Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Multimedia Center For Windows

An anonymous reader writes "A new opensourced multimedia center for Windows has been released. Media Portal boasts the ability to turn your PC into an advanced HTPC (Home-Theatre PC) and PVR/DVR (Personal/Digital Video Recorder). It allows you to listen to your favorite music and radio, watch all your video's and DVD's, view, schedule and record live TV and much more. The software is a port of the homebrew Xbox Media Center software which requires a Modded Xbox to run."

215 comments

  1. Open Source for Windows ? by mirko · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does it still require the MFC to be compiled ?
    If this is the case I then fail to see the interest of this especially when it requires an Xbox and then Micorsoft to gain alittle money from the operation.
    Geek factor > Open Source interest.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by nosaj72 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've been running this for a while. It just runs on regular Windows, not the XBOX. It is just a port of the XBOX Media Program. Not bad for keeping a nice queue of DIVX movies at the ready for the kids.

    2. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by norminator · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does it still require the MFC to be compiled ? If this is the case I then fail to see the interest of this especially when it requires an Xbox and then Micorsoft to gain alittle money from the operation.

      They're saying that it's a port of the XBox app, which has already been around for a while. The new app is a Windows-based product and does not require an XBox

    3. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by thempstead · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Media Portal software appears to be a port of the media center from the xbox platform to normal Windows. Hence it doesn't require an Xbox. I.e. from the requirements page it specifies WinXP SP1 or SP2.

      t

    4. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by turnage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some people don't read the articles, others don't even read the post.

      Read this part once again and notice the "is a port of the" part then finish off with the "which requires a" part:
      The software is a port of the homebrew Xbox Media Center software which requires a Modded Xbox to run.

    5. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by Chundra · · Score: 1

      The kids should be weened from the glass teet at an early age. I do admire your attitude regarding the MPAA though and I'm sure it'll rub off on the youngsters.

    6. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      The software is a port of the homebrew Xbox Media Center software which requires a Modded Xbox to run

      It doesnt' require an XBox. It's a PORT of software that requireD an XBox...

    7. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled 'teat'

    8. Re:Open Source for Windows ? by niteice · · Score: 1

      MFC is for building Windows applications that look like Windows applications, dumbass. You don't need a Windows GUI on an Xbox. Seeing as the site is /.ed, I can't see screenies, but I'll guess it doesn't need MFC and uses GCC.

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  2. media portal page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    don't link the home page or anything
    http://mediaportal.sourceforge.net/

    1. Re:media portal page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original poster claimed it supported recording live TV on the Xbox but I couldn't find any reference to this ability on the project homepage. Which tuners and how many of them does the Xbox support and how do you install them? I mean, surely the OP wasn't just trolling on the Slashdot front page.

  3. erm, not 1.0? by thempstead · · Score: 1

    homepage seems to indicate 0.1.0.0 not 1.0 ... i.e. beta not release ....

    t

    1. Re:erm, not 1.0? by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the homepage:

      There are some rumors floating around about MediaPortal 1.0.

      However this is very wrong, because as you can see below we just released 0.1. The current version 0.1 is not considered as the first stable release and it is definitely not final!

      This does not mean the product is an alpha release! The 0.1 is considered a very nice and stable beta release, which everyone can and should test and help out to fix bugs and/or improve the product even further. And remember: it is free forever!

    2. Re:erm, not 1.0? by thempstead · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Exactly ....

      t

    3. Re:erm, not 1.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a seriously crappy alpha... many bugs. Must have the latest DX. I got 7 crashes in 20 minutes. Back on the shelf for now.

  4. Media Portal by sp00 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The SF Media Portal site seems to be /.'d. Here's the Google Cache.

    1. Re:Media Portal by sp00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ummm.... yeah... Linky!

    2. Re:Media Portal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm ... can you say karma whore ... site is running fine as of 22:00 GMT which is after your post ...

  5. At last!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  6. The server's already running slow... by rjelks · · Score: 4, Informative

    The project is at SourceForge if you guys want to give maxconsole a break.

    1. Re:The server's already running slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That page looks like ass in FireFox. Makes me wish there were a setting to use Internet Explorer's engine within Firefox.

    2. Re:The server's already running slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Coralize the SF page for even more speed.

    3. Re:The server's already running slow... by Cplus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your mother looks like ass in FireFox, however this page looks much the same in IE, FireFox or Mozilla.

      Are you happy? I wasted a whole two minutes of my life on this. That's two minutes less that I get to live, it's like you murdered me a little bit with a tiny, little knife.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  7. Um.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    It allows you to listen to your favorite music and radio, watch all your video's and DVD's, view, schedule and record live TV and much more.

    Clearly a threat to Copyrights, Profits and Homeland Security. In certain the authorities (MPAA/RIAA/Microsoft have already been notified and are moving the threat level up from Plaid to Paisley)

    The software is a port of the homebrew Xbox Media Center software which requires a Modded Xbox to run."

    Now I'm certain Microsoft will be activating their Bucket 'o Lawyers* The only people allowed to give away something like that for free must have an ulterior motive, such as locking everyone into mind control or market share...

    *Not to be confused with the toys Bucket o' Soldiers or Barrel o' Monkeys, but toys of their masters all the same.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Um.. by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
      Plaid to Paisley? That's worrying. Plaid Cymru just burns down the houses of the English settlers, but the Rev. Ian Paisley shouts stupid things really really loudly.

      So where is that on the Fonda-Rumsfeld threat scale?

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    2. Re:Um.. by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      I thought the only level higher than Blackwatch Plaid was the cover of Rush's seminal album _Moving_Pictures_

      Oh, and I've played with this software, Xbox Media Center is still a better option, even if you have to go buy and mod an Xbox to get it.

    3. Re:Um.. by fermion · · Score: 0, Troll
      More like a threath to the english language

      schedule and record live TV
      Does this mean that I can only record shows that are live? Well that rules out just about everything, as even "live" shows are on a short delay.

      But at least I get to schedule the shows. I would love to kick out all the reality show and replace it with more Buffy!

      Or perhaps the text means that we can record real time. With proper hardware, of course.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Um.. by sepluv · · Score: 1

      Actually, no, Paisley et al are far more militant, and Plaid Cymru don't even want independence, just some level of autonomy (like the NAW but more so--say like Scotland) unlike the Wales Independence Party (but I think they've disapparead off the political landscape).

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    5. Re:Um.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    6. Re:Um.. by Burb · · Score: 1
      Not a brilliant comparison, since Paisley's DUP and the other unionist parties want to maintain closer ties with Britain. I never thought that the Northern Ireland unionist parties wanted significant independence from England ... it might be seen as playing into the hands of the nationalists/republicans.

      Accusing Paisley of being a demagogue is a valid accusation, mind you.

      --

    7. Re:Um.. by sepluv · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Paisley obviously doesn't want any independence (although I don't know much about Ireland--they could want some possibly). I wasn't making the comparison--just pointing out it was untrue (as well as a bad comparison anyway). Terribly OT anyway.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    8. Re:Um.. by Silburn_Luke · · Score: 1
      Plaid Cymru just burns down the houses of the English settlers
      I think you mean 'Mabion Glyndyr' (trans. 'Sons of Glendower') - the lairy idiots who decided a couple of decades ago that burning down holiday cottages was an effective way of striking back at eeevil English invaders (or at least was a diverting way to while away the long winter nights) probably vote Plaid Cymru, but I doubt the PC leadership are overjoyed to be recieving support from such quarters.

      Regards
      Luke
      --
      #include witty_one_liner.h
  8. Hardware by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This could be interesting.
    What is the most inexpensive hardware with enough OOMPH to run this?

    I looked at Mini-ITX systems, and the HUSH grabbed my eye. Then the price grabbed me somewhere else.

    And I don't really want to get an XBOX then modify it, so don't give me the obvious answer...

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Hardware by garcia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What is the most inexpensive hardware with enough OOMPH to run this?

      I wonder if because it was based on the XBox version if a sub 1Ghz machine with very little RAM would suffice?

      I would be very interested in seeing a barebones media center application that ran on minimal hardware. MythTV remains out of reach for me as I would have to build a machine specifically for it that is 100x more powerful than my current fastest machine.

    2. Re:Hardware by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      And I don't really want to get an XBOX then modify it, so don't give me the obvious answer...

      So how about the slightly-less-obvious-answer: Find one of the guys that is selling pre-modded XBoxen on the internet, and grab one of those. Usually they can be had for around $250, and have a switch so you can temporarily "unmod" as necessary.

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    3. Re:Hardware by gekkotron · · Score: 0

      The obvious answer is an XBox,
      except for the fact that it is lacking in the PVR department,
      having no native inbound video.

      I'm very happy with my modded XBox/XBMC,
      but am curious what the answer to hoggoth's post is.
      Adding DVR/PVR to the mix would be nice.

    4. Re:Hardware by 74nova · · Score: 2, Funny

      hehe, im presently taking a break from coding in C++ and saw the OO in 'OOMPH' and thought to myself,

      'Object Oriented...Multimedia...Player...Hardware?'

      huh? ah well. back to coding...

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    5. Re:Hardware by kaustik · · Score: 2, Informative

      An Xbox will not act as a DVR, as far as I know. I use the XBMP to play media from my Xbox onto my television, but the Xbox does not have a TV card needed to capture the feed from the television. This port is very very cool because it allows you to run the app on hardware that is much more upgradable than the Xbox. I will definitely check this out.

    6. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get TV/video cards with built in MPEG2 encoding/decoding to greatly reduce cpu load.
      Hauppauge's WinTV 250 has MPEG2 encoding only, the 350 has en- and decoding.
      Via's EPIA M mobos have hw mpeg2 something or other. Those rock for pvrs.

    7. Re:Hardware by jarich · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why do you say that about Myth?

      I am running a 1.2 ghz Thunderbird (AMD) w/256 megs of a memory and a ~really~ cheap ($10) capture card and it's working fine.

      A lot of the people in the Myth forums go on about how you need a P4 3 ghz chip, but it just isn't so.

    8. Re:Hardware by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "MythTV remains out of reach for me as I would have to build a machine specifically for it that is 100x more powerful than my current fastest machine."

      Hmm..what kind of box do you have?? If you get a PVR250/350 for the hardware compression...you can significanly lower your processor needs. I tried it with a P3 600 Mhz...and just skipped a bit...but, I've heard other have success that low. I junked that box, and am rebuilding with new case...new MB and Althon (2.1 Ghz?)...just reused the old drives, DVD, etc. Didn't cost that much to upgrade...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Hardware by Knight2K · · Score: 1

      Myth is split into a backend and frontend. You can add multiple backends and have one front-end access them.

      The approach I've been thinking about is creating a MythTV box that is just a front-end and using it to play music through my home theater. Then gradually save the money to build a file server/Myth backend box that will do the DVR stuff. In the meantime, I can just share my music from my current workstation to the front-end.

      If you are running Linux on your current fastest machine, you could do something similar. Spend the money on a nice small frontend with enough horsepower to display video (not encode it), and use your workstation to do that capture.

      You could even have all of your old machines work as single-tuner backends if you wanted.

      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
    10. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Can I put it on a TIVO?

    11. Re:Hardware by caino59 · · Score: 1

      i just built an asus pundit with 2.4ghz celeron d, 512mb mushkin ram, lite-on dvd-r+r/w, and a cheapie bt878 based tuner card that does fm too. got the WD hard drive @ best buy for 50 after rebates - bringing the whole system in at under 400 bucks. That's fairly cheap and powerfull if you ask me...

      works great under mythtv and the best part is that it has composite and s-vid out - and the s-vid will output 1080i

    12. Re:Hardware by Trelane · · Score: 1

      I am using a Pentium II 400Mhz/512MB RAM with a Hauppauge PVR-350 and MythTV. I don't get any skips. It's slow changing screens, but I don't really have problems watching TV, recording TV, or watching recordings.

      --

      --
      Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
    13. Re:Hardware by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      I've managed to get MythTV working pretty well on an old carppy 500 MHz Compaq. I use a PVR 250 card and a 160 GB HD and the only time I get anything choppy is when I play and record simultaneously. ---I want a PVR 350 card which would allow the hardware to do the M-PEG decoding and it's also another tuner card so I will be able to play and record at the same time, then I could even record two shows simultaneously while playing since I'll keep the 250 card in it too :)

    14. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Two things you should know. Compared to other HTPC software Media Portal is slow on older systems. In fact in general parts of it are just kinda slow. For example MYHTPC and many other htpc packages run very well on say a PIII700 256MB system, this does not. Second it only supports cards that do mpeg2 in hardware. That obviously made things easier for them but it really let down a ton of users when they dropped support for non-mpeg2 tv cards for recording.

      The one good thing is its acutally opensource. That doesn't mean the original devs won't leave to make their own commercial proprietary htpc programs but at least the project can live on unlike myhtpc which I had mentioned above. Considering the current glut of htpc frontends etc on win32 these days it is a little worrying that this is the only truly open one. :( Most people just don't want to code open HTPC software except on linux.

      Another decent option is GotAllMedia which is coming along nicely. Its also Free but as in beer. I highly suggest you check it out. http://www.gottvpvr.com/

    15. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm running it on a Celeron 450 with 256MB of ram. It works, but is a little slow. Fine for recording (using a capture card with builtin mpeg encoder) but playback is a little slow to start with (but ends up ok). I'd consider this machine the absolute bottom end of what will run it ok.

      People who say you need a massive machine to run this sort of stuff are most likely "audiophile" type who have no real idea how things work.

    16. Re:Hardware by sepluv · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Or get one of the guys on the "X-Box Chocolate Project" to do it for you.

      You find a local X-box modder on that list and (s)he mods your X-box (hardware or software) or just your memory card and you give them chocolate or their suggsted gift for the service.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    17. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S-video out is all well and good, but not much stuff has an s-video in -- at least not in Australia anyway....

    18. Re:Hardware by dn15 · · Score: 1

      (Note: I'm not the original poster.)

      Personally I've never been able to make MythTV perform well. I have a 1 GHz Athlon with 384 MB of RAM and all I can really manage to do is watch TV. Anything else, and it gets slow and hangs. I'm not dissing the MythTV project because it seems really nice and I'd love to be able to run it. But the system I tried it on certainly didn't seem to up the task.

      As much as I'd like to aviod Windows for a PVR system, I'll be ecstatic if this project works for me.

    19. Re:Hardware by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      MythTV remains out of reach for me as I would have to build a machine specifically for it that is 100x more powerful than my current fastest machine.
      Um..., where do you get that info from? The trick with MythTV or _any_ PVR, be it MS Windows based or Linux based, is to do _hardware_ encoding. Get a PVR250/350 for the hardware compression and you can run a very low end processor and low mem (256 MB or so). If you don't have a hardware card, then of course you will need a good proc, again be it MS Windows or Linux. The PVR 250 is pretty cheap and you can throw it in any ole` box and get a good MythTV setup. I have an AMD 1800+ (which is very cheap) and it performs great with a PVR 250, though next time I plan on getting a PVR 350.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    20. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built my PVR for a tad over $300

      512mb muskin ram
      80gb IDE HD
      geforce2 video card (old one lying around) with svideo out
      intel motherboard
      1.8ghz celeron
      avermedia M150 MPEG2 card ($58 at newegg)
      enlight desktop case
      Old 16x Cd burner lying around

      I'd prefer having built a fanless system so it's more like a tivo instead of a noisy PC, but I wasn't sure if it wasn't going to work so I built it as cheaply as I could.. I'll probably sell this one in a year and build a good one.. prices should be down by then (crosss fingers for ITX standard to become more mainstream in the states like it is in UK)

    21. Re:Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what have you? component or just composite?

    22. Re:Hardware by jarich · · Score: 1
      Interesting... I wonder what's different in our setups. My video card is as cheap as they come. :)

      I'm by no means a Myth expert (I'm learning more everyday) but I'd look at your "transcode" settings if that box won't handle the load.

      Transcoding is what the Myth folk call converting a video. Transcoding takes place in the background, so if you've got a TV show that just finished recording and you're setup for automatic transcoding, you'll see the Myth Transcoding Daemon (mtd) pulling all the CPU cycles.

    23. Re:Hardware by dn15 · · Score: 1

      I'm using a cheap-o WinTV Go card. Nothing special or weird about the setup as far as I can tell. I'll have to give it another try with that transcoding bit in mind.

    24. Re:Hardware by jarich · · Score: 1
      Yup... you got the "expensive" $20 card http://www.softwareandstuff.com/CRD10186.html and I got the "cheap" $10 card http://www.softwareandstuff.com/crd_Aitechtvpci.ht ml

      I'm debating on putting a second card into the box and seeing what happens... I wonder if it could handle the load?

  9. No Xbox needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, this software does not require an XBox at all. It's a standalone program that gives you a nice 10' interface suitable for vewing on TV, and operation with a remote.

    Think MS Media Center, but Open-Source. And a good bit more flexible, in my opinion. I've been following this software for awhile, actually. This is really nothing new..

  10. Re:HAHA by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I still think Beyond TV snapstream is the only logical option on windows XP due to price and the fact that it runs on virtually all cards. MythTV and other open source projects seem so raw still.

  11. Re:HAHA by rylin · · Score: 0

    You're still paying the Micrsoft tax after all.

    FCKGW!
    -r

  12. Re:HAHA by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    An Open Source solution running on Microsoft branded hardware.

    You're still paying the Micrsoft tax after all.

    Actually, if you buy the Xbox but no games for it you're screwing Microsoft, since the box is a loss-leader. The real revenue is games and services.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  13. Not 1.0 by Gathers · · Score: 3, Informative

    This just in from http://mediaportal.sourceforge.net/

    Latest News

    01-December 2004

    IMPORTANT NEWS PLEASE READ THIS!

    There are some rumors floating around about MediaPortal 1.0.

    However this is very wrong, because as you can see below we just released 0.1. The current version 0.1 is not considered as the first stable release and it is definitely not final!

    This does not mean the product is an alpha release! The 0.1 is considered a very nice and stable beta release, which everyone can and should test and help out to fix bugs and/or improve the product even further. And remember: it is free forever!

  14. Features on the XBOX.... by Aceto3for5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Alot of people also use this as the dashboard, or OS so to speak, of their modded XBOXes. The version I have also has some built in VOIP capabilities. With VOIP locked into a media center, you could simulate the full movie theater experience, with everyone talking to each other during the movie.

    Seriously though, comedies tend to seem funnier in theaters, i think in part to the fact that you are with a bunch of other people laughing. Its like how children, and some adults, look around before or while they are laughing, as if they are looking for approval.

    VOIP in a media center could also be fun and useful for streaming educational videos, sporting events, sales, what have you. I hope they port those options over too. Forgive me if they mentioned that in TFA, but i couldnt seem to connect to it.

    1. Re:Features on the XBOX.... by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      I'm not looking for approval. I'm analyzing individual reactions so I can improve my behavioral prediction subroutines.

    2. Re:Features on the XBOX.... by flynniec6 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could hook up a webcam too to record the films you're watching and then sell them on the black market. You'd have all of the noise of the audience included. I've always wanted to be a video pirate (Aahhrrr) but I was too nervous of the legal wranglings. Now I can play in my home!

    3. Re:Features on the XBOX.... by jazman · · Score: 1

      It may not be just for approval. Ever been the one person in a silent audience that bursts out laughing? Embarrassing, isn't it? So after that you tend to look around to make sure others are laughing, then let rip.

  15. Re:Confusing... by bellevueGeek · · Score: 3, Informative


    Well it would be if it was for the fact that it is for xp.

    --

    All ye all ye outs in free!
  16. Re:DO NOT CLICK CACHE OF GOAT.CX by yellena · · Score: 0, Troll

    LIES!

  17. No, it doesn't require an Xbox to run. by mkaltner · · Score: 1, Informative

    If you read the summary correctly, you'd see that it's a PORT of Xbox Media Center, which does require a modded Xbox. Media Portal however, runs on Windows PC's.

    - Mike

    1. Re:No, it doesn't require an Xbox to run. by mkaltner · · Score: 1

      Appearantly it runs in Visual Studio because upon execution I get prompted to open it up in a new instance of Visual Studio .NET 2003! "An exception 'System.IO.FileNotFoundException' has occurred in MediaPortal.exe" - Mike

    2. Re:No, it doesn't require an Xbox to run. by kmmatthews · · Score: 1
      First, it doesn't "run in visual studio," it's likely compiled in *gasp* debug mode.

      Second, why don't you read the docs, or ... actually DEBUG IT and figure out which file it isn't finding?

      --
      feh. stuff.
  18. Does it come with... by noidentity · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...an extraneous apostrophe remover?

    1. Re:Does it come with... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

      No'

    2. Re:Does it come with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Everybody know's that you put apostrophe's before every "s". Anybody who 'say's otherwi'se is 'stupid.

    3. Re:Does it come with... by qute · · Score: 1

      This is a must:
      http://www.angryflower.com.nyud.net:8090/bo bsqu.gi f

      non-cached:
      http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.g if

      --
      -- Make software not war
    4. Re:Does it come with... by qute · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a must: Bob's Quick Guide to the Apostrophe

      non-cached: http://www.angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif
      (My first post was in error :-( )

      --
      -- Make software not war
    5. Re:Does it come with... by Graabein · · Score: 2, Funny
      While fully realizing that this is Slashdot, and not the New York Times, I'd just like to share the response I got from the Public Editor at the NYT when I complained about their use of apostrophes in headlines like "NEW DVD'S":

      Dear Graabein,

      Thank you for your message.

      I include The Times stylebook entry on this subject below.

      Sincerely,
      [Name withheld by me]
      Office of the Public Editor
      The New York Times

      Also use the apostrophe for plurals formed from letters or numerals (p's and q's; size 7's; B-52's) and terms like PC's, TV's and VCR's. While many authorities prefer to omit the apostrophe in these cases, it is necessary for clarity in all-uppercase headlines. Therefore use it in other kinds of copy also, for consistency.

      To which I replied:

      I see. I guess I will just have to respectfully disagree with The New York Times stylebook then. I was going to write at length about why, but mercifully (for us all) I remembered this little gem by Dave Barry and decided to include it instead (reproduced here entirely without permission):

      Dear Mister Language Person: What is the purpose of the apostrophe?

      Answer: The apostrophe is used mainly in hand-lettered small business signs to alert the reader than an "S" is coming up at the end of a word, as in: WE DO NOT EXCEPT PERSONAL CHECK'S, or: NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ITEM'S.

      Another important grammar concept to bear in mind when creating hand- lettered small-business signs is that you should put quotation marks around random words for decoration, as in "TRY" OUR HOT DOG'S, or even TRY "OUR" HOT DOG'S.
      --Tips for Writer's

      Note the use of all-uppercase and the impression conveyed.

      Thank you for taking the time to reply to my email.

      Best regards,
      Graabein

      I never heard back from the Public Editor.

      --
      And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
    6. Re:Does it come with... by jazman · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I guess I will just have to respectfully disagree...I never heard back

      Perhaps he just didn't want to argue the finer points of grammar with someone who likes splitting infinitives.

    7. Re:Does it come with... by Graabein · · Score: 1
      > with someone who likes splitting infinitives

      And what's wrong with splitting infinitives, pray tell? If all you've got is the "not done in Latin" argument, please don't bother.

      --
      And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
    8. Re:Does it come with... by jazman · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with the "not done in Latin" argument, pray tell? If all you've got is the "English is a living dynamic language and Latin is dead" response, please don't bother.

  19. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Oh come on, deep down we know he's right.

    I wish the author thought of that before he wrote up the article.

  20. Re:DO NOT CLICK CACHE OF GOAT.CX by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Google cache links display their cached destination in the link...

    You can float your mouse over the "linky" to the google cache and Firefox (or any other respectable webbrowser that doesn't disable the status bar by default) will show that the link displays "mediaportal.sourceforge.net".

  21. Re:HAHA by swordboy · · Score: 1

    You're still paying the Micrsoft tax after all.

    And why is that so bad?

    I'd run another OS if I got as much hardware and software support. The OSS community needs to get rid of people like you in favor of some people that will help me move to an alternate OS without *wanting* to fdisk and go back.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  22. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope because you are not running on MS Hardware BECAUSE THIS DOESNT RUN ON AN XBOX ... try reading the informataion given.

    You are of course paying $$$ for the chance to run a quality *cough* *cough* operating system from them to run this on though as it runs on Windows XP!

  23. Yes it plays Oggs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used this program, it has Ogg support using the Winamp player as the underlying technology. Plays WMA and WMV with Windows Media player and DVD as well. I prefer the Windows Media Center 2005 for music using Losless WMAs however.

  24. Re:Um . . . so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who don't have windows.

  25. Slightly on-topic... by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just got my Xbox modded yesterday, and it included the excellent XBMC. Only problem is upgrading it. My version is a few months behind, and you cannot download binaries from Sourceforge, because the project must be compiled with Microsoft's dev kit for the Xbox, and XBMC is an unlicensed project. I still have not figured out how to get binaries!

    This project is compiled with Vanilla .NET, I tried running it on my PC before modding my Xbox and it crashed every time I tried to do anything, I might download and try again.

    Although modding an Xbox isn't for the faint of heart (I just had someone else do it), it's fun and the software you get is very powerful. I was up and running with MP3's burnt on a DVD-R and some Divx TV shows. By the way, you can make XBMC be the default program when you boot the Xbox, if thats all you want to use your console for.

    1. Re:Slightly on-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Binaries will never be distributed until an licence-compatible compiler is capable of building it. Typical binaries are distributed over P2P such as on suprnova.org using bit torrent.

    2. Re:Slightly on-topic... by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Xbins runs an FTP that you can download latest XBMC from, join #xbins on efnet. Otherwise, try looking for a torrent of it (there's usually a weekly one on suprnova)

    3. Re:Slightly on-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to get newer XBMC, etc. binaries:

      connect to #xbins on EFNet

      All the instructions to get them should be given to you in the channel as you connect.
    4. Re:Slightly on-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My version is a few months behind, and you cannot download binaries from Sourceforge, because the project must be compiled with Microsoft's dev kit for the Xbox, and XBMC is an unlicensed project. I still have not figured out how to get binaries!

      If you are looking for a new version of XBMC for the XBox, then I would suggest using Bittorrent and getting the torrent file from suprnova.org (or some other tracker on the net). I have downloaded the Xbox SDK once before on a Direct Connect Hub (but never got around to testing it) so I believe you can find it on the net. But if you want to go the simplistic route, I would suggest just getting the compiled version of XBMC through Bittorrent. I know this is a fairly easy way to do it, as I found the November 11th or 12th build of it less than a week ago. Also remember that your old configuration file (XboxMediaCenter.xml) might not be valid anymore, so make sure that you don't copy that over to the new version of your XBMC folder without checking the new one and comparing. Sometimes options are removed or added between builds. I have especially noticed this with builds in the last month or two, such as network settings. Good luck.

    5. Re:Slightly on-topic... by timts · · Score: 1

      a few more sources as those news group might have it shared under some small subgroups.

      you can search kazaa, ed2k, bt network to find a binary, some time.

      and u might get a copy of XDK and compile one yourself.

    6. Re:Slightly on-topic... by monkeyman_67156 · · Score: 1
      You can grab the newest CVS builds of XBMC off of bittorrent, you can usually find links to the torrents from Suprnova.

      Or, you could simply go to ftp://xbmp.uk.xbins.org and use the username: xbins and password: homebrew

    7. Re:Slightly on-topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too am running a modded xbox with xbmc. It turned out to be a fairly costly project.

      Used Xbox $130
      Mod Chip + Labor $125
      120 GB HD $75
      DVD remote $20
      HDTV Adapter $20
      Extra Controller $25
      Halo 2 ;) $45

      So, that brings the grand total to $440. You could shave some cash by modding it yourself, but it is still quite an expensive project. Yet, once you've got it setup with XBMC - you'd be hard pressed to find a functionaly equivalent off the shelf product...short of building it yourself and running MythTV et al.

    8. Re:Slightly on-topic... by PasteEater · · Score: 1

      By the way, you can make XBMC be the default program when you boot the Xbox, if thats all you want to use your console for.

      You can still use your XBox to play games if you use XBMC as your dashboard. All you have to do is modify your xboxmediacenter.xml file, which can be found on the C: drive, to point to your games. You can rename all of the links on screen in XBMC to say what you want, and also (obviously) modify where they point. There is also a "default" tag for each section which will tell XBMC what to load first when you select each menu item.

      As for getting the files, as another poster mentioned, use the #xbins on efnet --> xbins method. That way, you will should always be able to trust the source.

      --
      There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  26. Re:HAHA by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    This was always a weak argument but especially weak now. 5 years ago the xbox was a loss leader, today despite the slashes in price Microsoft are stil probably making a tiny profit on each one. If you buy one now then you are just helping to offset the losses they made in the past.

  27. An open source program that does not run on Linux? by thammoud · · Score: 0

    How girlie!!

  28. Use Linux for PVR by bytor4232 · · Score: 1, Funny
    I really should write down a HOWTO on my system at home, cause its soo l33t. I have a basic Athlon based system with a fat HDD, an Happuage WinTV card, and a few scripts I downloaded over the 'net. I use streamer to grab my fav programming, and mencoder to put it into Divx format. I have a record-tv.sh script that runs through Cron for scheduled, and at for one time programming grabs.

    I make use of my "grabs" with a Radeon 7000 TV out card patched into my entertainment system. For real l33tness, every night before bed I sync my "vcr" directory to my laptop, and carry my Trek/Spike TV and adult swim with me throughout the day. And if I want to save my TV programming, which I do save alot, a standard CD-R holds 2 hours of Divx in the bitrate I encoded it in, which is a decent bitrate for broadcast. Right now I have about six 50 CD spindles of Spike TV and Adult Swim programming.

    Proof that I married the right person: all I have to do is make the ISO's. My wife burns them in her spare time ;) Oh, she cooks, cleans, pays bills, and runs Debian Sid with WindowMaker, and doesn't care when I go out gaming, and hardly spends a dime on non-essential girly stuff. Great in the other "wifely" duties areas too.

    I really should write a HOWTO on how I put it together. Its quite cool. On a side note, I should write a HOWTO on how I found the perfect Geek wife.

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    1. Re:Use Linux for PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot confirm how well your wife cooks, cleans, pays bills, and runs Debian Sid with WindowMaker...

      but I can confirm she performed her "wifely" duties well last night!

    2. Re:Use Linux for PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are sure your wife is female?

    3. Re:Use Linux for PVR by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Funny

      On a side note, I should write a HOWTO on how I found the perfect Geek wife.

      Yes, you should. I havn't heard of an American woman under 40 that cooks, cleans, and pays bills without also being a psycho bitch on the side. If she still does this in 5 years (without bitching)...

      Wow. I'm speechless, and thats hard for me to say.

    4. Re:Use Linux for PVR by rewt66 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't speak for the grandparent, but...

      Yes, I found her. She's under 40, cooks, and pays the bills. She cleaned until a couple years ago, when as a birthday present I got her someone to come in and clean every other week.

      "If she still does this in 5 years"? Try 14. Yes, she still does. And no, she's not a psycho.

      Where did I find such a gem? In church. (What, you thought I found someone like that in a bar?)

    5. Re:Use Linux for PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      "Proof that I married the right person: all I have to do is make the ISO's. My wife burns them in her spare time ;) Oh, she cooks, cleans, pays bills, and runs Debian Sid with WindowMaker, and doesn't care when I go out gaming, and hardly spends a dime on non-essential girly stuff. Great in the other "wifely" duties areas too.

      I really should write a HOWTO on how I put it together. Its quite cool. On a side note, I should write a HOWTO on how I found the perfect Geek wife. "

      forget the HOWTO on the DVR, make the HOWTO on configuring _my_ wife like yours.

    6. Re:Use Linux for PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where did I find such a gem? In church.


      I knew there would be a downside.
    7. Re:Use Linux for PVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where did I find such a gem? In church.


      I thought you said she wasn't psycho ... ??
    8. Re:Use Linux for PVR by passionplay · · Score: 1

      Dude - get me one of those - geek wife that is. If you can't, in the meantime, let me know how you set the WinTV card up. I have a MSI Tv@nywhere Master card (CX8800) that I want to run under Mandrake 10.1 and haven't been able to get it to work yet. Then again, kernel 2.6.8.1-12 fails miserably on my system. Can't seem to find precompiled kernel modules and obviously, the 2.6.3-7 kernel which works, won't compile the latest CX8800 modules.

      I dunno - might just need to install a fresh copy of the OS but upgrading should have worked - just don't know if I have something interfering or not.

      So anyway - let me know on either score - the geek wife, or the wintv card - or both.

      Cheers.

  29. I for one by uberjoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    welcome our new open source overlords.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  30. new stuff ?! by l3v1 · · Score: 0, Troll

    [...]A new opensourced multimedia center for Windows has been released. Media Portal[...]

    How is this new. I've been tracking this app for months now, downloading from time to tie and trying it. It's good and everything (mythtv and freevo stand closer to my heart by anyway), but drooling it being new stuff... well, just nother well informed guy.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  31. Re:Um . . . so? by gristlebud · · Score: 0

    I'm no Mirosoft fanboy, but $150? Cmon.
    It's currently going for less than $65, with COA and a CD.

    http://www.salesintl.com/product.asp?3=13/

    If you check pricewatch, you can get a COA for $44.

    --
    OK...
    I can do this. I am, after all,
    a superhero!
  32. Re:HAHA by thempstead · · Score: 1

    hmmm ... personally I run gbpvr on XP which is free but not open source. Probably supports less cards than Snapstream, (needs hardware encoding ... I use a PVR250), but seems to give good results.

    t

  33. Needs beefy hardware by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember awhile ago I installed this a long time ago when it first started development, and it still supported my old hauppauge card and my Riva TNT2 video card, Installed it yesterday when I saw 0.1.0.0 was released and it doesnt even open, read the min requirements, and you NEED a mpeg2 hardware encoder, WMP9 which crashes my system so I refuse to install it, and a directx 9 card. After my frusttration yesterday, I convinced myself maybe I should install mythtv, Not sure if I will need a mpeg2 encoder for time shifting, but it will be a fun project over the break.

    1. Re:Needs beefy hardware by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      Will you need an MPEG2 encoder? Depends on your CPU speed. But if you have a P3 1ghz, a decent video capture card and use something like rtjpeg MythTV should run fine with passable disk utilization.

      I'd still recommend an MPEG2 encoder regardless. I use a Hauppage PVR350 for both input and output. While watching and recording simultaneously, I have a net CPU usage of 1% (P4 2.6). When I was running my P3 950, I had a net CPU usage of only between 1% and 2%.

      This card has been well worth the money.

      Bryan

    2. Re:Needs beefy hardware by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      I used a regular BT8x8 card in a 1400 for a long time as my main Myth machine. I even had that card in a 1ghz machine for a while and they both seemed to handle encoding sufficiently -- although I think the 1ghz was recording at 320x240 for a 19" TV. You can feel the reduction in CPU utilization you get from a hardware encoder in the snappiness of the menus and video searches and such but even a modest machine should be able to software-encode video reasonably.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    3. Re:Needs beefy hardware by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I believe they do support using ATI's All in Wonder from my previous scoping out of the project. But yeah your old hauppauge (wintv go?) card is more than long in the tooth and regardless of which pvr software you choose, I think you'd be better served by getting a hardware based encoding tuner card (pvr250 would be a good choice if you're linux bound - ivtv drivers and all)

      That's not to say you can't use your existing tuner card, just that I think you'll have an easier time of it and better performance w/hardware encoding card. IMHO

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  34. That's hardly the point... by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The point is:
    * The VAST majority of computer users are using Windows ie... they've already paid for it, so it's not an issue (ie. it came with their computer or whatever)
    * They don't want to wipe it out completely to install a media center
    * Things like this can exist harmoniously with Windows, and can be tried before wiping it all out... or you can use the computer for both purposes (htpc and normal)

    There is another free (not open source) windows based media pc solution... It's called myHTPC.

    Now, it's since turned into a paid product called Meedio, however you can still get the free version and have access to a gazillion (oh yeah baby, that's a number) plugins for it.

    1. Re:That's hardly the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's also GBPVR - free, beta, but not opn source, and can do the live TV, radio, play your music, play your DVD, play your AVI DIVX etc, supports most TV Tuner cards with MPEG2 encoding (Hauppauge cards with no hassles, others with a bit of hair-pulling), supports the X-Card for playback to boot.

    2. Re:That's hardly the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but honestly, quantity != quality and that's a point that's proven with the Meedio "plugins". There's a lot of shit in their directory. I haven't seen them attract any real programmers to their platform. Just tinkerers writing "hello world" apps.

  35. Now if we could only add a DVI-D input... by Deton8 · · Score: 1

    This all sounds great, but I just spent a wad on all new HDTV gear and am distressed to find that you can't easily capture HD to a DVR in a PC. Maybe in a year or two...

    1. Re:Now if we could only add a DVI-D input... by kaustik · · Score: 1

      I'm in the same boat. Realistically, though, most channels are not broadcast in HD, so you're not missing out on much. I do have a few key HD channels that I'm stuck on, but I can live without recording them. Have you had any luck finding a card that works with your HD receiver and component cables?

  36. Any success? by rjelks · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tested this out yet? I'd be interested in how it compares with Meedio, WMCE, Sage TV, Snapstream, etc... I guess I'll have to wait until I get home.

    I used myHTPC for a while and it worked pretty good. They moved to a commercial project called Meedio (probably worth the money when they get the TV tuner working), but I've been looking for other solutions.

  37. Things that make you go Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay $15 and get something that works, or pay nothing and get something fantastically finicky, built around unnecessarily obscure and unwieldy commands, and nuances of configuration. Choices, choices. I'll uh... have to get back to you, I'm still trying to figure out how to get an up-kernel for my dual processor xeon, and how to make use of the soundblaster live, and how to get some reasonable behavior out of the DVD-RAM drive.... Linux is super cool, as long as you're not married to things working 100%.

    1. Re:Things that make you go Hmmm by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      slow down and take a deep breath.. You are right in that linux is more dificult then microsoft operating systems.

      You shouldn't be having too much problem getting those things working though. I have all of them working besides the dual xenon from a default mandrake install. Slackware should have the rigth stuff too but it might be a little more complicated. As for the dual processor kernel, most distrobutions have a smp kernel prebuilt that shoudl work.

      However if you are trying to do this from scatch because you want to learn about it, then please try to be a little less negetive about the hassle because it is self induced.

    2. Re:Things that make you go Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing about windows, all considered it's not that particular, Mandrake 10.1 on the other hand.... Which incidently doesn't like the 64 GB up kernel with the particular hardware configuration, not that a i686, 2-4 GB, 2 CPU wouldn't be just perfect. So I go about learning to roll my own, only to find out that custom crap in Mandrake makes this yet another pain in the ass.

      And after my survey, Mandrake is the most user friendly. But it is a bad joke compared to windows in a lot of critical areas. Is microsoft perfect, hell no, but what they offer for 15 bucks is much more valuable that what the various distros toss out for free.

      Like the CPU the soundcard works some, just not all the way, DVD-RAM drive, same deal. That's what linux is, and that's fine, a half-assed OS for hobbyists, or a comparitively focused, potentially very lightweight, OS for servers. But it is not even close to what Microsoft is putting out there in terms of quality and versatility. Any statement to the contrary either comes with a library of caveats or is completely delusional.

    3. Re:Things that make you go Hmmm by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I can agree that the linux distrobutions have a ways to go before they equal microsofts latest offerings. I would put mandrake equal to the levels of windows 98 though.

      As for rolling your own kernel. I know what you mean. but alot of times it isn't really as dificult as it first seems. Alot of people don;'t realize you can recompile the mandrake kernels with additional hardware support or different support. I have had to do this a couple of times when i ran out after the lastest hardware and stuff. My dvd-ram works just fine. i dunno if there is somethign i am missing but i can acomplish everythign in linux on a custom 2.4 kernel on mandrake 9.0 that i could in windows 2000 when i dual booted.

      i wouldn't exactly call liux a "a half-assed OS for hobbyists" It can acomplish everything that most people say they use thier pc for without much more hassle then a windows box. Email, internet support, a playing games, writing documents and printing them, artwork with gimp(as aposed to paint or a cheap version of photoshop), cd burning, listening to mp3's and other music, watching video's, dvds and more. Sure your doing more then the normal person would do. and sure there might be a little configuring/fiddling to do in order to get all that functionality acomplished. This fiddling should be done by the installer too. Most people don't load the os themselves, they buy it preloaded or take it to a shop for an upgrade. Even windows XP needs new drivers to be installed on new hardware (granted, linux versoin of new is usualy older then windowsXP's).

      I guess you could refraze your statment to a 'half-assed OS for hobbyists that want to do more then the normal person' but for the normal person it is more then suitable unless you want a gaming machine. I'm not sure exactly what problem you were having but i do know your frustration levels when dealing with it. You can have the same amounts in windows too.. I'm mot saying you didn't have dificulty or reasons to have dificulties. i am saying though, your impresion of linux is misleading. Once you get some basics out of the way, it is quite easy. You didn't know all you know about windows overnight and shouldn't expect to know the same about linux. Granted after being raised on windows, it does seem easier to feel your way thru some things.

      I have set up mandrake boxes and sold them to several people. These were new computers and not piles of junk pieced together to get rid of failing parts. With the exception of one person who let thier rocket scientist neibor try to install windows XP non of them have had any major problems. The windows XP situations turned ended up getting madrake reinstalled later becasue of spyware and virus problems (no they didn't install any antivirus). I support windows machines too and did the linux to lower cost for some elderly and poor people.

  38. Re:HAHA by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting
    No, the OSS community does not need to "get rid of him." But they do need to understand that not everyone is going 100% open source. I'm running Windows at home because the games and apps I want are Win32 platform based. I'm a developer whose day job is programming on a Win32 app, and so I need to use Windows all day long. Does that mean I'm opposed to open source? Of course not, I run several open source apps, and have contributed to a few.

    I usually ignore both sides of the OSS / Microsoft debate, but in this case the attitude of "trow da bums out" is just too divisive. If you're OK with paying Microsoft dues, then fine. If Robyanetta is avoiding it, that's fine too. Just both of you should recognize the other point of view isn't going away, and you should learn to cooperate on the common ground that exists between you.

    --
    John
  39. Re:In Corea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Inn Corea, speling iz ownly four owld peepl.

  40. xbins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.xbins.org/
    #xbins on efnet

  41. MythTV clone? by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Funny

    What does this do, besides lack any substantial development history, that MythTV doesn't do?

    That being said, it seems to be working great on my Xbox, that mighty 733MHz P3 w/no hw MPEG capabi...BUFFERING...

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:MythTV clone? by skadus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, for one thing it installs a hell of a lot easier.

      I gave up on MythTV after having to fight with it and Fedora (and dependencies, and X, and Y...) at the same time. Why do I need MySQL when I just want a media player with a NES and SNES emulator built-in (no need or space on my media box for PVR)?

      Yeah, PEBKAC, and I'll never profess to be anything but sub-adequate at Linux, but MediaPortal installed and ran fine in about 5 minutes from download to setup.

    2. Re:MythTV clone? by glamslam · · Score: 1

      Its slick, pretty easy to install, and I don't have to fight Linux driver issues to get it running. It has a way to go before its as complete at Myth, but as it is, it works pretty well.

  42. OS X version? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

    Just because, you know, for the rest of us who want to plug in our systems to our TV sets without having to shill out money for a modded Xbox or a PC.

    1. Re:OS X version? by yabos · · Score: 1

      Seems to rely on all Microsoft technoligies such as DirectX, .NET and WMP9, so porting would be pretty hard.

    2. Re:OS X version? by 74nova · · Score: 1

      i would imagine mythtv would work fine with yellowdog, but i dont run either.

      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    3. Re:OS X version? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I think you're relegated to using elgato's EyeTV and an external device like the plextor pvr convertX (wired news short review)

      Although I wonder if freevo/mythtv/etc have an OSX port (or if someone would do one... I think the lack of tv tuners for the mac would be both a boon and a bane)

      *Shrug*

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    4. Re:OS X version? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      How poor do you have to be? Xbox are cheap , unless ur a trailer trash hippie.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    5. Re:OS X version? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Who wants to pay to get a modded Xbox when they already have a computer which should be able to do the same thing?

  43. Re:DO NOT CLICK CACHE OF GOAT.CX by sploo22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Except that the destination part of the URL can be trivially spoofed. The base64 hash is what really determines the page you get.

    Demonstration: http://64.233.179.104/search?q=cache:zhool8dxBV4J: www.microsoft.com/+&hl=en This takes you to google's cache of its own home page, not to Microsoft.

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  44. Would be useful to link to homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://mediaportal.sourceforge.net/> instead of some little piracy gaming console website trying to sell you modchips.

  45. Re:HAHA by myc · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    some of us happen to like windows xp for home applications. windows xp + cheap commodity x86 hardware = inexpensive, easy to set up and use home computer. Sure I am paying for my copy of xp, but I think it's worth it in terms of not having to deal with the hassle of installing linux. To qualify my opinion, I happen to use linux in a work environment because of certain features, but for (let's face it) linux is a pain in the ass to set up. Is it doable? Sure. Is it worth my effort? Probably not. Last time I tried to run linux at home and play mp3s I had to chmod 777 /dev/dsp so that the mp3 player could talk to the sound driver. Linux is a hacker's system and it's very good for what it is. It is not yet fully mature as a home system. I just plop my xp home system behind a simple router/firewall, install firefox, and I'm ready to websurf/play GTAIII/listen to mp3s.

    --
    NO CARRIER
  46. You can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must be imagining the HDTV files on my MythTV hard drive...

    I don't have a HD display yet, due to high prices, but a pcHDTV-3000 card was less than $200, so I got one. There are similar cards for Windows, but I can't speak to their ease of use.

    HD looks great on my PC, and is still pretty good scaled down to my old 27" XBR. Even the Over-The-Air SD shows look better than the analog signal from my cable company.

    1. Re:You can by Deton8 · · Score: 1

      I think most of us are aware of this card, but it's not much help in capturing the HD signals which come out of our cable and satellite boxes. We need something with a DVI input.

    2. Re:You can by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Have you considered the bandwidth required to record uncompressed HDTV over DVI? It's not even MPEG video anymore by that point. You'd need an intermediary box to recompress that raw video back into an HD data stream again.

      You'd be better off getting a cable box with a Firewire output.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    3. Re:You can by Deton8 · · Score: 1

      My idea would be to make a card with a DVI input and output, which also has a compression chip on it for when the signal is going to or coming from the hard drive or RAID array. It would also have a mode where it would accept and playout the raw data. Note that there are a number of uncompressed HD capture/playback cards on the market (DeckLink, BlueFish 444, etc.) and with the 400GB drives widely available now, it's not that unreasonable to have uncompressed HD if you really want it, but it's overkill for most applications. The problem with these HD cards is that they have SDI inputs and outputs, which would have to be converted externally to DVI and that's not cheap. Me, I would like the option to run my box either compressed or uncompressed. For 1080i you would need something like 250 MB/s bandwidth, which would take a small RAID array of ATA drive to achieve.

  47. Re:Confusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its misleading not to include that its only for xbox on the title

    It's also misleading not to say that it's only for old people, for the benefit of Slashdot's Korean users.

  48. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > You're still paying the Micrsoft tax after all.
    >
    > FCKGW!
    > -r

    That's funny. I remember that. It was part of the license key for a cracked corporate copy of Windows XP. I typed it in dozens of times. And I always thought fuck GW. Yeah. That was funny. You are funny to bring it up. But I don't use that key anymore because it did not work with XP SP1. Those were the days. GW is kind of a shorthand for George W. Bush in case you were wondering. It really brings back some memories. Is that what you were trying to do? I hope so.

  49. same server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    funny how maxconsole.com and teamxodus.com are on the same server ... very objective console scene news site
    LOL

  50. Re:DO NOT CLICK CACHE OF GOAT.CX by BobPaul · · Score: 1

    Interesting... However, the link REALLY DOES go to the cache of the website. That's how I was able to get to the mediaportal website...

    Good to know, however.

  51. Not new, not 1.0 by EdMcMan · · Score: 1

    Media Portal is not new, and has been posted on /. before (that's how I read about it first).

    Furthermore, it's not at version 1.0 like the article claims. Read the snip on the website about rumors.

  52. Re:Confusing... by BobPaul · · Score: 2

    It's not for XBox... It's for Windows. It's a PORT of a program that origionated on the XBox.

  53. Media Portal is nowhere near prime-time by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I tried this software a few months back, and I must say, while I was comparing it to an already mature piece of software (MythTV), it was certainly not up to snuff. It was incredibly slow to launch from my standpoint (this was on an Athlon 2400XP ), took over 20 seconds for the GUI to launch - probably due to it being in .Net. After launch, only a few functions were usable, and the system frequently crashed.

    On the whole - if you are looking for some free PVR software NOW, get MythTV or Freevo. There are excellent tutorials on the net on how to set up a MythTV system - from scratch - no hardcore Linux skills required.

    1. Re:Media Portal is nowhere near prime-time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure MythTV and Freevo are nice... but the whole point of MediaPortal is that it runs on Windows. I have been looking at MediaPortal over MythTV because I want to run it on my Windows box. I have a nice system running Windows for gaming. Fast CPU, lots of RAM, big hard drive. My Linux box is quite old now and MythTv would run like crap on it.

      Sure MediaPortal may not be up to snuff with some PVR software available for Linux, but give it time.

    2. Re:Media Portal is nowhere near prime-time by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "probably due to it being in .Net"

      On what basis do you ground that hypothosis?

      All versions of VC#.NET require the .NET framework be loaded, but 2002 takes nearly a minute to load where as the 2005 beta loads in less than 3 seconds on my machine. .NET does incur some startup cost (the CLR needs to be initalized) and code needs to be JITed, but this should hardly take 20 seconds!

      There are full featured high performance 3D engines written with .NET, let's have no more FUD about .NET's performance!

      The startup sequence is probably just poorly optimized.

      --
      http://brandonbloom.name
    3. Re:Media Portal is nowhere near prime-time by ZenCaser · · Score: 1

      I've been working on getting MythTV installed on FC2...

      First, I installed my WinTV Go, booted into XP, installed the cheesy PVR software that came with the WinTV Go. Everything worked fine.

      Second, booted into FC2. Uhh... hours later, after a lot of command line apt-gets, no package founds, chmod this, etc., MythTV is about ready to go. Except, unfortunately, no friggin' sound. I'm sure it's solvable, but oiy, it would be nice to have an open source PVR system that just installs and works, without ridiculously long HOWTOs, on Linux or Windows. I wonder how nice the SUSE Pro PVR is.

      I downloaded this Media Portal and I look forward to trying it out.

    4. Re:Media Portal is nowhere near prime-time by Hedon · · Score: 1

      I've been playing around with Mediaportal over the past few months, and must say they have made giant leaps forward.

      There are a few caveats on the hardware side:
      You're best of with a full DX9 card, and you'll get best TV results with a Hardware MPEG2 encoder card. Software cards are useable for viewing, but timeshifting is a no-no without hardware MPEG2.

      You might want to try this one again.

  54. xbox media center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've been using xbox media center and xbox media player before that for a while now and i absolutely love it. my xbox has ceased playing games and now just play movies and music. just stream them to my xbox via samba. this developer team constantly updates and bug fixes their work. it plays virtually every known format and this is with 64 mb of ram on a stock xbox and an older processor. if there was a way to add a tv card to the xbox it would blow all these very pricey new media players/pvr's out of the water. $ 150.(no you don't need a modchip) yes i know about mythtv...

  55. I love this b/c it doesnt require a specific card by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

    from the requirements page:

    WDM compatible TV card or a hardware MPEG2 TV card

    That right there is why I'll be running this and not MythPC.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  56. XBMC is the mutts nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really is good, I had a quick go at the media portal doobry but couldn't work out how to make it work tho :(

  57. Compare to other solutions? by cephyn · · Score: 1

    Can anyone in the know compare this to the other Open Source solutions out there? I've been having a MISERABLE time getting MythTV to work. 8( Is this program as good? Easy to install configure? How does it compare to MythTV, Freevo, Meedio/MyHTPC?

    --
    Moo.
    1. Re:Compare to other solutions? by hkb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not try SageTV? It's mature, inexpensive, pretty stable, and nicely designed. It's even hackable (via STV modules) to boot. People have already written STV mods for weather, early itunes functionality, and a web interface for it.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    2. Re:Compare to other solutions? by cephyn · · Score: 1

      It costs money, its not open source. with the quality open source options out there, I'd prefer to go with them, since I know they won't be taking away features like TiVo -- I fear SageTV will eventually have to bend under pressure like TiVo if it gets to be too popular.

      Seriously, if the open source community could get a rock-solid instant knoppix/mythtv bundle install solution, they'd have a real Killer App on their hands with how TiVo is going. The current knoppix/mythtv just didnt work at all for me, even after lots of tweaking. If the community could put all the pieces together, then total n00bs could really get a good start into the linux community with it. To me, this lack of grabbing the bull by the horns when the opportunity presents itself is a real weakness of the open source system. And don't go saying "Do it yourself" -- I clearly don't have the expertise to do so. But I know somebody or some group out there does.

      --
      Moo.
    3. Re:Compare to other solutions? by bLindmOnkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not try Knoppmyth(http://www.mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html )? It's a package of Knoppix with MythTV already installed.He's made it mucchhh easier for anyone to install mythtv without any hassle. All you need to do is pop the cd in and install. However, you'll need to repartition or wipe clean your hard drive before installing.

    4. Re:Compare to other solutions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you dont want pvr and just want to play media check out geexbox at http://www.geexbox.org/, the download iso is tiny and it runs pretty well on older hardware, supports tv out and remotes etc.

    5. Re:Compare to other solutions? by cephyn · · Score: 1

      I did try it. It didn't work. It really doesn't like the TV-OUT on the new PVR-350 cards. Plus 2 out of 3 times it didn't cleanly install the MBR, which required fixing. I wasn't impressed. 8(

      --
      Moo.
    6. Re:Compare to other solutions? by cephyn · · Score: 1

      thanks, but i definitely want a pvr.

      --
      Moo.
    7. Re:Compare to other solutions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also had a miserable time to install MythTV - it kept on crashing or freezing up my Linux box. I have also tried Freevo with better success but then I realized that mplayer really sucks. MediaPortal is much smoother in both installation, dokumentaion and stability than the above and I will never regret the decision to shift.

      And for ease of installation I must say that the support for my grafic card, TV card and SP/DIF sound output in Linux was a real pain. In Windows this wasn't an issue at all.

  58. Re:HAHA by sumdumass · · Score: 1

    what hardware and software support are you needing? Or are you someone that has to have a certain program over a certain type of prograM.

    I can replicate everythign i need to do with windows on linux but there are a few thing i prefere to do in windows becasue thats what i'm used to doing. I do however, find that in most cases the argument about not having the software or hardware support to only fit a few minor cases when it is really a preference or fear of getting into the guts of the os in order to install hardware support.

  59. Re:Um . . . so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an OEM version and is subject to OEM licensing agreements. Just because you have a CD doesn't mean that you can install Windows wherever you want, you know.

  60. Re:Confusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, who the crap pays for Windows?

  61. Re:HAHA by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i use gentoo and before that slackware, ive never had to chmod my dsp device, even on advanced distro's like gentoo and slackware.

    sound is now very easy using alsa (alsaconf)

    device management is now very very easy using
    udev, hotplug and coldplug

    package management (including dependancies) is very simple now using apt-get or emerge (slackware's not there yet).

    i cant think of anything else that supposed to be hard, but im sure its not quite there for everybody.

    maybe its just because im now used to using linux and it seems natural and actually find it easier to use than windows (it does what i tell it rather than guessing what it thinks i want).

    Im sure times have changed since last time you tried installing a distro at home, if you get time try one.

    *not a troll, but i am now familiar with linux and prefer administering it in a home environment to windows and i know that things were not always this easy.

  62. Xbox Modding Link? by Bri3D · · Score: 1

    I find interesting that the poster linked to Team Xodus, a modchip maker, rather than xbox-scene.com which has much more balanced information+tutorials on how to run homebrew apps without a modchip/even opening your Xbox.

    1. Re:Xbox Modding Link? by stickystyle · · Score: 1

      That easy, the Xenium chips that Xodus makes run Linux.
      And we all know that Linux takes precedence over God, your country, and any better story links with Slashdot.

      --
      Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
  63. All that and a bag of nuts by kuzb · · Score: 1

    We could do all this before, what added value is there to running this kind of thing?

    With an XBox it made sense because you didn't actually have a UI to work with. With a PC you don't need this kind of thing at all.

    If you're going to run it on a mini itx and use it like a toaster, why not use movix or something similar that has an operating system with it?

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  64. Mythtv for Windows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Right now the best PVR-type software you can get, open source or closed source, is Mythtv.

    Very flexible, you can have multiple front ends work with multiple back ends and have many many different tv tuner cards and have it all work in concert together.

    Now this is all Linux stuff, of course, however you can get a front end for Mythtv that will work in Windows.

    It's called WinMyth and is written in .NET, the guy learned the mythtv protocols and built a front end that will work on Windows with a backend that runs on Linux.

    Basicly the backend serves the data in mpeg2 or mpeg4 or mjpeg type streams to the frontend over a network. And the frontend is also what you use to scedual recordings and play games and stuff like that.

    You can find the home page of the product at
    http://winmyth.sourceforge.net/

  65. Re:Um . . . so? by gristlebud · · Score: 1

    But I thought copyright infringement wasn't piracy and that ELUAs weren't enforceable!

    What is /. coming to?

    --
    OK...
    I can do this. I am, after all,
    a superhero!
  66. Start with a boot cdrom version and be lazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep make part copy content of cdrom into partion setup boot manager one MythTV box.(this is simpler than fighting Fedora)

    Note Fedora is the worst pick of any disto for media work.(You did well to get as far as you did)

    SUSE Mandrake and Debian(with a better installer ie different disks provide Debian installers). You would have had a chance.

    1. Re:Start with a boot cdrom version and be lazy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You all are wussies, or not 1337 enough. I can install MythTV on Fedora with my eyes close and have it work in no time.

      Now if someone would get a decent and legal DVD player for Linux that WORKS CORRECTLY we'll all be good and Windows can just sit and rot until I want to play some emulators (the one problem I do have with MythTV: bad support for emulators with switches).

  67. What's really missing is good remote support by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

    Really... Isn't the point of media center is supporting remote, so you can sit in your chair, relax, turn off your brain and push little buttons?
    And.. It seems they will be using winlirc, which doesn't support my remote...
    So I'll stick with my SlyControl (program with macroeing with remote control) forever. It makes everything just easy. Press TV and it launches my tv tuner program. Press Menu and select .avi file, it plays. The same for Pictures and DVD.
    So without good integration with remotes Media Portal is just pretty "shell" for doing things I already know how to do.
    I know, I know: "code it yourself" and stuff... Not now, sorry.

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    1. Re:What's really missing is good remote support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usbuirt integration is standard. I understand it works well and will control your cable box too.
      Try it, you'll like it.
      usbrit

  68. Re:HAHA -- plenty of options in windoze by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    " I still think Beyond TV snapstream is the only logical option on windows XP due to price and the fact that it runs on virtually all cards. MythTV and other open source projects seem so raw still"

    plug I just posted a review of BeyondTV 3.5 on my site. There's also SageTV on windoze that's good. (sage tv review)

    GBPVR is free as in beer and although an independent project hangs pretty well with the commercial apps in most respects, from what I understand.

    Also commercial is Meedio HTPC which used to be myHTPC which has a beta PVR plugin that should be not beta pretty soon.

    GotTV (no link handy sorry) recently spun into something else, and is also windows and "free" (not sure if it's FOSS or not...)

    Have you used mythTV lately? I'm not sure you are giving it a fair shake. I think the issue is more the complexity of the install/linux learning curve than usability/look and feel issues... (hopefuly efforts like knoppmyth mitigate that a little bit)

    *shrug* that said, I do like the polish and all the features of BTV, but there's a lot of options out there, and i'm glad to see media portal's (and xmbc's) progressing nicely)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  69. Re:HAHA by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

    I was just about sold on Snapstream, but now I'm leaning toward SageTV. Of course, the nice thing about sage is that they have a 15 day free trial. :) (I couldn't see a trial of Snapstream.)

    I'm just waiting for my Hauppauge pvr-150 to arrive to try it out.

  70. Duh it plays Oggs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is just the mplayer/xine/ffmpeg code ported to Xbox, and now Windows. It plays everything the Linux version does, including Oggs.

  71. In Chick Corea? by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 0

    Let me guess... only old people play jazz fusion.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
  72. What does this do that MythTV doesnt? by billybob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd say RUNS ON WINDOWS is a pretty damn big feature that MythTV lacks. :P

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:What does this do that MythTV doesnt? by Phatmanotoo · · Score: 1

      I'd say RUNS ON WINDOWS is a pretty damn big feature that MythTV lacks

      Moderators, that was supposed to be funny, not insightful. Sheeees...

  73. Readable version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  74. You better watch out by sicking · · Score: 1

    If RMS hears crazytalk like that he's gonna smack you so hard ;-)

    (disclaimer: I have a lot of respect for RMS and thank him for playing part in creating a foundation on which a lot of OSS is built on. That doesn't mean he's not a bit crazy around the edges though.)

    --
    Failing to learn from history dooms you to repeat it.
  75. Re:HAHA by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    I suggest trying both and seeing which one "feels" better to you =) Snapstream does indeed have a free trial.

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  76. Re:HAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, why are you trying to debate this shit on slashdot? It doesn't matter.

  77. SnapStream Beyond Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting that this article ran on slashdot today becauase SnapStream just started shipping their Media Center software package, Beyond Media: http://www.snapstream.com/products/beyondmedia/. I've been using it since it came out. Big thumbs up. I've been using their PVR software for a long time (Beyond TV) and this measures up to that (which is to say, it's really really good).

  78. Re:Why are you helping the enemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, shut up.

  79. Re:Why are you helping the enemy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bravo! applause! encore! best rant of the day.

  80. Re:HAHA by Mortlath · · Score: 1

    I thought you were referring to Bill Gates's Wife!

  81. Windows 2000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know why Windows 2000 isn't supported?

  82. Damn, if only I new C# by DrStrangeLug · · Score: 1

    This thing is written in C# (and I gather the # stands for RAP) and I only know java.

    I've been writing a PVR system in Java for about a year now as a home project (running on a win box) , and I've got it working pretty sweet. Its not pure java, as it uses VirtualVCR for the grabbing and XMLTV for grabbing the listings. My next job is going from the WIMP style interface to something a little more set top box like. I'm also considering using a wireless joypad as a remote.

    It just a shame that the UK source for XMLTV has been so unreliable over the past year. First ananova stop serving listings data, then the radio times changed their site to block xmltv, before relenting and releasing the listings in an alternate machine readable format. Lets hope the RT guys keep that going.

    Relevant sites:
    VirtualVCR : http://virtualvcr.sourceforge.net/
    XmlTV : http://membled.com/work/apps/xmltv/

    1. Re:Damn, if only I new C# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very interested in your java pvr project: would you consider opening a source forge project for it or something?

  83. nice by Gizmoguy · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a nice alternative to Windows Media Center! :-)

    --
    -- There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, And those who don't.
  84. Apologies to Plaid Cymru...off topic I know by panurge · · Score: 1
    In being flippant (and I never expected to be moderated up...) I was unintentionally unfair to Plaid Cymru. Perhaps I should make it clear that:
    • I'm in favor of Welsh Devolution (and I have numerous relatives in South Wales)
    • I think rich Londoners buying houses and driving out locals is inexcusable. Burning down houses is wrong, but so is destroying communities.
    • And, now Sinn Fein has almost completed turned into a legitimate political movement, I hope NI gets its independence from the UK and the likes of Ian Paisley are consigned to the dustbin of history.
    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  85. Likely Not by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    What you are saying is totally unacceptable from a performance perspective. I have *TWO* software tuners in my Myth box and it runs without issues. And you sare saying MediaPortal can't even timeshift with *ONE*?

    No thanks.