Slashdot Mirror


User: kmmatthews

kmmatthews's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
252
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 252

  1. Re:Say "Goodbye, Sollog" on Usenet Psychic Wars With Wikipedia · · Score: 1
    Not me..

    Although it does make me suspicious that Sollog submitted this story - how else would he know exactly when to create the account to troll in the comments? Of course, it's entirely possible it's another troll...

  2. Re:Say "Goodbye, Sollog" on Usenet Psychic Wars With Wikipedia · · Score: 1

    Not the existence of the site, the comments on the site. :)

  3. Don't trust his site?... on Usenet Psychic Wars With Wikipedia · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.wikipediasucks.com/ - check out the slant on his site, and you'll immediately have a good idea of his creditability...

  4. Say "Goodbye, Sollog" on Usenet Psychic Wars With Wikipedia · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm thinking this motherfucker bit off more than he can chew with this one.

    http://www.wikipediasucks.com/ probably qualifies as libel. Anyone want to set up a donation fund to take him out? (If Mr. Wales is interested in filing suit, that is. Unlikely, but we can hope?)

    Beyond that:

    TOH c/o AIS
    Domain Register (dnr@theasi.net)
    +1.3863165425
    Fax: +1.5555555555
    4613 University Dr Number 311
    Coral Springs, ST 33067
    US
    Wanna slashdot his phone?
  5. Re:To summarize parent, on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 1
    Okay, so in an attempt to get help you post absolute tripe [that you now appear to be admitting is false]. This, of course, bothers people because someone not knowing any better could come along and take your post for truth.

    Beyond that, you didn't post any questions. Just complaints.

  6. Re:Why? on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 1
    1. They don't own* the patents you mentioned.
    2. You certainly appeared to be cheering on a patent lawsuit.

    * Or, the patents they do own are widely recognized as having prior art, e.g. being invalid. FWIW, #2 is what annoys the crap out of me.

  7. Re:Dandy, but... on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 1
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, ask those who can nicely to consider adding the features you want for you. If you can prove your idea is good, someone will be willing to help.

    I agree entirely; the OP however seemed to think bitching about it was a good way to do that.

  8. Re:Dandy, but... on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 1
    The difference is the willingness to pay for a feature you want - if you're paying with cash, or with your own time.

    If you want feature $Y that no one else has written and/or wants to write, or you wish feature $Z worked a little differently, you've got to pay for it - either with your time, or by hiring someone to do it.

    Of course, for many features, others have already "paid" for it by developing it, so you get it for free.

  9. To summarize parent, on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Ooooh, it doesn't work for me, I can't be bothered to read the fricking docs and figure out how to make it work, it's trash and you shouldn't use it.. "

  10. Re:Dandy, but... on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I really don't intend this to be flamebait, but instead of bitching that it isn't supported, why not shut up and do it?

    So many people proclaiming "Open Source application $X will fail because it doesn't support my favorite feature $Y." Either quit bitching or MAKE THE APP SUPPORT it.

  11. Re:I thought Firefox was Streamlined on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 1
    Uh, you seem to think Minimo is intended to replace Firefox, which would indicate that not only did you not read the article, you didn't even read the summary!

    Minimo is intended for small/embedded devices, not a desktop computer.

  12. Re:Will it work on cell phones? on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check this out http://www.fizzl.net/projects/sdwap.php.. Very nicely done, it makes slashdot readable on devices that support WAP.

  13. Re:a light browser on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 1
    What in $DIETYs name are you doing that it's taking 133mb of ram?!

    It takes around 20mb on my XP system.

  14. Re:How long before Opera starts enforcing patents? on Mozilla Heading to Mobiles · · Score: 4, Funny

    Allow me to be the first to say:
    You, sir, are an ass monkey.

  15. Re:Problem solved. on Cell Phones In The Air? · · Score: 1
    I've got a rocket launcher in my trunk, but does that give me the right to blow your car up because you annoy me?

    If someone ever tried to pull this shit on me, I'd have them arrested in about 3 seconds flat.

    Not to mention that what you're doing *is* illegal.

  16. Re:Huge performance drop- in single player! on Half-Life 2 Deathmatch Confirmed · · Score: 1
    During panning scenes, you will literally see the landscape jump around the screen because 24 fps is not enough to make it smooth

    Wow, you just completely misunderstood the process of animation. I'm proud.

  17. Re:No, it doesn't require an Xbox to run. on Open Source Multimedia Center For Windows · · Score: 1
    First, it doesn't "run in visual studio," it's likely compiled in *gasp* debug mode.

    Second, why don't you read the docs, or ... actually DEBUG IT and figure out which file it isn't finding?

  18. Re:Huge performance drop- in single player! on Half-Life 2 Deathmatch Confirmed · · Score: 1

    And just think, your eyes can't differntiate much between 30 fps and 90 fps. ;)

  19. Re:They should mention that no firewall was used.. on Clean System to Zombie Bot in Four Minutes · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't need a firewall if it didn't default to having so many ports open listening for traffic.

  20. Re:Worth the wait.. on Steam Registration Servers Overloaded · · Score: 1
    but considering that there has *yet* to be a pirated release it seems like they

    You're not looking hard enough.

    Maybe valve should stand up and take notice that we aren't going to accept this bullshit? All it did was lose them a sale.

  21. Re:Where's my money? on Shawn Fanning Is Back Into Digital Music · · Score: 1
    Is just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?

    Let me assure you, it's not just your observation. :)

    ps.. you're missing "it"

  22. Re:Human beings are dumb on Meet Millionaire Spammer Jeremy Jaynes · · Score: 2, Funny
    parent says:

    And PT Barnum's top competitor said, "There's a sucker born every minute." I've pretty much lost hope for the species.

    followed by (.sig):

    Free flat screen? [seankelly.biz]

    bwhahahahahaha :)

  23. Re:Question regarding DSL and VOIP on The Continued Advance of VoIP · · Score: 2, Funny
    One word (err, URL) http://www.speakeasy.net/residential/onelink/. I have it, and I'll never go back. (DSL without the home phone line.)

    Once you try thier VOIP service, you'll love it, too. :)

    (No, I don't work for them, just a very satisfied customer).

  24. Re:Stock, not stock options on Employee Stock Options? · · Score: 1

    Ooops :( Sorry about that, I guess I am getting stock. Crawls safely back to c++... ;)

  25. The company I work for... on Employee Stock Options? · · Score: 2, Insightful

    still does. It's a ... convulted calculation, but you end up getting between 2-4x your monthly salary in stock at the end of the year. So if you make 5k a month, you can end up getting between 10 and 20k in stock; which you can sell immediately if you so desire. (They also have an end of year cash bonus equal to 1/2 of one months salary.)

    Here's a note to other companies: this stock bonus ploy keeps me working for them when I might otherwise seek other employment. Pay/treat your good people nicely, and they'll respond in kind. Treat your employees like crap, and they'll respond in kind.

    (ok, I'm really tired.. err, that's my excuse.)