This guy would disagree with complements of London's rail. I know that you said it was 'better', but standing in cow shit is better than standing in pig shit. I don't want to stand in either. When I went to London, the rail WAS 'better' than public transportation here in the US, but it still sucked.
Given the amount of propaganda that people right here in the US go for hook line and sinker, it would seem shocking to find that a good portion of the North Korean people don't believe a good portion of what they are being told.
Uhhh... Kirk was NOT a geek. He was just a hero to geeks. You might argue that Spock was a geek, and there was one or two episodes where women went for him, but given that he could kill Kirk, a definite jock, with his bare hands, even trying to argue that Spock was a geek is a stretch.
More likely, it would would make it possible for a geek to watch someone else get a date, but they can do that here on Earth.
The reason is that 'think of the children' is generally used as a way to 'control the adults'. I know that when I see 'parental controls', I get nervous. The movie rating system is a perfect example of 'parental controls' gone bad. That being said, it seems that lately, most of the computer based parental controls are being done correctly, and are not being used to control the adults. I find that I am becoming more comfortable with them being implemented because I have been able to completely turn them off. If I can turn them off, then they actually become beneficial to me, as it neuters complaints that someone elses kid might get corrupted.
Not defending cheating, but if your reason is that it devalues the A that you "earned". Then you should consider the rampant grade inflation to be just as bad as plagiarizing, as it certainly devalues the A that some people earn when work that should get a C gets the same A as the person that earned it. The only problem with that is that a lot of people that now get A s and feel they earned it, would be getting A s if it were not for the teachers "cheating".
Except that the it is the bad ones who don't turn the other cheek and are still around that will find out that you scammed them. I would much rather start the "You have been raptured". Web site, where we send an email to the earthly address of those that did NOT get left behind.
That kind of comment is a total cop out. If you believe that the rule of law is so profound that you just don't break it, then you must condemn Gandhi. If you don't condemn Gandhi, then you must concede that there are times when breaking the law is still the right thing to do. Your attempt at distancing the two by claiming that there is system in place in the US for change, is a poor argument at best. If you consider "The trick is getting enough people to understand the issues and vote accordingly." to be a valid argument, then the same can be said for Gandhi. The difference is that Gandhi only had to convince a handful of people instead of the millions that would be required in the US. That is if you believe that voting even works on anything that has big money implications. Heck, Gandhi might well have succeeded in getting the law changed by convincing just Winston Churchill.
Of course, if you want to limit it to the US, then you also must condemn every single person involved with the Underground Railroad. Are you prepared to call Harriet Tubman a villain?
Yes, the Nuremburg trials wer just "victor's justice". Regardless of the criminality of the defendants, when translators are allowed to intentionally mistranslate and make fun of defendants, you are dealing with a kangaroo court.
Netflix has a VERY limited amount of brand new content. Gametap has a limited selection of brand new content.
Netflix has a lot of medium aged and old content. Gametap has a lot of medium aged an old content.
Netflix has video on par with the quality of TV. Gametap gives you the exact same game with the exact same quality as the retail package.
Netflix lets you start watching the movie before the whole thing is downloaded. Gametap lets you play the game before the whole thing is downloaded.**
It sounds more like you just don't really want a service like streaming Netflix for games, but that you want a service that is dramatically better than Netflix, and do not accept service levels similar to Netflix for your gaming.
** It is true that many of the older games download so fast that the whole thing gets downloaded faster than Netflix can start playing it's stream, so those games do get downloaded completely before play.
Only if you you would also say that having your pal Wally (who happens to write software for a living) come over and drink beer with you would be getting a free programmer.
The "I killed one person, and if you don't leave I'll kill another" tactic isn't as likely to work when the choice is to take a chance that you will be the one that might get the second drone, or you will definitely be the one that gets shot for dissertion when you get back to port.
No, if you are going to use drones to kill, you need to just sink their boats. Preferably with a big explosion to make sure there are very few survivors.
So, someone makes the absolute bare minimum database that is nothing more than a glorified text file, but uses MySQL syntax. Tada! The application can function with another database.
Of course there is a 'chemical mechanism' involved. The brain is a electro-chemical devices. EVERYTHING the brain does has a 'chemical mechanism' involved. Including the prior example of taking a walk in the country.
No, they put that in to maintain a monopoly on the manufacture of cartridge and software for the NES. They didn't want just anybody to be able to sell their own software directly to customers without Nintendo getting a paid. It wasn't to stop piracy. It was to stop the legitimate writers of software from selling their work.
When someone says "zero carbon output". That means zero carbon output. By your logic, my car has zero carbon output. Perhaps you are just so set on wanting someone famous who is pushing your agenda to be right, that you are just unwilling to accept that he very clearly said something incredibly stupid.
Ok, since you seem a little dense, here is the Irony. You said:
Pretending to misunderstand the concept of carbon output so you can make fun of the other side is not a good way to resolve this argument. Actually misunderstanding the concept of carbon output means you should think carefully about why you're so confident that you understand the situation better than climatologists. You can decide which of those two you were doing in your comment.
This is in response to pointing out that a media whore claimed that you can have "Zero carbon output". Notice I did not say "Net zero carbon output". There is a HUGE difference between the two. You obviously are pretending to misunderstand the concept, or are actually misunderstanding the concept. Thus, your doing exactly what you are accusing me of in the prior post. Hence, by definition, "IRONY".
This becomes even more pronounced when you bring up climatologists, as I was not discussing the opinions of climatologists. I was making fun of the completely absurd statement made by a media whore. So, again, you are either "Pretending to misunderstand the concept" or are "Actually misunderstanding the concept".
The final bit of irony is:
And that everyone somehow overlooked this massive absurdity, until you finally pointed out in a web forum that the emperor has no clothes?
Does it really need to be explained to you how defending a statement that you can reduce your carbon output to zero while at the same time claiming that the other individual is "Pretending to misunderstand the concept" or is "Actually misunderstanding the concept"? And hence the very definition of IRONY?
Slashdot Mirror
No kidding, I just got my insurance bill today, and it is $105 a month for 3 cars and a camper.
This guy would disagree with complements of London's rail. I know that you said it was 'better', but standing in cow shit is better than standing in pig shit. I don't want to stand in either. When I went to London, the rail WAS 'better' than public transportation here in the US, but it still sucked.
Thank you for offering yourself up as a perfect example of an American who has bought into US propaganda hook line and sinker.
Given the amount of propaganda that people right here in the US go for hook line and sinker, it would seem shocking to find that a good portion of the North Korean people don't believe a good portion of what they are being told.
Uhhh... Kirk was NOT a geek. He was just a hero to geeks. You might argue that Spock was a geek, and there was one or two episodes where women went for him, but given that he could kill Kirk, a definite jock, with his bare hands, even trying to argue that Spock was a geek is a stretch.
More likely, it would would make it possible for a geek to watch someone else get a date, but they can do that here on Earth.
The reason is that 'think of the children' is generally used as a way to 'control the adults'. I know that when I see 'parental controls', I get nervous. The movie rating system is a perfect example of 'parental controls' gone bad. That being said, it seems that lately, most of the computer based parental controls are being done correctly, and are not being used to control the adults. I find that I am becoming more comfortable with them being implemented because I have been able to completely turn them off. If I can turn them off, then they actually become beneficial to me, as it neuters complaints that someone elses kid might get corrupted.
Not defending cheating, but if your reason is that it devalues the A that you "earned". Then you should consider the rampant grade inflation to be just as bad as plagiarizing, as it certainly devalues the A that some people earn when work that should get a C gets the same A as the person that earned it. The only problem with that is that a lot of people that now get A s and feel they earned it, would be getting A s if it were not for the teachers "cheating".
Except that the it is the bad ones who don't turn the other cheek and are still around that will find out that you scammed them. I would much rather start the "You have been raptured". Web site, where we send an email to the earthly address of those that did NOT get left behind.
That kind of comment is a total cop out. If you believe that the rule of law is so profound that you just don't break it, then you must condemn Gandhi. If you don't condemn Gandhi, then you must concede that there are times when breaking the law is still the right thing to do. Your attempt at distancing the two by claiming that there is system in place in the US for change, is a poor argument at best. If you consider "The trick is getting enough people to understand the issues and vote accordingly." to be a valid argument, then the same can be said for Gandhi. The difference is that Gandhi only had to convince a handful of people instead of the millions that would be required in the US. That is if you believe that voting even works on anything that has big money implications. Heck, Gandhi might well have succeeded in getting the law changed by convincing just Winston Churchill.
Of course, if you want to limit it to the US, then you also must condemn every single person involved with the Underground Railroad. Are you prepared to call Harriet Tubman a villain?
To bad nobody convince Gandhi of that, huh?
Yes, the Nuremburg trials wer just "victor's justice". Regardless of the criminality of the defendants, when translators are allowed to intentionally mistranslate and make fun of defendants, you are dealing with a kangaroo court.
It sounds more like you just don't really want a service like streaming Netflix for games, but that you want a service that is dramatically better than Netflix, and do not accept service levels similar to Netflix for your gaming.
** It is true that many of the older games download so fast that the whole thing gets downloaded faster than Netflix can start playing it's stream, so those games do get downloaded completely before play.
Here you go: http://www.gametap.com/
Only if you you would also say that having your pal Wally (who happens to write software for a living) come over and drink beer with you would be getting a free programmer.
There you go. THAT is how you make a threat.
Of course, but as a society, we have decided that the word 'Hooker' only applies to the ones that say it out loud and collect money directly.
Well, actually no, the real way to get it right is to build an Arnold robot.
The "I killed one person, and if you don't leave I'll kill another" tactic isn't as likely to work when the choice is to take a chance that you will be the one that might get the second drone, or you will definitely be the one that gets shot for dissertion when you get back to port.
No, if you are going to use drones to kill, you need to just sink their boats. Preferably with a big explosion to make sure there are very few survivors.
So, someone makes the absolute bare minimum database that is nothing more than a glorified text file, but uses MySQL syntax. Tada! The application can function with another database.
Uh... If the hookers are free, then by definition, they are not hookers.
Of course there is a 'chemical mechanism' involved. The brain is a electro-chemical devices. EVERYTHING the brain does has a 'chemical mechanism' involved. Including the prior example of taking a walk in the country.
No, they put that in to maintain a monopoly on the manufacture of cartridge and software for the NES. They didn't want just anybody to be able to sell their own software directly to customers without Nintendo getting a paid. It wasn't to stop piracy. It was to stop the legitimate writers of software from selling their work.
Wow, when she said she was going to tell you that she was "out running", I really didn't think you would believe it.
When someone says "zero carbon output". That means zero carbon output. By your logic, my car has zero carbon output. Perhaps you are just so set on wanting someone famous who is pushing your agenda to be right, that you are just unwilling to accept that he very clearly said something incredibly stupid.
Pretending to misunderstand the concept of carbon output so you can make fun of the other side is not a good way to resolve this argument. Actually misunderstanding the concept of carbon output means you should think carefully about why you're so confident that you understand the situation better than climatologists. You can decide which of those two you were doing in your comment.
This is in response to pointing out that a media whore claimed that you can have "Zero carbon output". Notice I did not say "Net zero carbon output". There is a HUGE difference between the two. You obviously are pretending to misunderstand the concept, or are actually misunderstanding the concept. Thus, your doing exactly what you are accusing me of in the prior post. Hence, by definition, "IRONY".
This becomes even more pronounced when you bring up climatologists, as I was not discussing the opinions of climatologists. I was making fun of the completely absurd statement made by a media whore. So, again, you are either "Pretending to misunderstand the concept" or are "Actually misunderstanding the concept".
The final bit of irony is:
And that everyone somehow overlooked this massive absurdity, until you finally pointed out in a web forum that the emperor has no clothes?
Does it really need to be explained to you how defending a statement that you can reduce your carbon output to zero while at the same time claiming that the other individual is "Pretending to misunderstand the concept" or is "Actually misunderstanding the concept"? And hence the very definition of IRONY?