That could happen... or just maybe, she goes and buys a Sony television, and a Sony player to match?
That's what my mom would do. Her priorities: color, brand, price, and in a distant fourth comes technology. She has a Sony XBR 36" TV(very nice), Sony Progressive Scan DVD player(only because I made her get it), Sony HTiB(ugh), and to top it off she refuses to upgrade to Digital Cable and HDTV(slams head against wall). Such a waste of a great TV.
Those gaps for the iPod have more to do with the storage technology than pricing. They can't fit 10GB in the Mini/Nano form factor, and if you go larger there's no point in going as small as 10GB.
so that's why I waited for HDMI.
One thing that they don't mention is that those early HDTV adopters wouldn't have 1080p TVs anyway, so it's closer to half the resolution as opposed to a quarter.
The correct statement would be "one-tenth as thick", or if you really want to use "thin" then I guess you could say "ninety-percent thinner".
On a related note, one of my biggest pet peeves is people who misuse "as many" and "more". Say if you have ten apples and your friend has one apple, the correct statement is "ten times as many apples", not "ten times more apples". The latter statement is correct only if you have eleven apples.
No, that was the second time, they did try to buy them before they made the first Xbox. Offered many billions of dollars.
"A stretch?" Not a stretch that anyone would want to buy Nintendo. Why wouldn't they? An extremely profitable company with extremely popular brands and franchises? The problem is that it IS a stretch that Nintendo would ever consider selling to a company like Cisco.
You make the same mistake by using Celsius, it's zero point is only meaningful for water. The only truly meaningful zero point is absolute zero. So if you convert the temperatures to Kelvin you'll see that it was a 2.6% decrease.
Not some, most, and every one worth a damn. All the games I have support progressive scan. The comment above was really aimed at them supporting widescreen in addition to progressive scan, which is rarely done.
Those of us who think in 4 dimensions know they didn't slow anything down, just changed its direction. They only slowed the speed of the 3-dimensional shadow of light.
He lost me at Hellboy.
Yeah, with sprite flipping it did change hands, but he was left handed in 3 of 4 directions.
Nu-uh, scientists are stupid.
That could happen... or just maybe, she goes and buys a Sony television, and a Sony player to match?
That's what my mom would do. Her priorities: color, brand, price, and in a distant fourth comes technology. She has a Sony XBR 36" TV(very nice), Sony Progressive Scan DVD player(only because I made her get it), Sony HTiB(ugh), and to top it off she refuses to upgrade to Digital Cable and HDTV(slams head against wall). Such a waste of a great TV.
Those gaps for the iPod have more to do with the storage technology than pricing. They can't fit 10GB in the Mini/Nano form factor, and if you go larger there's no point in going as small as 10GB.
Vanilla Ice
No, it would be "negative nine times as much power", so we're talking infinite battery life, truly a breakthrough.
Blu-ray is the same dimensions and there will be Blu-Ray/DVD hybrids also.
This is the face of TV 2.0--embrace and extend! Oh great, first we had to put up with Web 2.0, and now we have TV 2.0?
Although isn't the second law that it will not follow human commands if it violates the first law?
On the contrary, I'd expect Fox to be way overrepresented on that network.
You could probably make an entire network where all they have are shows that were prematurely cancelled by Fox.
I was with you until you said Stealth and Dukes of Hazzard
so that's why I waited for HDMI. One thing that they don't mention is that those early HDTV adopters wouldn't have 1080p TVs anyway, so it's closer to half the resolution as opposed to a quarter.
The correct statement would be "one-tenth as thick", or if you really want to use "thin" then I guess you could say "ninety-percent thinner".
On a related note, one of my biggest pet peeves is people who misuse "as many" and "more". Say if you have ten apples and your friend has one apple, the correct statement is "ten times as many apples", not "ten times more apples". The latter statement is correct only if you have eleven apples.
No, that was the second time, they did try to buy them before they made the first Xbox. Offered many billions of dollars. "A stretch?" Not a stretch that anyone would want to buy Nintendo. Why wouldn't they? An extremely profitable company with extremely popular brands and franchises? The problem is that it IS a stretch that Nintendo would ever consider selling to a company like Cisco.
You make the same mistake by using Celsius, it's zero point is only meaningful for water. The only truly meaningful zero point is absolute zero. So if you convert the temperatures to Kelvin you'll see that it was a 2.6% decrease.
First cheap player will be the PS3, so Blu-ray wins.
Not good for my hairline.
Why would your TV do that? There's probably an option somewhere that you're overlooking.
Not some, most, and every one worth a damn. All the games I have support progressive scan. The comment above was really aimed at them supporting widescreen in addition to progressive scan, which is rarely done.
Those of us who think in 4 dimensions know they didn't slow anything down, just changed its direction. They only slowed the speed of the 3-dimensional shadow of light.
*clap* *clap* *clap* :)
heh.
"OF believes in computers being controlled by their owners." Computer manufacturers don't.
fixed