Parodies, though, are allowed under current copyright law, and the original owners of the songs / materials do not have to give permission. Even if they deny someone permission to make a parody, that individual still may if he/she wishes.
Far as I know: every review I've read there indicates how the products were obtained, testing methodologies, etc. Plus, the [stated] policy is that advertising is handled by a separate group from the tech reviewers.
That's illegal in this country: it'd written write across the front of every denomination of Federal Reserve Note: "Good for all debts, public and private".
The best source of [business] hardware and software reviews has been InfoWorld: They either a) get samples from every manufacturer to compare head-to-head or (horror or horrors!) they actually *buy* one from each company and then test them.
if you want to know how the sky *looks* from where you are, taking into account the gook in the sky, gravitational lenses, etc all, I think, would make it more realistic
Slashdot Mirror
Parodies, though, are allowed under current copyright law, and the original owners of the songs / materials do not have to give permission. Even if they deny someone permission to make a parody, that individual still may if he/she wishes.
the "unathorized charger" message doesn't disallow the charger from completing the charge, however
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of THOSE!
indeed, with a growth rate among diabetics, foot shortages are a thing to worry about
hey! I'm a member of the strong cron lobby!
personally, I think vehicles like these are good for competition - Smart gets about equivalent mpg, but costs 5 times as much, and holds fewer people
because i'm a nice guy and have been your google proxy today
merry christmas
personally, I've long wondered why they went for gas-electric first in the car world when diesel-electric is a known technology
Ummm.... what about Scalix (scalix.com) & Zimbra (zimbra.com)?
why sequester the methane when you can turn around and burn it again?
aren't astronauts *above* most everything?
Far as I know: every review I've read there indicates how the products were obtained, testing methodologies, etc. Plus, the [stated] policy is that advertising is handled by a separate group from the tech reviewers.
On several occasions, I've successfully paid for things in cash where it was "prohibited"
That's illegal in this country: it'd written write across the front of every denomination of Federal Reserve Note: "Good for all debts, public and private".
The best source of [business] hardware and software reviews has been InfoWorld: They either a) get samples from every manufacturer to compare head-to-head or (horror or horrors!) they actually *buy* one from each company and then test them.
I have aptitudes for several fields, but no desire to do several
and I have interests in ones I have no aptitudes for
if you want to know how the sky *looks* from where you are, taking into account the gook in the sky, gravitational lenses, etc all, I think, would make it more realistic
actually, most of NYC's budget *does* come from its own taxes, tolls, and parking fees.
It's not quite a real-time data source, but it's close enough for route planning on my commute.
I think you mean they worked-IN all the bugs......
Last I checked, light travels a lot slower in denser materials (ie: speed of light in air versus in water)
maybe it was his 'pre-sense' it's like spidey-sense... but online
what are you doing that makes it not work in FF?
Um... we already have figured out fusion weapons: Hydrogen Bombs, anyone?