Condensed translation: Bush is one of worst presidents by historical analysis. You can count on objective view of many historians. bla bla bla(about 80KB of it). Irrelevant Statistics,Historical paralells,Agenda of administration explained.
- I think G.W.Bush in fifty years will be remembered as "patriotic" "Just" "somewhat authoritarian" and his misdeeds are whitewashed or even forgotten completely(except his new laws,which will carry on and impede democracy for decades.They would be seen as natural though when you live under such laws for long).History is objective? I never believed that.
HISTORY IS ALWAYS INFLUENCED BY CURRENT POLITICS.
There have been presidents -- Harry Truman was one -- who have left office in seeming disgrace, only to rebound in the estimates of later scholars.
each detail and setting become distorted and/or redefined viewing through historic caleidoscope.We don't know the facts we trust history to be reliable "enough".Media is a product of the historical period where it produced,it doesn't help to have an documentary when it composed by biased authors who present something in distorted view. Interpretation is left to historians.
I don't support historical revisionism/republicans/Bush/etc... Just a common sceptic viewpoint. I just point out this criticism is from a "Lincoln is better" venue (while convinietly ignore changes brought by time/social progress/etc) when Lincoln is not relevant to current politics(his Political Views have influence though).You as well recruit Jesus and Hitler and start speculating on similarities and approval ratings. This is Invalid point of view(its a politics debate masquerading as valid fact sheet;approval numbers mean nothing(the context of polls,political situation,media attention,propoganda mean everything.Society is easily influenced.The approval of Bush for ex.)) . Bush should be judged based on current politics and current situation.His policies laws and agenda should be documented and studied
throughly as historics do.In unbiased way (Neutral Point Of View in wikispeak) representing maximum information on the subject.Let the comparisions to historic speculations field and statistics discussion to politicians and statistics. Factual unbiased history is what we need. Opinions make history less historic and more political.
I hope NPOV will get accepted as common practice (wikipedia does.It works.Bias is removed as POV(point of View)) Or we will have to read wiki exclusively to 'get the facts'.
You have to tell this to all website developers who use flash(as part of menus,content,or software such as games).Flash is common technology. Some sites (although i never approve of) use Flash as a way to deliver their content.Its not unlike you can froce them to use text and demand Macromedia to stop distributing Flash because it "Can be used for ads".
Everythign can eb used for ads.If you want to block something use AdBlock or hosts file.Blocking a ad-hosting agency is better then just relying on Flash being disabled.
Case in point:If i disabled Flash,i'd have to reenable Each Time to few flash games sites,and specific sites who use Flash as online application platform. Flash is very useful to developers.There better ways to deliver content(text) but Flash has more uses then just a menu,ad or random flash game you encounter. Rejecting Flash is equivalent Rejecting a whole technology,regardless of it application,judging on "harmful appllications". Absurd? Well unless you subscribe to anarcho-primitivism or other ideology opposed to progress,this view is deficient.
I understood this when i realized that Bikes Can't replace Cars. Cars are New technology that has apllications greater and superior on some aspects then for bikes(bulk content delivery by trucks for example) or any lower tech(such as horse carriage). Despite their detrimental impact on enviompment,pollution and car accidents. Cars have contributed much to development of modern society and it would be never considered Modern without this technology(not specifically cars,the category of Mass transport and delivery). Rejecting Flash becuase of ads is rejecting Cars because of Car accidents/pollution/etc without any adequate alternatives,i.e. Telling people to stop using cars and get on bikes instead(In principle the idea is fine if society isn't dependant on Cars(not necessary for mass transport),which most modern societies Do.).You can't reject technology that way.You need an alternative to Flash that does all Flash does and is better(not showing ads in some magical way) before you block it(i advise just blocking the ad sites,not blocking Flash itself).
"The military can't just hire civilian musicians to play at a military funeral" IS something wrong with that idea? I think it is.A perfect audio recording of Taps,or a civilian playing Taps isn't somehow suffiecient even if performed perfectly? The ceremony is a show.It has symbolic purpose only.In that specific culture(which DETERMINES EVEN : player of instrument X specifically to perform specific song Y) setting. Making an easier ceremony by not using real players (which are rare in the military,on slashdotters posts) is improving efficiency and should be encouraged instead of blatant claims of anti-patriotism or something in that venue(such as "goverment doesn't want to pay" for real players).
A Tape/CD is clearly cheaper and more efficient.It the technological progress which they refuse to acknowledge and insist on keeping the 'old customs' and "proper flag-waving" in traditional, conservative way.A conformism atmosphere where deviating from the status quo marks someone as unpatriotic(or is implied).
The set of circumstances which spawned internet wouldn't appear decades later. Creating equivalent structure without funding and knowledge about perspectives of the global interneworking doesn't lead to same results.
As for Sun it doesn't that important.The NSFNET stage is much more important when it linked internationally.The Merge of Commercial networks is significant.The change of Cost of communications and ISP formation. Sun is just a footnote in comparision. Computer industry and millions of jobs aren't reliant on Sun in any way(free Java anyone?).Their products are not must-have or revolutionary.
We have Utorrent and the competition will never allow such opportunities to go to waste(publicity). Azureus signed its suicide note. Not to mention a single possible link to anti-p2p groups would spell ruin to BT clients (the Utorrent had to make a disclaimer on the front page,just becuase of rumors).
Last ninja as in "last Working Ninja" i.e. Ninja that had a job like a bodyguard.Not that does prevent another ninjas to get security jobs,just most of them are trained for sport.
No,slashdotters just are pessimistic about technology and for good reasons. TEchnology isn't always brings positive changes or even viable in most articles. Ex:vaporware,AI,Robots,surveillance. Such scepticism and hostility to ReInvented/rebranded technology make each "sensation" a subject of such jokes.The artificial insect eye thing is revolutionary invention,though impact can't be judged immediatly.You'll Feel it later,much later.Possibly when NSA builds fleets of flying microCams armed with those eyes.
When oil cartels stand behind the business it never becomes illegal. Piracy is on the other hand is supported only by disorganized home users and small servers overseas(where they relatively safe from US draconian laws). Which has the power?
The problem that information is not a salable good.They sell copies of their content.At their own prices.And claim they "own" your copy becuase they have "copyrights".You can't use that good. Copy/share/publish and you're violating "copyrights".
Who sells their original product as real Product,not just another copy you can't copy/share yourself or share? I don't force you(hypothetical content pridcucer/publisher) to produce content. I don't want to be mass-marketed about your product.And i don't care about your expenses if you choose to sell worthless licensed copies of information that you "own".You can't own my information.
A cheaper/free pirate copy doesn't have those "rights"(as opposed to Publishers Copy) becuase it doesn't comes from the "right" publisher(published by pirates),who pays "right" extortion fees(to content producer/copyrigth owner)?
As for now content is nothing more then rearranged bits. A copy of them isn't different from another copy. plus your claims you own "the rights" to copy/share/publish my content are ridicoulous.These Rights invented to protect steady streams of profit for copyright owners.
Piracy is just efficient distribution free of the copyright crud/DRM.
You can't slashdot torrent without a giant hostile botnet,sending garbage to tracker and you have to crash all trackers to be sure.Except DHT and PEX will keep it alive ^^(for some clients).BitTorrent is network within a network.
Mindware isn't soul IMHO.Soul is probably a bootloader for Mindware OS: skills are applications,data is knowledge,memory is storage,reflexes are drivers,etc.Soul could be in some EM field form attached to one of organs and/or bootup routine replicated in DNA.
College students play mainstream games: Counterstrike,Starcraft and WoW.That game was designed for kids. A cute plastic chicken(^_^ looks like one) solves puzzles.Some of them hard,but nothing college-level (Like rubik cubes).
Besides my favorite abandownware(ROMS excluded) is Flying Saucer(first real simulator i played)
along with such classics as Commander Keen and Incredible Machine. They just don't compete with new games. What they are good for is gameplay concepts,and some bits of artwork(the ideas and style matter more then pixels).Artwork is improving daily,concepts never change.I'm sure if we to catalogue all concepts and mechanics it will show some insight for better game programming as well as obvious flaws.
Re:Old games were pretty nice
on
Abandoned Games
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
yeah nothing better then spend hours trying to figure the right text for commands. look rock You can't see the rock becuase there is no rock. look thing There is no thing there.But there is soemthing that looks liek a rock.
This game is degenerate pile of pixelated RPG bullshit.(I never buy games, there was no manual,and the game sucked) one wrong move and you're dead.wrong potion and you're poisoned and dead.
the real idea behind is moral panics and excuses to grab more power.
Moral panics are political dream. if you make your laws justified by some excuse which is reasonable it doesn't matter what the laws turn out to. Terrorism,child porn,bioweapons,rebellion, anything scary enough to use. Its goose that lays the golden eggs. Manipulating society emotions,fears,attitudes,trends for own causes is extremely efficient tactic. People at large are sheep(yes,that right.Rigid self-enforcing system beased on memeplexes(a codes of memes) people replicate and absorb from authority)),since "normal" social structures are built to rule the sheep. few people fight against indoctrination and social rules.Easy to be a sheep.
Its like a lever.To turn it you need excuses.When you got an excuse you turn it.turning it back requires much effort and much better excuses.Excuse is power.
I'm sure the Patriot act was seen as measure to fight terrorism.But terrorism isn't a real force/army/organization,it a movement[Notice the -ISM:Fascism,Communism,terrorism].Abstract definition of "insurgent activity" or "rebellion" doesn't make it different from usual murder/kidnapping/civil disobedience.
Terrorism is a control system: "rule by terror" the -ism implies that terror is the desired objective.To make it more powerful it needs victims to manipulate.Furthering the cause of terrorism advertising it effects and exxeragating the threats make terrorism what it is.
Its not a war,its intimidation,War on terror is war on Fear.Ignoring your fear is different then making it a central opponent,and telling everyone how you prepared to fight it. Scare tactics benefit only when there is way to scare.
If you see further terrorism is what media tells us is.What if media was under control of goverment and labeled terrorist symphatizers or terrorists any group that opposes goverment's politics (which is the case of USSR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_statehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_people ). ex:If you oppose current Bush administration(doesn't have to be terrorism related) you're suddenly terrorist symphatizer or unpatriotic.
So Eradicating something Requires measures that interfer with all potential terrorists,a convinient domestic terrorism category and some redefinitions to help cover as much it can extend to "a terrorist who was not an agent of a foreign power could be the target of a federal investigation of foreign intelligence" "Excludable Aliens." "lone wolf terrorists" and such nonsense(that has as much relation to terrorism as weapon manufacturers and psychos have).
Surveilance of Financial help to terrorists,Potential communication to potential terrorists,potential terrorist activity,collecting information relevant to terrorism(or information that helps figthing terrorism) etc.One step closer to 1984 Some of these "potential communication" maybe even yours.Wiretapping ISPs.
Forget about child porn,thoughtcrimes,terrorism,,the real idea behind this is getting more information (and control). Surveillance is easy to coerce when you have the moral backing and justification.No one thinks about it: what authority does with information they collect is their own business.There is no feedback.They may use it for any purpose,they already have the data.NSA and ATT datamining story just shows what going behind the scenes. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/07/12 46259&from=rss They want it to become legal.Child porn is a best excuse they can conjure at the moment.
Now you get to arguments "If you're innocent you have nothing to worry about" and the slippery slope of "innocent" "Loyal" "patriotic".With a slight redefiniton of innocent every step
what exactly you buy besides the storage media when you buy DVDs? 1."The Service":delivery/packing/transport 2.Original packaging.Plastic cases. 3.The expense of making another copy at publishing facility. 4.Copyright extortion fee.Since you don't really own the DVD content you own a license to use it.
All this creates more expense then downloading content,contributes to pollution and waste,depletes more resources,makes people spend much more. Advertising the service costs too.
this a "natural right"? old rotten unproductive system.a relic of content industry."Piracy" is superior. There is no "natural right" to information.Its free as air. You can't erase it from my brain. You can't make me forget it or extort fees to keep remembering it.
The only way you stop piracy is stop producing paid content.
Like every modders obsession is add few lousy textures here and there.Modders shoudl improve mechanics and UI.If you need porn get porn.if you need games play games. Each is specialised venue(not considering hentai anime games).
Slashdot Mirror
Probably right but there remain archived sites
blogs and forums that have negative views of his presidency and that
WILL NOT GO AWAY.
Content Restriction,Anullment and Protection.
Condensed translation:
Bush is one of worst presidents by historical analysis. You can count on objective view of many historians. bla bla bla(about 80KB of it). Irrelevant Statistics,Historical paralells,Agenda of administration explained.
-
I think G.W.Bush in fifty years will be remembered as "patriotic" "Just" "somewhat authoritarian" and his misdeeds are whitewashed or even forgotten completely(except his new laws,which will carry on and impede democracy for decades.They would be seen as natural though when you live under such laws for long).History is objective? I never believed that.
HISTORY IS ALWAYS INFLUENCED BY CURRENT POLITICS.
There have been presidents -- Harry Truman was one -- who have left office in seeming disgrace, only to rebound in the estimates of later scholars.
each detail and setting become distorted and/or redefined viewing through historic caleidoscope.We don't know the facts we trust history to be reliable "enough".Media is a product of the historical period where it produced,it doesn't help to have an documentary when it composed by biased authors who present something in distorted view.
Interpretation is left to historians.
I don't support historical revisionism/republicans/Bush/etc...
Just a common sceptic viewpoint.
I just point out this criticism is
from a "Lincoln is better" venue (while convinietly ignore changes brought by time/social progress/etc) when Lincoln is not relevant to current politics(his Political Views have influence though).You as well recruit Jesus and Hitler and start speculating
on similarities and approval ratings.
This is Invalid point of view(its a politics debate masquerading as valid fact sheet;approval numbers mean nothing(the context of polls,political situation,media attention,propoganda mean everything.Society is easily influenced.The approval of Bush for ex.)) . Bush should be judged based on current politics and current situation.His policies laws and
agenda should be documented and studied
throughly as historics do.In unbiased way (Neutral Point Of View in wikispeak) representing maximum information on the subject.Let the comparisions to historic speculations field and statistics discussion to politicians and statistics.
Factual unbiased history is what we need.
Opinions make history less historic and more political.
I hope NPOV will get accepted as common
practice (wikipedia does.It works.Bias is removed as POV(point of View)) Or we will have to read wiki exclusively to 'get the facts'.
You have to tell this to all website developers who use flash(as part of menus,content,or software such as games).Flash is common technology.
Some sites (although i never approve of)
use Flash as a way to deliver their content.Its not unlike you can froce them to use text and demand Macromedia to stop distributing Flash because it
"Can be used for ads".
Everythign can eb used for ads.If you want to block something use AdBlock or hosts file.Blocking a ad-hosting agency is better then just relying on Flash being disabled.
Case in point:If i disabled Flash,i'd have to reenable Each Time to few flash games sites,and specific sites who use Flash as online application platform.
Flash is very useful to developers.There
better ways to deliver content(text) but Flash has more uses then just a menu,ad or random flash game you encounter.
Rejecting Flash is equivalent Rejecting a whole technology,regardless of it application,judging on "harmful appllications". Absurd? Well
unless you subscribe to anarcho-primitivism or other ideology opposed to progress,this view is deficient.
I understood this when i realized that Bikes Can't replace Cars.
Cars are New technology that has apllications greater and superior on some aspects then for bikes(bulk content delivery by trucks for example) or any lower tech(such as horse carriage).
Despite their detrimental impact on enviompment,pollution and car accidents.
Cars have contributed much to development of modern society and it would be never considered Modern without this technology(not specifically cars,the category of Mass transport and delivery).
Rejecting Flash becuase of ads is rejecting Cars because of Car accidents/pollution/etc without any adequate alternatives,i.e. Telling people to stop using cars and get on bikes instead(In principle the idea is fine if society isn't dependant on Cars(not necessary for mass transport),which most modern societies Do.).You can't reject technology that way.You need an alternative to Flash that
does all Flash does and is better(not showing ads in some magical way) before you block it(i advise just blocking the ad sites,not blocking Flash itself).
"The military can't just hire civilian musicians to play at a military funeral" ,on slashdotters posts) is
IS something wrong with that idea?
I think it is.A perfect audio recording of Taps,or a civilian playing Taps isn't somehow suffiecient even if performed perfectly?
The ceremony is a show.It has symbolic purpose only.In that specific culture(which DETERMINES EVEN : player of instrument X specifically to perform specific song Y) setting.
Making an easier ceremony by not using real players (which are rare in the military
improving efficiency and should be encouraged instead of blatant claims of anti-patriotism or something in that venue(such as "goverment doesn't want to pay" for real players).
A Tape/CD is clearly cheaper and more efficient.It the technological progress
which they refuse to acknowledge and insist on keeping the 'old customs' and
"proper flag-waving" in traditional, conservative way.A conformism atmosphere where deviating from the status quo marks someone as unpatriotic(or is implied).
The set of circumstances which spawned internet wouldn't appear decades later.
Creating equivalent structure without
funding and knowledge about perspectives of the global interneworking doesn't lead to same results.
As for Sun it doesn't that important.The NSFNET stage is much more important when it linked internationally.The Merge of Commercial networks is significant.The change of Cost of communications and ISP formation.
Sun is just a footnote in comparision.
Computer industry and millions of jobs aren't reliant on Sun in any way(free Java anyone?).Their products are not
must-have or revolutionary.
We have Utorrent and the competition will never allow such opportunities to go to waste(publicity). Azureus signed its suicide note. Not to mention a single possible link to anti-p2p groups would spell ruin
to BT clients (the Utorrent had to make a disclaimer on the front page,just becuase of rumors).
Translation:
Conform to social norms and forget about your dreams.
You know who pushes the strings on the 'Space Race'.Hint:Its a higher authority then NASA.
Last ninja as in "last Working Ninja" i.e. Ninja that had a job like a bodyguard.Not that does prevent another ninjas to get security jobs,just most of them are trained for sport.
According to you Slashdot is composed of 1337 N1nj4s,brewing their deadly perl scripts.
No,slashdotters just are pessimistic about technology and for good reasons.
TEchnology isn't always brings positive changes or even viable in most articles.
Ex:vaporware,AI,Robots,surveillance.
Such scepticism and hostility to ReInvented/rebranded technology make each "sensation" a subject of such jokes.The artificial insect eye thing is
revolutionary invention,though impact can't be judged immediatly.You'll
Feel it later,much later.Possibly when NSA builds fleets
of flying microCams armed with those eyes.
That is abstract crime.Nothing is stolen from the vendor.You make a copy,maybe share to others,use it.
Now equate that with murder?
When oil cartels stand behind the business it never becomes illegal.
Piracy is on the other hand is supported only by disorganized home users and
small servers overseas(where they relatively safe from US draconian laws).
Which has the power?
The problem that information is not a salable good.They sell copies of their content.At their own prices.And claim they "own" your copy becuase they have "copyrights".You can't use that good.
Copy/share/publish and you're violating "copyrights".
Who sells their original product as real Product,not just another copy you can't copy/share yourself or share?
I don't force you(hypothetical content pridcucer/publisher) to produce content.
I don't want to be mass-marketed about your product.And i don't care about your
expenses if you choose to sell worthless licensed copies of information that you "own".You can't own my information.
A cheaper/free pirate copy doesn't have those "rights"(as opposed to Publishers Copy) becuase it doesn't comes from the "right" publisher(published by pirates),who pays "right" extortion fees(to content producer/copyrigth owner)?
As for now content is nothing more then rearranged bits.
A copy of them isn't different from another copy. plus your claims you own "the rights" to copy/share/publish my content are ridicoulous.These
Rights invented to protect steady streams of profit for copyright owners.
Piracy is just efficient distribution free of the copyright crud/DRM.
You can't slashdot torrent without a giant hostile botnet,sending garbage to tracker and you have to crash all trackers to be sure.Except DHT and PEX will keep it alive ^^(for some clients) .BitTorrent is network within a network.
Mindware isn't soul IMHO.Soul is probably a bootloader for Mindware OS: skills are applications,data is knowledge,memory is storage,reflexes are drivers,etc.Soul could be in some EM field form attached to one of organs and/or bootup routine replicated in DNA.
College students play mainstream games: Counterstrike,Starcraft and
WoW.That game was designed for kids.
A cute plastic chicken(^_^ looks like one) solves puzzles.Some of them hard,but nothing college-level
(Like rubik cubes).
Besides my favorite abandownware(ROMS excluded) is Flying Saucer(first real simulator i played)
along with such classics as Commander Keen and Incredible Machine.
They just don't compete with new games.
What they are good for is gameplay concepts,and some bits of artwork(the ideas and style matter more then pixels).Artwork is improving daily,concepts never change.I'm sure if we to catalogue all concepts and mechanics it will show some insight for better game programming as well as obvious flaws.
yeah nothing better then spend hours trying to figure the right text for commands.
look rock
You can't see the rock becuase there is
no rock.
look thing
There is no thing there.But there is soemthing that looks liek a rock.
This game is degenerate pile of pixelated RPG bullshit.(I never buy games,
there was no manual,and the game sucked)
one wrong move and you're dead.wrong potion and you're poisoned and dead.
the real idea behind is moral panics and excuses to grab more power.
,the real idea behind this is getting more information (and control).
Moral panics are political dream.
if you make your laws justified by some
excuse which is reasonable it doesn't matter what the laws turn out to.
Terrorism,child porn,bioweapons,rebellion,
anything scary enough to use.
Its goose that lays the golden eggs.
Manipulating society emotions,fears,attitudes,trends for own causes is extremely efficient tactic.
People at large are sheep(yes,that right.Rigid self-enforcing system beased on memeplexes(a codes of memes) people replicate and absorb from authority)),since "normal" social structures are built to rule the sheep.
few people fight against indoctrination and social rules.Easy to be a sheep.
Its like a lever.To turn it you need excuses.When you got an excuse you turn it.turning it back requires much effort and much better excuses.Excuse is power.
I'm sure the Patriot act was seen as
measure to fight terrorism.But terrorism isn't a real force/army/organization,it a movement[Notice the -ISM:Fascism,Communism,terrorism].Abstract definition of
"insurgent activity" or "rebellion" doesn't make it different from usual murder/kidnapping/civil disobedience.
Terrorism is a control system: "rule by terror" the -ism implies that terror is
the desired objective.To make it
more powerful it needs victims to manipulate.Furthering the cause of terrorism advertising it effects and exxeragating the threats make terrorism
what it is.
Its not a war,its intimidation,War on terror is war on Fear.Ignoring your fear is different then making it a central opponent,and telling everyone how you prepared to fight it.
Scare tactics benefit only when there is way to scare.
If you see further terrorism is what media tells us is.What if media was under control of goverment and labeled
terrorist symphatizers or terrorists any group that opposes goverment's politics
(which is the case of USSR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_state http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enemy_of_the_people ). ex:If you oppose current Bush administration(doesn't have to be terrorism related) you're suddenly terrorist symphatizer or unpatriotic.
So Eradicating something Requires measures that interfer with all
potential terrorists,a convinient domestic terrorism category and some redefinitions to help cover as much it
can extend to "a terrorist who was not an agent of a foreign power could be the target of a federal investigation of foreign intelligence" "Excludable Aliens." "lone wolf terrorists" and such nonsense(that has as much relation to terrorism as weapon manufacturers and psychos have).
Surveilance of Financial help to terrorists,Potential communication to
potential terrorists,potential terrorist activity,collecting information relevant to terrorism(or information that helps figthing terrorism) etc.One step closer to 1984
Some of these "potential communication"
maybe even yours.Wiretapping ISPs.
Forget about child porn,thoughtcrimes,terrorism,
Surveillance
is easy to coerce when you have the moral backing and justification.No one thinks about it: what authority does with information they collect is their own business.There is no feedback.They may use it for any purpose,they already have the data.NSA and ATT datamining story just shows what going behind the scenes. http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/04/07/12 46259&from=rss
They want it to become legal.Child porn
is a best excuse they can conjure at the moment.
Now you get to arguments "If you're innocent you have nothing to worry about" and the slippery slope of "innocent" "Loyal" "patriotic".With a
slight redefiniton of innocent every step
what exactly you buy besides the storage media when you buy DVDs?
1."The Service":delivery/packing/transport
2.Original packaging.Plastic cases.
3.The expense of making another copy at publishing facility.
4.Copyright extortion fee.Since you don't really own the DVD content you own a license to use it.
All this creates more expense then downloading content,contributes to pollution and waste,depletes more resources,makes people spend much more.
Advertising the service costs too.
this a "natural right"?
old rotten unproductive system.a relic of content industry."Piracy" is superior.
There is no "natural right" to information.Its free as air.
You can't erase it from my brain.
You can't make me forget it or extort fees to keep remembering it.
The only way you stop piracy is stop producing paid content.
I don't watch TV but i laughed.
Like every modders obsession is add few lousy textures here and there.Modders shoudl improve mechanics and UI.If you need porn get porn.if you need games play games.
Each is specialised venue(not considering hentai anime games).
People still like their flying cars...