed and laugh about it" blog

    The raunchy comedian who hasn't had a gig in 3 years blog

    The "Look at this news article I found on fark.com" commentary blog

    The Will Tippen, the fictional character who used to be on Alias blog (man that never gets updated)

    The "guy who played Will Tippen on Alias" actual blog.

    And the list goes on and on

  95. Damn! My blog's not on the list! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh wait, I don't have a blog...

  96. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

    What are you talking about? I set my threshold to 5, and it's like sitting at a table with the philosopher kings here.

    Had I not already posted in this thread, I would mod that comment up as "funny."

    Not because it was all that hilarious or anything... I just think it would be nice if he could read his own posts once in a while. :)

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  97. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

    You can always read your own posts.

    --
    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  98. I'll Tell You What I Think by David_R · · Score: 1

    What does the slashdot crowd think of their choices?

    This /. crowd member thinks we should stop giving entries in the Contagious Media Showdown more help than they deserve.

  99. Re: Are your own lives really THAT boring? by wsanders · · Score: 1

    You haven't read my blog, then, have you?

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  100. What about Pamela Jones by gbitten · · Score: 1

    PJ is shiniest blog celebrity in recent days.

  101. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    What I find completely devoid of humor are all the different ways people modify the phrase "pot calling the kettle black." Really, it never was funny.

  102. Sorry, dude, it's not a gag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From http://www.seanbonner.com/blog/archives/001718.php :

    "Scam" is a pretty powerful allegation....there's no fraud at work here....just a lot of people contributing time and energy to something that you're RACING to trash any which way possible.

    Yes, we ARE part of the Contagious Media Showdown.

    NO, it isn't a "hoax"....any more than Metroblogging is a local media hoax. Blogebrity is launching a full blog/magazine site, complete with a variety of rich interactive content about bloggers. There will be plenty of value/interest (beyond sheer ego) for those interested in bloggers and blogging.

    Why are you so down on the idea of engaging in a conversation with the very community that you and Metroblogging are trying to profit from? We felt there was a great opportunity to use the Contagious Media platform to start a large discussion with bloggers about their own pursuits, passions, and blog experiences.

    The only thing that changed, from one day ago, is that you discovered we're NOT a commercial outfit, trying to make $$$ exploiting bloggers as an advertising platform. Instead, we're just trying to use a high-profile opportunity to start a conversation, for the good of the community at large.

    Perhaps we'd all be better off with videos of us crying over a bowl of Apple Jacks.

  103. Word. by wheezl · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... I used to be roomates with an A-List Blogger. I'm going to put that on my resume right away.

    --
    -- oh.... so..... sleeeeeepy.
  104. Better option by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

    How about we remove from the gene pool anyone who runs a blog, writes into a blog, or even uses the term blog?

    --

    Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    1. Re:Better option by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      It was nice knowing ya.

  105. wil wheaton by cwapface · · Score: 0

    Wil Wheaton's blog no longer counts until he finishes his Ask Slashdot interview.

    Then he can be Slashdot's poster child again.

  106. Not an accurate list by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

    Ok, this isn't even close to being an accurate list... Surely they would have included *MY* blog on the A-List if it were ;)

  107. Tucker by gogoguez3000 · · Score: 1

    I know that a lot of people hate him. But if you're going to make a list like this based on the notoriety and possibly the amount of hits on the site Tucker Max has to be near the top.

  108. Maddox on the B-list? by kyle90 · · Score: 1

    I would have put him on the A-list for sure; he broke 100 million page views a couple months ago.

    --
    Real_men_don't_need_spacebars.
  109. who the hell cares?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i still have yet to find a reason to read a blog. if i want to listen to other people talk about stupid shit i can listen to the people in my head.

  110. Where's Richard Herring by phaze3000 · · Score: 1
    He was even on British TV a few years ago, he surely qualifies as a C-lister..

    His blog is often very amusing (at least for those that understand our British humour).

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
  111. Juan Cole by WinkyN · · Score: 3, Informative

    Juan Cole was listed as a "B-list" blogger, but he should be on the A-list.

    For the uninformed, Juan is a University of Michigan professor who collects information from various Arab Web sites and posts them in his blog. If you want to take a read at what's really happening in the Middle East, check out his blog http://www.juancole.com/.

    He's definitely against the U.S. involvement in Iraq, so he's definitely biased. And I would prefer he stop some of the partisan crap that spews from both sides (his recent Photoshop pic of Cheney on a body-builders' body comes to mind), but the information he provides is well worth reading.

  112. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mars Rover still stuck. Google launches new feature.

    That takes us to next Wednesday.

  113. Attn: Blogebrity by twilight30 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuck off.

    Thank you.

    Isn't the last thing this world needs is the extension of celebrity bullshit?

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  114. Some geek has friends! by HooliganIntellectual · · Score: 1

    That's an original one. Post the list of your Friendster friends and call it the list of top blogging celebrities.

  115. Where is Groklaw? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Or isn't it considered a blog?

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  116. it's a fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Last week we stumbled across the website Blogebrity, which purported to be a magazine focusing on bloggers-as-celebrities (see 5/20 Blogometer). We speculated then that the site was a promotional tool for another website; it turns out we were wrong, but close. The website is actually an entry in a contest sponsored by liberal-leaning performance artists/activists at Contagious Media, previously known for a well-publicized prank on Nike and the satirical website Black People Love Us. Gawker Media founder Nick Denton, a "Blogebrity" target, is also involved. The contest will award cash prizes to a completely new website that receives the most unique visitors over a 3-week period ending 6/9. Blogebrity is currently ranked third. "

  117. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except this is a community with atleast some semblance of conversation. A blog is a soapbox and people commenting on the rants.

  118. Enders Game by schlick · · Score: 1

    It's been a while, but in enders game didn't enders brother and sister manipulate politics and elections on "the net?" Isn't that where blogs are going? Some how I doubt it will happen that soon. I do like how science fiction predicts the future so well sometimes.

    --
    "It's because they're stupid, that's why. That's why everybody does everything." -Homer Simpson
  119. Where is CowboyNeal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And for that matter, CmdrTaco and PJ of Groklaw fame?

  120. I don't get what's so special about a blog... by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    Can someone please explain?

    It seems to be nothing more than a forum in which only the owner is allowed to start a new headlined thread. A /. where only one person can submit and moderate.

    Or am I just getting curmudgeony with age?

    Perhaps making one would get me fame and fortune?

    They seem to be the hot new thing.

    Adding an old DECtalker for text to speech and coupling to podcast(which I do grok and can't understand why it's not being exploited in many ways that it could be) would be kind of fun.

    OK, you tell me what makes a blog something that will make people say, 'well isn't that special' and I'll do a BLOG meets PODCAST site.

    Could start it off with a RANT about the idiots at home depot telling me that I couldn't buy vermiculite because it is used in making BOMBS and then calling the security guard... One of a million good stories waiting to be told.

  121. Glen Reynolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed!

    1. Re:Glen Reynolds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh.

  122. Wil's Blog by javamann · · Score: 1

    I use to read Wil's blog every day but of late it seems all he does is whine about stuff. Tried again today and he was whining about being sick. Crap, I can get that at home from my wife.

  123. Perhaps ... by pjammer · · Score: 1

    They ought to be using an Artificial Intelligence program to generate entries?

  124. My new secret language... by chriswaclawik · · Score: 1
    I've decided to invent a new language called bloggie. It helps to get the point accross more quickly when talking about blogs or writing articles about them.

    Here is a sample English phrase:
    This is a sample sentence about blogs.

    In bloggie, this becomes:
    Blog blog blog blog blog blog blogs.

    But on a more serious note, this is what all the recent media coverage about blogs sounds like. It has become ridiculously overexposed. I remember that one time I wasn't able to open a single newspaper without finding a front page article about what a "metrosexual" was. I'm hoping that the same thing doesn't happen to blogs, which have many uses when they are used instead of talked about.

    --
    A guy walks into a bar... well, I forgot the joke, but the punchline is that he's an alcoholic.
  125. the media is the message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    since everyone bitches about how they have no content, let's see how many present their content, or rather: how many are black text on white background...

    EVIL

    * underlined+bold
    * drop shadow
    * cream background, not much of an improvement. some of the header text is glossy (shiney / embossed / see above one / other various "auto-artistic" trash ).
    * the tiny images illustrating each entry, are dithered (i guess with a "web palette" [making it look even more horrible], which people stopped doing 5+ years ago) then jpg'd.
    * cyan background (the name of 100% green + 100% blue)
    * purple text, orange links. no, that's not better.
    * yes i really want to be tortured with your family album pics
    * half of the people leave directly (or die) with the header
    * light yellow (piss-water yellow?) background.
    * "I.Mter-
    views" ?
    i don't get it. dashes in headlines are satan.
    * scary vector portrait
    * horrible. evil. tasteless.
    * scarier than the sixapart girl.
    * yellow background.

    GOOD

    * pear/white background. title with first letter biggie, first line in different font from rest.
    * greenish tasty tone over everything ...which i didn't follow. great. thanks. as for the equally bad link-colours being that horrible default-blue/purple, it was only around 10%. this was checking 70% of the a-list. methinks those popular people should hire someone to design their site

    good design = pyros, don't remember any other. and yeah, it's not a blog.
    says intersting things = ms g33k. who i'm not sure is a good thing to link, i won't link myself.

  126. BLOG-CAST by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    Submitted this as an ask slashdot but figured might get some input here, in case it's another editors REJECT!

    Senor_Programmer writes "I'm always getting these wild and crazy ideas but I'm both lazy and wanting to implement well. So, have come a begging all you /. wizards of internet communications for the scoop on the good stuff.

    Here is what I want to to.

    I want to set up a combination podcasting and blogging site.

    weblog > text to speech > podcast

    I'm looking for FOSS suggestions-recommendations to employ in this silly endeavour. Stuff I can glue together with scripts.

    What do you say?

    1)Blog. Personal and some friends but don't want to be tied down if it gets popular.
    2)Text to speech. Something with tailorable voices would be nice.
    3)Podcasting, see '1'.

    Once running would also like to have a go at a speech to text input for the blog. It's a natural once the text to speech part is there becase it makes training easy. Shoud be trainable for multiple users so that once a user is identified or identifies himself the past training results are available. So, suggestions for speech to text would be nice too. With speech to text and picture phones, it's possible to update the thing easily on the go, once the speech to text is trained.

    If anyone wants to play with me on this project, speak up."

  127. sux by floodo1 · · Score: 0

    as with all lists there is some lameness.
    matt drudge as a-list? roflmao

    --
    I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
  128. Zach Braff? by Oakey · · Score: 1

    So...erm... why isn't Zach Braff not listed? I know he updates his blog on the Garden State website quite regularly. Not worthy of even the C list?

    --
    "Dre don't get as high as me.... I'm Cheech and Chong" - Snoop Dogg
  129. Blogs for Nerds by obender · · Score: 1

    The only blogs I ever read are located at cvs.sourgeforge.net. None of these guys seem to write there.

  130. Wil Wheaton? A-list? by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


    Based on what? His entries are about as banal as any other's, and his writings pale compared to Sterling's (yes, apples and oranges). Perhaps his left-leaning self-important tone carries the day...

  131. Mod this dude up by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    "This is pathetic. In such a short time, a community has taken everything despicable about celebrity worship and reimplemented it on the Internet. "

    How true it is. How pathetic it is.

  132. Blobs of Blah Blogs by NetSettler · · Score: 1

    Well, when the web came along, everyone thought the web would be this big amorphous blob with no discernable center, just a sense of egalitarianism in which everyone was as important as everyone else. But no one could see their way around, and some sites had more content than others, but most importantly this upset the establishment, who quickly moved to have portal pages like msn.com and aol.com and such that controlled what most people saw first. Soon order was restored, and the establishment was on top again.

    Now blogs have sought to re-organize the media into an egalitarian space where anyone's opinion is as good as anyone else's. And now there's a move by establishment media to have blog portals, and rankings of blogs, and whatnot. This is good because not every blog is worth the time. It's bad because you're substituting someone else's opinion for your own. But it's good because we have finite lifespans and can't devote our whole lives to having an opinion on everything. But mostly it's really good because it restores order and says that establishment media still has a place in the world, and that that place is, as it always was, to tell us what information we want and what information we don't.

    Really, this is a victory. It means you don't have to decide for yourself. And we're a culture who doesn't like to do things for ourselves, right? That sounds too much like work. And who wants to work when one can press a button and not have to think...? I, for one, am thrilled that this easy information about who's on the A, B, and C lists is available to me. Think of the time it's going to save me. Can we get these guys to sort through Slashdot and give us A, B, and C lists of topics, too? Why, there's just no end to the time savings they could be to us if we'd only utilize their services properly...

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  133. Re:These people don't know what they're talking ab by category_five · · Score: 3, Informative
    "Clearly the list is fraudulent. Maddox is on the B list? I've never heard of most of the A list but I'd think getting a book deal off of having a well read blog would put you on the A list of blogging. Afterall, that's the point of having one."

    I agree with you. I clicked on some of the "A List" links and found mostly news aggregation sites. One of the random "A List" clicks had the top posting as a link to The Onion, the second link on the same page to a CNN type story. Why does an amateur news aggregation site make "A list" while people who are making original material like Bruce Sterling and Maddox get delegated to the B list? The list doesn't even include Robert X. Cringely Robert X. Cringely, one of the original bloggers who blogged on the internet before these people who wrote this crappy list ever even knew what the internet was. I guess it doesn't matter because Cringely, Maddox and Sterling will keep writing their original material about relevant things while "Blogebrity" and it's "A list" keep writing about their toothpaste woes, or what brand of shoes they like, hoping for some venture capital so they can sell out without ever having contributed one iota of anything, original thought or otherwise, to society.

    Or as Maddox would say, "It doesn't matter, bag my groceries"

  134. Re:Reading your own posts by unitron · · Score: 1
    "You can always read your own posts."

    Too bad more of us don't do so before hitting "Submit". :-)

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  135. Tonight on bloggertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I am your host (cute girl icon) and I am live blogging from the bloggertainment studio.

    We have the inside scoop on the papparzzi blog, and special geek blog, the geeks of Star Wars.

    We will be back after this quick blogger ad break........

  136. Personal Preference-Fe Fi Fo Fum. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Except to find the ones you like, you have to read a lot of articles that don't interest you. Doh!"

    FOAF, semantic web.

  137. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    sitting at a table with the philosopher kings here
    So, have you guys yet been able to score more than one chopstick each?
  138. Blog:Understanding the Information Reformation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0785 21187X/qid%3D1117069013/sr%3D11-1/ref%3Dsr_11_1/10 2-5370309-2816147?v=glance&s=books

    "If the blogosphere had a press agent, it would be Hugh Hewitt. He has flogged the potential of the blogosphere for over a year on his website, and "Blog" attempts to bring the word to people who don't get their news from the Internet.

    Like his previous work, "If It's Not Close, They Can't Cheat," "Blog" is an eminently readable work you can devour in an afternoon. Hugh's writing style is conversational and transmits information quickly and clearly. This makes "Blog" a good read regardless of your position on blogs and blogging.

    Hugh's thesis is simple: blogs are the next wave in the information revolution, as important to the dissemination of information as the printing press was to the Reformation. While Hugh touts a number of blogs (oddly enough missing yours truly, but I'm sure that was an oversight), his discussion isn't about any particular blog, but about how the technology of blogs is changing how information reaches the public. He cites four significant instances of the blogosphere influencing the public discourse: the removal of Trent Lott from his position as Senate Majority Leader, the fall of Jayson Blair and Howell Raines at the New York Times, the takedown of John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth and Dan Rather's immolation following the 60 Minutes forged National Guard documents scandal. Each case illustrates how the blogosphere was able to keep stories percolating (and even breaking, in the latter two cases) until the national media had no choice to take what the blogosphere was giving them, and in each case the results were markedly different than what would have occurred prior to the rise of the blogosphere.

    Naysayers will probably ding Hugh for what notes as blogger triumphalism, but I think such readers are missing the point. Hugh is not arguing that any one blogger or group of bloggers is able to have this effect, but that the blogosphere as a whole is distributing the flow of information in such a manner as to make it far more difficult for anyone to control that flow. That will make life far more difficult for people accustomed to keeping tight control over information, but it also represents a great opportunity for people willing to take advantage of this new medium's strengths. And this is what Hugh is trying to sell: those people and businesses that jump into the blogosphere now are going to gain a serious competitive advantage on those who continue to stick to older methods of communicating. While this process in likely to move in fits and starts over the next few years, it is coming nevertheless, and "Blog" offers some good advice to those people looking to get out ahead of the blogosphere rather than ending up in trouble due to a failure to understand this new technology.

    The definitive work on the blogosphere is yet to be written, because it's still too early in the development of the system to chronicle it all. But Blog is a good start and a valuable resource for anyone looking to understand more about what the blogosphere is and how it can help or hurt your business."

  139. Who are these people? by uvsc_wolverine · · Score: 1

    The only name I recognized was Wil Wheaton. Who are the rest of the bunch? It looks more like a directory listing from Blogger. Just a bunch of names.

    --
    This space for rent...
  140. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too used to think that all blogs looked like http://www.wibsite.com/wiblog/dull/ this [wibsite.com] Then someone pointed out to me the therapeutic effect that offloading your thoughts and troubles can have, a bit like seeing a psychiatrist but without the fat as a panacea

  141. An old man said it best... by pfrankenstein · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want to be part of any club that would have me.

  142. Cho and the C-List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the reason that Margaret Cho and her blog haven't broken out of the C-list is because she hasn't updated her blog in two months.

  143. Doesn't really matter. by OwP_Fabricated · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has so much fucking astroturf now it could host the next Superbowl.

  144. hey, k3w1 concept... by alizard · · Score: 1
    lights others on fire for using the term "blog"

    Great idea. You posted to your LJ about it yet?

  145. evil is blue? by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 0

    Smurf Nazis Must Die

  146. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is quite possibly the funniest thing I've ever read on /.

    I commend you, good sir/madam :)

  147. a plague in their houses? by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 0

    Kevin Smith and Wil Wheaton both sick!

    It's a blogPlague!

  148. Re:WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS SHIT? BLOGEBRITY? by Silentnite · · Score: 1

    "Whine whine whine, Blah blah blah" "I have an opinion, everyone look at me." "This is stupid, and your stupid for reading it."

    And that shall account for almost all posts from here till wednesday. Except for the true gems.

    If you don't like it, don't read it.

    Slashdot may now resume.