It doesn't run on the local OS, (like using a Linux share on Windows, Windows doesn't care what filesystem is running on Linux). The same should be true of Onedrive.
How many GM, Ford, Chrysler, Audi, BMW, VW or other cars have received that rating? GM hid a defect for about ten years, VAG cheated on Diesel emissions. Takata is going bankrupt over airbag defects, but Tesla is the bad guy here.
Seems like the big guys don't want the new guy to succeed.
Onedrive is akin to a network share, so it shouldn't even care what the native filesystem is. I could backup my PCs from a network share in Time Machine, so it's an artifiacial limitation
Give me an "enthusiast" Mac Pro machine (not Xeons but standard i7, mini-tower and just call it Mac), but leave PCI-E slots and upgradeable RAM (non-ECC), and I'd buy one. Meanwhile, I'll keep Hackintoshing old DELLs.
I'll bite. Free software is cool and everything, most of my stuff is running on it. But do you really want all the different car safety stuff to be open? Didn't they ditch a Jeep by remote last year? My car (1999 Grand Marquis LS) is not open to that kind of hacking. Sure, it doesn't have anything fancy like bluetooth or remote software update, but the software that runs the car is pretty safe from malware. I'd like my next car to be like that...
I love open software, but since so many eyeballs can look at the code, do I really want that in my car? (because the many eyeballs stuff)
Amen to that. I've been given a 4S (needs a new battery), one of their best designs, Wish it was never upgraded beyond IOS6, I miss that interface, now it's all flat, feels like either Win3.11 or Win8. It currently runs on IOS 9.x (a little slow, but still runs)
On my dad's Apple ][+ clone (upgraded to a ][e for LOGO and PASCAL). Then MS BASIC v2.0 on my very first own computer, a breadbox C64. Afterwards, 6809 assembler in CEGEP, some PERL couple years ago, I don't really code anymore, but I'd like as hell to be able to read those old 5.25 floppies. That I can do for the C64 (still have one, and x1541 can transfer to PC, but Without buying extra hardware I'm kinda fscked for Apple disks.)
"So can one with a human driver. They do it every day all over the world with excellent results. Nothing wrong with letting the computer do it but let's not pretend humans can't handle the task."
While working at a Coke bottling plant as a student job, one of their drivers would backup his truck (2 45-footers on it) in one move. in 1988 I'm pretty sure he didn't have any electronic assistance, and yet everytime he would dock perfectly, maybe an inch or so between the dock and the second trailer.
Back when I was doing tech support for an ISP, people would complain about the 5MB mailbox limit. My answer was you don't use the postal service when you move houses.
Apple ][ series (6502) to MAC (68k) compatibility was achieved via an add-on card on some models. 68k to PPC was via an emulation layer. MacOS classic to OS X was done with emulation (my gigabit G4 Powermac did that pretty well actually, and if memory serves it was called CLASSIC, or do it with fat binaries.
Starting with 10.4.11 there were universal binaries that could run on either PPC or x86, or Rosetta could handle them via emulation (up to 10.5.8 IIRC). So they can pull off another architecture change and retain compatibility until vendors come up with updated software.
Kinda fascinating that a Visicalc file could be transfered from a 5.25 floppy from late '70s early 80s all the way to the latest MAC, while Windows running on X64 can't even handle a 16-bit installer without external support...
IMHO what Intel needs to do is ditch anything before P6 in their architecture. What ran on a 66Mhz 486 or 233 Pentium can be done easily with emulation on newer machines.
They might not find any so we'll be left alone... Joking aside, they might have something akin to a Prime Directive, and we're not advanced enough in technology to be worth contacting, or not civilized enough (we're still trying to extinct ourselves)
Slashdot Mirror
It doesn't run on the local OS, (like using a Linux share on Windows, Windows doesn't care what filesystem is running on Linux). The same should be true of Onedrive.
This ^
ANd when I burn a flash drive to install linux, guess what filesystem it uses?
Digital Camera? Some of my Nikons use FAT32. Not everybody is using NT exclusively. Some users use other filesystems.
How many GM, Ford, Chrysler, Audi, BMW, VW or other cars have received that rating? GM hid a defect for about ten years, VAG cheated on Diesel emissions. Takata is going bankrupt over airbag defects, but Tesla is the bad guy here.
Seems like the big guys don't want the new guy to succeed.
Onedrive is akin to a network share, so it shouldn't even care what the native filesystem is. I could backup my PCs from a network share in Time Machine, so it's an artifiacial limitation
Convenient to have left out the other numbers on the same tire (ie: 225/60 is 225mm with a 60% ratio). Guess what mm in 225mm stands for?
But even then they are salvageable, even if a big chunk is damaged. Some media files won't play correctly if even 10% is damaged.
Big scratch on a DVD disc on the wrong side of the disc? might render it unplayable. VHS that got eaten by a deck? simple splice job...
(thinking about delamination problems on laserdiscs, even worse)
Applies to car tires too. 225/xx R16 means 225mm wide and 16inches wheel size. two different units on the same product...
Looks like something out of a Transformers cartoon, but still cool
https://cleantechnica.com/2017...
Give me an "enthusiast" Mac Pro machine (not Xeons but standard i7, mini-tower and just call it Mac), but leave PCI-E slots and upgradeable RAM (non-ECC), and I'd buy one. Meanwhile, I'll keep Hackintoshing old DELLs.
Wood glue can do wonders
http://120studio.com/vinylclea...
I'll bite. Free software is cool and everything, most of my stuff is running on it. But do you really want all the different car safety stuff to be open? Didn't they ditch a Jeep by remote last year? My car (1999 Grand Marquis LS) is not open to that kind of hacking. Sure, it doesn't have anything fancy like bluetooth or remote software update, but the software that runs the car is pretty safe from malware. I'd like my next car to be like that...
I love open software, but since so many eyeballs can look at the code, do I really want that in my car? (because the many eyeballs stuff)
Amen to that. I've been given a 4S (needs a new battery), one of their best designs, Wish it was never upgraded beyond IOS6, I miss that interface, now it's all flat, feels like either Win3.11 or Win8. It currently runs on IOS 9.x (a little slow, but still runs)
On my dad's Apple ][+ clone (upgraded to a ][e for LOGO and PASCAL). Then MS BASIC v2.0 on my very first own computer, a breadbox C64. Afterwards, 6809 assembler in CEGEP, some PERL couple years ago, I don't really code anymore, but I'd like as hell to be able to read those old 5.25 floppies. That I can do for the C64 (still have one, and x1541 can transfer to PC, but Without buying extra hardware I'm kinda fscked for Apple disks.)
"That doesn't mean those jobs wont be replaced by automation... pretending otherwise is just sticking ones head in the sand"
Unfortunately, you are probably right. The technological jump in the last 3-4 decades is pretty impressive...
like 12.04, 14.04, 16.04 (what I'm using on some laptops/desktops), dunno what the next 18.04 will be named, but Horny Human would be kinda cool.
^this
"So can one with a human driver. They do it every day all over the world with excellent results. Nothing wrong with letting the computer do it but let's not pretend humans can't handle the task."
While working at a Coke bottling plant as a student job, one of their drivers would backup his truck (2 45-footers on it) in one move. in 1988 I'm pretty sure he didn't have any electronic assistance, and yet everytime he would dock perfectly, maybe an inch or so between the dock and the second trailer.
Back when I was doing tech support for an ISP, people would complain about the 5MB mailbox limit. My answer was you don't use the postal service when you move houses.
So basically about the same as an i3... nice price. For browsing and everyday use, plenty enough.
Leaving 100$ more for the GPU, which will make a big difference in games.
http://ars.userfriendly.org/ca...
Actually, they do (or did, future will tell us).
Apple ][ series (6502) to MAC (68k) compatibility was achieved via an add-on card on some models. 68k to PPC was via an emulation layer. MacOS classic to OS X was done with emulation (my gigabit G4 Powermac did that pretty well actually, and if memory serves it was called CLASSIC, or do it with fat binaries.
Starting with 10.4.11 there were universal binaries that could run on either PPC or x86, or Rosetta could handle them via emulation (up to 10.5.8 IIRC). So they can pull off another architecture change and retain compatibility until vendors come up with updated software.
Kinda fascinating that a Visicalc file could be transfered from a 5.25 floppy from late '70s early 80s all the way to the latest MAC, while Windows running on X64 can't even handle a 16-bit installer without external support...
IMHO what Intel needs to do is ditch anything before P6 in their architecture. What ran on a 66Mhz 486 or 233 Pentium can be done easily with emulation on newer machines.
Rogers?
They might not find any so we'll be left alone... Joking aside, they might have something akin to a Prime Directive, and we're not advanced enough in technology to be worth contacting, or not civilized enough (we're still trying to extinct ourselves)
No, seriously, what's different about 45-year old women? Sorry, but sounds chauvinistic to me.